President of Uganda threatens death to Protesters of Palm Oil land grab

Pres­i­dent Musev­eni of Ugan­da has joined his sup­port to Bid­co and Wilmar. call­ing for Bul­lets to be used against those who protest the Palm Oil devel­op­ment on the islands of Kalan­gala.

Pres­i­dent Musev­eni of Ugan­da has joined his sup­port to Bid­co and Wilmar. call­ing for Bul­lets to be used against those who protest the Palm Oil devel­op­ment on the islands of Kalan­gala. The devel­op­ment has meant that 10,000 heca­tres of vir­gin for­est has been destroyed leav­ing envi­ron­men­tal dam­age and eco­nom­ic hardhsip for the peo­ple. The words from Musev­eni come after a renewed protest against Bid­co began ear­li­er this year through twit­ter and Youtube. Fur­ther direct action against Vimal Shah the own­er of Bid­co is expect­ed soon.

Hawaii: Eight Arrested in Protest Against Mauna Kea Telescope

Sev­en women and one man were arrest­ed ear­ly on Wednes­day in the lat­est round of arrests in the ongo­ing bat­tle against build­ing a giant tele­scope atop a moun­tain many native Hawai­ians con­sid­er sacred.

The state depart­ment of land and nat­ur­al resources said 20 of its offi­cers arrest­ed the pro­test­ers on Mau­na Kea at about 1am. They were enforc­ing an emer­gency rule cre­at­ed to stop peo­ple from camp­ing on Mau­na Kea. The land board approved the rule in July, which restricts access to the moun­tain dur­ing cer­tain night­time hours and pro­hibits cer­tain camp­ing gear. It was prompt­ed by pro­test­ers’ around-the-clock pres­ence to pre­vent con­struc­tion of the Thir­ty Meter Tele­scope.

Pro­test­ers say offi­cers hauled them away while they were pray­ing. In video footage pro­vid­ed by the state, offi­cers are seen walk­ing toward a group of peo­ple hud­dled in a cir­cle and chant­i­ng. A man’s voice is heard say­ing: “Eh, they’re pray­ing you guys, they’re pray­ing.”

The footage shows offi­cers putting plas­tic hand­cuffs on women and putting them into the back of a vehi­cle. “Why do I have to have my hands behind my back,” a woman asked. “Because you’ll be placed in restraints, ma’am,” an offi­cer respond­ed.

The emer­gency rule, in place for 120 days, is intend­ed to make the moun­tain safe for pro­test­ers, vis­i­tors and work­ers of the 13 tele­scopes already on the moun­tain, the state said. Attor­ney gen­er­al Doug Chin told the land board that even though camp­ing is already pro­hib­it­ed on the moun­tain, a tar­get­ed rule is nec­es­sary because of bad behav­ior by some pro­test­ers – rang­ing from putting boul­ders in the road to threats and harass­ment – cre­at­ed unsafe con­di­tions.

The non­prof­it com­pa­ny build­ing the Thir­ty Meter Tele­scope hasn’t indi­cat­ed when there will be anoth­er attempt to resume con­struc­tion. Work­ers weren’t able reach the site dur­ing two pre­vi­ous attempts when they were blocked by hun­dreds of pro­test­ers, includ­ing dozens who were arrest­ed.

This was the fourth time tele­scope oppo­nents have been arrest­ed on the moun­tain.

Uni­ver­si­ty of Hawaii law school pro­fes­sor Williamson Chang has filed a law­suit seek­ing to repeal the rule, argu­ing it pre­vents tele­scope oppo­nents from legal­ly exer­cis­ing their rights to peace­ful­ly protest.

The Ka’apor of Brazil Use Bows, Arrows, Sabotage and GPS to Defend the Amazon from Logging

With bows, arrows, GPS track­ers and cam­era traps, an indige­nous com­mu­ni­ty in north­ern Brazil is fight­ing to achieve what the gov­ern­ment has long failed to do: halt ille­gal log­ging in their cor­ner of the Ama­zon.

Sep­tem­ber 10th, 2015

With bows, arrows, GPS track­ers and cam­era traps, an indige­nous com­mu­ni­ty in north­ern Brazil is fight­ing to achieve what the gov­ern­ment has long failed to do: halt ille­gal log­ging in their cor­ner of the Ama­zon.

The Ka’apor – a tribe of about 2,200 peo­ple in Maran­hão state – have organ­ised a mili­tia of “for­est guardians” who fol­low a strat­e­gy of nature con­ser­va­tion through aggres­sive con­fronta­tion.

Log­ging trucks and trac­tors that encroach upon their ter­ri­to­ry – the 530,000-hectare Alto Turi­açu Indige­nous Land – are inter­cept­ed and burned. Dri­vers and chain­saw oper­a­tors are warned nev­er to return. Those that fail to heed the advice are stripped and beat­en.

It is dan­ger­ous work. Since the tribe decid­ed to man­age their own pro­tec­tion in 2011, they say the theft of tim­ber has been reduced, but four Ka’apor have been mur­dered and more than a dozen oth­ers have received death threats.

