(USA) Another Lockdown Against the Keystone Tar Sands Pipeline!

Pro­test­ers locked to equip­ment clearcut­ting forests to make way for the Key­stone tar sands pipeline. Winns­boro, TX, Sep. 19 2012

Tar Sands Block­ade pro­test­ers have locked them­selves to a wood chip­per and skid­der being used to clear-cut trees near Winns­boro, TX to make way for the Key­stone XL tar sands pipeline. This is the fourth action to date in the Tar Sands Block­ade cam­paign.

The Tar Sands Block­ade cam­paign is active and ongo­ing. Calls to join the action have been put out both by the main group and by “a small crew of Earth First!ers and eco-anar­chists engaged in tac­ti­cal ele­ments of the larg­er Tar Sands Block­ade cam­paign.”

To find out more, watch this Tar Sands Block­ade action video, and vis­it tarsandsblockade.org and stoptarsands.org.

 

BBC Investigates Opencast Mining

THE  LOOSE ANTI OPEN-CAST NETWORK

BBC’s COUNRTYFILE PROGRAMME INVESTIGATES WHY A REMOTE HAMLET IS ON THE FRONT LINE OF A PLANNING BATTLE OF NATIONAL IMPORTANCE.

THE  LOOSE ANTI OPEN-CAST NETWORK

BBC’s COUNRTYFILE PROGRAMME INVESTIGATES WHY A REMOTE HAMLET IS ON THE FRONT LINE OF A PLANNING BATTLE OF NATIONAL IMPORTANCE.

A small vil­lage, of just 75 house­holds, is all that may stand between pre­serv­ing large sec­tions of the Eng­lish coun­try­side and the expressed desire of the UK Min­er­al Extrac­tion Indus­try to see more per­mis­sions giv­en to exploit­ing England’s min­er­al resources in areas that are more envi­ron­men­tal­ly sen­si­tive and / or are clos­er to where peo­ple live.

The unfor­tu­nate vil­lage is Hal­ton Lea Gate, locat­ed on the Cum­bria / Northum­ber­land bor­der and near an Area of Out­stand­ing Nat­ur­al Beau­ty. A team from the BBC’s Coun­r­ty­file pro­gramme was film­ing there recent­ly to inves­ti­gate why this spot now finds itself on the front line of a nation­al plan­ning con­tro­ver­sy.

 In ear­ly August, after a Pub­lic Inquiry into an Appeal to grant per­mis­sion for an Open­cast Mine, the Inspec­tor found in favour of the Appli­cant. The sting in the tale, for all oth­er com­mu­ni­ties in Eng­land, is the rea­son­ing giv­en by the Inspec­tor to allow the Appeal. His rea­son­ing set a new case law prece­dent, it is argued, which affects all future min­er­al plan­ning appli­ca­tions in Eng­land.

 What the Appli­cant has to repli­cate in the future, is the argu­ment used here: that there is a nation­al need for the min­er­al in ques­tion, in this case coal. If they can per­suade the Plan­ning Author­i­ty (or the Inspec­tor, if the Appli­ca­tion has gone to an Appeal) that this is the case, then ‘great weight’ has to be attached to this claim. So much weight it seems, that this fac­tor alone may over­ride all oth­er con­sid­er­a­tions.  (1)

This sit­u­a­tion has arisen as a con­se­quence of the Gov­ern­ment imple­ment­ing the new Nation­al Plan­ning Pol­i­cy Frame­work. In the time lead­ing up to the 2010 elec­tion, lob­by­ing organ­i­sa­tions such as Coal­pro and the CBI lob­bied long and hard for a relax­ation of the plan­ning rules for min­er­al extrac­tion. (2) It seems, from this exam­ple, the first Pub­lic Inquiry for min­er­al extrac­tion to be held under the new rules, that their efforts have been reward­ed. The advice of the Inspec­tor has now gone to the Depart­ment of Com­mu­ni­ties and Local Gov­ern­ment to be con­firmed or reject­ed by a Min­is­ter.

