Brazil: Munduruku People Kick Miners Off Indigenous Territory, Seize Equipment

Trans­lat­ed from Por­tuguese by Thomas Walk­er / Earth First! Newswire

Trans­lat­ed from Por­tuguese by Thomas Walk­er / Earth First! Newswire

Threatened by Death, Muduruku Expel Miners from their territories, West of Para.

Under threat of death, Mudu­ruku expel min­ers from their ter­ri­to­ries, west of Para.

Night had hard­ly arrived when indige­nous Munduruku peo­ple land­ed on the bank of a mine on Tropas Riv­er, a trib­u­tary of Tapa­jós riv­er, in a region west of Pará.  From the five speed­boats, all of them full, came war­riors and chil­dren, all with one objec­tive: to dri­ve out ille­gal min­ers from Munduruku land.

Right at the entrance of the shed, the indige­nous encoun­tered two of the twelve min­ers present.  Paint­ed for war, the Munduruku held strong.

“You have ten min­utes to get out.  Get your things, go away, and don’t come back.  This is the land of the Munduruku,” ordered Paigo­muy­at­pu, chief of the war­riors, while the min­ers were pack­ing their bags and prepar­ing to aban­don the area.

Accord­ing to the work­ers in the mine, the four pairs of dredges, used for the extrac­tion of gold, belonged to Alexan­dre Mar­tins.

Known as Tubaí­na, Mar­tins is also own­er of at least two more mines in the region, and left the site three days before the oper­a­tion, exact­ly when the Munduruku start­ed the sur­vey in the Tapa­jós basin.

“He (Tubaí­na) said that he was going there to anoth­er of his posts. He isn’t there, and he isn’t here.  No one knows,” con­firmed Mara Almei­da, who cooked in the posts for the min­ers in Tubaí­na.  The action came after numer­ous com­plaints filed with gov­ern­ment agen­cies.  Ozi­mar Dace, Munduruku mem­ber of the move­ment and reporter of the oper­a­tion, said that the indige­nous have already tried to kick out the pari­wat (who are not indige­nous) by way of the Brazil­ian Envi­ron­men­tal Insti­tute (Iba­ma), Insti­tute Chico Mendes of Bio­di­ver­si­ty Con­ser­va­tion (ICM­Bio), and Nation­al Foun­da­tion of the Indige­nous (Funai).

“The peo­ple decid­ed that these author­i­ties would nev­er give results to us.  They are nev­er going to do this so that we can live in peace.  They gave the dead­line for when they would give results, but this nev­er hap­pened.  So, for these rea­sons, we decid­ed to resolve the issue by our own account.”

The ille­gal explo­ration of the mine inside the indige­nous land of the Munduruku is not new.  Accounts trace the start of these activ­i­ties to the 1980s.  One sto­ry of threats, agree­ments with a small group of lead­ers, and exploita­tion of indige­nous labor weave a web that does not ben­e­fit the major­i­ty of peo­ple.

Accord­ing to local com­mu­ni­ties, the min­ers have caused var­i­ous prob­lems in the indige­nous lands due to uncon­trolled exploita­tion.  Pol­lu­tion of the riv­er, lack of fish, mis­un­der­stand­ings, and threats are the main rea­sons cit­ed for the indige­nous actions.  For these rea­sons, the indige­nous were “expelling min­ers and tak­ing their machines,” explains Paigo­muy­at­pu, chief of the Munduruku war­riors.

“The min­ers already made too many dam­ages in our ter­ri­to­ry.  We are evict­ing prob­lems, sick­ness, and many oth­er things that are hap­pen­ing.  We are evict­ing this for our future gen­er­a­tion,” he added.

The sur­veil­lance start­ed on Jan­u­ary 15, last­ed almost twen­ty days, and passed through var­i­ous trib­u­taries of the Tapa­jós riv­er basin, such as Tropas riv­er, Kabu­ruá riv­er, Kadiriri riv­er, and Kabitu­tu riv­er.  In all, the Munduruku con­fis­cat­ed twelve dredges.  They will remain in the vil­lages for a month while the indige­nous decide what they will do.

