CALL OUT: Resist the bailiffs at Justice Not Crisis Birmingham squat

At 0900 hours on Tues­day 21st April 2009 bailiffs will attempt to evict mem­bers of Jus­tice Not Cri­sis from 310, 312, 314 and 318 Per­shore Road, fol­lowed imme­di­ate­ly after at 11AM, an attempt­ed evic­tion at the Beech­wood Hotel, Bris­tol Road.

At 0900 hours on Tues­day 21st April 2009 bailiffs will attempt to evict mem­bers of Jus­tice Not Cri­sis from 310, 312, 314 and 318 Per­shore Road, fol­lowed imme­di­ate­ly after at 11AM, an attempt­ed evic­tion at the Beech­wood Hotel, Bris­tol Road.

We intend to resist evic­tions at all five prop­er­ties and will stage a roof-top demon­stra­tion at the Beech­wood Hotel. We require as much sup­port and assis­tance as pos­si­ble, and a brief­ing will take place at the Beech­wood Hotel at 0800 hours on Tues­day 21st April. Press and media have already indi­cat­ed they will be attend­ing the Beech­wood to cov­er our resis­tance of the bailiffs’ evic­tion.

Any­one wish­ing to join us this evening/night for our bar­be­cue and drink is wel­come. Rooms will be avail­able for any­body wish­ing to stay. Fur­ther infor­ma­tion can be obtained on 07874180014

Updates to the days events will appear on our web­site through­out the day Tues­day 21st April.

Bath Bomb #21 Out Now

THE BATH BOMB

@nti-copyright: copy and dis­trib­ute!
Issue #21
free/donation
Apr 09

“Keep­ing our heads in a cri­sis”

Sum­mit For Noth­ing

Bath Bomb logoTHE BATH BOMB

@nti-copyright: copy and dis­trib­ute!
Issue #21
free/donation
Apr 09

“Keep­ing our heads in a cri­sis”

Sum­mit For Noth­ing

This month, 20 of the world’s most pow­er­ful lead­ers flew in pri­vate jets to Lon­don to stay in lux­u­ry hotels, drink the finest wines, and dis­cuss the col­lapse of the glob­al econ­o­my. Safe­ly tucked away behind the UK’s most expen­sive police oper­a­tion in his­to­ry (£8 mil­lion, thank you very much), with their every desire attend­ed to irre­spec­tive of cost (hotel expens­es top­ping £50 mil­lion), our glo­ri­ous lead­ers failed to notice the obvi­ous answer to the UK’s 2‑mil­lion-strong employ­ment prob­lem.

Which was, I sourly reflect­ed at the slight­ly dis­ap­point­ing block out­side the con­fer­ence cen­tres on Thurs­day the 2nd, to train them all as jour­nal­ists. As this jour­nal­ist pon­dered his genius, anoth­er ner­vous-look­ing hip­py edged up to me and whis­pered “Hey, are you a pro­test­er?” Of course not, I replied, I’m an under­cov­er media par­a­site des­per­ate­ly hop­ing this will sud­den­ly start liv­ing up to the awe­some front-page-grab­bing defi­ance of yesterday’s ruckus in the city. “Me, too!” he exclaimed, with a junkie-like edge to his voice. “Have you found any­one who isn’t? I need some quotes, man…”

Sat­ur­day the 28th of March’s Put Peo­ple First pro­ces­sion was the excep­tion rather than the rule, with the placid police let­ting the 40,000 marchers get on with it. But as for the Cli­mate Camp… It was sup­posed to be beau­ti­ful. Sneak­ing like a weed through bro­ken paving cracks, tan­gled vines creep­ing through urban decay, snatch­ing back the stolen space that was swal­lowed up by the city. Camp­ing under twin­kling stars and street­lights in the very heart of cap­i­tal­ism. Singing songs around camp­fires fuelled by news­pa­per scraps and debris. Screw the sys­tem, we’ve got samosas, cake and a com­post loo! It was sup­posed to be like that, but the Camp For Cli­mate Action, occu­py­ing the space sur­round­ing Lon­don’s Euro­pean Car­bon Exchange, was evict­ed after 12 hours on the night of April 1st.

Indeed, overnight, bru­tal police attacks, raids, false impris­on­ment and sleep depri­va­tion (offi­cial­ly recog­nised by the UN as tor­ture) had hit the all the oth­er squats and con­ver­gences spaces around the city too, to ensure that there was no repeat of Wednesday’s 15,000-strong march­es, no fluffy car­ni­val, or entire­ly jus­ti­fi­able smash­ing of RBS. Despite all this provo­ca­tion, the pro­test­ers remained peace­ful and pro­por­tion­ate. Despite cop­pers delib­er­ate­ly assault­ing civil­ians, baton­ning peo­ple in the crotch, and walk­ing up and down the lines shield-smash­ing the face of each demon­stra­tor in turn, the crowds refused to low­er them­selves to the pigs’ lev­el. Which, frankly, they should have.

http://www.g‑20meltdown.org/
http://www.putpeoplefirst.org.uk/

How The G20 Plan To Help The World’s Poor

So what actu­al­ly hap­pened at the G20 sum­mit last week? Well, in an attempt to give the glob­al econ­o­my a kick up the arse and return to “busi­ness as usu­al”, $1.1 tril­lion was giv­en to the Inter­na­tion­al Mon­e­tary Fund to aid fail­ing indus­tries around the world. $50 bil­lion of this will alleged­ly go to poor coun­tries, but will it actu­al­ly reduce pover­ty?

The IMF typ­i­cal­ly only lends out funds at a price, con­trol­ling poor­er coun­tries by means of iron­i­cal­ly named ‘Pover­ty Reduc­tion Strat­e­gy Papers’. Loans are grant­ed in exchange for the approval of reg­u­la­tions that help cor­po­ra­tions and harm work­ers, such as cuts to the min­i­mum wage and the ban­ning of unions. The IMF and rich lender coun­tries want to make sure they get their mon­ey back, so poor coun­tries are forced to focus their indus­tries on pro­duc­ing exports, rather than food for their own peo­ple. They are made to remove trade bar­ri­ers so that rich for­eign cor­po­ra­tions can flood their mar­kets with cheap goods and run local traders out of busi­ness. Pub­lic ser­vices such as health­care, schools and trans­port are pri­va­tised while gov­ern­ment spend­ing on health and edu­ca­tion is cut – plac­ing the empha­sis on prof­it rather than pro­vi­sion of ser­vices. When the Bech­tel cor­po­ra­tion took over the sup­ply of pub­lic water in Bolivia, bills went up by up to 90%, leav­ing many fam­i­lies unable to afford water. When riots forced them to with­draw, Bech­tel (sup­port­ed by the IMF) demand­ed $30 mil­lion in com­pen­sa­tion from the Boli­vian Gov­ern­ment.

Deci­sions made by the IMF over­ride nation­al laws. For exam­ple, when the State of Cal­i­for­nia banned the gaso­line addi­tive MBTE because it pol­lutes ground water and pos­es a real threat to pub­lic health, the Cana­di­an mak­er of the addi­tive sued them under IMF and World Trade Organ­i­sa­tion laws, because this restrict­ed trade.

Who needs colo­nial­ism when you’ve got the IMF? They put the “rights” of cor­po­ra­tions ahead of human rights. The G20 mean busi­ness as usu­al and don’t give a shit about the poor if this is their plan for change.

Tak­ing The Vis­teon

On Tues­day the 31st of March, work­ers at three fac­to­ries owned by Vis­teon, a Ford sub­sidiary received news that is all too com­mon at the moment – you’re fired! The work­ers in Belfast, Enfield and Basil­don were ordered to leave with­out any notice, redun­dan­cy pack­ages, back pay and oth­er mon­ey owed to them by the com­pa­ny. What hap­pened next how­ev­er, shows what hap­pens when work­ers stand up to the boss. Refus­ing to leave, the 70 work­ers locked them­selves inside their fac­to­ries, refus­ing to budge despite intim­i­da­tion from cops and boss­es until they got the mon­ey and rights that were owed to them. The work­ers stayed put for 11 days, receiv­ing huge sup­port from locals and activists who set up 24-hour pick­ets in the fac­to­ries’ car parks. The occu­piers have now left the fac­to­ries, but the fight is only just begin­ning: a per­ma­nent pick­et has been estab­lished at the Lon­don fac­to­ry, along with oth­er ini­tia­tives and the work­ers and their sup­port­ers have vowed not to give up the strug­gle. The cam­paign needs your help, and is set­ting a great exam­ple of how organ­ised work­ers are capa­ble of stand­ing up for their rights in the face of the clas­sist attacks of cap­i­tal­ism and the state. In this reces­sion, the boss­es and politi­cians have made it all too clear that they are look­ing out for them­selves, their rich mates and nobody else. Only by tak­ing a leaf from the book of the Vis­teon work­ers, or the Prisme Pack­ag­ing & Design work­ers in Dundee, and get­ting organ­ised to fight back can we build a fair and just soci­ety rather than relent­ing to lead­ers’ vision of busi­ness as usu­al. Or why not emu­late the 2 mil­lion French who’ve just enjoyed their sec­ond gen­er­al strike of the year, or the sacked Sony work­ers of the Lan­des region who took their chief exec­u­tive hostage? To find out how you can sup­port the Vis­teon work­ers, drop and email to visteon_support [at] haringey.org.uk, or bathac­tivist­net [at] yahoo.co.uk for info on local sup­port actions.

http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2009/03/423897.html
http://www.visteonoccupation.org

EVENTS

Bath Hunt Sabo­teurs meet­ings, 2nd and 4th Mon­day of the month, 8pm, The Bell, Wal­cot Street

Lon­don Road Food Co-op, Wednes­days, 4–7pm, River­side Com­mu­ni­ty Cen­tre, Lon­don Road

Bath Stop The War Coali­tion vig­il, Sat­ur­days, 11.30am-12.30, Bath Abbey Court­yard

‘Can’t Pay, Won’t Pay: From Poll Tax Rebel­lion to Reces­sion Resis­tance’ talk and film, Thurs­day 23rd April, 7.30pm, The Cube cin­e­ma, Dove Street South, Bris­tol

Vis­teon sol­i­dar­i­ty pick­et, Fri­day 24th April, 5.30pm, Allen Ford garage, oppo­site for­mer Bath Press, Red­bridge House, Low­er Bris­tol Road

World Day for Lab Ani­mals march, Sat­ur­day 25th April, Hyde Park, Lon­don, coach leav­ing Bris­tol Tem­ple Meads, 8.45am, info@wdail.org to book place

anti-police bru­tal­i­ty sol­i­dar­i­ty demo, Sun­day 26th April, meet 12 mid­day out­side Bath Spa train sta­tion

May­day TU march, Fri­day 1st May, Clerken­well Green, Lon­don, 12 mid­day

Anti-Mil­i­tarist Gath­er­ing, Sat­ur­day 2nd May – Sun­day 3rd May, Cow­ley Club, Brighton, http://www.antimilitaristnetwork.noflag.org.uk

May­day every­day gigs, Fri­day 1st May — Sun­day 3rd May, Chesters, Frog­more Street, Bris­tol

May­day in Brighton, Mon­day 4th May, 12 noon, Brighton, http://www.smashedo.org.uk

Bath Friends of the Earth meet­ing, Mon­day 4th May, 8pm, Still­point, Broad Street Place, Broad Street

Bath Ani­mal Action meet­ing, Wednes­day 6th May, 7.30–8.30pm, back­room of The Bell,

Bath Activist Net­work meet­ing, Thurs­day 7th May, 7.30–9pm, down­stairs at The Hob­gob­lin, St James Parade

Bath FreeShop, Sat­ur­day 9th May, 12–3pm, out­side Pump Rooms, Stall Street

Broad­lands Orchard­share Vol­un­teer­ing Day, Sat­ur­day 9th May, 12–4pm, Broad­lands Orchard, Box Road, Bath­ford, email broad­land­sor­chard­share [at] googlemail.com or phone 07532 472 256

Bath Green­peace meet­ing, Mon­day 11th May, 7.30–9pm, Still­point, Broad Street Place

Tran­si­tion Open Forum, Tues­day 12th May, 7pm, Wid­combe Social Club

Bath Green Drinks, Wednes­day 13th May, 8.30pm, the Rum­mer, Grand Parade

Per­for­mance: ‘Roots – A Tale Of Love And Veg­eta­bles’, Thurs­day 28th May – Sun­day 7th June, BOG Low­er Com­mon Allot­ments

G20 Death – Pigs Might Lie

Amongst the bro­ken win­dows and smashed banks of the recent G20 protests, a tragedy occurred that is threat­en­ing to drag the inhu­mane and bru­tal tac­tics reg­u­lar­ly employed by British cops into the pub­lic eye. Ian Tom­lin­son, a 47-year-old paper sell­er, was walk­ing home from work through the protests, when he sud­den­ly dropped dead of a heart attack. The cops were quick to clar­i­fy the mat­ter for us – Ian had become trapped in the crowd before col­laps­ing. Police efforts to res­cue and resus­ci­tate the man were ham­pered by bay­ing mobs of pro­tes­tors pelt­ing police medics with bricks and bot­tles. Real­ly? The police clung dogged­ly to this ver­sion of events despite sev­er­al con­vinc­ing wit­ness state­ments to the con­trary. Then, some video footage came to light that showed a vast­ly dif­fer­ent sto­ry. Ian, on his own, was walk­ing away from a line of riot police with his hands in his pock­ets. With­out warn­ing, an offi­cer beat Tomlinson’s legs with a trun­cheon before shov­ing him to the floor with his shield. He remained on the floor for around 10 sec­onds, receiv­ing no help before being helped up by activists and mov­ing off, “Dazed and stum­bling along the road.” A minute lat­er, he was dead. The police have now changed their sto­ry to suit the uncov­er­ing of their lies, but they deny any incon­sis­ten­cy in their ver­sion of events, which has changed from “bay­ing mob stop us help­ing the injured” to “well, maybe an offi­cer over­re­act­ed.” In a fur­ther rev­e­la­tion, the police have been crit­i­cized for rush­ing the post-mortem and using an incom­pe­tent, and wide­ly dis­cred­it­ed pathol­o­gist. Mean­while, Sat­ur­day the 11th of April saw near­ly 500 peo­ple march through cen­tral Lon­don to protest the death – thank­ful­ly, this day wasn’t attacked, unlike the vig­il for Ian held on the 2nd.

