Happy J18 — Ten Year Anniversary — Pics + Links

June 18th 2009
Ten year’s ago today and a glob­al Car­ni­val Against Cap­i­tal was erupt­ing across the world with co-ordi­nat­ed protests tak­ing place in over 40 coun­tries on June 18th 1999.

J18 flier frontJ18 crowd meets at Liverpool Street stationJune 18th 2009
Ten year’s ago today and a glob­al Car­ni­val Against Cap­i­tal was erupt­ing across the world with co-ordi­nat­ed protests tak­ing place in over 40 coun­tries on June 18th 1999.

Direct­ly tar­get­ing finan­cial cen­tres the J18 day of Inter­na­tion­al Action was stun­ning in its scale and ran along­side the G7/G8 meet­ing in Koln Ger­many. It fol­lowed the Glob­al Street Par­ty that had been held along­side the G7/G8 meet­ing in Birm­ing­ham in 1998 and co-ordi­nat­ed through Reclaim The Streets.

To remem­ber it, here’s a set of 23 pic­tures from Lon­don J18 cour­tesy of a pho­tog­ra­ph­er who was there for the morn­ing and the par­ty, but who missed the ensu­ing riot as police fought to regain con­trol of the City of Lon­don.

The rea­sons for strug­gle are greater now than then, and cli­mate change and eco­nom­ic melt­downs threat­en the lives and liveli­hoods of us all.

There’s too much to men­tion about J18, from the sheer joy of tak­ing the City to the full-on bat­tles, from the danc­ing and the masks to the spoof FT paper to pirate radio broad­casts, from the brick­ing up and storm­ing of the Lon­don Inter­na­tion­al Finan­cial Futures Exchange to the knock­ing out of CCTV cam­eras, from the elec­tron­ic dis­tur­bance actions to the begin­nings of Indy­media, from the exhaus­tion to the recrim­i­na­tions and the state back­lash against RTS and every­one else protest­ing for a bet­ter world.

But most of all it was GLOBAL: “Our Resis­tance is as Transna­tion­al as Cap­i­tal”

See this col­lec­tion of 2 pages of web links to orig­i­nal reports, web­sites, analy­sis, pic­tures and video:

http://www.delicious.com/directmedia/j18

Enjoy.

Trident Ploughshares Blockade at Aldermaston on 15th June 2009

It was a glo­ri­ous morn­ing as 5 sep­a­rate groups made their way towards Alder­mas­ton. At 6.30a.m.

Aldermaston blockade 1It was a glo­ri­ous morn­ing as 5 sep­a­rate groups made their way towards Alder­mas­ton. At 6.30a.m. the Muriel Lesters arrived at North Gate to find it had not been opened yet for the park and ride coach­es so they fur­ther locked it with their own chains and some super-glue and arranged them­selves as com­fort­ably as pos­si­ble in their lock-ons and hung their peace ban­ners.

There were 5 of them locked on, includ­ing one in a wheel chair plus a lone sup­port­er. A police­man soon arrived and asked them, in amaze­ment, why they had cho­sen that par­tic­u­lar gate (it being rather out of the way and not a usu­al tar­get for demon­stra­tors). They inge­nious­ly replied that they had nev­er blocked that gate before! They were then told that they were doing noth­ing ille­gal and could stay there all day if they wished! Well we know we are doing noth­ing ille­gal and that the real crim­i­nals are those build­ing ille­gal weapons of mass destruc­tion inside the fences. And the Muriel Lesters also knew, unlike the police, that they were an essen­tial part of an over­all block­ade and that oth­er gates were being block­ad­ed. They remained where they were.

Aldermaston blockade 2At 7a.m. women from the Alder­mas­ton Women’s Peace Camp pushed their heavy lock-ons into place at Home Office Gate, and three women locked on, slow­ing traf­fic down whilst the East Anglian group drove two cars into Tadley Gate com­plete­ly block­ing it. The two cars had been care­ful­ly pro­vid­ed with lock-on tubes fixed to the back-seat floors so that when the cars were posi­tioned the sup­port­ers in the front could get out fast and the two in the back seat just opened their doors and then sat in the road and put their arms in the tube. Thus 2 peo­ple locked-on to each car and the rest of the sup­port­ing group spray paint­ed CND signs on the cars and hung ban­ners say­ing ’Nuclear Weapons are State Ter­ror­ism’.

Aldermaston blockade 3Mean­while, two intre­pid cyclists man­aged to pad­lock shut both sets of gates at the Main Gate and then rush off with­out get­ting arrest­ed in order to sup­port the oth­er groups. They were soon joined by 2 oth­er cyclists and through­out the morn­ing not only gave good sup­port but also got lots of ideas about how to do some bicy­cle block­ades anoth­er time. They put up their ban­ner that said ’Bikes Block Bombs — No Tri­dent’ at the Tadley Gate.

Aldermaston blockade 4At 7.30a.m. two com­bined TP affin­i­ty groups call­ing them­selves the ’Birth­day Group’ (it was Alison’s 60th birth­day) manoeu­vred a car­a­van into the Boil­er­house Gate stop­ping the line of traf­fic that had been direct­ed around to that gate. There were 4 locked to each cor­ner of the car­a­van sit­ting on the ground with their arms in con­crete lock-ons that were fixed inside each cor­ner of the car­a­van. One oth­er block­ad­er locked him­self to the side of the car­a­van. Then the ban­ner went up say­ing ’No Tri­dent Replace­ment’ and the birth­day cake came around.

Streams of traf­fic were try­ing to get into the var­i­ous gates and hav­ing to move slow­ly around the base try­ing to find a way to get in. The base had been suc­cess­ful­ly blocked at 5 gates and although the locks were bro­ken with­in min­utes at the main gates and traf­fic trick­led in past the con­crete blocks at Home Office Gate nev­er­the­less 3 gates were blocked for between 2 to 3 hours. The hard­est to move were the two cars as it was dif­fi­cult for the cut­ting teams to remove the tubes with­in the restrict­ed space inside the cars. Once every­one was removed the cars and the car­a­van then had to be towed away.

Eleven peo­ple were arrest­ed and tak­en along to Lod­don Val­ley Police Sta­tion. The 5 at North Gate had been released last of all, cut out and then plonked on the grass and instead of being arrest­ed they were left free to join the sup­port­ers from the oth­er blockad­ing groups. We all sat down and shared food and drink and our expe­ri­ences of the day. We had had a kind ded­i­cat­ed press per­son who got out the press releas­es for us as he cycled round col­lect­ing people’s pic­tures and anoth­er sup­port per­son who had dri­ven me around to take pic­tures and to get an over­all pic­ture of what was going on. We were able to do a cou­ple of inter­views includ­ing one for the local radio. You can find local press accounts here at http://www.newburytoday.co.uk/News/Article.aspx?articleID=10297 and at http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/berkshire/8101261.stm

You can also find pic­tures of the block­ades at http://aldermaston.net/media

In all eleven peo­ple were arrest­ed and tak­en along to Lod­don Val­ley Police Sta­tion. They were not kept inside too long and we were all re-unit­ed at around 4p.m. After more chat­ting and de-briefs we all set off home — tired but hap­py.

