Activists set up “Camp Hope” at Gloucester Airport

Activists have set up Camp Hope at Glouces­ter Air­port in a protest over pro­posed expan­sion and increased avi­a­tion at Staver­ton in Glouces­ter

Camp Hope 1Camp Hope 2Activists have set up Camp Hope at Glouces­ter Air­port in a protest over pro­posed expan­sion and increased avi­a­tion at Staver­ton in Glouces­ter

Peace­ful protest against the air­port’s impacts on noise, the envi­ron­ment, and the area’s image

The air­port claims “only a small minor­i­ty are opposed to the devel­op­ment,” Come and show them that you are not part of a small minor­i­ty by mak­ing your voice heard.

This cam­paign is about more than an air­port. It is about our resolve to adapt to cli­mate change.

You can come and camp for the week­end, or just come for the Sat­ur­day or Sun­day.

For more infor­ma­tion email CampForTheFuture@btinternet.com

Take Action at Camp Hope 20th/21st Octo­ber. A Cli­mate Camp @ Staver­ton Air­port, Glouces­ter­shire.

Camp Hope 20th/21st Octo­ber, Staver­ton Air­port, Glouces­ter­shire Air­port

At a loca­tion close to the air­port, see

http://www.myspace.com/campofhope

http://CampForHopeAtStaverton.blogspot.com/

More images can be found at http://www.radical-images.co.uk
and on Flickr http://www.flickr.com/photos/radical_images/sets/72157602561523510/

New Ring Fort discovered at hill of Tara-activist arrested, plus reminder of Samhain action & celebration weekend

Octo­ber 19, 2007

URGENT

Call­ing out for sup­port NOW and for the rest of the day at main gate Sol­diers Hill N3.

2 Pro­tes­tors are locked on to a tri­pod and are not mov­ing until an inde­pen­dent archae­o­log­i­cal sur­vey is car­ried out on the new­ly revealed site.

Octo­ber 19, 2007

URGENT

Call­ing out for sup­port NOW and for the rest of the day at main gate Sol­diers Hill N3.

2 Pro­tes­tors are locked on to a tri­pod and are not mov­ing until an inde­pen­dent archae­o­log­i­cal sur­vey is car­ried out on the new­ly revealed site.

Please bring ban­ners, leaflets, warm and water­proof cloth­ing, phone cred­it, cam­eras, video equip­ment, food and water.

SPREAD THE WORD, CONTACT ALL MEDIA.

Thank you

»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»

Reminder: Tara the Great Feast and Samhain cel­e­bra­tion Oct31/Nov3rd

Samhain Cel­e­bra­tion and big Actions come and rev­el and resist,calling out to all up for it pos­see.

Call­ing ALL PEOPLE to the defence of the Tara Val­ley, Ire­land.
Halt the destruc­tion of this ancient sacred site by the pro­posed M3 Motor­way. We need you NOW! Dig­gers are destroy­ing this World Her­itage site NOW.

We invite you to come to the Hill of Tara and cel­e­brate Samhain, Wed. Oct31st-Sat. Nov.3rd, the ancient Celtic New Year.
As well as havin it actions on Thurs Nov1st and Fri 2nd.
Also a reg­u­lar mon­day route walk and action,digger div­ing and free adren­a­lin rush.

Expe­ri­enced activists urgent­ly needed,tree house builders,tunnelers,techies,networkers,media spinners,and mid­night pix­ie com­man­dos.

Dust off your climb­ing har­ness and come,all help and sup­port appre­ci­at­ed.
If u cant make it to Tara,network where u are,organise a benefit,film showing,network fly­ers email the EU com­mis­sion­er Stavros Dimos info on web­sites below.

Also to come and sup­port ongo­ing actions through­out the com­ing year.
The tide is turn­ing the resis­tance grows these road build­ing cul­ture destroy­ing cra­zies aint seen noth­ing yet.The peo­ple are awakening,hear the call of the Ances­tors

Please down­load fly­er and posters,from www.tarapixie.net. or view info on www.circlecommunity.org ( Lift­shares are avail­able from London,Bristol,Brighton,Wales check web­site above)
Email to all con­tacts on your net­work.
Print copies and dis­trib­ute, par­tic­u­lar­ly in pub­lic places com­mu­ni­ty cen­tres and libraries.
Net­work it to the maximum.Thanks from Tara Sup­port.

For more infor­ma­tion

www.tarapixie.net www.tarawatch.org
www.circlecommunity.org www.savetara.com
www.indymedia.ie www.indymedia.org.uk

Posters and fly­ers down­load­able from www.tarapixie.net

tarasupport@googlemail.com

Norwegian Whaling Vessel’s Career is Finished

Sea Shep­herd News Releas­es 10/16/2007

Nor­we­gian Whal­ing Ves­sel’s Career is Fin­ished

The Willassen Senior, the Nor­we­gian whal­ing ves­sel that was scut­tled on August 30, 2007 in the north­ern city of Svolvaer in the Lofoten Islands, will not be killing any more whales—ever again. The dam­age sus­tained by the ves­sel that was delib­er­ate­ly sunk by whale defend­ers exceed­ed $22 mil­lion kro­ner (over US $2 mil­lion). Sea Shep­herd Con­ser­va­tion Soci­ety was pleased to learn that the Willassen Senior was not insured. The own­ers of the ves­sel have decid­ed to scrap the ship, because they can­not afford to pay to repair the exten­sive dam­age caused to the elec­tri­cal and mechan­i­cal sys­tems by salt water. A group called Agen­da 21 has tak­en cred­it for scut­tling the whal­ing ship.

