Another 3 people from the Lappersfort Forest arrested

Around mid­night on 21st April three peo­ple from the Lap­pers­fort for­est occu­pa­tion in Brugge, Bel­gium were arrest­ed.

They were on their way back to the for­est on foot when they were sprung on by at least 6 pigs dressed in black & a police dog who were wait­ing on ambush. At the moment all we know is they are accused of damaging/vandalising a road being con­struct­ed through the for­est.

Around mid­night on 21st April three peo­ple from the Lap­pers­fort for­est occu­pa­tion in Brugge, Bel­gium were arrest­ed.

They were on their way back to the for­est on foot when they were sprung on by at least 6 pigs dressed in black & a police dog who were wait­ing on ambush. At the moment all we know is they are accused of damaging/vandalising a road being con­struct­ed through the for­est.

The road con­struc­tion began in sept.08 and was met with large protest from the local com­mu­ni­ty, as part of the Lap­pers­fort for­est by the canal was to be destroyed to make way for its con­struc­tion. Activists man­aged to occu­py the threat­ened trees on the first night of con­struc­tion (sept. 2nd) despite a police cor­don of some 250 pig­gies, and delayed work for some hours. Since then, through­out the 7 months of the occu­pa­tion the con­struc­tion com­pa­ny, police & media have accused the occu­piers of sab­o­tage against their pumps and cranes, with­out any proof or charges.

The arrests are part of an ongo­ing sequence of repres­sion. Less than 2 weeks ago two peo­ple were final­ly released from Brugge prison after spend­ing 10 days in the cell based on false charges and fab­ri­cat­ed sto­ries from the Brugge cops. On the day of the lat­est 3 arrests, under­cov­er and uni­formed pig­gies had been seen around the for­est and talk­ing with the con­struc­tion work­ers, and the nature of the arrest shows that the cops here in Brugge are sim­ply try­ing to find any excuse, real or not, to arrest as many peo­ple as pos­si­ble.
We don’t know yet exact­ly what their charges are, or when the 3 peo­ple will be released, but they are already in cus­tody for more than 12 hours, which means they are arrest­ed juridi­cal­ly and will have to see a judge in the Brugge cour­t­house some­time tomor­row.

lap­pers­fort occu­piers — lappersfort@gmail.com

Skyr Thrown in the Heavy Industry Parties’ Election Offices

April 20 2009

Skyr throwing 1Skyr throwing 2April 20 2009
Today, green ’skyr’ (tra­di­tion­al Ice­landic dairy prod­uct) was thrown at the elec­tion offices of three polit­i­cal par­ties, which are respon­si­ble for the inva­sion of the alu­mini­um indus­try into Ice­land. Skyr throw­ing is the Ice­landic equiv­a­lent of pie throw­ing and has become a tra­di­tion in the envi­ron­men­tal strug­gle; the last sim­i­lar action took place only one and a half month ago.

At 11:00 this morn­ing, peo­ple rushed into an office of Sam­fylkingin (the Social Demo­c­ra­t­ic Alliance) in Haf­nar­fjörður, and threw the green liq­uid over the party’s pro­pa­gan­da, fur­ni­ture and the floor. At a sim­i­lar time Fram­sók­narflokkurinn (right wing) was tar­get­ed in Kópavogur. The win­dows of the elec­tion office were com­plete­ly cov­ered in green liq­uid, as well as adver­tise­ment signs out­side the build­ing.

Two hours lat­er, green ’skyr’ was thrown inside an office of Sjálf­stæð­is­flokkurinn (right wing con­ser­v­a­tives) close to the cen­ter of Reyk­javík. The whole office was cov­ered; fur­ni­ture, floors and pro­pa­gan­da.

Skyr Why these tar­gets?
The tar­gets are all under­stand­able, since these three par­ties share the respon­si­bil­i­ty for the envi­ron­men­tal and eco­nom­i­cal cri­sis Ice­land is now fac­ing.

Rio Tin­to-Alcan oper­ates an alu­mini­um smelter in Haf­nar­fjörður and has want­ed to enlarge it for sev­er­al years. In a local ref­er­en­dum the major­i­ty of Haf­nar­fjörður inhab­i­tants vot­ed against the enlarge­ment. But since then, RT-Alcan and the city coun­cil, lead by Sam­fylkingin, have tried to force the enlarge­ment through, e.g. by claim­ing that the referendum’s issue was not the enlarge­ment of the smelter, but only city plan­ning. In con­tin­u­a­tion they have sug­gest­ed that the smelter will be enlarged in the oppo­site direc­tion; on a land­fill in the sea. The ener­gy need­ed for the increased pro­duc­tion is sup­posed to come from Þjórsá and Tung­naá Rivers in the south of Ice­land, where there is fierce local oppo­si­tion to fur­ther dams.

Sjálf­stæð­is­flokkurinn was in gov­ern­ment for 17 years, until angry Ice­landers rushed onto the streets of Reyk­javík last Jan­u­ary, protest­ed and in the end top­pled the gov­ern­ment. Dur­ing these years, Sjálf­stæð­is­flokkurinn invit­ed the alu­mini­um indus­try to Ice­land, promis­ing “min­i­mal envi­ron­men­tal red tape” and cheap ener­gy. To ful­fill the party’s mas­ter plan, every major glacial riv­er in Ice­land would have to be dammed, as well as every active geot­her­mal zone.

Skyr­Fram­sók­narflokkurinn formed the oth­er half of the first cor­rupt heavy indus­try coali­tion, hold­ing the min­istries of envi­ron­ment and indus­try. Now, when in par­lia­men­tary oppo­si­tion, the par­ty speaks and behaves like it had noth­ing to do with the eco­nom­ic col­lapse last fall. One of its main aims for the upcom­ing elec­tions is (just like Sjálf­stæð­is­flokkurinn) the con­tin­u­a­tion of the alu­mini­um industry’s inva­sion.

Not for the first time
This is the sec­ond time in a short time peri­od when green skyr is thrown in Ice­land. Ear­ly in March this year, three peo­ple attacked the ener­gy com­pa­nies, while their rep­re­sen­ta­tives took part in green-wash­ing days inside the Uni­ver­si­ty of Ice­land. Read more about it here.

