Camp Bling back up and awaiting chainsaws — chopping on Sunday?

27.2.2010
Impor­tant Update

Cuckoo Corner tent27.2.2010
Impor­tant Update

6pm — so far, so good at Camp Cuck­oo; food dona­tions com­ing in but still need more peo­ple; lat­est twit­ter updates on PPPS web­site below or SKIPP face­book page.

Var­i­ous sources have now con­firmed that the Coun­cil will be felling the trees on Pri­o­ry Cres­cent dur­ing Sun­day. The affect­ed stretch of Pri­o­ry Cres­cent is going to be closed to traf­fic between mid­night and 8pm Sun­day.

There will be peo­ple climb­ing the trees to pre­vent them being felled — if you feel up to it, please vol­un­teer! We also need as many peo­ple as pos­si­ble on the ground to lend sup­port, wit­ness the Coun­cil’s, pri­vate secu­ri­ty and Police’s actions and so on.

Please come down to lend your sup­port. Peo­ple have been cam­paign­ing against this road widen­ing since 1972 and it’s all com­ing to a head tonight.

Addi­tion­al from SKIPP: Urgent notice — help need­ed NOW! Tree felling begins tonight in Pri­o­ry Cres­cent, any­one who can please come down to site, your help is des­per­ate­ly need­ed, if pos­si­ble please can­cel what ever you are doing, it is now or nev­er, pas­sive or active, you can help save the trees if we act togeth­er NOW… SKIPP Com­mit­tee Con­tact: 07799414887 — mark 07747755205 — pat­sy Please let us know if you can help.

—-

After years of patient occu­pa­tion and appar­ent vic­to­ry, Southend activists have had to reoc­cu­py land to pre­vent the coun­cils new road build­ing scheme. Evic­tions are expect­ed immi­nent­ly and crew are urgent­ly need­ed.

Southend Bor­ough Coun­cil has reneged on the agree­ment made last April with Bling and Park­life which result­ed in an agree­ment with the res­i­dents to vacate the site.

Local Group SKIPP has since been cam­paign­ing to pre­vent the revised plan from becom­ing a real­i­ty, last week SKIPP joined force with Park­life, and Blingers to occu­py a site in Pri­o­ry Cres­cent with a view to pre­vent­ing tree felling which is due in the next few days.

This morn­ing a source with­in the Coun­cil informed us, that tree felling and evic­tion is now immi­nent.

Sup­port is urgent­ly need­ed, the site is sit­u­at­ed in Pri­o­ry Cres­cent on land adja­cent to the Cuck­oo Cor­ner Round­about; by car head into Southend using the A127, fol­low­ing the town cen­tre signs, by train the near­est sta­tion is Prit­tlewell on the Liv­er­pool Street Line.

(for back­ground please refer to: www.campbling.org / www.ppps.org.uk / on face­book search for Sax­on King In Pri­o­ry Park.

Lim­it­ed accom­mo­da­tion is avail­able on site in the form of tents, please bring warm cloth­ing and harness/lock on gear if poss, same old things need­ed; peo­ple, climb­ing gear/lock on gear, her­ras fenc­ing, scaff bar/clips, kit and dona­tions.

On Fri­day a coun­cil meet­ing was halt­ed for 20 min­utes fol­low­ing protests over the new plans.

Fossil Fools Day 2010

Cli­mate change is no laugh­ing mat­ter – but that doesn’t mean we can’t con­front the Fos­sil Fuel Empire with sub­ver­sive humour.

WHAT: Direct actions, prac­ti­cal jokes and throw­ing a span­ner in the works to stop the fos­sil fools.
WHERE: Your street, town or city.
WHEN: April 1st, 2010.

FFD graphic - bigCli­mate change is no laugh­ing mat­ter – but that doesn’t mean we can’t con­front the Fos­sil Fuel Empire with sub­ver­sive humour.

WHAT: Direct actions, prac­ti­cal jokes and throw­ing a span­ner in the works to stop the fos­sil fools.
WHERE: Your street, town or city.
WHEN: April 1st, 2010.

Last Decem­ber in Copen­hagen, the politi­cians sold us out to the fos­sil fools, cor­po­rate lob­by­ists and big banks. Now we’re left with “green cap­i­tal­ism,” a deeply unjust car­bon mar­ket and con­tin­ued assaults on our com­mu­ni­ties and ecosys­tems. If we’re going to stop cli­mate chaos, the only real solu­tion is to keep fos­sil fuels in the ground.

The stakes couldn’t be high­er: desta­bil­i­sa­tion of the glob­al cli­mate, local com­mu­ni­ties destroyed by dirty ener­gy extrac­tion and com­bus­tion, dev­as­tat­ing freak storms, droughts, floods, the list goes on …

This April 1st, join Ris­ing Tide in some cre­ative direct action … use the sim­ply sub­ver­sive to the down­right dis­rup­tive: office occu­pa­tions, ban­ner drops, clown­ish parades, road block­ades, spoof web­sites, sub­ver­tis­ing, street the­atre, leaflets, lock-ons or laugh-ins. What­ev­er works for you and your group.

Join us this Fos­sil Fools Day and hatch some hare­brained schemes that will strike a blow to cli­mate crim­i­nals every­where!

WANT MORE? Fos­sil Fools Day also marks the launch of the BP Tar Sands Fort­night of Shame: a two-week cam­paign cul­mi­nat­ing in actions sur­round­ing BP’s AGM on April 15th. The goal? To stop BP from going into the Cana­di­an Tar Sands – the biggest, dirt­i­est fos­sil fuel project on earth. Find out more: Tar Sands in Focus.. And a word to BP: be afraid… be very afraid.

NEED A HAND? If you would like ideas for actions, graph­ics for leaflets or web­sites, advice on deal­ing with the press, etc., send us an email and we’ll do our best to help out: info@risingtide.org.uk

For more infor­ma­tion see: Fos­sil Fools Day.