“In rela­tion to the mines, they will stay put.  After a month pass­es and we decide what we are going to do with machines: if we are going to do projects to ben­e­fit the com­mu­ni­ties in the area where there are already machines.  But we need alter­na­tive projects to gen­er­ate funds for the com­mu­ni­ty, like fish farm­ing, flour pro­duc­tion, nut extrac­tion, copal and hon­ey.  We need the sup­port of FUNAI,” Paigo­muy­at­pu said.

Pressed by the Munduruku, the FUNAI sup­port­ed the autonomous action of the indige­nous, financ­ing fuel for the boats.

“It was one of their demands, it came from pres­sure.  They want­ed this to hap­pen in any form they could.  We think that tak­ing their own ini­tia­tive is even bet­ter, so that they can under­stand them­selves with their rel­a­tives and decide that they are not going to per­mit the entry of the min­ers any­more,” com­ment­ed Julian Arau­jo, from the coor­di­na­tion of the FUNAI of Itaitu­ba.

Accord­ing to Juliana, since she arrived in the region in 2010, FUNAI has received com­plaints from the Munduruku on ille­gal min­ing on indige­nous land.  In Octo­ber of last year, the com­plaints were reit­er­at­ed and for­ward­ed to ICM­Bio and the Fed­er­al Police.  In 2012, an oper­a­tion against the min­ers had only a pro­vi­sion­al effect because the min­ers returned.  Because of this, it was sug­gest­ed that FUNAI work towards aware­ness with­in the man­age plant.

“It’s not enough to just do the oper­a­tion and after­wards oth­er indige­nous peo­ple autho­rize the entrance of min­ers.  We resolved to take a lit­tle more care with this.  As much as ICM­Bio, we have per­son­al dif­fi­cul­ties.  There is one per­son that is respon­si­ble for a num­ber of units when we are mon­i­tor­ing [the area], so we will try call­ing vol­un­teers from oth­er places because the local vol­un­teers end up being tar­get­ed by the min­ers.”

The cli­mate is tense in the region.  Com­mu­ni­cat­ing by radio, the lead­ers dis­cov­ered that they are being fol­lowed.  There is a list with at least five names of indige­nous lead­ers marked for death.  The author of the threats could be Tubaí­na.  Accord­ing to a Munduruku, he com­mands a group of gun­men with auto­mat­ic weapons.

“Tubaí­na is feared in the region and walks with a rifle in his right hand through the vil­lage.  No one says any­thing.  I said, ‘Hey, inside indige­nous ter­ri­to­ry, only the Fed­er­al Police and FUNAI are autho­rized to be armed,’” Val­mar Kaba relat­ed.  Beyond the lead­ers, Tubaí­na has alleged­ly threat­ened the chief of the vil­lage sur­veil­lance sta­tion, Oswal­do Waro, and his son, Joao Waro.  In the last nine­teen days, the two closed the vil­lage airstrip with sticks and stones in order to make sure that the min­ers leave with the seized machines.

“Tubaí­na passed the radio to the chief and said that when Oswal­do went to work, in the Bananal, Tubaí­na would catch him and his kid,” said Leuza Kaba, an indige­nous woman.  One of the work­ers expelled by the Mundruku, known as Shorty, informed that the min­ers of Humai­ta and from 180 kilo­me­ters across the Trana­ma­zon­i­ca (Trans Ama­zon High­way) would be plan­ning to go to Tapa­jós and to “work things out” with the indige­nous peo­ple.  Shorty did not reveal his true name.  He is frank and soft-spo­ken.  At a bar table, Shorty said that he became a min­er 14 years ago, when his part­ner left him.

“I’ve only been here in the region for six years.  The peo­ple tell a lot of lies about the min­ers.  They talk a lot about Tubaí­na, but he is a good per­son and helps every­body,” he said.

He left say­ing that he is still going to return to get the gold from the indige­nous area.  Some acquain­tances said that Shorty got out of prison two months ago.  He was impris­oned for killing a man with a knife in a min­ing vil­lage near Caton, with­in the indige­nous area.

“And he killed anoth­er with a .20 bul­let, right here, on this road,” said one of his acquain­tances.  The reporter was not able to con­tact Tubaí­na.  On Fri­day, (Jan­u­ary 31, 2014), indige­nous lead­ers in the Jacarea­can­ga del­e­ga­tion reg­is­tered a police report denounc­ing the threats of the mine own­er and report­ed the sit­u­a­tion to fed­er­al pros­e­cu­tors.

