Two-year long Moroccan Occupation of Silver Mine

An activist with the Berber flag.
</p>
</body></html>

An activist with the Berber flag. Protesters have occupied a hilltop above a silver mine for more than two years.

An activist with the Berber flag. Pro­test­ers have occu­pied a hill­top above a sil­ver mine for more than two years.

A Jan. 23 pro­file in the New York Times put a rare spot­light on the ongo­ing occu­pa­tion camp estab­lished by Berber vil­lagers at Mount Aleb­ban, 5,000 feet high in the Atlas Moun­tains of Moroc­co, to protest the oper­a­tions of the Imiter Met­talur­gic Min­ing Company—whose prin­ci­pal own­er is the North African nation’s King Mohammed VI.

The occu­pa­tion was first launched in 1996, but bro­ken up by the author­i­ties. It was revived in the sum­mer of 2011, after stu­dents from the local vil­lage of Imider, who were used to get­ting sea­son­al jobs at the mine, were turned down. That led the villagers—even those with jobs at the complex—to again estab­lish a per­ma­nent encamp­ment block­ing access to the site of Africa’s most pro­duc­tive sil­ver mine.

A key griev­ance is the mine’s use of local water sources, which is mak­ing agri­cul­ture in the arid region increas­ing­ly unten­able. Pro­test­ers closed a pipe valve, cut­ting off the water sup­ply to the mine. Since then, the mine’s out­put has plummeted—40% in 2012 and a fur­ther 30% in 2013. But Imider farm­ers say their long-dry­ing wells are start­ing to replen­ish, and their shriv­eled orchards are again start­ing to bear fruit.

 

In addi­tion to pro­tec­tion of local waters, vil­lagers are demand­ing that 75% of the jobs at the mine be allo­cat­ed to their munic­i­pal­i­ty. But more gen­er­al demands for Berber cul­tur­al rights and dig­ni­ty also ani­mate the protest, with the Berber flag fly­ing above the encamp­ment.

A 2011 con­sti­tu­tion­al reform, the fruit of a protest move­ment inspired by those across the Arab world, grant­ed greater cul­tur­al rights to the Berbers who (by lan­guage) con­sti­tute near­ly half Morocco’s pop­u­la­tion. But the Berbers remain dis­pro­por­tion­ate­ly affect­ed by pover­ty and mar­gin­al­iza­tion. The area around Mount Aleb­ban is among the poor­est zones of Moroc­co.

The Imider pro­test­ers say they are will­ing to talk, but nei­ther the gov­ern­ment nor the min­ing com­pa­ny have come to the table, appar­ent­ly opt­ing for a strat­e­gy of wait­ing the move­ment out. (Eth­i­cal Con­sumer, Jan. 28; Yabi­la­di, Jan. 27; Reuters, Feb. 20, 2012)

All for one, and one for all

http://earthfirstjournal.org/newswire/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2014/02/blackmail3.gif

 

http://earthfirstjournal.org/newswire/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2014/02/blackmail3.gif

 

The state-spon­sored crack­down on ani­mal rights activists con­tin­ues next month, with the open­ing of the third ‘con­spir­a­cy to black­mail’ tri­al relat­ing to vivi­sec­tion giants Hunt­ing­don Life Sci­ences in Win­ches­ter…

Earth First! Direct Action Manual Is Ready for Print

Cover for Direct Action Manual

Cover for Direct Action Manual

Earth First! Direct Action Man­u­al. To sup­port this pub­li­ca­tion, pre­order your copy or donate today.

After sev­er­al years in devel­op­ment, the Earth First! Direct Action Man­u­al is ready to go to press. A group of front­line activists has assem­bled over 300 pages of dia­grams, descrip­tions of tech­niques and a com­pre­hen­sive overview of the role direct action plays in our cam­paigns in defense of the Earth.

We are now in a three-week fundrais­ing cam­paign to ensure that this crit­i­cal book gets out to peo­ple who can use it. You can pre­order your copy and get some extra thank you gifts for your ear­ly endorse­ment by donat­ing today. More impor­tant­ly, though, we have offered a chance for you to help us spread this knowl­edge. Every dona­tion over $50 gives you the chance to send a free copy of the man­u­al to a cam­paign of your choice. The more you give, the more man­u­als we can put in the mail.