The cop who mur­dered Ian has now been sus­pend­ed pend­ing inves­ti­ga­tion, but this avoids the most impor­tant issue sur­round­ing the inci­dent. This is how police ALWAYS behave dur­ing pub­lic order sit­u­a­tions. ‘Ket­tling’, the police tac­tic of con­fin­ing a group and refus­ing them access to toi­lets, med­ical aid or water is now com­mon place, as is police refusal to wear iden­ti­fi­ca­tion, use of pep­per spray, and unpro­voked baton charges. Sus­pend­ing and pun­ish­ing one cop is a start, but we need to use the trag­ic death of Ian Tom­lin­son to chal­lenge the vio­lent and arbi­trary man­ner in which police deal with almost all acts of pub­lic protest. Ian’s death was not caused by the actions of one ‘bad apple’, but by a cul­ture of con­tempt, vio­lence and arro­gance that is the rule, rather than the excep­tion in the mod­ern police force. Will we, in Britain, sit by and watch as the police con­tin­ue to kill and injure us with arro­gance and bru­tal­i­ty? Or per­haps now is the time to stand up against a sys­tem that is hap­py to vicious­ly strike any­one who dares to stand up and ques­tion its wan­ing author­i­ty.

A full video of the events lead­ing up to Ian’s death can be viewed at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ADd_6ISHLdg

What Hous­ing Cri­sis?

As repos­ses­sions soar by 68%, hous­ing lists dou­ble (from 3,000 to 6,000 local­ly over the last decade), and the mar­ket con­tin­ues to nose­dive, B&NES are deal­ing with things the only way they know how. They’re, um, sell­ing off all coun­cil hous­es. With 1,100 afford­able homes ditched already (thanks to retired banker Coun­cil­lor Mal­colm Han­ney, who lives in a very unaf­ford­able house in Chew Magna), and more at Man­vers Street, Dorch­ester Street and Broad Street to fol­low, this can only mean one thing… Less rent to pay!

That’s right. The­ses hous­es aren’t going any­where, after all. There’s no actu­al hous­ing short­age – just an excess of scam­ming land­lords leav­ing build­ings emp­ty. And increas­ing num­bers of peo­ple across the region are choos­ing to legal­ly squat these emp­ties rather than choose home­less­ness or giv­ing every pen­ny they own to the unde­serv­ing.

In Bris­tol, a nation­al squat­ters’ meet­ing on the 14th and 15th of March, brought peo­ple from across the coun­try to a spe­cial­ly-occu­pied man­sion for a week­end of dis­cus­sions and work­shops – and also helped the econ­o­my by pro­vid­ing work for a ver­i­ta­ble horde of journos. More local­ly, the Squat­ters Com­mu­nal Asso­ci­a­tion of Bath have final­ly lost the for­mer Twer­ton rail sta­tion fol­low­ing their fourth ille­gal evic­tion, with the tac­it approval of Twer­ton ward Lib Dem Coun­cil­lor Tim Ball. Bath police turned a blind eye to the theft, crim­i­nal dam­age and bur­glary com­mit­ted by pub­lic­i­ty-shy bailiffs, who even got away with pour­ing boil­ing water over one occupant’s hands. Res­i­dent David Clements explains, “Deal­ing with a land­lord who resorts to force first and the courts sec­ond is hard, but we stuck at it to teach them a les­son. For­tu­nate­ly, land­lords like that are rare, so we’re look­ing for­wards to hav­ing an eas­i­er time of things in our new home.”

Inter­est­ed in squat­ting or learn­ing more? Con­tact bathac­tivist­net [at] yahoo.co.uk. Prob­lems with bailiffs or repos­ses­sions? Con­tact resist­bailiffs [at] yahoo.co.uk, or 07794 774938.

http://www.squatter.org.uk/

GOT A STORY? WANT TO RECEIVE THE BATH BOMB BY EMAIL? HOPING TO SUE? Con­tact us by e‑mailing bath­bomb­press [at] yahoo.co.uk. Large print e‑versions avail­able on request.

Bath Activist Net­work are a local umbrel­la group cam­paign­ing on issues as diverse as devel­op­ment, envi­ron­men­tal­ism, anti-war, ani­mal rights, work­ers’ rights and more. Help­ing to pro­duce The Bath Bomb, we are open to any­one, and our mem­bers range from trade union­ists to anar­chists, lib­er­als to greens, and peo­ple who just want to change Bath for the bet­ter. For details on meet­ings, demos, or just to get in touch, email bathac­tivist­net [at] yahoo.co.uk, or see our web­site: http://www.bathactivistnetwork.blogspot.com

Meet­ing True Veg

Kil­ter, Bath’s unique out­door the­atre com­pa­ny, pre­mieres their new pro­duc­tion ‘Roots – A Tale Of Love And Veg­eta­bles,’ dur­ing this year’s Fringe Fest, run­ning from Thurs­day the 28th May to Sun­day 7th June, it is to be per­formed on Bath Organ­ic Group’s Low­er Com­mon Allot­ments, in Vic­to­ria Park. Plant­i­ng the seeds of change with a play­ful and engag­ing show, Kil­ter lead their audi­ence on a gen­tle jour­ney down the bean-rows to inves­ti­gate food-secu­ri­ty, food his­to­ry and tra­di­tion­al skills in the approach­ing post-oil world. Friend­ly, wel­com­ing char­ac­ters tin­ker with their seedlings whilst mulling over the cycles of past and future. The set is made up of entire­ly found and recy­cled mate­ri­als, and you even get to take away a free set of seeds at the end! Kil­ter, who will be work­ing the allot­ments dur­ing the pre­ced­ing week, is com­mit­ted to engag­ing audi­ences in issues on the envi­ron­ment, social jus­tice and Eng­lish her­itage, and seeks to deliv­er low car­bon the­atre. Tick­ets are priced at £9 (con­ces­sions £7) and are on sale from ICIA’s Box Office at Bath Uni — ring 01225 386777.

http://www.kiltertheatre.org

A Cut Above The Rest

Here at Bath Bomb HQ, we were sad­dened to hear the news sur­round­ing the death of pas­sion­ate blood-junkie Trevor Morse. Trevor end­ed his life attempt­ing to pre­vent two hunt mon­i­tors from tak­ing off in a gyro­copter they were using to mon­i­tor fox hunt­ing activ­i­ties. Run­ning in front of the fast mov­ing air­craft, Trevor was obvi­ous­ly under the impres­sion that the sheer strength of his per­son­al­i­ty would suf­fice to halt a speed­ing air­craft. Wrong. It was not so much the news of his gyro­copter-inflict­ed near-decap­i­ta­tion that caused our bad moods, but the ridicu­lous charges that have been pinned on the pilot, Bryan Grif­fiths, of the gyro­copter, a peace­ful man who has been charged with mur­der. In the last 20 years, three hunt sabo­teurs have been killed, most­ly being run over, by hunters, and the most seri­ous charge brought against a hunter has been reck­less dri­ving. But as soon as it is a hunter who dies, it is not a trag­ic acci­dent, but mur­der. This charge just high­lights the one-sided polic­ing that’s been the norm regard­ing hunt­ing for decades. A sup­port group has been set up for Bryan, and let­ters of sup­port can be sent to:

Bryan Grif­fiths XW8892
HMP Hewell
Hewell Lane
Red­ditch B97 6QS

Phar­ma To Get Taste Of Own Med­i­cine?

In spite of the Government’s sus­tained attack on ani­mal rights advo­cates, World Day for Lab Ani­mals will be marked this year in Lon­don with a nation­al march on the 25th April. Meet­ing in Hyde Park at 12 mid­day, the demo will pro­ceed to through the cen­tre to a ral­ly at Par­lia­ment. Whilst Neo-Labour still refuse to car­ry out their much-promised Roy­al Com­mis­sion into the med­ical rel­e­vance of ani­mal test­ing, 18,000 peo­ple a year die from dodgy drug side effects in the UK alone: in fact, rely­ing on ani­mal test­ing results for our med­i­cines is Britain’s fourth biggest killer. But instead of wor­ry­ing about help­ing research into mod­ern non-ani­mal test­ing, such as the work car­ried out by the Dr Had­wen Trust or Euro­peans for Med­ical Progress, instead they bail out com­pa­nies like Hunt­ing­don Life Sci­ences, who car­ry out con­tracts for ani­mal abuse and have once again recent­ly been exposed for cru­el­ty. To join this fight for both human and non-human ani­mals’ health and dig­ni­ty, a coach will be leav­ing Bris­tol Tem­ple Meads train sta­tion just before 9am that morn­ing, £4 waged return or £2 unwaged return: get in touch with bathani­malac­tion [at] yahoo.co.uk, or ring 07595 745441 to book your place.

http://www.shac.net
http://www.curedisease.net “ “ ‘
http://www.drhadwentrust.org.uk
http://www.wdail.org

The Big Chalk-In

Mem­bers of BAN attend­ed a big ‘chalk-in’ out­side Bris­tol Mag­is­trates’ Court on Thurs­day 9th April. This demo was called because Paul Sav­ille, a UWE stu­dent, had chalked on a pave­ment in Bris­tol: ‘Lib­er­ty – the right to ques­tion it, the right to ask are we free?’ Obvi­ous­ly not, because he was prompt­ly arrest­ed and charged with crim­i­nal dam­age. He was to appear at court the morn­ing of the 9th, but the Crown Pros­e­cu­tion Ser­vice dropped the charges at the last moment. The chalk-in was called as a protest against the lat­est would-be attack on our right to free­dom of speech and dis­sent. Peo­ple on the demo took turns to scrawl slo­gans, and were joined by oth­er young peo­ple who’d been in court that morn­ing already. Paul, how­ev­er, had prob­lems in tak­ing part, as his wrist had been bro­ken by the police at the recent G20 protests! This time, the thin black and blue line kept a low pro­file, prob­a­bly due to their own cur­rent pub­lic order prob­lems. The day proved that the best way of defend­ing one’s rights when attacked is mass defi­ance.

And now, to the dis­claimer: As any­one is free to con­tribute, the opin­ions expressed in each arti­cle are not nec­es­sar­i­ly reflec­tive of each con­trib­u­tor. Nat­u­ral­ly, any right-wing or cor­po­rate bull­shit will be binned and spat on. Need­less to say, the opin­ions of the author of this dis­claimer does not nec­es­sar­i­ly rep­re­sent the views of any oth­er con­trib­u­tor…

For fur­ther info on any of our sto­ries see www.thebathbomb.blogspot.com

Why climate camping & other protest? Ecological debt day for your city…coming soon!

Eco­log­i­cal debt: no way back from bank­rupt

3 planetsEco­log­i­cal debt: no way back from bank­rupt

While most gov­ern­ments’ eyes are on the bank­ing cri­sis, a much big­ger issue — the envi­ron­men­tal cri­sis — is pass­ing them by, says Andrew Simms. In the Green Room this week, he argues that fail­ure to organ­ise a bailout for eco­log­i­cal debt will have dire con­se­quences for human­i­ty.

“Nature Does­n’t Do Bailouts!” said the ban­ner strung across Bish­ops­gate in the City of Lon­don.

Civil­i­sa­tion’s biggest prob­lem was out­lined in five words over the entrance to the small, par­al­lel real­i­ty of the peace­ful cli­mate camp. Their tents bloomed on the morn­ing of 1 April faster than daisies in spring, and faster than the police could stop them.

Across the city, where the world’s most pow­er­ful peo­ple met simul­ta­ne­ous­ly at the G20 sum­mit, the same prob­lem was almost com­plete­ly ignored, mer­it­ing only a sin­gle, after­thought men­tion in a long com­mu­nique.

World lead­ers dropped every­thing to tack­le the finan­cial debt cri­sis that spilled from col­laps­ing banks.

Gripped by a pan­ic so com­plete, there was no pol­i­cy dog­ma too deeply engrained to be dug out and instant­ly dis­card­ed. We went from tri­umphant, finance-dri­ven free mar­ket cap­i­tal­ism, to bank nation­al­i­sa­tion and mov­ing the dec­i­mal point on indus­try bailouts quick­er than you can say sub-prime mort­gage.

But the eco­log­i­cal debt cri­sis, which threat­ens much more than pen­sion funds and car man­u­fac­tur­ers, is left to lan­guish.

It is like hav­ing a Com­mis­sion on House­hold Ren­o­va­tion ago­nise over which expen­sive design­er wall­pa­per to use for paper­ing over plas­ter cracks whilst ignor­ing the fact that the walls them­selves are col­laps­ing on sub­sid­ing foun­da­tions.

Beyond our means

Each year, human­i­ty’s eco­log­i­cal over­draft gets larg­er, and the day that the world as a whole goes into eco­log­i­cal debt — con­sum­ing more resources and pro­duc­ing more waste than the bios­phere can pro­vide and absorb — moves ever ear­li­er in the year.

The same pic­ture emerges for indi­vid­ual coun­tries like the UK — which now starts liv­ing beyond its own envi­ron­men­tal means in mid-April.

Because the glob­al econ­o­my is still over­whelm­ing­ly fos­sil-fuel depen­dent, the accu­mu­la­tion of green­house gas­es and the prog­no­sis for glob­al warm­ing remain our best indi­ca­tors of “over­shoot”.

