squatting news — London, Leeds & Manchester — updated

Sec­ond court reprieve for RAMpart2
3.03.2008
The squat opened as a back­up venue to the ram­pART social cen­tre in east lon­don today enjoyed it’s sec­ond court­room reprieve. Twice now it has been served with an appli­ca­tion for a Inter­im Pos­ses­sion Order. The first time the claimants failed to turn up at the hear­ing and today they admit­ted that they had failed to cor­rect­ly serve notice on the defen­dants so it was thrown out of court. The own­ers will be apply for the third time and the papers are expect­ed to be served some­time Tues­day with a court date prob­a­bly some­time next week (although it could be ear­li­er if there is an avail­able time slot at the court).

Sec­ond court reprieve for RAMpart2
3.03.2008
The squat opened as a back­up venue to the ram­pART social cen­tre in east lon­don today enjoyed it’s sec­ond court­room reprieve. Twice now it has been served with an appli­ca­tion for a Inter­im Pos­ses­sion Order. The first time the claimants failed to turn up at the hear­ing and today they admit­ted that they had failed to cor­rect­ly serve notice on the defen­dants so it was thrown out of court. The own­ers will be apply for the third time and the papers are expect­ed to be served some­time Tues­day with a court date prob­a­bly some­time next week (although it could be ear­li­er if there is an avail­able time slot at the court).

Whether it will be ram­pART or RAMpart2 which gets evict­ed first remains a neck and neck race. A new build­ing is being sought. If you have sug­ges­tions please con­tact the col­lec­tive via ram­part at mutu­alaid dot org.

Check out the pho­to essay about lon­don’s secret social cen­tre…

http://indymedia.org.uk/en/regions/london/2008/02/392529.html

///////

ram­pART and RAMpart2 evic­tions
25.2.2008

All very gloomy news from the var­i­ous parts of the ram­pART. This morn­ing there was a hear­ing to decide whether there would be an appeal against the grant­i­ng of the pos­ses­sion order relat­ing to Ram­part Street. The judge decid­ed there would be no appeal.

The pos­ses­sion order orig­i­nal­ly grant­ed for the 3rd of Jan is now active and the own­ers may now get a war­rant to enforce the order and book the bailiffs for an evic­tion. This could be with­in two or three weeks although this is just a guess and we’ll know more in a day or two.

Mean­while, a new set of papers was served (kind of) on RAMpart2 and the hear­ing date is the 3rd of March (ie. next mon­day). The hear­ing is both for an IPO and ordi­nary pos­ses­sion order (which seems a lit­tle weird) and assum­ing they actu­al­ly both­er to turn up this time we seem to have no defense beyond a few tech­ni­cal­i­ties. If they get the IPO then we’d be evict­ed tues­day 4th March.

A new build­ing is urgent­ly required.

===============

Part of the inter­na­tion­al week­end of action in sup­port of squats and autonomous spaces around the world (see www.april2008.squat.net for more info).

A Cel­e­bra­tion of Free Spaces
Leeds City Cen­tre, Fri­day 11th — Sat­ur­day 12th April 2008

Across the world, com­mu­ni­ties are under threat as city “regen­er­a­tion schemes” favour a glam­orous , busi­ness-friend­ly envi­ron­ment over and above issues such as com­mu­ni­ty,. social hous­ing and diver­si­ty. Leeds is no excep­tion as PFIs and sim­i­lar pri­va­tised “regen­er­a­tion” pro­grammes threat­en com­mu­ni­ties across the city.

We want to show that com­mu­ni­ties through­out our city are not pre­pared to lie down and accept this!

For this week­end we are plan­ning a squat­ted space in Leeds City Cen­tre, fea­tur­ing:

- cafe
— focus on hous­ing / squat­ting / gen­tri­fi­ca­tion
— free shop
— fam­i­ly friend­ly space: day­time cafe will be alco­hol-free & drug-free space
— oppor­tu­ni­ty to link up with oth­er com­mu­ni­ties threat­ened by the above issues

…but most impor­tant­ly the space will be open for what­ev­er you want it to be: an oppor­tu­ni­ty for films, dis­plays, art, work­shops… to get involved give us an email on leedssquat@googlemail.com or call 07526 261061.

===============

Man­ches­ter Space Invaders Land­ing April

11th & 12th April have been named as ‘inter­na­tion­al days of action on autonomous
spaces’. There will be things hap­pen­ing in Europe includ­ing squat­ted
build­ings, par­ties, Reclaim the Streets, land occu­pa­tions and more!
We have start­ed an organ­is­ing group to kick start ideas for action in Man­ches­ter. From reclaim­ing the streets to gueril­la gardening..from a ceilidh to a
veg­an cafe…free par­ty to per­ma­cul­ture space…

MANCHESTER SPACE INVADERS LANDING SOON!

