Australia : Mass Protest Against Whitehaven Coal

Front Line Action On Coal

Novem­ber 2nd, 2014

Front Line Action On Coal

Novem­ber 2nd, 2014

The bats have been released! Mass protests against White­haven Coal.

Maules Creek Mine Main access: A young woman has locked her­self to the inside of a car, block­ing the main access point for Maules creek mine.

UPDATE: Police res­cue have arrived on the scene

Maules Creek Mine, inside: The rail­way line being built inside the mine site has been blocked by a woman sus­pend­ed in a tree with the rope going across the con­struc­tion site.

UPDATE: Work­ers have been able to go under the ropes, trucks are still being held up.

Maules Creek Mine Hitachi Dig­ger: 1 woman has scaled the super dig­ger while anoth­er woman has locked her­self to the huge machine.

 

Leard For­est Alliance Spokesper­son

Mur­ray Drech­sler

0418754869

 

MAULES CREEK 3/11/2014
Over eighty peo­ple have set up sep­a­rate block­ades on and around the con­struc­tion site of the con­tro­ver­sial Maules Creek mine, near Narrabri, in a ramp up of peace­ful action to pre­vent the mine from depres­suris­ing the water table.

White­haven Coal’s Maules Creek mine has been seri­ous­ly delayed by a grow­ing move­ment of farm­ers, envi­ron­men­tal­ists and oth­er sup­port­ers con­cerned that farm bores will fail due to the 600 mega­l­itres of water the mine would use each year.

The Leard For­est Alliance is call­ing on NSW Plan­ning Min­is­ter Rob Stokes to stop con­struc­tion work on the mine while a par­lia­men­tary inquiry into plan­ning deci­sions is under­way.

Spokesper­son for the Leard For­est Alliance Mur­ray Drech­sler said “The amount of water White­haven plans to use over the life of the Maules Creek mine would fill a third of Lake Bur­ley Grif­fin and this is water that should be used for food pro­duc­tion.”

“The com­mu­ni­ty has the courage to stand up for water ahead of coal and we expect Plan­ning Min­is­ter Rob Stokes to do the same.” Con­tin­ued Mr. Drech­sler.

The mine’s state and fed­er­al approvals were grant­ed before White­haven had fin­ished their water man­age­ment plan and that fact was includ­ed in a sub­mis­sion to the par­lia­men­tary inquiry.

Twit­ter:

@FLACcoal #Leard­block­ade

MG_3888-300x200

Front Line Action On Coal

Front Line Action On Coal

Front Line Action On Coal

 

Australia: Batman Blocks Coal Mine with Tripod

Trick-or-Treat-06-300x200

Octo­ber 30th, 2014

Trick-or-Treat-06-300x200

Octo­ber 30th, 2014

Kick­ing off a week­end of action against Whitehaven’s con­tro­ver­sial Maules Creek coal mine, a con­cerned cit­i­zen has scaled a tri­pod, block­ing access to Whitehaven’s Tar­ra­won­ga haul road, block­ing access for trucks try­ing to leave Tar­ra­won­ga coal mine. This comes as peo­ple from around the coun­try con­verge at the Leard Block­ade to defend water, cli­mate and our democ­ra­cy from White­haven coal.

Phil Evans, 33, a cli­mate cam­paign­er with 350.org has today put him­self on the line to draw atten­tion to White­haven dodgy deal­ings and destruc­tion of our water and cli­mate.

Leard For­est Alliance Spokesper­son, and tri­pod activist, Phil Evans says,” I’m here to call ‘trick or treat’ on White­haven coal. White­haven need to be held respon­si­ble for the destruc­tion of the com­mu­ni­ty, water and the cli­mate.”

Due to Whitehaven’s Maules Creek mine, the aquifers are pre­dict­ed to drop by up to 2m. Pre­vi­ous­ly dur­ing drought the agri­cul­tur­al com­mu­ni­ty has not had water for their live­stock and their farms. The Maules Creek mine, as the largest new coal mine under-con­struc­tion in Aus­tralia, will con­tribute sig­nif­i­cant­ly to cli­mate change caus­ing fur­ther droughts for the local com­mu­ni­ty and insta­bil­i­ty of glob­al pro­por­tions.

“We hope the NSW par­lia­men­tary inquiry into the plan­ning process will send the Maules Creek project back to square one, if any of the alleged­ly cor­rupt rela­tion­ships between Aston exec­u­tives and senior politi­cians from both sides have found to influ­ence the approvals process in any­way.” said Mr. Evans.

Whitehaven’s plan­ning, approval and con­struc­tion process­es have been plagued by ques­tion­able deal­ings and clouds of cor­rup­tion. The mul­ti­ple prob­lems of the plan­ning process have been brought to the atten­tion of the NSW par­lia­men­tary inquiry into plan­ning by com­mu­ni­ty groups.

“The state ICAC has raised very seri­ous con­cerns about the undue influ­ence of coal on our democ­ra­cy, but it has not gone far enough. The Leard For­est Alliance is call­ing for work to stop on the Maules Creek project, and an audit of the plan­ning and approval process that allows White­haven to con­tin­ue with this atroc­i­ty. We need a fed­er­al lev­el ICAC and we need to take our democ­ra­cy back.” said Mr. Drech­sler.

