Dam construction site destroyed in the Kurdish East of Turkey!

On the 25th July, Wednes­day, more than 500 protest­ing peo­ple in the Kur­dish province Der­sim have destroyed the con­struc­tion site of the high­ly crit­i­cized Pem­be­lik Dam on the Peri Riv­er.

Since Sep­tem­ber 2012 local affect­ed peo­ple along the Peri Riv­er, a bor­der Riv­er of the two provinces Der­sim (Tunceli) and Elazig protest con­ti­nous­ly against the con­struc­tion of the 77 m high and 125 MW Pem­be­lik Dam on the Peri Riv­er. Since then they have pitched protest tents close to the con­struc­tion site of the dam which they refuse cat­e­gor­i­cal­ly. The affect­ed peo­ple crit­i­cize the state for destroy­ing the liveli­hoods of thou­sands of peo­ple through the con­struc­tion of the Pem­be­lik and oth­er dams on the Peri Riv­er and for exclud­ing them from any dam con­struc­tion activ­i­ties. Two oth­er dams have been built in the past and have result­ed in neg­a­tive impacts for peo­ple and nature in the whole val­ley. Although the protest con­tin­ues for so long and there is a big region­al and nation­al sol­i­dar­i­ty, no state offi­cial took into con­sid­er­a­tion the local peo­ple.

More than 500 peo­ple, affect­ed peo­ple and peo­ple in sol­i­dar­i­ty with them, gath­ered close to the dam in order to start a protest demon­stra­tion. It was one day before the start of the annu­al big Mun­zur Cul­ture and Nature Fes­ti­val which is the biggest cul­tur­al event in the province of Der­sim. After march­ing some kilo­me­ters they decid­ed to occu­py the dam con­struct­ing site although it is pro­tect­ed by many secu­ri­ty guards. These guards and dozens of sol­diers could not stopped the peo­ple although they fired in the air. The pro­test­ers over­came the gates and fences and then destroyed sev­er­al con­struc­tion machines and some build­ings by fire.

To date this protest is the most rad­i­cal one in the Kur­dish region of the Repub­lic of Turkey. In Der­sim for more than ten years there are protests by peo­ple against dams which are refused by more than 90% of the pop­u­la­tion. It con­sid­ers the dams as tools to destroy the wild nature, to dis­place peo­ple and to “paci­fy” the rebel­lious province Der­sim.

See one video of the protest: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Xcx01ZFg7M

Angry Environmental Protesters Occupy Government Office, Smash Computers in China

28.7.12

Angry demon­stra­tors occu­pied a gov­ern­ment office in east­ern Chi­na on Sat­ur­day, destroy­ing com­put­ers and over­turn­ing cars in a vio­lent protest against an indus­tri­al waste pipeline they said would poi­son their coastal waters.

28.7.12

Angry demon­stra­tors occu­pied a gov­ern­ment office in east­ern Chi­na on Sat­ur­day, destroy­ing com­put­ers and over­turn­ing cars in a vio­lent protest against an indus­tri­al waste pipeline they said would poi­son their coastal waters.

The demon­stra­tion was the lat­est in a string of protests sparked by fears of envi­ron­men­tal degra­da­tion and high­lights the social ten­sions the gov­ern­ment in Bei­jing faces as it approach­es a lead­er­ship tran­si­tion this year.

About 1,000 pro­test­ers marched through the coastal city of Qidong, about one hour north of Shang­hai by car, shout­ing slo­gans against the plan pipeline that would emp­ty waste from a paper fac­to­ry in a near­by town into the sea.

 

Demon­stra­tors reject­ed the government’s stand that waste from the fac­to­ry would not pol­lute the coastal waters.

“The gov­ern­ment says the waste will not pol­lute the sea, but if that’s true, then why don’t they dump it into Yangtze Riv­er?” said Lu Shuai, a 25-year-old pro­test­er who works in logis­tics.

“It is because if they dump it into the riv­er, it will have an impact on peo­ple in Shang­hai and peo­ple in Shang­hai will oppose it.”

Sev­er­al pro­test­ers entered the city government’s main build­ing and were seen smash­ing com­put­ers, over­turn­ing desks and throw­ing doc­u­ments out the win­dows to loud cheers from the crowd.

Reuters wit­nessed five cars and one minibus being over­turned. Over 1,000 police – some para­mil­i­tary – guard­ed the city gov­ern­ment office com­pound in lines.

At least two police offi­cers were dragged into the crowd at the gov­ern­ment office and punched and beat­en enough to make them bleed.

On Fri­day, in an effort to stave off the protest, the Qidong city gov­ern­ment announced it would sus­pend the project for fur­ther research.

But many pro­test­ers said on Sat­ur­day that post­pone­ment was not enough.

“If the gov­ern­ment real­ly want­ed to stop this project, they should have done it right from the begin­ning. At this point they are too late,” said Xi Feng, a 17-year-old pro­test­er.

Local offi­cials took steps to ward off the demon­stra­tion and res­i­dents received text mes­sages and let­ters warn­ing that any pub­lic demon­stra­tion would be ille­gal.

Envi­ron­men­tal wor­ries have stoked calls for expand­ed rights for cit­i­zens and greater con­sul­ta­tion in the tight­ly con­trolled one-par­ty state.

The out­pour­ing of pub­lic anger is emblem­at­ic of the ris­ing dis­con­tent fac­ing Chi­nese lead­ers, who are obsessed with main­tain­ing sta­bil­i­ty and strug­gling to bal­ance growth with ris­ing pub­lic anger over envi­ron­men­tal threats.

The protest fol­lowed sim­i­lar demon­stra­tions against projects the Sichuan town of Shi­fang ear­li­er this month and in the cities of Dalian in the north­east and Haimen in south­ern Guang­dong province in the past year.

In Shi­fang, the gov­ern­ment halt­ed con­struc­tion of a cop­per refin­ery fol­low­ing protests by res­i­dents that it would poi­son them. It also freed most of the peo­ple who were detained after a clash with police.

