Broken Cross Open Cast Site blockaded – police act as Scottish Coal security

This morn­ing Bro­ken Cross open­cast site in the Dou­glas Val­ley was block­ad­ed for an hour and a half before Scot­tish Coal work­ers lift­ed three peo­ple in heavy con­crete lock-ons out of the road, all over­seen by Inspec­tor Whip (pho­tographed) of Strath­clyde Police. This isn’t the first time that Inspec­tor Whip has hurt peo­ple by lift­ing them out of the road. He’s reck­less and delib­er­ate­ly put people’s safe­ty at risk, all to pro­tect the prof­its of Scot­tish Coal.

COAL ACTION SCOTLAND MEDIA RELEASE – FOR IMMEDIATE USE 16th July 2012

Activists dis­rupt coal haulage and police take unac­cept­able risks of injury at Lanark­shire mine

At 6:00 this morn­ing a group of 20 envi­ron­men­tal and social jus­tice activists block­ad­ed the only entrance to Scot­tish Coal’s Bro­ken Cross Open Cast Coal Site [1] in the Dou­glas Val­ley. This pre­vent­ed all access to the site by coal lor­ries for one and a half hours before police ordered work­ers to dan­ger­ous­ly car­ry activists out of the road. Con­crete “lock-on tubes” were used to pre­vent three activists from being removed.

In an act of extreme reck­less­ness, Inspec­tor Whip of Strath­clyde Police ordered Scot­tish Coal employ­ees to drag pro­test­ers out of the access road, while they were still attached to their lock-on tubes, each weigh­ing around 50kg. One of those moved was injured in this inci­dent. The three have been arrest­ed and are cur­rent­ly being held in cus­tody.

Rob Hearne, one of the activists sup­port­ing the protest at the mine said: “This is not the first time that Inspec­tor Whip and Strath­clyde Police have shown such utter dis­re­gard for the safe­ty of anti-coal activists. This kind of behav­iour is total­ly unac­cept­able, where untrained work­ers are allowed to assault peo­ple in such a way, break­ing all health and safe­ty reg­u­la­tions and com­mit­ting crim­i­nal offences. Strath­clyde Police are act­ing as Scot­tish Coal’s pri­vate secu­ri­ty.”

The protest was intend­ed to stop coal from being trans­port­ed from the mine to rail­heads and to oppose Scot­tish Coal’s exten­sion to the mine as part of their “for­ward strat­e­gy” [2]. In par­tic­u­lar, it aimed to stop coal HGVs from being rout­ed through Dou­glas and Gle­spin, an issue of par­tic­u­lar impor­tance for local com­mu­ni­ties.

Gle­spin res­i­dent David Grey said: “A top traf­fic police offi­cer has been quot­ed in the past as say­ing that some­one will have to be killed on Lanarkshire’s roads before some­thing is done about the haulage of coal in this area. HGVs pass right through Dou­glas and Gle­spin, past two pri­ma­ry schools with no lev­el cross­ings, some­thing that Scot­tish Coal, South Lanark­shire Coun­cil and Scot­tish Min­is­ters all said would nev­er hap­pen. And now Inspec­tor Whip endan­gers the lives of peo­ple try­ing to make the roads safer for local res­i­dents! It’s out­ra­geous. Inspec­tor Whip should be ashamed for putting the prof­its of coal above the safe­ty of peo­ple in the val­ley.”

Today´s protest fol­lows Saturday’s inva­sion of Main­shill Open Cast Coal Site [3] where 45 activists stopped work on the site for the day. This is part of a week-long action camp and occu­pa­tion of Scot­tish Coal’s intend­ed new mine in the area, Glen­tag­gart East [4]. The camp called “Take Back the Land!” [5] has attract­ed activists from across Scot­land, the UK and Europe to take direct action against the blight of open­cast coal min­ing.

Coal Action Scot­land are prepar­ing a for­mal com­plaint to Strath­clyde Police about this inci­dent.

For inter­views and com­ment please con­tact:

Roger Wilkins on 07917141720 or email  contact@coalactionscotland.org.uk

Pho­tos can be emailed upon request.

Notes to edi­tors:

[1] Bro­ken Cross is the larg­er of Scot­tish Coal’s two oper­at­ing open cast coal mines in the Dou­glas Val­ley, South Lanark­shire, pro­duc­ing around 15,000 tonnes of coal a week

[2] South Lanark­shire Coun­cil approved Scot­tish Coal’s North (East) Exten­sion to Bro­ken Cross, the third such exten­sion, despite huge com­mu­ni­ty oppo­si­tion to it. The exten­sion will see the life of the mine extend­ed until 2024, way beyond what Scot­tish Plan­ning Pol­i­cy con­sid­ers an accept­able cumu­la­tive impact and some­thing that local res­i­dents find total­ly unac­cept­able.

[3] Main­shill Wood was occu­pied by the Main­shill Sol­i­dar­i­ty Camp on 12th June 2009. It was even­tu­al­ly evict­ed on 25th Jan­u­ary 2010 in an evic­tion that last­ed 5 days. It involved 45 arrests and was the largest protest site evic­tion in the UK since Man­ches­ter Air­port 11 years pre­vi­ous­ly. There was huge com­mu­ni­ty oppo­si­tion to the mine local­ly, with 654 objec­tions being lodged against the appli­ca­tion. Despite Lord Home, the land own­er, telling local res­i­dents that he’d safe­guard the area from min­ing, he did the oppo­site and is now being paid by Scot­tish Coal for lease of the land. Since the start of coal­ing oper­a­tions at the site in Feb­ru­ary 2010 local res­i­dents have com­plained of noise and dust impacts and dan­ger on the roads as coal HGVs are rout­ed through Dou­glas and Gle­spin.

Lord Home owns Dou­glas & Angus Estates. He is the son of the for­mer prime min­is­ter Alec Home, a peer in the House of Lords and chair­per­son of Coutts Bank. He lives in Lon­don but has a state­ly home at Castle­mains in the Dou­glas Val­ley.

Scot­tish Coal cur­rent­ly have two oper­a­tional sites in the val­ley, Main­shill and Glen­tag­gart, down from 5 in 2010.

