World Naked Bike Rides UK (& Manchester Critical Mass)

Brighton:

In Brighton, organ­is­ers of the sev­en-mile ride were warned by Sus­sex Police last month that par­tic­i­pants could face pros­e­cu­tion if offi­cers received com­plaints about the nudi­ty.

But, after advice from civ­il lib­er­ties group Lib­er­ty, cyclists entered dis­cus­sions with local police chiefs and resolved the impasse.

Brighton:

In Brighton, organ­is­ers of the sev­en-mile ride were warned by Sus­sex Police last month that par­tic­i­pants could face pros­e­cu­tion if offi­cers received com­plaints about the nudi­ty.

But, after advice from civ­il lib­er­ties group Lib­er­ty, cyclists entered dis­cus­sions with local police chiefs and resolved the impasse.

Co-organ­is­er Dun­can Blinkhorn said: “This is a fun if out­ra­geous way to make the seri­ous point that we should not have to tol­er­ate roads, cities and a plan­et dom­i­nat­ed by the brutish­ness of cars that rou­tine­ly foul the air we all breathe, destroy lives and impov­er­ish the envi­ron­ment.”

—-

Lon­don:

On Sat­ur­day 12 June 2010 the sev­enth Lon­don World Naked Bike Ride will return to the streets of the cap­i­tal, allow­ing rid­ers to see the city sights from the com­fort of a bike or skates. The ride is easy and upbeat, and rid­ers dec­o­rate their bod­ies and bikes with mes­sages of protest against oil depen­den­cy and car cul­ture.

Around 1200 rid­ers turned out for the Lon­don World Naked Bike Ride on Sat­ur­day, com­plet­ing a 10km cir­cuit through some of the major tourist and shop­ping streets of the cap­i­tal and as in pre­vi­ous rides cre­at­ing quite a stir for the five min­utes or so while they passed.

Lon­don police, also on ped­al cycles but ful­ly clothed, accom­pa­nied the cyclists and eased their pas­sage through the traf­fic. Nudi­ty is not in itself an offence and police allow the now annu­al protest to take place.

Crowds sev­er­al deep lined the edge of the road in pop­u­lar tourist spots includ­ing Trafal­gar Square, and even many of the shop­pers in Oxford St stopped con­sum­ing to watch, although from the many com­ments I heard, many were unclear about the pur­pose of the event.

Some rid­ers did have slo­gans on their bod­ies, main­ly about oil and traf­fic, and some bikes car­ried A4 posters read­ing REAL RIGHTS FOR BIKE and CELEBRATE BODY FREEDOM or had flags stat­ing ‘CURB CAR CULTURE’ which made clear the pur­pose of the event to the care­ful onlook­er, but for most peo­ple it seemed sim­ply a spec­ta­cle of naked or near-naked bod­ies. Though of course also a rare treat for any bicy­cle spot­ters.

Rid­ers rode in a vari­ety of dress and undress. Apart from shoes — vir­tu­al­ly essen­tial on a bike — some wore noth­ing, while oth­ers added body paint, cycle hel­mets, hats, shorts or briefs, bras and often a cam­era; a few rode ful­ly dressed. As on pre­vi­ous events there were con­sid­er­ably more men than women, some­thing that isn’t ful­ly reflect­ed in my pic­tures. Although there were few­er women, more of them were in colour­ful body paint or oth­er­wise stood out from the crowd.

This is an event that many — rid­ers and watch­ers — enjoy and some­thing that real­ly does make thou­sands of peo­ple stop and stare, but as in pre­vi­ous years it seems to fail to get a clear mes­sage across, per­haps because those tak­ing part do so for such var­ied rea­sons. This isn’t essen­tial­ly a natur­ist ral­ly and nudi­ty alone just isn’t enough to get the point of the event across.

* Lon­don is the largest day­time WNBR event in the world. We had 1,200 par­tic­i­pants on Sat­ur­day 13 June 2009!!! Pre­vi­ous­ly we had 1,000 (2007 & 2008), 800 (2006), 250 (2005) and 58 (2004).

—-

Man­ches­ter:

The weath­er was per­fect, the rid­ers were excep­tion­al and the start­ing point was love­ly. We rode in joy and fun and lots of noise for almost the whole route and the crowds loved us. It all went a bit pear-shaped on Port­land Street when some well-inten­tioned but sad­ly ill-informed con­stab­u­lary stopped the ride and tried to make us get dressed. We undressed around the cor­ner any­way, and we did get a lot of won­der­ful media cov­er­age. It ain’t gonna hap­pen again folks, we’ll make sure of that! Next year’s going to have the best ride ever!

—-

Sheffield:

There were 18 naked rid­ers which was down from last year’s 27 par­tic­i­pants, although the weath­er was just as nice and sun­ny with a warm gen­tle breeze. The gold­en sun­shine and clear blue skies, made it a won­der­ful day for ever­body. This year, as it was our sec­ond annu­al ride, we were hop­ing for around one hun­dred naked rid­ers. How­ev­er, as the Lon­don WNBR was held in the after­noon, this may have low­ered the turn out as folk thronged to the Lon­don ride which had over one thou­sand rid­ers.

—-

Southamp­ton:

On a dry and ‘warm enough’ evening 150 rid­ers attend­ed. The con­voy was led in fine style by a pair of Pen­ny Far­things dat­ing from the 1890s. We felt that these vehi­cles from a time before the inter­nal com­bus­tion engine neat­ly debunked the fool­ish idea that roads are made for cars! Helped by the state­ly pace of the vin­tage bikes, the ride stayed close­ly bunched togeth­er which gave a sense of uni­ty. We were greet­ed warm­ly by bystanders as we passed, and most car dri­vers were tol­er­ant (though there were the odd few aggres­sive excep­tions). Though num­bers were about the same as last year, it seemed to me there was a greater show of naked­ness this time, so hoorah for Southamp­ton rid­ers!

—-

York:

AN 87-year-old woman was among the par­tic­i­pants in this year’s York Naked Bike Ride.

Mar­garet Dust­man, who lived in Acomb for more than 50 years before mov­ing to Mir­field, said she took part because she was against people’s devo­tion to petrol and fash­ion.

Mrs Dust­man cycled off in the alto­geth­er, but oth­ers were there in var­i­ous states of undress, wear­ing Indi­an head­dress, biki­nis and var­i­ous slo­gans daubed on their bod­ies.

Oth­er reports, pho­tos and things at http://www.worldnakedbikeride.org/uk/

—-

The Crit­i­cal Mass­es in Man­ches­ter have been attend­ed by well over 100 peo­ple each month, for the last cou­ple of years — hoorah!

Videos of May 2009 ride parts 1 2 3 4

See you there — every last fri­day of the month 6pm cen­tral library MCR

—-

Thugs Seek Jobs at Shell HQ

The main doors at Shells head­quar­ters were closed to staff at 9am today, 12 June as pro­test­ers dressed as ‘thugs’ turned up for a job inter­view. Shell secu­ri­ty locked all doors as pro­test­ers tried to enter the build­ing for what they said was a job inter­view “we hear Shell are hir­ing thugs to sink ships in Ire­land”.