In the words of that mas­ter of pranks: “That’s All Folks”.

Hundreds blockade nuclear bomb factory

15th Feb 2010

Aldermaston construction gate blockadeAldermaston wheelchair blockadeAldermaston Nurses not Nukes15th Feb 2010
Update: Approx­i­mate­ly 800 pro­test­ers block­ad­ed the base, with a large police and FIT/EG sur­veil­lance pres­ence. 26 arrests were report­ed, main­ly for obstruc­tion of a pub­lic high­way. The block­ade caused a huge back­log of traf­fic, many of which were work­ers try­ing to get to work at AWE, and fail­ing due to blocked gates. Main­stream media cov­er­age.

Cam­paign­ers call for dis­ar­ma­ment of Tri­dent and abo­li­tion of nuclear weapons

An esti­mat­ed eight hun­dred cam­paign­ers from Eng­land, North­ern Ire­land, Scot­land, Wales and a num­ber of oth­er coun­tries have joined a block­ade of every gate of the Atom­ic Weapons Estab­lish­ment (AWE) at Alder­mas­ton, Berk­shire, Eng­land. [1] The block­ade start­ed at 7am.

Indi­vid­u­als present at the block­ade, which is aimed at halt­ing con­struc­tion of mul­ti-bil­lion pound facil­i­ties for research and devel­op­ment of a new gen­er­a­tion of nuclear war­heads, [2] include Nobel Peace Prize lau­re­ates Jody Williams, from Ver­mont, USA and Máiread Cor­ri­g­an-Maguire, from Belfast, North­ern Ire­land (both Jody and Máiread were locked on using tubes). [3] Also present are the Catholic bish­op of Brent­wood, Thomas McMa­hon; the Angli­can bish­ops Stephen Cot­trell (Read­ing), Mike Hill (Bris­tol) and Peter Price (Bath and Wells); Jill Evans MEP, Vice Pres­i­dent of Plaid Cym­ru and chair of CND Cym­ru (Wales); and Kate Hud­son, chair of CND.

All gates have been block­ad­ed, with a large num­ber of peo­ple locked-on using tubes. In par­tic­u­lar, sev­er­al women are locked-on at the main gate exit, one of whom is in a wheel chair. Police are cur­rent­ly cut­ting peo­ple out of their lock-ons. Five arrests have been made to this point, with more expect­ed over the course of the day.

Bri­an Larkin, a Tri­dent Ploughshares (TP) activist who trav­elled from Helens­burgh, Scot­land, said: “This is the biggest block­ade of Alder­mas­ton in years and comes at a time when even major polit­i­cal par­ties are ques­tion­ing the log­ic of spend­ing up to £97 bil­lion [4] on use­less weapons. It demon­strates the depth and breadth of deter­mined civ­il soci­ety oppo­si­tion to Tri­dent and its planned replace­ment. [5] Although the gov­ern­ment now seems to have delayed the next phase of Tri­dent replace­ment until after the gen­er­al elec­tion, the ongo­ing con­struc­tion of facil­i­ties at the AWE for the design, devel­op­ment and man­u­fac­ture of new nuclear war­heads is ille­gal and immoral and will only lead to fur­ther pro­lif­er­a­tion of nuclear weapons.”

Ang­ie Zel­ter, co-founder of TP, who trav­elled from Knighton, Wales, added: “In May, world gov­ern­ments will meet to review the nuclear Non-Pro­lif­er­a­tion Treaty (NPT); [6] but this pro­gram of mod­erni­sa­tion of UK nuclear weapons vio­lates the treaty and could lead to a dis­as­trous fail­ure of the Review Con­fer­ence. Over forty years ago, when it signed up to the treaty, the UK made a deal to nego­ti­ate mul­ti­lat­er­al nuclear dis­ar­ma­ment in exchange for states with­out nuclear weapons agree­ing not to obtain them.[7] Not only have we failed to keep that promise but now we are prepar­ing to build a new gen­er­a­tion of nuclear weapons. If the gov­ern­ment wants to halt the pro­lif­er­a­tion of nuclear weapons it should get rid of its own nuclear weapons first. We are call­ing on the UK to abide by its agree­ment to achieve nuclear dis­ar­ma­ment — that means tak­ing Tri­dent off patrol, halt­ing all work and prepa­ra­tions for any new gen­er­a­tion of nuclear weapons and using the AWE only for dis­ar­ma­ment and ver­i­fi­ca­tion.”

Sarah Lasen­by, a TP activist who trav­elled from Oxford, added: “The time has come for the UK to dis­arm its nuclear weapons. Instead of build­ing a new gen­er­a­tion, the gov­ern­ment should go to the upcom­ing NPT Review Con­fer­ence in New York and com­mit to nego­ti­a­tions for a Nuclear Weapons Con­ven­tion to abol­ish nuclear weapons world­wide.” [8]

Each of the gates to the nuclear weapons site is themed: Scot­land, Wales, Eng­land, inter­na­tion­als [9], cyclists and envi­ron­men­tal­ists, faith groups, women and stu­dents. Choirs, med­ical pro­fes­sion­als, aca­d­e­mics and politi­cians are also present.

Media con­tacts: Daniel Vies­nik 07506 234 091; Bri­an Larkin 07768 312 676; Ang­ie Zel­ter 07835 354 652

Images from the block­ade: http://www.flickr.com/photos/cnduk

Updates:
http://twitter.com/TridentPlough
http://blockawe.blogspot.com

ENDS

Notes to edi­tors:

1. The Alder­mas­ton Big Block­ade was ini­ti­at­ed by Tri­dent Ploughshares and sup­port­ed by the Cam­paign for Nuclear Dis­ar­ma­ment (CND), the Alder­mas­ton Women’s Peace Camp(aign) (AWPC) and var­i­ous oth­er groups.

