Goldcorp Security Shoots Peaceful Protesters in Guatemala 1st May

Police, mil­i­tary and pri­vate secu­ri­ty attack peace­ful anti-min­ing pro­test­ers at the San Rafael mine in Guatemala, Sep.

Police, mil­i­tary and pri­vate secu­ri­ty attack peace­ful anti-min­ing pro­test­ers at the San Rafael mine in Guatemala, Sep. 2008

From Rights Action:

Six civil­ians were shot and wound­ed (2 seri­ous­ly) on April 27, 2013 by Tahoe / Gold­corp secu­ri­ty forces at Tahoe’s “San Rafael” mine site (munic­i­pal­i­ty of San Rafael Las Flo­res, depart­ment of San­ta Rosa, Guatemala).  The wound­ed are: Adol­fo Gar­cía, 57; his son Luis Gar­cía, 18; Wilmer Pérez, 17; Anto­nio Hum­ber­to  Castil­lo, 48;  Noé Aguilar Castil­lo, 27; Érick Fer­nan­do Castil­lo, 27.  Local res­i­dents, who are main­tain­ing a per­ma­nent peace­ful occu­pa­tion by the mine entrance in protest against it, saw com­pa­ny armed guards open fire on the group of men who were walk­ing by.  (Pren­sa Libre, April 29, 2013, http://www.prensalibre.com/santa_rosa/personas-resultan-incidente-San-Rafael_0_909509181.html)

Read more here about Goldcorp’s (and sub­sidiary Tahoe Resources’) recent his­to­ry of vio­lence and repres­sion against indige­nous and campesino com­mu­ni­ties in Guatemala.

 

RECLAIM THE POWER

Join No Dash for Gas for a 4 day camp and

Join No Dash for Gas for a 4 day camp and
protest at West Burton power station

17th — 20th August 2013

Big deci­sions are being made now about how we’re going to pow­er the UK. The gov­ern­men­t’s pol­i­cy of increas­ing our reliance on gas is push­ing mil­lions into fuel pover­ty. This — cou­pled with ruth­less cuts to essen­tial ser­vices — leaves many with an impos­si­ble choice between heat­ing and eat­ing. And the same pol­i­cy guar­an­tees that we’ll miss even our mod­est car­bon reduc­tion tar­gets. Both the finan­cial and the cli­mate crises are relat­ed to the pur­suit of prof­it above all else, in the inter­ests of the few and at the expense of the many.

We need a win. And one win we need is a secure future for gen­er­a­tions to come, where prof­its don’t trump the pub­lic inter­est and where we have safe, clean ener­gy to meet our needs.

Be part of cre­at­ing some­thing BIG this sum­mer, get involved now and Reclaim The Pow­er.

We can fight back, as the stu­dent, trade union, wom­en’s, dis­abled rights and anti-cuts move­ments have shown us. There has nev­er been a more crit­i­cal time to take action. The solu­tions are there to be grasped.

21 peo­ple went up two chim­neys but 64,000 came down

Last Octo­ber, 21 envi­ron­men­tal activists shut down EDF’s West Bur­ton pow­er sta­tion for a week in protest at the gov­ern­men­t’s Dash for Gas. West Bur­ton is the first of up to 40 new gas fired pow­er sta­tions being planned. With your help, includ­ing a sol­i­dar­i­ty peti­tion signed by 64,000 peo­ple — they fought off EDF’s attempt to sue them for £5 mil­lion.

This sum­mer, inspired by their action, we are build­ing a wide coali­tion of groups and indi­vid­u­als who will be com­ing togeth­er to Reclaim the Pow­er. We’ll plan togeth­er. We’ll put for­ward solu­tions. We’ll cross the bor­der from anger to action. It was peo­ple pow­er that stopped new coal and stalled plans for a third run­way at Heathrow, that made bankers’ greed and tax avoid­ance tox­ic and that is now fight­ing aus­ter­i­ty attacks on work­ers, women, pen­sion­ers and the dis­abled. Togeth­er, we will stop the dash for gas.

Want to be part of cre­at­ing Reclaim The Pow­er? Won­der­ing where we’ll be, how you can get there or what you need to bring? More info to come soon, keep up to date at:

www.nodashforgas.org.uk
info@nodashforgas.org.uk
@nodashforgas

Three squatters on trial next week

On Sep­tem­ber 3 2012, some peo­ple were arrest­ed for being in a derelict build­ing under sec­tion 144 of the Legal Aid, Sen­tenc­ing and Pun­ish­ment of Offend­ers Act.

