Bombing against Bristol office of Vinci, Life Sciences Centre constructors

We think that any­one seri­ous about con­fronting dom­i­na­tion as it stands today will soon­er or lat­er come to the ques­tions of sci­ence and tech­nol­o­gy. It’s clear how both have an increas­ing­ly vital role to the rul­ing order by cre­at­ing, man­ag­ing and spread­ing con­trol with­in soci­ety and over the rest of an earth we’re false­ly sep­a­rat­ed from.

We think that any­one seri­ous about con­fronting dom­i­na­tion as it stands today will soon­er or lat­er come to the ques­tions of sci­ence and tech­nol­o­gy. It’s clear how both have an increas­ing­ly vital role to the rul­ing order by cre­at­ing, man­ag­ing and spread­ing con­trol with­in soci­ety and over the rest of an earth we’re false­ly sep­a­rat­ed from. By inves­ti­gat­ing the devel­op­ment of these pow­ers in the region and who makes it pos­si­ble, we came to Vin­ci.

In the U.K, the French multi­na­tion­al ener­gy and con­struc­tion giant Vin­ci car­ry out spe­cial­ist con­struc­tion ser­vices for the police, Min­istry of Defence and pris­ons, earth­works for motor­ways, rail­ways and quar­ry­ing, pow­er sta­tions, off­shore rigs and nuclear new-builds, as well as shop­ping cen­tres and the like. World­wide this cor­po­ra­tion and its sub­sidiaries are active in many fields: dam build­ing, pri­vate secu­ri­ty, air­ports, ura­ni­um mines; these scum have no prob­lem with inflict­ing car­nage on the earth and us as part of it, rais­ing an indus­tri­al cage around us both fig­u­ra­tive­ly and lit­er­al­ly, and feed­ing off the labours of their work­force while the boss­es line their pock­ets and move on to the next con­tract.

In these respects we attack Vin­ci any­way, but one of our main motives for tar­get­ing them is because they’re respon­si­ble for build­ing the new Bio­log­i­cal Life Sci­ences Cen­tre soon to open at the Uni­ver­si­ty of Bris­tol.

We set off an explo­sive at Vin­ci’s offices at Van­tage busi­ness park, north of Bris­tol, at approx­i­mate­ly 3:45 yes­ter­day morn­ing (6th Jan­u­ary). It was placed with the aim of cut­ting off pow­er lines, scorch­ing the exte­ri­or and start­ing a fire inside. We con­sid­ered the res­i­dent com­pa­ny in the next-door part of the unit a wor­thy sec­ondary tar­get in any dam­ages (White­head, anoth­er con­struc­tion and build­ing ser­vic­ing group who do com­mis­sioned work for Vin­ci).

A £54 mil­lion facil­i­ty, the Bio­log­i­cal Life Sci­ences Cen­tre will offer cours­es for “the next gen­er­a­tion of biol­o­gists” as well as cur­rent spe­cial­ists, aim­ing to improve col­lab­o­ra­tion with the uni­ver­si­ty’s nan­otech­nol­o­gy cen­tre and just across from the Med­ical School’s genet­ic engi­neer­ing, vivi­sec­tion and ani­mal breed­ing labs. The world cap­i­tal­ist sys­tem sees advances in fields like this as key to the next round of dis­cov­ery, enclo­sure and wealth cre­ation. As the area around Bris­tol and Bath hous­es the biggest hi-tech design clus­ter in the world after Amer­i­ca’s Sil­i­con Val­ley, this “rev­o­lu­tion” is hap­pen­ing on our doorsteps, “with Bris­tol being an excit­ing and ide­al place to car­ry out research over the com­ing years.” (This is in the words of Pro­fes­sor Gary Fos­ter, whose work at the Uni­ver­si­ty of Bris­tol in genet­ic-mod­i­fi­ca­tion and oth­er biotech­nolo­gies feeds the nox­ious phar­ma­ceu­ti­cal indus­try such as Glax­o­SmithK­line. The uni­ver­si­ty breeds genet­i­cal­ly-altered mice, for exam­ple, then mor­bid­ly sub­jects these liv­ing crea­tures to exten­sive nerve dam­age and hand the results to drug com­pa­nies.)

One of the main thrusts of this dri­ve is syn­thet­ic biol­o­gy, a dis­turb­ing prac­tice using the lat­est tech­nol­o­gy for “rewrit­ing and rebuild­ing nat­ur­al sys­tems to pro­vide engi­neered sur­ro­gates.” In 2012 a con­fer­ence at the Uni­ver­si­ty of Bris­tol stat­ed that syn­thet­ic biol­o­gy “could become a dri­ving force of the nation­al econ­o­my,” and the gov­ern­ment have declared it a top research pri­or­i­ty. The Euro­pean Union has now award­ed £3.3 mil­lion to the Uni­ver­si­ty of Bris­tol just to cre­ate “pub­lic aware­ness” pro­mot­ing the prac­tice.

The log­ic of these kind of sci­ences has, as its pri­ma­ry goal, attempt­ed con­trol over every­thing. They reduce knowl­edge, that might be more deeply gained in wild rela­tion­ships of inter­ac­tion and inter­de­pen­dence, to a detached uni­verse of obses­sive mea­sure­ment and objec­ti­fi­ca­tion, arro­gant­ly sep­a­rat­ing parts from the whole that gives them mean­ing as if every­thing were mere­ly a machine to dis­man­tle. This sci­en­tif­ic tra­di­tion is close­ly tied up with the world­view that emerged dur­ing the ear­ly for­ma­tion of com­mer­cial cap­i­tal­ism, which sought and still seeks to adapt life­forms to the dri­ve for prof­its, jus­ti­fy the dom­i­na­tion and destruc­tion of the liv­ing world, and imple­ment a macho uber-ratio­nal­ism scorn­ful of every­thing frag­ile and organ­ic on which all species depend. Right now, plant and ani­mal genes are bro­ken down and opti­mised in labs so they suit pro­duc­tive stan­dards and to cre­ate new pri­vate prop­er­ty through patents. Where we might see the unique leaves, seeds, bod­ies and minds of our­selves and our fel­low crea­tures, this sci­ence (if not nec­es­sar­i­ly each sci­en­tist, the results are the same) just sees life­less objects to pick apart, study and sac­ri­fice on the altar of eco­nom­ic use­ful­ness to their pay­mas­ters who reap the ben­e­fits from this sick and sick­en­ing soci­ety.