Decen­tralised days of action (April 11–12th) meet­ing
Thurs­day 21st Feb­ru­ary 7–9pm

15 peo­ple met from var­i­ous dif­fer­ent net­works to begin plan­ning for the autonomous
days of action in April..

What are the days of action?

11th & 12th April have been named as ‘inter­na­tion­al days of action on autonomous
spaces’. There will be things hap­pen­ing in Europe includ­ing squat­ted
build­ings, par­ties, Reclaim the Streets, land occu­pa­tions and more!

The squat­ting net­work met recent­ly in Leeds, and the next nation­al squat meet­ing
will be in Sep­tem­ber 2008, in Man­ches­ter and the focus will be on skill shar­ing, and
the pos­si­bil­i­ty of a mass squat­ting action.

Ideas for action for 11–12 April. We dis­cussed lots of options for the days of
action… From reclaim­ing the streets to gueril­la gardening..from a ceilidh to a
veg­an cafe… Con­sen­sus was that it would be good to com­bine doing a squat with a
pos­i­tive, inclu­sive, out­door event, reclaim­ing a pub­lic space in the city..

We dis­cussed the capac­i­ty need­ed to make these ideas happen..so if you have time,
equip­ment or skills please get involved! Peo­ple are up for mak­ing squat­ted social
spaces, there have been 2 pre­vi­ous TAA’s (Tem­po­rary Autonomous Art spaces) in
Man­ches­ter that have been in squat­ted build­ings. There have been TAAs all over the
coun­try.

To find out more about poten­tial areas we are look­ing at for the squat, street par­ty
and park, come to the next meet­ing.

A build­ing could be the nucle­us for what we do and some­where to base the week­end.
Every­one agreed that it’s vital to have time and space set aside for
work­shops, meet­ing space and events. It could cre­ate a col­lec­tive that
wants to keep a squat­ted social cen­tre going for a while. There are com­mu­ni­ty
cen­tres being shut down all over the city at the minute.

We need mon­ey and peo­ple with skills to share and squat­ting expe­ri­ence. Please get
in touch if this applies to you! you don;t have to come to lots of meet­ings, but it
would be great if you could join our team to help make these plans a real­i­ty!

We are devel­op­ing a resource for legal infor­ma­tion and to clar­i­fy what is involved
in squat­ting..

We call for net­works and autonomous groups across Man­ches­ter to get involved…
Basement/Critical Mass/Under the Pavement/Indymedia/Open Media Collective/
Man­ches­ter Ani­mal Protection/Temporary Autonomous Artists/Campaigns Collective/No
Borders/Manchester Cli­mate Action/Soundsystems/
LGBT Groups/Queer/Feminist/Permaculture/Food not Bombs/Musicians
and many more besides!

Next meet­ing: Thurs­day 6th March 7pm Meet­ing Rm 3 Uni­ver­si­ty of Man­ches­ter Stu­dents
Union, Oxford Rd.. please note this is an acces­si­ble venue.

Peo­ple will split into work­ing groups and start to
con­sid­er prac­ti­cal­i­ties.

To join the email list:
https://lists.riseup.net/www/info/manchesterspaceinvaders
then click on sub­scribe
email manchesterspaceinvaders@yahoo.co.uk

Sankofa Foundation in Crisis & ASBO social centre disintegration

Amidst the recent dis­in­te­gra­tion of the ASBO project the Sanko­fa Foun­da­tion has been suf­fer­ing and sur­viv­ing, but now the end may be in sight for our Burns Street office.

Sanko­fa ther­a­pist Miri­am Hol­lis recent­ly wrote this mes­sage ask­ing for help, which can also be read on the Sanko­fa blog — sankofafoundation.blogspot.com

Amidst the recent dis­in­te­gra­tion of the ASBO project the Sanko­fa Foun­da­tion has been suf­fer­ing and sur­viv­ing, but now the end may be in sight for our Burns Street office.