Now the Ka’apor are seek­ing sup­port through NGOs and the media. Ear­li­er this month, the Guardian was among a first group of for­eign jour­nal­ists and Green­peace activists who were invit­ed to see how they live and oper­ate.

kapoor map

Reach­ing their land was a long haul. After fly­ing to São Luis, the cap­i­tal of Maran­hão state, it took more than eight hours to dri­ve along a pot­holed high­way flanked by cat­tle farms and palm plan­ta­tions before turn­ing off on to a bumpy dirt track through tracts of defor­est­ed land, until a dense thick­et of jun­gle marked the lim­it of Ka’apor ter­ri­to­ry.

The path was so close to the foliage here that branch­es con­stant­ly scratched and scraped the sides of our 4×4 until final­ly, just a few min­utes before mid­night, we emerged into a clear­ing bathed in moon­light.

This was Jax­ipuxiren­da, one of eight for­mer log­ging camps that have been tak­en over by the Ka’apor and set­tled by a hand­ful of fam­i­lies so the tim­ber thieves can­not return. It was very sim­ple; six thatched roofs under which fam­i­lies slept in ham­mocks.

Liv­ing in such out­posts is a sac­ri­fice. Longer-estab­lished vil­lages have elec­tric­i­ty, health cen­tres, foot­ball pitch­es and satel­lite dish­es. Jax­ipuxiren­da is bereft of such crea­ture com­forts.

But it is a key part of a dri­ve to regain ter­ri­to­ry, inde­pen­dence and respect – all of which have been steadi­ly erod­ed by log­gers for more than two decades. Alto Turi­açu, which cov­ers an area equal to Delaware or three times that of Greater Lon­don, is a vul­ner­a­ble and lucra­tive tar­get. Although 8% has already been cleared, the indige­nous land con­tains about half of the Ama­zon for­est left in Maran­hão state. This includes much sought-after trees, like ipê (Brazil­ian wal­nut), which can fetch almost £1,000 ($1,500) per cubic metre after pro­cess­ing and export.

Kaapor indians
Ka’apor Indi­ans set­ting up trap cam­eras in areas used by ille­gal log­gers to invade the indige­nous ter­ri­to­ry. Pho­to­graph: Lunae Parracho/Greenpeace

 

The Ka’apor asked the gov­ern­ment to pro­tect their bor­ders, which were recog­nised in 1982. Last year, a fed­er­al court ordered the author­i­ties to set up secu­ri­ty posts. But noth­ing has been done, prompt­ing the com­mu­ni­ty to organ­ise self-defence mis­sions.

In the morn­ing, one of the for­est guardians, Tid­i­un Ka’apor (who, like all of the lead­ers of the group, asked to have his name changed to avoid being tar­get­ed by log­gers) explains what hap­pens when they encounter log­gers.

“Some­times, it’s like a film. They fight us with machetes, but we always dri­ve them off,” he says. “We tell them, ‘We’re not like you. We don’t steal your cows so don’t steal our trees.”

The main weapons used by the Ka’apor are bows and arrows and bor­duna – a heavy sword-shaped baton. One of the group also owns a rusty old rifle. Most­ly though, they depend on greater num­bers.

Tid­i­un Ka’apor takes us to a charred truck and trac­tor that the group burned in a con­fronta­tion a lit­tle over a week ear­li­er and uses the ash­es to paint his face. “This gives us strength,” one of his asso­ciates says. The Ka’apor are thought to have set fire to about a dozen log­gers’ vehi­cles. Fur­ther along the road, they build a pyre of planks seized inside their land, douse it with gaso­line and then watch it burn.

Anoth­er of the group’s lead­ers Miraté Ka’apor says the use of vio­lence – which has result­ed in some bro­ken bones but no deaths among the log­gers – is jus­ti­fied. “The log­gers come here to steal from us. So, they deserve what they get. We have to make them feel our loss – the loss of our tim­ber, the destruc­tion of our for­est.”

Com­pared with the past, he said the mis­sions were effec­tive. “Our strug­gle is hav­ing results because the log­gers respect us now.”

But the log­gers also appear to be respond­ing with lethal force. On 26 April, a for­mer chief­tain, Eusébio Ka’apor was mur­dered by gun­men on his way back from a vis­it to his broth­er. Like most killings of indige­nous peo­ple and envi­ron­men­tal activists in Brazil, the crime has not been solved, but the dead man’s son has lit­tle doubt who is respon­si­ble and what they were try­ing to achieve.

Ka'apor 3
Ka’apor Indi­ans stand next to a log­ging trac­tor that they dis­cov­ered and set on fire inside the indige­nous ter­ri­to­ry one month before. Pho­to­graph: Lunae Parracho/Greenpeace

“He was a tar­get because [the log­gers] thought he was the main leader of the group,” said Iraun Ka’apor. “They thought the Ka’apor would stop if they killed him. But we will con­tin­ue with our work of pro­tec­tion. I’m not afraid. This is my home, my land, my for­est.”

Ten days before we arrived, Iraun received a death threat and was told that the bul­let that killed his father had been meant for him.

The author­i­ties in Maran­hão – the poor­est state in Brazil – warn the Ka’apor that although they are with­in their rights to pro­tect their land, it is ulti­mate­ly up to the state to resolve dis­putes over ter­ri­to­ry.

