Mapuche Indians Fight New Airport in Southern Chile

“This is a project that reflects the occupation…of Mapuche ter­ri­to­ry,” said Iván Reyes, an indige­nous leader staunch­ly opposed to the con­struc­tion of an inter­na­tion­al air­port in the south­ern Chilean region of Arau­canía.

Reyes, an agri­cul­tur­al tech­ni­cian, said the con­struc­tion project was approved thanks to an envi­ron­men­tal impact study “based on lies” that was car­ried out by Arcadis Geot­éc­ni­ca, the Chilean sub­sidiary of a Nether­lands-based inter­na­tion­al con­sult­ing and engi­neer­ing com­pa­ny.

The study “says there will be no impact on com­mu­ni­ties in the area. But in a lat­er analy­sis, we detect­ed that the base line and mea­sure­ments had been manip­u­lat­ed,” he said.

The new air­port, whose con­struc­tion was actu­al­ly approved in 2005, is now one of the most high-pro­file projects of the right-wing gov­ern­ment of Sebastián Piñera. It is being built in Quepe, 20 km from the city of Temu­co and near­ly 700 km south of San­ti­a­go.

The La Arau­canía New Inter­na­tion­al Air­port, which will replace the Maque­hue Air­port, will have a 2,440-metre run­way and a 5,000-square-metre pas­sen­ger ter­mi­nal.

Temu­co, which is halfway between the Pacif­ic Ocean and the Andes foothills, is in the mid­dle of prairies, pas­ture and farm­land, and forests.

Although a few Mapuche com­mu­ni­ties sup­port the new air­port, which they see as a step for­ward for the region in terms of eco­nom­ic and cul­tur­al devel­op­ment, many oth­ers are staunch­ly opposed, argu­ing that it will under­mine bio­di­ver­si­ty and the envi­ron­ment, and will destroy their ances­tral ter­ri­to­ry.

The Mapuche, Chile’s largest indige­nous group, num­ber near­ly one mil­lion in this coun­try of over 16 mil­lion peo­ple, and the strug­gle for their ances­tral land in the south of the coun­try has fre­quent­ly pit­ted them against large land­hold­ers, log­ging com­pa­nies and oth­er pri­vate inter­ests.

At the age of 23, Tranamil is already a Mapuche leader, in charge of the reli­gious life of his com­mu­ni­ty, Rofue. He is tena­cious­ly opposed to the con­struc­tion of the air­port, which he describes as “a gate­way to invade Mapuche ter­ri­to­ry.”

Tranamil, or “machi Fidel” as he is known by the local com­mu­ni­ty, is one of the most active indige­nous lead­ers in the area. He has been arrest­ed sev­er­al times, and his home is fre­quent­ly searched by the police. Since 2005, his moth­er has been liv­ing with sev­en pel­lets in her right knee, after a harsh police crack­down on a protest.

The house where Tranamil and his moth­er live is warm and qui­et. They raise pigs and chick­ens, and have a small veg­etable gar­den.

“But soon, air­lin­ers will be land­ing every minute. That will not only vio­late our spir­i­tu­al life but also our cul­ture and har­mo­ny,” he said.

He also said that to build the air­port, “between 200 and 300 hectares of native (old-growth) for­est will be cut down, and lost for­ev­er. It would take 400 years for the trees to grow back to their cur­rent height.”

Evictions and Destruction on the ZAD Airport Protest Site

The ZAD air­port protest site in France is still being evict­ed, a process that start­ed on the 16th Octo­ber. The zone is grad­u­al­ly being mil­i­tarised but there are HUGE num­bers of pro­test­ers and seem­ing­ly more every day. We’re still fight­ing and it is not over!

 

The ZAD air­port protest site in France is still being evict­ed, a process that start­ed on the 16th Octo­ber. The zone is grad­u­al­ly being mil­i­tarised but there are HUGE num­bers of pro­test­ers and seem­ing­ly more every day. We’re still fight­ing and it is not over!

 

The ZAD is an air­port protest site in the west of France about 15 miles north of Nantes. The air­port project was first pro­posed over forty years ago and has faced con­stant local resis­tance ever since. The project is in the hands of the multi­na­tion­al com­pa­ny Vin­ci, who also pro­vide us with such « ser­vices » as pris­ons, motor­ways and nuclear pow­er sta­tions. It is the par­tic­u­lar pet project of Jean Marc Ayrault, the for­mer may­or of Nantes and cur­rent Prime Min­is­ter of France. In 2009 the area host­ed a cli­mate camp, since when the emp­ty hous­es, fields and forests have been grad­u­al­ly fill­ing up with peo­ple dis­gust­ed enough by the idea of this project to stay and resist. The rea­sons for stay­ing are as diverse as the peo­ple but the occu­piers are unit­ed by an idea that fight­ing cap­i­tal­ism is an impor­tant part of every day life.

Until the sec­ond week of Octo­ber you could still arrive on the ZAD and tour around over 30 diverse squats spread across the two thou­sand hectares of threat­ened land. The peo­ple unit­ed there to organ­ise togeth­er and fight the air­port project but life was far from unpleas­ant. You could vis­it the beau­ti­ful straw bale house bak­ery which pro­vid­ed the whole area with free price deli­cious organ­ic bread twice a week, the numer­ous col­lec­tive gar­dens, the home made wind tur­bine to pro­vide elec­tric­i­ty, an incred­i­ble range of cab­ins on the ground and in the trees made from col­lect­ed mate­ri­als, and you prob­a­bly would have been able to go to a con­cert, join us on an action, help us organ­ise and come to a few work­shops to learn to climb, or knit, or maybe build a rock­et stove.

Right at the moment though we don’t seem to be leav­ing our­selves much time for knit­ting work­shops. On Tues­day 16th Octo­ber the large scale evic­tions of the place we call home start­ed, and they weren’t mess­ing around. Riot vans arrived en masse from six in the morn­ing and had already evict­ed sev­en squat­ted hous­es and burned down a large cab­in by ten o’clock in the
morn­ing. Approx­i­mate­ly 1200 police were mobi­lized for this so-called ‘oper­a­tion Cesar’, pro­tect­ing the work­ers who use plain white vans, hid­ing their com­pa­ny names. Since then we have seen near­ly all of those hous­es razed to the ground, and most of the oth­er hous­es, cab­ins and homes evict­ed and destroyed. We have also near­ly all inhaled a deeply unhealthy amount of tear gas and seen enough blue vans and uni­forms to last a life­time.

Novem­ber 17th marked a huge change in this strug­gle. Some­where between 20,000 and 40,000 (depend­ing who you ask) peo­ple were unit­ed togeth­er on the ZAD for the huge Reoc­cu­pa­tion Demo. This involved a march from the near­by town of Notre Dame des Lan­des (where the demo stretched for near­ly eight kilo­me­tres) and a chest­nut plan­ta­tion close to the cen­tre of the ZAD where huge num­bers of peo­ple got to work build­ing new cab­ins. All day it was hard to move with­out get­ting in the way of peo­ple ham­mer­ing, saw­ing and car­ry­ing heavy things into the for­est. Wit­ness­ing this col­lec­tive ener­gy, and around ten large cab­ins fly up in the course of an after­noon is some­thing I feel sure no one who was there will for­get. More than that, I hope that every sin­gle per­son who squelched through the mud that day now feels a part of the ZAD, and that we will not lose this col­lec­tive force and feel­ing of strength.