On Sep­tem­ber 3 2012, some peo­ple were arrest­ed for being in a derelict build­ing under sec­tion 144 of the Legal”>http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2012/10/contents/enacted”>Legal Aid, Sen­tenc­ing and Pun­ish­ment of Offend­ers Act.

The three defen­dants are booked in for a two and a half day tri­al at Brighton Mag­is­trates Court (map) which starts at 10am Mon­day April 22 2013.

At this stage we think the tri­al will go ahead on this date. Come on down!! It’s gonna be a lot of fun. We are ask­ing peo­ple to be out­side court at 9.30am Mon­day.

The charges orig­i­nal­ly were squat­ting (under s144), obstruc­tion (of the police in their law­ful duty) and abstrac­tion (ie steal­ing elec­tric­i­ty). The abstrac­tion charge has already been dropped.

Here’s the con­tact details:
You can con­tact the sup­port group on housingwar@squat.net
Fone – 07599377058
Twit­ter – hous­ing­war (will be updat­ed dur­ing tri­al)
Web — rooftopresistance.squat.net

Odd Alliance of Anarchists & Farmers Takes on French Gov’t in Airport Battle 16th April

They hurl sticks, stones and gaso­line bombs. They have spent bru­tal win­ter months for­ti­fy­ing mud­dy encamp­ments. And now they’re ready to ramp up their fight against the prime min­is­ter and his pet project — a mas­sive new air­port in west­ern France.

An unlike­ly alliance of anar­chists and beret-wear­ing farm­ers is cre­at­ing a headache for Pres­i­dent Fran­cois Hollande’s belea­guered gov­ern­ment by mount­ing an esca­lat­ing Occu­py Wall Street-style bat­tle that has delayed con­struc­tion on the ambi­tious air­port near the city of Nantes for months. The con­flict has flared anew at a par­tic­u­lar­ly tricky time for the Social­ist gov­ern­ment, amid a grow­ing scan­dal over tax-dodg­ing rev­e­la­tions that forced the bud­get min­is­ter to resign, and ever-wors­en­ing news about the French econ­o­my.

A protest held over the week­end is like­ly to trig­ger a new round of demon­stra­tions like those that drew thou­sands of pro­test­ers to the remote wood­lands of Brit­tany in the fall. In those ear­li­er protests, heav­i­ly armored riot police bat­tled young anar­chists and farm­ers, caus­ing injuries on both sides. On Mon­day, sim­i­lar clash­es erupt­ed, with three demon­stra­tors injured, accord­ing to the rad­i­cals’ web­site.

The fight has brought togeth­er odd bed­fel­lows: Local farm­ers who rep­re­sent tra­di­tion­al French con­ser­v­a­tive val­ues are col­lab­o­rat­ing with anar­chists, rad­i­cal eco-fem­i­nists and drifters from around Europe — who see the anti-air­port move­ment as a flash­point against glob­al­iza­tion and cap­i­tal­ism. Envi­ron­men­tal­ists and the far-left Green Par­ty also oppose the air­port, argu­ing that it will bring pol­lu­tion.

The clash has been par­tic­u­lar­ly dam­ag­ing for Prime Min­is­ter Jean-Marc Ayrault, Nantes’ long­time may­or and the airport’s high­est-pro­file cham­pi­on. He and the project’s sup­port­ers say the air­port will attract busi­ness at a time when France sore­ly needs an eco­nom­ic boost and job cre­ation. The Aero­port du Grand Ouest is intend­ed to replace the exist­ing Nantes Atlan­tique air­port, with run­ways able to han­dle larg­er air­craft such as the A380 super­jum­bo and room to expand from 4.5 mil­lion pas­sen­gers a year at the open to 9 mil­lion in the longer term.

With an approval rat­ing at his­toric lows, Ayrault’s lever­age to push through the project is shrink­ing. Mean­while the oppo­nents’ threat to remo­bi­lize is lead­ing to new fears of vio­lent clash­es.

Pro­test­ers have spent months ille­gal­ly occu­py­ing the site of the planned Notre-Dame-Des-Lan­des air­port, which is set to start oper­at­ing in 2017. In Novem­ber, more than 500 riot police tried to remove thou­sands of squat­ters in the wood­ed area near this vil­lage 15 miles (24 kilo­me­ters) north of Nantes. Pro­test­ers respond­ed by hurl­ing rocks and Molo­tov cock­tails. Police fired back with tear gas in clash­es that dom­i­nat­ed the nation­al news.