The lead­er­ship has vowed to clean up China’s skies and water­ways and increas­ing­ly tried to appear respon­sive to com­plaints about pol­lu­tion. But envi­ron­men­tal dis­putes pit cit­i­zens against local offi­cials whose aim is to lure fresh invest­ment and rev­enue into their areas.

sabotage to save Khimki forest, Russia

report­ed by activists in Rus­sia:

“Rus­sia. Khim­ki for­est (north of Moscow). Con­struc­tion vehi­cles torched, tree-cut­ter assault­ed, his arm bro­ken.

report­ed by activists in Rus­sia:

“Rus­sia. Khim­ki for­est (north of Moscow). Con­struc­tion vehi­cles torched, tree-cut­ter assault­ed, his arm bro­ken.

Unknown activists have torched sev­er­al con­struc­tion vehi­cles and assault­ed tree-cut­ter at the new toll high­way con­struc­tion site in Khim­ki for­est. These news appeared in joint dec­la­ra­tion, pub­lished by state enter­prise “Avtodor” and “North-East­ern con­ces­sion” (sub­sidiary of Vin­ci). The acci­dents hap­pened on nights of 19.07 and 21.07.
“Avtodor” rep­re­sen­ta­tives stat­ed that an assault on tree-cut­ters took place on 19.07: one of the work­ers tried to pre­vent eco-activists from enter­ing the con­struc­tion site. In the fol­low­ing fight his arm broke.
On the night of 21.07 spe­cial con­struc­tion vehi­cles were torched: sev­er­al brand new har­vesters and hydraulic exca­va­tor were com­plete­ly destroyed by fire. Mate­r­i­al dam­age is esti­mat­ed to be over $ 2 000 000.
Ear­li­er the same com­pa­nies filed a com­plaint about unknown peo­ple open­ing fire on con­struc­tion vehi­cles (sup­pos­ed­ly from “Saiga”, a civ­il 12-mm car­bine) and torch­ing work­ers sheds with molo­tovs.
Eco-activists present at the site of eco-camp near the con­struc­tion failed to pro­vide police with evi­dence or ideas about the nature of per­pe­tra­tors.”

report­ed on From Rus­sia With Love:

“On the night of 20–21 july, after hav­ing received news of new tree-cut­ting activ­i­ty in Khim­ki for­est, we decid­ed to vis­it the work­ers. We aimed for 2 trucks and exca­va­tor parked on the clear cut. They were com­plete­ly destroyed.

Our sol­i­dar­i­ty goes out to eco-activists who broke the arm of pri­vate guard who was guard­ing the clear cut (this piece we learned from news).

Enough of pseu­do-legal­ism!

Do like us, do bet­ter than us.
- Autonomous autonoms

video footage of the action:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P51k3CrtF20&feature=youtu.be

Residents Blockade Injection Well One Week After 1,000 Gallon Fracking Waste Spill

16.7.12

[For updates check ohiofracktion.com]

16.7.12

[For updates check ohiofracktion.com]

Con­cerned res­i­dents blocked access to an injec­tion well in Trum­bull Coun­ty this morn­ing, protest­ing the fail­ure of Ohio reg­u­la­tors to ade­quate­ly test and mon­i­tor dump­ing of tox­ic frack­ing waste. At least one pro­tes­tor has been arrest­ed and at least two oth­ers have been detained.

Trum­bull Coun­ty res­i­dents, along with support­ers from Frack Free Mahon­ing and Ohio Frack­tion, are gath­er­ing at the well site on Sodom Hutch­ings Road in Vien­na Town­ship, to express con­cerns about the con­tents of the 1,000 gal­lons of frack­ing waste­water that spilled along five miles of road in Fowler Town­ship, a near­by res­i­den­tial area on July 7.They are demand­ing that Ohio’s Divi­sion of Nat­ur­al Resources (ODNR) begin sys­tem­at­i­cal­ly test­ing out-of-state frack waste that is inject­ed into over 170 wells through­out Ohio. One sup­port­er has locked him­self to the gate to pre­vent all trucks car­ry­ing frack­ing waste from enter­ing the site.

Accord­ing to spokesper­son Mike Set­tles, emer­gency respon­ders from Ohio’s Envi­ron­men­tal Pro­tec­tion Agency (EPA) con­duct­ed only a sim­ple pH test of the spilled frack waste lin­ing the roads of Fowler Town­ship. As far as fur­ther test­ing for radi­a­tion, heavy met­als, and oth­er chem­i­cals, Set­tles explained that EPA doesn’t “have the resources” to per­form test­ing unless there is a “legit­i­mate con­cern” of envi­ron­men­tal dam­age. Thick, rust col­ored residue was still vis­i­ble on the road over a week after the spill.

Lib­er­al Town­ship Trustee Jodi Stoy­ak expressed her frus­tra­tion with EPA’s response in a July 12 let­ter to Mr. Set­tles, not­ing “many of the chem­i­cals used in [frack­ing] and con­tained in the waste are offi­cial­ly clas­si­fied indi­vid­u­al­ly as haz­ardous…. This, in my opin­ion, is a huge envi­ron­men­tal con­cern.”

ODNR offi­cials have ignored numer­ous writ­ten and oral requests from Ohio res­i­dents to order test­ing of the count­less gal­lons of out-of-state frack waste inject­ed under­ground into Ohio each year. In response to a recent pub­lic records request ask­ing ODNR to release all test­ing rel­e­vant to frack­ing waste, ODNR Geol­o­gist Tom Tomas­tik pro­vid­ed no results tak­en after 1989.

Chinese Environmentalists Protest, Riot, Defeat Copper Plant in Sichuan

9/7/12

9/7/12

Fol­low­ing three days of mass protest, over­turned police cars, tear gas and vio­lent clash­es between pro­test­ers and riot police, the city gov­ern­ment of Shi­fang in the province of Sichuan, south­west Chi­na, announced last week that it is scrap­ping plans for a cop­per alloy plant. This is but one of dozens of indus­tri­al projects that have been suc­cess­ful­ly defeat­ed by large scale protests and riots in Chi­na in recent years. As in protests else­where in Chi­na, enraged activists stormed the city’s gov­ern­ment head­quar­ters and staged a suc­cess­ful occu­pa­tion.