Tri­dent Ploughshares is a cam­paign to dis­arm the UK Tri­dent nuclear weapon sys­tem in a non­vi­o­lent, open, peace­ful and ful­ly account­able man­ner.
Web­site: http://www.tridentploughshares.org

CND web­site: http://www.cnduk.org
AWPC web­site: http://www.aldermaston.net

Block­ades of AWE Alder­mas­ton took place most recent­ly in Octo­ber 2008 and June 2009.

2. The Min­istry of Defence’s plan­ning appli­ca­tion for a new enriched ura­ni­um han­dling and stor­age facil­i­ty at AWE Alder­mas­ton, Project Pega­sus, was approved by West Berk­shire coun­cil on Wednes­day 10 Feb­ru­ary 2010, despite receiv­ing over 1400 let­ters of objec­tion. http://news.bbc.co.uk/local/berkshire/hi/people_and_places/newsid_8509000/8509099.stm

Cam­paign­ers say the new facil­i­ty will be used to build a new gen­er­a­tion of nuclear war­heads, which they say breach­es the UK’s legal oblig­a­tions under the Nuclear Non-Pro­lif­er­a­tion Treaty [see note 7].

For infor­ma­tion on all facil­i­ties under devel­op­ment or planned at the AWE, see: http://www.aldermaston.net/awe

3. Jody Williams won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1997 joint­ly with the cam­paign she worked for, the Inter­na­tion­al Cam­paign to Ban Land­mines..
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jody_Williams

Máiread Cor­ri­g­an-Maguire was award­ed the prize in 1976 joint­ly with Bet­ty Williams for their work to end vio­lence in North­ern Ire­land.
http://en.wikipedia..org/wiki/Mairead_Corrigan

4. See report from Green­peace, In the Fir­ing Line (Sep­tem­ber 2009): http://www.greenpeace.org.uk/media/reports/firing-line-hidden-costs-supercarrier-project-and-replacing-trident

5. In an ICM poll for the Guardian pub­lished on 13 July 2009, 54% of respon­dents indi­cat­ed that they want­ed to see Britain aban­don its nuclear weapons and not replace its Tri­dent sys­tem. http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/jul/13/icm-poll-nuclear-weapons

6. The next five-year­ly Review Con­fer­ence of the NPT is due to take place 3–28 May 2010 in New York. For back­ground infor­ma­tion on the NPT and the Review Con­fer­ence, see: http://www.reachingcriticalwill.org

7. Arti­cle VI of the NPT, rat­i­fied by both the UK and the US, stip­u­lates: “Each of the Par­ties to the Treaty under­takes to pur­sue nego­ti­a­tions in good faith on effec­tive mea­sures relat­ing to ces­sa­tion of the nuclear arms race at an ear­ly date and to nuclear dis­ar­ma­ment, and on a treaty on gen­er­al and com­plete dis­ar­ma­ment under strict and effec­tive inter­na­tion­al con­trol.”
http://www.un.org/en/conf/npt/2005/npttreaty.html

8. For fur­ther infor­ma­tion on the inter­na­tion­al cam­paign for the NPT Review Con­fer­ence to com­mit to nego­ti­a­tions toward a Nuclear Weapons Con­ven­tion, see: http://www.icanw.org

9. In addi­tion to the hun­dreds of UK peo­ple who have par­tic­i­pat­ed in the block­ade, there are peo­ple from Bel­gium, Swe­den, Fin­land, and Switzer­land in atten­dance at Alder­mas­ton.

media@tridentploughshares.org
http://blockawe.blogspot.com/

Tar Sands protests (Brighton & London)

Cli­mate Camp Invades BP Petrol Sta­tions Over Tar Sands

Cli­mate Camp Invades BP Petrol Sta­tions Over Tar Sands
On Sat­ur­day 13th Feb­ru­ary activists from the South Coast neigh­bour­hood of the Camp for Cli­mate Action invad­ed the three BP petrol sta­tions in Brighton, on the Lewes Rd, Ditch­ling Rd and Lon­don Rd, to protest at BP’s plans to invest in the Alber­ta Tar Sands in Cana­da. Mov­ing by bicy­cle 8 activists car­ried a ban­ner read­ing ‘Tar Sands Oil Is Blood Oil’. They hand­ed out infor­ma­tion on the Cana­di­an tar sands and BP’s plans to invest in it to cus­tomers and urged them to boy­cott BP.

Many of BP’s cus­tomers where shocked to hear about BP’s pro­posed involve­ment in one of the dirt­i­est busi­ness­es on earth, espe­cial­ly in the light of its past attend to project a green image, and in some cas­es left imme­di­ate­ly left to get their fuel some­where else. This action is the start of a cam­paign, which is hoped will spread across the UK. A one of the Brighton activists said: “We hope that oth­er con­cerned local peo­ple across the UK will fol­low our exam­ple and begin putting the pres­sure on BP in their areas. Tar sands are an appalling exam­ple of plac­ing insane greed ahead of the whole plan­et and every­one on it.”

Tar sands are deposits of tar, sand and clay under the forests of Alber­ta in west­ern Cana­da. Tar sands extrac­tion is an eco­log­i­cal dis­as­ter, some­times referred to as ‘The biggest envi­ron­men­tal crime in his­to­ry’. Oil pro­duced from tar sands is the filth­i­est most car­bon inten­sive oil (over 3 times as much CO2 to pro­duce as con­ven­tion­al oil). The Athabas­ca tar sands oper­a­tions are the largest sin­gle indus­tri­al emit­ter of CO2 on the plan­et. Enough nat­ur­al gas is used every day extract­ing this oil to heat 3.2 mil­lion Cana­di­an homes.

Tar sands extrac­tion involves the whole­sale destruc­tion of vast tracts of ancient for­est over an area the size of Eng­land and Wales and the use of huge amounts of water that is left so con­t­a­m­i­nat­ed that it must be stored in giant ponds. The tox­ic tail­ings ponds are so vast they can be seen from space. Leaks for these ponds are poi­son­ing local rivers and the indige­nous peo­ples that live there. The rush to extract oil from tar sands is also tram­pling on the rights of the local indige­nous peo­ples.