For the farm­ers, it’s all about pro­tect­ing the land.

“This will be a run­way,” says Syl­vain Fres­neau, ges­tur­ing toward the two-sto­ry house built by his grand­fa­ther and the dairy farm that has been in his fam­i­ly for five gen­er­a­tions.

Fres­neau and his cousin Dominique are among the local farm­ers who are hold­ing out, refus­ing to sell up and clear off the land where they have lived and worked their entire lives. Sylvain’s 88 cows pro­duce 550,000 liters (580,000 quarts) of milk a year. “Since Jan­u­ary,” Fres­neau says, “we are squat­ters and so are the cows.”

While some local farm­ers have accept­ed buy­outs from Vin­ci, the giant con­struc­tion firm that was select­ed to build and run the air­port, the Fres­neaus and many of their neigh­bors have fought the project for years.

“It’s not a ques­tion of mon­ey,” Syl­vain Fres­neau says. “You can’t put a price on five gen­er­a­tions of peas­ants. It’s my duty not to accept that mon­ey from any builder.”

He says his 80-year-old father was one of the first to resist the air­port project when the idea sur­faced 40 years ago. Long-moth­balled, the air­port plan gained fresh impe­tus when Ayrault’s Social­ist Par­ty came to pow­er nation­al­ly in the late 1990s. The plan then wound its way through a slow and tor­tur­ous­ly com­plex process of stud­ies, com­mis­sions and advi­so­ry com­mit­tees.

Although Syl­vain Fres­neau claims the farm­ers “could make one call and block Nantes with our trac­tors in half a day,” the real­i­ty is that the farm­ers alone could not have delayed the project as long as they have with­out help from a sur­pris­ing quar­ter: the main­ly 20-some­thing rad­i­cals who call them­selves “ZADists.”

Their name derives from the French acronym for “devel­op­ment zone,” the gener­ic name giv­en to the area where the air­port is to be built. The ZADists have delight­ed in appro­pri­at­ing the acronym for their own use, but with var­i­ous new takes: Zone To Defend, or Zone of Defin­i­tive Auton­o­my, among oth­ers.

Since 2009, the activists have been occu­py­ing the fields where the air­port is to be built. Some squat in aban­doned farm­hous­es or homes opened up to them by locals who refuse to sell. Oth­ers spent the win­ter in inge­nious­ly con­struct­ed cab­ins set up deep in the wood­ed and mud­dy scrub­land out­side the vil­lage.

“With­out the ZADists we wouldn’t have kept the land,” admits Syl­vain Fres­neau.

Up to sev­er­al hun­dred ZADists live on the site at any giv­en time. Police con­trol access to the zone with check­points at road cross­ings, but the ZADists avoid them by sim­ply cut­ting across fields to their camp­sites.

ZADists have also built their own for­ti­fi­ca­tions, ram­shackle assem­blages of wood, wire, mat­tress­es and hay bales. The entrance is con­trolled by ZADists who cov­er their faces with scarves and hoods, not only to ward off the cold but also to hide their iden­ti­ties from the police post­ed at the road cross­ing bare­ly 100 yards (meters) away.

Clash­es between the two sides are com­mon. On a recent vis­it, ZADists who all iden­ti­fied them­selves by the pseu­do­nym “Camille” described an expe­di­tion the night before in which they suc­ceed­ed in splash­ing some police with paint, traces of which were still vis­i­ble on the road.

For the farm­ers, the fight is most­ly a mat­ter of keep­ing their land. The ZADists, on the oth­er hand, say they have wider, lofti­er goals. “Against the Air­port … and its World” is one of the slo­gans spray-paint­ed on signs around the zone.

Some of the ZADists have tak­en part in anti-glob­al­iza­tion and Occu­py move­ments across Europe. They see the move­ment to sup­port the farm­ers of Notre-Dame-des-Lan­des as an exten­sion of their goal of “learn­ing to live togeth­er, cul­ti­vate the land, and increase our auton­o­my from the cap­i­tal­ist sys­tem,” as their web­site explains.

“It’s a bit utopi­an, but some­times you need some utopia,” said Dominique Fres­neau. The farm­ers’ appre­ci­a­tion for the ZADists’ ener­gy and the atten­tion they’ve brought to their fight against the air­port is mixed with bemuse­ment at some of their rad­i­cal posi­tions.

