Tar Sands Street Theatre Pictures

cam­paign­ers from the UK Tar Sands Net­work staged a dra­mat­ic piece of street the­atre out­side Chatham House. Con­fer­ence atten­dees, includ­ing Peter Kent him­self, were greet­ed by the dis­turb­ing spec­ta­cle of black-clad masked fig­ures rep­re­sent­ing Cana­da and Shell lit­er­al­ly ‘stran­gling’ cli­mate activists. The cam­paign­ers hand­ed out fly­ers and spoke to the con­fer­ence atten­dees, ques­tion­ing whether gen­uine solu­tions to cli­mate change that would end our depen­dence on fos­sil fuels, pro­mote cli­mate jus­tice and penalise high­ly-car­bon-inten­sive com­pa­nies could real­ly be on the table for dis­cus­sion at an event spon­sored by Shell and fea­tur­ing Peter Kent as a keynote speak­er.

Activists disrupt speeches by Canadian Minister and Shell Chairman

Today at a high-lev­el con­fer­ence on cli­mate change at Chatham House, Lon­don, two activists inter­rupt­ed first Peter Kent, Canada’s Envi­ron­ment Min­is­ter, then Shell’s UK Chair­man Gra­ham van’t Hoff, as they got up to make speech­es.

Today at a high-lev­el con­fer­ence on cli­mate change at Chatham House, Lon­don, two activists inter­rupt­ed first Peter Kent, Canada’s Envi­ron­ment Min­is­ter, then Shell’s UK Chair­man Gra­ham van’t Hoff, as they got up to make speech­es.

The first activist, Dan­ny Chivers, accused Peter Kent of being a ‘dan­ger­ous rad­i­cal’ and asked for him to be removed from the stage. The audi­ence respond­ed to the tongue-in-cheek speech – in which Kent was also referred to as an ‘agent from a rogue petro-state’ – with a mix­ture of laugh­ter and heck­ling, and the pro­test­er was able to speak for sev­er­al min­utes before being removed by secu­ri­ty.

Dur­ing the inter­ven­tion, Mr Chivers explained that Kent had clear­ly got into this cli­mate change con­fer­ence under false pre­tences. Far from being a leader on the issue, Kent is ded­i­cat­ed to pro­mot­ing the high­ly destruc­tive tar sands – despite the industry’s neg­a­tive impact on local indige­nous com­mu­ni­ties, and its poten­tial to emit enough green­house gas to tip the world over the edge into run­away cli­mate change. Kent also pulled Cana­da out of the Kyoto Pro­to­col and his coun­try con­tin­ues to lob­by fierce­ly against the inclu­sion of tar sands in the EU Fuel Qual­i­ty Direc­tive, which aims to reduce emis­sions from trans­port and has stalled as a result of Canada’s inter­fer­ence.

The sec­ond activist, Sophie Pre­ston, then rose as Gra­ham van’t Hoff was about to speak. She accused Shell – the spon­sor of the event – of being a ‘world-class green­wash­er’ whilst ener­get­i­cal­ly lob­by­ing against gen­uine nation­al and inter­na­tion­al cli­mate action. Shell is one of the largest oper­a­tors in the tar sands and plans to dou­ble its pro­duc­tion despite a legal chal­lenge from the Athabas­ca Chipewyan First Nation who claim their treaty rights have been vio­lat­ed. She too was removed by secu­ri­ty.

Ear­li­er that morn­ing, cam­paign­ers from the UK Tar Sands Net­work staged a dra­mat­ic piece of street the­atre out­side Chatham House. Con­fer­ence atten­dees, includ­ing Peter Kent him­self, were greet­ed by the dis­turb­ing spec­ta­cle of black-clad masked fig­ures rep­re­sent­ing Cana­da and Shell lit­er­al­ly ‘stran­gling’ cli­mate activists. The cam­paign­ers hand­ed out fly­ers and spoke to the con­fer­ence atten­dees, ques­tion­ing whether gen­uine solu­tions to cli­mate change that would end our depen­dence on fos­sil fuels, pro­mote cli­mate jus­tice and penalise high­ly-car­bon-inten­sive com­pa­nies could real­ly be on the table for dis­cus­sion at an event spon­sored by Shell and fea­tur­ing Peter Kent as a keynote speak­er.