Sea Shep­herd News Releas­es 10/16/2007

Nor­we­gian Whal­ing Ves­sel’s Career is Fin­ished

The Willassen Senior, the Nor­we­gian whal­ing ves­sel that was scut­tled on August 30, 2007 in the north­ern city of Svolvaer in the Lofoten Islands, will not be killing any more whales—ever again. The dam­age sus­tained by the ves­sel that was delib­er­ate­ly sunk by whale defend­ers exceed­ed $22 mil­lion kro­ner (over US $2 mil­lion). Sea Shep­herd Con­ser­va­tion Soci­ety was pleased to learn that the Willassen Senior was not insured. The own­ers of the ves­sel have decid­ed to scrap the ship, because they can­not afford to pay to repair the exten­sive dam­age caused to the elec­tri­cal and mechan­i­cal sys­tems by salt water. A group called Agen­da 21 has tak­en cred­it for scut­tling the whal­ing ship.

“One less whal­ing ship on the water trans­lates into few­er whales being killed by these crim­i­nal whalers,” said Sea Shep­herd Founder and Pres­i­dent Cap­tain Paul Wat­son. “The Agen­da 21 team did an excel­lent job: no injuries, no evi­dence, no mis­takes, and no more whal­ing. These are results that we can appre­ci­ate and admire.”

Imme­di­ate­ly after the whaler was scut­tled, the own­ers of oth­er whal­ing ves­sels in Nor­way placed their ships under 24-hour guard. This trans­lates into increased secu­ri­ty costs for whal­ing ships, which cuts into whal­ing prof­its. “The whalers should be afraid of being scut­tled,” said Cap­tain Wat­son. “A ves­sel that is being oper­at­ed in clear defi­ance of inter­na­tion­al con­ser­va­tion law and is involved with the ille­gal slaugh­ter of these intel­li­gent and gen­tle crea­tures has only one place—on the bot­tom of the sea!”

Nor­we­gian police have been unsuc­cess­ful in iden­ti­fy­ing the Agen­da 21 team mem­bers. All they have done so far is to seize a hard dri­ve from an inter­net cafe in Svolvaer, based on a report that one of the sab­o­tage team mem­bers may have been using a com­put­er there. Police have con­firmed that the Willassen Senior was delib­er­ate­ly sunk by a sabo­teur (or sabo­teurs) unknown. The ship was sunk when a pipe used to pro­vide salt water cool­ing to the engine was removed. It took four hours for the ship to sink, allow­ing the whale defend­ers plen­ty of time to leave the area.

“This was not a crime,” said Cap­tain Wat­son. “The Willassen Senior was a ship engaged in crim­i­nal activ­i­ty specif­i­cal­ly vio­lat­ing the Inter­na­tion­al Whal­ing Com­mis­sion’s glob­al mora­to­ri­um on com­mer­cial whal­ing activ­i­ties. Sink­ing this whaler was an act of law enforce­ment, and we applaud this suc­cess­ful retire­ment of an ille­gal killing machine.”

www.seashepherd.org

French GM maize decontamination action

Mon­san­to files suit against French GMO activists

Oct 19 (Reuters) — The French unit of U.S. Biotech giant Mon­san­to has filed a law­suit fol­low­ing the lat­est destruc­tion of some of its test fields for genet­i­cal­ly-mod­i­fied maize. In a state­ment issued on Fri­day, Mon­san­to said that uniden­ti­fied activists had ran­sacked three test fields in Val­divi­enne in cen­tral France after dark on Thurs­day.

Mon­san­to files suit against French GMO activists

Oct 19 (Reuters) — The French unit of U.S. Biotech giant Mon­san­to has filed a law­suit fol­low­ing the lat­est destruc­tion of some of its test fields for genet­i­cal­ly-mod­i­fied maize. In a state­ment issued on Fri­day, Mon­san­to said that uniden­ti­fied activists had ran­sacked three test fields in Val­divi­enne in cen­tral France after dark on Thurs­day.

‘This sense­less new act of vio­lence penalis­es French research into biotech crops yet again and has no sci­en­tif­ic basis,’ Mon­san­to said.

It used a pro­ce­dure in French law allow­ing legal action to be brought against unknown defen­dants.

Activists have ruined oth­er Mon­san­to GMO test fields this year, prompt­ing a series of offi­cial com­plaints which the com­pa­ny has said typ­i­cal­ly leads to court action.

Indus­try groups have denounced such attacks as dis­as­trous for the coun­try’s agri­cul­tur­al research work.

Some farm­ers sup­port­ive of GMO crops have called on the gov­ern­ment dur­ing gov­ern­ment-led meet­ings on the envi­ron­ment to pass a GMO law as soon as pos­si­ble, in part to stress the ille­gal nature of such activ­i­ties.

Heat­ed debate has sur­round­ed the use of GMO prod­ucts across Europe and in France, where many con­sumers and green groups doubt the safe­ty of GMO prod­ucts and fear that they will reduce bio­di­ver­si­ty.

REUTERS, Octo­ber 19 2007
http://www.reuters.com/article/companyNewsAndPR/idUSL1944836620071019

“Common Ground” Community Garden Finally Evicted

Report on Thurs­day 18th Octo­bers evic­tion of Com­mon Ground Com­mu­ni­ty Gar­den.

