Panama: Campesinos arrested over gold mine

June 5, 2009

Late last month, a group of demon­stra­tors were vio­lent­ly arrest­ed by police at a road­block in the north­ern Pana­man­ian province of Cocle.

June 5, 2009

Late last month, a group of demon­stra­tors were vio­lent­ly arrest­ed by police at a road­block in the north­ern Pana­man­ian province of Cocle.

The road­block was first set up on May 9, 2009 to resist the Petaquil­la Gold mine project, which is owned by the Pana­ma com­pa­ny Min­era Petaquil­la, and devel­oped by two oth­ers: the Van­cou­ver-based junior com­pa­ny, Petaquil­la Min­er­als and the Toron­to-based com­pa­ny, Inmet Min­ing.

As a many as 24 local com­mu­ni­ties are opposed to the project because of the “aber­rant pre­da­tion and destruc­tion of the Mesoamer­i­can Bio­log­i­cal Cor­ri­dor, where hun­dreds of hectares of vir­gin jun­gle and for­est have been cut down, and where the moun­tain pass­es and rivers that made the area one of the most impor­tant in the world due to its rich bio­di­ver­si­ty have been destroyed and pol­lut­ed,” notes a May 14 report by La Estrel­la.

The com­mu­ni­ties also say “they have nev­er been con­sult­ed, but rather deceived, and their lands have been tak­en from them unfair­ly in many ways, includ­ing the destruc­tion and burn­ing of ranch­es of indige­nous peo­ples, with­out even indem­ni­fy­ing the local res­i­dents and with­out any author­i­ty of the PRD gov­ern­ment ful­fill­ing its con­sti­tu­tion­al oblig­a­tion to defend the com­mu­ni­ties.”

Also report­ing on the arrests, La Estrel­la says 12 demon­stra­tors were arrest­ed in total (oth­er reports say it was 30 demon­stra­tors), “among them the Chiriqui envi­ron­men­tal­ist Car­menci­ta Ted­man. A peas­ant who did not want to be iden­ti­fied, said that he was real­ly afraid, because police­men were hit­ting the pro­tes­tors mer­ci­less­ly, even women and chil­dren. He added that when all this was hap­pen­ing Petaquil­la Gold heli­copters were sur­vey­ing the scene.”

The police used rods, and shot pel­lets and tear gas to sub­due the demon­stra­tors.

For back­ground on the Petaquil­la Gold mine and local efforts to stop it, vis­it miningwatch.ca

Perenco and armed forces break indigenous blockade (Peru)

6 May 2009
A gun­boat belong­ing to Peru’s armed forces has bro­ken through an Indi­an riv­er block­ade in the north­ern Peru­vian Ama­zon.

anti-Perenco crossed spears6 May 2009
A gun­boat belong­ing to Peru’s armed forces has bro­ken through an Indi­an riv­er block­ade in the north­ern Peru­vian Ama­zon.

The gun­boat, togeth­er with at least one boat belong­ing to Anglo-French oil com­pa­ny Peren­co, broke the block­ade at 5:15 am on 4 May. The block­ade, organ­ised by local indige­nous peo­ple, is on the Napo riv­er, one of the main trib­u­taries of the Ama­zon.

Peru’s indige­nous organ­i­sa­tion, AIDESEP, con­demned the use of a boat belong­ing to the armed forces, describ­ing it as a ‘use and abuse of their pow­er’. The block­ade forms part of Ama­zon-wide protests by Peru’s indige­nous peo­ple against gov­ern­ment poli­cies and the inva­sion of their ter­ri­to­ries by multi­na­tion­al com­pa­nies. The protests have been going on for almost a month.

Peren­co holds the licence to work in a remote part of Peru known as Lot 67, acces­si­ble via the Napo Riv­er. It is an area inhab­it­ed by at least two of the world’s last uncon­tact­ed tribes – the com­pa­ny is under increas­ing pres­sure to with­draw from the project.

Less than a fort­night ago Perenco’s chair­man, Fran­cois Per­ro­do, met Peru’s pres­i­dent, Alan Gar­cia, in the pres­i­den­tial palace in Lima, pledg­ing to invest US$2 bil­lion in Lot 67. Just days lat­er the gov­ern­ment passed a law declar­ing Perenco’s work a ‘nation­al neces­si­ty’.