The protest fol­lows a series of dam­ag­ing rev­e­la­tions about how close­ly the Cana­di­an gov­ern­ment, oil com­pa­nies such as Shell and BP, and some British politi­cians are work­ing togeth­er to fur­ther the high­ly-pol­lut­ing tar sands industry’s aims. Ear­li­er this year the Fuel Qual­i­ty Direc­tive – a key piece of EU cli­mate leg­is­la­tion that would dis­cour­age tar sands imports to Europe – stalled after inten­sive lob­by­ing by Cana­da and the oil indus­try result­ed in key mem­ber states, includ­ing the UK, not sup­port­ing it. Two weeks ago, Vince Cable, for­mer­ly Shell’s chief econ­o­mist, was revealed to be ‘Con­tact Min­is­ter for Shell’ with­in the UK Coali­tion Gov­ern­ment, fol­low­ing a Free­dom of Infor­ma­tion Request.

Dan­ny Chivers, said ‘Invit­ing Peter Kent and Shell to speak at a cli­mate change event is like ask­ing the Cook­ie Mon­ster and Homer Simp­son to address a con­fer­ence on healthy eat­ing. We know that in order to have a chance of pre­vent­ing run­away cli­mate change, we need to leave the tar sands in the ground, yet Cana­da and Shell are intent on heav­i­ly pro­mot­ing this insane­ly destruc­tive indus­try. They are part of the prob­lem and cer­tain­ly should not be held up as experts in a dis­cus­sion about effec­tive cli­mate solu­tions.’

Sophie Pre­ston, who is a Cli­mate Change and Pol­i­cy stu­dent, said: ‘I have been to Cana­da and seen first-hand the dev­as­tat­ing effects of tar sands oil extrac­tion on the local envi­ron­ment and Indige­nous com­mu­ni­ties whose rights are being vio­lat­ed. So I am very dis­tressed to find that lob­by­ing by Cana­da and Shell is now also scup­per­ing attempts to make effec­tive cli­mate pol­i­cy in the EU and inter­na­tion­al­ly. Until it has halt­ed all plans to expand the tar sands, Cana­da should be treat­ed as a cli­mate pari­ah, not invit­ed to the table to skew the debate.’

Shell’s Tunnel Boring Machine parts delayed by lock-on

First seg­ments even­tu­al­ly deliv­ered to tun­nelling compound,11 seg­ments to come

On Thurs­day night Shel­l’s efforts to move parts of a Tun­nel Bor­ing Machine (TBM) crit­i­cal to the Cor­rib gas project hit anoth­er delay as pro­test­ers blocked the main gate of the refin­ery site with a con­crete lock-on.

First seg­ments even­tu­al­ly deliv­ered to tun­nelling compound,11 seg­ments to come

On Thurs­day night Shel­l’s efforts to move parts of a Tun­nel Bor­ing Machine (TBM) crit­i­cal to the Cor­rib gas project hit anoth­er delay as pro­test­ers blocked the main gate of the refin­ery site with a con­crete lock-on.

Two pro­test­ers from the Ross­port Sol­i­dar­i­ty Camp locked them­selves into a 400kg rein­forced con­crete bar­rel from 7.30pm until the Gar­da protest removal team fin­ished cut­ting them out at about mid­night. By this stage about 20 peo­ple had gath­ered at the gates in sup­port, but this was out-num­bered by a force of about 50 to 60 Gar­daí which was clear­ly already planned to mobilise to move the TBM.

For the hour or two before the Gar­dai cor­doned off the area around the lock-on, cam­paign­ers chat­ted drink­ing tea and eat­ing scones. It was sat­is­fy­ing to hear that as the lock on was being set up at Shel­l’s main refin­ery gate, Gar­daí were search­ing the ditch­es on the Augh­oose road (where most of the recent lock-ons have hap­pened).