The BBC came to inves­ti­gate the issue and explore why local peo­ple have tak­en on the task of rais­ing £40,000 so that they can mount a Judi­cial Review over the deci­sion. If local peo­ple are suc­cess­ful in rais­ing the mon­ey and mount­ing a suc­cess­ful action, they may have pre­vent­ed the flood­gates from open­ing and saved Eng­land from expe­ri­enc­ing a rash of min­er­al plan­ning appli­ca­tions for devel­op­ing swathes of the coun­try­side. This is now a Pub­lic Appeal, and dona­tions can be made payable to The North Pen­nines Pro­tec­tion Group, who have been one of the local groups who have opposed this Appli­ca­tion

An e peti­tion to the Gov­ern­ment has been start­ed about this plan­ning deci­sion and its impli­ca­tion for sim­i­lar plan­ning deci­sions else­where which can be signed by fol­low­ing this link:

http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/36985

Steve Leary for the Loose Anti Open­cast Net­work com­ment­ed

“ LAON was con­tact­ed by the BBC in the lead up to film­ing for the Coun­try­side pro­gramme. We are delight­ed to be able to coop­er­ate in the mak­ing of the pro­gramme and show why we argue that this is an issue of nation­al impor­tance which will affect oth­er com­mu­ni­ties up and down the Coun­try if the deci­sion is not changed.

We know of five oth­er open­cast mine appli­ca­tions, near Smal­ly in Der­byshire (George Farm) , Kirklees, Sth. York­shire (Dearne Lea), Trow­el in Not­ting­hamshire (Short­wood Farm) , Whit­ton­stall in Northum­ber­land ( Hood­sclose) and Gateshead  (Birk­lands) that will be affect­ed by this deci­sion if it stands.

In addi­tion, we are aware of three oth­er sites where a poten­tial appli­cant is mak­ing the final deci­sion to pro­ceed with a full appli­ca­tion in Gateshead,   Mar­ley Hill Recla­ma­tion) , Der­byshire ( Hill Top Project near Clay Cross) and Northum­ber­land  (Fer­neybeds near Wid­dring­ton Sta­tion, Northum­ber­land) which might also be affect­ed.

The issue here though, we believe, goes way beyond open­cast min­ing. It’s about relax­ing the rules around all forms of min­er­al extrac­tion from pits for sand, grav­el and clay to quar­ries for gran­ite and lime­stone to open­cast mines for coal. This is what the indus­try lob­bied for and now, it seems, the Gov­ern­ment has deliv­ered, if it upholds the Inspector’s rec­om­men­da­tion to approve the Appli­ca­tion and the Judi­cial Review fails. We there­fore urge peo­ple every­where, who cher­ish and love our coun­try­side, to sup­port both the peti­tion and the pub­lic appeal for mon­ey to take this case to a Judi­cial Review.”

The Coun­r­ty­file edi­tion of the pro­gramme is to be broad­cast on Sun­day 30th Sep­tem­ber 2012. It will include a 12 minute sec­tion on the Hal­ton Lea Gate issue.

———————————————————————————-

Ref­er­ences

1)   For more infor­ma­tion on the sig­nif­i­cance of this deci­sion as far as open­cast mine appli­ca­tions are con­cerned see  LAON PR7 here

http://nottingham.indymedia.org/articles/2754

2)   Evi­dence about the lob­by­ing to relax these plan­ning rules can be found here.

Brief­ing Note E2 “Ener­gy Pol­i­cy and the Pro­posed Nation­al Plan­ning Pol­i­cy Frame­work,” MOPG 2011  @

http://www.leicestershirevillages.com/measham/mopg-briefing-notes-series.html

——————————————————————-

ABOUT LAON

The Loose Anti-Open­cast Net­work (LAON) has been in exis­tence since 2009. It  func­tions as a medi­um through to oppose open cast mine appli­ca­tions through which any per­son / group can com­mu­ni­cate ideas, infor­ma­tion, requests for infor­ma­tion and pos­si­bly con­cert­ed actions if we find a tar­get. In addi­tion feel free to invite any oth­er per­son / group who oppose open­cast min­ing appli­ca­tions, to join the net­work so that it grows. At present LAON links indi­vid­u­als and groups in N Ire­land, Scot­land, Wales, Northum­ber­land, Co Durham, Leeds, Kirklees Not­ting­hamshire, Der­byshire, Leices­ter­shire and Wal­sall.