The 11 arrest­ed were all charged with wil­ful obstruc­tion of the high­way either with or with­out a motor vehi­cle and were giv­en rather stiff bail con­di­tions to stay well away from Alder­mas­ton and Burgh­field that some of them may chal­lenge in court. They have to appear at New­bury Mag­is­trates Court on the fol­low­ing dates:- 7 on the 25th June, 2 on the 26th June, 1 on the 30th June and 1 on 2nd July. If any­one lives near the court then some court sup­port would be wel­come for the actu­al court cas­es. You can con­tact me if you want to do this and I will let you know the dates.

Any groups read­ing this who want to be involved in the next hid­den block­ade do con­tact me.….…we need to keep the pres­sure on Alder­mas­ton and try to per­suade our Gov­ern­ment to ful­fil its promise to the world com­mu­ni­ty to dis­arm its nuclear weapons not make new ones.

Local Writer Stops Council Hedge Cutting

This small, local action was car­ried out on the spur of the moment, but worked and prob­a­bly saved the lives of hun­dreds of nest­ing birds and oth­er inhab­i­tants of the hedgerow ecol­o­gy. Just goes to show that any­one can do it if they care enough — you don’t always need chains and tubes.

———-

This small, local action was car­ried out on the spur of the moment, but worked and prob­a­bly saved the lives of hun­dreds of nest­ing birds and oth­er inhab­i­tants of the hedgerow ecol­o­gy. Just goes to show that any­one can do it if they care enough — you don’t always need chains and tubes.

———-

NATURE-LOVING Kei­th Far­nish stood in front of trac­tors to stop them get­ting to birds nest­ing in hedges.

And Keith’s defi­ance has man­aged to halt a coun­cil hedge-cut­ting project in his local park.

Kei­th, 38, sprung into action when he spot­ted coun­cil con­trac­tors lop­ping two foot off the top of hedgerows, as he walked home through Sweyne Park, Rayleigh.

It stopped work­ers in their tracks, and Rochford Dis­trict Coun­cil has now decid­ed to call off the whole project until the end of the nest­ing sea­son.

Writer and dad-of-two Kei­th, who lives in near­by Eastcheap, is delight­ed.

He said: “That’s bril­liant news.Obviously, the coun­cil needs to review its pol­i­cy so it won’t hap­pen again.

“It’s so impor­tant the coun­cil takes into accounts pat­terns of nature.

“It was about three miles of hedgerow they would have mas­sa­cred and it would have destroyed nest­ing birds. Sweyne Park is the only green lung that Rayleigh has.”

Kei­th said the hedges are used by spar­rows, black­birds and robins, and about 20 metres had been cut down by the time he arrived after drop­ping off his chil­dren at school.

He said: “It’s just pure chance I hap­pened to be there and saw them. I said to the con­trac­tors that I will just stand in front of your machin­ery until you go.

“These guys seemed OK though I got their goat a bit. The man­ag­er told me they will just have to pack up and go some­where else.

“It’s the first time I’ve ever stood in front of machin­ery. It’s just some­thing I had to do.

“I felt empow­ered because it was the right thing to do. I didn’t feel threat­ened at all.”

(from http://www.echo-news.co.uk/news/local_news/rayleigh/4431250.Keith_makes_a_stand_to_protect_bird_nests/)Hedge Protester

Greenwash Guerrillas confront the Guardian – Mon 15 Jun 09

Date­line: the­guardian CLIMATE CHANGE SUMMIT 2009, Hotel Rus­sell, Lon­don, UK, 08:30–09:30, Mon 15 Jun 09 – Despite cli­mate crim­i­nal cor­po­ra­tion E.ON’s efforts to bag bil­lions of quid from the British State to build new filthy dirty coal fired pow­er sta­tions at Kingsnorth, north Kent and else­where, the Guardian still too

Greenwash Guerillas at Guardian e.On climate conferenceDate­line: the­guardian CLIMATE CHANGE SUMMIT 2009, Hotel Rus­sell, Lon­don, UK, 08:30–09:30, Mon 15 Jun 09 – Despite cli­mate crim­i­nal cor­po­ra­tion E.ON’s efforts to bag bil­lions of quid from the British State to build new filthy dirty coal fired pow­er sta­tions at Kingsnorth, north Kent and else­where, the Guardian still took its pol­lut­ed mon­ey in spon­sor­ing its Cli­mate Change Sum­mit. What­ev­er next?

* the­guardian MULTICULTURAL SUMMIT 2009, spon­sored by the BNP?
* the­guardian GEOGRAPHY SUMMIT 2009, spon­sored by the Flat Earth Soci­ety?
* the­guardian ABORTION RIGHTS SUMMIT 2009, spon­sored by the Soci­ety for the Pro­tec­tion of Unborn Chil­dren?

The Green­wash Gueril­las, Lon­don Brigade, Detec­tion Pla­toon #1 could not let this obscen­i­ty go un-protest­ed!

Vidz at YouTube

• Green­wash Guer­ril­las – 1. Action
» youtube.com/watch?v=NzEASynZxck

• Green­wash Guer­ril­las – 2. Inter­views
» youtube.com/watch?v=M5A6NYpvArs

An excel­lent full colour spoof edi­tion of the Guardian, using the news­pa­per’s own arti­cles from the last year to expose the destruc­tive role E.ON is play­ing in the UK’s fight against cli­mate change, was avail­able en mass for dis­tri­b­u­tion to sum­mit atten­dees, and a cou­ple of plucky com­rades infil­trat­ed the venue ear­ly doors to dis­trib­ute them.

Green­wash Gueril­las actions work best with­out inter­fer­ence from the filth, but because this event had already attract­ed activist atten­tion…
• Green­wash Alert — Guardian Cli­mate Change Sum­mit (17 Apr 09)
» www.indymedia.org.uk/en/regions/leedsbradford/2009/04/427737.html
…a Press Release was pub­lished in advance…
• Green­wash Guer­ril­las Tar­get­ing Guardian Cli­mate Change Sum­mit (14 Jun 09)
» www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2009/06/432268.html
…and sure enough Plod turned up mob-hand­ed.

How­ev­er… the cop-in-charge, a Sgt Salt­marsh – EK 10, was unlike any cop I’ve come across before – com­mu­nica­tive, co-oper­a­tive, open to com­pro­mise and nego­ti­a­tion, even charm­ing, while at the same being con­trol­ling and coer­cive. As we donned our white ‘green­wash haz­ard’ suits in leafy Rus­sell Square, he approached us and told us of the pen we’d be restrict­ed to, on the oppo­site cor­ner of a cross­roads from the sum­mit entrance to the Rus­sell Rooms in the Rus­sell Hotel, where­in the sum­mit was being held. But… although he men­tioned that our two infil­tra­tor com­rades were eject­ed from the venue, he said he’d made sure a copy of our spoof Guardian was on every atten­dees seat inside. Whether this was actu­al­ly so remains unver­i­fied. And… I found it easy to nego­ti­ate free­dom from being penned for media news gath­er­ers (myself and a video­g­ra­ph­er doc­u­men­tary film-mak­er), such that when a cou­ple of cop bot­tom-feed­ers tried to inter­fere with my record­ing the event on cam­era, I could say, “We’ve already secured a free­dom arrange­ment for media work­ers with your sergeant – you need to speak to him,” which ter­mi­nat­ed their inter­fer­ence and put them on the defen­sive.