Clean­ing June 14th 2005, green skyr was thrown in an inter­na­tion­al alu­mini­um con­fer­ence in Reyk­javík. This was one of the first Sav­ing Ice­land actions as well as one of the first direct actions tak­en against the government’s heavy indus­try pol­i­cy. Read more here.

The tra­di­tion of throw­ing skyr as a protest orig­i­nates from a mil­i­tant athe­ist action that took place in Reyk­javík, 1970, when one indi­vid­ual, car­pen­ter Hel­gi Hósea­son, threw ’skyr’ over the Ice­landic bish­op, pres­i­dent, the entire gov­ern­ment and mem­bers of par­lia­ment. For years he had fought for the right to be de-bap­tized, but was repeat­ed­ly refused. Hence he took action.

Recent actions at Tara, Eire

planned action went ahead on mon­day 20.4.09 at the ard­sal­lagh bridge project at the boyne… pro­tes­tors entered site imme­di­at­ly stop­ping all work but this did not last for long as with­in only five min­utes the guards and nine jeeps from M3 work­ers had arrived on site. it was a total set up.

Standing on a dumper-truck at Taraplanned action went ahead on mon­day 20.4.09 at the ard­sal­lagh bridge project at the boyne… pro­tes­tors entered site imme­di­at­ly stop­ping all work but this did not last for long as with­in only five min­utes the guards and nine jeeps from M3 work­ers had arrived on site. it was a total set up. per­haps this is proof of phone mon­i­tor­ing. pro­tes­tors retreat­ed to the pub­lic road where a block­ade sit­u­a­tion quick­ly unfold­ed. this stand off last­ed well in excess of an hour as M3 work­ers had gar­dai inves­ti­gate some ‘bent steel’ all activists were ques­tioned all names were tak­en, mean­while M3 work­ers con­tin­ue to block pub­lic road infu­ri­at­ing locals. after all was said and done the guards escort­ed us back to the hill and wait­ed in the carpark at maguires eat­ing the tara spe­cial…

enjoy the video

——–

Fan­cy dress dig­ger-div­ing, 25.3.09 — video

——–

Action 3.3.09 video

——–


action 12.2.09
THE NEXT DAY OF ACTION for Tara, this wednes­day 18th feb. Meet­ing tues­day night
at Vig­il Farm, for actions ear­ly and all day wednes­day.
Come pre­pared — bring sleep­ing bag, torch, water­proof warm clothes, cam­eras,
ban­ners, cos­tumes, musi­cal instru­ments etc etc

*All wel­come, please tell lit­er­al­ly every­one. Protests can­not con­tin­ue
unless we have the num­bers to sup­port us.
*
If you can­not make it on wednes­day but would like to help out, we need help
with:
Press releas­es
Ban­ner mak­ing mate­ri­als
Cam­eras
Food
Any­thing else you thing that could be help­ful!
Tara is call­ing, the days are get­ting longer and warmer. Protest­ing is
great cra­ic, it’s nev­er to late for TARA
——–

Video of dan­ger­ous dig­ger-div­ing action, 29.1.09

Protests continue…see youtube for more past actions…

Blue NG offices in Bath occupied by 13 members of Action Against Agrofuels (AAA)

AAA occu­pied Blue NG offices on Fri­day 17th, Via Campesina Day, in sol­i­dar­i­ty with mil­lions of peas­ant land-work­ers demon­strat­ing glob­al­ly against agro­fu­els.

Blue NG protestAAA occu­pied Blue NG offices on Fri­day 17th, Via Campesina Day, in sol­i­dar­i­ty with mil­lions of peas­ant land-work­ers demon­strat­ing glob­al­ly against agro­fu­els. Blue NG are com­mit­ting a crime against human­i­ty and the plan­et by using mis­in­for­ma­tion* to win sup­port for the new mar­ket of agro­fu­el pow­er sta­tions, when vir­tu­al­ly all agro­fu­els have been shown to cause ecosys­tem destruc­tion, accel­er­at­ed cli­mate change & food pover­ty.

* For more on Blue-NG mis­in­for­ma­tion see…
http://sites.google.com/site/foodnotfuelorg/Home/facts-on-biofuels/biofuels-for-electricity/BlueNGinconsistenciesApril2009.doc?attredirects=0

On 17th April 2009 13 cli­mate and social jus­tice activists occu­pied the head office of Blue NG, the com­pa­ny which is plan­ning to build the UK’s first bio­fu­el pow­er plants. Ban­ners were hung from the build­ing and activists demand­ed that the com­pa­ny stops invest­ing in bio­fu­els.

Blu­eNG ini­tial­ly plans eight pow­er plants which would run on vir­gin veg­etable oil. Cam­paign­ers warn that those pow­er plants will sig­nif­i­cant­ly boost the UK’s imports of palm oil, which is linked to defor­esta­tion and the dis­place­ment of rur­al com­mu­ni­ties, includ­ing indige­nous peo­ples. Blue NG speaks about using rape­seed oil but has failed to rule out using palm oil. In Ger­many, 1.3 bil­lion kWh of ener­gy are pro­duced from palm oil burn­ing because this is the cheap­est veg­etable oil and Ger­man providers have found it impos­si­ble to afford rape­seed oil.

STATEMENT:

We are here to demand that you stop invest­ing in agro­fu­els. We need tru­ly renew­able ener­gy but call­ing pes­ti­cide-sprayed mono­cul­tures for bio­fu­els renew­able is obscene.

Already, small farm­ers and indige­nous peo­ples are being evict­ed, far more peo­ple are going hun­gry and ever more forests and oth­er diverse ecosys­tems are being destroyed in order to grow fuel for our cars. While hun­dreds of civ­il soci­ety groups and insti­tu­tions, includ­ing he Euro­pean Envi­ron­ment Agency, our Envi­ron­men­tal Audit Com­mit­tee, the UN Rap­por­teur for the Right of Food and even the OECD were against Europe’s bio­fu­el tar­gets for trans­port, your com­pa­ny was draw­ing up plans to fur­ther push up an already com­plete­ly unsus­tain­able demand for bio­fu­els.

