Mainshill Solidarity Camp solidifies as local support grows

20.06.2009
In its first full day of resis­tance Main­shill Sol­i­dar­i­ty Camp, in the Dou­glas Val­ley in South Lanark­shire, has grown as the site is set up. Tree-hous­es and oth­er struc­tures in the wood­land have been put in place to show Scot­tish Coal that they are seri­ous about pre­vent­ing the open­cast site from going ahead. The site will be con­tin­u­ous­ly occu­pied.

20.06.2009
In its first full day of resis­tance Main­shill Sol­i­dar­i­ty Camp, in the Dou­glas Val­ley in South Lanark­shire, has grown as the site is set up. Tree-hous­es and oth­er struc­tures in the wood­land have been put in place to show Scot­tish Coal that they are seri­ous about pre­vent­ing the open­cast site from going ahead. The site will be con­tin­u­ous­ly occu­pied.

Scot­tish Coal have been giv­en per­mis­sion to mine 1.7 mil­lion tonnes of coal from Main­shill Wood in South Lanark­shire, a deci­sion by South Lanark­shire Coun­cil that enraged local res­i­dents who have cam­paigned against this mine for many months. Min­is­ters of the Scot­tish Gov­ern­ment gave final approval to the site in April, deem­ing the pro­posed site at Main­shill in the Dou­glas Val­ley to be “envi­ron­men­tal­ly accept­able.” This is despite the fact that there are 18 res­i­den­tial dwellings locat­ed with­in 500m of the pro­posed site bound­ary, con­tra­ven­ing Scot­tish plan­ning pol­i­cy on open cast sites.

Local peo­ple have shown enthu­si­as­tic sup­port from the start.‭ Many‬ culi­nary delights have already been donat­ed and grate­ful­ly received.

Peo­ple turned up through­out the day to show their sup­port.‭ ‬One local res­i­dent exclaimed,‭ “‬We’re so glad you’re here‭!”

There will be a Tea Par­ty and open day on Sun­day‭ ‬28th June,‭ ‬from‭ ‬3pm.‭ ‬Fam­i­lies and oth­ers from the sur­round­ing areas will be invit­ed to par­take in fun and games whilst learn­ing about how a protest site is run and about what can be done to pro­tect the local envi­ron­ment and pre­vent run­away cli­mate change.

Ban­ners vis­i­ble from the road have been erect­ed at the site,‭ ‬high­light­ing the fun­da­men­tal­ly anti-demo­c­ra­t­ic way in which the plan­ning process has rid­den roughshod over the wish­es of the local com­mu­ni­ties.

Activist Mar­cus Ander­son com­ments,‭ “‬Main­shill Sol­i­dar­i­ty Camp high­lights how com­mu­ni­ty resis­tance and direct action go hand in hand in secur­ing a future for gen­er­a­tions to come‭”‬.

The site will con­tin­ue to grow as aware­ness increas­es of what is being done to the peo­ple and envi­ron­ment‭ ‬of Scot­land, and what can be done by peo­ple them­selves to stop cat­a­stroph­ic cli­mate change.

coalactionedinburgh@riseup.net
http://coalactionedinburgh.noflag.org.uk

Climate activists blockade Peruvian Embassy & companies list

19 June 2009
Cli­mate change activists have blocked the entrance to the Peru­vian Embassy today in protest the country’s killing of indige­nous peo­ple in the Ama­zon rain­for­est.

Peruvian Embassy protest19 June 2009
Cli­mate change activists have blocked the entrance to the Peru­vian Embassy today in protest the country’s killing of indige­nous peo­ple in the Ama­zon rain­for­est.

Up to 100 peo­ple have been killed in recent clash­es over attempts to extract oil, gas, min­er­als and tim­ber from the for­est where indige­nous peo­ple have lived for cen­turies. On June 5, the gov­ern­men­t’s secu­ri­ty forces attacked a peace­ful block­ade, lead­ing to blood­shed on both sides with 30–100 esti­mat­ed deaths, over 100 injuries and numer­ous dis­ap­pear­ances.

Since the clash­es, the Peru­vian gov­ern­ment has sus­pend­ed some exploita­tion in the area, but it is unclear whether some com­pa­nies will be allowed to con­tin­ue.

Pro­test­ers from Lon­don Camp for Cli­mate Action are demand­ing to deliv­er a let­ter of protest to Peru­vian Ambas­sador Ricar­do Luna. The calls for oil and gas com­pa­nies in the Ama­zon to sus­pend their oper­a­tions until the gov­ern­ment agrees to peace­ful nego­ti­a­tions with local rep­re­sen­ta­tives; for an inde­pen­dent and impar­tial inquiry into the vio­lence; and for the lift­ing of all charges against Alber­to Pizan­go (the Pres­i­dent of Peru’s Ama­zon Indi­an organ­i­sa­tion, AIDESEP)

Pro­test­er Sam Gar­den­er said: “This protest is to show sol­i­dar­i­ty with the thou­sands of indige­nous peo­ple that are risk­ing, and some­times los­ing, their lives to pro­tect their homes in the Ama­zon.

“By destroy­ing the Ama­zon rain­for­est to extract fos­sil fuels, we are accel­er­at­ing cat­a­stroph­ic cli­mate change. The Ama­zon removes vast amounts of car­bon diox­ide from the atmos­phere. By cut­ting it down to remove yet more fos­sil fuels we are speed­ing towards a world­wide cat­a­stro­phe.”

15.6.09: Live­ly and well attend­ed demo at the Embassy by Colec­ti­vo Peru­ano, togeth­er with the Coor­di­nado­ra Lati­noamer­i­cana, and was sup­port­ed by Latin Amer­i­can Youth Against Vio­lence

Some of the com­pa­nies with new con­tracts in the Ama­zon and else­where in Peru (signed April 2009, some indi­vid­u­al­ly and some as part of a con­sor­tium with Peru­petro) that I can find (but unable to secure direct links/locations in the UK) are:

Plus­petrol — http://www.pluspetrol.net/
Reliance — http://www.reliancepetroleum.com/
CNPC — http://www.cnpc.com.cn/eng/
Petrope­ru — http://www.cnpc.com.cn/eng/
Faulkn­er Suits Explo­ration (US)
Olympic (US or Cana­di­an)
Petro­lif­era — http://www.petrolifera.ca/
Pan Andean Resources (Dublin based) — http://www.panandeanresources.com/contact/
Kei (Aus­tralia)
Petro­Viet­nam (Viet­nam)
Gold­en Oil — http://www.goldenoilcorp.com/new/english/company/company01_4.php

How­ev­er, some of these com­pa­nies DO have UK based offices and trad­ing:

EMERALD ENERGY PLC
http://www.emeraldenergy.com/contact.htm
With a reg­is­tered office in Lon­don.

