Kinder Morgan Surveyor Office Blocked by ‘Pipeline’, Canada

mappipe2

Octo­ber 7th, 2014

mappipe2

Octo­ber 7th, 2014

Activists installed a “pipeline” ear­ly this mor­ing in front of the down­town offices of McEl­han­ney map­ping. The adhoc group says the com­pa­ny was taget­ed for its part in sur­vey­ing for the con­tro­ver­sial Kinder Mor­gan pipeline expan­sion plan on Burn­a­by Moun­tain.

The group erect­ed a pvc pipeline, com­plete with drip­ping ‘bitu­men’ and notices to “Get off Burn­a­by Moun­tain.”

From the group’s release:

“Ear­ly this morn­ing the entrance to McElhanney’s down­town Van­cou­ver office was block­ad­ed. The doors were locked, a “bitu­men pipeline” blocked the stairs and posters were past­ed. The action is in response to McElhanney’s par­tic­i­pa­tion in sur­vey­ing for the Kinder Mor­gan pipeline expan­sion project in Burn­a­by .

 

mappipe6_0

“The pro­pos­al aims to increase the num­ber of bar­rels of Alber­ta bitu­men deliv­ered to Burn­a­by and the Sal­ish Sea from 300,000 bar­rels a day to 890,000 a day. This would result in an astro­nom­i­cal and dan­ger­ous increase in tanker traf­fic through the Bur­rard Inlet. The expan­sion cross­es the unced­ed ter­ri­to­ry of many Indige­nous nations and is evi­dence of con­tin­ued oppres­sive col­o­niza­tion and ram­pant cap­i­tal­ist greed.  Resis­tance to this project is strong and unwa­ver­ing!

“The Secwepemc Women War­rior Soci­ety has been vocal­ly opposed to the projects’ intru­sion through the heart of their ter­ri­to­ry, the Tsleil-Wau­tuth Nation has launched a legal bat­tle as well as cre­at­ed a treaty with sur­round­ing nations vow­ing to pro­tect the Sal­ish Sea, even local may­ors are stand­ing up in oppo­si­tion. Despite the resound­ing no from affect­ed com­mu­ni­ties, Kinder Mor­gan is con­tin­u­ing with the project and hir­ing com­pa­nies to do inva­sive stud­ies that are against Coast Sal­ish law and even “Cana­di­an” colo­nial bylaws. No means no and the peo­ple, led by Indige­nous resis­tance are not back­ing down to cor­po­ra­tions!

“This dis­rup­tion has been brought to you by a group of friends who refuse to accept, and are com­mit­ted to resist­ing, the con­tin­ued col­o­niza­tion of indige­nous ter­ri­to­ries by cor­po­ra­tions and gov­ern­ment.  We oppose the oppres­sive nature of the oil and gas indus­try in our fight for cli­mate and social jus­tice. We stand in sol­i­dar­i­ty with front­line com­mu­ni­ties who are fight­ing destruc­tive and oppres­sive resource extrac­tion projects.”

The office entrance has now been blocked off by Van­cou­ver police.

mappipe1

 

All-Woman Tripod and Lockdown Halts Enbridge Line 9 Pipeline Operations for Hours

The third woman at the protest spent hours teetering on this makeshift construction before being removed by firefighters.
</p>
</body></html>

The third woman at the protest spent hours teetering on this makeshift construction before being removed by firefighters. (Kate McKenna/CBC)
Octo­ber 7th, 2014
Three activists who chained them­selves to a fence at Enbridge’s Mon­tre­al
head­quar­ters had their locks and chains cut just after noon on Tues­day.

After spend­ing hours in the cold rain, Alyssa Symons-Bélanger, Jes­si­ca Lam­bert and a third woman were removed from the fence they chained them­selves to at Enbridge’s head­quar­ters on Hen­ri-Bouras­sa East.

She attached her­self to a chain-link fence with a heavy chain around her waist and a bicy­cle lock around her neck.

“I know that today I stand with these peo­ple, and these peo­ple stand with me also in oppo­si­tion of Enbridge’s Line 9,” she said.

The group of pro­test­ers, who accord­ing to Symons-Bélanger are not part of a larg­er orga­ni­za­tion, issued a news release Tues­day morn­ing say­ing they were look­ing to dis­rupt Suncor’s refin­ery oper­a­tions.

Enbridge plans to reverse the 9B sec­tion of its Line 9 pipeline. (Enbridge)

Enbridge trans­ports the crude oil to Mon­tre­al via pipeline, where refiner­ies like Sun­cor process it.

Symons-Bélanger said she is against Enbridge’s Line 9 pipeline rever­sal for a vari­ety of rea­sons, includ­ing safe­ty con­cerns and improp­er com­pen­sa­tion for peo­ple whose land is touched by the pipeline.

She was a mem­ber of the group of pro­test­ers who walked for 34 days from Cacouna, Que., to Kane­sa­take in the spring.

