Rising Up — turning fences into lock-ons and a second camp springs up

Stapleton allotments.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

14th March 2015

Stapleton allotments.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

14th March 2015

Pro­test­ers are con­tin­u­ing to cause mis­chief at the Sta­ple­ton Allot­ments where bailiffs are attempt­ing to evict peo­ple from trees.MetroBus pro­test­ers who have already been removed from the site being bull­dozed for a new road have pushed over the tem­po­rary fenc­ing and mount­ed it in defi­ance.

Mean­while, one pro­test­er has locked him­self to a gate with a bicy­cle D‑lock at a sec­ond site on the oth­er side of the M32 where a new occu­pa­tion has sprung up. The new camp has also been served with an evic­tion notice.

How to dig a pro­tes­tor out of a hole at Sta­ple­ton allot­ment

More pho­tos

Burma: Bomb Destroys Mining Company Truck

March 13th, 2015

March 13th, 2015

Min­ing Com­pa­ny Trucks Being Blocked by Vil­lagers in Namhkam Town­ship on 26 Feb­ru­ary

A bomb blew up a truck loaded with sil­i­con min­er­al stone in Aung Myit­tar Ward, Namhkam Town­ship, North­ern Shan State at 7.20pm on 10 March accord­ing to Sai Ye, a local res­i­dent.

He said: “When the bomb explod­ed under the engine at the front of the truck some parts of the engine were destroyed but no one was injured in the acci­dent. The truck dri­ver is Sai Pe from Aung Myit­tar Ward and the explo­sion hap­pened in front of his home. The explo­sion was very big, it caused the ground to shake. The whole town was silent after the explo­sion and there was almost no one on the street.”

 

The destroyed truck belongs to the Ngwe Kabar Kyaw min­ing com­pa­ny and is a Chi­nese made six-wheel truck accord­ing to Sai Ye.

On 26 Feb­ru­ary about 300 local res­i­dents blocked Ngwe Kabar Kyaw min­ing com­pa­ny trucks loaded with min­er­als in Namhkam Town­ship for one and a half hours. The res­i­dents stopped the trucks because they are angry that the min­ing com­pa­ny had nev­er dis­cussed with local res­i­dents about car­ry­ing out fur­ther exca­va­tions for min­er­als at Nam­seri Stream.

Pre­vi­ous­ly the com­pa­ny had been min­ing min­er­al stone from the Nam­seri Stream, but they stopped their activ­i­ties after com­plaints from the vil­lagers and promised to con­sult them before resum­ing exca­va­tions.

Recent­ly, the com­pa­ny angered the vil­lagers by resum­ing exca­va­tions with­out con­sult­ing them, which led to them blockad­ing the trucks.

The exca­va­tions already car­ried out at Nam­seri Stream by the com­pa­ny have caused the dete­ri­o­ra­tion of near­by farm­lands, which have not yet been addressed accord­ing to Sai Hseng Moon, a farmer leader.

He said: “The dete­ri­o­ra­tion of the farm­lands along the Nam­seri Stream due to the min­ing project, in Phan-Khar Vil­lage, have not been repaired yet [for a long time] and now they are going to exca­vate stone at Hway-Oh Vil­lage after get­ting per­mis­sion from the Naypyi­daw Gov­ern­ment, which they nev­er should have giv­en.”

The truck that was blown up was one of the trucks block­ad­ed by the vil­lagers on 26 Feb­ru­ary, but no one yet knows what group set off the bomb said a source close to the police.

The source said: “The bomb was made of min­ing explo­sives and was the same type of bomb that explod­ed in the house of U Aung Win last year in Namkhan Town­ship. U Aung Win is a town­ship sup­port­ing group mem­ber and exec­u­tive com­mit­tee mem­ber of the Shan Nation­al League for Democ­ra­cy (SNLD) par­ty of Namhkam Town.

Accord­ing to local peo­ple there have been sev­er­al bombs explod­ing in Namhkam Town, but no one has ever been arrest­ed over the explo­sions.