After the lock-on had been dealt with the Gar­daí swept up its remains to clear the way for the TBM parts, then pro­ceed­ed to clear the sec­tion of road out­side the refin­ery with the usu­al law­less push­ing and shov­ing. After a delay of over 2 months since the first deliv­ery was attempt­ed, Shell and the Gar­daí final­ly man­aged to deliv­er some of the TBM parts to the Augh­oose tun­nelling com­pound two miles away.

The two lock-on pro­test­ers were released from Bel­mul­let Gar­da sta­tion at about 4am this morn­ing each charged with sec­tions 8&9 (obstruc­tion and refus­ing to obey the direc­tions of a Gar­da when sus­pect­ed of com­mit­ting a crime) of the pub­lic order act, and join 5 more cam­paign­ers due to appear in court in Bel­mul­let on Novem­ber 14th.

In a recent let­ter to local res­i­dents Shell have said that they intend to start tun­nelling in the com­ing weeks, but it is thought that there are still 11 sec­tions of the TBM yet to be deliv­ered before they can begin. There are signs that delays will con­tin­ue — with­out any help yet anoth­er lor­ry deliv­er­ing TBM parts went off road ear­li­er in the week out­side Ban­gor — after mak­ing its deliv­ery how­ev­er.

After a lie in today we head­ed down to remove the wind­mill — last ves­tige of the sum­mer camp 2012. The pre­vi­ous week had been a mas­sive mov­ing effort to clear out the field and pack the camp infra­struc­ture away for the win­ter. The house up the hill at Barr na Coil­leadh Pul­lath­omas is now the main camp base again for the win­ter. Come vis­it and check out the view for your­self!

See rossportsolidaritycamp.org for info about stay­ing at the camp,
email rossportsolidaritycamp@gmail.com or
ring 085 1141170 to let us know you’re com­ing or for oth­er info.
 

Relat­ed Link: http://www.shelltosea.com

(Ukraine) Excavator torched

report­ed by activists in Ukraine:

report­ed by activists in Ukraine:

“Ukraine, Kiev. In the night of 02/10/2012 anony­mous activists attacked a clearcut site on the ‘Bald Moun­tain’. A LIEBHERR exca­va­tor fell vic­tim to their arson. Clearcut coor­di­nates: http://wikimapia.org/#lat=50.3891043&lon=30.5495088&z=16&l=0&m=b
We take this oppor­tu­ni­ty to report about a sim­i­lar action at the same loca­tion on the 20/03/2012 (http://nature-first.info/2012/03/20/forest-svyatoshyno/).”

report­ed on http://vk.com/anarcho.ecoline:

“Tree spik­ing in Ternopol munic­i­pal park. Ukraine.

This act of eco­tage is in response to devel­op­ment plans of a local con­struc­tion com­pa­ny: it intends to destroy a pub­lic park to make room for pri­vate liv­ing blocks.

We spiked trees with huge nails, so the devel­op­er will have to bring in heavy equip­ment in order to destroy those trees. But con­struc­tion vehi­cles can be tak­en care of as well!”

(India) Anti-Nuclear Fishermen

 

On 22nd Sep­tem­ber 3,000 fish­er­men and anti-nuclear activists aboard 500 boats attempt­ed to block­ade a port to pre­vent the unload­ing of nuclear fuel into the recent­ly con­struct­ed Kudanku­lam nuclear pow­er plant locat­ed on the Tamil Nadu coast in south­ern India.

 

On 22nd Sep­tem­ber 3,000 fish­er­men and anti-nuclear activists aboard 500 boats attempt­ed to block­ade a port to pre­vent the unload­ing of nuclear fuel into the recent­ly con­struct­ed Kudanku­lam nuclear pow­er plant locat­ed on the Tamil Nadu coast in south­ern India.

This mas­sive pow­er plant is a joint ven­ture between India and Rus­sia and hous­es two nuclear pres­sur­ized water reac­tors (PWR) reac­tors, with future plans to con­struct four addi­tion­al reac­tors at the site.