Sanko­fa ther­a­pist Miri­am Hol­lis recent­ly wrote this mes­sage ask­ing for help, which can also be read on the Sanko­fa blog — sankofafoundation.blogspot.com

The Sanko­fa Foun­da­tion and impact of van­dal­ism in the imme­di­ate short term to the sur­vival of the project

www.sankofafoundation.org.uk

The Sanko­fa Foun­da­tion is a psy­chother­a­peu­tic ser­vice for seek­ers of asy­lum and their fam­i­lies, refugees and those grant­ed human­i­tar­i­an pro­tec­tion. We are based in Not­ting­ham and take refer­rals from Not­ting­ham, Der­by, Leices­ter and South York­shire. In fact, if we have the capac­i­ty, we won’t turn any­one away. We are a not for prof­it ser­vice and we do not receive any state or char­i­ta­ble fund­ing. We offer appoint­ments to any­one who is suf­fer­ing from trau­ma aris­ing from expe­ri­ences of tor­ture, impris­on­ment, vio­lence, wit­ness­ing of vio­lence or sex­u­al assault in their coun­try of ori­gin. We also offer sup­port to peo­ple suf­fer­ing from trau­ma aris­ing from the process of asy­lum and des­ti­tu­tion. Our ser­vices are free at the point of deliv­ery and we rely on dona­tions from sup­port­ers of The Sanko­fa Foun­da­tion.

His­to­ry:

Sanko­fa arose out of anoth­er project which was accessed by young peo­ple seek­ing asy­lum and who were with­out their fam­i­lies ( Unac­com­pa­nied Minors). Due to unex­pect­ed fund­ing cuts to the pro­vi­sion of a ser­vice to these young peo­ple, the deci­sion was made to con­tin­ue to offer psy­chother­a­py to those young peo­ple who were in crit­i­cal need. With­out fund­ing or a base, social ser­vices in Not­ting­ham offered a room for meet­ing with their own refer­rals. The ser­vice con­tin­ued and was based in the offices of social ser­vices over three days a week for over a year. Efforts were made to move towards char­i­ta­ble sta­tus. How­ev­er, when Sanko­fa became aware that the Local Author­i­ty in Not­ting­ham were not com­ply­ing with the deci­sion in the Hilling­don case 2003, Sanko­fa need­ed to relo­cate in order to sup­port young peo­ple to access appro­pri­ate guid­ance and legal advice in pur­suit of their rights under the law. Pur­suit of char­i­ta­ble sta­tus was set aside in order to meet the needs of this very busy time.

Social activists had tak­en the occu­pan­cy of a dis­used local author­i­ty build­ing. Pre­vi­ous­ly, the build­ing, which had been three large Vic­to­ri­an three storey ter­races with shared court­yard, had been divid­ed into flats and occu­pied by ten­ants of the local author­i­ty. How­ev­er, the build­ings had been unused for over eight years, apart from casu­al use on a reg­u­lar basis by peo­ple with seri­ous drugs habits, and women sex work­ers. Local res­i­dents were upset by what was hap­pen­ing in their neigh­bour­hood and sup­port­ed the occu­pa­tion of the build­ings by social activists who repaired win­dows and floors, paint­ed and fur­nished and set up projects very quick­ly which ben­e­fit­ted the local area. With­in a short amount of time the build­ing, which had been dete­ri­o­rat­ing fast ( as doc­u­ment­ed by free­lance pho­to­graph­ic jour­nal­ist, Tash) was look­ing occu­pied, the gar­dens were tidied, and the unin­spir­ing back yard was green­ing up with bath tubs and con­tain­ers full of herbs and toma­toes, which nas­tur­tiums tum­bling out of them in full colour in the sum­mer. A Com­mu­ni­ty Cen­tre was estab­lished ( and entered in the Direc­to­ry of Com­mu­ni­ty Cen­tres), and with­in the Com­mu­ni­ty Cen­tre, a free shop was opened, invit­ing dona­tions of use­able goods and cloth­ing which were avail­able free to any­one who need­ed them. A Com­mu­ni­ty lend­ing Library was opened, an inter­net cafe, a bicy­cle main­te­nance work­shop, a com­mu­ni­ty arts room with reg­u­lar activ­i­ties for chil­dren, and a free Com­mu­ni­ty meal once a week for any­one who need­ed a hot meal ( veg­eta­bles donat­ed from local green­gro­cers).