Trans­lat­ed by Aung Myat Soe Eng­lish ver­sion writ­ten by Mark Inkey for BNI Bur­ma News Inter­na­tion­al

Stapleton Road protest camp eviction continues

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

13th March 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

13th March 2015

The evic­tion con­tin­ues into a sec­ond day…

Updates:

Day 42..just! 11.59pm. An event­ful day with conifers and tow­ers gone and the ent top­pled! it was heart­break­ing watch­ing the dig­gers tear­ing up what has been wildlife habi­tat , per­fect for slow worms and tear­ing down the water tow­er and oth­er build­ing that was sus­pect­ed bats at one point. There was a hor­ri­ble “res­cue” from the water tow­er with pain inflict­ed upon the per­son being “res­cued” such a tying his hands behind his back with a cable tie, grab­bing his face and his crotch.all caught on film and will be doc­u­ment­ed as being assault­ed as with oth­ers. Despite all of this twee dwellers, though cold and tired are in good spir­its, wel­com­ing the food and oth­er treats sent up to them ( even hot water bot­tles!). Tomor­row is anoth­er day in the trees – hop­ing the week­end will draw more peo­ple – come down Bris­tol!

Day 42 1.45pm. The tree pro­tec­tors in the conifer trees ( not the wood­land) have been “res­cued” . Two of them chose to scur­ry down with­out assis­tance then one jumped over the her­ris fence in true squir­rel nin­ja style!
The oaks and the poplars are still full and in high spir­its. We man­aged to get a charged cam­era up to one so we are hop­ing to get some good ariel shots of the action soon!
Again, more peo­ple on site would be real­ly wel­comed and the com­rade­ship between sup­port­ers is strong.
We strong­ly urge peo­ple to call Bris­tol City Coun­cil and demand evi­dence that they have car­ried out eco­log­i­cal sur­veys for bats, rep­tiles and birds ( espe­cial­ly with hiber­nat­ing bats & slow worms & nest­ing birds) that their dig­ger & doz­er prob­a­bly have dis­turbed or even killed! Tel : 0117 922 2000. u might want to Tweet or email May­or G!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Day 42 7.40am..The dawn cho­rus was joined today by the twit­ter­ings of tree folk, all well fed ( thanks skipchen!)& nes­tled high in the trees antic­i­pat­ing the arrival of oth­er climb­ing peo­ple – though this time not to join them but to bring them down.

So far all is qui­et on the site, now the drone of the all night gen­er­a­tors has stopped and there is respite from the glar­ing spot lights ring­ing the entire fenc­ing. We are one tree dweller down after a secu­ri­ty guard rug­by tack­led one pro­tes­tor who had descend­ed from a tree which result­ed in sus­pect­ed bro­ken ribs and a bad­ly sprained ankle. This is being report­ed as assault. But replace­ments quick­ly sprang into action scur­ry­ing over fences and up trees in true squir­rel style!

There are 10 to15 peo­ple left in the trees.

Today we hope for respect both from the bailiffs and con­trac­tors both for the peo­ple, land and wildlife which yes­ter­day was very sad­ly in ques­tion on many, (but not all) occa­sions. We are call­ing all Ris­ing Up sup­port­ers to come to the site…the sup­port, cheer and moti­va­tion you bring is vital – as are the observ­ing eyes and mouths ‑which can avert and wit­ness any wrong doings. Join this Ris­ing Up – Resis­tance is Fer­tile, come sow your seeds!

Web­site

More pho­tos

Updates, pho­tos and videos

Yorkley Court community farm: possession order now in effect/come support us

https://yorkleycourt.files.wordpress.com/2015/03/smalltower.png

12 March 2015

https://yorkleycourt.files.wordpress.com/2015/03/smalltower.png

12 March 2015

Many ques­tions remain around the own­er­ship of Yorkley Court, and the process­es which led to Bri­an Ben­nett “buy­ing” the farm. Nonetheless,the judge’s order giv­ing Benett poses­sion of the whole farm will come into effect this Thurs­day 12th March at noon. This means that he will legal­ly have the right to evict us from that point onwards.

We remain com­mit­ted to our belief that sus­tain­able farm­ing for the ben­e­fit of the local com­mu­ni­ty is more impor­tant than greedy devel­op­ers seek­ing prof­it with lit­tle regard for local peo­ple, and we ask any­body that agrees with us for sup­port.