“The involve­ment of the Ka’apor in the defence of their ter­ri­to­ry against the log­gers should be under­stood as legit­i­mate defence, since the action of the log­gers puts their sur­vival at risk,” said Alexan­dre Sil­va Sarai­va, region­al super­in­ten­dent of the fed­er­al police. “But the pres­ence of the state is the only way to dimin­ish the agrar­i­an con­flicts and reduce homi­cides.”

Inside Alto Turi­açu, peo­ple are scep­ti­cal that the police and gov­ern­ment are will­ing to look after indige­nous inter­ests. Last year 70 Indi­ans were mur­dered in Brazil, a 32% increase on 2013, accord­ing to the Mis­sion­ary Indige­nous Coun­cil. In many cas­es the killings were relat­ed to land dis­putes with log­gers or ranch­ers. In their com­mu­ni­ty gath­er­ing, many Ka’apor expressed the belief that the author­i­ties were col­lud­ing in the sell-off of the for­est.

“We are very con­cerned,” Miraté says. “Even the local author­i­ties are involved. They grant licences to the sawmills and that encour­ages the log­gers. The way the bran­cos [white or non-indige­nous peo­ple] are organ­ised also pro­motes death. They make a prof­it from this.”

Gov­ern­ment offi­cials pre­fer to focus on the pos­i­tives: the slow­down in Ama­zon­ian defor­esta­tion rates over the past 10 years (though in Maranhão’s case this is large­ly because there is so lit­tle for­est left) and the progress made in bring­ing cul­prits to jus­tice. This year, pros­e­cu­tors in neigh­bour­ing Pará state have bro­ken up an ille­gal land-clear­ance ring and arrest­ed cor­rupt offi­cials in tim­ber-laun­der­ing syn­di­cates that sup­ply fake cer­ti­fi­ca­tion to log­gers. Else­where, satel­lite mon­i­tor­ing has helped to iden­ti­fy which landown­ers are tear­ing down or burn­ing the most trees, though this approach is of less use when it comes to the steady degrad­ing of the forests by inva­sive log­gers.

Pedro Leão, super­in­ten­dent for Iba­ma (Brazil­ian Insti­tute of the Envi­ron­ment and Renew­able Nat­ur­al Resources) insists his agency is already com­bat­ing the crim­i­nal organ­i­sa­tions behind ille­gal log­ging and cau­tions that it is “extreme­ly risky” for the Ka’apor to do the same. He said he hoped Iba­ma could make greater strides in the future by focus­ing on sawmills and pos­si­bly using GPS track­ers.

These are already areas where the Ka’apor are active. Dur­ing this month’s vis­it, Green­peace – which also helped the Guardian to reach the area – pro­vid­ed the com­mu­ni­ty with 11 cam­era traps, 11 GPS track­ers and two com­put­ers, worth a total of 20,000 reais (£3,480/$5,260).

Ka'apor image 5
A Ka’apor Indi­an sets up a trap cam­era in an area used by ille­gal log­gers. Pho­to­graph: Lunae Parracho/Greenpeace

Mari­na Lacorte, a for­est cam­paign­er with Green­peace Brazil, said the devices – which are usu­al­ly used to cap­ture wild ani­mals on film – were intend­ed to enhance the Ka’apor’s suc­cess in dimin­ish­ing ille­gal log­ging. “With the cam­eras, we hope to prove that at a cer­tain time and date in a cer­tain place, the trucks arrived emp­ty and left with tim­ber. We hope the devices can pro­duce more evi­dence to per­suade the author­i­ties to do some­thing to stop the log­ging and the con­flict and the mur­der.”

For many con­ser­va­tion­ists, the sig­nif­i­cance of the Ka’apor’s actions goes beyond their par­tic­u­lar case and puts them on the front­line of the bat­tle against cli­mate change. Brazil, like oth­er Ama­zon­ian coun­tries, has strug­gled to tack­le defor­esta­tion part­ly because envi­ron­men­tal author­i­ties are con­stant­ly out­num­bered and out­gunned by log­gers, ranch­ers and farm­ers.

Iba­ma – the main agency ded­i­cat­ed to pro­tect­ing the for­est – has about 1,500 rangers to mon­i­tor the Brazil­ian Ama­zon, an area that is more than half the size of the US. Many of them have mixed feel­ings about land clear­ance. Some are even in the pay of log­gers, as recent scan­dals have revealed.

By con­trast, indige­nous groups like the Ka’apor have the incen­tive and the man­pow­er on the ground to resist the dec­i­ma­tion of their forests. For them, this is not just a job, but a mat­ter of iden­ti­ty and sur­vival. The ben­e­fits can be glob­al. In a recent report, the World Resources Insti­tute not­ed that when indige­nous peo­ple have weak legal rights, their forests tend to become the source of car­bon diox­ide emis­sions, while those in a strong posi­tion are more like­ly to main­tain or even improve their forests’ car­bon stor­age. Under­lin­ing this, a research paper pub­lished last month in Sci­ence, notes that for­est dwellers are the best defence against log­ging and land clear­ance.

The dan­ger is that such groups might become involved in a proxy war against emis­sions with­out the tech­nol­o­gy, the fire­pow­er or the legal author­i­ty to over­come more pow­er­ful oppo­nents. But Miraté said the com­mu­ni­ty would pick and choose how and when to get involved.

