Portland Activists Blockade Columbia River in Symbolic Protest Against Fossil Fuel Shipments

581681_555938907803540_1813073730_n

28th July 2013

581681_555938907803540_1813073730_n

28th July 2013

In a day-long affair involv­ing hun­dreds of activists, the Port­land Ris­ing Tide and 350.org col­lab­o­ra­tion, Sum­mer Heat, went off yes­ter­day with­out a hitch.

Activists con­gre­gat­ed in the morn­ing at the Van­cou­ver Land­ing in Van­cou­ver, Wash­ing­ton, where the port author­i­ties recent­ly OKed a ter­mi­nal to ship hun­dreds of thou­sands of bar­rels of oil car­ried on trains from the Bakken Shale. 

521686_555937994470298_835309442_nHost­ing info ses­sions about free trade agree­ments, direct action, and infra­struc­ture resis­tance, the event car­ried a fes­tive air into the ear­ly after­noon. By 3pm, around 250 activists in more than 100 boats took to the riv­er for a sym­bol­ic block­ade and massed under the Colum­bia Bridge.

More activists gath­ered on the bridge, and three climbers repelled down with a long, trans­par­ent ban­ner that read, “Coal, Oil, Gas: None Shall Pass.”

“It went as well as I thought it could have,” stat­ed one Ris­ing Tide activist to EF! News. Although the FBI had been snoop­ing around in the weeks pri­or to the event, the crowd that came out to the protest showed that they will not be intim­i­dat­ed.

18394_10100137671048341_1671520289_n

Police pres­ence was rel­a­tive­ly min­i­mal at the protest com­pared to oth­er Ris­ing Tide and Occu­py actions that have occurred. Nobody was arrest­ed, and the mes­sage was sent: Expect Resis­tance.

Sum­mer Heat was only a high point in what has been a long, hard, and in many ways suc­cess­ful strug­gle, which has seen three three pro­posed coal ter­mi­nals shut down so far.  Today, Port­land Ris­ing Tide looks invig­o­rat­ed, con­fi­dent, and more ded­i­cat­ed than ever to the mis­sion of stop­ping cli­mate change.

 

Myanmar Activist Jailed 10 years For Anti-Mine Protest

Security forces move in to stop protesters plowing fields near the copper mine at Letpadaung Mountain in northern Burma's Sagaing division on April 25, 2013.

Security forces move in to stop protesters plowing fields near the copper mine at Letpadaung Mountain in northern Burma's Sagaing division on April 25, 2013.

Secu­ri­ty forces move in to stop pro­test­ers plough­ing fields near the cop­per mine at Let­padaung Moun­tain in north­ern Burma’s Sagaing divi­sion on April 25, 2013.

28th July 2013

A court in cen­tral Myan­mar has sen­tenced an activist to a decade in prison for “threat­en­ing nation­al secu­ri­ty” after he led a protest against a con­tro­ver­sial Chi­na-backed cop­per mine which led to clash­es with author­i­ties, accord­ing to a fel­low cam­paign­er.

Judge Kaythi Hlaing of the Shwe­bo city court hand­ed Aung Soe, an activist with Myanmar’s People’s Sup­port Net­work, the 10-year sen­tence on Mon­day after con­vict­ing him on eight charges linked to the vio­lence on April 25, Moe Moe, also of the activist’s group, told RFA’s Myan­mar Ser­vice.   

The group had backed hun­dreds of farm­ers protest­ing the alleged seizure of their land by Wan Bao Com­pa­ny, which runs the cop­per mine near Mount Let­padaung in north­ern Burma’s Sagaing divi­sion.

The clash­es broke out after secu­ri­ty forces moved in to stop the farm­ers from plow­ing their fields on the con­test­ed land. At least ten protest­ing farm­ers were injured, some of them report­ed­ly with gun­shot wounds, while 15 police­men were also wound­ed.

Aung Soe “was sen­tenced under eight charges, includ­ing for threat­en­ing reli­gious puri­ty and nation­al secu­ri­ty, and for ille­gal assem­bly,” Moe Moe said Tues­day.

“He was sen­tenced at the Shwe­bo court by the judge, Daw Kaythi Hlaing,” he said, using an hon­orif­ic title.

Two res­i­dents of Setae vil­lage, near the Let­padaung cop­per mine, named Soe Thu and Maung San, were also sen­tenced for “vio­lat­ing orders” and “incit­ing riots,” Moe Moe added.

He did not say how long the two vil­lagers were sen­tenced to prison.

Moe Moe said that Aung Soe’s lawyer will appeal his con­vic­tion.

