Titnore developers back down — protest cancelled, meeting & walk

MORE good news in the bat­tle to Save Tit­nore Woods!

The would-be devel­op­ers have now announced they will NOT be appeal­ing against the his­toric refusal of their plans for 875 homes by Wor­thing coun­cil back in March.

Below is the Argus report.

MORE good news in the bat­tle to Save Tit­nore Woods!

The would-be devel­op­ers have now announced they will NOT be appeal­ing against the his­toric refusal of their plans for 875 homes by Wor­thing coun­cil back in March.

Below is the Argus report.

So is this it? Are Tit­nore Woods saved? Where next for the cam­paign and the camp? This will be the time­ly top­ic of dis­cus­sion at the next Wor­thing Alliance meet­ing, which is on Thurs­day June 24, 8pm, at The Jol­ly Brew­ers in Clifton Road, Wor­thing – not far from the main sta­tion.

As ever, all are wel­come!

Deci­sion on Tit­nore plans will not be appealed
Devel­op­ers will not appeal against a deci­sion to reject plans to build 875 homes which would have seen the destruc­tion of ancient wood­land.

Wor­thing Bor­ough Coun­cil reject­ed pro­pos­als for a devel­op­ment at Tit­nore Woods, near Wor­thing, in March, because of its impact on wildlife.

Yes­ter­day the West Dur­ring­ton Con­sor­tium said it would not appeal and would now be look­ing at alter­na­tive plans on the out­skirts of Wor­thing.

Pro­test­ers set up camp in the tree­tops in Tit­nore Wood in May 2006.

The con­sor­tium first sub­mit­ted pro­pos­als in 2003 which includ­ed the straight­en­ing of Tit­nore Lane, with the loss of 275 trees.
They were lat­er changed to save 200 exist­ing trees, with 2,350 more being plant­ed across the site.
Speed man­age­ment mea­sures were also pro­posed rather than the straight­en­ing of Tit­nore Lane, with 20mph lim­its in the hous­ing areas.

But coun­cil­lors still feared the plans would cause unac­cept­able dam­age to ancient wood­land and overde­vel­op the site.

Yes­ter­day the con­sor­tium said it was work­ing on new pro­pos­als but would not appeal the council’s deci­sion.
It stat­ed: “We will not appeal against Wor­thing Coun­cil’s deci­sion to refuse plan­ning per­mis­sion for 875 homes.
“In a pos­i­tive response to the terms of this deci­sion the con­sor­tium has now elect­ed to progress alter­na­tive pro­pos­als over com­ing months which will very clear­ly exclude any pro­posed devel­op­ment of the west­ern area and any direct access to Tit­nore Lane.”
Coun­cil leader Paul Yal­lop said future devel­op­ment of the area was “up in the air” fol­low­ing a change in Gov­ern­ment.

The Con­ser­v­a­tives had pledged, pri­or to the gen­er­al elec­tion, to scrap hous­ing tar­gets which had meant 1,000 hous­es might still have to be built in West Dur­ring­ton.

Coun Yal­lop said: “I am pleased to hear that the con­sor­tium is not appeal­ing.
“I am not sure where it is going to go from here because the Gov­ern­ment is scrap­ping tar­gets.
“It is dif­fi­cult to say what will hap­pen. We do have long wait­ing lists for hous­ing, but until it is a bit clear­er where Gov­ern­ment leg­is­la­tion is going I think it’s all up in the air.”

http://www.eco-action.org/porkbolter

—–

Tit­nore vic­to­ry means protest is off

THE Tit­nore on Tour cam­paign has achieved its aim of per­suad­ing the would-be devel­op­ers at Dur­ring­ton, West Sus­sex, not to appeal against the sur­prise coun­cil refusal of their plans.

And it only took one vis­it!

Because of this vic­to­ry the planned protest on Sat­ur­day June 26 out­side devel­op­er Per­sim­mon Homes’ region­al HQ in Fare­ham has been can­celled.

Please spread the word to any­one who might have been plan­ning to come.

We are not com­pla­cent and know there is still a threat to local green space, though it appears the wood­land may now be safe.

A spe­cial meet­ing is being held at 8pm on Thurs­day June 24 at The Jol­ly Brew­ers pub in Clifton Road, Wor­thing (not far from main sta­tion) to dis­cuss where the Tit­nore cam­paign goes next.

Any­one who cares about Tit­nore Woods is encour­aged to come along and have their say.