For instance we can see the cur­rent push for genet­i­cal­ly-mod­i­fied (G.M) food in the U.K by the media, indus­try and gov­ern­ment, for which these research insti­tu­tions play an impor­tant part: such as advances in biotech­nol­o­gy for crops thanks to the Long Ash­ton Research Sta­tion run by the Uni­ver­si­ty of Bris­tol in the past. Sci­en­tists like Gary Fos­ter are well aware of the dan­gers from G.M genes “leak­ing into the nat­ur­al world” (again, his own words) but appar­ent­ly the mon­ey and pres­tige from their mas­tery are worth more than our insignif­i­cant lives. A decade ago the first wave of G.M tri­als was slowed here by sus­tained pres­sure and crop-trash­ing; today sab­o­tage con­tin­ues from Hol­land to the Philip­pines, and oth­ers like us also won’t be accom­plices to these devel­op­ments or their agents through inac­tion. It’s nec­es­sary to attack the new wave of so-called ‘life’ sci­ence facil­i­ties at the root (those who design them, those who con­struct them) not just crit­i­cize the more well-known prod­ucts of their research: because to these insti­tu­tions all knowl­edge becomes anoth­er oppor­tu­ni­ty for con­trol and exploita­tion, so extend­ing the scope of a sys­tem that’s in real­i­ty anni­hi­lat­ing and arti­fi­cial­is­ing life in all it’s beau­ty.

Abroad, plant and ani­mal die-offs as well as increased aller­gies and intol­er­ances are already being attrib­uted to G.M. With the bio-tech indus­try non­cha­lant­ly unleash­ing its mon­sters, espe­cial­ly across lands in the glob­al south where patent­ed G.M seeds that must be re-bought year­ly exert a stran­gle­hold, it many take gen­er­a­tions to show some of their effects on infi­nite­ly com­plex webs of life that evolved over mil­lions of years. That is, before civilised cul­tures began inten­sive­ly manip­u­lat­ing them, today even down to the nano-scale. With the like of syn­thet­ic biol­o­gy we’re mov­ing fast into a future where even life­forms “in nature” are the prod­ucts of lab­o­ra­to­ry exper­i­ments, and noth­ing remains that isn’t engi­neered some­where along the line by a human-cen­tred sys­tem of sci­en­tif­ic total­i­tar­i­an­ism.

For obvi­ous rea­sons as peo­ple turn­ing against laws and dom­i­na­tion in more than words we also stand against new polic­ing and iden­ti­fi­ca­tion con­trols enabled by more foren­sics, bio­met­rics etc. and the intro­duc­tion of their com­mon use in the infor­ma­tion-age social prison (mobile fin­ger­print­ing, facial recog­ni­tion sys­tems, D.N.A swabs etc. — they did­n’t stop us yet though…).

This isn’t Vin­ci’s only U.K ven­ture into this lucra­tive field either. They’ve also under­tak­en future expan­sions in sci­ence, tech­nol­o­gy and engi­neer­ing depart­ments at Swansea Uni­ver­si­ty. They’ve com­mis­sioned White­head for the job too, their neigh­bours at Van­tage busi­ness park, who are now also marked by our attack. This will be the result for as long as soci­ety steps in line to realise the fan­tasies of a despot­ic sci­ence, reach­ing for their dreams which are our night­mares.

So what about the ‘ben­e­fits’ that these hi-tech insti­tu­tions want to sell us, found­ed as they are on mas­sive ener­gy con­sump­tion and resource extrac­tion, on the author­i­ty of a spe­cial­ist caste’s some­how-unre­proach­able med­dling with our envi­ron­ments, and on the domes­ti­ca­tion of wild spaces and the tor­ture of oth­er ani­mals? They promise us advances in (human) health, food and tech­nol­o­gy, fos­ter­ing the illu­sion that sci­ence can fix all the dam­age incurred by the dom­i­nant ways of liv­ing. They expect us to for­get how many of the dis­eases, dis­or­ders and can­cers are direct­ly caused by the same indus­tri­al out­put, glob­alised mass soci­ety, psy­cho­log­i­cal­ly and phys­i­cal­ly unhealthy habi­tats and tox­ic work­places of a cul­ture which goes toward these labs and more in the first place. They expect us to for­get that agri-mono­cul­ture pro­duc­tion led to an anti-nutri­tious diet of manip­u­lat­ed short-term energising/comfort food at an esca­lat­ing cost to the land, while diverse wild plant and ani­mals species we used to coex­ist with get wiped out by the sys­tem’s end­less expan­sion and pol­lu­tion. (Vin­ci’s works being a prime exam­ple.) They expect us to for­get how it’s pre­cise­ly the advances in com­plex tech­no­log­i­cal sys­tems that gen­er­ate our depen­dance on their design­ers and man­u­fac­tur­ers, alien­ation from our­selves as well as the earth as a whole and each oth­er at the per­son­al lev­el, and increased effi­cien­cy in achiev­ing the goals of soci­ety’s rulers: prof­it and pow­er, through mis­ery and exploita­tion, push­ing the plan­e­tary ecol­o­gy toward col­lapse.