Sus­pend­ed oper­a­tions

An inquiry com­mis­sion in Myan­mar ruled in March that the cop­per mine should be allowed to con­tin­ue despite wide­spread objec­tions.

But near­ly four months lat­er, oper­a­tions at the facil­i­ty remain sus­pend­ed with protest­ing vil­lagers refus­ing to accept com­pen­sa­tion offers.

Oper­a­tions at the mine have been sus­pend­ed since Novem­ber, when a bru­tal crack­down on protests against the mine prompt­ed the gov­ern­ment to set up the com­mis­sion to look into the project’s via­bil­i­ty.

The com­mis­sion rec­om­mend­ed that the project should be allowed to move ahead despite con­ced­ing that it brought only “slight” ben­e­fits to the nation.

Since then, vil­lagers who are most­ly farm­ers have staged reg­u­lar protest against the mine, com­plain­ing that the com­pen­sa­tion was not enough and call­ing for a com­plete halt to the project.

Some 15 protesters—both local res­i­dents and activists from Yangon—are want­ed by the author­i­ties over demon­stra­tions against the mine in recent months.

Vil­lagers have said that they do not want pol­lu­tion from the mine to destroy the area and that author­i­ties have con­fis­cat­ed some 8,000 acres (3,000 hectares) of farm­land from 26 vil­lages to make way for the mine.

Report­ed by Yada­nar Oo for RFA’s Myan­mar Ser­vice.

All-Night Anti-Shale Gas Truck Seizure, Road Block, Ends Peacefully Despite RCMP Negotiation Failure

Last night, July 27th,

Last night, July 27th, about 35 anti-shale gas activists block­ad­ed a 20 ton truck, sub­con­tract­ed to SWN Resources Cana­da, for over 8 hours. The truck, filled with heli­copter bags – each con­tain­ing dozens of geo­phones – was attempt­ing to exit south­ward along Irv­ing Road, a back road west of high­way 126 in New Brunswick. The truck, as well as eight oth­er equip­ment trucks sub­con­tract­ed to SWN, were con­duct­ing seis­mic test­ing in the hopes of find­ing shale gas deposits along a 35.9 kilo­me­ter north-south line known as ‘Line 5′. All the equip­ment and work­ers were halt­ed until about 3:30am Atlantic Time.

Activists had orig­i­nal­ly nego­ti­at­ed with RCMP for a 3 hour work stop­page, in homage to the Ghost Dance that the Sun­dancers in Elsi­pog­tog were under­tak­ing yes­ter­day evening. Elsi­pog­tog War Chief John Levi, him­self a Sun­dancer, was absent from the block­ade. In his stead, Jason Okay, Dis­trict War Chief, and ‘Sev­en’, the Mi’kmaq ter­ri­to­ry War Chief, had come to the assis­tance of the anti-shale gas move­ment.

The 3 hour work stop­page was meant to occur at the end of the work­day. It would appear that RCMP had agreed to this tem­po­rary block.

How­ev­er, when the 20 ton truck was first blocked at about 5pm – in front of an already heavy police pres­ence – the RCMP imme­di­ate­ly blocked in the activists who sur­round­ed the truck. At the time there were about 35 activists at the scene, and word began to trick­le in to those encamped that an RCMP road­block at the entrance to Irv­ing Road – about 16 kilo­me­ters to the south – was not allow­ing any­one to pass. This was appar­ent­ly counter to the orig­i­nal agree­ment, and began what was to be a stand­off that con­tin­ued until the ear­ly morn­ing hours.

RCMP and the ‘Elsi­pog­tog Peace­keep­ers’ – a group of three indi­vid­u­als on Elsi­pog­tog Band pay­roll who osten­si­bly serve as a neu­tral par­ty – did not seem able or desirous of undo­ing the police road­block that was refus­ing all entry. The activists requests were ini­tial­ly straight­for­ward, only ask­ing that any­one wish­ing to attend their cer­e­mo­ny be allowed to dri­ve the 16 kilo­me­ter dis­tance. The activists also specif­i­cal­ly request­ed a drum leader and a pipe car­ri­er to assist them. Social media sources con­tin­ued to note that a siz­able line of cars was still being refused entry.

Ten­sions fur­ther increased at about 7:30pm when Annie Clair, also known as ‘Pocha­hon­tas’ to the anti-shale gas activists, climbed atop the roof of the seized truck and chained and pad­locked her­self to a spare tire mount­ing weld­ed to the roof. She was quick­ly joined by two oth­er activists, one of whom also chained her­self to the roof while the oth­er locked her­self to a heli­copter bag filled with geo-phones.