The man­u­al will be print­ed in the com­ing month with long­time Earth First! part­ner, The Gloo Fac­to­ry. This com­mu­ni­ty-mind­ed, union print shop has sup­plied Earth First! and its affil­i­ates with stick­ers and mer­chan­dise for decades and remains com­mit­ted to using a high stan­dard for recy­cled and reclaimed mate­r­i­al, as well as sup­port­ive work­er con­di­tions.

The man­u­al was first print­ed near­ly two decades ago and has been out of print since its ini­tial dis­sem­i­na­tion. Though many of the con­sid­er­a­tions for civ­il dis­obe­di­ence and inter­ven­tion have remained tried and true, new ele­ments have altered the ways we put these tac­tics into action. The Earth First! Direct Action Man­u­al will con­tin­ue the role of safe and effec­tive actions in stop­ping the destruc­tion of the plan­et.

Sup­port this effort today!

Barton Moss anti-fracking update

 

Embedded image permalink

15th Feb 2014

Lor­ries being brought in on a Sat­ur­day, tankers so like­ly full of chem­i­cals, fol­lowed by trucks with pipes. 

 

Embedded image permalink

15th Feb 2014

Lor­ries being brought in on a Sat­ur­day, tankers so like­ly full of chem­i­cals, fol­lowed by trucks with pipes. 

Campers try­ing to stop, one locked on top of a tanker. 

Three days ago a court ruled that the road was not a pub­lic high­way, but a foot­path, open­ing up the threat of being arrest­ed for aggra­vat­ed tres­pass by block­ing the trucks on the foot­path (it is legal­ly pos­si­ble under Sec­tion 68 Crim­i­nal Jus­tice and Pub­lic Order Act 1994). 

Live feed 1 and Live feed 2

Romanian Villagers and Priests Occupy Chevron Fracking Site in Protest

9/2/14

Roman­ian police clashed with vil­lagers on Wednes­day as they tried in vain to force them off a field they have occu­pied for a third day to pre­vent U.S. ener­gy giant Chevron from drilling for shale gas.

9/2/14

Roman­ian police clashed with vil­lagers on Wednes­day as they tried in vain to force them off a field they have occu­pied for a third day to pre­vent U.S. ener­gy giant Chevron from drilling for shale gas.

Hun­dreds of pro­test­ers blocked access to the site at Silis­tea in east­ern Roma­nia where Chevron plans to drill an explo­ration well, lying down in the mud and hold­ing hands to form a human chain.

Some 250 anti-riot police engaged in an hours-long stand-off with the pro­test­ers, with skir­mish­es as they phys­i­cal­ly tried to force them off, but the demon­stra­tors pushed their way back onto the field.

The group of pro­test­ers, some of whom have been sleep­ing at the site since Mon­day, had grown to about 500 on Wednes­day, pre­vent­ing Chevron bull­doz­ers and exca­va­tors from access­ing the site.

Ortho­dox priests also joined the protest.

Many of the vil­lagers in the rur­al region arrived on horse carts, some brought their chil­dren who held up signs read­ing: “Stop Chevron!”, while an elder­ly woman leaned on her cane beside them.

They are afraid of the envi­ron­men­tal and health impact of the high­ly con­tro­ver­sial method used for shale gas drilling, called hydraulic frac­tur­ing or ‘frack­ing’.

The tech­nique con­sists of pump­ing water and chem­i­cals at high pres­sure into deep rock for­ma­tions to free oil and gas.

Envi­ron­men­tal­ists say frack­ing may con­t­a­m­i­nate ground water and even cause small earth­quakes.

Chevron has per­mits to explore for shale gas in three vil­lages in this part of east­ern Roma­nia as well as on Romania’s Black Sea coast.

“Chevron is com­mit­ted to build­ing con­struc­tive and pos­i­tive rela­tion­ships with the com­mu­ni­ties where we oper­ate and will con­tin­ue our dia­logue with the pub­lic, local com­mu­ni­ties and author­i­ties on its projects,” the com­pa­ny said in a state­ment to AFP.