In short the sick­ness is civil­i­sa­tion itself, includ­ing its false solu­tions to its chron­ic prob­lems steadi­ly impov­er­ish­ing sur­vival for human and non-human pop­u­la­tions alike, an unac­cept­able trans­gres­sion on our intent to live freely.

Choos­ing direct action over despair we declare our part in a low-inten­si­ty urban war in its ear­ly stages across Bris­tol against the many faces of the sys­tem, with stones, paint or fire and with the plans, debates and dai­ly refusals; some­times almost imper­ceiv­able, some­times dev­as­tat­ing. In Britain’s ugly cities and inten­sive­ly-man­aged coun­try­side a deter­mined minor­i­ty of rebels and wilder­ness-lovers spo­rad­i­cal­ly take the offen­sive: some strik­ing anony­mous­ly, some form­ing one-off action groups, and some hav­ing test­ed the open pro­pos­al of the Infor­mal Anar­chist Fed­er­a­tion; not only in the south-west but Not­ting­ham, Cam­bridge, Lon­don and now Glas­gow.

Every­thing is at stake to us and we our­selves have no time to waste. Toward recov­er­ing our own voli­tion and find­ing affini­ties for rebel­lion, our meth­ods shall include intractable con­flict with­out pause or nego­ti­a­tion: and much more besides, break­ing with this mis­er­able civ­il order with a wide vari­ety of exper­i­ments and the full scope of our imag­i­na­tions. Destruc­tion is just anoth­er indis­pens­able side of cre­ation (and vice ver­sa) not an oppo­site, we’re now sure of that. Our insur­gency would be jus­ti­fied as an end in itself in the face of this life we’re raised into, but it’s beyond only being reac­tive. It acts to solid­i­fy that we’re already tak­ing back in our face-to-face encoun­ters and in our minds. It allows poten­tial space for new and stronger rela­tion­ships cho­sen by aware indi­vid­u­als mind­ful of all life­forms, through active­ly weak­en­ing the cur­rent modes. Until some point of break­down where what­ev­er comes next is out of any soci­ety-wide con­trol and rea­son­ing, and so beyond soci­ety. Lib­er­a­tion can mean noth­ing less; tend­ing toward the wild.

The inter­na­tion­al and inter­nal bat­tle­ground between anar­chy and dom­i­na­tion holds both loss­es and gains, of which some are known and some unknown to us. With this is mind we start the new year by cel­e­brat­ing the release of Braulio Duran (an unre­pen­tant eco-anar­chist who was held by the Mex­i­can State) last Octo­ber, albeit into the wider prison-soci­ety. When we dis­cov­er sol­i­dar­i­ty with a locked-up com­rade through their atti­tude and words, it does­n’t dimin­ish when they get ‘out’; it just cre­ates more grounds to keep fight­ing toward our mutu­al goals. Still ‘inside’, we remem­ber the total-lib­er­a­tionist Adri­an Gon­za­les and anar­chist ban­dits of the Kozani case as well as Babis Tsil­ian­i­dis; and Mar­co Camenisch, denied parole once again. Respect to the Mi’k­maq War­riors engag­ing the Cana­di­an State/petro-indus­try aggres­sors in incen­di­ary clash­es, a renewed phase of indige­nous mil­i­tan­cy, and to the ones con­sis­tent­ly defend­ing both Khim­ki for­est and the land of Notre-Dames-Des-Lan­des from Vin­ci’s devel­op­ments. A raised fist above the prison walls for Nico­la Gai and Alfre­do Cospi­to aka F.A.I/F.R.I Olga Nucle­us, until cell­blocks are rub­ble and jail­ers are ash.

On a sad­der note, 2012 end­ed with the anar­chist Sebas­t­ian Over­sluij being fatal­ly shot in San­ti­a­go while try­ing to col­lec­tive­ly seize back some of what the banks extract every day from the exploit­ed. Nei­ther a vic­tim or a mar­tyr, we sim­ply see some­one who did­n’t bow their head and accept the sys­tem’s rules, and we are glad to have such peo­ple as com­rades. Even with­in this non­sen­si­cal, resigned and cyn­i­cal mod­ern cul­ture, every action demands a reac­tion. When they kill one of the resisters, our ene­mies must pay in any way. This is how our strug­gle leaves behind emp­ty ges­tures and keeps the dead from falling into obliv­ion. Black­ened offices won’t replace split blood, but they sig­nal that same social war isn’t fin­ished, and our grief births rage.

Infor­mal Anar­chist Fed­er­a­tion (F.A.I) Insur­gents: Bris­tol North

Maya People of Sipacapa Issue International Call for Solidarity

11th Dec The Maya Peo­ple of Sipaca­pa issued an inter­na­tion­al appeal for sol­i­dar­i­ty this past week­end, in the midst of ongo­ing protests against Gold­corp Inc.’s min­ing activ­i­ties in San Mar­cos, Guatemala.

11th Dec The Maya Peo­ple of Sipaca­pa issued an inter­na­tion­al appeal for sol­i­dar­i­ty this past week­end, in the midst of ongo­ing protests against Gold­corp Inc.’s min­ing activ­i­ties in San Mar­cos, Guatemala.

The Maya began protest­ing with campesino com­mu­ni­ties on Decem­ber 4,2013, set­ting up two sep­a­rate block­ades on the Inter-Amer­i­can High­way — at Kilo­me­ter 170 in San­ta Cata­ri­na Ixtahuacán, Sololá and Kilo­me­ter 242 near Pajapi­ta, San Mar­cos.