All qui­et for now, no sign of bailiffs or bul­lies..

Evic­tion could how­ev­er come at any point, if you would like to join our emer­gency text – out list, please text 07522 025 889

Lots of peo­ple are stay­ing for a while, in case they try to evict soon.. more are always very wel­come.

More info

Protester climbs lorry in protest at fracking site near Immingham

March 12, 2015

The protest, one of the first direct action demon­stra­tions in North East Lin­colnshire for decades, caused a halt to traf­fic for near­ly four hours after the 20-year-old refused to descend from the top of the lor­ry.

March 12, 2015

The protest, one of the first direct action demon­stra­tions in North East Lin­colnshire for decades, caused a halt to traf­fic for near­ly four hours after the 20-year-old refused to descend from the top of the lor­ry.

He threat­ened to super­glue him­self to the vehi­cle, copy­ing the tac­tic deployed by envi­ron­men­tal­ists in oth­er parts of the coun­try.

Motorists were forced to seek diver­sions through Stalling­bor­ough and Keel­by, many of them HGVs going to and from Imming­ham Docks.

Police nego­tia­tors tried to per­suade the man to come down.

Two spe­cial­ist units from South York­shire Police pre­pared to under­take a tac­ti­cal manoeu­vre involv­ing spe­cial­ly trained offi­cers.

Short­ly after 12.30pm, the man sur­ren­dered and came down.

Pro­test­ers have gath­ered and set up a small camp at the entrance to the Europa Oil and Gas test drilling site.

Boss­es of Europa, who are drilling at Maux­hall Farm, Stalling­bor­ough, have repeat­ed­ly stat­ed they will not be frack­ing.

Pro­test­ers claimed oth­er test drilling oper­a­tors had sold their sites to frack­ing com­pa­nies once they dis­cov­er shale gas in oth­er parts of the coun­try.

Video

 

RisingUp in Bristol: eviction begins of allotments protest camp

12th March 2015

After more than a month mak­ing a stand against Metrobus plans by liv­ing in trees above Sta­ple­ton Allot­ments, pro­test­ers look set to be evict­ed this morn­ing.

12th March 2015

After more than a month mak­ing a stand against Metrobus plans by liv­ing in trees above Sta­ple­ton Allot­ments, pro­test­ers look set to be evict­ed this morn­ing.

Accord­ing to a Bris­tol Post reporter on the scene, at least 30 bailiffs have sur­round­ed a make-shift camp with more being dropped off by bus.

The move comes two days after the coun­cil secured a sec­ond pos­ses­sion order for land in the area occu­pied by the Ris­ing Up Group, which has said it will strong­ly resist any moves to get them off the land.

It is not the first time there has been activ­i­ty by secu­ri­ty staff at the site, how­ev­er reports from the scene sug­gest this is the first time bailiffs have been mak­ing obvi­ous moves towards the camp.

Peo­ple have locked into bar­rels of con­crete, up trees, dig­ger div­ing, naked cat & mouse, lock­ing on to dig­ger arms, con­crete blocks in car­a­vans and more!

Day 41! EVICTION UDATE

4.10pm. Update: The attempt­ed evic­tion is still going on – all of the tree sits are still full of peo­ple who are all fine & in good spir­its – giv­ing us a show of acro­bat­ics and dare dev­il climb­ing here & there!

The hero­ic per­son in the mead­ow tun­nel has after 7 hours been brought out – waved an arm but was on a stretch­er- hope­ful­ly OK. Oth­er peo­ple still locked onto trees on the ground and gate!
They have crashed dig­gers and bull­doz­ers through bird rich wood­ed area and have man­aged to swamp one of their bull­doz­ers after dig­ging through a cul­vert, which 2 peo­ple then chose to lock them­selves to! ..
Some secu­ri­ty and bailiffs have been OK oth­ers heavy hand­ed and dan­ger­ous – at one point they were about to use an axle grinder to remove a D lock from someone’s neck until we shout­ed that they could kill him! One woman was pulled around and one bailiff tried to drag her out of a tree – in a total­ly unsafe man­ner – all cap­tured on video.

