Hunt Sabs prepare for second year of badger culling

Badger-4751-300x204 27 March 2014 from HSA

 

Badger-4751-300x204 27 March 2014 from HSA

 

At our AGM in June 2012 a spokesper­son from the cam­paign group “Stop the Cull” addressed those of us present on their belief that the cull could only be suc­cess­ful­ly sab­o­taged with a lot of help from hunt sab groups. We were told that we’d have to do thou­sands of hours of prepara­to­ry sett sur­vey­ing, that we’d get no sleep for weeks when it start­ed, we’d lose all our hol­i­day time from work and to top it all we did­n’t even know if we’d be even slight­ly suc­cess­ful in find­ing marks­men with silencers at poten­tial­ly any loca­tion inside 100’s of square miles. “Look­ing for a nee­dle in a haystack” actu­al­ly sound­ed eas­i­er.

We were also told that there was a lot of press inter­est in the bad­ger culls and that it might be good for hunt sabs’ pub­lic pro­file. Con­sid­er­ing that for decades we have been por­trayed in the main stream press as “thugs” no one was par­tic­u­lar­ly enam­oured with the idea of a media make over.

As it turned out the press did­n’t praise or recog­nise us for our behav­iour or endeav­ours, but what did hap­pen is that tens of thou­sands of peo­ple came into con­tact with us. Whether that was via speech­es on demo’s, from reports on Face­book or in the flesh in the cull zone. Peo­ple learnt about us and they liked what they saw — groups of com­pas­sion­ate peo­ple who work hard in the field to pro­tect wild ani­mals from being hunt­ed.

It is this very fact that we have “gone viral”, not just on social media, but in the real world, where it counts, that makes us an unstop­pable force. Whether that’s new sab groups form­ing across the coun­try or small sab groups being over­whelmed with new peo­ple. The HSA mem­ber­ship has more than dou­bled in size in under a year and dona­tions have increased dra­mat­i­cal­ly.

 

When we got to the cull zones in 2013, it quick­ly became clear that we were mak­ing a mas­sive dif­fer­ence. Right from the start groups, work­ing close­ly with bad­ger patrollers, engaged, and repelled, the bad­ger killers. The HSA sup­port­ed the sabs on the ground by giv­ing grants totalling many thou­sands of pounds to help with trans­port, and cru­cial­ly, the very expen­sive Gen2+ night vision equip­ment that enabled sabs to spot shoot­ers from huge dis­tances.

 

Many peo­ple will be unaware of the lit­er­al­ly thou­sands of miles walked by sabs in the run up to the culls, as they mapped out all the setts over hun­dreds of square miles so they could defend them against shoot­ers. The rea­son that the culls were sab­o­taged so spec­tac­u­lar­ly is due large­ly to that work.

That sur­vey­ing work in Dorset this year won’t rely on a few sab groups sup­port­ed by a dozen or so locals. This year it’s total­ly dif­fer­ent. The British pub­lic has engaged with us en masse & we are con­fi­dent that with their help, we will have every sett mapped in that zone eas­i­ly by June 1st.

In 2012 we were told to expect a roll out to ten cull zones and then a fur­ther forty in fol­low­ing years. Here we are in 2014 with a cull pol­i­cy in tat­ters and a roll out to one more cull zone a small pos­si­bil­i­ty. We are pre­pared to take Dorset by storm and destroy any attempts to kill bad­gers

We will help “Stop the Cull”

 

That’s what we do.

 

Join us.

Animal rights activist convicted as repression of activists in the UK intensifies

An ani­mal rights activist has been con­vict­ed of con­spir­a­cy to black­mail after 5 weeks on tri­al at Win­ches­ter Crown Court.

An ani­mal rights activist has been con­vict­ed of con­spir­a­cy to black­mail after 5 weeks on tri­al at Win­ches­ter Crown Court. Deb­bie Vin­cent of the Stop Hunt­ing­don Ani­mal Cru­el­ty (SHAC) cam­paign was accused of black­mail on the basis that SHAC pres­sured com­pa­nies to end their busi­ness rela­tion­ships with Hunt­ing­don Life Sci­ences, Europe’s largest ani­mal test­ing lab­o­ra­to­ry. The case is the lat­est devel­op­ment in the use of black­mail laws against ani­mal rights activists. In 2010 sev­en SHAC cam­paign­ers were hand­ed sen­tences of up to 16 years in prison for ‘con­spir­ing’ to black­mail com­pa­nies not to do busi­ness with HLS. Deb­bie was accused of being part of the same ten year ‘con­spir­a­cy’ as the pre­vi­ous defen­dants, from 2001-11, despite the fact that there was only evi­dence that she had been involved in the cam­paign from 2005. Police had bugged a house used by SHAC cam­paign­ers for an eight month peri­od in 2005 and put those going in and out under sur­veil­lance. Much of the case against Deb­bie was on the grounds of guilt by asso­ci­a­tion with the defen­dants con­vict­ed in 2010 and with unnamed peo­ple. The twist­ing of black­mail laws in this way has broad ram­i­fi­ca­tions for the right to express dis­sent in the UK. The law is being used to intim­i­date peo­ple who are attempt­ing to resist against cor­po­rate pow­er. The log­i­cal exten­sion of the use of the law in this way is that any cam­paign­er who pres­sures a com­pa­ny to end its prac­tices could be tar­get­ed. The pros­e­cu­tion argued that SHAC had post­ed details of com­pa­nies on their web­site and encour­aged peo­ple to protest against them. The CPS claimed that this amount­ed to black­mail, despite the fact that the SHAC cam­paign stip­u­lat­ed on its web­site that protests should be law­ful. In the sec­ond week of the tri­al, after the defence demand­ed that the Crown Pros­e­cu­tion Ser­vice (CPS) give full dis­clo­sure of the papers at their dis­pos­al to the defence, it was revealed that an under­cov­er police offi­cer, using the alias ‘James Adams’ had mas­quer­ad­ed as an exec­u­tive for Novar­tis and met with Deb­bie and anoth­er activist from the SHAC cam­paign to dis­cuss Novar­tis’ deal­ings with HLS. It seems that the police and Novar­tis were try­ing, unsuc­cess­ful­ly, to link the two activists to ille­gal direct action. Sev­er­al offi­cers from the Nation­al Domes­tic Extrem­ism Unit gave evi­dence at the tri­al. The NDEU is a spe­cial­ist police unit which aims to tar­get activists involved in direct action cam­paign­ing. For more infor­ma­tion on the UK’s polit­i­cal police units click here.