You can now fol­low LAON on Twit­ter @ https://twitter.com/Seftonchase

Anti Opencast Coal March in Clay Cross

A march is tak­ing place on Sat­ur­day 22nd Sep­tem­ber to show the strength of oppo­si­tion to any pro­pos­al to seek to open­cast mine on the Hill­top Project site. For more info see

http://nottingham.indymedia.org.uk/events/2774

A march is tak­ing place on Sat­ur­day 22nd Sep­tem­ber to show the strength of oppo­si­tion to any pro­pos­al to seek to open­cast mine on the Hill­top Project site. For more info see

http://nottingham.indymedia.org.uk/events/2774

(India) Police Kill Anti-Nuke Protester in India, Resistance Continues to Grow

A group of fish­er­folk stag­ing “jal satya­gra­ha” in the sea, against the Kudanku­lam nuclear pow­er project at Veer­a­pan­di­an­pat­ti­nam coast in Tuti­corin dis­trict on Fri­day. (Pho­to: N.Rajesh)

Despite the killing of an anti-nuclear pro­test­er by police on Mon­day, hun­dreds of pro­test­ers form­ing a human chain stood in sea waters today, for the sec­ond day in a row, demand­ing a halt to prepa­ra­tions for fuel load­ing into the reac­tor of Kudanku­lam Nuclear Pow­er Project (KKNPP) in Tuti­corin dis­trict.

The Hindu.com report­ed that women and men would stand in the sea waters for two hours in turns. Push­parayan, leader of the People’s Move­ment Against Nuclear Ener­gy (PMANE) has been spear­head­ing the year-long agi­ta­tion.

Indi­an police offi­cers detain a pro­tes­tor after they baton charged res­i­dents protest­ing against the Russ­ian built Kudamku­lam nuclear plant on the Bay of Ben­gal coast at Kudamku­lam, Tamil Nadu state, India, Mon­day, Sept. 10, 2012. (AP Pho­to)

The Coast Guard air­craft and ships main­tained sur­veil­lance at sea off near­by Idinthakarai as the vil­lagers stood in waist and neck deep water.

Tak­ing cue from a sim­i­lar protest demand­ing land as com­pen­sa­tion and reduc­tion of Omkaresh­war Dam recent­ly by vil­lagers of Khand­wa dis­trict in Mad­hya Pradesh, PMANE launched their jal satya­gra­ha (water civ­il dis­obe­di­ence) on Thurs­day, mark­ing a new turn in their agi­ta­tion, which was inten­si­fied after prepa­ra­tions for fuel load­ing into the plant was announced.

More than 4,000 police per­son­nel, bol­stered by the para­mil­i­tary Rapid Action Force, con­tin­ued to main­tain a strict vig­il, hav­ing almost sealed the entire Kudanku­lam town.

Mean­while, police have been seek­ing to arrest S.P. Udayaku­mar, the con­ven­er of PMANE, in attempt to quell the protests. They have already arrest­ed a close asso­ciate of Udayaku­mar in Chen­nai last week for try­ing to “insti­gate” the fish­er­men to join the stir against Nuclear Pow­er Project.

Mr. Udayaku­mar had alleged­ly announced that he would sur­ren­der on Tues­day night, but seems to have changed his mind.  Police said they would con­tin­ue their search.

Ear­li­er this week, state offi­cials say Indi­an police fired at pro­test­ers near this nuclear pow­er plant being con­struct­ed in south­ern India, killing one per­son.

The Tamil Nadu state gov­ern­ment says police fired Mon­day to dis­perse about 2,000 peo­ple who were demon­strat­ing against the load­ing of nuclear fuel in the Russ­ian-built reac­tor. It says the pro­test­ers threw stones and sticks at police near the Kudanku­lam Project, and five offi­cers were injured.

Con­struc­tion of the plant has been delayed by protests in the past year by res­i­dents and anti-nuclear groups con­cerned about safe­ty fol­low­ing the Fukushi­ma nuclear pow­er plant dis­as­ter in Japan last year.

The gov­ern­ment says the plant, about 700 kilo­me­ters (440 miles) south of Chen­nai, the state cap­i­tal, will meet safe­ty stan­dards.

The fol­low­ing video shows recent cov­er­age of the jal satya­gra­ha actions against hydro­elec­tric dams which have become an inspi­ra­tion to move­ments through­out the region:

 

Activists ‘brick up’ Shell HQ as Arctic melt

Activists ‘brick up’ Shell HQ as Arc­tic melts from Small Axe Films on Vimeo.

Activists ‘brick up’ Shell HQ as Arc­tic melts from Small Axe Films on Vimeo.

Ear­ly morn­ing on the 11th Sep­tem­ber 12 a group of 20 cli­mate change activists call­ing them­selves ‘Ice Bloc’ unloaded near­ly two tonnes of ice into the main entrance of Shell HQ. The protest was timed to coin­cide with this week’s impend­ing announce­ment of the low­est sea-ice cov­er­age ever record­ed, a loss of about 50% more ice cov­er­age than the sum­mer ice min­i­mum 30 years ago.

