Earth First! Direct Action Manual Is Ready for Print

Cover for Direct Action Manual

Cover for Direct Action Manual

Earth First! Direct Action Man­u­al. To sup­port this pub­li­ca­tion, pre­order your copy or donate today.

After sev­er­al years in devel­op­ment, the Earth First! Direct Action Man­u­al is ready to go to press. A group of front­line activists has assem­bled over 300 pages of dia­grams, descrip­tions of tech­niques and a com­pre­hen­sive overview of the role direct action plays in our cam­paigns in defense of the Earth.

We are now in a three-week fundrais­ing cam­paign to ensure that this crit­i­cal book gets out to peo­ple who can use it. You can pre­order your copy and get some extra thank you gifts for your ear­ly endorse­ment by donat­ing today. More impor­tant­ly, though, we have offered a chance for you to help us spread this knowl­edge. Every dona­tion over $50 gives you the chance to send a free copy of the man­u­al to a cam­paign of your choice. The more you give, the more man­u­als we can put in the mail.

The man­u­al will be print­ed in the com­ing month with long­time Earth First! part­ner, The Gloo Fac­to­ry. This com­mu­ni­ty-mind­ed, union print shop has sup­plied Earth First! and its affil­i­ates with stick­ers and mer­chan­dise for decades and remains com­mit­ted to using a high stan­dard for recy­cled and reclaimed mate­r­i­al, as well as sup­port­ive work­er con­di­tions.

The man­u­al was first print­ed near­ly two decades ago and has been out of print since its ini­tial dis­sem­i­na­tion. Though many of the con­sid­er­a­tions for civ­il dis­obe­di­ence and inter­ven­tion have remained tried and true, new ele­ments have altered the ways we put these tac­tics into action. The Earth First! Direct Action Man­u­al will con­tin­ue the role of safe and effec­tive actions in stop­ping the destruc­tion of the plan­et.

Sup­port this effort today!

Eleven Arrested Protesting Monsanto Shareholder Meeting

Dozens of pro­tes­tors from around the globe ral­lied against Mon­san­to, the world’s largest seed com­pa­ny, on Tues­day urg­ing its share­hold­ers to con­sid­er the risks of grow­ing and con­sum­ing genet­i­cal­ly mod­i­fied crops.

Pro­tes­tors, with signs in hand, con­verged at the Mon­san­to head­quar­ters in sub­ur­ban St. Louis, MO dur­ing the company’s annu­al investors meet­ing in sup­port of two share­hold­er res­o­lu­tions that ques­tioned the lev­el of con­t­a­m­i­na­tion passed onto non-GMO (genet­i­cal­ly mod­i­fied organ­isms) crops and request­ed the seed giant end its fight against manda­to­ry labels on foods con­tain­ing GMO ingre­di­ents, reports Reuters.

The res­o­lu­tions failed by con­sid­er­able mar­gins and 11 pro­tes­tors were arrest­ed after attempt­ing to dis­rupt traf­fic near the Mon­san­to gates.

“Right now there’s a grow­ing move­ment to label genet­i­cal­ly mod­i­fied food,” said Dave Mur­phy, exec­u­tive direc­tor of Food Democ­ra­cy Now!, who pre­sent­ed the label­ing pro­pos­al at Tuesday’s share­hold­er meet­ing “Mon­san­to has cho­sen unfor­tu­nate­ly to resist the rights of Amer­i­can peo­ple.”

Over the last two years, Mon­san­to has spent more than $13.4 mil­lion to defeat GMO label­ing efforts in Cal­i­for­nia and Wash­ing­ton state, said Mur­phy.

Share­hold­er Adam Eidinger intro­duced the label­ing res­o­lu­tion, hop­ing to get at least 7 per­cent of investors to sup­port it, but wound up with just 4 per­cent, accord­ing to the St. Louis Post-Dis­patch.

The sec­ond res­o­lu­tion, intro­duced by share­hold­er John Har­ring­ton, focused on Monsanto’s poten­tial lia­bil­i­ty to organ­ic farm­ers. It received just 6.5 per­cent sup­port from investors.

Live audio of the share­hold­er meet­ing, which was broad­cast for the first time on the inter­net, also attract­ed Mon­san­to sup­port­ers, reports the Wall Street Jour­nal.

Justin Dan­hof, gen­er­al coun­sel for the Nation­al Cen­ter for Pub­lic Pol­i­cy Research, told WSJ.com the protest was a “cam­paign of junk sci­ence” against biotech foods. Dan­hof insist­ed Mon­san­to com­bat the envi­ron­men­tal­ist out­cry by enlist­ing its sci­en­tists as spokes­peo­ple on talk radio and oth­er media to cre­ate an open con­ver­sa­tion with the pub­lic.

Accord­ing to Reuters, the protest res­o­lu­tions were backed by envi­ron­men­tal, food safe­ty and con­sumer activist groups. Pro­tes­tors said that 2.6 mil­lion mem­bers of those groups sup­port the anti-GMO ini­tia­tive.

“It’s time that Mon­san­to join the 21st cen­tu­ry and allow Amer­i­cans the basic right to know what’s in their food, some­thing that’s already done in 64 oth­er coun­tries around the world. Why not Amer­i­ca?” said Mur­phy.

Eleven Arrested Protesting Monsanto Shareholder Meeting

photo credit: Eco Watch

30/1/14

photo credit: Eco Watch

30/1/14

Dozens of pro­tes­tors from around the globe ral­lied against Mon­san­to, the world’s largest seed com­pa­ny, on Tues­day urg­ing its share­hold­ers to con­sid­er the risks of grow­ing and con­sum­ing genet­i­cal­ly mod­i­fied crops.

Pro­tes­tors, with signs in hand, con­verged at the Mon­san­to head­quar­ters in sub­ur­ban St. Louis, MO dur­ing the company’s annu­al investors meet­ing in sup­port of two share­hold­er res­o­lu­tions that ques­tioned the lev­el of con­t­a­m­i­na­tion passed onto non-GMO (genet­i­cal­ly mod­i­fied organ­isms) crops and request­ed the seed giant end its fight against manda­to­ry labels on foods con­tain­ing GMO ingre­di­ents, reports Reuters.