Accord­ing to the appeal, issued by The Mayan Coun­cil Of Sipaca­pa on Decem­ber 7, Gold­corp and its sub­sidiary EntreMares de Guatemala are vio­lat­ing a com­mu­ni­ty deci­sion to reject any min­ing exploita­tion in Sipaca­pa.

The Maya are now demand­ing the with­draw­al of both the company’s per­son­nel and its machin­ery from Sipaca­pa, and request­ing ”that cen­tral gov­ern­ment author­i­ties respect the com­mu­ni­ty con­sul­ta­tion car­ried out in 2005.”

They are fur­ther demand­ing an end to any ongo­ing efforts to force them to accept the new mine as well as the pres­ence of var­i­ous gov­ern­ment offi­cials “To resolve this issue, since the only thing we seek is peace”, state the Maya Peo­ple of Sipaca­pa, adding, “The pres­ence of the mine is caus­ing social con­flict, on a fam­i­ly lev­el and on a com­mu­ni­ty lev­el, and it is destroy­ing our social har­mo­ny.”

In addi­tion to their demands, the Maya Peo­ple Of Sipaca­pa are ask­ing “our sis­ters and broth­ers from oth­er nations to accom­pa­ny us in this strug­gle which [is] in ben­e­fit of all.”

Below, please find the Decem­ber 7 Appeal from the The Peo­ple Of Sipaca­pa, in Eng­lish and Span­ish. Eng­lish trans­la­tion by Rights Action.

The Peo­ple Of Sipaca­pa, Via The Mayan Coun­cil Of Sipaca­pa, Informs:

  • To all sis­ter­ly and broth­er­ly peo­ples, nation­al and inter­na­tion­al author­i­ties, nation­al and inter­na­tion­al social and human rights orga­ni­za­tions;
  • To the Min­istry of Ener­gy and Mines, the Min­istry of the Envi­ron­ment and Nat­ur­al Resources, the Min­istry of the Inte­ri­or; and
  • To EntreMares (Gold­corp Inc.):

Sipaca­pa Already Said No To Min­ing Exploita­tion.

“Sipaca­pa Is Not For Sale”

In 2005, the pop­u­la­tion firm­ly reject­ed min­ing explo­ration and exploita­tion in its ter­ri­to­ry, as was doc­u­ment­ed in the acts of the com­mu­ni­ty con­sul­ta­tion car­ried out in good faith on June 18, 2005 in each com­mu­ni­ty of the munic­i­pal­i­ty.

Since that time, the com­mu­ni­ty has con­tin­ued to defend that posi­tion. The pop­u­la­tion does not want its land destroyed by metal­lic min­ing, which only leads to social con­t­a­m­i­na­tion (con­flict), envi­ron­men­tal con­t­a­m­i­na­tion, health prob­lems, dete­ri­o­ra­tion of wildlife and eco­nom­ic injus­tice, as we see in the sis­ter munic­i­pal­i­ty of San Miguel Ixtahuacán, depart­ment of San Mar­cos.

Nev­er­the­less, on April 30, 2012, the Min­istry of Ener­gy and Mines – through its gen­er­al direc­tor of min­ing – issued a min­ing explo­ration license to the com­pa­ny EntreMares de Guatemala (owned by Gold­corp Inc.), called the “Chocoyos” license, to exploit gold, sil­ver, nick­el, cobalt, chromi­um, cop­per, lead, zinc anti­mo­ny and rare earth ele­ments in an area of 23 square kilo­me­ters.

For these rea­sons, we have been protest­ing peace­ful­ly since Decem­ber 4, 2013, to reject the pres­ence of explo­ration machin­ery and per­son­nel from EntreMares/ Gold­corp. We demand the with­draw­al of this machin­ery and the com­pa­ny per­son­nel from the ter­ri­to­ry of Sipaca­pa, and request that cen­tral gov­ern­ment author­i­ties respect the com­mu­ni­ty con­sul­ta­tion car­ried out in 2005.

We request and demand that they cease to force us to accept the pres­ence of the EntreMares/ Gold­corp mine in Sipaca­pa. We con­tin­ue to be intim­i­dat­ed by the pres­ence of the Nation­al Civil­ian Police.

We also demand the pres­ence of the depart­men­tal gov­er­nor, the direc­tor of Ener­gy and Mines, the Min­is­ter of Ener­gy and Mines and the Human Rights Pros­e­cu­tor. We request their pres­ence in our munic­i­pal­i­ty to resolve this issue, since the only thing we seek is peace. The pres­ence of the mine is caus­ing social con­flict, on a fam­i­ly lev­el and on a com­mu­ni­ty lev­el, and it is destroy­ing our social har­mo­ny.

We ask our sis­ters and broth­ers from oth­er nations to accom­pa­ny us in this strug­gle which in ben­e­fit of all. Munic­i­pal author­i­ties should not be pro­mot­ing destruc­tive projects.

Munic­i­pal­i­ty of Sipaca­pa, San Mar­cos

Decem­ber 7, 2013

URGENT: Q’eqchi Leaders Attacked with Machetes on Eve of Megadam Construction

August, 2013 funeral for two Q'eqchi children killed in an assassination attempt against an opponent of Hidro Santa Rita's planned dam on Guatemala's Dolores River10th Dec From

August, 2013 funeral for two Q'eqchi children killed in an assassination attempt against an opponent of Hidro Santa Rita's planned dam on Guatemala's Dolores River10th Dec From Guatemala Sol­i­dar­i­ty Project:

Four lead­ers of the Q’eqchi com­mu­ni­ty Monte Oli­vo were attacked and severe­ly injured with machetes by employ­ees of the San­ta Rita hydro­elec­tric com­pa­ny who also car­ried firearms. Police were called but refused to arrest the attack­ers. On Wednes­day the com­pa­ny plans to begin con­struc­tion of a hydro­elec­tric dam that would flood com­mu­ni­ties and destroy the local ecosys­tem. The dam is being con­struct­ed in vio­la­tion of nation­al and inter­na­tion­al law which require con­sul­ta­tion of the com­mu­ni­ties, which strong­ly oppose the project. In August the com­mu­ni­ty was also attacked and two chil­dren were killed in ret­ri­bu­tion to human rights com­plaints filed by the com­mu­ni­ty.