World famous French free-climber Alain Robert, known as Spi­der­man, climbed the Lloyds of Lon­don build­ing for the OneHundredMonths.org cam­paign as the G20 met, to demon­strate how time is slip­ping away.

Using thresh­olds for risk iden­ti­fied by the Inter­gov­ern­men­tal Pan­el on Cli­mate Change (IPCC), on cur­rent trends, in only 92 months — less than eight years — we will move into a new, more per­ilous phase of warm­ing.

It will then no longer be “like­ly” that we can pre­vent some aspects of run­away cli­mate change. We will begin to lose the cli­mat­ic con­di­tions which, as Nasa sci­en­tist James Hansen points out, were those under which civil­i­sa­tion devel­oped.

Small div­i­dend

As “nature does­n’t do bailouts”, how have our politi­cians fared who ripped open the nation’s wal­let to save the banks?

Not good.

Accord­ing to the Inter­na­tion­al Mon­e­tary Fund (IMF), the UK spent a stag­ger­ing 20% of its GDP in sup­port of the finan­cial sec­tor.

Yet the amount of mon­ey that was new and addi­tion­al, announced in the “green stim­u­lus” pack­age of the Trea­sury’s Pre-Bud­get Report, added-up to a van­ish­ing­ly small 0.0083% of GDP.

Glob­al­ly, the green shade of eco­nom­ic stim­u­lus mea­sures has var­ied enor­mous­ly. For exam­ple, the shares of spend­ing con­sid­ered in research by the bank HSBC to be envi­ron­men­tal were:

* the US — 12%
* Ger­many — 13%
* South Korea — 80%

The inter­na­tion­al aver­age was around 15%. HSBC found the UK planned to invest less than 7% of its stim­u­lus pack­age (dif­fer­ent from the bank bailout) in green mea­sures.

Com­par­ing the IMF and HSBC fig­ures actu­al­ly reveals an inverse rela­tion­ship — pro­por­tion­ate­ly, those who spent more on sup­port for finance had weak­er green spend­ing.

So here we are, faced with the loss of an envi­ron­ment con­ducive to human civil­i­sa­tion, and we find gov­ern­ments pros­trate before bare­ly repen­tant banks, with their backs to a far worse eco­log­i­cal cri­sis.

Extreme mar­kets

On top of low and incon­sis­tent fund­ing for renew­able ener­gy, the shift to a low car­bon econ­o­my is being fur­ther frus­trat­ed by anoth­er mar­ket fail­ure in the trade for car­bon seen, for exam­ple, in the EU’s Emis­sions Trad­ing Scheme.

Bad mar­ket design, fee­ble car­bon reduc­tion tar­gets and the reces­sion have all con­spired to dri­ve down the cost of car­bon emis­sion per­mits, wreck­ing eco­nom­ic incen­tives to grow renew­able ener­gy.

Worse still, the dif­fi­cul­ty of account­ing to ensure that per­mits rep­re­sent real emis­sions has led both ener­gy com­pa­nies and envi­ron­men­tal­ists to warn of an emerg­ing “sub-prime car­bon mar­ket”.

Rely­ing on mar­ket mech­a­nisms is attrac­tive to gov­ern­ments because it means they have less to do them­selves. But they will fail if car­bon mar­kets are just hot air.

There seems to be a hard-wired link between mem­o­ry fail­ure and mar­ket fail­ure.

As the his­to­ri­an E J Hob­s­bawm observed in The Age of Extremes: “Those of us who lived through the years of the Great Slump still find it almost impos­si­ble to under­stand how the ortho­dox­ies of the pure free mar­ket, then so obvi­ous­ly dis­cred­it­ed, once again came to pre­side over a glob­al peri­od of depres­sion in the late 1980s and 1990s”.

Per­haps the great­est fail­ure is one of imag­i­na­tion.

Some peo­ple alive today lived through those past reces­sions and depres­sions. They know they can be nasty and need avert­ing.

But the last time the Earth­’s cli­mate real­ly flipped was at the end of the last Ice Age, more than 10,000 years ago. No one can remem­ber what that felt like.

Lessons of his­to­ry

Look­ing for­ward, the IPC­C’s worst case sce­nario warns of a max­i­mum 6C rise over the next cen­tu­ry.

Look­ing back, how­ev­er, indi­cates that an unsta­ble cli­mate sys­tem holds worse hor­rors.

Work by the sci­en­tist Richard Alley on abrupt cli­mate change indi­cates the plan­et has pre­vi­ous­ly expe­ri­enced a 10C tem­per­a­ture shift in only a decade, and pos­si­bly “as quick­ly as in a sin­gle year”.

And, around the turn of the last Ice Age, there were “local warm­ings as large as 16C”.

Imag­ine that every day of your life you have tak­en a walk in the woods and the worse thing to hap­pen was an acorn or twig falling on your head.

Then, one day, you stroll out, look up and there is a threat approach­ing so large, unex­pect­ed and out­side your expe­ri­ence that can’t quite believe it, like a mas­sive goth­ic cathe­dral falling from the sky.

In tack­ling cli­mate change we need urgent­ly to recal­i­brate our respons­es, just as gov­ern­ments had to when they res­cued the reck­less finance sec­tor.

Then offi­cials had to ask them­selves “is what we are doing right, and is it enough?”

They must ask them­selves the same ques­tions on the eco­log­i­cal debt cri­sis and cli­mate change.

The dif­fer­ence is, that if they fail this time, not even a long-term busi­ness cycle will come to our res­cue. If the cli­mate shifts to a hot­ter state not con­vivial to human soci­ety, it could be tens of thou­sands of years, or nev­er, before it shifts back.

Remem­ber; nature does­n’t do bailouts.

Andrew Simms is pol­i­cy direc­tor of the New Eco­nom­ics Foun­da­tion (nef), and author of Eco­log­i­cal Debt: Glob­al Warm­ing and the Wealth of Nations

——

One Plan­et Liv­ing http://www.oneplanetliving.org

Your city’s Eco­log­i­cal Debt Day:

Using the lat­est data avail­able WWF has cal­cu­lat­ed when res­i­dents of British cities will have con­sumed their fair share of nat­ur­al resources for 2008 – or when their eco­log­i­cal debt day is.

City Eco­log­i­cal debt day

Win­ches­ter 10 April
St Albans 13 April
Chich­ester 14 April
Brighton & Hove 14 April
Can­ter­bury 17 April
Oxford 17 April
Southamp­ton 21 April
Durham 22 April
Cam­bridge 23 April
Portsmouth 23 April
Edin­burgh 23 April
Chester 24 April
Aberdeen 24 April
Ely (East Cambs) 26 April
Here­ford (Coun­ty of Here­ford­shire) 28 April
Stir­ling 28 April
Lon­don 29 April
Lich­field 29 April
Lan­cast­er 30 April
New­cas­tle upon Tyne 30 April
Wells (Bath and NE Som­er­set) 1 May
Bath (Bath and North East Som­er­set) 1 May
Ripon (Har­ro­gate) 2 May
Man­ches­ter 2 May
Inver­ness (High­land) 2 May
Pre­ston 2 May
Nor­wich 2 May
Peter­bor­ough 2 May
Dundee City 3 May
Leeds 3 May
York 3 May
Sheffield 3 May
Der­by 4 May
Carlisle 4 May
Leices­ter 4 May
Worces­ter 4 May
Ban­gor (Gwynedd) 4 May
St Davids (Pembrokeshire)4 May
Not­ting­ham 4 May
Liv­er­pool 4 May
Bris­tol 5 May
Birm­ing­ham 5 May
Lin­coln 5 May
Brad­ford 5 May
Glas­gow 6 May
Cardiff 6 May
Exeter 6 May
Coven­try 7 May
Swansea 8 May
Sal­ford 8 May
Wolver­hamp­ton 8 May
Truro (Car­rick) 8 May
Sun­der­land 8 May
Wake­field 9 May
Glouces­ter 9 May
Stoke on Trent 10 May
Kingston upon Hull 10 May
Sal­is­bury 10 May
Ply­mouth 11 May
New­port 11 May

G20 update — police violence; what happened b4 Ian Tomlinson’s death witnesses; vigil on 11th; legal support; protest tactics

Chan­nel 4 com­men­tary on what hap­pened to Ian Tom­lin­son just before his death — the lat­est ITN footage com­bined with the first footage pub­lished on the Guardian web­site. On the ground, pro­tes­tors try to help before being cleared out of the area — counter the media-bot­tle-throw­ing hype, watch two eye wit­ness­es.

New inci­dent of sys­temic police vio­lence — when an offi­cer slaps the face then batons the legs of a woman — cap­tured on film.

Even new­er video evi­dence of yet more police vio­lence — shields and fists used to punch with­out provo­ca­tion — more details.

Newest footage which shows Ian Tom­lin­son’s head hit the ground from the push by police.

Police charge press pho­tog­ra­phers.

Col­lec­tions of videos of police vio­lence: 1 | 2
—————-

G20 police medic -cracking heads with baton

Chan­nel 4 com­men­tary on what hap­pened to Ian Tom­lin­son just before his death — the lat­est ITN footage com­bined with the first footage pub­lished on the Guardian web­site. On the ground, pro­tes­tors try to help before being cleared out of the area — counter the media-bot­tle-throw­ing hype, watch two eye wit­ness­es.

New inci­dent of sys­temic police vio­lence — when an offi­cer slaps the face then batons the legs of a woman — cap­tured on film.

Even new­er video evi­dence of yet more police vio­lence — shields and fists used to punch with­out provo­ca­tion — more details.

Newest footage which shows Ian Tom­lin­son’s head hit the ground from the push by police.

Police charge press pho­tog­ra­phers.

Col­lec­tions of videos of police vio­lence: 1 | 2
—————-

Lon­don assem­bly and pro­ces­sion:

East­er ris­ing!
Reclaim the City, Sat­ur­day April 11

* 12.00 noon Sat­ur­day — 12.00 noon Sun­day
* Wear Black
* Assem­ble 11:30am, Beth­nal Green
* Lay your flow­ers where Ian Tom­lin­son died
* Bring pop-up tents to stay with Ian through the night

—————-

Edin­burgh protest:

Four months ago it was a 15-year-old school­boy in Greece – today it’s a 47-year-old news­pa­per sell­er in the UK.

Enough with the state mur­ders!

Whether civil­ians’ deaths are caused because of “heart attacks” (most like­ly due to police ter­ror) or head injuries (due to police bru­tal­i­ty) or “mis­fires” (due to police stu­pid­i­ty), we say we had Enough!

Enough! Of your lies in attempt­ing to cov­er up your mis­takes
Enough! Of your “Robo­cop” atti­tude
Enough! Of your “to serve and pro­tect” fake masks
Enough! Of you being the guardian dogs of the priv­i­leged elite

We say Enough! and we are going to say it out loud so every­one can hear us.

Sat­ur­day 11th of April at 1:30pm in Bris­to Square (Edin­burgh)

Bring friends, ban­ners, can­dles and some­thing to make noise with (drums, whis­tles etc.)

—————-

Red­ditch protest:

The polic­ing at the G20 protests was extreme­ly vio­lent and aggres­sive. Peace­ful pro­test­ers were attacked and beat­en, many of them suf­fer­ing injuries. We’ve all seen the videos of police lay­ing into the cli­mate campers who stood there with their hands in the air calm­ly stat­ing “this is not a riot”. And now we see film evi­dence that Ian Tom­lin­son, who was not even a pro­test­er, was bru­tal­ly attacked from behind with a baton, before being shoved hard to the ground by a vicious cop. Ian Tom­lin­son died min­utes lat­er — I call this MURDER and it hap­pened on Jacqui Smith‘s watch!!

This is a call out for a Nation­al Demon­stra­tion in Red­ditch, the con­stituen­cy of Jacqui Smith, the Home Sec­re­tary.

Demon­strate against the increas­ing­ly vio­lent and aggres­sive polic­ing at peace­ful protests. Demon­strate against the ero­sion of civ­il lib­er­ties in our so called democ­ra­cy. Demand that Jacqui Smith ensures that the offi­cers who mur­dered Ian Tom­lin­son are brought to jus­tice.

Let‘s see how Jacqui Smith likes it when 1,000s of pro­test­ers turn up in her home town demand­ing JUSTICE!!!

Sat­ur­day 18th April — 12 noon out­side Red­ditch Town Hall.

The town hall is about 10 min­utes walk from the train sta­tion.
http://www.multimap.com/s/QKjPxY9S

—————-

A protest against the death of Ian Tom­lin­son and the grow­ing use of vio­lent tac­tics by police against pro­test­ers will take place 1 pm Sat­ur­day 11 April, Grey’s Mon­u­ment, New­cas­tle

—————-

Legal call-out

G20 LEGAL UPDATE
First, thank you for all the emails. We are read­ing them but not acknowl­edg­ing them at the moment due to the quan­ti­ty. Our apolo­gies. For the time being, if you would like us to respond — please send us anoth­er email request­ing a response.

HOW THE POST-PROTEST LEGAL PROCESS WORKS:
Lots of peo­ple are writ­ing to us with evi­dence of police mis­be­hav­iour and there cer­tain­ly seems to be grounds for com­plaint in many of them.
How­ev­er, cru­cial­ly com­plaints and legal claims need to be brought by indi­vid­u­als: we can’t do it on your behalf. Also, do NOT make a com­plaint if there’s a pos­si­bil­i­ty that you will make a legal claim, or could sup­port some­one else doing so — com­plain­ing to the IPCC before suing the police will com­pro­mise the case.

What we are doing is:

1. We are mak­ing sure we have the evi­dence avail­able to us sort­ed so we can locate sup­port­ing evi­dence for those arrest­ed or those who bring com­plaints of assault and so forth against the police.

2. We are explor­ing whether there is a legal chal­lenge strate­gi­cal­ly worth bring­ing this time. If so, we will be look­ing for poten­tial lit­i­gants.