CONOCO PHILLIPS
http://www.conocophillips.co.uk/ContactUs/index.htm
An Amer­i­can com­pa­ny that is report­ed to have a new “mega con­ces­sion” of 10.5 mil­lion hectares in the Ama­zon for oil explo­ration.
Offices and activ­i­ties in Lon­don, Aberdeen, Teesside, Hum­ber, Thed­dlethor­pe, War­wick

There’s a report on their activ­i­ties in Peru here: http://www.amazonwatch.org/conoco2009.pdf

The sit­u­a­tion in Peru cur­rent­ly is dire.… the indige­nous com­mu­ni­ties have been mobi­liz­ing and resist­ing since April and at this time when their lead­ers are threat­ened with arrest and there are wide­spread mur­ders and dis­ap­pear­ances occur­ring it is key that those of us ben­e­fit­ting from these explo­rations (in the Glob­al North) do what we can to show sol­i­dar­i­ty and to put the pres­sure direct­ly on the com­pa­nies that are treat­ing Peru as a smor­gas­board of ways out of the cur­rent eco­nom­ic cri­sis…

Peru indigenous blockades win repeal of land laws

18th June 2009: Peru­vian Con­gress Votes 82 – 12 to Repeal Two Con­tro­ver­sial Laws

Gov­ern­ment Urged to Drop Crim­i­nal Charges Against Indige­nous Lead­ers and Allow Inde­pen­dent Inves­ti­ga­tion into Vio­lent Inci­dents in Bagua

18th June 2009: Peru­vian Con­gress Votes 82 – 12 to Repeal Two Con­tro­ver­sial Laws

Gov­ern­ment Urged to Drop Crim­i­nal Charges Against Indige­nous Lead­ers and Allow Inde­pen­dent Inves­ti­ga­tion into Vio­lent Inci­dents in Bagua

Lima, Peru – The Peru­vian Con­gress vot­ed today 82 – 12 to repeal two of nine con­test­ed laws in an attempt to end wide­spread indige­nous protests that have been par­a­lyz­ing trans­porta­tion and com­merce in the Peru­vian Ama­zon for 70 days. In a com­plete shift of dis­course, Pres­i­dent Gar­cia admit­ted that “there were a series errors and exag­ger­a­tions” in the gov­ern­men­t’s han­dling of this con­flict and asked Con­gress to repeal decrees 1090 and 1064, which were passed in 2008 as part of a pack­age of new laws to facil­i­tate the imple­men­ta­tion of the Free Trade Agree­ment with the Unit­ed States.

Hav­ing wit­nessed the vote in the Peru­vian Con­gress, Daysi Zap­a­ta, act­ing Pres­i­dent of AIDESEP, Peru’s nation­al Ama­zon­ian indige­nous orga­ni­za­tion wel­comed the Pres­i­den­t’s com­ments and declared: “Today is a his­toric day. We are grate­ful that the will of the indige­nous peo­ples has been heard and we only hope that in the future gov­ern­ments lis­ten and attend to indige­nous peo­ples, and not leg­is­late behind their backs.”

Zap­a­ta said that AIDESEP it is call­ing on our base orga­ni­za­tions and com­mu­ni­ties to end their block­ades and protests while also call­ing on the gov­ern­ment to enter into a good faith and trans­par­ent dia­logue.

Primer Min­is­ter Simon, who has been a lead nego­tia­tor to the indige­nous com­mu­ni­ties, said Tues­day that he would resign after bring­ing the cur­rent con­flict clos­er to res­o­lu­tion. The Peru­vian Gov­ern­ment has been heav­i­ly crit­i­cized for the June 5 attack to quell non­vi­o­lent protests by Ama­zon­ian indige­nous com­mu­ni­ties, which result­ed in dozens of deaths of both pro­test­ers and police and left 150 of indige­nous demon­stra­tors injured.

In addi­tion to decrees 1090 and 1064, AIDESEP points to at least sev­en oth­er laws that con­tin­ue to pose a threat to their con­sti­tu­tion­al­ly guar­an­teed rights. In addi­tion to the repeal of all these con­tro­ver­sial laws, indige­nous peo­ple are demand­ing that the Peru­vian Gov­ern­ment lift the State of Emer­gency, in effect since May 9 in sev­er­al regions through­out the Ama­zon. AIDESEP is also call­ing for the Gov­ern­ment to drop crim­i­nal charges against Alber­to Pizan­go and five oth­er indige­nous lead­ers. Pizan­go was giv­en safe pas­sage to leave the coun­try and is now exiled in Nicaragua.

In the Unit­ed States, fif­teen human rights and envi­ron­men­tal orga­ni­za­tions recent­ly sent a let­ter to Sec­re­tary of State Hillary Clin­ton and oth­er top Admin­is­tra­tion offi­cials urg­ing the Unit­ed States to take imme­di­ate steps towards address­ing the polit­i­cal cri­sis in Peru. Rep­re­sen­ta­tives from this coali­tion met with the U.S. Trade Rep­re­sen­ta­tive’s office on Wednes­day to again urge the U.S. Gov­ern­ment to pub­licly clar­i­fy if Peru would be penal­ized for revok­ing the pack­age of “free trade laws.”

The dra­mat­ic shift in the Gar­cia Admin­is­tra­tion’s dis­course is like­ly due to the unprece­dent­ed inter­na­tion­al and domes­tic con­dem­na­tion of the attacks on peace­ful demon­stra­tions on June 5 in Bagua. Tens of thou­sands protest­ed in cities through­out Peru on June 11 in sup­port of Peru’s indige­nous peo­ples. Peru­vian con­sulates and embassies world­wide have been the site of repeat­ed vig­ils and protests. Tens of thou­sands have sent let­ters to Peru­vian and US gov­ern­ment offi­cials. Celebri­ties includ­ing Q’o­ri­an­ka Kilch­er and Ben­jamin Bratt, both part Peru­vian as well as Nobel Prize Lau­re­ate Rigob­er­ta Menchu, have pub­licly con­demned the vio­lence in Peru while call­ing for a peace­ful solu­tion.

Lead­ing inter­na­tion­al human rights bod­ies includ­ing the Inter-Amer­i­can Com­mis­sion on Human Rights, the Unit­ed Nations Per­ma­nent Forum on Indige­nous Issues, and the Inter­na­tion­al Labor Orga­ni­za­tion have pressed the Gar­cia Admin­is­tra­tion to end repres­sion and uphold the rights of indige­nous peo­ples. Yes­ter­day, James Anaya, the UN Spe­cial Rap­por­teur of Human Rights and Fun­da­men­tal Free­doms of Indige­nous Peo­ple arrived in Peru for a 3‑day vis­it to gath­er infor­ma­tion about the vio­lent inci­dent in Bagua.

Ama­zon Watch’s Exec­u­tive Direc­tor, Atossa Soltani, react­ed to the news with the fol­low­ing state­ment: “The Peru­vian Con­gress’s repeal of the two decrees is a wel­come first step in bring­ing indige­nous rights in Peru back to where they were before the decrees were pro­mul­gat­ed in 2008. The con­flict has become a water­shed moment for Peru’s poli­cies in the Ama­zon and has invig­o­rat­ed nation­al debate about deep-root­ed vio­la­tions of indige­nous peo­ples rights. Today’s good news notwith­stand­ing, indige­nous peo­ples are like­ly to con­tin­ue to be at risk by Gar­ci­a’s poli­cies to open up the Ama­zon to extrac­tive indus­tries.”