“It’s not that we don’t under­stand tech­nol­o­gy. We can dri­ve cars and motor­bikes and we can use com­put­ers. But we want to do things our way, the Ka’apor way,” he said.

Ka'apor image 6
Ka’apor Indi­ans have occu­pied a site for­mer­ly used by ille­gal log­gers. Pho­to­graph: Jonathan Watts for the Guardian

The log­gers are not the only threat to the tribe’s sur­vival. Pre­vi­ous bat­tles with the author­i­ties and the spread of dis­eases brought in by out­siders reduced the pop­u­la­tion – which once stood at sev­er­al thou­sand – to lit­tle more than 500 at the low point in 1982. The com­mu­ni­ty has since rebound­ed – large­ly thanks to the recog­ni­tion of its ter­ri­to­ry – and it con­tin­ues to assert its cul­tur­al iden­ti­ty on a vari­ety of fronts.

While many oth­er indige­nous groups are plagued by alco­holism, the Ka’apor recent­ly intro­duced a ban on con­sump­tion of beer and spir­its (as well as vis­its by Chris­t­ian evan­ge­lists and polit­i­cal cam­paign­ers). If a mem­ber vio­lates the rule once, he gets a warn­ing; twice, he must face a full meet­ing of the tribe; three times and he is sen­tenced to work in the near­by town. In their rela­tions with the gov­ern­ment, the tribe insist­ed last year on being rep­re­sent­ed by a mem­ber of their own com­mu­ni­ty rather than a bureau­crat from Funai (the Nation­al Indi­an Foun­da­tion). They have also moved away from what they say is a Funai-led sys­tem of hav­ing a sin­gle vil­lage chief and instead revert­ed towards col­lec­tive lead­er­ship.

In edu­ca­tion, they have ensured that their chil­dren are taught entire­ly in Ka’apor rather than Por­tuguese until the age of 10. Most cre­ative­ly, they also recent­ly cod­i­fied their own cal­en­dar, which pri­ori­tis­es plant­i­ng, har­vest­ing and mat­ing sea­sons, as an alter­na­tive to the solar-based Gre­go­ri­an sys­tem. While they occa­sion­al­ly shop for rice, the Ka’apor says they are large­ly self-suf­fi­cient with crops of man­ioc, bananas, pump­kin and water­mel­on. They also raise chick­ens, and hunt wild boar, deer, capy­bara and par­rots – though only in cer­tain sea­sons to ensure wild pop­u­la­tions remain strong.

But Miraté fears the author­i­ties in Brasília are more con­cerned about the country’s non-indige­nous pop­u­la­tion and the pres­sure of a glob­al econ­o­my.

“We believe that what the Brazil­ian gov­ern­ment is doing now is wrong. They are fol­low­ing a pol­i­cy to fin­ish off the indige­nous peo­ple,” he warns. But “we want to do things our own way, to respect our own cul­ture. That’s the only way to sur­vive.”

by Jonathan Watts / The Guardian

Build gardens not prisons

The Reclaim the Fields Inter­na­tion­al Action Camp, attend­ed by 100–150 peo­ple

8.9.15

The cam­paign against a new mega-prison being built near Wrex­ham got a boost recent­ly when the Reclaim the Fields net­work held an action camp near­by.

The Reclaim the Fields Inter­na­tion­al Action Camp, attend­ed by 100–150 peo­ple, ran from 28th August to the 2nd Sep­tem­ber 2015 and was host­ed by a local anti-frack­ing site. Work­shops explored the links between land strug­gles, prison abo­li­tion and oth­er issues includ­ing gen­der, ani­mal lib­er­a­tion and free­dom of move­ment.

Peo­ple held evening noise demos at three pris­ons in the region in sol­i­dar­i­ty with those inside, leaflet­ted the local town, and pick­et­ed sev­er­al com­pa­nies involved in the mega-prison. Final­ly a block­ade of the con­struc­tion site held up lor­ries for over 4 hours with­out any arrests.

As any­one with expe­ri­ence of them knows, pris­ons are abu­sive places used to con­trol and threat­en peo­ple, par­tic­u­lar­ly those of us who are work­ing class, peo­ple of colour, or dis­obe­di­ent. We need jus­tice process­es based on strong, vibrant com­mu­ni­ties, not more pris­ons and cops harm­ing our com­mu­ni­ties.

The new prison would be the biggest in the UK, and the sec­ond biggest in Europe. It aims to open in 2017 and would give the State enough cages to lock up an extra 2100 peo­ple.

Mean­while, Robert King of the Ango­la 3 will give a talk on strug­gle and rev­o­lu­tion in the US prison sys­tem, on Wed 16 Sep in Dundee.

Com­mu­ni­ty Action on Prison Expan­sion | Reclaim the Fields UK | Gar­dens not Cages | Frack Free Wrex­ham | Bor­ras Com­mu­ni­ty Pro­tec­tion Camp

No Gold, No Masters: Press release of the 1st “Beyond Europe” Camp in Halkidiki #skouries

On Sun­day, the August 2015, about 2000 peo­ple attend­ed on a demon­stra­tion in the moun­tains of Skouries.