Soon after sci­en­tists pub­lished stud­ies which unequiv­o­cal­ly show that today’s agro­fu­els are dis­as­ter for the cli­mate and that using land for agro­fu­els means less ecosys­tems and less food, you pub­lished your plans to build the first veg­etable oil pow­er plant in Beck­ton. It so hap­pens that, in Beck­ton, asth­ma lev­els are already excep­tion­al­ly high, almost cer­tain­ly due to air pol­lu­tion.

You then made false and mis­lead­ing claims to gar­ner polit­i­cal sup­port for those destruc­tive plans. Many peo­ple liked what you said about com­bin­ing geo-pres­sure and com­bined heat and pow­er, yet your two pub­lished plan­ning appli­ca­tions involve nei­ther – as for CHP, you don’t even plan to sup­ply heat to prop­er­ties or indus­try. But even if those claims had not been false, the ener­gy will still come from one of the most destruc­tive and cli­mate-dam­ag­ing types of fuel.

You con­tin­ue to make false state­ments about the fuel you will use. You tell media reporters you have a sus­tain­able sourc­ing agree­ment – yet the par­ty you claim to have that agree­ment with knows noth­ing about it. Just this month, you pub­lished claims that you could pow­er your plants from half a mil­lion hectares of set aside land in the UK and that this would be cli­mate-friend­ly. This is absurd – as any­body in the indus­try must know, most of that set aside land has already been ploughed up in what even Defra fears is a dis­as­ter for our bio­di­ver­si­ty. And far from being cli­mate-friend­ly, rape­seed oil is grown with so many fer­tilis­ers that it’s up to 70% worse for the cli­mate than fos­sil fuel oil.

Your bio­mass pol­i­cy boasts that you will min­imise indi­rect impacts. Not sur­pris­ing­ly, you haven’t told any­body just how you plan to do that – after all nobody else has come up with any cred­i­ble ideas for this either. Except for one study which makes it clear that the only way that could be done was by mak­ing sure less food was grown and more peo­ple went hun­gry. Is this what you mean when you say “If we are going to be suc­cess­ful in our fight against cli­mate change in the con­text of an eco­nom­ic down­turn and ris­ing ener­gy and food prices, we have to make some hard choic­es.”? Though the only suc­cess this project might bring is prof­its, no oth­er ben­e­fits.

And final­ly, the rea­son we are here on this par­tic­u­lar day is that we wish to sup­port the Inter­na­tion­al Day of Action called by Via Campesina, in mem­o­ry of land­less farm­ers killed in Brazil on the same day in 1996. Via Campesina and many oth­er groups right­ly demand poli­cies which sup­port food sov­er­eign­ty, not mono­cul­tures to grow fuel for Europe, and rights and sup­port for small farm­ers and for bio­di­verse, organ­ic farm­ing which tru­ly helps to counter cli­mate change. Bio­fu­el com­pa­nies like Blue NG are under­min­ing our hopes for an agri­cul­ture sys­tem which can feed peo­ple, reduce cli­mate change, safe­guard bio­di­ver­si­ty and sup­port com­mu­ni­ties’ rights and liveli­hoods. Your choic­es are your respon­si­bil­i­ty and we demand that you stop all sup­port for agro­fu­els. We will not stop cam­paign­ing until you stop your sup­port for agro­fu­els.

Barrick and Argentine Officials Violently Assault Women at Roadblock

On April 14, a group of Argen­tine gov­ern­ment offi­cials and employ­ees of Bar­rick Gold Cor­po­ra­tion, car­ried out a vio­lent assault against Women at the Famati­na min­ing camp in the province of La Rio­ja, where a road block­ade has stood for the past two years.

Famatina roadblock

On April 14, a group of Argen­tine gov­ern­ment offi­cials and employ­ees of Bar­rick Gold Cor­po­ra­tion, car­ried out a vio­lent assault against Women at the Famati­na min­ing camp in the province of La Rio­ja, where a road block­ade has stood for the past two years.

When the offi­cials arrived, a group of Women from the “Self-Orga­nized (Auto­con­vo­ca­dos) Neigh­bors of Famati­na for Life,” gath­ered at site and low­ered a met­al bar they installed to deny the company’s pas­sage to the mine site.

The offi­cials and Bar­rick employ­ees then began to ram their trucks against the bar­ri­er, but “with­out any suc­cess,” explains an April 14 media alert.

The offi­cials then exit­ed their vehi­cles and car­ried out a vio­lent assault against a hand­ful of women, who had peace­ful­ly sat down in front the vehi­cles – first shov­ing them, and then kick­ing and strik­ing the women with their fists.

“When the women did not budge,” the Bar­rick and gov­ern­ment offi­cials decid­ed to leave the min­ing camp, and set out to the Famati­na police sta­tion mas­querad­ing as vic­tims with a plan to file charges against the Women.

How­ev­er, “upon enter­ing the police sta­tion, the aggres­sors encoun­tered Famati­na res­i­dents who had been alert­ed to what was tak­ing place,” the alert states. “The Bar­rick and gov­ern­ment offi­cials then con­tin­ued to ver­bal­ly assault the com­mu­ni­ty mem­bers in an arro­gant man­ner, self-assured of their impuni­ty.”

“This atti­tude did not fall well upon the com­mu­ni­ty: Prac­ti­cal­ly the entire pop­u­la­tion of Famati­na imme­di­ate­ly turned out in force, and has gath­ered to sur­round the police sta­tion. As of this moment, the Bar­rick and min­ing offi­cials are now ‘trapped’ inside, afraid to exit the police sta­tion.”

Police forces from the city of Chilecito have since been con­tact­ed to sup­port the Famati­na police and the agres­sors.