[4] Scot­tish Coal have been giv­en approval by South Lanark­shire Coun­cil despite 232 let­ters of objec­tion to mine 4 mil­lion tonnes of coal from the Glen­tag­gart East site, adja­cent to the exist­ing Glen­tag­gart site which was in oper­a­tion between 2001 and 2011. RSPB object­ed to the appli­ca­tion because of the eco­log­i­cal­ly impor­tant blan­ket bog and pro­tect­ed bird breed­ing habi­tats on the 350 hectare site. The mine will be 1.5km away from two pri­ma­ry schools and con­tin­ue the encir­clement of Dou­glas Val­ley vil­lages with open­cast mines.

Glen­tag­gart East is part of Scot­tish Coal’s “For­ward Strat­e­gy”, unveiled in Sep­tem­ber 2011. It includ­ed 3 new open­cast mine appli­ca­tions. One of these, Auld­ton Heights, was with­drawn fol­low­ing a sub­stan­tial cam­paign against it. A fur­ther exten­sion to Bro­ken Cross, an exist­ing site, was grant­ed per­mis­sion by the coun­cil, despite oppo­si­tion from local res­i­dents.

[5] for more infor­ma­tion about Take Back the Land! please see the fol­low­ing web­site:  http://takebacktheland.org.uk/

Residents Blockade Injection Well One Week After 1,000 Gallon Fracking Waste Spill

16.7.12

[For updates check ohiofracktion.com]

16.7.12

[For updates check ohiofracktion.com]

Con­cerned res­i­dents blocked access to an injec­tion well in Trum­bull Coun­ty this morn­ing, protest­ing the fail­ure of Ohio reg­u­la­tors to ade­quate­ly test and mon­i­tor dump­ing of tox­ic frack­ing waste. At least one pro­tes­tor has been arrest­ed and at least two oth­ers have been detained.

Trum­bull Coun­ty res­i­dents, along with support­ers from Frack Free Mahon­ing and Ohio Frack­tion, are gath­er­ing at the well site on Sodom Hutch­ings Road in Vien­na Town­ship, to express con­cerns about the con­tents of the 1,000 gal­lons of frack­ing waste­water that spilled along five miles of road in Fowler Town­ship, a near­by res­i­den­tial area on July 7.They are demand­ing that Ohio’s Divi­sion of Nat­ur­al Resources (ODNR) begin sys­tem­at­i­cal­ly test­ing out-of-state frack waste that is inject­ed into over 170 wells through­out Ohio. One sup­port­er has locked him­self to the gate to pre­vent all trucks car­ry­ing frack­ing waste from enter­ing the site.

Accord­ing to spokesper­son Mike Set­tles, emer­gency respon­ders from Ohio’s Envi­ron­men­tal Pro­tec­tion Agency (EPA) con­duct­ed only a sim­ple pH test of the spilled frack waste lin­ing the roads of Fowler Town­ship. As far as fur­ther test­ing for radi­a­tion, heavy met­als, and oth­er chem­i­cals, Set­tles explained that EPA doesn’t “have the resources” to per­form test­ing unless there is a “legit­i­mate con­cern” of envi­ron­men­tal dam­age. Thick, rust col­ored residue was still vis­i­ble on the road over a week after the spill.

Lib­er­al Town­ship Trustee Jodi Stoy­ak expressed her frus­tra­tion with EPA’s response in a July 12 let­ter to Mr. Set­tles, not­ing “many of the chem­i­cals used in [frack­ing] and con­tained in the waste are offi­cial­ly clas­si­fied indi­vid­u­al­ly as haz­ardous…. This, in my opin­ion, is a huge envi­ron­men­tal con­cern.”

ODNR offi­cials have ignored numer­ous writ­ten and oral requests from Ohio res­i­dents to order test­ing of the count­less gal­lons of out-of-state frack waste inject­ed under­ground into Ohio each year. In response to a recent pub­lic records request ask­ing ODNR to release all test­ing rel­e­vant to frack­ing waste, ODNR Geol­o­gist Tom Tomas­tik pro­vid­ed no results tak­en after 1989.

Mainshill Open Cast Coal Site shut down for the day!

July 14th, 2012

July 14th, 2012

At 10:00 this morn­ing a group of 45 activists invad­ed Scot­tish Coal’s Main­shill Open Cast Coal Site near Dou­glas, South Lanark­shire, and occu­pied machin­ery and pre­vent­ed coal­ing oper­a­tions on the site and shut it down for the day. Machines includ­ing a “prime mover” were occu­pied and all work was stopped com­plete­ly. This is the first action at Take Back the Land! - the action camp in the Dou­glas Val­ley will be up and run­ning until the 18th July. Updates and pho­tos to fol­low

 

Fracking On Trial: call out

THE TRIAL

The tri­al for the first frack­ing rig occu­pa­tion in Lan­cashire last Novem­ber kicks off next week. Start­ing Tues­day 10th July and sched­uled to last till Fri­day 13th July… so four full days at Pre­ston Mag­is­trates Court.

THE TRIAL

The tri­al for the first frack­ing rig occu­pa­tion in Lan­cashire last Novem­ber kicks off next week. Start­ing Tues­day 10th July and sched­uled to last till Fri­day 13th July… so four full days at Pre­ston Mag­is­trates Court.

If you’re against frack­ing and want to see it stopped, it’d be great to have your sup­port, both inside and out­side the court room! If you can’t make it down you can still help out by spread­ing the word (see below for social media details), and sol­i­dar­i­ty actions are always wel­come.

Three pro­test­ers have been charged with aggra­vat­ed tres­pass and are plead­ing not guilty based on ‘neces­si­ty’; assert­ing stop­ping frack­ing is nec­es­sary in the con­text of run-away cli­mate change and the dam­age it will cause the envi­ron­ment and local com­mu­ni­ties. Defen­dants will also be chal­leng­ing the ‘law­ful­ness’ of the extrac­tive process.

The defen­dants will be backed up by a num­ber of wit­ness­es, both ‘experts’ and from the local com­mu­ni­ty, who will tes­ti­fy about the con­se­quences of cli­mate change and hydraulic frac­tur­ing, the dam­age it caus­es to water con­t­a­m­i­na­tion, air pol­lu­tion, severe health risks, earth­quakes etc. The defence aim to total­ly rebuke indus­try claims that frack­ing is a harm­less ‘envi­ron­men­tal­ly friend­ly’ way to extract fos­sil fuel… and instead put the indus­try on tri­al.