It is a media fren­zy, but the usu­al Ris­ing Up way the atmos­phere is some­what jovial and there is noth­ing to fear… if you are spec­ta­tor on the ground. Pho­tos and videos about to be post­ed. Ris­ing Up call for more peo­ple to come down to the site to show their sol­i­dar­i­ty and wit­ness this spec­ta­cle
– COME & SHOW YOUR SUPPORT & SOLIDARITY TODAY! – It is some­thing you will nev­er for­get and a sto­ry to tell for years to come!

10.30am update Many of the pro­tes­tors, includ­ing legal observers on the ground have forcibly been removed – dragged off by heavy hand­ed bailiffs , one on one, show­ing com­plete­ly unrea­son­able force, one female pro­tes­tor had her top pulled up whilst a bailiff smok­ing a fag dropped ash in her face. A bull­doz­er has start­ed ille­gal­ly demol­ish­ing build­ings which have asbestos roofs and a dig­ger has gone through a bird rich wood­land area raz­ing trees – despite it being bird nest­ing sea­son – mak­ing this both a wor­ry­ing and ille­gal act. Bris­tol Coun­cil “Green Cap­i­tal” ..hold your head in shame! The world is watch­ing.

8.38am Update: EVICTION IN PROCESS ( ABOUT 1 HR IN) around 70 bailiffs on site – have been very heavy hand­ed drag­ging off legal observers and oth­er peo­ple – 1 on 1 ( they should be 2 peo­ple). A climb­ing team is there and have set up a sta­tion and med­ical tent. Very few police on site – most on the road. They have brought in a dig­ger and an amphibi­ous vehi­cle and set up med­ical area…hope not to be need­ed. All of the tree sits are full and some peo­ple still on the ground! COME DOWN , BRING CAMERA, BANNERS, NOISE AND GOOD VIBES!

Web­site

Updates, pho­tos and videos

 

Bristol allotment protest camp: possession is nine tenths of the law! – Second Possession Order granted

This after­noon Judge Deny­er QC ruled in favour of Bris­tol City Council‘s appli­ca­tion for an imme­di­ate Pos­ses­sion Order for land at Sta­ple­ton allot­ments cur­rent­ly occu­pied by Ris­ing

This after­noon Judge Deny­er QC ruled in favour of Bris­tol City Council‘s appli­ca­tion for an imme­di­ate Pos­ses­sion Order for land at Sta­ple­ton allot­ments cur­rent­ly occu­pied by Ris­ing Up.  Five mem­bers of the Ris­ing Up col­lec­tive stood in court to defend their right to tem­porar­i­ly be on land, with­out legal rep­re­sen­ta­tion,  due to a lack of legal aid.

The QC dis­missed the argu­ments of human rights, the neces­si­ty to pro­tect the land from destruc­tion and poten­tial­ly dan­ger­ous and unlaw­ful devel­op­ment.  The Ris­ing Up spokes­peo­ple cit­ed leg­is­la­tion, case law, pub­lic and polit­i­cal sup­port as well evi­dence of poten­tial breach­es in plan­ning and pro­ce­dure and the need for time to mount a legal case. These were all dis­missed in a dis­tinct demon­stra­tion of how prop­er­ty rights take prece­dent over human rights and the rights of nature.

Food secu­ri­ty, the rights to protest, the rights to home and fam­i­ly life and to sub­sist in a sus­tain­able way have once against come into direct con­flict with cap­i­tal­ism and short ter­mism. The coun­cil have failed to hear, acknowl­edge and explore the con­cerns of many, and have pri­ori­tised the eco­nom­ic gains of a few pri­vate com­pa­nies – under the guise of a “sus­tain­able” pub­lic trans­port sys­tem.

Ris­ing Up Spokesper­son Dan­ny Bal­la states: “Today was a clear indi­ca­tion that the sys­tem is bro­ken and reflects why we are cur­rent­ly fac­ing many seri­ous envi­ron­men­tal and social crises. In the court­room we wit­nessed a fail­ure of the judi­cial sys­tem to facil­i­tate the rights of peo­ple to chal­lenge con­tentious and poten­tial­ly unlaw­ful deci­sions.  Judge Deny­er even stat­ed how the avenues “to judi­cial­ly review local plan­ning author­i­ties “are a some­what illu­so­ry right” due to costs involved.