Into this busy and engaged space, Sanko­fa was offered a base. Encour­aged to approach the Com­mu­ni­ty by Bill Wal­ton of NNRF Des­ti­tu­tion Group, our orig­i­nal room was in a dis­used ground floor flat, and shared with the Com­mu­ni­ty Print­works who had equip­ment in the kitchen. We had no glass in the win­dows and only one room was use­able due to prob­lems with floor­ing in an adja­cent room. A team worked long into the nights to glaze the win­dows, fix the floor­ing and dec­o­rate. With fur­ni­ture obtained through the freecy­cle net­work and a com­put­er donat­ed from friends in oth­er coun­selling ser­vices, with­in a week, Sanko­fas new ther­a­py room was host­ing a meet­ing which was to have an impact on the pro­vi­sion for unac­com­pa­nied asy­lum seek­ing chil­dren in Not­ting­ham. The Refugee Coun­cil (GB) Chil­drens Pan­el, the Co-Ordi­na­tor of the asy­lum Project at the Chil­drens Legal Cen­tre (Uni­ver­si­ty of Essex), Nation­al Youth Advo­ca­cy Ser­vice (NYAS) and 23 young peo­ple seek­ing asy­lum and in the care of the local author­i­ty ( with more pop­ping in and out through­out the day) met to dis­cuss the pro­vi­sion made for them in the area. As a result, The Refugee Coun­cil, the Chil­drens Legal Cen­tre, and a local Fam­i­ly Law Solic­i­tor took instruc­tions from many chil­dren to demand the right to cloth­ing allowances, bet­ter pro­vi­sion in accom­mo­da­tion, and the insti­ga­tion of care plans. The co-ordi­na­tor of the Chil­drens Legal Cen­tre (asy­lum project), now the Pol­i­cy Advi­sor to the Chil­drens ‘ Com­mis­sion­er on chil­dren seek­ing asy­lum, who was due to spend only one day in Not­ting­ham, worked late into the night and through­out the next day tak­ing state­ments from chil­dren. A year lat­er the Refugee Coun­cil Chil­drens’ Pan­el had set up a part­ner­ship arrange­ment with the Sanko­fa Foun­da­tion to pro­vide a month­ly surgery in Not­ting­ham for minors seek­ing asy­lum who had been unable to access care. Although appoint­ments were by arrange­ment the surg­eries were always over­sub­scribed. NYAS set up and gained fund­ing for a tem­po­rary (nine months) post for a work­er to write with young peo­ple, a sur­vival guide to Not­ting­ham. This guide was to assist young peo­ple gain access to sup­port in Not­ting­ham uip to the age of eigh­teen years, and for the imme­di­ate peri­od after this. The appointee under­took the NYAS train­ing for work­ing with young peo­ple and has been able to go on to offer a ser­vice at NNRF once a week for young peo­ple. The Local Author­i­ty has made changed to some of their pro­vi­sion and young peo­ple became eli­gi­ble for ongo­ing care. Although not all the prob­lems were solved by any means, young peo­ple seek­ing asy­lum in Not­ting­ham ben­e­fit­ted from being heard con­struc­tive­ly, and a mes­sage has gone out to young peo­ple in Not­ting­ham that they have rights and they can have their rights assert­ed by agen­cies in Not­ting­ham.

Sanko­fa con­tin­ued with the work of meet­ing indi­vid­u­als for ther­a­py. How­ev­er, as a mem­ber of both the Per­son Cen­tred Coun­sel­lors and Psy­chother­a­pists for Social Change, and Psy­chother­a­pists and Coun­sel­lors for Social Change, we acknowl­edge that ther­a­pists reg­u­lar­ly hear sto­ries from dis­ad­van­taged, alien­at­ed and dis­em­pow­ered peo­ple with­in the Com­mu­ni­ty. Sanko­fa Foun­da­tion is com­mit­ted to, and active in, ongo­ing debates with­in ther­a­py about the ground between con­fi­den­tial­i­ty and using our voice to denounce the inequal­i­ties with­in soci­ety that con­tribute to injus­tice and there­fore stress and men­tal health prob­lems. We take more and more refer­rals from GPs who are see­ing des­ti­tute seek­ers of asy­lum in their surg­eries, whose men­tal health prob­lems are exac­er­bat­ed by the lack of care avail­able to peo­ple in this sit­u­a­tion.

Sanko­fa became com­mit­ted to recy­cling bed­ding use­ful to seek­ers of asy­lum made des­ti­tute. Often bed­ding would be made avail­able to seek­ers of asy­lum who had arrived in the City at the week­end when oth­er offices were closed. Local stu­dents in the area annu­al­ly seemed to be in a hur­ry to bin all the house­hold goods accu­mu­lat­ed dur­ing their stud­ies in the City. Annu­al­ly the area around the Sanko­fa office became a rich source of items use­ful to our client group. We obtained a wash­ing machine which allowed des­ti­tute clients to wash their cloth­ing and take new­er cloth­ing from our store cup­boards. Bed­ding became avail­able in vast amounts, as did cook­ing equip­ment and sundry fur­ni­ture. We were able to sup­port peo­ple in makeshift accom­mo­da­tion who had no fur­ni­ture or bed­ding.