Since 2006, the gov­ern­ment has autho­rized oil and gas con­ces­sions cov­er­ing over 70 per­cent of the Peru­vian Ama­zon, much of it on indige­nous lands (see Peru­petro map at http://mirror.perupetro.com.pe/exploracion01‑e.asp).
For more infor­ma­tion, see http://www.amazonwatch.org/peru-protests.php

Ear­li­er arti­cle on block­ade crush­ing & mas­sacre here

ELF sabotage digger & arson solidarity with Peru

ELF SABOTAGE DIGGER (Italy)

anony­mous report:

“ROME ITALY We cut wires and the oil tube of a dig­ger used to defor­est. unfor­tu­nate­ly there were men at work so we could not destroy the cab Earth lib­er­a­tion front”

»

ARSON ATTACK AGAINST POLICE VEHICLE IN SOLIDARITY WITH INDIGENOUS RESISTANCE IN PERU (Mex­i­co)

anony­mous com­mu­nique (trans­la­tion):

ELF SABOTAGE DIGGER (Italy)

anony­mous report:

“ROME ITALY We cut wires and the oil tube of a dig­ger used to defor­est. unfor­tu­nate­ly there were men at work so we could not destroy the cab Earth lib­er­a­tion front”

»

ARSON ATTACK AGAINST POLICE VEHICLE IN SOLIDARITY WITH INDIGENOUS RESISTANCE IN PERU (Mex­i­co)

anony­mous com­mu­nique (trans­la­tion):

“On the night of June 8, we, the Frente de Lib­eración de la Tier­ra, along with some anar­cho-Insur­rec­tion­al indi­vid­u­als who are com­mit­ted to con­stant con­flict with the state and its insti­tu­tions, decid­ed to car­ry out an action togeth­er in the city of Ecate­pec in Mex­i­co State. This time our main objec­tive was the machines that belong to author­i­ties in that city that are used to rip up trees from their roots and to cov­er the earth with con­crete; the machines were hid­den under the bridge over Aveni­da More­los and López Por­tillo.

When we arrived there we real­ized that the earth-destroy­ing own­ers’ slaves were inside the machines, and that they sure­ly would­n’t be leav­ing until the fol­low­ing day, to work and to be exploit­ed to earn a few coins for their sub­sis­tence. Why is it that peo­ple are watch­ing the machines? Is it that the own­ers fear leav­ing them alone and the next morn­ing find­ing them unus­able, that their urban­ist project be delayed and thou­sands of pesos lost in dam­ages, like they have seen hap­pen in oth­er munic­i­pal­i­ties in Mex­i­co State?

This objec­tive was aban­doned and we decid­ed to car­ry out anoth­er; in front of the exca­va­tors, bull­doz­ers and oth­er machines was a large com­mand head­quar­ters of state police tor­tur­ers, the ASE (Agency of State Secu­ri­ty), vio­la­tors of the pris­on­ers in Aten­co, accom­plices in the killing of ani­mals in Jal­tenco, pro­tec­tors of the inter­ests of the multi­na­tion­als, killers of the earth, liv­ing with the impuni­ty that Mex­i­can jus­tice gives them, laugh­ing with their machine guns on their backs and con­fi­dant that they can destroy any protest with their repres­sion. They were there; maybe they did­n’t know that all vio­lence cre­ates counter vio­lence and for all who are struck down, soon­er or lat­er there will be a response.

Ded­i­cat­ed like wild wolves who have left their dens under the full moon, we placed an incen­di­ary device in one of the trucks, a small flame ignit­ed the engine and burnt the truck.

Our sab­o­tage was fast and effec­tive, the destruc­tion of social peace was immi­nent. What police would be expect­ing an arson attack in front of their very noses? How do those com­man­ders feel who boast of the fast effec­tive­ness of their sub­or­di­nates now that a group of eco-anar­chists have attacked their facil­i­ties? Do they feel hor­ri­ble because the raid they car­ried out after the fire was use­less; they could not catch those respon­si­ble who now write these lines of revenge against the anthro­pocen­tric state and its insti­tu­tions?

The war against this sys­tem is dead­ly seri­ous, if they order their police to sup­press, incen­di­ary self-defense will rise up.

We ded­i­cate this action to the fierce defense that is car­ried out in the Ama­zon in Peru; the peas­ants killed by the anthro­pocen­trist state have been avenged by their nat­ur­al instinct to defend the wilder­ness, killing, kid­nap­ping and also injur­ing the police.

Let’s defend the plan­et where we live!

Show your teeth!

Now no more pas­siv­i­ty!

ELF/FLT”

Rossport Solidarity Group Take Action at Van Oord’s UK Offices

An account of todays (16/06/2009) action against Van Oord UK, own­ers of the dredgers oper­at­ing in Broad­haven Bay, and in Sol­i­dar­i­ty with the peo­ple of Erris in their 10 year strug­gle.

ROSSPORT SOLIDARITY GROUP TAKE ACTION AT VAN OORD’S UK OFFICES

Van Oord protestAn account of todays (16/06/2009) action against Van Oord UK, own­ers of the dredgers oper­at­ing in Broad­haven Bay, and in Sol­i­dar­i­ty with the peo­ple of Erris in their 10 year strug­gle.

ROSSPORT SOLIDARITY GROUP TAKE ACTION AT VAN OORD’S UK OFFICES

Today (16/06/2009) at 2.30pm a group of ten activists arrived at the UK offices of Van Oord, in New­bury, Berk­shire. Van Oord own the dredg­ing ves­sels oper­at­ing in Broad­haven Bay, as part of the Cor­rib Gas Project.

Our inten­tion was to occu­py the offices and to deliv­er a let­ter to and speak with the UK head of oper­a­tions, explain­ing our sol­i­dar­i­ty with the peo­ple of Erris and our objec­tions to Van Oord’s involve­ment in the project and demand­ing that they stop their oper­a­tions there imme­di­ate­ly.

We were met out­side by police; a local woman told us that they had been there, out­side Van Oord’s offices since 11am, with rein­force­ments arriv­ing at 2pm; at least half an hour before we arrived in the area. It was obvi­ous from the actions of the Police Offi­cers in ques­tion that they knew we were com­ing and had briefed Van Oord.

They refused to let us on to the fore­court and carpark, but were will­ing, how­ev­er, for us to stand and sit on the wall and pave­ment out­side.

We unfurled our ban­ners and demand­ed to speak to high­est rank­ing man­ag­er on the premis­es.

One of our group was allowed to approach the offices and even­tu­al­ly some­one claim­ing to be Van Oord’s UK Man­ag­er in charge of Irish oper­a­tions emerged to speak to her.

A let­ter and port­fo­lio of pho­tographs was then deliv­ered to him out­lin­ing the his­to­ry of the Cor­rib Gas Project, the oppo­si­tion of local res­i­dents, and includ­ing our demands.

Press releas­es were sent, a local paper inter­viewed some of the group, and at 4.pm we left peace­ful­ly.
Part of the let­ter deliv­ered to Van Oord UK

For the atten­tion of Van Oord direc­tors:

We are here today to demand that Van Oord stop all work on the Cor­rib Gas project imme­di­ate­ly. We have come in sol­i­dar­i­ty with the com­mu­ni­ty of Ross­port in Coun­ty Mayo, Ire­land.

Van Oord are cur­rent­ly car­ry­ing out dredg­ing works in Broad­haven Bay, Spe­cial Area of Con­ser­va­tion (SAC), in prepa­ra­tion for the lay­ing of the off-shore sec­tion of the gas pipeline.

The devel­op­ment has no con­sent from the local com­mu­ni­ty and the neg­a­tive impacts the project has made on their lives and envi­ron­ment are already huge.

In the last few months the sit­u­a­tion in the Ross­port area has become increas­ing­ly seri­ous. There have been sev­er­al major attacks on promi­nent cam­paign­ers against the project; these are almost cer­tain­ly linked to the secu­ri­ty com­pa­ny con­tract­ed by Shell, IRMS.

Van Oord state that “Safe­ty is a key indi­ca­tor of our suc­cess”. Recent events in Mayo demon­strate a com­plete dis­re­gard for safe work­ing prac­tise.

Van Oord must end its oper­a­tion in Mayo imme­di­ate­ly.