SmashEDO protest in Brighton — links to timelines

May Day, 4th May 2009: Hun­dreds of peo­ple from all over the coun­try met in Brighton today to protest against the war, cap­i­tal­ism, and the arms trade.

Smash EDO Mayday 1Smash EDO Mayday 2Smash EDO Mayday 3May Day, 4th May 2009: Hun­dreds of peo­ple from all over the coun­try met in Brighton today to protest against the war, cap­i­tal­ism, and the arms trade. Organ­ised by the Smash EDO move­ment, which for years has been cam­paign­ing against the EDO/ITT weapons fac­to­ry based in Brighton, the protest start­ed off very peace­ful­ly and remained gen­er­al­ly pos­i­tive through­out the day.

After meet­ing by the Palace Pier, the protest moved through the cen­tre of Brighton cheer­ing and chant­i­ng. Four young anar­chists climbed to the top of the Bar­clays build­ing, where they hung a ban­ner read­ing “Arms Deal­ers Out Of Brighton’. Bar­clays is noto­ri­ous for being one of the banks most com­plic­it in the inter­na­tion­al arms trade. The peo­ple respon­si­ble for the ban­ner were wel­comed into the crowd as heroes, and avoid­ed arrest.

After pass­ing peace­ful­ly past the Clock tow­er, down Queens Road and through North Laine, the protest clashed with police on Lon­don Road. A heavy police pres­ence blocked part of the road out­side McDon­alds, and minor scuf­fles quick­ly esca­lat­ed as mount­ed and riot police forced through crowds to pro­tect the build­ing. A smoke-bomb lit by pro­test­ers, com­bined with a push for­ward from mount­ed police, fright­ened shop­pers and near­ly split the protest in two.

From then on, the protest became a game of cat-and-mouse — although it was some­times hard to tell who was the cat and who the mouse. Pro­test­ers man­aged to force back mount­ed police sev­er­al times, while police hasti­ly re-grouped around the protest as it moved into res­i­den­tial dis­tricts and through Pre­ston Park. How­ev­er, nei­ther pro­test­ers nor police seemed to have a plan as such, and after much walk­ing and a few minor scuf­fles — includ­ing the arrest of one man by riot police — the protest moved back into the town cen­tre.

On the seafront, for the first time in the day the police attempt­ed to ‘ket­tle’ pro­test­ers by sur­round­ing them on all sides. How­ev­er, pro­test­ers quick­ly skirt­ed down onto the beach and back onto the road behind police lines. The protest moved on peace­ful­ly and, after more skirt­ing through nar­row lanes and mov­ing around police lines, set­tled on the grass out­side St. Peter’s Church to dance and relax.

http://www.smashedo.org.uk/

Time­lines:

Indy­media
The Brighton & Hove Argus

Last Hours twit­ter

Camp Bling announces ‘the end’ as road scheme stopped.

Press release:

Camp Bling ‘Save Pri­o­ry Park!’ road cam­paign

Thurs­day 30th April 2009
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

—————————————————————————————

Camp Bling announces ‘the end’ as road scheme stopped.

Press release:

Camp Bling ‘Save Pri­o­ry Park!’ road cam­paign

Thurs­day 30th April 2009
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

—————————————————————————————

Camp Bling announces ‘the end’ as road scheme stopped.

Long run­ning road protest and counter-cul­tur­al cam­paign site Camp Bling, based in the mid­dle of Southend-on-Sea, Essex, is set to be decom­mis­sioned by the sum­mer, after the long await­ed announce­ment that the con­tro­ver­sial Pri­o­ry Cres­cent road widen­ing has now offi­cial­ly been can­celled. (1)

Mem­bers of the camp met with Coun­cil lead­ers last night with a view to resolv­ing the sit­u­a­tion, after the pub­li­ca­tion of an open let­ter from Trans­port Coun­cil­lor Anna Waite, stat­ing that £5m in cen­tral gov­ern­ment fund­ing would be spent sole­ly on the Cuck­oo Cor­ner round­about, with pos­si­ble junc­tion improve­ments — but no widen­ing — to fol­low at the Prit­tle Brook indus­tri­al site at a lat­er date. (2)

As a result, cam­paign­ers intend to hon­our their pub­lic pledge to clear and vacate the camp, now that their objec­tive to stop the road has been met com­plete­ly. It is expect­ed that it will take a num­ber of weeks to ful­ly return the East Sax­on king’s bur­ial to its for­mer con­di­tion, with all struc­tures and mate­ri­als on the site to be removed by the group, with the objec­tive of incur­ring no cost to the local tax­pay­er.