Coordinated Direct Action against Maules Creek Mine Suspends Work at Several Sites

Octo­ber 2nd, 2014

Activists protest­ing against a coal project have dis­rupt­ed min­ing oper­a­tions at sev­er­al sites in the Gunnedah Basin, in north­ern New South Wales.

An anti-coal protest group said about 150 pro­test­ers had tar­get­ed four mines and a coal loader oper­at­ed by White­haven Coal, which is plan­ning a con­tro­ver­sial mine at Maules Creek, near Narrabri in the state’s north-west.

Oppo­nents, includ­ing envi­ron­men­tal­ists and farm­ers, have said the project and asso­ci­at­ed for­est-clear­ing pose sig­nif­i­cant envi­ron­men­tal threats includ­ing to bio­di­ver­si­ty and water required for agri­cul­tur­al use.

Four pro­test­ers chained them­selves to access points to the Maules Creek project and two scaled the coal loader at the Wer­ris Creek mine and unfurled a ban­ner.

At the Tar­ra­won­ga mine at Bog­gabri a pro­tes­tor climbed a tri­pod struc­ture to block access to the site while, three oth­ers chained them­selves togeth­er across the road.

Two pro­test­ers chained them­selves to a gate at the Roc­glen mine near Gunnedah and anoth­er pair chained them­selves to a gate at the Gunnedah coal han­dling plant.

Police from Bar­won Local Area Com­mand said at least six peo­ple were arrest­ed.

They includ­ed a 27-year-old envi­ron­men­tal­ist who chained him­self to a rail line near New­cas­tle.

Police res­cue offi­cers had to cut the man free and he was like­ly to be charged with tres­pass.

The Aus­tralian Rail Track Cor­po­ra­tion con­firmed the protest had dis­rupt­ed rail oper­a­tions.

The rail line, which is used to trans­port coal into the Port of New­cas­tle for export, was blocked for more than two hours.

Protesters demand inquiry into ‘flawed approval processes’

Helen War, from the Front Line Action on Coal group, said the pro­test­ers want­ed the State Gov­ern­ment to con­duct an inquiry into how the Maules Creek project was giv­en plan­ning approval.

“They’re call­ing for an imme­di­ate stop to work at the Maules Creek mine and for the New South Wales Gov­ern­ment to con­duct a full inquiry into the flawed approval process­es,” she said.

White­haven Man­ag­ing Direc­tor Paul Fly­nn said the protests caused lit­tle dis­rup­tion at Maules Creek, but there were delays at the company’s oth­er active mines.

“The police have been called for each of these activ­i­ties,” he said.

“The real­i­ty of it is, is that it will only be a mar­gin­al impact on us for the day, and unfor­tu­nate­ly again anoth­er wide­spread con­sump­tion of impor­tant valu­able com­mu­ni­ty resources such as the police and police res­cue.

“I’m not quite sure what these peo­ple thing they’re doing by tar­get­ing just inno­cent peo­ple try­ing to do their job.”

Greens leader Chris­tine Milne vis­it­ed an activist camp site near Maules Creek on Sun­day to show sup­port for the ongo­ing protest action.

The par­ty has con­tro­ver­sial­ly sup­port­ed those involved in the unrest, includ­ing activist Jonathon Moy­lan.

Moy­lan was giv­en a 20-month prison sen­tence in July after plead­ing guilty to issu­ing a fake press release that tem­porar­i­ly wiped mil­lions of dol­lars from the company’s books.

Ms Milne said Moy­lan was sup­port­ing the Maules Creek farm­ing com­mu­ni­ty and has had his day in court.

“And that is what you do when you’re an activist but the com­pa­ny hasn’t faced the full face of the law and that is what is wrong here,” she said.

“You’ve got com­mu­ni­ty activists who are pre­pared to take the con­se­quences but the com­pa­ny who gets out of tak­ing the con­se­quences.”

Anti-industrial Sabotage in Southern Quebec in Solidarity with Evicted Algonquin Protesters

Octo­ber 1st, 2014

by King Ludd and his army of Feni­ans / Anar­chist News

Octo­ber 1st, 2014

by King Ludd and his army of Feni­ans / Anar­chist News

Brief resume of this com­mu­nique: A rail­road tele­com was burned and three res­i­den­tial devel­op­ment pan­els van­dalised in response to an evic­tion of Native resisters in Gatineau and in sol­i­dar­i­ty with the 5E3, some­where in south­ern K‑bekk.

Full ver­sion:

So the oth­er night on Sep­tem­ber 21, we’ve set fire to a rail­road telecomm cable link­ing Brigham to Sher­brooke (Qc) to the US, think­ing about the Algo­nquins peo­ple recent­ly evict­ed from a resis­tance camp and detained in Gatineau. We took the time to select a rail­way bridge in the mid­dle of nowhere near Water­loo, so we’d not have to dig to get to the cables or attract too much atten­tion. Some fuel was dropped through an open­ing in the steel cas­ing of the cables, then set on fire. Noth­ing fan­cy. It worked bet­ter as we’d guessed, as a few sec­onds lat­er it already smelled burn­ing rub­ber a few meters away. The enclosed air in the con­duct appar­ent­ly turned the fire into some­thing like a blow torch. Kind of easy game to be repro­duced else­where by oth­ers, we told our­selves… so that’s a rea­son to let oth­ers know.