Many of our clients have been sup­port­ed to return to solic­i­tors with reports from Sanko­fa, enhanced by the hours of research that post grad­u­ate stu­dents have put into assist­ing peo­ple to find evi­dence in sup­port of their fresh appli­ca­tions for asy­lum. Sanko­fa has reached out to organ­i­sa­tion in Iraq and Ger­many for assis­tance in gath­er­ing pri­ma­ry evi­dence in sup­port of clients, with Ger­man NGOs using their con­tacts with­in coun­tries to make enquiries on our behalf. We don’t give legal advice but we do walk beside clients in their quest for sup­port in obtain­ing infor­ma­tion and evi­dence, help­ing them to learn the skills nec­es­sary, encour­ag­ing con­fi­dence and ulti­mate­ly doing the research on behalf of those too debil­i­tat­ed by the process of asy­lum to try. Of clients who have returned to their coun­try of ori­gin, whether vol­un­tar­i­ly or assist­ed(!) we have endeav­oured to stay in touch. We speak with clients returned to Afghanistan, Iraq, Sudan, Ethiopi­an. (We have con­cerns about the qual­i­ty of com­mit­ment from agen­cies sup­port­ing returns and are gath­er­ing evi­dence in sup­port of our con­cerns.)

A reg­u­lar week­ly film night was held for young peo­ple seek­ing asy­lum. Films were select­ed by the audi­ence from a range of films rep­re­sen­ta­tive of, or made in, or by film direc­tors from, the coun­tries of ori­gin of the audi­ence. In the after­noon of the show, a group of young peo­ple would go shop­ping for ingre­di­ents to cre­ate a meal which was shared with the rest of the audi­ence on arrival. As the film was shown, fruit and nuts were shared around the room. At the end of the show­ing young peo­ple would share their mem­o­ries and their feel­ings about their coun­try of ori­gin and the life that they have left behind, the peo­ple that they miss, and the heartache of their lives in their coun­try. These thoughts and feel­ings were sen­si­tive­ly lis­tened to and shared with audi­ence mem­bers from the host com­mu­ni­ty. With these film nights came new and deep­er under­stand­ings and bridges between peo­ple were built. One of the audi­ence on one occa­sion was the neice of a Kur­dish film direc­tor, Karzan Sher­abayani. (With­in a year we assist­ed Karzan to show his new doc­u­men­tary about Kirkuk at the Broad­way cin­e­ma, and to host an event at Robin­hood Chase with guests Shano dance Com­pa­ny — a Kur­dish dance com­pa­ny in the UK who had pre­vi­ous­ly per­formed at the Edin­burgh fes­ti­val).

It wasn’t long before the Com­mu­ni­ty Print works relo­cat­ed to the Sumac Cen­tre and Sanko­fa was ful­ly using the whole space of the orig­i­nal flat. On occa­sions when our clients were detained, groups of peo­ple would col­lect to run cam­paigns to pre­vent the removal of our clients and to help them to get legal advice. There have been many tense and heart warm­ing moments in the anti depor­ta­tion activ­i­ties ema­nat­ing from the office.

Cur­rent Cri­sis

After two years at the Com­mu­ni­ty Cen­tre we must leave. Many of the orig­i­nal social activists have moved on to oth­er projects and Sanko­fa has remained, active­ly respond­ing to the ther­a­peu­tic needs of the asy­lum seek­ing com­mu­ni­ty in Not­ting­ham.

It is with heavy hearts that we are now look­ing urgent­ly for a place to be. Sanko­fa has been the tar­get of harass­ment and vio­lent attacks for a year. With the first attack in the sum­mer of last year, , and this year on five sep­a­rate occa­sions with­in a month. The attacks are so vicious and with­out restraint that it is not pos­si­ble to attempt to repair. On each occa­sion doors have been forced and research papers and fold­ers strewn around, com­put­ers dam­aged and made unus­able. Refugees and sup­port­ers of Sanko­fa have worked into the night on each occa­sion to secure the premis­es for the next day to ensure that client work was not affect­ed. How­ev­er, the attacks have gained momen­tum and we have arrived to see the kitchen door so dam­aged that only the bor­der of the door remained. We have secured inner doors as well as exter­nal doors but final­ly this week, we have arrived to see the back door destroyed again as well as the inter­nal doors, and, more shock­ing­ly, the hot water tank ripped out and water gush­ing all through­out the office and fill­ing up the cel­lar with nowhere else for the water to go. All the win­dows have been smashed, and then smashed again. How­ev­er, the win­dows and doors on the old Com­mu­ni­ty Cen­tre (unused) and the art room (unused) have remained untouched.