“The time of coal get­ting spe­cial treat­ment is over. The cor­rup­tion has got to end. It is up to all of us to reclaim our voice, and democ­ra­cy” said Mr. Evans.

There have been over 265 arrests this year as part of the ongo­ing com­mu­ni­ty lead cam­paign of peace­ful civ­il dis­obe­di­ence against White­haven Coal.

Trick-or-Treat-04-300x200

from Front Line Action on Coal

USA: Burnaby Blockade, Encampment Stops Kinder Morgan Suveyors for a Second Day

Octo­ber 30th, 2014

Angry pro­test­ers stopped crews from con­duct­ing pipeline sur­vey work on Burn­a­by Moun­tain Wednes­day, forc­ing the com­pa­ny to reassess how it will fin­ish work need­ed for a Nation­al Ener­gy Board deci­sion.

Octo­ber 30th, 2014

Angry pro­test­ers stopped crews from con­duct­ing pipeline sur­vey work on Burn­a­by Moun­tain Wednes­day, forc­ing the com­pa­ny to reassess how it will fin­ish work need­ed for a Nation­al Ener­gy Board deci­sion.

RCMP offi­cers watched as some pro­test­ers con­front­ed a Trans Moun­tain sur­vey crew, yelling “go back to Texas,” while anoth­er pro­test­er crawled under a sur­vey crew’s SUV, wrapped him­self around the front tire and refused to leave.

Stephen Col­lis, a spokesman for the pro­test­ers who call them­selves the Care­tak­ers, said they plan to hun­ker down.

“We’re cur­rent­ly occu­py­ing the space that they have iden­ti­fied that they need to work in. Since we’re on pub­lic land, we have every right to be here,” he said. “They can’t real­ly work in a space that’s filled with dozens of peo­ple. That’s the inten­tion.”

The plan worked, at least for the day.

Work­ers left in anoth­er vehi­cle, and one man car­ried sev­er­al signs under his arm that read No Entry Until Fur­ther Notice and Field Test­ing Area Under Order of the Nation­al Ener­gy Board.

Greg Toth, senior direc­tor for Kinder Morgan’s Trans Moun­tain expan­sion project, said all sur­vey work on the moun­tain was stopped, although oth­er crews were still work­ing around Burn­a­by.

He wasn’t yet sure if the com­pa­ny would ask for an injunc­tion pre­vent­ing protests.

“We have to reassess, based on today’s activ­i­ties,” said Toth. “It’s quite a vocal protest. Our pri­or­i­ty is the safe­ty of our crews and the gen­er­al pub­lic. So we’ll retrench and look at what options are avail­able.”

The demon­stra­tion comes in the midst of a bit­ter bat­tle over the company’s plans to expand the pipeline through Burn­a­by.

The Nation­al Ener­gy Board grant­ed Trans Moun­tain access to the sites so it can com­plete work through Burn­a­by Moun­tain, it’s pre­ferred route for the pipeline. The NEB ruled the City of Burn­a­by can’t pre­vent the activ­i­ty because the work is need­ed for the board to make a deci­sion on the expan­sion appli­ca­tion.

The City of Burn­a­by announced it will appeal the NEB rul­ing.

May­or Derek Cor­ri­g­an said he didn’t believe the reg­u­la­tor has the author­i­ty to con­sid­er con­sti­tu­tion­al ques­tions con­cern­ing city bylaws.

Toth said the Nation­al Ener­gy Board and the Fed­er­al Court have giv­en the com­pa­ny every right to do work need­ed to sup­port the deci­sion-mak­ing process.

He said it’s iron­ic that crews haven’t been allowed on Burn­a­by Moun­tain, con­sid­er­ing the com­pa­ny and city res­i­dents have deter­mined the route is the least dis­rup­tive option.

“It’s real­ly in response to strong feed­back from the local res­i­dents and the gen­er­al pub­lic in the area for the alter­na­tive rout­ing, which would have been through the streets,” he said.

In July 2007, a geyser of oil cov­ered more 100 homes, after a crew acci­den­tal­ly pulled up the pipeline, spilling 250,000 litres.

The cleanup cost about $15 mil­lion.

The 5.4‑billion dol­lar expan­sion plan would come close to tripling the capac­i­ty of the exist­ing pipeline between Alber­ta and B.C. to about 900,000 bar­rels of crude a day.

Raging Grannies Blockading Entrances and Exits of WA Department of Ecology

Octo­ber 30th, 2014

UPDATE: Grannies Unlock After 6‑Hour Block­ade

Cur­rent­ly, sev­en mem­bers of the Seat­tle Rag­ing Grannies are block­ing the entrance to the Depart­ment of Ecol­o­gy head­quar­ters, stalling traf­fic and pre­vent­ing employ­ees from enter­ing work. The groups are sit­ting in rock­ing chairs chained togeth­er across the Department’s vehi­cle entrance.

They are telling work­ers that the Depart­ment is closed today for a “Work­shop on How to Say No to Big Oil.” Today’s action coin­cides with hear­ings on a con­tro­ver­sial study on the safe­ty of oil trains con­duct­ed by the Depart­ment of Ecol­o­gy. Hun­dreds are expect­ed in Olympia to express con­cern at the study’s nar­row scope and omis­sion of risks to the envi­ron­ment or treaty rights.