Let­ter

In a let­ter, the indige­nous say they do not have fear of death and that they will con­tin­ue fight­ing for their rights.

Car­ta VI—Letter of the Munduruku Ipereg Ayu Move­ment

We, chiefs, lead­ers, and war­riors, came across to greet you, ladies and gentlemen—those who sup­port our move­ment Munduruku Ipereg Ayu.

We, war­riors, did our sur­veil­lance of our ter­ri­to­ry.  We took out and expelled the invad­ing min­ers from our ter­ri­to­ry and we seized their machines.  Now they are threat­en­ing us with death, but we are not intim­i­dat­ed.

This is the first step.  We are going to defend our ter­ri­to­ry, our riv­er, our for­est, our rich­es, and our peo­ple until the end.  This is our word. 

We fin­ish this let­ter with much peace and friend­ship.  Sawe! Sawe! Sawe! 

            Sin­cere­ly,

            Munduruku Apereg Ayu Move­ment

            Caro­cal Vil­lage, Tropas Riv­er,

            In the Munic­i­pal­i­ty of Jacarea­can­ga, West of Para.

Reclaim the Power gathering 8–9 February

After an incred­i­ble day of idea gen­er­a­tion and vision­ing at the last gath­er­ing, it’s time for con­crete pro­pos­als and deci­sions about our next steps.


Loca­tion: Oxford
Time: Sat­ur­day 8th Feb­ru­ary 11am ­­– Sun­day 9th 4pm

Address: TBC
Crash Space/Social: Pro­vid­ed. Fur­ther details TBC.
Meals: Pro­vid­ed, dona­tion cost TBC
Trav­el Pool: Avail­able. Please book trav­el tick­ets in advance so that this can sup­port the most peo­ple.
Notes from Man­ches­ter Vision­ing Day are here: http://bit.ly/1lQ0Yd3

In ear­ly Decem­ber a large num­ber of peo­ple came togeth­er to dis­cuss the rad­i­cal visions they had for the future – visions that Reclaim the Pow­er, as a net­work, could help bring about.

It was a very open day of dis­cus­sion with a clear struc­ture, but with no pre-planned agen­da. Every­thing we talked about was gen­er­at­ed by par­tic­i­pants, and a huge num­ber of dif­fer­ent ideas were placed on the table.

So what next? Well, the idea is that all of that dis­cus­sion feeds into a month of cre­ative pro­pos­al mak­ing before the next gath­er­ing. This will be a space for short and medi­um-term deci­sion mak­ing where we work out what we’re doing in the next few months – and how this fits in with long term visions.

Rough pro­pos­al area groups formed at the Decem­ber gath­er­ing, includ­ing:

1. How to chal­lenge cor­po­rate pow­er
2. Move­ment and diver­si­ty
3. Ener­gy and fos­sil fuels
4. Pos­i­tive solu­tions

If you would like to link up with these groups and input into pro­pos­als for next steps, just con­tact info@nodashforgas.org.uk and you will be put in touch with a group con­tact.

This said, all pro­pos­als are wel­come! If you’re work­ing on your own, out­side these groups, then great. The more ideas the bet­ter.

The pro­pos­al dead­line is the 31st Jan­u­ary 2014. Please try and fol­low this rough four point list when writ­ing them, as it is essen­tial that all the pro­pos­als be con­sid­ered on an equal foot­ing.

1. What is it?
2. How does it link to long-term strate­gic aims?
3. Time­line?
4. Resources need­ed? (inc, peo­ple, costs, skills)

Spe­cif­ic venue and agen­da details to fol­low soon. In the mean­while, please check http://bit.ly/1lQ0Yd3 to see the dis­cus­sions and out­comes of the last agen­da.

See you soon,

RTP Gath­er­ings Team

info@nodashforgas.org.uk

 

SALFORD COUNCIL CIVIC CENTRE SHUT DOWN BY BARTON MOSS CAMPAIGNERS

Salford Civic Centre Shut Down By Barton Mo
</p>
</body></html>

Salford Civic Centre Shut Down By Barton Moss Protectors     31st Jan­u­ary 2014

 

ANTI FRACKING CAMPAIGNERS SHUT SWINTON CIVIC CENTRE

Sal­ford Coun­cil’s Civic Cen­tre in Swin­ton was dra­mat­i­cal­ly shut down this after­noon as five anti-frack­ing cam­paign­ers from the Bar­ton Moss Pro­tec­tion Camp locked on in the recep­tion area.

