Fracking Lord’s Chelsea Mansion Drilled

The Big Rig Revolt kicked off at 8am Sat­ur­day with Frack Off Lon­don pay­ing a sur­prise vis­it to the Chelsea Man­sion owned by Lord Browne of River­stone and Cuadrilla. The Frack­ing Lord’s malign influ­ence has spread through­out the gov­ern­ment since he was appoint­ed to the role of recuit­ing busi­ness lead­ers to advise gov­ern­ment depart­ments. A vari­ety of oth­er actions are planned across the coun­try through­out the day.

Uncon­ven­tion­al gas, includ­ing Shale Gas, Coal Bed Methane (CBM) and Under­ground Coal Gasi­fi­ca­tion (UCG), are threat­en­ing to spread thou­sands of wells across the British Isles. The first appli­ca­tion for an uncon­ven­tion­al gas devel­op­ment in Britain, 14 sites with 22 wells and over 20km of pipelines, was sub­mit­ted to Falkirk Coun­cil by Dart Ener­gy. Most areas off the coun­try face some sort of threat and the cli­mate impli­ca­tions of these process­es are fright­en­ing.

Dressed in orange boil­er suits and wear­ing gas masks 6 cam­paign­ers from Frack Off Lon­don erect­ed a 20ft drilling rig out­side the home of Lord Browne to high­light the peer’s involve­ment in UK uncon­ven­tion­al gas devel­op­ment. The gov­ern­ment has just announced that they are end­ing their gentleman’s agree­ment with Cuadrilla to sus­pend frack­ing oper­a­tions in Lan­cashire and it could start again in Lan­cashire with­in months.

The gov­ern­ment has plans to sell off large parts of the coun­try next year for uncon­ven­tion­al gas exploita­tion. The Chan­cel­lor, George Osborne, is also expect­ed to announce the set­ting up of an Office of Shale Gas to expidite the process of frack­ing the coun­try. The gov­ern­ment is also plot­ting to short cir­cuit local plan­ning pro­cee­dures and green-light appli­ca­tions direct­ly from cen­tral gov­ern­ment, ensur­ing local com­mu­ni­ties have no chance to object.

WAKE UP CALL TO PROTECT THE COUNTRYSIDE FROM NEW PLANNING LEGISLATION

 

             THE  LOOSE ANTI OPEN-CAST NETWORK

 

WAKE-UP CALL TO PROTECT THE COUNRTYSIDE  FROM  LARGE SCALE MINERAL DEVELOPMENT ISSUED BY CAMPAIGN GROUP

 

             THE  LOOSE ANTI OPEN-CAST NETWORK

 

WAKE-UP CALL TO PROTECT THE COUNRTYSIDE  FROM  LARGE SCALE MINERAL DEVELOPMENT ISSUED BY CAMPAIGN GROUP

PR 2012 ‑15                                                                           28/1/12

Does a com­pa­ny want to dig a big hole near you? Is it inter­est­ed in try­ing to extract sand, clay. grav­el, stone or coal? If it is, and the site is going to be more than 100 hectares, then why not sug­gest to the own­er that they can side­step going to the Local Author­i­ty and have the plan­ning appli­ca­tion con­sid­ered by a new ‘fast- track’ method. Label it a ‘Nation­al­ly Sig­nif­i­cant Infra­struc­ture Project’ and it can then be decid­ed on, in a year, by a  Plan­ning Inspec­tor who, unlike local peo­ple and local­ly elect­ed rep­re­sen­ta­tives, will not know the site, will not be affect­ed and will not know you.