The res­o­lu­tions failed by con­sid­er­able mar­gins and 11 pro­tes­tors were arrest­ed after attempt­ing to dis­rupt traf­fic near the Mon­san­to gates.

“Right now there’s a grow­ing move­ment to label genet­i­cal­ly mod­i­fied food,” said Dave Mur­phy, exec­u­tive direc­tor of Food Democ­ra­cy Now!, who pre­sent­ed the label­ing pro­pos­al at Tuesday’s share­hold­er meet­ing “Mon­san­to has cho­sen unfor­tu­nate­ly to resist the rights of Amer­i­can peo­ple.”

Over the last two years, Mon­san­to has spent more than $13.4 mil­lion to defeat GMO label­ing efforts in Cal­i­for­nia and Wash­ing­ton state, said Mur­phy.

Share­hold­er Adam Eidinger intro­duced the label­ing res­o­lu­tion, hop­ing to get at least 7 per­cent of investors to sup­port it, but wound up with just 4 per­cent, accord­ing to the St. Louis Post-Dis­patch.

The sec­ond res­o­lu­tion, intro­duced by share­hold­er John Har­ring­ton, focused on Monsanto’s poten­tial lia­bil­i­ty to organ­ic farm­ers. It received just 6.5 per­cent sup­port from investors.

Live audio of the share­hold­er meet­ing, which was broad­cast for the first time on the inter­net, also attract­ed Mon­san­to sup­port­ers, reports the Wall Street Jour­nal.

Justin Dan­hof, gen­er­al coun­sel for the Nation­al Cen­ter for Pub­lic Pol­i­cy Research, told WSJ.com the protest was a “cam­paign of junk sci­ence” against biotech foods. Dan­hof insist­ed Mon­san­to com­bat the envi­ron­men­tal­ist out­cry by enlist­ing its sci­en­tists as spokes­peo­ple on talk radio and oth­er media to cre­ate an open con­ver­sa­tion with the pub­lic.

Accord­ing to Reuters, the protest res­o­lu­tions were backed by envi­ron­men­tal, food safe­ty and con­sumer activist groups. Pro­tes­tors said that 2.6 mil­lion mem­bers of those groups sup­port the anti-GMO ini­tia­tive.

“It’s time that Mon­san­to join the 21st cen­tu­ry and allow Amer­i­cans the basic right to know what’s in their food, some­thing that’s already done in 64 oth­er coun­tries around the world. Why not Amer­i­ca?” said Mur­phy.

Earth First! Winter Moot 7–9 March 2014: programme up

A week­end gath­er­ing for peo­ple involved or want to know more about eco­log­i­cal direct action around the UK includ­ing fight­ing open­cast coal, frack­ing, GM, nuclear pow­er, new road build­ing and quar­ries with dis­cus­sions and cam­paign plan­ning — empha­sis on the tac­tics and strate­gies, com­mu­ni­ty sol­i­dar­i­ty and sus­tain­able activism.

A week­end gath­er­ing for peo­ple involved or want to know more about eco­log­i­cal direct action around the UK includ­ing fight­ing open­cast coal, frack­ing, GM, nuclear pow­er, new road build­ing and quar­ries with dis­cus­sions and cam­paign plan­ning — empha­sis on the tac­tics and strate­gies, com­mu­ni­ty sol­i­dar­i­ty and sus­tain­able activism.

Evening Fri­day 7th — after­noon Sun­day 9th March 2014, Not­ting­ham

Cost scale £20 to £30. This includes full veg­an meals and accom­mo­da­tion.

It will be an indoor floor sleep­ing space so bring a warm sleep­ing bag and mat. Train to Not­ting­ham then tram to Bea­cons­field street– walk to the end turn right on to Glad­stone St — 245 Glad­stone St, Not­ting­ham NG7 6HX — www.earthfirst.org.uk

Full map/travel details

For offers of help or ques­tions email themiddle@earthfirst.org.uk

 

Programme

Friday

16.30–17.30 Secu­ri­ty Work­shop
17.30–18.30 Film

18.30 Din­ner

20.00 Ben­e­fit Gig

Saturday

8.30–9.30 Break­fast
9.30–10.45 Intro go round of cam­paigns

10.45–11.00 Break

11.00–12.00 Future of Earth First Part 1
12.00–13.00 Secu­ri­ty Work­shop

13.00–14.00 Lunch

14.00–14.30 Lush/fundraising work­shop
14.30–18.15 Cam­paign Work­shops (tim­ings to be finalised to include Frack­ing, Nuclear, Roads and Coal)
18.15–18.30 Sum­mer Gath­er­ing han­dover

18.30 Din­ner
20.00 DJ??

Sunday

9.00–10.00 Break­fast fry up
10.00–10.30 Tidy up of venue
10.30–11.30 Feed­back go round
11.30–12.30 Future of Earth First Part 2
12.30–14.00 Sum­mer Gath­er­ing Plan­ning (and time of oth­er work­shops to run in par­al­lel)

14.00–15.00 Lunch
15.00 End

Bombing against Bristol office of Vinci, Life Sciences Centre constructors

We think that any­one seri­ous about con­fronting dom­i­na­tion as it stands today will soon­er or lat­er come to the ques­tions of sci­ence and tech­nol­o­gy. It’s clear how both have an increas­ing­ly vital role to the rul­ing order by cre­at­ing, man­ag­ing and spread­ing con­trol with­in soci­ety and over the rest of an earth we’re false­ly sep­a­rat­ed from.

We think that any­one seri­ous about con­fronting dom­i­na­tion as it stands today will soon­er or lat­er come to the ques­tions of sci­ence and tech­nol­o­gy. It’s clear how both have an increas­ing­ly vital role to the rul­ing order by cre­at­ing, man­ag­ing and spread­ing con­trol with­in soci­ety and over the rest of an earth we’re false­ly sep­a­rat­ed from. By inves­ti­gat­ing the devel­op­ment of these pow­ers in the region and who makes it pos­si­ble, we came to Vin­ci.