The cam­paign­ers’ action was against Gov­ern­ment attempts to bribe Sal­ford Coun­cil to allow frack­ing in the city.

The front doors of Sal­ford Civic Cen­tre were closed this after­noon as five cam­paign­ers locked on in its recep­tion area to draw atten­tion to Con­Dem Gov­ern­ment attempts to bribe coun­cils to accept rates and com­mu­ni­ty pay­ments in exchange for allow­ing frack­ing in their cities.

Two anti-frack­ing cam­paign­ers from the Bar­ton Moss Com­mu­ni­ty Pro­tec­tion Campsite of explorato­ry drilling by frack­ing com­pa­ny IGas — super­glued them­selves to bars on the recep­tion win­dows, while two more attached them­selves to an arm tube, with anoth­er super­glued to them. It took the Greater Man­ches­ter Police Pro­test­er Removal Team around two hours to free them, while the Cen­tre remained closed to the pub­lic.

“The pro­tec­tors are here protest­ing against Sal­ford Coun­cil’s allowance of IGas to do explorato­ry drilling with a view to frack­ing at Bar­ton Moss” said Dar­ren Nes­bit, an observ­er from the Camp “We’ve had one of the pro­tec­tors, Boris, here on the lawn of the Civic Cen­tre for the last few weeks and we attend­ed the demo at the full Coun­cil meet­ing recent­ly.

“Every­thing we do is to, first­ly, raise aware­ness of frack­ing and the cor­rup­tion of the Gov­ern­ment and Coun­cil, and, sec­ond­ly, to let coun­cils know that this is what will hap­pen to every coun­cil in the coun­try if they allow frack­ing or any oth­er cor­po­rate rape of the earth which will affect their res­i­dents.”

Eleven Arrested Protesting Monsanto Shareholder Meeting

Dozens of pro­tes­tors from around the globe ral­lied against Mon­san­to, the world’s largest seed com­pa­ny, on Tues­day urg­ing its share­hold­ers to con­sid­er the risks of grow­ing and con­sum­ing genet­i­cal­ly mod­i­fied crops.

Pro­tes­tors, with signs in hand, con­verged at the Mon­san­to head­quar­ters in sub­ur­ban St. Louis, MO dur­ing the company’s annu­al investors meet­ing in sup­port of two share­hold­er res­o­lu­tions that ques­tioned the lev­el of con­t­a­m­i­na­tion passed onto non-GMO (genet­i­cal­ly mod­i­fied organ­isms) crops and request­ed the seed giant end its fight against manda­to­ry labels on foods con­tain­ing GMO ingre­di­ents, reports Reuters.

The res­o­lu­tions failed by con­sid­er­able mar­gins and 11 pro­tes­tors were arrest­ed after attempt­ing to dis­rupt traf­fic near the Mon­san­to gates.

“Right now there’s a grow­ing move­ment to label genet­i­cal­ly mod­i­fied food,” said Dave Mur­phy, exec­u­tive direc­tor of Food Democ­ra­cy Now!, who pre­sent­ed the label­ing pro­pos­al at Tuesday’s share­hold­er meet­ing “Mon­san­to has cho­sen unfor­tu­nate­ly to resist the rights of Amer­i­can peo­ple.”

Over the last two years, Mon­san­to has spent more than $13.4 mil­lion to defeat GMO label­ing efforts in Cal­i­for­nia and Wash­ing­ton state, said Mur­phy.

Share­hold­er Adam Eidinger intro­duced the label­ing res­o­lu­tion, hop­ing to get at least 7 per­cent of investors to sup­port it, but wound up with just 4 per­cent, accord­ing to the St. Louis Post-Dis­patch.

The sec­ond res­o­lu­tion, intro­duced by share­hold­er John Har­ring­ton, focused on Monsanto’s poten­tial lia­bil­i­ty to organ­ic farm­ers. It received just 6.5 per­cent sup­port from investors.

Live audio of the share­hold­er meet­ing, which was broad­cast for the first time on the inter­net, also attract­ed Mon­san­to sup­port­ers, reports the Wall Street Jour­nal.