Far- fetched ideas?  Unfor­tu­nate­ly not. These ideas are part of the pro­pos­als in the Government’s Growth and Infra­struc­ture Bill now before Par­lia­ment. It will enable sec­ondary leg­is­la­tion to be passed that, in its present form , will allow an appli­cant to by-pass the local demo­c­ra­t­ic deci­sion mak­ing process and have their appli­ca­tion treat­ed as a Major Infra­struc­ture Project. The Gov­ern­ment have ini­ti­at­ed a pub­lic con­sul­ta­tion process on the pro­pos­al enti­tled  ‘Nation­al­ly sig­nif­i­cant infra­struc­ture plan­ning: extend­ing the regime to busi­ness and com­mer­cial projects: con­sul­ta­tion’ which can be down­loaded from here.

https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/nationally-significant-infrastructure-planning-extending-the-regime-to-business-and-commercial-projects

The Loose Anti Open­cast Net­work (LAON) has analysed what the effect would be if the leg­is­la­tion was in place now on open­cast mine pro­pos­als. There are 11 pos­si­ble or actu­al pro­pos­als for open­cast mines in Eng­land cur­rent­ly. Under these pro­pos­als, deci­sions about the four largest could be tak­en out of the hands of the Local Author­i­ty and giv­en to a sin­gle unelect­ed per­son to decide. Our Brief­ing Note “ Growth and Infra­struc­ture Bill: Pro­posed 100 Hectare Thresh­old” pub­lished along with this Press Release @

http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2012/11/503382.html

 out­lines fur­ther why The Loose Anti Open­cast Net­work argues against this pro­pos­al and urges oth­er com­mu­ni­ty and envi­ron­men­tal groups to urgent­ly study these pro­pos­als and voice their objec­tions.

All respons­es, on forms pro­vid­ed in the con­sul­ta­tion doc­u­ment, have to be in by 7/1/13.

About LAON

The Loose Anti-Open­cast Net­work (LAON) has been in exis­tence since 2009. It func­tions as a medi­um through which to oppose open cast mine appli­ca­tions. At present LAON links indi­vid­u­als and groups in N Ire­land (Just Say No to Lig­nite), Scot­land (Coal Action Scot­land), Wales (Green Val­leys Alliance, The Merthyr Tyd­fil Anti Open­cast Cam­paign), Eng­land, (Coal Action Net­work), Northum­ber­land, (Whit­ton­stall Action Group, Hal­ton Lea Gate Res­i­dents)) Co Durham (Pont Val­ley Net­work), Leeds, Sheffield (Cow­ley Res­i­dents Action Group), Kirklees, (Skel­mansthor­pe Action Group)  Not­ting­hamshire (Short­wood Farm Open­cast Oppo­si­tion), Der­byshire (West Hal­lum Envi­ron­ment Group, Smal­l­ey Action Group and Hill­top Action Group) , Leices­ter­shire (Minor­ca Open­cast Protest Group) and Wal­sall (Alumwell Action Group).

Con­tact­ing LAON

Steve Leary LAON’Ss Co-ordi­na­tor, at infoatlaon@yahoo.com

You can now fol­low LAON on Twit­ter @ http://twitter.com/Seftonchase

 

 

‘Tar Sands Oil Orgy’ blockades Canada House in London

Cana­da-EU Ener­gy Sum­mit dis­rupt­ed as Canada’s aggres­sive lob­by­ing threat­ens EU cli­mate leg­is­la­tion

Cana­da-EU Ener­gy Sum­mit dis­rupt­ed as Canada’s aggres­sive lob­by­ing threat­ens EU cli­mate leg­is­la­tion

This morn­ing an ‘oil orgy’ per­for­mance-protest dis­rupt­ed the Cana­da Europe Ener­gy Sum­mit, at Cana­da House, in Lon­don. The annu­al ener­gy sum­mit was host­ed by Cana­di­an High Com­mis­sion­er Gor­don Camp­bell and fea­tured top offi­cials from Shell, Total and Enbridge, along with Con­ser­v­a­tive Ener­gy and Cli­mate Min­is­ter John Hayes (who has recent­ly received media atten­tion for an alleged plot to pro­mote the anti-wind farm agen­da in the Coali­tion Gov­ern­ment). The aim of the event was to pro­mote Canada’s tar sands in Europe, and dis­cus­sions includ­ed how to deal with ‘pub­lic pol­i­cy risks’ such as impend­ing Euro­pean trans­port leg­is­la­tion which would dis­cour­age imports of high­ly-pol­lut­ing fuels like tar sands into the EU mar­ket.