Clair, who only days before had tied her­self to heli­copter bags and had halt­ed work at a heli­copter launch­ing site, was defi­ant in her mes­sage to the gath­ered police force, not­ing that if they were going to shoot her, to go ahead.

 

RCMP and the Peace­keep­ers again con­tin­ued to ‘nego­ti­ate’, but did not seem able to relay the mes­sage to the RCMP block­ade that the first step towards resolv­ing the stand­off was to allow traf­fic to flow freely. Activists, for their part, remained adamant that the 3 hours they were promised for cer­e­mo­ny would only begin once the RCMP block­ade was removed and their sup­port­ers could join them. As the hours of stand­off con­tin­ued, and food and water were denied to the activists, RCMP marched in for­ma­tion through the block­ade with numer­ous box­es of piz­za and cas­es of water.

 Even­tu­al­ly, one of the Elsi­pog­tog Elders – also a clan moth­er – begged Clair to unchain her­self and descend from the truck roof. With social media now reach­ing some­thing of a fren­zied pitch – and sto­ries of dozens of police cruis­ers and pad­dy wag­ons wait­ing for the activists, Clair com­plied. Indeed, the activists were now vis­i­bly blocked in by numer­ous police trucks and cruis­ers. Infrared lights shone from some of the RCMP cars and a large spot­light was erect­ed shin­ing direct­ly onto the activists’ makeshift encamp­ment.

 

RCMP nego­tia­tors not­ed that they would not arrest any­one that night, but made no guar­an­tees that future days might not see activists picked off one by one in house arrests. As has been the case since ear­ly June when active protests began against shale gas explo­ration in Kent Coun­ty, yes­ter­day police made no secret of their heavy sur­veil­lance of the action. At 3:30am, as activists moved their trucks and cars off the road, it became clear that an entire SWN work crew had been stopped. With a heavy police escort, eight SWN trucks emerged from a side road and quick­ly sped past the gath­ered crowd. With no equip­ment or SWN work­ers left to guard, the RCMP quick­ly left the scene as well.

 

Indian tribe blocks Pan-American Highway to protest land invasion

23 July 2013 Cross post­ed from Sur­vival

 

23 July 2013 Cross post­ed from Sur­vival

 

A key South Amer­i­can high­way con­nect­ing Paraguay and Bolivia is being blocked by an Indi­an tribe angry at the destruc­tion of their rapid­ly-shrink­ing island of for­est.

Ayoreo Indi­ans today blocked the Trans-Cha­co High­way, which forms part of the Pan-Amer­i­can High­way, and have vowed to main­tain their protest until out­siders who have occu­pied their land are removed.

The Indi­ans are angry about the ille­gal inva­sion of their land by two Paraguayan farm­ers, in an area to which the Ayoreo secured offi­cial land title 16 years ago.

The farm­ers and their work­ers have erect­ed cat­tle fences and bull­dozed wide tracks, and claim that the land belongs to them. They were guard­ed by police, to pre­vent any attempt on the Ayore­os’ part to stop the work.

The land is titled to the Ayoreo, but the farmers have erected cattle fences and bulldozed wide tracks.
The land is titled to the Ayoreo, but the farm­ers have erect­ed cat­tle fences and bull­dozed wide tracks.
© Sur­vival

Although most mem­bers of the Ayoreo tribe are con­tact­ed, some groups are known to remain uncon­tact­ed in the for­est in the area now under threat.

The Ayoreo have said to Sur­vival Inter­na­tion­al, ‘We don’t want any out­siders in our ter­ri­to­ry – it’s dan­ger­ous for us, and dan­ger­ous for our rel­a­tives in the for­est. We’ll stay here [on the road] until all the out­siders leave our land.’

Uncon­tact­ed Cha­coA spe­cial report from the Paraguayan Cha­co. Recent­ly con­tact­ed Ayoreo Indi­ans are wor­ried for the future of their uncon­tact­ed rel­a­tives.

Survival’s Direc­tor Stephen Cor­ry said today, ‘The Ayoreo are extreme­ly angry that one of the few parts of their ter­ri­to­ry that they had man­aged to secure is now being invad­ed by out­siders, with the con­nivance of the local police. It seems like the author­i­ties in Paraguay favor the rich and pow­er­ful over peo­ple like the Ayoreo, who sim­ply try to live in peace on their own land.’

New Wick Drain Protest Delays CalTrans Again, USA

Picture from the May wick drain lock down.

23.7.13

Picture from the May wick drain lock down.