This has result­ed in a peri­od of sus­tained direct action by local res­i­dents, strong­ly opposed to the plan­t’s con­struc­tion. Over a mil­lion peo­ple live with­in 30 km of the pro­posed plant. Over the last year demon­stra­tors have endured severe repres­sion as over 10,000 police and para­mil­i­tary forces have been deployed in the area. Vil­lagers have been beat­en, hun­dreds have been arrest­ed and some activists face charges of sedi­tion and even of wag­ing war against the gov­ern­ment. In April the police cut off the water, food and pow­er-sup­ply to protest­ing vil­lagers and imposed a cur­few in the vil­lages at the heart of the resis­tance.

At this point the Peo­ples Move­ment Against Nuclear Ene­gy (PMANE) called off their protests hop­ing for some respite for the peo­ple. They filed a pub­lic inter­est lit­i­ga­tion against the gov­ern­ments civ­il nuclear pro­gram com­plain­ing that the plant itself was unsafe, that there has not been a pub­lic hear­ing and thus it is an author­i­tar­i­an project imposed upon the peo­ple. Unfor­tu­nate­ly their pleas were ignored and when the Indi­an gov­ern­ment announced that the load­ing of fuel into the plant would begin on or around 11th Sep­tem­ber the peo­ple imme­di­ate­ly sprung into action.

CHAIN REACTION

On 10th Sep­tem­ber thou­sands of anti-nuclear pro­test­ers marched towards the pow­er plant, many were injured by the police who lobbed tear-gas shells into the crowd, while at Man­ap­padu police fired into the crowd and a fish­er­man was shot and killed. On the 13th hun­dreds of pro­test­ers formed a human chain in the sea to protest at the load­ing of the fuel, stay­ing in for two hour inter­vals in shifts. They demand­ed the release of all arrestees, com­pen­sa­tion for those injured by the police and an end to the police repres­sion.

One major fact is that there are more than one mil­lion peo­ple liv­ing with­in a 30km radius of the plant, which in the event of a dis­as­ter would make the evac­u­a­tion of the pop­u­la­tion impos­si­ble. This far exceeds the rec­om­men­da­tions of the Atom­ic Ener­gy Reg­u­la­to­ry Board and so the plant should nev­er have been built there. Not that this will wor­ry the Russ­ian firm that sup­plied and built the reac­tor as the Indi­an gov­ern­ment agreed that they will have zero lia­bil­i­ty in the event of an acci­dent. (Sim­i­lar con­di­tions apply to pow­er com­pa­nies respon­si­ble for major civic emer­gen­cies in the UK)

Beyond their legit­i­mate safe­ty con­cerns, vil­lagers have oth­er rea­sons to be angry. The gov­ern­ment has invest­ed mil­lions on a new hos­pi­tal and oth­er facil­i­ties exclu­sive­ly for plant empoy­ees, mean­while the rest of the locals live in squalor lack­ing even basic facil­i­ties such as run­ning water.

The Indi­an gov­ern­ment has attempt­ed to dis­cred­it the move­ment com­plain­ing that for­eign organ­i­sa­tions are agi­tat­ing the local peo­ple and that this should not be allowed. Despite all of this fur­ther demon­stra­tions are planned for the com­ing weeks and they are not giv­ing up.

Anti-nuclear activists claims major victory in mass trespass

8 Octo­ber 2012

At least eight pro­test­ers have been arrest­ed dur­ing a mass tres­pass at the Hink­ley Point nuclear pow­er sta­tion in Som­er­set.

More than 50 peo­ple swooped on the perime­ter fence of the land ear­marked for two new EPR mega-reac­tors next to the exist­ing pow­er plant just after dawn.

8 Octo­ber 2012

At least eight pro­test­ers have been arrest­ed dur­ing a mass tres­pass at the Hink­ley Point nuclear pow­er sta­tion in Som­er­set.

More than 50 peo­ple swooped on the perime­ter fence of the land ear­marked for two new EPR mega-reac­tors next to the exist­ing pow­er plant just after dawn.

Dozens fanned out around the 5‑miles long fence while oth­ers held ban­ners and plac­ards out­side the main secu­ri­ty gate. A 14-foot ban­ner read­ing, “Nuclear dis­as­ter zone. Boy­cott EDF” was hung across the gate.

At 11am a total of 577 seed balls were thrown over the fence onto the con­struc­tion area in a sym­bol­ic attempt to repair the dam­age already caused to the land. The seed balls rep­re­sent the num­ber of days since the Fukushi­ma nuclear dis­as­ter in Japan.