At 8.30am, half an hour before the event was due to start, 30 pro­test­ers rushed to the steps of Cana­da House and blocked the entrance with their bod­ies and a huge ban­ner say­ing ‘Stop tar sands’. They then held a tongue-in-cheek ‘oil orgy’, fea­tur­ing danc­ing shad­owy rep­re­sen­ta­tives of the oil indus­try, and speech bub­bles with iron­ic pro-oil state­ments such as ‘Destroy the Fuel Qual­i­ty Direc­tive’, ‘Cana­da: emerg­ing ener­gy supervil­lain’, and ‘Gag cli­mate sci­en­tists’. The main entrance was block­ad­ed until after the event was due to start, forc­ing del­e­gates to be divert­ed around the protest through a back door.

Tar sands extrac­tion is dev­as­tat­ing ecosys­tems and tram­pling on Indige­nous rights. Wor­ry­ing­ly, Lon­don has become a hotbed of col­lu­sion for the Cana­di­an Government’s ‘dirty diplo­mats’ to schmooze with oil giants and pro­mote tar sands in Europe,” said Suzanne Dhali­w­al, from the UK Tar Sands Net­work. “With Europe nego­ti­at­ing new cli­mate leg­is­la­tion which would threat­en the high­ly car­bon-inten­sive tar sands indus­try, Canada’s lob­by­ing has become increas­ing­ly aggres­sive.”

The Cana­di­an Gov­ern­ment has recent­ly been exposed as mount­ing an unprece­dent­ed lob­by­ing cam­paign to under­mine the EU Fuel Qual­i­ty Direc­tive (FQD), which aims to reduce emis­sions from trans­port fuel by 6% by 2020, and would label tar sands-derived fuel as high­ly pol­lut­ing. “The Cana­di­an Gov­ern­ment is work­ing over­time to under­mine cli­mate poli­cies in Europe so that they can bar­rel for­ward with unfet­tered tar sands expan­sion,” said Han­nah McK­in­non of Cli­mate Action Net­work Cana­da (see Dirty Oil Diplo­ma­cy: The Cana­di­an Government’s Glob­al Push to Sell the Tar Sands). “There is no doubt that the tar sands are stand­ing in the way of Canada’s cli­mate promis­es, but they shouldn’t stand in the way of Europe’s as well.”

The UK Coali­tion Gov­ern­ment has been doc­u­ment­ed as sup­port­ing these attempts by the Cana­di­an Gov­ern­ment and British oil giants BP and Shell to under­mine the FQD.

We are already see­ing the impacts of cli­mate change around the world, and want to see the kind of lead­er­ship the Euro­pean Union is tak­ing to reduc­ing emis­sions from trans­port fuels. But the UK Gov­ern­ment is cosy­ing up to Cana­da to sab­o­tage key cli­mate leg­is­la­tion,” said Philip­pa de Bois­sière from Peo­ple & Plan­et. “We need to see the UK Coali­tion Gov­ern­ment take action on reduc­ing emis­sions rather than stay­ing tan­gled in their twist­ed love affair with big oil.”

The protest at Cana­da House was organ­ised by UK Tar Sands Net­work, Lon­don Ris­ing Tide, Peo­ple & Plan­et, Cli­mate Jus­tice Col­lec­tive, Cli­mate Rush, Occu­py Ener­gy, Envi­ron­ment and Equi­ty Group, and Cor­po­rate Watch, as part of a glob­al week of cli­mate action which includ­ed actions against the Key­stone XL tar sands pipeline in Wash­ing­ton DC and Texas.