The activists are angry that Shell are set to prof­it from this envi­ron­men­tal catastrophe.The com­pa­ny has this week begun to drill for oil in new­ly exposed areas once cov­ered by ice. The protest hap­pens as news reports that Shell are already hav­ing to delay oper­a­tions due to float­ing sea ice near their drill-site [1].

The group are seek­ing to bring the col­lapse of the Arc­tic ice sheet to the door of Shell because they hold the com­pa­ny part­ly respon­si­ble for the car­bon emis­sions that caused cli­mate change, lead­ing to the melt.

The activists piled the 27kg blocks of ice high in the entrance way, which looks on to the South Bank, cre­at­ing a huge wall of ice to greet Shell exec­u­tives as they arrived at work.

Rachel Grif­fin, involved in today’s action, said:

“Right now the Arc­tic sea ice, a part of the plan­et essen­tial for our sur­vival, is van­ish­ing because com­pa­nies like Shell have filled the atmos­phere with cli­mate-chang­ing gas­es.

“Yet rather than being stopped from trad­ing and held to account, the com­pa­ny have begun drilling in Alas­ka, an area of the Arc­tic once cov­ered with ice. That they are already hav­ing prob­lems there just shows how ludi­crous the plan is.

“The polit­i­cal response has been piti­ful. Peo­ple need to take action now to min­imise this unprece­dent­ed dis­as­ter.”

The activists are part of a big­ger net­work, Cli­mate Jus­tice Col­lec­tive, which grew from the Cli­mate Camp

USA: Protesters Blockade Monsanto Seed Facility in California

Opponents of genetically engineered foods blocked shipments and deliveries yesterday at Monsanto Co’s vegetable seed company that developed a new genetically modified sweet corn that will hit stores this fall.

The pro­test­ers, who want to remove all so-called genet­i­cal­ly mod­i­fied organ­isms (GMOs) from the food sup­ply, say their action is a pre­view of about five dozen oth­er events planned for coun­tries around the world next week.

They also hope to drum up sup­port for a Cal­i­for­nia bal­lot mea­sure that would require food sell­ers to label a broad range of prod­ucts, includ­ing soup, soy milk, break­fast cere­als and chips, that con­tain GMOs.

Mon­san­to and oth­er devel­op­ers of these biotech crops say they are safe. But U.S. reg­u­la­tors do not require any inde­pen­dent safe­ty tests that would put a lid on doubts raised by con­sumers and some sci­en­tif­ic and health groups.

More than 40 coun­tries around the world have some require­ments for label­ing foods con­tain­ing ingre­di­ents from genet­i­cal­ly mod­i­fied crops. But U.S. reg­u­la­tors have reject­ed requests by many groups for sim­i­lar label­ing rules, and as a result many Amer­i­cans do not know that they have been eat­ing GMOs for years.

At the protest on Wednes­day, about a dozen peo­ple orga­nized by a net­work of anti-GMO activists called Occu­py Mon­san­to stopped trucks from enter­ing or leav­ing Monsanto’s Oxnard, Cal­i­for­nia-based Sem­in­is for near­ly six hours.

The activists, some dressed in bio­haz­ard suits, blocked truck entrances with cars and chained them­selves to the vehi­cles.

Police arrest­ed nine of the pro­test­ers and charged them with tres­pass­ing, orga­niz­ers said.

Sem­in­is’ biotech sweet corn is one of the newest GMO crop prod­ucts to make it to mar­ket. The corn was altered genet­i­cal­ly to with­stand dous­ings of a com­mon weed­killer and to ward off cer­tain pests.

“We deserve to know what we are eat­ing and we should put GMO crops back in the lab and off the kitchen table,” pro­test­er Rica Madrid said.

Occu­py Mon­san­to is not affil­i­at­ed with the back­ers of a Cal­i­for­nia pro­pos­al to label foods that are made with crops or from ani­mals that have had their genet­ic make­up altered in the lab­o­ra­to­ry.

Mon­san­to did not direct­ly address Wednesday’s events but said the company’s work helped improve farm pro­duc­tiv­i­ty and food qual­i­ty.

“We respect each individual’s right to express their point of view on these top­ics,” Thomas Helsch­er, a Mon­san­to spokesman, said of the Sem­in­is protest.

