Anti-nuclear Power Protesters ‘Drop Dead’ on 700th day of Kudankulam Stir

15 July 2013 On the 700th day of their protest against the Kudanku­lam Nuclear Pow­er Project (KNPP), vil­lagers of Idinthakarai in Tamil Nadu “dropped dead” on the roads in a sym­bol­ic ges­ture, an anti-plant activist said Mon­day

15 July 2013 On the 700th day of their protest against the Kudanku­lam Nuclear Pow­er Project (KNPP), vil­lagers of Idinthakarai in Tamil Nadu “dropped dead” on the roads in a sym­bol­ic ges­ture, an anti-plant activist said Mon­day.”

Sev­er­al vil­lagers who were walk­ing on the roads sud­den­ly fell down ‘dead’. After some time, they got up. A pub­lic meet­ing was also held today (Mon­day),” S.P. Udayaku­mar, coor­di­na­tor of the People’s Move­ment Against Nuclear Ener­gy (PMANE) told IANS over phone from Idinthakarai.

The ‘drop dead’ ges­ture was an enact­ment of the impact the pow­er plant would have on peo­ple. The protest was held against the clear­ance grant­ed by the Atom­ic Ener­gy Reg­u­la­to­ry Board (AERB) to KNPP’s first 1,000 MW unit to start nuclear fis­sion.

On Sat­ur­day night, the KNPP’s first reac­tor attained crit­i­cal­i­ty or began nuclear fis­sion.
The vil­lagers in the vicin­i­ty of the KNPP have been protest­ing against the nuclear pow­er plant for the past 700 days, fear­ing for their lives in the wake of the nuclear acci­dent in Fukushi­ma, Japan, in 2011, under the PMANE ban­ner.

The Nuclear Pow­er Cor­po­ra­tion of India Ltd (NPCIL) is build­ing two reac­tors of 1,000 MW each. The reac­tors are sup­plied by Rus­sia.

Refut­ing rumours that the protest would take a vio­lent turn, Udayaku­mar said: “Ours is a peace­ful protest. We don’t believe in vio­lence. We will not coop­er­ate. A plant of this nature would need the coop­er­a­tion of the locals.”

“It is a gen­uine strug­gle of the work­ing class. But it is not being recog­nised. We had knocked sev­er­al doors — gov­ern­ment, experts, courts — but no door was opened to us,” M. Push­parayan, anoth­er PMANE leader, told IANS.

Udayaku­mar ques­tioned the urgency for giv­ing the “first approach to crit­i­cal­i­ty” clear­ance even before the apex court had the time to go through the reports filed by AERB, Nuclear Pow­er Cor­po­ra­tion of India Ltd (NPCIL) and the union min­istry of envi­ron­ment and forests.

He said the fight against KNPP would con­tin­ue — legal­ly, sci­en­tif­i­cal­ly and polit­i­cal­ly.
Udayaku­mar said a case had been filed in the Madras High Court Mon­day, chal­leng­ing the AERB’s clear­ance for the first KNPP unit to go crit­i­cal.

China Cancels Uranium Plant One Day After Protest

13 July 2013

13 July 2013

Chi­na has abrupt­ly can­celed plans to build its largest ura­ni­um pro­cess­ing plant in a south­ern Chi­nese city, a day after hun­dreds of pro­test­ers took to the streets demand­ing the project be scrapped, a local gov­ern­ment web­site said on Sat­ur­day.

The pro­posed 230-hectare com­plex in the heart of China’s Pearl Riv­er delta indus­tri­al heart­land in Guang­dong province had also sparked unease in neigh­bor­ing Hong Kong and Macau.

Author­i­ties in the gam­bling enclave had for­mal­ly raised the issue with their Guang­dong coun­ter­parts, the South Chi­na Morn­ing Post report­ed.

A one-line state­ment pub­lished on the Hes­han city government’s web­site said that “to respect people’s desire, the Hes­han gov­ern­ment will not pro­pose the CNNC project”.

