Report from Emma Sheppard’s Sentencing

28/2/15

UPDATE: Em has writ­ten her own report on the sen­tenc­ing – read it here

28/2/15

UPDATE: Em has writ­ten her own report on the sen­tenc­ing – read it here

This week saw the sen­tenc­ing of Emma Shep­pard, who plead guilty to caus­ing “crim­i­nal dam­age reck­less­ly endan­ger­ing life” to sev­er­al police cars. All in all it went much as expect­ed. Before hand­ing out a prison sen­tence of two years in order to “send a mes­sage”, the judge gave a sum­ming up dis­play­ing all the igno­rance we have come to expect of the rich and pow­er­ful. He admit­ted to being con­fused that a com­pas­sion­ate per­son might dis­like the police, and list­ed some exam­ples of police ‘good deeds’ to try and make his point, such as pro­tect­ing the peo­ple who suf­fer from domes­tic abuse [1]. We won­der if he would apply the same rea­son­ing to the peo­ple he sen­tences, and find them not guilty because they once helped an old per­son cross a busy road?

Police involved in “Oper­a­tion Rhone” [2] also tried to claim it as a vic­to­ry for them­selves, despite only get­ting involved after the arrest, and seem­ing to con­tribute noth­ing sig­nif­i­cant to the tri­al. They made a pub­lic state­ment claim­ing that they have “a long and proud his­to­ry of facil­i­tat­ing peace­ful protest”. Need­less to say this isn’t true – Bris­tol Defen­dant Sol­i­dar­i­ty reg­u­lar­ly sees exam­ples of peo­ple injured and fit­ted up by Avon and Som­er­set Police.

We encour­age peo­ple to write to Emma and sup­port her through her time in jail. She may be moved dur­ing her sen­tence, so check the Bris­tol ABC web­site before writ­ing.

Emma can receive cards, stamps and sta­tion­ary. For dona­tions, news & any oth­er sol­i­dar­i­ty efforts email: bristol_abc [at] riseup.net

[1] this is despite police being far more like­ly than aver­age to PERPETRATE domes­tic vio­lence in the first place – womenandpolicing.com/violenceFS.asp
[2] More infor­ma­tion: https://bristolabc.wordpress.com/2015/02/20/operation-grhone-and-the-badger-hunt/

For updates and lat­est address to write to, vis­it Bris­tol ABC

Earth First! Summer Gathering, August 2015

Update: see earthfirstgathering.org for an inspir­ing and excit­ing pro­gramme and more.

Excit­ing plans are tak­ing shape.  Get involved by com­ing along to the EF! Win­ter Moot in Bris­tol.

Email: sum­mer­gath­er­ing AT earthfirst.org.uk

Update: see earthfirstgathering.org for an inspir­ing and excit­ing pro­gramme and more.

Excit­ing plans are tak­ing shape.  Get involved by com­ing along to the EF! Win­ter Moot in Bris­tol.

Email: sum­mer­gath­er­ing AT earthfirst.org.uk

Call out for protectors at Bristol camp to protect trees, wildlife and allotments

http://risingup.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/DSF2762.jpg

http://risingup.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/DSF2762.jpg

The Ris­ing Up camp to pro­tect trees, wildlife and allot­ments in NE Bris­tol from the planned Metrobus road needs pro­tec­tors urgent­ly to come and be on site. Please share with your net­works.

More details go to:

https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100008701005657&fref=ts

http://risingup.org.uk/category/news/

How to get there/involved

Video inter­views (around 6 min­utes long and 72MB in size.)

Ten Arrested at Seneca Lake Fathers and Grandfathers Blockade

photo from popular resistance

Feb­ru­ary 7th, 2015

Nine men and one woman were arrest­ed Wednes­day morn­ing and charged with tres­pass, part of the ongo­ing protest at the Crest­wood Mid­stream facil­i­ty north of Watkins Glen.

Hous­ton-based Crest­wood wants to store up to 88 mil­lions gal­lons of liq­uid propane and butane in under­ground salt cav­erns near Seneca Lake. The com­pa­ny is await­ing state Depart­ment of Envi­ron­men­tal Con­ser­va­tion approval.

Pro­test­ers also have cit­ed the Fed­er­al Ener­gy Reg­u­la­to­ry Commission’s deci­sion to allow Crest­wood to expand nat­ur­al gas stor­age at its 576-acre prop­er­ty as a rea­son for pick­et­ing.

The group appre­hend­ed Wednes­day was par­tic­i­pat­ing in what they termed a “Fathers and Grand­fa­thers Block­ade” at the site.

About 200 peo­ple have been arrest­ed since protests began in Sep­tem­ber.

Two of those charged Wednes­day, John Den­nis ofLans­ing and Daryl Ander­son of Hec­tor, are teach­ers. Both said they were protest­ing in mem­o­ry of the deaths of their respec­tive sons two years ago.