We ini­tial­ly occu­pied the wide pave­ment space out­side the sum­mit entrance, and lashed our TOXIC GREENWASH HAZARD ban­ner to the rail­ings flank­ing the Rus­sell Rooms entrance. A hotel man­ag­er emerged and began tak­ing it down – and in a lat­er con­fab with Sgt Salt­marsh, got his smug grin wiped off his face (oh, for a sen­si­tive rifle micro­phone!). While threat­en­ing us with arrests under Sec­tion 12, Pub­lic Order Act 1986, Sgt Salt­marsh agreed to com­pro­mise over the loca­tion of the pro­test­er pen, and got his under­lings to drag crash bar­ri­ers across Her­brand Street to oppo­site the Rus­sell Rooms entrance. And two non-haz­ard-suit­ed com­rades were “allowed” to hand copies of our spoof Guardian to sum­mit atten­dees as they arrived. But the modus operan­di rai­son d’être of Green­wash Gueril­las – con­sen­su­al­ly run­ning e‑scanners over arriv­ing sum­mit atten­dees, and inter­pret­ing the scan­ners’ “moop-moop-NEEK” noise as “TOXIC GREENWASH DETECTED”, as both a street-the­atri­cal per­for­mance AND a seri­ous con­ver­sa­tion-starter – was com­plete­ly negat­ed by Sgt Saltmarsh’s impo­si­tions of Pub­lic Order Act con­di­tions.

But… in con­ver­sa­tions after­ward, he inti­mat­ed that his post-event intel­li­gence report would empha­sise how fluffy, peace­ful, and (if only under the coer­cive threats of mul­ti­ple Sec­tion 12 arrests) ulti­mate­ly co-oper­a­tive the Green­wash Gueril­las were on this occas­sion. Who knows – maybe in future he’ll have no grounds for pre-judg­ing our actions to entail a threat of “seri­ous pub­lic dis­or­der, seri­ous crim­i­nal dam­age or seri­ous dis­rup­tion to the life of the com­mu­ni­ty”, and we can protest with­out arrest threats? But I’m not hold­ing my breath, so to speak – bet­ter by far to only send advance Press Releas­es embar­goed until the action’s start time, or only send them at the action’s start time, so we’ve a high­er chance of peace­ful protest with­out ANY inter­fer­ence and obstruc­tion from the filth.

What­ev­er Next?
I rec­om­mend anoth­er Gov­ern­ment of the Dead protest pro­duc­tion:
“New” Labour Zom­bie Lunchtime Lurch
• Date: Thu 18 Jun 09, 13:00 & lurch­ing onwards to 15:00
• Ren­dezvous: “New” Labour Par­ty HQ, 39 Vic­to­ria St, Lon­don, SW1H 0HA
• Shout Out: Brown bare­ly sur­vived the Par­lia­men­tary Labour Par­ty meet­ing on Mon 08 Jun 09. Since he’s hang­ing on for grim death, we can look for­ward to a peri­od of “Zom­bie Dead Man Walk­ing” gov­ern­ment in the run up to an elec­tion. Can we take the pow­er to the streets? YES WE CAN!!
• Who-What: The Gov­ern­ment of the Dead will be send­ing a whole lurch of zom­bies down there to “New” Labour Par­ty HQ on Thu 18 Jun, from 13:00 lunchtime, when zom­bies could be hun­gry. Zom­bies are not known for their sense of direc­tion, so they could head off to Par­lia­ment and Down­ing Street at a slow shuf­fle, or they might end up stag­ger­ing across St James’ Park to Buck­ing­ham Palace, demand­ing to be dis­solved and put out of their mis­ery.
• Dress Code: this can be ordi­nary clothes, but torn up or blood­stained is a good look, espe­cial­ly with trendy blairite suits; on the oth­er hand, why not go for the goth­ic?
• Make­up: green/white pale skin, good healthy look for a zom­bie, blood, wounds, sores all rec­om­mend­ed; PVC glue gives good skin-peel effect.
• Loco­mo­tion: SLOW, gets there in the end.
» Loca­tion & Pub­lic Trans­port Map: tinyurl.com/NLZLL-map
» Face­book Event Page: tinyurl.com/NLZLL-FB
» Web: tinyurl.com/GotDead-future

World Naked Bike Rides UK (& Manchester Critical Mass)

Brighton:

In Brighton, organ­is­ers of the sev­en-mile ride were warned by Sus­sex Police last month that par­tic­i­pants could face pros­e­cu­tion if offi­cers received com­plaints about the nudi­ty.

But, after advice from civ­il lib­er­ties group Lib­er­ty, cyclists entered dis­cus­sions with local police chiefs and resolved the impasse.

Brighton:

In Brighton, organ­is­ers of the sev­en-mile ride were warned by Sus­sex Police last month that par­tic­i­pants could face pros­e­cu­tion if offi­cers received com­plaints about the nudi­ty.

But, after advice from civ­il lib­er­ties group Lib­er­ty, cyclists entered dis­cus­sions with local police chiefs and resolved the impasse.

Co-organ­is­er Dun­can Blinkhorn said: “This is a fun if out­ra­geous way to make the seri­ous point that we should not have to tol­er­ate roads, cities and a plan­et dom­i­nat­ed by the brutish­ness of cars that rou­tine­ly foul the air we all breathe, destroy lives and impov­er­ish the envi­ron­ment.”

—-

Lon­don:

On Sat­ur­day 12 June 2010 the sev­enth Lon­don World Naked Bike Ride will return to the streets of the cap­i­tal, allow­ing rid­ers to see the city sights from the com­fort of a bike or skates. The ride is easy and upbeat, and rid­ers dec­o­rate their bod­ies and bikes with mes­sages of protest against oil depen­den­cy and car cul­ture.

Around 1200 rid­ers turned out for the Lon­don World Naked Bike Ride on Sat­ur­day, com­plet­ing a 10km cir­cuit through some of the major tourist and shop­ping streets of the cap­i­tal and as in pre­vi­ous rides cre­at­ing quite a stir for the five min­utes or so while they passed.

Lon­don police, also on ped­al cycles but ful­ly clothed, accom­pa­nied the cyclists and eased their pas­sage through the traf­fic. Nudi­ty is not in itself an offence and police allow the now annu­al protest to take place.

Crowds sev­er­al deep lined the edge of the road in pop­u­lar tourist spots includ­ing Trafal­gar Square, and even many of the shop­pers in Oxford St stopped con­sum­ing to watch, although from the many com­ments I heard, many were unclear about the pur­pose of the event.

Some rid­ers did have slo­gans on their bod­ies, main­ly about oil and traf­fic, and some bikes car­ried A4 posters read­ing REAL RIGHTS FOR BIKE and CELEBRATE BODY FREEDOM or had flags stat­ing ‘CURB CAR CULTURE’ which made clear the pur­pose of the event to the care­ful onlook­er, but for most peo­ple it seemed sim­ply a spec­ta­cle of naked or near-naked bod­ies. Though of course also a rare treat for any bicy­cle spot­ters.