“We have so many peo­ple in Shi­fang. We aren’t afraid of them (the author­i­ties),” an 18-year-old activist bold­ly stat­ed to Reuters by tele­phone from Shi­fang just before the gov­ern­ment acqui­es­cence to demands. “The Shi­fang peo­ple will def­i­nite­ly not sur­ren­der.”

But the vic­to­ry comes with seri­ous sac­ri­fice. Dozens of pro­test­ers have been  injured and many more round­ed up and detained. Their legal future is uncertain.If sim­i­lar post-protest crack-downs are of any insight there will be dozens of more orga­niz­ers round­ed up in the months to come as gov­ern­ment attempts to qui­et such protests pub­licly is coun­tered by a pri­vate dra­con­ian witch hunt to silence “ring­lead­ers.”

The gov­ern­ment has accused the banned spir­i­tu­al move­ment Falun Gong and the Dalai Lama for insti­gat­ing the vio­lence. But these are the com­mon scape­goats used by the gov­ern­ment any­time pop­u­lar upris­ings take place in Chi­na.

A Letter of Resistance in Shifang

The fol­low­ing is a trans­la­tion of a hand­out post­ed around the city of Shi­fang in the lead up and dur­ing the protests.

Save Shi­fang! All City Res­i­dents Unite!

Peo­ple of Shi­fang, let’s save our city!! It already a “can­cer town,” and they still want to build that molyb­de­num cop­per plant. We res­olute­ly oppose this! This is our shared home, and it is our respon­si­bil­i­ty to pro­tect it. Every­one is respon­si­ble for pro­tect­ing the envi­ron­ment!!

Per­haps many peo­ple still do not know Shi­fang plans to build a molyb­de­num cop­per plant, and still more peo­ple do not know the dam­age this will cause. Once con­struc­tion of the fac­to­ry begins, it will already be too late. We do not want to leave Shi­fang! Shi­fang is the “Bright Pearl of West­ern Sichuan.” We can­not leave! Heavy met­al pol­lu­tion will cause us ter­ri­ble harm.

Are there real­ly that many Shi­fang res­i­dents who have the mon­ey to move to anoth­er province? We must come togeth­er and work to keep the molyb­de­num cop­per plant far from Shi­fang!

Peo­ple of Shi­fang, rise up!!

Anti-fracking Blockade in Moshannon State Forest

9th July 2012

9th July 2012

Near­ly 100 Earth First! activists, friends and allies forced a 70-foot-tall EQT hydrofrack­ing drill rig to sus­pend oper­a­tions for 12 hours yes­ter­day in Pennsylvania’s Moshan­non State For­est. This is the first time that pro­test­ers have shut down a hydrofrack drilling oper­a­tion in the US. A tree sit­ter hung above the access road, with their anchor ropes block­ing it. A sec­ond per­son was also in a tree to sup­port the sit­ter while dozens of sup­port­ers guard­ed ten large debris piles that were across the road. Anoth­er group of 50 activists block­ad­ed the entrance to the access road. The State Police, with the Depart­ment of Con­ser­va­tion and Nat­ur­al Resources, dis­persed the block­ade around nine p.m. And removed the tree sit­ters with a lad­der truck. Three arrests were made for dis­or­der­ly con­duct, but pro­test­ers were cit­ed and released on-site.

There are a lim­it­ed num­ber of actu­al drill rigs in oper­a­tion in the state which are fer­ried around from site to site on a tight sched­ule. By halt­ing oper­a­tions for a day on this site, the block­ade has like­ly cre­at­ed a cost­ly dis­rup­tion for a hand­ful of wells in the area which EQT appar­ent­ly planned to drill in suc­ces­sion.

The activists report­ed that the police were reck­less with the sit­ters’ safe­ty, such as being quick to cut their anchor ropes.  The sup­port­ing sitter’s safe­ty and descent ropes were cut by the police as he climbed high­er in the tree.  The police in the lad­der truck had no radios and com­mu­ni­ca­tion to the ground was dif­fi­cult over the noise of the diesel engine; at one point the lad­der hit one of the sitter’s sup­port lines. Police were seen taunt­ing the sit­ter by wav­ing around one of their anchor lines and mak­ing jokes at them while shak­ing the ham­mock.

The site is part of a high con­cen­tra­tion of wells in Moshan­non State For­est, one of the most heav­i­ly drilled state forests in Penn­syl­va­nia. Over half of the forest’s 190,000 acres have been leased for Mar­cel­lus drilling using hydraulic frac­tur­ing. Despite wide­spread pub­lic oppo­si­tion, the for­mer PA sec­re­tary of Con­ser­va­tion and Nat­ur­al Resources pre­dicts 12,000 Mar­cel­lus wells will be drilled in state forests in the com­ing decade1. A recent poll showed that the major­i­ty of Penn­syl­va­ni­ans are opposed to frack­ing on pub­lic lands2.

Local farmer Jen­ny Lisak, whose own prop­er­ty has been impact­ed by frack­ing, describes the dev­as­ta­tion she has seen in the Moshan­non, “Hav­ing grown up enjoy­ing Moshan­non State For­est in so many ways, I am absolute­ly appalled at the ongo­ing destruc­tion. The once nar­row and invit­ing oak-shad­ed lanes are now being replaced by dust and traf­fic choked roads for chem­i­cal laden trucks – there are no words to describe the injus­tice of tak­ing pub­lic land, meant to pro­vide a source of beau­ty and wilder­ness for all and turn­ing it into an indus­tri­al zone.”