Police and FBI are on the scene try­ing to direct traf­fic, and ecol­o­gy man­age­ment is mak­ing sup­port­ive employ­ees move inside so they can’t talk to the media about their sup­port of the elders.

Dale R Jense, pro­gram man­ag­er for the department’s oil spills safe­ty pro­gram, is cur­rent­ly walk­ing the line and talk­ing to the grannies, who remain in high spir­its and are singing songs. There is a group of sup­port­ers mak­ing sure that the DoE knows that fos­sil fuel ship­ments are unpop­u­lar, dan­ger­ous, and bad for the plan­et.

“We’re here to help the Depart­ment of Ecol­o­gy learn how to say no to the oil indus­try,” said Beth DeRooy. “After grant­i­ng per­mits to four ille­gal oil train ter­mi­nals and let­ting for­mer BNSF exec­u­tives write their oil study, I was wor­ried the folks over at the Depart­ment nev­er learned how to say no and need­ed a lit­tle help from their grannies.”

Since 2012 the Depart­ment of Ecol­o­gy has grant­ed per­mits for oil-by-rail ter­mi­nals at four of Washington’s five refiner­ies. Ter­mi­nals in Taco­ma, Ana­cortes and at Cher­ry Point out­side of Belling­ham, have begun tak­ing trains while a fourth is under con­struc­tion at the Phillips 66 refin­ery in Fer­n­dale. Envi­ron­men­tal groups have argued that the these ter­mi­nals are ille­gal under the Mag­nu­son Act, which pro­hibits expan­sions at Wash­ing­ton refiner­ies that may increase the amount of oil they han­dle.

Per­mits for a fifth oil-by-rail ter­mi­nal at Shell’s Puget Sound refin­ery are cur­rent­ly under con­sid­er­a­tion. “Hot on the heels of record wild­fires, Gov­er­nor Inslee’s so-called Depart­ment of Ecol­o­gy is going to ignore the envi­ron­ment in this study? They’re act­ing more like the Depart­ment of Oil Trains,” stat­ed Cyn­thia Linet.

Last year Gov­er­nor Inslee direct­ed the Depart­ment of Ecol­o­gy to con­duct a safe­ty study on the extreme­ly con­tro­ver­sial ship­ment of oil by rail. The governor’s study has been crit­i­cized for ignor­ing impacts on the envi­ron­ment, treaty rights and glob­al warm­ing, as well as fail­ing to ques­tion whether they should build oil-train ter­mi­nals in the first place.

The Depart­ment of Ecol­o­gy has declared that impacts on the envi­ron­ment, trib­al treaty rights or local economies are “ancil­lary” and not being con­sid­ered. The Depart­ment has also come under fire after rev­e­la­tions that a num­ber of the study’s authors are for­mer BNSF exec­u­tives.

“You’d think bring­ing explod­ing trains to help oil com­pa­nies dev­as­tate Native Amer­i­can com­mu­ni­ties in North Dako­ta would be easy to say no to, but it looks like the Depart­ment of Ecol­o­gy needs a stern les­son from their grannies,” said Car­ol McRoberts.

Many of North Dakota’s oil wells are on trib­al lands of the Man­dan, Hidat­sa and Arikara nations. In addi­tion to spills and oth­er local pol­lu­tion, the oil boom has brought tremen­dous social costs to the com­mu­ni­ties. Deaths from auto acci­dents, drug abuse and vio­lent crime have explod­ed; hous­ing short­ages force many to live in sub­stan­dard con­di­tions; and sex­u­al vio­lence such as rape and sex traf­fick­ing have become preva­lent in a once small com­mu­ni­ty.

“My daugh­ter is 15 months old and my heart aches that I do not even want her to be at home for fear of what she’d be exposed to,” said Kan­di Mos­sett, a mem­ber of the Man­dan, Hidat­sa and Arikara nations who sub­mit­ted writ­ten tes­ti­mo­ny to today’s oil train hear­ings. “This oil boom using frack­ing has been dev­as­tat­ing for us and no amount of mon­ey can ever give us back what’s being lost.”

IMAG0692image4

Pro­tes­tors hand­ed out dough­nuts and cof­fee as they turned away employ­ees’ cars. They also hand­ed out a fli­er explain­ing “How to Say No To Fos­sil Fuels.” The fli­er calls on the Depart­ment of Ecol­o­gy to reject all new fos­sil fuel projects pro­posed for Wash­ing­ton and to explic­it­ly link their rejec­tion to con­cerns about glob­al warm­ing.

Cli­mate jus­tice activists point out that if all pro­posed fos­sil fuel ter­mi­nals are built, the North­west will be trans­port­ing five times more car­bon than the Key­stone XL Pipeline.

“It’s grandma’s com­mon sense – we need to keep car­bon in the ground to stop cat­a­stroph­ic glob­al warm­ing, and if they can’t ship it, they have to leave it in the ground,” said Rosy Betz-Zall. But while he has been wide­ly hailed as one of the green­est gov­er­nors in Amer­i­ca, Inslee has yet to out­right reject a major fos­sil fuel project, or even declare a mora­to­ri­um on projects that would increase dan­ger­ous ship­ments of explo­sive oil.