At meet­ings between the two groups of allies, Fres­neau admit­ted that “we clash” some­times. But more often they find ways to work togeth­er. Some farm­ers have used their trac­tors to set up a pro­tec­tive bar­ri­cade around one of the encamp­ments. A ZADist who was also a grad­u­ate stu­dent in agri­cul­tur­al stud­ies helped a farmer com­plete a geo­log­i­cal sur­vey of his land. Farm­ers bring in food and build­ing sup­plies for the ZADists.

In ear­ly April, a com­mis­sion set up by Ayrault to try to calm the debate over the air­port deliv­ered its report. It rec­om­mend­ed fur­ther eval­u­a­tion of the cost of expand­ing the Nantes Atlan­tique air­port instead of build­ing a new one at Notre-Dame-des-Lan­des, and sug­gest­ed that addi­tion­al noise, traf­fic and envi­ron­men­tal stud­ies be car­ried out.

The gov­ern­ment wel­comed the commission’s report, say­ing it under­scored the need for the new air­port. Oppo­nents, mean­while, said that on the con­trary it bol­stered their case that the new air­port should be scrapped. In any event, the activists said, all the new stud­ies will delay the start of work on the air­port, like­ly push­ing back its open­ing from the orig­i­nal­ly planned 2017 date.

Ecol­o­gists went as far as to cry vic­to­ry.

“As it stands, car­ry­ing out all the rec­om­men­da­tions called for in these reports amounts to a ‘mis­sion impos­si­ble’ and post­pone the project indef­i­nite­ly,” the Green Par­ty said in a state­ment.

Mean­while in the fields around Notre-Dame-des-Lan­des, farm­ers and activists are not going away.

Their next action is Sat­ur­day, when they plan a day of plant­i­ng, clear­ing and repair work at their camp across the site of the future air­port.

Open letter on the future of the Faslane peace camp

April 6, 2013

CORRECTION: The open meet­ing on the future of the peace camp will now be held at 4pm in the Kin­ning Park Com­plex on Sat­ur­day 13th April.

April 6, 2013

CORRECTION: The open meet­ing on the future of the peace camp will now be held at 4pm in the Kin­ning Park Com­plex on Sat­ur­day 13th April.
For the last two years, there has been a small group of us rebuild­ing Faslane Peace Camp as a com­mu­ni­ty of anti-nuclear action. We came togeth­er with a shared vision that if we main­tain the camp as a safe and alco­hol and drug free space with reg­u­lar actions and cam­paign­ing, we could cre­ate a strong, autonomous com­mu­ni­ty active in the fight against Tri­dent and the mil­i­tari­sa­tion of the West coast of Scot­land.

Part of our vision has been achieved in mak­ing the camp a safe and wel­com­ing space with facil­i­ties to sup­port anti-nuclear action, low impact liv­ing and skill shar­ing. We have worked to sus­tain resis­tance to nuclear weapons as cen­tral to this space and our col­lec­tive rea­son for being here through our own direct action cam­paigns and active involve­ment in wider Scot­tish anti-nuclear and anti-mil­i­tary move­ments. How­ev­er, our main hope that we would grow, in terms of strength through num­bers, has not been achieved. Main­tain­ing this space whilst hav­ing an active cam­paign with so few of us has put us under such pres­sure, per­son­al­ly and as a col­lec­tive, that we can’t con­tin­ue.

This let­ter is our issu­ing a notice of this, iden­ti­fy­ing poten­tial out­comes for the camp, our own lim­its in achiev­ing these and, hope­ful­ly ini­ti­at­ing an inclu­sive dis­cus­sion on the future of Faslane Peace Camp that does not see the four cur­rent res­i­dents assum­ing this respon­si­bil­i­ty.

Our pro­pos­al:
We feel, as a group, our lim­it on being here is 12th June 2013, the 31st anniver­sary of the Camp. If the respon­si­bil­i­ty on decid­ing and enact­ing the future of the camp is to be ours,(i.e. if this notice does not pro­voke wider con­struc­tive dis­cus­sion on the future of the camp or encour­age a new wave of res­i­dents) then we will enact the fol­low­ing pro­pos­al:
we will start tak­ing the camp down on 12th May to cre­ate a gar­den space (to be fin­ished by 12th June) that will both cel­e­brate the 31years of resis­tance here and act as a site facil­i­ty to sup­port future action camps.