We are once again forced into a posi­tion of eth­i­cal­ly and moral­ly sound, yet unlaw­ful behav­iour by con­tin­u­ing to defend this land. This plan­ning and legal process has been a clear fab­ri­ca­tion of any real space for alter­na­tive and sus­tain­able think­ing.  Rid­ing roughshod over the wants of needs of local peo­ple, nature and the future gen­er­a­tions of Bris­tol.”

Today, jus­tice has been obscured by the law, but our deter­mi­na­tion to resist has risen.  Bris­tol is Ris­ing up!

 

ZADists Lose Bitter Battle over Controversial Dam

March 7th, 2015

March 7th, 2015

A bit­ter bat­tle over a dam that has pit­ted French farm­ers against envi­ron­men­tal­ists may have final­ly come to an close Fri­day fol­low­ing a rul­ing by local lead­ers, though the for­mer are like­ly to be hap­pi­est with the deci­sion.

The depart­men­tal coun­cil in Tarn, south­west France, vot­ed in favour 46 to 43 of cre­at­ing a dam and reser­voir at around half the size of the orig­i­nal­ly pro­posed project.

They also asked the gov­ern­ment to forcibly remove “with­out delay” a group of envi­ron­men­tal pro­test­ers who have occu­pied the site of the pro­posed Sivens dam for the past nine months in an effort to block con­struc­tion.

A lit­tle over an hour lat­er, armed police entered the area to begin clear­ing the pro­test­ers’ camp.

Protests, bar­ri­cades and tragedy

It may be the final chap­ter of a saga that has been the source of intense dis­pute in France for sev­er­al years – and result­ed in the death of at least one pro­test­er.

The project, for which plan­ning began in 1989, was con­ceived to pro­vide bet­ter irri­ga­tion for local farms by damming the Riv­er Tescou to cre­ate a reser­voir.

After years of delib­er­a­tion and fea­si­bil­i­ty stud­ies, the final plans were giv­en offi­cial approval in 2004, envi­sion­ing the cre­ation of a reser­voir hold­ing 1.5 mil­lion cubic metres of water.

But the €8.4m-project faced fierce oppo­si­tion from the start from envi­ron­men­tal­ists, includ­ing France’s green par­ty the EELV, who argued it would mean the destruc­tion of sev­er­al hectares of wet­lands – a haven for wildlife – and ben­e­fit only a small num­ber of farms.

In Octo­ber 2013, mem­bers of a rad­i­cal envi­ron­men­tal­ist group known as the “Zadistes” began occu­py­ing the con­struc­tion site. Police twice removed the pro­test­ers from the site, most recent­ly in May 2014, but both times they returned.

Then, one year lat­er, the dam project made inter­na­tion­al head­lines after a 21-year-old envi­ron­men­tal activist, Rémi Fraisse, was killed dur­ing a protest after being struck on the head by a flash grenade thrown by police.

His death trig­gered demon­stra­tions in sev­er­al cities in France against police bru­tal­i­ty, which them­selves led to vio­lent clash­es with author­i­ties.

The pro­test­ers have also pro­voked the ire of local farm­ers, who sup­port the dam. Most recent­ly, around 130 farm­ers set up bar­ri­cades to stop activists from access­ing the site.

Final­ly, on Octo­ber 31, 2014, work on the dam was halt­ed and the orig­i­nal plans for the project scrapped entire­ly by Ecol­o­gy Min­is­ter Ségolène Roy­al the fol­low­ing Jan­u­ary.

Roy­al gave local author­i­ties two options: build a small­er reser­voir of about 750,000 cubic metres fur­ther upstream from the orig­i­nal site, or build four sep­a­rate (and small­er) reser­voirs.

It was this first option the gen­er­al coun­cil opt­ed for on Fri­day, judg­ing the sec­ond sce­nario too expen­sive.