A busy week here in Mayo

Work con­tin­ues in Glen­gad, but so does action resist­ing the pipeline. The Ross­port Sol­i­dar­i­ty Camp is active and run­ning, so please come and vis­it! Come and see what is hap­pen­ing with your own eyes, and bring what­ev­er skills and tal­ents you would like to share. Here is a five day update.

Wednes­day 10 June

Rossport Solidarity Camp 2009Work con­tin­ues in Glen­gad, but so does action resist­ing the pipeline. The Ross­port Sol­i­dar­i­ty Camp is active and run­ning, so please come and vis­it! Come and see what is hap­pen­ing with your own eyes, and bring what­ev­er skills and tal­ents you would like to share. Here is a five day update.

Wednes­day 10 June

Bel­mul­let Cour­t­house:
There was a packed cour­t­house in Bel­mul­let on Wednes­day with 31 Shell to Sea peo­ple up in court. The tim­ing of this court date is unde­ni­ably polit­i­cal, con­sid­er­ing 13 of the charges were from Sep­tem­ber 2008. Pre­sum­ably court has been timed to coin­cide with the immi­nent arrival of the Soli­taire. There was a new judge in place of Mary Devins, judge Denis Mclaugh­lan. Only one case was heard that day, and the rest of them had their cas­es adjourned until the 8th of July. The num­bers on camp grew on Wednes­day as many peo­ple who had to return for court remained on camp.

Truck action at GlengadTruck block­ade:
Around 5:30pm on Wednes­day, locals and sup­port­ers attempt­ed to block a con­voy of four trucks along the road to the Shell com­pound. Peo­ple moved plas­tic bar­ri­cades into the road by the grave­yard in Glen­gad, leav­ing enough room for cars but caus­ing the Shell trucks to have to stop in the road up by Kil­com­mon Lodge. The trucks were car­ry­ing grav­el and hard­core for build­ing the cause­way at the Shell com­pound on the beach in Glen­gad where the pipeline is pro­posed to come ashore. While the trucks were stopped, one per­son attempt­ed to speak with the dri­vers, engag­ing in heat­ed but civilised con­ver­sa­tion with one of them. The main argu­ment was that when peo­ple’s lives are at risk, it is no longer ‘just a job’. As this con­ver­sa­tion was going on, the truck at the front of the queue start­ed to move, and a pro­tes­tor jumped onto the back of it and climbed into the bed of the truck. After the dri­ver was informed that a pro­tes­tor was aboard the truck he slowed down a bit but con­tin­ued to dri­ve until final­ly com­ing to a stop after about 100 metres. The pro­test­er sat on top of the cab of the truck until the gar­dai arrived and after about 10–15 min­utes began to force­ful­ly remove the pro­test­er.

As this was hap­pen­ing on top of the truck two peo­ple climbed under­neath it. The gar­dai moved in and wres­tled one pro­tes­tor out from under the truck. As he was on the ground guards grabbed one of his feet and raised it above waist height, he was then dragged across the road in this posi­tion caus­ing a con­sid­er­able amount of pain. Sev­er­al gar­da then climbed under­neath the truck and vio­lent­ly dragged the oth­er per­son out. Simul­ta­ne­ous­ly four gar­dai were remov­ing the per­son from the top of the truck, lift­ing him over their heads and slid­ing him down the side onto the road. Offi­cer MY2 made a ver­bal promise to the pro­test­er that he would take down the details of the truck dri­ver because of his reck­less dri­ving. Final­ly after 10–15 min­utes of being pinned to the ground with his arm twist­ed behind his back, the per­son on the ground was brought to a stand­ing posi­tion and arrest­ed, though none of the gar­dai would explain what he was being arrest­ed for when asked. He fell to the ground as he was being put into the police van, and had to be lift­ed into the van by sev­er­al gar­da.

Though the per­son who had been on top of the truck was not imme­di­ate­ly arrest­ed, soon after­wards he was arrest­ed under three charges: obstruct­ing traf­fic, breach of the peace, and refus­ing to obey the orders of a gar­da. Both arrestees were held in cus­tody overnight and brought to court in West­port the next morn­ing before they’d recieved legal aid. The gar­dai attempt­ed to have them both put on remand, which means they’d be put in jail until the next court date on 8 July. They also have begun ask­ing for bail, from 100 euro to 500 euro, some­thing which has­n’t been done at all in the past sev­er­al years of the cam­paign. This seems to be a polit­i­cal move by An Gar­da Síochá­na in an attempt to repress the cam­paign. There is no rea­son to sus­pect peo­ple of flight risk, as there has nev­er been a prob­lem with peo­ple show­ing up to court in the past. When asked why they are doing this, the only expla­na­tion is that ‘this is the new pol­i­cy’. How­ev­er it is not clear whether this is the new pol­i­cy for any­one arrest­ed in Ire­land, or whether it is some­thing put in place strate­gi­cal­ly to deal with polit­i­cal pro­tes­tors. The two truck-block­ers were held until the next morn­ing, and brought to court the next day. One of them was forced to go to Cas­tle Rea prison to sign his 500 euro bail. He was released at 6pm on Thurs­day after being held for 24 hours for a sim­ple breach of the peace.

Thurs­day 11 June

Sink­ing of the Chief’s boat- Defin­i­tive account from Pat him­self:

Pat O’Don­nel­l’s fish­ing boat was board­ed by four masked men, two of whom were armed with guns, at approx­i­mate­ly 2am on 11 June whilst out at sea lay­ing pots. The two armed men held Mr O’Don­nell and his crew­man Mar­tin McDon­nell in the wheel­house of the boat while anoth­er two went below deck for 20 min­utes. These men returned to the deck and the two crew mem­bers were held for one and a half hours until the engine went out. At this point the masked men alight­ed onto an unknown ves­sel that took them away. None of the men spoke good Eng­lish. Mr O’Don­nell went down to the engine room and realised that the boat was sinking.The two fish­er­men put out a may­day sig­nal and attempt­ed to inflate their lifeboat. The infla­tion mech­a­nism failed a num­ber of times but even­tu­al­ly worked with only moments left to spare. Once onboard the lifeboat Mr O’Don­nell and Mr McDon­nell sent out a dis­tress flare. They were res­cued at 4.30am by the ‘Rachel Mary’, anoth­er boat owned by Pat O’Donnell and oper­at­ed by his son, fish­er­man, Jonathan O’Donnell. He then rang the Gar­dai at around 6am to inform them of the inci­dent.

Pat said “I was in fear for my life, is there no end to what these thugs will try to do? AIl I am try­ing to do is pro­tect my fam­i­ly and the seas that are our liveli­hood. I told Min­ster O’Cuiv in April that I need­ed pro­tec­tion by the state, but he would­n’t give it — now its time for the gov­ern­ment to pro­tect its peo­ple. I won’t be intim­i­dat­ed by this.”