We are extreme­ly con­cerned that fur­ther vio­lence will occur this week in sup­port of the ille­gal dam. The GSP con­demns the attack and calls for the imme­di­ate arrest of those respon­si­ble, includ­ing the intel­lec­tu­al authors of the attack. The GSP calls for the sus­pen­sion of con­struc­tion and imme­di­ate can­cel­la­tion of the ship­ment of machin­ery to the region.

Take Action

1 Call Edgar Vil­lanue­va at the Gutemalan Embassy in the Unit­ed States at (202) 745‑4953 or (202) 745‑3873 and demand the imme­di­ate arrest of those respon­si­ble, includ­ing the intel­lec­tu­al authors of the attack. Also ask for sus­pen­sion of con­struc­tion and imme­di­ate can­cel­la­tion of the ship­ment of machin­ery to the region.

2 Sign our new peti­tion call­ing for jus­tice for Saquimo Setana, a Q’eqchi com­mu­ni­ty locat­ed near­by Monte Oli­vo which has also par­tic­i­pat­ed in mobi­liz­ing against the dam.

3. Sup­port our part­ners through a con­tri­bu­tion to the Guatemala Sol­i­dar­i­ty Project. We are a vol­un­teer run orga­ni­za­tion and all funds go to our part­ners in Guatemala. The best way to donate is to send a check to our fis­cal spon­sor, “UPAVIM Com­mu­ni­ty Devel­op­ment Foun­da­tion” to UPAVIM, PO Box 63, Marsh­field, VT 05658. Please write “GSP” in the notes/memo sec­tion of the check. Or donate online by vis­it­ing http://www.upavim.or/donate Click on the yel­low donate but­ton, then YOU MUST WRITE ‘Guatemala Sol­i­dar­i­ty Project’ for the pur­pose. We thank our fis­cal spon­sor UPAVIM for help­ing us ensure that your con­tri­bu­tions are tax deductible and that all funds (oth­er than bank trans­ac­tion) go to our part­ners in Guatemala.

Bullying tactics drive Penan to abandon dam blockade

The abandoned Long Singu longhouse last week after the government rushed through the Penan's move to the unfinished relocation site. 9th Dec Mem­bers of the

The abandoned Long Singu longhouse last week after the government rushed through the Penan's move to the unfinished relocation site. 9th Dec Mem­bers of the Penan tribe from the Malaysian state of Sarawak have bowed to over­whelm­ing pres­sure and aban­doned their 77-day protest against the Murum dam.

Faced with ris­ing waters approach­ing their vil­lages, lack of food at the protest site and the announce­ment that the bridges that led to their vil­lages were going to be dis­man­tled, the Penan felt they had no choice but to halt their block­ade and accept the move to a new gov­ern­ment reset­tle­ment site.

When asked why they had agreed to move one Penan man said, ‘ The water is already very close to our vil­lage. It’s very high’. A local activist told Sur­vival, ‘They went with a very heavy heart, they are not hap­py’.

As part of the agree­ment the Penan were promised a fur­ther RM8000 (approx­i­mate­ly US$2,500) com­pen­sa­tion, tak­ing the total com­pen­sa­tion per fam­i­ly to just over US$7,000. How­ev­er, their oth­er demands includ­ing, cru­cial­ly, the need for more land for plant­i­ng and for­est for hunt­ing and gath­er­ing, have been ignored.

The Penan rely on hunting and gathering in their forests to survive.

The for­est is cru­cial for the Penan. Even the government’s own stud­ies showed that the Murum Penan rely on the for­est for 75% of their sus­te­nance. With­out more for­est it’s hard to see how the Penan will sur­vive in the relo­ca­tion site.

Despite being pres­sured to move, the build­ing of the new site is not yet fin­ished. Two of the long­hous­es are still being worked on. Water sup­plies have not been con­nect­ed; the promised school and clin­ic have not been built and the road con­nect­ing the vil­lages is not com­plet­ed.

The impound­ment (flood­ing) of the dam before all the affect­ed fam­i­lies had agreed to move has caused world­wide out­rage. Despite promis­es from the Sarawak gov­ern­ment that the relo­ca­tion process would meet inter­na­tion­al stan­dards the Penan were not prop­er­ly con­sult­ed and the relo­ca­tion process was shroud­ed in secre­cy.

Sur­vival was told, ‘Peo­ple believed that it would be dif­fer­ent this time, but it has shown to be lies. The gov­ern­ment nev­er took their demands into con­sid­er­a­tion’.

The lawyer act­ing for the Penan has promised that despite this move the Penan will still protest and will con­tin­ue to push for jus­tice in the courts.

Ecuador Bans Environmental Group

ecuador indigenous woman faces police 8th Dec The

ecuador indigenous woman faces police 8th Dec The crim­i­nal­iza­tion of Ecuador’s indige­nous and envi­ron­men­tal move­ments con­tin­ues, as the Cor­rea gov­ern­ment pri­or­i­tizes extrac­tion at all costs. From World War 4 Report:

Ecuador’s gov­ern­ment ordered closed the envi­ron­men­tal­ist Fun­dación Pachama­ma Dec. 4, with the Inte­ri­or Min­istry say­ing it was “affect­ing the pub­lic peace.” The Envi­ron­ment Min­istry issued its own state­ment accus­ing of the orga­ni­za­tion of “inter­fer­ence in pub­lic pol­i­cy.” Plain­clothes police were sent to seal off the group’s offices in the morn­ing. The action stemmed from the pre­vi­ous week’s protests at the XI Round for sell­ing oil leas­es in the Ecuadroan Ama­zon. Pres­i­dent Rafael Cor­rea accused Pachama­ma and anoth­er group, Yasunidos, of attack­ing the Chilean ambas­sador, Juan Pablo Lira. Pachama­ma denies the alle­ga­tions, say­ing its mem­bers were not even present at the protest in front of the Hydro­car­bons Min­istry. Fun­dación Pachama­ma plans to appeal the government’s deci­sion.