23.7.13

Cal­trans’ attempt to drain and fill wet­lands was shut down today when two activists locked them­selves to both of the giant “stitch­er” tow­ers that are punch­ing thou­sands of wick drains into the water table near this small rur­al town. The wick drains are being used to com­pact the soil so that it can no longer hold water, in prepa­ra­tion for build­ing a free­way. The Willits Bypass free­way project entails the biggest loss of wet­lands in North­ern Cal­i­for­nia in 50 years. Oppo­nents of the project say it is a giant loss for tax­pay­ers as well.

Two pro­test­ers were able to slip past CHP guards in the predawn dark­ness to get to the steel tow­ers, which had been low­ered to the ground for the night. The tow­ers are now low­ered each evening ever since activist Will Par­rish climbed 60 feet into an upright tow­er, occu­py­ing it and shut­ting down work for eleven days from June 20 to July 1.

Travis Jochim­sen and a woman call­ing her­self Blue Heron used weld­ed steel lock box­es to attach them­selves to the equip­ment, plac­ing their arms deep into the met­al tubes they had insert­ed between the tower’s open grid work. “We can’t afford to lose pre­cious water for the sake of an unnec­es­sary free­way, said Jochim­sen. “Every day the wick drains aren’t being installed is a vic­to­ry for farm­ers, tax­pay­ers and the plan­et”.
Bypass oppo­nents con­tin­ue to say the project is unjus­ti­fied by Cal­trans’ own traf­fic data, point­ing to a vir­tu­al­ly emp­ty two-lane high­way north of town. The emp­ty high­way can be seen on  Cal­trans’ web­cam that records traf­fic every hour. http://www.dot.ca.gov/dist1/d1tmc/1_cam.php?cam=27 
Over 70% of traf­fic is local and would not be served by the bypass.  “This project is a bonan­za for the con­trac­tors and a mas­sive loss for every­one else—especially the tax­pay­ers,” said Willits city coun­cil­woman Madge Strong. The con­tro­ver­sial project has a “stick­er price” of $210 mil­lion, but with inter­est on the prop 1B bonds and the usu­al cost over­runs, the final cost could be as high as $500 mil­lion dol­lars.

A del­e­ga­tion from Willits, includ­ing Strong, met with Cal­trans Chief Offi­cer Mal­colm Dougher­ty in Sacra­men­to on July 9 to show how Cal­trans employ­ees inflat­ed the traf­fic fig­ures and oth­er data in order to jus­ti­fy a four lane free­way, ignor­ing less cost­ly and destruc­tive alter­na­tives. Dougher­ty dis­missed the traf­fic data as irrel­e­vant, although he could not explain why the tax­pay­ers should finance an I‑5 style free­way for a rur­al area that has been los­ing pop­u­la­tion for a decade. Cal­trans only has suf­fi­cient fund­ing for a two-lane bypass at present, yet it is build­ing a mas­sive four lane foot­print. Dougher­ty expressed con­fi­dence that plen­ty of fund­ing will be avail­able in the future.

Break­ing news: Reporter/photographer Steve Eber­hart of The Willits News was arrest­ed at 7:35 a.m. this morn­ing on the con­struc­tion site while wait­ing for his Cal­trans escort to arrive

Michigan Activists Locking Down to Halt Tar Sands Pipeline Construction

Brooklyn & Barb locked down

From MI-CATS Press Release:

Mon­day, July 22nd, 2013

Brooklyn & Barb locked down

From MI-CATS Press Release:

Mon­day, July 22nd, 2013

This morn­ing Michi­gan Coali­tion Against Tar Sands (MI-CATS) is tak­ing direct action near Stock­bridge ‘to halt con­struc­tion of the Tar Sands pipeline 6B expan­sion project of Cana­di­an cor­po­ra­tion Enbridge. Over 40 Michi­gan­ders have come to oppose the infa­mous corporation’s fla­grant expan­sion of the very same pipeline that spilled out into the Kala­ma­zoo Riv­er only three years ago. Enbridge claims they have restored the riv­er after a spill is no excuse to expand the pipeline, expand­ing the pipeline increas­es the risk for every­one.

Res­i­dents are cur­rent­ly halt­ing Enbridge’s con­struc­tion plans by putting their bod­ies on the line in an act of non vio­lent civ­il dis­obe­di­ence against Enbridge’s plans. At least 6 peo­ple have been arrest­ed so far as police attempt to shut down the protest. 4 peo­ple are cur­rent­ly locked down to con­struc­tion equip­ment and refus­ing to move. Police have arrest­ed their med­ical sup­port team and threat­en to arrest any­one who tries to approach them.