Around 10 peo­ple are known to be still on the land owned by EDF Ener­gy. Many oth­ers are expect­ed to join them lat­er on today.

The mood has been relaxed and cel­e­bra­to­ry. “This is a major vic­to­ry for the anti-nuclear move­ment,” said Camil­la Berens, spokesper­son for the Stop New Nuclear Alliance. ‘Because the gov­ern­ment has refused to lis­ten to us and we have been forced to raise the game. We have suc­cess­ful­ly block­ad­ed the main entrance to Hink­ley Point on two occa­sion in the last year and now we have accom­plished a mass tres­pass. Our mes­sage today is that we will con­tin­ue to raise the game with peace­ful protest until our voice in heard.”

More info at Stop New Nuclear and Stop Hink­ley

(Sweden) Swedish Forest Occupation Declares Temporary Victory

Envi­ron­men­tal activists have been cel­e­brat­ing a vic­to­ry on Got­land Island, off the coast of south­east Swe­den, as tree felling machin­ery remained idle on Sat­ur­day evening.

Envi­ron­men­tal activists have been cel­e­brat­ing a vic­to­ry on Got­land Island, off the coast of south­east Swe­den, as tree felling machin­ery remained idle on Sat­ur­day evening.

“It was a smart and brave deci­sion,” field biol­o­gist Alva Snis Sigtryg­gs­son told Swedish news agency TT. “It feels like a par­tial vic­to­ry.”

Ear­li­er in the day police had to use cut­ting equip­ment to remove Green­peace pro­tes­tors who had chained them­selves to the machin­ery. The tree clear­ance was planned to make way for a con­tro­ver­sial lime­stone quar­ry in the Ojnare for­est adja­cent to an EU des­ig­nat­ed Natu­ra 2000 pro­tect­ed area.

The forestry own­ers’ asso­ci­a­tion, Mel­lan­skog, issued a state­ment indi­cat­ing that the for­est clear­ance will be stopped until after a High Court Rul­ing on the issue.

“We are well aware that Nord­kalk has a legal right to start work here but we want to avoid long term splits and bit­ter­ness in this com­mu­ni­ty where we have many mem­bers,” the asso­ci­a­tion wrote.

The min­ing company’s com­mu­ni­ca­tion chief, Eva Feldt, called the deci­sion “deplorable” and blamed the coun­try gov­er­nor for putting pres­sure on the forestry group.

Envi­ron­men­tal groups, includ­ing the Swedish Soci­ety for Nature Con­ser­va­tion and Green­peace have pledged to block all attempts to open a quar­ry in the area which they say should be pro­tect­ed in line with Euro­pean Union rules on bio­di­ver­si­ty.

The Swedish Ojnare For­est has been described as unlike any oth­er on the plan­et – with unique ancient pine forests, short in stature due to the cold cli­mate, yet with indi­vid­ual trees up to 1000 years old, in ecosys­tems con­tain­ing 265 endan­gered species. These old forests shroud the island’s unique and com­plex ground­wa­ter sys­tem, and their destruc­tion will place the island’s biggest fresh­wa­ter source at risk. The area’s unique nat­ur­al ecosys­tem habi­tats are of high nation­al inter­est for nature con­ser­va­tion, as the Ojnare For­est is locat­ed between and adja­cent to two Euro­pean Natu­ra 2000 con­ser­va­tion areas, and is pro­posed to become a Nation­al Park. The Ojnare For­est and its nat­ur­al ecosys­tems are under attack by a large open pit lime­stone mine that would cov­er 420 acres with a 26 meter deep tox­ic hole.