While the tar sands are in Cana­da, much of the financ­ing is com­ing from UK com­pa­nies. BP which once tried to rebrand itself as ‘Beyond Petro­le­um’ to give itself a green image is plan­ning on invest­ing $10billion in the Sun­rise Project a tar sands extrac­tion project in Alber­ta. This week a num­ber BP’s share­hold­ers have start­ed a revolt and are pres­sur­ing BP to stop. Oth­er UK com­pa­nies that are involved in tar sands include Shell, RBS and Bar­calys.

Pho­tos:
http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4048/4354992582_a300eeb4fb_b_d.jpg
http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4062/4354252823_1123bd6cd9_b_d.jpg

Tar sands info:
http://www.ienearth.org/tarsandsinfo.html

Press:
BP faces protest over oil sands devel­op­ment
http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/natural_resources/article7018483.ece
Share­hold­er group calls on BP to rethink oil sands project
http://business.scotsman.com/business/Shareholder-group-calls-on-BP.6050650.jp

Con­tact:
E‑mail: southcoast@climatecamp.org.uk
Web: http://climatecamp.org.uk/get-involved/local-groups/south-coast

Tar Sands banner LondonOil-ympics Come To Trafal­gar Square
On Sat­ur­day, 13 Feb­ru­ary at 12 noon, UK and Cana­di­an envi­ron­men­tal activists opened the ‘Oil-ympics’ at Cana­da House in Trafal­gar Square. The event, timed to coin­cide with the open­ing of the 2010 Win­ter Olympics in Van­cou­ver, high­light­ed the role of British com­pa­nies in the sin­gle biggest indus­tri­al project on earth, the Cana­di­an Tar Sands (1).

The Oil-ympics event saw activists divid­ed into three teams: BP, Shell and RBS, all ready to ‘Race to the Tar Sands’. Tra­di­tion­al win­ter sports were sub­vert­ed to illus­trate the irony of Cana­da por­tray­ing the Van­cou­ver Win­ter Olympics as an event which cel­e­brates Cana­di­an indige­nous cul­ture and envi­ron­men­tal sus­tain­abil­i­ty, while in the neigh­bour­ing province of Alber­ta, Cana­di­an First Nations are find­ing that their lands, com­mu­ni­ties and health are being dev­as­tat­ed by the Tar Sands (2).

BP received spe­cial atten­tion after it recent­ly unveiled plans to embark on its first Tar Sands extrac­tion project. BP had pre­vi­ous­ly sold its poten­tial stake in Alber­ta in 1999, when BP’s chief exec­u­tive at the time, Lord Browne, deemed Tar Sands extrac­tion to be eco­nom­i­cal­ly unvi­able and envi­ron­men­tal­ly unpleas­ant. How­ev­er, BP’s new chief exec­u­tive, Tony Hay­ward, is now set to make BP a major play­er in the Tar Sands with a part­ner­ship with Canada’s Husky Ener­gy – a ven­ture that is fac­ing sharp crit­i­cism from BP’s own share­hold­ers (3, 4).

Alice Har­g­reaves, of the UK Tar Sands Net­work, said: “BP has been try­ing to prove that they are ‘Beyond Petro­le­um’ for years, but with their entry into the Tar Sands project, we can see the truth: Beyond Petro­le­um is noth­ing more than a Bro­ken Promise.(5) BP share­hold­ers are rebelling over this betray­al, and so are we. Over the next two months, we’ll be putting the pres­sure on to make sure BP get the mes­sage – stay out of the Tar Sands!”

Shell has been sin­gled out as it is already a major oper­a­tor in the Tar Sands, and RBS as it is the 7th biggest glob­al investor in the Tar Sands. (6)

tarsandsinfocus@gmail.com

http://tarsandsinfocus.wordpress.com/

(1) Deposits of Tar Sands are spread out over 54,000 square miles of prime for­est in north­ern Alber­ta, an area the size of Eng­land and Wales com­bined. Pro­duc­ing crude oil from the Tar Sands gen­er­ates up to five times more car­bon diox­ide, the prin­ci­pal glob­al warm­ing gas, than con­ven­tion­al drilling: see

Envi­ron­ment Cana­da, 2007, Nation­al Inven­to­ry Report Green­house Gas Sources and Sinks in Cana­da 1990–2005, http://www.ec.gc.ca/pdb/ghg/inventory_report/2006_report/som-sum_eng.cfm

(2) This action is in sol­i­dar­i­ty with Cana­di­an First Nations who have called for a mora­to­ri­um on the Tar Sands. For more infor­ma­tion see the Indige­nous Envi­ron­men­tal Net­work: http://www.ienearth.org/cits.html

(3) BP has entered a joint ven­ture with Husky Ener­gy to devel­op a Tar Sands facil­i­ty which will be capa­ble of pro­duc­ing 200,000 bar­rels of crude a day by 2020. In return for a half share of Husky’s Sun­rise field in the Athabas­ca region of Alber­ta, the epi­cen­tre of the Tar Sands indus­try, BP has sold its part­ner a 50 per cent stake in its Tole­do oil refin­ery in Ohio. The com­pa­nies plan to invest $10 bil­lion in the project, mak­ing BP a major play­er in Tar Sands extrac­tion. The final invest­ment deci­sion will be made in the next few months.

http://www.bp.com/genericarticle.do?categoryId=2012968&contentId=7038865

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601082&sid=aGw2sL7JwHG8

(4) A coali­tion of share­hold­ers has tabled a res­o­lu­tion for BP’s AGM on April 15 high­light­ing the envi­ron­men­tal and social risks of Tar Sands extrac­tion. http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/natural_resources/article7018483.ece

(5) http://tarsandsinfocus.wordpress.com/bpbrokenpromises/

(6) For Shell Invest­ments see http://www.foei.org/en/resources/publications/pdfs-members/economic-justice/shells-big-dirty-secret/view?searchterm=shell%27s%20big%20dirty%20secret

For RBS invest­ments see http://understory.ran.org/2010/01/31/banks-ranked-and-spanked-on-tar-sands/

UK Tar Sands Net­work
tarsandsinfocus@googlemail.com
http://www.tarsandsinfocus.wordpress.com

Brighton RBS painted — the lines are drawn

Com­mu­nique from the Fine Line Art Col­lec­tive (FLAC)
Date: 3rd Feb 2010
Address: Old Steine, Brighton
Tel: 01273 821118

In the small hours of this morn­ing the Brighton branch of The Roy­al Bank of Scot­land fell foul of a FLAC attack.