Of course it didn’t cause the whole tech­no-indus­tri­al sys­tem to col­lapse! Soci­ety is still pret­ty much func­tion­al today. But you got­ta start attack­ing it some­where. Though it did feel as if an impor­tant nerve deep below soci­ety had been sev­ered. And this felt good get­ting off our ass­es in the mid­dle of the night for this.

It is note­wor­thy that this rail­way line is the exact same on which the tar sands train used to pass, tak­ing the lives of a hun­dred peo­ple last year. It is again used to trans­port oil from the West to the US, though at much small­er rate. Soon it will be replaced by the equal­ly par­a­sitic and dev­as­tat­ing pipelines, unless a seri­ous oppo­si­tion to it ris­es out from the cur­rent apa­thy so wide­spread in south­ern Que­bec these days. As the sheep put their trust in the bureau­crats and the “experts” with all their “mora­to­ri­ums”, legal chal­lenges and “envi­ron­men­tal assess­ments”, the pop­u­lar beast is tamed and kept in line, the same line that led us to a dis­as­ter last year, and keeps destroy­ing the wild life around…

Hence, as bonus, dur­ing the fol­low­ing days, pan­els for rur­al res­i­den­tial devel­op­ments were van­dal­ized, each in the name of pris­on­ers Amélie, Fal­lon and Car­los impris­oned in Mex­i­co, two of which are from Mon­tre­al.

Two pan­els were spray-paint­ed in Sainte-Eti­enne-de-Bolton (not very far from that sab­o­tage) where “Eco­cide” was writ­ten, and a large pan­el by the high­way 10 that ties Mon­tre­al to Sher­brooke.

Those ges­tures are far from the inten­si­ty of the attacks those three per­sons are accused of, but they tar­get anoth­er end of the same same social machine that destroys and rapes the liv­ing, here as in north­ern Alber­ta, Mex­i­co and else­where.

We take the oppor­tu­ni­ty to pass on our shared view on fight­ing the progress of tech­no-civ­i­liza­tion: This fast-grow­ing type of visu­al pol­lu­tion plays a key role in the destruc­tion process paving way to the inva­sion of tech­no-indus­tri­al soci­ety, but also are very wor­thy alter­na­tives to the clas­sic urban van­dal­ism. There’s no geopol­i­tics of van­dal­ism, what mat­ters being just the sen­si­tiv­i­ty of the tar­get to the infra­struc­ture behind, and this one is sen­si­tive as fuck. Though as count­less graf­fi­ti in the City will at least express a cri­tique and give a vir­tu­al impres­sion of dis­or­der, at best defame the fas­cists and the cops and cap­i­tal; sub­ur­ban sprawl can be stopped or slowed down in direct result from van­dal­ism against those spec­tac­u­lar out­lets of cap­i­tal (in this case, the gang­ster con­struc­tion indus­try and all its par­a­sites who just wan­na pay them­selves a yatch with easy mon­ey out the sale and destruc­tion of fic­tion­al­ly-owned land, who’re pret­ty much the same fuck­ers who pay them­selves sum­mer res­i­dences here with gen­tri­fi­ca­tion mon­ey in the city. Get the pic­ture?). We have proof of this, by expe­ri­ence… we have seen major real-estate cor­po­ra­tions with­draw­ing from devel­op­ments, just because of pan­els being recur­sive­ly van­dal­ized. We fought this kind of tac­tic, no mat­ter how low-scale or bor­ing it may look like, deserves to be brought back in the attack menu, at least as appe­tiz­ers. So, tons of oppor­tu­ni­ties for sub­vertive art at the tip of the civ­i­liza­tion­al spear­head. A good field for spread­ing anti-civ memes too!

For all the crea­tures killed or evict­ed by the death machine of soci­ety that keeps spawl­ing.

For the wild!

– King Ludd and his army of Feni­ans, from the dark­ness of the for­est

Coalition Block Highway Construction on Back-to-Back Days

Pic1

Pic1

Tribal Pomo Representatives, AIM elders and Environmentalists Block Filling of Wetlands

[Today (Sep­tem­ber 28th, 2014) , rough­ly 30 peo­ple block­ad­ed dump trucks at both entrance gates to the Willits Bypass north­ern inter­change con­struc­tion zone, halt­ing near­ly all soil dump­ing for the day.  At rough­ly 11 a.m., the dump trucks went home for the day. The Cal­i­for­nia High­way Patrol took a light approach to polic­ing the demon­stra­tion, mak­ing no arrests.  We are gath­er­ing again tomor­row at 7 a.m. at The Tipi! Only seri­ous rain will pre­vent us from gath­er­ing. Check out the KMUD News report filed by Annie Espos­i­to, which begins at 6:00 into the broad­cast.]