State-run Chi­na Nation­al Nuclear Cor­po­ra­tion and Chi­na Guang­dong Nuclear Pow­er Corp (CGNPC) had planned to build the 37 bil­lion yuan ($6 bil­lion) project.

Offi­cials from both com­pa­nies could not be reached for com­ment.

A Bei­jing-based nuclear pow­er expert said he was sur­prised local author­i­ties had tak­en the deci­sion as the project designed to pro­duce 1,000 tonnes of ura­ni­um fuel annu­al­ly by 2020 was hot­ly con­test­ed by local gov­ern­ments.

“Com­pared to a nuclear pow­er plant, a ura­ni­um pro­cess­ing facil­i­ty is way more safer, as there is no fusion or reac­tion tak­ing place in the pro­duc­tion process,” said the offi­cial with close knowl­edge of the project. He declined to be iden­ti­fied as he was not autho­rized to speak to the press.

The sur­pris­ing­ly swift deci­sion to can­cel the project came after hun­dreds marched to city offices on Fri­day that forced offi­cials to pledge an exten­sion of pub­lic con­sul­ta­tion by 10 days. Locals had planned more protests on Sun­day.

Chi­nese author­i­ties are becom­ing increas­ing­ly sen­si­tive to local protests over envi­ron­men­tal issues, hav­ing can­celed, post­poned or relo­cat­ed sev­er­al major petro­chem­i­cal and met­als plants.

The planned con­ver­sion and enrich­ment plant had been meant to sup­ply fuel for China’s expand­ing nuclear pow­er capac­i­ty, like­ly to reach 60–70 gigawatts by 2020 from the cur­rent 12.6 GW.

Chi­na cur­rent­ly pro­duces 800 tonnes of ura­ni­um fuel at its plants in south­west­ern Sichuan province and north China’s Inner Mon­go­lia. Chi­na sources ura­ni­um both from domes­tic mines and imports from Kaza­khstan, Cana­da and Aus­tralia, said the expert.

Guang­dong is one of the country’s largest nuclear pow­er bases, already run­ning five nuclear reac­tors and build­ing anoth­er dozen, incor­po­rat­ing tech­nolo­gies from com­pa­nies like French Are­va and West­ing­house, a unit of Japan’s Toshi­ba Corp.

EARTH FIRST! SUMMER GATHERING 2013

EARTH FIRST! SUMMER GATHERING 2013 web­site all infor­ma­tion is now up at http://efgathering.weebly.com.

Gath­er­ing Dates 7th-11th August,

Loca­tion — SE Eng­land (near­est sta­tion Bex­hill)

EARTH FIRST! SUMMER GATHERING 2013 web­site all infor­ma­tion is now up at http://efgathering.weebly.com.

Gath­er­ing Dates 7th-11th August,

Loca­tion — SE Eng­land (near­est sta­tion Bex­hill)

60,000 in Tokyo Protest Government Plans to Restart Nuclear Power 3rd June

Approx­i­mate­ly 60,000 peo­ple ral­lied in Japan’s cap­i­tal of Tokyo on Sun­day, June 2nd in order to protest recent gov­ern­ment plans to restart the country’s idled nuclear reac­tors. Peo­ple gath­ered in Shi­ba Park and lat­er marched towards the par­lia­ment build­ing. Among the orga­niz­ers was Ken­z­aburo Oe, a Nobel lit­er­a­ture lau­re­ate, who called on the Japan­ese gov­ern­ment to leave the nuclear pow­er plants in sus­pen­sion out of fears for safe­ty.

The Japan­ese gov­ern­ment has pre­vi­ous­ly stat­ed that it will most like­ly allow those reac­tors to return to pow­er which have been approved by the Nuclear Reg­u­la­tion Author­i­ty (NRA), whose new safe­ty guide­lines are sched­uled to be adopt­ed in July. One of Japan’s largest-ever protests saw 170,000 peo­ple gath­er in a sim­i­lar fash­ion in July 2012, around the same time that then-Prime Min­is­ter Yoshi­hiko Noda decid­ed on the first two reac­tor restarts since the March 2011 Fukushi­ma dis­as­ter. As of now, the anti-nuclear pro­tes­tors say they have col­lect­ed over 8 mil­lion sig­na­tures of those opposed to reac­tor restarts.