Den­nis and Ander­son met in a local bereave­ment group and drove to the protest togeth­er.

Week of Action Against Spectra

Activists shut down Spec­tra Energy’s Waltham office after deploy­ing

a 24-foot tall tri­pod.

Feb­ru­ary 4th, 2015

While a gag­gle of con­fused police tried to unseat Shane Capra from his perch atop a 24-foot tri­pod inside Spec­tra Energy’s Waltham, Mass., office on the morn­ing of Decem­ber 17, and oth­ers tried to snare a bal­loon ban­ner float­ing near the office ceil­ing — all while accom­pa­nied by a brass band pro­vid­ing the rous­ing sound­track — one Spec­tra employ­ee was over­heard mut­ter­ing to anoth­er, “This is extreme­ly dis­rup­tive.”

Of course, that was the point.

The action in Waltham was part of the Week of Respect and Resis­tance, a series of demon­stra­tions, sit-ins, and lock-downs aimed at Spec­tra Ener­gy, their investors, and the politi­cians who sup­port them in their plan to expand a fracked gas pipeline — the so-called Algo­nquin, a name which many activists describe as insult­ing to the indige­nous speak­ers of the Algo­nquian lan­guage — through New Eng­land. With FERC poised to present its final Envi­ron­men­tal Impact State­ment any day, and with New Eng­land politi­cians and Big Greens voic­ing their unwa­ver­ing sup­port for their favorite “bridge fuel,” cli­mate jus­tice orga­niz­ers and pipeline fight­ers in New York, Con­necti­cut, Mass­a­chu­setts, and Rhode Island knew they had to esca­late their already long-run­ning cam­paign against Spec­tra.

For Nick Katke­vitch of Fight­ing Against Nat­ur­al Gas, or FANG, this sense of urgency was fueled by a recent trip to Fer­gu­son, MO, where he saw first-hand the pow­er of the con­fronta­tion­al direct action tac­tics that had yet to be seen in the cam­paign against Spec­tra. “A lot of times in the cli­mate move­ment, espe­cial­ly in New Eng­land, there’s a ten­den­cy to fol­low the polit­i­cal process, to not dis­turb things too quick­ly, to take it slow,” Katke­vitch said. “When I went to Fer­gu­son, it was a total learn­ing expe­ri­ence. I learned to be tena­cious, to be fear­less, and to just say it like it is. I learned the true mean­ing of speak­ing truth to pow­er.”

Dur­ing the week of Decem­ber 13–19, activists brought that tena­cious­ness and fear­less­ness to a vari­ety tar­gets, from Dan­bury, Conn., where Spec­tra plans to expand the already-exist­ing gas pipeline to accom­mo­date the high­er vol­ume of gas flow­ing from the Mar­cel­lus Shale, to the gas com­pres­sor sta­tion in Cromwell, Conn., to the offices of some of the most pow­er­ful indi­vid­u­als and enti­ties involved in the so-called Algo­nquin Incre­men­tal Mar­ket project — includ­ing Spec­tra them­selves.

Sher­rie Andre of FANG, who gave the week of action its name, stress­es that while many of the actions car­ried out against Spec­tra and their finan­cial and polit­i­cal sup­port­ers involved acts of civ­il dis­obe­di­ence, “We need to respect those who have been orga­niz­ing before us and have their own way of doing things. We need to show that we know how to pay homage to dif­fer­ent types of non­vi­o­lent direct action.” She added, “I recent­ly bumped into a friend who’s become inter­est­ed in what we’re doing, but said, ‘I can’t climb a tri­pod.’ It’s real­ly dis­heart­en­ing if that’s all they’re see­ing because there are so many oth­er play­ers and parts involved that make that hap­pen.”

For Noga Hey­man of Flood Boston, the suc­cess of the cam­paign against Spec­tra — and the broad­er cli­mate jus­tice move­ment — hinges on mak­ing activism as acces­si­ble as pos­si­ble for a wide vari­ety of peo­ple. “Maybe lock-downs don’t always draw peo­ple in, but giv­ing some­one a zine to read, or get­ting a song stuck in their head, might engage them more.”

A bridge to nowhere

This empha­sis on engage­ment and cre­ativ­i­ty was cru­cial to one of the goals for the week: to not only dis­rupt busi­ness as usu­al at the loca­tions of the protests, but to dis­rupt the nar­ra­tive about fracked gas per­pet­u­at­ed by the ener­gy indus­try, fos­sil fuel-friend­ly politi­cians, and main­stream envi­ron­men­tal groups alike.