Native Amer­i­can Trib­al mem­bers, includ­ing direct descen­dants of the Pomo peo­ples who once pop­u­lat­ed the Lit­tle Lake Val­ley where Cal­trans is cur­rent­ly build­ing an over­sized free­way Bypass, will join envi­ron­men­tal groups in a mass protest on the north end of the project today. Pro­tes­tors will enter the con­struc­tion zone north of town in the ear­ly morn­ing hours, slow­ing and stop­ping the fast and furi­ous flow of dirt-filled, dou­ble-bel­ly dump trucks work­ing from dawn to dusk to cov­er the wet­lands and arche­o­log­i­cal sites the activists seek to pro­tect.
Elders and spir­i­tu­al lead­ers from local Pomo Indi­an Bands and the Amer­i­can Indi­an Move­ment (AIM) will lead the way to threat­ened cul­tur­al sites where prayers will be offered for the ances­tors. The AIM flag and drum will be present near the con­struc­tion area where Native Amer­i­can cul­tur­al arti­facts have been dis­cov­ered. The sites have been doc­u­ment­ed and fenced off by Cal­trans, but are still slat­ed to be destroyed by being per­ma­nent­ly grad­ed and buried under the Bypass as cur­rent­ly designed.

“I hear and feel our ances­tors cry to save our vil­lages from destruc­tion. The white man’s his­to­ry repeats itself. We pray that the Cre­ator will hear our prayers”, said Priscil­la Hunter, trib­al rep­re­sen­ta­tive for the Coy­ote Val­ley Band of Pomo Indi­ans. “Cal­trans pla­cat­ed the inter­ests of local ranch­ers by giv­ing them per­ma­nent graz­ing rights on the mit­i­ga­tion lands and built the viaduct over the rail­road track to pre­serve it, but yet they don’t lis­ten to the Indi­ans’ con­cerns for pro­tec­tion of our ances­tors’ cul­ture or to our call for down­siz­ing the north­ern inter­change to avoid a large vil­lage site.”

The Coy­ote Val­ley Tribe request­ed gov­ern­ment to gov­ern­ment con­sul­ta­tions with the Army Corps of Engi­neers in June, but to date has received no response. Hunter stat­ed that Cal­trans was like­ly in vio­la­tion of the Clean Water Act 404 Per­mit Gen­er­al Con­di­tion # 3 which specif­i­cal­ly ref­er­ences the pro­tec­tion of arche­o­log­i­cal sites and Sec­tion 106 of the Nation­al His­toric Preser­va­tion Act. At this time, Cal­trans has refused to pro­vide any fur­ther infor­ma­tion about the recent cul­tur­al find­ings to Hunter.

The Coy­ote Val­ley Band of Pomo Indi­ans let­ter to the Army Corps of Engi­neers and their Res­o­lu­tion for Gov­ern­ment to Gov­ern­ment con­sul­ta­tion can be found here.

Over thir­ty addi­tion­al sites and more than one hun­dred arti­facts have been iden­ti­fied since Bypass con­struc­tion in the val­ley began. One site is thought to be the ancient vil­lage site of Yami. After ini­tial­ly assur­ing the Sher­wood Val­ley Band of Pomo that con­struc­tion on this large, known site would be avoid­ed, Cal­trans destroyed the vil­lage com­plete­ly in the sum­mer of 2013. Equip­ment oper­a­tors did not stop work and did not noti­fy the Tribes, as required. Cal­trans admit­ted the destruc­tion months lat­er, call­ing it “acci­den­tal” and blam­ing faulty maps. Arti­facts in Lit­tle Lake Val­ley are so plen­ti­ful it has been described by arche­ol­o­gists as an Arche­o­log­i­cal Dis­trict.

Some of the cul­tur­al sites being “dis­cov­ered by bull­doz­er” are on the so-called mit­i­ga­tion lands, acres Cal­trans is rely­ing upon to com­pen­sate for envi­ron­men­tal dam­age to pub­lic val­ues, called “tem­po­ral loss”. When cul­tur­al sites are iden­ti­fied, the area is set aside, reduc­ing the acreage avail­able for mit­i­ga­tions. Cal­trans needs every acre of scarce mit­i­ga­tion land to make up for the tem­po­ral loss­es already incurred by its chron­ic fail­ure to per­form mit­i­ga­tion mea­sures now two years over­due.

Bypass oppo­nents have pro­posed a small­er, low­er impact design to reduce the amount of mit­i­ga­tion lands need­ed to sat­is­fy require­ments that would also save time mon­ey as well as some 30 acres of wet­lands while avoid­ing cul­tur­al sites. Cal­trans had com­mit­ted to find­ing ways to reduce the amount of fill used on the north­ern inter­change as one of the con­di­tions of rein­stat­ing its pre­vi­ous­ly sus­pend­ed 404 Oper­at­ing Per­mit under lead agency Army Corps of Engi­neers. Cal­trans has pro­posed only a min­i­mal 3.5 acre reduc­tion carved from minor design adjust­ments, with­out eval­u­at­ing oth­er, less destruc­tive options.