“Gov­er­nor Inslee talks about being a cli­mate cham­pi­on, but he keeps say­ing ‘maybe’ to new fos­sil fuel projects, when what we need is a sol­id ‘NO’,” said Dee­jah Sher­man-Peter­son.

“Take it from your granny: if you want to say yes to some­thing good – a just, clean ener­gy future – you have start by say­ing NO to some­thing bad – build­ing more fos­sil fuel infra­struc­ture.”

Today’s protest fol­lows an intense wave of oppo­si­tion to oil-by-rail across the North­west this sum­mer with pro­tes­tors lock­ing them­selves to bar­rels of con­crete and sit­ting atop tripods to block­ade rail­road tracks across Wash­ing­ton and Ore­gon.

Argentina: Quechua Community Members Occupy Airport During Second Day of Protest Against Plupetrol

Octo­ber 29th, 2014

Inhab­i­tants inform the author­i­ties that, if their requests are not respect­ed, they will be tak­ing more direct mea­sures, such as man­u­al­ly clos­ing pipeline valves.  They ask that DINOES (Spe­cial Oper­a­tion Divi­sion) does not inter­vene. 

Octo­ber 29th, 2014

Inhab­i­tants inform the author­i­ties that, if their requests are not respect­ed, they will be tak­ing more direct mea­sures, such as man­u­al­ly clos­ing pipeline valves.  They ask that DINOES (Spe­cial Oper­a­tion Divi­sion) does not inter­vene. 

On the sec­ond day of protest­ing against the neg­li­gent deci­sions of Plus­petrol, a dom­i­nat­ing E&P pri­vate com­pa­ny orig­i­nat­ing from Argenti­na, Quechua inhab­i­tants took their retal­i­a­tion to the air­port.

Dur­ing a press con­fer­ence, Aure­lio Chi­no Dahua, pres­i­dent of Fediquep (Indige­nous Quechua Fed­er­a­tion of the Pas­taza), explained that the peo­ple feel deceived by both the cor­po­ra­tion and the state.  He relates such uneasi­ness to the the state’s dis­en­gage­ment from alle­vi­at­ing Pluspetrol’s social-envi­ron­men­tal impacts on the com­mu­ni­ty, even in the face of raw evi­dence.

The indige­nous leader also projects his indig­na­tion towards the government’s lack of com­mit­ment, stat­ing that, although the Quechua peo­ple have fos­tered active dia­logue with the author­i­ties since 2011, not one pro­gram has been imple­ment­ed with the sole pur­pose of meet­ing their demands.

Dahua reit­er­at­ed that, dur­ing the last months, Plus­petrol Norte has been erod­ing and divid­ing the com­mu­ni­ties, and that Fediquep has been bla­tant­ly ignor­ing the inhab­i­tants’ rights.  For such rea­sons, he pro­pos­es that the com­pa­ny retreats from the area and, if they wish to resume the oper­a­tion, heeds to the community’s direct par­tic­i­pa­tion.  It is also being demand­ed that fam­i­lies are con­nect­ed to the elec­tric­i­ty that is pro­vid­ed by Lore­to Region­al Gov­ern­ment and Plust­petrol.

Mean­while in Nue­vo Andeos, the peo­ple hold their grounds in hopes that atten­tion will final­ly be brought to their demands.

Not too long ego, it was them who request­ed a reme­di­a­tion process of Shan­shococha Lagoon, as well as ade­quate com­pen­sa­tion for Pluspetrol’s exper­i­men­ta­tion through­out the past 15 years.

As the con­ver­sta­tion moves, it is evi­dent that yesterday’s demon­stra­tion in Nue­vo Andoas is being vig­or­ous­ly sup­port­ed by sur­round­ing areas with­in the Pas­taza and that will sure­ly res­onate beyond.

[EF!  Newswire Note:  The fol­low­ing post is a loose trans­la­tion of an arti­cle first pub­lished by Servin­di.]

Pacific Island Warriors Blockade World’s Largest Coal Port

Octo­ber 25th, 2014

Cli­mate Change War­riors from 12 Pacif­ic Island nations pad­dled canoes into the world’s largest coal port in New­cas­tle, Aus­tralia, Fri­day (Octo­ber 17th) to bring atten­tion to their grave fears about the con­se­quences of cli­mate change on their home coun­tries.

The 30 war­riors joined a flotil­la of hun­dreds of Aus­tralians in kayaks and on surf­boards to delay eight of the 12 ships sched­uled to pass through the port dur­ing the nine-hour block­ade, which was organ­ised with sup­port from the U.S.-based envi­ron­men­tal group 350.org.

The war­riors came from 12 Pacif­ic Island coun­tries, includ­ing Fiji, Tuvalu, Toke­lau, Microne­sia, Van­u­atu, The Solomon Islands, Ton­ga, Samoa, Papua New Guinea and Niue.

Mikaele Maia­va spoke with IPS about why he and his fel­low cli­mate change war­riors had trav­elled to Aus­tralia: “We want Aus­tralia to remem­ber that they are a part of the Pacif­ic. And as a part of the Pacif­ic, we are a fam­i­ly, and hav­ing this fam­i­ly means we stay togeth­er. We can­not afford, one of the biggest sis­ters, real­ly destroy­ing every­thing for the fam­i­ly.