Deb­bie is due in court for sen­tenc­ing on April 17th. The CPS have indi­cat­ed they intend to apply for an Anti Social Behav­iour Order (ASBO) to come into effect on her release which will restrict her move­ments. In 2010 indef­i­nite ASBOs were grant­ed against four con­vict­ed activists ban­ning them from ever protest­ing against ani­mal exper­i­men­ta­tion. The case is part of an ongo­ing cam­paign of police repres­sion against the SHAC cam­paign. Sev­en SHAC activists have been charged with ‘con­spir­a­cy to inter­fere with the con­trac­tu­al rela­tions so as to harm an ani­mal research organ­i­sa­tion’ under Sec­tion 144 of the Seri­ous Organ­ised Crime and Police Act (2005). The charges relate to demon­stra­tions against com­pa­nies with busi­ness rela­tion­ships with HLS. They are due to appear in court lat­er this year A Stop UK Repres­sion cam­paign has been set up to sup­port ani­mal rights activists bear­ing the brunt of this lat­est state crack­down on anti-cor­po­rate dis­sent. The cam­paign’s web­site reads “In an atmos­phere of increas­ing repres­sion against activists and the crim­i­nal­i­sa­tion of effec­tive cam­paigns, it is impor­tant that we show our sol­i­dar­i­ty for those involved and form a strong net­work to sup­port the UK ani­mal rights move­ment.” More details at: www.shac.net
www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2014/03/515954.html
www.stopukrepression.org/?page_id=75#

BREAKING THE FRAME

A GATHERING ON THE POLITICS OF TECHNOLOGY

2nd — 5th May 2014

Unstone Grange, Der­byshire

YOU NEED TO BOOK ‑SEE BELOW

Organ­ised by Lud­dites 200, Cor­po­rate Watch, and Sci­en­tists for Glob­al Respon­si­bil­i­ty

A GATHERING ON THE POLITICS OF TECHNOLOGY

2nd — 5th May 2014

Unstone Grange, Der­byshire

YOU NEED TO BOOK ‑SEE BELOW

Organ­ised by Lud­dites 200, Cor­po­rate Watch, and Sci­en­tists for Glob­al Respon­si­bil­i­ty

Tech­nol­o­gy can bring some ben­e­fits for ordi­nary peo­ple, but its devel­op­ment is almost entire­ly con­mtrolled by cor­po­rate, mil­i­tary and tech­no­crat­ic elites, so it usu­al­ly serves their inter­ests and rein­forces their pow­er.

The pol­i­tics of food, ener­gy, work, gen­der, peace, eco­nom­ics, health, etc are all shaped by choic­es about tech­nol­o­gy made by those elites. The whole way our soci­ety devel­ops is mas­sive­ly influ­enced by tech­nol­o­gy, yet ordi­nary peo­ple nev­er have a prop­er say in it.  We’re always left react­ing to the tech­nocrats’ lat­est plan, whether it’s drones, inter­net sur­veil­lance, GM food, frack­ing, design­er babies or nuclear pow­er.

We think all these issues are linked. So it’s time for a more joined up and more proac­tive approach, one which address­es the root caus­es of prob­lems and is not lim­it­ed by the dog­ma that tech­nol­o­gy equals progress.

  • We want to cre­ate a new pol­i­tics of tech­nol­o­gy based on bring­ing togeth­er the insights of dif­fer­ent move­ments and learn­ing from each oth­er.
  • We want a human-scale tech­nol­o­gy that serves real human needs, not cor­po­rate bot­tom lines.
  • We want demo­c­ra­t­ic con­trol of tech­nol­o­gy.

An world fac­ing envi­ron­men­tal melt­down and mas­sive inequal­i­ty ‑both caused byb 200 years ofn indus­tri­al cap­i­tal­ism- needs bet­ter solu­tions than more dan­ger­ous tech­no-fix­es such as cli­mate engi­neer­ing.

Whether you’re a tech­nol­o­gy pol­i­tics cam­paign­er, trade union­ist, envi­ron­men­tal­ist. altech devel­op­er, artist or just plain con­cerned, BREAKING THE FRAME IS NOT TO BE MISSED.

YOU NEED TO BOOK

www.breakingtheframe.org.uk      

email: luddites200@yahoo.co.uk

(020) 7426 0005

Accom­mo­da­tion is either in the con­fer­ence cen­tre OR camp­ing (which is cheap­er).  The con­ces­sion­ary rate for camp­ing is £36, which includes all meals for 4 days (it’s a bank hol­i­day week­end).

BUT if £36 is more than you can man­age, we’re com­mit­ted to mak­ing sure nobody is left out for lack of mon­ey.  So get in touch now.  Rich peo­ple can make extra dona­tions, of course!

All for one, and one for all

http://earthfirstjournal.org/newswire/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2014/02/blackmail3.gif

 

http://earthfirstjournal.org/newswire/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2014/02/blackmail3.gif

 

The state-spon­sored crack­down on ani­mal rights activists con­tin­ues next month, with the open­ing of the third ‘con­spir­a­cy to black­mail’ tri­al relat­ing to vivi­sec­tion giants Hunt­ing­don Life Sci­ences in Win­ches­ter…

Earth First! Direct Action Manual Is Ready for Print

Cover for Direct Action Manual

Cover for Direct Action Manual

Earth First! Direct Action Man­u­al. To sup­port this pub­li­ca­tion, pre­order your copy or donate today.

