Earth First! Winter Moot (Bristol): 20th-22nd February 2015 /full programme

A week­end gath­er­ing for peo­ple involved or want­i­ng to know more about eco­log­i­cal direct action around the UK includ­ing fight­ing open­cast coal, frack­ing, GM, nuclear pow­er, new road build­ing and quar­ries with dis­cus­sions and cam­paign plan­ning — empha­sis on the tac­tics and strate­gies, com­mu­ni­ty sol­i­dar­i­ty and sus­tain­able activism.

Shar­ing sto­ries, skills, tac­tics, updates & analy­ses of the rad­i­cal eco­log­i­cal move­ment

Cost scale £20 to £30 . This includes full veg­an meals and accom­mo­da­tion. Arrive Fri­day evening (pro­gramme starts at 7pm), leave Sun­day (ends by 4pm). It will be an indoor floor sleep­ing space so bring a warm sleep­ing bag and mat to

Kebele Com­mu­ni­ty Cen­tre 14 Robert­son Road Eas­t­on Bris­tol BS5 6JY
TrainTo Sta­ple­ton rd , two stops from Bris­tol TM then 7min walk —

Earth First! is a net­work of peo­ple and cam­paigns who fight eco­log­i­cal destruc­tion and the forces dri­ving it. We believe in non-hier­ar­chi­cal organ­is­ing of Direct Action, to con­front, stop and even­tu­al­ly reverse the forces that are respon­si­ble for the destruc­tion of the Earth and its inhab­i­tants. EF! is not a cohe­sive group or cam­paign, but a con­ve­nient ban­ner for peo­ple who share sim­i­lar philoso­phies to work under and doing it our­selves rather than rely­ing on gov­ern­ments or indus­try.

For info or offers southwest.earthfirst@riseup.net www.earth­first.org.uk

Down­load the (ready-to-print) fly­er

 

Pro­gramme sub­ject to change:

Starts 7pm Fri­day with din­ner, fol­lowed by films & an intro to EF!

On Sat­ur­day, break­fast is before the 9:30am start with cam­paigns round-ups and legal & secu­ri­ty work­shops.  After lunch we’ll be look­ing at strate­gic think­ing (see below) and at 5 explor­ing the rela­tion­ship between Reclaim the Pow­er and EF!

On Sun­day we’ll con­tin­ue those explo­rations from 10am.  After lunch, there’ll be a work­shop on sus­tain­able activism, and a chance to get involved in organ­is­ing the EF! Sum­mer Gath­er­ing.  Please stay for that if you can and get involved. 

 

Work­shops include:

Intel­li­gent Resis­tance: strat­e­gy and its imple­men­ta­tion in the mod­ern world

Sum­ma­ry: Strong strat­e­gy has always been a key ele­ment of suc­cess­ful resis­tance move­ments. Whether it be the anar­chist move­ments of rev­o­lu­tion­ary Spain, or the con­tem­po­rary fight against frack­ing, a sol­id strat­e­gy is proven to be indis­pens­able.‘Intel­li­gent Resis­tance’ is a basic intro­duc­tion to strate­gic thought and action and looks to pro­vide those in atten­dance with a prac­ti­cal set of the­o­ret­i­cal tools to take away and apply to their own move­ments and prac­tice.

Sus­tain­ing Resis­tance: avoid­ing ‘Burn out”

This is a taster work­shop from a much longer ten day work­shop and offers a range of tools, col­lec­tive and per­son­al, which can make our activism more effec­tive and help us avoid burn out stay­ing in for the long haul.

Reclaim the Pow­er meets Earth First!”

How can Earth First! and Reclaim the pow­er coex­ist in the future strug­gles and is there a need for col­lab­o­ra­tion between oth­er camps or a con­sol­i­da­tion of resources?

Legal Defence Mon­i­tor­ing:

A taster ses­sion in how to be an effec­tive LDM on actions and demos.

Cam­paigns go-round:

Dates for your diary and what resis­tance is going on around the world and your back yard..

Eight Protestors with Lancaster Against Pipelines Arrested Blockading Testing Site in PA

Jan­u­ary 5th, 2015

Eight pro­tes­tors were arrest­ed Mon­day morn­ing at a pipeline test­ing site in Lan­cast­er Coun­ty, police have con­firmed. The demon­stra­tors includ­ed local res­i­dents oppos­ing the pro­posed Atlantic Sun­rise project and mem­bers of a Native Amer­i­can tribe who claim the pipeline com­pa­ny is improp­er­ly drilling test bores on sacred grounds in Con­esto­ga Town­ship.

More from Lan­cast­er Online, which had a reporter on the scene:

Eight of the rough­ly three-dozen pro­test­ers were charged with tres­pass­ing after refus­ing to leave when PPL, the property’s own­er, said they had to.

Pro­test­ers gath­ered near the drilling site around 9 a.m. and walked about a quar­ter-mile to where work­ers were drilling along the Con­esto­ga Riv­er.

 

The work­ers stopped drilling about 10 min­utes after the pro­test­ers arrived at the site around 9:20 a.m.

How­ev­er, drilling had resumed by about 12:25 p.m., and no pro­test­ers remained.

“Every­one was peace­ful,” said Chief John Fio­r­ill with the South­ern Region­al Police Depart­ment. Fio­r­ill not­ed it was not the first time pro­tes­tors gath­ered on the site owned by PPL over the last two weeks, nor does he expect it will be the last.

A Williams spokesman said the com­pa­ny is drilling to col­lect soil sam­ples that will help deter­mine the least-inva­sive con­struc­tion method for its pro­posed Atlantic Sun­rise project. The inter­state pipeline would send nat­ur­al gas from the Mar­cel­lus Shale south­ward to mar­kets on the east coast.

The project has faced fierce oppo­si­tion from peo­ple in Lan­cast­er Coun­ty who have raised con­cerns about how it will effect the envi­ron­ment, pub­lic safe­ty and prop­er­ty val­ues.

“Our imme­di­ate goal is to pre­vent the pipeline from going in and doing what we can in a peace­ful way to pro­tect our land,” said Bren­da Sieglitz, a mem­ber of the group No Lan­cast­er Pipeline which orga­nized Monday’s protest.