Pat O’Donnell is a local fish­er­man with over thir­ty years expe­ri­ence in the waters off the coast of Ire­land. It is assumed that Pat O’Don­nell was tar­get­ed as he is one of the loud­est objec­tors to Shel­l’s Cor­rib Gas Project. As a fifth gen­er­a­tion fish­er­man his liveli­hood will be severe­ly affect­ed by pol­lu­tion from the cor­rib project into Broad­haven bay. Deter­mined to pro­tect the waters for future gen­er­a­tions of fish­er­men, Mr. O’Don­nell has con­sis­tent­ly refused to be paid off by Shell.

http://www.indymedia.ie/article/92657

Ear­ly morn­ing water action:

At 4:30am, 14 kayak­ers set out to try and dis­rupt the works being car­ried out in prepa­ra­tion for the lay­ing of the off­shore pipeline in Broad­haven Bay. The gar­dai were quick­ly on the scene, and began arrest­ing peo­ple under pub­lic order charges, fail­ure to obey the instruc­tions of a gar­da. Over the course of an hour, work was sucess­ful­ly dis­rupt­ed and six peo­ple were arrest­ed. The gar­dai con­fis­cat­ed the six kayaks of the arrestees, slash­ing five of the inflat­able kayaks with knives. The gards have height­ened their intim­i­da­tion tac­tics, telling first offense arrestees that they may have to spend a week in prison sim­ply for a breach of the peace vio­la­tion. They are doing what­ev­er they can to dis­cour­age peo­ple from doing fur­ther actions against Shell, attempt­ing to put peo­ple on remand, charg­ing dis­pro­por­tion­ate amounts for unnec­es­sary bail, and arbi­trar­i­ly attempt­ing to get peo­ple ‘banned’ from Broad­haven Bay. Alle­ga­tions that this ear­ly morn­ing action kept res­cue teams from respond­ing to Pat O’Don­nel­l’s dis­tress sig­nal are unfound­ed. The kayak action was unre­lat­ed to that inci­dent, and is fair­ly unim­por­tant com­pared to the seri­ous­ness of the attack on Pat and Mar­tin.

Fri­day 12 June

Ear­ly Fri­day morn­ing, a local bus dri­ver was fol­lowed by the gar­dai on his bus route, then arrest­ed in his own home after he had dropped the bus full of kids off at school. The gar­dai claimed to have video footage of him tak­ing part in the removal of nets. The ind­ci­dent hap­pened in April when near­ly 200 local res­i­dents and sup­port­ers went to take the nets down from the spe­cial area of con­ser­va­tion where the endan­gered sand mar­tins nest. How­ev­er the footage was unre­li­able and accord­ing to the per­son he was not even at the protest that day, so the gar­dai let him go with­out charg­ing him. To arbi­trar­i­ly arrest a per­son in their home near­ly two months after an event with­out sub­stan­tial evi­dence is plain ter­ror­ism.

At 10am Fri­day morn­ing, a local res­i­dent blocked Shell trucks from pass­ing his house by park­ing his car in the road. His house has been dam­aged due to the heavy traf­fic from Shel­l’s trucks on a road unsuit­able for haulage and after reciev­ing no response from the Mayo Coun­ty Coun­cil, he took action. The trucks turned around, promis­ing that there would be no traf­fic for ‘a few days.’ The gar­dai were informed that this action was going to take place before­hand, and they did not try to arrest him. The local com­mu­ni­ty has vowed to con­tin­ue the block­ade once the trucks start up again.

Sun­day 14 June
Late Sun­day night a group of 7 kayak­ers set out to dis­rupt the dredg­ing going on in Broad­haven Bay, but were instant­ly met with a fleet of 9 motor­boats. Work was stopped for about 15 min­utes, and one kayak­er was cap­sized by one of the secu­ri­ty boats. They took the inflat­able kayak into their motor­boat and left the per­son swim­ming in the water. One of the secu­ri­ty guards grabbed hold of the per­son by the neck of his life­jack­et and dragged him through the water. When oth­er kayak­ers tried to inter­vene, they were vio­lent­ly dealt with by the secu­ri­ty boat who pro­ceed­ed to take one kayak­er’s pad­dle and aban­don her there. Despite this aggres­sive behav­ior on the part of the Shell secu­ri­ty, every­one made it back to shore safe­ly. Peo­ple are in high spir­its here at the Ross­port Sol­i­dar­i­ty Camp, and the resis­tance will con­tin­ue as long as the work on this project does!

Local Writer Stops Council Hedge Cutting

This small, local action was car­ried out on the spur of the moment, but worked and prob­a­bly saved the lives of hun­dreds of nest­ing birds and oth­er inhab­i­tants of the hedgerow ecol­o­gy. Just goes to show that any­one can do it if they care enough — you don’t always need chains and tubes.

———-

This small, local action was car­ried out on the spur of the moment, but worked and prob­a­bly saved the lives of hun­dreds of nest­ing birds and oth­er inhab­i­tants of the hedgerow ecol­o­gy. Just goes to show that any­one can do it if they care enough — you don’t always need chains and tubes.

———-

NATURE-LOVING Kei­th Far­nish stood in front of trac­tors to stop them get­ting to birds nest­ing in hedges.

And Keith’s defi­ance has man­aged to halt a coun­cil hedge-cut­ting project in his local park.

Kei­th, 38, sprung into action when he spot­ted coun­cil con­trac­tors lop­ping two foot off the top of hedgerows, as he walked home through Sweyne Park, Rayleigh.

It stopped work­ers in their tracks, and Rochford Dis­trict Coun­cil has now decid­ed to call off the whole project until the end of the nest­ing sea­son.

Writer and dad-of-two Kei­th, who lives in near­by Eastcheap, is delight­ed.

He said: “That’s bril­liant news.Obviously, the coun­cil needs to review its pol­i­cy so it won’t hap­pen again.

“It’s so impor­tant the coun­cil takes into accounts pat­terns of nature.

“It was about three miles of hedgerow they would have mas­sa­cred and it would have destroyed nest­ing birds. Sweyne Park is the only green lung that Rayleigh has.”

Kei­th said the hedges are used by spar­rows, black­birds and robins, and about 20 metres had been cut down by the time he arrived after drop­ping off his chil­dren at school.

He said: “It’s just pure chance I hap­pened to be there and saw them. I said to the con­trac­tors that I will just stand in front of your machin­ery until you go.

“These guys seemed OK though I got their goat a bit. The man­ag­er told me they will just have to pack up and go some­where else.

“It’s the first time I’ve ever stood in front of machin­ery. It’s just some­thing I had to do.

“I felt empow­ered because it was the right thing to do. I didn’t feel threat­ened at all.”

(from http://www.echo-news.co.uk/news/local_news/rayleigh/4431250.Keith_makes_a_stand_to_protect_bird_nests/)Hedge Protester

Thugs Seek Jobs at Shell HQ

The main doors at Shells head­quar­ters were closed to staff at 9am today, 12 June as pro­test­ers dressed as ‘thugs’ turned up for a job inter­view. Shell secu­ri­ty locked all doors as pro­test­ers tried to enter the build­ing for what they said was a job inter­view “we hear Shell are hir­ing thugs to sink ships in Ire­land”.

Shell Thugs 4 HireThe main doors at Shells head­quar­ters were closed to staff at 9am today, 12 June as pro­test­ers dressed as ‘thugs’ turned up for a job inter­view. Shell secu­ri­ty locked all doors as pro­test­ers tried to enter the build­ing for what they said was a job inter­view “we hear Shell are hir­ing thugs to sink ships in Ire­land”.

Pro­test­ers tried to enter the Head­quar­ters but the doors were locked as they went in. The doors remained locked for about an hour and a half, despite the var­i­ous demon­stra­tions the pro­test­ers gave of their ‘thugery’ skills even sim­u­lat­ing how they coud hold a fish­er­man cap­tive why sink­ing his boat.

One of the pro­test­ers Saman­tha John­son said “Shell have been hir­ing hit squads to ter­rorise local pro­test­ers at their activ­i­ties abroad, as with the Ogo­ni peo­ple in the Niger Delta. Now, they have import­ed these meth­ods to Ire­land. Indeed, last month a for­mer Shell secu­ri­ty guard was iden­ti­fied as one of the mer­ce­nar­ies employed in an assas­si­na­tion plot in Bolivia”.