Today’s per­for­mance-protest fol­lows a mass action by Peo­ple & Plan­et two weeks ago, which saw 400 stu­dents call on Deputy Prime Min­is­ter Nick Clegg from his Sheffield Hal­lam con­stituen­cy, to sup­port the FQD (‘No more sor­ries Nick’ mass action and e‑action).

anti BP sponsorship flashmob at british museum — report & pics

this after­noon, the ‘reclaim shake­speare com­pa­ny’ ran through some of their best per­for­mances in the great court hall of the british muse­um, cheered on by a flash­mob of up to a hun­dred cli­mate activists.

 

this after­noon, the ‘reclaim shake­speare com­pa­ny’ ran through some of their best per­for­mances in the great court hall of the british muse­um, cheered on by a flash­mob of up to a hun­dred cli­mate activists.

 

click pho­to for large ver­sion. some rights reserved. free for cred­it­ed non-com­mer­cial rad­i­cal use­age. oth­er­wise con­tact author.

today’s show marked the end of a series of gueril­la per­for­mances which took place this year at var­i­ous venues linked by their accep­tance of BP spon­sor­ship. these includ­ed the tate, the strat­ford roy­al shake­speare com­pa­ny, the nation­al por­trait gallery and the roy­al bal­let.

the british muse­um has been host­ing a “shake­speare: stag­ing the world” exhi­bi­tion which is BP-spon­sored. activists see oil com­pa­ny spon­sor­ship as an attempt to green­wash their brands and to mit­i­gate the immense destruc­tion caused by the deep­wa­ter hori­zon spill, the exploita­tion of the arc­tic, and the expan­sion of frack­ing and tar sands extrac­tion.

ear­li­er this year, the ‘reclaim shake­speare com­pa­ny’ infil­trat­ed the exhi­bi­tion and launched into a short per­for­mance lead­ing to the staged ejec­tion of the BP logo (aid­ed by muse­um secu­ri­ty) — see the video at  http://vimeo.com/46968930

(Short Edit) Reclaim Shake­speare Com­pa­ny at BP-spon­sored British Muse­um from rik­ki indy­media on Vimeo.

today, the group repeat­ed that per­for­mance, along with oth­er short activist plays pre­vi­ous­ly seen on the strat­ford stage and oth­er venues. the flash­mob, which at its peak grew to more than a hun­dred spec­ta­tors, many pre-armed with scripts, joined in the cho­rus “out damned logo”, as the actors play­ing BP execs were lift­ed and car­ried out of the hall.

unlike pre­vi­ous per­for­mances, the muse­um was aware of today’s plans, which had been made pub­lic.

as a result, vis­i­tors had to queue to enter via a spe­cial­ly erect­ed secu­ri­ty tent, and as well as a huge num­ber of secu­ri­ty staff, there were also more than a dozen police offi­cers, includ­ing mem­bers of the for­ward intel­li­gence team (dressed in nor­mal uni­form). muse­um staff pho­tographed the actors and flash­mob, both on the ground and from the gal­leries. oth­er plain clothed char­ac­ters were spot­ted, pre­sum­ably from the cor­po­rate spy com­pa­ny employed by BP to keep tabs on the activist groups.

despite the huge secu­ri­ty oper­a­tion, the per­for­mances were allowed to con­tin­ue, draw­ing the crowd round the grand court. the open­ing act was sig­nalled by a drum­mer, and the unfurl­ing of a large tar sands ban­ner. vis­i­tors to the muse­um stopped and watched and took leaflets, and the shake­speare exhi­bi­tion itself was closed by secu­ri­ty for a while as a pre­cau­tion­ary mea­sure.

after around 20 min­utes and some final speech­es, every­one left peace­ful­ly.

today also marked the 12th anniver­sary of the glob­al cli­mate activist net­work, ris­ing tide, so cel­e­bra­tions were held in a local pub.