In the U.K, the French multi­na­tion­al ener­gy and con­struc­tion giant Vin­ci car­ry out spe­cial­ist con­struc­tion ser­vices for the police, Min­istry of Defence and pris­ons, earth­works for motor­ways, rail­ways and quar­ry­ing, pow­er sta­tions, off­shore rigs and nuclear new-builds, as well as shop­ping cen­tres and the like. World­wide this cor­po­ra­tion and its sub­sidiaries are active in many fields: dam build­ing, pri­vate secu­ri­ty, air­ports, ura­ni­um mines; these scum have no prob­lem with inflict­ing car­nage on the earth and us as part of it, rais­ing an indus­tri­al cage around us both fig­u­ra­tive­ly and lit­er­al­ly, and feed­ing off the labours of their work­force while the boss­es line their pock­ets and move on to the next con­tract.

In these respects we attack Vin­ci any­way, but one of our main motives for tar­get­ing them is because they’re respon­si­ble for build­ing the new Bio­log­i­cal Life Sci­ences Cen­tre soon to open at the Uni­ver­si­ty of Bris­tol.

We set off an explo­sive at Vin­ci’s offices at Van­tage busi­ness park, north of Bris­tol, at approx­i­mate­ly 3:45 yes­ter­day morn­ing (6th Jan­u­ary). It was placed with the aim of cut­ting off pow­er lines, scorch­ing the exte­ri­or and start­ing a fire inside. We con­sid­ered the res­i­dent com­pa­ny in the next-door part of the unit a wor­thy sec­ondary tar­get in any dam­ages (White­head, anoth­er con­struc­tion and build­ing ser­vic­ing group who do com­mis­sioned work for Vin­ci).

A £54 mil­lion facil­i­ty, the Bio­log­i­cal Life Sci­ences Cen­tre will offer cours­es for “the next gen­er­a­tion of biol­o­gists” as well as cur­rent spe­cial­ists, aim­ing to improve col­lab­o­ra­tion with the uni­ver­si­ty’s nan­otech­nol­o­gy cen­tre and just across from the Med­ical School’s genet­ic engi­neer­ing, vivi­sec­tion and ani­mal breed­ing labs. The world cap­i­tal­ist sys­tem sees advances in fields like this as key to the next round of dis­cov­ery, enclo­sure and wealth cre­ation. As the area around Bris­tol and Bath hous­es the biggest hi-tech design clus­ter in the world after Amer­i­ca’s Sil­i­con Val­ley, this “rev­o­lu­tion” is hap­pen­ing on our doorsteps, “with Bris­tol being an excit­ing and ide­al place to car­ry out research over the com­ing years.” (This is in the words of Pro­fes­sor Gary Fos­ter, whose work at the Uni­ver­si­ty of Bris­tol in genet­ic-mod­i­fi­ca­tion and oth­er biotech­nolo­gies feeds the nox­ious phar­ma­ceu­ti­cal indus­try such as Glax­o­SmithK­line. The uni­ver­si­ty breeds genet­i­cal­ly-altered mice, for exam­ple, then mor­bid­ly sub­jects these liv­ing crea­tures to exten­sive nerve dam­age and hand the results to drug com­pa­nies.)

One of the main thrusts of this dri­ve is syn­thet­ic biol­o­gy, a dis­turb­ing prac­tice using the lat­est tech­nol­o­gy for “rewrit­ing and rebuild­ing nat­ur­al sys­tems to pro­vide engi­neered sur­ro­gates.” In 2012 a con­fer­ence at the Uni­ver­si­ty of Bris­tol stat­ed that syn­thet­ic biol­o­gy “could become a dri­ving force of the nation­al econ­o­my,” and the gov­ern­ment have declared it a top research pri­or­i­ty. The Euro­pean Union has now award­ed £3.3 mil­lion to the Uni­ver­si­ty of Bris­tol just to cre­ate “pub­lic aware­ness” pro­mot­ing the prac­tice.

The log­ic of these kind of sci­ences has, as its pri­ma­ry goal, attempt­ed con­trol over every­thing. They reduce knowl­edge, that might be more deeply gained in wild rela­tion­ships of inter­ac­tion and inter­de­pen­dence, to a detached uni­verse of obses­sive mea­sure­ment and objec­ti­fi­ca­tion, arro­gant­ly sep­a­rat­ing parts from the whole that gives them mean­ing as if every­thing were mere­ly a machine to dis­man­tle. This sci­en­tif­ic tra­di­tion is close­ly tied up with the world­view that emerged dur­ing the ear­ly for­ma­tion of com­mer­cial cap­i­tal­ism, which sought and still seeks to adapt life­forms to the dri­ve for prof­its, jus­ti­fy the dom­i­na­tion and destruc­tion of the liv­ing world, and imple­ment a macho uber-ratio­nal­ism scorn­ful of every­thing frag­ile and organ­ic on which all species depend. Right now, plant and ani­mal genes are bro­ken down and opti­mised in labs so they suit pro­duc­tive stan­dards and to cre­ate new pri­vate prop­er­ty through patents. Where we might see the unique leaves, seeds, bod­ies and minds of our­selves and our fel­low crea­tures, this sci­ence (if not nec­es­sar­i­ly each sci­en­tist, the results are the same) just sees life­less objects to pick apart, study and sac­ri­fice on the altar of eco­nom­ic use­ful­ness to their pay­mas­ters who reap the ben­e­fits from this sick and sick­en­ing soci­ety.

For instance we can see the cur­rent push for genet­i­cal­ly-mod­i­fied (G.M) food in the U.K by the media, indus­try and gov­ern­ment, for which these research insti­tu­tions play an impor­tant part: such as advances in biotech­nol­o­gy for crops thanks to the Long Ash­ton Research Sta­tion run by the Uni­ver­si­ty of Bris­tol in the past. Sci­en­tists like Gary Fos­ter are well aware of the dan­gers from G.M genes “leak­ing into the nat­ur­al world” (again, his own words) but appar­ent­ly the mon­ey and pres­tige from their mas­tery are worth more than our insignif­i­cant lives. A decade ago the first wave of G.M tri­als was slowed here by sus­tained pres­sure and crop-trash­ing; today sab­o­tage con­tin­ues from Hol­land to the Philip­pines, and oth­ers like us also won’t be accom­plices to these devel­op­ments or their agents through inac­tion. It’s nec­es­sary to attack the new wave of so-called ‘life’ sci­ence facil­i­ties at the root (those who design them, those who con­struct them) not just crit­i­cize the more well-known prod­ucts of their research: because to these insti­tu­tions all knowl­edge becomes anoth­er oppor­tu­ni­ty for con­trol and exploita­tion, so extend­ing the scope of a sys­tem that’s in real­i­ty anni­hi­lat­ing and arti­fi­cial­is­ing life in all it’s beau­ty.