Since then there has been vast amounts of con­struc­tion hap­pen­ing all over the ZAD. In fact it is hard to find a place on the zone where you can’t hear ham­mer­ing. Unfor­tu­nate­ly for the last few days this has been accom­pa­nied by the all-too-famil­iar sounds of con­cus­sion grenades and tear gas bombs. All of the new­ly con­struct­ed tree hous­es and the ground-lev­el cab­in in the Rohanne For­est were once again destroyed on Sat­ur­day in a con­stant cloud of tear gas. Despite being attacked and gassed all day, the huge num­ber of sup­port­ers on the ground stayed until long after dark, until the police final­ly crawled back to where they came from. The new cab­ins from the reoc­cu­pa­tion demo remain but they seem at risk of being destroyed soon. Dur­ing the week­end there were huge num­bers of injuries for the first time since the evic­tions start­ed, and also instances of police attack­ing bar­ri­cades in the mid­dle of the night. They are now mil­i­taris­ing the zone, stay­ing all night on the roads to stop us from mov­ing around, and grad­u­al­ly upping the pres­sure.

We got the mes­sage yes­ter­day that the evic­tions will stop if we stop build­ing, and I can smile as I type that I feel quite sure that will not hap­pen. We will con­tin­ue to build, and con­tin­ue to fight against this oppres­sion and this use­less sense­less project. We will not let them win so eas­i­ly. There are more of us than ever and it is impos­si­ble not to feel strong, even as they destroy our homes again and again. We have ever more peo­ple to keep rebuild­ing.

There is a call out for sol­i­dar­i­ty actions on our web­site (www.zad.nadir.org)

The strug­gle con­tin­ues for us, and we wel­come the sup­port of those as dis­il­lu­sioned as us with this com­pa­ny, the state, and the con­trol on our every day lives. It’s far from over, this is just the begin­ning.

Call out for actions dur­ing the moment of evic­tion of the ZAD
 https://zad.nadir.org/spip.php?article175

new call out for occu­pa­tion
https://zad.nadir.org/spip.php?article348

WAKE UP CALL TO PROTECT THE COUNTRYSIDE FROM NEW PLANNING LEGISLATION

 

             THE  LOOSE ANTI OPEN-CAST NETWORK

 

WAKE-UP CALL TO PROTECT THE COUNRTYSIDE  FROM  LARGE SCALE MINERAL DEVELOPMENT ISSUED BY CAMPAIGN GROUP

 

             THE  LOOSE ANTI OPEN-CAST NETWORK

 

WAKE-UP CALL TO PROTECT THE COUNRTYSIDE  FROM  LARGE SCALE MINERAL DEVELOPMENT ISSUED BY CAMPAIGN GROUP

PR 2012 ‑15                                                                           28/1/12

Does a com­pa­ny want to dig a big hole near you? Is it inter­est­ed in try­ing to extract sand, clay. grav­el, stone or coal? If it is, and the site is going to be more than 100 hectares, then why not sug­gest to the own­er that they can side­step going to the Local Author­i­ty and have the plan­ning appli­ca­tion con­sid­ered by a new ‘fast- track’ method. Label it a ‘Nation­al­ly Sig­nif­i­cant Infra­struc­ture Project’ and it can then be decid­ed on, in a year, by a  Plan­ning Inspec­tor who, unlike local peo­ple and local­ly elect­ed rep­re­sen­ta­tives, will not know the site, will not be affect­ed and will not know you.

Far- fetched ideas?  Unfor­tu­nate­ly not. These ideas are part of the pro­pos­als in the Government’s Growth and Infra­struc­ture Bill now before Par­lia­ment. It will enable sec­ondary leg­is­la­tion to be passed that, in its present form , will allow an appli­cant to by-pass the local demo­c­ra­t­ic deci­sion mak­ing process and have their appli­ca­tion treat­ed as a Major Infra­struc­ture Project. The Gov­ern­ment have ini­ti­at­ed a pub­lic con­sul­ta­tion process on the pro­pos­al enti­tled  ‘Nation­al­ly sig­nif­i­cant infra­struc­ture plan­ning: extend­ing the regime to busi­ness and com­mer­cial projects: con­sul­ta­tion’ which can be down­loaded from here.

https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/nationally-significant-infrastructure-planning-extending-the-regime-to-business-and-commercial-projects

The Loose Anti Open­cast Net­work (LAON) has analysed what the effect would be if the leg­is­la­tion was in place now on open­cast mine pro­pos­als. There are 11 pos­si­ble or actu­al pro­pos­als for open­cast mines in Eng­land cur­rent­ly. Under these pro­pos­als, deci­sions about the four largest could be tak­en out of the hands of the Local Author­i­ty and giv­en to a sin­gle unelect­ed per­son to decide. Our Brief­ing Note “ Growth and Infra­struc­ture Bill: Pro­posed 100 Hectare Thresh­old” pub­lished along with this Press Release @

http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2012/11/503382.html

 out­lines fur­ther why The Loose Anti Open­cast Net­work argues against this pro­pos­al and urges oth­er com­mu­ni­ty and envi­ron­men­tal groups to urgent­ly study these pro­pos­als and voice their objec­tions.

All respons­es, on forms pro­vid­ed in the con­sul­ta­tion doc­u­ment, have to be in by 7/1/13.

About LAON

The Loose Anti-Open­cast Net­work (LAON) has been in exis­tence since 2009. It func­tions as a medi­um through which to oppose open cast mine appli­ca­tions. At present LAON links indi­vid­u­als and groups in N Ire­land (Just Say No to Lig­nite), Scot­land (Coal Action Scot­land), Wales (Green Val­leys Alliance, The Merthyr Tyd­fil Anti Open­cast Cam­paign), Eng­land, (Coal Action Net­work), Northum­ber­land, (Whit­ton­stall Action Group, Hal­ton Lea Gate Res­i­dents)) Co Durham (Pont Val­ley Net­work), Leeds, Sheffield (Cow­ley Res­i­dents Action Group), Kirklees, (Skel­mansthor­pe Action Group)  Not­ting­hamshire (Short­wood Farm Open­cast Oppo­si­tion), Der­byshire (West Hal­lum Envi­ron­ment Group, Smal­l­ey Action Group and Hill­top Action Group) , Leices­ter­shire (Minor­ca Open­cast Protest Group) and Wal­sall (Alumwell Action Group).

Con­tact­ing LAON

Steve Leary LAON’Ss Co-ordi­na­tor, at infoatlaon@yahoo.com

You can now fol­low LAON on Twit­ter @ http://twitter.com/Seftonchase

 

 

Sizewell Nuclear Power Stations Blockaded

26.11.2012

The road lead­ing to Sizewell nuclear pow­er sta­tions A & B has been block­ad­ed since 6:45 this morn­ing. The pro­tes­tors are still there (9:00).

 Waste of Our Future

26.11.2012

The road lead­ing to Sizewell nuclear pow­er sta­tions A & B has been block­ad­ed since 6:45 this morn­ing. The pro­tes­tors are still there (9:00).