Fur­ther updates (in Span­ish) will be post­ed at http://www.noalamina.org/

‘A Wake for BP’, (ExCel 16.4.09; British Museum 6.5.09)

ART NOT OIL REQUESTS THE PLEASURE OF YOUR COMPANY AT ‘A WAKE FOR BP’ AT ITS CENTENARY PARTY, (BRITISH MUSEUM, 6–7PM, 6.5.09)

** dress rehearsal to take place at BP’s 100th AGM, Cus­tom House DLR, 10.30am, 16.4.09 **

BP the party is overART NOT OIL REQUESTS THE PLEASURE OF YOUR COMPANY AT ‘A WAKE FOR BP’ AT ITS CENTENARY PARTY, (BRITISH MUSEUM, 6–7PM, 6.5.09)

** dress rehearsal to take place at BP’s 100th AGM, Cus­tom House DLR, 10.30am, 16.4.09 **

Oil goliath BP, already forced to post­pone its cen­te­nary par­ty at the British Muse­um on April 1st, (also known as Fos­sil Fools Day[1]), has resched­uled the event for May 6th. Art Not Oil[2], the group behind the orig­i­nal demon­stra­tion against its ‘tar­nished cen­te­nary’, will be throw­ing ‘A Wake for BP’ as guests arrive at the British Muse­um between 6pm and 7pm on the new date.

As before, peo­ple want­i­ng to come and say ‘BP – your party’s over!’ and wish the behe­moth a hap­py last birth­day are more than wel­come. The British Museum’s main gate on Great Rus­sell Street will find a con­tin­gent of the new­ly-formed Brazen Pranksters play­ing tunes to ush­er in a new era of cli­mate jus­tice and eco­log­i­cal san­i­ty.

They will also be warm­ing up between 10.30 and 11.30am out­side BP’s 100th AGM at the ExCel Cen­tre on April 16th. There, Art Not Oil hopes to present BP Chair­man Peter Suther­land a spe­cial ‘I sur­vived BP, but the plan­et might not’ T‑shirt, to com­mem­o­rate his last AGM with the com­pa­ny, to place along­side his £600,000 2007–8 pay pack­et. They also plan to wish him a hap­py low-car­bon retire­ment.

‘This real­ly is a case of “BP100 = World Plun­dered”, said Art Not Oil’s Jo Castell. ‘Through­out its his­to­ry, BP has spread the curse of oil wher­ev­er it has oper­at­ed, injur­ing (and some­times killing) work­ers, tear­ing com­mu­ni­ties asun­der and dec­i­mat­ing wildlife. And that’s long before the CO2 from burn­ing the stuff hits the upper atmos­phere and wreaks hav­oc with the cli­mate. Per­haps the most valu­able les­son we could learn from the 20th cen­tu­ry is that the 21st cen­tu­ry will need to see us kick the fos­sil fuel habit, and pret­ty damn soon. Art Not Oil would pre­fer to be in this for the short haul, but either way we’re deter­mined to see BP decom­mis­sioned as a cen­tral part of that oily cold turkey.’

Sam Chase added that ‘Any com­pa­ny that can boast that it’s replac­ing “2008 oil pro­duc­tion by 121% and aims to grow annu­al out­put through to 2020”(4) needs to be decom­mis­sioned forth­with, if we’re to have a chance of avoid­ing cli­mate cat­a­stro­phe in the not-so-dis­tant future. For­tu­nate­ly, Art Not Oil is not alone in work­ing for this to hap­pen, as move­ments of resis­tance are gath­er­ing strength all over the world.’

Notes to edi­tors:

(1) Fos­sil Fools Day was big and inter­na­tion­al in 2008 and 2009:
http://www.newint.org/columns/currents/2008/06/01/climate-campaigning;
www.fossilfoolsdayofaction.org

(2) Art Not Oil stands for ‘cre­ativ­i­ty, cli­mate jus­tice and an end to oil indus­try spon­sor­ship of the arts’, and is part of Ris­ing Tide UK. Look out for its nigh-on irre­sistible 2010 desk diary in Sep­tem­ber!
info@artnotoil.org.uk
07709 545116
www.artnotoil.org.uk
www.risingtide.org.uk

(3) The Car­bon Town Cry­er has now post­ed his BP paean ‘Cel­e­brate This!’ here: www.myspace.com/carbontowncryer

(4) What’s Right With BP?
(An edit­ed ver­sion of this text is now avail­able on a free Art Not Oil post­card):
* Beyond Petro­le­um? ‘BP replaces 2008 pro­duc­tion by 121% & aims to grow annu­al out­put through to 2020’; (BP press release)

* Fos­sil fuel-induced cli­mate chaos hit Europe in August 2003, killing tens of thou­sands of most­ly old­er peo­ple in record-break­ing tem­per­a­tures. 150,000 may have died world­wide.

* In 2007, BP bought 50% of the Sun­rise oil tar sands field in Cana­da. Tar sands are most pol­lut­ing of all the fos­sil fuels. ‘Fund man­agers attack BP over tar sands plan’, Times, 18.4.08; www.tarsandswatch.org

* ‘Exposed: BP, its pipeline, and an envi­ron­men­tal time-bomb’, Inde­pen­dent (26.6.04) on BP’s Baku-Cey­han oil & gas pipelines, which will pro­duce over 150m tonnes of CO2 each year for 40 years, caus­ing untold dam­age to the world’s cli­mate; baku.org.uk

* ‘BP dou­bles cor­po­rate ad bud­get in $150m bid for green­er image’, Times, 28.12.05; BP invests 2.6% of its annu­al bud­get in solar & oth­er renew­able ener­gy sources, much less than it ploughs into adver­tis­ing and PR like its spon­sor­ship of the Olympics, Tate, NPG, NHM etc.

* ‘BP and Shell have dis­cussed with the gov­ern­ment the prospect of claim­ing a stake in Iraq’s oil reserves in the after­math of war.’ Finan­cial Times, 11.3.03.

* ‘BP slat­ed for ‘sys­temic laps­es’, FT, 18.8.05; 15 work­ers were killed and 500 injured in an explo­sion at BP’s Texas City refin­ery on March 23rd 2005.