Shell Thugs 4 HireThe main doors at Shells head­quar­ters were closed to staff at 9am today, 12 June as pro­test­ers dressed as ‘thugs’ turned up for a job inter­view. Shell secu­ri­ty locked all doors as pro­test­ers tried to enter the build­ing for what they said was a job inter­view “we hear Shell are hir­ing thugs to sink ships in Ire­land”.

Pro­test­ers tried to enter the Head­quar­ters but the doors were locked as they went in. The doors remained locked for about an hour and a half, despite the var­i­ous demon­stra­tions the pro­test­ers gave of their ‘thugery’ skills even sim­u­lat­ing how they coud hold a fish­er­man cap­tive why sink­ing his boat.

One of the pro­test­ers Saman­tha John­son said “Shell have been hir­ing hit squads to ter­rorise local pro­test­ers at their activ­i­ties abroad, as with the Ogo­ni peo­ple in the Niger Delta. Now, they have import­ed these meth­ods to Ire­land. Indeed, last month a for­mer Shell secu­ri­ty guard was iden­ti­fied as one of the mer­ce­nar­ies employed in an assas­si­na­tion plot in Bolivia”.

This protest is in response to an inci­dent in Ross­port, Ire­land at 2am yes­ter­day morn­ing where 4 masked men sunk a local fisherman’s boat, with the own­er and a crewmem­ber still on it. 2 of the men were armed and held the fish­er­men while the oth­ers went below deck to sink the boat.

One of the pro­test­ers today Sean Reil­ly said “This shows the extremes Shell go to, to get what they want. They are will­ing to put 2 men in hos­pi­tal for vocal­ly express­ing oppo­si­tion.

Indigenous anti-infastructure protesters murdered in crackdown on months-long blockade in Peru

For sev­en weeks tens of thou­sands of Ama­zon­ian Indi­ans blocked roads and rivers across east­ern Peru. They seized hydro­elec­tric plants and pump­ing sta­tions on oil and gas pipelines to try to force the repeal of decrees facil­i­tat­ing oil explo­ration, com­mer­cial farm­ing and log­ging in parts of the jun­gle.

For sev­en weeks tens of thou­sands of Ama­zon­ian Indi­ans blocked roads and rivers across east­ern Peru. They seized hydro­elec­tric plants and pump­ing sta­tions on oil and gas pipelines to try to force the repeal of decrees facil­i­tat­ing oil explo­ration, com­mer­cial farm­ing and log­ging in parts of the jun­gle. Petrope­ru, the state oil com­pa­ny, had to shut a pipeline that car­ries 40,000 bar­rels of oil each day. Amid threats of ener­gy rationing in east­ern towns, the gov­ern­ment of Pres­i­dent Alan Gar­cía this month ordered armed police to clear a stretch of road and retake a pump­ing sta­tion near Bagua, in Peru’s north­ern jun­gle

—-

THE BACKGROUND

Ear­ly this morn­ing (June 5th), Peru­vian police launched a vio­lent attack on a non­vi­o­lent road block­ade held by Ama­zon­ian indige­nous pro­test­ers oppos­ing 10 laws that would open up their ter­ri­to­ry to increased min­er­al, oil, gas and tim­ber exploita­tion. Police opened fire with live ammu­ni­tion, killing at least 28 peo­ple.

FMI:
http://www.rootforce.org/2009/06/05/peruvian-police-murder-indigenous-protesters-take-action/

WHY TAKE ACTION

The first rea­son to take action, of course, is sim­ply out of sol­i­dar­i­ty with our fel­low war­riors in the strug­gle for a just and sus­tain­able world. But why are we send­ing out this action alert as Root Force?

For near­ly two months, thou­sands indige­nous pro­test­ers have near­ly par­a­lyzed Peru’s Ama­zon region with block­ades of crit­i­cal trans­porta­tion and min­ing infra­struc­ture. They have sparked a nation­al dis­course over the lim­its to devel­op­ment and who owns nature, and have made it clear that they will not sur­ren­der any of their ances­tral home­lands.

At the heart of the issue are 10 laws passed by pres­i­den­tial decree that would great­ly facil­i­tate indus­tri­al exploita­tion of the Ama­zon. THIS IS CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE, intend­ed to sup­ply new raw mate­ri­als for the glob­al mar­ket. THIS IS ONE OF THOSE WEAK POINTS OF THE SYSTEM that we are always talk­ing about.

The indige­nous war­riors fight­ing for their lives have pushed this issue into the glob­al eye, and the Peru­vian gov­ern­ment has placed itself in a posi­tion of weak­ness by mur­der­ing unarmed pro­test­ers. Even before the recent killings, a con­gres­sion­al pan­el had already declared 2 of the laws uncon­sti­tu­tion­al, and only through pro­ce­dur­al tricks has the pres­i­den­t’s par­ty been able to stall debate on repeal­ing one of those laws.

This is one of those rare cas­es where SUSTAINED INTERNATIONAL PRESSURE COULD TIP THE SCALES. If these laws are repealed, it will be a major set­back for infra­struc­ture expan­sion plans in a tru­ly crit­i­cal region of the hemi­sphere.

HOW TO TAKE ACTION

You can email crit­i­cal peo­ple in the Peru­vian gov­ern­ment through this link, pro­vid­ed by Ama­zon Watch:

http://amazonwatch.org/peru-action-alert.php

You can also orga­nize protests at Peru­vian embassies or con­sulates, or take oth­er actions that you think stand a good chance of mak­ing it back to the deci­sion mak­ers in Lima.

Make sure to express your out­rage at the gov­ern­men­t’s strong arm tac­tics — even before the mur­ders, the gov­ern­ment had sus­pend­ed civ­il lib­er­ties in 5 provinces and was call­ing indige­nous peo­ple “ter­ror­ists” — and demand the repeal of the Free Trade laws and any law fur­ther open­ing the Ama­zon to min­er­al, oil, gas, tim­ber, hydro­elec­tric or agri­cul­tur­al exploita­tion.

In Sol­i­dar­i­ty,
Root Force

—–

Recent reports indi­cate as many as 84 peo­ple killed and 150 arrest­ed in clash­es stem­ming from an ear­ly morn­ing vio­lent raid by police on unarmed pro­test­ers on June 5. Police are report­ed to be burn­ing the bod­ies of the dead and dump­ing them into the riv­er.

Aston­ish­ing­ly — but not sur­pris­ing­ly — the gov­ern­ment is accus­ing the pro­test­ers of using tac­tics rem­i­nis­cent of the 1980s inter­nal con­flict. Deploy­ing racist imagery paint­ing indige­nous pro­test­ers as spear-wield­ing sav­ages, Pres­i­dent Alan Gar­cia has vowed a tough “response.”