 

These mea­sures come after the exhaus­tion of every method with­in the law, as it has has become appar­ent from our expe­ri­ences all through­out the state. Our state gov­ern­ment is ready to set aside its own laws and legal process­es to accom­mo­date this for­eign cor­po­ra­tion.

Enbridge itself has con­sis­tent­ly demon­strat­ed that their sole pri­or­i­ty is their own bot­tom line, not the health and safe­ty of the peo­ple of Michi­gan, our ecosys­tem, and even their own work­ers.

Michi­gan Coali­tion Against Tar Sands seeks to unite the peo­ple of Michi­gan toward the com­mon goal of stop­ping all trans­porta­tion of tar sands oil in the state and advo­cat­ing against the pro­duc­tion and trans­porta­tion of tar sands every­where. We work in sol­i­dar­i­ty with the glob­al move­ment against harsh fos­sil fuel extrac­tive prac­tices.

Accord­ing to one per­son who is par­tic­i­pat­ing in this action “This pipeline is a dis­as­ter for Michigan’s water and the glob­al cli­mate. I’m blockad­ing this pipeline to  pre­vent the next spill because I care about Michigan’s air and water. Peo­ple all over the world are tak­ing action in their own com­mu­ni­ty this Fear­less Sum­mer. We need to leave all fos­sil fuels in the ground.” – William Lawrence of East Lans­ing

We will not allow Cana­di­an tar sands to pass through our back­yards. We will no longer allow the same Cana­di­an cor­po­ra­tion respon­si­ble for the tar sands which still lie at the bot­tom of our Kala­ma­zoo Riv­er to place all of us at risk. We are tak­ing this action to pro­tect from anoth­er spill and to ensure a liv­able plan­et for gen­er­a­tions to come.

Loca­tion of the action is the Enbridge 6B ease­ment off of Grimes west of M‑52 near Stock­bridge, MI. Look for the orange con­struc­tion signs and the police pres­ence. ‪#‎micat­s­act‬. Updates on the action will con­tin­ue, as events unfold.

This is MI-CATS’ sec­ond action at the Enbridge 6B pipeline this sum­mer; in the first an activist climbed inside the Enbridge 6B pipe. Fol­low @MichiganCats and @efjournal on twit­ter for updates

Flotilla Protests Development in Manatee County

Res­i­dents opposed to the pro­posed Long Bar Pointe devel­op­ment project gath­ered in boats on Sara­so­ta Bay to protest los­ing the last piece of unde­vel­oped shore­line in Man­a­tee Coun­ty.

Res­i­dents opposed to the pro­posed Long Bar Pointe devel­op­ment project gath­ered in boats on Sara­so­ta Bay to protest los­ing the last piece of unde­vel­oped shore­line in Man­a­tee Coun­ty.

Dozens of pro­tes­tors gath­ered on a flotil­la of boats, kayaks, pad­dle boards and jet skis in Sara­so­ta Bay Sat­ur­day after­noon.

“This is tip­ping point for Man­a­tee Coun­ty, we got to make a deci­sion which way we go,” pro­tes­tor Jaime Can­field said. “Do we want to fol­low the rest of Flori­da and devel­op the coast or do we pre­serve it.”

Can­field is opposed to an ambi­tious project that threat­ens to remove man­groves and sea grass in Sara­so­ta Bay to make way for a mari­na and five-star resort-style devel­op­ment. The project is pro­posed for an area that par­al­lels El Con­quis­ta­dor Park­way where 75th Street West inter­sects with 53rd Avenue West that has long been agri­cul­tur­al.

Cur­rent­ly a project includ­ing con­dos and sin­gle fam­i­ly homes with docks is already approved but devel­op­ers want to expand.

Devel­op­ers behind the project — Car­los Beruff of Medal­lion Home and Lar­ry Lieber­man from the Bar­ring­ton Group — how­ev­er believe the project will be a wel­come and much need­ed addi­tion to Man­a­tee Coun­ty.

The new plans call for a mixed-use devel­op­ment — sin­gle- and mul­ti-fam­i­ly units, hotel, mari­na, office and com­mer­cial space, and a con­fer­ence cen­ter — on the 463.2 acres.

How­ev­er near­ly 295 acres is with­in the Coastal High Haz­ard zone, an area prone to flood­ing dur­ing storms. Because the land is vul­ner­a­ble in a storm, devel­op­ers must get the coun­ty to amend the com­pre­hen­sive plan to allow for the more intense devel­op­ment.

