That’s the way to do it! Climate action camps across the Channel

CLIMATE ACTION CAMP 2012, BELGIUM, 3-8 AUG

If the climate was a bank...

... Then it would have been saved already (Hugo Chavez)
... Then I wouldn’t be getting a bonus (Jean-Luc Dehaene)
... Then the ratings agencies would have gone bust (Mario Draghi)
... Then it would need to look for a new name (Belfius!!!)

CLIMATE ACTION CAMP 2012, BELGIUM, 3-8 AUG

If the climate was a bank...

... Then it would have been saved already (Hugo Chavez) ... Then I wouldn’t be getting a bonus (Jean-Luc Dehaene) ... Then the ratings agencies would have gone bust (Mario Draghi) ... Then it would need to look for a new name (Belfius!!!) ... Then you’d read even more rubbish about it than you do today! .. Then it would be popular with businesses ... Then it wouldn’t change so quickly ... Then I would campaign just as much about it!!!

We’ve been organising climate action camps for three years. During a climate action camp activists come together to share experiences, live together peacefully and sustainably, and self-organise to make plans and carry out actions. They set up the most beautiful campsite in the Northern hemisphere and spend a week letting the air out of the tyres of the capitalist landrover... Climate action camp is a week full of action, exciting workshops, relaxation and vegan food. Every year lots of children come too. They have a great time in the kids barrio with activities to suit all ages.

The next climate camp will take place from 3rd to 8th August somewhere in Leuven

If you want to steal money, then steal a lot all at once. Then they will call you a dynamic entrepreneur or who knows, a banker... Banks can gamble with people’s savings, we know that already. But they also gamble with the climate, the planet and farmers in the south: Banks like BNP-Paribas, KBC or ING invest heavily in tar sands, the most environmentally destructive way to extract oil from the ground. A recent report revealed that these same banks are involved land-grabbing, the large scale acquisition of more and more agricultural land in the South by financial institutions. The World Bank invests climate funds in the biggest fossil fuel energy projects in the world. Lastly, banks speculate on carbon emission allowances. Banks aren’t only gambling our money away but are also playing with the planet. It’s time to take action. Now!

The exact location of the camp will be announced on the websites on the 2nd of August...

Join our Facebookevent: http://www.facebook.com/events/337275796321385/

Information & Contact:

http://www.climaxi.be http://www.climate-justice-action.be

Camp-phone? +32(0)478.07.98.58

info[at] climate-justice-action.be info[at] climaxi.be

**********************************************

TWO CLIMATE ACTION CAMPS IN GERMANY - August

Just a shout out to see if you might be interesting in coming over to Germany for some climate action this summer?

There are 2 camps going on, one in the West from the 3-12th August: http://www.ausgeco2hlt.de/klimacamp/en/

and the other in the East from the 11-19th August http://www.lausitzcamp.info/international-information/english/

There's also in the West camp an ongoing Forest Occupation: http://hambachforest.blogsport.de/

Both camps are dealing with open cast mining and plans for new coal power plants. I'm more familiar with the East camp so a bit about that: The main days of action are on the 17th and 18th--coal plant blockade. We could def. use more people here! We're also still open for more workshops, especially practical ones and skill sharings, but also anything you're dealing with over there... It would be great to connect... see below for contact details.

Action: aktion@lausitzcamp.info Finances: finanzen@lausitzcamp.info Logistics: logistik@lausitzcamp.info Mobilsation: mobi@lausitzcamp.info Programme: programm@lausitzcamp.info

Reclaim Hinkley — 8–9 October 2012

When injus­tice becomes law, resis­tance becomes duty.”

MASS TRESPASS — MASS CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE

No New Nuclear — Inter­na­tion­al call out

Join us in an act of mass civ­il dis­obe­di­ence as we tres­pass on the pro­posed site of Hink­ley C nuclear pow­er sta­tion in Som­er­set.

When injus­tice becomes law, resis­tance becomes duty.”

MASS TRESPASS — MASS CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE

No New Nuclear — Inter­na­tion­al call out

Join us in an act of mass civ­il dis­obe­di­ence as we tres­pass on the pro­posed site of Hink­ley C nuclear pow­er sta­tion in Som­er­set.

EDF Ener­gy is already trash­ing frag­ile Som­er­set coun­try­side in prepa­ra­tion for the Hink­ley C nuclear pow­er sta­tion – even though it hasn’t got plan­ning per­mis­sion to start build­ing.

SOWING THE SEEDS OF DISSENT

This mass action is for any­one who feels able to pub­licly tres­pass — or bear wit­ness to the mass tres­pass by join­ing us around the perime­ter fence. We need peo­ple who are pre­pared to be arrest­ed. We also need peo­ple to sup­port those who are tres­pass­ing by gath­er­ing around the perime­ter fence. We will be pro­vid­ing legal brief­in­gs and sup­port for any tres­passers who are arrest­ed.

Our aim is to make the tres­pass as safe and dig­ni­fied as pos­si­ble. All our activ­i­ties are bound by the prin­ci­ples of non-vio­lent direct action. We are hold­ing a camp imme­di­ate­ly before the tres­pass so that every­one involved has a voice in plan­ning the action itself.

On the day of the tres­pass, we will attempt to rein­tro­duce some of the bio­di­ver­si­ty that has been stripped through EDFs pre­ma­ture pre­lim­i­nary works. Once inside we will scat­ter wild­flow­ers and oth­er species native to this site. By show­ing your sup­port for an end to nuclear pow­er, you are part a grow­ing move­ment that is expos­ing this cor­rupt gov­ern­ment pol­i­cy that puts prof­its before safe­ty.

EDF is Eager­ly Destroy­ing Fields even though it doesn’t yet have per­mis­sion to build the reac­tors — nor does it have approval for the reac­tor design, or even a final invest­ment deci­sion.

The new EPR reac­tor design will pro­duce radioac­tive waste that is so tox­ic that it will have to be stored on site for over 100 years. The dan­gers asso­ci­at­ed with flood­ing, ter­ror­ist attack and acci­den­tal leak­age are total­ly unac­cept­able.

NO MORE NUCLEAR BAILOUTS

The move­ment against the gov­ern­men­t’s so-called ‘nuclear renais­sance’ is winning….but we must keep up the pres­sure. Out of the eight new nuclear pow­er sta­tions sup­port­ed by the coali­tion gov­ern­ment when it came into pow­er, only two are still on the table: Hink­ley in Som­er­set and Sizewell in Suf­folk.

French-owned EDF Ener­gy — the own­er of Hink­ley and Sizewell — is pres­sur­ing the gov­ern­ment to increase the range of hid­den sub­si­dies on offer in a des­per­ate bid to attract inter­est from scep­ti­cal investors. THIS MUST NOT HAPPEN.

If EDF gets its way, it will be a dou­ble wham­my for us — and for future gen­er­a­tions. It will mean we pay twice: once as tax­pay­ers and once as con­sumers through our ener­gy bills.

We say put the £60bn ear­marked for ‘new nuclear’ into a clean­er, green­er, fair­er future. The way for­ward is through ener­gy reduc­tion and greater invest­ment into research and devel­op­ment to make renew­able ener­gy and ener­gy stor­age fit for the 21st cen­tu­ry.

We need to cre­ate a long term sus­tain­able ener­gy plan that is based on meet­ing peo­ple’s needs rather than mak­ing prof­its for investors. In May, ener­gy sec­re­tary Charles Hendry told min­is­ters at a select com­mit­tee hear­ing that the government’s ener­gy pol­i­cy would be robust enough with­out includ­ing nuclear in the mix. It’s time we moved ener­gy pol­i­cy for­wards rather than back­wards.