“Our pri­or­i­ty is to con­duct … activ­i­ties in a safe and envi­ron­men­tal­ly respon­si­ble man­ner con­sis­tent with the per­mits under which we oper­ate,” it added.

Also Wednes­day, more than 2,000 peo­ple staged a protest in the cap­i­tal Bucharest, shout­ing “no to shale gas”.

Romania’s rul­ing cen­tre-left coali­tion has been defend­ing shale gas explo­ration after fight­ing it when it was in the oppo­si­tion.

Day 72 – 6th February — Barton Moss — anti-fracking camp & blockade

day 71 lock on 2

day 71 lock on 2

Today there was a lock-on pre­vent­ing the con­voy leav­ing the iGas site from mov­ing for over 6 hours. The leader of the Green Par­ty, Natal­ie Ben­nett also vis­it­ed the camp with her sup­port­ers and met up with pro­tec­tors on the march.

Live feed from lock-on

Brazil: Munduruku People Kick Miners Off Indigenous Territory, Seize Equipment

Trans­lat­ed from Por­tuguese by Thomas Walk­er / Earth First! Newswire

Trans­lat­ed from Por­tuguese by Thomas Walk­er / Earth First! Newswire

Threatened by Death, Muduruku Expel Miners from their territories, West of Para.

Under threat of death, Mudu­ruku expel min­ers from their ter­ri­to­ries, west of Para.

Night had hard­ly arrived when indige­nous Munduruku peo­ple land­ed on the bank of a mine on Tropas Riv­er, a trib­u­tary of Tapa­jós riv­er, in a region west of Pará.  From the five speed­boats, all of them full, came war­riors and chil­dren, all with one objec­tive: to dri­ve out ille­gal min­ers from Munduruku land.

Right at the entrance of the shed, the indige­nous encoun­tered two of the twelve min­ers present.  Paint­ed for war, the Munduruku held strong.

“You have ten min­utes to get out.  Get your things, go away, and don’t come back.  This is the land of the Munduruku,” ordered Paigo­muy­at­pu, chief of the war­riors, while the min­ers were pack­ing their bags and prepar­ing to aban­don the area.

Accord­ing to the work­ers in the mine, the four pairs of dredges, used for the extrac­tion of gold, belonged to Alexan­dre Mar­tins.

Known as Tubaí­na, Mar­tins is also own­er of at least two more mines in the region, and left the site three days before the oper­a­tion, exact­ly when the Munduruku start­ed the sur­vey in the Tapa­jós basin.

“He (Tubaí­na) said that he was going there to anoth­er of his posts. He isn’t there, and he isn’t here.  No one knows,” con­firmed Mara Almei­da, who cooked in the posts for the min­ers in Tubaí­na.  The action came after numer­ous com­plaints filed with gov­ern­ment agen­cies.  Ozi­mar Dace, Munduruku mem­ber of the move­ment and reporter of the oper­a­tion, said that the indige­nous have already tried to kick out the pari­wat (who are not indige­nous) by way of the Brazil­ian Envi­ron­men­tal Insti­tute (Iba­ma), Insti­tute Chico Mendes of Bio­di­ver­si­ty Con­ser­va­tion (ICM­Bio), and Nation­al Foun­da­tion of the Indige­nous (Funai).

“The peo­ple decid­ed that these author­i­ties would nev­er give results to us.  They are nev­er going to do this so that we can live in peace.  They gave the dead­line for when they would give results, but this nev­er hap­pened.  So, for these rea­sons, we decid­ed to resolve the issue by our own account.”

The ille­gal explo­ration of the mine inside the indige­nous land of the Munduruku is not new.  Accounts trace the start of these activ­i­ties to the 1980s.  One sto­ry of threats, agree­ments with a small group of lead­ers, and exploita­tion of indige­nous labor weave a web that does not ben­e­fit the major­i­ty of peo­ple.

Accord­ing to local com­mu­ni­ties, the min­ers have caused var­i­ous prob­lems in the indige­nous lands due to uncon­trolled exploita­tion.  Pol­lu­tion of the riv­er, lack of fish, mis­un­der­stand­ings, and threats are the main rea­sons cit­ed for the indige­nous actions.  For these rea­sons, the indige­nous were “expelling min­ers and tak­ing their machines,” explains Paigo­muy­at­pu, chief of the Munduruku war­riors.