After sev­er­al years in devel­op­ment, the Earth First! Direct Action Man­u­al is ready to go to press. A group of front­line activists has assem­bled over 300 pages of dia­grams, descrip­tions of tech­niques and a com­pre­hen­sive overview of the role direct action plays in our cam­paigns in defense of the Earth.

We are now in a three-week fundrais­ing cam­paign to ensure that this crit­i­cal book gets out to peo­ple who can use it. You can pre­order your copy and get some extra thank you gifts for your ear­ly endorse­ment by donat­ing today. More impor­tant­ly, though, we have offered a chance for you to help us spread this knowl­edge. Every dona­tion over $50 gives you the chance to send a free copy of the man­u­al to a cam­paign of your choice. The more you give, the more man­u­als we can put in the mail.

The man­u­al will be print­ed in the com­ing month with long­time Earth First! part­ner, The Gloo Fac­to­ry. This com­mu­ni­ty-mind­ed, union print shop has sup­plied Earth First! and its affil­i­ates with stick­ers and mer­chan­dise for decades and remains com­mit­ted to using a high stan­dard for recy­cled and reclaimed mate­r­i­al, as well as sup­port­ive work­er con­di­tions.

The man­u­al was first print­ed near­ly two decades ago and has been out of print since its ini­tial dis­sem­i­na­tion. Though many of the con­sid­er­a­tions for civ­il dis­obe­di­ence and inter­ven­tion have remained tried and true, new ele­ments have altered the ways we put these tac­tics into action. The Earth First! Direct Action Man­u­al will con­tin­ue the role of safe and effec­tive actions in stop­ping the destruc­tion of the plan­et.

Sup­port this effort today!

HUNTING TOWERS TOPPLED, BURNED AND BLOWN UP

Jan­u­ary 20, 2014 — Ger­many  The fol­low­ing is a sum­ma­ry of recent inci­dents in Ger­many report­ed on the Anti-Hunt­ing Blog (ani­mal rights activists may not be respon­si­ble for all of these inci­dents):

Jan­u­ary 20, 2014 — Ger­many  The fol­low­ing is a sum­ma­ry of recent inci­dents in Ger­many report­ed on the Anti-Hunt­ing Blog (ani­mal rights activists may not be respon­si­ble for all of these inci­dents):

- A hunt­ing seat/tower was destroyed by fire in Het­ten­shausen (Bavaria) on Jan­u­ary 18.

- Accord­ing to news reports, between Jan­u­ary 6–7 a hunt­ing tow­er at the edge of a nature reserve near Salem (Schleswig-Hol­stein) was knocked over. Two oth­er hunt­ing tow­ers in the same area were dam­aged in Novem­ber and Decem­ber. Police blamed “Mil­i­tant hunt­ing oppo­nents.”

- In ear­ly Jan­u­ary, two hunt­ing tow­ers were demol­ished near Hagen (North Rhine-West­phalia). Local police spec­u­lat­ed that ani­mal rights activists were respon­si­ble.

- On Decem­ber 24, a hunt­ing tow­er was set on fire near the city of Hildesheim (Low­er Sax­ony).

- Police are inves­ti­gat­ing an explo­sion that com­plete­ly destroyed a hunt­ing tow­er in Poll­ha­gen (Low­er Sax­ony) in mid-Decem­ber. The exact cause of the blast has not been deter­mined.

- Late on Decem­ber 14 a hunt­ing tow­er was dam­aged by an explo­sion in Samern (Low­er Sax­ony). pho­to: gn-online.de

- On Novem­ber 14, the inside of a hunt­ing tow­er in Dud­er­stadt (Low­er Sax­ony) was soaked with butyric acid, mak­ing it unus­able.

Bombing against Bristol office of Vinci, Life Sciences Centre constructors

We think that any­one seri­ous about con­fronting dom­i­na­tion as it stands today will soon­er or lat­er come to the ques­tions of sci­ence and tech­nol­o­gy. It’s clear how both have an increas­ing­ly vital role to the rul­ing order by cre­at­ing, man­ag­ing and spread­ing con­trol with­in soci­ety and over the rest of an earth we’re false­ly sep­a­rat­ed from.

We think that any­one seri­ous about con­fronting dom­i­na­tion as it stands today will soon­er or lat­er come to the ques­tions of sci­ence and tech­nol­o­gy. It’s clear how both have an increas­ing­ly vital role to the rul­ing order by cre­at­ing, man­ag­ing and spread­ing con­trol with­in soci­ety and over the rest of an earth we’re false­ly sep­a­rat­ed from. By inves­ti­gat­ing the devel­op­ment of these pow­ers in the region and who makes it pos­si­ble, we came to Vin­ci.

In the U.K, the French multi­na­tion­al ener­gy and con­struc­tion giant Vin­ci car­ry out spe­cial­ist con­struc­tion ser­vices for the police, Min­istry of Defence and pris­ons, earth­works for motor­ways, rail­ways and quar­ry­ing, pow­er sta­tions, off­shore rigs and nuclear new-builds, as well as shop­ping cen­tres and the like. World­wide this cor­po­ra­tion and its sub­sidiaries are active in many fields: dam build­ing, pri­vate secu­ri­ty, air­ports, ura­ni­um mines; these scum have no prob­lem with inflict­ing car­nage on the earth and us as part of it, rais­ing an indus­tri­al cage around us both fig­u­ra­tive­ly and lit­er­al­ly, and feed­ing off the labours of their work­force while the boss­es line their pock­ets and move on to the next con­tract.

In these respects we attack Vin­ci any­way, but one of our main motives for tar­get­ing them is because they’re respon­si­ble for build­ing the new Bio­log­i­cal Life Sci­ences Cen­tre soon to open at the Uni­ver­si­ty of Bris­tol.