Fol­low­ing the ear­ly-morn­ing mas­sacre, pro­test­ers took 38 police hostage at a pump­ing sta­tion for the nation­al oil com­pa­ny, PetroPe­ru. A police raid to free the offi­cers result­ed in the deaths of nine of them. An Argen­tin­ian oil com­pa­ny, Plus­petrol, has halt­ed oil pump­ing in one unit and will soon halt pump­ing in anoth­er due to the unrest.

The gov­ern­ment has since issued an arrest war­rant for indige­nous leader Alber­to Pizan­go (who was elect­ed to rep­re­sent the indige­nous coali­tion by the lead­ers of 1,200 com­mu­ni­ties), charg­ing him with “sedi­tion.” Pizan­go has gone into hid­ing.

Please take action and urge the Peru­vian gov­ern­ment to halt the vio­lence and repeal the con­tro­ver­sial free trade laws that would open up indige­nous land in the Ama­zon to increased devel­op­ment. Con­tact the US gov­ern­ment and inter­na­tion­al agen­cies as well, and encour­age them to place pres­sure on Peru. The Peru­vian gov­ern­ment is in a seri­ous posi­tion of weak­ness right now and try­ing to cov­er it up with vio­lence, and this is one of those rare cas­es where inter­na­tion­al pres­sure could deal a major set­back to infra­struc­ture expan­sion plans.

Read the full Root Force action alert on this issue here.

——

Indige­nous Lead­ers and Allies Call for an End to Vio­lence on All Sides

BAGUA, Peru — June 8 — In the after­math of Friday’s bloody raid on a peace­ful indige­nous road block­ade near Bagua in the Peru­vian Ama­zon, numer­ous eye­wit­ness­es are report­ing that the Spe­cial Forces of the Peru­vian Police have been dis­pos­ing of the bod­ies of indige­nous pro­test­ers who were killed.

“Today I spoke to many eye­wit­ness­es in Bagua report­ing that they saw police throw the bod­ies of the dead into the Marañon Riv­er from a heli­copter in an appar­ent attempt by the Gov­ern­ment to under­re­port the num­ber of indige­nous peo­ple killed by police,” said Gre­gor MacLen­nan, spokesper­son for Ama­zon Watch speak­ing.

“Hos­pi­tal work­ers in Bagua Chi­ca and Bagua Grande cor­rob­o­rat­ed that the police took bod­ies of the dead from their premis­es to an undis­closed loca­tion. I spoke to sev­er­al peo­ple who report­ed that there are bod­ies lying at the bot­tom of a deep crevasse up in the hills, about 2 kilo­me­ters from the inci­dent site. When the Church and local lead­ers went to inves­ti­gate, the police stopped them from approach­ing the area,” report­ed MacLen­nan.

Police and gov­ern­ment offi­cials have been con­sis­tent­ly under­re­port­ing the num­ber of indige­nous peo­ple killed by police gun­fire. Indige­nous orga­ni­za­tions place the num­ber of pro­test­ers killed at least at 40, while Gov­ern­ment offi­cials claim­ing that only a hand­ful of indige­nous peo­ple were killed. Also the Gar­cia Gov­ern­ment claims that 22 police offi­cers were killed and sev­er­al still miss­ing.

“Wit­ness­es say that it was the police who opened fire last Fri­day on the pro­test­ers from heli­copters,” MacLen­nan said. “Now the gov­ern­ment appears to be destroy­ing the bod­ies of slain pro­test­ers and giv­ing very low esti­mates of the casu­al­ty. Giv­en that the demon­stra­tors were unarmed or car­ry­ing only wood­en spears and the police were fir­ing auto­mat­ic weapons, the actu­al num­ber of indige­nous peo­ple killed is like­ly to be much high­er.”

“Anoth­er eye­wit­ness report­ed see­ing the bod­ies of five indige­nous peo­ple that had been burned beyond iden­ti­fi­ca­tion at the morgue. I have lis­tened to tes­ti­mo­ny of peo­ple in tears talk­ing about wit­ness­ing the police burn­ing bod­ies,” con­tin­ued MacLen­nan.

At least 150 peo­ple from the demon­stra­tion on Fri­day are still being detained. Eye-wit­ness reports also con­firm that police forcibly removed some of the wound­ed indige­nous pro­test­ers from hos­pi­tals, tak­ing them to unknown des­ti­na­tions. Their fam­i­lies expressed con­cern for their well being while in deten­tion. There are many peo­ple still report­ed miss­ing and access to med­ical atten­tion in the region is hor­ri­bly inad­e­quate.

The Orga­niz­ing Com­mit­tee for the Indige­nous Peo­ples of Alto Ama­zonas Province issued this state­ment: “It is appalling that polit­i­cal pow­ers have act­ed in such a cru­el and inhu­man man­ner against Ama­zon­ian Peo­ples, fail­ing to rec­og­nize the fun­da­men­tal rights and pro­tec­tions guar­an­teed to us by the Con­sti­tu­tion. We express deep grief over the death of our indige­nous broth­ers, of civil­ians and the offi­cers of the Nation­al Police.”

The gov­ern­ment expand­ed the State of Emer­gency and estab­lished a cur­few on all traf­fic in the region from 3 pm to 6 am. Indige­nous and inter­na­tion­al human rights orga­ni­za­tions are wor­ried about plans of anoth­er Nation­al Police raid on a block­ade in Yurimaguas close to the town of Tara­po­to where thou­sands are block­ing a road.

Pres­i­dent Alan Gar­cia is being wide­ly crit­i­cized for foment­ing a cli­mate of fear mon­ger­ing against indige­nous peo­ples by draw­ing par­al­lels to the bru­tal Shin­ning Path guer­ril­la move­ment of the 1980s and ear­ly 1990s, and by vague­ly refer­ring to exter­nal and anti-demo­c­ra­t­ic threats to the coun­try.

The Ama­zon­ian indige­nous peo­ples’ mobi­liza­tions have been peace­ful, local­ly coor­di­nat­ed, and extreme­ly well orga­nized for near­ly two months. Yet Gar­cia insists on call­ing them ter­ror­ist acts and anti-demo­c­ra­t­ic. Gar­cia has even gone so far as to describe the indige­nous mobi­liza­tions as “sav­age and bar­bar­ic.” Gar­cia has made his dis­crim­i­na­tion explic­it, say­ing direct­ly that the Ama­zon­ian indige­nous peo­ple are not first-class cit­i­zens.

“These peo­ple don’t have crowns,” Gar­cia said about the pro­test­ers. “These peo­ple aren’t first-class cit­i­zens who can say — 400,000 natives to 28 mil­lion Peru­vians — ‘You don’t have the right to be here.’ No way. That is a huge error.”
Iron­i­cal­ly, Peru was the coun­try that intro­duced the Unit­ed Nations Dec­la­ra­tion on the Rights of Indige­nous Peo­ples on the floor of the Gen­er­al Assem­bly when it was adopt­ed in Sep­tem­ber 2007.