NUCLEAR IS NOT THE ANSWER

.…Cher­nobyl
The cri­sis is far from over: the sar­coph­a­gus cov­er­ing the doomed Russ­ian reac­tor is falling apart. Only this year, gov­ern­ments final­ly approved the fund­ing for a new one. The human pop­u­la­tion in the most heav­i­ly con­t­a­m­i­nat­ed ter­ri­to­ries is in decline. In Belarus 80% of chil­dren were born healthy before Cher­nobyl. Now, just 26 years lat­er, only 20% of chil­dren are born healthy.

.….Fukushi­ma
Thanks to peo­ple pow­er, all of Japan’s reac­tors have now been turned off. For the first time in over half a cen­tu­ry Japan is nuclear free. How­ev­er, the cri­sis at Fukushi­ma is far from over.

  • The Japan­ese peo­ple are foot­ing the bill. The com­pa­ny behind the pow­er sta­tion, Tep­co, has had to be re-nation­alised because of the spi­ralling cost of com­pen­sa­tion and the ongo­ing attempts to sta­bilise the reac­tors.
  • Many peo­ple are still liv­ing in heav­i­ly con­t­a­m­i­nat­ed areas that should have been evac­u­at­ed.
  • Food across Japan is heav­i­ly con­t­a­m­i­nat­ed and peo­ple are being encour­aged to sup­port the farm­ers of Fukushi­ma by eat­ing it.
  • The triple melt­down is still in full swing.
  • All of the fuel pools in reac­tors 1,2,3 & 4 are in bad con­di­tion.
  • The pool in reac­tor 4 is of par­tic­u­lar con­cern. Thou­sands of high­ly radioac­tive spent fuel rods are at risk of fur­ther explo­sions. If such an event occurs, high lev­els of radioac­tive con­t­a­m­i­na­tion could spread as far as Tokyo and wipe out Japan’s com­mer­cial infra­struc­ture.

WE WANT A FUTURE, NOT A DISASTER

More infor­ma­tion com­ing soon.

Sub­scribe to our newslet­ter and get reg­u­lar updates on the tres­pass plan and the lat­est devel­op­ments in the cam­paign against ‘new nuclear’. Please send any queries to: campaign@stopnewnuclear.org.uk or call our hot­line on: 07527–219476

Chinese Environmentalists Protest, Riot, Defeat Copper Plant in Sichuan

9/7/12

9/7/12

Fol­low­ing three days of mass protest, over­turned police cars, tear gas and vio­lent clash­es between pro­test­ers and riot police, the city gov­ern­ment of Shi­fang in the province of Sichuan, south­west Chi­na, announced last week that it is scrap­ping plans for a cop­per alloy plant. This is but one of dozens of indus­tri­al projects that have been suc­cess­ful­ly defeat­ed by large scale protests and riots in Chi­na in recent years. As in protests else­where in Chi­na, enraged activists stormed the city’s gov­ern­ment head­quar­ters and staged a suc­cess­ful occu­pa­tion.

“We have so many peo­ple in Shi­fang. We aren’t afraid of them (the author­i­ties),” an 18-year-old activist bold­ly stat­ed to Reuters by tele­phone from Shi­fang just before the gov­ern­ment acqui­es­cence to demands. “The Shi­fang peo­ple will def­i­nite­ly not sur­ren­der.”

But the vic­to­ry comes with seri­ous sac­ri­fice. Dozens of pro­test­ers have been  injured and many more round­ed up and detained. Their legal future is uncertain.If sim­i­lar post-protest crack-downs are of any insight there will be dozens of more orga­niz­ers round­ed up in the months to come as gov­ern­ment attempts to qui­et such protests pub­licly is coun­tered by a pri­vate dra­con­ian witch hunt to silence “ring­lead­ers.”

The gov­ern­ment has accused the banned spir­i­tu­al move­ment Falun Gong and the Dalai Lama for insti­gat­ing the vio­lence. But these are the com­mon scape­goats used by the gov­ern­ment any­time pop­u­lar upris­ings take place in Chi­na.

A Letter of Resistance in Shifang

The fol­low­ing is a trans­la­tion of a hand­out post­ed around the city of Shi­fang in the lead up and dur­ing the protests.

Save Shi­fang! All City Res­i­dents Unite!

Peo­ple of Shi­fang, let’s save our city!! It already a “can­cer town,” and they still want to build that molyb­de­num cop­per plant. We res­olute­ly oppose this! This is our shared home, and it is our respon­si­bil­i­ty to pro­tect it. Every­one is respon­si­ble for pro­tect­ing the envi­ron­ment!!

Per­haps many peo­ple still do not know Shi­fang plans to build a molyb­de­num cop­per plant, and still more peo­ple do not know the dam­age this will cause. Once con­struc­tion of the fac­to­ry begins, it will already be too late. We do not want to leave Shi­fang! Shi­fang is the “Bright Pearl of West­ern Sichuan.” We can­not leave! Heavy met­al pol­lu­tion will cause us ter­ri­ble harm.

Are there real­ly that many Shi­fang res­i­dents who have the mon­ey to move to anoth­er province? We must come togeth­er and work to keep the molyb­de­num cop­per plant far from Shi­fang!

Peo­ple of Shi­fang, rise up!!

Anti-fracking Blockade in Moshannon State Forest

9th July 2012

9th July 2012

Near­ly 100 Earth First! activists, friends and allies forced a 70-foot-tall EQT hydrofrack­ing drill rig to sus­pend oper­a­tions for 12 hours yes­ter­day in Pennsylvania’s Moshan­non State For­est. This is the first time that pro­test­ers have shut down a hydrofrack drilling oper­a­tion in the US. A tree sit­ter hung above the access road, with their anchor ropes block­ing it. A sec­ond per­son was also in a tree to sup­port the sit­ter while dozens of sup­port­ers guard­ed ten large debris piles that were across the road. Anoth­er group of 50 activists block­ad­ed the entrance to the access road. The State Police, with the Depart­ment of Con­ser­va­tion and Nat­ur­al Resources, dis­persed the block­ade around nine p.m. And removed the tree sit­ters with a lad­der truck. Three arrests were made for dis­or­der­ly con­duct, but pro­test­ers were cit­ed and released on-site.

There are a lim­it­ed num­ber of actu­al drill rigs in oper­a­tion in the state which are fer­ried around from site to site on a tight sched­ule. By halt­ing oper­a­tions for a day on this site, the block­ade has like­ly cre­at­ed a cost­ly dis­rup­tion for a hand­ful of wells in the area which EQT appar­ent­ly planned to drill in suc­ces­sion.

The activists report­ed that the police were reck­less with the sit­ters’ safe­ty, such as being quick to cut their anchor ropes.  The sup­port­ing sitter’s safe­ty and descent ropes were cut by the police as he climbed high­er in the tree.  The police in the lad­der truck had no radios and com­mu­ni­ca­tion to the ground was dif­fi­cult over the noise of the diesel engine; at one point the lad­der hit one of the sitter’s sup­port lines. Police were seen taunt­ing the sit­ter by wav­ing around one of their anchor lines and mak­ing jokes at them while shak­ing the ham­mock.

The site is part of a high con­cen­tra­tion of wells in Moshan­non State For­est, one of the most heav­i­ly drilled state forests in Penn­syl­va­nia. Over half of the forest’s 190,000 acres have been leased for Mar­cel­lus drilling using hydraulic frac­tur­ing. Despite wide­spread pub­lic oppo­si­tion, the for­mer PA sec­re­tary of Con­ser­va­tion and Nat­ur­al Resources pre­dicts 12,000 Mar­cel­lus wells will be drilled in state forests in the com­ing decade1. A recent poll showed that the major­i­ty of Penn­syl­va­ni­ans are opposed to frack­ing on pub­lic lands2.