THE ACTION

Pro­test­ers stormed the gas rig in Banks, Lan­cashire on 2nd Nov 2011, with one team climb­ing the der­rick (drill) and a sec­ond team scal­ing the pipe han­dling sys­tem, occu­py­ing the rig and stop­ping work at the site for a day, dec­o­rat­ing the slimy machin­ery with anti-frack­ing ban­ners while they were at it.

The occu­pa­tion of the rig was timed to coin­cide with an indus­try spon­sored “Shale Gas Envi­ron­men­tal Sum­mit” in Lon­don, a far­ci­cal event where indus­try and gov­ern­ment reg­u­la­tors meet to col­lab­o­rate on green­wash­ing PR to cov­er up the dam­age done by the fos­sil fuel indus­try.

The rig occu­pa­tion also coin­cid­ed with the release of a report by Cuadrilla admit­ting that the hydraulic frac­tur­ing of its first well had caused sev­er­al earth­quakes.

Since frack­ing came to the UK last year there have been mobil­i­sa­tions of local com­mu­ni­ty groups and envi­ron­men­tal activists across the coun­try ris­ing up against the indus­try. Includ­ing anoth­er occu­pa­tion of the site in Decem­ber 2011 [1] and a block­ade at PR Mar­riot Drilling in Chester­field, where the rig was being ser­viced, last month. [2]

THE BIGGER PICTURE

Halt­ing the extrac­tion of more fos­sil fuels is essen­tial at a time when the plan­et is warm­ing expo­nen­tial­ly. Com­pared to 100 years ago the cli­mate is 0.75 degrees warmer and now, in 2012, the Inter­na­tion­al Ener­gy Agency warn we are on a tra­jec­to­ry to warm by 6 degrees Cel­sius in the next 100 years. [3]

For the younger gen­er­a­tion this means the world will become large­ly unin­hab­it­able in their life­time, cer­tain­ly for their kids, if emis­sions are not cut. The imme­di­ate peri­od, now, is regard­ed as a tip­ping point and despite a lot of rhetoric about ‘tack­ling cli­mate change’ from gov­ern­ments, finan­cial insti­tu­tions and indus­tries alike, in recent years we have seen the high­est emis­sions ever. [4]

Extract­ing resources on this scale to feed the indus­tri­al sys­tem is destroy­ing the envi­ron­ment that our lives depend on.

As con­ven­tion­al oil and gas pro­duc­tion peaks, gov­ern­ment and indus­tries con­tin­ue to steam roll ahead devel­op­ing destruc­tive prac­tices that will pro­vide prof­itable new mar­kets to line their pock­ets.

Frack­ing is part of a recent boom in more extreme meth­ods of extrac­tion, described as ‘uncon­ven­tion­al ener­gy sources’; Tar Sands, Moun­tain Top Removal, Deep Water Drilling, Coal Bed Methane, Under­ground Coal Gasi­fi­ca­tion and Nuclear expan­sion.

Extrac­tive indus­tries noto­ri­ous­ly deny dam­ag­ing the envi­ron­ment and neg­a­tive­ly effect­ing humans, ani­mals or the envi­ron­ment. How­ev­er there is a long his­to­ry of these indus­tries caus­ing wide-scale destruc­tion, and also long his­to­ry of cov­er ups.

Its time to put frack­ing on tri­al!

You can keep up to date with pro­ceed­ings on Twit­ter @frack_off or
#frackingon­tri­al, on Face­book http://www.facebook.com/frackoffuk or at
http://frackingontrial.org (avail­able soon).

NOTES

[1] [http://risingtide.org.uk/node/428]

[2] [http://frack-off.org.uk/fracking-protesters-lay-siege-to-cuadrilla-drill-rig]

[3] [http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/world-on-track-for-nearly-11-degree-temperature-rise-energy-expert-says/2011/11/28/gIQAi0lM6N_story.html]

[4] [http://www.iea.org/index_info.asp?id=1959]

Anti-fracking Blockade in Moshannon State Forest

9th July 2012

9th July 2012

Near­ly 100 Earth First! activists, friends and allies forced a 70-foot-tall EQT hydrofrack­ing drill rig to sus­pend oper­a­tions for 12 hours yes­ter­day in Pennsylvania’s Moshan­non State For­est. This is the first time that pro­test­ers have shut down a hydrofrack drilling oper­a­tion in the US. A tree sit­ter hung above the access road, with their anchor ropes block­ing it. A sec­ond per­son was also in a tree to sup­port the sit­ter while dozens of sup­port­ers guard­ed ten large debris piles that were across the road. Anoth­er group of 50 activists block­ad­ed the entrance to the access road. The State Police, with the Depart­ment of Con­ser­va­tion and Nat­ur­al Resources, dis­persed the block­ade around nine p.m. And removed the tree sit­ters with a lad­der truck. Three arrests were made for dis­or­der­ly con­duct, but pro­test­ers were cit­ed and released on-site.

There are a lim­it­ed num­ber of actu­al drill rigs in oper­a­tion in the state which are fer­ried around from site to site on a tight sched­ule. By halt­ing oper­a­tions for a day on this site, the block­ade has like­ly cre­at­ed a cost­ly dis­rup­tion for a hand­ful of wells in the area which EQT appar­ent­ly planned to drill in suc­ces­sion.

The activists report­ed that the police were reck­less with the sit­ters’ safe­ty, such as being quick to cut their anchor ropes.  The sup­port­ing sitter’s safe­ty and descent ropes were cut by the police as he climbed high­er in the tree.  The police in the lad­der truck had no radios and com­mu­ni­ca­tion to the ground was dif­fi­cult over the noise of the diesel engine; at one point the lad­der hit one of the sitter’s sup­port lines. Police were seen taunt­ing the sit­ter by wav­ing around one of their anchor lines and mak­ing jokes at them while shak­ing the ham­mock.

The site is part of a high con­cen­tra­tion of wells in Moshan­non State For­est, one of the most heav­i­ly drilled state forests in Penn­syl­va­nia. Over half of the forest’s 190,000 acres have been leased for Mar­cel­lus drilling using hydraulic frac­tur­ing. Despite wide­spread pub­lic oppo­si­tion, the for­mer PA sec­re­tary of Con­ser­va­tion and Nat­ur­al Resources pre­dicts 12,000 Mar­cel­lus wells will be drilled in state forests in the com­ing decade1. A recent poll showed that the major­i­ty of Penn­syl­va­ni­ans are opposed to frack­ing on pub­lic lands2.