We feel that leav­ing the camp emp­ty and open to chance is not an option because we have seen it hav­ing “fall­en into the wrong hands” and feel that this is much more detri­men­tal to the peace move­ment and activism in gen­er­al than the camp not being here.

The camp’s poten­tial, capac­i­ty and sup­port and the poten­tial for con­tin­u­ing:
We feel that the camp’s capac­i­ty to sup­port a self-suf­fi­cient com­mu­ni­ty of resis­tance should not go under­stat­ed. Despite ups and downs, for the last thir­ty years the camp has been an active chal­lenge to the sta­tion­ing of nuclear weapons on the Clyde. Many of the peo­ple who have passed through here have learned and con­tin­ued to prac­tise so many skills in active resis­tance and low impact liv­ing. Those of us here have grown and learned so much, from a per­son­al lev­el to an under­stand­ing of the nature of the state spon­sored ter­ror­ism of nuclear weapons and the banal­i­ty of the every­day run­ning of this evil. This is a space to learn, grow and chal­lenge a very fun­da­men­tal human will­ing­ness to tol­er­ate soci­etal cor­rup­tion (in this case, that of nuclear weapons) as well as main­tain­ing a degree of liv­ing “out­side the sys­tem” whilst we make attempts to chal­lenge it.

The facil­i­ties here are indica­tive of the inge­nu­ity of thir­ty years of cre­ative and resource­ful indi­vid­u­als who have sim­ply found ways to cre­ate alter­na­tive ways of organ­is­ing that chal­lenge so many of the neg­a­tive learned behav­iour in soci­ety.

Ide­al­ly, we would love to see this con­tin­ue, not least because so many have worked so hard to con­tin­ue it but also because the sym­bol­ism of dis­man­tling the camp at this poten­tial­ly cru­cial time in the strug­gle for nuclear dis­ar­ma­ment (in the con­text of the ongo­ing Scot­tish inde­pen­dence and Tri­dent replace­ment debates) would be the worst pos­si­ble tim­ing.

We believe that main­tain­ing sup­port­ive com­mu­ni­ty liv­ing here, as well as active cam­paign­ing, can only be sus­tain­ably achieved with a sig­nif­i­cant increase in num­bers, pos­si­bly eight res­i­dents. The poten­tial and capac­i­ty of the camp is also severe­ly lim­it­ed by the lack of wider input and prac­ti­cal sup­port for it’s inhab­i­tants. We have felt like care­tak­ers of a sou­venir. We have felt a strong and increas­ing sense of moral sup­port for what we are doing but with this has come inad­e­quate and dwin­dling prac­ti­cal sup­port.

In short, we feel that the camp can only have a future if a larg­er group of peo­ple decide they wish to be based here and the wider peace move­ment assumes a degree of col­lec­tive respon­si­bil­i­ty to sup­port these peo­ple, emo­tion­al­ly and prac­ti­cal­ly and take active mea­sures to ensure their wel­fare. The cur­rent res­i­dents would be com­mit­ted to pro­vid­ing long term sup­port to any group or indi­vid­u­als that wish to con­tin­ue the Camp.

What hap­pens next:
So many peo­ple have giv­en so much of their lives and ener­gy to the Peace Camp and anti-nuclear move­ment so we expect our pro­pos­al and thoughts con­tained here to have mixed respons­es. We have there­fore decid­ed to call an open meet­ing on Sat­ur­day 14th April at 4pm in the Kin­ning Park Com­plex, Glas­gow as part of the Scrap Tri­dent week­end and wel­come any con­struc­tive input on this day or via email from this point onward (faslane30@gmail.com).

What­ev­er the deci­sion on the future of the camp, we will con­tin­ue with cam­paign­ing and an active pres­ence at Faslane, but per­haps not in the form of con­tin­u­ous occu­pa­tion. Nev­er­the­less, we want to avoid the sym­bol­ism of tak­ing the camp away at this cru­cial and hope­ful time for dis­ar­ma­ment and will active­ly sup­port any viable alter­na­tive to this.

On 13–15th of April, there will be an unprece­dent­ed demon­stra­tion in Glas­gow and mass block­ade of Faslane with Scrap Tri­dent and we expect this to be the begin­ning of a new wave of anti-nuclear and anti-mil­i­tarist action. The future is dis­ar­ma­ment!

http://faslanepeacecamp.wordpress.com/

Earth First! Summer Gathering: 7th-11th August 2013

This year’s the Sum­mer Gath­er­ing will be in the Hast­ings area near the Bex­hill-Hast­ings Link Road cam­paign. It will run from the evening of Wednes­day 7th August and fin­ish on Sun­day 11th August.