A coali­tion of indige­nous and human rights orga­ni­za­tions will protest in front of the Peru­vian Embassy in Wash­ing­ton D.C. on Mon­day, June 8 at 12:30 pm.

Indige­nous peo­ples have vowed to con­tin­ue protests until the Peru­vian Con­gress revokes the “free trade” decrees issued by Pres­i­dent Gar­cia under spe­cial pow­ers grant­ed by Con­gress in the con­text of the Free Trade Agree­ment with the Unit­ed States.

Among the out­pour­ing of state­ments con­demn­ing the vio­lence in Peru were those from Peru’s Ombudsman’s office, the chair of the Unit­ed Nations Per­ma­nent Forum on Indige­nous Issues, a coali­tion of 45 inter­na­tion­al human rights orga­ni­za­tions, Indige­nous orga­ni­za­tions from through­out the Amer­i­c­as, and the Con­fer­ence of Bish­ops of Peru. Also famous per­son­al­i­ties includ­ing Q’orianka Kilch­er, Ben­jamin Bratt, Peter Bratt, and Daryl Han­nah and Bian­ca Jag­ger called on the Peru­vian Gov­ern­ment to cease the vio­lence and seek peace­ful res­o­lu­tion to the con­flict.

AIDESEP, the nation­al indige­nous orga­ni­za­tion of Peru has called for a nation­wide gen­er­al strike start­ing June 11th.

Ama­zon Watch is con­tin­u­al­ly updat­ing pho­tographs, audio tes­ti­mo­ny, and video footage from Bagua on www.amazonwatch.org.

New­ly released b‑roll at http://amazonwatch.org/peru-protests-highres-photos.php

—–

—–

The broad­en­ing influ­ence of the indige­nous move­ment was on dis­play Thurs­day in a gen­er­al strike that drew thou­sands of pro­test­ers here to the streets of Iqui­tos, the largest Peru­vian city in the Ama­zon, and to cities and towns else­where in jun­gle areas. Protests over Mr. Gar­cía’s han­dling of the vio­lence in the north­ern Bagua Province last Fri­day also took place in high­land regions like Puno, near the Boli­vian bor­der, and in Lima and Are­quipa on the Pacif­ic coast.

“The gov­ern­ment made the sit­u­a­tion worse with its con­de­scend­ing depic­tion of us as gangs of sav­ages in the for­est,” said Wag­n­er Muso­line Acho, 24, an Awa­jún Indi­an and an indige­nous leader. “They think we can be tricked by a maneu­ver like sus­pend­ing a cou­ple of decrees for a few weeks and then rein­tro­duc­ing them, and they are wrong.”

The pro­test­ers’ imme­di­ate threat – to cut the sup­ply of oil and nat­ur­al gas to Lima, the cap­i­tal – seems to have sub­sided, with pro­test­ers part­ly with­draw­ing from their occu­pa­tion of oil instal­la­tions in the jun­gle. But as anger fes­ters, indige­nous lead­ers here said they could eas­i­ly try to shut down ener­gy instal­la­tions again to exert pres­sure on Mr. Gar­cía.

Anoth­er wave of protests appears like­ly because indige­nous groups are demand­ing that the decrees be repealed and not just sus­pend­ed. The decrees would open large jun­gle areas to invest­ment and allow com­pa­nies to bypass indige­nous groups to obtain per­mits for petro­le­um explo­ration, log­ging and build­ing hydro­elec­tric dams. A stop­gap attempt to halt ear­li­er indige­nous protests in the Ama­zon last August failed to pre­vent them from being reini­ti­at­ed more force­ful­ly in April.

The author­i­ties are strug­gling to under­stand a move­ment that is crys­tal­liz­ing in the Peru­vian Ama­zon among more than 50 indige­nous groups. They include about 300,000 peo­ple, account­ing for only about 1 per­cent of Peru’s pop­u­la­tion, but they live in strate­gi­cal­ly impor­tant and resource-rich loca­tions, which are scat­tered through­out jun­gle areas that account for near­ly two-thirds of Peru’s ter­ri­to­ry.

So far, alliances have proved elu­sive between Indi­ans in the Ama­zon and indige­nous groups in high­land areas, rul­ing out, for now, the kind of broad indige­nous protest move­ments that helped oust gov­ern­ments in neigh­bor­ing Ecuador and Bolivia ear­li­er in the decade.

In con­trast to some ear­li­er efforts to orga­nize indige­nous groups, the lead­ers of this new move­ment are them­selves indige­nous, and not white or mes­ti­zo urban intel­lec­tu­als. They are well orga­nized and use a web of radio sta­tions to exchange infor­ma­tion across the jun­gle. After one promi­nent leader, Alber­to Pizan­go [who explic­i­ty links the strug­gles there to glob­al cli­mate change every­where], was grant­ed asy­lum in Nicaragua this week, oth­ers quick­ly emerged to artic­u­late demands.

Two Fishermen in Hospital After Boat Boarded and Sunk by Masked Men in Ireland

The sit­u­a­tion in Erris Co. Mayo has esca­lat­ed into a sor­did state of affairs, with two fish­er­men being held by force by two men in bal­a­clavas at 2am on Thurs­day the 11th of June. The fish­er­men, Pat O’Donnell and Mar­tin McDon­nell, are both locals opposed to the con­tro­ver­sial Cor­rib gas project which is cur­rent­ly being over­seen by The Roy­al Dutch Shell Com­pa­ny.

The sit­u­a­tion in Erris Co. Mayo has esca­lat­ed into a sor­did state of affairs, with two fish­er­men being held by force by two men in bal­a­clavas at 2am on Thurs­day the 11th of June. The fish­er­men, Pat O’Donnell and Mar­tin McDon­nell, are both locals opposed to the con­tro­ver­sial Cor­rib gas project which is cur­rent­ly being over­seen by The Roy­al Dutch Shell Com­pa­ny.
The two fish­er­men were return­ing to Bal­ly­glass pier, hav­ing been fish­ing out at sea, when their boat was board­ed by four masked men. When Mr. O’Donnell and Mr. McDon­nell had been ren­dered help­less, the board­ers pro­ceed­ed to move below decks and sink the ‘Iona Isle’, the trawler belong­ing to Mr. O’Donnell. Both men are now being tend­ed to in Castle­bar gen­er­al hos­pi­tal.

These attacks come short­ly after rough­ly thir­ty Shell to Sea activists appeared in Bell­mul­let dis­trict court yes­ter­day for assort­ed acts of civ­il dis­obe­di­ence relat­ing to the pro­posed pipeline project. How­ev­er a num­ber of mem­bers of An Gar­da Síochan­na were also sum­moned by the judge for pos­si­ble acts of mis­con­duct, mis­use of author­i­ty and ille­gal behav­iour relat­ing to Shell to Sea protests.