Local farmer Jen­ny Lisak, whose own prop­er­ty has been impact­ed by frack­ing, describes the dev­as­ta­tion she has seen in the Moshan­non, “Hav­ing grown up enjoy­ing Moshan­non State For­est in so many ways, I am absolute­ly appalled at the ongo­ing destruc­tion. The once nar­row and invit­ing oak-shad­ed lanes are now being replaced by dust and traf­fic choked roads for chem­i­cal laden trucks – there are no words to describe the injus­tice of tak­ing pub­lic land, meant to pro­vide a source of beau­ty and wilder­ness for all and turn­ing it into an indus­tri­al zone.”

Drilling in the area has a trou­bled his­to­ry. In June 2010, a major blowout at anoth­er well in Clearfield Coun­ty spewed 35,000 gal­lons of tox­ic drilling waste into the Lit­tle Lau­rel Run water­shed and caused the evac­u­a­tion of Moshan­non State For­est3. Since 2008, only 24 of EQT’s 198 Mar­cel­lus wells in the state have been inspect­ed and vio­la­tions were found at every sin­gle inspec­tion. When they have been cit­ed, they’ve refused to change their prac­tices. On May 9, 2012, in Dun­can Town­ship, Tio­ga Coun­ty, EQT was cit­ed for faulty con­struc­tion on a flow­back water impound­ment; three weeks lat­er the pit failed, con­t­a­m­i­nat­ing a near­by spring4.

“This is part of an esca­lat­ing direct action cam­paign against frack­ing in the Mar­cel­lus Shale region,” said Danielle Diet­t­er­ick, an activist affil­i­at­ed with Mar­cel­lus Earth First! from Ben­ton, Pa. “Peo­ple from all around the coun­try have joined with Penn­syl­va­nia res­i­dents to put their bod­ies on the line to stop frack­ing.”

The action comes on the heels of a 12-day block­ade to stop the dis­place­ment of the Riverdale Mobile Home Park, in Lycoming Coun­ty, and the shut­down of a frack­ing waste­water injec­tion well near Athens, Ohio. Groups across the coun­try are plan­ning more anti-extrac­tion inter­ven­tions like RAMPS in West Vir­ginia and the Tar Sands Block­ade in Texas, lat­er this month. All these inde­pen­dent, grass­roots-led actions show per­haps a coa­lesc­ing nation­al upris­ing against exploita­tive extrac­tion.

Susan Riley, anoth­er sup­port­er, cheered on the bold action, “The state gov­ern­ment has sold off our pub­lic lands and, with Act 13, stripped us of our rights to local self-gov­er­nance. The frack­ing indus­try has free reign in this state and no one’s gonna stop them unless we do.”

8th July 2012

Activists from Mar­cel­lus Earth First! have erect­ed a slash pile block­ade and two tree sits block­ing an access road to an EQT hydro-frack­ing site in Moshan­non State For­est in Clearfield Coun­ty, PA., halt­ing drilling oper­a­tions set to begin this week. The block­aders were joined by 40 sup­port­ers and con­cerned cit­i­zens, who turned around a Hal­libur­ton truck. The block­ade is try­ing to stop the fur­ther destruc­tion of Pennsylvania’s state forests—more than half of which have already been leased for drilling—and call atten­tion to the dev­as­tat­ing effects of hydrofrack­ing on the state’s com­mu­ni­ties. The sit­ters’ anchor lines are block­ing the road by cross­ing each oth­er and the road, and if an anchor line is cut a sit­ter will fall. This action has been coor­di­nat­ed as the post-Ren­dezvous action. Each Sum­mer Earth First!ers and allies come togeth­er to skill share, take part in dis­cus­sion work­shops, and keep it wild in our last remain­ing wilder­ness places in the US. Fol­low­ing a week in the woods, we take part in an action in sup­port of the local orga­niz­ers host­ing the camp out, also know as the Round Riv­er Ren­dezvous, or Rondy.

Today’s block­ade is the lat­est in a series of esca­lat­ing actions of resis­tance to the destruc­tive impacts of hydrofrack­ing in the Mar­cel­lus Shale. Last May, res­i­dents of But­ler Coun­ty occu­pied the office of State Rep­re­sen­ta­tive Bri­an Ellis, demand­ing account­abil­i­ty for wide­spread con­t­a­m­i­na­tion caused by hor­i­zon­tal drilling. In June, sev­en fam­i­lies, along with dozens of sup­port­ers, blocked the entrance to the Riverdale Mobile Home Com­mu­ni­ty to pre­vent their immi­nent evic­tion at the hands of Aqua Amer­i­ca PVR. Aqua sought to destroy their homes and con­struct a water with­draw­al facil­i­ty per­mit­ted to extract up to three mil­lion gal­lons of water from the Susque­han­na Riv­er dai­ly for use in frack­ing. Res­i­dents were able to main­tain the block­ade for 12 days. On June 17, 1,000 Ohioans stormed the state­house in Colum­bus and passed a “people’s res­o­lu­tion” ban­ning hydrofrack­ing. Most recent­ly, a 31-year-old landown­er from Athens Coun­ty, Ohio chained her­self to con­crete bar­rels and shut down oper­a­tions at one of Ohio’s 170 injec­tion wells, which con­tain about 95% of the tox­ic and radioac­tive frack­ing waste gen­er­at­ed from Penn­syl­va­nia drilling.

Momen­tum in the anti-frack­ing bat­tle will con­tin­ue to build across the Mar­cel­lus and Uti­ca shale regions through­out July. Next week­end, res­i­dents from Ohio and beyond will gath­er at an anti-frack­ing action camp in Youngstown and pre­pare to enforce the “people’s res­o­lu­tion” against frack­ing. The upcom­ing months show the begin­nings of a nation­al rebel­lion against extrac­tive indus­try across the board. On July 28, anti-frack­ers from across the nation will gath­er in Wash­ing­ton D.C. for “Stop the Frack Attack,” the largest mobi­liza­tion against frack­ing ever. In West Vir­ginia, Appalachi­ans and allies will stand togeth­er at the “Moun­tain Mobi­liza­tion” and shut down an active strip mine the last week of July. In Montana,the “Coal Export Action”, a ten-day cam­paign of civ­il dis­obe­di­ence at the begin­ning of August will tar­get coal ship­ments from strip mines in the Pow­der Riv­er Basin, over­seas. And lat­er in the month, Texas res­i­dents have called for the “Tar Sands Block­ade” to block the recent­ly approved south­ern leg of the Key­stone XL pipeline.