In addi­tion to block­ing the dri­ve­way to the Cromwell gas com­pres­sor sta­tion, Dan Fis­ch­er explained, he and fel­low Cap­i­tal­ism vs the Cli­mate mem­ber Vic Lan­cia “were also try­ing to block the for­ma­tion of mis­lead­ing assump­tions. Peo­ple dri­ve by the com­pres­sor sta­tion every day, and either don’t know about it or false­ly assume it’s part of the clean ener­gy process. So we felt it was impor­tant to take direct action at the point of assump­tion and say this is a dirty fuel, and there are plen­ty of clean, renew­able alter­na­tives that make frack­ing unnec­es­sary.” To help make this point, Fis­ch­er and Lan­cia locked them­selves to a mas­sive wood­en “bridge to nowhere” built in the days lead­ing up to the action.

Mem­bers of Flood Boston and oth­er groups fight­ing pipeline expan­sion in Mass­a­chu­setts echoed this sen­ti­ment at their action at the Boston office of the State Street Cor­po­ra­tion, one of Spectra’s biggest finan­cial back­ers, lat­er in the week. For Hey­man, the action was an oppor­tu­ni­ty to use art, the­ater and music to “dis­man­tle the myths sur­round­ing nat­ur­al gas” and advo­cate for com­mu­ni­ty-con­trolled renew­ables. To this end, activists con­struct­ed a giant pair of lips “spew­ing myths” about fracked gas which pro­test­ers chal­lenged with facts about the health and safe­ty impacts of the pipeline project.

“The peo­ple of West Rox­bury are trau­ma­tized,” said David Lud­low, a 72 year-old orga­niz­er in the Boston area, cit­ing the 2010 explo­sion of a gas pipeline in San Bruno, Calif., which killed eight peo­ple and which looms large in the minds of local res­i­dents brac­ing them­selves for the con­struc­tion of the West Rox­bury Lat­er­al pipeline and a new, high-pres­sure Meter­ing and Reg­u­lat­ing Sta­tion, both of which would be built dan­ger­ous­ly close to an active quar­ry and res­i­den­tial areas.

Activists and com­mu­ni­ty mem­bers expressed these con­cerns in songs, chants and can­tas­to­rias that rang out in State Street’s office and con­tin­ued to Boston’s South Sta­tion after pro­test­ers deliv­ered a let­ter urg­ing State Street to divest from Spec­tra Ener­gy and oth­er sim­i­lar­ly destruc­tive cor­po­ra­tions, includ­ing Kinder Mor­gan, whose gas pipeline projects also threat­en Mass­a­chu­setts com­mu­ni­ties and ecosys­tems.

In Rhode Island, activists drew atten­tion to the hypocrisy of the politi­cians and gov­ern­ment agen­cies sup­port­ing Spectra’s plan, with Bur­ril­lville Against Spec­tra Expan­sion hold­ing a protest at the Rhode Island Depart­ment of Envi­ron­men­tal Man­age­ment and FANG orga­niz­ing a sit-in at Sen. Shel­don Whitehouse’s office. Ten pro­test­ers joined Uni­ver­si­ty of Rhode Island physics pro­fes­sor Peter Nightin­gale, a mem­ber of Fos­sil Free Rhode Island, in the sit-in, and cheered for Nightin­gale as he was even­tu­al­ly arrest­ed for refus­ing to leave the office. White­house, who Nightin­gale calls a “wolf in sheep’s cloth­ing,” has long been a focal point in the Rhode Island fight against Spectra’s pipeline projects: in August, mem­bers of Bur­ril­lville Against Spec­tra Expan­sion held a sit-in at Whitehouse’s office which led to a meet­ing with the sen­a­tor.

Despite Bur­ril­lville res­i­dents express­ing their con­cerns about the health and safe­ty impacts of Spectra’s plans to expand the gas com­pres­sor sta­tion in their town, how­ev­er, Whitehouse’s sup­port for the pipeline expan­sion has not changed; in light of Whitehouse’s cli­mate-friend­ly rhetoric from the Sen­ate floor, Nightin­gale finds this inex­cus­able. “Com­pared to any of the oth­er cli­mate zom­bies, [White­house] may be a ‘cli­mate cham­pi­on,’” Nightin­gale explained. “But at the same time he sup­ports this plan out of Wash­ing­ton and Wall Street that wants to push nat­ur­al gas and gets in the way of devel­op­ing the green pow­er sec­tor.”

Blocka­dia and beyond

The actions dur­ing the Week of Respect and Resis­tance gar­nered sig­nif­i­cant local media atten­tion and, some spec­u­late, may have played a role in FERC delay­ing the release of their final Envi­ron­men­tal Impact State­ment on the AIM project — not to men­tion Spectra’s stock hit­ting a 52-week low. Still, orga­niz­ers know that the fight against Spec­tra — and the fight for cli­mate jus­tice — is far from over.