Ter­ri Won­der, one of the orga­niz­ers of the protest thinks an amend­ment to the com­pre­hen­sive plan is a ter­ri­ble idea.

“We hope Car­los changes his mind now or before Aug. 6,” Won­der said. “If not, that the Man­a­tee Coun­ty Com­mis­sion will not rat­i­fy his project.”

Won­der, a Bayshore, res­i­dent said she grew up on Sies­ta Key and saw how devel­op­ment changed the island. She moved to Bayshore Gar­dens to get back some of what she had lost and because Sies­ta Key became to pricey.

Many of the pro­tes­tors includ­ing Won­der are con­cerned about the effects the pro­posed devel­op­ment will have on the bay, a breed­ing and feed­ing ground for dol­phins and man­a­tees.

The boaters gath­ered in a flotil­la and shared ban­ners and signs read­ing “Pro­tect the bay” and “Save our Shore.” They even tar­get­ed the project’s financ­ing, which is from Bain Cap­i­tal.

“We want to pre­serve what is pre­cious,” Won­der said. “Home­own­ers want to retire here and their chil­dren and grand­chil­dren want to come here.”

Won­der fears that if the project is approved, devel­op­ment will reach a point of no return and that Man­a­tee Coun­ty will no longer rep­re­sent the best of Flori­da.

“Well it’s inter­est­ing because last night we held a meet­ing at the El Con­quis­ta­dor Coun­try Club and we received a tremen­dous­ly pos­i­tive reac­tion from peo­ple that would be thrilled that there would be some place to go, eat and enjoy the water,” Lieber­man said. “They were thrilled that there would be a revi­tal­iza­tion of Man­a­tee Coun­ty.”

Liber­man says one of the project’s envi­ron­men­tal experts was at meet­ing to explain how the project intends to have zero neg­a­tive impact to the envi­ron­ment.

“I know there are a lot of peo­ple that are protest­ing, but these peo­ple have not seen the plan. They have not talked to the expert envi­ron­men­tal­ist who have guar­an­teed us that this would have a pos­i­tive envi­ron­men­tal impact on the envi­ron­ment and Sara­so­ta Bay,” Lieber­man said. “They are out there protest­ing and they don’t know the facts and that is dan­ger­ous.”

Long­time Bayshore res­i­dent Richard Nel­son looked to the Sara­so­ta side of the bay Sat­ur­day after­noon and then around him, fear­ful of the changes that could come.

“Look at this, they all want it to look like that,” Nel­son said. “That actu­al­ly looks more like the Bronx.”

Nel­son moved to Flori­da from New York City near­ly 23 years ago, and he says he hasn’t regret­ted it for a day.

“We have to try and pre­serve every­thing we got,” Nel­son said. “You have to fight for it or else they are just going to try and do what­ev­er they want.”

Mapuche, Human Rights Activists Slam Argentina’s Chevron Deal

18 July 2013 The Argen­tine government’s long-sought deal with Chevron Corp.

18 July 2013 The Argen­tine government’s long-sought deal with Chevron Corp. to exploit shale oil reserves in Patag­o­nia was strong­ly crit­i­cized Wednes­day by Mapuche Indi­ans, human rights activists, envi­ron­men­tal­ists and left­ists who called it a sell­out to the U.S. that could drain and pol­lute the nation’s resources.

The $1.5 bil­lion joint ven­ture with Chevron was made pub­lic in a brief announce­ment by the state-owned YPF oil com­pa­ny Tues­day night. Pres­i­dent Cristi­na Fer­nan­dez said the deal will pro­mote ener­gy inde­pen­dence for Argenti­na, but many of her one-time allies warned that it would do the oppo­site.

“It’s an irre­spon­si­bil­i­ty and a lack of con­scious­ness that the nation­al gov­ern­ment hands over these resources to Chevron,” said Nilo Cayuqueo, who leads a Mapuche com­mu­ni­ty in Neuquen province, where the Vaca Muer­ta shale oil basin is. “We’re talk­ing about mon­ey here, noth­ing else. They don’t talk about the envi­ron­ment, or of future gen­er­a­tions.”

Mapuch­es say the land belongs to them and con­tend they weren’t con­sult­ed about the deal in vio­la­tion of inter­na­tion­al treaties cov­er­ing indige­nous peo­ples. YPF denied that claim Tues­day.

Adol­fo Perez Esquiv­el, an Argen­tine rights activist award­ed the Nobel Peace Prize in 1980, said the deal would hurt the coun­try.