Mean­while, Sus­sex coun­try­side lovers are urged to sup­port new pres­sure group Wor­thing Down­lan­ders’ Mid­sum­mer cir­cu­lar walk from High­down to Patch­ing Hill on Sun­day June 20 with local his­to­ri­an Chris.

Meet High­down car park, up the hill from Gor­ing by Sea rail sta­tion, at 11am to return 3pm to 4pm. Pub lunch or pic­nic en route. Sug­gest­ed dona­tion £3. www.worthingdownlanders.org.uk

http://www.eco-action.org/porkbolter/Titnoretour.html

Innu block access to mining projects on their territory

June 14, 2010

Innu com­mu­ni­ties are block­ing access to two min­ing projects in north­east­ern Que­bec and west­ern Labrador in an attempt to pro­tect their Indige­nous rights and ensure no min­ing can pro­ceed on their ter­ri­to­ry with­out their pri­or con­sent.

Innu blockadeJune 14, 2010

Innu com­mu­ni­ties are block­ing access to two min­ing projects in north­east­ern Que­bec and west­ern Labrador in an attempt to pro­tect their Indige­nous rights and ensure no min­ing can pro­ceed on their ter­ri­to­ry with­out their pri­or con­sent.

At the moment, rough­ly 100 Innu from the com­mu­ni­ties of Matimekush-Lac John and Uashat mak Mani-Ute­nam are attend­ing the block­ade, which offi­cial­ly began on Fri­day, June 11.

That num­ber could eas­i­ly swell if the gov­ern­ments and the two min­ing com­pa­nies, New Mil­len­ni­um Cap­i­tal and Labrador Iron Mines Hold­ings (LIM), fail to act respon­si­bly. Both com­mu­ni­ties are mem­bers of the Innu Strate­gic Alliance (ISA), which rep­re­sents some 12,000 peo­ple or 70% of all Innu in the province of Que­bec. The ISA sup­port­ing the block­ade.

On June 9, the Alliance chiefs said they have no choice to set up a block­ade, which “com­plies with the exist­ing Innu tra­di­tion­al juridi­cal sys­tem,” because the Provin­cial and Fed­er­al gov­ern­ments are under­min­ing their rights.

“We are open to con­struc­tive dia­logue with the gov­ern­ments and the com­pa­nies as long as our cul­tur­al, eco­nom­ic, social, envi­ron­men­tal and spir­i­tu­al aspi­ra­tions are respect­ed. We are not against all forms of devel­op­ment of the ter­ri­to­ry but we are against all devel­op­ment held with­out our con­sent,” stat­ed the Chiefs in a joint state­ment.

Matimekush-Lac John Chief Real McKen­zie and Uashat mak Mani-Ute­nam Chief Georges-Ernest Gré­goire also reaf­firmed Innu own­er­ship of the nat­ur­al resources with­in their ter­ri­to­ry, stat­ing, “We have nev­er ced­ed, aban­doned or renounced our Abo­rig­i­nal rights or our Abo­rig­i­nal title. The gov­ern­ments there­fore have the con­sti­tu­tion­al oblig­a­tion to con­sult us and to accom­mo­date our rights and inter­ests.”

The ISA notes that, in 1927, the Que­bec-Labrador bor­der was imposed on them by the British Crown, which cre­at­ed an “arti­fi­cial divi­sion of Nitassi­nan (Innu ter­ri­to­ry)”.

The divi­sion opened the flood­gates for Canada’s stan­dard abo­rig­i­nal pol­i­cy, includ­ing res­i­den­tial schools, the ban­ish­ment of hunt­ing Cari­bou (which the Innu heav­i­ly rely on) and, ulti­mate­ly, the exploita­tion of Nitassi­nan.

The region was stripped of its resources in the 1950s and 60s; the Innu barred from exer­cis­ing their rights and ben­e­fit­ing in any way mean­ing­ful.

“Our com­mu­ni­ty will not be fooled like in the 60s. For many years, our ter­ri­to­ry was stripped of its resources with­out our con­sent and with­out any ben­e­fit for our com­mu­ni­ty. When the gov­ern­ments com­plet­ed their min­ing oper­a­tions, [Schef­ferville] was des­tined for doom; the gov­ern­ments left it deprived of eco­nom­ic activ­i­ty and resources and with­out tak­ing account of our pres­ence and with­out con­cern for our rights. If they now wish to take up min­ing again, they have to do so under our con­di­tions,” said Chief McKen­zie, pri­or to a gen­er­al meet­ing last month held to dis­cuss the future of Innu lands.