“The real rea­son the gov­ern­ment has tar­get­ed Fun­dación Pachama­ma is because of the effec­tive­ness of their work,” said Bill Twist of the Pachama­ma Alliance, the group’s sib­ling orga­ni­za­tion based in San Fran­cis­co.  ”This is an attempt to keep them from doing their work, and chill their rights to free speech and assem­bly.”

Yasunidos is a group that is col­lect­ing sig­na­tures to demand a ref­er­en­dum on devel­op­ment of the Ish­pin­go-Tam­bo­cocha-Tipu­ti­ni oil bloc, locat­ed with­in Yasuni Nation­al Park. State com­pa­ny Petroa­ma­zonas is set to begin devel­op­ing the ITT bloc in 2014, and is seek­ing pri­vate part­ners for pro­duc­tion in the zone.

In June, the Cor­rea admin­is­tra­tion issued a Exec­u­tive Decree 16, instat­ing new strin­gent pro­ce­dures for NGOs to obtain legal sta­tus. Human Rights Watch, protest­ing the clo­sure of Fun­dación Pachama­ma, said the group was the “first vic­tim” of the decree, which it charged “con­tra­venes the rights of free expres­sion and asso­ci­a­tion.”

In a state­ment, Fun­dación Pachama­ma accused the Cor­rea gov­ern­ment of vio­lat­ing its own con­sti­tu­tion: “We have the right to dis­sent the deci­sion of the author­i­ties, the process that has been imple­ment­ed and alter­na­tive­ly pro­pose that the oil remain under­ground to pre­serve one of the great­est rich­es of our coun­try, its cul­tur­al and bio­log­i­cal diver­si­ty. The cur­rent Con­sti­tu­tion oblig­es the gov­ern­ment to find a new devel­op­ment mod­el that respects our country’s Pluri-nation­al­i­ty, Human Rights, Rights of Nature and ‘Sumak Kawsay’ or ‘Liv­ing For­est.’… We believe it is ille­git­i­mate to imple­ment process­es affect­ing indige­nous ter­ri­to­ries and not include the pres­i­dents of indige­nous nation­al­i­ties and peo­ples…”

The state­ment also said the group “extends sol­i­dar­i­ty” to the Devel­op­ment Coun­cil of the Nation­al­i­ties and Peo­ples of Ecuador (CODENPE), offi­cial­ly empow­ered to con­sult on issues affect­ing indige­nous peo­ples. (Rebe­lión, Dec. 7; EFE via Ecuavisa, Dec. 6; Pachama­ma Alliance press releas­es via Sacra­men­to Bee, Dec. 5, UDW, Dec. 4; WSJ, Dec. 4)

Ecuador’s 2008 con­sti­tu­tion includes pro­vi­sions for con­sul­ta­tion with indige­nous peo­ples on devel­op­ment issues, but the Cor­rea gov­ern­ment has been repeat­ed­ly accused of vio­lat­ing these mea­sures. The con­sti­tu­tion­al prin­ci­ple of Sumak Kawsay, usu­al­ly ren­dered Vivir Bien or Good Liv­ing, is a phrase adopt­ed from Ecuador’s indige­nous move­ment.

Partial Success for Mi’kmaq: SWN Pulls Out (Till 2015?)

Burning tires form a blockade against pre-fracking seismic testing in Mi'kmaq territory, Dec 3, 2013 6th Dec

Burning tires form a blockade against pre-fracking seismic testing in Mi'kmaq territory, Dec 3, 2013 6th Dec

ELSIPGOTG FIRST NATION, NB–A Hous­ton-based ener­gy com­pa­ny that has faced fero­cious resis­tance from a Mi’kmaq-led coali­tion is end­ing its shale gas explo­ration work for the year, says Elsi­pog­tog War Chief John Levi.

Levi said Fri­day that the RCMP informed him that SWN Resources Cana­da is end­ing its explo­ration work, but will return in 2015.

Levi said SWN and its con­trac­tors would be pick­ing up geo­phones from the side of the high­way today. Geo­phones inter­act with thumper trucks to cre­ate imag­ing of shale gas deposits under­ground.

“They are just going to be pick­ing up their gear today,” said Levi. “At least peo­ple can take a break for Christ­mas.”

Demon­stra­tions against the com­pa­ny esca­lat­ed this week. Demon­stra­tors twice burned tires on Hwy 11 which was the area where SWN was con­duct­ing its shale gas explo­ration.

SWN said in a state­ment late Fri­day after­noon that it had com­plet­ed its “seis­mic acqui­si­tions pro­gram in New Brunswick.”

The com­pa­ny, how­ev­er, was silent on its future time­line for return­ing. [empha­sis added ‑Ed.]

SWN obtained an exten­sion to an injunc­tion against the demon­stra­tors Mon­day after argu­ing it need­ed two more weeks to fin­ish its work. In its court fil­ing, SWN claimed it need­ed about 25 km left to explore.

Levi said the Mi’kmaq com­mu­ni­ty, which sits about 80 km north of Monc­ton, will be there again in 2015 to oppose the com­pa­ny. Levi said SWN will be return­ing to con­duct explorato­ry drilling.