We set off an explo­sive at Vin­ci’s offices at Van­tage busi­ness park, north of Bris­tol, at approx­i­mate­ly 3:45 yes­ter­day morn­ing (6th Jan­u­ary). It was placed with the aim of cut­ting off pow­er lines, scorch­ing the exte­ri­or and start­ing a fire inside. We con­sid­ered the res­i­dent com­pa­ny in the next-door part of the unit a wor­thy sec­ondary tar­get in any dam­ages (White­head, anoth­er con­struc­tion and build­ing ser­vic­ing group who do com­mis­sioned work for Vin­ci).

A £54 mil­lion facil­i­ty, the Bio­log­i­cal Life Sci­ences Cen­tre will offer cours­es for “the next gen­er­a­tion of biol­o­gists” as well as cur­rent spe­cial­ists, aim­ing to improve col­lab­o­ra­tion with the uni­ver­si­ty’s nan­otech­nol­o­gy cen­tre and just across from the Med­ical School’s genet­ic engi­neer­ing, vivi­sec­tion and ani­mal breed­ing labs. The world cap­i­tal­ist sys­tem sees advances in fields like this as key to the next round of dis­cov­ery, enclo­sure and wealth cre­ation. As the area around Bris­tol and Bath hous­es the biggest hi-tech design clus­ter in the world after Amer­i­ca’s Sil­i­con Val­ley, this “rev­o­lu­tion” is hap­pen­ing on our doorsteps, “with Bris­tol being an excit­ing and ide­al place to car­ry out research over the com­ing years.” (This is in the words of Pro­fes­sor Gary Fos­ter, whose work at the Uni­ver­si­ty of Bris­tol in genet­ic-mod­i­fi­ca­tion and oth­er biotech­nolo­gies feeds the nox­ious phar­ma­ceu­ti­cal indus­try such as Glax­o­SmithK­line. The uni­ver­si­ty breeds genet­i­cal­ly-altered mice, for exam­ple, then mor­bid­ly sub­jects these liv­ing crea­tures to exten­sive nerve dam­age and hand the results to drug com­pa­nies.)

One of the main thrusts of this dri­ve is syn­thet­ic biol­o­gy, a dis­turb­ing prac­tice using the lat­est tech­nol­o­gy for “rewrit­ing and rebuild­ing nat­ur­al sys­tems to pro­vide engi­neered sur­ro­gates.” In 2012 a con­fer­ence at the Uni­ver­si­ty of Bris­tol stat­ed that syn­thet­ic biol­o­gy “could become a dri­ving force of the nation­al econ­o­my,” and the gov­ern­ment have declared it a top research pri­or­i­ty. The Euro­pean Union has now award­ed £3.3 mil­lion to the Uni­ver­si­ty of Bris­tol just to cre­ate “pub­lic aware­ness” pro­mot­ing the prac­tice.

The log­ic of these kind of sci­ences has, as its pri­ma­ry goal, attempt­ed con­trol over every­thing. They reduce knowl­edge, that might be more deeply gained in wild rela­tion­ships of inter­ac­tion and inter­de­pen­dence, to a detached uni­verse of obses­sive mea­sure­ment and objec­ti­fi­ca­tion, arro­gant­ly sep­a­rat­ing parts from the whole that gives them mean­ing as if every­thing were mere­ly a machine to dis­man­tle. This sci­en­tif­ic tra­di­tion is close­ly tied up with the world­view that emerged dur­ing the ear­ly for­ma­tion of com­mer­cial cap­i­tal­ism, which sought and still seeks to adapt life­forms to the dri­ve for prof­its, jus­ti­fy the dom­i­na­tion and destruc­tion of the liv­ing world, and imple­ment a macho uber-ratio­nal­ism scorn­ful of every­thing frag­ile and organ­ic on which all species depend. Right now, plant and ani­mal genes are bro­ken down and opti­mised in labs so they suit pro­duc­tive stan­dards and to cre­ate new pri­vate prop­er­ty through patents. Where we might see the unique leaves, seeds, bod­ies and minds of our­selves and our fel­low crea­tures, this sci­ence (if not nec­es­sar­i­ly each sci­en­tist, the results are the same) just sees life­less objects to pick apart, study and sac­ri­fice on the altar of eco­nom­ic use­ful­ness to their pay­mas­ters who reap the ben­e­fits from this sick and sick­en­ing soci­ety.

For instance we can see the cur­rent push for genet­i­cal­ly-mod­i­fied (G.M) food in the U.K by the media, indus­try and gov­ern­ment, for which these research insti­tu­tions play an impor­tant part: such as advances in biotech­nol­o­gy for crops thanks to the Long Ash­ton Research Sta­tion run by the Uni­ver­si­ty of Bris­tol in the past. Sci­en­tists like Gary Fos­ter are well aware of the dan­gers from G.M genes “leak­ing into the nat­ur­al world” (again, his own words) but appar­ent­ly the mon­ey and pres­tige from their mas­tery are worth more than our insignif­i­cant lives. A decade ago the first wave of G.M tri­als was slowed here by sus­tained pres­sure and crop-trash­ing; today sab­o­tage con­tin­ues from Hol­land to the Philip­pines, and oth­ers like us also won’t be accom­plices to these devel­op­ments or their agents through inac­tion. It’s nec­es­sary to attack the new wave of so-called ‘life’ sci­ence facil­i­ties at the root (those who design them, those who con­struct them) not just crit­i­cize the more well-known prod­ucts of their research: because to these insti­tu­tions all knowl­edge becomes anoth­er oppor­tu­ni­ty for con­trol and exploita­tion, so extend­ing the scope of a sys­tem that’s in real­i­ty anni­hi­lat­ing and arti­fi­cial­is­ing life in all it’s beau­ty.