More recent­ly, Chief McKen­zie said the block­ade will stay up as long as it takes for the gov­ern­ments and the com­pa­nies to act. “It’s up to them.”

Huntingdon Lane camp update

May 24, 2010
Hi there folks! Sor­ry it’s been so long since we last updat­ed the site, it’s been a busy busy month of dig­ging in and build­ing up! We’ve had peo­ple come and peo­ple go but over­all num­bers are steadi­ly climb­ing as more and more peo­ple hear about what we’re doing! Many thanks go out to those of you who have come and gone, all your efforts and dona­tions, be them time, mate­ri­als, food or finan­cial con­tri­bu­tions, have been great­ly appre­ci­at­ed and we hope to see you all again soon! Now on with the news…

Huntingdon Lane camp flyerMay 24, 2010
Hi there folks! Sor­ry it’s been so long since we last updat­ed the site, it’s been a busy busy month of dig­ging in and build­ing up! We’ve had peo­ple come and peo­ple go but over­all num­bers are steadi­ly climb­ing as more and more peo­ple hear about what we’re doing! Many thanks go out to those of you who have come and gone, all your efforts and dona­tions, be them time, mate­ri­als, food or finan­cial con­tri­bu­tions, have been great­ly appre­ci­at­ed and we hope to see you all again soon! Now on with the news…

NEWS
—————————————————

Over the last month we have seen UKCoal’s intend­ed date for the com­mence­ment of work move from the start of June to the end of June to mid July to ear­ly August and the lat­est news is that they don’t intend to start until the end of August. Good news!

—————————————————

Local water com­pa­ny Sev­ern Trent Water have assessed the area’s water sup­ply and have deter­mined that the pump that sup­plies the vil­lage of New Works with water does not have the capac­i­ty to sup­ply the pro­posed coal mine. This means that if they want a water sup­ply on site they will have to pay for an addi­tion­al pump to be installed at a cost of… wait for it… £40000!!!!

—————————————————

UKCoal’s share price is cur­rent­ly at a 52 week low, mean­ing they real­ly haven’t got much mon­ey knock­ing about right now. If this con­tin­ues they won’t be able to afford to install that pump, let alone fund an open cast mine!

—————————————————

CONSTRUCTION

We’ve have a busy time on the con­struc­tion front, with struc­tures going up and more tun­nels going in.

First up, due to the steadi­ly increas­ing num­bers of mouths to feed, we tore down the old kitchen tee-pee and built an brand new kitchen build­ing with prep areas, more stor­age and now enclos­ing the wash­ing up area.

Those very same police and fire crews have also tak­en pic­tures of the mouths of tun­nels and were not very hap­py with what they saw, leav­ing us quite hap­py 🙂

CAMP NEWS

As We said before, we’ve had some flu­id­i­ty in num­bers over the past month, with some com­ing, some going but over­all num­bers are look­ing up and a fair amount of folks are mak­ing repeat vis­its when they can. Thank you again to you all for your sup­port!

We recent­ly had three birth­days on camp all in the same week and a fan­tas­tic time was had by all! Hap­py Birth­day to Sarah (now 23), Dutch (an amaz­ing 30th) and Mon­key-Boy (spend­ing his 11th birt­day on site!).

An awe­some group of folks over Lud­low way did a fund rais­ing gig for us and raised a whop­ping £80 for the cause! Thanks so much guys, we’ll see you soon!

All in all, spir­its are pret­ty high on site right now, the fan­tas­tic weath­er has helped no end and the camp is a love­ly place to be, the trees are in bloom, every­thing is grow­ing, it’s beau­ti­full!

—————————————————

An updat­ed Wish List will fol­low short­ly, thanks again for your con­tin­ued sup­port and hope­ful­ly we’ll see you soon!

Pho­tos of some of the defence struc­tures, wish­list and updat­ed maps at http://defendhuntingtonlane.wordpress.com

Shotton opencast coal mine sabotaged

Machines sab­o­taged at Banks Group’s Shot­ton open­cast coal mine near Cram­ling­ton. On the morn­ing of the 24th of May 13 machines were sab­o­taged at Shot­ton open­cast coal mine. One exca­va­tor, two bull­doz­ers and ten heavy earth movers were dam­aged. The dam­age includ­ed cut electrics, cut hydraulics and coal dust in oil tanks. Also 150 meters of water pipe was slashed, flood­ing an area of the mine.