Drilling in the area has a trou­bled his­to­ry. In June 2010, a major blowout at anoth­er well in Clearfield Coun­ty spewed 35,000 gal­lons of tox­ic drilling waste into the Lit­tle Lau­rel Run water­shed and caused the evac­u­a­tion of Moshan­non State For­est3. Since 2008, only 24 of EQT’s 198 Mar­cel­lus wells in the state have been inspect­ed and vio­la­tions were found at every sin­gle inspec­tion. When they have been cit­ed, they’ve refused to change their prac­tices. On May 9, 2012, in Dun­can Town­ship, Tio­ga Coun­ty, EQT was cit­ed for faulty con­struc­tion on a flow­back water impound­ment; three weeks lat­er the pit failed, con­t­a­m­i­nat­ing a near­by spring4.

“This is part of an esca­lat­ing direct action cam­paign against frack­ing in the Mar­cel­lus Shale region,” said Danielle Diet­t­er­ick, an activist affil­i­at­ed with Mar­cel­lus Earth First! from Ben­ton, Pa. “Peo­ple from all around the coun­try have joined with Penn­syl­va­nia res­i­dents to put their bod­ies on the line to stop frack­ing.”

The action comes on the heels of a 12-day block­ade to stop the dis­place­ment of the Riverdale Mobile Home Park, in Lycoming Coun­ty, and the shut­down of a frack­ing waste­water injec­tion well near Athens, Ohio. Groups across the coun­try are plan­ning more anti-extrac­tion inter­ven­tions like RAMPS in West Vir­ginia and the Tar Sands Block­ade in Texas, lat­er this month. All these inde­pen­dent, grass­roots-led actions show per­haps a coa­lesc­ing nation­al upris­ing against exploita­tive extrac­tion.

Susan Riley, anoth­er sup­port­er, cheered on the bold action, “The state gov­ern­ment has sold off our pub­lic lands and, with Act 13, stripped us of our rights to local self-gov­er­nance. The frack­ing indus­try has free reign in this state and no one’s gonna stop them unless we do.”

8th July 2012

Activists from Mar­cel­lus Earth First! have erect­ed a slash pile block­ade and two tree sits block­ing an access road to an EQT hydro-frack­ing site in Moshan­non State For­est in Clearfield Coun­ty, PA., halt­ing drilling oper­a­tions set to begin this week. The block­aders were joined by 40 sup­port­ers and con­cerned cit­i­zens, who turned around a Hal­libur­ton truck. The block­ade is try­ing to stop the fur­ther destruc­tion of Pennsylvania’s state forests—more than half of which have already been leased for drilling—and call atten­tion to the dev­as­tat­ing effects of hydrofrack­ing on the state’s com­mu­ni­ties. The sit­ters’ anchor lines are block­ing the road by cross­ing each oth­er and the road, and if an anchor line is cut a sit­ter will fall. This action has been coor­di­nat­ed as the post-Ren­dezvous action. Each Sum­mer Earth First!ers and allies come togeth­er to skill share, take part in dis­cus­sion work­shops, and keep it wild in our last remain­ing wilder­ness places in the US. Fol­low­ing a week in the woods, we take part in an action in sup­port of the local orga­niz­ers host­ing the camp out, also know as the Round Riv­er Ren­dezvous, or Rondy.

Today’s block­ade is the lat­est in a series of esca­lat­ing actions of resis­tance to the destruc­tive impacts of hydrofrack­ing in the Mar­cel­lus Shale. Last May, res­i­dents of But­ler Coun­ty occu­pied the office of State Rep­re­sen­ta­tive Bri­an Ellis, demand­ing account­abil­i­ty for wide­spread con­t­a­m­i­na­tion caused by hor­i­zon­tal drilling. In June, sev­en fam­i­lies, along with dozens of sup­port­ers, blocked the entrance to the Riverdale Mobile Home Com­mu­ni­ty to pre­vent their immi­nent evic­tion at the hands of Aqua Amer­i­ca PVR. Aqua sought to destroy their homes and con­struct a water with­draw­al facil­i­ty per­mit­ted to extract up to three mil­lion gal­lons of water from the Susque­han­na Riv­er dai­ly for use in frack­ing. Res­i­dents were able to main­tain the block­ade for 12 days. On June 17, 1,000 Ohioans stormed the state­house in Colum­bus and passed a “people’s res­o­lu­tion” ban­ning hydrofrack­ing. Most recent­ly, a 31-year-old landown­er from Athens Coun­ty, Ohio chained her­self to con­crete bar­rels and shut down oper­a­tions at one of Ohio’s 170 injec­tion wells, which con­tain about 95% of the tox­ic and radioac­tive frack­ing waste gen­er­at­ed from Penn­syl­va­nia drilling.

Momen­tum in the anti-frack­ing bat­tle will con­tin­ue to build across the Mar­cel­lus and Uti­ca shale regions through­out July. Next week­end, res­i­dents from Ohio and beyond will gath­er at an anti-frack­ing action camp in Youngstown and pre­pare to enforce the “people’s res­o­lu­tion” against frack­ing. The upcom­ing months show the begin­nings of a nation­al rebel­lion against extrac­tive indus­try across the board. On July 28, anti-frack­ers from across the nation will gath­er in Wash­ing­ton D.C. for “Stop the Frack Attack,” the largest mobi­liza­tion against frack­ing ever. In West Vir­ginia, Appalachi­ans and allies will stand togeth­er at the “Moun­tain Mobi­liza­tion” and shut down an active strip mine the last week of July. In Montana,the “Coal Export Action”, a ten-day cam­paign of civ­il dis­obe­di­ence at the begin­ning of August will tar­get coal ship­ments from strip mines in the Pow­der Riv­er Basin, over­seas. And lat­er in the month, Texas res­i­dents have called for the “Tar Sands Block­ade” to block the recent­ly approved south­ern leg of the Key­stone XL pipeline.

Where the gov­ern­ment has failed to act to pro­tect com­mu­ni­ties and the earth from the rav­ages of an out-of-con­trol ener­gy indus­try, the peo­ple are ris­ing up to resist. No mat­ter where you live, you have the oppor­tu­ni­ty to join the fight for our future. Find your place, stand your ground, and in the words of Moth­er Jones, “Boo­gie Chilluns.”

UPDATE, 11:53 am:
Police mak­ing vague threats at block­ade about assault rifles going off and wan­der­ing through block­ade with assault riflesHow­ev­er, at the ral­ly they said there’s a sick bear up the road that needs to be put down, and not to freak out if a gun shot is heard.