“The min­ers already made too many dam­ages in our ter­ri­to­ry.  We are evict­ing prob­lems, sick­ness, and many oth­er things that are hap­pen­ing.  We are evict­ing this for our future gen­er­a­tion,” he added.

The sur­veil­lance start­ed on Jan­u­ary 15, last­ed almost twen­ty days, and passed through var­i­ous trib­u­taries of the Tapa­jós riv­er basin, such as Tropas riv­er, Kabu­ruá riv­er, Kadiriri riv­er, and Kabitu­tu riv­er.  In all, the Munduruku con­fis­cat­ed twelve dredges.  They will remain in the vil­lages for a month while the indige­nous decide what they will do.

“In rela­tion to the mines, they will stay put.  After a month pass­es and we decide what we are going to do with machines: if we are going to do projects to ben­e­fit the com­mu­ni­ties in the area where there are already machines.  But we need alter­na­tive projects to gen­er­ate funds for the com­mu­ni­ty, like fish farm­ing, flour pro­duc­tion, nut extrac­tion, copal and hon­ey.  We need the sup­port of FUNAI,” Paigo­muy­at­pu said.

Pressed by the Munduruku, the FUNAI sup­port­ed the autonomous action of the indige­nous, financ­ing fuel for the boats.

“It was one of their demands, it came from pres­sure.  They want­ed this to hap­pen in any form they could.  We think that tak­ing their own ini­tia­tive is even bet­ter, so that they can under­stand them­selves with their rel­a­tives and decide that they are not going to per­mit the entry of the min­ers any­more,” com­ment­ed Julian Arau­jo, from the coor­di­na­tion of the FUNAI of Itaitu­ba.

Accord­ing to Juliana, since she arrived in the region in 2010, FUNAI has received com­plaints from the Munduruku on ille­gal min­ing on indige­nous land.  In Octo­ber of last year, the com­plaints were reit­er­at­ed and for­ward­ed to ICM­Bio and the Fed­er­al Police.  In 2012, an oper­a­tion against the min­ers had only a pro­vi­sion­al effect because the min­ers returned.  Because of this, it was sug­gest­ed that FUNAI work towards aware­ness with­in the man­age plant.

“It’s not enough to just do the oper­a­tion and after­wards oth­er indige­nous peo­ple autho­rize the entrance of min­ers.  We resolved to take a lit­tle more care with this.  As much as ICM­Bio, we have per­son­al dif­fi­cul­ties.  There is one per­son that is respon­si­ble for a num­ber of units when we are mon­i­tor­ing [the area], so we will try call­ing vol­un­teers from oth­er places because the local vol­un­teers end up being tar­get­ed by the min­ers.”

The cli­mate is tense in the region.  Com­mu­ni­cat­ing by radio, the lead­ers dis­cov­ered that they are being fol­lowed.  There is a list with at least five names of indige­nous lead­ers marked for death.  The author of the threats could be Tubaí­na.  Accord­ing to a Munduruku, he com­mands a group of gun­men with auto­mat­ic weapons.

“Tubaí­na is feared in the region and walks with a rifle in his right hand through the vil­lage.  No one says any­thing.  I said, ‘Hey, inside indige­nous ter­ri­to­ry, only the Fed­er­al Police and FUNAI are autho­rized to be armed,’” Val­mar Kaba relat­ed.  Beyond the lead­ers, Tubaí­na has alleged­ly threat­ened the chief of the vil­lage sur­veil­lance sta­tion, Oswal­do Waro, and his son, Joao Waro.  In the last nine­teen days, the two closed the vil­lage airstrip with sticks and stones in order to make sure that the min­ers leave with the seized machines.