3. We are prepar­ing report and film on the Camp and may be in con­tact with some of you to use your state­ments. We have made no deci­sion as to what we will do with the report at this point.

4. We have a par­tic­u­lar inter­est in how those with injuries or ill­ness­es were treat­ed by the police — so if you have rel­e­vant evi­dence there please let us know. Depend­ing on the evi­dence, we may focus on this as an area of con­cern.

What you could do:

If you were wrong­ful­ly arrest­ed, or assault­ed and injured by a police offi­cer, you may be able to bring a case against the police. Please con­tact Bind­mans Solic­i­tors in the first instance: 020 7833 4433. If they do not have the capac­i­ty then we can rec­om­mend oth­er firms of solic­i­tors who have worked with activists in the past. We may have sup­port­ing evi­dence so let us know if we can help. Please keep us informed of the out­comes — legal@climatecamp.org.uk.

If you were arrest­ed and charged, let us know as we may have sup­port­ing evi­dence that may help with your defence. You will need to give your solic­i­tor your con­sent to them talk­ing to us or they will not be able to tell us about your case. Please keep us informed of the out­come — legal@climatecamp.org.uk.

N.B. If you have pre­vi­ous­ly left any impor­tant legal infor­ma­tion on an answer­ing machine or sent to a dif­fer­ent email address and nobody got back to you, please try again using the email address above

Mean­while write up any­thing rel­e­vant now and email us, let us know if you have footage and we will send you some infor­ma­tion on how to share it with us, keep copies of any orig­i­nal notes, pho­tos and film (and keep them for 12 months).

Final­ly, if your wit­ness state­ment relates to the G20 Melt­down protests at Bank, there is a sep­a­rate legal sup­port process. Please con­tact the Legal Defence and Mon­i­tor­ing Group — email ldmgmail@yahoo.co.uk or post to Legal Defence and Mon­i­tor­ing Group, BM Box HAVEN, Lon­don, WC1N 3XX .

—————-
Bloody protestor & baton-wielding cop
Pub­lic Order strate­gies to not get ket­tled and beat­en by the police

For how to sur­vive police tac­tics in big pub­lic order sit­u­a­tions such as the G20 protests, and still do what you want to do, read the Guide to Pub­lic Order Sit­u­a­tions — any com­ments or ideas please send them in to manchester@earthfirst.org.uk

—-

Video of police rush on cli­mate camp — why you should read the above, rather than lis­ten to some­one on a mega­phone sug­gest­ing peo­ple put their hands up AND link arms! The same charge but clear­er and more bru­tal can be seen here. Oth­er clips and reports from the day are all here.

—————-

Jour­nal­ists removed from cov­er­ing G20 protests with ille­gal use of laws and through injury — see the com­men­taryhere.

—————-

Beau­ti­ful & incite­ful G20 pho­to essaychap­ter 1: the anar­chists are com­ing! | chap­ter 2 part 1: storm the banks? | chap­ter 2 part 2: a tale of ket­tles, and death | chap­ter 3: police work

—————-

Cor­rect­ing the media nar­ra­tive of the G20 protests on April 1, 2009

The media cov­er­age of the G20 protests has been sys­tem­at­i­cal­ly biased, writes Musab You­nis — ignor­ing the vio­lent polic­ing, the tac­tic of open-air impris­on­ment of demon­stra­tors, and the real chronol­o­gy of events. “It has tak­en remark­able obe­di­ence by the press,” writes Musab, “to refuse to ask some sim­ple and obvi­ous ques­tions.”

#1 – The rever­sal of events

“Anti-cap­i­tal­ist pro­test­ers embarked upon a wreck­ing spree with­in a City branch of the Roy­al Bank of Scot­land today,” shrieked The Times on April 1, “and engaged in run­ning bat­tles with police as G20 demon­stra­tions turned vio­lent. Police were forced to use dogs, hors­es and trun­cheons to con­trol a crowd of up to 5,000 peo­ple who marched on the Bank of Eng­land, in Thread­nee­dle Street, on the eve of the Lon­don sum­mit.”

This nar­ra­tive of events is entire­ly typ­i­cal. Under the head­line “Police clash with G20 pro­tes­tors”, the BBC report­ed that “pro­test­ers stormed a Lon­don office of the Roy­al Bank of Scot­land”, lat­er adding tha: “offi­cers lat­er used ‘con­tain­ment’ then ‘con­trolled dis­per­sal’” (BBC, April 1). The Guardian report­ed: “The G20 protests in cen­tral Lon­don turned vio­lent today ahead of tomor­row’s sum­mit, with a band of demon­stra­tors close to the Bank of Eng­land storm­ing a Roy­al Bank of Scot­land branch … [S]ome bloody skir­mish­es broke out as police tried to keep thou­sands of peo­ple in con­tain­ment pens” (The Guardian, April 1).

What is inter­est­ing about this nar­ra­tive is that it pre­cise­ly revers­es the events of the day.

Eye­wit­ness accounts of the day agree that the police began the now-infa­mous tac­tic of ‘ket­tling’ pro­tes­tors – refus­ing to allow any­one in or out of a con­fined space held by police lines – as soon as the four march­es had con­verged on the Bank of Eng­land, at around mid­day. An arti­cle in The Times a day ear­li­er by a for­mer Assis­tant Com­mis­sion­er of the Met­ro­pol­i­tan Police, Andy Hay­man, sug­gest­ed that the police had planned to use this tac­tic well in advance: “Tac­tics to herd the crowd into a pen, known as ‘the ket­tle’, have been crit­i­cised heav­i­ly before, yet the police will not want groups splin­ter­ing away from the main crowd. This would stretch their resources” (The Times, March 31).

Note that the “vio­lent out­burst” (Tele­graph) of win­dow-break­ing took place hours after the police had decid­ed to “herd the crowd” of at least 5,000 peo­ple “into a pen” with­out access to food, water or toi­let facil­i­ties – and with­out allow­ing them to leave.

The press was sure­ly aware of this. The Guardian’s live blog from the day not­ed at 11.57 a.m. that “the bar­ri­ers designed to fence in the pro­test­ers are not big enough”, an hour lat­er it con­firms that there is “a ‘ket­tle’ at the Bank of Eng­land”: half an hour lat­er they report “clash­es” and final­ly, at 1.30 p.m., “a win­dow has been smashed.” An objec­tive observ­er of the sequence of events here might ask whether the police ‘ket­tle’ had in fact been respon­si­ble for the “clash­es”, “vio­lence” and smashed win­dow.

But this idea – that the ket­tle might have pro­voked the “clash­es”, and that the police might there­fore be respon­si­ble for the “vio­lence” – is remark­ably absent from vir­tu­al­ly all of the reams of press cov­er­age of the protests. We do, of course, have a spec­trum of opin­ion: where­as the right-wing Dai­ly Mail sees the pro­tes­tors as “a fear­some group of thugs”, a “bizarre group of mis­fits” fuelled by “Dutch courage” and a “will­ing­ness to use vio­lence” (April 1), for the left-wing Guardian only “a minor­i­ty of demon­stra­tors seemed deter­mined to cause dam­age” whilst “much of the protest­ing” was “peace­ful” (April 1).

Again, the notion that there was not a “vio­lent” core of demon­stra­tors at all, but that peo­ple were pro­voked into “clash­es” with the police due to police tac­tics, is absent. Even the arti­cle which is by far most crit­i­cal of the police actions – a piece by Dun­can Camp­bell in The Guardian titled ‘Did police con­tain­ment cause more trou­ble than it pre­vent­ed?’ – only goes as far as to say: “As for the vio­lent clash­es that led to cracked heads and limbs, how much was inevitable and how much avoid­able?”. Camp­bell con­cedes that “some demon­stra­tors were bent on aggro” but adds: “so were some of the offi­cers.” He also crit­i­cis­es the con­di­tions inside the ket­tle and sug­gests that it will make peo­ple think twice before embark­ing on a demon­stra­tion in future. Thus Camp­bell sug­gests the “clash­es” were avoid­able, but does not indi­cate that the ket­tles actu­al­ly led to the “clash­es” – though, to give cred­it where it is due, his is the only piece in the press which dares to sug­gest that the police were them­selves vio­lent.

#2 – Jus­ti­fi­ca­tions

Well before the protests, the press had been report­ing with glee the “vio­lence” pre­dict­ed as “Lon­don went into lock­down” and “pro­tes­tors issued a call to arms” with “police fears” of pro­tes­tors “intent on vio­lence” (The Lon­don Paper, 31 March).

The BBC post­ed a sym­pa­thet­ic arti­cle titled ‘The chal­lenge of polic­ing the G20’ (30 March) which point­ed out that: “police offi­cers spend their pro­fes­sion­al lives try­ing to play down the pub­lic order impli­ca­tions of demon­stra­tions — it’s in their inter­ests to keep things calm.”

“The secu­ri­ty strat­e­gy of the day,” they report­ed breath­less­ly, “resem­bles a three-dimen­sion­al ever-chang­ing puz­zle” where “the unknow­able fac­tor is the demon­stra­tor bent on vio­lence”. The arti­cle end­ed with a quote from Com­man­der O’Brien: “If any­one wants to come to Lon­don to engage in crime or dis­or­der, they will be met with a swift and effi­cient polic­ing response.”

This flur­ry of media cov­er­age pre­dict­ing “vio­lence” from “anar­chists” was clear­ly ini­ti­at­ed by the police, who released a bar­rage of press state­ments before the protests which served to pre-emp­tive­ly quell crit­i­cism of their actions on the day – actions which had, of course, been planned well in advance. The G20 polic­ing was to be “one of the largest, one of the most chal­leng­ing, and one of the most com­pli­cat­ed oper­a­tions” ever “deliv­ered” by the Met­ro­pol­i­tan Police, accord­ing to Com­man­der Simon O’Brien, who hit the press cir­cuit with gus­to in the days pre­ced­ing the G20.

The press obe­di­ent­ly played their part by report­ing police “fears” word for word, with com­plete sym­pa­thy, and with no ques­tion on ask­ing those who planned to protest whether they thought the police reac­tion might be over­ly vio­lent. After all, “the police have had to pre­pare for every pos­si­bil­i­ty” on April 1, not­ed the Times: “from ter­ror­ism to riots” (The Times, March 31).

With ample oppor­tu­ni­ty to ques­tion an unusu­al­ly talk­a­tive police force, bare­ly a sin­gle sen­tence in the press asked whether the police prepa­ra­tion for the protests might be heavy-hand­ed or that a vio­lent reac­tion by the police to the protests might lead to seri­ous injury or death. The pro­tes­tors, of course, were to be “vio­lent” “mobs” (based on police “intel­li­gence” gleaned from “social net­work­ing sites”), but the police were to be calm, mea­sured and under­take only nec­es­sary mea­sures.

The effect of this press cov­er­age was to jus­ti­fy in advance all police actions whilst de-legit­imis­ing any actions by pro­tes­tors. End­less pre­dic­tions of “vio­lent pro­tes­tors” meant that all the day’s “clash­es” were sure to be blamed on the “minor­i­ty” of “intent on vio­lence” – even if evi­dence sug­gest­ed that “clash­es” were actu­al­ly insti­gat­ed by police, and that vio­lence was in the main inflict­ed by the police on pro­tes­tors. With­in the press nar­ra­tive, the police are mere­ly reac­tive; forced to respond to a “vio­lent” sit­u­a­tion and “keep things calm”; the notion that they could have active­ly encour­aged and pro­voked “clash­es” seems patent­ly absurd.

#3 – So what’s miss­ing?

There are a num­ber of impor­tant ques­tions which sim­ply didn’t appear in the press.

a) Did the police intend to ‘ket­tle’ demon­stra­tors in a con­fined space regard­less of whether there was any vio­lence or not?

All the evi­dence, includ­ing past cas­es of the police using this tac­tic, sug­gests this was the case. (At the Cli­mate Camp protest at Bish­ops­gate on the same day, the police beat pro­tes­tors back into a ket­tle despite them hold­ing up their hands and chant­i­ng ‘this is not a riot’, as can clear­ly be seen on the Indy­media video ‘Riot police attack peace­ful pro­tes­tors at G20 cli­mate camp’).
Is there a pos­si­bil­i­ty that the police were not in fact “forced to use dogs, hoses and trun­cheons” due to “vio­lent” pro­tes­tors, but that they inflict­ed vio­lence on peace­ful pro­tes­tors?

b) Was there real­ly “vio­lence” from the pro­tes­tors?

The Met­ro­pol­i­tan Police state that “small groups of pro­tes­tors intent on vio­lence, mixed with the crowds of law­ful demon­stra­tors” (Met Police, 2 April) and The Guardian quotes Com­man­der Simon O’Brien as claim­ing there were “small pock­ets of crim­i­nals” with­in the crowd who attend­ed a memo­r­i­al for Ian Tom­lin­son on April 2. Again, eye­wit­ness accounts of both days state that vir­tu­al­ly all of the vio­lence came from police. Despite hours of ket­tling and media reports of “mis­siles” being thrown at police (trans­la­tion: plas­tic bot­tles), the only tan­gi­ble evi­dence of pro­tes­tor vio­lence at either of the two main protest sites seems to have been some smashed win­dows, which of course is dam­age to prop­er­ty and not “vio­lence”.