Rid­ers rode in a vari­ety of dress and undress. Apart from shoes — vir­tu­al­ly essen­tial on a bike — some wore noth­ing, while oth­ers added body paint, cycle hel­mets, hats, shorts or briefs, bras and often a cam­era; a few rode ful­ly dressed. As on pre­vi­ous events there were con­sid­er­ably more men than women, some­thing that isn’t ful­ly reflect­ed in my pic­tures. Although there were few­er women, more of them were in colour­ful body paint or oth­er­wise stood out from the crowd.

This is an event that many — rid­ers and watch­ers — enjoy and some­thing that real­ly does make thou­sands of peo­ple stop and stare, but as in pre­vi­ous years it seems to fail to get a clear mes­sage across, per­haps because those tak­ing part do so for such var­ied rea­sons. This isn’t essen­tial­ly a natur­ist ral­ly and nudi­ty alone just isn’t enough to get the point of the event across.

* Lon­don is the largest day­time WNBR event in the world. We had 1,200 par­tic­i­pants on Sat­ur­day 13 June 2009!!! Pre­vi­ous­ly we had 1,000 (2007 & 2008), 800 (2006), 250 (2005) and 58 (2004).

—-

Man­ches­ter:

The weath­er was per­fect, the rid­ers were excep­tion­al and the start­ing point was love­ly. We rode in joy and fun and lots of noise for almost the whole route and the crowds loved us. It all went a bit pear-shaped on Port­land Street when some well-inten­tioned but sad­ly ill-informed con­stab­u­lary stopped the ride and tried to make us get dressed. We undressed around the cor­ner any­way, and we did get a lot of won­der­ful media cov­er­age. It ain’t gonna hap­pen again folks, we’ll make sure of that! Next year’s going to have the best ride ever!

—-

Sheffield:

There were 18 naked rid­ers which was down from last year’s 27 par­tic­i­pants, although the weath­er was just as nice and sun­ny with a warm gen­tle breeze. The gold­en sun­shine and clear blue skies, made it a won­der­ful day for ever­body. This year, as it was our sec­ond annu­al ride, we were hop­ing for around one hun­dred naked rid­ers. How­ev­er, as the Lon­don WNBR was held in the after­noon, this may have low­ered the turn out as folk thronged to the Lon­don ride which had over one thou­sand rid­ers.

—-

Southamp­ton:

On a dry and ‘warm enough’ evening 150 rid­ers attend­ed. The con­voy was led in fine style by a pair of Pen­ny Far­things dat­ing from the 1890s. We felt that these vehi­cles from a time before the inter­nal com­bus­tion engine neat­ly debunked the fool­ish idea that roads are made for cars! Helped by the state­ly pace of the vin­tage bikes, the ride stayed close­ly bunched togeth­er which gave a sense of uni­ty. We were greet­ed warm­ly by bystanders as we passed, and most car dri­vers were tol­er­ant (though there were the odd few aggres­sive excep­tions). Though num­bers were about the same as last year, it seemed to me there was a greater show of naked­ness this time, so hoorah for Southamp­ton rid­ers!

—-

York:

AN 87-year-old woman was among the par­tic­i­pants in this year’s York Naked Bike Ride.

Mar­garet Dust­man, who lived in Acomb for more than 50 years before mov­ing to Mir­field, said she took part because she was against people’s devo­tion to petrol and fash­ion.

Mrs Dust­man cycled off in the alto­geth­er, but oth­ers were there in var­i­ous states of undress, wear­ing Indi­an head­dress, biki­nis and var­i­ous slo­gans daubed on their bod­ies.

Oth­er reports, pho­tos and things at http://www.worldnakedbikeride.org/uk/

—-

The Crit­i­cal Mass­es in Man­ches­ter have been attend­ed by well over 100 peo­ple each month, for the last cou­ple of years — hoorah!

Videos of May 2009 ride parts 1 2 3 4

See you there — every last fri­day of the month 6pm cen­tral library MCR

—-

Thugs Seek Jobs at Shell HQ

The main doors at Shells head­quar­ters were closed to staff at 9am today, 12 June as pro­test­ers dressed as ‘thugs’ turned up for a job inter­view. Shell secu­ri­ty locked all doors as pro­test­ers tried to enter the build­ing for what they said was a job inter­view “we hear Shell are hir­ing thugs to sink ships in Ire­land”.

Shell Thugs 4 HireThe main doors at Shells head­quar­ters were closed to staff at 9am today, 12 June as pro­test­ers dressed as ‘thugs’ turned up for a job inter­view. Shell secu­ri­ty locked all doors as pro­test­ers tried to enter the build­ing for what they said was a job inter­view “we hear Shell are hir­ing thugs to sink ships in Ire­land”.

Pro­test­ers tried to enter the Head­quar­ters but the doors were locked as they went in. The doors remained locked for about an hour and a half, despite the var­i­ous demon­stra­tions the pro­test­ers gave of their ‘thugery’ skills even sim­u­lat­ing how they coud hold a fish­er­man cap­tive why sink­ing his boat.

One of the pro­test­ers Saman­tha John­son said “Shell have been hir­ing hit squads to ter­rorise local pro­test­ers at their activ­i­ties abroad, as with the Ogo­ni peo­ple in the Niger Delta. Now, they have import­ed these meth­ods to Ire­land. Indeed, last month a for­mer Shell secu­ri­ty guard was iden­ti­fied as one of the mer­ce­nar­ies employed in an assas­si­na­tion plot in Bolivia”.

This protest is in response to an inci­dent in Ross­port, Ire­land at 2am yes­ter­day morn­ing where 4 masked men sunk a local fisherman’s boat, with the own­er and a crewmem­ber still on it. 2 of the men were armed and held the fish­er­men while the oth­ers went below deck to sink the boat.

One of the pro­test­ers today Sean Reil­ly said “This shows the extremes Shell go to, to get what they want. They are will­ing to put 2 men in hos­pi­tal for vocal­ly express­ing oppo­si­tion.

Indigenous anti-infastructure protesters murdered in crackdown on months-long blockade in Peru

For sev­en weeks tens of thou­sands of Ama­zon­ian Indi­ans blocked roads and rivers across east­ern Peru. They seized hydro­elec­tric plants and pump­ing sta­tions on oil and gas pipelines to try to force the repeal of decrees facil­i­tat­ing oil explo­ration, com­mer­cial farm­ing and log­ging in parts of the jun­gle.

For sev­en weeks tens of thou­sands of Ama­zon­ian Indi­ans blocked roads and rivers across east­ern Peru. They seized hydro­elec­tric plants and pump­ing sta­tions on oil and gas pipelines to try to force the repeal of decrees facil­i­tat­ing oil explo­ration, com­mer­cial farm­ing and log­ging in parts of the jun­gle. Petrope­ru, the state oil com­pa­ny, had to shut a pipeline that car­ries 40,000 bar­rels of oil each day. Amid threats of ener­gy rationing in east­ern towns, the gov­ern­ment of Pres­i­dent Alan Gar­cía this month ordered armed police to clear a stretch of road and retake a pump­ing sta­tion near Bagua, in Peru’s north­ern jun­gle

—-

THE BACKGROUND

Ear­ly this morn­ing (June 5th), Peru­vian police launched a vio­lent attack on a non­vi­o­lent road block­ade held by Ama­zon­ian indige­nous pro­test­ers oppos­ing 10 laws that would open up their ter­ri­to­ry to increased min­er­al, oil, gas and tim­ber exploita­tion. Police opened fire with live ammu­ni­tion, killing at least 28 peo­ple.