As they marched through the streets, the pro­tes­tors car­ried signs and ban­ners that had mes­sages such as “No Nukes! Unevolved Apes Want Nukes!” As of today, the two reac­tors that were restart­ed last sum­mer, locat­ed in Oi, Fukui Pre­fec­ture, are the only ones out the country’s 50 that have returned to oper­a­tion. While Sunday’s ral­ly was orga­nized between three dif­fer­ent groups, Kyo­do news report­ed that the Tokyo Met­ro­pol­i­tan Police Depart­ment had put the num­ber of pro­test­ers between 20,000 and 30,000.

Faslane Peace Camp update

As you may know Faslane Peace Camp recent­ly put out an appeal for new mem­bers. For­tu­nate­ly the pub­lic­i­ty has gen­er­at­ed more peo­ple mov­ing to the camp and the good news is that it now looks like the peace camp is not going to close at this cru­cial time in the debate about nuclear weapons in Scot­land.

As you may know Faslane Peace Camp recent­ly put out an appeal for new mem­bers. For­tu­nate­ly the pub­lic­i­ty has gen­er­at­ed more peo­ple mov­ing to the camp and the good news is that it now looks like the peace camp is not going to close at this cru­cial time in the debate about nuclear weapons in Scot­land.
Vis­it Faslane Peace Camp from Cam­corder Guer­ril­las on Vimeo.

     To help the peace camp some for­mer res­i­dents and sup­port­ers of the camp have set up a Faslane Peace Camp Sup­port­ers net­work to help dis­trib­ute infor­ma­tion, fundraise, organ­ise events and protests, ben­e­fit gigs, trips out to the camp and stay­ing there reg­u­lar­ly etc.

    This sum­mer the Sup­port Net­work are plan­ning to build an eco-house using recy­cled mate­ri­als for use as a com­mu­nal space at the peace camp and we recent­ly held a suc­cess­ful ‘Phoenix Gath­er­ing’ at the peace camp. Some of us are meet­ing in Mono on Wednes­day 22nd May at 7.30 to dis­cuss set­ting up a Sup­port Net­work in Glas­gow and how we can do more to help the camp.

    Any­one inter­est­ed in help­ing to sup­port the camp is wel­come to come along!

Cheers!

Phill
Faslane Peace Camp Sup­port Net­work

faslanepeacecampsolidarity@gmail.com

Or Faslane Peace Camp 01436 820901 / faslane30@gmail.com

Resistance to the Nordic Mining Boom — Action Camp in Finnish North Karelia Starting 18 June 2013

Tal­vi­vaaras’ nick­el-ura­ni­um mine has caused the most seri­ous envi­ron­men­tal dam­ages in the finnish his­to­ry in decades. The mine has been con­tin­u­ous­ly pol­lut­ing the amaz­ing water­scapes of east­ern Fin­land.

Tal­vi­vaaras’ nick­el-ura­ni­um mine has caused the most seri­ous envi­ron­men­tal dam­ages in the finnish his­to­ry in decades. The mine has been con­tin­u­ous­ly pol­lut­ing the amaz­ing water­scapes of east­ern Fin­land. More and more peo­ple and orga­ni­za­tions are demand­ing clos­ing of the mine and the locals can’t use water from sev­er­al lakes any­more, but it does­n’t seem to have any impact in a coun­try where the finance elite knows that the gov­ern­ment is in their ser­vice.
The eco-dis­as­ter in the Tal­vi­vaara mine is not a rare excep­tion: rather, it is busi­ness as usu­al wher­ev­er large min­ing cor­po­ra­tions are oper­at­ing. For the sur­round­ing areas, pol­lut­ed ground­wa­ter has been the price to pay for every sin­gle ura­ni­um mine in the world so far. Despite this, a num­ber of  projects for open­ing huge mines are under­way in Fin­land and Swe­den.