Speak­ing from the camp Gin­ger said, ‘We would like to thank each and every one of the peo­ple who have been involved, not just with Camp Bling, but also with the ongo­ing cam­paign which ran from 2001 in oppo­si­tion to the scheme. It’s not every day that you get to be part of an effort to stop a £25m road widen­ing, with the added oppor­tu­ni­ty to warn peo­ple of the cul­mi­na­tion of envi­ron­men­tal and social crises that we now all face.’

‘For many of us this has been our first taste of an alter­na­tive, low­er impact, and more com­pas­sion­ate lifestyle. We have shared our expe­ri­ences — both good and bad — along the way, and often got peo­ple to acknowl­edge the real choic­es that we all have. It is time for every­one to con­front real­i­ty, as west­ern indus­tri­al soci­ety con­tin­ues to over­shoot the eco­log­i­cal lim­its of the Earth.’ (3)

Peo­ple are still wel­come to vis­it the camp whilst decom­mis­sion­ing is under­way, and are also encour­aged to check out some of the alter­na­tives at: www.campbling.org

—————————————————————————————

ENDS.

NOTES TO EDITORS:

(1) Camp Bling was first set up by local activists on 23rd Sep­tem­ber 2005. For more info about both the camp, and the long run­ning cam­paign, go to: www.campbling.org

(2) See full con­tents of let­ter at: http://www.southend.gov.uk/news/default.asp?id=2835

(3) Cli­mate, Peak Oil, Over­pop­u­la­tion, Mass Extinc­tion, Over­con­sump­tion, etc.

Camp Bling ‘Save Pri­o­ry Park!’ road cam­paign
www.campbling.org

Con­tact Camp Bling direct­ly on 07866 967601

Or e‑mail camp.bling@yahoo.co.uk

McDonalds Protester Found “Not Guilty”!

An activist from Ani­mal Rights Cam­bridge arrest­ed under Sec­tion 5 of the Pub­lic Order Act for a protest inside the McDon­alds restau­rant in Cam­bridge in June 2008 was found ‘not guilty’ on 30th April 09.

See http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/regions/cambridge/2008/06/401637.html for more on the case and to see a video of the protest in ques­tion.

An activist from Ani­mal Rights Cam­bridge arrest­ed under Sec­tion 5 of the Pub­lic Order Act for a protest inside the McDon­alds restau­rant in Cam­bridge in June 2008 was found ‘not guilty’ on 30th April 09.

See http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/regions/cambridge/2008/06/401637.html for more on the case and to see a video of the protest in ques­tion.

The protest was in com­mem­o­ra­tion of the now famous Mcli­bel cas­es anniver­sary, that was a huge PR dis­as­ter for McDon­alds. The pro­test­ers entered the restau­rant and informed cus­tomers about issues regard­ing McDon­alds cor­po­rate prac­tices on a range of issues. One of the cam­paign­ers was then arrest­ed under Sec­tion 5 of the Pub­lic Order Act.

This is a small vic­to­ry for the ani­mal rights move­ment that has been under increas­ing state repres­sion. “Lets take this as a col­lec­tive lift to our self-esteem” said the cleared activist “I’m Mclov­ing it!”.

The case has dragged on but it final­ly came to an end with the mag­is­trate find­ing the defen­dant not guilty “Ani­mal rights activism may have been covert­ly out­lawed in the UK” said the activist “but it seems not every­one has read the memo yet!”.

The cam­paign­ers Bar­ris­ter put for­ward an excel­lent case with the help of the bril­liant defence wit­ness­es. As the Not Guilty ver­dict was read out the sup­port­ers in the pub­lic gallery began to applaud!