Police ini­ti­at­ed anoth­er round of nego­ti­a­tion with the ral­ly insist­ing folks move the debris that’s in the road because it’s a safe­ty risk, mak­ing veiled threats about things esca­lat­ing if that doesn’t hap­pen.  Police have informed peo­ple it’s ille­gal to block the road, but have not giv­en any order to dis­perse, they said “if it doesn’t hap­pen [dis­per­sal] they don’t want things to esca­late.”  Oth­er­wise, sit­u­a­tion unchanged.

UPDATE  10:14 am:
State police on scene at sup­port­ing ral­ly.

UPDATE  10:10 am:
Two tree-sit­ters block­ing the well pad access road–their anchor lines are cross­ing the road and each oth­er, and if an anchor line is cut­ter a sit­ter will fall.  There’s also a slash pile in the road.  No police on seen and appar­ent­ly no secu­ri­ty either.

UPDATE  9:30 am:
Mar­cel­lus Earth First! and sup­port­ers have set up a block­ade at an EQT well pad in the Moshan­non Penn­syl­va­nia State For­est.  An addi­tion­al group of 40 sup­port­ers are hold­ing a ral­ly down the road, and have blocked a Hal­libur­ton truck.  The activists plan to stay as long as they can.  Stay tuned for more updates as infor­ma­tion becomes avail­able.

State Of Emergency In Cajamarca Follows Four Deaths in Mine Protests

6th July ’12

A state of emer­gency has been declared in three provinces in the Andean depart­ment of Caja­mar­ca, locat­ed in north­ern Peru, fol­low­ing the deaths of four peo­ple dur­ing protests against the mul­ti-bil­lion dol­lar Con­ga gold project.

6th July ’12

A state of emer­gency has been declared in three provinces in the Andean depart­ment of Caja­mar­ca, locat­ed in north­ern Peru, fol­low­ing the deaths of four peo­ple dur­ing protests against the mul­ti-bil­lion dol­lar Con­ga gold project.

Peru’s Exec­u­tive branch approved the mea­sure, which cur­tails civ­il lib­er­ties, in the provinces of Caja­mar­ca, Celendin and Hual­gay­oc. The state of emer­gency came into force on Wednes­day and will be valid for 30 days, the gov­ern­ment said.

The mea­sure fol­lows the death in Celendin of three peo­ple and more than 30 injured on Tues­day, dur­ing clash­es between police and demon­stra­tors.  One of the per­sons killed was 17 years old.  More than 15 peo­ple were arrest­ed.  On the same day, a man was killed dur­ing protests in Bam­ba­mar­ca, cap­i­tal of the province of Hual­gay­oc.

This week’s protests, with Minas Con­ga still in focus, are against the may­ors of 65 dis­tricts who last week were in Lima with Pres­i­dent Humala at the Gov­ern­ment Palace to accept gov­ern­ment invest­ment in a series of infra­struc­ture projects in their provinces.   

It is the sec­ond time since last Decem­ber that Peru has declared a state of emer­gency in Caja­mar­ca to con­trol esca­lat­ing protests against the $4.8 bil­lion Minas Con­ga project, which is being devel­oped by gold min­ing com­pa­ny Yana­cocha.

Yana­cocha is major­i­ty con­trolled by US-based New­mont Min­ing (51%), with Peru’s Minas Bue­naven­tu­ra own­ing 49%.

Protests late last year against Minas Con­ga, over wor­ries that it would harm the water sup­ply to farm­ers, result­ed in the sus­pen­sion of the project. 

At the same time, the delay in reach­ing an agree­ment with pro­test­ers pushed Pres­i­dent Humala to make a major cab­i­net shuf­fle late last year, appoint­ing for­mer Inte­ri­or min­is­ter Oscar Valdes as his new pre­mier to apply a stronger hand in quelling the protests.  Those against the min­ing project have only become more entrenched.

Inde­pen­dent con­sul­tants hired by the gov­ern­ment have reviewed the Minas Con­ga envi­ron­men­tal impact study, and the gov­ern­ment said recent­ly that the com­pa­ny could restart work if it made some changes like build­ing water reser­voirs before start­ing con­struc­tion of the mine.

How­ev­er, oppo­si­tion has remained strong despite attempts by Peru’s gov­ern­ment to resolve the dis­pute. One of the main oppo­nents of the project is the region­al gov­ern­ment of Caja­mar­ca, led by far-left gov­er­nor Gre­go­rio San­tos.

San­tos reject­ed the state of emer­gency and called on the gov­ern­ment to lift the mea­sure.

Minas Con­ga is the lat­est in a num­ber of min­ing projects that have been tar­get­ed by com­mu­ni­ty oppo­si­tion, large­ly over envi­ron­men­tal con­cerns. Ana­lysts say some $50 bil­lion in min­ing invest­ments are at risk due to the social con­flicts in Peru, a coun­try where min­ing has been the lynch­pin of eco­nom­ic growth.

Brazil tribes occupy contentious dam site

30th June 2012

About 150 indige­nous peo­ple are protest­ing a mas­sive dam they say will dry up the riv­er their liveli­hood depends on.

30th June 2012

About 150 indige­nous peo­ple are protest­ing a mas­sive dam they say will dry up the riv­er their liveli­hood depends on.

A clus­ter of 12 men from the Xikrin tribe chant in their native lan­guage while march­ing togeth­er, arms inter­locked, stomp­ing their feet against the dry red dirt. They say this is their call of resis­tance from the Ama­zon.

The Xikrin are joined by about 150 indige­nous peo­ple from three oth­er tribes — the Arara, Juruna, and Parakana — that are occu­py­ing one of the work sites at the Belo Monte dam con­struc­tion site in what is becom­ing a high-stakes stand­off. The occu­pa­tion, which is enter­ing its sec­ond week, has halt­ed a part of the con­struc­tion on what will be the world’s third-largest hydro­elec­tric dam.