Dis­re­gard­ing the cost to the ecosys­tem or the oppo­si­tion of locals, the inter­na­tion­al elite has decid­ed to sac­ri­fice the Nordic flo­ra, fau­na and waters to fuel the growth-com­pul­sive econ­o­my.

Deter­mined resis­tance is need­ed to keep the envi­ron­ment viable. Join us to share knowl­edge and skills, and to act!

The camp is locat­ed ca. 30 km from the Tal­vi­vaara mine. The first week of the camp, we will share info about the min­ing sit­u­a­tion in the north and explore tac­tics for open direct action. These skills will be put to use dur­ing the sec­ond week.

More info & updates com­ing at turvaverkosto.wordpress.com

Feel free to offer your own pro­gram! The camp will work in a self-orga­nized man­ner, so par­tic­i­pants are expect­ed to do their share of run­ning the camp. To cov­er costs we ask for a dona­tion of 5–10 € per day, tak­ing into account peo­ple’s per­son­al eco­nom­ic sit­u­a­tions. Rides from more acces­si­ble loca­tions will be arranged as often as pos­si­ble. When sign­ing up for the camp, please con­tact us if you would want a ride or have any oth­er spe­cial needs, aller­gies etc.

Let us know you’re com­ing by mail­ing turva@riseup.net before 10th of June, if pos­si­ble!

TURVA — Action net­work against ura­ni­um indus­try
turvaverkosto.wordpress.com

Hyökyaal­to net­work (Ris­ing Tide Fin­land)
hyokyaalto.org

Friends of the Land­less Fin­land
http://maattomienliike.wordpress.com/

 

Faslane Peace Camp: Phoenix Gathering 3–5 May 2013

meeting

Watch the great new video call-out.

meeting

Watch the great new video call-out.

A 3 day gath­er­ing at Faslane Peace Camp to work out logis­tics etc of rebuild­ing or tat­ting down the camp.  For every­one who wants to be involved as a new res­i­dent or part of the new sup­port group.  
Please get in touch if you want to attend either phone the camp on 01436–820901 or e‑mail the peace camp sol­i­dar­i­ty group:
faslanepeacecampsolidarity@gmail.com

3rd, 4th and 5th May
Faslane Peace Camp, Shan­don, Helens­burgh, Dun­bar­ton­shire G84 8NT

Faslane Peace Camp is look­ing for new mem­bers!

Faslane Peace Camp is the longest run­ning peace camp in the world.  Opened in 1982 by local peo­ple opposed to the bas­ing of Tri­dent mis­sile sub­marines here, the peace camp has been a sym­bol of hope and resis­tance for over thir­ty years.
Over that time num­bers at the camp have fluc­tu­at­ed from 2 to 25 peo­ple liv­ing there at any one time.
Now num­bers are falling and the peo­ple liv­ing at the camp want to move on.  They’ve decid­ed to set a dead­line of May 12th 2013 to find more peo­ple or they are going to start dis­man­tling the camp and turn­ing it into a peace gar­den in time for the peace cam­p’s 31st birth­day on 12th June 2013.  
We don’t have that much time to find a group of peo­ple who are com­mit­ted to stay­ing at the camp to con­tin­ue the resis­tance to British nuclear weapons on the Clyde.  
Some for­mer peace campers and friends at the peace camp have set up a group to try to do this and are com­mit­ted to pro­vid­ing sup­port for new peo­ple mov­ing to the peace camp.
Please if you don’t want to see the Peace Camp close at this cru­cial time in the debate about nuclear weapons in Scot­land and can offer help in any way or are inter­est­ed in find­ing out more about liv­ing at the peace camp please email us the Faslane Sup­port Net­work at: faslanepeacecampsolidarity@gmail.com
Or talk to the peace campers them­selves by con­tact­ing Faslane Peace Camp on 01436–820901 or faslane30@gmail.com

Lots more recent sto­ries here,

Open letter on the future of the Faslane peace camp

April 6, 2013

CORRECTION: The open meet­ing on the future of the peace camp will now be held at 4pm in the Kin­ning Park Com­plex on Sat­ur­day 13th April.