Machines sab­o­taged at Banks Group’s Shot­ton open­cast coal mine near Cram­ling­ton. On the morn­ing of the 24th of May 13 machines were sab­o­taged at Shot­ton open­cast coal mine. One exca­va­tor, two bull­doz­ers and ten heavy earth movers were dam­aged. The dam­age includ­ed cut electrics, cut hydraulics and coal dust in oil tanks. Also 150 meters of water pipe was slashed, flood­ing an area of the mine. Shot­ton open­cast is oper­at­ed by Banks Min­ing and start­ed work­ing in 2008. It is expect­ed to extract 3.4 mil­lion tonnes of coal, two mil­lion tonnes of shale and 750,000 tonnes of fire­clay over an eight-year peri­od. This action was tak­en by a group of autonomous peo­ple resist­ing total envi­ron­men­tal destruc­tion, cli­mate change and civilised cul­ture, and in sol­i­dar­i­ty with all peo­ple who are strug­gling against the coal indus­try.

Eagle Rock Defenders camp ‘crushed’ by Police

Dozens of heav­i­ly armed Police and State Troop­ers have raid­ed the peace­ful defend­ers camp at Eagle Rock in Michi­gan’s Upper Penin­su­la; “crush­ing” the month-long effort to pro­tect the sacred site from a con­tro­ver­sial sul­fide mine.

Eagle Rock flag
Dozens of heav­i­ly armed Police and State Troop­ers have raid­ed the peace­ful defend­ers camp at Eagle Rock in Michi­gan’s Upper Penin­su­la; “crush­ing” the month-long effort to pro­tect the sacred site from a con­tro­ver­sial sul­fide mine.

Raid at Eagle Rock; Two campers arrest­ed, camp destroyed

BIG BAY, Mich. – The defend­ers of sacred Eagle Rock sat in a cir­cle and wept as they were sur­round­ed by dozens of heav­i­ly armed state and local police offi­cers who raid­ed the Eagle Rock encamp­ment the morn­ing of May 27 arrest­ing two campers at the request of Ken­necott Eagle Min­er­als, who wast­ed no time destroy­ing the month-old camp to make way for their nick­el and cop­per mine.

Wit­ness­es say there were about six peo­ple at Eagle Rock when police moved in includ­ing four campers who had spent the night and two sup­port­ers who arrived with a warn­ing the raid was immi­nent. Armed with high-pow­ered rifles, Michi­gan State Police and mine secu­ri­ty could be seen atop Eagle Rock scan­ning the vast Yel­low Dog Plains with binoc­u­lars appar­ent­ly look­ing for tres­passers.

Two hand­cuffed campers, who refused to leave when ordered by police, were tak­en away by sheriff’s deputies and dri­ven near­ly one hour to the Mar­quette Coun­ty Jail and were released on bond. Arrest­ed were Keweenaw Bay Indi­an Com­mu­ni­ty mem­bers Chris Chosa, 28, and Char­lotte Loons­foot, 37, both of Bara­ga, Mich.

Loons­foot was one of three women who set up the encamp­ment April 23 protest­ing the arrest three days ear­li­er of envi­ron­men­tal­ist Cyn­thia Pry­or and hop­ing to pro­tect Eagle Rock from the Eagle Project nick­el and cop­per mine. Despite fed­er­al treaties that allow Ojib­wa to hunt, fish and gath­er on the Yel­low Dog Plains, the state of Michi­gan leased the land to Ken­necott to open a sul­fide mine. The mine por­tal is planned near the front of Eagle Rock and the tun­nel will trav­el under­neath the rock.

“Today, we got a mes­sage in camp that police were on their way,” said non-Native camper Cather­ine Park­er of the warn­ing from two mem­bers of the Yel­low Dog Water­shed Pre­serve who arrived short­ly before police. “Char­lotte and Chris had no inten­tion of leav­ing vol­un­tar­i­ly.”

Park­er said the Eagle Rock defend­ers wept for the land as they sat in a cir­cle.

“There were a lot of tears and pas­sion­ate remarks because the peo­ple have come to care a lot about each oth­er out here,” said Park­er of Mar­quette, Mich. “We have all been work­ing togeth­er, Native Amer­i­cans and whites to pro­tect some­thing that is tremen­dous­ly impor­tant to us.”

After police arrived, “we stayed as long as we could, we kept ask­ing to stay with our friends (Chosa and Loons­foot),” said Park­er, wip­ing away a tear. “We sat down with them repeat­ed­ly, we were pushed ver­bal­ly numer­ous times by law enforce­ment.”