Chief Carlos Rivera of the North Arawak Tribal Nation is arrested protesting the Atlantic Sunrise pipeline in Conestoga, Pa. (courtesy of Michelle Johnsen)

Chief Car­los Rivera of the North Arawak Trib­al Nation is arrest­ed protest­ing the Atlantic Sun­rise pipeline in Con­esto­ga, Pa. (cour­tesy of Michelle Johnsen)

Chief Car­los Rivera, a leader of the North­ern Arawak Trib­al Nation, was among the eight pro­tes­tors arrest­ed. Accord­ing to his Face­book page, Rivera believes Williams’ drill bores are des­e­crat­ing a site sacred to his tribe.

“I know there are some sen­si­tive cul­tur­al resources out there and that’s one of the rea­sons we’ve been tak­ing the steps we’ve been tak­ing to make sure we treat those with respect,” said Williams spokesman Chris Stock­ton, who could not con­firm whether the com­pa­ny is oper­at­ing on a sacred North­ern Arawak site.

Rivera coop­er­at­ed with police offi­cers and was released on a sum­ma­ry cita­tion, Fio­r­ill said.

How­ev­er, the oth­er sev­en pro­tes­tors, who linked arms when offi­cers attempt­ed to arrest them, were charged with tres­pass­ing in the third degree and could face up to a year in jail and $250 in fines.

Thousands Join Second Week of Protest against Privatization of Turkey’s Caretta Beach

by 

by MUĞLA / Hur­riyet Dai­ly News

Jan­u­ary 5th, 2015

A vig­il held against the pri­va­ti­za­tion of the pro­tect­ed beach of İzt­uzu on the Mediter­ranean coast will enter its sec­ond week today, with activists mobi­liz­ing to pre­vent a com­pa­ny from build­ing recre­ation­al facil­i­ties on the site, a major nest­ing ground for Caret­ta Caret­ta tur­tles.

Local activists were prompt­ed to action after offi­cials from DALÇEV, the com­pa­ny that won the ten­der to oper­ate the beach facil­i­ties, entered the area with three con­struc­tion vehi­cles around mid­night on Dec. 29, 2014, after a court lift­ed a stay of exe­cu­tion order on the pri­va­ti­za­tion process.

The inci­dent trig­gered fury among local activists, who spon­ta­neous­ly gath­ered near the beach and launched their resis­tance. They cel­e­brat­ed New Year’s Eve in İzt­uzu and thou­sands of activists are now attend­ing the vig­il.

“We were three in the begin­ning. Then we became five. Now our num­ber has reached 2,000 peo­ple,” said Tuğ­ba Özge Musaoğlu, a local who was among the first to join the impromp­tu protest.One of the last untouched seashores along Turkey’s coasts, İzt­uzu is locat­ed with­in an archae­o­log­i­cal site and has a spe­cial pro­tect­ed sta­tus that bans any con­struc­tion on the site. The sandy beach is also glob­al­ly known for being one of the main breed­ing grounds for log­ger­head tur­tles, also known as Caret­ta Caret­ta.

But the beach’s envi­ron­men­tal impor­tance has not pre­vent­ed the author­i­ties’ pri­va­ti­za­tion attempt, which was even­tu­al­ly won by DALÇEV last June, a local com­pa­ny that also has British part­ners.

“We wouldn’t even lay our tow­els in the areas were the tur­tles deposit their eggs. And then, one morn­ing, we learned that con­struc­tion machines had entered the site. This place was ours and we want it to remain like that, because it is the locals who will take care of it the best,” Musaoğlu said.

The par­tic­u­lar­ly pho­to­genic giant tur­tles are on the red list of the Inter­na­tion­al Union for Con­ser­va­tion of Nature (IUCN) due to the destruc­tion of their habi­tat.

Activists have remained at the entrance of the İzt­uzu beach after Gen­darmerie offi­cers refused to allow activists to hold a vig­il inside the pro­tect­ed area.

Legal trou­ble has ensued fol­low­ing the pri­va­ti­za­tion, as the process was ini­tial­ly sus­pend­ed by a court order on June 23, 2014. But the stay of exe­cu­tion was lift­ed in late Sep­tem­ber, with the Muğla Governor’s Office order­ing the author­i­ties of Orta­ca dis­trict, which İzt­uzu is a part of, to evac­u­ate the facil­i­ties at the beach. The pri­va­ti­za­tion was then chal­lenged by the Orta­ca Munic­i­pal­i­ty, with the Muğla Admin­is­tra­tive Court rul­ing for a stay of exe­cu­tion for a sec­ond time. The same court lift­ed the order on Dec. 22, giv­ing the go-ahead to the com­pa­ny to take over the facil­i­ties. But only three days lat­er, a dis­trict court again ruled to sus­pend the exe­cu­tion of the pri­va­ti­za­tion.

Adding fuel to the legal tur­moil, the Envi­ron­ment Min­istry on Jan. 5 con­firmed that the ten­der land had now been tak­en over by the firm “in accor­dance with the can­cel­la­tion of the stay of exe­cu­tion order.”

Human rights abuse

Main oppo­si­tion Repub­li­can People’s Par­ty (CHP) law­mak­er Mah­mut Tanal, who joined the protest at İzt­uzu, said any action regard­ing İzt­uzu would amount to a human rights vio­la­tion. “This would seri­ous­ly hurt Muğla’s tourism, econ­o­my and the right for peo­ple to live in a healthy envi­ron­ment. What the state has to do is pro­tect and devel­op the envi­ron­ment,” Tanal said.

For their part, offi­cials from DALÇEV claim they came to the site after the lat­est rul­ing lift­ing the stay of exe­cu­tion had been announced. “We should nor­mal­ly have tak­en over in June. But the facil­i­ties owned by the Orta­ca Munic­i­pal­i­ty were not giv­en to us. The munic­i­pal­i­ty opened sev­er­al law­suits against us,” said the company’s exec­u­tive com­mit­tee head, Ramazan Oruç, empha­siz­ing that if they did not under­take any action it was due to their “respect for jus­tice.”

He also dis­missed claims that their arrival to the site near mid­night was an attempt to raid the facil­i­ties.

“The governor’s office announced the court deci­sion at 5 p.m. So we entered the facil­i­ties [at night]. We are not here to occu­py. We would have entered dur­ing the morn­ing if the deci­sion had been announced dur­ing the morn­ing,” Oruç said.