Justin Dan­hof, gen­er­al coun­sel for the Nation­al Cen­ter for Pub­lic Pol­i­cy Research, told WSJ.com the protest was a “cam­paign of junk sci­ence” against biotech foods. Dan­hof insist­ed Mon­san­to com­bat the envi­ron­men­tal­ist out­cry by enlist­ing its sci­en­tists as spokes­peo­ple on talk radio and oth­er media to cre­ate an open con­ver­sa­tion with the pub­lic.

Accord­ing to Reuters, the protest res­o­lu­tions were backed by envi­ron­men­tal, food safe­ty and con­sumer activist groups. Pro­tes­tors said that 2.6 mil­lion mem­bers of those groups sup­port the anti-GMO ini­tia­tive.

“It’s time that Mon­san­to join the 21st cen­tu­ry and allow Amer­i­cans the basic right to know what’s in their food, some­thing that’s already done in 64 oth­er coun­tries around the world. Why not Amer­i­ca?” said Mur­phy.

Eleven Arrested Protesting Monsanto Shareholder Meeting

photo credit: Eco Watch

30/1/14

photo credit: Eco Watch

30/1/14

Dozens of pro­tes­tors from around the globe ral­lied against Mon­san­to, the world’s largest seed com­pa­ny, on Tues­day urg­ing its share­hold­ers to con­sid­er the risks of grow­ing and con­sum­ing genet­i­cal­ly mod­i­fied crops.

Pro­tes­tors, with signs in hand, con­verged at the Mon­san­to head­quar­ters in sub­ur­ban St. Louis, MO dur­ing the company’s annu­al investors meet­ing in sup­port of two share­hold­er res­o­lu­tions that ques­tioned the lev­el of con­t­a­m­i­na­tion passed onto non-GMO (genet­i­cal­ly mod­i­fied organ­isms) crops and request­ed the seed giant end its fight against manda­to­ry labels on foods con­tain­ing GMO ingre­di­ents, reports Reuters.

The res­o­lu­tions failed by con­sid­er­able mar­gins and 11 pro­tes­tors were arrest­ed after attempt­ing to dis­rupt traf­fic near the Mon­san­to gates.

“Right now there’s a grow­ing move­ment to label genet­i­cal­ly mod­i­fied food,” said Dave Mur­phy, exec­u­tive direc­tor of Food Democ­ra­cy Now!, who pre­sent­ed the label­ing pro­pos­al at Tuesday’s share­hold­er meet­ing “Mon­san­to has cho­sen unfor­tu­nate­ly to resist the rights of Amer­i­can peo­ple.”

Over the last two years, Mon­san­to has spent more than $13.4 mil­lion to defeat GMO label­ing efforts in Cal­i­for­nia and Wash­ing­ton state, said Mur­phy.

Share­hold­er Adam Eidinger intro­duced the label­ing res­o­lu­tion, hop­ing to get at least 7 per­cent of investors to sup­port it, but wound up with just 4 per­cent, accord­ing to the St. Louis Post-Dis­patch.

The sec­ond res­o­lu­tion, intro­duced by share­hold­er John Har­ring­ton, focused on Monsanto’s poten­tial lia­bil­i­ty to organ­ic farm­ers. It received just 6.5 per­cent sup­port from investors.

Live audio of the share­hold­er meet­ing, which was broad­cast for the first time on the inter­net, also attract­ed Mon­san­to sup­port­ers, reports the Wall Street Jour­nal.

Justin Dan­hof, gen­er­al coun­sel for the Nation­al Cen­ter for Pub­lic Pol­i­cy Research, told WSJ.com the protest was a “cam­paign of junk sci­ence” against biotech foods. Dan­hof insist­ed Mon­san­to com­bat the envi­ron­men­tal­ist out­cry by enlist­ing its sci­en­tists as spokes­peo­ple on talk radio and oth­er media to cre­ate an open con­ver­sa­tion with the pub­lic.

Accord­ing to Reuters, the protest res­o­lu­tions were backed by envi­ron­men­tal, food safe­ty and con­sumer activist groups. Pro­tes­tors said that 2.6 mil­lion mem­bers of those groups sup­port the anti-GMO ini­tia­tive.

“It’s time that Mon­san­to join the 21st cen­tu­ry and allow Amer­i­cans the basic right to know what’s in their food, some­thing that’s already done in 64 oth­er coun­tries around the world. Why not Amer­i­ca?” said Mur­phy.