“So, we want the Aus­tralian com­mu­ni­ty, espe­cial­ly the Aus­tralian lead­ers, to think about more than their pock­ets, to real­ly think about human­i­ty not just for the Aus­tralian peo­ple, but for every­one,” Mikaele said.

REUTERS / David Gray

Speak­ing at the open­ing of a new coal mine on Oct. 13, Aus­tralian Prime Min­is­ter Tony Abbott said that “coal is good for human­i­ty.”

Mikaele ques­tioned Abbott’s posi­tion, ask­ing, “If you are talk­ing about human­i­ty: Is human­i­ty real­ly for peo­ple to lose land? Is human­i­ty real­ly for peo­ple to lose their cul­ture and iden­ti­ty? Is human­i­ty to live in fear for our future gen­er­a­tions to live in a beau­ti­ful island and have homes to go to? Is that real­ly human­i­ty? Is that real­ly the answer for us to live in peace and har­mo­ny? Is that real­ly the answer for the future?”

Mikaele said that he and his fel­low cli­mate war­riors were aware that their fight was not just for the Pacif­ic, and that oth­er devel­op­ing coun­tries were affect­ed by cli­mate change too.

“We’re aware that this fight is not just for the Pacif­ic. We are very well aware that the whole world is stand­ing up in sol­i­dar­i­ty for this. The mes­sage that we want to give, espe­cial­ly to the lead­ers, is that we are humans, this fight is not just about our land, this fight is for sur­vival.”

 

Mikaele described how his home of Toke­lau was already see­ing the effects of cli­mate change,

“We see these changes of weath­er pat­terns and we also see that our food secu­ri­ty is threat­ened. It’s hard for us to build a sus­tain­able future if your soil is not that fer­tile and it does not grow your crops because of salt intru­sion.”

Tokelau’s coast­line is also begin­ning to erode. “We see our coastal lines chang­ing. Fif­teen years ago when I was going to school, you could walk in a straight line. Now you have to walk in a crooked line because the beach has erod­ed away.”

Mikaele said that he and his fel­low cli­mate change war­riors would not be con­tent unless they stood up for future gen­er­a­tions, and did every­thing pos­si­ble to change world lead­ers’ men­tal­i­ty about cli­mate change.

“We are edu­cat­ed peo­ple, we are smart peo­ple, we know what’s going on, the days of the indige­nous peo­ple and local peo­ple not hav­ing the infor­ma­tion and the knowl­edge about what’s going on is over,” he said.

“We are the gen­er­a­tion of today, the lead­ers of tomor­row and we are not blind­ed by the prob­lem. We can see it with our own eyes, we feel it in our own hearts, and we want the Aus­tralian gov­ern­ment to realise that. We are not blind­ed by mon­ey we just want to live as peace­ful­ly and fight for what mat­ters the most, which is our homes.”

Toke­lau became the first coun­try in the world to use 100 per­cent renew­able ener­gy when they switched to solar ener­gy in 2012.

Speak­ing about the canoes that he and his fel­low cli­mate war­riors had carved in their home coun­tries and bought to Aus­tralia for the protest, he talked about how his fam­i­ly had used canoes for gen­er­a­tions,

“Each extend­ed fam­i­ly would have a canoe, and this canoe is the main tool that we used to be able to live, to go fish­ing, to get coconuts, to take fam­i­ly to the oth­er islands.”

Anoth­er cli­mate war­rior, Kathy Jet­nil-Kijin­er, from the Mar­shall Islands, brought mem­bers of the Unit­ed Nations Gen­er­al Assem­bly to tears last month with her impas­sioned poem writ­ten to her baby daugh­ter Matafele Peinam,

“No one’s mov­ing, no one’s los­ing their home­land, no one’s gonna become a cli­mate change refugee. Or should I say, no one else. To the Carteret islanders of Papua New Guinea and to the Taro islanders of Fiji, I take this moment to apol­o­gise to you,” she said.

The Pacif­ic Islands Forum describes cli­mate change as the “sin­gle great­est threat to the liveli­hoods, secu­ri­ty and well-being of the peo­ples of the Pacif­ic.”

“Cli­mate change is an imme­di­ate and seri­ous threat to sus­tain­able devel­op­ment and pover­ty erad­i­ca­tion in many Pacif­ic Island Coun­tries, and for some their very sur­vival. Yet these coun­tries are amongst the least able to adapt and to respond; and the con­se­quences they face, and already now bear, are sig­nif­i­cant­ly dis­pro­por­tion­ate to their col­lec­tive minis­cule con­tri­bu­tions to glob­al emis­sions,” it says.

Pacif­ic Island lead­ers have recent­ly stepped up their lan­guage, chal­leng­ing the Aus­tralian gov­ern­ment to stop delay­ing action on cli­mate change.

Oxfam Australia’s cli­mate change advo­ca­cy coor­di­na­tor, Dr Simon Brad­shaw, told IPS, “Aus­tralia is a Pacif­ic coun­try. In opt­ing to dis­man­tle its cli­mate poli­cies, dis­en­gage from inter­na­tion­al nego­ti­a­tions and forge ahead with the expan­sion of its fos­sil fuel indus­try, it is utter­ly at odds with the rest of the region.”