At the site of the protest, vis­it­ed by Al Jazeera on Wednes­day, the tribes­men were car­ry­ing clubs and spears and had built rudi­men­ta­ry sleep­ing quar­ters in what has essen­tial­ly become a non-vio­lent sit-in. An anthro­pol­o­gist was with them, typ­ing away at her lap­top as the indige­nous peo­ple artic­u­lat­ed their demands.

The tribes are occu­py­ing a road, built by the dam builders, which cuts through part of the Xin­gu River’s water­ways. The road blocks the nat­ur­al flow of the waters.

The occu­pa­tion of the site began at about 11 am on June 21 and played out like some­thing from a fic­tion­al Hol­ly­wood movie. The indige­nous peo­ple arrived at the work site in half a dozen small boats, charged the area, and announced that they were tak­ing over. The con­struc­tion work­ers, see­ing the tribes­men with their faces paint­ed for com­bat and armed with spears, imme­di­ate­ly fled for safe­ty.

“The work­ers were scared, so they imme­di­ate­ly ran when we arrived,” said Bepumuiti, from the Juruna tribe. “They prob­a­bly thought they were going to die.”

The tribes­men con­fis­cat­ed the keys to more than three dozen dump trucks and heavy machin­ery left behind.

What the indige­nous peo­ple want

Last year, a series of con­di­tions were agreed upon with the indige­nous peo­ple to reduce the impact of the con­struc­tion of the dam on their com­mu­ni­ties. Some of the con­di­tions includ­ed the demar­ca­tion of indige­nous lands, the con­struc­tion of health facil­i­ties and schools, and means of trans­porta­tion for the trib­al peo­ple when the rivers dry up.

In exchange for their agree­ment, the indige­nous said they would not force­ful­ly oppose the dam con­struc­tion.

The prob­lem, the indige­nous now say, is that while the con­struc­tion of the dam steams ahead, the promis­es made by the con­sor­tium build­ing the dam and by gov­ern­ment-led Norte Ener­gia — the ener­gy com­pa­ny over­see­ing the dam — have yet to be ful­filled.

So the tribes decid­ed to invade. This was a his­toric and sig­nif­i­cant move, because the deci­sion was made with­out the assis­tance or knowl­edge of local or inter­na­tion­al NGOs or gov­ern­ment rights bod­ies, who in the past often assist­ed tribes dur­ing protest move­ments.

“We would not be here today if the builders and the gov­ern­ment would have done what they promised us,” Bebtok, a tribe elder from the Xikrin tribe, told Al Jazeera. “In my com­mu­ni­ty, noth­ing has been done. There is no qual­i­ty health post, there is no school, they have not built a road for us. My road is the riv­er and that is going to be dried up.”

Since Octo­ber, the tribes most affect­ed by the con­struc­tion of the dam have been receiv­ing a bud­get of about $15,000 from the gov­ern­ment, through which they can request any­thing they want, such as gaso­line for their boats, food or con­struc­tion mate­r­i­al.

But the tribes have been told that the mon­ey — called “emer­gency assis­tance” in gov­ern­ment par­lance — will stop lat­er this year, infu­ri­at­ing the trib­al peo­ple at the very moment they are start­ing to feel the neg­a­tive impacts of the dam, they say.

The indige­nous peo­ple are now also start­ing to see the impact the con­struc­tion is hav­ing on their lives. Surara, from the Parakana tribe, showed Al Jazeera how a road built on the con­struc­tion site through a nat­ur­al water­way of the Xin­gu riv­er has already start­ed to dry out one side of the riv­er.

“We were always nav­i­gat­ing this riv­er because we know this riv­er like the palm of our hands,” Surara said. “And today, as you can see, it’s very dry. That is sad for us.”

Surara pre­dict­ed that, at the cur­rent pace of con­struc­tion, in two years the tribe will no longer be able to reach their com­mu­ni­ty by boat because of the changes in water lev­els. The tribes have a new list of demands they want ful­filled before they say they will end their occu­pa­tion.

Response from gov­ern­ment and builders

The tribes’ occu­pa­tion of the dam seemed to catch the dam builders and the gov­ern­ment by sur­prise. In response, Norte Ener­gia has tak­en what seems like a pecu­liar approach that involves two very oppo­site respons­es, using the car­rot and the stick at the same time. Three days after the occu­pa­tion began, a judge reject­ed a request to have the indige­nous evict­ed by force from the area.

At the same time, Norte Ener­gia is pro­vid­ing the indige­nous peo­ple three meals a day at the occu­pa­tion site. Often times, a rep­re­sen­ta­tive from the com­pa­ny will show up at the site dur­ing a meal and ask the indige­nous peo­ple for the keys back to their heavy machin­ery. So far, the tribes have refused to hand them over.

Last week, Norte Ener­gia refused an Al Jazeera request for an inter­view on the mat­ter. Norte Ener­gia has said in the past that the eco­nom­ic and social assis­tance pack­ages to help the tribes will be imple­ment­ed at var­i­ous points dur­ing the entire­ty of the project, as pre­vi­ous­ly agreed upon.

Behind the scenes, the com­pa­ny is fac­ing a daunt­ing task. Not only do each of the four tribes involved in the occu­pa­tion have their own set of demands, but there are also as many as 35 dif­fer­ent sub-com­mu­ni­ties with­in the tribes tak­ing part in the occu­pa­tion, and each have their own inter­ests and requests they want met.

Activists face arrest

Pres­sure is build­ing on mul­ti­ple fronts. Con­struc­tion of the dam ramped up ear­li­er this year, and there are strict timeta­bles to get the dam up and run­ning by late 2014.

Aside from the indige­nous protest, sev­er­al oth­er tense issues sur­round­ing the dam are coa­lesc­ing at the same time.

In Altami­ra, the clos­est city to the dam site, 11 peo­ple — all unaf­fil­i­at­ed with the indige­nous protest now occur­ring — are fight­ing arrest war­rants after being accused of help­ing organ­ise an anti-dam protest ear­li­er in June that the dam builders say led to prop­er­ty dam­age. Local TV chan­nels have been air­ing video of bro­ken win­dows and the burn­ing of office equip­ment at the con­struc­tion site.