Local farmer Jen­ny Lisak, whose own prop­er­ty has been impact­ed by frack­ing, describes the dev­as­ta­tion she has seen in the Moshan­non, “Hav­ing grown up enjoy­ing Moshan­non State For­est in so many ways, I am absolute­ly appalled at the ongo­ing destruc­tion. The once nar­row and invit­ing oak-shad­ed lanes are now being replaced by dust and traf­fic choked roads for chem­i­cal laden trucks – there are no words to describe the injus­tice of tak­ing pub­lic land, meant to pro­vide a source of beau­ty and wilder­ness for all and turn­ing it into an indus­tri­al zone.”

Drilling in the area has a trou­bled his­to­ry. In June 2010, a major blowout at anoth­er well in Clearfield Coun­ty spewed 35,000 gal­lons of tox­ic drilling waste into the Lit­tle Lau­rel Run water­shed and caused the evac­u­a­tion of Moshan­non State For­est3. Since 2008, only 24 of EQT’s 198 Mar­cel­lus wells in the state have been inspect­ed and vio­la­tions were found at every sin­gle inspec­tion. When they have been cit­ed, they’ve refused to change their prac­tices. On May 9, 2012, in Dun­can Town­ship, Tio­ga Coun­ty, EQT was cit­ed for faulty con­struc­tion on a flow­back water impound­ment; three weeks lat­er the pit failed, con­t­a­m­i­nat­ing a near­by spring4.

“This is part of an esca­lat­ing direct action cam­paign against frack­ing in the Mar­cel­lus Shale region,” said Danielle Diet­t­er­ick, an activist affil­i­at­ed with Mar­cel­lus Earth First! from Ben­ton, Pa. “Peo­ple from all around the coun­try have joined with Penn­syl­va­nia res­i­dents to put their bod­ies on the line to stop frack­ing.”

The action comes on the heels of a 12-day block­ade to stop the dis­place­ment of the Riverdale Mobile Home Park, in Lycoming Coun­ty, and the shut­down of a frack­ing waste­water injec­tion well near Athens, Ohio. Groups across the coun­try are plan­ning more anti-extrac­tion inter­ven­tions like RAMPS in West Vir­ginia and the Tar Sands Block­ade in Texas, lat­er this month. All these inde­pen­dent, grass­roots-led actions show per­haps a coa­lesc­ing nation­al upris­ing against exploita­tive extrac­tion.

Susan Riley, anoth­er sup­port­er, cheered on the bold action, “The state gov­ern­ment has sold off our pub­lic lands and, with Act 13, stripped us of our rights to local self-gov­er­nance. The frack­ing indus­try has free reign in this state and no one’s gonna stop them unless we do.”

8th July 2012

Activists from Mar­cel­lus Earth First! have erect­ed a slash pile block­ade and two tree sits block­ing an access road to an EQT hydro-frack­ing site in Moshan­non State For­est in Clearfield Coun­ty, PA., halt­ing drilling oper­a­tions set to begin this week. The block­aders were joined by 40 sup­port­ers and con­cerned cit­i­zens, who turned around a Hal­libur­ton truck. The block­ade is try­ing to stop the fur­ther destruc­tion of Pennsylvania’s state forests—more than half of which have already been leased for drilling—and call atten­tion to the dev­as­tat­ing effects of hydrofrack­ing on the state’s com­mu­ni­ties. The sit­ters’ anchor lines are block­ing the road by cross­ing each oth­er and the road, and if an anchor line is cut a sit­ter will fall. This action has been coor­di­nat­ed as the post-Ren­dezvous action. Each Sum­mer Earth First!ers and allies come togeth­er to skill share, take part in dis­cus­sion work­shops, and keep it wild in our last remain­ing wilder­ness places in the US. Fol­low­ing a week in the woods, we take part in an action in sup­port of the local orga­niz­ers host­ing the camp out, also know as the Round Riv­er Ren­dezvous, or Rondy.

Today’s block­ade is the lat­est in a series of esca­lat­ing actions of resis­tance to the destruc­tive impacts of hydrofrack­ing in the Mar­cel­lus Shale. Last May, res­i­dents of But­ler Coun­ty occu­pied the office of State Rep­re­sen­ta­tive Bri­an Ellis, demand­ing account­abil­i­ty for wide­spread con­t­a­m­i­na­tion caused by hor­i­zon­tal drilling. In June, sev­en fam­i­lies, along with dozens of sup­port­ers, blocked the entrance to the Riverdale Mobile Home Com­mu­ni­ty to pre­vent their immi­nent evic­tion at the hands of Aqua Amer­i­ca PVR. Aqua sought to destroy their homes and con­struct a water with­draw­al facil­i­ty per­mit­ted to extract up to three mil­lion gal­lons of water from the Susque­han­na Riv­er dai­ly for use in frack­ing. Res­i­dents were able to main­tain the block­ade for 12 days. On June 17, 1,000 Ohioans stormed the state­house in Colum­bus and passed a “people’s res­o­lu­tion” ban­ning hydrofrack­ing. Most recent­ly, a 31-year-old landown­er from Athens Coun­ty, Ohio chained her­self to con­crete bar­rels and shut down oper­a­tions at one of Ohio’s 170 injec­tion wells, which con­tain about 95% of the tox­ic and radioac­tive frack­ing waste gen­er­at­ed from Penn­syl­va­nia drilling.

Momen­tum in the anti-frack­ing bat­tle will con­tin­ue to build across the Mar­cel­lus and Uti­ca shale regions through­out July. Next week­end, res­i­dents from Ohio and beyond will gath­er at an anti-frack­ing action camp in Youngstown and pre­pare to enforce the “people’s res­o­lu­tion” against frack­ing. The upcom­ing months show the begin­nings of a nation­al rebel­lion against extrac­tive indus­try across the board. On July 28, anti-frack­ers from across the nation will gath­er in Wash­ing­ton D.C. for “Stop the Frack Attack,” the largest mobi­liza­tion against frack­ing ever. In West Vir­ginia, Appalachi­ans and allies will stand togeth­er at the “Moun­tain Mobi­liza­tion” and shut down an active strip mine the last week of July. In Montana,the “Coal Export Action”, a ten-day cam­paign of civ­il dis­obe­di­ence at the begin­ning of August will tar­get coal ship­ments from strip mines in the Pow­der Riv­er Basin, over­seas. And lat­er in the month, Texas res­i­dents have called for the “Tar Sands Block­ade” to block the recent­ly approved south­ern leg of the Key­stone XL pipeline.

Where the gov­ern­ment has failed to act to pro­tect com­mu­ni­ties and the earth from the rav­ages of an out-of-con­trol ener­gy indus­try, the peo­ple are ris­ing up to resist. No mat­ter where you live, you have the oppor­tu­ni­ty to join the fight for our future. Find your place, stand your ground, and in the words of Moth­er Jones, “Boo­gie Chilluns.”

UPDATE, 11:53 am:
Police mak­ing vague threats at block­ade about assault rifles going off and wan­der­ing through block­ade with assault riflesHow­ev­er, at the ral­ly they said there’s a sick bear up the road that needs to be put down, and not to freak out if a gun shot is heard.

Police ini­ti­at­ed anoth­er round of nego­ti­a­tion with the ral­ly insist­ing folks move the debris that’s in the road because it’s a safe­ty risk, mak­ing veiled threats about things esca­lat­ing if that doesn’t hap­pen.  Police have informed peo­ple it’s ille­gal to block the road, but have not giv­en any order to dis­perse, they said “if it doesn’t hap­pen [dis­per­sal] they don’t want things to esca­late.”  Oth­er­wise, sit­u­a­tion unchanged.

UPDATE  10:14 am:
State police on scene at sup­port­ing ral­ly.