Australia: Anti-mining Blockade at Maules Creek Steps It Up a Notch

Maules Creek mining site protest.
</p>
</body></html>

Maules Creek mining site protest.  Photo credit: Leard Forest Alliance

28.01.14 — More than 100 pro­test­ers have blocked access for work crews in the Leard State For­est as the cam­paign to block con­struc­tion of the Maules Creek open-cut coal mine expands.

Work­ers from White­haven Coal, the devel­op­er of the planned mine in north­ern NSW, were turned away ear­ly on Tues­day, said Georgina Woods, spokes­woman for the Leard For­est Alliance. Machin­ery is tied up at three sites and four access roads are blocked, she said.

“We’re basi­cal­ly dig­ging in to stop them from using the machines to clear the for­est,” said Ms Woods. “It’s not going to end until this for­est gets a reprieve.”

 

Police have arrest­ed at least 10 pro­test­ers since the main block­ade began about two weeks ago. One pro­test­er has been arrest­ed on Tues­day as police move in on cam­paign­ers attached to sev­er­al struc­tures on the work site.

The cam­paign­ers want fed­er­al Envi­ron­ment Min­is­ter Greg Hunt to revoke approval to clear the for­est for coal min­ing.

Police and the Rur­al Fire Ser­vice this month suc­ceed­ed in hav­ing the Leard for­est declared closed to the pub­lic until March 31 by the Forestry Cor­po­ra­tion of NSW because of fire risks. The move sparked com­plaints by envi­ron­men­tal groups and a fire­fight­ers’ union.

Coun­cil evic­tion vote

A sep­a­rate move by the Narrabri Coun­cil to evict the pro­test­ers from crown land under their con­trol will now pro­ceed after after sev­er­al coun­cil­lors had lodged an objec­tion to the move. The coun­cil brought for­ward a vote on the evic­tion from Feb­ru­ary 4 and passed the evic­tion order on Tues­day after­noon.

“There’s a pre­dic­tion that there’s very hot weath­er on the way,” said Bevan O’Regan, one of the coun­cil­lors who halt­ed the orig­i­nal coun­cil move, detail­ing the rea­son giv­en for the ear­ly vote.

Mr O’Regan said the council’s gen­er­al man­ag­er may not pro­ceed to issue fines for those who refuse to move on from crown land.

“The ques­tion is now whether they will start evict­ing, or is it a bluff?,” said Mr O’Regan. “We’ll soon find out,” he said, adding that the pro­tes­tors may not move their camps back into the for­est.

The Bureau of Mete­o­rol­o­gy is fore­cast­ing a max­i­mum of 35 degrees on Tues­day and then six days rang­ing from 37 to 40 degrees.

Among peo­ple risk­ing arrest on Tues­day is Bill Ryan, a legal­ly blind 91-year old Koko­da vet­er­an, who is tak­ing part with his 65-year old son, cam­paign­ers said.

“This block­ade has giv­en our com­mu­ni­ty hope that we are not just the col­lat­er­al dam­age of the coal indus­try,” said Maules Creek res­i­dent Roslyn Druce in a state­ment “(It) is doing the job the gov­ern­ment should have done, pro­tect­ing an irre­place­able for­est.”

Earth First! Winter Moot 7–9 March 2014: programme up

A week­end gath­er­ing for peo­ple involved or want to know more about eco­log­i­cal direct action around the UK includ­ing fight­ing open­cast coal, frack­ing, GM, nuclear pow­er, new road build­ing and quar­ries with dis­cus­sions and cam­paign plan­ning — empha­sis on the tac­tics and strate­gies, com­mu­ni­ty sol­i­dar­i­ty and sus­tain­able activism.

A week­end gath­er­ing for peo­ple involved or want to know more about eco­log­i­cal direct action around the UK includ­ing fight­ing open­cast coal, frack­ing, GM, nuclear pow­er, new road build­ing and quar­ries with dis­cus­sions and cam­paign plan­ning — empha­sis on the tac­tics and strate­gies, com­mu­ni­ty sol­i­dar­i­ty and sus­tain­able activism.

Evening Fri­day 7th — after­noon Sun­day 9th March 2014, Not­ting­ham

Cost scale £20 to £30. This includes full veg­an meals and accom­mo­da­tion.