“Before this week, the fight against Spec­tra had been most­ly polite and play­ing by the rules,” Fis­ch­er said. “We’re still going to keep using the old tac­tics, but this was the week where peo­ple in four dif­fer­ent states said that they’ve had enough with Spectra’s mis­lead­ing claims and with the white­wash advanced by the gov­ern­ment and busi­ness-friend­ly envi­ron­men­tal groups. This is the week where we entered a more com­mit­ted resis­tance, and hope­ful­ly a more suc­cess­ful resis­tance.”

As many of those involved in this week of action think about what that resis­tance will look like, one word seems to be on many of their minds: “Blocka­dia,” a name giv­en to the grow­ing net­work of groups dis­rupt­ing the extrac­tion and trans­porta­tion of fos­sil fuels with elab­o­rate and long­stand­ing protest camps. “We see Blocka­dia as an impor­tant way of achiev­ing vic­to­ry against not only this project, but extreme ener­gy in gen­er­al,” Fis­ch­er explained. “Spec­tra Ener­gy can keep its eyes peeled for the con­struc­tion of Blocka­dia in more and more places.”

How­ev­er, even as the resis­tance to Spec­tra and the fos­sil fuel ener­gy indus­try mounts, many orga­niz­ers also rec­og­nize that there is still sig­nif­i­cant work that needs to be done with­in the envi­ron­men­tal move­ment itself, a fact that was high­light­ed by the Week of Respect and Resis­tance coin­cid­ing with an esca­la­tion of the Black Lives Mat­ter move­ment fol­low­ing the non-indict­ment of the police offi­cers respon­si­ble for the chok­ing death of Eric Gar­ner. Andre explained that as FANG shared Black Lives Mat­ter memes and arti­cles on their social media plat­forms, “there was a lot of back­lash from envi­ron­men­tal orga­niz­ers who fol­low the FANG page and who want­ed us just to focus on pipelines. But life is not just about pipelines. Our strug­gles are not siloed.” Indeed, FANG mem­bers under­scored this point by block­ing a com­muter train car­ry­ing pas­sen­gers to a New Eng­land Patri­ots game for four and half min­utes ear­li­er this month to sig­ni­fy the four and a half hours Mike Brown’s dead body remained in the streets of Fer­gu­son after he was shot by offi­cer Dar­ren Wil­son.

For Andre and many of the oth­er orga­niz­ers involved in the Week of Respect and Resis­tance, the fight against Spec­tra has to be seen as part of a larg­er fight for jus­tice that begins with rec­og­niz­ing that the land mem­bers of the pre­dom­i­nant­ly white envi­ron­men­tal move­ment live on and strug­gle to pro­tect “is not theirs. It was stolen. Envi­ron­men­tal­ists need to under­stand the his­to­ry of col­o­niza­tion and what it’s done to indige­nous peo­ple before they can even begin to talk about pipelines. Pipelines are just a new form of col­o­niza­tion. They’re a new trau­ma.”

Lud­low, who stress­es the impli­ca­tions of the cli­mate cri­sis for indige­nous com­mu­ni­ties in the Unit­ed States and around the world, also empha­sizes the need to rec­og­nize the con­nec­tions between the cli­mate jus­tice move­ment and move­ments fight­ing mil­i­tarism and eco­nom­ic injus­tice. “The U.S. makes more wars to pro­tect its resources and gob­ble up more of the world’s exist­ing resources. We’re not going to stop this by being nice. We’re not going to stop it by just talk­ing to our local areas about safe­ty. We need to make alliances to build a broad-based move­ment.”

For all the work that needs to be done to stop Spec­tra and com­bat the oppres­sive ten­den­cies with­in the envi­ron­men­tal move­ment, the activists involved in the Week of Respect and Resis­tance all agree that the week of action marked a turn­ing point in their cam­paign against Spec­tra. As Katke­vitch reflect­ed on the week’s impacts, his mind turns to one of the oth­er great pas­sions of his life besides orga­niz­ing: bas­ket­ball.

“When the team you’re play­ing is much bet­ter, they don’t respect you and they think it’s going to be an easy game,” he said. “But if you start play­ing aggres­sive­ly and assertive­ly and real­ly con­fi­dent­ly, at first they’ll think it’s kin­da fun­ny, like, ‘look at these kids try­ing so hard.’ But there’s a cer­tain moment in the game when all of a sud­den the ener­gy switch­es and the oppo­nent is actu­al­ly afraid, because they’re rec­og­niz­ing that your con­fi­dence and your aggres­sion is actu­al­ly com­ing from a real place — that you could actu­al­ly win. In Spectra’s office, it def­i­nite­ly felt like one of those moments of turn­ing the ener­gy. Now they have to respect us.”