UPDATE  10:10 am:
Two tree-sit­ters block­ing the well pad access road–their anchor lines are cross­ing the road and each oth­er, and if an anchor line is cut­ter a sit­ter will fall.  There’s also a slash pile in the road.  No police on seen and appar­ent­ly no secu­ri­ty either.

UPDATE  9:30 am:
Mar­cel­lus Earth First! and sup­port­ers have set up a block­ade at an EQT well pad in the Moshan­non Penn­syl­va­nia State For­est.  An addi­tion­al group of 40 sup­port­ers are hold­ing a ral­ly down the road, and have blocked a Hal­libur­ton truck.  The activists plan to stay as long as they can.  Stay tuned for more updates as infor­ma­tion becomes avail­able.

BP F***ing the Future subverts

6.7.12

6.7.12

With the Olympics now only three weeks away, protests against Olympic spon­sor BP are esca­lat­ing. Today dozens of BP logos across Lon­don were sab­o­taged, includ­ing the UK’s most pres­ti­gious bill­board site at Cromwell Road. Around the cap­i­tal, pro­test­ers hit petrol sta­tions, BP-spon­sored cul­tur­al insti­tu­tions and adver­tis­ing hoard­ings, protest­ing against one of the world’s most envi­ron­men­tal­ly destruc­tive com­pa­nies being a major spon­sor of the Lon­don Olympics. Signs were splat­tered with oil and BP’s tagline ‘Fuelling the Future’ was sub­ver­tised with the URL ‘f‑ingthefuture.org.uk’.

BP has con­tin­u­ous­ly been slammed for its sys­tem­at­ic dis­re­gard for the envi­ron­ment, human rights and work­er safe­ty, includ­ing its fail­ure to clean up after the Gulf of Mex­i­co dis­as­ter of 2010, its deci­sion to enter the dev­as­tat­ing Cana­di­an tar sands, and its plans to drill for Arc­tic oil. This crit­i­cism has increased dra­mat­i­cal­ly since BP was announced ‘Sus­tain­abil­i­ty Part­ner’ of the Lon­don 2012 games, and today’s protests fol­low a series of recent actions tar­get­ing BP’s Olympic spon­sor­ship:
* On the eve of BP’s AGM in April, protest group CAMSOL posed online as LOCOG and announced BP had been dropped as Sus­tain­abil­i­ty Part­ner.
* In April, the UK Tar Sands Net­work nom­i­nat­ed BP in the Green­wash Gold cam­paign as ‘worst Olympic spon­sor’.
* Since April, the Reclaim Shake­speare Com­pa­ny has been invad­ing Shake­speare­an per­for­mances across the coun­try to protest against BP’s spon­sor­ship of the Cul­tur­al Olympiad.
* Last week, acclaimed actor Mark Rylance spoke out against BP’s spon­sor­ship of the Games, reveal­ing he had ques­tioned his own involve­ment in the Open­ing Cer­e­mo­ny.

One of those tak­ing part in the action, Bren­dan Pierce, said, “BP is pay­ing tens of mil­lions of pounds to clean up its tar­nished image, in what could well be the most expen­sive use of pro­pa­gan­da in his­to­ry. But with even its own busi­ness pro­jec­tions prepar­ing for a six degree tem­per­a­ture rise, BP knows it is damn­ing us to a future of run­away cli­mate change.”

Anoth­er activist, Deb­o­rah Dud­ley, said “Reports sug­gest that BP’s spon­sor­ship of the Olympics has been high­ly effec­tive at laun­der­ing its filthy image, so we’re reveal­ing the dirt behind the glossy brand­ing. I’m proud to be tak­ing direct action as part of a world­wide move­ment for cli­mate jus­tice. I encour­age oth­ers to get involved.”

A web­site, f‑ingthefuture.org.uk, shows pic­tures of the action and out­lines the prob­lems with BP’s spon­sor­ship of the Olympics.

For more infor­ma­tion, inter­views and high-res­o­lu­tion pho­tos, email: f.ingthefuture@gmail.com

 

 

What the web­site says:

——————————————-

Why shouldn’t BP spon­sor the Olympics?

BP’s green logo is plas­tered all over the Olympics. The com­pa­ny is ‘Offi­cial Fuel and Gas Provider’ and also spon­sor of the Cul­tur­al Olympiad and Lon­don 2012 Fes­ti­val.

Worst of all BP is ‘Sus­tain­abil­i­ty Part­ner’. That’s right, the organ­is­ers of the Olympics have decid­ed to allow BP, one of the dirt­i­est com­pa­nies on earth, the oppor­tu­ni­ty to rebrand itself as social­ly respon­si­ble and take an active role in propos­ing how soci­ety should approach cli­mate change.

Do you remem­ber images of oil gush­ing into the Gulf of Mex­i­co from BP’s deep-sea Macon­do well back in 2010, coat­ing the ocean and its inhab­i­tants? Have you heard of BP’s plans in the tar sands, the world’s sec­ond largest oil deposits after Sau­di Ara­bia, that can only be extract­ed by using four times as much green­house gas and have been labelled the most destruc­tive project on earth? Have you heard about BP’s deals to extract oil from the depths of the pris­tine Arc­tic, despite the poten­tial risk of a cat­a­stroph­ic spill even hard­er to clean up than the Gulf?

Do you think BP has earned the right to be ‘Sus­tain­abil­i­ty Part­ner’ to the Lon­don 2012 Olympics?

Does BP have the right to have any asso­ci­a­tion what­so­ev­er with the Games, whose found­ing state­ment speaks of ‘uni­ver­sal fun­da­men­tal eth­i­cal prin­ci­ples’, whose 2011 Char­ter declares that the Games should be ‘pro­mot­ing a peace­ful soci­ety con­cerned with the preser­va­tion of human dig­ni­ty’, and require ‘mutu­al under­stand­ing with a spir­it of friend­ship, sol­i­dar­i­ty and fair play’?

Do you think oil and sport shouldn’t mix?

Do you some­times have the feel­ing that wher­ev­er you turn these days, adver­tis­ing has intrud­ed a lit­tle fur­ther, unin­vit­ed, into your per­son­al space?

BP is a cor­po­ra­tion that feeds off injus­tice and the destruc­tion of the nat­ur­al world that we and count­less oth­er species rely on. That destruc­tion comes most threat­en­ing­ly from the cur­rent bru­tal desta­bil­i­sa­tion of the world’s cli­mate.

BP is deeply embed­ded in British soci­ety – our ener­gy, our pen­sions, our invest­ments, our cul­ture… It pumps seri­ous mon­ey and effort into keep­ing things this way. Mar­ket­ing works. Shiny adver­tise­ments around the cap­i­tal do change the way peo­ple per­ceive a com­pa­ny. By spon­sor­ing activ­i­ties like the Cul­tur­al Olympiad, the Lon­don 2012 Fes­ti­val, the World Shake­speare Fes­ti­val and the Games them­selves, BP is able to con­tin­ue its cat­a­stroph­ic, though increas­ing­ly prof­itable, oper­a­tions. That’s why we had to act.

Remem­ber, if you see any ‘improved’ BP adver­tise­ments, please take a pho­to and email them to f.ingthefuture@gmail.com – and don’t wor­ry, we won’t assume that you have any respon­si­bil­i­ty for them!