The Guardian reports that a small group of demon­stra­tors were “seek­ing con­fronta­tion as they surged towards police lines.” Of course you’re expect­ed to sit qui­et­ly when you are being held against your will behind police lines and peri­od­i­cal­ly beat­en with batons. But is it con­ceiv­able that those who “charged” police lines sim­ply want­ed to leave? And why is it con­fronta­tion­al to “charge police lines” with­out using any weapons, but not con­fronta­tion­al to hold thou­sands of peo­ple in an area, keep­ing them there with kicks and batons? That the pro­tes­tors could have actu­al­ly showed remark­able restraint when being pro­voked in an unbear­able sit­u­a­tion is laugh­able accord­ing to all the press. Yet this is what eye­wit­ness accounts point to. Only the Let­ters page in the Guardian gives any cre­dence to this: one per­son writes that “the few scuf­fles we did wit­ness were caused pre­cise­ly at the frus­tra­tion of peo­ple not being allowed to come and go as they pleased”; anoth­er states that: “an ugly mood devel­oped after those who had come to exer­cise their demo­c­ra­t­ic right to protest were detained against their will” (Guardian, April 3).

c) Were the police tac­tics respon­si­ble for the “vio­lence” of the day?

Because the press has been admirably obe­di­ent in revers­ing the course of events, this is an impos­si­ble ques­tion – accord­ing to the media first there was “vio­lence” from “anar­chist” pro­tes­tors, then the ket­tle began. Yet once we estab­lish a more accu­rate chronol­o­gy, and take into account police pri­or plan­ning, it seems that it had always been intend­ed to shut thou­sands of peo­ple into an enclosed space with­out being able to leave.

d) Was the ‘ket­tling’ tac­tic intend­ed to make peo­ple think twice about demon­strat­ing in future?

The most crit­i­cal piece in the press, by Dun­can Camp­bell in the Guardian, states that those “peo­ple think­ing about embark­ing on demon­stra­tions in the future may have to decide whether they want to be effec­tive­ly locked up for eight hours with­out food or water and, when leav­ing, to be pho­tographed and iden­ti­fied.” Yet it does not sug­gest that this may have been the ini­tial inten­tion of the police in adopt­ing this tac­tic, even though it is absurd to sug­gest the police might have planned to use this tac­tic with­out imag­in­ing it would lead to anger and frus­tra­tion on the part of those trapped in the ket­tle. In con­junc­tion with the exten­sive restric­tions to free­dom of protest under the New Labour gov­ern­ment, amply doc­u­ment­ed else­where, it might be rea­son­able to sug­gest that the police tac­tics were in part, at least, designed to deter pro­tes­tors.

e) Were the police vio­lent and should any offi­cers face charges?

Remark­ably, this ques­tion is absent from vir­tu­al­ly all the press cov­er­age – despite hun­dreds of injuries to pro­tes­tors, the death of some­one appar­ent­ly trapped in a ket­tle, and video footage show­ing baton charges direct­ed towards crowds of peo­ple with their hands in the air, the use of riot shields as an offen­sive weapon, and the beat­ing with batons of pro­tes­tors sat on the ground (see, for exam­ple, ‘Riot police attack peace­ful pro­tes­tors at G20 cli­mate camp’ on Indy­media). The ample ground­work laid by the police sug­gest­ing there would be pro­tes­tors “intent on vio­lence” hap­pi­ly accounts for all the vio­lence of the day and makes easy to ignore eye­wit­ness accounts that state that peace­ful pro­tes­tors being ket­tled, charged, beat­en and pro­voked by the police. Giv­en the num­ber of wit­ness­es and video evi­dence, it has tak­en remark­able obe­di­ence by the press to refuse to ask this ques­tion – and for a media so obsessed with vio­lence, it seems strange that the over­whelm­ing vio­lence of the day, that inflict­ed by the police on pro­tes­tors, bare­ly mer­its a men­tion.

Climate Camp in the City, Critical Mass & the G20 Meltdown Bank of England plus other protests from this week — updated

The urban Cli­mate Camp at Bish­ops­gate by the Euro­pean Cli­mate Exchange has been report­ed to have over 2000 peo­ple and 150 tents, and has been described as a huge­ly impres­sive infra­struc­ture.

Welcome to the Climate Camp in the CityThe urban Cli­mate Camp at Bish­ops­gate by the Euro­pean Cli­mate Exchange has been report­ed to have over 2000 peo­ple and 150 tents, and has been described as a huge­ly impres­sive infra­struc­ture. There has been numer­ous the­atri­cal per­for­mances, and sound-sys­tems along­side com­post toi­lets, a med­ical tent, a chil­dren’s area, a cou­ple of work­ing kitchens, speak­ers, ban­ners across the street and numer­ous work­shops. Many peo­ple have been pic­nick­ing there and the camp has been attract­ing passers by and city work­ers. There have been police lines on either side of the camp but peo­ple are allowed in and out. There has been danc­ing near the police lines and the atmos­phere has gen­er­al­ly been described as very good, with office work­ers waiv­ing out of win­dows at the campers.

'Nature doesn't do Bailouts'CC London money-eyes
“Street emp­ty. They beat us out and squashed our tents. But oh what a world we cre­at­ed! Shame on the pow­ers that be.”
— Cli­mate Camp Lon­don

Cli­mate Camp in the City has come to a end as police aggres­sive­ly cleared pro­test­ers from Bish­ops­gate. Sev­er­al hours ear­li­er campers agreed to move to the North to shore up their defences, but after heav­i­ly provoca­tive polic­ing, peo­ple began to try and leave.

Bloodied & put in vanMany campers head home with light injuries after a long evening of intim­i­da­tion and vio­lence from the police. At sev­er­al points they moved in to snatch indi­vid­u­als from the crowd and sent lines of offi­cers into sit­ting campers, unpro­voked. One pro­test­er said “the police act­ed aggres­sive­ly, goad­ing pro­test­ers, but we remained peace­ful and the aim remains strong.” By 2am their aggres­sive tac­tics suc­ceed­ed with most of the campers doing their best to escape the cor­don. Soon after the camp was bro­ken.

Climate Camp in the City tentsCampers claim a vic­to­ry hav­ing held their ground peace­ful­ly for so long, serv­ing food, drink, a vari­ety of work­shops to the campers, and above all, cre­at­ing a pos­i­tive space for change. We also pay homage to the inven­tor of the pop-up tent, for mak­ing today pos­si­ble.

Updates:

01:20 Reports that Cli­mate Camp has been evict­ed by police — peo­ple pushed back and beat­en, won­der­ing how to retrieve their belong­ings.

01:10 — Police pulling peo­ple out of Cli­mate Camp from south­ern perime­ter.

00:30 — Cli­mate Camp par­tic­i­pants have been mak­ing speech­es to the police about why they have been tak­ing action today.

00:20 — Reports from Cli­mate Camp of police using bolt-cut­ters to dis­man­tle the bike bar­ri­cade whilst there is now noth­ing to stop them com­ing in from the North.

23:55 — Police are now mov­ing from south to north push­ing peo­ple out of the space occu­pied by the cli­mate camp, and it’s clear­ing out fast. About 500 peo­ple are left at this point.

23:28 — Push past Liv­er­pool Street as a group are chased at speed pur­sued by police dogs and vans. At least one arrest.

23:18 — Let­ting peo­ple out from South side oppo­site Liv­er­pool St. Lots of police charg­ing, Bot­tles being thrown from out­side camp towards charg­ing cops

22:48 — About 2000 peo­ple in Cli­mate Camp Ket­tle, police want to impose a sec­tion 14 and ID every­one. They’re look­ing to force peo­ple out through the North two at a time. There are police mass­ing at the South End, Due to the amount of campers that does cur­rent­ly not seem fea­si­ble.

22:15 — riot police have moved into the cli­mate camp crowd at bish­ops­gate and are vio­lent­ly drag­ging peace­ful sit­ting pro­test­ers to dis­perse the area

ear­li­er this evening riot police forced their way into the peace­ful cli­mate camp. pro­test­ers held their hands up and shout­ed ‘this is not a riot’ over and over, while ful­ly-kit­ted riot police used shields and batons to push and vio­lent­ly surge for­ward into the camp along the east­ern pave­ment of bish­ops­gate. it seems like­ly this clear­ance oper­a­tion had been planned all day — a line of police vans parked along the east­side had cre­at­ed a ‘walk­way’ along that pave­ment which was effec­tive­ly sep­a­rat­ed from the camp itself. all the riot police had to do was push their way onto that side, and it is clear that was their strat­e­gy. once done, there was a fur­ther stand-off for a while before the next stage to start mov­ing pro­test­ers out one-by-one.

21:35 — we are cur­rent receiv­ing reports from the Cli­mate Camp in the city, that all peo­ple are going to be searched to be allowed out, as well as peo­ple are told to delete pho­tos of offi­cers from their cam­eras, under the threat of seizure. Inter­est­ing­ly the joint com­mit­tee on human rights of the UK par­lia­ment has just made a cou­ple of rec­om­men­da­tion about polic­ing direct­ly con­demn­ing the use of these anti-ter­ror pow­er to police protest. Here are the direct quotes and links.

Democracy is an illusionRec­om­men­da­tions of the UK Par­lia­ment Joint Com­mit­tee on Human Rights con­cern­ing the use of anti-ter­ror pow­ers for stop-and-search:

“93. Whilst we accept that there may be cir­cum­stances where the police rea­son­ably believe, on the basis of intel­li­gence, that a demon­stra­tion could be used to mask a ter­ror­ist attack or be a tar­get of ter­ror­ism, we have heard of no exam­ples of this issue aris­ing in prac­tice. We are con­cerned by the reports we have received of police using counter-ter­ror­ism pow­ers on peace­ful pro­test­ers. It is not clear to us whether this stems from a delib­er­ate deci­sion by the police to use a legal tool which they now have or if indi­vid­ual offi­cers are exer­cis­ing their dis­cre­tion inap­pro­pri­ate­ly. What­ev­er the rea­son, this is a mat­ter of con­cern. We wel­come the Min­is­ter’s com­ments that counter-ter­ror­ism leg­is­la­tion should not be used to deal with pub­lic order or protests. We also wel­come the rec­om­men­da­tion in the new guid­ance to human rights being includ­ed in com­mu­ni­ty impact assess­ments. We rec­om­mend that the new guid­ance on the use of the sec­tion 44 stop and search pow­er be amend­ed to make clear that counter-ter­ror­ism pow­ers should not be used against peace­ful pro­test­ers. In addi­tion, the guid­ance should make spe­cif­ic ref­er­ence to the duty of police to act com­pat­i­bly with human rights, includ­ing, for exam­ple, by spec­i­fy­ing the human rights engaged by protest.”
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/jt200809/jtselect/jtrights/47/4707.htm

Con­cern­ing the impact of the recent leg­is­la­tion about tak­ing pho­tographs of offi­cers in pub­lic the joint com­mit­tee said:

“94. Con­cerns have recent­ly been expressed in the media that a new pro­vi­sion in the Counter Ter­ror­ism Act 2008 makes it a crim­i­nal offence to take and pub­lish a pho­to­graph of a police offi­cer. Sec­tion 76 of the 2008 Act makes it an offence to elic­it or attempt to elic­it infor­ma­tion about an indi­vid­ual who is or has been a con­sta­ble “which is of a kind like­ly to be use­ful to a per­son com­mit­ting or prepar­ing an act of terrorism.”[174] As the Explana­to­ry Notes to the Counter Ter­ror­ism Bill cor­rect­ly stat­ed, the new offence will only be com­mit­ted where the infor­ma­tion in ques­tion is “such as to raise a rea­son­able sus­pi­cion that it was intend­ed to be used to assist in the prepa­ra­tion or com­mis­sion of an act of ter­ror­ism, and must be of a kind that was like­ly to pro­vide prac­ti­cal assis­tant to a per­son com­mit­ting or prepar­ing an act of terrorism.”[175] That is the effect of a deci­sion of the Court of Appeal in a case in 2008[176] inter­pret­ing the same statu­to­ry lan­guage in the sep­a­rate ter­ror­ism offence of pos­sess­ing a doc­u­ment or record con­tain­ing infor­ma­tion of a kind like­ly to be use­ful to a per­son com­mit­ting or prepar­ing an act of terrorism.[177]”

“95. We there­fore do not share the con­cerns expressed in the media that the new offence crim­i­nalis­es tak­ing pho­tographs of the police. How­ev­er, we do regard as sig­nif­i­cant the fact that this is being wide­ly report­ed as a mat­ter of con­cern to jour­nal­ists. Legal uncer­tain­ty about the reach of crim­i­nal offences can have a chill­ing effect on the activ­i­ties of jour­nal­ists and pro­test­ers. We there­fore rec­om­mend that, to elim­i­nate any scope for doubt about the scope of the new offence in section76 of the Counter Ter­ror­ism Act 2008, guid­ance be issued to the police about the scope of the offence in light of the deci­sion of the Court of Appeal, and specif­i­cal­ly address­ing con­cerns about its improp­er use to pre­vent pho­tograph­ing or film­ing police. ”
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/jt200809/jtselect/jtrights/47/4707.htm

20:45 — cur­rent­ly ket­tled in but they are hav­ing a ceilidh/ barn dance so not bro­ken yet! Fuck the po-lice.

18:35 — Riot police baton charge cli­mate camp
Police clearing climate camp in city
Numer­ous reports come in stat­ing the riot police are in the process of attack­ing the peace­ful cli­mate camp. Even in the face of severe and unpro­voked police bru­tal­i­ty the pro­test­ers are main­tain­ing their peace­ful protest.

Despite events through­out the day at the urban cli­mate camp being entire­ly peace­ful, riot police are mobil­is­ing at the camp with 14 riot vans pulling up in addi­tion to the six already present there. While cli­mate campers appealed to the police high­light­ing the peace­ful nature of the protest and the pres­ence of many fam­i­lies with chil­dren, the police stormed into into the camp through a gap in the bicy­cle perime­ter of the camp indis­crim­i­nate­ly attack­ing campers with batons, push­ing fam­i­lies and chil­dren out of tents and destroy­ing sec­tions of the camp. Camomile, Bish­ops­gate and Wom­wood st are closed off hem­ming in the campers. Five police motor bikes pulled up with what looked like sur­veil­lance gear. Anoth­er report comes in from cli­mate camp stat­ing that the police have formed lines at the Liv­er­pool st end of the camp. a third report comes in from an Indy­media vol­un­teer report­ing that he has ‘nev­er seen any­thing like this’ three lines of hel­met­ed riot police are indis­crim­i­nate­ly beat­ing pro­test­ers with batons. Pro­test­ers are not fight­ing back and are main­tain­ing the non-vio­lent nature of their action in spite of this there are report­ed to be at least four arrests. The crowd chants shame on you as the police con­tin­ue to attack campers.