Where the gov­ern­ment has failed to act to pro­tect com­mu­ni­ties and the earth from the rav­ages of an out-of-con­trol ener­gy indus­try, the peo­ple are ris­ing up to resist. No mat­ter where you live, you have the oppor­tu­ni­ty to join the fight for our future. Find your place, stand your ground, and in the words of Moth­er Jones, “Boo­gie Chilluns.”

UPDATE, 11:53 am:
Police mak­ing vague threats at block­ade about assault rifles going off and wan­der­ing through block­ade with assault riflesHow­ev­er, at the ral­ly they said there’s a sick bear up the road that needs to be put down, and not to freak out if a gun shot is heard.

Police ini­ti­at­ed anoth­er round of nego­ti­a­tion with the ral­ly insist­ing folks move the debris that’s in the road because it’s a safe­ty risk, mak­ing veiled threats about things esca­lat­ing if that doesn’t hap­pen.  Police have informed peo­ple it’s ille­gal to block the road, but have not giv­en any order to dis­perse, they said “if it doesn’t hap­pen [dis­per­sal] they don’t want things to esca­late.”  Oth­er­wise, sit­u­a­tion unchanged.

UPDATE  10:14 am:
State police on scene at sup­port­ing ral­ly.

UPDATE  10:10 am:
Two tree-sit­ters block­ing the well pad access road–their anchor lines are cross­ing the road and each oth­er, and if an anchor line is cut­ter a sit­ter will fall.  There’s also a slash pile in the road.  No police on seen and appar­ent­ly no secu­ri­ty either.

UPDATE  9:30 am:
Mar­cel­lus Earth First! and sup­port­ers have set up a block­ade at an EQT well pad in the Moshan­non Penn­syl­va­nia State For­est.  An addi­tion­al group of 40 sup­port­ers are hold­ing a ral­ly down the road, and have blocked a Hal­libur­ton truck.  The activists plan to stay as long as they can.  Stay tuned for more updates as infor­ma­tion becomes avail­able.

State Of Emergency In Cajamarca Follows Four Deaths in Mine Protests

6th July ’12

A state of emer­gency has been declared in three provinces in the Andean depart­ment of Caja­mar­ca, locat­ed in north­ern Peru, fol­low­ing the deaths of four peo­ple dur­ing protests against the mul­ti-bil­lion dol­lar Con­ga gold project.

6th July ’12

A state of emer­gency has been declared in three provinces in the Andean depart­ment of Caja­mar­ca, locat­ed in north­ern Peru, fol­low­ing the deaths of four peo­ple dur­ing protests against the mul­ti-bil­lion dol­lar Con­ga gold project.

Peru’s Exec­u­tive branch approved the mea­sure, which cur­tails civ­il lib­er­ties, in the provinces of Caja­mar­ca, Celendin and Hual­gay­oc. The state of emer­gency came into force on Wednes­day and will be valid for 30 days, the gov­ern­ment said.

The mea­sure fol­lows the death in Celendin of three peo­ple and more than 30 injured on Tues­day, dur­ing clash­es between police and demon­stra­tors.  One of the per­sons killed was 17 years old.  More than 15 peo­ple were arrest­ed.  On the same day, a man was killed dur­ing protests in Bam­ba­mar­ca, cap­i­tal of the province of Hual­gay­oc.

This week’s protests, with Minas Con­ga still in focus, are against the may­ors of 65 dis­tricts who last week were in Lima with Pres­i­dent Humala at the Gov­ern­ment Palace to accept gov­ern­ment invest­ment in a series of infra­struc­ture projects in their provinces.   

It is the sec­ond time since last Decem­ber that Peru has declared a state of emer­gency in Caja­mar­ca to con­trol esca­lat­ing protests against the $4.8 bil­lion Minas Con­ga project, which is being devel­oped by gold min­ing com­pa­ny Yana­cocha.

Yana­cocha is major­i­ty con­trolled by US-based New­mont Min­ing (51%), with Peru’s Minas Bue­naven­tu­ra own­ing 49%.

Protests late last year against Minas Con­ga, over wor­ries that it would harm the water sup­ply to farm­ers, result­ed in the sus­pen­sion of the project. 

At the same time, the delay in reach­ing an agree­ment with pro­test­ers pushed Pres­i­dent Humala to make a major cab­i­net shuf­fle late last year, appoint­ing for­mer Inte­ri­or min­is­ter Oscar Valdes as his new pre­mier to apply a stronger hand in quelling the protests.  Those against the min­ing project have only become more entrenched.

Inde­pen­dent con­sul­tants hired by the gov­ern­ment have reviewed the Minas Con­ga envi­ron­men­tal impact study, and the gov­ern­ment said recent­ly that the com­pa­ny could restart work if it made some changes like build­ing water reser­voirs before start­ing con­struc­tion of the mine.

How­ev­er, oppo­si­tion has remained strong despite attempts by Peru’s gov­ern­ment to resolve the dis­pute. One of the main oppo­nents of the project is the region­al gov­ern­ment of Caja­mar­ca, led by far-left gov­er­nor Gre­go­rio San­tos.

San­tos reject­ed the state of emer­gency and called on the gov­ern­ment to lift the mea­sure.

Minas Con­ga is the lat­est in a num­ber of min­ing projects that have been tar­get­ed by com­mu­ni­ty oppo­si­tion, large­ly over envi­ron­men­tal con­cerns. Ana­lysts say some $50 bil­lion in min­ing invest­ments are at risk due to the social con­flicts in Peru, a coun­try where min­ing has been the lynch­pin of eco­nom­ic growth.

Brazil tribes occupy contentious dam site

30th June 2012

About 150 indige­nous peo­ple are protest­ing a mas­sive dam they say will dry up the riv­er their liveli­hood depends on.