This protest is in response to an inci­dent in Ross­port, Ire­land at 2am yes­ter­day morn­ing where 4 masked men sunk a local fisherman’s boat, with the own­er and a crewmem­ber still on it. 2 of the men were armed and held the fish­er­men while the oth­ers went below deck to sink the boat.

One of the pro­test­ers today Sean Reil­ly said “This shows the extremes Shell go to, to get what they want. They are will­ing to put 2 men in hos­pi­tal for vocal­ly express­ing oppo­si­tion.

Indigenous anti-infastructure protesters murdered in crackdown on months-long blockade in Peru

For sev­en weeks tens of thou­sands of Ama­zon­ian Indi­ans blocked roads and rivers across east­ern Peru. They seized hydro­elec­tric plants and pump­ing sta­tions on oil and gas pipelines to try to force the repeal of decrees facil­i­tat­ing oil explo­ration, com­mer­cial farm­ing and log­ging in parts of the jun­gle.

For sev­en weeks tens of thou­sands of Ama­zon­ian Indi­ans blocked roads and rivers across east­ern Peru. They seized hydro­elec­tric plants and pump­ing sta­tions on oil and gas pipelines to try to force the repeal of decrees facil­i­tat­ing oil explo­ration, com­mer­cial farm­ing and log­ging in parts of the jun­gle. Petrope­ru, the state oil com­pa­ny, had to shut a pipeline that car­ries 40,000 bar­rels of oil each day. Amid threats of ener­gy rationing in east­ern towns, the gov­ern­ment of Pres­i­dent Alan Gar­cía this month ordered armed police to clear a stretch of road and retake a pump­ing sta­tion near Bagua, in Peru’s north­ern jun­gle

—-

THE BACKGROUND

Ear­ly this morn­ing (June 5th), Peru­vian police launched a vio­lent attack on a non­vi­o­lent road block­ade held by Ama­zon­ian indige­nous pro­test­ers oppos­ing 10 laws that would open up their ter­ri­to­ry to increased min­er­al, oil, gas and tim­ber exploita­tion. Police opened fire with live ammu­ni­tion, killing at least 28 peo­ple.

FMI:
http://www.rootforce.org/2009/06/05/peruvian-police-murder-indigenous-protesters-take-action/

WHY TAKE ACTION

The first rea­son to take action, of course, is sim­ply out of sol­i­dar­i­ty with our fel­low war­riors in the strug­gle for a just and sus­tain­able world. But why are we send­ing out this action alert as Root Force?

For near­ly two months, thou­sands indige­nous pro­test­ers have near­ly par­a­lyzed Peru’s Ama­zon region with block­ades of crit­i­cal trans­porta­tion and min­ing infra­struc­ture. They have sparked a nation­al dis­course over the lim­its to devel­op­ment and who owns nature, and have made it clear that they will not sur­ren­der any of their ances­tral home­lands.

At the heart of the issue are 10 laws passed by pres­i­den­tial decree that would great­ly facil­i­tate indus­tri­al exploita­tion of the Ama­zon. THIS IS CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE, intend­ed to sup­ply new raw mate­ri­als for the glob­al mar­ket. THIS IS ONE OF THOSE WEAK POINTS OF THE SYSTEM that we are always talk­ing about.

The indige­nous war­riors fight­ing for their lives have pushed this issue into the glob­al eye, and the Peru­vian gov­ern­ment has placed itself in a posi­tion of weak­ness by mur­der­ing unarmed pro­test­ers. Even before the recent killings, a con­gres­sion­al pan­el had already declared 2 of the laws uncon­sti­tu­tion­al, and only through pro­ce­dur­al tricks has the pres­i­den­t’s par­ty been able to stall debate on repeal­ing one of those laws.

This is one of those rare cas­es where SUSTAINED INTERNATIONAL PRESSURE COULD TIP THE SCALES. If these laws are repealed, it will be a major set­back for infra­struc­ture expan­sion plans in a tru­ly crit­i­cal region of the hemi­sphere.

HOW TO TAKE ACTION

You can email crit­i­cal peo­ple in the Peru­vian gov­ern­ment through this link, pro­vid­ed by Ama­zon Watch:

http://amazonwatch.org/peru-action-alert.php

You can also orga­nize protests at Peru­vian embassies or con­sulates, or take oth­er actions that you think stand a good chance of mak­ing it back to the deci­sion mak­ers in Lima.

Make sure to express your out­rage at the gov­ern­men­t’s strong arm tac­tics — even before the mur­ders, the gov­ern­ment had sus­pend­ed civ­il lib­er­ties in 5 provinces and was call­ing indige­nous peo­ple “ter­ror­ists” — and demand the repeal of the Free Trade laws and any law fur­ther open­ing the Ama­zon to min­er­al, oil, gas, tim­ber, hydro­elec­tric or agri­cul­tur­al exploita­tion.

In Sol­i­dar­i­ty,
Root Force

—–

Recent reports indi­cate as many as 84 peo­ple killed and 150 arrest­ed in clash­es stem­ming from an ear­ly morn­ing vio­lent raid by police on unarmed pro­test­ers on June 5. Police are report­ed to be burn­ing the bod­ies of the dead and dump­ing them into the riv­er.

Aston­ish­ing­ly — but not sur­pris­ing­ly — the gov­ern­ment is accus­ing the pro­test­ers of using tac­tics rem­i­nis­cent of the 1980s inter­nal con­flict. Deploy­ing racist imagery paint­ing indige­nous pro­test­ers as spear-wield­ing sav­ages, Pres­i­dent Alan Gar­cia has vowed a tough “response.”

Fol­low­ing the ear­ly-morn­ing mas­sacre, pro­test­ers took 38 police hostage at a pump­ing sta­tion for the nation­al oil com­pa­ny, PetroPe­ru. A police raid to free the offi­cers result­ed in the deaths of nine of them. An Argen­tin­ian oil com­pa­ny, Plus­petrol, has halt­ed oil pump­ing in one unit and will soon halt pump­ing in anoth­er due to the unrest.

The gov­ern­ment has since issued an arrest war­rant for indige­nous leader Alber­to Pizan­go (who was elect­ed to rep­re­sent the indige­nous coali­tion by the lead­ers of 1,200 com­mu­ni­ties), charg­ing him with “sedi­tion.” Pizan­go has gone into hid­ing.

Please take action and urge the Peru­vian gov­ern­ment to halt the vio­lence and repeal the con­tro­ver­sial free trade laws that would open up indige­nous land in the Ama­zon to increased devel­op­ment. Con­tact the US gov­ern­ment and inter­na­tion­al agen­cies as well, and encour­age them to place pres­sure on Peru. The Peru­vian gov­ern­ment is in a seri­ous posi­tion of weak­ness right now and try­ing to cov­er it up with vio­lence, and this is one of those rare cas­es where inter­na­tion­al pres­sure could deal a major set­back to infra­struc­ture expan­sion plans.

Read the full Root Force action alert on this issue here.

——

Indige­nous Lead­ers and Allies Call for an End to Vio­lence on All Sides

BAGUA, Peru — June 8 — In the after­math of Friday’s bloody raid on a peace­ful indige­nous road block­ade near Bagua in the Peru­vian Ama­zon, numer­ous eye­wit­ness­es are report­ing that the Spe­cial Forces of the Peru­vian Police have been dis­pos­ing of the bod­ies of indige­nous pro­test­ers who were killed.