Italy – No TAV: Convictions and Tear Gas on the Motorway

 

scontri27.6.2011Maddalena1

 

scontri27.6.2011Maddalena1

(June 27th, 2011: Evic­tion of the Free Repub­lic of Mad­dale­na)

Feb­ru­ary 3rd, 2015

from Con­tra Info

NO TAV (No to the High Speed Train) move­ment, which is based in the Susa Val­ley (Italy) in Pied­mont and which oppos­es the cre­ation of the new high speed rail­way line between Turin and Lyon in France. This line is part of a EU project which plans to con­nect Lyon to Budapest and then onto Ukraine

The so-called ‘No TAV mega-tri­al’ has fin­ished at first instance, in which 53 com­rades are involved over the evic­tion resis­tance of the Free Repub­lic of Mad­dale­na on June 27th, 2011, and for the attack of the con­struc­tion site of Chiomonte on July 3rd that fol­lowed. Charges of caus­ing bod­i­ly-harm and aggra­vat­ed vio­lence, resis­tance against cus­to­di­al staff of the pub­lic author­i­ty, deface­ment and cov­er­ing faces (mask­ing up) became sen­tences which var­ied between a few months and four and a half years in prison for 47 defen­dants. Heavy sen­tences, but less than the requests of the pros­e­cu­tors Pedrot­ta and Quaglino—who, on Octo­ber 7th, 2014, demand­ed 200 years of prison in total—except for a few com­rades, against whom the judge decid­ed to tight­en the screw a bit more than what was pro­posed by the pros­e­cu­tion. On the oth­er hand, six peo­ple were acquit­ted of charges.

When leav­ing the room, the No TAV sup­port­ers present at the tri­al invad­ed and blocked the route of Cor­so Regi­na Margheri­ta for about twen­ty min­utes in both direc­tions, at the point of the bunker room [the spe­cial court of Tori­no, built into the Val­lette jail, near the begin­ning of the motor­way], to protest against the sen­tences giv­en by the judges.

Anoth­er gath­er­ing hap­pened the same after­noon at Bus­soleno train sta­tion at 6pm. This trans­formed into a march of about 250 peo­ple, who at first blocked the main road, then tried to invade the motor­way. The police man­aged to put them­selves in the way in time to pre­vent this first attempt, but then were quick­ly bypassed by a large group of pro­test­ers, who scat­tered through the mead­ows, and seized one of the two sides of the motor­way. The occu­pa­tion of the motor­way last­ed approx­i­mate­ly half an hour until the arrival of oth­er police forces that attacked with shots of tear gas and some charges. Five com­rades were arrest­ed dur­ing these events, two of whom were released short­ly after. The motor­way was then reopened, well pro­tect­ed by offi­cers, whilst the main road was still blocked. At around 11.30pm, the three No TAV arrest­ed dur­ing the police charges on the motor­way were then released with a sum­mons to the court.

Trans­lat­ed and (a tiny bit) adapt­ed from Mac­erie

A large protest has been called on Feb­ru­ary 21st in Turin to demon­strate that every­thing con­tin­ues and that the 145 years of prison-time which were dis­trib­uted do not dimin­ish the deter­mi­na­tion of the No TAV strug­gle

More Info (in Ital­ian)

Peru’s Indigenous People Blockade Oil Company on River Tigre

Hun­dreds of indige­nous peo­ple deep in the Peru­vian Ama­zon are block­ing a major Ama­zon trib­u­tary fol­low­ing what they say is the government’s fail­ure to address a social and envi­ron­men­tal cri­sis stem­ming from oil oper­a­tions.

Kich­wa men, women and chil­dren from numer­ous com­mu­ni­ties have been protest­ing along the Riv­er Tigre for almost a month, bar­ring the riv­er with cables and stop­ping oil com­pa­ny boats from pass­ing.

Oil com­pa­nies have oper­at­ed in the region for over 40 years, and have been linked by local peo­ple to pol­lu­tion that has led the gov­ern­ment to declare “envi­ron­men­tal emer­gen­cies” in the Tigre and oth­er riv­er basins.

“The Tigre is the most con­t­a­m­i­nat­ed, but the gov­ern­ment has done noth­ing seri­ous,” says Jose Fachin, a Kich­wa leader. “This is a protest by the whole Kich­wa peo­ple. They’re ready to die for it. The price of oil is low, but the pain caused is extreme­ly high.”

The oil con­ces­sion where the protest is tak­ing place, Lot 1‑AB, is Peru’s most pro­duc­tive, but the con­tract, held by Plus­petrol, expires in August. The gov­ern­ment has com­mit­ted to reli­cens­ing it and con­sult­ing the indige­nous com­mu­ni­ties involved, but lead­ers say the con­t­a­m­i­na­tion and oth­er issues must be addressed first.