Coun­cil pres­i­dent Thier­ry Carcenac told AFP that fur­ther stud­ies would be car­ried out to deter­mine exact­ly where the new reser­voir would be built, adding that there was a “lee­way of plus or minus 10 per­cent” on the final size of the dam.

Farm­ers hap­py, envi­ron­men­tal­ists scepi­cal

The gov­ern­ment, so long stuck between a rock and a hard place – unable to please both farm­ers and envi­ron­men­tal­ists – will be hop­ing a com­pro­mise accept­able to both sides has now been reached.

In a joint state­ment, Roy­al and Agri­cul­ture Min­is­ter Stéphane Le Foll wel­comed the council’s deci­sion. The new plan, they said, “while meet­ing all the cri­te­ria of envi­ron­men­tal pro­tec­tion, will secure the water sup­ply nec­es­sary for agri­cul­tur­al pro­duc­tion at a much high­er rate.”

How­ev­er, ini­tial reac­tions sug­gest the farm­ers may be hap­pi­er than the envi­ron­men­tal­ists with Friday’s deci­sion.

The FNSEA farm­ers’ union praised the council’s “courage” and said it now want­ed to see “the respect of law, the evac­u­a­tion of the Zadistes and con­struc­tion work to start with­out delay”.

The EELV, in con­trast, said the revised project “in the end resolves noth­ing”, though it wel­comed the aban­don­ment of the orig­i­nal plans.

“In the absence of addi­tion­al stud­ies, there is noth­ing to sug­gest that legal doubts over respect for the envi­ron­ment have been alle­vi­at­ed,” the par­ty said in a state­ment.

Mean­while, there appeared to be mixed reac­tions from pro­test­ers as the police moved in to dis­band their camp on Fri­day.

“Most left the scene qui­et­ly,” police spokesper­son Stéphane Rap­pailles told Reuters.

How­ev­er, oth­ers were less will­ing to give in. Around 25 Zadistes had to be forcibly removed, said Rap­pailles, while six were arrest­ed.

“[We will] hide in the woods,” one pro­test­er, named Chris­t­ian, told AFP. “We will not leave.”

Brazil’s Landless Movement Destroys GMO Eucaliptus Seedlings, Occupies GMO Meeting

16104292273_91103c33f8_b

March 5th, 2015

16104292273_91103c33f8_b

March 5th, 2015

This morn­ing about 300 peas­ants orga­nized by La Via Campesina occu­pied the meet­ing of the Brazil Nation­al Biosafe­ty Tech­ni­cal Com­mis­sion (CTNBio), which was con­ven­ing to dis­cuss the release of three new vari­eties of trans­genic plants in Brazil includ­ing genet­i­cal­ly engi­neered euca­lyp­tus trees. The meet­ing was inter­rupt­ed and deci­sions were post­poned. Ear­li­er in the morn­ing on Thurs­day, anoth­er 1,000 women of the Brazil Land­less Work­ers’ Move­ment (MST) from the states of São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro and Minas Gerais occu­pied the oper­a­tions of Futura­Gene Tech­nol­o­gy Brazil Ltda, a sub­sidiary of Suzano tim­ber cor­po­ra­tion, in the munic­i­pal­i­ty of Itape­tininga, in São Paulo.

16722801571_96f17a6a7c_bThe site occu­pied by women of the MST was in Itape­tininga, where trans­genic euca­lyp­tus, known as H421 is being devel­oped and test­ed. Dur­ing the protest, the MST destroyed the seedlings of trans­genic euca­lyp­tus trees there. The action denounced the evils that a pos­si­ble release of trans­genic euca­lyp­tus, which was to be vot­ed on CTNBio today, could cause to the envi­ron­ment. Accord­ing to Atil­iana Brunet­to, a mem­ber of the Nation­al MST, the his­toric deci­sion of the Com­mis­sion must respect the Brazil­ian leg­is­la­tion and the Bio­di­ver­si­ty Con­ven­tion to which Brazil is a sig­na­to­ry. Destroys Eucalip­tus Seedlings The vast major­i­ty of its mem­bers are placed in favor of busi­ness inter­ests of the large multi­na­tion­als at the expense of envi­ron­men­tal, social and pub­lic health con­se­quences,” he says. For Brunet­to all approved GMO means more pes­ti­cides in agri­cul­ture, since the pack­ets always approved for mar­ket­ing include a type of agri­cul­tur­al poi­son.