The recent trans­fer of author­i­ties regard­ing pri­va­ti­za­tions to governor’s offices instead of munic­i­pal­i­ties has hurt locals as it means they have less con­trol over deci­sions on such sen­si­tive mat­ters.

A recent hos­pi­tal project for sea tur­tles near İzt­uzu also raised con­tro­ver­sy with activists object­ing to the con­struc­tion of the facil­i­ty with­in the pro­tect­ed area. Their action was suc­cess­ful in obtain­ing the can­ce­la­tion of the project but prompt­ed Envi­ron­ment Min­is­ter İdris Gül­lüce to accuse them of fanati­cism.

Many inter­na­tion­al envi­ron­men­tal and ani­mal rights groups, includ­ing the World Wildlife Fund (WWF), expressed their oppo­si­tion to the estab­lish­ment of a hos­pi­tal in İzt­uzu.

Italy’s No-TAV Movement Heats Up with Major Sabotage and Court Victory

pho­to from protest in the for­est atta

pho­to from protest in the for­est attacked by police in 2011

from Earth First! News

Decem­ber 29th, 2014Advocates of the impos­si­bly cor­rupt and envi­ron­men­tal­ly dev­as­tat­ing high speed rail project known as TAV that threat­ens to cut through the Alps received a dou­ble-blow last week in the form of a major court vic­to­ry for activists, and anoth­er large-scale act of arson.

This month, six fires have been set along the TAV lines in Italy, with mil­i­tant groups like Armed Oper­a­tional Nuclei (NOA) call­ing on activists to join them in armed strug­gle.

Image from the sabotage in Bologna five days ago / courtesy ANSA

Image from the sab­o­tage in Bologna five days ago

As recent­ly as last week, three peo­ple wear­ing hoods set fires at Bologna’s San­ta Vio­la sta­tion. Though pri­vate sur­veil­lance cam­eras caught their image, they are uniden­ti­fi­able. Accord­ing to the Dai­ly Beast, the sab­o­tage was sur­pris­ing­ly effec­tive: “the Bologna fires destroyed the region­al train traf­fic con­trol sys­tem, which put the entire rail net­work in north­ern Italy on hold until it could be repaired.”

Since the first of Decem­ber, six fires have been set along Italy’s high-speed rail, caus­ing the fast-mov­ing trains to screech to a halt.

In spite of accu­sa­tions of ter­ror­ism and the con­tro­ver­sy sur­round­ing fresh sab­o­tage, three anar­chists who were jailed in rela­tion to the block­ade of machin­ery and throw­ing molo­tovs at cops had their ter­ror­ism charges dropped in court today.

Dur­ing the action in ques­tion, the newswire ser­vice ANSA explains, “Police at the time said rough­ly 30 hood­ed mil­i­tants broke into the con­struc­tion site under the cov­er of night­fall and tore down fences and blocked machin­ery. In a near­by inci­dent, sev­er­al oth­er activists con­front­ed police with fire­works and Molo­tov cock­tails.”

The court vic­to­ry sends a mes­sage that activists fight­ing the TAV are not sim­ply ter­ror­ists pre­tend­ing to be envi­ron­men­tal­ists, but mem­bers of a diverse and com­mit­ted move­ment that encom­pass­es large sec­tors of the Ital­ian pop­u­lace.

Inves­ti­ga­tors are not just out to get activists, either. They are also crack­ing down on sup­port­ers of the TAV—chiefly mafia oper­a­tives who have infil­trat­ed the project in order to chan­nel con­tracts and per­mits to their syn­di­cates.

Mean­while, the largest mob of them all, the EU, has made infra­struc­ture a pri­or­i­ty, over and against resis­tant com­mu­ni­ties and mil­i­tant groups fight­ing against the destruc­tion of a sim­pler way of life.

Diverse crowd of protestors marching from a historical site through the forest set to be destroyed by TAV / by Pietro Bondi

Live Streamers Make Great Informants

from We Cop Watch

There are many ways to effec­tive­ly doc­u­ment the move­ment while pro­tect­ing the space, its move­ments and people’s pri­va­cy. Live Stream­ing is gen­er­al­ly NOT one of them.

from We Cop Watch

There are many ways to effec­tive­ly doc­u­ment the move­ment while pro­tect­ing the space, its move­ments and people’s pri­va­cy. Live Stream­ing is gen­er­al­ly NOT one of them.

A com­mon issue with Stream­ers is their dis­play of enti­tle­ment, often cit­ing the val­ue of bring­ing the move­ment to the peo­ple. But Stream­ers have a hard time admit­ting that the police find their work more valu­able then demon­stra­tors.

In a world of voyeurism and exhi­bi­tion­ists, Stream­ers often get car­ried away, inter­pret­ing their role as being a nar­ra­tor for the move­ment. They often film peo­ple with­out their con­sent, plac­ing more val­ue in pre­sent­ing to their view­er­ship, then pro­tect­ing the group that is already tak­ing risks by just get­ting out into the street to protest.

 

live-streamers-make-great-informants_1-800x428

One of the biggest prob­lems with stream­ing is that it gives real time infor­ma­tion to the police as far as what peo­ple are present, the group’s inten­tions, as well as its loca­tion and routes. Embed­ded Stream­ers give police a tac­ti­cal advan­tage when try­ing to con­duct mass arrests.

An even more trag­ic con­tract Stream­ers impose on demon­stra­tors is the raw, unedit­ed, archived video that is often made pub­lic and avail­able online for law enforce­ment to use lat­er to help iden­ti­fy and tar­get peo­ple.

Before we move to “Stream­er Solu­tions” lets review some “Stream­er tac­tics” that are favor­able to law enforce­ment, and almost always at the expense of the peo­ple.

Very Poor Stream­er Eti­quette:
Call­ing Peo­ple out by Name on Streams.

Peo­ple don’t go to protests for oth­er peo­ple to call them out on streams that are put up per­ma­nent­ly online for law enforce­ment to review.

Film­ing Peo­ples’ Iden­ti­ties on Streams

Law enforce­ment use streams to tar­get and iden­ti­fy peo­ple for repres­sion and arrest

Nar­rat­ing your Inter­pre­ta­tion of what Kind of Action is Tak­ing Place

Stream­ers often divulge per­son­al opin­ions rather than facts when nar­rat­ing about actions. Are you pre­pared to be a wit­ness for law enforce­ment in the future?