30th June 2012

About 150 indige­nous peo­ple are protest­ing a mas­sive dam they say will dry up the riv­er their liveli­hood depends on.

A clus­ter of 12 men from the Xikrin tribe chant in their native lan­guage while march­ing togeth­er, arms inter­locked, stomp­ing their feet against the dry red dirt. They say this is their call of resis­tance from the Ama­zon.

The Xikrin are joined by about 150 indige­nous peo­ple from three oth­er tribes — the Arara, Juruna, and Parakana — that are occu­py­ing one of the work sites at the Belo Monte dam con­struc­tion site in what is becom­ing a high-stakes stand­off. The occu­pa­tion, which is enter­ing its sec­ond week, has halt­ed a part of the con­struc­tion on what will be the world’s third-largest hydro­elec­tric dam.

At the site of the protest, vis­it­ed by Al Jazeera on Wednes­day, the tribes­men were car­ry­ing clubs and spears and had built rudi­men­ta­ry sleep­ing quar­ters in what has essen­tial­ly become a non-vio­lent sit-in. An anthro­pol­o­gist was with them, typ­ing away at her lap­top as the indige­nous peo­ple artic­u­lat­ed their demands.

The tribes are occu­py­ing a road, built by the dam builders, which cuts through part of the Xin­gu River’s water­ways. The road blocks the nat­ur­al flow of the waters.

The occu­pa­tion of the site began at about 11 am on June 21 and played out like some­thing from a fic­tion­al Hol­ly­wood movie. The indige­nous peo­ple arrived at the work site in half a dozen small boats, charged the area, and announced that they were tak­ing over. The con­struc­tion work­ers, see­ing the tribes­men with their faces paint­ed for com­bat and armed with spears, imme­di­ate­ly fled for safe­ty.

“The work­ers were scared, so they imme­di­ate­ly ran when we arrived,” said Bepumuiti, from the Juruna tribe. “They prob­a­bly thought they were going to die.”

The tribes­men con­fis­cat­ed the keys to more than three dozen dump trucks and heavy machin­ery left behind.

What the indige­nous peo­ple want

Last year, a series of con­di­tions were agreed upon with the indige­nous peo­ple to reduce the impact of the con­struc­tion of the dam on their com­mu­ni­ties. Some of the con­di­tions includ­ed the demar­ca­tion of indige­nous lands, the con­struc­tion of health facil­i­ties and schools, and means of trans­porta­tion for the trib­al peo­ple when the rivers dry up.

In exchange for their agree­ment, the indige­nous said they would not force­ful­ly oppose the dam con­struc­tion.

The prob­lem, the indige­nous now say, is that while the con­struc­tion of the dam steams ahead, the promis­es made by the con­sor­tium build­ing the dam and by gov­ern­ment-led Norte Ener­gia — the ener­gy com­pa­ny over­see­ing the dam — have yet to be ful­filled.

So the tribes decid­ed to invade. This was a his­toric and sig­nif­i­cant move, because the deci­sion was made with­out the assis­tance or knowl­edge of local or inter­na­tion­al NGOs or gov­ern­ment rights bod­ies, who in the past often assist­ed tribes dur­ing protest move­ments.

“We would not be here today if the builders and the gov­ern­ment would have done what they promised us,” Bebtok, a tribe elder from the Xikrin tribe, told Al Jazeera. “In my com­mu­ni­ty, noth­ing has been done. There is no qual­i­ty health post, there is no school, they have not built a road for us. My road is the riv­er and that is going to be dried up.”

Since Octo­ber, the tribes most affect­ed by the con­struc­tion of the dam have been receiv­ing a bud­get of about $15,000 from the gov­ern­ment, through which they can request any­thing they want, such as gaso­line for their boats, food or con­struc­tion mate­r­i­al.

But the tribes have been told that the mon­ey — called “emer­gency assis­tance” in gov­ern­ment par­lance — will stop lat­er this year, infu­ri­at­ing the trib­al peo­ple at the very moment they are start­ing to feel the neg­a­tive impacts of the dam, they say.

The indige­nous peo­ple are now also start­ing to see the impact the con­struc­tion is hav­ing on their lives. Surara, from the Parakana tribe, showed Al Jazeera how a road built on the con­struc­tion site through a nat­ur­al water­way of the Xin­gu riv­er has already start­ed to dry out one side of the riv­er.

“We were always nav­i­gat­ing this riv­er because we know this riv­er like the palm of our hands,” Surara said. “And today, as you can see, it’s very dry. That is sad for us.”

Surara pre­dict­ed that, at the cur­rent pace of con­struc­tion, in two years the tribe will no longer be able to reach their com­mu­ni­ty by boat because of the changes in water lev­els. The tribes have a new list of demands they want ful­filled before they say they will end their occu­pa­tion.

Response from gov­ern­ment and builders

The tribes’ occu­pa­tion of the dam seemed to catch the dam builders and the gov­ern­ment by sur­prise. In response, Norte Ener­gia has tak­en what seems like a pecu­liar approach that involves two very oppo­site respons­es, using the car­rot and the stick at the same time. Three days after the occu­pa­tion began, a judge reject­ed a request to have the indige­nous evict­ed by force from the area.

At the same time, Norte Ener­gia is pro­vid­ing the indige­nous peo­ple three meals a day at the occu­pa­tion site. Often times, a rep­re­sen­ta­tive from the com­pa­ny will show up at the site dur­ing a meal and ask the indige­nous peo­ple for the keys back to their heavy machin­ery. So far, the tribes have refused to hand them over.

Last week, Norte Ener­gia refused an Al Jazeera request for an inter­view on the mat­ter. Norte Ener­gia has said in the past that the eco­nom­ic and social assis­tance pack­ages to help the tribes will be imple­ment­ed at var­i­ous points dur­ing the entire­ty of the project, as pre­vi­ous­ly agreed upon.

Behind the scenes, the com­pa­ny is fac­ing a daunt­ing task. Not only do each of the four tribes involved in the occu­pa­tion have their own set of demands, but there are also as many as 35 dif­fer­ent sub-com­mu­ni­ties with­in the tribes tak­ing part in the occu­pa­tion, and each have their own inter­ests and requests they want met.