“We Argen­tines,” he said, “are giv­ing our resources to the Unit­ed States and con­vert­ing YPF into a high­ly pol­lut­ing com­pa­ny that will use this method known as frack­ing,” which requires mil­lions of gal­lons of fresh water pumped at high pres­sure to extract oil and nat­ur­al gas from oth­er­wise unpro­duc­tive wells deep under­ground in shale deposits.

Perez Esquiv­el said he would file suit demand­ing to see envi­ron­men­tal impact stud­ies and try to block the oil devel­op­ment. But he said he had lit­tle hope of suc­cess since the court sys­tem recent­ly over­turned an injunc­tion seiz­ing any Chevron prof­its in Argenti­na if the com­pa­ny didn’t pay a $19 bil­lion dam­age judg­ment won by plain­tiffs in Ecuador, where the Tex­a­co oil com­pa­ny since bought by Chevron was judged to have con­t­a­m­i­nat­ed parts of the Ama­zon.

The deal reached with Chevron is the biggest for­eign invest­ment that Argenti­na has attract­ed since expro­pri­at­ing YPF from con­trol of the Span­ish com­pa­ny Grupo Rep­sol last year. Rep­sol is demand­ing $10 bil­lion in com­pen­sa­tion and threat­ens to sue any oil com­pa­ny that takes over the wells.

Tanks Move in Around Earth’s Most Threatened Tribe

Brazil’s mil­i­tary has moved in to stop ille­gal log­ging around the land of Earth’s most threat­ened tribe.
© Exérci­to Brasileiro

Cross Post­ed from S

Brazil’s mil­i­tary has moved in to stop ille­gal log­ging around the land of Earth’s most threat­ened tribe.
© Exérci­to Brasileiro

Cross Post­ed from Sur­vival Inter­na­tion­al

Sur­vival Inter­na­tion­al has received reports that Brazil’s mil­i­tary has launched a major ground oper­a­tion against ille­gal log­ging around the land of the Awá, Earth’s most threat­ened tribe.

Hun­dreds of sol­diers, police offi­cers and Envi­ron­ment Min­istry spe­cial agents have flood­ed the area, backed up with tanks, heli­copters and close to a hun­dred oth­er vehi­cles, to halt the ille­gal defor­esta­tion which has already destroyed more than 30% of one of the Awá’s indige­nous ter­ri­to­ries.

Since the oper­a­tion report­ed­ly start­ed at the end of June, 2013, at least eight saw mills have been closed and oth­er machin­ery has been con­fis­cat­ed and destroyed.

Little Butterfly, an Awá girl. The Awá have pleaded for all illegal invaders to be evicted from their forest.
Lit­tle But­ter­fly, an Awá girl. The Awá have plead­ed for all ille­gal invaders to be evict­ed from their for­est.
© Sarah Shenker/Survival

The oper­a­tion comes at a crit­i­cal time for the Awá, one of the last nomadic hunter-gath­er­er tribes in the Brazil­ian Ama­zon, who are at risk of extinc­tion if the destruc­tion of their for­est is not stopped as a mat­ter of urgency.

But while the oper­a­tion is mak­ing it more dif­fi­cult for log­gers to enter Awá ter­ri­to­ry and remove the valu­able tim­ber, the forces have not moved onto the Awá’s land itself – where ille­gal log­ging is tak­ing place at an alarm­ing rate and where quick action is cru­cial.

Amiri Awá told Sur­vival, ‘The invaders must be made to leave our for­est. We don’t want our for­est to dis­ap­pear. The log­gers have already destroyed many areas.’

Tanks, helicopters and close to a hundred vehicles have been deployed to protect the forest.
Tanks, heli­copters and close to a hun­dred vehi­cles have been deployed to pro­tect the for­est.
© May­con Alves

Tens of thou­sands of peo­ple world­wide, includ­ing many celebri­ties, have joined Sur­vival International’s cam­paign urg­ing the Brazil­ian gov­ern­ment to send forces into the Awá’s ter­ri­to­ries to evict the ille­gal invaders, stop the destruc­tion of the Awá’s for­est, pros­e­cute the ille­gal log­gers and pre­vent them from re-enter­ing the area.

Survival’s Direc­tor Stephen Cor­ry said today, ‘Brazil has tak­en a promis­ing first step towards sav­ing the world’s most threat­ened tribe, and it’s thanks to the many thou­sands of Awá sup­port­ers world­wide. This is proof that pub­lic opin­ion can effect change. How­ev­er, the bat­tle is not yet won: the author­i­ties must not stop until all ille­gal invaders are gone.’