We claim full cred­it for the free pub­lic art instal­la­tion of a fat red and black line of gloss paint on the floor across the door­way of the bank.

Com­mu­nique from the Fine Line Art Col­lec­tive (FLAC)
Date: 3rd Feb 2010
Address: Old Steine, Brighton
Tel: 01273 821118

In the small hours of this morn­ing the Brighton branch of The Roy­al Bank of Scot­land fell foul of a FLAC attack.

We claim full cred­it for the free pub­lic art instal­la­tion of a fat red and black line of gloss paint on the floor across the door­way of the bank.

The black paint sig­ni­fies RBS oil invest­ments and the red paint, the lives that will be lost to cli­mate change.

Black paint was applied to the cash point to cre­ate the impres­sion of oil ooz­ing from the unstop­pable mon­ey machine. This illus­trates the
filthy nature of this banks activ­i­ties. We also proved we CAN stop a small cog in the machine. When we want to.

FLAC — the Fine Line Arts Col­lec­tive — has used this pub­licly owned space — bought with tax pay­ers mon­ey — to pose the ques­tion: “Where do we draw the line?”

Today FLAC mem­bers drew the line at RBS because…

RBS has financed com­pa­nies involved in tar sands extrac­tion to the tune of £8.3 bil­lion. RBS is the UK’s biggest financier of one of the dirt­i­est projects on Earth.

This is destroy­ing the Cana­di­an wilder­ness, forc­ing the indige­nous peo­ple off their lands and cre­at­ing the biggest C02 emit­ter in the world.

FLAC says: “RBS deserves to take some flack for that.And don’t get us start­ed on Chair­man Sir Fred’s £16 mil­lion pen­sion, not to men­tion the bankers’ £1million plus bonus­es.

“We all have to draw the line some­where. We draw the line at RBS using our mon­ey to destroy our plan­et and our future for pri­vate gain. Where do you draw the line?”

Artists notes.

FLAC used gloss paint for this action to sig­ni­fy the per­ma­nence of the bank’s destruc­tive activ­i­ties.

FLAC mem­bers hope oth­er artists will feel inspired to draw a line at their own local branch of the Roy­al Bank of Scot­land. Or indeed any oth­er bank that con­sis­tent­ly invests in human suf­fer­ing and ulti­mate­ly our demise.

Or draw your line wher­ev­er your sense of out­rage deems fit.

The new EF! Action Update — bursting onto the seams…

In the Spring edi­tion of the EF! Action Update, see how King Coal is being con­front­ed — chim­neys climbed, con­vey­ors locked-on to, mines invad­ed, machin­ery occu­pied, eco­tage, and more.

EF! AU logo 1In the Spring edi­tion of the EF! Action Update, see how King Coal is being con­front­ed — chim­neys climbed, con­vey­ors locked-on to, mines invad­ed, machin­ery occu­pied, eco­tage, and more.

Mar­vel at the Main­shill strat­e­gy of con­tin­u­ous action, look with awe at the range of tac­tics they used in the many months before eviction…and then think about what you can do, with who, where and when.

“If not you, who? If not now, when?”

The Main­shill fea­ture includes an action time­line, local com­mu­ni­ty links and ideas for the future.

The Nuclear New Build CON­sul­ta­tion is over on 22nd Feb­ru­ary — read about what hap­pens next, who’s involved, and an anti-nuclear camp in April.

“in the end we just need rebel­lion. Every­where.” — what was your response to the Copen­hagen cli­mate chaos, whether you went or stayed at home?

Be inspired by an inter­view with “D Lock,our mys­tery dig­ger div­ing activist” — get out there, bicy­cle lock in hand. In Jan­u­ary, one per­son so-armed brought a whole coal ter­mi­nal to a halt for many hours.

And from across the seas, read about our broth­ers and sis­ters strug­gling against high-speed train destruc­tion in Italy, high-volt­age pow­er lines in Cat­alo­nia, and whale hunt­ing on the High Seas.

And if you don’t get high on all that, try not to be inspired by con­fer­ences block­ad­ed, dams delayed, earth-trash­ing machin­ery sab­o­taged, trees hugged, archi­tects impost­ed, genet­ics roofed, bio­mess bio­massed and much more.