 Waste of Our Future

At 6:45am this morn­ing cam­paign­ers oppos­ing nuclear new build block­ad­ed the entrance to EDF’s Sizewell facil­i­ty in Suf­folk lim­it­ing access to the site by vis­i­tors to the site. This is the sec­ond time in three days that EDFs nuclear facil­i­ties have been tar­get­ed by activists, fol­low­ing hot on the heels of Friday’s dawn Block­ade at Hink­ley Point in Som­er­set.

EDF began their Con­sul­ta­tion on the 21 Nov, and the pub­lic have just eleven weeks (until the 6th Feb 2012) to wade through the 342 pages of con­sul­ta­tion doc­u­ments. The glossy Brochures encour­age us to play an ‘active’ role in the con­sul­ta­tion, so here we are. Said mom Nik­ki Clark, “The government’s ener­gy pol­i­cy and changes to the plan­ning sys­tem are pre-emp­tive­ly deny­ing peo­ple the oppor­tu­ni­ty to raise their legit­i­mate con­cerns about nuclear pow­er. This makes acts of civ­il dis­obe­di­ence extreme­ly impor­tant as with­out this there is no oth­er way to raise these issues.” She went on to say “If the process already under­way at Hink­ley Point in Som­er­set where I live is any­thing to go by, then the pub­lic here at Sizewell can expect a sham process which is noth­ing more than a cyn­i­cal box-tick­ing exer­cise designed to allow EDF to claim that they have ‘lis­tened’ to people’s con­cerns. The new process that the gov­ern­ment has intro­duced to ‘fast-track new nuclear’ is total­ly unde­mo­c­ra­t­ic and there­fore, ille­git­i­mate.

On Fri­day the gov­ern­ment announced that “they have reached a land­mark agree­ment on ener­gy pol­i­cy that will send a durable sig­nal to investors”1 so that they can intro­duce the Ener­gy Bill next week how­ev­er most com­men­ta­tors believe that The Elec­tric­i­ty reform Act is more about sub­si­dis­ing new nuclear that it is about sub­si­dis­ing ‘low car­bon tech­nol­o­gy, the proof (if any were need­ed) lies in the fact that the gov­ern­ments pro­pos­als as they stand will ham­string gen­uine­ly renew­able projects2.

On-shore wind would only require a strike price of around £80 per megawatt hour com­pared to the min­i­mum ‘strike’ price of around £165 per MW/h that would be need­ed to sub­sidise new nuclear build. This would not be the only ‘subsidy-that-isn’t‑a-subsidy ‘ that nuclear pow­er would require. Said Mell Har­ri­son, Edu­ca­tion Direc­tor at a local Eco-cen­tre “The biggest ‘subsidy-that-isn’t‑a-subsidy’ that this indus­try will receive will be the one that comes in the form of high­ly tox­ic radioac­tive waste lega­cy they plan to store on-site at new build facil­i­ties. The cost of these sub­si­dies will be borne by our grand­chil­dren both phys­i­cal­ly and eco­nom­i­cal­ly in around six­ty years time when EDF get to leave the waste where it is and return ‘cus­tody’ of it to our grand­chil­dren. This will be in the form of high­ly dan­ger­ous waste that will require a min­i­mum of a fur­ther hun­dred years cool­ing in-situ before any­one can even begin to think about pack­ag­ing it for any fur­ther ‘storage’3

Said local cam­paign­er Helen Swanston “Most peo­ple around here don’t realise that EDF were giv­en the go ahead recent­ly to build a dry stor­age facil­i­ty to house the back­log of 1,466 tonnes of radioac­tive waste that is accu­mu­lat­ing on site. The rea­son for this accu­mu­la­tion is because the tech­nocrats of yester-year promised that the ‘waste issue’ would be resolved ‘in the future’ mak­ing fan­tas­tic promis­es about mag­i­cal dis­pos­al facil­i­ties that would mate­ri­alise in the not too dis­tant future. These are the same emp­ty promis­es that todays tech­nocrats and politi­cians are mak­ing to us now. We are no clos­er now to any kind of inter­im stor­age facil­i­ty let alone any kind of final rest­ing place for nuclear waste.” The government’s so-called pol­i­cy of vol­un­tarism has seen only one set of local author­ites even con­sid­er ‘vol­un­teer­ing’ and even they seem to have cold feet hav­ing deferred any deci­sion to get involved until Jan­u­ary of next year.4 EDF plan to cre­ate 3500 tonnes of waste from their twin EPR reac­tors 5

********************************ENDS*********************************************

Notes to Edi­tors:

1 –DECC press release Re Ener­gy Reform Act:  http://www.decc.gov.uk/en/content/cms/news/pn12_0146/pn12_0146.aspx

2 – Dr David Toke is Senior Lec­tur­er in Ener­gy Pol­i­cy in the Depart­ment of Polit­i­cal Sci­ence and Inter­na­tion­al Stud­ies in the Uni­ver­si­ty of Birm­ing­ham (UK). He was a key play­er in the cam­paign to estab­lish feed-in tar­iffs for small renew­able projects in the UK, the leg­is­la­tion for which was passed in 2008  http://realfeed-intariffs.blogspot.co.uk/2012/11/are-tories-anti-bourgeois-left-or-just.html

3 –The Nuclear Reg­u­la­to­ry Com­mis­sion and Argoone Nation­al Lab­o­ra­to­ry in the U.S high­light­ed the dan­gers asso­ci­at­ed with the new high burn up fuel in 2008 in a con­fer­ence where ‘They say that fuels with a burn-up above 45 GWd/tU cause pre­vi­ous­ly unfore­seen safe­ty prob­lems’  http://www.robedwards.com/2008/04/nuclear-super‑f.html

4 – There is deep unease about trust­ing gov­ern­ment enough to comitt to the process to find loca­tion for a nuclear waste dump with con­cerns about the abs­cence of laws gov­ern­ing the process as well as con­cerns about the unsuit­able geol­o­gy in Cum­bria.  http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/the-northerner/2012/oct/03/three-month-delay-nuclear-waste-burial-cumbria

5 – Peter Lux is a local per­son con­cerned about Sizewell  http://www.plux.co.uk/3500-tonnes-of-spent-fuel-may-be-produced-by-sizewell‑c/

 

Dawn blockade leaves nuclear workers locked out — Hinkley blockaded today

Via South West Against Nuclear

23/11/12

Dawn block­ade leaves nuclear work­ers locked out

Via South West Against Nuclear

23/11/12

Dawn block­ade leaves nuclear work­ers locked out

At 6am this morn­ing 10 pro­tes­tors block­ad­ed access to EDF ener­gy’s nuclear sites at Hink­ley Point, pre­vent­ing the morn­ing shift from start­ing work. 4 peo­ple in arm locks formed a bar­ri­er across the main access road at Wick Moor Drove in a bid to pre­vent fur­ther ground clear­ance work at the planned Hink­ley C site and to protest at EDF’s plan to extend the life of aging reac­tors at the Hink­ley B sta­tion.