Rossport Solidarity Camp Summer Gathering May 29th-June 1st

The RSC June bank hol­i­day gath­er­ing is back! From the 29th may till the 1st June we will be hold­ing a gath­er­ing com­bin­ing info shar­ing, direct action train­ing, music and fun…

Last year resis­tance in Mayo was incred­i­ble; the Soli­taire pipe lay­ing ship was forced to leave Irish waters with no pipeline laid! This year resis­tance con­tin­ues, and the ship will be forced to leave once again. Come to the gath­er­ing to find out more about the cam­paign, share skills and make plans for anoth­er sum­mer of action.…

Glengad bannerThe RSC June bank hol­i­day gath­er­ing is back! From the 29th may till the 1st June we will be hold­ing a gath­er­ing com­bin­ing info shar­ing, direct action train­ing, music and fun…

Last year resis­tance in Mayo was incred­i­ble; the Soli­taire pipe lay­ing ship was forced to leave Irish waters with no pipeline laid! This year resis­tance con­tin­ues, and the ship will be forced to leave once again. Come to the gath­er­ing to find out more about the cam­paign, share skills and make plans for anoth­er sum­mer of action.…

Work­shops con­firmed include: his­to­ry of the cam­paign, tour of the local area, draw­ing links with the Saro Wiwa vs. Shell tri­al in New York, direct action train­ing for land and water based action, know­ing your legal rights, facil­i­ta­tion train­ing, health, safe­ty and envi­ron­men­tal impacts of the Cor­rib project, Cor­rib and cli­mate change: Shell to Sea or Shell to hell? and per­ma­cul­ture. If you are inter­est­ed in giv­ing a work­shop, want to play music, are inter­est­ed in run­ning a creche, want to help with the kitchen crew or think you can help in some oth­er way, please get in touch to dis­cuss your ideas.

The gath­er­ing will be a camp based on the coast in Glen­gad. You will need to bring camp­ing equip­ment for sleep­ing (althought there is the RSC house avail­able for any­one who is unable to camp). Meals will be pro­vid­ed.

For more infor­ma­tion con­tact the RSC on rossportsolidaritycamp@gmail.com or 0851141170.

Shell return to Glengad in force

Pro­tes­tors beat­en by Gar­dai

22nd April 2009 UPDATE UPDATE
Today’s fenc­ing (and gates?) in Glen­gad is right now being removed by the com­mu­ni­ty.

Shell returned in force today to Glen­gad, arriv­ing about 6.45, by about 7 pro­test­ers from the com­mu­ni­ty and camp had start­ed to gath­er.

Pro­tes­tors beat­en by Gar­dai

22nd April 2009 UPDATE UPDATE
Shell's fencingToday’s fenc­ing (and gates?) in Glen­gad is right now being removed by the com­mu­ni­ty.

Shell returned in force today to Glen­gad, arriv­ing about 6.45, by about 7 pro­test­ers from the com­mu­ni­ty and camp had start­ed to gath­er.

On and under the fencing lorryWillie Cor­duff, Gold­man Envi­ron­men­tal Award Win­ner and 2 oth­ers climbed under a truck car­ry­ing pal­isade fenc­ing on the SAC. A camper climbed onto a tele­scop­ic loader, lat­er chang­ing to a 20t excavator/digger used for lift­ing the fenc­ing pan­els.
9 hour digger sit
Mau­ra Har­ring­ton par­tial­ly blocked the front entrance of the com­pound with her car, and through­out the day many folk jumped the fence and tried to stop the destruc­tion of this pris­tine habi­tat.

Shell had dozens of secu­ri­ty and dozens of work­ers, but were severe­ly ham­pered in their activ­i­ties by stiff local resis­tance. The occu­pa­tion of truck and dig­ger meant that they had only lim­it­ed resources for their work, but in the late after­noon they had anoth­er dig­ger and anoth­er truck load of fenc­ing dropped to site.

The Gar­dai tried to talk the dig­ger jumper and Wille & co out but to no avail, they sim­ply kept stat­ing that they want­ed to see Shell’s per­mis­sions to be car­ry­ing out the work. When this failed they took a more direct approach with the men under the lor­ry. They man­aged to pull Willie’s boots off and stared twist­ing his toes, they threw stones at them and beat Willie on the ankle with a rock, while anoth­er lor­ry pro­tes­tor had his had repeat­ed­ly banged off the ground by a thug mas­querad­ing as a Inspec­tor. Willie was also scratched and stuck in the pri­vates by Gar­dai.
Gardai getting under lorry
As the hours ticked by the Gar­dai had Maura’s car towed by plant hire own­er Carey. After 9hrs on the dig­ger the camper was grabbed by secu­ri­ty and forcibly pulled off, severe­ly bruis­ing his legs and arm. The oth­er 2 peo­ple under the lor­ry spent approx 8hrs under it.