August 27th, 2015

On Sun­day, the 23rd August 2015, about 2000 peo­ple attend­ed on a demon­stra­tion in the moun­tains of Skouries. Dur­ing this heavy clash­es between demon­stra­tors and the police took place, with police mak­ing mas­sive use of tear­gas and shock grenades. 78 per­sons were detained, of which four are still being held in cus­tody.

The demon­stra­tion was organ­ised by the anti-author­i­tar­i­an plat­form against cap­i­tal­ism, Beyond Europe, togeth­er with activist com­mit­tees of the local vil­lages in the area of Skouries. This protest march was the prac­ti­cal cul­mi­na­tion of the inter­na­tion­al Beyond Europe camp, which has been tak­ing place at the beach of Ieris­sos close to the area of Skouries. At this camp, 400–500 anti-author­i­tar­i­ans from all over Europe came togeth­er in order to exchange ideas with each oth­er and dis­cuss polit­i­cal analy­ses and prac­tices. The loca­tion was cho­sen very con­scious­ly in order to sup­port the ongo­ing eco­log­i­cal-social strug­gles against the extrac­tion of gold and oth­er heavy met­als in Skouries. and of course we are not only active on behalf of but along­side the local activists. For a long time now, Beyond Europe activists have been engaged in prac­ti­cal sol­i­dar­i­ty and sup­port for this strug­gle. It has a strong impact for social move­ments in Greece and the whole of Europe as an impor­tant front­line in the strug­gle against the recon­fig­u­ra­tion of Euro­pean cap­i­tal­ism through the Troi­ka on the back of the many.

Photo from Stratosphere (Twitter)

For us, the camp and espe­cial­ly the demon­stra­tion is a polit­i­cal suc­cess, by being set in the right place at the right time. In Jan­u­ary 2015 the left par­ty Syriza took over pow­er and evoked hope in many Left­ists. Con­cern­ing the issue of Skouries, Syriza played the role of the par­ty of the move­ment dur­ing oppo­si­tion, but has act­ed very dif­fer­ent since it has been in pow­er. Short­ly before the march the Alex­is Tsipras’ gov­ern­ment resigned, only two days after the start of the Beyond Europe camp and since Syriza had learned about our demon­stra­tion. Mean­while the ener­gy min­is­ter Panos Skourletis ordered to sus­pend the min­ing oper­a­tions in Chalkidi­ki on 19th August, claim­ing the com­pa­ny vio­lat­ed envi­ron­men­tal con­tract terms. We attribute the announce­ment to close the mine as a result of us choos­ing to organ­ise a camp here, but we did not rely on the government’s announce­ment as being the end of the strug­gle– which we have seen to be jus­ti­fied. One day after the announce­ment, dur­ing our walk from the camp to the moun­tain by the vil­lage Mega­li Pana­gia we could see that the works at the mines were con­tin­u­ing. This was just one more expres­sion of the most basic but impor­tant les­son in the ques­tions of rela­tion between par­ties and the move­ments: although they may improve tiny things with­in their lim­it­ed capac­i­ty, the pos­si­bil­i­ty to cre­ate real progress and eman­ci­pa­tion lies in our hands. Del­e­gat­ing desires for change towards par­ties will always be a dead end, since par­ties in pow­er will always need to work to enact nation­al inter­est. We agree with Syriza that the mines in Skouries need to be closed, but it is up to us to ful­fill this task. Our action sent this mes­sage to any par­ty which will take pow­er in the Greek re-elec­tions in Sep­tem­ber.

Sunday’s demon­stra­tion put the impor­tant and vital strug­gle of Skouries back on the table. Its impact was felt deeply all over Greece and beyond. We see this as a polit­i­cal suc­cess as now, since the first time after the huge gen­er­al strike of 2012, a new polit­i­cal dynam­ic from below is being cre­at­ed in Greece. After a drought of social move­ments since that year, Syriza’s seizure of pow­er seemed to have par­a­lyzed large parts of it due to a posi­tion of grant­i­ng the Tsipras’ gov­ern­ment time. Our camp and demon­stra­tion was an effort to put an end to this drought and rely on our strongest weapon – self-organ­i­sa­tion and social strug­gles.

As always when social strug­gles are effec­tive, the state’s repres­sion also con­tin­ued yes­ter­day. In the sev­er­al years in the ongo­ing issue of Skouries, police and secret ser­vices have been heav­i­ly try­ing to oppress the local move­ment by harass­ment, arrests and juridi­cal pros­e­cu­tion. Yes­ter­day again, the police vio­lent­ly dis­persed the demon­stra­tion, arrest­ed 78 peo­ple and injured sev­er­al. One per­son suf­fered a bro­ken leg while being arrest­ed by the cops. Our wish­es for a quick recov­ery are with her and with every­one else suf­fer­ing beat­ing or gas injuries. And of course we are in sol­i­dar­i­ty with the four still detained, as well as all the oth­er activists being pros­e­cut­ed in the last years. This might only have been a small step towards an anti-author­i­tar­i­an organ­i­sa­tion beyond bor­ders and against the sad­ness of real exist­ing cap­i­tal­ism, but it was a step nonethe­less. And there is more to come.

from beyondeurope.net

Turkish Army Burns Down Forests in Kurdistan – Call for an International Delegation!