 

Sit­ting beneath a ban­ner say­ing “Nuclear Pow­er — not worth the risk” Bris­tol tree-sur­geon Zoe Smith said, “We want the destruc­tion of land at the pro­posed Hink­ley C site to stop. EDF still don’t have plan­ning per­mis­sion for the new nuclear plant, the gov­ern­ments ener­gy pol­i­cy is in tat­ters. With Cen­tri­ca pulling out and the long await­ed Elec­tric­i­ty Reform Act delayed, there is not even enough invest­ment to fin­ish the project. If the tories fix the elec­tric­i­ty price for nuclear so that the project can go ahead it will leave a radioac­tive waste dump here for hun­dreds of years.” The ear­ly morn­ing block­ade caused long tail­backs for scores of work­ers con­tract­ed in to per­form main­te­nance work on the the exist­ing reac­tors at Hink­ley B, EDF have sig­nalled their inten­tion to re-licence the reac­tor again in 2016.

Bridg­wa­ter mum Nik­ki Clark from South West Against Nuclear said, “Not only do we not need new nuclear, we cer­tain­ly don’t need to extend the life of the exist­ing reac­tors even fur­ther. Just this year alone reac­tor no 4 in the B sta­tion has scrammed at least three times. EDF like to call these emer­gency shut­downs ‘unplanned out­ages’ but this delib­er­ate­ly con­ceals the fact that these age­ing reac­tors are now in a dan­ger­ous con­di­tion. In 2008 the reg­u­la­tors threat­ened British Ener­gy with clo­sure of the site. The reac­tors do not have any few­er cracks in the graphite core now than they did then. Do we have to have our own Fukushima­here in Som­er­set­be­fore we aban­don this insan­i­ty and embrace a renew­ables rev­o­lu­tion in the UK?”

Stop Hink­ley spokesper­son Theo Simon said, “We sup­port this protest. New nuclear is dead in the water. We need pub­lic invest­ment in a renew­ables rev­o­lu­tion which could cre­ate a mil­lion cli­mate jobs and cut ener­gy bills through a pro­gramme of home insu­la­tion and ener­gy-effi­cien­cy. With it’s mas­sive marine ener­gy resource, West Som­er­setis per­fect­ly placed to lead the way in renew­ables, but EDF’s plans would turn it into a tox­ic waste dump for our grand­chil­dren.”

Via South West Against Nuclear
Pro­tes­tors are block­ing the road out­side Hink­ley Point TODAY
Fri­day, 23 Novem­ber, 2012, 7:52

Pro­tes­tors are block­ing the road out­side Hink­ley Point TODAY stop­ping the work­ers enter­ing the site. Lis­ten to BBC Som­er­set report 7.40am. Pass on the word those who want to take a flask of cof­fee to them, great­ly received.

 http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/radio/bbc_radio_somerset_sound/listenlive

La Zad Re-occupied!

On Sat­ur­day, after 3 weeks of evic­tions, more than 30000 came to re-occu­py the ZAD. As soon as the demon­stra­tion arrived, 5 pre-assem­bled struc­tures start­ed to get built: a meet­ing-room of 80m², a kitchen house, 2 dorms, a toi­let and bath block and a work­shop.

On Sat­ur­day, after 3 weeks of evic­tions, more than 30000 came to re-occu­py the ZAD. As soon as the demon­stra­tion arrived, 5 pre-assem­bled struc­tures start­ed to get built: a meet­ing-room of 80m², a kitchen house, 2 dorms, a toi­let and bath block and a work­shop. On Mon­day, the work is con­tin­u­ing. Thanks to a sum of inge­nios­i­ty, mutu­alised know-hows and end­less human chains to bring the tons of planks, as well as cross beams, met­al sheets and straw need­ed for the work, the con­struc­tion showed rapid progress. The achieve­ment is breath­tak­ing and can only leave large smiles on the faces. In order to cel­e­brate that, and inau­gu­rate, a cock­tail is announced, this mon­day, at 17:00 on the build­ing site. We would like to remind that these new col­lec­tive build­ings are meant to become a cross­ing point for all oppo­nents and a head­quar­ter to organ­ise the resis­tance to the air­port con­struc­tion. The pre­fec­ture, who knows what they are about, have announced as of Sat­ur­day, that these new huts were “woed to dis­s­ap­pear”. But the land on which most of the recon­struc­tions were made is lent by a pri­vate own­er, opposed to the air­port and also ongo­ing expro­pri­a­tion. There­fore, there is no judi­cial way to evict these hous­es with­out lenghty pro­ce­dures, regard­ing the urban­ism laws, to be per­formed by the pre­fec­ture. We can there­fore reas­sure to every­one who got involved in the reoc­cu­pa­tion on Sat­ur­day, that, accord­ing to the law, these build­ing can­not be destroyed at least for some time. In par­ralel to these large con­struc­tions, new huts and liv­ing spaces are being rebuilt on squat­ted lands owned by Vin­ci. Dur­ing the whole week, tree­hous­es will nest again in the Rohanne for­est. Whether on lent or squat­ted land, we call for com­mon defense of each hut with all the required deter­mi­na­tion. If they evict us, we resist, and we come back!

Cyber-sabotage in Saudi Arabia

by DGR News Ser­vice

by DGR News Ser­vice

Civ­i­liza­tion is not a sta­t­ic force. It has metas­ta­sized across the world by accel­er­at­ing its own devel­op­ment, by trans­form­ing the blood and corpses of its vic­tims into new weapons with which to wage its relent­less war against all life

Grass­lands become grain mono­cul­tures feed­ing armies, con­quer­ing forests and moun­tains that become ships and swords that kill oth­er cul­tures, con­quer­ing more forests and moun­tains, whose trees and min­er­als are turned into tim­ber mills and trains, going forth to damn rivers, turn­ing the relent­less flu­id­i­ty of their being to elec­tric­i­ty to smelt iron and steel and alu­minum, which in turn become guns and ocean tankers, which expand this super­struc­ture ever fur­ther, tire­less­ly tak­ing in what lit­tle wild remains, absorb­ing every­thing and every­one into this accel­er­at­ing death march.

And yet, as the world is tied and bound tighter into this bru­tal arrange­ment, civ­i­liza­tion (and espe­cial­ly indus­tri­al­ism) becomes more and more vul­ner­a­ble, more open and frag­ile to dis­rup­tion and destruc­tion.

This brit­tle­ness is exem­pli­fied by the near-total depen­dence of the indus­tri­al econ­o­my on “advanced” tech­nol­o­gy, and the inter­net. This depen­den­cy upon a decen­tral­ized and acces­si­ble sys­tem that is poor­ly reg­u­lat­ed and controlled—at least com­pared to oth­er phys­i­cal struc­tures, like the offices of the same cor­po­ra­tions— presents a poten­tial point of pow­er­ful lever­age against the oper­a­tion of civ­i­liza­tion.

Activists and resisters around the world are begin­ning to real­ize this, and seize the oppor­tu­ni­ty it presents to groups engaged in asym­met­ric forces against destruc­tion.

Such as in Sau­di Ara­bia; from a recent arti­cle in the New York Times;

“On Aug. 15, more than 55,000 Sau­di Aram­co [described as the world’s most valu­able com­pa­ny] employ­ees stayed home from work to pre­pare for one of Islam’s holi­est nights of the year — Lailat al Qadr, or the Night of Pow­er — cel­e­brat­ing the rev­e­la­tion of the Koran to Muham­mad.