There has been a grow­ing unease about some of the peo­ple who have come to occu­py the dis­used premis­es at the back. On each occa­sion the police have been called and they are increas­ing­ly shocked. Most recent­ly, this week, the police who attend­ed have expressed their own frus­tra­tion, acknowl­edg­ing the pos­i­tive con­tri­bu­tion of Sanko­fa to the area and to the needs of a client group who are increas­ing­ly find­ing it dif­fi­cult to have ther­a­peu­tic and health needs met else­where. More recent­ly we have observed a small group of men, reg­u­lars who fre­quent the back of the build­ing at night, kick­ing at the door, run­ning at the door, but the police have not been able to respond quick­ly enough to make arrests.

At Sanko­fa we have nev­er had large fund­ing. Our fund­ing base has been rel­a­tive­ly small because many donors respond more read­i­ly to the imme­di­ate mate­r­i­al needs of seek­ers of asy­lum, par­tic­u­lar­ly when they become des­ti­tute. We are such a shoe­string oper­a­tion that where there have been short­falls in our income and expen­di­ture (on ser­vice bills) we have paid the bills our­selves. Our ther­a­peu­tic skills are pro­vid­ed with­out fee or salary. Our psy­chother­a­peu­tic reports to Tri­bunal and Immi­gra­tion hear­ings are com­mend­ed for their objec­tiv­i­ty and thor­ough­ness. Our vision has always been big­ger than our bud­get and we have attempt­ed to deliv­er a holis­tic and respon­sive ser­vice regard­less of the lack of fund­ing.

Sanko­fa has been approached on many occa­sions to write – chap­ters on ther­a­py with young peo­ple seek­ing asy­lum, men­tal health care of asy­lum seek­ing women, and more recent­ly for the Jour­nal of Crit­i­cal Psy­chol­o­gy. There sim­ply isn’t the time, because we are run­ning a ser­vice across six days in the week, whilst earn­ing a liv­ing else­where for part of the day. We have been invit­ed to give opin­ion and to con­tribute to com­mit­tee meet­ings of the House of Com­mons, and the House of Lords.

At this moment in time we have nowhere to offer ses­sions next week. The Sanko­fa Office is dam­aged beyond repair. We have a wait­ing list and we are out of funds. Although con­ver­sa­tions are tak­ing place next week with a cou­ple of oth­er organ­i­sa­tions in the field for very tem­po­rary access to space, we urgent­ly need premis­es and funds to help us to con­tin­ue the work that we do. We have des­ti­tute clients who are strug­gling to keep going and the dev­as­ta­tion of the Sanko­fa space has been deeply upset­ting and dis­rup­tive to them. We are try­ing to con­tin­ue with house vis­its – but these nec­es­sar­i­ly take and mean that we see less peo­ple – and by meet­ing peo­ple at NNRF at the des­ti­tu­tion group. We have been in dis­cus­sion with mem­bers of Sudanese and Kur­dish organ­i­sa­tions for a long time about shared spaces and the future vision will be some­where that we can work togeth­er to cre­ate fam­i­ly spaces as well as ther­a­peu­tic spaces with­in a social action con­text.

This is an appeal for funds and/or urgent accom­mo­da­tion. Even tem­po­rary accom­mo­da­tion will help us to con­tin­ue in the short term. We also appeal for peo­ple with expe­ri­ence of fundrais­ing to help us to con­tin­ue the work that we do, and to help us to extend our ser­vice to those in need. If you would like to talk to us about any aspect of our work please con­tact us by email Miriam@sankofafoundation.org.uk or by mobile at 07866 733223 as our lan­line is not acces­si­ble ion the imme­di­ate short term.

Thank you ..

Kind­est regards,
Miri­am Hol­lis

www.sankofafoundation.org.uk /
sankofafoundation.blogspot.com

——-

ASBO, The Last Days — for full arti­cle & pho­tos, click on this title link

After many meet­ings and plan­ning, in August 2005, a num­ber of con­cerned indi­vid­u­als took direct action to squat a large house / block of flats. The place had been emp­ty for the pre­vi­ous sev­en years and was in a great state of dis-repair.

Because of some bad peo­ple that end­ed up tak­ing over, vio­lent­ly attack­ing peo­ple that tried to stand up to them, the whole project has col­lapsed. Peo­ple drift­ed away being intim­i­dat­ed and at some fear.