The assaults car­ried out on the fish­er­men bear an uncan­ny resem­blance to that which occurred almost a month and a half ago on local farmer and Gold­man envi­ron­men­tal prize win­ner Willie Cor­duff.

The recent devel­op­ments here in Erris are becom­ing an increas­ing cause for con­cern for local peo­ple attempt­ing to halt Shell’s work in order to defend their own liveli­hoods. Many fam­i­lies here are com­plete­ly depen­dent on the local envi­ron­ment to pro­duce a source of income. Hav­ing fish­ing grounds pol­lut­ed by dredg­ing work, or pipelines dragged through one’s fields is like­ly to evoke strong protest. Albeit most local peo­ple who oppose the project ini­tial­ly felt that there was lit­tle or no chance of the sit­u­a­tion unrav­el­ling to the extent it would be so effort­less­ly com­pa­ra­ble to the Ogo­ni saga in Nige­ria.

More activists were arrest­ed yes­ter­day evening after they had assist­ed local men in bar­ri­cad­ing nar­row choke points of road which lead to the Shell com­pound at Glen­gad, which is still devoid of the suf­fi­cient plan­ning per­mis­sion. One man had hoist­ed him­self up onto the cab of a truck in an attempt to halt the ille­gal work, much to the sur­prise of local peo­ple and Gar­da present at the scene. The dri­ver elect­ed to accel­er­ate down a steep hill with the man still on top of the vehi­cle. Two Shell to Sea activists were vio­lent­ly appre­hend­ed on the road and brought to Bell­mul­let Gar­da sta­tion where they’ve been held all night. They have been brought to court this morn­ing with­out legal rep­re­sen­ta­tion and the state is attempt­ing to put them on remand. This means they will be held in jail until the next court hear­ing in July.

Also at half four ear­li­er this morn­ing four­teen peo­ple from the Ross­port Sol­i­dar­i­ty Camp dis­rupt­ed work whilst kayak­ing in bay where Shell are cur­rent­ly dredg­ing. This result­ed in the arrest of six peo­ple and police also slashed kayaks. Over the past ten days dredgers have been board­ed on two occa­sions where activists climbed on top of dig­gers and stopped work. A num­ber of injuries have been sus­tained dur­ing water actions injuries at the hands of the IRMS secu­ri­ty, employed by Shell to trit­u­rate the cam­paign oppos­ing the theft of bil­lions of euro worth of gas.

The glob­al pres­sure has been mount­ing sig­nif­i­cant­ly on Shell in recent times, with much media focus sur­round­ing the Wiwa fam­i­ly law­suits against them in New York. Shell was being sued for human rights abus­es in the Ogo­ni region of Nige­ria dat­ing back to the ear­ly nineties, how­ev­er Shell decid­ed to set­tle out of court to the sum of $15.5 mil­lion dol­lars.

In the face of one of the world’s biggest multi­na­tion­al cor­po­ra­tions backed by the state and a team of secu­ri­ty, many of whom are known fas­cists and mer­ce­nar­ies, the com­mu­ni­ty still stand strong in defence of their envi­ron­ment and liveli­hoods. The Ross­port Sol­i­dar­i­ty Camp is pro­vid­ing active sup­port to the com­mu­ni­ty, please come and help!

Plane Stupid stage ‘Corporate Takeover’ at London City Airport

June 10th: 5 eco activists have shut down oper­a­tions at Lon­don City Air­port. The group, who are wear­ing pin­striped suits and bowler hats entered at 2.30 am today.

City airport action 1City airport action 2City airport action 3June 10th: 5 eco activists have shut down oper­a­tions at Lon­don City Air­port. The group, who are wear­ing pin­striped suits and bowler hats entered at 2.30 am today. They cut through the perime­ter fence and formed a human wheel clamp around one of the airport’s busi­ness jet fleet at the west end of the run­way. The need to avoid sparks around high­ly flam­able avi­a­tion fuel could meen that the nor­mal process of cut­ting them out of their arm­tubes could be severe­ly ham­pered.

Check out the pho­tos on our Flickr pho­to­stream.

Video

The ‘eco-takeover’ puts the spot­light on the self­ish­ness of pri­vate jet use:

“Because of their low pas­sen­ger capac­i­ty, small jets emit between five and 10 times more car­bon per pas­sen­ger than com­mer­cial flights,” said spokes­woman Nan­cy Birch. “In an age where we face poten­tial­ly cat­a­stroph­ic cli­mate change, this is no longer an accept­able form of trans­port. It’s time that pri­vate jets were ground­ed for good.”

Until the down­turn, the pri­vate jet busi­ness was the fastest grow­ing seg­ment of the avi­a­tion sec­tor. Over the last ten years it has expand­ed by almost 50%.

“This is yet anoth­er exam­ple of the insane rush towards mas­sive air­port and flight expan­sion,” Birch con­cludes. “The avi­a­tion indus­try seems to think it can pol­lute its way out of cli­mate change. But any­one with half a brain will know that this is just plane stu­pid.”

Lon­don City air­port blights the lives of some of the poor­est peo­ple in Lon­don. Newham has been known to expe­ri­ence air pol­lu­tion lev­els which reg­u­lar­ly exceed EU safe­ty lim­its for high­t­ly tox­ic chem­i­cals such as Nitrus Oxide and has the high­est lev­els of mor­tal­i­ty in under 30s in the UK from asth­ma, a mat­ter that Asth­maUK are cur­rent­ly inves­ti­gat­ing.

While it seems the group have suc­cess­ful­ly shut down the pri­vate Jet cen­tre part of the air­port, locals are report­ing that pub­lic flights start­ed run­ning from City from 7am. No one is claim­ing that the pro­test­ers have yet been arrest­ed or removed, which sug­gests that the Air­port are breach­ing health and safe­ty by con­tin­u­ing oper­a­tions in this restrict­ed area. If the five are still in posi­tion then they will have been locked on for 7 hours and a half hours now…

——

Police cut­ting teams weren’t sight­ed in the area at the time the press team were forced to leave. Acsess roads have now been shut down, and the woman with the phone in the arm­tube can’t take calls any­more, so it’s dif­fi­cult to get any news of what’s going on. More pho­tos are avail­able on the Plane Stu­pid web­site, check out the flickr stream.

——

Notes to the edi­tor

A total of 27 local and region­al air­ports around the UK are cur­rent­ly seek­ing to expand their activ­i­ties.

Lon­don City Air­port recent­ly received local author­i­ty per­mis­sion to expand its com­mer­cial flights from 80,000 to 120,000. The air­port aims to increase this total to 170,000 by 2030.

Activists tar­get­ed Lon­don City Air­port because it is one of the key dri­vers of the pri­vate jet busi­ness. The air­port cur­rent­ly sees an aver­age of 170 move­ments (take-offs and land­ings) per week. The airport’s Jet Cen­tre pre­dicts this fig­ure will increase to more than 530 a week by 2030.