Dr. Brad­shaw added, “Australia’s clos­est neigh­bours have con­sis­tent­ly iden­ti­fied cli­mate change as their great­est chal­lenge and top pri­or­i­ty. So it is inevitable that Australia’s recent actions will impact on its rela­tion­ship with Pacif­ic Islands.

“A recent poll com­mis­sioned by Oxfam showed that 60 per­cent of Aus­tralians thought cli­mate change was hav­ing a neg­a­tive impact on the abil­i­ty of peo­ple in poor­er coun­tries to grow and access food, ris­ing to 68 per­cent among 18 to 34-year-olds,” he said.

Vis­it IPS news for fresh per­spec­tives on devel­op­ment and glob­al­iza­tion

Construction of Areng Dam Continues Despite Natives Protests

Regardless of the dam's progression, Chong inhabitants continue to express their discontent.

Regardless of the dam's progression, Chong inhabitants continue to express their discontent.

Octo­ber 21st, 2014

Regard­less of the dam’s pro­gres­sion, Chong inhab­i­tants con­tin­ue to express their dis­con­tent.

The deten­tion and release of 11 envi­ron­men­tal activists in Cambodia’s Areng Val­ley in mid-Sep­tem­ber end­ed the last major protests of the con­tro­ver­sial Stung Cheay Areng hydro dam project.

Activists had been detain­ing and block­ing con­voys of vehi­cles into the val­ley since March of this year, but their makeshift road­block has since been com­man­deered by the country’s Roy­al Cam­bo­di­an Armed Forces.

The valley’s native Chong inhab­i­tants have watched the dam project grow with a mix­ture of fear and bit­ter­ness. The Chong have dwelt along the Areng for over 600 years but soon, if the dam is com­plet­ed, it will flood at least 26,000 acres of land. Moth­er Jones writes that the esti­mates range between 40 and 77 square miles.

This will dis­place more than 1,500 peo­ple, and is already invit­ing the rape of the Cen­tral Car­damom Pro­tect­ed For­est. To begin the dam project, new roads had to be built to trans­port equip­ment back and forth, pro­vid­ing free access to unscrupu­lous tim­ber com­pa­nies. At least 20,000 cubic yards of rose­wood (worth an esti­mat­ed $220 mil­lion in tim­ber) have been ille­gal­ly logged since the dam project began.

The dam itself is being con­struct­ed by Sino­hy­dro Resources, China’s largest dam-build­ing con­trac­tor and its third firm to take on the task. Ini­tial­ly, Chi­na South­ern Pow­er Grid was to build the dam, but relin­quished its con­tract with the Cam­bo­di­an gov­ern­ment in 2010 on pur­port­ed­ly “moral” grounds.

A report from the Japan­ese Inter­na­tion­al Coop­er­a­tion Agency on the project lat­er point­ed out that the dam would only gen­er­ate an out­put of 108 megawatts – too lit­tle for so high a mon­e­tary and envi­ron­men­tal cost.

Chi­na Guo­di­an Cor­po­ra­tion was the next firm to take up the project, but pulled out in 2013. They, too, found the dam to be eco­nom­i­cal­ly unvi­able.

Though the dam would be hypo­thet­i­cal­ly capa­ble of gen­er­at­ing enough pow­er for 87,000 homes, Inter­na­tion­al Rivers argues that “the dam will only oper­ate at 46 per­cent capac­i­ty dur­ing the dry sea­son, pre­cise­ly when Cam­bo­dia most needs the elec­tric­i­ty.”

In addi­tion to this low ener­gy out­put, the dam is pro­ject­ed to be more of a bur­den to Cam­bo­dia than a bless­ing – even with­out tak­ing the valley’s 31 endan­gered ani­mals into account. Areng is just one of 17 dams the coun­try wants to build over the next two decades, but most of their pow­er will be export­ed to neigh­bor­ing coun­tries. What’s worse, Sino­hy­dro will own the dam for the next 40 years before turn­ing it over to the Cam­bo­di­an gov­ern­ment, at which time the dam’s main­te­nance costs and envi­ron­men­tal impacts will poten­tial­ly make it worth­less to the coun­try.

Despite all this, Cambodia’s Min­is­ter of Mines and Ener­gy and Min­is­ter of Envi­ron­ment have both stat­ed that the Areng dam is on sched­ule for com­ple­tion by 2020.

But that hasn’t stopped natives from protest­ing.

“Even if they piled mon­ey one meter above my head, I don’t want their Chi­nese mon­ey,” one vil­lager told Moth­er Jones’ Kalya­nee Mam. “I want to stay in my vil­lage. Even with all this mon­ey, I could only spend it in this life. I wouldn’t be able to pass it on to my grand­chil­dren. I just want my vil­lage and my land for the future of my grand­chil­dren.”

by Plan­et Experts

Manitoba Hydro Evicted from Northern Dam Station by Protesters

pimicikamak-first-nation-protest-2

Octo­ber 17th, 2014

Pro­test­ers have forced employ­ees of Man­i­to­ba Hydro out of the Jen­peg gen­er­at­ing sta­tion in north­ern Man­i­to­ba.

The pro­test­ers, from Pimi­cika­mak Cree Nation, deliv­ered an over­sized evict­ed notice on Fri­day to staff at the sta­tion and the employ­ee hous­ing com­plex, both of which are locat­ed on the Nel­son Riv­er in Pimi­cika­mak ter­ri­to­ry.