FMI:
http://www.rootforce.org/2009/06/05/peruvian-police-murder-indigenous-protesters-take-action/

WHY TAKE ACTION

The first rea­son to take action, of course, is sim­ply out of sol­i­dar­i­ty with our fel­low war­riors in the strug­gle for a just and sus­tain­able world. But why are we send­ing out this action alert as Root Force?

For near­ly two months, thou­sands indige­nous pro­test­ers have near­ly par­a­lyzed Peru’s Ama­zon region with block­ades of crit­i­cal trans­porta­tion and min­ing infra­struc­ture. They have sparked a nation­al dis­course over the lim­its to devel­op­ment and who owns nature, and have made it clear that they will not sur­ren­der any of their ances­tral home­lands.

At the heart of the issue are 10 laws passed by pres­i­den­tial decree that would great­ly facil­i­tate indus­tri­al exploita­tion of the Ama­zon. THIS IS CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE, intend­ed to sup­ply new raw mate­ri­als for the glob­al mar­ket. THIS IS ONE OF THOSE WEAK POINTS OF THE SYSTEM that we are always talk­ing about.

The indige­nous war­riors fight­ing for their lives have pushed this issue into the glob­al eye, and the Peru­vian gov­ern­ment has placed itself in a posi­tion of weak­ness by mur­der­ing unarmed pro­test­ers. Even before the recent killings, a con­gres­sion­al pan­el had already declared 2 of the laws uncon­sti­tu­tion­al, and only through pro­ce­dur­al tricks has the pres­i­den­t’s par­ty been able to stall debate on repeal­ing one of those laws.

This is one of those rare cas­es where SUSTAINED INTERNATIONAL PRESSURE COULD TIP THE SCALES. If these laws are repealed, it will be a major set­back for infra­struc­ture expan­sion plans in a tru­ly crit­i­cal region of the hemi­sphere.

HOW TO TAKE ACTION

You can email crit­i­cal peo­ple in the Peru­vian gov­ern­ment through this link, pro­vid­ed by Ama­zon Watch:

http://amazonwatch.org/peru-action-alert.php

You can also orga­nize protests at Peru­vian embassies or con­sulates, or take oth­er actions that you think stand a good chance of mak­ing it back to the deci­sion mak­ers in Lima.

Make sure to express your out­rage at the gov­ern­men­t’s strong arm tac­tics — even before the mur­ders, the gov­ern­ment had sus­pend­ed civ­il lib­er­ties in 5 provinces and was call­ing indige­nous peo­ple “ter­ror­ists” — and demand the repeal of the Free Trade laws and any law fur­ther open­ing the Ama­zon to min­er­al, oil, gas, tim­ber, hydro­elec­tric or agri­cul­tur­al exploita­tion.

In Sol­i­dar­i­ty,
Root Force

—–

Recent reports indi­cate as many as 84 peo­ple killed and 150 arrest­ed in clash­es stem­ming from an ear­ly morn­ing vio­lent raid by police on unarmed pro­test­ers on June 5. Police are report­ed to be burn­ing the bod­ies of the dead and dump­ing them into the riv­er.

Aston­ish­ing­ly — but not sur­pris­ing­ly — the gov­ern­ment is accus­ing the pro­test­ers of using tac­tics rem­i­nis­cent of the 1980s inter­nal con­flict. Deploy­ing racist imagery paint­ing indige­nous pro­test­ers as spear-wield­ing sav­ages, Pres­i­dent Alan Gar­cia has vowed a tough “response.”

Fol­low­ing the ear­ly-morn­ing mas­sacre, pro­test­ers took 38 police hostage at a pump­ing sta­tion for the nation­al oil com­pa­ny, PetroPe­ru. A police raid to free the offi­cers result­ed in the deaths of nine of them. An Argen­tin­ian oil com­pa­ny, Plus­petrol, has halt­ed oil pump­ing in one unit and will soon halt pump­ing in anoth­er due to the unrest.

The gov­ern­ment has since issued an arrest war­rant for indige­nous leader Alber­to Pizan­go (who was elect­ed to rep­re­sent the indige­nous coali­tion by the lead­ers of 1,200 com­mu­ni­ties), charg­ing him with “sedi­tion.” Pizan­go has gone into hid­ing.

Please take action and urge the Peru­vian gov­ern­ment to halt the vio­lence and repeal the con­tro­ver­sial free trade laws that would open up indige­nous land in the Ama­zon to increased devel­op­ment. Con­tact the US gov­ern­ment and inter­na­tion­al agen­cies as well, and encour­age them to place pres­sure on Peru. The Peru­vian gov­ern­ment is in a seri­ous posi­tion of weak­ness right now and try­ing to cov­er it up with vio­lence, and this is one of those rare cas­es where inter­na­tion­al pres­sure could deal a major set­back to infra­struc­ture expan­sion plans.

Read the full Root Force action alert on this issue here.

——

Indige­nous Lead­ers and Allies Call for an End to Vio­lence on All Sides

BAGUA, Peru — June 8 — In the after­math of Friday’s bloody raid on a peace­ful indige­nous road block­ade near Bagua in the Peru­vian Ama­zon, numer­ous eye­wit­ness­es are report­ing that the Spe­cial Forces of the Peru­vian Police have been dis­pos­ing of the bod­ies of indige­nous pro­test­ers who were killed.

“Today I spoke to many eye­wit­ness­es in Bagua report­ing that they saw police throw the bod­ies of the dead into the Marañon Riv­er from a heli­copter in an appar­ent attempt by the Gov­ern­ment to under­re­port the num­ber of indige­nous peo­ple killed by police,” said Gre­gor MacLen­nan, spokesper­son for Ama­zon Watch speak­ing.

“Hos­pi­tal work­ers in Bagua Chi­ca and Bagua Grande cor­rob­o­rat­ed that the police took bod­ies of the dead from their premis­es to an undis­closed loca­tion. I spoke to sev­er­al peo­ple who report­ed that there are bod­ies lying at the bot­tom of a deep crevasse up in the hills, about 2 kilo­me­ters from the inci­dent site. When the Church and local lead­ers went to inves­ti­gate, the police stopped them from approach­ing the area,” report­ed MacLen­nan.

Police and gov­ern­ment offi­cials have been con­sis­tent­ly under­re­port­ing the num­ber of indige­nous peo­ple killed by police gun­fire. Indige­nous orga­ni­za­tions place the num­ber of pro­test­ers killed at least at 40, while Gov­ern­ment offi­cials claim­ing that only a hand­ful of indige­nous peo­ple were killed. Also the Gar­cia Gov­ern­ment claims that 22 police offi­cers were killed and sev­er­al still miss­ing.