 

 

for more info and to join future actions:
bp-or-not-bp.org
risingtide.org.uk
risingtide.org.uk/london
artnotoil.org.uk
no-tar-sands.org
rik­ki
- e‑mail: rikkiindymedia[At]gmail(d0t)com

Activists disrupt Shell greenwashing event

Ris­ing Tide activists have invad­ed the stage tonight at a Shell-spon­sored lec­ture at the Geo­log­i­cal Soci­ety!

The title of the lec­ture — “Geo­log­i­cal Aspects of Renew­able Ener­gy”; the *only* speak­er — a Shell employ­ee. Coin­ci­dence? Or per­fect oppor­tu­ni­ty for seri­ous green­wash­ing?

(The ban­ner says — “Shell Tar Sands = 55 years First Nations treaty vio­la­tions”)

Frack Off (London) Stage Die In Outside Shale Gas Conference

Mem­bers of the group Frack Off (Lon­don) staged a die in out­side the Respon­si­ble Shale Con­fer­ence in Lon­don. [1]  The con­fer­ence held at Hogan and Lovells explores the ben­e­fits of shale gas and informs investors of its chal­lenges.  Speak­ers include mem­bers of the shale gas indus­try from the Unit­ed States as well as senior mem­bers from Sta­tOil, IGas and the British Geo­log­i­cal Soci­ety.  It is believed that they are prepar­ing for the British Geo­log­i­cal Society’s lat­est esti­mate of shale gas with­in the coun­try. [2]

The demon­stra­tion comes with­in days of protest group No Dash for Gas’s end­ing their record occu­pa­tion of the West Bur­ton gas pow­er sta­tion. [3] Both these demon­stra­tions are part of the ongo­ing debate over the UK’s ener­gy future.  Last week Ener­gy min­is­ter John Hayes entered the fray by sug­gest­ing that there are enough wind tur­bines in the UK and that we need to invest in shale gas. [4]

The group says that the die in was to high­light the fact that burn­ing gas is not a clean fuel and that it will lead to us not meet­ing our cli­mate change tar­gets. Gideon George, a par­tic­i­pant in the demon­stra­tions says “Build­ing more pow­er sta­tions to run on shale gas only leads to more coal being burned as the price drops on the glob­al mar­ket. Instead of con­tin­u­ing to invest in dan­ger­ous fos­sil fuels, the gov­ern­ment needs to con­tin­ue to invest in renew­ables so that we can tack­le cli­mate change.  Oth­er­wise droughts and extreme storms like Hur­ri­cane Sandy will become com­mon­place.”

Frack­ing uses water and a mix­ture of chem­i­cals to extract shale gas from the ground. The process is cred­it­ed with reduc­ing the price of gas in the Unit­ed States. How­ev­er in the UK the process caused two minor earth­quakes in Lan­cashire.

END

Notes for Edi­tor
All pho­tos are cour­tesy of Guy Bell.  Please con­tact him for high res­o­lu­tion pho­tos – guy@gbphotos.com

[1]http://www.responsibleshale.co.uk/
[2]http://uk.reuters.com/article/2012/10/16/uk-shale-idUKBRE89F0JW20121016
[3]http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2012/nov/05/no-dash-for-gas-end-occupation
[4]http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/energy/9644558/Death-knell-for-wind-farms-Enough-is-Enough-says-minister.html

Frack Off (Lon­don) is a peace­ful direct action group cam­paign­ing against all forms of uncon­ven­tion­al fos­sil fuel extrac­tion.  They have per­formed street the­atre out­side DECC and co-host­ed last year’s ‘frack mob’ out­side the uncon­ven­tion­al gas con­fer­ence.

EF! Winter Moot 2013: 22–24th February, near Preston

A week­end get-togeth­er for peo­ple involved in eco­log­i­cal direct action, from fight­ing open­cast coal, frack­ing, GM, nuclear pow­er to road build­ing. There’ll be dis­cus­sions and cam­paign plan­ning – with the empha­sis on the tac­tics and strate­gies we use, com­mu­ni­ty sol­i­dar­i­ty and sus­tain­able activism.