16104095753_c57c053ece_b

“Brazil is the largest con­sumer of world’s pes­ti­cides since 2009. A recent sur­vey by the Uni­ver­si­ty of Brasil­ia found that, in the most opti­mistic case, 30% of the food con­sumed by Brazil­ians are unsafe to eat only con­t­a­m­i­na­tion by pes­ti­cides account” said Brunet­to.

In the case of euca­lyp­tus, the appli­ca­tion of trans­genic release was made by pulp and paper com­pa­ny Suzano.

“If approved by the com­mit­tee these GE faster grow­ing euca­lyp­tus will mature in only 4 years, as opposed to 6–7 years present­ly in non-GMO euca­lyp­tus. The water con­sump­tion will increase 25 to 30 liters / day per euca­lyp­tus plant­ed that it cur­rent­ly uses. We are again call­ing atten­tion to the dan­ger of green deserts,” said Catiane Cinel­li, a mem­ber of the Rur­al Women’s Move­ment.

16516963687_0916bffcb1_b 16516785567_7d2848cd23_b

More at Stop GE Trees

Algeria Fights Back: 40 Police Injured in Anti-Fracking Protests

photo courtesy Imad Mesdoua / Twitter

photo courtesy Imad Mesdoua / Twitter

March 2nd, 2015

from Earth First! Newswire

New devel­op­ments in a sto­ry we’ve been fol­low­ing for some time now.

Tens of thou­sands of peo­ple in Alge­ria have joined a mass move­ment to halt frack­ing. These protests have involved peace­ful block­ades and march­es with broad swaths of soci­ety.

The mass move­ment has been met by state repres­sion, as we report­ed last week. But instead of deflat­ing the move­ment, state repres­sion inflamed the anger on the streets. On Sun­day, riots erupt­ed in the dis­trict of In-Salah in which 40 offi­cers were injured, and the police head­quar­ters, the chief’s house, some police bar­racks, and a police truck were all set ablaze.

Here’s AFP with more:

Forty police offi­cers were wound­ed Sun­day in clash­es with demon­stra­tors opposed to shale gas explo­ration in the Alger­ian Sahara, the Inte­ri­or Min­istry announced.

“The town of In-Salah saw inci­dents involv­ing pub­lic order, ini­ti­at­ed by a group of young peo­ple protest­ing against shale gas oper­a­tions in the region,” the min­istry said in a state­ment.

It said the clash­es “caused injuries to 40 police offi­cers, includ­ing two who were seri­ous­ly injured.”

Pro­test­ers set fire to the head­quar­ters of In-Salah dis­trict and the res­i­dence of the dis­trict chief, as well as part of a police dor­mi­to­ry and a police truck.

The secu­ri­ty forces man­aged to “take con­trol of the sit­u­a­tion and bring calm to the city,” the state­ment said.

Increased protests

Anti-shale gas demon­stra­tions have increased in the cities of the Alger­ian Sahara since late Decem­ber, when Alger­ian oil com­pa­ny Sonatra­ch announced it had suc­cess­ful­ly com­plet­ed its first pilot drilling in the In-Salah region.

Sonatra­ch announced in ear­ly Feb­ru­ary that its explorato­ry drilling for shale gas using hydraulic frac­tur­ing would con­tin­ue despite mount­ing hos­til­i­ty among peo­ple liv­ing near­by.

Con­tin­u­ous demon­stra­tions were held for two months at In-Salah, the town clos­est to the drilling sites.

Alge­ria has seen mas­sive invest­ment in shale gas to com­pen­sate for declin­ing oil rev­enues, but faces oppo­si­tion from peo­ple liv­ing near the fields, con­cerned about the con­se­quences on the envi­ron­ment.

Accord­ing to inter­na­tion­al stud­ies, Alge­ria has the fourth biggest recov­er­able reserves of shale gas glob­al­ly, after the Unit­ed States, Chi­na and Argenti­na.