April 6, 2013

CORRECTION: The open meet­ing on the future of the peace camp will now be held at 4pm in the Kin­ning Park Com­plex on Sat­ur­day 13th April.
For the last two years, there has been a small group of us rebuild­ing Faslane Peace Camp as a com­mu­ni­ty of anti-nuclear action. We came togeth­er with a shared vision that if we main­tain the camp as a safe and alco­hol and drug free space with reg­u­lar actions and cam­paign­ing, we could cre­ate a strong, autonomous com­mu­ni­ty active in the fight against Tri­dent and the mil­i­tari­sa­tion of the West coast of Scot­land.

Part of our vision has been achieved in mak­ing the camp a safe and wel­com­ing space with facil­i­ties to sup­port anti-nuclear action, low impact liv­ing and skill shar­ing. We have worked to sus­tain resis­tance to nuclear weapons as cen­tral to this space and our col­lec­tive rea­son for being here through our own direct action cam­paigns and active involve­ment in wider Scot­tish anti-nuclear and anti-mil­i­tary move­ments. How­ev­er, our main hope that we would grow, in terms of strength through num­bers, has not been achieved. Main­tain­ing this space whilst hav­ing an active cam­paign with so few of us has put us under such pres­sure, per­son­al­ly and as a col­lec­tive, that we can’t con­tin­ue.

This let­ter is our issu­ing a notice of this, iden­ti­fy­ing poten­tial out­comes for the camp, our own lim­its in achiev­ing these and, hope­ful­ly ini­ti­at­ing an inclu­sive dis­cus­sion on the future of Faslane Peace Camp that does not see the four cur­rent res­i­dents assum­ing this respon­si­bil­i­ty.

Our pro­pos­al:
We feel, as a group, our lim­it on being here is 12th June 2013, the 31st anniver­sary of the Camp. If the respon­si­bil­i­ty on decid­ing and enact­ing the future of the camp is to be ours,(i.e. if this notice does not pro­voke wider con­struc­tive dis­cus­sion on the future of the camp or encour­age a new wave of res­i­dents) then we will enact the fol­low­ing pro­pos­al:
we will start tak­ing the camp down on 12th May to cre­ate a gar­den space (to be fin­ished by 12th June) that will both cel­e­brate the 31years of resis­tance here and act as a site facil­i­ty to sup­port future action camps.

We feel that leav­ing the camp emp­ty and open to chance is not an option because we have seen it hav­ing “fall­en into the wrong hands” and feel that this is much more detri­men­tal to the peace move­ment and activism in gen­er­al than the camp not being here.

The camp’s poten­tial, capac­i­ty and sup­port and the poten­tial for con­tin­u­ing:
We feel that the camp’s capac­i­ty to sup­port a self-suf­fi­cient com­mu­ni­ty of resis­tance should not go under­stat­ed. Despite ups and downs, for the last thir­ty years the camp has been an active chal­lenge to the sta­tion­ing of nuclear weapons on the Clyde. Many of the peo­ple who have passed through here have learned and con­tin­ued to prac­tise so many skills in active resis­tance and low impact liv­ing. Those of us here have grown and learned so much, from a per­son­al lev­el to an under­stand­ing of the nature of the state spon­sored ter­ror­ism of nuclear weapons and the banal­i­ty of the every­day run­ning of this evil. This is a space to learn, grow and chal­lenge a very fun­da­men­tal human will­ing­ness to tol­er­ate soci­etal cor­rup­tion (in this case, that of nuclear weapons) as well as main­tain­ing a degree of liv­ing “out­side the sys­tem” whilst we make attempts to chal­lenge it.