* ‘Oil gush­es into Arc­tic Ocean from BP pipeline’, (265,000 gal­lons, to be more exact.) Inde­pen­dent, 21.3.06.

* ‘BP prof­its soar 148%’, Guardian, 28.10.08. ‘Oil giant BP today beat ana­lysts’ fore­casts as its report­ed a 148% surge in third-quar­ter prof­its to top $10bn (£6.5bn), boost­ed by record oil prices.’

* Com­mu­ni­ty-con­trolled, post-cap­i­tal­ist renew­able ener­gy is already a real­i­ty; see for exam­ple www.escanda.org

…and by the way, Shel­l’s no bet­ter. In fact, they’re all up to no good!

Shell to Sea Good Friday Walk ends with net removal after battle with Shell security.

Shell to Sea sup­port­ers on the annu­al Good Fri­day Walk, walked to Glen­gad beach this morn­ing to take action in defence of their com­mu­ni­ty and envi­ron­ment by remov­ing nets over the cliff face in the Spe­cial Area of Con­ser­va­tion, despite a bat­tle with Shell Secu­ri­ty.

Glengad bannerShell to Sea sup­port­ers on the annu­al Good Fri­day Walk, walked to Glen­gad beach this morn­ing to take action in defence of their com­mu­ni­ty and envi­ron­ment by remov­ing nets over the cliff face in the Spe­cial Area of Con­ser­va­tion, despite a bat­tle with Shell Secu­ri­ty.

Today, the tra­di­tion­al Good Fri­day walk took place in both Glen­gad and Ross­port. Over 150 peo­ple attend­ed in total. The first walk end­ed at the site of the Shell com­pound in Glen­gad. The group walked togeth­er to the Glen­gad cliff-face and removed net­ting, recent­ly erect­ed by Shell, intend­ed to stop Sand Mar­tins nest­ing in the area. This is the eighth time the net­ting has been removed in the last two weeks by local res­i­dents.
Crossing Glengad gate
Although Eamon Ryan only signed the final con­sents for work at Glen­gad yes­ter­day, there were already over 40 secu­ri­ty per­son­nel present on the site. They were wear­ing dark, mil­i­tary-style cloth­ing with no vis­i­ble iden­ti­fi­ca­tion badges. In scenes rem­i­nis­cent of last year at Glen­gad, they used exces­sive force in deal­ing with the group, which includ­ed elder­ly peo­ple and chil­dren.
Glengad standoff
For around 45 min­utes the group attempt­ed to remove the net and the secu­ri­ty attempt­ed to stop them … Even­tu­al­ly, a pair of scis­sors was pro­duced and the net was cut in two. After, every­one left togeth­er; there were no arrests.

Glengad tug-o-war
The action tak­en today is a demon­stra­tion of resis­tance to come if Shell attempt to recom­mence work in Glen­gad.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I7ZHynY0sKw

Why climate camping & other protest? Ecological debt day for your city…coming soon!

Eco­log­i­cal debt: no way back from bank­rupt

3 planetsEco­log­i­cal debt: no way back from bank­rupt

While most gov­ern­ments’ eyes are on the bank­ing cri­sis, a much big­ger issue — the envi­ron­men­tal cri­sis — is pass­ing them by, says Andrew Simms. In the Green Room this week, he argues that fail­ure to organ­ise a bailout for eco­log­i­cal debt will have dire con­se­quences for human­i­ty.

“Nature Does­n’t Do Bailouts!” said the ban­ner strung across Bish­ops­gate in the City of Lon­don.

Civil­i­sa­tion’s biggest prob­lem was out­lined in five words over the entrance to the small, par­al­lel real­i­ty of the peace­ful cli­mate camp. Their tents bloomed on the morn­ing of 1 April faster than daisies in spring, and faster than the police could stop them.

Across the city, where the world’s most pow­er­ful peo­ple met simul­ta­ne­ous­ly at the G20 sum­mit, the same prob­lem was almost com­plete­ly ignored, mer­it­ing only a sin­gle, after­thought men­tion in a long com­mu­nique.

World lead­ers dropped every­thing to tack­le the finan­cial debt cri­sis that spilled from col­laps­ing banks.

Gripped by a pan­ic so com­plete, there was no pol­i­cy dog­ma too deeply engrained to be dug out and instant­ly dis­card­ed. We went from tri­umphant, finance-dri­ven free mar­ket cap­i­tal­ism, to bank nation­al­i­sa­tion and mov­ing the dec­i­mal point on indus­try bailouts quick­er than you can say sub-prime mort­gage.

But the eco­log­i­cal debt cri­sis, which threat­ens much more than pen­sion funds and car man­u­fac­tur­ers, is left to lan­guish.

It is like hav­ing a Com­mis­sion on House­hold Ren­o­va­tion ago­nise over which expen­sive design­er wall­pa­per to use for paper­ing over plas­ter cracks whilst ignor­ing the fact that the walls them­selves are col­laps­ing on sub­sid­ing foun­da­tions.

Beyond our means

Each year, human­i­ty’s eco­log­i­cal over­draft gets larg­er, and the day that the world as a whole goes into eco­log­i­cal debt — con­sum­ing more resources and pro­duc­ing more waste than the bios­phere can pro­vide and absorb — moves ever ear­li­er in the year.

The same pic­ture emerges for indi­vid­ual coun­tries like the UK — which now starts liv­ing beyond its own envi­ron­men­tal means in mid-April.

Because the glob­al econ­o­my is still over­whelm­ing­ly fos­sil-fuel depen­dent, the accu­mu­la­tion of green­house gas­es and the prog­no­sis for glob­al warm­ing remain our best indi­ca­tors of “over­shoot”.

World famous French free-climber Alain Robert, known as Spi­der­man, climbed the Lloyds of Lon­don build­ing for the OneHundredMonths.org cam­paign as the G20 met, to demon­strate how time is slip­ping away.

Using thresh­olds for risk iden­ti­fied by the Inter­gov­ern­men­tal Pan­el on Cli­mate Change (IPCC), on cur­rent trends, in only 92 months — less than eight years — we will move into a new, more per­ilous phase of warm­ing.