“We are going to inher­it the earth . There is not the slight­est doubt about that. We Are not afraid of ruins. We car­ry a new world, here in our hearts. That world is grow­ing this minute.” — Dur­ru­ti

To down­load the lat­est EF!AU for print­ing, go to http://www.earthfirst.org.uk/efau/actionupdate_feb10print.pdf

To read the lat­est EF!AU online, go to http://www.earthfirst.org.uk/efau/actionupdate_feb10.pdf

climate camp ‘where next?’ regional gatherings and reader

PROPOSALS FOR 2010 SO FAR

We’ve got a new dis­cus­sion board up on the Cli­mate Camp web­site with all the pro­pos­als for the region­al gath­er­ings received so far, plus some oth­er use­ful texts from the Where Next? dis­cus­sions. Join the dis­cus­sion here:

http://discussion.climatecamp.org.uk

REGIONAL GATHERINGS IN JANUARY

PROPOSALS FOR 2010 SO FAR

We’ve got a new dis­cus­sion board up on the Cli­mate Camp web­site with all the pro­pos­als for the region­al gath­er­ings received so far, plus some oth­er use­ful texts from the Where Next? dis­cus­sions. Join the dis­cus­sion here:

http://discussion.climatecamp.org.uk

REGIONAL GATHERINGS IN JANUARY

Here are the lat­est con­firmed details of our region­al gath­er­ings in Jan­u­ary…

(More details as we have them will be post­ed at:
http://www.climatecamp.org.uk/get-involved/national-gatherings/next)

Cli­mate Camp Read­er

Dysophia and Shift Mag­a­zine have joined forces to put togeth­er a Cli­mate Camp Read­er, “Crit­i­cism with­out Cri­tique”, pub­lished in Jan­u­ary 2010. This read­er hopes to encour­age and facil­i­ate debates at the next cli­mate camp gath­er­ings. To down­load it fol­low this link:
http://dysophia.files.wordpress.com/2010/01/cca_reader.pdf
The edi­to­r­i­al is post­ed below:

Edi­to­r­i­al

In Jan­u­ary & Feb­ru­ary 2010, the Camp for Cli­mate Action will go through a peri­od of intro­spec­tion as it works out where it shall go next. While in some ways the Camp has been a suc­cess, it has also come under a bar­rage of crit­i­cism from some quar­ters with­in the rad­i­cal move­ments that spawned it.

To help this debate we have put togeth­er a set of resources and rel­e­vant arti­cles to inform and spark dis­cus­sion relat­ing to this crit­i­cism. Our bias is obvi­ous, though the opin­ions expressed are those of the authors alone. Whether you agree with them or not, we believe they are worth tak­ing on board. We hope at least that you feel con­fi­dent answer­ing their chal­lenges, rather than just dis­miss­ing them.

Now is the time for the Camp to exam­ine its pol­i­tics in more depth, to work out just what it stands for. This is a cross-roads in its devel­op­ment, to con­tin­ue down a path of ever increas­ing lib­er­al, reformist approach, or to be the noisy rad­i­cal, point­ing out all the white ele­phants in the cli­mate change debate. The future of the move­ment around the camp is being shaped here. The deci­sions being made now will have pro­found impacts on who is and who is not involved in the future.

The Camp for Cli­mate Action grew out of the rad­i­cal anar­chist and envi­ron­men­tal move­ments, a syn­the­sis of the organ­i­sa­tion­al skills devel­oped at the Anti-G8 protest camp at Stir­ling, and the eco­log­i­cal direct action move­ments such as Earth First! The per­cep­tion that emerges from these crit­i­cisms is this has been lost along the way.

We accept that this book­let makes chal­leng­ing read­ing and that we offer lit­tle in the way of solu­tions. These, we believe, must come from with­in the camp itself. How­ev­er, it is appar­ent that there is a need for two things. First­ly, a greater vis­i­bil­i­ty for the anar­chist roots with­in the day to day life of the CCA process and pro­pos­als. Sec­ond­ly, and just as impor­tant, a more open and explic­it cri­tique of cap­i­tal­ism and how it is the root cause of cli­mate change.

If we do nei­ther out of fear of a main­stream media back­lash, then we are reduced to being anoth­er NGO. Yet, the pow­er of the Camp has always been the promise of a gen­uine alter­na­tive action in the face of pre­var­i­ca­tion and obstruc­tion from gov­ern­ments and cor­po­ra­tions – now is the time to spell that cri­tique out and use it to build real alter­na­tives, not legit­imis­ing the sys­tem we com­plain of. It was the strength of the Camp’s found­ing cri­tiques that gave it the bold­ness its sub­se­quent suc­cess­es have rest­ed on.

Ulti­mate­ly, the mes­sage of the Camp is a very rad­i­cal one – that rad­i­cal social change is need­ed, espe­cial­ly if we are to tack­le of the root caus­es of cli­mate change. The answer is not to water down our actions and our mes­sages, but to be bold­er than ever. That is the excite­ment and pow­er that gives the Camp its life.

To down­load the read­er fol­low this link:
http://dysophia.files.wordpress.com/2010/01/cca_reader.pdf

http://dysophia.wordpress.com/
http://www.shiftmag.co.uk/

Cowley Club Bookshop Talks 2010

The Cow­ley Book­shop Col­lec­tive are proud to present a series of author talks for 2010:

_______________________________________
All events run from 16.00 to 18.30 and are FREE
***************************************

_____________
Fri­day 8 Jan­u­ary
*************

Clive Bloom (Vio­lent Lon­don) talks about his research into Edwar­dian anar­chism.

The Cow­ley Book­shop Col­lec­tive are proud to present a series of author talks for 2010:

_______________________________________
All events run from 16.00 to 18.30 and are FREE
***************************************

_____________
Fri­day 8 Jan­u­ary
*************

Clive Bloom (Vio­lent Lon­don) talks about his research into Edwar­dian anar­chism.