Full 1st April time­line

Video show­ing police tac­tics clear­ing space.

Camp set­ting-up video.

Panora­ma — click through to orig­i­nal for big­ger image: Climate Camp in the City panorama

Anoth­er per­son­al report: I arrived at about 5pm, at the north end of it. Police were already form­ing a line along­side the bar­ri­er that had been erect­ed made up of rail­ings and bikes attached to them, but they were not blockad­ing and every one was free to vis­it, come in and out.

There was a fes­tive atmos­phere, colour­ful tents, ban­ners, street dec­o­ra­tion…

A man with the slo­gan “God is too big for reli­gion” on his t‑shirt then start­ed to try and make every sin­gle riot police­man and woman on the line to smile. “This is an order”, he shout­ed, “and if they don’t com­ply, things will only get worse”. He man­aged to get or steal a smile of every sin­gle police offi­cer includ­ing a police woman who tried just too hard to keep a stony face.

He then pro­ceed­ed to try and hug every one “of these very won­der­ful peo­ple” as a sign of his love. To try to get to their hearts, he asked them if they had chil­dren: “please raise your hands if you do not have chil­dren, or keep your hands down if you do have chil­dren”. None of the police moved their arms but he did not suc­ceed to hug every one of the offi­cers. One of them claimed that he was embar­rass­ing them.

I then pro­ceed­ed to pho­to­graph the rest of the camp. A few police vans had some­how made their way into the mid­dle of the cli­mate camp.

At about 6.15pm the south end of the camp start­ed to get “nasty”. Police charged into the peace­ful peo­ple, bring­ing tents vio­lent­ly down to the ground, but peo­ple man­aged to peace­ful­ly stop the police vio­lence, and a par­ty was estab­lished in front of the police lines.

A few police also moved to the mid­dle of the camp, next to the vans, and it looked like they were try­ing to divide the crowd. But peo­ple kept the area occu­pied and this did­n’t hap­pen.

As it got dark­er, more and more riot police and vans gath­ered at the south end of the camp, and I heard that a demon­stra­tion had formed at the north end of the camp, but that the police were afraid of the grow­ing num­bers and were pre­vent­ing peo­ple from get­ting in or out of the camp. We had been cor­doned off with­out warn­ing.

Three meet­ings were held in the camp. One at the south end, anoth­er at the north end, and anoth­er one in the mid­dle, right in front of police. We were informed that the police had decid­ed to keep us penned for two hours, and that after that, they would allow us out in groups of 20, after tak­ing every one’s pho­to­graph and details.

Some peo­ple con­sid­ered sleep­ing the night in the camp, but it was clear from the begin­ning of the night that police were going to dis­rupt peo­ple’s sleep all through the night, just like it had hap­pened dur­ing the cli­mate camp in the sum­mer, last year, with a heli­copter fly­ing over our heads fir­ing an intense light over the street and with the vans’ strongest lights also focus­ing on the campers.

At about 10.00 I tried my luck to get out of the pen by ask­ing per­mis­sion to leave to one of the police offi­cer. He said, “I can not tell you if you can go out. Ask one of your senior mem­bers (eh?) Your legal observers should know more”. A legal observ­er told me that the police had decid­ed to only allow peo­ple out in groups of two after push­ing the crowd in a way that I did­n’t man­age to under­stand.

It was get­ting cold­er and most peo­ple present in the camp by then had not brought a camp­ing tent or sleep­ing bag. Luck­i­ly peo­ple had brought plen­ty of food, which was wide­ly shared. Music was heard around the camp most of the time, and at about 10.30 mem­bers of Radio Rev­olu­cion gave a taste of their music towards the mid­dle of the street. Police offi­cers looked at the scene in aston­ish­ment and a secu­ri­ty guard inside the build­ing began to video them using his phone, as if he had nev­er in his life seen spon­ta­neous acts of arts hap­pen­ing. After a few songs, ran­dom peo­ple in the crowd took on the micro­phone and the instru­ments and shared their art with a small crowd danc­ing around them.

At about 22.45 we again heard des­per­ate cries from the south end of the street and there we went, to learn that the police had charged again on the peace­ful crowd, using batons and pep­per spray, and to see that the peo­ple had decid­ed to sit down and hold the site as much as pos­si­ble.

I joined some peo­ple that had shared their food with me before and start­ed to help them putting their tent down. It was pret­ty clear that the police were going to charge again so we thought bet­ter to have the tent and oth­er things on our backs than destroyed. As we were in the process of undo­ing the tent, the whole of the police line that was at the north end of the camp moved in and we fran­ti­cal­ly con­tin­ued to undo the tent as the police approached, with peo­ple run­ning ahead of them, cry­ing for help. We decid­ed to stay and con­tin­ue to gath­er and pack every­thing until the police stopped us with their batons.

Strange­ly, they just passed by. It seemed all they want­ed to do was reach the north end of the street and join the cops there.

By then it seemed that there were few­er peo­ple than before and we were informed that, although the police had intend­ed to search every one before leav­ing, they were only doing so ran­dom­ly. We gath­ered tent, sleep­ing bags and food, and head­ed for the con­ver­gence cen­tre unmo­lest­ed.

At 11.30 the street was still cor­doned off and peo­ple were not allowed in, but from the out­side, it looked like the peo­ple who were remained inside the cor­don actu­al­ly want­ed to be there; exit seemed to be allowed.


G20 EF! graffiti
Although for the first half hour or so the police seemed con­tent to watch the protest, scuf­fles start­ed to devel­op around the edges. Most seemed to be caused by groups of police grab­bing masked demon­stra­tors and attempt­ing to unmask them.

——–

Crit­i­cal Mass

At 9.30 we were still wait­ing for more peo­ple to join in Bank Junc­tion. We start­ed off at about 10am, with a big sound sys­tem and lots of peo­ple in cos­tumes.

Our first stop was the Roy­al Bank of Scot­land, RBS, next to Bish­ops­gate. There we were informed that RBS heav­i­ly invest in fos­sil fuels. RBS has recent­ly giv­en a mas­sive loan to EON, the com­pa­ny behind the coal pow­er sta­tion in King­worth, where the last cli­mate camp took place.

Back on Bish­ops­gate, we went then to the Deutche Bank, where again the sound sys­tem per­son informed us that this bank has been active­ly involved in “car­bon trad­ing”, which means plant­i­ng trees to “off­set” the exces­sive car­bon emis­sions that com­pa­nies in the rich part of the world should not be pro­duc­ing if they were com­ply­ing with their com­pa­nies’ signed treaties. This tree-plant­i­ng has been done in lands of indige­nous peo­ples in the poor part of the world that have been how the land that they need for their own food is used for this busi­ness with­out their being able to do any­thing about it. We were told that car­bon trad­ing is now big busi­ness, and that it basi­cal­ly con­sists of sell­ing the air we breath.

From where we were, across the road, was the Car­bon Exchange, which, we’re informed, gives us in the Rich West the abil­i­ty to use more car­bon than we have agreed to use in order to try and stop cli­mate chaos. Big com­pa­nies in devel­op­ing coun­tries are said to be mak­ing mon­ey by sell­ing their car­bon cred­its to big com­pa­nies in rich coun­tries so that they can use more car­bon.

We’re told about a com­pa­ny in South Korea that dis­cov­ered a prod­uct in the 70s that is use­ful to “decar­bon­ate” the air, but for some mys­te­ri­ous rea­son it has not made this dis­cov­ery pub­lic, nor used the prod­uct, until now, so it has been allow­ing the South Kore­an pop­u­la­tion to be unnec­es­sar­i­ly pol­lut­ed for about 40 years. Now that it is sell­ing this prod­uct, this com­pa­ny still makes (10 times?) more mon­ey sell­ing car­bon trade cred­its than pro­duc­ing and sell­ing this de-con­t­a­m­i­nat­ing prod­uct.

Space Hijackers APC outside & guarding RBSAt this point the Space Hijack­ers took on the micro­phone to ask us for sup­port because their tank had been “stopped”, sur­round­ed by police. We went there to show our sup­port but the cops did­n’t seem very pre­pared to allow the tank move peace­ful­ly.

At about 10.30 we moved south towards Lon­don Bridge. Last stop before cross­ing the bridge was a spot next to premis­es of Cater­pil­lar, the com­pa­ny pro­vid­ing home-destroy­ing bull­doz­ers to the Israeli gov­ern­ment, and right next to an “Abbey” branch, now prop­er­ty of Grupo San­tander, cur­rent­ly in the process of buy­ing most of the His­pan­ic world and part of the rest, and object of protests and con­tempt in Spain and Latin Amer­i­ca.

From there crossed Lon­don Bridge and then Tow­er Bridge back to the north bank of the riv­er. Next to the tow­er, we were served with free veg­an food reclaimed from the sys­tem’s dai­ly waste. There we were joined by the Dancers and then moved on to join the Cli­mate Camp.

In the mean­time police had moved on to close all streets that lead to Bank junc­tion to the traf­fic, and at noon they were prepar­ing to com­plete­ly cor­don off the area, allow­ing peo­ple in but not out, except city work­ers.

Police separate crowdAt 12.15 peo­ple were in Bank Junc­tion already penned in and allowed in but not out. In Princess Street there were to lines of cops, sep­a­rat­ed by about 100 metres. The “out­side” line, away from the crowd penned in, was rein­forced with three vans crossed.

At 12.30, Queen Vic­to­ria Street, on the west side of Bank Junc­tion, it did­n’t look like the police had formed a line, but quick­ly formed at the shout of one of their offices, then moved away from the pen, still form­ing a line, and push­ing peo­ple away from the junc­tion, so the police line came to block the access of peo­ple com­ing both from Poul­try Street and Queen Vic­to­ria Street. The police were wear­ing bul­let proof vests.

In Man­sion House Place, a small alley way approach­ing the Junc­tion from St. Stephen’s Row in the South, police were also form­ing two lines sep­a­rat­ed by a few metres, cor­don­ing off the junc­tion and only allow­ing fam­i­lies and city work­ers out.

A sin­gle line of vans com­bined with cops blocked the point where King William Street and Lom­bard Street meet.

A few min­utes lat­er horse mount­ed police were form­ing the lines instead of police­men on foot.

——–

Pho­tos from the G20 Melt­down, and oth­er protests from todayG20 Stop Fooling placard
Police armoured vehicle at G20 | Oth­er pic­tures of police APCs: 2 | 3

FIT spotting from on high
Injured woman at G20
'The Beginning is Nigh' placard
Riot cops at G20
Video of police forced into retreat at G20 Melt­down.

How not to use crowd con­trol bar­ri­ers when deal­ing with the police video — also watch police advances & retreats! Tips for how — see the Guide to Pub­lic Order Sit­u­a­tions.

Violent cops at G20
Link to many oth­er video clips.

——–

Activist tank at Roy­al Bank of Scot­land

The activist group Space Hijack­ers joined with police to take care of any “bad” demon­stra­tors who might have shown up to anti-G20 protests in the City of Lon­don today. At 10:30 this morn­ing they showed up with a CCTV-equipped armoured vehi­cle in front of the Roy­al Bank of Scot­land and pre­pared to defend the build­ing.

Police spoil­sports refused their help, con­duct­ed thor­ough search of the vehi­cle, and moved them along. They were lat­er arrest­ed out­side News Inter­na­tion­al.

——–

Window-kicking at the G20Despite the media’s apoc­a­lyp­tic pre­dic­tions, the four horse­men (See SchNEWS 667) did at least make it to the Bank of Eng­land. Whether this was a good idea or not is open to ques­tion. It cer­tain­ly brought a mea­sure of may­hem to the finan­cial heart of Lon­don, which seemed large­ly closed down for the dura­tion. Our num­bers were impres­sive – giv­en the short notice and the media hype of extreme vio­lence. But tac­tics adopt­ed gave the Met free rein to place a huge cor­don around the entire demo – the so-called ket­tle.

As soon as the final Black Horse (iron­i­cal­ly the one sym­bol­is­ing land enclo­sure) arrived, police lines rapid­ly snapped into place across the streets sur­round­ing the plaza that the bank sits on. Unfor­tu­nate­ly — although many did suc­cess­ful­ly make a break for it — the major­i­ty of the crowd, with lit­tle idea of what to do (unless they’d read last week’s SchNEWS pub­lic order guide obvi­ous­ly) stood around as this manoeu­vre was exe­cut­ed. Whilst we know that the protests were organ­ised on very short notice, there seemed to be lit­tle aim oth­er than sim­ply get­ting into the area – there were no bust-cards, and no attempts at crowd co-ordi­na­tion.

At first most seemed hap­py to be inside the huge ket­tle – a few sound-sys­tems were blast­ing out and there was even a bizarre out­burst of con­tem­po­rary dance in front of the The Roy­al Exchange. As the hours wore on and the few city types caught in the cir­cle had shown ID and got them­selves extract­ed, it became obvi­ous that if the police had their way no-one was get­ting out ‘til long after dark. No water, no food, not even a toi­let. The rea­son giv­en? — ‘to pre­vent a breach of the peace’.

By around half-one the ket­tle had been tru­ly brought the boil and fight­ing had bro­ken out along Thread­nee­dle St. A line of police were pushed back by a crowd shout­ing, “Let us out”. A few bot­tles were lobbed but even with­out these the cops were forced to give way to the sheer phys­i­cal pres­sure. Alert­ed by the noise, sup­port streamed over from the oth­er exits to rein­force Thread­nee­dle and push the cops back to the junc­tion with Bartholomew Lane. This left the win­dows of Roy­al Bank of Scot­land exposed. They were duly smashed, although riot­ers were out­num­bered by pho­tog­ra­phers by around fif­teen to one. How­ev­er police lines here were too strong to breach.