The facil­i­ties here are indica­tive of the inge­nu­ity of thir­ty years of cre­ative and resource­ful indi­vid­u­als who have sim­ply found ways to cre­ate alter­na­tive ways of organ­is­ing that chal­lenge so many of the neg­a­tive learned behav­iour in soci­ety.

Ide­al­ly, we would love to see this con­tin­ue, not least because so many have worked so hard to con­tin­ue it but also because the sym­bol­ism of dis­man­tling the camp at this poten­tial­ly cru­cial time in the strug­gle for nuclear dis­ar­ma­ment (in the con­text of the ongo­ing Scot­tish inde­pen­dence and Tri­dent replace­ment debates) would be the worst pos­si­ble tim­ing.

We believe that main­tain­ing sup­port­ive com­mu­ni­ty liv­ing here, as well as active cam­paign­ing, can only be sus­tain­ably achieved with a sig­nif­i­cant increase in num­bers, pos­si­bly eight res­i­dents. The poten­tial and capac­i­ty of the camp is also severe­ly lim­it­ed by the lack of wider input and prac­ti­cal sup­port for it’s inhab­i­tants. We have felt like care­tak­ers of a sou­venir. We have felt a strong and increas­ing sense of moral sup­port for what we are doing but with this has come inad­e­quate and dwin­dling prac­ti­cal sup­port.

In short, we feel that the camp can only have a future if a larg­er group of peo­ple decide they wish to be based here and the wider peace move­ment assumes a degree of col­lec­tive respon­si­bil­i­ty to sup­port these peo­ple, emo­tion­al­ly and prac­ti­cal­ly and take active mea­sures to ensure their wel­fare. The cur­rent res­i­dents would be com­mit­ted to pro­vid­ing long term sup­port to any group or indi­vid­u­als that wish to con­tin­ue the Camp.

What hap­pens next:
So many peo­ple have giv­en so much of their lives and ener­gy to the Peace Camp and anti-nuclear move­ment so we expect our pro­pos­al and thoughts con­tained here to have mixed respons­es. We have there­fore decid­ed to call an open meet­ing on Sat­ur­day 14th April at 4pm in the Kin­ning Park Com­plex, Glas­gow as part of the Scrap Tri­dent week­end and wel­come any con­struc­tive input on this day or via email from this point onward (faslane30@gmail.com).

What­ev­er the deci­sion on the future of the camp, we will con­tin­ue with cam­paign­ing and an active pres­ence at Faslane, but per­haps not in the form of con­tin­u­ous occu­pa­tion. Nev­er­the­less, we want to avoid the sym­bol­ism of tak­ing the camp away at this cru­cial and hope­ful time for dis­ar­ma­ment and will active­ly sup­port any viable alter­na­tive to this.

On 13–15th of April, there will be an unprece­dent­ed demon­stra­tion in Glas­gow and mass block­ade of Faslane with Scrap Tri­dent and we expect this to be the begin­ning of a new wave of anti-nuclear and anti-mil­i­tarist action. The future is dis­ar­ma­ment!

http://faslanepeacecamp.wordpress.com/

Earth First! Summer Gathering: 7th-11th August 2013

This year’s the Sum­mer Gath­er­ing will be in the Hast­ings area near the Bex­hill-Hast­ings Link Road cam­paign. It will run from the evening of Wednes­day 7th August and fin­ish on Sun­day 11th August.

 

This year’s the Sum­mer Gath­er­ing will be in the Hast­ings area near the Bex­hill-Hast­ings Link Road cam­paign. It will run from the evening of Wednes­day 7th August and fin­ish on Sun­day 11th August.