“What we want is reme­di­a­tion, com­pen­sa­tion, and to be con­sult­ed, accord­ing to inter­na­tion­al norms, about the reli­cens­ing,” says Fachin. “We won’t per­mit anoth­er 30 years of work oth­er­wise.”

The Kich­was are protest­ing in a com­mu­ni­ty called Nue­vo Rema­nente. The community’s head, Ronal Chu­je San­di, told the Guardian two years of dia­logue with the gov­ern­ment “hasn’t achieved any­thing” and now they are demand­ing 100 mil­lion Peru­vian nue­vo soles, from Plus­petrol, for “com­pen­sa­tion after almost 45 years of con­t­a­m­i­na­tion.”

“The state declared an envi­ron­men­tal emer­gency, but hasn’t done any­thing,” says Guiller­mo San­di Tuituy, from indige­nous fed­er­a­tion Feconat. “It must find a solu­tion to this prob­lem if it wants to reli­cense the con­ces­sion.”

Hun­dreds of oth­er indige­nous peo­ple are also protest­ing in Lot 1‑AB along an adja­cent riv­er, the Cor­ri­entes. Accord­ing to Puina­mudt, a col­lec­tive of indige­nous fed­er­a­tions, 400 Achuar from a com­mu­ni­ty called Pam­pa Her­mosa have protest­ed for over a week, paralysing oper­a­tions at 19 wells and shut­ting down one field.

Achuar leader Car­los San­di, pres­i­dent of indige­nous fed­er­a­tion Fecona­co, says they will not allow Lot 1‑AB to be reli­censed if their demands are not met. Pluspetrol’s part­ner in Lot 1‑AB, which account­ed for almost 25% of Peru­vian oil pro­duc­tion in 2013, is the Chi­na Nation­al Petro­le­um Cor­po­ra­tion.

Raul Sosa Rodriguez, from Fecona­co, told the Guardian that Pam­pa Her­mosa is demand­ing com­pen­sa­tion for land use, ful­fil­ment of an agree­ment with Plus­petrol, and the oppor­tu­ni­ty to work for sub-con­trac­tors, in addi­tion to exist­ing demands such as clean-up.

“This is a lever to pro­pel the fight for all the indige­nous peo­ples in the region,” he says. “If these demands aren’t met, they’ll close the con­ces­sion.”

Anthro­pol­o­gist Alber­to Chirif says the gov­ern­ment is deter­mined to reli­cense Lot 1‑AB.

“What the indige­nous peo­ple are ask­ing for isn’t dif­fi­cult to sat­is­fy,” he says. “These are basic rights: ter­ri­to­ry, health, edu­ca­tion, the clean-up of impact­ed areas, and con­trol so there are no new envi­ron­men­tal dis­as­ters.”

Peru’s coun­cil of min­is­ters (PCM) issued a state­ment say­ing it has sent a com­mis­sion to the region and urg­ing the Kich­was and Achuars to sus­pend their protests.

Plus­petrol took over Lot 1‑AB from Occi­den­tal in 2000. It did not respond to requests for com­ment.

 

Activist convicted after using ‘stinger’ device on police cars

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Three patrol cars were immo­bilised by Emma Sheppard’s home­made stinger device.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Three patrol cars were immo­bilised by Emma Sheppard’s home­made stinger device.

Tues­day 27 Jan­u­ary 2015

An envi­ron­men­tal activist faces jail for putting the lives of police offi­cers in dan­ger by suc­cess­ful­ly set­ting up a home-made trap designed to take patrol cars out of action.

Emma Shep­pard brought three cars to a jud­der­ing stop by punc­tur­ing their tyres with the crude “stinger” device made of ply­wood and nails that she had posi­tioned out­side a police sta­tion near Bris­tol on New Year’s Eve.

Emma Sheppard, who has been convicted in Bristol of damaging police cars with a stinger device.
Emma Shep­pard, who has been con­vict­ed in Bris­tol of dam­ag­ing police cars with a stinger device. Pho­to­graph: Pub­lic Domain

Sheppard’s con­vic­tion is the first fol­low­ing an arrest by detec­tives from Avon and Som­er­set police’s Oper­a­tion Rhone, which is prob­ing more than 100 attacks on estab­lish­ment tar­gets includ­ing police sta­tions, banks and politician’s cars by sus­pect­ed anar­chists in and around Bris­tol.

Shep­pard is well known with­in green activist cir­cles and is one of the cam­paign­ers who was found guilty of try­ing to shut down the Rat­cliffe pow­er sta­tion in Not­ting­hamshire in 2009 but whose con­vic­tion was quashed fol­low­ing the rev­e­la­tions that the group had been infil­trat­ed by the under­cov­er police offi­cer Mark Kennedy.

At a brief hear­ing at Bris­tol crown court on Tues­day, Shep­pard, 33, appeared via video-link from East­wood Park prison in Glouces­ter­shire.