 

Here are a few more things you can do:

  • Take action for cli­mate jus­tice! See Ris­ing Tide UK and Cli­mate Jus­tice Col­lec­tive for ways to get involved.
  • Learn more about BP’s enor­mous envi­ron­men­tal and human rights atroc­i­ties. Start with tar sands.
  • Move your mon­ey away from banks and oth­er insti­tu­tions who will lend it to fos­sil fuel-based projects
  • Har­ness your cre­ativ­i­ty to a more car­ing, con­scious future, pos­si­bly by con­tribut­ing to Art Not Oil‘s ‘Cutur­al or Vul­tur­al 2012?’ gallery.
  • Be part of a move­ment for real, deep, pos­i­tive and last­ing social and eco­log­i­cal change: http://www.occupyuk.infohttp://occupylsx.org
  • Cut your car­bon! Cut out short-haul flights, min­i­mize car use, min­i­mize your meat con­sump­tion, insu­late your house. There are plen­ty of things you can do…but what­ev­er you do, try to chal­lenge the over­ar­ch­ing mind­set and sys­tem that’s allowng this insan­i­ty to hap­pen!

(NB. These links are not con­nect­ed to us, we just like ‘em!)

 

Pho­tos

Videos

Action round-up from Faslane anti-nuke action month

Four Olympic Gold Medal Winners arrested at Faslane Naval Base on Monday 11th June!

The  four women from Glas­gow and Edin­burgh are mem­bers of the Gare­loch Hor­tis peace group which was tak­ing part in thir­ty days of actions to mark thir­ty years of Faslane Peace Camp’s protest against Tri­dent nuclear weapons. The group staged the Peace Olympics with events as var­ied as syn­chro­nised swim­ming and putting the Hag­gis.

The medal­lists were arrest­ed dur­ing the Tug of Peace across the North Gate of the base.

The event drew atten­tion to the con­tin­ued pres­ence of the ille­gal and dead­ly weapons in Scot­land, and all eight oth­er nuclear nations. The win­ners’ podi­um high­light­ed that the only way to win the Race for Peace is to lay down the weapons of mass destruc­tion.

 

Activists blockade Faslane Naval Base

19.6.2012

Today at 7 o’ clock in the morn­ing activists of the Faslane Peace­camp block­ad­ed the Tri­dent Naval Base. Three peo­ple locked on in front of the South Gate. From the orig­i­nal five peo­ple at the North Gate two were arrest­ed imme­di­ate­ly while the rest were able to block­ade one lane of the road. The block­ade last­ed about 90 min­utes.


A spokesper­son said on behalf of the Peace Camp: ” We are hav­ing this block­ade today because we want to show our oppo­si­tion against nuclear weapons. We express our fear and our anger in a non­vi­o­lent way. We ask the British gov­ern­ment to lis­ten to the opin­ion of the major­i­ty of Scot­tish peo­ple and MSP’s. The Peo­ple do not want Tri­dent! They do not want this base with it’s nuclear weapons in Scot­land. Due to the fact that in the next few years Scot­tish inde­pen­dence may be achieved now is the time to put pres­sure upon the British gov­ern­ment. Instead of start­ing to put mon­ey into a Tri­dent replace­ment we want them to shut down the Faslane Naval Base and stop their nuclear weapons pro­gram.”

An inter­na­tion­al activist added: “This block­ade was a very inter­na­tion­al one. Peo­ple from all parts of Britain and activists from Spain and Swe­den were involved. I think that it is my right and my duty as a glob­al cit­i­zen to do non­vi­o­lent direct actions against nuclear weapons as long as our gov­ern­ments do not ful­fill their duty and stop fight­ing wars. Nuclear weapons are ille­gal by inter­na­tion­al human­i­tar­i­an law and I want all coun­tries to respect this and make a step to a more peace­ful world.”

This block­ade is part of the 30 days of action from the 9th June to the 9th July. To find out more about what has hap­pened and will hap­pen in the future vis­it our blog.

http://faslanepeacecamp.wordpress.com/

Faslane Peace Campers Trespass at Coulport Nuclear Weapons Depot

15/06/2012

Angus Chalmers and Leon­na O’Neill of Faslane Peace Camp entered RNAD Coul­port in the ear­ly hours of Wednes­day morn­ing.

They left the camp on foot at approx­i­mate­ly 10pm with the inten­tions of see­ing how close they could get to Coul­port under the cov­er of dark­ness. By the time they were approach­ing the out­er fence perime­ter the two still had­n’t been appre­hend­ed or detect­ed by secu­ri­ty or any of the night vision cctv cam­eras, and so decid­ed to con­tin­ue to see how far luck (or the inep­ti­tudes of the secu­ri­ty sys­tem on what should be the most heav­i­ly guard­ed naval depot in the UK) would get them.

They decid­ed to approach the Explo­sives Han­dling Jet­ty via the shore line and entered by wad­ing water and climb­ing a razor wire fence. At this point they decid­ed to walk vis­i­bly and announce them­selves to the first police they saw. To their sur­prise they were met with zero secu­ri­ty per­son­nel and were able to access a jet­ty a mat­ter of feet from the Explo­sives Han­dling Jet­ty where the Tri­dent nuclear war­heads are loaded to the Van­gau­rd sub­marines.

Angus climbed a fur­ther fence into the estab­lish­ment set­ting off the ban­dit alarm and alert­ing the MOD secu­ri­ty and cctv cam­era oper­a­tors. Both were soon appre­hend­ed by MOD police and arrest­ed and charged with miil­i­tary by-laws and the Seri­ous Organ­ised Crime and Police Act 2005 (SOCPA). Both were held in cus­tody until court on Thurs­day after­noon where the SOCPA charges were dropped and they plead­ed not guilty to the by-laws charges.

Leon­na and Angus said “This is evi­dence that the Couport Nuclear Weapons Depot is unsafe. The capac­i­ty for this tech­nol­o­gy to irreper­a­bly destroy life and the envi­ron­ment should be rea­son enough to ensure that it is safe guard­ed and pro­tect­ed in a way that does not allow for human error or com­pla­cen­cy. The rel­a­tive ease at which we were able to approach and enter Coul­port on foot and the close prox­i­matey we were able to get to the Explo­sives Han­dling Jet­ty is sur­pris­ing and dis­turb­ing”.

 

Faslane Peace Camp and Trident Ploughshares Trespass at Faslane Naval Base

2/07/2012

 
Sev­en activists from Faslane Peace Camp and Tri­dent Ploughshares entered Faslane naval base this morn­ing with four mem­bers of the group slip­ping past guards and reach­ing points up to 100 yards inside the base. A fur­ther two were arrest­ed in the attempt.

At 7am this morn­ing Faslane Peace Camp and Tri­dent Ploughshares activists attend­ed the North gate of the Faslane Naval Base to ser­e­nade the approach­ing morn­ing shift staff with peace and nuclear dis­ar­ma­ment songs. The act dou­bled as a ruse to enable fif­teen of the group to attempt enter­ing the base. One TP activist, Bri­an Larkin, suc­ceed­ed in gain­ing entry to the base whilst the rest were pre­vent­ed from doing so by Minit­sry of Defence and Strath­clyde police.

Bri­an was charged with breach of SOCPA, the Seri­ous Organ­ised Crime and Police Act, and mil­i­a­try by-laws and lat­er released on an under­tak­ing. Upon being released Larkin said “the seri­ous organ­ised crime hap­pens inside the base and not in these actions for peace and dis­ar­ma­ment. It is the ongo­ing deploy­ment of Tri­dent sub­marines – each car­ry­ing 48 war­heads, eight times more destruc­tive than the bomb dropped on Hiroshi­ma which killed 200,000 peo­ple – that con­sti­tutes seri­ous organ­ised crime and vio­lates every prin­ci­ple of human­i­ty in inter­na­tion­al law.”

In a show of the same relent­less per­sis­tence that has kept the Peace Camp and the anti-nuclear move­ment going over the years, the group lat­er returned to make a sec­ond attempt at breach­ing the North Gate. Two were arrest­ed dur­ing the attempt whilst six gained entry, four of which reach­ing up to 100 yards inside the base.