“The build­ing is emp­ty, locked, undam­aged and under the Pimi­cika­mak flag,” states a release from the Cree Nation, which is locat­ed approx­i­mate­ly 525 kilo­me­tres by air north of Win­nipeg.

A few hydro per­son­nel remain inside the dam itself to mon­i­tor the facil­i­ty. Pimi­cika­mak guar­an­tees the safe­ty and well-being of these peo­ple, and ensures that hydro facil­i­ties will not be dam­aged.”

The pro­test­ers want com­pen­sa­tion for dam­ages caused by flood­ing from the dam, which opened in 1979.

“The hydro sys­tem floods 65 square kilo­me­tres of Pimi­cika­mak land and caus­es severe dam­age to thou­sands of kilo­me­tres of shore­line,” Chief Cathy Mer­rick stat­ed in the press release. “Out­ly­ing grave sites have been washed away; Pimi­cika­mak peo­ple have died as a result of semi-sub­merged debris from erod­ing shore­lines and unsafe ice con­di­tions caused by hydro.

“The project has turned a once boun­ti­ful and inti­mate­ly known home­land into a dan­ger­ous and despoiled pow­er cor­ri­dor.”

Jen­peg, which Man­i­to­ba Hydro uses to con­trol out­flows from Lake Win­nipeg into the Nel­son Riv­er sys­tem, is locat­ed about 20 kilo­me­tres from Cross Lake, which is the main Pimi­cika­mak set­tle­ment with some 8,000 res­i­dents.

“This is our home; we will not let it be tram­pled,” said Mer­rick. “This dam has been great for the south but for us it is a man-made cat­a­stro­phe. Hydro needs to clean up the mess it has cre­at­ed in our home­land. Hydro needs to treat us fair­ly.”

She said the provin­cial gov­ern­ment has spo­ken about rec­on­cil­i­a­tion with all hydro-affect­ed peo­ples, and a “new era” of “part­ner­ship” but so far none of that has hap­pened.

The hydro sys­tem pro­duces $3.8 mil­lion worth of pow­er on its five Nel­son Riv­er dams every day, accord­ing to Mer­rick, who not­ed it “has not con­tributed to ‘the erad­i­ca­tion of mass pover­ty and mass unem­ploy­ment’ as was con­tem­plat­ed in the 1977 North­ern Flood Agree­ment.

“The NFA says affect­ed peo­ple will be dealt with fair­ly and equi­tably,” she said, adding, “In many parts of Cana­da, gov­ern­ments and com­pa­nies are real­iz­ing that every­one ben­e­fits when the tremen­dous wealth and oppor­tu­ni­ty of the land is shared fair­ly.”

Pimicikamak’s road map to pos­i­tive change includes:

  • A pub­lic apol­o­gy from Pre­mier Greg Selinger for past and present harms suffered​ by all hydro-affect­ed peo­ples and their lands.
  • A com­mit­ment from Man­i­to­ba and Man­i­to­ba Hydro to engage in a good-faith process to ful­fill promis­es in the NFA, includ­ing mea­sures relat­ed to com­mu­ni­ty devel­op­ment, envi­ron­men­tal mit­i­ga­tion and max­i­mum employ­ment oppor­tu­ni­ties.
  • A rev­enue shar­ing agree­ment and/or water rental arrange­ment with Pimi­cika­mak.

“​The Pimi­cika­mak peo­ple will not leave Jen­peg until Man­i­to­ba and Hydro make sub­stan­tive com­mit­ments to fol­low the course out­lined above,” Mer­rick said.

The chief and coun­cil will be meet­ing with provin­cial and hydro offi­cials at the Jen­peg sta­tion on Fri­day.

Ts’ka7 Warriors Burn Down Imperial Metals Ruddock Creek Mine Bridge

fire-handSecwepemc Ts’ka7 Warriors deactivate Imperial Metals Ruddock Creek mine road.

Inter

fire-handSecwepemc Ts’ka7 Warriors deactivate Imperial Metals Ruddock Creek mine road.

Inter­na­tion­al State­ment, Octo­ber 14, 2014

With much dis­cus­sion with Elders Coun­cils and around Sacred fires and cer­e­monies the Secwepemc Ts’ka7 War­riors have act­ed out their col­lec­tive respon­si­bil­i­ty and juris­dic­tion to and in the Ts’ka7 area by deac­ti­vat­ing the Impe­r­i­al Met­als Rud­dock Creek mine road.

Impe­r­i­al Met­als Cor­po­ra­tion nev­er asked for or received free, pri­or and informed con­sent to oper­ate in Secwepemc Ter­ri­to­ry.  The Impe­r­i­al Met­als Mount Pol­ley mine dis­as­ter, in the area known as Yuct Ne Senxiymetk­we, the absolute destruc­tion and dev­as­ta­tion of our Ter­ri­to­ry has nev­er been answered for.  No repa­ra­tions have been made.    Instead Impe­r­i­al Met­als con­tin­ues to force through anoth­er mine in our Ter­ri­to­ry while crim­i­nal­iz­ing the Klabona Keep­ers of the Tahltan Nation also exert­ing their juris­dic­tion­al and with­hold­ing con­sent from the same com­pa­ny.