The activists fac­ing pos­si­ble arrest all deny they were involved, and say any protests they organ­ised were peace­ful and legal. They include, among oth­ers, a Catholic priest, a nun, some mem­bers of Xin­gu Vivo Para Sem­pre — a local anti-dam NGO — as well as a local fish­er­man fea­tured in an Al Jazeera report in Jan­u­ary

Police have an open inves­ti­ga­tion, and have yet to for­mal­ly announce if charges will be filed. How­ev­er, even the threat of jail time has sent a chill through the tight-knit com­mu­ni­ty of local anti-dam activists.

How will it end?

On Thurs­day, in the city of Altami­ra, more than 60 of the indige­nous occu­piers met with a high-lev­el del­e­ga­tion from Brasil­ia that includ­ed the pres­i­dent of Norte Ener­gia.

The meet­ing last­ed near­ly four hours, and was closed to the media. The indige­nous peo­ple dis­cussed their demands to end the protest, but no agree­ment was reached. Norte Ener­gia said they need­ed to take the requests back to Brasil­ia for analy­sis. A new meet­ing was set for July 9. In the mean­time, the tribes say their occu­pa­tion will con­tin­ue. It was also agreed by all sides that work will con­tin­ue on the parts of the con­struc­tion site not under the con­trol of the tribes.

“This was a very friend­ly con­ver­sa­tion; the tribe elders are very wise and mea­sured,” said Car­los Nasci­men­to, pres­i­dent of Norte Ener­gia, in a brief press con­fer­ence after the meet­ing. “There are some young tribes­men that want some improve­ments, and as much as we can, we will do any­thing in our pow­er so these kinds of things will not hap­pen again.”

The indige­nous seemed deter­mined to keep up the fight for as long as it takes. “What we asked for, the dam builders did not give us an answer to, so we will only leave the con­struc­tion site when they bring an answer to us on paper,” Giliar­di, from the Juruna tribe, said after the meet­ing. “And as long as they don’t do any­thing in our com­mu­ni­ties regard­ing infra­struc­ture, we are not leav­ing the occu­pa­tion.”

Mean­while, more boats loaded with indige­nous peo­ple are arriv­ing at the protest site every day. It is an indi­ca­tion that this stand­off in the Ama­zon could drag on for days to come.

More pho­tos and video

Earth First! Summer Gathering Update — programme, directions, website and more

It’s only weeks until the Earth First! Sum­mer Gath­er­ing begins.
Five days of work­shops, info shar­ing and learn­ing new skills, 1–5 August.

It’s only weeks until the Earth First! Sum­mer Gath­er­ing begins.
Five days of work­shops, info shar­ing and learn­ing new skills, 1–5 August.

The Earth First Sum­mer Gath­er­ing takes place each year to pro­vide a space in which the rad­i­cal ecol­o­gy move­ment can share skills and plan for future cam­paigns and actions.

Dis­cus­sions around the impor­tance of com­mu­ni­ty build­ing in inner cities, the state of the anar­chist move­ment and patri­archy in activism.

Skill shares includ­ing wom­en’s self-defence, research­ing cor­po­ra­tions and nav­i­ga­tion.

Cam­paign round ups from Frack Off! Smash Edo and Lud­dites 2000 amongst oth­ers.

If you have work­shops you like to run or dis­cus­sions you’d like to facil­i­tate then email us at earthfirstsummergathering@riseup.net

Full pro­gramme.

Camp­ing is on a slid­ing scale of £30 to £15, pay what is gen­uine­ly appro­pri­ate.

Food will be from Anar­chist Teapot and meal tick­ets will be £5 a day.

Kids can have sep­a­rate meals if they want for £3 a day.

There will be a cou­ple of kids spaces, and spe­cial work­shops being ran for kids. If you’d like to run any kids work­shops get in touch at earthfirstsummergathering@riseup.net.

If you want you dog to come along then you’re going to have to email us at earthfirstsummergathering@riseup.net

And of course there will be enter­tain­ment and a bar open in the evenings.

The camp is ½ mile from the Berring­ton vil­lage, and 1 mile from the larg­er vil­lage of Cross Hous­es.

We encour­age non-cycling campers to use pub­lic trans­port if pos­si­ble as Cross Hous­es is on a bus route.

BY TRAIN
The near­est train sta­tion is Shrews­bury. You can then get the bus to Cross Hous­es (see below). If com­ing from a long dis­tance it can some­times be cheap­er to get a tick­et to a large sta­tion such as Birm­ing­ham, Wolver­hamp­ton, Man­ches­ter or Crewe and then a sep­a­rate tick­et on to Shrews­bury. Check nation­al rail for train times and prices. If com­ing from the Lon­don direc­tion, it’s gen­er­al­ly cheap­er to buy a Super Off­peak Return, spec­i­fy­ing “Lon­don Mid­land & Arri­va only”.

BY BIKE
See here for direc­tions and a map to the camp from Shrews­bury for cyclists and dri­vers.

BY BUS
When you arrive at Shrews­bury train sta­tion, ask some­one to point you to the bus sta­tion. It’s only a few min­utes walk from the train sta­tion. The bus ser­vice that runs from town to with­in a mile of Crabap­ple is the 436 towards Bridg­north. It runs every hour from 7.40am to 5.40pm with a “late” one at 7.40pm. The jour­ney to Cross Hous­es is approx 15 mins. You will need to press the stop but­ton when you see the sign for Cross Hous­es. Some of the ser­vices on this route are low-floor acces­si­ble bus­es. Please note that the last bus leaves Shrews­bury at 7.40pm, Mon­day to Sat­ur­day and there are no Sun­day bus ser­vices. For the bus timetable see here http://shropshire.gov.uk/bustimes/timetable.jsc?timetable=436mfi0412.
The camp itself is about 1 mile from the bus stop. From the bus stop at Cross Hous­es, walk back towards Shrews­bury past the petrol sta­tion (on your right) and take the first left turn signed “Berring­ton”. After about ½ mile, the road forks at the edge of the vil­lage. Take the right turn sign­post­ed “Bet­ton Abbots” and we’re about ¼ mile up the road on the right.
If you intend to come by bus but need help get­ting to and from the bus stop, you can arrange a pick up with us: details will be avail­able near­er the time.