“It’s break­ing my heart,” said a cry­ing Park­er as she wit­nessed heavy equip­ment roar­ing up the entrance to Eagle Rock. “This mine is not going to per­form (safe­ly) as they say it will. What is going to hap­pen if the mine col­laps­es into the Trout Salmon Riv­er?”

Police from sev­er­al agen­cies “lit­er­al­ly sur­round­ed us in a big cir­cle,” said Kalvin Hartwig, a mem­ber of the Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippe­wa who spent the night of May 26 at Eagle Rock but was not arrest­ed after agree­ing to leave the prop­er­ty with his car.

When police arrived, “three of us and two vis­i­tors were down by the sacred fire and anoth­er one of our campers (Char­lotte Loons­foot) was up on the hill fast­ing,” Hartwig said. “I think this whole sit­u­a­tion is pret­ty sad.

“The water and this land is at-risk. These peo­ple (Ken­necott) are here ille­gal­ly about to destroy it.”

Accord­ing to the Save The Wild UP Web site, about 20 police cars were sent and warned to expect a riot that nev­er occurred. Many sup­port­ers and the media rushed to the scene after hear­ing the Pow­ell Town­ship emer­gency per­son­nel dis­patched with instruc­tions to stage at the main entrance to the mine includ­ing an ambu­lance and fire trucks. No injuries were report­ed.

Atop a pole at the entrance to the camp, a lone eagle feath­er flut­tered in the dusty wind as heavy equip­ment moved in. Mine offi­cials doused the grand­fa­ther fire, uproot­ed the Eagle Rock Com­mu­ni­ty Gar­den, removed two flags from atop Eagle Rock and bull­dozed the camp.

Deputies blocked the dusty, remote, sea­son­al Triple A Road at the mine entrance but allowed the media and campers to walk the three-quar­ters of a mile to the for­mer entrance to the camp that was blocked by heavy machin­ery as mine employ­ees erect­ed a met­al cyclone fence. The media was not allowed to see the remains of the encamp­ment.

“They are putting up a fence and they are wreck­ing our gar­den we plant­ed,” said Gabriel Caplett, who has post­ed dai­ly updates about the campers activ­i­ties on the Stand for the Land Blog and has writ­ten count­less sto­ries about the fight to stop the mine since it was announced in 2004. “They are putting out the sacred fire” that has burned since the first night.

There was no word on what hap­pened to the tents and a large cache of food and oth­er sup­plies donat­ed by sup­port­ers. About 10 campers spent the night of May 25 at Eagle Rock, but sev­er­al left to pre­pare for activ­i­ties planned at the rock for Memo­r­i­al Day week­end.

Two non-Native campers, not present for the raid, broke into tears while walk­ing to Eagle Rock.

“It’s heart­break­ing, it’s real­ly dis­con­cert­ing to feel the rights of the cor­po­ra­tions have been put above and beyond the rights of the peo­ple,” said Amy Conover of Mar­quette, Mich. When politi­cians “get into pow­er they don’t act on behalf of the peo­ple, they act on behalf of the mon­ey.”

A Detroit native attend­ing nurs­ing school in Mar­quette said she “can’t under­stand how hard­ened the hearts have become of the peo­ple who are doing this.”

“To not feel how wrong it actu­al­ly is – is a very scary thing,” said Lau­ra Nagle. “The police offi­cer said this is a ‘bum­mer’ this was hap­pen­ing, it is not a bum­mer, it is a cat­a­stro­phe, a tragedy and a mis­for­tune for us all. This can still be stopped.”

Brazilian tribal opposition to Belo Monte dam

A Kayapó Indi­an leader has appealed for sup­port for his tribe, which is cam­paign­ing against the Belo Monte dam on the Xin­gu riv­er in the Brazil­ian Ama­zon. He said, ‘I have always pre­vent­ed my peo­ple from fight­ing, but I am very wor­ried now. It is time that we take back what belongs to us’. He added that ‘3,000 war­riors’ are ready to take up arms.

A Kayapó Indi­an leader has appealed for sup­port for his tribe, which is cam­paign­ing against the Belo Monte dam on the Xin­gu riv­er in the Brazil­ian Ama­zon. He said, ‘I have always pre­vent­ed my peo­ple from fight­ing, but I am very wor­ried now. It is time that we take back what belongs to us’. He added that ‘3,000 war­riors’ are ready to take up arms.