Abroad, plant and ani­mal die-offs as well as increased aller­gies and intol­er­ances are already being attrib­uted to G.M. With the bio-tech indus­try non­cha­lant­ly unleash­ing its mon­sters, espe­cial­ly across lands in the glob­al south where patent­ed G.M seeds that must be re-bought year­ly exert a stran­gle­hold, it many take gen­er­a­tions to show some of their effects on infi­nite­ly com­plex webs of life that evolved over mil­lions of years. That is, before civilised cul­tures began inten­sive­ly manip­u­lat­ing them, today even down to the nano-scale. With the like of syn­thet­ic biol­o­gy we’re mov­ing fast into a future where even life­forms “in nature” are the prod­ucts of lab­o­ra­to­ry exper­i­ments, and noth­ing remains that isn’t engi­neered some­where along the line by a human-cen­tred sys­tem of sci­en­tif­ic total­i­tar­i­an­ism.

For obvi­ous rea­sons as peo­ple turn­ing against laws and dom­i­na­tion in more than words we also stand against new polic­ing and iden­ti­fi­ca­tion con­trols enabled by more foren­sics, bio­met­rics etc. and the intro­duc­tion of their com­mon use in the infor­ma­tion-age social prison (mobile fin­ger­print­ing, facial recog­ni­tion sys­tems, D.N.A swabs etc. — they did­n’t stop us yet though…).

This isn’t Vin­ci’s only U.K ven­ture into this lucra­tive field either. They’ve also under­tak­en future expan­sions in sci­ence, tech­nol­o­gy and engi­neer­ing depart­ments at Swansea Uni­ver­si­ty. They’ve com­mis­sioned White­head for the job too, their neigh­bours at Van­tage busi­ness park, who are now also marked by our attack. This will be the result for as long as soci­ety steps in line to realise the fan­tasies of a despot­ic sci­ence, reach­ing for their dreams which are our night­mares.

So what about the ‘ben­e­fits’ that these hi-tech insti­tu­tions want to sell us, found­ed as they are on mas­sive ener­gy con­sump­tion and resource extrac­tion, on the author­i­ty of a spe­cial­ist caste’s some­how-unre­proach­able med­dling with our envi­ron­ments, and on the domes­ti­ca­tion of wild spaces and the tor­ture of oth­er ani­mals? They promise us advances in (human) health, food and tech­nol­o­gy, fos­ter­ing the illu­sion that sci­ence can fix all the dam­age incurred by the dom­i­nant ways of liv­ing. They expect us to for­get how many of the dis­eases, dis­or­ders and can­cers are direct­ly caused by the same indus­tri­al out­put, glob­alised mass soci­ety, psy­cho­log­i­cal­ly and phys­i­cal­ly unhealthy habi­tats and tox­ic work­places of a cul­ture which goes toward these labs and more in the first place. They expect us to for­get that agri-mono­cul­ture pro­duc­tion led to an anti-nutri­tious diet of manip­u­lat­ed short-term energising/comfort food at an esca­lat­ing cost to the land, while diverse wild plant and ani­mals species we used to coex­ist with get wiped out by the sys­tem’s end­less expan­sion and pol­lu­tion. (Vin­ci’s works being a prime exam­ple.) They expect us to for­get how it’s pre­cise­ly the advances in com­plex tech­no­log­i­cal sys­tems that gen­er­ate our depen­dance on their design­ers and man­u­fac­tur­ers, alien­ation from our­selves as well as the earth as a whole and each oth­er at the per­son­al lev­el, and increased effi­cien­cy in achiev­ing the goals of soci­ety’s rulers: prof­it and pow­er, through mis­ery and exploita­tion, push­ing the plan­e­tary ecol­o­gy toward col­lapse.

In short the sick­ness is civil­i­sa­tion itself, includ­ing its false solu­tions to its chron­ic prob­lems steadi­ly impov­er­ish­ing sur­vival for human and non-human pop­u­la­tions alike, an unac­cept­able trans­gres­sion on our intent to live freely.

Choos­ing direct action over despair we declare our part in a low-inten­si­ty urban war in its ear­ly stages across Bris­tol against the many faces of the sys­tem, with stones, paint or fire and with the plans, debates and dai­ly refusals; some­times almost imper­ceiv­able, some­times dev­as­tat­ing. In Britain’s ugly cities and inten­sive­ly-man­aged coun­try­side a deter­mined minor­i­ty of rebels and wilder­ness-lovers spo­rad­i­cal­ly take the offen­sive: some strik­ing anony­mous­ly, some form­ing one-off action groups, and some hav­ing test­ed the open pro­pos­al of the Infor­mal Anar­chist Fed­er­a­tion; not only in the south-west but Not­ting­ham, Cam­bridge, Lon­don and now Glas­gow.

Every­thing is at stake to us and we our­selves have no time to waste. Toward recov­er­ing our own voli­tion and find­ing affini­ties for rebel­lion, our meth­ods shall include intractable con­flict with­out pause or nego­ti­a­tion: and much more besides, break­ing with this mis­er­able civ­il order with a wide vari­ety of exper­i­ments and the full scope of our imag­i­na­tions. Destruc­tion is just anoth­er indis­pens­able side of cre­ation (and vice ver­sa) not an oppo­site, we’re now sure of that. Our insur­gency would be jus­ti­fied as an end in itself in the face of this life we’re raised into, but it’s beyond only being reac­tive. It acts to solid­i­fy that we’re already tak­ing back in our face-to-face encoun­ters and in our minds. It allows poten­tial space for new and stronger rela­tion­ships cho­sen by aware indi­vid­u­als mind­ful of all life­forms, through active­ly weak­en­ing the cur­rent modes. Until some point of break­down where what­ev­er comes next is out of any soci­ety-wide con­trol and rea­son­ing, and so beyond soci­ety. Lib­er­a­tion can mean noth­ing less; tend­ing toward the wild.