BY TAXI
There is also a taxi rank just out­side Shrews­bury train sta­tion. Acces­si­ble taxis can be got from here.- but it is MUCH cheap­er to book a cab from a local com­pa­ny – Comet Cabs 01743 344444, or Vin­cent Cabs 01743 367777. Vin­cents also have a book­ing office just across the road from the sta­tion, which is handy if you don’t have a phone to book a cab in advance.

USEFUL LINKS
See here direc­tions and a map to the camp from Shrews­bury for cyclists and dri­vers.
See a map of where the site is here
See the bus timetable
Direc­tions from places oth­er than Shrews­bury

Earth First! Sum­mer Gath­er­ing Col­lec­tive
earthfirstsummergathering@riseup.net

http://earthfirstgathering.weebly.com

North Dakota Shale Boom Displaces Tribal Residents

Heather Young­bird and Crys­tal Dee­gan used to live in a trail­er at the Prairie Winds Mobile Home Park in the Fort Berthold Indi­an Reser­va­tion in North Dako­ta. Last week Leroy Olsen, their land­lord, removed their front door and cut off the elec­tric­i­ty and the propane sup­ply. The rea­son?

Heather Young­bird and Crys­tal Dee­gan used to live in a trail­er at the Prairie Winds Mobile Home Park in the Fort Berthold Indi­an Reser­va­tion in North Dako­ta. Last week Leroy Olsen, their land­lord, removed their front door and cut off the elec­tric­i­ty and the propane sup­ply. The rea­son? New homes to be con­struct­ed for out of town oil work­ers com­ing to take part in the shale explo­ration boom.

“This oil boom has divid­ed the Man­dan, Hidat­sa and Arikara peo­ple and pit­ted them against each oth­er in a neg­a­tive way,” says Kan­di Mos­sett, a trib­al mem­ber and orga­niz­er with the Indige­nous Envi­ron­men­tal Net­work.

In 2010, WPX Ener­gy of Okla­homa paid $925 mil­lion for the right to explore for oil on the 86,000 acres of the Fort Berthold Indi­an Reser­va­tion. The com­pa­ny plans to squeeze oil out of shale, the most abun­dant form of sed­i­men­ta­ry rock. Until recent­ly such explo­ration was pro­hib­i­tive­ly expen­sive, but with the evo­lu­tion of tech­nol­o­gy and the rise in the price of oil, many rur­al com­mu­ni­ties from Eng­land to the Ukraine, from Argenti­na to North Dako­ta, have become tar­gets for the shale oil boom.

Anoth­er com­pa­ny prof­it­ing from the Bakken boom, which has been described as the biggest oil find in North Amer­i­ca in four decades with an esti­mat­ed 4.3 bil­lion bar­rels of recov­er­able oil, is Con­ti­nen­tal Resources, also from Okla­homa.

Fort Berthold – the cen­ter of the oil boom — has long suf­fered from crum­bling roads and the lack of good hous­ing and prop­er sewage facil­i­ties on the reser­va­tion. The com­pa­nies plan to invest in hous­ing and infra­struc­ture for their work­ers and plants, but not for local res­i­dents.

“Right now, any­thing that’s avail­able that has water and sew­er on it is very attrac­tive to any­body that’s try­ing to con­tin­ue to grow their busi­ness,” says John Reese, the CEO of the Unit­ed Prairie Coop­er­a­tive com­pa­ny, which has tak­en over the trail­er park.

“We were not even giv­en a for­mal 30 day evic­tion notice and now that we have been kicked out of our home we are cur­rent­ly home­less,” said Heather Young­bird. The remain­ing res­i­dents of Prairie Winds Mobile Home Park have been told that they had to leave their trail­ers by May 1, but the evic­tion date has now been post­poned until August 31.

More trou­ble is expect­ed for the trib­al com­mu­ni­ty: Envi­ron­men­tal groups note that res­i­dents may also soon see prob­lems with their drink­ing water. “Infor­ma­tion post­ed hydraulic frac­tur­ing flu­id chem­i­cals on the Frac­Fo­cus web site indi­cates that Bakken Shale oil wells may con­tain tox­ic chem­i­cals such as hydrotreat­ed light dis­til­late, methanol, eth­yl­ene gly­col, 2‑butoxyethanol (2‑BE), phos­pho­ni­um, tetrakis(hydroxymethyl)-sulfate (aka phos­pho­n­ic acid),  acetic acid, ethanol, and napth­lene,” writes Earth­Works, a Wash­ing­ton DC based group.

Then there is the air pol­lu­tion: the oil com­pa­nies are not even both­er­ing to cap­ture the nat­ur­al gas that is gen­er­at­ed by the drilling, part­ly because there are no state reg­u­la­tions to force them to and part­ly because it is expen­sive. Instead the gas is being “flared” or burnt off, the same way Shell does in the Niger delta with sim­i­lar envi­ron­men­tal con­se­quences.

“Across west­ern North Dako­ta, hun­dreds of fires rise above fields of wheat and sun­flow­ers and bales of hay. At night, they illu­mi­nate the prairie skies like giant fire­flies,” wrote Clif­ford Krauss in the New York Times last Sep­tem­ber. “Every day, more than 100 mil­lion cubic feet of nat­ur­al gas is flared this way — enough ener­gy to heat half a mil­lion homes for a day.”

Per­haps the great­est irony is that North Dako­ta has the great­est wind resource of almost any state in the coun­try, says Mos­sett. She says that North Dako­ta could sup­ply 1.2 tril­lion kilo­watt-hours (kWh) of annu­al elec­tric­i­ty.

Prat­ap Chat­ter­jee is the Senior Edi­tor at CorpWatch.org, where this arti­cle orig­i­nal­ly appeared.