“Tubaí­na passed the radio to the chief and said that when Oswal­do went to work, in the Bananal, Tubaí­na would catch him and his kid,” said Leuza Kaba, an indige­nous woman.  One of the work­ers expelled by the Mundruku, known as Shorty, informed that the min­ers of Humai­ta and from 180 kilo­me­ters across the Trana­ma­zon­i­ca (Trans Ama­zon High­way) would be plan­ning to go to Tapa­jós and to “work things out” with the indige­nous peo­ple.  Shorty did not reveal his true name.  He is frank and soft-spo­ken.  At a bar table, Shorty said that he became a min­er 14 years ago, when his part­ner left him.

“I’ve only been here in the region for six years.  The peo­ple tell a lot of lies about the min­ers.  They talk a lot about Tubaí­na, but he is a good per­son and helps every­body,” he said.

He left say­ing that he is still going to return to get the gold from the indige­nous area.  Some acquain­tances said that Shorty got out of prison two months ago.  He was impris­oned for killing a man with a knife in a min­ing vil­lage near Caton, with­in the indige­nous area.

“And he killed anoth­er with a .20 bul­let, right here, on this road,” said one of his acquain­tances.  The reporter was not able to con­tact Tubaí­na.  On Fri­day, (Jan­u­ary 31, 2014), indige­nous lead­ers in the Jacarea­can­ga del­e­ga­tion reg­is­tered a police report denounc­ing the threats of the mine own­er and report­ed the sit­u­a­tion to fed­er­al pros­e­cu­tors.

Let­ter

In a let­ter, the indige­nous say they do not have fear of death and that they will con­tin­ue fight­ing for their rights.

Car­ta VI—Letter of the Munduruku Ipereg Ayu Move­ment

We, chiefs, lead­ers, and war­riors, came across to greet you, ladies and gentlemen—those who sup­port our move­ment Munduruku Ipereg Ayu.

We, war­riors, did our sur­veil­lance of our ter­ri­to­ry.  We took out and expelled the invad­ing min­ers from our ter­ri­to­ry and we seized their machines.  Now they are threat­en­ing us with death, but we are not intim­i­dat­ed.

This is the first step.  We are going to defend our ter­ri­to­ry, our riv­er, our for­est, our rich­es, and our peo­ple until the end.  This is our word. 

We fin­ish this let­ter with much peace and friend­ship.  Sawe! Sawe! Sawe! 

            Sin­cere­ly,

            Munduruku Apereg Ayu Move­ment

            Caro­cal Vil­lage, Tropas Riv­er,

            In the Munic­i­pal­i­ty of Jacarea­can­ga, West of Para.

Occupation of Minvest Deva Headquarters in Romania

3/2/14

Nine activists from Roma­nia and Ger­many climbed the fire escape of Min­vest Deva’s head­quar­ters today and unfurled two thir­ty-foot-long ban­ners call­ing for a ban on cyanide min­ing. They were fined 500 lei each, but declared they would not pay.

3/2/14

Nine activists from Roma­nia and Ger­many climbed the fire escape of Min­vest Deva’s head­quar­ters today and unfurled two thir­ty-foot-long ban­ners call­ing for a ban on cyanide min­ing. They were fined 500 lei each, but declared they would not pay.

The ban­ners read, “Respect Exis­tance or Expect Resis­tance,” “Min­ing with Cyanide Caus­es Death!” and oth­er slo­gans

The activists chose Min­vest Deva due to con­flict of inter­est. Accord­ing to one activist named Mih­nea Bli­dar­iu who was involved in the ban­ner drops, ”The cur­rent Direc­tor of Deva Gold , Mr Nico­lae Stan­ca, is the same per­son who in 1987 signed the Asso­ci­a­tion Agree­ment between Gabriel Resources and the Roman­ian state.”

The full state­ment from the group is below (from Rev­o­lu­tion Sociale)

“Today, the 3rd of Feb­ru­ary 2014, we, cit­i­zens of Roma­nia and Ger­many have occu­pied Min­vest Deva head­quar­ters in order to draw atten­tion at the ille­gal and ille­git­i­mate favor­ing of min­ing com­pa­nies by the Roman­ian state author­i­ties.

We denounce the cyanide based min­ing projects from Certej, Deva-Mun­cel, Băiţa Cră­ci­unești, Brad, Rov­ina și Roșia Mon­tană, projects that have destruc­tive effects towards nature and humans and can only start with no regard of legal pro­ce­dures.