Film­ing Direct Actions

Every­thing you film, can and will be used against pro­test­ers if law enforce­ment has any­thing to do with it.

Nar­rat­ing Logis­tics and Tac­tics

At the height of Occu­py Oak­land, Under­cov­ers were being called into cer­tain FTP protests because of the “no Live Stream­ing” / “no Twit­ter­ing” tac­tic.

live-streamers-make-great-informants_2
FTP march­es are ongo­ing Fuck the Police march­es that take place in Oak­land and across the Bay.

Nar­rat­ing Group Routes

Police have a much eas­i­er time arrest­ing peo­ple in the streets when they have Stream­ers nar­rat­ing the group’s routes. You don’t need Under­cov­ers and heli­copters when you have a front-row seat.

If you want to be help­ful to the move­ment, be hon­est about your inten­tions. Is your view­er­ship more impor­tant than the peo­ple you are stand­ing with? Do you want to be doing some­thing that ben­e­fits the police over the peo­ple? Every action, every mass mobi­liza­tion, has a sto­ry that can be told. But folks need to either start hold­ing “non stream­ing” actions again, or stream­ers should stop oper­at­ing as infor­mants for the police.

If any of these issues are con­cern­ing to you, maybe con­sid­er NOT “Live Stream­ing” your next protest. Pick up a still cam­era, con­duct some audio inter­views, heck shoot some video. There’s no rea­son why you can’t go home after a protest and pro­duce some con­tent that is use­ful and not harm­ful. But in case it’s not in your blood to con­sid­er oth­er peo­ple on that lev­el, here are some good Live Stream tac­tics.

“Good” Livestream Tac­tics

  • Stand hun­dreds of feet away from the group so the low qual­i­ty record­ing doesn’t pick up con­ver­sa­tions or peo­ples’ iden­ti­ty.
  • Don’t film peo­ples’ iden­ti­ty with­out their con­sent.
  • Don’t nar­rate inten­tions, tac­tics, loca­tions, or des­ti­na­tions.
  • Wear a bright shirt that says “Live Stream­er” or “Infor­mant.”

More “Real Good” Livestream Tac­tics

  • Live Stream an event, pan­el, or dis­cus­sion where all par­ties con­sent.
  • Live Stream a demo or action where all par­ties involved con­sent.
  • Live Stream your inter­ac­tions when being stopped, ques­tioned, or harassed by law enforce­ment. (maybe put your chan­nel on pri­vate!)

Be safe out there, and make it safer for the mass­es by con­sid­er­ing them when you point a cam­era at them!

story of direct action behind fracking ban in New York

toxic-avenger

toxic-avenger

Did Somebody Say Direct Action? What’s Missing from the Victory Narrative

by Sasha / Earth First! Jour­nal

We have heard a lot about what stopped the frack­ing boom in New York after Gov­er­nor Cuo­mo banned it last week.

While some insist that fal­ter­ing prices that did the gas boom in, oth­ers cred­it the sev­en-year legal bat­tle with stopped the prac­tice. The run­ning nar­ra­tive is that it’s a com­bi­na­tion of grass­roots polit­i­cal involvement—going to pub­lic hear­ings, sub­mit­ting com­ments, and doing eco­log­i­cal stud­ies. But there’s anoth­er ele­ment peo­ple aren’t talk­ing about as much.

What we don’t hear about is the intense blos­som­ing of direct action that has gen­er­at­ed a net­work of sev­er­al Earth First! groups who have been work­ing dili­gent­ly to shut down frack­ing oper­a­tions and nat­ur­al gas infra­struc­ture for the last six years. This move­ment spans a gamut of tac­tics, from protests to block­ades to oth­er escapades. It has been upset­ting busi­ness as usu­al, cost­ing the cor­po­ra­tions mon­ey and the politi­cians cred­it.

In short, it’s work­ing.

EF! in the Mix

The Mar­cel­lus Shale Earth First! Net­work sprung into action soon after the first wells start­ed get­ting test­ed, and rapid­ly assem­bled sev­er­al groups around the Mar­cel­lus, includ­ing Hud­son Val­ley EF! (HVEF!) and Fin­ger Lakes EF! (FLEF!), which have been active in direct action strug­gles.

In May of this year, Hud­son Val­ley Earth First! (HVEF!) dis­rupt­ed the 9th annu­al North­east Pow­er and Gas Mar­kets Con­fer­ence in New York City, send­ing home the mes­sage that frack­ing would not be accept­ed in the state.

Oth­er groups involved have been Susque­han­na Val­ley EF!, Genessee Val­ley EF!, and Occu­py WELL Street.

“This cam­paign has been going on for almost two years, but now it’s get­ting seri­ous,” said April Rogers, a mem­ber of HVEF! “If trucks show up, we’ll be there to stop them!”

Indeed, two years before the dis­rup­tion in NYC, HVEF! stopped con­struc­tion on a com­pres­sor sta­tion in Min­isink, NY, along the Mil­le­ni­um Pipeline.

EF! has been engaged in this move­ment since the Newswire has been in exis­tence, protest­ing out­side of pub­lic hear­ings, draw­ing a spot­light with out­ra­geous actions, and grow­ing the move­ment.

In Win­ter of last year, MSEF! went on an exten­sive tour of New York and Penn­syl­va­nia, spread­ing the good word about direct action against frack­ing after a cru­cial vic­to­ry defend­ing the Loy­al­sock State For­est from frack­ing in Penn­syl­va­nia.

As the col­lec­tive put it at the time, “MSEF! is a cre­ative and grow­ing move­ment, and shar­ing our strug­gle with oth­ers around PA and NY made it clear that the cam­paign to defend the Loy­al­sock is one that will unite many peo­ple.”

Pri­or to halt­ing frack­ing in the Loy­al­sock, MSEF! engaged in a pro­longed cam­paign against the Ten­nessee Pipeline through a lock­down, two con­sec­u­tive treesits, and a two-week road block­ade matched with a nine-day treesit.