Activists face arrest

Pres­sure is build­ing on mul­ti­ple fronts. Con­struc­tion of the dam ramped up ear­li­er this year, and there are strict timeta­bles to get the dam up and run­ning by late 2014.

Aside from the indige­nous protest, sev­er­al oth­er tense issues sur­round­ing the dam are coa­lesc­ing at the same time.

In Altami­ra, the clos­est city to the dam site, 11 peo­ple — all unaf­fil­i­at­ed with the indige­nous protest now occur­ring — are fight­ing arrest war­rants after being accused of help­ing organ­ise an anti-dam protest ear­li­er in June that the dam builders say led to prop­er­ty dam­age. Local TV chan­nels have been air­ing video of bro­ken win­dows and the burn­ing of office equip­ment at the con­struc­tion site.

The activists fac­ing pos­si­ble arrest all deny they were involved, and say any protests they organ­ised were peace­ful and legal. They include, among oth­ers, a Catholic priest, a nun, some mem­bers of Xin­gu Vivo Para Sem­pre — a local anti-dam NGO — as well as a local fish­er­man fea­tured in an Al Jazeera report in Jan­u­ary

Police have an open inves­ti­ga­tion, and have yet to for­mal­ly announce if charges will be filed. How­ev­er, even the threat of jail time has sent a chill through the tight-knit com­mu­ni­ty of local anti-dam activists.

How will it end?

On Thurs­day, in the city of Altami­ra, more than 60 of the indige­nous occu­piers met with a high-lev­el del­e­ga­tion from Brasil­ia that includ­ed the pres­i­dent of Norte Ener­gia.

The meet­ing last­ed near­ly four hours, and was closed to the media. The indige­nous peo­ple dis­cussed their demands to end the protest, but no agree­ment was reached. Norte Ener­gia said they need­ed to take the requests back to Brasil­ia for analy­sis. A new meet­ing was set for July 9. In the mean­time, the tribes say their occu­pa­tion will con­tin­ue. It was also agreed by all sides that work will con­tin­ue on the parts of the con­struc­tion site not under the con­trol of the tribes.

“This was a very friend­ly con­ver­sa­tion; the tribe elders are very wise and mea­sured,” said Car­los Nasci­men­to, pres­i­dent of Norte Ener­gia, in a brief press con­fer­ence after the meet­ing. “There are some young tribes­men that want some improve­ments, and as much as we can, we will do any­thing in our pow­er so these kinds of things will not hap­pen again.”

The indige­nous seemed deter­mined to keep up the fight for as long as it takes. “What we asked for, the dam builders did not give us an answer to, so we will only leave the con­struc­tion site when they bring an answer to us on paper,” Giliar­di, from the Juruna tribe, said after the meet­ing. “And as long as they don’t do any­thing in our com­mu­ni­ties regard­ing infra­struc­ture, we are not leav­ing the occu­pa­tion.”

Mean­while, more boats loaded with indige­nous peo­ple are arriv­ing at the protest site every day. It is an indi­ca­tion that this stand­off in the Ama­zon could drag on for days to come.

More pho­tos and video

Earth First! Summer Gathering Update — programme, directions, website and more

It’s only weeks until the Earth First! Sum­mer Gath­er­ing begins.
Five days of work­shops, info shar­ing and learn­ing new skills, 1–5 August.

It’s only weeks until the Earth First! Sum­mer Gath­er­ing begins.
Five days of work­shops, info shar­ing and learn­ing new skills, 1–5 August.

The Earth First Sum­mer Gath­er­ing takes place each year to pro­vide a space in which the rad­i­cal ecol­o­gy move­ment can share skills and plan for future cam­paigns and actions.

Dis­cus­sions around the impor­tance of com­mu­ni­ty build­ing in inner cities, the state of the anar­chist move­ment and patri­archy in activism.

Skill shares includ­ing wom­en’s self-defence, research­ing cor­po­ra­tions and nav­i­ga­tion.

Cam­paign round ups from Frack Off! Smash Edo and Lud­dites 2000 amongst oth­ers.

If you have work­shops you like to run or dis­cus­sions you’d like to facil­i­tate then email us at earthfirstsummergathering@riseup.net

Full pro­gramme.

Camp­ing is on a slid­ing scale of £30 to £15, pay what is gen­uine­ly appro­pri­ate.

Food will be from Anar­chist Teapot and meal tick­ets will be £5 a day.

Kids can have sep­a­rate meals if they want for £3 a day.

There will be a cou­ple of kids spaces, and spe­cial work­shops being ran for kids. If you’d like to run any kids work­shops get in touch at earthfirstsummergathering@riseup.net.

If you want you dog to come along then you’re going to have to email us at earthfirstsummergathering@riseup.net

And of course there will be enter­tain­ment and a bar open in the evenings.

The camp is ½ mile from the Berring­ton vil­lage, and 1 mile from the larg­er vil­lage of Cross Hous­es.

We encour­age non-cycling campers to use pub­lic trans­port if pos­si­ble as Cross Hous­es is on a bus route.

BY TRAIN
The near­est train sta­tion is Shrews­bury. You can then get the bus to Cross Hous­es (see below). If com­ing from a long dis­tance it can some­times be cheap­er to get a tick­et to a large sta­tion such as Birm­ing­ham, Wolver­hamp­ton, Man­ches­ter or Crewe and then a sep­a­rate tick­et on to Shrews­bury. Check nation­al rail for train times and prices. If com­ing from the Lon­don direc­tion, it’s gen­er­al­ly cheap­er to buy a Super Off­peak Return, spec­i­fy­ing “Lon­don Mid­land & Arri­va only”.

BY BIKE
See here for direc­tions and a map to the camp from Shrews­bury for cyclists and dri­vers.