The inter­na­tion­al and inter­nal bat­tle­ground between anar­chy and dom­i­na­tion holds both loss­es and gains, of which some are known and some unknown to us. With this is mind we start the new year by cel­e­brat­ing the release of Braulio Duran (an unre­pen­tant eco-anar­chist who was held by the Mex­i­can State) last Octo­ber, albeit into the wider prison-soci­ety. When we dis­cov­er sol­i­dar­i­ty with a locked-up com­rade through their atti­tude and words, it does­n’t dimin­ish when they get ‘out’; it just cre­ates more grounds to keep fight­ing toward our mutu­al goals. Still ‘inside’, we remem­ber the total-lib­er­a­tionist Adri­an Gon­za­les and anar­chist ban­dits of the Kozani case as well as Babis Tsil­ian­i­dis; and Mar­co Camenisch, denied parole once again. Respect to the Mi’k­maq War­riors engag­ing the Cana­di­an State/petro-indus­try aggres­sors in incen­di­ary clash­es, a renewed phase of indige­nous mil­i­tan­cy, and to the ones con­sis­tent­ly defend­ing both Khim­ki for­est and the land of Notre-Dames-Des-Lan­des from Vin­ci’s devel­op­ments. A raised fist above the prison walls for Nico­la Gai and Alfre­do Cospi­to aka F.A.I/F.R.I Olga Nucle­us, until cell­blocks are rub­ble and jail­ers are ash.

On a sad­der note, 2012 end­ed with the anar­chist Sebas­t­ian Over­sluij being fatal­ly shot in San­ti­a­go while try­ing to col­lec­tive­ly seize back some of what the banks extract every day from the exploit­ed. Nei­ther a vic­tim or a mar­tyr, we sim­ply see some­one who did­n’t bow their head and accept the sys­tem’s rules, and we are glad to have such peo­ple as com­rades. Even with­in this non­sen­si­cal, resigned and cyn­i­cal mod­ern cul­ture, every action demands a reac­tion. When they kill one of the resisters, our ene­mies must pay in any way. This is how our strug­gle leaves behind emp­ty ges­tures and keeps the dead from falling into obliv­ion. Black­ened offices won’t replace split blood, but they sig­nal that same social war isn’t fin­ished, and our grief births rage.

Infor­mal Anar­chist Fed­er­a­tion (F.A.I) Insur­gents: Bris­tol North

Blockade Against Monsanto in Argentina Enters Second Month

1malvinas

1malvinas

18th Octo­ber from Rev­o­lu­tion News

Today is day 28th of the block­ade against Mon­san­to in Malv­inas, Argenti­na and around 50 pro­tes­tors camp­ing there have no inten­tions of going home any time soon. Cit­i­zens are mak­ing them­selves at home near the main entrance of the new Mon­san­to plant cur­rent­ly under con­struc­tion.

They are camp­ing out indef­i­nite­ly to protest the new GMO seed pro­cess­ing plant which is sched­uled to open for busi­ness in 2014. Rev­o­lu­tion News spoke with activist Celi­na Moli­na from Asam­blea Malv­inas Lucha por Vida who said sim­ply, “We do not want Mon­san­to to install the 2nd largest GMO seed pro­cess­ing plant of Latin Amer­i­ca in our city.”

528281_10151621643225728_52293209_n

The plans for Monsanto’s new plant show future con­struc­tion of 240 silos for stor­age of chem­i­cal­ly treat­ed GMO corn. The silos have fans that are required to ven­ti­late the shafts. GMO corn in an enclosed area tends to rub togeth­er and pro­duce chem­i­cal dust which explodes with­out prop­er ven­ti­la­tion. Peo­ple there fear that when Mon­san­to switch­es on the fans the local town of Malv­inas will be engulfed in a cloud of chem­i­cal dust.

Mon­san­to has already done enough health dam­age to cit­i­zens of Argenti­na. They have wit­nessed the long term effects of expo­sure to Roundup for the past decade. Epi­demi­o­log­i­cal sur­veys were con­duct­ed 2001–2002 in areas heav­i­ly fumi­gat­ed with Mon­san­to Roundup her­bi­cide. Results of the sur­veys showed alarm­ing­ly high rates of birth defects and mal­for­ma­tions in chil­dren, can­cer clus­ters and mis­car­riage rates 100 times high­er than the nation­al aver­age. The onset of sky­rock­et­ing health issues in Argenti­na coin­cides direct­ly with the rise of soya cul­ti­va­tion and spray­ing of her­bi­cides near pop­u­lat­ed areas. Pro­fes­sor Andres Car­ras­co, Direc­tor of Mol­e­c­u­lar Embry­ol­o­gy at the Uni­ver­si­ty of Buenos Aires con­duct­ed lab­o­ra­to­ry stud­ies link­ing local health issues to Glyphosate, the active ingre­di­ent in Monsanto’s her­bi­cide Roundup.

Mon­san­to has a ter­ri­ble track record in Argenti­na and the cit­i­zens of Malv­inas are not going to allow fur­ther expan­sion for the agro­chem­i­cal giant with­out a fight. Videos of police repres­sion of peace­ful pro­tes­tors on Sep­tem­ber 30, 2013 cir­cu­lat­ed online. Sofia Gat­i­ca, spokes­woman for Madres de Ituzain­go Anexo was injured dur­ing the clash­es with police. Videos of the repres­sion have since cir­cu­lat­ed online and more peo­ple are arriv­ing at the con­struc­tion site every­day to join the block­ade.

Birth defects found in child born in barrio Ituzaingo Anexo.

Birth defects found in child born in bar­rio Ituzain­go Anexo.

Mon­san­to – Argenti­na

Time­line

1996 – Soya crops first intro­duced to Argenti­na along with Mon­san­to Roundup her­bi­cides

2001 – Res­i­dents of Ituzain­go Anexo start­ed notic­ing health irreg­u­lar­i­ties in their neigh­bor­hoods and began their own epi­demi­o­log­i­cal sur­veys

2002 – Results of sur­veys were alarm­ing: can­cer clus­ters, high rate of mal­for­ma­tions and birth defects, mis­car­riages 100 times high­er than the nation­al aver­age. Pro­fes­sor Andres Car­ras­co (Direc­tor of Mol­e­c­u­lar Embry­ol­o­gy U. of Buenos Aires) per­forms lab stud­ies link­ing health prob­lems with expo­sure to Glyphosate (the active ingre­di­ent in Mon­san­to Roundup). Local moth­ers formed activist group “Madres de Ituzain­go” and protests began.