 

The Earth First! Sum­mer Gath­er­ing takes place each year to pro­vide a space in which the rad­i­cal ecol­o­gy move­ment can share skills and plan for future cam­paigns and actions. Any­one who is inter­est­ed in eco­log­i­cal direct action will have a valu­able part to play and is wel­come to come to this fam­i­ly friend­ly gath­er­ing. If you’ve not been to an Earth First! Gath­er­ing before and are think­ing about it, please do come, we are a very friend­ly, wel­com­ing bunch and would love to have you get involved

 

Pro­gramme: Work­shops, skill shar­ing and plan­ning action, plus low-impact liv­ing with­out lead­ers. Meet peo­ple, learn skills.

Transport/location: exact loca­tion will be announced 2 weeks before gath­er­ing on web­site.

Cost: £20-£30 from each per­son to cov­er all costs except food. (If you real­ly can’t afford this, please come any­way and give what you can).

Food: Deli­cious veg­an food will be avail­able, and meal tick­ets will be on sale at the gath­er­ing.

What to bring: Every­one will be camp­ing so bring a tent, sleep­ing bag etc.

If you have any par­tic­u­lar accom­mo­da­tion, access or dietary needs please tell us asap but at least two weeks in advance so we can plan suit­able facil­i­ties. There will be a small amount of liv­ing vehic­u­lar space if booked in advance, on a first come first served basis.

 

Con­tact: summergathering-at-earthfirst.org.uk

http://efgathering.weebly.com

Sizewell Nuclear Power Stations Blockaded

26.11.2012

The road lead­ing to Sizewell nuclear pow­er sta­tions A & B has been block­ad­ed since 6:45 this morn­ing. The pro­tes­tors are still there (9:00).

 Waste of Our Future

26.11.2012

The road lead­ing to Sizewell nuclear pow­er sta­tions A & B has been block­ad­ed since 6:45 this morn­ing. The pro­tes­tors are still there (9:00).

 Waste of Our Future

At 6:45am this morn­ing cam­paign­ers oppos­ing nuclear new build block­ad­ed the entrance to EDF’s Sizewell facil­i­ty in Suf­folk lim­it­ing access to the site by vis­i­tors to the site. This is the sec­ond time in three days that EDFs nuclear facil­i­ties have been tar­get­ed by activists, fol­low­ing hot on the heels of Friday’s dawn Block­ade at Hink­ley Point in Som­er­set.

EDF began their Con­sul­ta­tion on the 21 Nov, and the pub­lic have just eleven weeks (until the 6th Feb 2012) to wade through the 342 pages of con­sul­ta­tion doc­u­ments. The glossy Brochures encour­age us to play an ‘active’ role in the con­sul­ta­tion, so here we are. Said mom Nik­ki Clark, “The government’s ener­gy pol­i­cy and changes to the plan­ning sys­tem are pre-emp­tive­ly deny­ing peo­ple the oppor­tu­ni­ty to raise their legit­i­mate con­cerns about nuclear pow­er. This makes acts of civ­il dis­obe­di­ence extreme­ly impor­tant as with­out this there is no oth­er way to raise these issues.” She went on to say “If the process already under­way at Hink­ley Point in Som­er­set where I live is any­thing to go by, then the pub­lic here at Sizewell can expect a sham process which is noth­ing more than a cyn­i­cal box-tick­ing exer­cise designed to allow EDF to claim that they have ‘lis­tened’ to people’s con­cerns. The new process that the gov­ern­ment has intro­duced to ‘fast-track new nuclear’ is total­ly unde­mo­c­ra­t­ic and there­fore, ille­git­i­mate.

On Fri­day the gov­ern­ment announced that “they have reached a land­mark agree­ment on ener­gy pol­i­cy that will send a durable sig­nal to investors”1 so that they can intro­duce the Ener­gy Bill next week how­ev­er most com­men­ta­tors believe that The Elec­tric­i­ty reform Act is more about sub­si­dis­ing new nuclear that it is about sub­si­dis­ing ‘low car­bon tech­nol­o­gy, the proof (if any were need­ed) lies in the fact that the gov­ern­ments pro­pos­als as they stand will ham­string gen­uine­ly renew­able projects2.