Abroad, plant and ani­mal die-offs as well as increased aller­gies and intol­er­ances are already being attrib­uted to G.M. With the bio-tech indus­try non­cha­lant­ly unleash­ing its mon­sters, espe­cial­ly across lands in the glob­al south where patent­ed G.M seeds that must be re-bought year­ly exert a stran­gle­hold, it many take gen­er­a­tions to show some of their effects on infi­nite­ly com­plex webs of life that evolved over mil­lions of years. That is, before civilised cul­tures began inten­sive­ly manip­u­lat­ing them, today even down to the nano-scale. With the like of syn­thet­ic biol­o­gy we’re mov­ing fast into a future where even life­forms “in nature” are the prod­ucts of lab­o­ra­to­ry exper­i­ments, and noth­ing remains that isn’t engi­neered some­where along the line by a human-cen­tred sys­tem of sci­en­tif­ic total­i­tar­i­an­ism.

For obvi­ous rea­sons as peo­ple turn­ing against laws and dom­i­na­tion in more than words we also stand against new polic­ing and iden­ti­fi­ca­tion con­trols enabled by more foren­sics, bio­met­rics etc. and the intro­duc­tion of their com­mon use in the infor­ma­tion-age social prison (mobile fin­ger­print­ing, facial recog­ni­tion sys­tems, D.N.A swabs etc. — they did­n’t stop us yet though…).

This isn’t Vin­ci’s only U.K ven­ture into this lucra­tive field either. They’ve also under­tak­en future expan­sions in sci­ence, tech­nol­o­gy and engi­neer­ing depart­ments at Swansea Uni­ver­si­ty. They’ve com­mis­sioned White­head for the job too, their neigh­bours at Van­tage busi­ness park, who are now also marked by our attack. This will be the result for as long as soci­ety steps in line to realise the fan­tasies of a despot­ic sci­ence, reach­ing for their dreams which are our night­mares.

So what about the ‘ben­e­fits’ that these hi-tech insti­tu­tions want to sell us, found­ed as they are on mas­sive ener­gy con­sump­tion and resource extrac­tion, on the author­i­ty of a spe­cial­ist caste’s some­how-unre­proach­able med­dling with our envi­ron­ments, and on the domes­ti­ca­tion of wild spaces and the tor­ture of oth­er ani­mals? They promise us advances in (human) health, food and tech­nol­o­gy, fos­ter­ing the illu­sion that sci­ence can fix all the dam­age incurred by the dom­i­nant ways of liv­ing. They expect us to for­get how many of the dis­eases, dis­or­ders and can­cers are direct­ly caused by the same indus­tri­al out­put, glob­alised mass soci­ety, psy­cho­log­i­cal­ly and phys­i­cal­ly unhealthy habi­tats and tox­ic work­places of a cul­ture which goes toward these labs and more in the first place. They expect us to for­get that agri-mono­cul­ture pro­duc­tion led to an anti-nutri­tious diet of manip­u­lat­ed short-term energising/comfort food at an esca­lat­ing cost to the land, while diverse wild plant and ani­mals species we used to coex­ist with get wiped out by the sys­tem’s end­less expan­sion and pol­lu­tion. (Vin­ci’s works being a prime exam­ple.) They expect us to for­get how it’s pre­cise­ly the advances in com­plex tech­no­log­i­cal sys­tems that gen­er­ate our depen­dance on their design­ers and man­u­fac­tur­ers, alien­ation from our­selves as well as the earth as a whole and each oth­er at the per­son­al lev­el, and increased effi­cien­cy in achiev­ing the goals of soci­ety’s rulers: prof­it and pow­er, through mis­ery and exploita­tion, push­ing the plan­e­tary ecol­o­gy toward col­lapse.

In short the sick­ness is civil­i­sa­tion itself, includ­ing its false solu­tions to its chron­ic prob­lems steadi­ly impov­er­ish­ing sur­vival for human and non-human pop­u­la­tions alike, an unac­cept­able trans­gres­sion on our intent to live freely.

Choos­ing direct action over despair we declare our part in a low-inten­si­ty urban war in its ear­ly stages across Bris­tol against the many faces of the sys­tem, with stones, paint or fire and with the plans, debates and dai­ly refusals; some­times almost imper­ceiv­able, some­times dev­as­tat­ing. In Britain’s ugly cities and inten­sive­ly-man­aged coun­try­side a deter­mined minor­i­ty of rebels and wilder­ness-lovers spo­rad­i­cal­ly take the offen­sive: some strik­ing anony­mous­ly, some form­ing one-off action groups, and some hav­ing test­ed the open pro­pos­al of the Infor­mal Anar­chist Fed­er­a­tion; not only in the south-west but Not­ting­ham, Cam­bridge, Lon­don and now Glas­gow.

Every­thing is at stake to us and we our­selves have no time to waste. Toward recov­er­ing our own voli­tion and find­ing affini­ties for rebel­lion, our meth­ods shall include intractable con­flict with­out pause or nego­ti­a­tion: and much more besides, break­ing with this mis­er­able civ­il order with a wide vari­ety of exper­i­ments and the full scope of our imag­i­na­tions. Destruc­tion is just anoth­er indis­pens­able side of cre­ation (and vice ver­sa) not an oppo­site, we’re now sure of that. Our insur­gency would be jus­ti­fied as an end in itself in the face of this life we’re raised into, but it’s beyond only being reac­tive. It acts to solid­i­fy that we’re already tak­ing back in our face-to-face encoun­ters and in our minds. It allows poten­tial space for new and stronger rela­tion­ships cho­sen by aware indi­vid­u­als mind­ful of all life­forms, through active­ly weak­en­ing the cur­rent modes. Until some point of break­down where what­ev­er comes next is out of any soci­ety-wide con­trol and rea­son­ing, and so beyond soci­ety. Lib­er­a­tion can mean noth­ing less; tend­ing toward the wild.