Also in 2002, Argenti­na default­ed on it’s for­eign debt, coun­try was in a state of eco­nom­ic upheaval & riots ensued

2004 – First for­mal crim­i­nal com­plaint against local farmer & aero­fu­mi­ga­tion pilot, Par­ra, was filed for ille­gal pol­lu­tion

2008 – Com­plaint filed against Pan­cel­lo (anoth­er local farmer & aero­fu­mi­ga­tion pilot) for ille­gal pol­lu­tion

2011 – Com­plaints from 2004 & 2008 are com­bined and a tri­al date is sched­uled.

June 11, 2012 – Crim­i­nal tri­al against Par­ra & Pan­cel­lo began

June 15, 2012 – Pres­i­dent Cristi­na Fer­nán­dez de Kirch­n­er announced arrival of a new Mon­san­to plant to be built in Malv­inas, Argenti­na. It will be the largest Mon­san­to plant in Latin Amer­i­ca

July 2012 – Activist group “Asam­blea Malv­inas Lucha por Vida is formed”. Protests against new Mon­san­to plant con­struc­tion began.

August 22, 2012 – Land­mark ver­dict in crim­i­nal case against Par­ra and Pan­cel­lo – both farm­ers are found guilty of ille­gal pol­lu­tion and giv­en 3 year sus­pend­ed sen­tences. Both are giv­en com­mu­ni­ty ser­vice and banned from work­ing with agro­chem­i­cals for 10 years but nei­ther will serve jail time.

2012 – 2013 – Cit­i­zens begin to take legal action against Mon­san­to thanks to Par­ra & Pan­cel­lo case. No com­pen­sa­tion is offered to fam­i­lies of vic­tims affect­ed by con­t­a­m­i­na­tion. Protests against Mon­san­to con­tin­ue.

Sep­tem­ber 18, 2013 – Block­ade in front of new Mon­san­to plant entrance in Malv­inas begins.

Sep­tem­ber 30, 2013 – Videos of police repres­sion at Malv­inas cir­cu­late online, local well-known activist, Sofia Gat­i­ca is injured on cam­era by police.

Cur­rent – Block­ade ongo­ing

1381875_10151621639465728_1376099712_n

GMO Papaya Trees Cut Down on Big Island

Hawaiian-Papaya29 Sep­tem­ber, About 100 papaya trees were cut down with machetes overnight on Thurs­day in the Big Island’s Puna Dis­trict, accord­ing to the Hawaii Police Depart­ment.

Hawaiian-Papaya29 Sep­tem­ber, About 100 papaya trees were cut down with machetes overnight on Thurs­day in the Big Island’s Puna Dis­trict, accord­ing to the Hawaii Police Depart­ment.

The papaya trees, which were three to four feet tall and val­ued at $3,000, were on the J and L Papaya Farm off of High­way 132, accord­ing to Capt. Samuel Jels­ma.

The inci­dent comes as the Big Island com­mu­ni­ty is con­sid­er­ing the future of biotech on the island. Two bills are cur­rent­ly up for debate by the coun­ty coun­cil that would impose restric­tions on biotech. One bill, intro­duced by Coun­cil­woman Bren­da Ford, would require that the island’s GMO papaya fields be cut down. Farm­ers or landown­ers grow­ing GMO papaya would face jail and fines.

Almost all of the papaya grown on the Big Island is from seeds that were genet­i­cal­ly altered in the 1990s to pro­tect the crop from a dev­as­tat­ing ringspot virus.

Jels­ma has heard the­o­ries that anti-GMO pro­tes­tors cut down the papaya trees, but said he wasn’t going to spec­u­late. “At this point, we have noth­ing to show the motives,” he said.

This isn’t the first time that the Puna district’s lush papaya fields have been attacked with machetes.

In 2011, about 10 acres of trees were cut down on three adjoin­ing papaya farms. The year before, some 8,500 papaya trees were cut down.

Some believed the inci­dents were the work of GMO pro­tes­tors.

The police depart­ment nev­er solved the cas­es, said Jels­ma.

 

Filipino Farmers Destroy Genetically Modified ‘Golden Rice’ Crops

GMO protester via Shutterstock

10th August 2013

GMO protester via Shutterstock

10th August 2013

A group of activist farm­ers in the Philip­pines stormed a gov­ern­ment research facil­i­ty and destroyed an area of genet­i­cal­ly mod­i­fied rice crops the size of 10 foot­ball fields. Accord­ing to New Sci­en­tist, the farm­ers say that genet­i­cal­ly mod­i­fied organ­ism (GMO) foods have not been estab­lished to be safe for con­sump­tion and that the real solu­tion to world hunger isn’t bio­log­i­cal­ly engi­neered plants, but a reduc­tion in world­wide rates of pover­ty.

“The Gold­en Rice is a poi­son,” said Willy Mar­bel­la to New Sci­en­tist. Mar­bel­la is a farmer and deputy sec­re­tary gen­er­al of a group of activists known as KMP — Kilu­sang Mag­bubukid ng Pilip­inas or Peas­ant Move­ment of the Philip­pines.

The farm­ers attacked the fields at the research facil­i­ty in Pili, Camarines Sur out of con­cern that their own crops could be pol­li­nat­ed and there­by con­t­a­m­i­nat­ed by the GMO plants, pos­si­bly result­ing in a boy­cott of their prod­ucts like U.S. farm­ers of soft white wheat saw when a strain of Mon­san­to her­bi­cide-resis­tant wheat abrupt­ly appeared in an Ore­gon field. South Korea and Japan both halt­ed imports of U.S. wheat in the wake of the dis­cov­ery.

Gold­en Rice is a strain of rice that has been mod­i­fied by sci­en­tists to con­tain beta carotene, a source of vit­a­min A. An esti­mat­ed 2 mil­lion peo­ple die from vit­a­min A defi­cien­cy world­wide every year. Annu­al­ly, about 500,000 chil­dren — main­ly in the devel­op­ing world — go blind from lack of the nutri­ent.

Gold­en Rice advo­cates claim that replac­ing half of a child’s rice intake with Gold­en Rice pro­vides them with 60 per­cent of their dai­ly require­ment of vit­a­min A.