Over the objec­tions of the Swedish Envi­ron­men­tal Pro­tec­tion Agency, and despite appeals to the Supreme Court, prepara­to­ry work for the mine is already under­way. There is a major for­est protest occu­pa­tion ongo­ing at Got­land Island against this log­ging and min­ing. Pro­test­ers have been occu­py­ing Ojnaresko­gen since July, and in recent days some 70 police offi­cers have come to remove them, and the num­ber of pro­tes­tors has risen to over 100 – rang­ing from self-described rebels against eco­cide, to fam­i­lies with small chil­dren. Despite hav­ing already start­ed clear­ing land for in excess of what had been approved, Mel­lan­skog decid­ed on Sat­ur­day to sus­pend the ongo­ing log­ging on Got­land pend­ing a deci­sion from the Supreme Court. While a pos­i­tive devel­op­ment, protest con­tin­ues until the log­ging and entire project are can­celled.

Although the acute­ly threat­ened area is “only” 170 hectares in size, the case reveals Sweden’s weak for­est pro­tec­tion leg­is­la­tion and pos­si­ble resource allo­ca­tion cor­rup­tion. Only a few per­cent of Sweden’s high con­ser­va­tion val­ue forests remain, and only 3.3 per­cent of the pro­duc­tive for­est area is pro­tect­ed. The ver­dict in this case will be used by oth­er cor­po­ra­tions to clearcut and exploit oth­er old nat­ur­al ecosys­tems in the coun­try. Eco­log­i­cal Inter­net has a long his­to­ry of suc­cess­ful­ly sup­port­ing local Scan­di­na­vian old-growth for­est pro­tec­tion move­ments. In 2009, our net­work sent 1,117,294 protest emails in a suc­cess­ful cam­paign stop­ping indus­tri­al devel­op­ment in 80% of Finland’s Cen­tral Lap­land wilder­ness, cov­er­ing tens of thou­sands of hectares. Few thought such pro­tec­tions were pos­si­ble, yet with strong local orga­niz­ing backed up by EI’s unprece­dent­ed glob­al network’s inter­na­tion­al cam­paign, it was one of many great vic­to­ries for Earth’s old forests.

(USA) Hudson Valley Earth First! Continue to Resist Fracking in New York

Res­i­dents in west­ern Orange Coun­ty began fight­ing the project over a year ago, and have tak­en every legal step pos­si­ble. FERC (the Fed­er­al Ener­gy Reg­u­la­to­ry Com­mis­sion) approved the project with a 3 to 2 vote, unprece­dent­ed in their his­to­ry as a rub­ber stamp­ing revolv­ing door for indus­try. The split deci­sion was the result of an alter­na­tive site pro­posed by res­i­dents, which would involve the expan­sion of an already exist­ing com­pres­sion facil­i­ty. With their deci­sion, FERC con­firmed what we already knew, that when the inter­ests of indus­try come up against com­mu­ni­ty, the gov­ern­ment is no ally. The gas indus­try has plans to turn Min­isink and West­ern Orange Coun­ty into a hub for oper­a­tions, with anoth­er com­pres­sion sta­tion and an $800 mil­lion dol­lar nat­ur­al gas pow­er plant already in the ear­ly stages of reg­u­la­to­ry approval.

 

The com­mu­ni­ty, how­ev­er, has no plans to bow to indus­try or FERC. They have respond­ed with a promise for dai­ly action. On day 1, the site was suc­cess­ful­ly block­ad­ed for over half the day, and only one res­i­dent was arrest­ed (he was released with­in 2 hours with a tick­et for dis­or­der­ly con­duct). On day 2, there were numer­ous work stop­pages as a result of soft block­ades (one brave indi­vid­ual was arrest­ed), vehic­u­lar inter­ven­tion, and the actions of one res­i­dent who jumped on top of a piece of heavy machin­ery (and amaz­ing­ly man­aged to avoid arrest). On day 3, around 75 peo­ple, includ­ing many chil­dren and local fam­i­lies marched from the site through town and back again to con­tin­ue to spread aware­ness about the tox­ic com­pres­sor sta­tion and strength­en resolve. On Day 4, a flash mob stopped traf­fic to the site for about an hour, with CBS news com­ing to cov­er the sto­ry. As we approach the 5th day, it remains to be seen how this cam­paign will esca­late in the near future.