The weath­er turned nasty with gale force winds and dri­ving rain, which made life dif­fi­cult for pro­test­ers and work­ers alike.

This evening Willie remains under the lor­ry and the Gar­dai have left. Anoth­er man man­aged to get under the lor­ry with Willie this evening. There is a large secu­ri­ty force still in Glen­gad, with a crowd form­ing of solemn pro­test­ers stand­ing near Willie in the dark but the sit­u­a­tion still seems poten­tial­ly volatile. Rumour is that sev­er­al fire brigade units are on their way to lift the lor­ry and remove him.

The local radio sta­tion, Mid­west Radio, have been open­ly call­ing in their news for Shell to pro­duce doc­u­men­ta­tion to the effect that they have the nec­es­sary per­mis­sions to work in Glen­gad which they don’t seem to have.

Around noon or so the por­taloos that Shell had dropped on the SAC blew over and all their chem­i­cals poured out onto the SAC, no attempt was made to clean up the chem­i­cal spill and the por­taloos were only stood up again about 7pm.

Today Shell even­tu­al­ly man­aged to put up large front gates and cre­ate the top com­pound sec­tion with a 2nd set of gates lead­ing down into the SAC.

Despite telling 1 or 2 peo­ple they were arrest­ed no arrests were made.

Peo­ple are frus­trat­ed & angry but deter­mined, they need all the help they can get, so now is the time to get to Erris if you can, for what­ev­er sup­port you can give.

Barrick and Argentine Officials Violently Assault Women at Roadblock

On April 14, a group of Argen­tine gov­ern­ment offi­cials and employ­ees of Bar­rick Gold Cor­po­ra­tion, car­ried out a vio­lent assault against Women at the Famati­na min­ing camp in the province of La Rio­ja, where a road block­ade has stood for the past two years.

Famatina roadblock

On April 14, a group of Argen­tine gov­ern­ment offi­cials and employ­ees of Bar­rick Gold Cor­po­ra­tion, car­ried out a vio­lent assault against Women at the Famati­na min­ing camp in the province of La Rio­ja, where a road block­ade has stood for the past two years.

When the offi­cials arrived, a group of Women from the “Self-Orga­nized (Auto­con­vo­ca­dos) Neigh­bors of Famati­na for Life,” gath­ered at site and low­ered a met­al bar they installed to deny the company’s pas­sage to the mine site.

The offi­cials and Bar­rick employ­ees then began to ram their trucks against the bar­ri­er, but “with­out any suc­cess,” explains an April 14 media alert.

The offi­cials then exit­ed their vehi­cles and car­ried out a vio­lent assault against a hand­ful of women, who had peace­ful­ly sat down in front the vehi­cles – first shov­ing them, and then kick­ing and strik­ing the women with their fists.

“When the women did not budge,” the Bar­rick and gov­ern­ment offi­cials decid­ed to leave the min­ing camp, and set out to the Famati­na police sta­tion mas­querad­ing as vic­tims with a plan to file charges against the Women.

How­ev­er, “upon enter­ing the police sta­tion, the aggres­sors encoun­tered Famati­na res­i­dents who had been alert­ed to what was tak­ing place,” the alert states. “The Bar­rick and gov­ern­ment offi­cials then con­tin­ued to ver­bal­ly assault the com­mu­ni­ty mem­bers in an arro­gant man­ner, self-assured of their impuni­ty.”

“This atti­tude did not fall well upon the com­mu­ni­ty: Prac­ti­cal­ly the entire pop­u­la­tion of Famati­na imme­di­ate­ly turned out in force, and has gath­ered to sur­round the police sta­tion. As of this moment, the Bar­rick and min­ing offi­cials are now ‘trapped’ inside, afraid to exit the police sta­tion.”

Police forces from the city of Chilecito have since been con­tact­ed to sup­port the Famati­na police and the agres­sors.

Fur­ther updates (in Span­ish) will be post­ed at http://www.noalamina.org/

California: Saboteurs Knock Out Phone & Internet Service

April 10, 2009
Van­dals chopped fiber-optic cables and killed land­lines, cell phones and Inter­net ser­vice for hun­dreds of thou­sands of peo­ple in San­ta Clara, San­ta Cruz and San Ben­i­to coun­ties on Thurs­day.