The MSEF! net­work also shut down frack­ing oper­a­tions in the Tiadaghton State For­est ear­li­er this year and block­ad­ed frack­ing trucks in the Moshan­non State For­est in 2012.

Despite tremen­dous resis­tance, frack­ing in Penn­syl­va­nia is still going on, and activists con­tin­ue to work to shut it down.

The Infra­struc­ture Fight Still Needs Sup­port

While the EF! net­work has been hold­ing action camps and engag­ing in a num­ber of cam­paigns, per­haps the largest of the area’s anti-gas strug­gles has been the We Are Seneca Lake cam­paign.

In a three-week block­ade this Novem­ber, 19 peo­ple were arrest­ed halt­ing con­struc­tion of Crest­wood Midstream’s gas stor­age facil­i­ty on Seneca Lake.

Just this month, more than 100 peo­ple attend­ed a demon­stra­tion out­side of the court where the arrest­ed were being arraigned. That day, nine more peo­ple were arrest­ed lock­ing them­selves to the gates of Crestwood’s facil­i­ty.

This came after a peace­ful block­ade in March which saw the arrest of 12 activists. Three more were arrest­ed at their tri­al in April.

In total, some 92 peo­ple have been arrest­ed in the move­ment to halt the Crest­wood facility—a rous­ing cam­paign that is ongo­ing and needs your sup­port!

If the move­ment against gas trans­port and stor­age is still rag­ing in New York, its vis­i­bil­i­ty has thrown the spot­light on the con­tro­ver­sial prac­tice of frack­ing as well. Chesa­peake EF! is involved in the ongo­ing cam­paign against frack­ing exports in the Mary­land Cove Point facil­i­ty, and oth­er cam­paigns con­tin­ue to build steam.

Move­ment Builders

The vic­to­ry in New York is a key move­ment builder, because it helps us rec­og­nize the com­po­nents that make them hap­pen, and focus on the cam­paigns that need sup­port with greater num­bers and resources.

Direct action is just one piece of the larg­er puz­zle to stop indus­tri­al exploita­tion and destruc­tion of land and liveli­hood. And, with com­mu­ni­ty rights move­ments, legal bat­tles, and protest move­ments, it’s win­ning.

It is impor­tant to note that these actions have tak­en place not just in New York, but in Penn­syl­va­nia and New Jer­sey, as well. This is a biore­gion­al strug­gle, and claim­ing suc­cess in New York is not the end. The move­ment to stop frack­ing won’t stop at legal bat­tles; it relies on the vig­i­lance of com­mu­ni­ties impact­ed by the unsafe prac­tices, and it will con­tin­ue to expand through­out the Mar­cel­lus Shale until all frack­ing oper­a­tions are shut down once and for all.

No Com­pro­mise!

Maules Creek coal mine protests, down under

Selfie-6-768x1024

Selfie-6-768x1024

No “Coal for Christmas” as Whitehaven Coal Disruptions Continue in New South Wales

from Front­line Action

MAULES CREEK, 24 Decem­ber 2014: A man has sus­pend­ed him­self from a rail bridge cross­ing the Namoi Riv­er block­ing a coal train being loaded at White­haven Coal’s con­tro­ver­sial Maules Creek mine from leav­ing the site. The train blocked at the Maules Creek mine is believed to be the first con­tain­ment of coal from the site after a test train – twice dis­rupt­ed by activists – left the site last week. The rail bridge also ser­vices Idemit­su Resource’s Bog­gabri Coal mine.

Ben Soli­ty, a 31 year old logis­tics con­sul­tant, cit­ed deep con­cerns about the impact the mine will have on water and the cli­mate, say­ing, “Farm­ers need water to con­tin­ue to put food on our tables – so why are com­pa­nies like White­haven allowed to take it with pref­er­ence over farm­ers? Farmer’s jobs are only going to get hard­er for them as the effects of cli­mate change dri­ven by coal takes hold. Why are our gov­ern­ments sell­ing out our water and our cli­mate for a quick buck when food secu­ri­ty is at stake?”

Leard For­est Alliance spokesper­son Phil Evans said, “Aus­tralians do not want coal for Christ­mas – and White­haven are try­ing to sneak it into their stock­ings whilst every­one is dis­tract­ed. Just more slimy behav­iour from this dis­graced com­pa­ny – and project – that has seen Aus­tralians lose faith in min­ing approval process­es in this coun­try.”

 

“We need a stop to this farce imme­di­ate­ly – stop work and then have a good long, hard look at how suc­ces­sive NSW gov­ern­ments, embroiled in min­ing relat­ed cor­rup­tion, have allowed the Maules Creek mine approval to stick.”

Both White­haven Coal’s Maules Creek and Idemitsu’s Bogggabri mines have approval to expand into the crit­i­cal­ly endan­gered Leard State For­est this Feb­ru­ary – spark­ing this warn­ing from the protest group.

“They have a bat­tle on their hands if they think local farm­ers, tra­di­tion­al cus­to­di­ans and con­cerned cit­i­zens are going to allow this whole­sale destruc­tion. The for­est, water, cli­mate and cul­ture are all too pre­cious to lose – and we won’t take this lying down.”

The Leard For­est Alliance is a group made up of local farm­ers, promi­nent envi­ron­men­tal groups with a treaty of pro­tec­tion with the Gomeroi tra­di­tion­al cus­to­di­ans of  the area. Over 300 peo­ple have been arrest­ed since the cam­paign began over 2 and half years ago.

UPDATE 09:00: Reg­u­lar police have arrived – no Police Resuce yet. Ben remains in place.

UPDATE 14:30: Ben has just unfurled a ban­ner read­ing “White­haven Coal – No Water – No Future”

UPDATE 16:15: Police Res­cue have arrived on site.

UPDATE 16:35: Police Res­cue are try­ing to get to Ben with a Cher­ry Pick­er sup­plied by White­haven Coal.

UPDATE 17:00: Ben says Police Res­cue are tak­ing apart the bridge to get to him!

UPDATE 18:30: Police Res­cue have begun to cut off the now locked on Ben.

UPDATE 19:30: Ben has been arrest­ed and tak­en to Narrabri Police Sta­tion after 13 hours.