There was then an attempt to re-squat the squat, a valiant attempt. But this again was made unten­able by the vio­lent activ­i­ty of only a cou­ple of peo­ple that remained there. Peo­ple being phys­i­cal­ly attacked and intim­i­dat­ed. The asy­lum and refugee project that was also housed there was then sub­ject­ed to numer­ous break-ins and much dam­age done to the build­ing, so that they could­n’t remain.

How to Fitwatch

Fit­watch meet­ing — Sat­ur­day 8th March at the LSE (Con­naught House, Ald­wych) at 2pm. Room H103.

Fit­watch has proved to be a high­ly effec­tive tac­tic against sur­veil­lance by pub­lic order police.

Although real­ly, it is bet­ter described as a range of tac­tics. Some are as sim­ple as tak­ing a pic­ture, or mak­ing a note of police num­bers. Oth­er tac­tics are more con­fronta­tion­al and active­ly pre­vent the police accu­mu­lat­ing the data they use for their ‘pre­ven­ta­tive’ pub­lic order polic­ing. There is a tac­tic for every­one, and all of them are very effec­tive.

Fit­watch meet­ing — Sat­ur­day 8th March at the LSE (Con­naught House, Ald­wych) at 2pm. Room H103.

Fit­watch has proved to be a high­ly effec­tive tac­tic against sur­veil­lance by pub­lic order police.

Although real­ly, it is bet­ter described as a range of tac­tics. Some are as sim­ple as tak­ing a pic­ture, or mak­ing a note of police num­bers. Oth­er tac­tics are more con­fronta­tion­al and active­ly pre­vent the police accu­mu­lat­ing the data they use for their ‘pre­ven­ta­tive’ pub­lic order polic­ing. There is a tac­tic for every­one, and all of them are very effec­tive.

To get involved, you need only bring a cam­era, plac­ard or ban­ner to your next demo or meet­ing, and get fit­watch­ing. But you would also be very wel­come at the Fit­watch meet­ing on Sat­ur­day so that we can share expe­ri­ences, devel­op tac­tics and cre­ate an effec­tive response to FIT and pub­lic order polic­ing.

Just as an aside, it seems that even secu­ri­ty firms have tak­en notice. The fol­low­ing tes­ti­mo­ni­als are tak­en from a Group 4 Securi­cor brief­ing, and from the web­site of the secu­ri­ty out­fit Inker­man, who make it their busi­ness to pro­tect com­pa­nies from the atten­tion of trou­ble mak­ing pro­tes­tors. Accord­ing to Inker­man, we are ‘counter-sur­veil­lance’. Sounds posh innit?

8 March 08 – Lon­don – The anar­chist group, Fit­watch, is arrang­ing a series of meet­ings that begin in Lon­don to dis­cuss the nature of polic­ing at protests and demon­stra­tions. Fit­watch are an active group that pre­vents Police For­ward Intel­li­gence Teams (FIT) from gath­er­ing infor­ma­tion dur­ing protests and demon­stra­tions. Fit­watch insist FIT are an oppres­sive reflec­tion of the state’s atti­tude towards protest groups. Fit­watch aim to use the meet­ings to dis­cuss ongo­ing tac­tics and to attract sup­port. The first meet­ing is to take place at the LSE (Group 4 Securi­cor)

Anoth­er protest group against the use of cam­eras and sur­veil­lance of activists has been estab­lished and holds grow­ing weight with­in activist move­ments. FITWATCH is a counter-sur­veil­lance group, who take pho­tos and try to obtain the per­son­al details and iden­ti­fi­ca­tion num­bers of the offi­cers in FIT. Pho­tographs of the offi­cers con­cerned have been post­ed on activist web­sites.”
(Inker­man. See http://www.inkerman.com/static/files/1197479765-theinkermanmonitorecoterror.pdf for their report on ‘eco-ter­ror­ism’.)

defycops@yahoo.co.uk
http://www.fitwatch.blogspot.com

Cops use military seige tactics at TAA fundraiser, Brighton.

3.03.2008
A fundrais­er for the forth­com­ing Tem­po­rary Autonomous Art project in Brighton was clamped down on heav­i­ly on Sat­ur­day. Police used vio­lent tac­tics to attack the build­ing show­ing there true face yet again. more.….…

3.03.2008
A fundrais­er for the forth­com­ing Tem­po­rary Autonomous Art project in Brighton was clamped down on heav­i­ly on Sat­ur­day. Police used vio­lent tac­tics to attack the build­ing show­ing there true face yet again. more.….…

A fundrais­er for the forth­com­ing Tem­po­rary Autonomous Art project in Brighton was clamped down on heav­i­ly on Saturday.The gig fea­tured local bands and a sound sys­tem in an old super­mar­ket in the city cen­tre.