With the restart of the war in North-Kur­dis­tan by Turk­ish state in end of July 2015 the Turk­ish Army has start­ed to burn down forests.

With the restart of the war in North-Kur­dis­tan by Turk­ish state in end of July 2015 the Turk­ish Army has start­ed to burn down forests. After 2,5 years of nego­ti­a­tions about the start of a peace process between the Turk­ish gov­ern­ment and the Kur­dish Free­dom Move­ment, the Turk­ish side decid­ed to attack the PKK Guer­ril­la HPG (Peo­ples Defense Forces) and legal polit­i­cal activists.

In a planned and sys­tem­at­ic man­ner the Turk­ish Army shoots with muni­tion and bombs which result in for­est fires. Par­tic­u­lar­ly in the provinces of Der­sim (Tunceli), Sirnex (Şır­nak) and Amed (Diyarbakır) the Army has burned down sev­er­al eco­log­i­cal­ly high­ly sen­si­tive forests in its oper­a­tions against the HPG. There­by the Turk­ish Army hopes to lim­it the mobil­i­ty of HPG. This method in fight­ing the long-last­ing Kur­dish rebel­lion has been used wide­ly already in the 90’s in North-Kur­dis­tan. Almost every greater for­est in the con­test­ed regions has been burned down in that years.

The most for­est fires have been ini­ti­at­ed in areas which have been declared by the Turk­ish gov­ern­ment as “secu­ri­ty areas” just after the restart of the war. That is why local peo­ple and activists – like from our move­ment – have been hin­dered by the Turk­ish Army to go to the affect­ed areas and try to extin­guish the fires. These ini­tia­tives have been cre­at­ed while the respon­si­ble gov­ern­men­tal bod­ies did not act. We assume that they have been instruct­ed by the gov­ern­ment not to inter­vene. To date sev­er­al hun­dred hectares of forests have been burnt down in North-Kur­dis­tan where the main tree type is the oak.

We call on the inter­na­tion­al polit­i­cal activists, social move­ments and NGO’s work­ing on eco­log­i­cal issues to join an inter­na­tion­al del­e­ga­tion. This del­e­ga­tion could inves­ti­gate the dimen­sion and impacts of the for­est fires of the last weeks, the sub­se­quent behav­ior of Turk­ish offi­cials, the efforts of locals to extin­guish the fires and if exist­ing the ongo­ing fires and inform the inter­na­tion­al pub­lic based on their obser­va­tions. We think that the extreme­ly destruc­tive behav­ior of the Turk­ish State in this dirty war must be treat­ed also on inter­na­tion­al lev­el. The peri­od for the inter­na­tion­al del­e­ga­tion is planned from the 8th to the 12th Sep­tem­ber 2015. Write us in case of inter­est.

Ercan Aybo­ga
for the Mesopotami­an Ecol­o­gy Move­ment

Con­tact:
email: e.ayboga@gmx.net
fb: www.facebook.com/mezopotamyaekolojihareketi

Sources about the fires:
Al-Mon­i­tor, 21.07.2015: http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2015/07/turkey-kurds-pkk-forest-fires-cause-political-mayhem.html
Firat News Agency, 05.08.2015: http://en.firatajans.com/kurdistan/forest-fires-caused-by-turkish-army-expand
Kur­dish Dai­ly News, 09.08.2015: http://kurdishdailynews.org/2015/08/09/forest-fires-caused-by-turkish-airstrikes-in-zap-and-xakurke/

Germany: Last Living Barricade in Hambach Forest Evicted; Freedom for Jus!

Ger­many: Last Liv­ing Bar­ri­cade in Ham­bach For­est Evict­ed

July 28th, 2015

On the 22nd of July the tow­er – to this date the only remain­ing liv­ing bar­ri­cade – got evict­ed. The tow­er blocked an impor­tant access way to the Ham­bach For­est [pre­vi­ous­ly on S!N]and its occu­pa­tion.

Dur­ing the 14 hours of the evic­tion, four activists were arrest­ed of who three have been released, while one is in deten­tion await­ing tri­al in the JVA (jail) in Köln-Ossendorf. Jus is accused of resist­ing the evic­tion. The cops are try­ing to jus­ti­fy the deten­tion by claim­ing that Jus doesn‘t have a legal address and alleged­ly “no social oblig­a­tions in Ger­many”. There­fore, they think that it’s like­ly that he will “stay away from tri­al”.

Innu Blockade Hydro-Quebec Construction in Northern Quebec

pho­to thanks to War­rior Pub­li­ca­tions

July 17th, 2015

Quebec’s Min­is­ter of Abo­rig­i­nal Affairs is urg­ing mem­bers of Natashquan’s Innu Com­mu­ni­ty to stop their block­ade near the La Romaine con­struc­tion site.

The group of pro­test­ers set up a bar­ri­cade Thurs­day near Havre-Saint-Pierre in east­ern Que­bec, about 200 kilo­me­tres east of Sept-Îles.

It says Hydro-Québec is not respect­ing an agree­ment it signed with the com­mu­ni­ty before work on the hydro­elec­tric project began.