Rep­re­sen­ta­tives of the Inter­na­tion­al Rice Research Insti­tute (IRRI), a fer­vent­ly pro-Gold­en Rice orga­ni­za­tion, say that even though the GMO has yet to be approved for human con­sump­tion, research tri­als sug­gest that it’s safe, and that sci­en­tists can’t find out any­thing more if peo­ple destroy the test plants.

Fram­ing attacks on GMO crops as attacks on the effort to end world hunger, the IRRI issued a series of press releas­es since the action at Pili on Thurs­day decry­ing the farm­ers as ill-informed “van­dals.”

Anti-GMO activists say that too many stud­ies on the effects of GMOs are being under­tak­en by orga­ni­za­tions that have a stake in their suc­cess. They also say that Gold­en Rice is being used as a seem­ing innocu­ous “poster boy” crop to sell GMOs to an over­ly cred­u­lous pub­lic.

Beau Baconguis of Green­peace South­east Asia told New Sci­en­tist, “There is not enough safe­ty test­ing done on any GM crops.”

“I think that the farm­ers know what they want,” she said. “What they want is a safe envi­ron­ment that they can grow their crops in” with­out fear of con­t­a­m­i­na­tion and a sub­se­quent boycott…This is play­ing with the lives of peo­ple when you are using Gold­en Rice to pro­mote more GMOs in our food.”

Watch a video state­ment about the inci­dent from the Inter­na­tion­al Rice Research Insti­tute, www.youtube.com/embed/uxa76CHDH5Y

http://earthfirstnews.files.wordpress.com/2013/07/bladerunner.jpg

FBI Calls Destruction of GMO Sugar Beets in Oregon ‘Economic Sabotage’

12 July 2013 In a break­ing devel­op­ment, the FBI con­firms that 1,500 GM Sug­ar Beet plants were destroyed this month in Ore­gon, in what they are call­ing an act of “Eco­nom­ic Sab­o­tage.”

12 July 2013 In a break­ing devel­op­ment, the FBI con­firms that 1,500 GM Sug­ar Beet plants were destroyed this month in Ore­gon, in what they are call­ing an act of “Eco­nom­ic Sab­o­tage.”

When GM pollen blows into a non-GM farmer’s fields and irre­versibly con­t­a­m­i­nates his crop with ‘biopol­lu­tion,’ who does the law side with? His­tor­i­cal­ly, Mon­san­to. Also, it’s not called ‘eco­nom­ic sab­o­tage’ but rather ‘copy­right infringe­ment,’ and the vic­tim not the aggres­sor is threat­ened with eco­nom­ic ruin.

When Monsanto’s unap­proved and there­fore ille­gal GM wheat is found years after open field tri­als grow­ing freely in an Ore­gon wheat field, the entire state crop’s export fate is held in lim­bo, jeop­ar­diz­ing the present and future liv­ing of thou­sands of farm­ers and their depen­dents, with Mon­san­to receiv­ing lit­tle more than a rep­ri­mand, fol­lowed by rapid USDA assur­ance that despite a lack of approval their GM wheat is “safe.”

Giv­en the unfair rules of the game, no won­der some folks in Ore­gon, hav­ing been treat­ed much like feu­dal peas­ants late­ly, are tak­ing things quite lit­er­al­ly into their own hands.

So, when the FBI inves­ti­gates the destruc­tion of genet­i­cal­ly mod­i­fied sug­ar beets from two fields in South­ern Oregon’s Jack­son Coun­ty this month, the act is imme­di­ate­ly labeled “eco­nom­ic sab­o­tage,” pre­sum­ably against the multi­na­tion­al cor­po­ra­tion who owned the plants.

How fit­ting an FBI descrip­tion, con­sid­er­ing that Mon­san­to already plant­ed these ‘evil seeds’ of doubt by sug­gest­ing their unap­proved GM wheat in Ore­gon was a result of sab­o­tage, and not neg­li­gence (orinten­tion­al con­t­a­m­i­na­tion) on their part.

Accord­ing to the Spokesman Review, “The agency [FBI] said in a state­ment Thurs­day that about 1,000 sug­ar beet plants were destroyed on June 8, and more than 5,000 plants were destroyed on a dif­fer­ent plot three nights lat­er.”  

The arti­cle went on to explain that the plants were owned by the Swiss-based biotech com­pa­ny Sygen­ta, and that the FBI spoke­woman, Beth Anne Steele, would not com­ment on the man­ner in which the crops were destroyed “…because we don’t want to encour­age copy­cats.”  How­ev­er, an arti­cle pub­lished on OregonLive.com demys­ti­fied the FBI’s account, quot­ing Paul Mine­hart, head of cor­po­rate com­mu­ni­ca­tions in North Amer­i­ca for Syn­gen­ta: “It doesn’t look like a vehi­cle was used. It looks like peo­ple entered the field and destroyed the plants by hand.”

When multi­na­tion­al cor­po­ra­tions like Mon­san­to have already suc­ceed­ed in genet­i­cal­ly mod­i­fy­ing the polit­i­cal sys­tem, splic­ing in their ex-exec­u­tives and ex-lawyers into posi­tions of great pow­er with­in the gov­ern­ment [see image above], how can folks rely on these Mon­san­to, Dow and Sygen­ta-influ­enced reg­u­la­to­ry agen­cies, and the enforce­ment arms with­in their con­trol, to make deci­sions in the inter­est of their health or basic civ­il rights?

Some resort to pulling up, burn­ing and oth­er­wise destroy­ing the plants them­selves. Are they ter­ror­ists or free­dom fight­ers? And if you answer affir­ma­tive­ly to the lat­ter def­i­n­i­tion, will you your­self be defined as sym­pa­thiz­ers to these “eco­nom­ic sabo­teurs,” or ter­ror­ists?