It seems it was “fourth time lucky” for Read­ing Bor­ough Coun­cil bailiffs today, when they final­ly realised that it’s not a good idea to inform anar­cho-com­mies (and oth­er assort­ed rev­o­lu­tion­ary repro­bates) 2 weeks in advance if you want to evict them from coun­cil land. Arriv­ing unan­nounced at 9.00am this morn­ing, they began by evict­ing our squat­ting neigh­bours, giv­ing us enough time to form an impromp­tu resis­tance of 3 peo­ple.

Report on Thurs­day 18th Octo­bers evic­tion of Com­mon Ground Com­mu­ni­ty Gar­den.

It seems it was “fourth time lucky” for Read­ing Bor­ough Coun­cil bailiffs today, when they final­ly realised that it’s not a good idea to inform anar­cho-com­mies (and oth­er assort­ed rev­o­lu­tion­ary repro­bates) 2 weeks in advance if you want to evict them from coun­cil land. Arriv­ing unan­nounced at 9.00am this morn­ing, they began by evict­ing our squat­ting neigh­bours, giv­ing us enough time to form an impromp­tu resis­tance of 3 peo­ple.

This reporter arrived at 10.00am, to find approx­i­mate­ly 8 police, 4 bailiffs, 4 coun­cil rep­re­sen­ta­tives and a bunch of burly builders board­ing up build­ings. Coun­cil bailiffs had kicked a large hole in our gar­den fence, which they left unguard­ed. After a short con­sul­ta­tion we decid­ed to climb through it, sit in our gar­den and peace­ful­ly resist. This reporter is ashamed to say that his resis­tance last­ed a mat­ter of min­utes, before he was con­vinced to leave the gar­den rather than face the pos­si­bil­i­ty of arrest. The resilience of his com­rades was some­what more respectable.

Leav­ing the gar­den, he dis­cov­ered that the 8 police had left just as the fun seemed to be start­ing, beg­ging the ques­tion “why had they come in the first place?”

Bailiffs and coun­cil employ­ees attempt­ed to use diplo­ma­cy (a facet for which they are not well known) to con­vince the remain­ing two gar­den­ers to leave. Both refused, and there ensued a minor kafuf­fle. A charm­ing gen­tle­man, sport­ing a fash­ion­able red coat (pic­tured) blocked our pho­tog­ra­ph­er from tak­ing any pic­tures of this. At one point, he even attempt­ed to steal the cam­era prompt­ing the ques­tion “What the fuck are you doing?”. He imme­di­ate­ly desist­ed in his klep­to­ma­ni­ac-like actions, but refused to stand aside and allow fur­ther pic­tures to be tak­en of this inci­dent.

By this time, there was but one com­rade remain­ing in the gar­den. Coun­cil employ­ees and bailiffs, unsure what to do about this final poten­tial men­ace, decid­ed to call for back-up. After a wait of 15 min­utes, a riot van arrived con­tain­ing 2 of Thames Val­leys finest, aka da Five‑0, da Fuzz, da Filth, da Feds aka PC 5479 A Hunt, PC 5292.

The offi­cers of the law entered the gar­den and a new arrival from our group fol­lowed them. He was asked to leave, with the promise of some con­ver­sa­tion, which he did not get. Once again we were down to one soli­tary indi­vid­ual, peace­ful­ly refus­ing to leave. The offi­cers of the law asked him to move on; he refused. This called for extreme solu­tions: one police man got on the phone and asked his boss what he should do. The answer was clear­ly “do noth­ing”, for that is what they did….

It seemed that no police or bailiffs actu­al­ly want­ed to arrest our “last man stand­ing”. Per­haps they realised the poten­tial dan­ger that they would be putting them­selves in (for he is a 3rd dan black belt in origa­mi…), but more like­ly there was nobody that was pre­pared to be “the one that arrest­ed a gar­den­er”. In any case, it even­tu­al­ly fell to a gen­tle­man from the coun­cil to forcibly pick him up and remove him from the gar­den. This sig­nalled the end of our resis­tance, and we called it a day.

At the time of going to press, sev­er­al ideas are being float­ed about to keep up the momen­tum and build upon the com­mu­ni­ty spir­it that Com­mon Ground has cre­at­ed so far. Need­less to say, this is not the last that Read­ing Bor­ough Coun­cil will hear from us, and it may not be the last time we set foot in our gar­den

————————————-

Com­mon Ground Com­mu­ni­ty Gar­den — on squat­ted land in Sil­ver Street, Kates­grove — was evict­ed Fri­day morn­ing. This is the third evic­tion attempt, the pre­vi­ous two, which the coun­cil announced in advance, were met with strong local resis­tance.

At about 9am on 18th Octo­ber 2007 coun­cil offi­cials, bail­liffs, police and PCSO’s arrived, and coun­cil offi­cials broke down the door to num­ber 6 Sil­ver Street (ex-Wom­ens Infor­ma­tion Cen­tre). Police and offi­cials entered the prop­er­ty and evict­ed the two peo­ple liv­ing there. They also broke a hole in the gar­den fence.

Around this time a cou­ple of local res­i­dents, who have worked and relaxed in the com­mu­ni­ty gar­den over the past 10 months, arrived on the scene, ask­ing ques­tions and attempt­ing to take pho­tographs of the event. After the evic­tion teams plans to “board-up” the gar­den were over­heard, two more local peo­ple who have worked in Com­mon Ground arrived.

Three peo­ple entered the gar­den and sat at a table, before coun­cil offi­cials entered and told them to leave. An argu­ment fol­lowed as the res­i­dents demand­ed that the com­mu­ni­ty should be asked what it want­ed to hap­pen to the site, rather than a devel­op­ment being imposed with­out con­sul­ta­tion, while coun­cil offi­cials sim­ply replied “its pri­vate prop­er­ty” — as if this is more impor­tant than social and envi­ron­men­tal con­cerns or local democ­ra­cy. When told “This isn’t right and you know it!”, offi­cials replied “You may have a moral argu­ment, but by the law this is right”. Sure­ly there is some­thing wrong with law when it con­flicts with what is moral­ly right or with local democ­ra­cy?