Clive Bloom is Pro­fes­sor Emer­i­tus of Eng­lish and Amer­i­can Stud­ies at Mid­dle­sex Uni­ver­si­ty. He has writ­ten many books on pop­u­lar cul­ture, cul­tur­al his­to­ry and lit­er­ary crit­i­cism, reg­u­lar­ly appears on radio and tele­vi­sion and con­tributes to a num­ber of nation­al news­pa­pers. His next book, enti­tled Goth­ic His­to­ries will be pub­lished in April 2010.
http://www.clivebloom.com/

__________________
Wednes­day 13 Jan­u­ary
******************

Stevphen Shukaitis (Con­stituent Imag­i­na­tion) and Jack Z. Bratich (Con­spir­a­cy Pan­ics) have a dis­cus­sion enti­tled An Affec­tive Weath­er Report

Event fly­er (3.4 MB pdf) — http://mujinga.net/AffectiveWeatherReport.pdf

Stevphen Shukaitis is an edi­tor at Autono­me­dia and lec­tur­er at the Uni­ver­si­ty of Essex. He is the author of Imag­i­nal Machines: Auton­o­my & Self-Orga­ni­za­tion in the Rev­o­lu­tions of Every­day Life (Autono­me­dia, 2009) and edi­tor with Eri­ka Bid­dle and David Grae­ber of Con­stituent Imag­i­na­tion: Mil­i­tant Inves­ti­ga­tions, Col­lec­tive The­o­riza­tion (AK Press, 2007). His research focus­es on the emer­gence of col­lec­tive imag­i­na­tion in social move­ments and the chang­ing com­po­si­tions of cul­tur­al and artis­tic labor.
http://stevphen.mahost.org/

Jack Z. Bratich is Assis­tant Pro­fes­sor of Jour­nal­ism and Media Stud­ies at Rut­gers Uni­ver­si­ty. He is also a zine librar­i­an at ABC No Rio in New York City. Jack uses crit­i­cal cul­tur­al stud­ies to ana­lyze the pol­i­tics of pop­u­lar cul­ture. He stud­ies media cul­ture as an inter­sec­tion of pow­er, knowl­edge, and sub­jec­tiv­i­ty. He is co-edi­tor, along with Jere­my Pack­er and Cameron McCarthy, of Fou­cault, Cul­tur­al Stud­ies and Gov­ern­men­tal­i­ty (SUNY 2003).
http://comminfo.rutgers.edu/directory/jbratich/index.html

_______________
Sun­day 17 Jan­u­ary — SUBJECT TO CONFIRMATION (Check Cow­ley club web­site)
***************

John Zerzan (Ele­ments of Refusal) talks on The roots of the cri­sis and the need for a new par­a­digm.

Amer­i­can philoso­pher John Zerzan’s the­sis is sim­ple: civ­i­liza­tion is patho­log­i­cal, and needs to be dis­man­tled. Zerzan’s rad­i­cal cri­tique of civ­i­liza­tion, laid out in books such as Ele­ments Of Refusal (1988), Future Prim­i­tive (1994), and Run­ning On Empti­ness (2002) draws on anthro­po­log­i­cal research to argue that domes­ti­ca­tion of nature and domes­ti­ca­tion of humans go hand in hand. And this is accom­plished pri­mar­i­ly through tech­nol­o­gy.
This is the first appear­ance by John Z in the UK since 2003. A one-off event.
http://www.johnzerzan.net/

________________
Thurs­day 4 Feb­ru­ary
****************

John Bark­er (Bend­ing the Bars) talks about his expe­ri­ences of the Angry Brigade.

Between 1970 and 1972 the Angry Brigade, strong­ly influ­enced by anar­chism and the Sit­u­a­tion­ists, launched a bomb­ing cam­paign which tar­get­ed banks, embassies and the homes of Tory MPs. In total, 25 bomb­ings were attrib­uted to them by the police. The dam­age done by the bomb­ings was most­ly lim­it­ed to prop­er­ty dam­age although one per­son was slight­ly injured. A group of anar­chists from North East Lon­don, the ‘Stoke New­ing­ton Eight’, were pros­e­cut­ed for car­ry­ing out bomb­ings as the Angry Brigade in one of the longest crim­i­nal tri­als of Eng­lish his­to­ry (it last­ed from 30 May to 6 Decem­ber 1972).
John Bark­er was one of those impris­oned. John went to prison in 1971, and stayed there for sev­en long years. Bend­ing The Bars is a col­lec­tion of sto­ries writ­ten then, and pub­lished togeth­er for the first time in 2007. This evening John will be dis­cussing his expe­ri­ence of impris­on­ment, and answer­ing ques­tions on the Brigade’s out­look and actions.

Book review by Stew­art Home — http://www.metamute.org/en/node/6241

_______________________________________
All events run from 16.00 to 18.30 and are FREE
***************************************

More to come!

____
INFO
****

Face­book:
http://www.facebook.com/group.php?v=app_2344061033&ref=ts&gid=59207379965

Cow­ley Books
12 Lon­don Road
Brighton
BN1 4JA

cowleybooks@gmail.com
http://www.cowleyclub.org.uk/

Tree felled despite protesters underneath & protection agreement

23 Decem­ber 2009
A MAJESTIC 350-year-old oak tree in Steep was chopped down just hours after a deal was struck to save it.

Shocked vil­lagers looked on in hor­ror as con­trac­tors reneged on an agree­ment to save the land­mark oak, which has stood in Ash­ford Chace since the time of Oliv­er Cromwell, by clam­ber­ing up into the high­est branch­es and hack­ing it down last Tues­day after­noon.

23 Decem­ber 2009
A MAJESTIC 350-year-old oak tree in Steep was chopped down just hours after a deal was struck to save it.

Shocked vil­lagers looked on in hor­ror as con­trac­tors reneged on an agree­ment to save the land­mark oak, which has stood in Ash­ford Chace since the time of Oliv­er Cromwell, by clam­ber­ing up into the high­est branch­es and hack­ing it down last Tues­day after­noon.

Pro­tes­tors stand­ing under­neath the canopy were forced to take cov­er when it became clear tree sur­geons had no regard for their safe­ty, as parts of the tree came crash­ing to the ground.

Police were called amid con­fronta­tion­al scenes between vil­lagers and con­trac­tors, before the res­i­dents were forced to watch help­less­ly as the oak was sys­tem­at­i­cal­ly dis­man­tled.

Ash­ford Hang­ers Preser­va­tion Soci­ety tree war­den Drake Hock­ing said: “They start­ed off care­ful­ly and slow­ly and then some­time in the mid­dle of the day they changed tack and start­ed butcher­ing it.
“They did not stop.
“It was trag­ic and the vil­lage is now in shock.”