The Coali­tion to Save Lit­tle Lake Val­ley and oth­ers includ­ing Save Our Lit­tle Lake Val­ley, Earth First!, the Willits Envi­ron­men­tal Cen­ter and Bay Area Coali­tion for Head­wa­ters are demand­ing an imme­di­ate halt to all fill activ­i­ties on the north­ern inter­change pend­ing a sig­nif­i­cant reduc­tion of impacts to pro­tect both wet­lands and cul­tur­al sites.

9/24 Protesters Come Back!

Despite impend­ing rain, activists returned today for a sec­ond day of protest against the bit­ter­ly con­test­ed Cal­trans’ Bypass, after shut­ting down fill oper­a­tions on the north­ern inter­change all day yes­ter­day. On Tues­day, two groups of activists held long cloth ban­ners with the mes­sages: ”Cal­trans Kills Wet­lands” and “Cal­trans: Paving the Road to Extinc­tion” stretched across the entrance to two haul roads off high­way 101, block­ing ingress and egress from the con­struc­tion zone.

A third group, includ­ing Priscil­la Hunter, Trib­al Rep­re­sen­ta­tive for the Coy­ote Val­ley Band of Pomo Indi­ans and oth­er Native Amer­i­cans of lin­eal descent to the area’s Pomo ances­tors, suc­ceed­ed in reach­ing the ances­tral cul­tur­al site they want to pro­tect, remain­ing there for some time with the Amer­i­can Indi­an Move­ment (AIM) flag, to drum and pray. The activists then blocked a third stream of dirt-filled trucks, effec­tive­ly stop­ping work.

Pro­test­ers’ num­bers have increased late­ly due to the par­tic­i­pa­tion of Native Amer­i­can Pomo Tribes, includ­ing those from Coy­ote Val­ley, Sher­wood Rancheria, Pot­ter and Red­wood Val­ley, all of whom were rep­re­sent­ed at the protest.

There were no arrests on Tues­day. CHP offi­cers were present in one squad car and one van, but did not tell pro­test­ers they were tres­pass­ing and did not ask them to leave, as erro­neous­ly stat­ed by Cal­trans Pub­lic Rela­tions offi­cial, Phil Fris­bee in the San­ta Rosa Press Demo­c­rat on Tues. Sept. 23.

 “We came back again today to insist on our demand for a less destruc­tive, less expen­sive design for the north­ern inter­change to pro­tect cul­tur­al sites and wet­lands”, said Nao­mi Wag­n­er of Red­wood Nation Earth First!

Pic4

Pic5

Pic6

Pic7

from Save Little Lake Valley

Video: “Chipmunks” Obstruct Work at Utah Tar Sands Mine

On Tues­day, Sept. 23rd, three brave “chip­munks” stopped word at US Oil Sands con­struc­tion site, on the East Tava­puts Plateau, by phys­i­cal­ly putting their bod­ies in front of the machines being used to destroy this amaz­ing land in order to strip-mine tar sands.

On Tues­day, Sept. 23rd, three brave “chip­munks” stopped word at US Oil Sands con­struc­tion site, on the East Tava­puts Plateau, by phys­i­cal­ly putting their bod­ies in front of the machines being used to destroy this amaz­ing land in order to strip-mine tar sands.

There will be a press release, and a state­ment from the “chip­munks” will be avail­able on Sept. 30, 2014 at: http://www.tarsandsresist.org/chipmunks/

http://youtu.be/zdjZOMizYyM

Oil Train Opponents Blockade Tracks at Port Westward (USA)

photo courtesy Portland Rising Tide

Sep­tem­ber 18th, 201

photo courtesy Portland Rising Tide

Sep­tem­ber 18th, 2014

Clatskanie, OR—Climate jus­tice activists, local Clatskanie farm­ers, and oil train oppo­nents from all over Colum­bia Coun­ty are blockad­ing the tracks that lead to Port West­ward on the Colum­bia Riv­er. The block­ade con­sists of a 20-foot-high tri­pod of steel poles, its apex occu­pied by 27-year-old Port­land Ris­ing Tide activist Sun­ny Glover.

Any train move­ment would risk her life, as would any attempt to remove her from the struc­ture. A ban­ner sus­pend­ed from the tri­pod reads: “Oil trains fuel cli­mate chaos.” She has vowed to stay as long as she is able. Mass­a­chu­setts-based Glob­al Part­ners ships oil by rail from the frack­ing fields of the Bakken Shale to the block­ad­ed facil­i­ty.

From there, it is loaded onto ocean­go­ing ves­sels bound for West Coast refiner­ies. The facil­i­ty was con­struct­ed with pub­lic clean ener­gy loans and tax cred­its to man­u­fac­ture ethanol in 2008. The own­ers declared bank­rupt­cy almost imme­di­ate­ly, and in a twist of sav­age irony, it became a crude oil ter­mi­nal.