One coun­cil offi­cial began to get aggres­sive and pulled one per­son­’s seat from under­neath them, throw­ing it across the gar­den. He then start­ed shov­ing the res­i­dent and squar­ing up to him, while the res­i­dent stood his ground and asked the offi­cial his name. Even­tu­al­ly, two res­i­dents had to leave the gar­den for per­son­al rea­sons, while one remained. Offi­cials asked him to leave again, before ask­ing the police, who had left, to return.

The Police once again asked the res­i­dent to leave, to avoid “embar­rass­ment”, only to be told “I’m not embar­rassed to defend this gar­den”. Even­tu­al­ly, fol­low­ing dis­cus­sions between the coun­cil and the police, a reluc­tant coun­cil offi­cial was told to use rea­son­able force to evict the per­son. The pro­test­er was phys­i­cal­ly lift­ed and dragged out of the gar­den, before builders fit­ted boards over the gar­den gate and over the hole in the fence.

This is def­i­nite­ly not the end, and Com­mon Ground Col­lec­tive will dis­cuss var­i­ous options over the week­end.

The Coun­cil have stat­ed in press releas­es and in the recent full coun­cil meet­ing that offers of alter­na­tive land had been reject­ed ‘out of hand’ by the gar­den­ers. This is a mis­lead­ing state­ment. Com­mon Ground gave care­ful con­sid­er­a­tion to the offers and, as a group, agreed to con­tin­ue defend the gar­den where it is, and push for a local demo­c­ra­t­ic process where the com­mu­ni­ty would decide what hap­pens to the site long term.

How­ev­er, indi­vid­u­als involved in Com­mon Ground have begun engag­ing in dis­cus­sion with local coun­cil­lors and the Kates­grove Res­i­dents Asso­ci­a­tion to dis­cuss the via­bil­i­ty of cre­at­ing oth­er com­mu­ni­ty gar­dens on the land offered by the coun­cil. It should be point­ed out how­ev­er, that both alter­na­tives are not with­out imme­di­ate prob­lems as one is very small and slopes down to the riv­er mak­ing it poten­tial­ly dan­ger­ous, and the oth­er is not whol­ly owned by the coun­cil. The iden­ti­ty of the part own­er in the lat­ter case is seem­ing­ly unknown. But all options will be con­sid­ered and pur­sued as far as they can go.

Thanks for all sup­port we have recieved over the last year, we’ll be back!

katesgrovegarden(AT)yahoo.co.uk
http://www.myspace.com/common_ground_garden

24-hour Total petrol station shuts due to protest

18.10.2007
Dur­ing the Thurs­day evening rush hour, the 24-hour Total petrol sta­tion on Maryle­bone Road in Lon­don shut down due to the pres­ence of pro­tes­tors call­ing for Total to pull out of Bur­ma.

London 24 hour Total demo18.10.2007
Dur­ing the Thurs­day evening rush hour, the 24-hour Total petrol sta­tion on Maryle­bone Road in Lon­don shut down due to the pres­ence of pro­tes­tors call­ing for Total to pull out of Bur­ma.

Fif­teen pro­tes­tors began their peace­ful protest at 5.00pm with ban­ners and leaflets inform­ing motorists and pedes­tri­ans of Total’s links with the Burmese dic­ta­tor­ship. Sev­er­al cam­paign­ers talked to motorists who drove in to buy petrol. Many motorists were sup­port­ive and vowed not to buy Total again.

How­ev­er Total com­plained to the police (after about an hour and a half) and the cam­paign­ers were asked to leave the fore­court. Short­ly after­wards the sta­tion was shut down com­plete­ly. Employ­ees moved cones and bins to block vehic­u­lar access to the sta­tion and the lights were switched off, includ­ing the 24-hour sign!

The petrol sta­tion remained closed until the protest fin­ished.

http://www.totaloutofburma.blogspot.com/

BP Executive pied as Europe’s largest BioFuels Event disrupted, Blockade of D1 Oils & demo outside exhibition

17th Octo­ber, 2007

BP speaker pied at Biofuel conference
BP biofuel conference stage invasionBiofuel lock-on17th Octo­ber, 2007
The exhi­bi­tion, fea­tur­ing over a hun­dred trade stands, ran along­side a con­fer­ence which opened on Wednes­day with a key note speech from BP Bio­fu­els’ Europe & Africa Direc­tor Oliv­er Mace, but was quick­ly thrown into chaos when a num­ber of peo­ple dressed in suits marched onto the stage to tar­get BP’s ‘dan­ger­ous and dis­hon­est’ green­wash and protest at the cat­a­stroph­ic effects of replac­ing cli­mate-sta­bil­is­ing ecosys­tems with arable crops for bio­fu­el feed­stocks.

A stunned audi­ence gasped as a cream-pie was launched at Mace, while activists swarmed the stage and hand­ed out leaflets to atten­dees. One of the pro­test­ers D‑locked him­self to the podi­um, telling del­e­gates “we need to reduce our con­sump­tion now – tech­no­log­i­cal fix­es are not the answer.” Pan­ic alarms were then set off around the room and the con­fer­ence was halt­ed.