At around 2.30, the crowd fac­ing a thin­ner police line across Vic­to­ria St sud­den­ly surged for­ward and by sheer weight of num­bers pushed their way through. One of the shovers told SchNEWS, “It was amaz­ing – we were resigned to being in the ket­tle until mid­night but the lines broke right in front of me and con­fused police were shout­ing ask­ing each oth­er, ‘What’s the plan?’”. Despite the rapid deploy­ment of riot cops, pos­si­bly up to a thou­sand peo­ple escaped at this point. Soon the win­dows of HSBC on Cheap­side had gone in.

SchNEWS has heard reports that oth­ers man­aged to sneak or blag their way out over the next few hours but dur­ing the after­noon the noose was grad­u­al­ly tight­ened with baton charges. Eye­wit­ness­es report­ed a sense of pan­ic devel­op­ing inside the pen. Peo­ple were not allowed out until after 8pm and only then after being pho­tographed.

One man, Ian Tom­lin­son is known to have died inside the cor­don. SchNEWS has heard con­flict­ing reports as to whether he was struck by police. Per­haps a coro­ners inquiry into his death will expose police tac­tics to pub­lic glare (unless they invoke their handy new pow­ers to keep it all secret of course).

This report and oth­ers at http://www.schnews.org.uk/archive/news671.htm

——–
——–

2nd April

Time­line
——–

Bank of Eng­land vig­il under­way for the man who died at yes­ter­day’s G20 Melt­down protest.
G20 vigil
Around 200 pro­test­ers have gath­ered in the City, on the steps of the Old Exchange by the Bank of Eng­land. Their pres­ence rep­re­sents a spon­ta­neous protest in sol­i­dar­i­ty for the man who died while ket­tled at G20 Melt­down yes­ter­day.

No details of the man’s death have been released. All that’s known is he was around 30-years-old and died while ket­tled with thou­sands of oth­ers out­side the Bank of Eng­land.

Demon­stra­tors are demand­ing answers and an inde­pen­dent inquiry into the man’s death. A wall of con­do­lences for the man who died as sprung up. A minute silence was held also.

Police are oper­at­ing an on off ket­tle pol­i­cy. This appears to be a method of encour­ag­ing peo­ple to leave while they can.

The mood over all is calm. There have been waves of chant­i­ng: SHAME SHAME SHAME ON YOU and WHO’S STREETS? OUR STREETS! to the 200-odd police draft­ed in to “keep the peace.”

While some pro­test­ers have left, many oth­ers con­tin­ue to arrive. Some line the pave­ments out­side the Bank of Eng­land. Police are now attempt­ing to move these peo­ple on.

Inter­view with two eye­wit­ness­es of the events pre­ced­ing the death of Ian Tom­lin­son, the man who died dur­ing anti G20 protests in the City of Lon­don on the 1st of April.

Wit­ness­es State­ment: Death at G20

PRESS RELEASE
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Var­i­ous par­tic­i­pants in the City of Lon­don demon­stra­tions on April 1st have come for­ward as wit­ness­es to the col­lapse of a man lat­er iden­ti­fied by author­i­ties as Ian Tom­lin­son. Four dif­fer­ent uni­ver­si­ty stu­dents wit­nessed the col­lapse of Mr. Tom­lin­son. “He stum­bled towards us from the direc­tion of police and pro­test­ers and col­lapsed,” said Peter Apps. “I saw a demon­stra­tor who was a first aider attend to the per­son who had col­lapsed. The man was late 40s, had tat­toos on his hands, and was wear­ing a Mill­wall shirt.”

While the first aider was help­ing the man, anoth­er demon­stra­tor with a mega­phone was call­ing the police over so that they could help.

Natal­ie Lang­ford, a stu­dent at Queen Mary, said “there was a police charge. A lot of peo­ple ran in our direc­tion. The woman giv­ing first aid stood in the path of the crowd.” The run­ning peo­ple, see­ing a guy on the ground, went around them.

Anoth­er demon­stra­tor had already called 999 and was get­ting med­ical advice from the ambu­lance dis­patch­er. “Four police with two police medics came. They told her [the first aider] to ‘move along’.”, said Peter Apps. “Then they pushed her forcibly away from him. They refused to lis­ten to her [the first aider] when she tried to explain his con­di­tion.”

The first aider, who did not wish to be named, said “The police sur­round­ed the col­lapsed man. I was stand­ing with the per­son who’d called 999. The ambu­lance dis­patch­er want­ed to talk to the police, the phone was being held out to them, but the police refused.”

Anoth­er wit­ness, Elias Stoakes, added “we did­n’t see them [the police] per­form CPR.”

Oth­er peo­ple who had tried to stay with the col­lapsed man were also pushed away.

All of the wit­ness­es deny the alle­ga­tion that many mis­siles were thrown.

Accord­ing to Peter Apps, “one bot­tle was thrown, but it did­n’t come close to the police. Noth­ing was thrown after­wards as oth­er demon­stra­tors told the per­son to stop. The per­son who threw the bot­tle prob­a­bly did­n’t real­ize that some­one was behind the ring of police.” All the wit­ness­es said that the demon­stra­tors were con­cerned for the well-being of the col­lapsed man once they real­ized that there was an injured per­son.

Natal­ie Lang­ford said “when the ambu­lance arrived the pro­test­ers got straight out of the way.”

These wit­ness­es are hap­py to give media state­ments.

They can be con­tact­ed through this press liai­son email: g20witnesses@gmail.com

——–

Police Raid at Earl Street G20 Con­ver­gence Cen­tre

As peo­ple were organ­is­ing to leave the con­ver­gence space at mid-day today police raid­ed. 30–40 peo­ple attempt­ed to pro­tect the space by blockad­ing the main doors. We then con­gre­gat­ed on the top floor and sat in a cir­cle with our arms in the air to show the police that we were not vio­lent. How­ev­er, the police met us with a taser gun, full riot gear and pro­ceed­ed to make us lie face down with our hands on the floor.

We believe two peo­ple were arrest­ed, although we are unsure what they have been charged with. One has been tak­en to hos­pi­tal fol­low­ing an injury. The rest were searched, hand­cuffed and had names, DOB, address­es and pho­tos tak­en.

If any­one has more infor­ma­tion please con­tact legal sup­port urgent­ly: legal@climatecamp.org.uk

Searches/details ille­gal­ly demand­ed before raid begins here.

Police massed outside convergence centreCon­ver­gence cen­tre evic­tion full time­line here.
Convgence centre raid search

——

Police attack Ram­part Social Cen­tre

At around 12:30 this after­noon, 30–50 police arrived at the Ram­part, an activist social cen­tre in Whitechapel, East Lon­don. A for­mer­ly derelict build­ing which had been emp­ty for years, Ram­part was occu­pied by activists and turned into a social and cul­tur­al venue more than four years ago.

When the police arrived, some­one went out­side to speak to them, ask­ing them if they were going to search the place and telling them that if they had a war­rant they could just knock on the door. The police told him not to wor­ry.

A few min­utes lat­er riot police in black uni­forms, wear­ing bal­a­clavas came through a down­stairs win­dow, the door to the roof and a door to an adjoin­ing build­ing. The police broke down the doors and stormed in with drawn tasers, scream­ing at every­one to get down on the ground, jump­ing on them and hand­cuff­ing them. They had a TV crew with them when break­ing in through the door. They were insult­ing peo­ple and say­ing things like “one of you croaked last night”, try­ing to pro­voke a bad reac­tion from peo­ple.

They then demand­ed iden­ti­fi­ca­tion from every­one and checked IDs against what appeared to be a list of spe­cif­ic peo­ple. There were 2 or 3 arrests. The remain­ing peo­ple were then let go.

Right now it’s calm, how­ev­er peo­ple are a bit shak­en after the expe­ri­ence. The cops have left the neigh­bour­hood.

——

Spi­der­man on bail after G20 Lloyds Cli­mate Demo

Alain Robert, oth­er­wise known as ‘Spi­der­man’ for his dar­ing free climbs of urban build­ings was arrest­ed ear­li­er today for climb­ing the Lloyds build­ing in Lon­don in a G20 cli­mate change protest.

Unfurl­ing a ban­ner that adver­tised the cam­paign onehundredmonths.org (which says we have lit­tle under 92 months left to pre­vent cat­a­stroph­ic cli­mate change), he climbed down from the 9th floor and was arrest­ed by police for aggra­vat­ed tres­pass.

——–
——–

Oth­er inter­est­ing arti­cles from oth­er days:

——

There have been 122 arrests relat­ed to the G20, includ­ing 86 on Wednes­day and 32 on Thurs­day, police said.

——

Police ask train staff to spy on G20 pro­test­ers

——

One-man G20 protest on 28th March 2009

——

Spoof Finan­cial Times hits Lon­don streets

10000 copies of a spoof Finan­cial Times were dis­trib­uted in Lon­don today.

“Set in 2020, the 12-page paper revealed how action in 2009 reined in cli­mate change, sav­ing bil­lions from extinc­tion. Car­bon rationing didn’t kill us, it explained, despite the incon­ve­nience to multi­na­tion­al com­pa­nies. But we couldn’t have end­less growth with finite resources. Edi­tors even apol­o­gised for sug­gest­ing oth­er­wise.”

The paper is a full-colour repli­ca of the icon­ic pink broad­sheet includ­ing nation­al and inter­na­tion­al pages and edi­to­ri­als and com­ment, pok­ing fun at FT colum­nists. It was fund­ed by dona­tions on the Inter­net, and giv­en away for free by vol­un­teers. Tens of thou­sands of copies were print­ed – almost as many as the FT sells here dai­ly.

http://ft2020.com

Down­load as a PDF file

——

Inter­na­tion­al Sol­i­dar­i­tyAotearoa/New Zealand | Fin­land

April 1st 2009 — Fossil Fools’ Day goes global

Today saw not only mass protests in Lon­don ahead of the G20 sum­mit, but local demon­stra­tions in cities around the UK and across the globe. Under the ban­ner of Fos­sil Fools Day, activists held protests at banks, ener­gy com­pa­nies and pow­er sta­tions across the UK, the USA, Cana­da and South Africa to high­light the twin eco­nom­ic and cli­mate crises.

'It's Going to Get Worse' placardToday saw not only mass protests in Lon­don ahead of the G20 sum­mit, but local demon­stra­tions in cities around the UK and across the globe. Under the ban­ner of Fos­sil Fools Day, activists held protests at banks, ener­gy com­pa­nies and pow­er sta­tions across the UK, the USA, Cana­da and South Africa to high­light the twin eco­nom­ic and cli­mate crises.

For more pho­tos vis­it here and if your action isn’t in the list below email us and we’ll add it to the site.

In the UK …

On the eve of the G20, activists descend­ed on Lon­don to high­light the links between the finan­cial and the cli­mate cri­sis. While the ‘Finan­cial Fools Day’ Street Par­ty got under­way out­side the Bank of Eng­land, the Camp for Cli­mate Action set up camp out­side the Euro­pean Cli­mate Exchange. Their mes­sage: “Stop­ping car­bon mar­kets — because nature doesn’t do bailouts”. It was­n’t until the evening that the police cleared the space — full sto­ry here. Mean­while over at the Excel Cen­tre, the Cam­paign Against Cli­mate Change is hold­ing an Ice-berg “Cli­mate Emer­gency” demo.

Ear­li­er in the week, the Oil Goliath BP was felled by Fos­sil Fools Day’s David as BP post­poned its cen­te­nary par­ty at the British Muse­um to be held on April 1st, due to a demon­stra­tion orga­nized by Art Not Oil and Ris­ing Tide.

Plymouth RBS glued for FFDIn Ply­mouth, Ris­ing Tide pen­guins super-glued them­selves to the entrance of RBS to high­light RBS’s fund­ing of fos­sil fuels projects. RBS are one of the biggest investors in the fos­sil fuel indus­try and pro­vid­ed $16 bil­lion to coal-relat­ed com­pa­nies in 2007 alone. Ann Smith of Ris­ing Tide Ply­mouth today said: “RBS is now 57% owned by the UK tax­pay­er. Cli­mate change requires a move to renew­able ener­gy, not con­tin­ued sup­port for the expan­sion of the fos­sil fuel indus­try”. For more pho­tos vis­it This is Ply­mouth

In Oxford­shire, the ear­ly hours of April 1st saw local activists hang­ing ban­ners from bridges over the A34 between Oxford and Did­cot. Ban­ners read “Cau­tion: Cli­mate Change Ahead”, “Give Way to Wind” and “Fos­sil Fool: 3rd exit” com­plete with pic­tures of Did­cot Pow­er Sta­tion. With Did­cot (run by RWE NPow­er) due for de-com­mis­sion­ing in a few years, it is time to pur­sue renew­able options local­ly. One of the activists said: “We want not only Did­cot, but also the gov­ern­ment and the G20 to see the fol­ly of their actions in pur­su­ing unsus­tain­able tech­nol­o­gy. We have an oppor­tu­ni­ty to pur­sue safe, cheap alter­na­tives and ensure a clean­er future. The wise choice would be to grasp this oppor­tu­ni­ty”.

In Portsmouth, mem­bers of Portsmouth Cli­mate Action Net­work and the University’s Peo­ple & Plan­et group took up posi­tion out­side the Nat West Bank in Com­mer­cial Road to encour­ag­ing shop­pers to tell Roy­al Bank of Scot­land — NatWest to stop fund­ing cli­mate chaos. Activists said: “It is our mon­ey that RBS-NatWest is using to extract tar sands, burn coal and fuel cli­mate chaos. We believe that the only way to pre­vent dan­ger­ous cli­mate change is by invest­ment in renew­ables, not in dirty coal. We are call­ing on the pub­lic to con­tact RBS-NatWest and the UK gov­ern­ment and tell them what they think about them bankrolling cli­mate chaos.”