April 10, 2009
Van­dals chopped fiber-optic cables and killed land­lines, cell phones and Inter­net ser­vice for hun­dreds of thou­sands of peo­ple in San­ta Clara, San­ta Cruz and San Ben­i­to coun­ties on Thurs­day.

The sab­o­tage essen­tial­ly froze oper­a­tions in parts of the three coun­ties at hos­pi­tals, stores, banks and police and fire depart­ments that rely on 911 calls, com­put­er­ized med­ical records, ATMs and cred­it and deb­it cards.

The first four fiber-optic cables were cut short­ly before 1:30 a.m. in an under­ground vault along Mon­terey High­way north of Blos­som Hill Road in south San Jose, police Sgt. Ron­nie Lopez said. The cables belong to AT&T, and most of the ser­vice dis­rup­tion came from this attack.

Four more under­ground cables, at least two of which belong to AT&T, were cut about two hours lat­er at two loca­tions near each oth­er along Old Coun­ty Road near Bing Street in San Car­los. Two addi­tion­al lines were sliced on Hayes Avenue in South San Jose.

In each case, the van­dals had to pry up heavy man­hole cov­ers with a spe­cial tool, climb down a shaft and chop through heavy cables. The four cables cut in San Jose were about the width of a sil­ver dol­lar and were encased in tough plas­tic sheath. One cable con­tained 360 fibers, and the oth­er three had 48 fibers each.

The van­dal­ism comes as AT&T is in talks with the Com­mu­ni­ca­tions Work­ers of Amer­i­ca for a con­tract cov­er­ing more than 80,000 employ­ees, who have been work­ing under their old deal since it expired at 11:59 p.m. Sat­ur­day. Union mem­bers vot­ed in late March to autho­rize a strike but have not sched­uled one.

http://anarchistnews.org/?q=node/7166

Why climate camping & other protest? Ecological debt day for your city…coming soon!

Eco­log­i­cal debt: no way back from bank­rupt

3 planetsEco­log­i­cal debt: no way back from bank­rupt

While most gov­ern­ments’ eyes are on the bank­ing cri­sis, a much big­ger issue — the envi­ron­men­tal cri­sis — is pass­ing them by, says Andrew Simms. In the Green Room this week, he argues that fail­ure to organ­ise a bailout for eco­log­i­cal debt will have dire con­se­quences for human­i­ty.

“Nature Does­n’t Do Bailouts!” said the ban­ner strung across Bish­ops­gate in the City of Lon­don.

Civil­i­sa­tion’s biggest prob­lem was out­lined in five words over the entrance to the small, par­al­lel real­i­ty of the peace­ful cli­mate camp. Their tents bloomed on the morn­ing of 1 April faster than daisies in spring, and faster than the police could stop them.

Across the city, where the world’s most pow­er­ful peo­ple met simul­ta­ne­ous­ly at the G20 sum­mit, the same prob­lem was almost com­plete­ly ignored, mer­it­ing only a sin­gle, after­thought men­tion in a long com­mu­nique.

World lead­ers dropped every­thing to tack­le the finan­cial debt cri­sis that spilled from col­laps­ing banks.

Gripped by a pan­ic so com­plete, there was no pol­i­cy dog­ma too deeply engrained to be dug out and instant­ly dis­card­ed. We went from tri­umphant, finance-dri­ven free mar­ket cap­i­tal­ism, to bank nation­al­i­sa­tion and mov­ing the dec­i­mal point on indus­try bailouts quick­er than you can say sub-prime mort­gage.

But the eco­log­i­cal debt cri­sis, which threat­ens much more than pen­sion funds and car man­u­fac­tur­ers, is left to lan­guish.

It is like hav­ing a Com­mis­sion on House­hold Ren­o­va­tion ago­nise over which expen­sive design­er wall­pa­per to use for paper­ing over plas­ter cracks whilst ignor­ing the fact that the walls them­selves are col­laps­ing on sub­sid­ing foun­da­tions.

Beyond our means

Each year, human­i­ty’s eco­log­i­cal over­draft gets larg­er, and the day that the world as a whole goes into eco­log­i­cal debt — con­sum­ing more resources and pro­duc­ing more waste than the bios­phere can pro­vide and absorb — moves ever ear­li­er in the year.