DIFFERENT VIEW IN EUROPE

GMOs are deeply unpop­u­lar in Europe and many oth­er coun­tries, but they even­tu­al­ly came to dom­i­nate key crops in the Unit­ed States after Mon­san­to in 1996 intro­duced a soy­bean genet­i­cal­ly altered to tol­er­ate Monsanto’s Roundup weed killer.

Using genes from oth­er species, Mon­san­to and rivals includ­ing DuPont and Dow Chem­i­cal have since intro­duced an array of genet­i­cal­ly altered crop vari­eties.

The most pop­u­lar genet­i­cal­ly engi­neered crops in the Unit­ed States include corn, soy­beans, sug­ar beets and canola – sta­ple ingre­di­ents in a wide array of pop­u­lar pack­aged foods.

Pro­po­nents of GM crops say they make farm­ing more effi­cient by mak­ing plants resis­tant to pes­ti­cides, pests and harsh grow­ing con­di­tions, such as drought. They say genet­i­cal­ly mod­i­fied crops are no dif­fer­ent from con­ven­tion­al types and that increas­ing demand for food, bio­fu­els and live­stock feed can only be met with help from the biotech indus­try that Mon­san­to dom­i­nates.

Crit­ics say GM crops have not always lived up to their promise and that the ben­e­fits to farm­ers do not out­weigh myr­i­ad risks to human and ani­mal health and to the envi­ron­ment.

Assess­ing such risks is dif­fi­cult in the Unit­ed States. The gov­ern­ment does not require GMO crops to under­go inde­pen­dent safe­ty test­ing before they are approved, and it does not require label­ing for GMO con­tent which makes it next to impos­si­ble to track any links to human health prob­lems.

The World Health Orga­ni­za­tion says “indi­vid­ual GM foods and their safe­ty should be assessed on a case-by-case basis.”

Recent­ly, some U.S. sci­en­tists have raised alarm bells over what they see as poten­tial­ly dan­ger­ous impli­ca­tions from overuse of GMO crops.

Among the con­cerns is the fact that the rapid adop­tion by U.S. farm­ers of genet­i­cal­ly engi­neered corn, soy­beans and cot­ton has pro­mot­ed increased use of her­bi­cides, which crit­ics say has trig­gered an epi­dem­ic of her­bi­cide-resis­tant weeds and more chem­i­cal residues in foods.

This week, the Cen­ter for Food Safe­ty vowed to sue the U.S. gov­ern­ment if it approves a new type of genet­i­cal­ly altered corn devel­oped by Dow.

 

Indigenous Peruvians Occupy 9 Oil Wells

Com­mu­ni­ty mem­bers in Canaan de Cachi­a­co

Com­mu­ni­ty mem­bers in Canaan de Cachi­a­co

By: Ronald Suarez, Pres­i­dent of the Net­work of Peru­vian Indige­nous Com­mu­ni­ca­tors, Ucay­ali  

*Cor­rec­tion: Maple Ener­gy is a com­pa­ny list­ed in Lon­don and Lima, Peru. It is not a Cana­di­an com­pa­ny.

Over 400 vil­lagers in the Native Com­mu­ni­ty of Canan de Cachi­a­co in the Ucay­ali region of the Peru­vian Ama­zon have tak­en con­trol of nine oil wells, belong­ing to oil com­pa­ny, Maple Gas, in oil lot 31B.

Com­mu­ni­ty mem­bers took over the oil wells on Sep­tem­ber 2nd, and con­tin­ue to hold them as a result of 37 years of oil con­t­a­m­i­na­tion in their ter­ri­to­ry by the com­pa­ny.

The com­mu­ni­ty leader, Basilio Rodriguez Venan­cio, said the action was made nec­es­sary because the com­pa­ny did not con­sid­er the envi­ron­men­tal impact assess­ment car­ried out by an inde­pen­dent con­sul­tant.

One of the oil wells occu­pied by mem­bers of the Canaan de Cachi­a­co com­mu­ni­ty in the Peru­vian Ama­zon, Sep­tem­ber 2012

The com­mu­ni­ty is demand­ing that the com­pa­ny pay them com­pen­sa­tion for the use of their lands and for the envi­ron­men­tal dam­age they have suf­fered for 37 years. Such dam­age includes the con­t­a­m­i­na­tion of their rivers, their only source of drink­ing water, and the con­t­a­m­i­na­tion of their soils due to the company´s use of chem­i­cals and heavy min­er­als, which the pop­u­la­tion says has sig­nif­i­cant­ly affect­ed the pro­duc­tiv­i­ty of their land.