In Bournemouth, mem­bers of direct action group Plane Stu­pid turned up at Bournemouth Air­port to give them a Fos­sil Fool Award for ‘Out­stand­ing con­tri­bu­tion to local, nation­al and glob­al pol­lu­tion’. Tara Bosworth said, “Bournemouth Air­port may well be the biggest sin­gle source of green­house gas emis­sions in Dorset and they are expand­ing their oper­a­tions, more than dou­bling the num­ber of flights, now that’s plane stu­pid and why they are get­ting our Fos­sil Fool award.” A mem­ber of the air­port staff accept­ed the award but declined hav­ing his pic­ture tak­en.

Fos­sil fool themed street the­atre took place in both Frome in Som­er­set and Totnes in Devon. In Totnes, the Inter­na­tion­al Cli­mate Crim­i­nal known as ‘Old King Coal’ was put on tri­al. The pris­on­er, who is not in good health, was led from The Plains up to the Civic Square where he was tried before a jury of local cit­i­zens and school­child­ren. Unfor­tu­nate­ly oth­er mem­bers of the Fos­sil Fools Gang, includ­ing Oil and Gas, remain at large and are a con­tin­ued dan­ger to the plan­et.

In South Africa …

FFD in South Africa - SasolIn Johan­nes­burg, Earth­life Africa award­ed Sasol (the South African Coal, Oil and Gas Cor­po­ra­tion) the pres­ti­gious 2009 Fos­sil Fool of the Year Award for pro­duc­ing 72 mil­lion tonnes of CO2 per year (over 15% of South Africa’s total emis­sions) and for try­ing to build a new coal-to-liq­uid pow­er plant. Although Sasol ini­tial­ly resist­ed accept­ing the award (one can only imag­ine why), the efforts of a deter­mined group of pro­test­ers final­ly forced the taint­ed tro­phy to be accept­ed.
For more infor­ma­tion vis­it: here or here.

In the USA …

Boston Mannequins on FFD 09In Boston, Mass­a­chu­setts, the “Man­nequins For Cli­mate Jus­tice” shut down the Ken­more Square branch of Bank of Amer­i­ca. A man­nequin was chained to the doors of the bank short­ly before open­ing this morn­ing. The lone man­nequin pro­test­er, Guy Fox, said, “Even a dum­my like me can see that Bank of America’s mas­sive loans to coal com­pa­nies and sup­port for the epi­dem­ic of fore­clo­sures and evic­tions has to stop now.” Fox fur­ther said, “Bank of Amer­i­ca seems deter­mined to be so evil it’s almost com­i­cal, but peo­ple resist­ing the bank’s prac­tices will have the last laugh. Hap­py April Fools to all the cap­i­tal­ist fos­sil fools!”

In Berke­ley, Cal­i­for­nia, a bike ride/march high­light­ed BP’s $500 mil­lion deal with Uni­ver­si­ty of Cal­i­for­nia. Under this deal, the oil giant BP is invest­ing $500 mil­lion for the uni­ver­si­ty to research bio­fu­els, rais­ing issues of green­wash­ing, false solu­tions, and the inter­ac­tion between a pub­lic uni­ver­si­ty and a pri­vate cor­po­ra­tion.

Asheville FFD 09In Asheville, North Car­oli­na, pro­test­ers declared Gov­er­nor Pur­due to be in bed with Duke Ener­gy, and demand­ed the can­cel­la­tion of the Cliff­side coal plant. In response to the North Car­oli­na Divi­sion of Air Qual­i­ty (DAQ) rul­ing that Duke Energy’s Cliff­side coal plant is a “minor source of emis­sions”, pro­test­ers gath­ered at noon out­side Gov­er­nor Purdue’s West­ern North Car­oli­na office in down­town Asheville to demand that she revoke the plant’s per­mit. In a demon­stra­tion orga­nized by Asheville Ris­ing Tide, pro­test­ers set up a bed in front of Gov­er­nor Purdue’s office with peo­ple in busi­ness suits rep­re­sent­ing Duke CEO Jim Rogers, DAQ head Kei­th Over­cash, and Gov­er­nor Pur­due under sheets and cov­ered in mon­ey. A ban­ner read­ing, “Gov­er­nor Pur­due in bed with Duke Ener­gy” pro­vid­ed a back­drop to the under-the-sheets liai­son.

In Den­ver, Col­orado, a Fos­sil Fools Day ral­ly of con­cerned cit­i­zens, health experts, and envi­ron­men­tal and neigh­bor­hood lead­ers demand­ed a tran­si­tion to clean ener­gy. The ral­ly, led by WildEarth Guardians, and joined by Sier­ra Club, Green­peace, Clean Ener­gy Action, Safe­Minds, stu­dents, church mem­bers, and affect­ed near­by com­mu­ni­ties, was held in the shad­ow of the Chero­kee coal burn­ing pow­er plant at Denver’s Heron Pond Nat­ur­al Area, and called upon Gov­er­nor Rit­ter to help Col­orado seize clean ener­gy solu­tions and keep Col­oradoans safe from coal. Car­ry­ing hand­made signs and hold­ing pin­wheels to sym­bol­ize a tran­si­tion to clean ener­gy, dozens of cit­i­zens demon­strat­ed their frus­tra­tions with the sta­tus quo and their hope for pro­tect­ing their future.

In New Orleans, con­ser­va­tion groups, stu­dents, and con­cerned cit­i­zens joined forces at Entergy’s head­quar­ters to protest about the company’s plans to expand their use of coal pow­er in Louisiana. “Louisiana’s coast is ground zero for cli­mate change impacts,” said ral­ly orga­niz­er Jonathan Hen­der­son. “Enter­gy should be a respon­si­ble neigh­bor and work to lim­it coast-destroy­ing pol­lu­tion and pro­tect rate-pay­ers from future car­bon price increas­es”.

In the spir­it of the “Coal Cir­cus,” stu­dents from Bowl­ing Green, Ken­tucky organ­ised a ‘Mon­ster Mash’ and a crit­i­cal mass bike ride.

Stu­dents in Tempe, Ari­zona, also hopped on their bikes and declared them­selves “too cool for fos­sil fools.”

In Cana­da …

Five actions in one day in down­town Toron­to? No foolin!
Today Rain­for­est Action Net­work activists kicked Fos­sil Fools Day off with a bang, drop­ping ban­ners off of a high­way, greet­ing over 4,000 cars (we count­ed) stuck in dead­lock traf­fic over a peri­od of two hours. From bridges, we broad­cast mes­sages about Roy­al Bank of Cana­da (RBC)’s financ­ing of the Cana­di­an Tar Sands from our makeshift Pirate Radio sta­tion. Our ban­ners read “Pirate Radio 89.9 FM Tune in now” and “Roy­al Bank cre­ates cli­mate chaos. Renew­ables not tar sands.” The pour­ing rain didn’t block our view of car after car reach­ing for the radio dial as they drove under us.

We began by dress­ing up and imper­son­at­ed bank employ­ees. About 16 of us rode ele­va­tors for up to two more hours, chat­ting up oth­er RBC per­son­nel — “Hey, on my way to work today I heard about how RBC is financ­ing the destruc­tion of Native ter­ri­to­ries in Alber­ta, caus­ing peo­ple can­cer and pol­lut­ing the water! Tar Sands are the world’s dirt­i­est oil. Did you know that? I had no idea! I’m telling my man­ag­er right away!”

Mean­while, out­side the HQ, sev­er­al more of us leaflet­ed and held ban­ners read­ing “RBC Cre­ates poi­soned water in our com­mu­ni­ty,” “Renew­ables not tar sands” and “RBC: financ­ing can­cer and tox­ic sludge.”

Back inside, a lone Torontan walked inside the main office with a beau­ti­ful bou­quet of bal­loons. I don’t know where he got the idea to release them in the atri­um, or how a ban­ner read­ing “ROYAL BANK CREATES CLIMATE CHAOS” got attached….I also don’t know how they’re gonna get it down. Watch him do it.

Lat­er that evening, dozens of activists recon­vened out­side RBC head­quar­ters along­side “Tar­bie,” an oil-soaked ver­sion of RBC’s prized mas­cot “Arbie” who explained to passers­by that he and RBC are help­ing finance one of the fastest grow­ing sources of water pol­lu­tion and green­house gas emis­sions on the plan­et, and how they con­flict with the finan­cial giant’s PR promis­es to pro­mote clean water.

To read more on RBC and the Cana­di­an Tar Sands, vis­it It’s Get­ting Hot in Here.

www.fossilfoolsday.org

Fossil Fool’s Day, Financial Fools & G20 reports

For the lat­est up-to-the-minute reports from Lon­don & else­where for the protests for Fos­sil Fools’ Day, Finan­cial Fools’ Day and the G20 sum­mit, see https://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/actions/2009/g20/ and the IMC newswire.

For links to what’s planned, meet­ing points & resources, see http://earthfirst.org.uk/actionreports/node/22201

We’ll fea­ture com­piled reports here lat­er in the day. See you in the streets!

Smash Capitalism banner on the ThamesFor the lat­est up-to-the-minute reports from Lon­don & else­where for the protests for Fos­sil Fools’ Day, Finan­cial Fools’ Day and the G20 sum­mit, see https://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/actions/2009/g20/ and the IMC newswire.

For links to what’s planned, meet­ing points & resources, see http://earthfirst.org.uk/actionreports/node/22201

We’ll fea­ture com­piled reports here lat­er in the day. See you in the streets!

Fight Speciesism! #8 — Out Now

Spring 2009 issue of the lat­est anti-speciesist, anti-cap­i­tal­ist, abo­li­tion­ist direct action news is out now.

Arti­cles: SHAC 7 sol­i­dar­i­ty, oper­a­tion sink­ing ship, hunt sab­bing, mink released, ‘fash­ion’ shop closed, lib­er­a­tionists arrest­ed, max mara cam­paign, inter­na­tion­al actions, pris­on­er let­ters, police under attack, alf vs wagenin­gen uni, pris­on­er sup­port, mon­keys fight back, netcu, bull­ring riots, aeta 4, earth lib­er­a­tion, mex­i­can actions, whale wars, riot­ing in lon­don and edo smashed.

Fight Speciesism! #8 - Out Now Spring 2009 issue of the lat­est anti-speciesist, anti-cap­i­tal­ist, abo­li­tion­ist direct action news is out now.

Arti­cles: SHAC 7 sol­i­dar­i­ty, oper­a­tion sink­ing ship, hunt sab­bing, mink released, ‘fash­ion’ shop closed, lib­er­a­tionists arrest­ed, max mara cam­paign, inter­na­tion­al actions, pris­on­er let­ters, police under attack, alf vs wagenin­gen uni, pris­on­er sup­port, mon­keys fight back, netcu, bull­ring riots, aeta 4, earth lib­er­a­tion, mex­i­can actions, whale wars, riot­ing in lon­don and edo smashed.

FS! #8 https://www.indymedia.org.uk/media/2009/03//424982.pdf

PRINT / SHARE / DISTRIBUTE

Anti­speciesist Action is a col­lec­tive of mil­i­tant anti­speciesists and ani­mal lib­er­a­tionists com­mit­ted to con­fronting ani­mal abuse, suf­fer­ing and exploita­tion of non-human beings through the use of direct action.

G20 critical mass & link to action maps, meeting points, and resources

A voy­age of explo­ration into the world of Car­bon Trad­ing, what it is and who’s mak­ing a killing out of trad­ing in hot air.

Wed April 1st 9:00 AM Meet at Bank Junc­tion (Bank tube sta­tion) EC2

You’d be a fool to miss it! Want more? Get involved with: http://www.climatecamp.org.uk

————–

G20 Critical Mass flierA voy­age of explo­ration into the world of Car­bon Trad­ing, what it is and who’s mak­ing a killing out of trad­ing in hot air.

Wed April 1st 9:00 AM Meet at Bank Junc­tion (Bank tube sta­tion) EC2

You’d be a fool to miss it! Want more? Get involved with: http://www.climatecamp.org.uk

————–

For oth­er G20 plans, actions & info, fol­low the links under G20 1–2 April 2009 in the updat­ed upcom­ing Action dates & gath­er­ings

500th day celebration for keeping Tescos off Mill Road, Cambridge

Today, 21st March 2009, a small mile­stone in com­mu­ni­ty activism was reached when the 500th day of being able keep Tescos off Mill Road was reached.

To mark this occa­sion, tables, chairs and stalls were set up in front of the old Wilco premis­es and a street par­ty took place, replete with music.

Today, 21st March 2009, a small mile­stone in com­mu­ni­ty activism was reached when the 500th day of being able keep Tescos off Mill Road was reached.

To mark this occa­sion, tables, chairs and stalls were set up in front of the old Wilco premis­es and a street par­ty took place, replete with music.

Alas I missed the music, so if any­one out there took some pic­tures of any of these per­for­mances, please feel free to post them here, but please remem­ber to resize them.

Tescos has now had two plan­ning appli­ca­tions turned down in the last year for set­ting up shop in the for­mer Wilco premis­es, which for a cou­ple of months last year was also Mill Road Social Cen­tre, before Tescos saw fit to issue an evic­tion order and have the Social Cen­tre’s world­ly goods uncer­e­mo­ni­ous­ly dumped by bailiffs in the car park behind the build­ing.

There are rumours that they may have have ditched their orig­i­nal plan to extend the build­ing and install refrig­er­a­tion (any addi­tion­al info confirming/denying this please post here), but we shall see what takes place over the com­ing months.

In the mean­time, let’s try and make it 1,000 days with­out Tescos on Mill Road!