The same pic­ture emerges for indi­vid­ual coun­tries like the UK — which now starts liv­ing beyond its own envi­ron­men­tal means in mid-April.

Because the glob­al econ­o­my is still over­whelm­ing­ly fos­sil-fuel depen­dent, the accu­mu­la­tion of green­house gas­es and the prog­no­sis for glob­al warm­ing remain our best indi­ca­tors of “over­shoot”.

World famous French free-climber Alain Robert, known as Spi­der­man, climbed the Lloyds of Lon­don build­ing for the OneHundredMonths.org cam­paign as the G20 met, to demon­strate how time is slip­ping away.

Using thresh­olds for risk iden­ti­fied by the Inter­gov­ern­men­tal Pan­el on Cli­mate Change (IPCC), on cur­rent trends, in only 92 months — less than eight years — we will move into a new, more per­ilous phase of warm­ing.

It will then no longer be “like­ly” that we can pre­vent some aspects of run­away cli­mate change. We will begin to lose the cli­mat­ic con­di­tions which, as Nasa sci­en­tist James Hansen points out, were those under which civil­i­sa­tion devel­oped.

Small div­i­dend

As “nature does­n’t do bailouts”, how have our politi­cians fared who ripped open the nation’s wal­let to save the banks?

Not good.

Accord­ing to the Inter­na­tion­al Mon­e­tary Fund (IMF), the UK spent a stag­ger­ing 20% of its GDP in sup­port of the finan­cial sec­tor.

Yet the amount of mon­ey that was new and addi­tion­al, announced in the “green stim­u­lus” pack­age of the Trea­sury’s Pre-Bud­get Report, added-up to a van­ish­ing­ly small 0.0083% of GDP.

Glob­al­ly, the green shade of eco­nom­ic stim­u­lus mea­sures has var­ied enor­mous­ly. For exam­ple, the shares of spend­ing con­sid­ered in research by the bank HSBC to be envi­ron­men­tal were:

* the US — 12%
* Ger­many — 13%
* South Korea — 80%

The inter­na­tion­al aver­age was around 15%. HSBC found the UK planned to invest less than 7% of its stim­u­lus pack­age (dif­fer­ent from the bank bailout) in green mea­sures.

Com­par­ing the IMF and HSBC fig­ures actu­al­ly reveals an inverse rela­tion­ship — pro­por­tion­ate­ly, those who spent more on sup­port for finance had weak­er green spend­ing.

So here we are, faced with the loss of an envi­ron­ment con­ducive to human civil­i­sa­tion, and we find gov­ern­ments pros­trate before bare­ly repen­tant banks, with their backs to a far worse eco­log­i­cal cri­sis.

Extreme mar­kets

On top of low and incon­sis­tent fund­ing for renew­able ener­gy, the shift to a low car­bon econ­o­my is being fur­ther frus­trat­ed by anoth­er mar­ket fail­ure in the trade for car­bon seen, for exam­ple, in the EU’s Emis­sions Trad­ing Scheme.

Bad mar­ket design, fee­ble car­bon reduc­tion tar­gets and the reces­sion have all con­spired to dri­ve down the cost of car­bon emis­sion per­mits, wreck­ing eco­nom­ic incen­tives to grow renew­able ener­gy.

Worse still, the dif­fi­cul­ty of account­ing to ensure that per­mits rep­re­sent real emis­sions has led both ener­gy com­pa­nies and envi­ron­men­tal­ists to warn of an emerg­ing “sub-prime car­bon mar­ket”.

Rely­ing on mar­ket mech­a­nisms is attrac­tive to gov­ern­ments because it means they have less to do them­selves. But they will fail if car­bon mar­kets are just hot air.

There seems to be a hard-wired link between mem­o­ry fail­ure and mar­ket fail­ure.

As the his­to­ri­an E J Hob­s­bawm observed in The Age of Extremes: “Those of us who lived through the years of the Great Slump still find it almost impos­si­ble to under­stand how the ortho­dox­ies of the pure free mar­ket, then so obvi­ous­ly dis­cred­it­ed, once again came to pre­side over a glob­al peri­od of depres­sion in the late 1980s and 1990s”.

Per­haps the great­est fail­ure is one of imag­i­na­tion.

Some peo­ple alive today lived through those past reces­sions and depres­sions. They know they can be nasty and need avert­ing.

