Activists disrupt speeches by Canadian Minister and Shell Chairman

Today at a high-lev­el con­fer­ence on cli­mate change at Chatham House, Lon­don, two activists inter­rupt­ed first Peter Kent, Canada’s Envi­ron­ment Min­is­ter, then Shell’s UK Chair­man Gra­ham van’t Hoff, as they got up to make speech­es.

Today at a high-lev­el con­fer­ence on cli­mate change at Chatham House, Lon­don, two activists inter­rupt­ed first Peter Kent, Canada’s Envi­ron­ment Min­is­ter, then Shell’s UK Chair­man Gra­ham van’t Hoff, as they got up to make speech­es.

The first activist, Dan­ny Chivers, accused Peter Kent of being a ‘dan­ger­ous rad­i­cal’ and asked for him to be removed from the stage. The audi­ence respond­ed to the tongue-in-cheek speech – in which Kent was also referred to as an ‘agent from a rogue petro-state’ – with a mix­ture of laugh­ter and heck­ling, and the pro­test­er was able to speak for sev­er­al min­utes before being removed by secu­ri­ty.

Dur­ing the inter­ven­tion, Mr Chivers explained that Kent had clear­ly got into this cli­mate change con­fer­ence under false pre­tences. Far from being a leader on the issue, Kent is ded­i­cat­ed to pro­mot­ing the high­ly destruc­tive tar sands – despite the industry’s neg­a­tive impact on local indige­nous com­mu­ni­ties, and its poten­tial to emit enough green­house gas to tip the world over the edge into run­away cli­mate change. Kent also pulled Cana­da out of the Kyoto Pro­to­col and his coun­try con­tin­ues to lob­by fierce­ly against the inclu­sion of tar sands in the EU Fuel Qual­i­ty Direc­tive, which aims to reduce emis­sions from trans­port and has stalled as a result of Canada’s inter­fer­ence.

The sec­ond activist, Sophie Pre­ston, then rose as Gra­ham van’t Hoff was about to speak. She accused Shell – the spon­sor of the event – of being a ‘world-class green­wash­er’ whilst ener­get­i­cal­ly lob­by­ing against gen­uine nation­al and inter­na­tion­al cli­mate action. Shell is one of the largest oper­a­tors in the tar sands and plans to dou­ble its pro­duc­tion despite a legal chal­lenge from the Athabas­ca Chipewyan First Nation who claim their treaty rights have been vio­lat­ed. She too was removed by secu­ri­ty.

Ear­li­er that morn­ing, cam­paign­ers from the UK Tar Sands Net­work staged a dra­mat­ic piece of street the­atre out­side Chatham House. Con­fer­ence atten­dees, includ­ing Peter Kent him­self, were greet­ed by the dis­turb­ing spec­ta­cle of black-clad masked fig­ures rep­re­sent­ing Cana­da and Shell lit­er­al­ly ‘stran­gling’ cli­mate activists. The cam­paign­ers hand­ed out fly­ers and spoke to the con­fer­ence atten­dees, ques­tion­ing whether gen­uine solu­tions to cli­mate change that would end our depen­dence on fos­sil fuels, pro­mote cli­mate jus­tice and penalise high­ly-car­bon-inten­sive com­pa­nies could real­ly be on the table for dis­cus­sion at an event spon­sored by Shell and fea­tur­ing Peter Kent as a keynote speak­er.

The protest fol­lows a series of dam­ag­ing rev­e­la­tions about how close­ly the Cana­di­an gov­ern­ment, oil com­pa­nies such as Shell and BP, and some British politi­cians are work­ing togeth­er to fur­ther the high­ly-pol­lut­ing tar sands industry’s aims. Ear­li­er this year the Fuel Qual­i­ty Direc­tive – a key piece of EU cli­mate leg­is­la­tion that would dis­cour­age tar sands imports to Europe – stalled after inten­sive lob­by­ing by Cana­da and the oil indus­try result­ed in key mem­ber states, includ­ing the UK, not sup­port­ing it. Two weeks ago, Vince Cable, for­mer­ly Shell’s chief econ­o­mist, was revealed to be ‘Con­tact Min­is­ter for Shell’ with­in the UK Coali­tion Gov­ern­ment, fol­low­ing a Free­dom of Infor­ma­tion Request.

Dan­ny Chivers, said ‘Invit­ing Peter Kent and Shell to speak at a cli­mate change event is like ask­ing the Cook­ie Mon­ster and Homer Simp­son to address a con­fer­ence on healthy eat­ing. We know that in order to have a chance of pre­vent­ing run­away cli­mate change, we need to leave the tar sands in the ground, yet Cana­da and Shell are intent on heav­i­ly pro­mot­ing this insane­ly destruc­tive indus­try. They are part of the prob­lem and cer­tain­ly should not be held up as experts in a dis­cus­sion about effec­tive cli­mate solu­tions.’

Sophie Pre­ston, who is a Cli­mate Change and Pol­i­cy stu­dent, said: ‘I have been to Cana­da and seen first-hand the dev­as­tat­ing effects of tar sands oil extrac­tion on the local envi­ron­ment and Indige­nous com­mu­ni­ties whose rights are being vio­lat­ed. So I am very dis­tressed to find that lob­by­ing by Cana­da and Shell is now also scup­per­ing attempts to make effec­tive cli­mate pol­i­cy in the EU and inter­na­tion­al­ly. Until it has halt­ed all plans to expand the tar sands, Cana­da should be treat­ed as a cli­mate pari­ah, not invit­ed to the table to skew the debate.’