Fur­ther Infor­ma­tion:
Phil Evans, Leard For­est Alliance Spokesper­son, 0490 064 139

Twit­ter updates @FLACCoal and #Leard­Block­ade

Banner-Drop-1024x683

 

Decem­ber 16th, 2014

Protest Halts First Coal Train from Maules Creek Mine

from Front Line Action on Coal20141215_061108-e1418609338604

New­cas­tle, Aus­tralia 15 Decem­ber: A peace­ful block­ade has halt­ed the first train load of coal com­ing from the con­tro­ver­sial Maules Creek coal mine on its way to Newcastle’s Koor­a­gang Island coal export ter­mi­nals this morn­ing.

A group of 22 peo­ple met the train this morn­ing. Eight peo­ple have occu­pied and stopped the train and are refus­ing to leave.

The train was stopped dur­ing the night and delayed for over 6 hours by a pro­tes­tor who locked onto loco­mo­tives need­ed to push the coal over the Great Divid­ing Range. The 58 year-old pro­tes­tor, Bruce, from North­ern Rivers, has been arrest­ed. Speak­ing about why he took action, Bruce said:

“Australia’s response to cli­mate change is head­ed com­plete­ly back­wards. “If we can stop this new coal mine we set a prece­dent for the rest of Aus­tralia to stand up.”

Jonathan Moy­lan from Front­line Action on Coal said, “Over the last twelve months, hun­dreds of peo­ple have been arrest­ed slow­ing down con­struc­tion of the Maules Creek mine. The fate of our coun­try, and peo­ple every­where, depends on coal being left in the ground. In the absence of lead­er­ship from the indus­try or the Gov­ern­ment to shut down coal exports and pre­vent dan­ger­ous cli­mate change, ordi­nary peo­ple have tak­en extra­or­di­nary action to stop this mine.

“A grow­ing num­ber of peo­ple are stand­ing up to the coal industry’s plans to ship increas­ing vol­umes of coal and fuel dan­ger­ous cli­mate change. Doc­tors, peo­ple of faith, IPCC sci­en­tists and ear­li­er this month, for­mer Wal­la­bies cap­tain David Pocock, have all tak­en action to halt con­struc­tion at Maules Creek. Even Mal­colm Fras­er last week tweet­ed about Maules Creek, refer­ring to the coal sec­tor as an ‘indus­try of a past age’.

Local New­cas­tle moth­er, Vanes­sa Wieb­ford said, “I want my daugh­ter to have a future with­out the hor­ror of extreme heat and fire, and uncer­tain water and food pro­duc­tion. I am bit­ter­ly dis­ap­point­ed in Australia’s polit­i­cal lead­er­ship and their unthink­ing sup­port for expand­ed coal exports at a time when we’re already see­ing alarm­ing signs of dan­ger­ous cli­mate change.

“If they’re not going to act to pre­vent this, then all par­ents have a duty to risk arrest to try and stop it our­selves.

2014 is now expect­ed to break the record as the hottest year in Australia’s his­to­ry. Heat­wave con­di­tions were observed in many parts of the coun­try dur­ing our hottest spring on record this year, and the Bureau of Mete­o­rol­o­gy is pre­dict­ing a return to El Nino con­di­tions at a time when much of Queens­land and parts of New South Wales are already drought declared.

The burn­ing of coal export­ed from Aus­tralia is this country’s biggest sin­gle con­tri­bu­tion to cli­mate change, and pro­duc­tion and export of coal increased in the last 12 months.

“With the inter­na­tion­al cli­mate nego­ti­a­tions in Lima fail­ing to deliv­er the scale of action need­ed, peo­ple around the world will next year have to take their future into their own hands like nev­er before. Ordi­nary peo­ple are step­ping up to do what it takes to stop the fos­sil fuel industry’s dan­ger­ous expan­sion plans,” said Moy­lan.

UPDATE 6:00 am: Coal train is stopped.

UPDATE 8:15 am: The five activists have been low­er from atop the coal wag­on by police.

UPDATE 9:00am: The coal train starts mov­ing again after 3 hours at a stand still.

UPDATE 12:30pm: Four activists released after being processed at Waratah police sta­tion.

Media Enquiries

  • On the ground:  Jonathan Moy­lan: 0431 289 766    |    Vanes­sa Wieb­ford: 0409 021 976
  • Off-site: Char­lie Wood: 0427 485 233
  • Pho­tos Avail­able at: http://bit.ly/13nps8U

0iOzmMA

pPuBsR3

FANG Shuts Down Spectra Energy after Sit-in at Senator’s Office, US

Decem­ber 17th, 2014

The New Eng­land group Fight­ing Against Nat­ur­al Gas has con­duct­ed two rous­ing actions in the last two days against green­wash­ing, frack­ing, and ener­gy infra­struc­ture.

Decem­ber 17th, 2014

The New Eng­land group Fight­ing Against Nat­ur­al Gas has con­duct­ed two rous­ing actions in the last two days against green­wash­ing, frack­ing, and ener­gy infra­struc­ture.

Here is the state­ment from FANG:

On Wednes­day morn­ing a group of New Eng­lan­ders were arrest­ed for occu­py­ing and shut­ting down the offices of Spec­tra Ener­gy to protest the company’s plans to expand a net­work of fracked gas pipelines in the region.

The group deployed mul­ti­ple ban­ners demand­ing fun­ders divest from Spec­tra Ener­gy due to the impacts of the company’s projects to local com­mu­ni­ties and the cli­mate, with one of them hang­ing from a 24 foot tri­pod and refus­ing to leave.

“As long as Spec­tra is com­mit­ted to the busi­ness of dev­as­tat­ing local health and the cli­mate, we’re com­mit­ted to dis­rupt­ing their busi­ness.”

This action took place one day after a sit-in at Sen­a­tor Shel­don Whitehouse’s office. Anoth­er state­ment:

“A group of fif­teen police offi­cers just cleared the occu­pa­tion of Sen­a­tor Shel­don Whitehouse’s office. Peter Night­en­gale a pro­fes­sor of physics at URI was arrest­ed.

Every­one – please don’t think of Sen­a­tor White­house as a “cli­mate cham­pi­on” any­more. At least until he stops sup­port­ing the Spec­tra pipeline and he stops hav­ing cli­mate activists arrest­ed.”