Lon­don City Air­port was closed at the time of the eco-takeover. Secu­ri­ty was giv­en two hours’ warn­ing before the first flights of the day.

The airport’s Jet Cen­tre com­pris­es a mix­ture of pri­vate­ly-owned jets and a for-hire busi­ness jet oper­a­tion run by Pri­vate­Jet.

——
8:30am update & local group press release:

Locals are con­firm­ing that flights start­ed from city air­port at 7am. While the pri­vate Jet Cen­tre where the group are locked on does apear to have been sucess­ful­ly shut down, it is alarm­ing that the air­port is pre­pared to dis­re­gard health and safe­ty reg­u­la­tions and con­tin­ue to run flights in the area. There have been no reports that the group have been arrest­ed or removed so far. If they are still there then they have been locked on for 7 hours now…

For the local cam­paign group per­spec­tive see below-

PRESS RELEASE FIGHT THE FLIGHTS — LONDON CITY AIRPORT

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE 10 June 2009

FIGHT THE FLIGHTS RESPONSE TO PLANE STUPIDS ACTION AT LONDON CITY AIRPORT

Fight the Flights is not a direct action group, but we ful­ly appre­ci­ate the frus­tra­tion that the cli­mate change activists feel in get­ting their voic­es, and con­cerns heard on avi­a­tion expan­sion, and how avi­a­tion is one of the fastest grow­ing sources of CO2 emis­sions.

It is no won­der that some cam­paign­ers feel they are being pushed into tak­ing non vio­lent direct action because the sys­tem is fail­ing peo­ple of their demo­c­ra­t­ic rights to pro­tect their com­mu­ni­ties, futures and their envi­ron­ment from harm­ful ‘run­away’ air­port and flight expan­sion.

Just under a 100,000 res­i­dents in east and south east Lon­don will be affect­ed by the increas­ing exces­sive noise lev­els from Lon­don City Air­port upon expan­sion, and yet less than 10,000 were claimed to have been con­sult­ed by the Lon­don Bor­ough of Newham. Most will not be enti­tled to any noise insu­la­tion. They will have to live with the con­se­quences every day of their lives, each time a flight takes off and lands. The major­i­ty do not have the option to move, and many lived in the area long before the air­ports cre­ation.

Ben­e­fits?

In just over 20 years the air­port has only man­aged to direct­ly employ 120 Newham res­i­dents out of the 406 direct­ly employed staff the air­port claim to employ.

Lon­don tax­pay­ers have also paid £24million for the air­ports secu­ri­ty pro­vid­ed by the Met­ro­pol­i­tan Police over the past 5 years, which the air­port refuse to pay.

In addi­tion the air qual­i­ty above Lon­don City Air­port exceeds EU direc­tive lev­els by 50% and was termed as ‘tox­ic’ but this was not acknowl­edged by the Lon­don Bor­ough of Newham. In a bor­ough which has the high­est lev­el of mor­tal­i­ty in under 30s with asth­ma in the whole coun­try, Newham should be focussing on improv­ing air qual­i­ty, not adding to the pol­lu­tion by approv­ing fur­ther expan­sion at this res­i­den­tial­ly sit­u­at­ed air­port in the most dense­ly pop­u­lat­ed area of Eng­land.

Erod­ed Democ­ra­cy

Res­i­dents have been con­stant­ly thwart­ed and ignored by this gov­ern­ment and the Lon­don Bor­ough of Newham when pro­vid­ing evi­dence against the expan­sion. Requests for a pub­lic inquiry into the planned 50% expan­sion of flights at Lon­don City Air­port was refused by Hazel Blears, Sec­re­tary of State in 2008, whilst the Lon­don Bor­ough of Newham showed no con­cern that 100s of homes in Green­wich will now be in the crash zone and failed to address the risk to res­i­dents and com­mu­ni­ties who live, work or trav­el through the crash zone in both Newham and Green­wich. How­ev­er in con­trast the gov­ern­ment and coun­cil appear to con­sis­tent­ly lis­ten to the avi­a­tion at the expense of the com­mu­ni­ties: this is expan­sion at any cost.

With a gov­ern­ment that does not lis­ten to local con­cerns on the effects of expan­sion on third par­ty safe­ty, increas­ing pol­lu­tion lev­els, the effect on res­i­dents health and children’s devel­op­ment, and the con­tri­bu­tion to cli­mate change, it is no won­der that we are see­ing actions such as this more fre­quent­ly.

New Social Centre/Ecovillage To Be Occupied In Suffolk/Essex Area

Want to get involved?

This week­end we will be occu­py­ing a prop­er­ty in the Suffolk/Essex area in order to start an ecov­il­lage. It’s got many acres of land attached, and var­i­ous groups will hope­ful­ly be com­ing to give work­shops on cli­mate change, shar­ing var­i­ous skills and activism.

Want to get involved?

This week­end we will be occu­py­ing a prop­er­ty in the Suffolk/Essex area in order to start an ecov­il­lage. It’s got many acres of land attached, and var­i­ous groups will hope­ful­ly be com­ing to give work­shops on cli­mate change, shar­ing var­i­ous skills and activism.

If you want to get involved in the occu­pa­tion, would like to come and live there, get in any of the activ­i­ties, or have some­thing you would like to teach, please email cocklehorsecrab@googlemail.com

London eco-village occupation — wish-list, directions, & film

Around 70 pro­test­ers have occu­pied an emp­ty plot of land next to Kew Bridge in Brent­ford, Lon­don (TW8 0EW). They’ve set up an eco-vil­lage.

London Eco-VillageAround 70 pro­test­ers have occu­pied an emp­ty plot of land next to Kew Bridge in Brent­ford, Lon­don (TW8 0EW). They’ve set up an eco-vil­lage.

This will show­case com­mu­ni­ty based sus­tain­able meth­ods of liv­ing such as veg­etable grow­ing, com­post toi­lets. They in the process of set­ting up tents and are clean­ing the site of rub­bish.

Lon­don eco-camp: Day One — video/quicktime 13M

We could do with the more of the fol­low­ing if you are think­ing of vis­it­ing:

>Big water con­tain­ers (>10ltrs)
>Oil for bolts
>Screws, bolts, coach bolts.
>Sta­tion­ary: paper, pens, sticky tape, etc.,
>Ban­ner mak­ing material/paints.
>Tarps
>String and Rope
>Spades shov­els and forks
>Lots of hose for mov­ing water.

We have a real­ly awe­some and secure site, it looks like we are stay­ing we have one large issue. Most of the site is heav­i­ly over­looked so we need to keep things tidy, make things visu­al­ly inter­est­ing and have banners/posters so peo­ple know what we are up to. The local have been very sup­port­ive so far due to the pro­posed use of the site we are occu­py­ing. Lets keep it that way…any help much appre­ci­at­ed.

If you would like to join our autonomous space in west lon­don then how do you get there?