“Wit­ness­es say that it was the police who opened fire last Fri­day on the pro­test­ers from heli­copters,” MacLen­nan said. “Now the gov­ern­ment appears to be destroy­ing the bod­ies of slain pro­test­ers and giv­ing very low esti­mates of the casu­al­ty. Giv­en that the demon­stra­tors were unarmed or car­ry­ing only wood­en spears and the police were fir­ing auto­mat­ic weapons, the actu­al num­ber of indige­nous peo­ple killed is like­ly to be much high­er.”

“Anoth­er eye­wit­ness report­ed see­ing the bod­ies of five indige­nous peo­ple that had been burned beyond iden­ti­fi­ca­tion at the morgue. I have lis­tened to tes­ti­mo­ny of peo­ple in tears talk­ing about wit­ness­ing the police burn­ing bod­ies,” con­tin­ued MacLen­nan.

At least 150 peo­ple from the demon­stra­tion on Fri­day are still being detained. Eye-wit­ness reports also con­firm that police forcibly removed some of the wound­ed indige­nous pro­test­ers from hos­pi­tals, tak­ing them to unknown des­ti­na­tions. Their fam­i­lies expressed con­cern for their well being while in deten­tion. There are many peo­ple still report­ed miss­ing and access to med­ical atten­tion in the region is hor­ri­bly inad­e­quate.

The Orga­niz­ing Com­mit­tee for the Indige­nous Peo­ples of Alto Ama­zonas Province issued this state­ment: “It is appalling that polit­i­cal pow­ers have act­ed in such a cru­el and inhu­man man­ner against Ama­zon­ian Peo­ples, fail­ing to rec­og­nize the fun­da­men­tal rights and pro­tec­tions guar­an­teed to us by the Con­sti­tu­tion. We express deep grief over the death of our indige­nous broth­ers, of civil­ians and the offi­cers of the Nation­al Police.”

The gov­ern­ment expand­ed the State of Emer­gency and estab­lished a cur­few on all traf­fic in the region from 3 pm to 6 am. Indige­nous and inter­na­tion­al human rights orga­ni­za­tions are wor­ried about plans of anoth­er Nation­al Police raid on a block­ade in Yurimaguas close to the town of Tara­po­to where thou­sands are block­ing a road.

Pres­i­dent Alan Gar­cia is being wide­ly crit­i­cized for foment­ing a cli­mate of fear mon­ger­ing against indige­nous peo­ples by draw­ing par­al­lels to the bru­tal Shin­ning Path guer­ril­la move­ment of the 1980s and ear­ly 1990s, and by vague­ly refer­ring to exter­nal and anti-demo­c­ra­t­ic threats to the coun­try.

The Ama­zon­ian indige­nous peo­ples’ mobi­liza­tions have been peace­ful, local­ly coor­di­nat­ed, and extreme­ly well orga­nized for near­ly two months. Yet Gar­cia insists on call­ing them ter­ror­ist acts and anti-demo­c­ra­t­ic. Gar­cia has even gone so far as to describe the indige­nous mobi­liza­tions as “sav­age and bar­bar­ic.” Gar­cia has made his dis­crim­i­na­tion explic­it, say­ing direct­ly that the Ama­zon­ian indige­nous peo­ple are not first-class cit­i­zens.

“These peo­ple don’t have crowns,” Gar­cia said about the pro­test­ers. “These peo­ple aren’t first-class cit­i­zens who can say — 400,000 natives to 28 mil­lion Peru­vians — ‘You don’t have the right to be here.’ No way. That is a huge error.”
Iron­i­cal­ly, Peru was the coun­try that intro­duced the Unit­ed Nations Dec­la­ra­tion on the Rights of Indige­nous Peo­ples on the floor of the Gen­er­al Assem­bly when it was adopt­ed in Sep­tem­ber 2007.

A coali­tion of indige­nous and human rights orga­ni­za­tions will protest in front of the Peru­vian Embassy in Wash­ing­ton D.C. on Mon­day, June 8 at 12:30 pm.

Indige­nous peo­ples have vowed to con­tin­ue protests until the Peru­vian Con­gress revokes the “free trade” decrees issued by Pres­i­dent Gar­cia under spe­cial pow­ers grant­ed by Con­gress in the con­text of the Free Trade Agree­ment with the Unit­ed States.

Among the out­pour­ing of state­ments con­demn­ing the vio­lence in Peru were those from Peru’s Ombudsman’s office, the chair of the Unit­ed Nations Per­ma­nent Forum on Indige­nous Issues, a coali­tion of 45 inter­na­tion­al human rights orga­ni­za­tions, Indige­nous orga­ni­za­tions from through­out the Amer­i­c­as, and the Con­fer­ence of Bish­ops of Peru. Also famous per­son­al­i­ties includ­ing Q’orianka Kilch­er, Ben­jamin Bratt, Peter Bratt, and Daryl Han­nah and Bian­ca Jag­ger called on the Peru­vian Gov­ern­ment to cease the vio­lence and seek peace­ful res­o­lu­tion to the con­flict.

AIDESEP, the nation­al indige­nous orga­ni­za­tion of Peru has called for a nation­wide gen­er­al strike start­ing June 11th.

Ama­zon Watch is con­tin­u­al­ly updat­ing pho­tographs, audio tes­ti­mo­ny, and video footage from Bagua on www.amazonwatch.org.

New­ly released b‑roll at http://amazonwatch.org/peru-protests-highres-photos.php

—–

—–

The broad­en­ing influ­ence of the indige­nous move­ment was on dis­play Thurs­day in a gen­er­al strike that drew thou­sands of pro­test­ers here to the streets of Iqui­tos, the largest Peru­vian city in the Ama­zon, and to cities and towns else­where in jun­gle areas. Protests over Mr. Gar­cía’s han­dling of the vio­lence in the north­ern Bagua Province last Fri­day also took place in high­land regions like Puno, near the Boli­vian bor­der, and in Lima and Are­quipa on the Pacif­ic coast.

“The gov­ern­ment made the sit­u­a­tion worse with its con­de­scend­ing depic­tion of us as gangs of sav­ages in the for­est,” said Wag­n­er Muso­line Acho, 24, an Awa­jún Indi­an and an indige­nous leader. “They think we can be tricked by a maneu­ver like sus­pend­ing a cou­ple of decrees for a few weeks and then rein­tro­duc­ing them, and they are wrong.”

The pro­test­ers’ imme­di­ate threat – to cut the sup­ply of oil and nat­ur­al gas to Lima, the cap­i­tal – seems to have sub­sided, with pro­test­ers part­ly with­draw­ing from their occu­pa­tion of oil instal­la­tions in the jun­gle. But as anger fes­ters, indige­nous lead­ers here said they could eas­i­ly try to shut down ener­gy instal­la­tions again to exert pres­sure on Mr. Gar­cía.

Anoth­er wave of protests appears like­ly because indige­nous groups are demand­ing that the decrees be repealed and not just sus­pend­ed. The decrees would open large jun­gle areas to invest­ment and allow com­pa­nies to bypass indige­nous groups to obtain per­mits for petro­le­um explo­ration, log­ging and build­ing hydro­elec­tric dams. A stop­gap attempt to halt ear­li­er indige­nous protests in the Ama­zon last August failed to pre­vent them from being reini­ti­at­ed more force­ful­ly in April.