BY BUS
When you arrive at Shrews­bury train sta­tion, ask some­one to point you to the bus sta­tion. It’s only a few min­utes walk from the train sta­tion. The bus ser­vice that runs from town to with­in a mile of Crabap­ple is the 436 towards Bridg­north. It runs every hour from 7.40am to 5.40pm with a “late” one at 7.40pm. The jour­ney to Cross Hous­es is approx 15 mins. You will need to press the stop but­ton when you see the sign for Cross Hous­es. Some of the ser­vices on this route are low-floor acces­si­ble bus­es. Please note that the last bus leaves Shrews­bury at 7.40pm, Mon­day to Sat­ur­day and there are no Sun­day bus ser­vices. For the bus timetable see here http://shropshire.gov.uk/bustimes/timetable.jsc?timetable=436mfi0412.
The camp itself is about 1 mile from the bus stop. From the bus stop at Cross Hous­es, walk back towards Shrews­bury past the petrol sta­tion (on your right) and take the first left turn signed “Berring­ton”. After about ½ mile, the road forks at the edge of the vil­lage. Take the right turn sign­post­ed “Bet­ton Abbots” and we’re about ¼ mile up the road on the right.
If you intend to come by bus but need help get­ting to and from the bus stop, you can arrange a pick up with us: details will be avail­able near­er the time.

BY TAXI
There is also a taxi rank just out­side Shrews­bury train sta­tion. Acces­si­ble taxis can be got from here.- but it is MUCH cheap­er to book a cab from a local com­pa­ny – Comet Cabs 01743 344444, or Vin­cent Cabs 01743 367777. Vin­cents also have a book­ing office just across the road from the sta­tion, which is handy if you don’t have a phone to book a cab in advance.

USEFUL LINKS
See here direc­tions and a map to the camp from Shrews­bury for cyclists and dri­vers.
See a map of where the site is here
See the bus timetable
Direc­tions from places oth­er than Shrews­bury

Earth First! Sum­mer Gath­er­ing Col­lec­tive
earthfirstsummergathering@riseup.net

http://earthfirstgathering.weebly.com

Frack Off: Activists Blockade Fracking Drill

Update: it has now end­ed — a suc­cess­ful 7 hour occu­pa­tion on the gates and no arrests

18.6.2012

Update: it has now end­ed — a suc­cess­ful 7 hour occu­pa­tion on the gates and no arrests

18.6.2012

Anti-frack­ing group, Frack Off, is blockad­ing the site of Cuadrilla Resource’s drilling rig. Twen­ty peo­ple descend­ed on the site at 5am and are blockad­ing the entrance. The site is owned by PR Mar­riot who is Cuadrilla’s lead drilling con­trac­tors.

The action is stop­ping work on the drill which is being worked on in prepa­ra­tion for more frack­ing explo­ration in Lan­cashire. Frack Off is high­light­ing the threat posed by the tidal wave of extreme ener­gy extrac­tion meth­ods that are being pushed by the gov­ern­ment and a num­ber of most­ly US and Aus­tralian com­pa­nies. The action is the begin­ning of a con­cert­ed cam­paign by peo­ple across the coun­try to stop the intro­duc­tion of these dan­ger­ous prac­tices before it is too late.

Despite the mount­ing evi­dence from the Unit­ed States that the exploita­tion of uncon­ven­tion­al fos­sil fuels such as shale gas and coal bed methane (CBM) threat­ens to poi­son the envi­ron­ment, fur­ther desta­bilise the cli­mate and is impli­cat­ed in ris­ing toll on human health includ­ing increas­ing can­cer rates, cor­po­ra­tions and gov­ern­ments are doing all they can to push through the intro­duc­tion of these new ener­gy extrac­tion meth­ods in the face of grow­ing pub­lic oppo­si­tion.

Last month the Ener­gy and Cli­mate Change Min­is­ter Gre­go­ry Bark­er announced in par­lia­ment that the “Gov­ern­ment will con­tin­ue to seek full eco­nom­ic recov­ery of UK hydro­car­bon resources, both con­ven­tion­al and uncon­ven­tion­al”, a posi­tion which amounts to a dec­la­ra­tion of war on the peo­ple and envi­ron­ment of the British Isles. Full eco­nom­ic recov­ery will involve coat­ing the coun­try­side with drilling sites and pipelines while poi­son­ing the air and water and the emis­sion of vast quan­ti­ties or car­bon diox­ide into the atmos­phere.

The main jus­ti­fi­ca­tion used for the need for this destruc­tive course of action is that we face an ener­gy cri­sis and need this gas to “keep the lights on”. In real­i­ty uncon­ven­tion­al fos­sil fuels are very expen­sive to extract and the amount that could be extract­ed is a small frac­tion of the gas from the North Sea that we have squan­dered over the last 40 years. The choice we face is between con­tin­u­ing to feed our addic­tion to increas­ing expen­sive and dan­ger­ous fos­sil fuels or putting a stop to the vicious eco­nom­ic sys­tem that requires them.

There is a gap­ing dis­con­nect between the green rhetoric that is thrown around by gov­ern­ments and cor­po­ra­tions alike and the dirty, dan­ger­ous and impov­er­ished future that they are actu­al­ly advo­cat­ing in their quest for a quick buck. This pri­ori­tis­ing of cor­po­rate greed over the inter­ests of peo­ple and ecosys­tems while pre­tend­ing to care about them, has no bet­ter poster child than the Rio+20 Earth Sum­mit that starts on Wednes­day.

Twen­ty years after world lead­ers met in Rio de Janeiro and promised to address the envi­ron­men­tal and social prob­lems afflict­ing the plan­et they will meet again, to promise, again, to do some­thing about the now even worse prob­lems we face. As with twen­ty years ago they have no inten­tion of actu­al­ly doing any­thing that would put a check on the sys­tem of cor­po­rate exploita­tion that is destroy­ing the ecosys­tems we rely on. This is why ordi­nary peo­ple must take a stand to stop the destruc­tion if any­thing is every going to change.

For more info have a look at:

Twit­ter: www.twitter.com/frack_off
Face­book: www.facebook.com/frackoffuk
Web­site: www.frack-off.org
Pic­tures:  http://s.coop/pzid

Carnival of Dirt

On Fri­day 15 June, Lon­don will expe­ri­ence its first ever Car­ni­val of Dirt, a car­ni­val like no oth­er. More than 30 activist groups from Lon­don and around the world have come togeth­er to high­light the illic­it deeds of min­ing and extrac­tion com­pa­nies.

On Fri­day 15 June, Lon­don will expe­ri­ence its first ever Car­ni­val of Dirt, a car­ni­val like no oth­er. More than 30 activist groups from Lon­don and around the world have come togeth­er to high­light the illic­it deeds of min­ing and extrac­tion com­pa­nies.

Reports and pho­tos from the day: 1 | 2 | 3

http://www.carnivalofdirt.org