It will then no longer be “like­ly” that we can pre­vent some aspects of run­away cli­mate change. We will begin to lose the cli­mat­ic con­di­tions which, as Nasa sci­en­tist James Hansen points out, were those under which civil­i­sa­tion devel­oped.

Small div­i­dend

As “nature does­n’t do bailouts”, how have our politi­cians fared who ripped open the nation’s wal­let to save the banks?

Not good.

Accord­ing to the Inter­na­tion­al Mon­e­tary Fund (IMF), the UK spent a stag­ger­ing 20% of its GDP in sup­port of the finan­cial sec­tor.

Yet the amount of mon­ey that was new and addi­tion­al, announced in the “green stim­u­lus” pack­age of the Trea­sury’s Pre-Bud­get Report, added-up to a van­ish­ing­ly small 0.0083% of GDP.

Glob­al­ly, the green shade of eco­nom­ic stim­u­lus mea­sures has var­ied enor­mous­ly. For exam­ple, the shares of spend­ing con­sid­ered in research by the bank HSBC to be envi­ron­men­tal were:

* the US — 12%
* Ger­many — 13%
* South Korea — 80%

The inter­na­tion­al aver­age was around 15%. HSBC found the UK planned to invest less than 7% of its stim­u­lus pack­age (dif­fer­ent from the bank bailout) in green mea­sures.

Com­par­ing the IMF and HSBC fig­ures actu­al­ly reveals an inverse rela­tion­ship — pro­por­tion­ate­ly, those who spent more on sup­port for finance had weak­er green spend­ing.

So here we are, faced with the loss of an envi­ron­ment con­ducive to human civil­i­sa­tion, and we find gov­ern­ments pros­trate before bare­ly repen­tant banks, with their backs to a far worse eco­log­i­cal cri­sis.

Extreme mar­kets

On top of low and incon­sis­tent fund­ing for renew­able ener­gy, the shift to a low car­bon econ­o­my is being fur­ther frus­trat­ed by anoth­er mar­ket fail­ure in the trade for car­bon seen, for exam­ple, in the EU’s Emis­sions Trad­ing Scheme.

Bad mar­ket design, fee­ble car­bon reduc­tion tar­gets and the reces­sion have all con­spired to dri­ve down the cost of car­bon emis­sion per­mits, wreck­ing eco­nom­ic incen­tives to grow renew­able ener­gy.

Worse still, the dif­fi­cul­ty of account­ing to ensure that per­mits rep­re­sent real emis­sions has led both ener­gy com­pa­nies and envi­ron­men­tal­ists to warn of an emerg­ing “sub-prime car­bon mar­ket”.

Rely­ing on mar­ket mech­a­nisms is attrac­tive to gov­ern­ments because it means they have less to do them­selves. But they will fail if car­bon mar­kets are just hot air.

There seems to be a hard-wired link between mem­o­ry fail­ure and mar­ket fail­ure.

As the his­to­ri­an E J Hob­s­bawm observed in The Age of Extremes: “Those of us who lived through the years of the Great Slump still find it almost impos­si­ble to under­stand how the ortho­dox­ies of the pure free mar­ket, then so obvi­ous­ly dis­cred­it­ed, once again came to pre­side over a glob­al peri­od of depres­sion in the late 1980s and 1990s”.

Per­haps the great­est fail­ure is one of imag­i­na­tion.

Some peo­ple alive today lived through those past reces­sions and depres­sions. They know they can be nasty and need avert­ing.

But the last time the Earth­’s cli­mate real­ly flipped was at the end of the last Ice Age, more than 10,000 years ago. No one can remem­ber what that felt like.

Lessons of his­to­ry

Look­ing for­ward, the IPC­C’s worst case sce­nario warns of a max­i­mum 6C rise over the next cen­tu­ry.

Look­ing back, how­ev­er, indi­cates that an unsta­ble cli­mate sys­tem holds worse hor­rors.

Work by the sci­en­tist Richard Alley on abrupt cli­mate change indi­cates the plan­et has pre­vi­ous­ly expe­ri­enced a 10C tem­per­a­ture shift in only a decade, and pos­si­bly “as quick­ly as in a sin­gle year”.

And, around the turn of the last Ice Age, there were “local warm­ings as large as 16C”.

Imag­ine that every day of your life you have tak­en a walk in the woods and the worse thing to hap­pen was an acorn or twig falling on your head.

Then, one day, you stroll out, look up and there is a threat approach­ing so large, unex­pect­ed and out­side your expe­ri­ence that can’t quite believe it, like a mas­sive goth­ic cathe­dral falling from the sky.

In tack­ling cli­mate change we need urgent­ly to recal­i­brate our respons­es, just as gov­ern­ments had to when they res­cued the reck­less finance sec­tor.

Then offi­cials had to ask them­selves “is what we are doing right, and is it enough?”

They must ask them­selves the same ques­tions on the eco­log­i­cal debt cri­sis and cli­mate change.

The dif­fer­ence is, that if they fail this time, not even a long-term busi­ness cycle will come to our res­cue. If the cli­mate shifts to a hot­ter state not con­vivial to human soci­ety, it could be tens of thou­sands of years, or nev­er, before it shifts back.

Remem­ber; nature does­n’t do bailouts.

Andrew Simms is pol­i­cy direc­tor of the New Eco­nom­ics Foun­da­tion (nef), and author of Eco­log­i­cal Debt: Glob­al Warm­ing and the Wealth of Nations

——

One Plan­et Liv­ing http://www.oneplanetliving.org

Your city’s Eco­log­i­cal Debt Day:

Using the lat­est data avail­able WWF has cal­cu­lat­ed when res­i­dents of British cities will have con­sumed their fair share of nat­ur­al resources for 2008 – or when their eco­log­i­cal debt day is.