Lat­er a press con­fer­ence was held at which East­side Cli­mate Action gave a state­ment say­ing: “Bio­fu­els are not part of the solu­tion, they are part of the prob­lem. We need lifestyle and eco­nom­ic change, a reduc­tion in con­sump­tion and local pro­duc­tion of all our own needs.”

BP, the main spon­sor of the Bio­fu­els con­fer­ence, did not rep­re­sent them­selves at the press con­fer­ence through fears that atten­tion would be focussed on the protest. Oliv­er Mace was said to be ‘shak­en’ by the morning’s events.

Richard Price, con­fer­ence organ­is­er and Bio­fu­els Media direc­tor, said that one of the aims of the event was to have some debate which sur­rounds issues such as food ver­sus fuel. He also offered a plat­form for those want­i­ng to raise objec­tions and con­cerns with the bio­fu­els indus­try.

Price point­ed to future bio­fu­el tech­nolo­gies, known as sec­ond gen­er­a­tion bio­fu­els, which use plant mat­ter such as Jat­ropha and algae, and do not nor­mal­ly enter the food chain. Price and oth­ers are claim­ing that these may offer advan­tages such as high­er oil yields and the pos­si­bil­i­ty of using oth­er­wise unvi­able land.

Price admit­ted “we should be using less fuel, being more eco­nom­i­cal, as well as explor­ing bio­fu­els. Next year we’ll see what the issues are, but clear­ly we need a much wider base.” Asked if the con­fer­ence would accept spon­sor­ship from BP in the future, Bio­fu­els Media have so far declined to com­ment.

Lat­er on there were fur­ther protests as cam­paign­ers gath­ered at the main gates to the Newark show­ground, where the con­fer­ence was held. Activists from pres­sure group Bio­fu­el­watch were in atten­dance to explain their con­cerns, and those attend­ing the con­fer­ence were engaged in dis­cus­sions and hand­ed leaflets explain­ing that defor­esta­tion ‑such as to make way for oil palms for fuel in Asia- is a major cause of cli­mate change, account­ing for up to 30 per­cent of glob­al green­house gas emis­sions.

Bio­fu­el­watch cam­paign­er Deep­ak Rughani referred to a recent study by sci­en­tist Paul Crutzen, which found that Bio­fu­els pro­duced from arable crops are direct­ly respon­si­ble for green­house gas emis­sions of up to 70% more than the equiv­a­lent of fos­sil-fuel. Rughani added, “when you add in ele­ments of defor­esta­tion or land-use change, you are look­ing at mas­sive fur­ther emis­sions due to the release of car­bon stored in trees, plants and with­in the soil.”

Bio­fu­el­watch cam­paigns against the use of bio-ener­gy from unsus­tain­able sources, name­ly bio­fu­els that are linked to accel­er­at­ed cli­mate change, defor­esta­tion, bio-diver­si­ty loss­es, water and soil degra­da­tion, and the dis­place­ment and impov­er­ish­ment of local pop­u­la­tions and loss of food sov­er­eign­ty and secu­ri­ty. Aside from tech­no­log­i­cal solu­tions, Bio­fu­el­watch and oth­er envi­ron­men­tal groups believe cuts in green­house gas emis­sions must be based on over­all demand reduc­tion. This means reduc­ing ener­gy use and trans­port as opposed to replac­ing one type of fuel with anoth­er.

Bio­fu­els Con­fer­ence — Audio clip (intro & pie) — mp3 1.7M

———————————–

Press release —

Date: 17th Octo­ber, 2007
Embar­go: Imme­di­ate Release
CONTACT: 07880 937 511
Newark Show­ground, Newark, Not­ting­hamshire

This morn­ing a group of 15 cli­mate change activists from protest group Food Not Fuel entered the Bio­Fu­el Expo & Con­fer­ence tak­ing place at the Newark Show­ground and took over the keynote speech. Oliv­er Mace, CEO of BP Fuels, the lead spon­sors of the event received a cream pie in the face. Anoth­er cam­paign­er was D‑locked to the podi­um and var­i­ous alarms were placed around the place. The hall was emp­tied and talks were can­celled. There were no arrests.

They were protest­ing against planned expan­sion of bio­fu­els cit­ing its con­tri­bu­tion to defor­esta­tion and the fact that it will con­tin­ue to con­tribute to cli­mate change. The activists com­plained that bio­fu­els on a large scale is green­wash and com­pa­nies such as BP are ignor­ing its neg­a­tive impacts on the envi­ron­ment.

Pro­test­er Michelle Lynch said, “What they are pro­mot­ing is a replace­ment to fos­sil fuels, but the real­i­ty is that they are lit­tle bet­ter. Large scale plan­ta­tions are not the solu­tion; reduc­ing our con­sump­tion is the only real­is­tic way for­ward.”

Anoth­er pro­test­er, Thomas Brad­shaw point­ed out, “Bio­fu­els will be tak­ing food from the mouths of the hun­gary when there are already 800 mil­lion peo­ple suf­fer­ing from mal­nu­tri­tion. These cor­po­ra­tions are effec­tive­ly encour­ag­ing the ero­sion of valu­able arable farm­land and rain­forests vital for com­bat­ing cli­mate change.”

-end-

Notes for edi­tors:

1. The pro­tes­tors can be con­tact­ed at 07880 937 511. Their cri­tique argues that rad­i­cal social change is need­ed to deal with the impact of peak oil and cli­mate change, and that seek­ing solu­tions such as car­bon trad­ing and bio­fu­els are not the answer, as the real prob­lem is unsus­tain­able eco­nom­ic growth.