The author­i­ties are strug­gling to under­stand a move­ment that is crys­tal­liz­ing in the Peru­vian Ama­zon among more than 50 indige­nous groups. They include about 300,000 peo­ple, account­ing for only about 1 per­cent of Peru’s pop­u­la­tion, but they live in strate­gi­cal­ly impor­tant and resource-rich loca­tions, which are scat­tered through­out jun­gle areas that account for near­ly two-thirds of Peru’s ter­ri­to­ry.

So far, alliances have proved elu­sive between Indi­ans in the Ama­zon and indige­nous groups in high­land areas, rul­ing out, for now, the kind of broad indige­nous protest move­ments that helped oust gov­ern­ments in neigh­bor­ing Ecuador and Bolivia ear­li­er in the decade.

In con­trast to some ear­li­er efforts to orga­nize indige­nous groups, the lead­ers of this new move­ment are them­selves indige­nous, and not white or mes­ti­zo urban intel­lec­tu­als. They are well orga­nized and use a web of radio sta­tions to exchange infor­ma­tion across the jun­gle. After one promi­nent leader, Alber­to Pizan­go [who explic­i­ty links the strug­gles there to glob­al cli­mate change every­where], was grant­ed asy­lum in Nicaragua this week, oth­ers quick­ly emerged to artic­u­late demands.

Two Fishermen in Hospital After Boat Boarded and Sunk by Masked Men in Ireland

The sit­u­a­tion in Erris Co. Mayo has esca­lat­ed into a sor­did state of affairs, with two fish­er­men being held by force by two men in bal­a­clavas at 2am on Thurs­day the 11th of June. The fish­er­men, Pat O’Donnell and Mar­tin McDon­nell, are both locals opposed to the con­tro­ver­sial Cor­rib gas project which is cur­rent­ly being over­seen by The Roy­al Dutch Shell Com­pa­ny.

The sit­u­a­tion in Erris Co. Mayo has esca­lat­ed into a sor­did state of affairs, with two fish­er­men being held by force by two men in bal­a­clavas at 2am on Thurs­day the 11th of June. The fish­er­men, Pat O’Donnell and Mar­tin McDon­nell, are both locals opposed to the con­tro­ver­sial Cor­rib gas project which is cur­rent­ly being over­seen by The Roy­al Dutch Shell Com­pa­ny.
The two fish­er­men were return­ing to Bal­ly­glass pier, hav­ing been fish­ing out at sea, when their boat was board­ed by four masked men. When Mr. O’Donnell and Mr. McDon­nell had been ren­dered help­less, the board­ers pro­ceed­ed to move below decks and sink the ‘Iona Isle’, the trawler belong­ing to Mr. O’Donnell. Both men are now being tend­ed to in Castle­bar gen­er­al hos­pi­tal.

These attacks come short­ly after rough­ly thir­ty Shell to Sea activists appeared in Bell­mul­let dis­trict court yes­ter­day for assort­ed acts of civ­il dis­obe­di­ence relat­ing to the pro­posed pipeline project. How­ev­er a num­ber of mem­bers of An Gar­da Síochan­na were also sum­moned by the judge for pos­si­ble acts of mis­con­duct, mis­use of author­i­ty and ille­gal behav­iour relat­ing to Shell to Sea protests.

The assaults car­ried out on the fish­er­men bear an uncan­ny resem­blance to that which occurred almost a month and a half ago on local farmer and Gold­man envi­ron­men­tal prize win­ner Willie Cor­duff.

The recent devel­op­ments here in Erris are becom­ing an increas­ing cause for con­cern for local peo­ple attempt­ing to halt Shell’s work in order to defend their own liveli­hoods. Many fam­i­lies here are com­plete­ly depen­dent on the local envi­ron­ment to pro­duce a source of income. Hav­ing fish­ing grounds pol­lut­ed by dredg­ing work, or pipelines dragged through one’s fields is like­ly to evoke strong protest. Albeit most local peo­ple who oppose the project ini­tial­ly felt that there was lit­tle or no chance of the sit­u­a­tion unrav­el­ling to the extent it would be so effort­less­ly com­pa­ra­ble to the Ogo­ni saga in Nige­ria.

More activists were arrest­ed yes­ter­day evening after they had assist­ed local men in bar­ri­cad­ing nar­row choke points of road which lead to the Shell com­pound at Glen­gad, which is still devoid of the suf­fi­cient plan­ning per­mis­sion. One man had hoist­ed him­self up onto the cab of a truck in an attempt to halt the ille­gal work, much to the sur­prise of local peo­ple and Gar­da present at the scene. The dri­ver elect­ed to accel­er­ate down a steep hill with the man still on top of the vehi­cle. Two Shell to Sea activists were vio­lent­ly appre­hend­ed on the road and brought to Bell­mul­let Gar­da sta­tion where they’ve been held all night. They have been brought to court this morn­ing with­out legal rep­re­sen­ta­tion and the state is attempt­ing to put them on remand. This means they will be held in jail until the next court hear­ing in July.

Also at half four ear­li­er this morn­ing four­teen peo­ple from the Ross­port Sol­i­dar­i­ty Camp dis­rupt­ed work whilst kayak­ing in bay where Shell are cur­rent­ly dredg­ing. This result­ed in the arrest of six peo­ple and police also slashed kayaks. Over the past ten days dredgers have been board­ed on two occa­sions where activists climbed on top of dig­gers and stopped work. A num­ber of injuries have been sus­tained dur­ing water actions injuries at the hands of the IRMS secu­ri­ty, employed by Shell to trit­u­rate the cam­paign oppos­ing the theft of bil­lions of euro worth of gas.

The glob­al pres­sure has been mount­ing sig­nif­i­cant­ly on Shell in recent times, with much media focus sur­round­ing the Wiwa fam­i­ly law­suits against them in New York. Shell was being sued for human rights abus­es in the Ogo­ni region of Nige­ria dat­ing back to the ear­ly nineties, how­ev­er Shell decid­ed to set­tle out of court to the sum of $15.5 mil­lion dol­lars.

In the face of one of the world’s biggest multi­na­tion­al cor­po­ra­tions backed by the state and a team of secu­ri­ty, many of whom are known fas­cists and mer­ce­nar­ies, the com­mu­ni­ty still stand strong in defence of their envi­ron­ment and liveli­hoods. The Ross­port Sol­i­dar­i­ty Camp is pro­vid­ing active sup­port to the com­mu­ni­ty, please come and help!

Plane Stupid stage ‘Corporate Takeover’ at London City Airport

June 10th: 5 eco activists have shut down oper­a­tions at Lon­don City Air­port. The group, who are wear­ing pin­striped suits and bowler hats entered at 2.30 am today.

City airport action 1City airport action 2City airport action 3June 10th: 5 eco activists have shut down oper­a­tions at Lon­don City Air­port. The group, who are wear­ing pin­striped suits and bowler hats entered at 2.30 am today. They cut through the perime­ter fence and formed a human wheel clamp around one of the airport’s busi­ness jet fleet at the west end of the run­way. The need to avoid sparks around high­ly flam­able avi­a­tion fuel could meen that the nor­mal process of cut­ting them out of their arm­tubes could be severe­ly ham­pered.

Check out the pho­tos on our Flickr pho­to­stream.