New Blockades in Guangdong, Third Major Protest This Week

Blockade via dumptruck17 July 2013 Author­i­ties in the south­ern Chi­nese province of Guang­dong have promised to halt pro­duc­tion at two fac­to­ries near Sihui city after demon­stra­tors blocked the gates, clash­ing with work­ers in the third mass e

Blockade via dumptruck17 July 2013 Author­i­ties in the south­ern Chi­nese province of Guang­dong have promised to halt pro­duc­tion at two fac­to­ries near Sihui city after demon­stra­tors blocked the gates, clash­ing with work­ers in the third mass envi­ron­men­tal protest in the region this week, activists said on Tues­day.

Local res­i­dents said vehi­cles con­tin­ued to come in and out of the main gates of an ink-mak­ing plant and a print fac­to­ry on Tues­day, how­ev­er, rais­ing sus­pi­cions that pro­duc­tion may still be going on.

The promise from local gov­ern­ment offi­cials came after hun­dreds of res­i­dents of Sihui’s Baisha vil­lage con­verged on the Nanyue Screen Print­ing Fac­to­ry and the Pre­ci­sion Ink. Co. Ltd. plant, which they claim are pol­lut­ing the local envi­ron­ment.

“We blocked up their gates using cement,” one pro­test­er sur­named Lu said on Tuesday.”We demand­ed that the work­ers on the pro­duc­tion floor stop work, but they closed the door on us and wouldn’t let us in.”

“A group of peo­ple got overex­cit­ed and forced their way onto the shop floor, and got into a fight with some of the work­ers there,” Lu said. ”A num­ber of vil­lagers were injured in the fight, and had to be tak­en to hos­pi­tal.”

Mount­ing anger

A sec­ond Baisha res­i­dent sur­named Liang said anger had been mount­ing over alleged pol­lu­tion from both fac­to­ries among local peo­ple for a num­ber of years.

“In recent years, peo­ple have been get­ting sick, and it’s get­ting worse and worse,” Liang said. “A lot of vil­lagers have devel­oped res­pi­ra­to­ry dis­eases like asth­ma and pneu­mo­nia.”
“A lot of peo­ple have con­stant sore throats and inflam­ma­tion, too, while some of the old­er peo­ple in the vil­lage have lung can­cer,” he said.

“The kids all have upper res­pi­ra­to­ry tract inflam­ma­tion, asth­ma and even pneu­mo­nia.”
Lu said vil­lagers were still sus­pi­cious that the promise to halt pro­duc­tion hadn’t been car­ried out, because both fac­to­ries pro­vid­ed high lev­els of income to local gov­ern­ment through tax­a­tion

“These two fac­to­ries are class A tax­pay­ers to the Sihui munic­i­pal gov­er­ment,” he said. “They are very large, and they pay huge amounts in tax­es.”

“They are big cus­tomers around these parts, and they hire a lot of work­ers, so of course the gov­ern­ment is going to be on their side.”

‘Run­ning nor­mal­ly’

An employ­ee who answered the phone at the neigh­bor­hood com­mit­tee of the rul­ing Chi­nese Com­mu­nist Par­ty in Sihui’s Chengzhong dis­trict declined to com­ment. “I don’t know about this,” the employ­ee said.

Repeat­ed calls to the dis­trict envi­ron­men­tal pro­tec­tion depart­ment went unan­swered dur­ing office hours on Tues­day.

An employ­ee who answered the phone at the Nanyue Screen Print­ing Co. said admin­is­tra­tive staff were oper­at­ing nor­mal­ly on Tues­day, but declined to com­ment on the protest, or on the report­ed halt in pro­duc­tion.

“We are all at work, and things are run­ning nor­mal­ly,” the employ­ee said, in ref­er­ence to the office staff. “I don’t real­ly know about it, because the top-lev­el lead­er­ship is deal­ing with it.”

Third protest

The Sihui con­fronta­tion on Mon­day marks the third mass envi­ron­men­tal protest in Guang­dong this week.

On the same day, thou­sands of peo­ple marched in Huadu dis­trict of the provin­cial cap­i­tal Guangzhou in protest over plans to build a waste incin­er­a­tor plant on their doorstep.
And the Huadu protest came just one day after res­i­dents of Jiang­men won an appar­ent con­ces­sion from local offi­cials, who said they would can­cel plans to build a nuclear fuel pro­cess­ing plant near the city after three days of demon­stra­tions.

Wors­en­ing lev­els of air and water pol­lu­tion, as well as dis­putes over the effects of heavy met­als from min­ing and indus­try, have forced ordi­nary Chi­nese to become increas­ing­ly involved in envi­ron­men­tal pro­tec­tion and protest.