That morn­ing, at 11:08, a per­son with priv­i­leged access to the Sau­di state-owned oil company’s com­put­ers, unleashed a com­put­er virus to ini­ti­ate what is regard­ed as among the most destruc­tive acts of com­put­er sab­o­tage on a com­pa­ny to date. The virus erased data on three-quar­ters of Aramco’s cor­po­rate PCs — doc­u­ments, spread­sheets, e‑mails, files — replac­ing all of it with an image of a burn­ing Amer­i­can flag.”

This attack presents a good exam­ple of tar­get­ing a sys­temic weak point with­in the infra­struc­ture of Sau­di Aram­co and max­i­miz­ing impact through effec­tive use of sys­tems dis­rup­tion: destroy­ing three-fourths of cor­po­rate data will have impacts that last for weeks, and inhib­it the company’s oper­a­tion for some time. In fact, the attacked lever­aged the company’s response against itself:

“Imme­di­ate­ly after the attack, Aram­co was forced to shut down the company’s inter­nal cor­po­rate net­work, dis­abling employ­ees’ e‑mail and Inter­net access, to stop the virus from spread­ing.”

The cyber-sab­o­tage also high­lights the impor­tance of care­ful plan­ning and tim­ing.

“The hack­ers picked the one day of the year they knew they could inflict the most dam­age…”

This smart and strate­gic approach to action plan­ning is some­thing that is too often over­looked, ignored, or dis­missed entire­ly. Yet for resis­tance to be effec­tive, it must fol­low the same prin­ci­ples. Rather than strik­ing at weak points to crip­ple the oper­a­tion or func­tion of indus­tri­al activ­i­ty, attacks are typ­i­cal­ly made against sym­bol­ic or super­fi­cial tar­gets, leav­ing the oper­a­tion of the bru­tal indus­tri­al machine unscathed. We can­not con­tin­ue to stum­ble with strate­gic blind­ness, lash­ing out all but ran­dom­ly, and no more than hop­ing to hit the mark.

Again, civ­i­liza­tion is not a sta­t­ic force: every hour, more forests, prairies, moun­tains and species are destroyed and extir­pat­ed. Every hour, civ­i­liza­tion is pulled fur­ther into biot­ic col­lapse. We are out of time. With every­thing at stake, we are not only jus­ti­fied in using any means nec­es­sary to bring down civ­i­liza­tion; it is our moral man­date as liv­ing beings to do so. But for that resis­tance to tru­ly be mean­ing­ful and effec­tive, it must also be smart. It can­not be reac­tive and spo­radic, but strate­gic and coor­di­nat­ed; designed not just to inflict dam­age or dent prof­it mar­gins, but to dis­able the fun­da­men­tal sup­port-sys­tems that sus­tain indus­tri­al civ­i­liza­tion and bring it all to a screech­ing halt.

This is one rea­son why cyber-sab­o­tage has such poten­tial as a tac­tic to be used in dis­man­tling indus­tri­al civ­i­liza­tion. Most, if not all, of the crit­i­cal sys­tems that sus­tain it are by now reliant upon com­put­er net­works, which as the Sau­di Aram­co attack demon­strates, are very vul­ner­a­ble to dis­rup­tion.

Online attacks also lend them­selves as a tac­tic to asym­met­ric forces, and allow a very small group of peo­ple to car­ry out deci­sive, coor­di­nat­ed strikes from a dis­tance, rather than requir­ing peo­ple on the ground to coor­di­nate across the coun­try to achieve a sim­i­lar effect.

Civilization’s relent­less growth and accel­er­at­ing tech­nol­o­gy-spi­ral has ren­dered mur­der and death across the plan­et on a scale that would be unimag­in­able if it weren’t the hor­rif­ic real­i­ty we now find our­selves in. But this process of unceas­ing cen­tral­iza­tion and con­trol has also become its weak­ness, and for all its impos­ing gigan­tism, the tow­er of civ­i­liza­tion is incred­i­bly unsta­ble, and now begins to sway pre­car­i­ous­ly. It’s time to push with all our might, and top­ple it once and for all.

Learn­ing to lever­age key sys­tems against them­selves is cru­cial to the suc­cess of a mil­i­tant resis­tance move­ment, and ulti­mate­ly is at the core of any effec­tive strat­e­gy to dis­able the func­tion of indus­tri­al civ­i­liza­tion and ulti­mate­ly to dis­man­tle it. Cyber-sab­o­tage presents a vital oppor­tu­ni­ty to use the dynam­ics of indus­tri­al operations—such as the com­plete depen­den­cy of the elec­tric grid or oil refiner­ies upon com­plex com­put­er systems—to accom­plish that most fun­da­men­tal and nec­es­sary goal.

Wet’suwet’en evict Gas Surveyors

by Van­cou­ver Media Co-Op

by Van­cou­ver Media Co-Op

On the evening of Novem­ber 20th, 2012, Wet’suwet’en Chief Togh­estiy inter­cept­ed and issued an eagle feath­er to sur­vey­ors from the Can-Am Geo­mat­ics com­pa­ny who were work­ing for Apache’s pro­posed Pacif­ic Trails Pipeline (PTP). In Wet’suwet’en law, an eagle feath­er is used as a first and only notice of tres­pass. The sur­vey­ors and all oth­er peo­ple asso­ci­at­ed with PTP were ordered to leave the ter­ri­to­ry and told that they are not ever allowed to return to Unis’tot’en land. As a result of the unsanc­tioned PTP work in the Unist’ot’en yin­tah, the road lead­ing into the ter­ri­to­ry has been closed to all indus­try activ­i­ties until fur­ther notice.

Togh­estiy stat­ed, “I have invoked the Wet’suwet’en Inuk nu’ot’en (Law) called Bi Kyi Wa’at’en (Respon­si­bil­i­ty of a hus­band to respect­ful­ly use and pro­tect his wife’s ter­ri­to­ry) to issue a tres­pass notice to Pipeline work­ers on her sov­er­eign ter­ri­to­ry. My Clan’s ter­ri­to­ry called Lho Kwa (Clore Riv­er) is locat­ed behind the Unist’ot’en ter­ri­to­ry adja­cent to the Coastal town of Kiti­mat and it is our respon­si­bil­i­ty to pro­tect our ter­ri­to­ry as well. We will be stop­ping all pro­posed pipelines.”

The Wet’suwet’en are made up of five Clans, with ter­ri­to­ries that they are expect­ed to man­age for their future gen­er­a­tions. The Unis’tot’en clan has been dead-set against all pipelines slat­ed to cross through their ter­ri­to­ries, which include PTP, Enbridge’s North­ern Gate­way, and many oth­ers. The Unis’tot’en have estab­lished a per­ma­nent com­mu­ni­ty along the Widzin Kwa (Morice Riv­er) direct­ly in the path of the pro­posed ener­gy cor­ri­dor and made their oppo­si­tion extreme­ly clear.

Fre­da Huson, spokes­woman for the Unis’tot’en Clan, states: “PTP does not have per­mis­sion to be on our ter­ri­to­ry. It’s unced­ed land. We said “NO!” in their meet­ings. We’ve writ­ten them let­ters; I’ve sent them emails, say­ing “absolute­ly NO!” to their projects. Con­sid­er it tres­pass when you enter our ter­ri­to­ry with­out per­mis­sion. You’ve received your warn­ing. Don’t come back!”