It will be an indoor floor sleep­ing space so bring a warm sleep­ing bag and mat. Train to Not­ting­ham then tram to Bea­cons­field street– walk to the end turn right on to Glad­stone St — 245 Glad­stone St, Not­ting­ham NG7 6HX — www.earthfirst.org.uk

Full map/travel details

For offers of help or ques­tions email themiddle@earthfirst.org.uk

 

Programme

Friday

16.30–17.30 Secu­ri­ty Work­shop
17.30–18.30 Film

18.30 Din­ner

20.00 Ben­e­fit Gig

Saturday

8.30–9.30 Break­fast
9.30–10.45 Intro go round of cam­paigns

10.45–11.00 Break

11.00–12.00 Future of Earth First Part 1
12.00–13.00 Secu­ri­ty Work­shop

13.00–14.00 Lunch

14.00–14.30 Lush/fundraising work­shop
14.30–18.15 Cam­paign Work­shops (tim­ings to be finalised to include Frack­ing, Nuclear, Roads and Coal)
18.15–18.30 Sum­mer Gath­er­ing han­dover

18.30 Din­ner
20.00 DJ??

Sunday

9.00–10.00 Break­fast fry up
10.00–10.30 Tidy up of venue
10.30–11.30 Feed­back go round
11.30–12.30 Future of Earth First Part 2
12.30–14.00 Sum­mer Gath­er­ing Plan­ning (and time of oth­er work­shops to run in par­al­lel)

14.00–15.00 Lunch
15.00 End

Anti-Highway Protester Faces Eight Year Sentence

Will Parrish in the wick drain stitcher. Jan­u­ary 22nd From June 20th to July 1st, local­ly well-known jour­nal­ist and activist Will Par­rish lived 50 feet above ground in a wick drain &l

Will Parrish in the wick drain stitcher. Jan­u­ary 22nd From June 20th to July 1st, local­ly well-known jour­nal­ist and activist Will Par­rish lived 50 feet above ground in a wick drain “stitch­er” in the north­ern Lit­tle Lake Val­ley (ie, Willits Val­ley) wet­lands, where the Cal­i­for­nia Depart­ment of Trans­porta­tion (Cal­Trans) is build­ing an unnec­es­sary and envi­ron­men­tal­ly destruc­tive free­way bypass.

By putting his body inside the frame­work of this destruc­tive equip­ment, which is in the process of installing rough­ly 55,000 80-foot drainage tubes into the Lit­tle Lake wet­lands, Will blocked it from oper­at­ing and brought nation­wide atten­tion to the harm Cal­Trans is caus­ing the Lit­tle Lake Val­ley water­shed.  This harm includes destroy­ing the largest North­ern Cal­i­for­nia wet­lands area of any project in over 50 years.

As pun­ish­ment for Will’s more than 11 day stand on behalf of the Valley’s land and peo­ple, Men­do­ci­no Coun­ty Dis­trict Attor­ney David Eyster is charg­ing him with 16 mis­de­meanors (14 counts of “unlaw­ful entry” and two of “resist­ing arrest”), with a max­i­mum eight-year jail sen­tence.  He also wants Will to pay Cal­trans a mind-bog­gling $490,002 in resti­tu­tion. This is an unheard of move by a dis­trict attor­ney in Men­do­ci­no and Hum­boldt Coun­ties, which each have a rich tra­di­tion of strug­gle for social jus­tice and the nat­ur­al envi­ron­ment.  If the DA and Cal­trans have their way, Will would spend the rest of his life pay­ing off these absurd penal­ties.

About The Case

When Men­do­ci­no Coun­ty DA David Eyster first filed a com­plaint against Will on July 2nd, the charges con­sist­ed of three infrac­tions cor­re­spond­ing to each of Will’s three non-vio­lent arrests protest­ing the Bypass.  This com­plaint includ­ed a require­ment to pay undis­closed resti­tu­tion fees.

Under an infrac­tion, the defendant’s case is presided over by a judge rather than a jury.  Will was unwill­ing to accept the uncapped resti­tu­tion stip­u­la­tion and was also adamant about his right to receive a jury tri­al, so his attor­ney (Omar Figueroa of Sebastopol) asked that Eyster re-file the charges as mis­de­meanors.  Will under­stood and accept­ed that the infrac­tions would become mis­de­meanors, and would include the pos­si­bil­i­ty of jail time, but was not pre­pared for Eyster’s arbi­trary deci­sion to add thir­teen addi­tion­al counts for mis­de­meanor vio­la­tions.