The pro­test­ers have been let­ting work­ers out of the site, but they say they will not let any­one in until Pre­mier Philippe Couil­lard speaks with them in per­son on the North Shore.

Rodrigue Wapis­tan, the chief of Natashquan’s Innu band coun­cil, said Hydro-Québec has flood­ed basins near the work­site with­out the community’s con­sent.

He said that will drown more than half the trees in the area.

“They have com­plete­ly tram­pled on our rights. It is some­thing that is unac­cept­able in my book — all while cre­at­ing a sit­u­a­tion that is cat­a­stroph­ic for our next gen­er­a­tion,” Wapis­tan said.

Abo­rig­i­nal Affairs Min­is­ter Geoff Kel­ley said he recog­nis­es there are dif­fer­ences between the Innu com­mu­ni­ty and Hydro-Québec, but said pro­test­ers should try to resolve its issues through nego­ti­a­tions.

from CBC News

Panama: Indigenous Activists Block Entry to the Barro Blanco Hydro Dam

Ngäbe activists stand­ing in front of the Bar­ro Blan­co dam site

Ngäbe activists stand­ing in front of the Bar­ro Blan­co dam site (Pho­to Jen­nifer Kennedy)

July 14th, 2015

A 30-strong splin­ter group of Ngäbe from the M10 resis­tance move­ment has blocked the entrance to the Bar­ro Blan­co hydro­elec­tric dam in west­ern Pana­ma, pre­vent­ing work­ers from enter­ing the site. The 15 year strug­gle of the Tabasará riv­er com­mu­ni­ties to pro­tect their liveli­hoods, their cul­ture, and their ances­tral her­itage now appears to be enter­ing a tense new phase. With nego­ti­a­tions exhaust­ed and the dam 95% com­plete, M10 has an issued an ulti­ma­tum for the gov­ern­ment to can­cel the project by Mon­day, June 15, 2015. It is unclear how the gov­ern­ment will respond.

“Being Ngäbe-Buglé cul­tur­al pat­ri­mo­ny,” said Clementi­na Pérez, part of the group camped at Bar­ro Blanco’s gates. “Our riv­er, our moth­er earth, our ecol­o­gy, our exis­tence, we are here to make known to the nation­al and inter­na­tion­al com­mu­ni­ty that this pat­ri­mo­ny belongs to us and to the church of Mama Tata. With the con­ser­va­tion of peace, lib­er­ty, jus­tice and uni­ty, lib­er­a­tion and social jus­tice… [we ask] the Pres­i­dent of the Repub­lic the can­cel­la­tion and removal of the dam from our com­mu­ni­ties, our riv­er and our moth­er earth, which belong to us as orig­i­nal peo­ple of the Americas…”Funded by Euro­pean banks – the Ger­man Invest­ment Cor­po­ra­tion (DEG) and the Dutch Devel­op­ment Bank (FMO) – the dam is set to inun­date a string of Ngäbe and campesino com­mu­ni­ties, all of whom have voiced their objec­tions from the out­set. The flood will destroy ances­tral pet­ro­glyphs, fer­tile agri­cul­tur­al grounds, and Mama Tata cul­tur­al cen­tres, includ­ing a unique school where the emerg­ing writ­ten script of the Ngäbere lan­guage is being devel­oped and dis­sem­i­nat­ed. The dam will sig­nif­i­cant­ly impact the river’s marine life, wip­ing out migra­to­ry fish species which many com­mu­ni­ties – both up and down stream – rely upon for essen­tial pro­tein. None of the Tabasará com­mu­ni­ties have pro­vid­ed their free, informed and pri­or con­sent to the dam, a fact recent­ly con­firmed by the FMO’s own inde­pen­dent com­plaints mech­a­nism (ICM).

“Lenders should have sought greater clar­i­ty on whether there was con­sent to the project from the appro­pri­ate indige­nous author­i­ties pri­or to project approval,” said an ICM report, pub­lished on May 29, 2015. “[The plan] con­tains no pro­vi­sion on land acqui­si­tion and reset­tle­ment and noth­ing on bio­di­ver­si­ty and nat­ur­al resources man­age­ment. Nei­ther does it con­tain any ref­er­ence to issues relat­ed to cul­tur­al her­itage…”

The report is the lat­est in a series of pro­fes­sion­al analy­ses that pour a thick lay­er of scorn over the dam project’s own­er, Gen­er­ado­ra del Ist­mo (GENISA). Demon­stra­bly unlaw­ful, GENISA has been con­demned by numer­ous inde­pen­dent inves­ti­ga­tors, the Unit­ed Nations, sev­er­al inter­na­tion­al NGOs, and Panama’s own envi­ron­men­tal agency, ANAM, who found a raft of flaws and short-com­ings in their envi­ron­men­tal impact assess­ment.

But despite fail­ing their own due dili­gence, the banks appear to have shrugged off the ICM report with an insipid call for ‘con­struc­tive dia­logue’ and ‘a solu­tion for a way for­ward’. In Feb­ru­ary this year, the FMO chose to threat­en the gov­ern­ment of Pana­ma after build­ing work was tem­porar­i­ly sus­pend­ed on the rec­om­men­da­tion of ANAM. Writ­ing to the Vice Pres­i­dent, the FMO warned that the sus­pen­sion “May weigh upon future invest­ment deci­sions, and harm the flow of long-term invest­ments into Pana­ma.”