 

This year’s the Sum­mer Gath­er­ing will be in the Hast­ings area near the Bex­hill-Hast­ings Link Road cam­paign. It will run from the evening of Wednes­day 7th August and fin­ish on Sun­day 11th August.

 

The Earth First! Sum­mer Gath­er­ing takes place each year to pro­vide a space in which the rad­i­cal ecol­o­gy move­ment can share skills and plan for future cam­paigns and actions. Any­one who is inter­est­ed in eco­log­i­cal direct action will have a valu­able part to play and is wel­come to come to this fam­i­ly friend­ly gath­er­ing. If you’ve not been to an Earth First! Gath­er­ing before and are think­ing about it, please do come, we are a very friend­ly, wel­com­ing bunch and would love to have you get involved

 

Pro­gramme: Work­shops, skill shar­ing and plan­ning action, plus low-impact liv­ing with­out lead­ers. Meet peo­ple, learn skills.

Transport/location: exact loca­tion will be announced 2 weeks before gath­er­ing on web­site.

Cost: £20-£30 from each per­son to cov­er all costs except food. (If you real­ly can’t afford this, please come any­way and give what you can).

Food: Deli­cious veg­an food will be avail­able, and meal tick­ets will be on sale at the gath­er­ing.

What to bring: Every­one will be camp­ing so bring a tent, sleep­ing bag etc.

If you have any par­tic­u­lar accom­mo­da­tion, access or dietary needs please tell us asap but at least two weeks in advance so we can plan suit­able facil­i­ties. There will be a small amount of liv­ing vehic­u­lar space if booked in advance, on a first come first served basis.

 

Con­tact: summergathering-at-earthfirst.org.uk

http://efgathering.weebly.com

Summer action camp against Shell

Come to Mayo on the 21st of June

This year it is planned to have a short­er camp, but to attract a large num­ber of peo­ple.

Come to Mayo on the 21st of June

This year it is planned to have a short­er camp, but to attract a large num­ber of peo­ple.

Basi­cal­ly we’ll be build­ing the camp from the start of June to be ready for Mid-June.

  • Build camp 1st – 15thJune
  • Sol­i­dar­i­ty camp from Fri­day the 21st to Sun­day the 30th June

 

The G8 is to take place 17th-19th June in Co. Fer­managh. The camp in Mayo takes place after the G8, for those who would like to have an active month in June!

We are also encour­ag­ing groups to come and engage in actions at this time, but if you can only come once this sum­mer, then the last week of June (21st-30th) is the time to be here – get organ­is­ing.

New posters, leaflets, youtube videos and speak­ing tours are being organised/made to pro­mote the cam­paign and sum­mer camp. Con­tact us if you can help organ­is­ing or pro­mot­ing the events this sum­mer.

Has­ta la vic­to­ria siem­pre,

RSC

 

Please print out the full update and help spread the word! http://www.rossportsolidaritycamp.org/?p=1651

rossportsolidaritycamp@gmail.com
www.rossportsolidaritycamp.org / www.shelltosea.com

Mexico: 22 Injured in Oaxaca Wind Farm Protest

Some 1,200 agents from the police forces of the south­ern Mex­i­can state of Oax­a­ca tried unsuc­cess­ful­ly on March 26 to remove local res­i­dents who were block­ing a road lead­ing to the Bii Yox­ho wind farm, which is under con­struc­tion in Juchitán de Zaragoza munic­i­pal­i­ty near the Pacif­ic coast. The oper­a­tion was also intend­ed to recov­er con­struc­tion equip­ment pro­test­ers had seized on Feb. 25 in an ongo­ing effort to stop the com­ple­tion of the wind project, which is owned by the Mex­i­can sub­sidiary of the Span­ish com­pa­ny Gas Nat­ur­al Fenosa. Local pros­e­cu­tor Manuel de Jesús López told the French wire ser­vice AFP that 22 peo­ple were injured in the March 26 oper­a­tion, includ­ing 11 police agents, and one police agent was tak­en pris­on­er. Pro­test­ers report­ed eight local peo­ple with seri­ous injuries, includ­ing Car­los Sánchez, the coor­di­na­tor of Radio Totopo, a com­mu­ni­ty radio sta­tion.