A week­end get-togeth­er for peo­ple involved in eco­log­i­cal direct action, from fight­ing open­cast coal, frack­ing, GM, nuclear pow­er to road build­ing. There’ll be dis­cus­sions and cam­paign plan­ning – with the empha­sis on the tac­tics and strate­gies we use, com­mu­ni­ty sol­i­dar­i­ty and sus­tain­able activism. This year we’ll be in Lan­cashire…

 

Update: full trans­port details and pro­gramme at link below.

Read more

Video: Canadian Minister and Shell embarrassed over tar sands at climate conference

Watch the Cana­di­an Envi­ron­ment Min­is­ter and Shel­l’s UK Chair­man hav­ing their Lon­don con­fer­ence speech­es hijacked by our anti-tar sands stage invaders.

Watch the Cana­di­an Envi­ron­ment Min­is­ter and Shel­l’s UK Chair­man hav­ing their Lon­don con­fer­ence speech­es hijacked by our anti-tar sands stage invaders. See con­fer­ence del­e­gates laugh­ing as the min­is­ter is called “an agent from a rogue petro-state”, and Shel­l’s speech referred to as “world-class green­wash”.

Tar Sands Street Theatre Pictures

cam­paign­ers from the UK Tar Sands Net­work staged a dra­mat­ic piece of street the­atre out­side Chatham House. Con­fer­ence atten­dees, includ­ing Peter Kent him­self, were greet­ed by the dis­turb­ing spec­ta­cle of black-clad masked fig­ures rep­re­sent­ing Cana­da and Shell lit­er­al­ly ‘stran­gling’ cli­mate activists. The cam­paign­ers hand­ed out fly­ers and spoke to the con­fer­ence atten­dees, ques­tion­ing whether gen­uine solu­tions to cli­mate change that would end our depen­dence on fos­sil fuels, pro­mote cli­mate jus­tice and penalise high­ly-car­bon-inten­sive com­pa­nies could real­ly be on the table for dis­cus­sion at an event spon­sored by Shell and fea­tur­ing Peter Kent as a keynote speak­er.

Activists disrupt speeches by Canadian Minister and Shell Chairman

Today at a high-lev­el con­fer­ence on cli­mate change at Chatham House, Lon­don, two activists inter­rupt­ed first Peter Kent, Canada’s Envi­ron­ment Min­is­ter, then Shell’s UK Chair­man Gra­ham van’t Hoff, as they got up to make speech­es.

Today at a high-lev­el con­fer­ence on cli­mate change at Chatham House, Lon­don, two activists inter­rupt­ed first Peter Kent, Canada’s Envi­ron­ment Min­is­ter, then Shell’s UK Chair­man Gra­ham van’t Hoff, as they got up to make speech­es.

The first activist, Dan­ny Chivers, accused Peter Kent of being a ‘dan­ger­ous rad­i­cal’ and asked for him to be removed from the stage. The audi­ence respond­ed to the tongue-in-cheek speech – in which Kent was also referred to as an ‘agent from a rogue petro-state’ – with a mix­ture of laugh­ter and heck­ling, and the pro­test­er was able to speak for sev­er­al min­utes before being removed by secu­ri­ty.

Dur­ing the inter­ven­tion, Mr Chivers explained that Kent had clear­ly got into this cli­mate change con­fer­ence under false pre­tences. Far from being a leader on the issue, Kent is ded­i­cat­ed to pro­mot­ing the high­ly destruc­tive tar sands – despite the industry’s neg­a­tive impact on local indige­nous com­mu­ni­ties, and its poten­tial to emit enough green­house gas to tip the world over the edge into run­away cli­mate change. Kent also pulled Cana­da out of the Kyoto Pro­to­col and his coun­try con­tin­ues to lob­by fierce­ly against the inclu­sion of tar sands in the EU Fuel Qual­i­ty Direc­tive, which aims to reduce emis­sions from trans­port and has stalled as a result of Canada’s inter­fer­ence.