Wear­ing all black, she spoke only to con­firm her name and to plead guilty to dam­ag­ing prop­er­ty and being reck­less as to whether her actions endan­gered lives.

Judge Mar­tin Pic­ton told Shep­pard, who is from the Eas­t­on area of the city – a neigh­bour­hood asso­ci­at­ed with Bristol’s rad­i­cal scene – that he would have to con­sid­er pub­lic pro­tec­tion issues when sen­tenc­ing her next month.

Order­ing a pre-sen­tence report, he told Shep­pard: “The court will have to know a lot more about you to deter­mine what is the right sen­tence. It will inevitably be a cus­to­di­al sen­tence.”

The facts of the case were not giv­en in court, but the Guardian under­stands that on New Year’s Eve Shep­pard placed a home-made stinger made of nails and ply­wood across a road close to Con­corde House in Emer­sons Green, a police base to the east of the city cen­tre. Police and armed forces typ­i­cal­ly use stingers to stop sus­pects’ cars and to defend road blocks.

Three police response vehi­cles had their tyres punc­tured as they left the police sta­tion togeth­er to deal with an inci­dent. No offi­cers were hurt.

Avon and Som­er­set police regard the guilty plea as sig­nif­i­cant because it is the first con­vic­tion cred­it­ed to Oper­a­tion Rhone. Detec­tives from Rhone, which has a per­ma­nent team of 10, were called in to inves­ti­gate Sheppard’s attack because it was con­sid­ered an assault on the estab­lish­ment.

In Decem­ber, for the first time police linked more than 100 arson and van­dal­ism attacks that have been car­ried out in and around Bris­tol and Bath over the past four years. The most spec­tac­u­lar arson attack caused £16m of dam­age to Avon and Somerset’s new firearms cen­tre in August 2013. But oth­er attacks have been car­ried out on phone masts, rail­way lines, car deal­er­ships, courts and church­es.

Often respon­si­bil­i­ty for the attacks is claimed on the anar­chist web­site http://325.nostate.net. Police believe a very small group is behind the cam­paign. Mem­bers of Bristol’s long-estab­lished and thriv­ing anar­chist scene claim the force has unfair­ly harassed activists because it hates their anti-estab­lish­ment stance.

A £10,000 reward has been offered over one well-known activist, Huw “Bad­ger” Nor­folk. Police have said they want to talk to Nor­folk about a van­dal­ism attack on the offices of the Bris­tol Post in August 2011 – at the time of protests around Britain fol­low­ing the shoot­ing of Mark Dug­gan in north Lon­don – and an arson attack on a phone mast in Jan­u­ary 2013 that cut off tele­vi­sion, radio and mobile phone sig­nals to thou­sands of homes and busi­ness­es. Norfolk’s loca­tion has been unknown to the police since 2011.

In 2010, Shep­pard, then liv­ing in Man­ches­ter, was giv­en a con­di­tion­al dis­charge over the Rat­cliffe protest. Judge Jonathan Teare told her and her co-defen­dants: “You are all decent men and women with a gen­uine con­cern for oth­ers, and in par­tic­u­lar for the sur­vival of plan­et Earth in some­thing resem­bling its present form. I have no doubt that each of you act­ed with the high­est pos­si­ble motives. And that is an extreme­ly impor­tant con­sid­er­a­tion.”

The con­vic­tions were quashed at the court of appeal the fol­low­ing year after three court of appeal judges ruled that cru­cial evi­dence record­ed by police spy Mark Kennedy had been with­held. The lord chief jus­tice, Lord Judge, said that the con­vic­tions were “unsafe because of sig­nif­i­cant non-dis­clo­sure” of secret sur­veil­lance tapes record­ed by Kennedy.

No link has been estab­lished between Shep­pard and any of the oth­er attacks on estab­lish­ment tar­gets in Bris­tol, but it is believed that she knew Bad­ger Nor­folk.

DCI Andy Bevan, who heads Oper­a­tion Rhone, said: “These crude home­made stinger devices caused dam­age to three police vehi­cles, which were respond­ing to emer­gency calls on New Year’s Eve.

“Each of these devices had around five large nails stick­ing through a piece of wood and ren­dered the police vehi­cles unus­able on what is tra­di­tion­al­ly one of the busiest nights of the year.

“Emma Shep­pard placed these pur­pose-built devices in the road, know­ing full well what the con­se­quences could be.

”They posed a seri­ous risk to our police offi­cers as well as oth­er road users and formed part of a reck­less and dan­ger­ous plan.”