The oak tree is sit­u­at­ed on the Hang­ers Way and forms part of the right of way for a new four-bed­room house, built by Rolls Royce’s head of human resources Avery Duff and wife Elfri­da of Emp­shott Green.

They intend to turn the site where the oak tree stood into a straight tar­mac dri­ve for their prop­er­ty.

The tree was con­sid­ered rot­ten by East Hamp­shire Dis­trict Coun­cil’s arbo­cul­tur­al team, so was not pro­tect­ed by a tree preser­va­tion order.

Mr Hock­ing explained an agree­ment had been thrashed out on Mon­day evening with the Duf­f’s con­trac­tors Pega­sus Builders, which stat­ed it would only remove about a third of the tree.

How­ev­er, the promise was bro­ken with­in 24 hours.

“It appears the Duf­f’s archi­tect went over the head of the con­trac­tor and insist­ed the tree should be cut,” he said.

Kate Burke, of Ash­ford Chace, said: “It is shock­ing, absolute­ly shock­ing.
“I am so upset about it and the way the sit­u­a­tion has been han­dled.
“I can­not under­stand how some peo­ple can have such dis­re­gard for the coun­try­side.
“If it had been a dif­fer­ent own­er or a dif­fer­ent arbi­cul­tur­al offi­cer at the coun­cil then I think the out­come would have been very dif­fer­ent.”

She added when she went to inspect the tree after it was felled, the rot inside was only the size of her cupped hands.

“As a pro­por­tion of the whole cir­cum­fer­ence of the tree, it was noth­ing,” Mrs Burke said.
“It is so, so sad.”

Anoth­er angered res­i­dent, Jes­si­ca Pocock, said: “I think I can speak for all those present when I say that we have all been tru­ly shak­en and appalled by the crass and dis­dain­ful atti­tude dis­played to to the peo­ple of Steep, many of whom tried to nego­ti­ate with the Duffs for over two years, and to the mag­nif­i­cent oak tree, which has been felled for no good rea­son.

“We did con­sid­er tak­ing up a stance again to try and pre­vent the work being done, but in truth, we have no chance of stop­ping such ruth­less behav­iour, and the strain of the last few days has been con­sid­er­able.”

On Mon­day a sign was placed beside the tree which quot­ed the famous war poet Edward Thomas, who lived in Steep 100 years ago.

It read: “In the sun and in the snow, there are no more sins to be sinned on the dead oak tree bough.”

Avery Duff was unavail­able for com­ment when The Post went to press.

Save Titnore Woods!

With the threat of devel­op­ment on Tit­nore Woods, one of the two remain­ing semi-ancient wood­lands left on the West Sus­sex coastal plain fast approach­ing, now is the time to rise up and resist the destruc­tion of our nat­ur­al envi­ron­ment by cor­po­rate greed.

With the threat of devel­op­ment on Tit­nore Woods, one of the two remain­ing semi-ancient wood­lands left on the West Sus­sex coastal plain fast approach­ing, now is the time to rise up and resist the destruc­tion of our nat­ur­al envi­ron­ment by cor­po­rate greed.

West Dur­ring­ton Con­sor­tium, which con­sists of Per­sim­mon Homes, Tay­lor Wimpy and Heron Homes could be giv­en the go ahead to build a 1250 home devel­op­ment and a road in the new year. Pre­vi­ous­ly 875 homes where to be built, so clear­ly their eyes are see­ing more pound signs as they envi­sion more clear­ance of the pre­cious land. The project is esti­mat­ed to cost over 3 bil­lion pounds to build and take 6 years to com­plete which is utter mad­ness when Wor­thing is report­ed to have over 1000 emp­ty build­ings! If plan­ning per­mis­sion is grant­ed West Dur­ring­ton will no longer home a semi- ancient wood­land with it’s rich diver­si­ty in rare species, flo­ra and fau­na or it’s sur­round­ing farm­land but a mas­sive hous­ing devel­op­ment, road, a giant Tesco and pos­si­bly 2 schools and a health cen­tre.

Already the destruc­tion is evi­dent when you vis­it Tit­nore. Just across the field from the protest site the eye sore that will be Tesco is well under way and is due to open in February/March 2010. West Sus­sex Coun­ty Coun­cil gave per­mis­sion on Decem­ber 9th 2009 to close the pub­lic foot­path reach­ing Tinore woods from Full­beck Avenue. No per­sons are allowed to use this right of way to vis­it the woods now as it is viewed as a pub­lic safe­ty haz­ard until the West Dur­ring­ton Con­sor­tium project is com­plet­ed. Also trees and bush­es have been cleared here, although none are of the semi ancient woods this is still a haunt­ing reminder that con­struc­tion is immi­nent.

On Thurs­day Jan­u­ary 28th 2010 at 6pm the West Dur­ring­ton Con­sor­tium will meet at Wor­thing Bor­ough Coun­cil’s Con­trol Com­mit­tee to push for per­mis­sion to begin devel­op­ment. If they win then it’s full steam ahead for the bull­doz­ers and a very sad day for the hard work­ing folk of Camp Tit­nore who have occu­pied the woods in resis­tance of the destruc­tion for the last 3 and a half years, and also for the local Wor­thing res­i­dents who strong­ly oppose the plans and wish to see their ancient wood­land left stand­ing.

To show that you oppose their plans to tear down an irre­place­able nat­ur­al space come and join the counter demo at 5.30pm out­side Assem­bly Hall, Stoke Abbott Road, Wor­thing on Jan­u­ary 28th 2010.
Please vis­it Camp Tit­nore. Enjoy its beau­ty, help to build new defences and walk­ways. Dona­tions of wood, nails, polyprop and cor­ru­gat­ed iron would be much appre­ci­at­ed.

Camp Tit­nore needs you!

See Tit­nore con­tact links for direc­tions and so on