The gov­ern­ment seems to have tak­en this threat to heart. Panama’s pres­i­dent, Juan Car­los Varela, who was elect­ed to office in 2014, flip-flopped on Bar­ro Blan­co before final­ly falling in line. Last week, while prof­fer­ing flim­sy reas­sur­ances about hav­ing found a human rights solu­tion, his gov­ern­ment left the nego­ti­at­ing table and sig­naled an end to the sus­pen­sion of works. M10 claims the work nev­er stopped and has been con­tin­u­ing clan­des­tine­ly. They are now mobil­is­ing for action.

Clementi­na Perez (Pho­to: Oscar Sogan­dares)

“If this sit­u­a­tion is not resolved,” said Clementi­na Pérez, “We will go to the Panamer­i­can high­way to ask togeth­er, at a nation­al lev­el, the can­cel­la­tion of Bar­ro Blan­co…”

Ris­ing with stark grey walls above the denud­ed banks of the Tabasará, Bar­ro Blan­co has become a sym­bol of the pre­vi­ous admin­is­tra­tion, its fun­da­men­tal vio­lence and con­tempt for the rule of law. The for­mer Pres­i­dent Ricar­do Mar­tinel­li – now on the run in the Unit­ed States and fac­ing a cor­rup­tion probe back home – pro­voked no less than four major upris­ings as he grasped for land and resources in Panama’s indige­nous ter­ri­to­ries. Heavy-hand­ed repres­sion result­ed in the deaths of sev­er­al pro­test­ers and bystanders, includ­ing an unarmed teenage boy who was shot in the face by police. Bar­ro Blan­co is the vis­i­ble lega­cy of a proud­ly thug­gish Pres­i­dent who seri­al­ly abused Panama’s Indige­nous Peo­ples and plun­dered the coun­try at will. Thus far, Varela has been keen to strike a more decent and humane tone. How he now han­dles the cri­sis evolv­ing on the banks of the Tabasará Riv­er will be a demon­stra­tion of his sin­cer­i­ty, or lack of.

by  IC Mag­a­zine

Turkey: Environmentalists Block Road to Mining Company

A group of locals and envi­ron­men­tal­ist activists blocked the road to an untouched forest­ed area in the Black Sea province of Artvin to pre­vent the activ­i­ties of a min­ing firm.

Activists and locals guard the moun­tain­ous forests of Artvin in sep­a­rate loca­tions to pre­vent Forestry Min­istry offi­cials from enter­ing the area.

Artvin Forestry Min­istry offi­cials, how­ev­er, aim to enter the area in order to make cal­cu­la­tions to com­plete the pro­ce­dures for the firm to start its work in the area. Min­istry offi­cials attempt­ed to enter the area from a dif­fer­ent path, after their pre­vi­ous attempt was stopped by the activists’ road block.

Local activists, who orga­nized them­selves via social media in a short time, gath­ered in the Cer­at­te­pe neigh­bor­hood, which is locat­ed at an alti­tude of 1,800 meters. They moved trees cut by the forestry offi­cials to the road and blocked traf­fic, stop­ping the entry of the offi­cials. They have tak­en pic­tures with the tree bar­ri­cades they have made and shared them via social media. The group called itself “300 Cer­at­te­peli” in ref­er­ence to the leg­end of 300 Spar­tans who stood their ground against the Per­sians, immor­tal­ized in the movie “300.” They are deter­mined at all costs to block any pos­si­ble con­struc­tion and min­ing work in the area. 

Green Artvin Association’s head Nur Neşe Kara­han said they had to walk the whole way to the forest­ed area, as it was blocked in sev­er­al loca­tions. “The road was blocked due to a col­lapse in the tun­nel. We had to walk 3 kilo­me­ters around it. We came across with the firm’s vehi­cle, as they are not using the well-known road any­more. They said offi­cials from the firm will come here and we are deter­mined to wait here to talk to them,” said Kara­han.

Hakan Akın, a shop keep­er in Artvin, said it is a promis­ing devel­op­ment for him to see many peo­ple could gath­er in the area min­utes after they heard rumors the firm would start work there.

“The experts said this area is not suit­able for min­ing. We are locals here. We already told them that it is not pos­si­ble for them to oper­ate here. This place is our green, this is where we live. We have giv­en enough to the dams; we will no longer allow any more con­struc­tion,” said Akın, among the group.

Hasan Yük­sel, a mem­ber of Green Arvin Asso­ci­a­tion, said they will con­tin­ue to hold their posts on mul­ti­ple roads in the Cer­at­te­pe neigh­bor­hood to pre­vent the entry of min­ing firms.

“They are wrong if they think we will give up.  They will come across an Artvin local on every cor­ner of these trees when­ev­er they come here,” said Yük­sel.

Main oppo­si­tion Repub­li­can People’s Par­ty (CHP) provin­cial branch head Ali Yücel Kurt also held a meet­ing in the area. He claimed that some peo­ple are also burn­ing the vehi­cles in order to pro­voke locals by blam­ing the locals for the arson. “We com­plete­ly deny such claims,” said Kurt.