The ban­dit alarm was acti­vat­ed and the Naval Base was locked down, pre­vent­ing traf­fic from enter­ing the base and nor­mal oper­a­tions to con­tin­ue with­in the base for 45 min­utes. The action was part of the Peace Camp’s 30 Days of Action mark­ing 30 years of con­tin­u­ous resis­tance to nuclear weapons at Faslane. Thir­ty peo­ple have been arrest­ed in the cam­paign which began on 9 June. Nine peo­ple were arrest­ed today.

It is not yet clear what the oth­er eight will be charged with but a breach of SOCPA charge is like­ly in addi­tion to breach­ing mil­i­tary by-laws. Angus Chalmers of the Fasland Peace Camp said “This land has been fenced and des­ig­nat­ed as a SOCPA area in order to make pos­si­ble the seri­ous crime of deploy­ing Tri­dent.” Mar­garet Brem­n­er of the Tri­dent Ploughshares Gare­loch Hor­ti­cul­tur­al­ists affin­i­ty group added “We cross this line today to demon­strate that this land, this earth, does not belong to a state which is using it to threat­en the destruc­tion of the earth and all its peo­ples. We enter this gate in order to reclaim land for life not death.”

Each of those tres­pass­ing were car­ry­ing let­ters explain­ing the inter­na­tion­al ille­gal­i­ty of nuclear weapons to present to work­ers inside the base. In 1996, the Inter­na­tion­al Court of Jus­tice wrote the advi­so­ry opin­ion that not only would the use of nuclear weapons be ille­gal but the very threat of use through deploy­ment, main­te­nance and upgrade of nuclear weapons sys­tems is in con­tra­ven­tion to the Nuclear Non-Pro­lif­er­a­tion Treaty.

Under the terms of the NPT which entered into force over forty years ago, the UK gov­ern­ment is oblig­at­ed to bring nuclear dis­ar­ma­ment to com­ple­tion. Instead the UK gov­ern­ment has con­tin­ued to main­tain and is now upgrad­ing its nuclear weapons sys­tem. The recent news that the MoD has award­ed lucra­tive con­tracts to arms com­pa­nies for the ini­tial stages of a Tri­dent replace­ment pro­gramme fur­thers this ongo­ing mock­ery of our inter­na­tion­al legal oblig­a­tions.

As long as our gov­ern­ment con­tin­ues to fail in it’s oblig­a­tion to make seri­ous moves toward com­plete nuclear dis­ar­ma­ment, mem­bers of Tri­dent Plougshares and Faslane Peace Camp are com­mit­ted to non-vio­lent direct action to dis­rupt the deploy­ment of these ille­gal and immoral weapons.

Fur­ther demon­stra­tions are planned for the remain­der of the thir­ty days of action which will fin­ish on July 9th. Amongst oth­er actions, there will be an aca­d­e­m­ic sem­i­nar block­ade on Fri­day and a Rebel Clown Army insur­gence on Sat­ur­day. For more infor­ma­tion on the 30Days Action Cam­paign con­tact the camp via  faslane30@gmail.com.

Faslane Peace Camp: 01436 820901 or 07511793227
Tri­dent Ploughshares: Bri­an Larkin 07768 312676

For More infor­ma­tion on
Tri­dent Ploughshares see: www.tridentploughshares.org.uk
Faslane Peace Camp and 30 Days of Action see: http://faslanepeacecamp.wordpress.com/

 

State Of Emergency In Cajamarca Follows Four Deaths in Mine Protests

6th July ’12

A state of emer­gency has been declared in three provinces in the Andean depart­ment of Caja­mar­ca, locat­ed in north­ern Peru, fol­low­ing the deaths of four peo­ple dur­ing protests against the mul­ti-bil­lion dol­lar Con­ga gold project.

6th July ’12

A state of emer­gency has been declared in three provinces in the Andean depart­ment of Caja­mar­ca, locat­ed in north­ern Peru, fol­low­ing the deaths of four peo­ple dur­ing protests against the mul­ti-bil­lion dol­lar Con­ga gold project.

Peru’s Exec­u­tive branch approved the mea­sure, which cur­tails civ­il lib­er­ties, in the provinces of Caja­mar­ca, Celendin and Hual­gay­oc. The state of emer­gency came into force on Wednes­day and will be valid for 30 days, the gov­ern­ment said.

The mea­sure fol­lows the death in Celendin of three peo­ple and more than 30 injured on Tues­day, dur­ing clash­es between police and demon­stra­tors.  One of the per­sons killed was 17 years old.  More than 15 peo­ple were arrest­ed.  On the same day, a man was killed dur­ing protests in Bam­ba­mar­ca, cap­i­tal of the province of Hual­gay­oc.

This week’s protests, with Minas Con­ga still in focus, are against the may­ors of 65 dis­tricts who last week were in Lima with Pres­i­dent Humala at the Gov­ern­ment Palace to accept gov­ern­ment invest­ment in a series of infra­struc­ture projects in their provinces.   

It is the sec­ond time since last Decem­ber that Peru has declared a state of emer­gency in Caja­mar­ca to con­trol esca­lat­ing protests against the $4.8 bil­lion Minas Con­ga project, which is being devel­oped by gold min­ing com­pa­ny Yana­cocha.

Yana­cocha is major­i­ty con­trolled by US-based New­mont Min­ing (51%), with Peru’s Minas Bue­naven­tu­ra own­ing 49%.

Protests late last year against Minas Con­ga, over wor­ries that it would harm the water sup­ply to farm­ers, result­ed in the sus­pen­sion of the project. 

At the same time, the delay in reach­ing an agree­ment with pro­test­ers pushed Pres­i­dent Humala to make a major cab­i­net shuf­fle late last year, appoint­ing for­mer Inte­ri­or min­is­ter Oscar Valdes as his new pre­mier to apply a stronger hand in quelling the protests.  Those against the min­ing project have only become more entrenched.

Inde­pen­dent con­sul­tants hired by the gov­ern­ment have reviewed the Minas Con­ga envi­ron­men­tal impact study, and the gov­ern­ment said recent­ly that the com­pa­ny could restart work if it made some changes like build­ing water reser­voirs before start­ing con­struc­tion of the mine.

How­ev­er, oppo­si­tion has remained strong despite attempts by Peru’s gov­ern­ment to resolve the dis­pute. One of the main oppo­nents of the project is the region­al gov­ern­ment of Caja­mar­ca, led by far-left gov­er­nor Gre­go­rio San­tos.

San­tos reject­ed the state of emer­gency and called on the gov­ern­ment to lift the mea­sure.

Minas Con­ga is the lat­est in a num­ber of min­ing projects that have been tar­get­ed by com­mu­ni­ty oppo­si­tion, large­ly over envi­ron­men­tal con­cerns. Ana­lysts say some $50 bil­lion in min­ing invest­ments are at risk due to the social con­flicts in Peru, a coun­try where min­ing has been the lynch­pin of eco­nom­ic growth.

Squat Milada brutally evicted after an attempt to make a one-off commemorative gig

The Prague’s renowned squat Vila Mila­da, which was evict­ed three years ago after being one of the most impor­tant places for Czech autonomous under­ground scene, had been occu­pied by approx­i­mate­ly 30 peo­ple on Sat­ur­day July 30th to com­mem­o­rate the bleak anniver­sary by an impro­vised hard­core punk gig.