 

Nine arrested in Newcastle blocking Maules Creek train

14 Dec 2014

Nine peo­ple have been arrest­ed after blockad­ing the first train load of coal com­ing from the Maules Creek coal mine at Narrabri to New­castle’s Koor­a­gang Island.

The train was stopped at Sandgate, near New­cas­tle, for more than three hours with police remov­ing five peo­ple from on top of one of the car­riages.

Ear­li­er this morn­ing a 58-year-old man was arrest­ed after lock­ing him­self onto loco­mo­tives, at Wil­low Tree, south of Tam­worth.

Jonathan Moy­lan from ‘Front­line Action On Coal’ said today’s protest is the lat­est in a long line of action against the con­tro­ver­sial Maules Creek mine.

“All the peo­ple who were occu­py­ing the rail line have been arrest­ed,” he said.

“So we imag­ine the train will con­tin­ue, seri­ous­ly delayed, from when it first left the Maules Creek mine.”

Act­ing Inspec­tor Mick Kel­ly said he is not against peace­ful protests, but the nine pro­tes­tors went too far.

“Police def­i­nite­ly sup­port protest­ing but in a peace­ful man­ner and cer­tain­ly with­in the bounds of the law,” he said.

“This protest here cer­tain­ly put lives at risk with the train trav­el­ling.

“It put stress on the train dri­vers and as a result it held up over one hun­dred trains.”

Police said the block­age pre­vent­ed around 100 trains from get­ting through.

Act­ing Inspec­tor Kel­ly said the pro­tes­tors are fac­ing a num­ber of charges.

“They did not com­ply with any police ver­bal direc­tions to get down and Police Res­cue were sum­monsed and as a result they even­tu­al­ly came down off the train,” he said.

“At the moment we are still look­ing at the charges, and inves­ti­ga­tions are con­tin­u­ing into that mat­ter.”

Hunting Badger: Police Offer £10,000 Reward After Bristol Anarchist Attacks

Decem­ber 6th, 2014

Decem­ber 6th, 2014

by Steven Mor­ris / The Guardian

It is the city of the sub­ver­sive street artist Banksy, a cen­tre for alter­na­tive lifestyles and under­ground pol­i­tics. Even the direct­ly elect­ed inde­pen­dent may­or, George Fer­gu­son, prais­es the anar­chic spir­it of Bris­tol.

But over the last four years the city and its envi­rons have been tar­get­ed by rad­i­cals who have not been sat­is­fied with non-vio­lent expres­sion and protest.

The police have revealed for the first time that they are link­ing more than 100 acts of van­dal­ism against police sta­tions, politi­cians, mil­i­tary bases, banks, multi­na­tion­al com­pa­nies, car deal­er­ships, rail­way lines, mag­is­trates courts and church­es believed to have been car­ried out by anar­chists. They have put a £10,000 reward on the head of one sus­pect­ed offend­er, a 27-year-old activist called Huw “Bad­ger” Nor­folk.

A per­ma­nent team of 10 detec­tives, work­ing under the code­name Oper­a­tion Rhone, has been set up to try to trace the per­pe­tra­tors and police have warned that it can only be a mat­ter of time before some­body is seri­ous­ly hurt or killed in one of the attacks. “I’m real­ly sur­prised that nobody has been injured so far,” said DCI Andy Bevan, who is lead­ing the search.

But Bristol’s long-estab­lished anar­chist com­mu­ni­ty is not tak­ing the police oper­a­tion lying down. The minor­i­tyre­spon­si­ble for the vio­lence has vowed to con­tin­ue the attacks. Many of the vast major­i­ty not involved have hit back at what they see as attempts by the police to prop up the estab­lish­ment, sup­press rad­i­cal­ism and split the com­mu­ni­ty. They are organ­is­ing demon­stra­tions against the police.

 

“The feel­ing is that they are using these attacks as an excuse for tar­get­ing any­one with alter­na­tive ideas. It’s not going to work,” said one anar­chist, who asked not to be named. “It is a strong, sol­id com­mu­ni­ty. That’s why the police can’t find the peo­ple they are after.”

Avon and Som­er­set police took the unusu­al step this week of nam­ing Nor­folk in con­nec­tion with two inci­dents. One was a van­dal­ism attack on the offices of the Bris­tol Post in August 2011 at the time of protests around Britain fol­low­ing the shoot­ing of Mark Dug­gan in north Lon­don. Win­dows were smashed and paint splashed over the front of the build­ing. The oth­er was an arson attack on a phone mast in Jan­u­ary 2013 that cut off tele­vi­sion, radio and mobile phone sig­nals to thou­sands of homes and busi­ness­es.

Nor­folk is a well-known and large­ly pop­u­lar fig­ure with­in the UK anar­chy scene. He was born in the leafy Bris­tol sub­urb of West­bury-on-Trym to David Nor­folk and Gill Gar­rett.

The Cam­bridge-edu­cat­ed David Nor­folk, 65, runs a con­sul­tan­cy advis­ing the nuclear indus­try. Gar­rett, 64, is a retired lec­tur­er and author of med­ical text­books and a well-known local poet. Ear­li­er this year she wrote a poem about wait­ing for her son’s birth and wor­ry­ing that an ear­ly spring would pre­cip­i­tate his arrival: “Delay your debut until spring has tru­ly come.”

Their daugh­ter, who is two years old­er than Bad­ger, fol­lowed a con­ven­tion­al career route, attend­ing uni­ver­si­ty and found find­ing work in health and social care.

In con­trast, after leav­ing school Huw Nor­folk moved from squat to squat, main­ly in Bris­tol, but at one point was liv­ing in the near­by For­est of Dean. For a while he helped run anar­chist book fairs in Bris­tol and helped out at a com­mu­ni­ty kitchen. “He’s a gen­tle, love­ly guy but com­mit­ted to the cause,” said one friend.

At the time of the attack on the Bris­tol Post he was believed to be liv­ing in a squat on Park Row in the cen­tre of Bris­tol but when police raid­ed the premis­es look­ing for him he had gone. While on the run, he post­ed a defi­ant open let­ter on the anar­chist web­site 325.nostate spelling out his world view and extolling the virtues of “proud lives of rebel­lion and com­pas­sion, recla­ma­tion and antag­o­nism, poet­ry and fire”.