If con­struct­ed, the dam would be the third largest in the world and it would flood a large area of land, dry up cer­tain parts of the Xin­gu riv­er, cause huge dev­as­ta­tion to the rain­for­est and reduce fish stocks upon which Indi­ans in the area depend for their sur­vival.

The influx of immi­grants to the region dur­ing the con­struc­tion of the dam threat­ens to intro­duce vio­lence to the area and bring dis­eases to these Indi­ans, putting their lives at risk.

The Indi­ans have orga­nized many protests against the dam. Most recent­ly, they have block­ad­ed a fer­ry which cross­es the Xin­gu riv­er and are plan­ning to form a ‘mul­ti-eth­nic com­mu­ni­ty’ which will occu­py the area where the dam is due to be built, in the ‘Big Bend’ of the Xin­gu riv­er.

Raoni and oth­er Indi­an lead­ers stat­ed, ‘We do not accept the Belo Monte hydro­elec­tric dam because we under­stand that it will bring more destruc­tion to our region… more cor­po­ra­tions, more ranch­es, more land inva­sions, more con­flicts, and even more dams. If the white man con­tin­ues to car­ry on like this, every­thing will be destroyed very quick­ly… We already warned the gov­ern­ment that if Belo Monte were built, they would have war on their hands’.

Kayapó leader Megaron Txu­car­ramãe, in a let­ter to the inter­na­tion­al press, said, ‘We want the plans to build the Belo Monte dam to be can­celed… Lula has shown him­self to be the Indi­ans’ num­ber one enemy…We Indi­ans are being seri­ous­ly aban­doned, since we Indi­ans, the first inhab­i­tants of this coun­try, are being neglect­ed by Lula’s gov­ern­ment which wants to destroy us’.

Brazil’s Pub­lic Prosecutor’s Office is call­ing for the license for the dam to be can­celed, stat­ing that the envi­ron­men­tal impact stud­ies were incom­plete, and that the Indi­ans and oth­er peo­ple who will be affect­ed were not prop­er­ly con­sult­ed.

Indi­ans and activists marched against Ama­zon mega-dam in April

Brazil: Kayapo blockade heads into second month

May 23, 2010

It’s been exact­ly one month to the day since a group of Kayapo set up a fer­ry block­ade across the Xin­gu Riv­er in an ongo­ing protest against the con­tro­ver­sial Belo Monte hydro dam.

Kayapo blockadeMay 23, 2010

It’s been exact­ly one month to the day since a group of Kayapo set up a fer­ry block­ade across the Xin­gu Riv­er in an ongo­ing protest against the con­tro­ver­sial Belo Monte hydro dam.

The Kayapo were dis­patched to the site on April 22, the same day Brazil’s gov­ern­ment grant­ed out rights to build the dam

Sad­ly, the effort has received lit­tle media cov­er­age since then, even with a con­stant ref­er­ence to celebri­ty activists Sting and James Cameron.

Nev­er­the­less, as the front line effort heads into its sec­ond month, the Kayapo warn that they have no inten­tion of back­ing down unless the gov­ern­ment can­cels the project.

The Kayapo Continue Blockades in Protest of the Belo Monte Dam

by Inter­na­tion­al Rivers and Ama­zon Watch

For Imme­di­ate Release
May 21, 2010

The Kayapo Continue Blockades of Amazon Highway for the 28th Straight Day in Protest of the Belo Monte Dam
Brazil’s Indigenous Peoples Vow to Block Dam Construction or “Die Fighting for our Rights”

Piaraçu, Xin­gu Nation­al Park, Brazil — A group of Kayapo indige­nous peo­ple led by Chief Megaron Txukar­ramãe have been blockad­ing the Xin­gu Riv­er cross­ing of the BR-80 — a major Ama­zon high­way in Mato Grosso State — since April 23 in protest of the gov­ern­men­t’s plans to build the mas­sive Belo Monte Dam. Dozens of Kayapo war­riors have been block­ing the fer­ry cross­ing over the Xin­gu Riv­er for four weeks and are deter­mined to remain there. Their actions have dis­rupt­ed a major trans­porta­tion artery for com­mer­cial goods in the region.

In a state­ment issued from the block­ade, Chief Megaron referred to Pres­i­dent Lula as “ene­my num­ber one” to Brazil’s indige­nous peo­ples, and vowed to main­tain the block­ade until Belo Monte is can­celed or “die fight­ing for our rights.”