The Prague’s renowned squat Vila Mila­da, which was evict­ed three years ago after being one of the most impor­tant places for Czech autonomous under­ground scene, had been occu­pied by approx­i­mate­ly 30 peo­ple on Sat­ur­day July 30th to com­mem­o­rate the bleak anniver­sary by an impro­vised hard­core punk gig. Even though the author­i­ties were informed that this is a one-off event which is not an attempt to reocup­py the squat for good but a sym­bol­ic point­ing out of a pas­sive approach of a Czech state to take care of unused build­ings and of the oppres­sion against alter­na­tive cul­ture, the police react­ed with a mas­sive police oper­a­tion includ­ing an aggres­sive attack against the non-vio­lent con­cert-goers, which result­ed in many bloody injuries and in a tem­po­rary arrest of tens of peo­ple. At least 20 peo­ple were bru­tal­ly beat­en up and psy­cho­log­i­cal­ly humil­i­at­ed inside the build­ing out of reach of cam­eras and wit­ness­es and the remain­ing 7 activists hid behind the chim­neys on the roof of the build­ing, fear­ing for their health and risk­ing their lives over a 4‑storey gap direct­ing to ground. After a day-long nego­ti­a­tions and a cou­ple of stu­pid attempts of the Czech police to harass tens of sup­port­ers in front of the build­ing, the squat­ters decid­ed to climb down if the Police lets them to gath­er their belong­ings from the low­er parts of the house. In the ear­ly evening of Sun­day July 1st, they real­ized all of their equip­ment, includ­ing lap­tops, loud­speak­ers, gui­tar com­bos and elec­tric gui­tars, were smashed up by the inter­ven­ing Police riot squad. The own­er of the house is going to bring a law­suit against the activists and more seri­ous offens­es are actu­al­ly threat­en­ing them.

Brazil tribes occupy contentious dam site

30th June 2012

About 150 indige­nous peo­ple are protest­ing a mas­sive dam they say will dry up the riv­er their liveli­hood depends on.

30th June 2012

About 150 indige­nous peo­ple are protest­ing a mas­sive dam they say will dry up the riv­er their liveli­hood depends on.

A clus­ter of 12 men from the Xikrin tribe chant in their native lan­guage while march­ing togeth­er, arms inter­locked, stomp­ing their feet against the dry red dirt. They say this is their call of resis­tance from the Ama­zon.

The Xikrin are joined by about 150 indige­nous peo­ple from three oth­er tribes — the Arara, Juruna, and Parakana — that are occu­py­ing one of the work sites at the Belo Monte dam con­struc­tion site in what is becom­ing a high-stakes stand­off. The occu­pa­tion, which is enter­ing its sec­ond week, has halt­ed a part of the con­struc­tion on what will be the world’s third-largest hydro­elec­tric dam.

At the site of the protest, vis­it­ed by Al Jazeera on Wednes­day, the tribes­men were car­ry­ing clubs and spears and had built rudi­men­ta­ry sleep­ing quar­ters in what has essen­tial­ly become a non-vio­lent sit-in. An anthro­pol­o­gist was with them, typ­ing away at her lap­top as the indige­nous peo­ple artic­u­lat­ed their demands.

The tribes are occu­py­ing a road, built by the dam builders, which cuts through part of the Xin­gu River’s water­ways. The road blocks the nat­ur­al flow of the waters.

The occu­pa­tion of the site began at about 11 am on June 21 and played out like some­thing from a fic­tion­al Hol­ly­wood movie. The indige­nous peo­ple arrived at the work site in half a dozen small boats, charged the area, and announced that they were tak­ing over. The con­struc­tion work­ers, see­ing the tribes­men with their faces paint­ed for com­bat and armed with spears, imme­di­ate­ly fled for safe­ty.

“The work­ers were scared, so they imme­di­ate­ly ran when we arrived,” said Bepumuiti, from the Juruna tribe. “They prob­a­bly thought they were going to die.”

The tribes­men con­fis­cat­ed the keys to more than three dozen dump trucks and heavy machin­ery left behind.

What the indige­nous peo­ple want

Last year, a series of con­di­tions were agreed upon with the indige­nous peo­ple to reduce the impact of the con­struc­tion of the dam on their com­mu­ni­ties. Some of the con­di­tions includ­ed the demar­ca­tion of indige­nous lands, the con­struc­tion of health facil­i­ties and schools, and means of trans­porta­tion for the trib­al peo­ple when the rivers dry up.

In exchange for their agree­ment, the indige­nous said they would not force­ful­ly oppose the dam con­struc­tion.

The prob­lem, the indige­nous now say, is that while the con­struc­tion of the dam steams ahead, the promis­es made by the con­sor­tium build­ing the dam and by gov­ern­ment-led Norte Ener­gia — the ener­gy com­pa­ny over­see­ing the dam — have yet to be ful­filled.

So the tribes decid­ed to invade. This was a his­toric and sig­nif­i­cant move, because the deci­sion was made with­out the assis­tance or knowl­edge of local or inter­na­tion­al NGOs or gov­ern­ment rights bod­ies, who in the past often assist­ed tribes dur­ing protest move­ments.

“We would not be here today if the builders and the gov­ern­ment would have done what they promised us,” Bebtok, a tribe elder from the Xikrin tribe, told Al Jazeera. “In my com­mu­ni­ty, noth­ing has been done. There is no qual­i­ty health post, there is no school, they have not built a road for us. My road is the riv­er and that is going to be dried up.”

Since Octo­ber, the tribes most affect­ed by the con­struc­tion of the dam have been receiv­ing a bud­get of about $15,000 from the gov­ern­ment, through which they can request any­thing they want, such as gaso­line for their boats, food or con­struc­tion mate­r­i­al.

But the tribes have been told that the mon­ey — called “emer­gency assis­tance” in gov­ern­ment par­lance — will stop lat­er this year, infu­ri­at­ing the trib­al peo­ple at the very moment they are start­ing to feel the neg­a­tive impacts of the dam, they say.

The indige­nous peo­ple are now also start­ing to see the impact the con­struc­tion is hav­ing on their lives. Surara, from the Parakana tribe, showed Al Jazeera how a road built on the con­struc­tion site through a nat­ur­al water­way of the Xin­gu riv­er has already start­ed to dry out one side of the riv­er.

“We were always nav­i­gat­ing this riv­er because we know this riv­er like the palm of our hands,” Surara said. “And today, as you can see, it’s very dry. That is sad for us.”

Surara pre­dict­ed that, at the cur­rent pace of con­struc­tion, in two years the tribe will no longer be able to reach their com­mu­ni­ty by boat because of the changes in water lev­els. The tribes have a new list of demands they want ful­filled before they say they will end their occu­pa­tion.

Response from gov­ern­ment and builders

The tribes’ occu­pa­tion of the dam seemed to catch the dam builders and the gov­ern­ment by sur­prise. In response, Norte Ener­gia has tak­en what seems like a pecu­liar approach that involves two very oppo­site respons­es, using the car­rot and the stick at the same time. Three days after the occu­pa­tion began, a judge reject­ed a request to have the indige­nous evict­ed by force from the area.

At the same time, Norte Ener­gia is pro­vid­ing the indige­nous peo­ple three meals a day at the occu­pa­tion site. Often times, a rep­re­sen­ta­tive from the com­pa­ny will show up at the site dur­ing a meal and ask the indige­nous peo­ple for the keys back to their heavy machin­ery. So far, the tribes have refused to hand them over.

Last week, Norte Ener­gia refused an Al Jazeera request for an inter­view on the mat­ter. Norte Ener­gia has said in the past that the eco­nom­ic and social assis­tance pack­ages to help the tribes will be imple­ment­ed at var­i­ous points dur­ing the entire­ty of the project, as pre­vi­ous­ly agreed upon.

Behind the scenes, the com­pa­ny is fac­ing a daunt­ing task. Not only do each of the four tribes involved in the occu­pa­tion have their own set of demands, but there are also as many as 35 dif­fer­ent sub-com­mu­ni­ties with­in the tribes tak­ing part in the occu­pa­tion, and each have their own inter­ests and requests they want met.