“Fos­sil fuels are cat­a­stroph­i­cal­ly destruc­tive,” Glover said. “Extrac­tion rav­ages land, water, and the health of local com­mu­ni­ties – trans­port results in dead­ly explo­sions, tox­ic spills and dust – and as they are burned, the Earth is forced ever deep­er into immense cli­mate insta­bil­i­ty. Fos­sil fuel pro­duc­tion is vio­lence, and on an incred­i­bly vast scale.”

Dozens are join­ing Glover on the tracks.

Photo courtesy Portland Rising Tide

The increase in US oil pro­duc­tion in recent years, and the con­se­quent rise in oil train traf­fic, has out­raged a diver­si­ty of groups and com­mu­ni­ties. Ris­ing Tide activists, hop­ing to deter the most severe effects of cli­mate change, are demand­ing a rapid dis­man­tling of fos­sil fuel infra­struc­ture through­out the region and the world.

Res­i­dents of areas effect­ed by oil train traf­fic are hor­ri­fied by the propen­si­ty of Bakken crude trains to derail in fiery explosions—a May, 2014 emer­gency order by the US Depart­ment of Trans­porta­tion describes the trains as an “immi­nent haz­ard.”

Res­i­dents of the patch­work of farms, dikes, and water­ways north of Clatskanie are fight­ing to pro­tect agri­cul­tur­al land and salmon habi­tat from indus­tri­al­iza­tion.

“When the crude oil trains began rolling through Colum­bia Coun­ty, we had no pri­or warning—not from DEQ, not from the Port of St. Helens, not from the coun­ty, and not from the State of Ore­gon,” said Nan­cy Whit­ney.

“With the close prox­im­i­ty of our towns, and par­tic­u­lar­ly our schools, and con­sid­er­ing the track record of crude oil derail­ments, my fear is that the poten­tial dev­as­ta­tion from leak­age or explo­sion could be astronomical—and it will hap­pen unless these trains are stopped.”

This is the fifth oil train block­ade in the Pacif­ic North­west since June.

“This is only the begin­ning,” said Noah Hochman. “We will con­tin­ue to block­ade until it is finan­cial­ly, logis­ti­cal­ly, and polit­i­cal­ly unten­able for oil trains to threat­en cli­mate and com­mu­ni­ties.”

Update:

Police Risk Protester’s Life to End 9‑Hour Oil Train Blockade

10423751_716456668441388_1080498042794148212_n

Yes­ter­day after­noon, cli­mate jus­tice group Port­land Ris­ing Tide and allies from Colum­bia Coun­ty erect­ed a 20-foot-tall tri­pod of steel poles to block­ade the Port West­ward oil ter­mi­nal. Dozens of police, work­ing at night under flood­lights, were mobi­lized to remove 27-year-old Sun­ny Glover from the tripod’s apex. After an ini­tial attempt to remove her with a buck­et truck—which she foiled by lock­ing her neck to one of the tripod’s poles—the police resort­ed to far more dras­tic and per­ilous mea­sures.

In a sur­re­al scene, the amassed law enforce­ment offi­cers began using a cir­cu­lar saw to cut through the tripod’s legs in approx­i­mate­ly foot-long incre­ments, grad­u­al­ly low­er­ing the struc­ture to the ground amidst a show­er of sparks from the saw. Glover’s neck remained locked to a pole the entire time. Each pre­car­i­ous cut threat­ened to top­ple the struc­ture. About 40 pro­test­ers shout­ed words of encour­age­ment from a near­by road until she was arrest­ed and dri­ven from the scene around 11:30pm.

“The courage my friend Sun­ny exhib­it­ed tonight was tremen­dous,” Scott Schroder said. “Unfor­tu­nate­ly, she lives in a world of ter­ri­fy­ing sce­nar­ios. She can either have her life jeop­ar­dized by the police or by cat­a­stroph­ic cli­mate change and explod­ing oil trains. She chose to resist because she under­stands acqui­es­cence is the greater per­il.”

The ter­mi­nal, oper­at­ed by Mass­a­chu­setts-based Glob­al Part­ners, has been con­tro­ver­sial since its incep­tion. At the protest today were res­i­dents of the Colum­bia Coun­ty towns of St. Helens, Scap­poose, and Clatskanie, whose homes and busi­ness­es are with­in the blast zone should an oil train derail and explode. Ris­ing Tide activists are demand­ing a rapid phase-out of fos­sil fuels in order to avert a cli­mate cat­a­stro­phe that would be felt for mil­len­nia.

Pro­test­ers were crit­i­cal of the tremen­dous mobi­liza­tion of pub­lic resources to dis­man­tle the blockade—there were approx­i­mate­ly 40 com­bined fire, police, and med­ical per­son­nel on site—saying it amount­ed to essen­tial­ly anoth­er sub­sidy for the fos­sil fuel indus­try.

“Tax­pay­ers have already giv­en Glob­al Part­ners mil­lions of dol­lars in clean ener­gy con­struc­tion sub­si­dies, when we thought their facil­i­ty was going to be an ethanol plant,” said David Osborn. “Now the pub­lic is hand­ing over thou­sands more to keep the train tracks free of peo­ple out­raged by their bait-and-switch.”