This marks the sec­ond time that eagle feath­ers have been issued to pipeline work­ers. On August 23rd, 2010, Togh­estiy and Hag­wilakw of the Likhts’amisyu clan gave Enbridge rep­re­sen­ta­tives tres­pass warn­ings dur­ing a Smithers Town Coun­cil meet­ing where Enbridge attend­ed to attempt to smooth over their recent oil spill on the Kala­ma­zoo Riv­er.

For more infor­ma­tion:

Fre­da Huson, Spokesper­son for the Unis’tot’en by email at fhuson@gmail.com or by cell phone at 778–210-1100.

Togh­estiy, Hered­i­tary Wing Chief of the Likhts’amisyu at toghestiy@gmail.com , inter­view requests can be made by send­ing an email along with your con­tact infor­ma­tion to the afore­men­tioned email.

A 9‑minute video explain­ing the com­mu­ni­ty can be found at http://stoptheflows.tumblr.com/ The Unist’ot’en community’s web­site is http://unistotencamp.wordpress.com/decolonizing-the-carbon-corridor/

Please note that nei­ther the Unis’tot’en Peo­ple or the oth­er Grass­roots Wet’suwet’en are asso­ci­at­ed with the Office of the Wet’suwet’en.

http://westcoastpipelinewatch.wordpress.com/2012/11/21/apache-surveyors-ordered-off-unceded-wetsuweten-territory/

Watch video of Unis’tot’en mem­bers turn­ing away sur­vey­ors, Nov 20, 2012:

http://youtu.be/sXmFwj4YKsQ

Day of Action shuts down Keystone XL Construction

Day of Action Sees Dozens Walk On to Work Site as the Nacogdoches Community Rallies with Affected Landowners at Lake Nacogdoches to Protect Fresh Water Supply from Toxic Tar Sands

NACOGDOCHES, TX – MONDAY, NOVEMBER 19,

Day of Action Sees Dozens Walk On to Work Site as the Nacogdoches Community Rallies with Affected Landowners at Lake Nacogdoches to Protect Fresh Water Supply from Toxic Tar Sands

NACOGDOCHES, TX – MONDAY, NOVEMBER 19, 2012 8:00AM – Today, four peo­ple locked them­selves to heavy machin­ery used along the Key­stone XL tar sands pipeline route. They were joined by sev­er­al oth­ers form­ing a human chain to block the move­ment of heavy machin­ery onsite, while more than 30 peo­ple walked onto the same con­struc­tion site to halt work ear­ly this morn­ing. Mean­while, three oth­ers launched a new tree block­ade at a cross­ing of the Angeli­na Riv­er, sus­pend­ing them­selves from 50 foot pine trees with life lines anchored to heavy machin­ery, effec­tive­ly block­ing the entire­ty of Key­stone XL’s path. Today’s Day of Action is in sol­i­dar­i­ty with local landown­ers strug­gling to pro­tect their water and land from TransCanada’s tox­ic tar sands pipeline.

Key­stone XL would cross 16 large rivers in Texas, includ­ing the site of today’s lat­est tree block­ade, the scenic Angeli­na Riv­er. Nes­tled amongst 50 foot pine trees in forest­ed bot­tom­lands, the tree block­aders have set­tled in for a long stand­off in pro­tec­tion of their fresh drink­ing and agri­cul­tur­al water. The waters down­stream feed into the pop­u­lar Sam Ray­burn Reser­voir, the largest lake entire­ly with­in the state of Texas, renowned for its angling oppor­tu­ni­ties and com­pe­ti­tions.

“Tar Sands Block­ade stands with all com­mu­ni­ties affect­ed by the Cana­di­an tar sands. From indige­nous nations in Alber­ta, Cana­da to the besieged refin­ery neigh­bor­hoods of the Amer­i­can Gulf Coast where the tar sands will be refined, there’s a groundswell of resis­tance demand­ing an end to tox­ic tar sands exploita­tion. Today’s events sim­ply mark the lat­est in our sus­tained, com­mu­ni­ty-based civ­il dis­obe­di­ence cam­paign, and many more com­mu­ni­ties are des­tined to rise up to defend their homes from TransCanada’s fraud, bul­ly­ing, and reck­less endan­ger­ment of their lives and fresh water,” insist­ed Ron Seifert, a Tar Sands Block­ade spokesper­son.

Includ­ed amongst the Angeli­na tree sit­ters is local Stephen F. Austin State Uni­ver­si­ty stu­dent, Lizzy Alvara­do, 21, an Austin-born, third-year cin­e­matog­ra­phy major. Lead­ing out­door excur­sions for oth­er local youth and hav­ing helped found the Nacog­doches Rat Skulls, an all female cycling-advo­ca­cy orga­ni­za­tion, Alvara­do is an active mem­ber of the Nacog­doches com­mu­ni­ty.

“I climbed this tree in hon­or of all the landown­ers who have been bul­lied mer­ci­less­ly into sign­ing ease­ment con­tracts and who were then silenced through fear by TransCanada’s threat of end­less lit­i­ga­tion. That’s not what this coun­try stands for in my mind, and if we don’t take a stand here to secure our rights now, then it will keep hap­pen­ing to every­one,” pro­claimed Alvara­do. “What’s hap­pen­ing isn’t just threat­en­ing my community’s drink­ing water but it will threat­en that of all com­mu­ni­ties along the pipeline’s path.“

While these mul­ti­site actions halt­ed Key­stone XL con­struc­tion this morn­ing, local com­mu­ni­ty mem­bers ral­lied at Lake Nacog­doches to fur­ther high­light the threats Key­stone XL pos­es to the community’s water­shed and pub­lic health. These events around the Nacog­doches area coin­cide with a week’s worth of events in sol­i­dar­i­ty with Tar Sands Block­ade. Sched­uled to occur in over 40 com­mu­ni­ties around the world, these actions high­light the urgent need to address the cli­mate cri­sis.

Some actions have tar­get­ed pol­i­cy mak­ers or finan­cial insti­tu­tions bankrolling dirty ener­gy projects while oth­ers ral­lied to address the dam­age done by Hur­ri­cane Sandy through com­mu­ni­ty orga­niz­ing and con­nect­ing extreme weath­er to extreme extrac­tion. Yes­ter­day in Wash­ing­ton, DC, more than 3,000 gath­ered at the White House to call on Pres­i­dent Oba­ma to reject the per­mit for the north­ern seg­ment of TransCanada’s Key­stone XL pipeline. Oth­er actions are sched­uled to hap­pen today and lat­er this week.

Tar Sands Block­ade is a coali­tion of Texas and Okla­homa landown­ers and cli­mate jus­tice orga­niz­ers using peace­ful and sus­tained civ­il dis­obe­di­ence to stop the con­struc­tion of TransCanada’s Key­stone XL tar sands pipeline.