GMO Crops Torched in America

27 June 2013 Though the con­trolled cor­po­rate media appa­ra­tus is sup­press­ing the sto­ry, 40 tons of GMO crops were torched, prompt­ing an FBI inves­ti­ga­tion. There has been a COMPLETE MEDIA BLACKOUT, out­side of local cir­cles has dared to men­tion it, per­haps because gov­ern­ment fears that if the pub­lic learns that oth­er peo­ple are get­ting fight­ing mad (liter

27 June 2013 Though the con­trolled cor­po­rate media appa­ra­tus is sup­press­ing the sto­ry, 40 tons of GMO crops were torched, prompt­ing an FBI inves­ti­ga­tion. There has been a COMPLETE MEDIA BLACKOUT, out­side of local cir­cles has dared to men­tion it, per­haps because gov­ern­ment fears that if the pub­lic learns that oth­er peo­ple are get­ting fight­ing mad (lit­er­al­ly), they might join in, and become an actu­al rev­o­lu­tion. It was only report­ed local­ly live on KXL Radio and echoed by the Ore­gon­ian, where the ONLY web men­tion exists, hard to find because the head­line word­ing is care­ful­ly avoids the most like­ly key­words for a search.

Here’s what hap­pened — 40 Tons of GMO Sug­ar Beets were set ablaze in East­ern Ore­gon, yes­ter­day. FORTY TONS — the entire acreage of two full fields of crops IN THE GROUND were set ablaze over a THREE NIGHT PERIOD OF TIME. That means ARSON.

Evi­dence is that 6,500 plants were destroyed BY HAND, ONE PLANT AT A TIME. That, in turn, implies A LOT OF PEOPLE were involved: would you want to stick around once a fire was going and wait to be dis­cov­ered? No, some­one (many some­ones) prob­a­bly want­ed to move as quick­ly as pos­si­ble. WE ARE TALKING ABOUT A MOVEMENT, a kind of ORGANIZED REVOLT — and this is exact­ly the kind of ret­ri­bu­tion that many have warned was com­ing; when law­mak­ers and cor­po­ra­tions refuse to hon­or the Con­sti­tu­tion and instead engage in ‘legal­ized’ crim­i­nal acts such as enabled by the ‘Mon­san­to Pro­tec­tion Act.’

More than decade ago, envi­ron­men­tal sabo­teurs van­dal­ized exper­i­men­tal crops across the coun­try in a revolt against high-tech agri­cul­ture. Foes of genet­ic engi­neer­ing also struck in 2000, when mem­bers of the Earth Lib­er­a­tion Front, with roots in Ore­gon, set fire to agri­cul­ture offices at Michi­gan State Uni­ver­si­ty. ELF’s posi­tion was that genet­ic engi­neer­ing was “one of the many threats to the nat­ur­al world as we know it.”

But ELF cells nor­mal­ly come for­ward imme­di­ate­ly to claim respon­si­bil­i­ty, because to them, its all about pub­lic­i­ty to edu­cate the pub­lic. Since there has been no state­ment about the recent arson this may have sim­ply been Ore­gon Farm­ers who have said, ‘Enough!’ Anoth­er clue that may be the case is that this comes on the heels (two weeks) of Japan’s rejec­tion of the entire Ore­gon Wheat crop for the year (a tremen­dous finan­cial blow because over 80% of Ore­gon Wheat is export­ed) because ONE report said ONE field was con­t­a­m­i­nat­ed with at least ONE GMO plant.

The right­ful fear is, because of pol­li­na­tion process­es, once you intro­duce a GMO crop of a giv­en vari­ety ANYWHERE, the wind and insects will spread its genet­ic con­t­a­m­i­na­tion to non GMO fields, and there­by ruin the ENTIRE INDUSTRY for a region. In fact, Ore­gon farm­ers have ten­dered a mul­ti-bil­lion dol­lar class action law suite against Mon­san­to, join­ing a long list of states doing so. Mon­san­to has exper­i­ment­ed with GMO crops before they were approved in 16 states. They were sup­pos­ed­ly all destroyed, but state after state is find­ing out the hard way, that Pandora’s box has been delib­er­ate­ly left open.

But while oth­er gov­ern­ments in Europe and else­where are pass­ing laws to ban GMO crops, and burn­ing entire crops them­selves, in Amer­i­ca, our gov­ern­ment is pass­ing laws pro­tect­ing Mon­san­to from legal reper­cus­sions, and there­fore, it seems, farm­ers are forced to burn the crops, them­selves. This means that where in oth­er coun­tries, cit­i­zens are being pro­tect­ed from cor­po­rate crimes, in Amer­i­ca, cit­i­zens are forced to become ‘ter­ror­ists’ to sur­vive. That’s how bla­tant­ly cor­rupt our cor­po­rate police state has become, I’m afraid.

Can GMO spark an armed rev­o­lu­tion? Recall this report on the Putin’s com­ments about how the pro­tec­tion of Mon­san­to (through things like the “Mon­san­to Pro­tec­tion Act”) could lead to armed revolt and war. This sto­ry was report­ed on by Polit­i­cal Blind Spot after ver­i­fy­ing the claims we had seen cir­cu­lat­ing, and omit­ting those which we had heard but could not ver­i­fy. Still, Mon­san­to pub­lic rela­tions employ­ees were lit­er­al­ly paid to track down arti­cles such as ours and try to argue that they should be tak­en down (we may pub­lish these exchanges with them from offi­cial Mon­san­to email address­es).

In this case, both fields belonged to the same Cor­po­rate Agri­cul­tur­al giant known for embrac­ing GMO, though try­ing to do so qui­et­ly, anoth­er rea­son per­haps big media has kept the sto­ry from reach­ing the Inter­net. We are talk­ing about Syn­gen­ta. Nowhere on their US web site will you find men­tion of GMO, but that is exact­ly what the com­pa­ny is about. They have even lied pub­licly in writ­ing on this issue with a pub­lic dec­la­ra­tion. Yet their very cor­po­rate name shouts GMO.

But the FBI, and local media knows bet­ter (and now, you)… because appar­ent­ly some­one from the Syn­gen­ta oper­at­ed farms men­tioned the fact as a pos­si­ble motive for the arson. This is a seri­ous mat­ter in many respects. It throws down the gaunt­let and says, WE ARE MAD AS HELL AND ARE NOT GOING TO LET YOU GET AWAY WITH THIS BULLSHIT ANYMORE! But it also rais­es the stakes and put lives and prop­er­ty at risk, and if it goes wrong, could indeed end up spark­ing an armed rev­o­lu­tion, just as Putin indi­cat­ed to Pres­i­dent Oba­ma.