“Today I spoke to many eye­wit­ness­es in Bagua report­ing that they saw police throw the bod­ies of the dead into the Marañon Riv­er from a heli­copter in an appar­ent attempt by the Gov­ern­ment to under­re­port the num­ber of indige­nous peo­ple killed by police,” said Gre­gor MacLen­nan, spokesper­son for Ama­zon Watch speak­ing.

“Hos­pi­tal work­ers in Bagua Chi­ca and Bagua Grande cor­rob­o­rat­ed that the police took bod­ies of the dead from their premis­es to an undis­closed loca­tion. I spoke to sev­er­al peo­ple who report­ed that there are bod­ies lying at the bot­tom of a deep crevasse up in the hills, about 2 kilo­me­ters from the inci­dent site. When the Church and local lead­ers went to inves­ti­gate, the police stopped them from approach­ing the area,” report­ed MacLen­nan.

Police and gov­ern­ment offi­cials have been con­sis­tent­ly under­re­port­ing the num­ber of indige­nous peo­ple killed by police gun­fire. Indige­nous orga­ni­za­tions place the num­ber of pro­test­ers killed at least at 40, while Gov­ern­ment offi­cials claim­ing that only a hand­ful of indige­nous peo­ple were killed. Also the Gar­cia Gov­ern­ment claims that 22 police offi­cers were killed and sev­er­al still miss­ing.

“Wit­ness­es say that it was the police who opened fire last Fri­day on the pro­test­ers from heli­copters,” MacLen­nan said. “Now the gov­ern­ment appears to be destroy­ing the bod­ies of slain pro­test­ers and giv­ing very low esti­mates of the casu­al­ty. Giv­en that the demon­stra­tors were unarmed or car­ry­ing only wood­en spears and the police were fir­ing auto­mat­ic weapons, the actu­al num­ber of indige­nous peo­ple killed is like­ly to be much high­er.”

“Anoth­er eye­wit­ness report­ed see­ing the bod­ies of five indige­nous peo­ple that had been burned beyond iden­ti­fi­ca­tion at the morgue. I have lis­tened to tes­ti­mo­ny of peo­ple in tears talk­ing about wit­ness­ing the police burn­ing bod­ies,” con­tin­ued MacLen­nan.

At least 150 peo­ple from the demon­stra­tion on Fri­day are still being detained. Eye-wit­ness reports also con­firm that police forcibly removed some of the wound­ed indige­nous pro­test­ers from hos­pi­tals, tak­ing them to unknown des­ti­na­tions. Their fam­i­lies expressed con­cern for their well being while in deten­tion. There are many peo­ple still report­ed miss­ing and access to med­ical atten­tion in the region is hor­ri­bly inad­e­quate.

The Orga­niz­ing Com­mit­tee for the Indige­nous Peo­ples of Alto Ama­zonas Province issued this state­ment: “It is appalling that polit­i­cal pow­ers have act­ed in such a cru­el and inhu­man man­ner against Ama­zon­ian Peo­ples, fail­ing to rec­og­nize the fun­da­men­tal rights and pro­tec­tions guar­an­teed to us by the Con­sti­tu­tion. We express deep grief over the death of our indige­nous broth­ers, of civil­ians and the offi­cers of the Nation­al Police.”

The gov­ern­ment expand­ed the State of Emer­gency and estab­lished a cur­few on all traf­fic in the region from 3 pm to 6 am. Indige­nous and inter­na­tion­al human rights orga­ni­za­tions are wor­ried about plans of anoth­er Nation­al Police raid on a block­ade in Yurimaguas close to the town of Tara­po­to where thou­sands are block­ing a road.

Pres­i­dent Alan Gar­cia is being wide­ly crit­i­cized for foment­ing a cli­mate of fear mon­ger­ing against indige­nous peo­ples by draw­ing par­al­lels to the bru­tal Shin­ning Path guer­ril­la move­ment of the 1980s and ear­ly 1990s, and by vague­ly refer­ring to exter­nal and anti-demo­c­ra­t­ic threats to the coun­try.

The Ama­zon­ian indige­nous peo­ples’ mobi­liza­tions have been peace­ful, local­ly coor­di­nat­ed, and extreme­ly well orga­nized for near­ly two months. Yet Gar­cia insists on call­ing them ter­ror­ist acts and anti-demo­c­ra­t­ic. Gar­cia has even gone so far as to describe the indige­nous mobi­liza­tions as “sav­age and bar­bar­ic.” Gar­cia has made his dis­crim­i­na­tion explic­it, say­ing direct­ly that the Ama­zon­ian indige­nous peo­ple are not first-class cit­i­zens.

“These peo­ple don’t have crowns,” Gar­cia said about the pro­test­ers. “These peo­ple aren’t first-class cit­i­zens who can say — 400,000 natives to 28 mil­lion Peru­vians — ‘You don’t have the right to be here.’ No way. That is a huge error.”
Iron­i­cal­ly, Peru was the coun­try that intro­duced the Unit­ed Nations Dec­la­ra­tion on the Rights of Indige­nous Peo­ples on the floor of the Gen­er­al Assem­bly when it was adopt­ed in Sep­tem­ber 2007.

A coali­tion of indige­nous and human rights orga­ni­za­tions will protest in front of the Peru­vian Embassy in Wash­ing­ton D.C. on Mon­day, June 8 at 12:30 pm.

Indige­nous peo­ples have vowed to con­tin­ue protests until the Peru­vian Con­gress revokes the “free trade” decrees issued by Pres­i­dent Gar­cia under spe­cial pow­ers grant­ed by Con­gress in the con­text of the Free Trade Agree­ment with the Unit­ed States.

Among the out­pour­ing of state­ments con­demn­ing the vio­lence in Peru were those from Peru’s Ombudsman’s office, the chair of the Unit­ed Nations Per­ma­nent Forum on Indige­nous Issues, a coali­tion of 45 inter­na­tion­al human rights orga­ni­za­tions, Indige­nous orga­ni­za­tions from through­out the Amer­i­c­as, and the Con­fer­ence of Bish­ops of Peru. Also famous per­son­al­i­ties includ­ing Q’orianka Kilch­er, Ben­jamin Bratt, Peter Bratt, and Daryl Han­nah and Bian­ca Jag­ger called on the Peru­vian Gov­ern­ment to cease the vio­lence and seek peace­ful res­o­lu­tion to the con­flict.

AIDESEP, the nation­al indige­nous orga­ni­za­tion of Peru has called for a nation­wide gen­er­al strike start­ing June 11th.

Ama­zon Watch is con­tin­u­al­ly updat­ing pho­tographs, audio tes­ti­mo­ny, and video footage from Bagua on www.amazonwatch.org.

New­ly released b‑roll at http://amazonwatch.org/peru-protests-highres-photos.php

—–

—–

The broad­en­ing influ­ence of the indige­nous move­ment was on dis­play Thurs­day in a gen­er­al strike that drew thou­sands of pro­test­ers here to the streets of Iqui­tos, the largest Peru­vian city in the Ama­zon, and to cities and towns else­where in jun­gle areas. Protests over Mr. Gar­cía’s han­dling of the vio­lence in the north­ern Bagua Province last Fri­day also took place in high­land regions like Puno, near the Boli­vian bor­der, and in Lima and Are­quipa on the Pacif­ic coast.

“The gov­ern­ment made the sit­u­a­tion worse with its con­de­scend­ing depic­tion of us as gangs of sav­ages in the for­est,” said Wag­n­er Muso­line Acho, 24, an Awa­jún Indi­an and an indige­nous leader. “They think we can be tricked by a maneu­ver like sus­pend­ing a cou­ple of decrees for a few weeks and then rein­tro­duc­ing them, and they are wrong.”