Chief Megaron has been joined in these protests by Kayapo Chief Raoni Metuk­tire, an emblem­at­ic leader for over 20 years of indige­nous resis­tance to the Brazil­ian gov­ern­men­t’s plans to dam the Xin­gu Riv­er. In a May 1st inter­view with the French chan­nel TF1, Chief Raoni said “I have asked my war­riors to pre­pare for war and I have spo­ken of this with oth­er tribes from the Upper Xin­gu. We will not let them [build this dam].”

Lead­ers of the Arara, Xipa­ia and Juruna indige­nous peo­ples of the Low­er Xin­gu echo the vocif­er­ous oppo­si­tion of the Kayapo to the Belo Monte Dam, and have also vowed to lay down their lives to stop the project, which would destroy their com­mu­ni­ties and liveli­hoods. “We are firm in this strug­gle, and con­tin­ue more strong and deter­mined than ever to stop Belo Monte,” said the leader Shey­la Juruna. Attempts to stop the Belo Monte Dam became known around the world last month when film­mak­er James Cameron and mem­bers of the cast of Avatar joined protests in Brasil­ia and vis­it­ed vil­lages on the Xin­gu Riv­er and its trib­u­taries to hear about the plight of the region’s indige­nous peo­ple.

Slat­ed to be the 3rd largest hydro­elec­tric project in the world, Belo Monte would divert over 80 per­cent of the Xin­gu River’s flow through arti­fi­cial canals, flood­ing over 500 sq km of rain­for­est while dry­ing out a 100 km stretch of the riv­er known as the “Big Bend,” which is home to hun­dreds of indige­nous and river­ine fam­i­lies. Though sold to the pub­lic as “clean ener­gy,” Belo Monte would gen­er­ate an enor­mous amount of methane, a green­house gas 20 times more potent than car­bon diox­ide.

Despite legal injunc­tions against the pro­jec­t’s auc­tion, the Brazil­ian gov­ern­ment announced that the auc­tion’s win­ning con­sor­tium, “Norte Ener­gia,” would pro­ceed with plans to dam the Xin­gu Riv­er. Pres­i­dent Lula’s insis­tence that the project move for­ward at all costs — in spite of seri­ous social, envi­ron­men­tal and finan­cial con­cerns, as well as a mas­sive local and inter­na­tion­al out­cry — con­tin­ues to be met with fierce denounce­ments from indige­nous peo­ple of the Xin­gu Basin.

“The destruc­tion that would be caused by the mas­sive Belo Monte Dam in the glob­al­ly essen­tial Ama­zon Basin would have world­wide ram­i­fi­ca­tions that can’t yet be ful­ly com­pre­hend­ed. Indige­nous peo­ple are deter­mined to dis­rupt the ‘busi­ness as usu­al’ mod­el of destruc­tive devel­op­ment projects that ruin the envi­ron­ment and their tra­di­tion­al ways of life,” said Atossa Soltani of Ama­zon Watch. “Indige­nous groups from the Xin­gu Basin have sent the Brazil­ian gov­ern­ment a clear and resound­ing mes­sage that they will not allow the Belo Monte Dam to move for­ward. A Brazil­ian and inter­na­tion­al coali­tion of orga­ni­za­tions and social move­ments stands in sol­i­dar­i­ty with these groups, and is mobi­liz­ing fur­ther social and legal actions.”

The new Action Update — full of of action news and analysis

In the new sum­mer edi­tion of the EF! Action Update, read about coal trains block­ad­ed, peat bogs defend­ed, and gas ter­mi­nals shut down. Find out about the dan­gers of nan­otech, cur­rent state of nuclear GM tri­als in the UK, Tesco upris­ings, golf course trash­ing, tar sands action and much more.

Newcastle flotilla blockadeIn the new sum­mer edi­tion of the EF! Action Update, read about coal trains block­ad­ed, peat bogs defend­ed, and gas ter­mi­nals shut down. Find out about the dan­gers of nan­otech, cur­rent state of nuclear GM tri­als in the UK, Tesco upris­ings, golf course trash­ing, tar sands action and much more.

Be inspired by our protest camp fea­ture and the recent Tit­nore vic­to­ry. And from across the seas, read about our broth­ers and sis­ters strug­gling against whal­ing ship sab­o­tage, coal port pirates, riots in Zagreb, min­ing firm occu­pa­tions in Bolivia, dam resis­tance in Brazil and much more.