Video

The ‘eco-takeover’ puts the spot­light on the self­ish­ness of pri­vate jet use:

“Because of their low pas­sen­ger capac­i­ty, small jets emit between five and 10 times more car­bon per pas­sen­ger than com­mer­cial flights,” said spokes­woman Nan­cy Birch. “In an age where we face poten­tial­ly cat­a­stroph­ic cli­mate change, this is no longer an accept­able form of trans­port. It’s time that pri­vate jets were ground­ed for good.”

Until the down­turn, the pri­vate jet busi­ness was the fastest grow­ing seg­ment of the avi­a­tion sec­tor. Over the last ten years it has expand­ed by almost 50%.

“This is yet anoth­er exam­ple of the insane rush towards mas­sive air­port and flight expan­sion,” Birch con­cludes. “The avi­a­tion indus­try seems to think it can pol­lute its way out of cli­mate change. But any­one with half a brain will know that this is just plane stu­pid.”

Lon­don City air­port blights the lives of some of the poor­est peo­ple in Lon­don. Newham has been known to expe­ri­ence air pol­lu­tion lev­els which reg­u­lar­ly exceed EU safe­ty lim­its for high­t­ly tox­ic chem­i­cals such as Nitrus Oxide and has the high­est lev­els of mor­tal­i­ty in under 30s in the UK from asth­ma, a mat­ter that Asth­maUK are cur­rent­ly inves­ti­gat­ing.

While it seems the group have suc­cess­ful­ly shut down the pri­vate Jet cen­tre part of the air­port, locals are report­ing that pub­lic flights start­ed run­ning from City from 7am. No one is claim­ing that the pro­test­ers have yet been arrest­ed or removed, which sug­gests that the Air­port are breach­ing health and safe­ty by con­tin­u­ing oper­a­tions in this restrict­ed area. If the five are still in posi­tion then they will have been locked on for 7 hours and a half hours now…

——

Police cut­ting teams weren’t sight­ed in the area at the time the press team were forced to leave. Acsess roads have now been shut down, and the woman with the phone in the arm­tube can’t take calls any­more, so it’s dif­fi­cult to get any news of what’s going on. More pho­tos are avail­able on the Plane Stu­pid web­site, check out the flickr stream.

——

Notes to the edi­tor

A total of 27 local and region­al air­ports around the UK are cur­rent­ly seek­ing to expand their activ­i­ties.

Lon­don City Air­port recent­ly received local author­i­ty per­mis­sion to expand its com­mer­cial flights from 80,000 to 120,000. The air­port aims to increase this total to 170,000 by 2030.

Activists tar­get­ed Lon­don City Air­port because it is one of the key dri­vers of the pri­vate jet busi­ness. The air­port cur­rent­ly sees an aver­age of 170 move­ments (take-offs and land­ings) per week. The airport’s Jet Cen­tre pre­dicts this fig­ure will increase to more than 530 a week by 2030.

Lon­don City Air­port was closed at the time of the eco-takeover. Secu­ri­ty was giv­en two hours’ warn­ing before the first flights of the day.

The airport’s Jet Cen­tre com­pris­es a mix­ture of pri­vate­ly-owned jets and a for-hire busi­ness jet oper­a­tion run by Pri­vate­Jet.

——
8:30am update & local group press release:

Locals are con­firm­ing that flights start­ed from city air­port at 7am. While the pri­vate Jet Cen­tre where the group are locked on does apear to have been sucess­ful­ly shut down, it is alarm­ing that the air­port is pre­pared to dis­re­gard health and safe­ty reg­u­la­tions and con­tin­ue to run flights in the area. There have been no reports that the group have been arrest­ed or removed so far. If they are still there then they have been locked on for 7 hours now…

For the local cam­paign group per­spec­tive see below-

PRESS RELEASE FIGHT THE FLIGHTS — LONDON CITY AIRPORT

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE 10 June 2009

FIGHT THE FLIGHTS RESPONSE TO PLANE STUPIDS ACTION AT LONDON CITY AIRPORT

Fight the Flights is not a direct action group, but we ful­ly appre­ci­ate the frus­tra­tion that the cli­mate change activists feel in get­ting their voic­es, and con­cerns heard on avi­a­tion expan­sion, and how avi­a­tion is one of the fastest grow­ing sources of CO2 emis­sions.

It is no won­der that some cam­paign­ers feel they are being pushed into tak­ing non vio­lent direct action because the sys­tem is fail­ing peo­ple of their demo­c­ra­t­ic rights to pro­tect their com­mu­ni­ties, futures and their envi­ron­ment from harm­ful ‘run­away’ air­port and flight expan­sion.

Just under a 100,000 res­i­dents in east and south east Lon­don will be affect­ed by the increas­ing exces­sive noise lev­els from Lon­don City Air­port upon expan­sion, and yet less than 10,000 were claimed to have been con­sult­ed by the Lon­don Bor­ough of Newham. Most will not be enti­tled to any noise insu­la­tion. They will have to live with the con­se­quences every day of their lives, each time a flight takes off and lands. The major­i­ty do not have the option to move, and many lived in the area long before the air­ports cre­ation.

Ben­e­fits?

In just over 20 years the air­port has only man­aged to direct­ly employ 120 Newham res­i­dents out of the 406 direct­ly employed staff the air­port claim to employ.

Lon­don tax­pay­ers have also paid £24million for the air­ports secu­ri­ty pro­vid­ed by the Met­ro­pol­i­tan Police over the past 5 years, which the air­port refuse to pay.

In addi­tion the air qual­i­ty above Lon­don City Air­port exceeds EU direc­tive lev­els by 50% and was termed as ‘tox­ic’ but this was not acknowl­edged by the Lon­don Bor­ough of Newham. In a bor­ough which has the high­est lev­el of mor­tal­i­ty in under 30s with asth­ma in the whole coun­try, Newham should be focussing on improv­ing air qual­i­ty, not adding to the pol­lu­tion by approv­ing fur­ther expan­sion at this res­i­den­tial­ly sit­u­at­ed air­port in the most dense­ly pop­u­lat­ed area of Eng­land.

Erod­ed Democ­ra­cy

Res­i­dents have been con­stant­ly thwart­ed and ignored by this gov­ern­ment and the Lon­don Bor­ough of Newham when pro­vid­ing evi­dence against the expan­sion. Requests for a pub­lic inquiry into the planned 50% expan­sion of flights at Lon­don City Air­port was refused by Hazel Blears, Sec­re­tary of State in 2008, whilst the Lon­don Bor­ough of Newham showed no con­cern that 100s of homes in Green­wich will now be in the crash zone and failed to address the risk to res­i­dents and com­mu­ni­ties who live, work or trav­el through the crash zone in both Newham and Green­wich. How­ev­er in con­trast the gov­ern­ment and coun­cil appear to con­sis­tent­ly lis­ten to the avi­a­tion at the expense of the com­mu­ni­ties: this is expan­sion at any cost.

With a gov­ern­ment that does not lis­ten to local con­cerns on the effects of expan­sion on third par­ty safe­ty, increas­ing pol­lu­tion lev­els, the effect on res­i­dents health and children’s devel­op­ment, and the con­tri­bu­tion to cli­mate change, it is no won­der that we are see­ing actions such as this more fre­quent­ly.