 

Activists Disrupt Hearing over Fast Track for Trans-Pacific Partnership

Froman

Jan­u­ary 27th, 2015

Froman

Jan­u­ary 27th, 2015

U.S. Trade Rep­re­sen­ta­tive Michael Fro­man was greet­ed with protest at Tuesday’s Sen­ate and House Hear­ings on Capi­tol Hill, as peo­ple raised con­cerns about the President’s trade agen­da and “Fast Track” Trade Pro­mo­tion Author­i­ty. Activists with signs and ban­ners chant­i­ng “No TPP!” and “No Fast Track!” were escort­ed from the Sen­ate Finance Com­mit­tee hear­ing room short­ly after the U.S. Trade Rep­re­sen­ta­tive took the micro­phone.

The leg­is­la­tion, which Oba­ma request­ed from both par­ties dur­ing last week’s State of the Union address, would lim­it con­gres­sion­al over­sight of the Administration’s free trade agree­ments and is wide­ly opposed by hun­dreds of envi­ron­men­tal, labor, pub­lic health, food safe­ty, and faith groups nation­wide.

Pro­test­ers wore shirts read­ing “No Fast Track” and held signs stat­ing “Fro­man lies,” a response to the Ambassador’s recent claims that Fast Track is the “best tool to ensure that Con­gress and the pub­lic have ample time to give our trade agree­ments the pub­lic scruti­ny and debate they deserve.” Past ver­sions of Fast Track leg­is­la­tion, includ­ing one intro­duced with lit­tle sup­port last Jan­u­ary, lim­its the amount of time Con­gress has to con­sid­er agree­ments and sus­pends their abil­i­ty to make amend­ments to the texts.

Fast-Track-disruption-300x229

Dr. Mar­garet Flow­ers, co-direc­tor of PopularResistance.org, held a sign that said “Trad­ing away our future” to high­light the dev­as­tat­ing impact that the Trans-Pacif­ic Part­ner­ship will have on many issues that peo­ple care about such as food safe­ty, the cost of med­i­cines, Inter­net free­dom, envi­ron­men­tal pro­tec­tion, finan­cial reg­u­la­tion and democ­ra­cy.

Richard Ochs, a retired steel­work­er from Bal­ti­more, and Kevin Zeese, Esq also from PopularResistance.org, held a ban­ner that read “TPP Fast Track: Job Killing Act,” which sought to draw atten­tion to the dev­as­tat­ing impact past free trade agree­ments have had on U.S. jobs. While Obama’s State of the Union claimed that the author­i­ty would “pro­tect Amer­i­can work­ers,” unions includ­ing the AFL-CIO, Team­sters, CWA, and more have instead spo­ken out against it.

In fact, there is broad oppo­si­tion to fast track­ing the TPP across the polit­i­cal spec­trum and across issues. “Fast Track is far from a ‘done deal’ in the Unit­ed States and for­eign nego­tia­tors ought to be cau­tious before accept­ing pro­vi­sions that will harm their pop­u­la­tion.” said Kevin Zeese.

from Pop­u­lar Resis­tance

Sapotaweyak Cree Nation Sets Up Blockades

sapotaweyak-cree-nation

Jan­u­ary 26th, 2015

sapotaweyak-cree-nation

Jan­u­ary 26th, 2015

Mem­bers of a west­ern Man­i­to­ba abo­rig­i­nal com­mu­ni­ty are peace­ful­ly protest­ing work on the Bipole III hydro­elec­tric line, a trans­mis­sion project that requires the con­struc­tion of a trans­mis­sion line, two new con­vert­er sta­tions and two ground elec­trodes for those sta­tions.

That con­struc­tion will involve clear-cut­ting trees near Sapotaweyak Cree Nation, locat­ed north of Swan Riv­er in cen­tral Man­i­to­ba.

On Sat­ur­day, mem­bers of the com­mu­ni­ty set up two block­ades along High­way 10 to pre­vent access for work­ers who are sched­uled to cut down trees, and they ignit­ed a sacred fire in the clear-cut­ting path.

A judge denied the First Nation’s request for an injunc­tion to stop con­struc­tion in an area known to the com­mu­ni­ty as N4, until the province prop­er­ly con­sult­ed with the com­mu­ni­ty in Jan­u­ary.

The area includes Sapotaweyak Cree Nation’s ances­tral lands and tra­di­tion­al ter­ri­to­ry, which includes bur­ial and spir­i­tu­al sites sacred to the com­mu­ni­ty.

Chief Nel­son Genaille says RCMP spoke briefly with him and allowed the peace­ful protest to con­tin­ue.

“Our peo­ple are now stand­ing up for their rights and inter­ests,” Genaille said.

“I have exhaust­ed the diplo­mat­ic and legal routes to voice our con­cerns against this project. And regret­tably, the respon­si­ble Man­i­to­ba min­is­ters and Man­i­to­ba Hydro big­wigs did not take our con­cerns seri­ous­ly.”

Noname

More news 28/1/15