Activists face arrest

Pres­sure is build­ing on mul­ti­ple fronts. Con­struc­tion of the dam ramped up ear­li­er this year, and there are strict timeta­bles to get the dam up and run­ning by late 2014.

Aside from the indige­nous protest, sev­er­al oth­er tense issues sur­round­ing the dam are coa­lesc­ing at the same time.

In Altami­ra, the clos­est city to the dam site, 11 peo­ple — all unaf­fil­i­at­ed with the indige­nous protest now occur­ring — are fight­ing arrest war­rants after being accused of help­ing organ­ise an anti-dam protest ear­li­er in June that the dam builders say led to prop­er­ty dam­age. Local TV chan­nels have been air­ing video of bro­ken win­dows and the burn­ing of office equip­ment at the con­struc­tion site.

The activists fac­ing pos­si­ble arrest all deny they were involved, and say any protests they organ­ised were peace­ful and legal. They include, among oth­ers, a Catholic priest, a nun, some mem­bers of Xin­gu Vivo Para Sem­pre — a local anti-dam NGO — as well as a local fish­er­man fea­tured in an Al Jazeera report in Jan­u­ary

Police have an open inves­ti­ga­tion, and have yet to for­mal­ly announce if charges will be filed. How­ev­er, even the threat of jail time has sent a chill through the tight-knit com­mu­ni­ty of local anti-dam activists.

How will it end?

On Thurs­day, in the city of Altami­ra, more than 60 of the indige­nous occu­piers met with a high-lev­el del­e­ga­tion from Brasil­ia that includ­ed the pres­i­dent of Norte Ener­gia.

The meet­ing last­ed near­ly four hours, and was closed to the media. The indige­nous peo­ple dis­cussed their demands to end the protest, but no agree­ment was reached. Norte Ener­gia said they need­ed to take the requests back to Brasil­ia for analy­sis. A new meet­ing was set for July 9. In the mean­time, the tribes say their occu­pa­tion will con­tin­ue. It was also agreed by all sides that work will con­tin­ue on the parts of the con­struc­tion site not under the con­trol of the tribes.

“This was a very friend­ly con­ver­sa­tion; the tribe elders are very wise and mea­sured,” said Car­los Nasci­men­to, pres­i­dent of Norte Ener­gia, in a brief press con­fer­ence after the meet­ing. “There are some young tribes­men that want some improve­ments, and as much as we can, we will do any­thing in our pow­er so these kinds of things will not hap­pen again.”

The indige­nous seemed deter­mined to keep up the fight for as long as it takes. “What we asked for, the dam builders did not give us an answer to, so we will only leave the con­struc­tion site when they bring an answer to us on paper,” Giliar­di, from the Juruna tribe, said after the meet­ing. “And as long as they don’t do any­thing in our com­mu­ni­ties regard­ing infra­struc­ture, we are not leav­ing the occu­pa­tion.”

Mean­while, more boats loaded with indige­nous peo­ple are arriv­ing at the protest site every day. It is an indi­ca­tion that this stand­off in the Ama­zon could drag on for days to come.

More pho­tos and video

Earth First! Summer Gathering Update — programme, directions, website and more

It’s only weeks until the Earth First! Sum­mer Gath­er­ing begins.
Five days of work­shops, info shar­ing and learn­ing new skills, 1–5 August.

It’s only weeks until the Earth First! Sum­mer Gath­er­ing begins.
Five days of work­shops, info shar­ing and learn­ing new skills, 1–5 August.

The Earth First Sum­mer Gath­er­ing takes place each year to pro­vide a space in which the rad­i­cal ecol­o­gy move­ment can share skills and plan for future cam­paigns and actions.

Dis­cus­sions around the impor­tance of com­mu­ni­ty build­ing in inner cities, the state of the anar­chist move­ment and patri­archy in activism.

Skill shares includ­ing wom­en’s self-defence, research­ing cor­po­ra­tions and nav­i­ga­tion.

Cam­paign round ups from Frack Off! Smash Edo and Lud­dites 2000 amongst oth­ers.

If you have work­shops you like to run or dis­cus­sions you’d like to facil­i­tate then email us at earthfirstsummergathering@riseup.net

Full pro­gramme.

Camp­ing is on a slid­ing scale of £30 to £15, pay what is gen­uine­ly appro­pri­ate.

Food will be from Anar­chist Teapot and meal tick­ets will be £5 a day.

Kids can have sep­a­rate meals if they want for £3 a day.

There will be a cou­ple of kids spaces, and spe­cial work­shops being ran for kids. If you’d like to run any kids work­shops get in touch at earthfirstsummergathering@riseup.net.

If you want you dog to come along then you’re going to have to email us at earthfirstsummergathering@riseup.net

And of course there will be enter­tain­ment and a bar open in the evenings.

The camp is ½ mile from the Berring­ton vil­lage, and 1 mile from the larg­er vil­lage of Cross Hous­es.

We encour­age non-cycling campers to use pub­lic trans­port if pos­si­ble as Cross Hous­es is on a bus route.

BY TRAIN
The near­est train sta­tion is Shrews­bury. You can then get the bus to Cross Hous­es (see below). If com­ing from a long dis­tance it can some­times be cheap­er to get a tick­et to a large sta­tion such as Birm­ing­ham, Wolver­hamp­ton, Man­ches­ter or Crewe and then a sep­a­rate tick­et on to Shrews­bury. Check nation­al rail for train times and prices. If com­ing from the Lon­don direc­tion, it’s gen­er­al­ly cheap­er to buy a Super Off­peak Return, spec­i­fy­ing “Lon­don Mid­land & Arri­va only”.

BY BIKE
See here for direc­tions and a map to the camp from Shrews­bury for cyclists and dri­vers.

BY BUS
When you arrive at Shrews­bury train sta­tion, ask some­one to point you to the bus sta­tion. It’s only a few min­utes walk from the train sta­tion. The bus ser­vice that runs from town to with­in a mile of Crabap­ple is the 436 towards Bridg­north. It runs every hour from 7.40am to 5.40pm with a “late” one at 7.40pm. The jour­ney to Cross Hous­es is approx 15 mins. You will need to press the stop but­ton when you see the sign for Cross Hous­es. Some of the ser­vices on this route are low-floor acces­si­ble bus­es. Please note that the last bus leaves Shrews­bury at 7.40pm, Mon­day to Sat­ur­day and there are no Sun­day bus ser­vices. For the bus timetable see here http://shropshire.gov.uk/bustimes/timetable.jsc?timetable=436mfi0412.
The camp itself is about 1 mile from the bus stop. From the bus stop at Cross Hous­es, walk back towards Shrews­bury past the petrol sta­tion (on your right) and take the first left turn signed “Berring­ton”. After about ½ mile, the road forks at the edge of the vil­lage. Take the right turn sign­post­ed “Bet­ton Abbots” and we’re about ¼ mile up the road on the right.
If you intend to come by bus but need help get­ting to and from the bus stop, you can arrange a pick up with us: details will be avail­able near­er the time.

BY TAXI
There is also a taxi rank just out­side Shrews­bury train sta­tion. Acces­si­ble taxis can be got from here.- but it is MUCH cheap­er to book a cab from a local com­pa­ny – Comet Cabs 01743 344444, or Vin­cent Cabs 01743 367777. Vin­cents also have a book­ing office just across the road from the sta­tion, which is handy if you don’t have a phone to book a cab in advance.

USEFUL LINKS
See here direc­tions and a map to the camp from Shrews­bury for cyclists and dri­vers.
See a map of where the site is here
See the bus timetable
Direc­tions from places oth­er than Shrews­bury

Earth First! Sum­mer Gath­er­ing Col­lec­tive
earthfirstsummergathering@riseup.net

http://earthfirstgathering.weebly.com