The sec­ond activist, Sophie Pre­ston, then rose as Gra­ham van’t Hoff was about to speak. She accused Shell – the spon­sor of the event – of being a ‘world-class green­wash­er’ whilst ener­get­i­cal­ly lob­by­ing against gen­uine nation­al and inter­na­tion­al cli­mate action. Shell is one of the largest oper­a­tors in the tar sands and plans to dou­ble its pro­duc­tion despite a legal chal­lenge from the Athabas­ca Chipewyan First Nation who claim their treaty rights have been vio­lat­ed. She too was removed by secu­ri­ty.

Ear­li­er that morn­ing, cam­paign­ers from the UK Tar Sands Net­work staged a dra­mat­ic piece of street the­atre out­side Chatham House. Con­fer­ence atten­dees, includ­ing Peter Kent him­self, were greet­ed by the dis­turb­ing spec­ta­cle of black-clad masked fig­ures rep­re­sent­ing Cana­da and Shell lit­er­al­ly ‘stran­gling’ cli­mate activists. The cam­paign­ers hand­ed out fly­ers and spoke to the con­fer­ence atten­dees, ques­tion­ing whether gen­uine solu­tions to cli­mate change that would end our depen­dence on fos­sil fuels, pro­mote cli­mate jus­tice and penalise high­ly-car­bon-inten­sive com­pa­nies could real­ly be on the table for dis­cus­sion at an event spon­sored by Shell and fea­tur­ing Peter Kent as a keynote speak­er.

The protest fol­lows a series of dam­ag­ing rev­e­la­tions about how close­ly the Cana­di­an gov­ern­ment, oil com­pa­nies such as Shell and BP, and some British politi­cians are work­ing togeth­er to fur­ther the high­ly-pol­lut­ing tar sands industry’s aims. Ear­li­er this year the Fuel Qual­i­ty Direc­tive – a key piece of EU cli­mate leg­is­la­tion that would dis­cour­age tar sands imports to Europe – stalled after inten­sive lob­by­ing by Cana­da and the oil indus­try result­ed in key mem­ber states, includ­ing the UK, not sup­port­ing it. Two weeks ago, Vince Cable, for­mer­ly Shell’s chief econ­o­mist, was revealed to be ‘Con­tact Min­is­ter for Shell’ with­in the UK Coali­tion Gov­ern­ment, fol­low­ing a Free­dom of Infor­ma­tion Request.

Dan­ny Chivers, said ‘Invit­ing Peter Kent and Shell to speak at a cli­mate change event is like ask­ing the Cook­ie Mon­ster and Homer Simp­son to address a con­fer­ence on healthy eat­ing. We know that in order to have a chance of pre­vent­ing run­away cli­mate change, we need to leave the tar sands in the ground, yet Cana­da and Shell are intent on heav­i­ly pro­mot­ing this insane­ly destruc­tive indus­try. They are part of the prob­lem and cer­tain­ly should not be held up as experts in a dis­cus­sion about effec­tive cli­mate solu­tions.’

Sophie Pre­ston, who is a Cli­mate Change and Pol­i­cy stu­dent, said: ‘I have been to Cana­da and seen first-hand the dev­as­tat­ing effects of tar sands oil extrac­tion on the local envi­ron­ment and Indige­nous com­mu­ni­ties whose rights are being vio­lat­ed. So I am very dis­tressed to find that lob­by­ing by Cana­da and Shell is now also scup­per­ing attempts to make effec­tive cli­mate pol­i­cy in the EU and inter­na­tion­al­ly. Until it has halt­ed all plans to expand the tar sands, Cana­da should be treat­ed as a cli­mate pari­ah, not invit­ed to the table to skew the debate.’