Sev­er­al com­pa­nies have been build­ing wind farms in south­east­ern Oax­a­ca on the Isth­mus of Tehuan­te­pec. Res­i­dents in the Juchitán area, most­ly from the Zapotec and Ikoots (Huave) indige­nous groups, say the Bii Yox­ho project is being built in an area they use for fish­ing and farm­ing that also includes cer­e­mo­ni­al sites, along with man­grove forests that are crit­i­cal to the local envi­ron­ment. The bar­ri­cade block­ing access to the Bii Yox­ho project on the Juchitán-Playa Vicente road is one of four main points of resis­tance to the wind tur­bines. Activists have also occu­pied the town hall in San Dion­i­sio del Mar since Jan­u­ary 2012; have refused to rec­og­nize the may­or in San Mateo del Mar, Fran­cis­co Valle, because he favors the projects; and have set up a bar­ri­cade in Juchitán’s Alvaro Obregón neigh­bor­hood to block access to anoth­er wind park, owned by the Mareña Ren­ov­ables com­pa­ny.

The resis­tance has been sub­ject­ed to police harass­ment, such as the 24-hour deten­tion by fed­er­al police of Lucila Bet­ti­na Cruz Velázquez, a leader in the Assem­bly of the Indige­nous Peo­ples of the Tehuan­te­pec Isth­mus in Defense of Land and Ter­ri­to­ry, in Feb­ru­ary 2012. Pro­test­ers also report the pres­ence of armed para­mil­i­tary groups, some with con­nec­tions to unions and oth­er groups affil­i­at­ed with the cen­trist Insti­tu­tion­al Rev­o­lu­tion­ary Par­ty (PRI) or close to the cen­ter-left Par­ty of the Demo­c­ra­t­ic Rev­o­lu­tion (PRD). On March 21 a group of men linked to Juchitán’s PRI may­or, Fran­cis­co Valle Pia­monte, briefly detained reporter Rosa Rojas and pho­tog­ra­ph­er Fran­cis­co Olvera, both from the left-lean­ing nation­al dai­ly La Jor­na­da, along with three reporters from alter­na­tive media and a San Mateo res­i­dent. On the morn­ing of March 29 a para­mil­i­tary group dis­man­tled Radio Totopa, seiz­ing a lap­top and the trans­mit­ter and cut­ting the pow­er cables, accord­ing to the Pop­u­lar Assem­bly of the Juchite­co Peo­ple (APPJ). APPJ spokes­peo­ple called this “anoth­er attack by the state gov­ern­ment and the transna­tion­al com­pa­nies which are try­ing to use vio­lence to silence the voic­es of those who oppose the con­struc­tion of wind parks.” 

After nego­ti­a­tions with rep­re­sen­ta­tives of the Oax­a­ca state gov­ern­ment on March 28, the APPJ returned 12 vehi­cles, includ­ing a back­hoe, to Gas Nat­ur­al Fenosa; in exchange the state agreed not to press charges against the pro­test­ers. How­ev­er, the APPJ reject­ed the state’s pro­pos­al for them to lift the road block­ades on April 1 and attend an April 2 meet­ing in the city of Oax­a­ca. The pro­test­ers said they would main­tain their bar­ri­cades, and they called on Oax­a­ca gov­er­nor Gabi­no Cué Mon­teagu­do to come meet with them in Juchitán. (Desin­for­mé­monos, March 24; Bloomberg News, March 27, from AFP; state­ment by assem­blies of the peo­ples of the Isth­mus, March 29, via Kaos en la RedLa Jor­na­da, March 29)

Breaking News: Cops Move in on Willits Treesit; Cutting and Construction to Follow

21 March 2013
If you are any­where near Men­do­ci­no Coun­ty, get out there and help!Warbler_treesit_9045_1000p_WEB

21 March 2013
If you are any­where near Men­do­ci­no Coun­ty, get out there and help!Warbler_treesit_9045_1000p_WEB
Willits, CA-Oppo­nents of the Cal­trans Will­lits Bypass through endan­gered wet­lands are con­verg­ing on the site to pro­tect a tree-sit­ter as dozens of Cal­i­for­nia High­way Patrol vehi­cles arrived at the Bypass protest area in Willits in Men­do­ci­no Coun­ty at 7 a.m. this morn­ing. CHP offi­cers began cor­don­ing off the access roads to the area, keep­ing a gath­er­ing num­ber of pro­test­ers and wit­ness­es away from the tree-sit and Cal­trans’ pro­posed con­struc­tion area. The 24-year old local farmer in the tree who calls her­self “the War­bler” has been aloft next to High­way 101 since Jan­u­ary 28.
 