One thing is cer­tain; no one in this area saw resis­tance of this mag­ni­tude com­ing. Hope­ful­ly this sig­nals a sea change in the way things have been in the Hud­son Val­ley. This bio-region has suf­fered enough sub­ur­ban­iza­tion, gen­tri­fi­ca­tion, pol­lu­tion, and down­right dirty deal­ing. From Indi­an point (the nuclear plant with no evac­u­a­tion plan) to PCBs, nat­ur­al gas infra­struc­ture to green-washed incin­er­a­tor projects, we are here to let it be known that the hey­day of indus­try is over. No com­pres­sor sta­tion! No com­pro­mise! Long live the Indi­ana Bat!

The next day of action is this Sat­ur­day (10/6/12) with anoth­er march, fol­lowed by a direct action train­ing pre­sent­ed by Hud­son Val­ley Earth First! 

excavator torched, trees spiked in the Ukraine

report­ed by activists in Ukraine:

“Ukraine, Kiev.
Exca­va­tor torched.

report­ed by activists in Ukraine:

“Ukraine, Kiev.
Exca­va­tor torched.

In the night of 02/10/2012 anony­mous activists attacked a clearcut site on the ‘Bald Moun­tain’. A LIEBHERR exca­va­tor fell vic­tim to their arson. Clearcut coor­di­nates: http://wikimapia.org/#lat=50.3891043&lon=30.5495088&z=16&l=0&m=b
We take this oppor­tu­ni­ty to report about a sim­i­lar action at the same loca­tion on the 20/03/2012 (http://nature-first.info/2012/03/20/forest-svyatoshyno/).”

report­ed on http://vk.com/anarcho.ecoline:

“Tree spik­ing in Ternopol munic­i­pal park. Ukraine.

This act of eco­tage is in response to devel­op­ment plans of a local con­struc­tion com­pa­ny: it intends to destroy a pub­lic park to make room for pri­vate liv­ing blocks.

We spiked trees with huge nails, so the devel­op­er will have to bring in heavy equip­ment in order to destroy those trees. But con­struc­tion vehi­cles can be tak­en care of as well!”

Reclaim Hinkley — 8 October 2012 — MASS TRESPASS, MASS CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE

No New Nuclear — Inter­na­tion­al call out

Join us in an act of mass civ­il dis­obe­di­ence as we tres­pass on the pro­posed site of Hink­ley C nuclear pow­er sta­tion in Som­er­set.

 

No New Nuclear — Inter­na­tion­al call out

Join us in an act of mass civ­il dis­obe­di­ence as we tres­pass on the pro­posed site of Hink­ley C nuclear pow­er sta­tion in Som­er­set.

 

EDF Ener­gy is already trash­ing frag­ile Som­er­set coun­try­side in prepa­ra­tion for the Hink­ley C nuclear pow­er sta­tion – even though it hasn’t got plan­ning per­mis­sion to start build­ing.

SOWING THE SEEDS OF DISSENT

This mass action is for any­one who feels able to pub­licly tres­pass — or bear wit­ness to the mass tres­pass by join­ing us around the perime­ter fence. We need peo­ple who are pre­pared to be arrest­ed.

We also need peo­ple to sup­port those who are tres­pass­ing by gath­er­ing around the perime­ter fence. We will be pro­vid­ing legal brief­in­gs and sup­port for any tres­passers who are arrest­ed.

Our aim is to make the tres­pass as safe and dig­ni­fied as pos­si­ble. All our activ­i­ties are bound by the prin­ci­ples of non-vio­lent direct action. We are hold­ing a camp imme­di­ate­ly before the tres­pass so that every­one involved has a voice in plan­ning the action itself.

On the day of the tres­pass, we will attempt to rein­tro­duce some of the bio­di­ver­si­ty that has been stripped through EDFs pre­ma­ture pre­lim­i­nary works.

Once inside we will scat­ter wild­flow­ers and oth­er species native to this site. By show­ing your sup­port for an end to nuclear pow­er, you are part a grow­ing move­ment that is expos­ing this cor­rupt gov­ern­ment pol­i­cy that puts prof­its before safe­ty.

EDF is Eager­ly Destroy­ing Fields even though it doesn’t yet have per­mis­sion to build the reac­tors — nor does it have approval for the reac­tor design, or even a final invest­ment deci­sion.