This sum­mer, Ris­ing Tide col­lec­tives have block­ad­ed oil train facil­i­ties in Wash­ing­ton and Ore­gon five times. The groups say they are work­ing toward mass mobi­liza­tions that will sig­nif­i­cant­ly impede the abil­i­ty of oil to be trans­port­ed by rail in the Pacif­ic North­west.

“We will be back,” Schroder said. “Over and over again. And we’re bring­ing more peo­ple every time.”

PHOTOS, VIDEO, AUDIO: https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0B8Tw30qC0uQib2xlLXk0cERaeVk&usp=sharing_eil

09/18 ACTION PRESS RELEASE: https://drive.google.com/?usp=folder&authuser=0#folders/0B8Tw30qC0uQib2xlLXk0cERaeVk

BACKGROUND ON OREGON OIL TRAINS AND THE CLIMATE CRISIS:http://portlandrisingtide.org/oil-trains-oregon-bakken-shale-uinta-basin-climate-crisis/

Two Arrested in Gas Pipeline Protest, USA

unnamed

Sep­tem­ber 17th, 2014

unnamed

Sep­tem­ber 17th, 2014

Two men were arrest­ed on Sep­tem­ber 16 after chain­ing them­selves to pipe being laid for Ver­mont Gas’ fracked gas pipeline.  The action took place a day before the Ver­mont Pub­lic Ser­vice Board begins a process which could result in the revok­ing of the per­mits required for Ver­mont Gas to con­tin­ue con­struc­tion.

Con­struc­tion was halt­ed around 3:45, and did not resume for the rest of the day. The two men were charged and released.

“Ver­mont Gas lied,” said Will Ben­ning­ton, a spokesper­son for Ris­ing Tide Ver­mont. “They’ve lied about the cli­mate and envi­ron­men­tal impacts of the project, they’ve lied to landown­ers and bro­ken promis­es, and now they’ve lied about the cost of this project.  The Pub­lic Ser­vice Board, and ulti­mate­ly Gov­er­nor Shum­lin, have no rea­son to believe Ver­mont Gas is act­ing in the pub­lic good.”

In July, Ver­mont Gas announced a 40 per­cent increase in the cost of con­struc­tion for Phase 1 of the fracked gas pipeline.  The com­pa­ny hopes to pass this cost on to ratepay­ers, increas­ing the price of gas at a time when many Ver­mon­ters are already strug­gling to heat their homes.

Demon­stra­tors oppose the pipeline because it will lock Ver­mont com­mu­ni­ties into decades more of dirty fos­sil fuel use, at a time when a rapid tran­si­tion away from fos­sil fuels and extreme ener­gy use is need­ed.  They are also con­cerned with impacts to local landown­ers and the lack of trans­paren­cy sur­round­ing the per­mit­ting process.

The Pub­lic Ser­vice Board is host­ing a hear­ing tomor­row in Mont­pe­lier to decide whether or not to re-open the company’s Cer­tifi­cate of Pub­lic Good.

“This isn’t the begin­ning, and this isn’t the end,” Ben­ning­ton said. “We are going to con­tin­ue to do every­thing we can to stop this pipeline.  It is moral­ly rep­re­hen­si­ble to be build­ing new fos­sil fuel infra­struc­ture in this day and age, espe­cial­ly in a state that has already banned frack­ing.”
Local copo­rate video cov­er­age here and here

Protesters Locks Down on Kinder Morgan Facility (Canada)

Bxa8AVpIcAAQ3bv.jpg large13/9/14

Bxa8AVpIcAAQ3bv.jpg large13/9/14

Ris­ing Tide Coast Sal­ish Ter­rior­ies reports that pro­test­ers have used bicy­cle locks to lock them­selves to a Kinder Mor­gan facil­i­ty in Burn­a­by, in unced­ed Coast Sal­ish Ter­ri­to­ries in so-called British Colum­bia.

Kinder Mor­gan has begun sur­vey­ing and cut­ting trees in con­ser­va­tion and park­land on Burn­a­by Moun­tain, unced­ed Coast Sal­ish Ter­ri­to­ries. The giant US oil pipeline com­pa­ny plans to clear park­land in prepa­ra­tion for bor­ing a tun­nel through the North­ridge of Burn­a­by Moun­tain con­trary to city bylaws.

The pur­pose of the tun­nel will be to trans­port crude tar sands oil from the stor­age tanks at For­est Hill to Westridge Ter­mi­nal. Many geol­o­gists and seis­mol­o­gists are con­cerned that the North­ridge will be sub­ject to extreme shak­ing in the event of even a mod­er­ate earth­quake putting at risk the pipeline, the huge oil stor­age tanks at For­est Hill and the Afra­max tankers at Westridge ter­mi­nal. A mod­er­ate earth­quake to the huge tanks, pipeline and ter­mi­nal would make the 2007 pipeline spill at Westridge minor in com­par­i­son.