“We can’t allow any drilling, we didn’t allow them to do the test­ing from the begin­ning,” said Levi.

Levi said word that SWN is leav­ing is no cause for cel­e­bra­tion just yet.

“We went through a lot,” he said. “We need some time for this to sink in and think about every­thing, think about what we went through…People did a lot of sac­ri­fic­ing.”

Mexican Guerillas Promise Armed La Parota Resistance

Members of the guerilla group FAR-LP, photographed at a hidden location in Guerrero, Mexico. 4th Dec

Members of the guerilla group FAR-LP, photographed at a hidden location in Guerrero, Mexico. 4th Dec

A new gueril­la group in the Mex­i­can state of Guer­rero has promised armed sup­port for social move­ments, includ­ing the strug­gle against La Paro­ta Dam.

Two days after announc­ing its for­ma­tion via online media, the Rev­o­lu­tion­ary Armed Forces-People’s Lib­er­a­tion (Fuerzas Armadas Rev­olu­cionar­ias-Lib­eración del Pueblo, FAR-LP) released a video of one of its lead­ers, “Coman­dante Cami­lo,” warn­ing that the group will launch armed reprisals against the gov­ern­ment if it con­tin­ues repress­ing social move­ments.

“If the fed­er­al and state gov­ern­ments con­tin­ue the repres­sion of activists and NGOs, we will make them pay,” he says, read­ing from a com­mu­niqué.

“From these lands, for­got­ten by all those gov­ern­ments, we say to you, Mr. Gov­er­nor and Mr. Pres­i­dent Peña Nieto, that the harass­ment, the deaths, the threats against the peo­ple must end.

“From this moment, if there is anoth­er who dies or is impris­oned from our peo­ple, we will exact pay­ment, not in the same place. If there has to be blood, we should spill more than they.”

The FAR-LP explic­it­ly men­tions its sup­port for the Coun­cil of Eji­dos and Com­mu­ni­ties in Oppo­si­tion to La Paro­ta Dam (CECOP), an unre­lat­ed non-gueril­la group that has spear­head­ed oppo­si­tion to the dam.

“They are not alone. They have an army at their dis­po­si­tion. You [the gov­ern­ment] are the ones who decide what we will do,” the group states.

Victory for Elsipogtog on the Highway, While Battle Continues in Court

RCMP cars burn in retaliation for a violent raid on a First Nations blockade of pre-fracking testing equipment in Elsipogtog, New Brunswick, Oct 17, 2013Novem­ber 15th, Mi’kmaq demon­stra­tors declared “vic­to­ry

RCMP cars burn in retaliation for a violent raid on a First Nations blockade of pre-fracking testing equipment in Elsipogtog, New Brunswick, Oct 17, 2013Novem­ber 15th, Mi’kmaq demon­stra­tors declared “vic­to­ry” Thurs­day after stop­ping thumper trucks belong­ing to a Hous­ton-based ener­gy com­pa­ny from con­duct­ing shale gas explo­ration north of Elsi­pog­tog First Nation.

While about 100 Mi’kmaq and sup­port­ers faced a line of RCMP offi­cers as SWN Resources Canada’s thumper trucks idled in the back­ground, the Elsi­pog­tog band coun­cil was 200 kilo­me­tres away in a Fred­er­ic­ton court­room seek­ing an ex parteinjunc­tion to stop SWN from con­tin­u­ing the explo­ration work. A hear­ing on the injunc­tion is set for Fri­day.

On Hwy 11 ten­sions ran high as Mi’kmaq demon­stra­tors from Elsi­pog­tog and oth­er com­mu­ni­ties along with non-First Nations sup­port­ers tried to block SWN from oper­at­ing their thumper trucks while the RCMP tried to inter­vene. SWN even­tu­al­ly decid­ed to turn the trucks around with plans for anoth­er attempt expect­ed Fri­day.

A well-known Elsi­pog­tog frack­ing oppo­nent Lor­raine Clair was arrest­ed dur­ing the protest for mis­chief, assault a police offi­cer and resist­ing arrest, accord­ing to New Brunswick RCMP.

 

Still, spir­its were high among peo­ple from Elsi­pog­tog who watched SWN’s trucks roll away as dusk began to set.

“It is a small vic­to­ry, but a vic­to­ry nonethe­less,” said Bren­nan Sock, from Elsi­pog­tog. “We will take any­thing right now. We got the trucks to leave, we man­aged to slow them down as much as we can.”

T’uma Bernard, a Mi’kmaq War­rior from Prince Edward Island, said he saw renewed uni­ty among the demon­stra­tors.

“It was a great vic­to­ry, it was a great day,” said Bernard.

RCMP spokesper­son Con­st. Jul­lie Rogers-Marsh said there were acts of van­dal­ism through­out the day that are under inves­ti­ga­tion.

“A truck belong­ing to a pri­vate com­pa­ny work­ing in the area and sev­er­al pieces of equip­ment were dam­aged,” said Rogers-Marsh.

She said the RCMP had video of “some­body wear­ing a mask” pulling up geo­phones along Hwy 11. Rogers-Marsh there “also threats of ille­gal acts.”

Rogers-Marsh said the police offi­cers are there to main­tain pub­lic safe­ty.

“Being safe and peace­ful and law­ful is very impor­tant and we are in the area con­tin­u­ing to mon­i­tor the sit­u­a­tion,” said Rogers-Marsh. “Our role is pub­lic safe­ty and we are there to pro­tect every­one.”

Thumper trucks inter­act with geo­phones, which are strung along the ground, to cre­ate imagery of shale gas deposits under­ground.