But the last time the Earth­’s cli­mate real­ly flipped was at the end of the last Ice Age, more than 10,000 years ago. No one can remem­ber what that felt like.

Lessons of his­to­ry

Look­ing for­ward, the IPC­C’s worst case sce­nario warns of a max­i­mum 6C rise over the next cen­tu­ry.

Look­ing back, how­ev­er, indi­cates that an unsta­ble cli­mate sys­tem holds worse hor­rors.

Work by the sci­en­tist Richard Alley on abrupt cli­mate change indi­cates the plan­et has pre­vi­ous­ly expe­ri­enced a 10C tem­per­a­ture shift in only a decade, and pos­si­bly “as quick­ly as in a sin­gle year”.

And, around the turn of the last Ice Age, there were “local warm­ings as large as 16C”.

Imag­ine that every day of your life you have tak­en a walk in the woods and the worse thing to hap­pen was an acorn or twig falling on your head.

Then, one day, you stroll out, look up and there is a threat approach­ing so large, unex­pect­ed and out­side your expe­ri­ence that can’t quite believe it, like a mas­sive goth­ic cathe­dral falling from the sky.

In tack­ling cli­mate change we need urgent­ly to recal­i­brate our respons­es, just as gov­ern­ments had to when they res­cued the reck­less finance sec­tor.

Then offi­cials had to ask them­selves “is what we are doing right, and is it enough?”

They must ask them­selves the same ques­tions on the eco­log­i­cal debt cri­sis and cli­mate change.

The dif­fer­ence is, that if they fail this time, not even a long-term busi­ness cycle will come to our res­cue. If the cli­mate shifts to a hot­ter state not con­vivial to human soci­ety, it could be tens of thou­sands of years, or nev­er, before it shifts back.

Remem­ber; nature does­n’t do bailouts.

Andrew Simms is pol­i­cy direc­tor of the New Eco­nom­ics Foun­da­tion (nef), and author of Eco­log­i­cal Debt: Glob­al Warm­ing and the Wealth of Nations

——

One Plan­et Liv­ing http://www.oneplanetliving.org

Your city’s Eco­log­i­cal Debt Day:

Using the lat­est data avail­able WWF has cal­cu­lat­ed when res­i­dents of British cities will have con­sumed their fair share of nat­ur­al resources for 2008 – or when their eco­log­i­cal debt day is.

City Eco­log­i­cal debt day

Win­ches­ter 10 April
St Albans 13 April
Chich­ester 14 April
Brighton & Hove 14 April
Can­ter­bury 17 April
Oxford 17 April
Southamp­ton 21 April
Durham 22 April
Cam­bridge 23 April
Portsmouth 23 April
Edin­burgh 23 April
Chester 24 April
Aberdeen 24 April
Ely (East Cambs) 26 April
Here­ford (Coun­ty of Here­ford­shire) 28 April
Stir­ling 28 April
Lon­don 29 April
Lich­field 29 April
Lan­cast­er 30 April
New­cas­tle upon Tyne 30 April
Wells (Bath and NE Som­er­set) 1 May
Bath (Bath and North East Som­er­set) 1 May
Ripon (Har­ro­gate) 2 May
Man­ches­ter 2 May
Inver­ness (High­land) 2 May
Pre­ston 2 May
Nor­wich 2 May
Peter­bor­ough 2 May
Dundee City 3 May
Leeds 3 May
York 3 May
Sheffield 3 May
Der­by 4 May
Carlisle 4 May
Leices­ter 4 May
Worces­ter 4 May
Ban­gor (Gwynedd) 4 May
St Davids (Pembrokeshire)4 May
Not­ting­ham 4 May
Liv­er­pool 4 May
Bris­tol 5 May
Birm­ing­ham 5 May
Lin­coln 5 May
Brad­ford 5 May
Glas­gow 6 May
Cardiff 6 May
Exeter 6 May
Coven­try 7 May
Swansea 8 May
Sal­ford 8 May
Wolver­hamp­ton 8 May
Truro (Car­rick) 8 May
Sun­der­land 8 May
Wake­field 9 May
Glouces­ter 9 May
Stoke on Trent 10 May
Kingston upon Hull 10 May
Sal­is­bury 10 May
Ply­mouth 11 May
New­port 11 May