City Eco­log­i­cal debt day

Win­ches­ter 10 April
St Albans 13 April
Chich­ester 14 April
Brighton & Hove 14 April
Can­ter­bury 17 April
Oxford 17 April
Southamp­ton 21 April
Durham 22 April
Cam­bridge 23 April
Portsmouth 23 April
Edin­burgh 23 April
Chester 24 April
Aberdeen 24 April
Ely (East Cambs) 26 April
Here­ford (Coun­ty of Here­ford­shire) 28 April
Stir­ling 28 April
Lon­don 29 April
Lich­field 29 April
Lan­cast­er 30 April
New­cas­tle upon Tyne 30 April
Wells (Bath and NE Som­er­set) 1 May
Bath (Bath and North East Som­er­set) 1 May
Ripon (Har­ro­gate) 2 May
Man­ches­ter 2 May
Inver­ness (High­land) 2 May
Pre­ston 2 May
Nor­wich 2 May
Peter­bor­ough 2 May
Dundee City 3 May
Leeds 3 May
York 3 May
Sheffield 3 May
Der­by 4 May
Carlisle 4 May
Leices­ter 4 May
Worces­ter 4 May
Ban­gor (Gwynedd) 4 May
St Davids (Pembrokeshire)4 May
Not­ting­ham 4 May
Liv­er­pool 4 May
Bris­tol 5 May
Birm­ing­ham 5 May
Lin­coln 5 May
Brad­ford 5 May
Glas­gow 6 May
Cardiff 6 May
Exeter 6 May
Coven­try 7 May
Swansea 8 May
Sal­ford 8 May
Wolver­hamp­ton 8 May
Truro (Car­rick) 8 May
Sun­der­land 8 May
Wake­field 9 May
Glouces­ter 9 May
Stoke on Trent 10 May
Kingston upon Hull 10 May
Sal­is­bury 10 May
Ply­mouth 11 May
New­port 11 May

Lappersfort forest occupation — ongoing Repression in Brugge – 2 people in prison

In the ear­ly hours of Wednes­day 30th of march, two occu­pants of the Lap­pers­fort for­est protest site were arrest­ed cycling back to the camp. Based on the fact that they had a screw­driv­er on them and a bike trail­er full of food, they are accused of break­ing a fence in order to take food from a skip that they nev­er actu­al­ly vis­it­ed.

In the ear­ly hours of Wednes­day 30th of march, two occu­pants of the Lap­pers­fort for­est protest site were arrest­ed cycling back to the camp. Based on the fact that they had a screw­driv­er on them and a bike trail­er full of food, they are accused of break­ing a fence in order to take food from a skip that they nev­er actu­al­ly vis­it­ed.

They are cur­rent­ly in prison await­ing a hear­ing on Fri­day morn­ing 9:00. There will be a noise demo tomor­row before the court house; those who wish to come, meet us at the train sta­tion at 8:00 or come to the for­est tonight. In case they don’t get released, there will be anoth­er demo in Brugge on Sat­ur­day, meet­ing at 13:00 at the front of the train sta­tion. BRING YOURSELF AND YOUR FRIENDS, BRING YOUR NOISE AND WHATEVER YOU WISH!

These arrests are the lat­est devel­op­ment in the ongo­ing cam­paign of repres­sion against the occu­pants of the protest site. In Feb­ru­ary one per­son was arrest­ed for skip­ping food and was held for 15 days in a high-secu­ri­ty prison after refus­ing to iden­ti­fy him­self in court. After the judge in Gent ordered his release, the Lap­pers­fort lawyer is expect­ing the judge in Brugge to flex his lit­tle mus­cles and try to make an exam­ple of the two peo­ple in prison.

Oth­er ‘offences’ occu­pants have been arrest­ed for in the last five months include: Tak­ing scrap wood from a bin, car­ry­ing wood chips in wheel­bar­rows in the street, hand­ing out fly­ers at a mar­ket in the city cen­tre and putting up posters on a legal pos­ter­ing spot.

The Lap­pers­fort occu­pants see this as an ongo­ing cam­paign of repres­sion to try to force them out of the woods and dis­cov­er as many of their iden­ti­ties as pos­si­ble. It is also seen as a crim­i­nal­iza­tion of envi­ron­men­tal activism, skip­ping and gen­er­al­ly increas­ing the pow­er of the police state. THIS IS NO LONGER A FIGHT ONLY FOR THE FOREST, BUT ALSO FOR PERSONAL FREEDOM, SELFDETERMINATION AND THE RIGHT TO RECYCLE.

Lap­pers­fort for­est has been occu­pied since Sep­tem­ber 2008 to pre­vent it from being cut down to build ware­hous­es, office build­ings and a car park. The own­er of the land, FABRICOM GTI, enti­ty of ener­gy-giant GDF SUEZ, has until now offered lit­tle con­tact to the occu­piers except to say that they insist on going ahead with their destruc­tive project.

The site is under con­stant evic­tion threat. Peo­ple who want to come and live with us to defend the for­est are wel­come, and vis­i­tors too!

Direc­tions from Brugge Train Sta­tion: Exit at the back – where all the con­struc­tion is going on – turn left and fol­low the road for a while until the round­about, turn left under the rail­way bridge. You’ll see the for­est soon on your right!

0032 (0) 471 658 544
(For infor­ma­tion in dutch — not yet trans­lat­ed nor updat­ed — www.lappersfort.tk)
lappersfort@gmail.com

————-

update — 3/4/2009
A tri­al was held today in the Brugge cour­t­house for the two Lap­pers­fort occu­piers, Sophie and Pitree, who were arrest­ed on tues­day night while rid­ing their bicy­cles back to the for­est. Occu­piers and oth­er folk went along to the cour­t­house to make some noise and show sol­i­dar­i­ty with their friends.