The geno­ci­dal dis­place­ment of the Secwepemc from their Home­lands through star­va­tion, fear and assim­i­la­tion by the state and indus­try being act­ed out by Impe­r­i­al Met­als stops now.  We are com­mit­ted to the ongo­ing pro­tec­tion of our Ter­ri­to­ry.  Our salmon is sacred, our land is sacred, our Women are sacred, our water is sacred and we the Peo­ples, the right­ful title hold­ers are the deci­sion mak­ers and we will pro­tect them.

Agree­ments made by elect­ed chief and coun­cil do not have author­i­ty and do not rep­re­sent us.  This is a warn­ing to Impe­r­i­al Met­als Cor­po­ra­tion:  Leave our Lands and do not come back.  This is a warn­ing to the provin­cial gov­ern­ment: You do not have juris­dic­tion on this Land to issue per­mits to any cor­po­ra­tion.  This is a warn­ing to investors (includ­ing the province), con­trac­tors, sup­pli­ers and sub­sidiaries:  Divest from Impe­r­i­al Met­als Cor­po­ra­tion.  We the Secwepemc, unit­ed, will not allow Impe­r­i­al Met­als Cor­po­ra­tion to con­tin­ue. Secwepemc Law will pre­vail in our Ter­ri­to­ry.
Secwepem­culecw wel me7 yews, wel me7 yews
Secwepemc Ts’ka7 War­riors

Portland Oil Terminal Blocked, USA

rally-wide-shot

rally-wide-shot

Activists form block­ade against oil trains at Arc Logis­tics, crude oil-by-rail ter­mi­nal

NW Port­land, Ore­gon: 100 peo­ple gath­ered in protest this after­noon (9/10/2014) at Arc Logis­tics, Portland’s only crude oil-by-rail ter­mi­nal. Five activists risked arrest by sit­ting direct­ly on the rail tracks to pre­vent an oil train from reach­ing the oil ter­mi­nal. Infor­ma­tion leaked from a work­er at the facil­i­ty revealed that due the con­tro­ver­sial protest, oil ship­ments had been halt­ed for the day. Pro­test­ers, includ­ing those block­ing the tracks have dis­persed peace­ful­ly.

Crude oil trains have caused a great deal of con­tro­ver­sy across the coun­ty. Near­ly a dozen derail­ments have occurred in the past two years, many end­ing in fire­ball explo­sions that have killed 47 peo­ple and caused hun­dreds of mil­lions in prop­er­ty dam­age. Event orga­niz­ers say these trains rep­re­sent an unac­cept­able threat to our com­mu­ni­ties: risk­ing explo­sive train derail­ments, dan­ger­ous spills and leaks, degrad­ing air qual­i­ty, and desta­bi­liz­ing the cli­mate.

“I am an obste­tri­cian, gyne­col­o­gist with a degree in pub­lic health. I have devot­ed my career to pro­tect­ing moth­ers and babies and worked inter­na­tion­al­ly in almost 40 coun­tries. I have taught at Har­vard and Stan­ford. The impor­tance of these efforts now pales,” said Kel­ly O’Hanley, MD, MPH, one of the five activists will­ing to risk arrest if an oil train attempt­ed to enter Arc Logis­tics. “I have nev­er gone to jail but the specter of cli­mate change has moved me out of my clin­ic, out of the hos­pi­tal and out of my com­fort­able liv­ing room – onto the streets and into jail if nec­es­sary.”

Port­land is a choke point for fos­sil fuel trans­port in the North­west. We are draw­ing the line to sup­port all those affect­ed from extrac­tion to the cli­mate-desta­bi­liz­ing com­bus­tion,” says orga­niz­er Mia Reback, “today’s action is intend­ed to send a strong mes­sage that the com­mu­ni­ty will not allow these dan­ger­ous oil trains to come through Port­land.”

Today’s protest con­tin­ues a series of direct actions and resis­tance against North­west oil-by-rail projects. In June, activists with Port­land Ris­ing Tide blocked the Arc Logis­tics site in Port­land when a woman locked her­self to a con­crete filled bar­rel on the tracks. Fol­low­ing that action, com­mu­ni­ty mem­bers across the North­west have set up block­ades at oil facil­i­ties in Ana­cortes, Wash­ing­ton, Everett, Wash­ing­ton and most recent­ly Port West­ward, Ore­gon.

Arc Logis­tics cur­rent­ly ships crude by rail from fracked oil shale in Utah. The first US tar sands mine is under con­struc­tion in Utah and Arc could soon be accept­ing this con­tro­ver­sial fuel. The Arc Logis­tics ter­mi­nal can also receive explo­sive Bakken crude oil from North Dako­ta with­out noti­fy­ing Port­land res­i­dents.

The Cli­mate Action Coali­tion demands that the city of Port­land halts the oper­a­tions of Arc Logis­tics and impos­es a ban on all new fos­sil fuel infra­struc­ture that puts our cli­mate and com­mu­ni­ties in jeop­ardy.

###

The Cli­mate Action Coali­tion is: Port­land Ris­ing Tide, NoKXL, 350 PDX, Port­land Rag­ing Grannies, First Uni­tar­i­an Uni­ver­sal­ist Com­mu­ni­ty for Earth Team, PDX Bike Swarm

Legal Fund Here