1. Cycle; from cen­tral lon­don there is one road with no change. The A315, it changes names to many things but starts south of Hyde Park (as Knights­bridge and Kens­ing­ton Road) and con­tin­ues through Chisick (Chiswick High Street) right untill the round about where the camp is set­up. From kew bridge the camp can be clear­ly seen.

2. Take a train: from south east lon­don this is the best option. Train are reg­u­lar out of water­loo and take about 25 min­utes to get to Kew Bridge sta­tion. You can take your bike on these trains.

3. Get dad­dy to give you a lift in his heli­copter: you may get thrown out.

We are at Kew Bridge
Map: http://tinyurl.com/n7ny33

The Pirates of Broadhaven Defeat Shell’s Armada (& contractor’s addresses)

For the sec­ond time in three days a Shell dredger has been board­ed and occu­pied by a Shell to Sea pro­test­er. As a result all the ships work­ing in the bay have ceased work and returned to har­bour. Reports con­firm that work has been aban­doned due to the action of the pro­test­ers!

Dredger occupation the second!For the sec­ond time in three days a Shell dredger has been board­ed and occu­pied by a Shell to Sea pro­test­er. As a result all the ships work­ing in the bay have ceased work and returned to har­bour. Reports con­firm that work has been aban­doned due to the action of the pro­test­ers!

A group of 11 kayak­ers set out at 5:30am on Fri­day, meet­ing instant resis­tance on the water from Shell secu­ri­ty boats and safe­ty boats. After avoid­ing the Shell pri­vate secu­ri­ty boats that were attempt­ing to cap­size the kayaks, one pro­test­er man­aged to board the dredger ‘Rezende Bol’ owned by Van Oord, who is sub­con­tract­ed by Shell to do the dredg­ing. This ves­sel along with anoth­er and mul­ti­ple sup­port and secu­ri­ty boats were dig­ging a trench in the seabed in prepa­ra­tion for the gas pipe-lay­ing ship Soli­taire. Work in the bay has been con­tin­u­ous 24 hours a day since Mon­day evening only stop­ping due to the pre­vi­ous dredger occu­pa­tion by Shell to Sea pro­test­ers which last­ed 10 hours. Dur­ing the attempts to board the dredger sev­er­al pro­test­ers were able to climb onto the side of the ves­sel. Exces­sive force was used to pre­vent them from board­ing; one pro­test­er had his thumb bent back­wards by a secu­ri­ty guard and lat­er was tak­en to the hos­pi­tal where tests revealed dam­aged lig­a­ments. Anoth­er pro­test­er who got on board the ship was vio­lent­ly pushed from the deck by two secu­ri­ty guards injur­ing his back, and fell over six feet from the deck into the water. Shell secu­ri­ty were kick­ing and stamp­ing fin­gers of pro­test­ers on the near side of the ves­sel, all the while one pro­test­er man­aged to board the ship on the oth­er side and climb up onto the same crane his friends had pre­vi­ous­ly occu­pied just three days ear­li­er.

The kayak sup­port team pre­pared for sim­i­lar shifts as Tues­day, antic­i­pat­ing a long-term occu­pa­tion. Four kayak­ers remained on the water to keep an eye on the pro­test­er while the rest went in to regain ener­gy. The reac­tion of the secu­ri­ty and safe­ty boats was very hos­tile, attempt­ing to cap­size kayaks and sep­a­rate peo­ple from each oth­er. The dri­ver of the Gall­tee (Shell’s pri­vate secu­ri­ty boat) repeat­ed his threat to sink kayaks, dri­ving extreme­ly aggres­sive­ly with no regard for the safe­ty of the kayak­ers.

After the dredgers were towed away, the Gar­da arrived and board­ed the ship in addi­tion to the Shell secu­ri­ty already on the ship. They threat­ened the pro­test­er on the crane arm with forced phys­i­cal removal. Fear­ing for his own safe­ty the pro­test­er jumped from the dredger arm onto the deck and dived into the water. The two sup­port­ing kayak­ers who were still in the water were arrest­ed despite their efforts to com­ply with the Gardai’s instruc­tions. In the water the crane pro­test­er man­aged to avoid cap­ture by the Gar­dai and Shell secu­ri­ty and get to the shore where he scaled a cliff to evade cap­ture. His where­abouts are now unknown but he is safe and well!

Shell claimed that they stopped work­ing in the bay due to a ‘swell’ but sources at Bal­ly­glass pier con­firmed that Van Oord, the sub­con­trac­tor run­ning the dredgers were unwill­ing to work with ongo­ing protest activ­i­ty and the exces­sive use of force by the IRMS (Inte­grat­ed Risk Man­age­ment Ser­vices) .

Today’s actions are proof that resis­tance rocks!

Come to Mayo!

—-

Van Oord are involved as a main con­trac­tor on the Lim­er­ick Tun­nel project, which they’re hap­py to tell you about on their web­site, but there’s no men­tion at all of their involve­ment with the Cor­rib Gas Project. Maybe their green­wash is impor­tant to them some­how, and maybe they don’t fan­cy neg­a­tive pub­lic­i­ty. Why don’t we give them some then, eh?

Van Oord’s web­site home­page:
http://www.vanoord.com/gb-en/index.php

Head office postal address for gen­er­al mail:
Van Oord Dredg­ing and Marine Con­trac­tors BV
PO Box 8574
3009 AN Rot­ter­dam
The Nether­lands

Vis­it­ing address:
Van Oord Dredg­ing and Marine Con­trac­tors BV
Water­man­weg 64
3067 GG Rot­ter­dam
The Nether­lands
T 31 10 447844
F 31 10 4478100
E info@vanoord.com

This is a con­tact for their ‘news­room’, i.e. Media and PR:
A.G.M. (Bert) Groothuizen
Man­ag­er Mar­ket­ing & Pub­lic Rela­tions
T 31 10 4478234
F 31 10 4478100
E info@vanoord.com

On their ‘agen­da’ page there is men­tion of this fol­low­ing event. Maybe they are keynote speak­ers at this con­fer­ence, or that they will have a large trade exhi­bi­tion pres­ence there. Details from the con­fer­ence web­site are sketchy, so more research is need­ed. There are oth­er events for lat­er in the year at which they’ll either attend or par­tic­i­pate in, but I think the event at the end of this month may be a place where Van Oord can be shamed pub­licly about its involve­ment in Shel­l’s destruc­tion of Broad­haven Bay.