“From the Sandy-dec­i­mate streets of New York City to these piney woods here in East Texas, com­mu­ni­ties are resist­ing dan­ger­ous cor­po­ra­tions like Tran­sCana­da. These sol­i­dar­i­ty actions are part of a bur­geon­ing move­ment of ordi­nary folks com­ing togeth­er in their neigh­bor­hoods, schools, and com­mu­ni­ty cen­ters to draw the con­nec­tions between extreme extrac­tion like tar sands exploita­tion and extreme weath­er like the droughts dev­as­tat­ing farm­ers and ranch­ers all over Texas and the Mid­west. Today we ral­ly to build a future where all peo­ple and the plan­et are healthy and thriv­ing,” said Kim Huynh, a spokesper­son for the Tar Sands Block­ade.

UPDATE: 8:15 am – Police offi­cers arrive on site at Angeli­na Riv­er tree block­ade

Fol­low us on Face­book and Twit­ter to keep up with the lat­est updates.

UPDATE: 8:40 am – Police threat­en­ing to cut sup­port lines for tree block­aders

Chero­kee Coun­ty Sher­iffs have been caught on tape mak­ing mul­ti­ple threats to cut the sup­port lines of the tree block­ades, which could be poten­tial­ly fatal for Lizzy and the oth­er block­aders occu­py­ing the tree-sits.

UPDATE: 9:10 am – All con­struc­tion stopped at site of lock down; work­ers have com­plete­ly left site

Work­ers intend­ing to con­tin­ue con­struc­tion of the Key­stone XL pipeline have com­plete­ly aban­doned all plans to work today at the site of our lock down and have left the site. A crew of block­aders will main­tain a pres­ence there while rein­force­ments are being sent to the new tree block­ade to sup­port Lizzy and the oth­er block­aders whose lives are being threat­ened by the police.

UPDATE: 9:30 am – Tran­sCana­da work­ers return to lock down site with police offi­cers and video equip­ment

Tran­sCana­da work­ers were over­heard telling the police that they want the block­aders out. Police are call­ing for rein­force­ments and get­ting out flex­i­cuffs.

UPDATE: 9:40 am – One per­son detained at lock down site, placed in flex­i­cuffs

The police have detained one per­son sup­port­ing the block­aders who locked them­selves to heavy machin­ery this morn­ing. Hear from the block­aders them­selves why they decid­ed to take action:

UPDATE: 10:15 am – Police pep­per spray two peo­ple locked down; one per­son arrest­ed on the ground at tree block­ade

Police have sprayed pep­per spray onto the skin of two peo­ple locked to heavy machin­ery on the Key­stone XL pipeline ease­ment as sup­port­ers and local media watched from the road. The block­aders who were pep­per sprayed respond­ed by singing loud­ly and are in good spir­its. Mean­while, at the tree block­ade, one per­son was arrest­ed on the ground for tres­pass­ing on the ease­ment.

UPDATE: 10:40 am – Sol­i­dar­i­ty actions take off in Min­neapo­lis and San Fran­cis­co

Sol­i­dar­i­ty actions took off this morn­ing with a ban­ner drop over­look­ing Min­neapo­lis. In San Fran­cis­co, demon­stra­tors ral­lied out­side the Cana­di­an Con­sulate in the finan­cial dis­trict, demand­ing that Cana­da with­draw its sup­port for the Key­stone XL Pipeline, and gath­er­ing strength for the con­tin­ued push to hold recent­ly elect­ed US politi­cians account­able to the will of the Amer­i­can peo­ple to com­bat cli­mate change.

UPDATE: 10:55 am – Sec­ond sup­port­er arrest­ed at lock down sitepolice putting hand­cuffs on block­aders locked to machin­ery

A sec­ond per­son sup­port­ing those locked to heavy machin­ery has been arrest­ed by the Chero­kee Coun­ty Sher­iff Depart­ment, while offi­cers have hand­cuffed the free hand of those locked down. The police are tam­per­ing with the lock box­es but seem unsure about how to remove the block­aders.

UPDATE: 11:10 am – Sol­i­dar­i­ty action in Palm Beach, FL results in arrests in front of Deutsche Bank

A sol­i­dar­i­ty action in Palm Beach, Flori­da tar­get­ing Deutsche Bank, a major financier of the Key­stone XL pipeline, has result­ed in the arrest of mul­ti­ple pro­test­ers. The pro­test­ers demand­ed that Deutsche Bank “refuse to facil­i­tate any future invest­ments in Big Oil, start­ing with the con­struc­tion of the Key­stone XL Pipeline.”

UPDATE: 11:15 am – Two block­aders extract­ed from lock down; two more hold­ing strong despite police bru­tal­i­ty

The police have just extract­ed the two block­aders they had pep­per sprayed ear­li­er this morn­ing. Both indi­vid­u­als had their eyes swollen shut because of the pep­per spray. After they were removed from their lock down device, the block­aders went limp and were dragged away by police. This brings the total num­ber of arrests so far today to five. Please make a gen­er­ous dona­tion to help get them out of jail quick­ly and to sup­port their legal defense.

UPDATE: 11:25 am – Police pep­per spray remain­ing two block­aders, drag­ging away arrest­ed block­ad­er who went limp

Police have pep­per sprayed the remain­ing two block­aders locked to heavy machin­ery and con­tin­ued to bru­tal­ize the two block­aders who were already arrest­ed. They were seen drag­ging one block­ad­er who seemed in extreme pain and unre­spon­sive face down along the ground by his shoul­der and shov­ing him into the back of a police car while refus­ing to clean pep­per spray out of the eyes of the oth­er arrest­ed block­ad­er or pro­vide him with water.

UPDATE: 11:40 am – Remain­ing two block­aders extract­ed after being pep­per sprayed

All four block­aders that were locked to heavy machin­ery have now been arrest­ed after being pep­per sprayed and bru­tal­ized by Chero­kee Coun­ty Sher­iffs. This brings the total num­ber of arrests so far today to sev­en, with two sup­port­ers at the ground block­ade and one sup­port­er at the tree block­ade also being arrest­ed. Donate now to help get them out of jail and to sup­port their legal defense.

UPDATE: 11:55 am – Sher­iffs shak­ing tree-sit life­line; sit­ters refus­ing to come down

Sher­iffs shook the sup­port line for one of the tree-sits, even after being repeat­ed­ly informed that the ropes are crit­i­cal sup­port lines and must not be tam­pered with. Lizzy and the oth­er tree-sit­ters are refus­ing to come down, even with their lives endan­gered by the police. In response, sher­iffs cleared sup­port­ers out from under­neath the tree-sits and the one in charge was seen hav­ing a long phone con­ver­sa­tion next to a life­line.

UPDATE: 12:45 pm – “Com­mon­luck The­ater of Dra­mat­ic Nour­ish­ment” tar­gets Tran­sCana­da lob­by­ing firm

In a beau­ti­ful dis­play of non­vi­o­lent resis­tance, the “Com­mon­luck The­ater of Dra­mat­ic Nour­ish­ment” deliv­ered cook­ies and oth­er treats to the San­ta Clari­ta, Cal­i­for­nia office of McKen­na, Long, and Aldridge, the main lob­by­ing firm for Tran­sCana­da, in an attempt to change their hearts, “Grinch style”. The stark con­trast between the tac­tics of our move­ment and the tac­tics of those in pow­er could not be more abun­dant­ly clear, with this action com­ing on the heels of sev­er­al block­aders being bru­tal­ized and arrest­ed by Chero­kee Coun­ty Sher­iffs ear­li­er today. Pleasecon­sid­er a dona­tion to the legal fund to sup­port those who were met with vio­lence just for stand­ing up for the health of their com­mu­ni­ties.