The pro­test­ers’ imme­di­ate threat – to cut the sup­ply of oil and nat­ur­al gas to Lima, the cap­i­tal – seems to have sub­sided, with pro­test­ers part­ly with­draw­ing from their occu­pa­tion of oil instal­la­tions in the jun­gle. But as anger fes­ters, indige­nous lead­ers here said they could eas­i­ly try to shut down ener­gy instal­la­tions again to exert pres­sure on Mr. Gar­cía.

Anoth­er wave of protests appears like­ly because indige­nous groups are demand­ing that the decrees be repealed and not just sus­pend­ed. The decrees would open large jun­gle areas to invest­ment and allow com­pa­nies to bypass indige­nous groups to obtain per­mits for petro­le­um explo­ration, log­ging and build­ing hydro­elec­tric dams. A stop­gap attempt to halt ear­li­er indige­nous protests in the Ama­zon last August failed to pre­vent them from being reini­ti­at­ed more force­ful­ly in April.

The author­i­ties are strug­gling to under­stand a move­ment that is crys­tal­liz­ing in the Peru­vian Ama­zon among more than 50 indige­nous groups. They include about 300,000 peo­ple, account­ing for only about 1 per­cent of Peru’s pop­u­la­tion, but they live in strate­gi­cal­ly impor­tant and resource-rich loca­tions, which are scat­tered through­out jun­gle areas that account for near­ly two-thirds of Peru’s ter­ri­to­ry.

So far, alliances have proved elu­sive between Indi­ans in the Ama­zon and indige­nous groups in high­land areas, rul­ing out, for now, the kind of broad indige­nous protest move­ments that helped oust gov­ern­ments in neigh­bor­ing Ecuador and Bolivia ear­li­er in the decade.

In con­trast to some ear­li­er efforts to orga­nize indige­nous groups, the lead­ers of this new move­ment are them­selves indige­nous, and not white or mes­ti­zo urban intel­lec­tu­als. They are well orga­nized and use a web of radio sta­tions to exchange infor­ma­tion across the jun­gle. After one promi­nent leader, Alber­to Pizan­go [who explic­i­ty links the strug­gles there to glob­al cli­mate change every­where], was grant­ed asy­lum in Nicaragua this week, oth­ers quick­ly emerged to artic­u­late demands.

Two Fishermen in Hospital After Boat Boarded and Sunk by Masked Men in Ireland

The sit­u­a­tion in Erris Co. Mayo has esca­lat­ed into a sor­did state of affairs, with two fish­er­men being held by force by two men in bal­a­clavas at 2am on Thurs­day the 11th of June. The fish­er­men, Pat O’Donnell and Mar­tin McDon­nell, are both locals opposed to the con­tro­ver­sial Cor­rib gas project which is cur­rent­ly being over­seen by The Roy­al Dutch Shell Com­pa­ny.

The sit­u­a­tion in Erris Co. Mayo has esca­lat­ed into a sor­did state of affairs, with two fish­er­men being held by force by two men in bal­a­clavas at 2am on Thurs­day the 11th of June. The fish­er­men, Pat O’Donnell and Mar­tin McDon­nell, are both locals opposed to the con­tro­ver­sial Cor­rib gas project which is cur­rent­ly being over­seen by The Roy­al Dutch Shell Com­pa­ny.
The two fish­er­men were return­ing to Bal­ly­glass pier, hav­ing been fish­ing out at sea, when their boat was board­ed by four masked men. When Mr. O’Donnell and Mr. McDon­nell had been ren­dered help­less, the board­ers pro­ceed­ed to move below decks and sink the ‘Iona Isle’, the trawler belong­ing to Mr. O’Donnell. Both men are now being tend­ed to in Castle­bar gen­er­al hos­pi­tal.

These attacks come short­ly after rough­ly thir­ty Shell to Sea activists appeared in Bell­mul­let dis­trict court yes­ter­day for assort­ed acts of civ­il dis­obe­di­ence relat­ing to the pro­posed pipeline project. How­ev­er a num­ber of mem­bers of An Gar­da Síochan­na were also sum­moned by the judge for pos­si­ble acts of mis­con­duct, mis­use of author­i­ty and ille­gal behav­iour relat­ing to Shell to Sea protests.

The assaults car­ried out on the fish­er­men bear an uncan­ny resem­blance to that which occurred almost a month and a half ago on local farmer and Gold­man envi­ron­men­tal prize win­ner Willie Cor­duff.

The recent devel­op­ments here in Erris are becom­ing an increas­ing cause for con­cern for local peo­ple attempt­ing to halt Shell’s work in order to defend their own liveli­hoods. Many fam­i­lies here are com­plete­ly depen­dent on the local envi­ron­ment to pro­duce a source of income. Hav­ing fish­ing grounds pol­lut­ed by dredg­ing work, or pipelines dragged through one’s fields is like­ly to evoke strong protest. Albeit most local peo­ple who oppose the project ini­tial­ly felt that there was lit­tle or no chance of the sit­u­a­tion unrav­el­ling to the extent it would be so effort­less­ly com­pa­ra­ble to the Ogo­ni saga in Nige­ria.

More activists were arrest­ed yes­ter­day evening after they had assist­ed local men in bar­ri­cad­ing nar­row choke points of road which lead to the Shell com­pound at Glen­gad, which is still devoid of the suf­fi­cient plan­ning per­mis­sion. One man had hoist­ed him­self up onto the cab of a truck in an attempt to halt the ille­gal work, much to the sur­prise of local peo­ple and Gar­da present at the scene. The dri­ver elect­ed to accel­er­ate down a steep hill with the man still on top of the vehi­cle. Two Shell to Sea activists were vio­lent­ly appre­hend­ed on the road and brought to Bell­mul­let Gar­da sta­tion where they’ve been held all night. They have been brought to court this morn­ing with­out legal rep­re­sen­ta­tion and the state is attempt­ing to put them on remand. This means they will be held in jail until the next court hear­ing in July.

Also at half four ear­li­er this morn­ing four­teen peo­ple from the Ross­port Sol­i­dar­i­ty Camp dis­rupt­ed work whilst kayak­ing in bay where Shell are cur­rent­ly dredg­ing. This result­ed in the arrest of six peo­ple and police also slashed kayaks. Over the past ten days dredgers have been board­ed on two occa­sions where activists climbed on top of dig­gers and stopped work. A num­ber of injuries have been sus­tained dur­ing water actions injuries at the hands of the IRMS secu­ri­ty, employed by Shell to trit­u­rate the cam­paign oppos­ing the theft of bil­lions of euro worth of gas.

The glob­al pres­sure has been mount­ing sig­nif­i­cant­ly on Shell in recent times, with much media focus sur­round­ing the Wiwa fam­i­ly law­suits against them in New York. Shell was being sued for human rights abus­es in the Ogo­ni region of Nige­ria dat­ing back to the ear­ly nineties, how­ev­er Shell decid­ed to set­tle out of court to the sum of $15.5 mil­lion dol­lars.

In the face of one of the world’s biggest multi­na­tion­al cor­po­ra­tions backed by the state and a team of secu­ri­ty, many of whom are known fas­cists and mer­ce­nar­ies, the com­mu­ni­ty still stand strong in defence of their envi­ron­ment and liveli­hoods. The Ross­port Sol­i­dar­i­ty Camp is pro­vid­ing active sup­port to the com­mu­ni­ty, please come and help!