On-shore wind would only require a strike price of around £80 per megawatt hour com­pared to the min­i­mum ‘strike’ price of around £165 per MW/h that would be need­ed to sub­sidise new nuclear build. This would not be the only ‘subsidy-that-isn’t‑a-subsidy ‘ that nuclear pow­er would require. Said Mell Har­ri­son, Edu­ca­tion Direc­tor at a local Eco-cen­tre “The biggest ‘subsidy-that-isn’t‑a-subsidy’ that this indus­try will receive will be the one that comes in the form of high­ly tox­ic radioac­tive waste lega­cy they plan to store on-site at new build facil­i­ties. The cost of these sub­si­dies will be borne by our grand­chil­dren both phys­i­cal­ly and eco­nom­i­cal­ly in around six­ty years time when EDF get to leave the waste where it is and return ‘cus­tody’ of it to our grand­chil­dren. This will be in the form of high­ly dan­ger­ous waste that will require a min­i­mum of a fur­ther hun­dred years cool­ing in-situ before any­one can even begin to think about pack­ag­ing it for any fur­ther ‘storage’3

Said local cam­paign­er Helen Swanston “Most peo­ple around here don’t realise that EDF were giv­en the go ahead recent­ly to build a dry stor­age facil­i­ty to house the back­log of 1,466 tonnes of radioac­tive waste that is accu­mu­lat­ing on site. The rea­son for this accu­mu­la­tion is because the tech­nocrats of yester-year promised that the ‘waste issue’ would be resolved ‘in the future’ mak­ing fan­tas­tic promis­es about mag­i­cal dis­pos­al facil­i­ties that would mate­ri­alise in the not too dis­tant future. These are the same emp­ty promis­es that todays tech­nocrats and politi­cians are mak­ing to us now. We are no clos­er now to any kind of inter­im stor­age facil­i­ty let alone any kind of final rest­ing place for nuclear waste.” The government’s so-called pol­i­cy of vol­un­tarism has seen only one set of local author­ites even con­sid­er ‘vol­un­teer­ing’ and even they seem to have cold feet hav­ing deferred any deci­sion to get involved until Jan­u­ary of next year.4 EDF plan to cre­ate 3500 tonnes of waste from their twin EPR reac­tors 5

********************************ENDS*********************************************

Notes to Edi­tors:

1 –DECC press release Re Ener­gy Reform Act:  http://www.decc.gov.uk/en/content/cms/news/pn12_0146/pn12_0146.aspx

2 – Dr David Toke is Senior Lec­tur­er in Ener­gy Pol­i­cy in the Depart­ment of Polit­i­cal Sci­ence and Inter­na­tion­al Stud­ies in the Uni­ver­si­ty of Birm­ing­ham (UK). He was a key play­er in the cam­paign to estab­lish feed-in tar­iffs for small renew­able projects in the UK, the leg­is­la­tion for which was passed in 2008  http://realfeed-intariffs.blogspot.co.uk/2012/11/are-tories-anti-bourgeois-left-or-just.html

3 –The Nuclear Reg­u­la­to­ry Com­mis­sion and Argoone Nation­al Lab­o­ra­to­ry in the U.S high­light­ed the dan­gers asso­ci­at­ed with the new high burn up fuel in 2008 in a con­fer­ence where ‘They say that fuels with a burn-up above 45 GWd/tU cause pre­vi­ous­ly unfore­seen safe­ty prob­lems’  http://www.robedwards.com/2008/04/nuclear-super‑f.html

4 – There is deep unease about trust­ing gov­ern­ment enough to comitt to the process to find loca­tion for a nuclear waste dump with con­cerns about the abs­cence of laws gov­ern­ing the process as well as con­cerns about the unsuit­able geol­o­gy in Cum­bria.  http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/the-northerner/2012/oct/03/three-month-delay-nuclear-waste-burial-cumbria

5 – Peter Lux is a local per­son con­cerned about Sizewell  http://www.plux.co.uk/3500-tonnes-of-spent-fuel-may-be-produced-by-sizewell‑c/