2. The Bio­Fu­els Expo & Con­fer­ence (www.biodiesel-expo.co.uk) is the largest of its kind in Europe, and brings togeth­er big indus­try play­ers such as BP Fuels, Deloitte & Touche and many chem­i­cal, agri­cul­tur­al and man­u­fac­tur­ing com­pa­nies.

3. A com­pre­hen­sive cri­tique of bio­fu­els can be found at Bio­Fu­els Watch (www.biofuelwatch.org.uk) who are a dis­tinct group from Food Not Fuels, but are host­ing their own demon­stra­tion against the Con­fer­ence.

4. Text of leaflet dis­trib­ute to atten­dees.


Bio­fu­els & Fos­sil Fuels: Bio­fu­els that are not pro­duced by recy­cling waste oil are the direct prod­uct of large scale mono­cul­ture. Cur­rent­ly the amount of fos­sil fuels required to pro­duce bio­fu­els is greater than the amount of fuel you get out: you have to make the fer­til­iz­er, run the agri­cul­tur­al machin­ery, trans­port the feed­stocks and fuels, and refine the plant mat­ter into fuel.

Bio­fu­els & Food: The land that is used to farm bio­fu­els has to come from some­where. If it is agri­cul­tur­al land used for food then there will be less food. Maize, Mex­i­co’s sta­ple crop, have increased mas­sive­ly due to Amer­i­can demand for bioethanol. Adding to the num­ber of peo­ple liv­ing below the pover­ty line.

Bio­fu­els & Land use: If not agri­cul­tur­al land, then bio­fu­els will be grown on vir­gin rain­for­est or wet­land. 1/3 of all green­house gas emis­sions come from the destruc­tion of liv­ing car­bon sinks. The Ama­zon rain­for­est is the largest dri­ver of the cli­mate on the plan­et and expand­ing bioethanol plan­ta­tions will push it to extinc­tion. Wet­lands, eg peat, con­tain more car­bon that the whole atmos­phere and cov­er just 1% of the worlds sur­face. The largest peat bogs in the world, in Indone­sia, are cur­rent­ly being drained for palm oil plan­ta­tions. If green­house gas emis­sions con­tin­ue as they cur­rent­ly are we will go beyond the cli­mate tip­ping point caus­ing mass extinc­tion of life on earth.

Bio­fu­els & Local Con­trol: The dri­ving force beyond the expan­sion in bio­fu­els are big cor­po­ra­tions such as BP & Mon­san­to, and gov­ern­ment — the very peo­ple who have got us into this mess. They are using bio­fu­els as a way to con­tin­ue their posi­tion of pow­er into the post peak oil world. To stand a chance of sur­vival the con­trol of land must be by local peo­ple for local peo­ple.

The Solu­tion: We will need to reduce our con­sump­tion to lev­els that we can meet our­selves. This WILL mean a reduc­tion in lux­u­ries, like the lux­u­ry to trav­el. Some bio­fu­els will be used, but at a frac­tion of our cur­rent oil use. We need to end the search for tech­no­log­i­cal solu­tions to eco­nom­ic prob­lems. We need to localise our econ­o­my, pro­duce our own food, make our own tools and use less.

We need an end to eco­nom­ic growth.

foodnotfuel1@yahoo.co.uk

——————————————
D1 Oils blockade banner
D1 Oils blockade
Block­ade of D1 Oils — anti-agro­fu­el demo

Pro­tes­tors from No Agro­fu­els UK block­ad­ed DI oils refin­ery and offices this morn­ing to raise aware­ness of the detri­men­tal impact of agro­fu­els. The protest was timed to coin­cide with the nation­al Bio­fu­els Con­fer­ence in Newark.

18 Pro­tes­tors chained the 3 gates to the refin­ery shut and 2 pro­tes­tors were D‑locked to the main gates. No vehi­cles were able to enter or leave the site and all work appeared to have been stopped.

Sev­er­al ban­ners were tied over the gates includ­ing “No Agro­fu­els, Land 4 Peo­ple, Food, Bio­di­ver­si­ty” and “Cli­mate Change Prof­i­teers”

Agro­fu­els (fuels pro­duced from pur­pose­ly and inten­sive­ly grown crops) are not the green solu­tion. They result in defor­esta­tion of trop­i­cal rain­forests and burn­ing of peat­lands which increase car­bon in the atmos­phere. Stud­ies have shown that when you include ener­gy used to grow and pro­duce the fuels includ­ing chem­i­cal pro­duc­tion and trans­porta­tion they use more ener­gy then oil based fuels.

Agro­fu­els also cause food inse­cu­ri­ty by reduc­ing land avail­bale to grow food and increas­ing food prices. They result in land dis­pos­ses­sion as peo­ple in Africa, Asia and South Amer­i­ca are forced off their land to enable crops to be grown for the fuel of Europe and the USA. In Colom­bia there have been human rights abus­es to gain con­trol of the land.

D1 is one of the biggest traders world­wide of palm oil and oil seed rape. They have inter­ests in India, Indone­sia, Chi­na, South Africa, Zam­bia, Swazi­land, El Sal­vador and are soon plan­ning to get into Brazil and sev­er­al otehr African coun­tries. They are direct­ly respon­si­ble for land dis­pos­ses­sion, food inse­cu­ri­ty and increas­ing pover­ty, they are not the pro­vid­ing the solu­tion to our cli­mate cri­sis, the only solu­tion to cli­mate change is a reduc­tion in ener­gy rather then exploit­ing the bio­di­ver­si­ty, peo­ple and land of the Glob­al South.