The Flood and Coastal Risk Man­age­ment Con­fer­ence 2009 — 30 June 2009 — 02 July 2009
The Inter­na­tion­al Cen­tre, Telford, UK
(Telford is in Shrop­shire, west-cen­tral Eng­land, I think. Near­ish to Birm­ing­ham any­way. The risks in coastal man­age­ment must be enor­mous these days, if this con­fer­ence has to be held in a place as far from the sea as you can get on the island of Britain!)
http://www.environment-agency.gov.uk/research/102626.aspx

Allseas are the com­pa­ny that own the Soli­taire. The Soli­taire is expect­ed to arrive with­in the next month. It would be good if peo­ple could also put pres­sure on them before they get here:

http://www.allseas.com/uk

Allseas UK Lim­it­ed
Address: Knyvett House The Cause­way
City: Staines, Mid­dle­sex
Post­code: TW18 3BA
Tele­phone: +44 1784 898038
Fax: +44 1784 898030

Shell security breached and work stopped in successful action at sea

On Tues­day, after the after­noon con­fronta­tion in Broad­haven Bay which result­ed in one man’s arrest and a cou­ple hours of halt­ed work for the dredgers, the Shell to Sea fleet of kayaks head­ed out on the water a sec­ond time around 6pm and two pro­test­ers man­aged to board one of the dredgers, climb­ing on to the neck of the c

Shell crane occupation in Broadhaven BayOn Tues­day, after the after­noon con­fronta­tion in Broad­haven Bay which result­ed in one man’s arrest and a cou­ple hours of halt­ed work for the dredgers, the Shell to Sea fleet of kayaks head­ed out on the water a sec­ond time around 6pm and two pro­test­ers man­aged to board one of the dredgers, climb­ing on to the neck of the crane, occu­py­ing it and halt­ing work for 10 hours.

Shell has been con­tin­u­ous­ly dredg­ing in the area since Mon­day evening, inter­fer­ing with pro­tect­ed fish­ing areas for local fish­er­men, defil­ing what was once a pris­tine marine habi­tat full of dol­phins, whales and oth­er marine life, and dis­turb­ing sleep for local res­i­dents. They have buoyed off an ‘exclu­sion zone’ in the pub­lic waters, with boats patrolling the area to make sure no one cross­es into it. There is a diverse assort­ment of ves­sels occu­py­ing the once pris­tine bay; the major­i­ty of these are either car­ry­ing out or assist­ing in the cur­rent dredg­ing and sur­veil­lance oper­a­tions. An Gar­da Siochana (police boat) have also been patrolling the work zone along with two black RIBs; The Lau­ra Emi­ly accom­pa­nied by its twin the Gall­tee, both brim­ming with men dressed in black mil­i­tary fatigues and video cam­eras for film­ing pro­test­ers. Oth­er small­er motor­boats accom­pa­nied the Shell crew, includ­ing ‘safe­ty boats’ and a large white motor launch. There were tug­boats for mov­ing the dredgers, barges for hold­ing the sand being removed from the seabed and, of course, the mas­sive dredgers them­selves.

A group of twelve Shell to Sea pro­test­ers in eight inflat­able kayaks, two hard kayaks, and two rub­ber dingys set out on the water at 6pm for the sec­ond time in one day on Tues­day 2nd June. Three of the kayaks man­aged to evade the secu­ri­ty boats and get close enough to board one of the dredgers. One pro­test­er began to climb the lad­der from her boat while anoth­er kayak­er blocked a secu­ri­ty boat from grab­bing her. The oth­er pro­test­er used the tires on the side of the dredger to board the deck. Once on the boat, both pro­test­ers were climb­ing onto the crane with­in sec­onds. They slid down into the neck of the crane mak­ing it impos­si­ble for the crew to remove them.

Loud cheers were heard from ashore where peo­ple were gath­ered at the Ross­port Sol­i­dar­i­ty Camp, and the mood on the water was extreme­ly pos­i­tive. ‘Shell to hell’ chants were abound­ing, and there were even some play­ful exchanges between Shell to Sea kayak­ers and a cou­ple of motor­boats. There were vary­ing atti­tudes on dif­fer­ent boats, but not all of the gar­dai or safe­ty boats were unfriend­ly. Both inflat­able kayaks which had been left in the water where the two pro­test­ers had board­ed the dredger were quick­ly recov­ered. One was towed out of the ‘exclu­sion zone’ by a Shell to Sea pro­test­er, and one was brought on board the gar­dai boat and placed back in the water out­side of the exclu­sion zone. The rest of the Shell to Sea kayak­ers remained on the water to ensure the pro­test­ers were not going to be dan­ger­ous­ly removed, then began tak­ing shifts to stay close to them and pro­vide sup­port.

In a sur­pris­ing­ly hon­est con­ver­sa­tion between the kayak pro­test­ers and a work­er on one of the boats, the work­er stat­ed that he ‘admired the per­sis­tence’ of the local com­mu­ni­ty and sup­port­ers who are resist­ing the pipeline. He also said he thought the pipeline plan was ‘rel­a­tive­ly safe’ and assert­ed that some­times risks have to be tak­en. Unfor­tu­nate­ly with a kill zone of up to 200 meters and the uncer­tain­ty of nev­er hav­ing built such a high pres­sure pipeline through a res­i­den­tial area, the risk is high. This is why resis­tance to the pipeline is so strong; as one of the two pro­test­ers who occu­pied the dredger lat­er stat­ed, “Today we took this action in sol­i­dar­i­ty with the local com­mu­ni­ty and to try to pro­tect this beau­ti­ful area from being rav­aged by Shell.”

The rotat­ing shifts of sup­port con­tin­ued on through the night, with small groups of kayak­ers keep­ing an eye on their friends long after the gar­dai had left around 12am. Once it was dark and the gar­dai had left, the mood at sea changed. The Shell secu­ri­ty and the safe­ty boat for the dredger were the only ones left. The Shell secu­ri­ty RIBs became increas­ing­ly aggres­sive towards the kayak­ers. They made mul­ti­ple attempts to cap­size them, and used intim­i­da­tion tech­niques such as turn­ing their lights off until they were up close then sud­den­ly shin­ing flood­lights, dis­ori­ent­ing and fright­en­ing them. One of the kayak crew report­ed feel­ing seri­ous­ly con­cerned that the sit­u­a­tion would esca­late. A secu­ri­ty guard even stat­ed his inten­tion was to sink the boats, a plau­si­ble threat giv­en the recent vicious attack by IRMS on Willie Cor­duff. It was report­ed that the ‘safe­ty boat’ also seemed con­cerned for the safe­ty of the kayak­ers, and may have been their only pro­tec­tion in the sit­u­a­tion.

By 4am, the two pro­test­ers on the dredger were feel­ing very cold and tired, and felt as if they had achieved a sig­nif­i­cant vic­to­ry. They vol­un­tar­i­ly climbed down from the crane, and were ille­gal­ly detained by IRMS secu­ri­ty and brought to Bal­ly­glass pier where they were arrest­ed and charged with loi­ter­ing in a pub­lic place.

Despite the severe dif­fi­cul­ties encoun­tered through­out the night the mood across the camp from the kayak­ing teams and all the sup­port crews was jubi­lant. Hav­ing breached Shell’s secu­ri­ty and made such a sig­nif­i­cant stop to dredg­ing work peo­ple at the sol­i­dar­i­ty camp remain in a defi­ant mood: watch this space for more resis­tance to the dev­as­ta­tion at sea and on the land.