He said: “I am one of those who sim­ply can­not and will not stom­ach the social, eco­nom­ic, moral, psy­cho­log­i­cal, phys­i­cal con­di­tions not of our mak­ing that we are born into at this point of his­to­ry. I have nev­er sought to dec­o­rate the walls of my cell with exam cer­tifi­cates, job pro­mo­tions, sports prizes, sta­tus sym­bols bor­rowed from the wealthy by our labour.

“I curse those who sell them­selves so cheap­ly to buy such unimag­i­na­tive dreams at the expense of a pos­si­bil­i­ty of a free­dom tru­ly of their own mak­ing. Since an ear­ly age this unwill­ing­ness and refusal has put me in con­flict, like count­less oth­ers, with that real­i­ty. And our under­stand­ing is grow­ing along with our fury.”

He signed off the 800-word let­ter: “Action replaces tears. For sol­i­dar­i­ty and self-organ­i­sa­tion, Huw ‘Bad­ger’ Nor­folk – just anoth­er fugi­tive.”

Since then police have found no trace of Nor­folk. They have linked him to the attack on the com­mu­ni­ca­tions mast in Jan­u­ary last year but now believe he may be lying low some­where else in Britain – or could be abroad.

They have pub­lished details of his appear­ance, includ­ing dis­tinc­tive tat­toos, but said he was known to change his appear­ance and use oth­er names.

Although the police have only iden­ti­fied the two inci­dents they want to speak to Nor­folk about, there are many more that the police have not linked to him. By far the most spec­tac­u­lar was an arson attack on a new police firearms cen­tre close to the Avon and Somerset’s force head­quar­ters in August 2013, which caused £16m of dam­age.

The spec­tac­u­lar arson attack on a new police firearms cen­tre in 2013
caused £16m of dam­age. Pho­to­graph: BBC

A group call­ing itself Angry Fox­es Cell claimed on 325.nostate that it had car­ried out the attack. “We left it with flames lick­ing high … It put smiles on our faces to realise how easy it was to enter their gun club and leave a fuck you sig­na­ture right in the bel­ly of the beast, with a curi­ous fox as our only wit­ness.”

The post claimed the attack was “also our way of mark­ing two years that Bris­tol anar­chist Bad­ger has evad­ed cap­ture” and added: “Stay free, keep fight­ing!”

There is no sign of the attacks stop­ping. Just before the Nato sum­mit took place in New­port, south Wales, in Sep­tem­ber this year a group call­ing itself “Ran­dom Anar­chists” set fire to an Air Cadet minibus in Bris­tol to high­light “the ways in which mil­i­tari­sa­tion works its way into the fab­ric of dai­ly life”.

The lat­est took place at the end of last month when five cars were torched in Long Ash­ton on the edge of the city. Four of the cars were parked on dri­ve­ways and police said they could eas­i­ly have put sleep­ing house­hold­ers at risk.

On the 325.nostate site the attack was claimed by “FAI Torch­es in the Night/Earth Lib­er­a­tion Front”. It said two of the cars had been linked to a multi­na­tion­al pow­er com­pa­ny and a provider of secu­ri­ty equip­ment; the oth­er three were high-end cars tar­get­ed to high­light the “green wash­ing” cha­rade of Bristol’s sta­tus as Euro­pean green cap­i­tal next year.

The police have stepped up their search for the attack­ers in recent months, anger­ing many with­in Bristol’s non-vio­lent alter­na­tive com­mu­ni­ty. One activist, Al, an office work­er in his 20s, who said his house was raid­ed by an “army” of Oper­a­tion Rhone offi­cers, dis­missed the police jus­ti­fi­ca­tion that they were try­ing to pre­vent any­one dying.

Arson attacks in Long Ash­ton last month destroyed five cars.
Pho­to from The Guardian

He argued that nobody had been hurt in the attacks – while peo­ple were dying in police cus­tody all the time. “If the police want to pre­vent deaths, they should leave us alone and start arrest­ing each oth­er,” he told the Guardian.

Al said: “I think that the police’s actions are an attempt to make it look like they’re doing some­thing. They care more about their image in the press than about the wel­fare of ordi­nary peo­ple. Their choice of who to tar­get is also polit­i­cal and feels like harass­ment polic­ing – mak­ing it clear that they know where we live and work, and that they can come into our homes and take what they want, when­ev­er they like.

“This hasn’t worked – I knew already that police are here to keep the rich in pow­er and keep us down. Since the raid, I also know that peo­ple in my com­mu­ni­ty will stand by me and sup­port me, what­ev­er the police try to do. I hope that they stop harass­ing peo­ple, but if they do not then they should know that it will only make us more unit­ed, and more angry.”

Last month a group of about 20 anar­chists turned up at the head­quar­ters of Avon and Som­er­set police’s CID and spe­cial oper­a­tions unit and made a nui­sance of them­selves as offi­cers arrived for work.

A let­ter was pub­lished on web­sites includ­ing that of the Bris­tol Anar­chist Fed­er­a­tion and Bris­tol Defen­dant Sol­i­dar­i­ty, signed by more than a dozen groups accus­ing the police of resort­ing to “des­per­ate” tac­tics to try to hunt down those behind the attacks.

It claimed the police had launched a “con­cert­ed effort to intim­i­date and divide us all,” adding: “A big part of their plan is to scare peo­ple into inac­tion and to cre­ate divi­sions between us. They hope to get us blam­ing each oth­er for increased sur­veil­lance to the point where some­one falls for their lies and starts talk­ing to the bad guys.”

Bevan said he believed only a small group of anar­chists was behind the attacks, argu­ing that if the group was a big one, some­one would have bro­ken ranks. He said the attacks were well planned and skil­ful­ly exe­cut­ed, sug­gest­ing the per­pe­tra­tors were organ­ised and intel­li­gent.

He was keen to empha­sise that the finan­cial impact was just one ele­ment, claim­ing that as well as putting human lives at risk, some of the inci­dents had caused envi­ron­men­tal dam­age.

Bevan insist­ed that the force was not try­ing to clamp down on Bristol’s counter-cul­ture or harass­ing peo­ple with alter­na­tive lifestyles. “That’s a fan­tas­tic part of the city. Avon and Som­er­set police sup­ports peace­ful protest. These attacks are some­thing quite dif­fer­ent.”