For more info see: www.biofuelwatch.org.uk

——————————————
Biofuel banner 2
Biofuel banner 1
Ban­ner Protest out­side Biodiesel Expo in Newark

About 40 pro­test­ers held a ban­ner protest out­side the Biodiesel Expo in Newark, Europe’s largest bio­fu­el con­fer­ence this year. Par­tic­i­pants of the con­fer­ence include BP, Vir­gin and D1 Oils, a bio­fu­el com­pa­ny head­ed by for­mer Shell CEO Lord Oxburgh which is acquir­ing rights over large areas of land in India and south­ern Africa. Pro­test­ers high­light­ed the dev­as­tat­ing impact which the indus­try is hav­ing on glob­al warm­ing, rain­forests, local com­mu­ni­ties in the glob­al South and food secu­ri­ty.

——

PRESS RELEASE

Newark : 40 Pro­tes­tors call for food for peo­ple, not cars

Over 40 envi­ron­men­tal­ists protest­ed out­side the ‘Biodiesel Expo’ today, Wednes­day 17th Octo­ber, at Newark Show­ground. The protest was to raise aware­ness of the dam­age that mas­sive and rapid bio­fu­els devel­op­ment is hav­ing on the cli­mate, peo­ple, food secu­ri­ty and forests.

The protest comes just the day after World Food Day Octo­ber 16th when the UN Food and Agro­cul­ture orga­ni­za­tion (FAO) high­light­ed the impacts of bio­fu­els of food secu­ri­ty around the world.

The Unit­ed Nations Spe­cial Rap­por­teur on the Right to Food, Jean Ziegler, is so con­cerned that he has warned that rapid bio­fu­el devel­op­ment is a total dis­as­ter for those who are starv­ing. He will call for an inter­na­tion­al five-year ban on pro­duc­ing bio­fu­els to com­bat soar­ing food prices in the UN Gen­er­al Assem­bly on Octo­ber 25th. (see below).

Deep­ak Rughani from bio­fu­el­watch says “The UN FAO is very con­cerned about bio­fu­els. They have said that they ‘are grave­ly con­cerned that bio­fu­els will bring hunger in their wake’. A bat­tle is being cre­at­ed between food and fuel that will leave the poor and hun­gry in devel­op­ing coun­tries at the mer­cy of rapid­ly ris­ing prices for food, land and water. The EU and the UK urgent­ly need a mora­to­ri­um of bio­fu­els to make sure that we don’t push mil­lions into star­va­tion. We have protest­ed today to sup­port the call in the UN and demand the UK gov­ern­ment stops the mad rush to bio­fu­els”.

bio­fu­el­watch, who are cam­paign­ing for EU mora­to­ri­um on large-scale bio­fu­el pro­duc­tion and imports into the EU, say that from April 2008 UK con­sumers will have no choice about hav­ing to buy bio­fu­els at the pump. The bio­fu­els avail­able will be blend­ed from many dif­fer­ence sources across the globe depend­ing on com­mod­i­ty mar­ket prices.

From April, con­sumers will not be able to avoid buy­ing bio­fu­el that may be accel­er­at­ing destruc­tion of trop­i­cal forests, increas­ing their car­bon emis­sions, caus­ing human rights abus­es, and tak­ing land from vital food pro­duc­tion.

Infor­ma­tion:

The Unit­ed Nations Spe­cial Rap­por­teur on the Right to Food is to demand an inter­na­tion­al five-year ban on pro­duc­ing bio­fu­els to com­bat soar­ing food prices at the Unit­ed Nations Gen­er­al Assem­bly on 25th Octo­ber. http://tinyurl.com/2ltgwd
The entire text of a report to the UN Gen­er­al Assem­bly from Unit­ed Nations Spe­cial Rap­por­teur on the Right to Food, Jean Zei­gler, high­light­ing the risks to mil­lions from bio­fu­els is attached to this Press release.

Links to World Food Day press from around the world
Jamaica — Food prices set to rise – Tufton:

http://www.jamaica-gleaner.com/gleaner/20071016/business/business1.html

Bio­fu­els high­light­ed in Colom­bia :

http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/biofuelwatch/message/1157

New Zealand: Food Prices Dri­ven by Bio­fu­els

http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/biofuelwatch/message/1149

World­wide Women’s Ener­gy issue :: Feed Peo­ple, Not Cars

http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/biofuelwatch/message/1146

Bio­fu­els and world hunger

http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/biofuelwatch/message/1145

Con­tacts:

Andrew Boswell, Bio­fu­el­watch , UK : T: +44–1603-613798 M: +44–7787127881 (at the protest)

E: andrew.boswell[at]yahoo.co.uk

Deep­ak Rughani, Bio­fu­el­watch , UK : +44–7931–636337 (at the protest)

info@biofuelwatch.org.uk
http://www.biofuelwatch.org.uk

Burma activists ‘lock on’ to Total

16.10.2007
Three direct activists have today shut down a busy Total fill­ing sta­tion in sol­i­dar­i­ty with the peo­ple of Bur­ma’s non­vi­o­lent strug­gle for democ­ra­cy.

London Total 116.10.2007
Three direct activists have today shut down a busy Total fill­ing sta­tion in sol­i­dar­i­ty with the peo­ple of Bur­ma’s non­vi­o­lent strug­gle for democ­ra­cy.

Under a ban­ner say­ing “May all beings be hap­py – Free Bur­ma ” the activists have locked them­selves togeth­er and begun to med­i­tate, lock­ing togeth­er the hoses, turn­ing off the pow­er and block­ing the entrance to the premis­es in Lon­don’s Maryle­bone Road.