UPDATE: 1:10 pm – Ground sup­port­ers block­ade cher­ry pick­er to pro­tect tree-sits; police retal­i­ate with reck­less pep­per spray and arrests

Chero­kee Coun­ty Sher­iffs brought in a cher­ry pick­er to try and extract the three tree block­aders. In response, a cou­ple dozen ground sup­port­ers stood in front of the truck with the cher­ry pick­er and pushed up against it in an attempt to stop it. The truck dri­ver refused to stop until they hit one of the sup­port­ers and almost dragged him under­neath the vehi­cle. In an effort to dis­perse the crowd, police began indis­crim­i­nate­ly spray­ing peo­ple in the face with pep­per spray, includ­ing a 21 year old woman from Nacog­doches and a 75 year old woman with a heart con­di­tion. The offi­cer who pep­per sprayed sup­port­ers is refus­ing to iden­ti­fy him­self. Two more of the ground sup­port­ers have been arrest­ed, bring­ing the total for today to nine. Donate now to sup­port these brave block­aders stand­ing up for their com­mu­ni­ties in the face of bru­tal police repres­sion.

UPDATE: 2:00 pm – From coast to coast, sol­i­dar­i­ty against the Key­stone XL

In Burling­ton, Ver­mont, and Fair­fax, Cal­i­for­nia, activists dis­played ban­ners decry­ing Key­stone XL’s role in the ongo­ing cli­mate cri­sis. “As com­mu­ni­ties con­tin­ue to rebuild in the wake of Super­storm Sandy, it should be obvi­ous that the expan­sion of fos­sil fuel infra­struc­ture is unac­cept­able,” said Sara Mehal­ick of Ris­ing Tide Ver­mont. “From Transcanada’s Key­stone XL tar sands pipeline, to Ver­mont Gas’s scheme to pump gas under Lake Cham­plain, to ExxonMobil’s plans for a New Eng­land tar sands pipeline, our right to a liv­able plan­et is under attack.”

‘Tar Sands Oil Orgy’ blockades Canada House in London

Cana­da-EU Ener­gy Sum­mit dis­rupt­ed as Canada’s aggres­sive lob­by­ing threat­ens EU cli­mate leg­is­la­tion

Cana­da-EU Ener­gy Sum­mit dis­rupt­ed as Canada’s aggres­sive lob­by­ing threat­ens EU cli­mate leg­is­la­tion

This morn­ing an ‘oil orgy’ per­for­mance-protest dis­rupt­ed the Cana­da Europe Ener­gy Sum­mit, at Cana­da House, in Lon­don. The annu­al ener­gy sum­mit was host­ed by Cana­di­an High Com­mis­sion­er Gor­don Camp­bell and fea­tured top offi­cials from Shell, Total and Enbridge, along with Con­ser­v­a­tive Ener­gy and Cli­mate Min­is­ter John Hayes (who has recent­ly received media atten­tion for an alleged plot to pro­mote the anti-wind farm agen­da in the Coali­tion Gov­ern­ment). The aim of the event was to pro­mote Canada’s tar sands in Europe, and dis­cus­sions includ­ed how to deal with ‘pub­lic pol­i­cy risks’ such as impend­ing Euro­pean trans­port leg­is­la­tion which would dis­cour­age imports of high­ly-pol­lut­ing fuels like tar sands into the EU mar­ket.

At 8.30am, half an hour before the event was due to start, 30 pro­test­ers rushed to the steps of Cana­da House and blocked the entrance with their bod­ies and a huge ban­ner say­ing ‘Stop tar sands’. They then held a tongue-in-cheek ‘oil orgy’, fea­tur­ing danc­ing shad­owy rep­re­sen­ta­tives of the oil indus­try, and speech bub­bles with iron­ic pro-oil state­ments such as ‘Destroy the Fuel Qual­i­ty Direc­tive’, ‘Cana­da: emerg­ing ener­gy supervil­lain’, and ‘Gag cli­mate sci­en­tists’. The main entrance was block­ad­ed until after the event was due to start, forc­ing del­e­gates to be divert­ed around the protest through a back door.

Tar sands extrac­tion is dev­as­tat­ing ecosys­tems and tram­pling on Indige­nous rights. Wor­ry­ing­ly, Lon­don has become a hotbed of col­lu­sion for the Cana­di­an Government’s ‘dirty diplo­mats’ to schmooze with oil giants and pro­mote tar sands in Europe,” said Suzanne Dhali­w­al, from the UK Tar Sands Net­work. “With Europe nego­ti­at­ing new cli­mate leg­is­la­tion which would threat­en the high­ly car­bon-inten­sive tar sands indus­try, Canada’s lob­by­ing has become increas­ing­ly aggres­sive.”

The Cana­di­an Gov­ern­ment has recent­ly been exposed as mount­ing an unprece­dent­ed lob­by­ing cam­paign to under­mine the EU Fuel Qual­i­ty Direc­tive (FQD), which aims to reduce emis­sions from trans­port fuel by 6% by 2020, and would label tar sands-derived fuel as high­ly pol­lut­ing. “The Cana­di­an Gov­ern­ment is work­ing over­time to under­mine cli­mate poli­cies in Europe so that they can bar­rel for­ward with unfet­tered tar sands expan­sion,” said Han­nah McK­in­non of Cli­mate Action Net­work Cana­da (see Dirty Oil Diplo­ma­cy: The Cana­di­an Government’s Glob­al Push to Sell the Tar Sands). “There is no doubt that the tar sands are stand­ing in the way of Canada’s cli­mate promis­es, but they shouldn’t stand in the way of Europe’s as well.”

The UK Coali­tion Gov­ern­ment has been doc­u­ment­ed as sup­port­ing these attempts by the Cana­di­an Gov­ern­ment and British oil giants BP and Shell to under­mine the FQD.

We are already see­ing the impacts of cli­mate change around the world, and want to see the kind of lead­er­ship the Euro­pean Union is tak­ing to reduc­ing emis­sions from trans­port fuels. But the UK Gov­ern­ment is cosy­ing up to Cana­da to sab­o­tage key cli­mate leg­is­la­tion,” said Philip­pa de Bois­sière from Peo­ple & Plan­et. “We need to see the UK Coali­tion Gov­ern­ment take action on reduc­ing emis­sions rather than stay­ing tan­gled in their twist­ed love affair with big oil.”

The protest at Cana­da House was organ­ised by UK Tar Sands Net­work, Lon­don Ris­ing Tide, Peo­ple & Plan­et, Cli­mate Jus­tice Col­lec­tive, Cli­mate Rush, Occu­py Ener­gy, Envi­ron­ment and Equi­ty Group, and Cor­po­rate Watch, as part of a glob­al week of cli­mate action which includ­ed actions against the Key­stone XL tar sands pipeline in Wash­ing­ton DC and Texas.

Today’s per­for­mance-protest fol­lows a mass action by Peo­ple & Plan­et two weeks ago, which saw 400 stu­dents call on Deputy Prime Min­is­ter Nick Clegg from his Sheffield Hal­lam con­stituen­cy, to sup­port the FQD (‘No more sor­ries Nick’ mass action and e‑action).