“We are going to inher­it the earth . There is not the slight­est doubt about that. We Are not afraid of ruins. We car­ry a new world, here in our hearts. That world is grow­ing this minute.” — Dur­ru­ti

To down­load the lat­est EF!AU for print­ing, go to http://www.earthfirst.org.uk/efau/actionupdate_summer10print.pdf

To read the lat­est EF!AU online, go to http://www.earthfirst.org.uk/efau/actionupdate_summer10.pdf

Thousands of Tibetans mobilize to defend Sacred Mountains

May 18, 2010
A mas­sive police crack­down may be immi­nent in the Tibetan Autonomous Region (TAR), where thou­sands of Tibetan vil­lagers have mobi­lized to defend their sacred moun­tains from exploita­tion.

Stop Mining Tibet protestMay 18, 2010
A mas­sive police crack­down may be immi­nent in the Tibetan Autonomous Region (TAR), where thou­sands of Tibetan vil­lagers have mobi­lized to defend their sacred moun­tains from exploita­tion.

Accord­ing to reports from Radio Free Asia (RFA), the vil­lagers are attempt­ing to halt three sep­a­rate gold mines in Tsong­shen, Choeten, and Deshoe in Markham coun­ty, TAR.

As many as five thou­sand Chi­nese troops have been called in to make sure the min­ing oper­a­tions pro­ceed.

A local Tibetan source, who spoke to RFA on con­di­tion of anonymi­ty, says at least five pro­test­ers have already been injured in the protests, while numer­ous oth­ers have been beat­en and tear-gassed by the troops. One also “attempt­ed to kill him­self with a bro­ken bot­tle, the source said.”

Almost exact­ly one year ago, the same Tibetan vil­lagers orga­nized an indef­i­nite road­block to pro­tect one of their sacred moun­tains, known local­ly as “Ser Ngul Lo.”

Trans­lat­ed into Eng­lish as “Year of Gold and Sil­ver”, Ser Ngul Lo has been wor­shipped by the Tibetans for cen­turies and it is the site of impor­tant cer­e­monies con­duct­ed in times of drought.

Gov­ern­ment offi­cials at the time grant­ed a Chi­nese com­pa­ny per­mis­sion to oper­ate a gold mine in the region–most cer­tain­ly, with­out con­sult­ing the Tibetans or gain­ing their con­sent.

In addi­tion to pro­tect­ing the Moun­tain, the vil­lagers were also deeply con­cerned that their drink­ing water would be con­t­a­m­i­nat­ed by the mine. And with a tense stand-off that ensued, the peace­ful vil­lagers declared that they were “ready to die” to pro­tect the sacred site. The Tibetans feared the worst.

But then, as the inter­na­tion­al com­mu­ni­ty watched on, the unimag­in­able hap­pened: Gov­ern­ment offi­cials sat down with the Tibetans and reached a peace­ful accord.

For their part, the offi­cials agreed to com­plete­ly aban­don the gold mine and with­draw all troops in the area. In addi­tion, they agreed to build a con­crete bar­ri­er to stop any old min­ing waste from leach­ing into the local water sys­tem.

In return, the Tibetans agreed to end their 24-hour block­ade and return home.

Coal Action Network website relaunched!

Check out http://coalaction.org.uk/ for the updat­ed and re-vamped Coal Action Net­work web­site and detailed coal maps of the UK. It is hoped that this web­site will be a use­ful resource to any­one tak­ing action – or think­ing of tak­ing action – to pro­tect com­mu­ni­ties, envi­ron­ments and the cli­mate sys­tem from coal projects.

Check out http://coalaction.org.uk/ for the updat­ed and re-vamped Coal Action Net­work web­site and detailed coal maps of the UK. It is hoped that this web­site will be a use­ful resource to any­one tak­ing action – or think­ing of tak­ing action – to pro­tect com­mu­ni­ties, envi­ron­ments and the cli­mate sys­tem from coal projects.

The CAN web­site will be kept up-to-date with recent news from cam­paigns and the indus­try. Have a look at The Coal Maps – map­ping coal across the UK, con­tacts page for cam­paigns and groups active on coal, use­ful resources for cam­paign groups, argu­ments against new coal, upcom­ing events and links to infor­ma­tion and oth­er issues. You can get in touch to con­tribute updates and infor­ma­tion and sign up to the CAN email list.

Through this web­site we aim to help link com­mu­ni­ty strug­gles and arm our­selves with the infor­ma­tion we need to resist new open cast coal mines and coal-fired pow­er sta­tions.