The new EPR reac­tor design will pro­duce radioac­tive waste that is so tox­ic that it will have to be stored on site for over 100 years. The dan­gers asso­ci­at­ed with flood­ing, ter­ror­ist attack and acci­den­tal leak­age are total­ly unac­cept­able.

NO MORE NUCLEAR BAILOUTS

The move­ment against the gov­ern­men­t’s so-called ‘nuclear renais­sance’ is winning….but we must keep up the pres­sure. Out of the eight new nuclear pow­er sta­tions sup­port­ed by the coali­tion gov­ern­ment when it came into pow­er, only two are still on the table: Hink­ley in Som­er­set and Sizewell in Suf­folk.

French-owned EDF Ener­gy — the own­er of Hink­ley and Sizewell — is pres­sur­ing the gov­ern­ment to increase the range of hid­den sub­si­dies on offer in a des­per­ate bid to attract inter­est from scep­ti­cal investors. THIS MUST NOT HAPPEN.

If EDF gets its way, it will be a dou­ble wham­my for us — and for future gen­er­a­tions. It will mean we pay twice: once as tax­pay­ers and once as con­sumers through our ener­gy bills.

We say put the £60bn ear­marked for ‘new nuclear’ into a clean­er, green­er, fair­er future. The way for­ward is through ener­gy reduc­tion and greater invest­ment into research and devel­op­ment to make renew­able ener­gy and ener­gy stor­age fit for the 21st cen­tu­ry.

We need to cre­ate a long term sus­tain­able ener­gy plan that is based on meet­ing peo­ple’s needs rather than mak­ing prof­its for investors. In May, ener­gy sec­re­tary Charles Hendry told min­is­ters at a select com­mit­tee hear­ing that the government’s ener­gy pol­i­cy would be robust enough with­out includ­ing nuclear in the mix. It’s time we moved ener­gy pol­i­cy for­wards rather than back­wards.

NUCLEAR IS NOT THE ANSWER

.…Cher­nobyl
The cri­sis is far from over: the sar­coph­a­gus cov­er­ing the doomed Russ­ian reac­tor is falling apart. Only this year, gov­ern­ments final­ly approved the fund­ing for a new one. The human pop­u­la­tion in the most heav­i­ly con­t­a­m­i­nat­ed ter­ri­to­ries is in decline. In Belarus 80% of chil­dren were born healthy before Cher­nobyl. Now, just 26 years lat­er, only 20% of chil­dren are born healthy.

.….Fukushi­ma
Thanks to peo­ple pow­er, all of Japan’s reac­tors have now been turned off. For the first time in over half a cen­tu­ry Japan is nuclear free. How­ev­er, the cri­sis at Fukushi­ma is far from over.

  • The Japan­ese peo­ple are foot­ing the bill. The com­pa­ny behind the pow­er sta­tion, Tep­co, has had to be re-nation­alised because of the spi­ralling cost of com­pen­sa­tion and the ongo­ing attempts to sta­bilise the reac­tors.
  • Many peo­ple are still liv­ing in heav­i­ly con­t­a­m­i­nat­ed areas that should have been evac­u­at­ed.
  • Food across Japan is heav­i­ly con­t­a­m­i­nat­ed and peo­ple are being encour­aged to sup­port the farm­ers of Fukushi­ma by eat­ing it.
  • The triple melt­down is still in full swing.
  • All of the fuel pools in reac­tors 1,2,3 & 4 are in bad con­di­tion.
  • The pool in reac­tor 4 is of par­tic­u­lar con­cern. Thou­sands of high­ly radioac­tive spent fuel rods are at risk of fur­ther explo­sions. If such an event occurs, high lev­els of radioac­tive con­t­a­m­i­na­tion could spread as far as Tokyo and wipe out Japan’s com­mer­cial infra­struc­ture.

WE WANT A FUTURE, NOT A DISASTER

More infor­ma­tion com­ing soon.

Sub­scribe to our newslet­ter and get reg­u­lar updates on the tres­pass plan and the lat­est devel­op­ments in the cam­paign against ‘new nuclear’. Please send any queries to: campaign@stopnewnuclear.org.uk or call our hot­line on: 07527–219476