Sev­er­al com­mu­ni­ty mem­bers tes­ti­fied that they have become sick due to the company’s neg­li­gence and con­t­a­m­i­na­tion of their drink­ing water. There have been sev­er­al instances in the past years of can­cer and ¨unknown deaths¨ that the com­mu­ni­ty attrib­ut­es to com­pa­ny abus­es.

The com­mu­ni­ty awaits the arrival of state rep­re­sen­ta­tives from the Min­istry of Ener­gy and Mines and Min­istry of Envi­ron­ment, sched­uled for Thurs­day, Sep­tem­ber 13th, to resolve this con­flict.

Mean­while the vil­lagers are still sta­tioned in the camp until author­i­ties set­tle their claims.

For more infor­ma­tion on the case of Canaan de Cachi­a­co, and the neigh­bor­ing com­mu­ni­ty, Nue­vo Sucre, watch this video. 

 

SEVEN MORE DUCKS SAVED

“ALF break into fac­to­ry farm and lib­er­ate 7 Ayles­bury ducks who had no access to water. All have gone to good homes.

Until every cage is emp­ty,

The Ani­mal Lib­er­a­tion Front”

“ALF break into fac­to­ry farm and lib­er­ate 7 Ayles­bury ducks who had no access to water. All have gone to good homes.

Until every cage is emp­ty,

The Ani­mal Lib­er­a­tion Front”

road sabotaged to protect wildlife reserve, Ukraine

Sep­tem­ber 10, 2012

received anony­mous­ly:

“Kiev. Roads sab­o­taged in sanc­tu­ary.

Sep­tem­ber 10, 2012

received anony­mous­ly:

“Kiev. Roads sab­o­taged in sanc­tu­ary.

On the night of 08.09 Kiev eco-activists dug a trench cut­ting the only road that led to the sanc­tu­ary ‘Zhukov Ostrov’, a habi­tat of sev­er­al rare species of ani­mals.
Kievan mid­dle and upper class has devel­oped a bad habit of using SUVs for week­end hikes to forests and river­banks.
The act was an attempt to make such kind of com­mu­nion with nature more dif­fi­cult.”

Protesters in Greece Clash with Police Over Gold Mine, Again

Riot police show up to pro­tect min­ing inter­est

Hun­dreds of pro­test­ers have bat­tled riot police for hours over plans for a gold mine in north­ern Greece’s Halkidi­ki penin­su­la.

Police fired tear gas to fend off pro­test­ers who had gath­ered in the Skouries area of Halkidi­ki, north­ern Greece, on Sun­day to protest gold min­ing activ­i­ty.

Dozens of res­i­dents of the near­by vil­lage of Ieris­sos, as well as pro­test­ers who arrived by coach­es and cars from Thes­sa­loni­ki, approached the for­est in Skouries, where Hel­lenic Gold, a sub­sidiary of Cana­di­an firm Eldo­ra­do Gold, has begun min­ing activ­i­ty that locals are appeal­ing against.

Pro­test­ers accused the police of mak­ing heavy use of tear gas, caus­ing a fire in the woods, and of chop­ping down trees to pre­vent demon­stra­tors from approach­ing the mine. Police say pro­test­ers threw fire­bombs at them, set­ting ablaze a forest­ed area on the site. Either way, the fire has been put out.

There were reports of sev­er­al peo­ple being arrest­ed and detained at Ieris­sos police sta­tion. Sev­er­al peo­ple were also injured, includ­ing SYRIZA MP Van­ge­lis Dia­man­topou­los.

Hel­lenic Gold has been award­ed an area of 26,400 hectares, of which 410 is for­est land. Almost all the trees in the for­est will be cut down as part of the min­ing firm’s plan to extract gold. The com­pa­ny says it will replant trees when it fin­ish­es its work.

Envi­ron­men­tal oppo­nents of the mine argue it would lead to the destruc­tion of the local for­est and irre­versible dam­age to the ecosys­tem. Own­ers of local tourist lodg­ing are also fierce­ly opposed due to envi­ron­men­tal rea­sons.

This is not the first clash over the gold mine. Oppo­nents suc­ceed­ed a decade ago in can­cel­ing a mul­ti­mil­lion-dol­lar gold min­ing project in a near­by area.      Source

The film below, Trea­sure Hunt, doc­u­ments that strug­gle. This is the first 10 min­utes of the film:

 

The entire doc­u­men­tary with sub­ti­tles can be found online by click­ing this link.