The inter­na­tion­al and inter­nal bat­tle­ground between anar­chy and dom­i­na­tion holds both loss­es and gains, of which some are known and some unknown to us. With this is mind we start the new year by cel­e­brat­ing the release of Braulio Duran (an unre­pen­tant eco-anar­chist who was held by the Mex­i­can State) last Octo­ber, albeit into the wider prison-soci­ety. When we dis­cov­er sol­i­dar­i­ty with a locked-up com­rade through their atti­tude and words, it does­n’t dimin­ish when they get ‘out’; it just cre­ates more grounds to keep fight­ing toward our mutu­al goals. Still ‘inside’, we remem­ber the total-lib­er­a­tionist Adri­an Gon­za­les and anar­chist ban­dits of the Kozani case as well as Babis Tsil­ian­i­dis; and Mar­co Camenisch, denied parole once again. Respect to the Mi’k­maq War­riors engag­ing the Cana­di­an State/petro-indus­try aggres­sors in incen­di­ary clash­es, a renewed phase of indige­nous mil­i­tan­cy, and to the ones con­sis­tent­ly defend­ing both Khim­ki for­est and the land of Notre-Dames-Des-Lan­des from Vin­ci’s devel­op­ments. A raised fist above the prison walls for Nico­la Gai and Alfre­do Cospi­to aka F.A.I/F.R.I Olga Nucle­us, until cell­blocks are rub­ble and jail­ers are ash.

On a sad­der note, 2012 end­ed with the anar­chist Sebas­t­ian Over­sluij being fatal­ly shot in San­ti­a­go while try­ing to col­lec­tive­ly seize back some of what the banks extract every day from the exploit­ed. Nei­ther a vic­tim or a mar­tyr, we sim­ply see some­one who did­n’t bow their head and accept the sys­tem’s rules, and we are glad to have such peo­ple as com­rades. Even with­in this non­sen­si­cal, resigned and cyn­i­cal mod­ern cul­ture, every action demands a reac­tion. When they kill one of the resisters, our ene­mies must pay in any way. This is how our strug­gle leaves behind emp­ty ges­tures and keeps the dead from falling into obliv­ion. Black­ened offices won’t replace split blood, but they sig­nal that same social war isn’t fin­ished, and our grief births rage.

Infor­mal Anar­chist Fed­er­a­tion (F.A.I) Insur­gents: Bris­tol North

A Victory for “People Power”

1st Decem­ber from Stop the Cull

1st Decem­ber from Stop the Cull

At lunchtime on the 29th of Novem­ber a moment in his­to­ry was cre­at­ed when the guardian released this sto­ry. Telling the world that final­ly the British gov­ern­ment had been beat­en into sub­mis­sion and called an ear­ly end to its wildlife mas­sacre it called a “bad­ger cull”.

The cull was always sold to the British pub­lic as a pilot to see if over a peri­od of 6 weeks, bad­gers could be killed “effec­tive­ly, safe­ly & humane­ly”. Toward the end of those 6 weeks we the pub­lic were told that the orig­i­nal pop­u­la­tion stud­ies had changed and the new pop­u­la­tion fig­ures were actu­al­ly much low­er, they refused to cred­it us the sabs with destroy­ing their Hair DNA pop­u­la­tion stud­ies and instead decid­ed to blame bad­gers for “mov­ing the goal­posts”. With mas­sive­ly reduced pop­u­la­tions (strange­ly David Heath had been com­plain­ing along with many farm­ers of pop­u­la­tion “explo­sions”) the tar­get to kill was made much eas­i­er for them to reach.

What they hadn’t planned on was the per­se­ver­ance, tenac­i­ty, endurance & crafti­ness of those opposed to the cull. Many expe­ri­enced hunt sabo­teurs walked the fields and wood­lands of the cull zones night after night, as did many oth­er peo­ple, these peo­ple just like sabs came from a wide vari­ety of back­grounds, teach­ers, graph­ic design­ers, care work­ers, the very rich, the retired and yes even the unem­ployed and stu­dents. A ded­i­cat­ed num­ber of  these peo­ple before the culls start­ed, going as far back as June last year had been sett sur­vey­ing the entire area, one of them “Jo Bad­ger” recent­ly passed away, her pass­ing has been a great loss to many of us. Their work was the foun­da­tion for all the defence of the bad­gers dur­ing the cull & it is these peo­ple who know how active setts are in cer­tain areas, find­ing the Hair DNA traps was an easy task for them.

With a total of over 500 sq Km’s sur­veyed, pro­tect­ing the bad­gers from free shoot­ers was a ques­tion of team work, whilst some peo­ple work­ing tire­less­ly with­in the law tra­versed hun­dreds of miles of foot­paths and report­ed in any sight­ings, Sab groups and peo­ple pre­pared to break minor tres­pass laws got clos­er to shoot­ers and often moved them on with noise. Sev­er­al weeks into the cull a small for­tune was spent on night vision equip­ment and the amount of shoot­ers being stopped increased rapid­ly. That equip­ment like the fuel in the tanks was gen­er­ous­ly donat­ed by sup­port­ers from across the coun­try, with­out their sup­port the cam­paign would have strug­gled great­ly and we would like to take this oppor­tu­ni­ty to thank every­one who helped with fundrais­ing to get peo­ple to the zones.

When the 6 week culls end­ed and it was announced in Som­er­set that they hadn’t achieved their tar­gets we sighed with relief & pre­pared to focus just on Glouces­ter­shire for the final week, to our dis­may they announced exten­sions, in Som­er­set with the dras­ti­cal­ly reduced pop­u­la­tions they announced that they had to kill anoth­er 165 bad­gers over a three week peri­od. Hav­ing man­aged to kill over 100 a week dur­ing the 6 week cull peo­ple on the ground knew they had a lot of work to do to stop them reach­ing their tar­gets. With lit­tle or no hol­i­day time left to claim many peo­ple took unpaid leave from work, rela­tion­ships were strained and many peo­ple were suf­fer­ing with extreme fatigue. Still they did not give up, with the weight of know­ing that the culls would be rolled out if these suc­ceed­ed, peo­ple buck­led down to the work know­ing that tens of thou­sands of bad­gers lives were in the bal­ance. At the end of the 3 week exten­sion 90 bad­gers had been killed, mak­ing the Som­er­set cull and exten­sion a fail­ure.

