Eleven Arrested Protesting Monsanto Shareholder Meeting

Dozens of pro­tes­tors from around the globe ral­lied against Mon­san­to, the world’s largest seed com­pa­ny, on Tues­day urg­ing its share­hold­ers to con­sid­er the risks of grow­ing and con­sum­ing genet­i­cal­ly mod­i­fied crops.

Pro­tes­tors, with signs in hand, con­verged at the Mon­san­to head­quar­ters in sub­ur­ban St. Louis, MO dur­ing the company’s annu­al investors meet­ing in sup­port of two share­hold­er res­o­lu­tions that ques­tioned the lev­el of con­t­a­m­i­na­tion passed onto non-GMO (genet­i­cal­ly mod­i­fied organ­isms) crops and request­ed the seed giant end its fight against manda­to­ry labels on foods con­tain­ing GMO ingre­di­ents, reports Reuters.

The res­o­lu­tions failed by con­sid­er­able mar­gins and 11 pro­tes­tors were arrest­ed after attempt­ing to dis­rupt traf­fic near the Mon­san­to gates.

“Right now there’s a grow­ing move­ment to label genet­i­cal­ly mod­i­fied food,” said Dave Mur­phy, exec­u­tive direc­tor of Food Democ­ra­cy Now!, who pre­sent­ed the label­ing pro­pos­al at Tuesday’s share­hold­er meet­ing “Mon­san­to has cho­sen unfor­tu­nate­ly to resist the rights of Amer­i­can peo­ple.”

Over the last two years, Mon­san­to has spent more than $13.4 mil­lion to defeat GMO label­ing efforts in Cal­i­for­nia and Wash­ing­ton state, said Mur­phy.

Share­hold­er Adam Eidinger intro­duced the label­ing res­o­lu­tion, hop­ing to get at least 7 per­cent of investors to sup­port it, but wound up with just 4 per­cent, accord­ing to the St. Louis Post-Dis­patch.

The sec­ond res­o­lu­tion, intro­duced by share­hold­er John Har­ring­ton, focused on Monsanto’s poten­tial lia­bil­i­ty to organ­ic farm­ers. It received just 6.5 per­cent sup­port from investors.

Live audio of the share­hold­er meet­ing, which was broad­cast for the first time on the inter­net, also attract­ed Mon­san­to sup­port­ers, reports the Wall Street Jour­nal.

Justin Dan­hof, gen­er­al coun­sel for the Nation­al Cen­ter for Pub­lic Pol­i­cy Research, told WSJ.com the protest was a “cam­paign of junk sci­ence” against biotech foods. Dan­hof insist­ed Mon­san­to com­bat the envi­ron­men­tal­ist out­cry by enlist­ing its sci­en­tists as spokes­peo­ple on talk radio and oth­er media to cre­ate an open con­ver­sa­tion with the pub­lic.

Accord­ing to Reuters, the protest res­o­lu­tions were backed by envi­ron­men­tal, food safe­ty and con­sumer activist groups. Pro­tes­tors said that 2.6 mil­lion mem­bers of those groups sup­port the anti-GMO ini­tia­tive.

“It’s time that Mon­san­to join the 21st cen­tu­ry and allow Amer­i­cans the basic right to know what’s in their food, some­thing that’s already done in 64 oth­er coun­tries around the world. Why not Amer­i­ca?” said Mur­phy.

Leave a Reply