The pro­test­ers, at the time of writ­ing, were still locked to the gate.

Update: Six peo­ple were arrest­ed after thir­teen hours locked-down and sub­se­quent­ly released.

For updates on the sit­u­a­tion check @risingtide604

 

Cor­rec­tion: We mis­tak­en­ly report­ed that this was a Ris­ing Tide Coast Sal­ish Ter­ri­to­ries action.

BxcQcHUCIAAXakt.jpg large

First Nations Protesters Shut Down Northern B.C. Drilling Site

10/9/14

After a sum­mer of protests aimed at min­ing com­pa­nies, mem­bers of the Tahltan Nation in north­ern B.C. say they have shut down an explorato­ry drilling oper­a­tion by tak­ing over the site.

“HAPPENING RIGHT NOW!!!!” states a Mon­day night post­ing on the Face­book page for Tahltan elders. “The Klabona Keep­er mem­bers are occu­py­ing a black hawk drill pad above Ealue Lake!!!”

The elders’ group, which is based in Iskut just south of Dease Lake, has staged sev­er­al protests in the area in recent years block­ing resource com­pa­nies from work­ing in a place known as the Sacred Head­wa­ters. The region is high­ly val­ued by the Tahltan because it holds the head­wa­ters of three impor­tant salmon rivers – the Stikine, Skeena and Nass.

Rho­da Quock, a spokes­woman for the Klabono Keep­ers, said Tues­day a group of pro­test­ers hiked to the remote drill site and took it over.

She said Black Hawk Drilling Ltd., a Smithers, B.C., com­pa­ny that works for Firesteel Resources Inc. of Van­cou­ver and OZ Min­er­als of Aus­tralia, flew its drilling crew out after the occu­pa­tion began.

Protests against the mine explo­ration work began in 2006-07, said Ms. Quock, when Firesteel Resources began exam­in­ing a cop­per-gold deposit in the Sacred Head­wa­ters region.

The Klabona Keep­ers set up road­blocks at that time and the com­pa­ny with­drew, before return­ing ear­li­er this sum­mer, she said.

“In July … we saw drilling equip­ment near the road,” she said. “We told them they had until noon to remove the drill or we’d take it over. And they did [remove the equip­ment].”

But Ms. Quock said heli­copters were lat­er seen fly­ing over­head.

Com­pa­ny offi­cials could not be reached for an inter­view, but on its web­site, Firesteel Resources states that in July it began work­ing with OZ Min­er­als on a drilling pro­gram in the area.

In a brief e‑mail, Michael Hep­worth, Pres­i­dent and chief exec­u­tive offi­cer of Firesteel Resources, said the drilling crew has approval to do explorato­ry drilling.

“We are work­ing in the area under [Tahltan Cen­tral Coun­cil] approval and are ful­ly per­mit­ted by the B.C. gov­ern­ment to work in the area,” said Mr. Hep­worth, who is trav­el­ling out­side Cana­da.

Although the Tahltan Cen­tral Coun­cil is the main gov­ern­ing body of the Tahltan Nation, the Klabona Keep­ers oper­ate inde­pen­dent­ly. The two groups are some­times at odds, but gen­er­al­ly sup­port one anoth­er.

Chad Day, recent­ly elect­ed Pres­i­dent of the Tahltan Cen­tral Coun­cil, could not be reached for com­ment.

David Haslam, a spokesman for the Min­istry of Mines, said in an e‑mail that Firesteel Resources “has all the nec­es­sary tenures and per­mits” it needs and the gov­ern­ment is work­ing with the Tahltan Cen­tral Coun­cil “to devel­op a shared vision for land and resource use.”

Mr. Haslam urged “every­one to remain respect­ful of one anoth­er on the ground while we seek a res­o­lu­tion to the sit­u­a­tion with the Klabona Keep­ers.”

Ms. Quock said mem­bers of the Klabona Keep­ers hiked through the moun­tains on the week­end look­ing for remote drill sites.

“They found the drill, the spill tray on it was over­flow­ing with oil and water,” she said. “We shut the drill down. They are stay­ing there and they are not allow­ing the drill to leave.”

Asked what mes­sage she want­ed to deliv­er, she said: “We want them out. Why are they con­tin­u­ing to put more mon­ey in to a project that will always be protest­ed? We will nev­er approve it.”

The Klabona Keep­ers block­ad­ed Impe­r­i­al Met­als’ Red Chris mine in August because of con­cerns about a tail­ings pond, but stopped the protest when talks began between the com­pa­ny and the Tahltan Cen­tral Coun­cil. Last year, the group blocked For­tune Min­er­als Ltd. from doing work on a coal deposit. On Mon­day, the B.C. gov­ern­ment announced a tem­po­rary hold on coal explo­ration per­mits in the area.

“I don’t want peo­ple to get the impres­sion we’re against all devel­op­ment. We’re not. But these places are sacred and we want to keep it [untouched],” said Ms. Quock.

Klabona Keep­er web­site

Video