The shoot­ers hav­ing failed at free shoot­ing ear­ly on had gone over heav­i­ly to cage trap­ping as a tried and test­ed method of killing large num­bers of bad­gers, when we knew this for sure, our efforts accord­ing­ly var­ied and we focussed as much resources as pos­si­ble at find­ing cage traps and “neu­tral­is­ing” them. In Som­er­set we nev­er found more than 3 cages on one sett. Mean­while in Glouces­ter­shire the fig­ures on the total killed came out, it was shock­ing­ly low at only 30% of the revised pop. fig­ure, Nat­ur­al Eng­land issued an exten­sion for 8 weeks with a tar­get of just 58% to achieve “dis­ease con­trol” the NFU didn’t mess about and prompt­ly put down hun­dreds of traps.

Protest cul­ture has for some years attrib­uted minor crim­i­nal dam­age done at night to “pix­ies”. Some peo­ple find this word annoy­ing, just as oth­er peo­ple don’t iden­ti­fy with the word “sab”. Seman­tics to one side, the cage traps were destroyed as fast as they went down, for the most part by very nor­mal peo­ple doing extra­or­di­nary work, through the day traps were found then by night they were destroyed, each one cost­ing approx £150. In just over 4 weeks near­ly 400 of these traps had been made use­less. With “free shoot­ing” being proven to be a method­ol­o­gy that didn’t work, cage trap­ping was under­tak­en to kill as many bad­gers as pos­si­ble. We the British pub­lic just weren’t hav­ing it.

Whilst we cel­e­brate the fail­ure of these bad­ger culls and the part we played in their down­fall, we mourn the loss of all the bad­gers that have been need­less­ly killed dur­ing this cull. We would ask any­one who thinks that killing bad­gers to stop the spread of bTB to spend a few min­utes watch­ing this video filmed just before the culls start­ed

We will con­tin­ue with our cam­paign, film­ing farm con­di­tions, sab­bing pheas­ant shoots, organ­is­ing boy­cotts, all the time build­ing our num­bers and reach on social media. The culls may con­tin­ue, but so will we.

As has been proven today, if you ignore the will of the peo­ple, the peo­ple will fight back, we are organ­ised, we have built teams of peo­ple who rely on each oth­er, our sup­port­ers know the meth­ods we use and are com­fort­able know­ing that we behave hon­ourably, we know how to dis­rupt culls, we are strong and we are many, and we will nev­er leave our bad­gers unde­fend­ed to be attacked by brutes and thugs.

NEVER

ELF Claim Responsibility for Colorado Mink Farm Raid

Mink_in_the_park_(2)

Mink_in_the_park_(2)

“On the night of Novem­ber 14th, the Earth Lib­er­a­tion Front vis­it­ed the pre­vi­ous­ly unknown Col­orado mink farm of Monte Ages, locat­ed at 622 Val­ley View Dri­ve in Mof­fat Coun­ty. This is one of the small­est mink farms in oper­a­tion, so open­ing near­ly every cage took very lit­tle time. The mink under­stood our mis­sion and quite lit­er­al­ly flew to the ground to make a dash for free­dom. To cause the deranged Mr. Ages more finan­cial trou­ble, breed­ing cards were removed and strewn about, and thrown in the piles of mink waste.

Michael Whe­lan will offer the same tired lies in response to this action. He advis­es farm­ers to ‘sym­pa­thize with the poor, lost ani­mals.’ The lost wild ani­mals who are now able to move freely, who will no longer be sub­ject to Michael and his friends pre­ferred meth­ods of exe­cu­tion in the pelt­ing sea­son just two weeks away.

 

The truth is that mink are not domes­ti­cat­ed. They are cap­tive bred, and only for the qual­i­ty of their pelts. Mink are aquat­ic ani­mals who are soli­tary in the wild and trav­el sev­er­al miles per day. The sur­round­ing area of Mof­fat Coun­ty is pris­tine wildlife habi­tat. The ones who escaped this wildlife prison will now live out their lives along the Lit­tle Snake and Yam­pa Rivers.

Mr. Ages has plans to move and expand his oper­a­tion to 35591 North Hwy 13 in the town of Craig. This will not be tol­er­at­ed. Your dreams of despoil­ing North­west Col­orado, con­t­a­m­i­nat­ing our drink­ing water, and exploit­ing native amer­i­can wildlife will turn into a night­mare. There will be con­se­quences when dark­ness falls.

We send a salute to those coura­geous few who con­tin­ue to fight along­side the earth and ani­mals, even as your work is over­shad­owed by the blog­gers, video edi­tors, and all man­ner of self-aggran­diz­ing activists.”

Badger Honour

14th Novem­ber  From schnews

Bad­ger killings in detail

14th Novem­ber  From schnews

Bad­ger killings in detail

When the Bad­ger Trust threat­ened Nat­ur­al Eng­land with legal action for extend­ing the bad­ger cull, Nat­ur­al Eng­land said the the claim was based on a fun­da­men­tal con­fu­sion, but can you blame them, when those involved in the cull have been so, well, con­fus­ing. Between the secre­cy, the lying, u‑turns and even the blam­ing of the bad­gers for not co-oper­at­ing with being shot. Schnews attempts to digest the bad­ger farce a lit­tle…

 

TRIGGER WARNING

The the­o­ry is that killing bad­gers will reduce TB in cat­tle by 16%. Pre­vi­ous tri­als used traps to catch the ani­mals before shoot­ing them, but this was vetoed as too expen­sive and too vul­ner­a­ble to dis­rup­tion. This time, they’ve gone for the econ­o­my ver­sion where the bad­gers are shot while free run­ning. Vac­ci­nat­ing bad­gers has been dis­missed by gov­ern­ment as too expen­sive though sev­er­al inde­pen­dent groups are vac­ci­nat­ing. The whole pol­i­cy ignores the real prob­lems around bovine TB, which you can read about here (SchNEWS 836)

One of the impor­tant cri­te­ria of the cull is that at least 70% of the bad­gers in a giv­en area must be killed, to min­imise the num­ber of dis­turbed sur­vivors roam­ing about spread­ing the dis­ease fur­ther afield — the so-called ‘per­tur­ba­tion’ effect.