Only at Certej, in 16 years of oper­a­tion 26.448 tons of sodi­um cyanide and 15.280 tons of cop­per sul­phate would be used. Large-scale cyanide use does not bring pros­per­i­ty to a com­mu­ni­ty, only death and the impos­si­bil­i­ty to devel­op oth­er eco­nom­ic activ­i­ties. We denounce deeds that reek of cor­rup­tion, con­flict of inter­ests and abus­es of Nico­lae Stan­ca, cur­rent direc­tor at Deva Gold. He has signed, in the name of the Roman­ian state, the asso­ci­at­ing doc­u­ments between Min­vest Deva and Gabriel Resources in 1997, then being employed by the con­tro­vert­ed busi­ness­man Frank Timis.

We con­demn the government’s inten­tion to bring for­ward to the par­lia­ment a new min­ing law, we con­demn the irre­spon­si­ble and undig­ni­fied atti­tude of the Min­is­ter of Envi­ron­ment, Rovana Plumb, and ask for her res­ig­na­tion. We warn prime-min­is­ter Vic­tor Pon­ta that a new attempt to pass the min­ing law with absurd stip­u­la­tions that only serve the inter­ests of the min­ing indus­try will not remain with­out con­se­quences. In his urgency and pres­sure on the par­lia­men­tar­i­ans to make forced expro­pri­a­tion of cit­i­zens by pri­vate com­pa­nies legal he is doing exact­ly the oppo­site of what the pub­lic opin­ion wants. As the events of last year have demon­strat­ed, ille­git­i­mate sup­port of min­ing com­pa­nies is not backed up by par­lia­ment (two leg­isla­tive attempts have failed last year), nor by the tens of thou­sands of peo­ple that have gone to the streets in 2013.

Last but not least, we wish to draw atten­tion to the total aban­don of moral­i­ty by polit­i­cal peo­ple such as Dan Șova or Rovana Plumb. Dan Șova, from the gov­ern­ment table pro­pos­es legal solu­tions for min­ing projects of his mother’s law clients. Cyanide-based projects are then passed to be eval­u­at­ed to his col­league min­is­ter, Rovana Plumb, who will do any­thing to see them approved, includ­ing drop­ping charges in court.

We ask the cit­i­zens of Roma­nia to inform them­selves cor­rect­ly about the many draw­backs of min­ing projects and remem­ber the hor­ri­ble eco­log­i­cal acci­dents at Certej in 1971 and Baia Mare in 2000. We do not want such tragedies to be repeat­ed! We show our sol­i­dar­i­ty with move­ments around the world that strug­gle against such destruc­tive min­ing projects: Krem­ni­ca (Slo­va­kia), Halkidi­ki (Greece), Cor­coesto (Spain), Salave Asturias (Spain), Berga­ma (Turkey), Kum­tor (Kyr­gyzs­tan), Tal­vi­vaara (Fin­land).

Respect exis­tence or expect resis­tance!
Roma­nia with­out cyanide!

Live update pe mobil: http://goo.gl/RnJUsl
Live update pe Vice: @MinvestDevaLIVE (this account has now been sus­pend­ed by Twit­ter)

Via https://www.facebook.com/rosia.montana.in.unesco

Reclaim the Power gathering 8–9 February

After an incred­i­ble day of idea gen­er­a­tion and vision­ing at the last gath­er­ing, it’s time for con­crete pro­pos­als and deci­sions about our next steps.


Loca­tion: Oxford
Time: Sat­ur­day 8th Feb­ru­ary 11am ­­– Sun­day 9th 4pm

Address: TBC
Crash Space/Social: Pro­vid­ed. Fur­ther details TBC.
Meals: Pro­vid­ed, dona­tion cost TBC
Trav­el Pool: Avail­able. Please book trav­el tick­ets in advance so that this can sup­port the most peo­ple.
Notes from Man­ches­ter Vision­ing Day are here: http://bit.ly/1lQ0Yd3

In ear­ly Decem­ber a large num­ber of peo­ple came togeth­er to dis­cuss the rad­i­cal visions they had for the future – visions that Reclaim the Pow­er, as a net­work, could help bring about.