Notably, Will already endured a form of house arrest in the wick drain stitch­er and was deprived of food, water and med­ical atten­tion by the CHP (at the behest of Cal­Trans). The CHP even arrest­ed six peo­ple who attempt­ed to bring him sup­plies.  Will went for almost six days with no food, sur­vived par­tial­ly on rain water, and was bit­ter­ly cold after being drenched by more than two days of unsea­son­al rain.

Why Will Is Pur­su­ing a Jury Tri­al

This part of the case bears repeat­ing. There is a com­mon mis­con­cep­tion that Will is seek­ing a jury tri­al because he wants to lever­age his case for max­i­mum pub­lic­i­ty.  This claim has been repeat­ed in numer­ous media accounts of the case.  But it is large­ly untrue.  While Will is indeed inter­est­ed in max­i­mum pub­lic­i­ty for his case, he is exer­cis­ing his Con­sti­tu­tion­al right to a jury tri­al pri­mar­i­ly because of DA Eyster’s dra­con­ian insis­tence that he pay crim­i­nal resti­tu­tion to Cal­trans.

Will believes a jury tri­al pro­vides the best oppor­tu­ni­ty for him to oppose the crim­i­nal resti­tu­tion stip­u­la­tion.

Will adamant­ly oppos­es this harsh crim­i­nal­iza­tion of envi­ron­men­tal activism on prin­ci­pal, par­tic­u­lar­ly when the real crim­i­nals in this case are those who pre­side over Cal­trans’ Willits Bypass con­struc­tion.  Crim­i­nal resti­tu­tion has not been pur­sued against direct action pro­test­ers in North­ern Cal­i­for­nia in recent mem­o­ry.  Thus, the impo­si­tion of resti­tu­tion would also have a chill­ing effect against future activism.  Besides not want­i­ng to be in a posi­tion of pay­ing off Cal­trans for the rest of his life, Will is dead set against see­ing peo­ple who stand on their rights to defend the earth from ille­gal plun­der be per­se­cut­ed for it. He is will­ing to risk a jail sen­tence to oppose this dan­ger­ous prece­dent.

HUNTING TOWERS TOPPLED, BURNED AND BLOWN UP

Jan­u­ary 20, 2014 — Ger­many  The fol­low­ing is a sum­ma­ry of recent inci­dents in Ger­many report­ed on the Anti-Hunt­ing Blog (ani­mal rights activists may not be respon­si­ble for all of these inci­dents):

Jan­u­ary 20, 2014 — Ger­many  The fol­low­ing is a sum­ma­ry of recent inci­dents in Ger­many report­ed on the Anti-Hunt­ing Blog (ani­mal rights activists may not be respon­si­ble for all of these inci­dents):

- A hunt­ing seat/tower was destroyed by fire in Het­ten­shausen (Bavaria) on Jan­u­ary 18.

- Accord­ing to news reports, between Jan­u­ary 6–7 a hunt­ing tow­er at the edge of a nature reserve near Salem (Schleswig-Hol­stein) was knocked over. Two oth­er hunt­ing tow­ers in the same area were dam­aged in Novem­ber and Decem­ber. Police blamed “Mil­i­tant hunt­ing oppo­nents.”

- In ear­ly Jan­u­ary, two hunt­ing tow­ers were demol­ished near Hagen (North Rhine-West­phalia). Local police spec­u­lat­ed that ani­mal rights activists were respon­si­ble.

- On Decem­ber 24, a hunt­ing tow­er was set on fire near the city of Hildesheim (Low­er Sax­ony).

- Police are inves­ti­gat­ing an explo­sion that com­plete­ly destroyed a hunt­ing tow­er in Poll­ha­gen (Low­er Sax­ony) in mid-Decem­ber. The exact cause of the blast has not been deter­mined.

- Late on Decem­ber 14 a hunt­ing tow­er was dam­aged by an explo­sion in Samern (Low­er Sax­ony). pho­to: gn-online.de

- On Novem­ber 14, the inside of a hunt­ing tow­er in Dud­er­stadt (Low­er Sax­ony) was soaked with butyric acid, mak­ing it unus­able.