The main prob­lem with this was pret­ty clear from the begin­ning; nobody knows how many bad­gers there in the first place. Pre­vi­ous data showed more about the dis­tri­b­u­tion of bad­ger enthu­si­asts than bad­gers.

In 2012, Defra post­poned the cull, using the excuse that the bad­ger pop­u­la­tion was far high­er than expect­ed. when their pop­u­la­tion esti­mate shot up sud­den­ly. This year, when half way through the process it was clear the cull was floun­der­ing, they revised the pop­u­la­tion esti­mate down – the famous ‘pesky bad­gers moved my goal­posts’ moment. In a sta­tis­ti­cal manip­u­la­tion wor­thy of any­body’s Five Year Plan, Pater­son­’s Polit­buro announced that 940 bad­gers amount­ed to 65% of the pop­u­la­tion (Unmo­lest­ed pop­u­la­tions of bad­gers have shown no sign of these wild oscil­la­tions in num­bers)

Stal­in Pater­son has been caught out fib­bing about more thasn the num­bers though. On 10th Octo­ber he stat­ed in par­lia­ment that ‘…some of the ani­mals we have shot have been des­per­ate­ly sick-in the final stages of dis­ease…’ Mark Jones vet and exec­u­tive direc­tor of Humane Soci­ety Inter­na­tion­al said: “As a vet I find Mr Paterson’s claim that bad­gers shot in the pilot culls were ‘des­per­ate­ly sick’ high­ly sus­pi­cious. I know of no evi­dence to back this up, indeed all the avail­able data sug­gests that even where bovine TB is rife among cat­tle, only a tiny pro­por­tion of bad­gers will be suf­fer­ing any symp­toms of the dis­ease. The fig­ure is per­haps as low as one in a hun­dred. As Mr Pater­son has refused to have the bad­ger car­cas­es test­ed for TB, he can­not pos­si­bly have any sci­en­tif­i­cal­ly cred­i­ble data to sup­port his asser­tion and nobody will be per­mit­ted to chal­lenge his claim because DEFRA is hav­ing all the bod­ies incin­er­at­ed”

In Som­er­set they have killed 940 bad­gers, which with the cur­rent pop­u­la­tion esti­mate of 1450 is 65%. But at one point they said the pop­u­la­tion was 4300, which meant they had to kill 3000 bad­gers. If we’ve got the maths right, 940 is only 22% of 4300. At the end of the orig­i­nal Glouces­ter peri­od, only 30% had been killed.

The Som­er­set cull has now stopped but the Glouces­ter cull zone has been grant­ed an eight week exten­sion.

 

Action against the cull

The sus­tained lev­el of resis­tance to the cull has been impres­sive, nev­er leav­ing shoot­ers to oper­ate in peace. Hun­dreds of peo­ple have been spend­ing their nights in the cull zones, often trav­el­ling long dis­tances. A sin­gle bad­ger killed is clear­ly one too many but the deter­mined work of so many has helped make the cull a fail­ure. What­ev­er the gov­ern­ment spin says, shoot­ers on the ground have been admit­ting there was ‘no point even turn­ing up most nights.’

SchNEWS spoke to a reg­u­lar trav­eller to the cull zones “One of the best things about the cull is how it has brought togeth­er such a diver­si­ty of peo­ple togeth­er for the sake of the bad­gers. There has been good co-oper­a­tion and accep­tance of dif­fer­ent tac­tics with those going on legal night patrols on foot­paths work­ing along­side those direct­ly sab­o­tag­ing the shoot­ers with noise and torch­es. Mean­while, the Bad­ger Trust have been fight­ing the cull in court and the likes of Bri­an May have been doing the media bit. There have been live­ly pro bad­ger march­es in towns all round the coun­try. Hunt sabo­teurs have report­ed an increase in sup­port since sab­o­tag­ing the cull.Those sorts of alliances and rad­i­cal­is­ing of the ani­mal lov­ing mid­dle eng­land could be a bit of an own goal for the shoot­ing lob­by.”

 

Info for Action

Polic­ing tac­tics in the two cull zones have been very dif­fer­ent but they haven’t in either case suceed­ed in dis­rupt­ing the sab­o­tage. Glouces­ter­shire polic­ing has been a lot more pro-active, more arrests and harass­ment of activists, than in Som­er­set.

“In terms of tac­tics, the hard­est part has gen­er­al­ly been find­ing the shoot­ers. Good sett sur­vey­ing before­hand, record­ing and com­mu­ni­cat­ing sight­ings and sheer num­bers of peo­ple out look­ing have all proved help­ful. The groups walk­ing foot­paths with torch­es have made cer­tain areas impos­si­ble to shoot in and noisy dis­rup­tion of shoots have stopped them as well. When cage traps are used you can squash them or cut them open with bolt cut­ters. The cull is still going on in Glouces­ter­shire so get on down there to prac­tice your trap destruc­tion skills.”

 

Next

The licences for these two cull zones last for four years, but oth­er pilot culls may be start­ed next year. Top of the list is Dorset. Culling has to stop over the win­ter but may start again in the spring.

An ‘inde­pen­dent pan­el’ is sup­posed to be eval­u­at­ing the evi­dence to decide if the tri­als are suc­cess­ful. Indi­ca­tions sug­gest that Owen ‘shoot the buz­zards’ Pater­son will not accept any thing but approval of the cull.