In Fred­er­ic­ton, the Elsi­pog­tog band was seek­ing an injunc­tion to stop SWN argu­ing “out­side rad­i­cal ele­ments” were con­verg­ing “in sig­nif­i­cant num­bers” as a result of the company’s con­tin­u­ing shale gas explo­ration.

The band’s fil­ing said mil­i­tary forces are at play on the police side of the oper­a­tion and warned a repeat of the Oct. 17 raid in Rex­ton, NB., by RCMP tac­ti­cal units is loom­ing.

“The cir­cum­stances com­bine to cre­ate a very real dan­ger that, as active seis­mic explo­ration is recom­menced in the com­ing hours and days, out­side rad­i­cal ele­ments, the respon­dent SWN and the RCMP, oth­er police and even mil­i­tary forces, all inter­act so as to cause a repeat esca­la­tion of the unac­cept­able and dan­ger­ous events that took place in Rex­ton,” said the fil­ing.

The fil­ing also names provin­cial Ener­gy Min­is­ter Craig Leonard and the Assem­bly of First Nations Chiefs in New Brunswick (AFNCNB).

The fil­ing argues that the province failed in its duty to con­sult and that the AFNCNB, which Elsi­pog­tog gave author­i­ty to con­sult on its behalf, failed in its respon­si­bil­i­ty by “inac­tion and inad­e­quate engage­ment.”

AFNCNB’s lawyer Mike Scul­ly has told APTN Nation­al News that the province set the terms of the con­sul­ta­tion and the AFNCNB had to act with­in those lim­it­ed para­me­ters.

While the band lead­er­ship will con­tin­ue its legal bat­tle in the court­room Fri­day, the grass­roots are vow­ing to be back on the pave­ment with their bod­ies to stop the thumpers.

“Nobody is going nowhere, they can’t bul­ly us and use force tac­tics against the peo­ple of the land,” said Bernard.

Sock said peo­ple would be out all night keep­ing a watch­ful eye.

“We have a lot of peo­ple who are ded­i­cat­ed and will be out there all night to make sure they don’t come back,” said Sock.

Indigenous Petro-Struggles

stop fracking indigenous 12th Novem­ber

stop fracking indigenous 12th Novem­ber

Another Elsipogtog Showdown Brewing

SWN Resources Cana­da is plan­ning to resume its con­tro­ver­sial shale gas seis­mic explo­ration work on Wednes­day, accord­ing to Elsi­pog­tog War Chief John Levi. …

Levi said Con­nors told the peo­ple that SWN would with­draw a law­suit against sev­er­al com­mu­ni­ty mem­bers if the Hous­ton-based firm was allowed to fin­ish its explo­ration work unim­ped­ed.

“We said no, we are going to be there,” said Levi, in an inter­view with APTN Nation­al News. “What we told him was we are going to be there Wednes­day.”

Ponca Families Challenge TransCanada

Key­stone XL pipeline oppo­nents took to a Neligh rancher’s land Sat­ur­day, protest­ing the pro­pos­al they say cuts through the his­toric Pon­ca Trail of Tears and pos­es a steep envi­ron­men­tal risk. Pon­ca trib­al fam­i­lies, Oceti Sakowin tribes, Brave Heart Soci­ety, Bold Nebras­ka, and oth­ers — host­ed the Pon­ca Trail of Tears Spir­i­tu­al Camp, the first in a series of trib­al events aimed at show­cas­ing sol­i­dar­i­ty among ranch­ers and Native Amer­i­cans against TransCanada’s project.

Mining Resistance Stories

Anti-fracking protesters on the Seaway International Bridge at Akwesasne, Mohawk territory, Nov 9, 2013.

Anti

Anti-fracking protesters on the Seaway International Bridge at Akwesasne, Mohawk territory, Nov 9, 2013.

Anti-frack­ing pro­test­ers on the Sea­way Inter­na­tion­al Bridge at Akwe­sasne, Mohawk ter­ri­to­ry, Nov 9, 2013.

Akwesasne Anti-fracking Protest Briefly Closes Seaway International Bridge

OTTAWA — The Sea­way Inter­na­tion­al Bridge between Corn­wall and the U.S. was closed for about an hour Sat­ur­day as First Nations pro­test­ers staged an “infor­ma­tion march” in oppo­si­tion to hydraulic frack­ing gas extrac­tion process­es.

First Nations Granted Delay On Shell’s Tar Sands Project

Ear­li­er this week  the Cana­di­an Envi­ron­men­tal Assess­ment Agency (CEAA) announced that a fed­er­al deci­sion on Shell Oil’s Jack­pine Mine Expan­sion, a 100,000 bar­rel per day open pit tar sands mine expan­sion, would be delayed an addi­tion­al 35 days.  At the heart of this deci­sion is the Athabas­ca Chipewyan First Nation who has been speak­ing out against the project since day one cit­ing a vari­ety of con­cerns relat­ing to treaty and abo­rig­i­nal rights as well as  direct and cumu­la­tive envi­ron­men­tal impacts.

Colombia: Mine Opponents Assassinated

Cesar Gar­cía, a campesino leader who opposed the min­ing oper­a­tions of Angl­o­Gold Ashan­ti at La Colosa in the cen­tral Colom­bian depart­ment of Toli­ma, was assas­si­nat­ed Nov. 2 by an unknown gun­man as he worked his small farm at the vere­da (ham­let) of Cajón la Leona. Sup­port­ers said he had been tar­get­ed for his work with the Envi­ron­men­tal Campesino Com­mit­tee of Caja­mar­ca, the local munic­i­pal­i­ty. In a state­ment, the Net­work of Toli­ma Envi­ron­men­tal and Campesino Com­mit­tees said the Caja­mar­ca group had been “stig­ma­tized as ene­mies of progress in the region,” and false­ly linked to the gueril­la move­ment.