The judge decid­ed they must be detained longer to give the police/repressive scum more time for “fur­ther inves­ti­ga­tion”. They are main­tain­ing their accu­sa­tion that the two girls had been skip­ping at the Del­haize in Asse­broek, which is obvi­ous­ly made up and is sim­ply being used as an excuse to hold them longer in prison. The only evi­dence they claim to have is some foot­print on the wall by the skip in ques­tion.
As this is being writ­ten an appeal process is going on, to request a sec­ond opin­ion from anoth­er judge. We cant say yet what the results are, but if the appeal is unsuc­ces­fulk the two will have to wait ANOTHER MONTH WITHOUT TRIAL to receive their next judge­ment.…

The devel­op­ments of police repres­sion against the Lap­pers­fort occu­piers in Brugge could not only threat­en the action camp and the for­est, but may also set prece­dents for fur­ther arrests and charges involv­ing skipping/dumpster diving…WE SEE THIS AS A CLEAR AND ROTTEN ATTEMPT TO CRIMINALISE A WAY OF LIFE, TURN PUBLIC OPINION AGAINST US,TO WEAKEN SUPPORT AND DEMORALISE THE SPIRIT OF THE ACTION CAMP ITSELF.…

SO… AS SOPHIE AND PITREE SIT IN PRISON, WE WILL GATHER TOMORROW (SATURDAY) AT 13:00 AT BRUGGE TRAIN STATION AND NOISILY WALK TO THE BRUGGE PRISON, TO SHOW OUR SOLIDARITY WITH OUR FRIENDS, WITH DUMPSTERDIVERS EVERYWHERE, AND AGAINST THE ONGOING REPRESSION BY THE POLICE STATE.….THE FIGHT FOR THE LAPPERSFORT FOREST WILL NOT BE STOPPED BY STUPID ARRESTS AND POINTLESS REPRESSION BY POLICE ANYWHERE…….
after the demo all are invit­ed back to the Lap­pers­fort for­est for some yum­my hot soup, camp­fire and all the rest of it, and are wel­come to stay as long as they wish…

RE-CYCLE, CREATE, FUCK THE STATE!!!
RED HET BOS!!

Shell to Sea Update from Erris – Shell Nets and Boats at Glengad

Shell has returned to Glen­gad beach to install nets over the cliff face. This cliff is a sand mar­tin nest­ing area, and the sand mar­tin nest­ing sea­son is begin­ning this month.

Glengad cliff nettedDead sandmartin in Shell's netShell has returned to Glen­gad beach to install nets over the cliff face. This cliff is a sand mar­tin nest­ing area, and the sand mar­tin nest­ing sea­son is begin­ning this month. Birds have been spot­ted in the area, and although there are some sec­tions of cliff not cov­ered by the nets, the nest­ing area is severe­ly restrict­ed. The sur­face of the cliff face is marked­ly dif­fer­ent from years past, after being destroyed last fall dur­ing Shel­l’s failed attempt to bring their raw gas pipeline onshore. For a report on the destruc­tion done to the beach last fall, you can read the Sol­i­dar­i­ty Cam­p’s Novem­ber update here on Earth First! Action Reports.

Two boats were present in Broad­haven Bay today from at least 10am until 4pm. The larg­er boat moved all around the bay, while the small­er boat most­ly stayed close to the green buoy. It is pos­si­ble that they are car­ry­ing out sur­vey works to pre­pare for the off­shore pipe lay­ing. Accord­ing to Shel­l’s Envi­ron­men­tal Man­age­ment Plan, Shell may be plan­ning to begin off­shore pipe lay­ing in May of this year, using an alter­na­tive “wet start” option. From the Envi­ron­men­tal Man­age­ment Plan:

“Alter­na­tive “wet start” option
If the dredg­ing of the trench for the nearshore sec­tion of the pipeline has not been com­plet­ed and the pipelay ves­sel is avail­able to start work an alter­na­tive sequence of instal­la­tion maybe under­tak­en.
The pipelay ves­sel will install a marine anchor on the pipeline route in approx­i­mate­ly 20 to 25m of water. A wire between this anchor and the lead­ing end of the pipeline will main­tain ten­sion in the pipeline and the ves­sel will start to lay pipe towards the Cor­rib Field as out­lined pre­vi­ous­ly.
Depend­ing upon the progress of the dredg­ing oper­a­tion, the pipelay ves­sel may con­tin­ue and lay all of the line to Cor­rib. Alter­na­tive­ly, it may sus­pend its oper­a­tions part way and return to Broad­haven Bay to com­plete the pull-in of the land­fall sec­tion and then pick up the pre­vi­ous­ly laid sec­tion before con­tin­u­ing to the field.
If a “wet start” is under­tak­en, it will be nec­es­sary to join the two sec­tions of pipeline togeth­er with­in Broad­haven Bay by lift­ing the pipe ends above water and weld­ing them togeth­er, or com­plet­ing the weld on the seabed using divers.”

As expect­ed, Shell seems to be gear­ing up for anoth­er attempt at forc­ing their project ahead with­out com­mu­ni­ty con­sent again in 2009. The strug­gle against Shell con­tin­ues, fol­low­ing a spir­it­ed week­end in Dublin out­side Moun­tjoy Prison in sol­i­dar­i­ty with Mau­ra Har­ring­ton. Mau­ra has been impris­oned for 20 days and has anoth­er 8 days yet to serve in her sen­tence. Anoth­er Peo­ple’s Forum will take place this week­end, with talks on the upcom­ing US case against Shel­l’s actions Nige­ria, Cli­mate Change, and Cor­rib Gas Per­mis­sions.

The Forum will take place in the Inver Com­mu­ni­ty Cen­ter on Sat­ur­day, April 4th from 10.30am – 3.30pm. As always, the Sol­i­dar­i­ty Camp is open to any­one who wants to vis­it Erris to sup­port the cam­paign. Con­tact the Ross­port Sol­i­dar­i­ty Camp: 085 1141170 ross­port­sol­i­dar­i­ty­camp at gmail dot com

—-

April 2nd, 2009

The net­ting over the cliff face at Glen­gad was tak­en down yes­ter­day by two mem­bers of Pobal Chill Chomain, in the pres­ence of a NPWS man­ag­er.

Attempts are being made by Bel­cross con­trac­tors this morn­ing (Thurs­day, 11am) to put the nets back up. They are cur­rent­ly being pre­vent­ed from fin­ish­ing this work.

Sand mar­tins and Brent geese are present on the beach.

Two boats, pos­si­bly sur­vey boats, are in Broad­haven Bay.

Beau­ti­ful day on the beach!