The group have tar­get­ed Total to high­light the com­pa­ny’s role in prop­ping up one of the world’s most bru­tal dic­ta­tor­ships. The Burmese mil­i­tary rulers rou­tine­ly tor­ture pris­on­ers, use rape as a weapon of war, and have forcibly dis­placed almost one mil­lion peo­ple from their land – includ­ing to make way for a 63 kilo­me­tre gas pipeline built by Total.

Aung San Suu Kyi, Burma’s pro-democ­ra­cy leader, has said that “Total has become the main sup­port­er of the Burmese mil­i­tary regime.” She told the French week­ly Le Nou­v­el Obser­va­teur that “Total knew what it was doing when it invest­ed mas­sive­ly in Bur­ma while oth­ers with­drew from the mar­ket for eth­i­cal rea­sons”. She added, “the com­pa­ny must accept the con­se­quences. The coun­try will not always be gov­erned by dic­ta­tors.”

Matthew Her­bert, one of the activists, said: “All the peo­ples of Bur­ma will be free. There is no force as pow­er­ful as the non­vi­o­lent resis­tance of a unit­ed peo­ple, espe­cial­ly when the cause is as just and urgent as this. As Aung San Suu Kyi says, Total will be held account­able. Today’s action plays just one small part in that reck­on­ing.”

A fel­low activist, added: “The author­i­ty to rule comes from the peo­ple them­selves, the peo­ple of Bur­ma have had enough, they are with­draw­ing their con­sent to be con­trolled. This action is in sol­i­dar­i­ty with the peo­ple of Bur­ma strug­gle for free­dom and a mes­sage to Total to with­draw from Bur­ma now.”

For more infor­ma­tion con­tact 07796 430141

Activist Film Festival is seeking submissions

Under­cur­rents is call­ing for sub­mis­sions of short videos and ani­ma­tions on the theme of the fes­ti­val: social jus­tice and envi­ron­men­tal action.

Beyond TV 8 flierUnder­cur­rents is call­ing for sub­mis­sions of short videos and ani­ma­tions on the theme of the fes­ti­val: social jus­tice and envi­ron­men­tal action.

Sub­ject: Polit­i­cal Activist videos want­ed
From: under­cur­rents

CALL FOR SUBMISSIONS OF FILMS

FOR BEYONDTV FESTIVAL NOVEMBER 2007

What is BEYONDTV?
From Novem­ber 28 to Decem­ber 2, 2007, Rad­i­cal media char­i­ty, Under­cur­rents will host the 8th annu­al BEYONDTV fes­ti­val of polit­i­cal doc­u­men­taries, ani­ma­tions and music videos from inspir­ing media direc­tors.

Under­cur­rents is call­ing for sub­mis­sions of short videos and ani­ma­tions on the theme of the fes­ti­val: social jus­tice and envi­ron­men­tal action.

Impor­tant Note: We do not screen dra­mas using actors

BEYONDTV will be host­ed at the Dylan Thomas Cen­tre and Tal­iesin Cin­e­ma Swansea from Novem­ber 28 — Decem­ber 2, 2007

More details at http://www.beyondtvfestival.info
beyondtv@undercurrents.org

Under­cur­rents
Old Exchange
Pier st
Swansea
SA1 1RY
UK

Brighton police make early morning raid against squat.

16.10.2007
At 4am Brighton police demand­ed squat­ters leave a new squat on Franklin road. Despite resis­tance by 5am the squat­ters had been evict­ed by the police, who were act­ing unlaw­ful­ly with­out a court order.

All Coppers are Bastards16.10.2007
At 4am Brighton police demand­ed squat­ters leave a new squat on Franklin road. Despite resis­tance by 5am the squat­ters had been evict­ed by the police, who were act­ing unlaw­ful­ly with­out a court order.

The police refused to acknowl­edge the ‘Sec­tion 6’ notice and said they were igno­rant of the law, even though the group of squat­ters had been pre­vi­ous­ly evict­ed by the some of the same police recent­ly.

There was a dog unit, 4 squad cars, drugs unit, and 2 undercover/civil cars (whose reg­is­tra­tion plates were not­ed), as well as a senior offi­cer who was over­heard say­ing that he would per­son­al­ly not tol­er­ate squat­ting in Brighton. Not real­ly a sur­prise there.

3 cop­pers kicked the door in, whilst 8 squat­ters resist­ed their efforts. Whilst this was hap­pen­ing the pigs laughed and joked about going hol­i­day out­side.

When the squat­ters were hauled out of the build­ing they were threat­ened with arrest for not pay­ing elec­tric­i­ty or water bills. When the cops saw that there was 8 peo­ple, they could­n’t be both­ered with the paper work and just took peo­ples names instead.

The squat­ters argued with the cops for half an hour until they were threat­ened with deten­tion, as the squat­ters left the area with the few pos­ses­sions they could man­age to take from the dis­used build­ing which had been emp­ty for the last 3 years, they were fol­lowed and har­rassed by under­cov­er police for about an hour.

It comes as no sur­prise that the police don’t fol­low the law, they are an armed gang pro­tect­ing what they think is nor­mal soci­ety, but it is clear that if they think kick­ing young home­less peo­ple out into the rain at 4am is nor­mal, they got a lot to learn.

Right now we are not going to give up squat­ting, because we have no choice, but organ­is­ing our­selves against the pigs, land­lords and politi­cians is the best adven­ture going right now — and we sure as hell ain’t going to work for a liv­ing!

We won’t stop squat­ting until the pigs fly off a cliff !

Squat­ters Asso­ci­a­tion of Brighton