Four arrests have been made of Willits res­i­dents, and the sit­u­a­tion is still active­ly unfold­ing. Anoth­er Bypass pro­test­er has been stand­ing in front of the brush crush­ing machine that is in the juris­dic­tion­al wet­lands and has repeat­ed­ly blocked it after hav­ing been removed sev­er­al times with­out arrest. Cal­trans’ per­mit process is not com­plete with regard to the Migra­to­ry Bird Act, in effect until Sep­tem­ber 15 for the nest­ing sea­son.
 
Updates will be released as the sit­u­a­tion unfolds.

Caltrans Bypass Battle in Willits Heats Up As Activists Sit Down to Block Equipment

16 March 2013

16 March 2013

Willits, CA-Local res­i­dents say Cal­trans tried to bull­doze their way through Fed­er­al and State reg­u­la­tions again in what has become a run­ning bat­tle over the planned Bypass high­way around Willits in Men­do­ci­no Coun­ty. Activists sat down in front of mov­ing equip­ment and called Cal-tip to report vio­la­tions of the Inter­na­tion­al Migra­to­ry Bird Act after bird nests were found. This was the third time activists have blocked equip­ment since Jan. 28, when a tree sit­ter named War­bler Warblerwent aloft in a tall pon­derosa pine at the south­ern end of the pro­posed con­struc­tion site on Hwy. 101 just out­side Willits to protest Cal­trans’ Bypass.

At issue is pro­to­col regard­ing required sur­veys for nest­ing birds in com­pli­ance with the Migra­to­ry Bird Act and a “juris­dic­tion­al wet­land” dam­aged when Cal­trans work­ers drove an exca­va­tor into the bog­gy area and it became stuck.
 
When Cal­trans arrived at 7:30 a.m. Wednes­day, they were accom­pa­nied by Arrow Fenc­ing Com­pa­ny and their con­sult­ing biol­o­gists, who walked ahead of the noisy machine in case nests were again found in its path. Cal­trans and Arrow Fenc­ing employ­ees on site claimed they had been told they could pro­ceed by Joann Dunn, Cal­i­for­nia Depart­ment of Fish and Wildlife’s (DFW) region­al liai­son to Cal­trans. No proof was avail­able that revised pro­to­cols for the bird sur­veys required before start­ing con­struc­tion had been approved by DFW.
 
Reached by phone, DFW Joann Dunn said she had not seen the pro­to­cols but that the Depart­ment had agreed Cal­trans could con­tin­ue fenc­ing in the pre­vi­ous­ly dis­turbed area, despite being under an “active inves­ti­ga­tion”. Last week it was revealed that Cal­trans did not have the approved pro­to­cols from DFW need­ed pri­or to per­form­ing bird sur­veys.  State DFW ordered Cal­trans to sub­mit revised pro­to­cols and do new bird sur­veys.
 Excavator tracks flat jurisdictional wetlands
The Bypass would raise a  thir­ty-foot high earth­en wall on either end of the small north­ern Cal­i­for­nia town, con­nect­ed by an ele­vat­ed two-lane, high-speed viaduct span­ning the Lit­tle Lake Val­ley. Sen­si­tive wet­lands and Coho salmon in the two longest trib­u­taries to the Eel Riv­er would be severe­ly impact­ed.  More­over, safe­ty con­cerns about the viaduct, which has no exits, have been raised repeat­ed­ly. Cal­trans’ EIR says the safe­ty stan­dards will be met in Phase II of the plan, which oppo­nents sus­pect may nev­er be fund­ed, leav­ing them with a sta­tis­ti­cal­ly pre­dictable high­er rate of seri­ous and fatal acci­dents.
 
State Sen­a­tor Noreen Evans last week sent a let­ter to Cal­trans with some “point­ed ques­tions” about Cal­trans’ design plans after her aide vis­it­ed the site and met with those opposed to the Cal­trans’ Bypass, accord­ing to the Willits News.  That let­ter can be found on the Willits News site at https://www.facebook.com/WillitsWeekly/posts/493170500739029.
 
Dur­ing the sit-down block­ade, activist Jaime Cheva­lier said, “We told Cal­trans we’d leave if they’d stop all work and sit down and talk with Sen­a­tor Noreen Evans.”