It was a very open day of dis­cus­sion with a clear struc­ture, but with no pre-planned agen­da. Every­thing we talked about was gen­er­at­ed by par­tic­i­pants, and a huge num­ber of dif­fer­ent ideas were placed on the table.

So what next? Well, the idea is that all of that dis­cus­sion feeds into a month of cre­ative pro­pos­al mak­ing before the next gath­er­ing. This will be a space for short and medi­um-term deci­sion mak­ing where we work out what we’re doing in the next few months – and how this fits in with long term visions.

Rough pro­pos­al area groups formed at the Decem­ber gath­er­ing, includ­ing:

1. How to chal­lenge cor­po­rate pow­er
2. Move­ment and diver­si­ty
3. Ener­gy and fos­sil fuels
4. Pos­i­tive solu­tions

If you would like to link up with these groups and input into pro­pos­als for next steps, just con­tact info@nodashforgas.org.uk and you will be put in touch with a group con­tact.

This said, all pro­pos­als are wel­come! If you’re work­ing on your own, out­side these groups, then great. The more ideas the bet­ter.

The pro­pos­al dead­line is the 31st Jan­u­ary 2014. Please try and fol­low this rough four point list when writ­ing them, as it is essen­tial that all the pro­pos­als be con­sid­ered on an equal foot­ing.

1. What is it?
2. How does it link to long-term strate­gic aims?
3. Time­line?
4. Resources need­ed? (inc, peo­ple, costs, skills)

Spe­cif­ic venue and agen­da details to fol­low soon. In the mean­while, please check http://bit.ly/1lQ0Yd3 to see the dis­cus­sions and out­comes of the last agen­da.

See you soon,

RTP Gath­er­ings Team

info@nodashforgas.org.uk

 

SALFORD COUNCIL CIVIC CENTRE SHUT DOWN BY BARTON MOSS CAMPAIGNERS

Salford Civic Centre Shut Down By Barton Mo
</p>
</body></html>

Salford Civic Centre Shut Down By Barton Moss Protectors     31st Jan­u­ary 2014

 

ANTI FRACKING CAMPAIGNERS SHUT SWINTON CIVIC CENTRE

Sal­ford Coun­cil’s Civic Cen­tre in Swin­ton was dra­mat­i­cal­ly shut down this after­noon as five anti-frack­ing cam­paign­ers from the Bar­ton Moss Pro­tec­tion Camp locked on in the recep­tion area.

The cam­paign­ers’ action was against Gov­ern­ment attempts to bribe Sal­ford Coun­cil to allow frack­ing in the city.

The front doors of Sal­ford Civic Cen­tre were closed this after­noon as five cam­paign­ers locked on in its recep­tion area to draw atten­tion to Con­Dem Gov­ern­ment attempts to bribe coun­cils to accept rates and com­mu­ni­ty pay­ments in exchange for allow­ing frack­ing in their cities.

Two anti-frack­ing cam­paign­ers from the Bar­ton Moss Com­mu­ni­ty Pro­tec­tion Campsite of explorato­ry drilling by frack­ing com­pa­ny IGas — super­glued them­selves to bars on the recep­tion win­dows, while two more attached them­selves to an arm tube, with anoth­er super­glued to them. It took the Greater Man­ches­ter Police Pro­test­er Removal Team around two hours to free them, while the Cen­tre remained closed to the pub­lic.

“The pro­tec­tors are here protest­ing against Sal­ford Coun­cil’s allowance of IGas to do explorato­ry drilling with a view to frack­ing at Bar­ton Moss” said Dar­ren Nes­bit, an observ­er from the Camp “We’ve had one of the pro­tec­tors, Boris, here on the lawn of the Civic Cen­tre for the last few weeks and we attend­ed the demo at the full Coun­cil meet­ing recent­ly.

“Every­thing we do is to, first­ly, raise aware­ness of frack­ing and the cor­rup­tion of the Gov­ern­ment and Coun­cil, and, sec­ond­ly, to let coun­cils know that this is what will hap­pen to every coun­cil in the coun­try if they allow frack­ing or any oth­er cor­po­rate rape of the earth which will affect their res­i­dents.”