The police arrived quite ear­ly and pro­ceed­ed to sur­round the whole build­ing, refus­ing entry to any­one wish­ing to enter. This just exac­er­bat­ed a pub­lic order sit­u­a­tion on the street which would not have hap­pened if they had left us alone.

Things esca­lat­ed when, after clos­ing down the entrance we were using, we sim­ply opened anoth­er one to allow peo­ple to enter the build­ing which we were legal­ly occu­py­ing.

Police attacked with pep­per spray and dogs after sur­round­ing the whole build­ing with a cor­don of vehi­cles, tape, dog and spe­cial ops units. There were sev­er­al arrests and one per­son was bad­ly mauled by a police dog and had to go to hos­pi­tal.

The police then tried to storm the entrance but were held off by hand to hand fight­ing until we man­aged to get the door closed and keep them out.

The police then served a sec­tion 63 and pro­ceed­ed to impound liv­ing vehi­cles and equip­ment. Our legal team think the sec­tion 63 was served improp­er­ly mak­ing the impound­ings ille­gal, so we will be attempt­ing to pros­e­cute.

http://www.subterraneanartbrighton.org/

Camp for Climate Action to target Kingsnorth power station

3.03.2008
Today it was announced that E.ON’s Kingsnorth pow­er sta­tion in Kent will be the site of this summer’s Camp for Cli­mate Action, run­ning from 4 th to 11th of August 2008.

Com­ing on the back of last week’s actions against the pro­posed third run­way at Heathrow, with activists occu­py­ing the tail­fin of a jet and the roof of the hous­es of par­lia­ment, cli­mate activists promise that 2008 will be “the year of direct action on cli­mate change”.

3.03.2008
Today it was announced that E.ON’s Kingsnorth pow­er sta­tion in Kent will be the site of this summer’s Camp for Cli­mate Action, run­ning from 4 th to 11th of August 2008.

Com­ing on the back of last week’s actions against the pro­posed third run­way at Heathrow, with activists occu­py­ing the tail­fin of a jet and the roof of the hous­es of par­lia­ment, cli­mate activists promise that 2008 will be “the year of direct action on cli­mate change”.

The protest will begin with a one-day event at Heathrow, the site of the pre­vi­ous year’s camp, before march­ing across Lon­don to Kingsnorth. This is one of eight cli­mate camps tar­get­ing coal across the world this sum­mer.

Cli­mate change activists will con­verge on Kingsnorth pow­er sta­tion where own­ers E.ON plan to build the UK’s first coal fired pow­er sta­tion in 30 years. Sat­ur­day 9th August has been named a ‘day of mass protest and direct action’ against Kingsnorth to high­light its impact on cli­mate change.

Mov­ing from Heathrow to Kingsnorth high­lights gov­ern­ment and cor­po­rate col­lu­sion to expand the fos­sil fuel econ­o­my when the sci­en­tif­ic con­sen­sus demands the oppo­site. The camp will bring togeth­er thou­sands of activists for sev­er­al days of work­shops and direct action. The camp will also chal­lenge busi­ness­es set to prof­it from false solu­tions to cli­mate change such as agro­fu­els. A day of action tar­get­ing the agro­fu­el indus­try will be an inte­gral part of the week long camp.

Natasha Edle­man said: “Build­ing a new coal-fired pow­er sta­tion in the mid­dle of a cli­mate cri­sis is mad­ness. The sci­ence shows that we only have a few years to avert cat­a­stroph­ic cli­mate change. If we let this hap­pen then there are sev­en more pow­er sta­tions com­ing. This must be stopped.”

Char­lie Owens said: “Bio­fu­els have been pro­posed as a solu­tion to cli­mate change. But new stud­ies con­firm that they are just as dan­ger­ous as fos­sil fuels. And they cre­ate the illu­sion we can car­ry on as usu­al. In the end we can only stop cli­mate change if we chal­lenge the growth econ­o­my and start putting peo­ple and plan­et first.”

For more infor­ma­tion see:

http://www.climatecamp.org.uk/
http://www.StopKingsnorth.org/

* Like Heathrow, Kingsnorth is await­ing the approval of the gov­ern­ment. The deci­sion on whether to hold a pub­lic inquiry into the pow­er sta­tion will be tak­en by John Hut­ton, at BERR, in the next six weeks. As with Heathrow, there are accu­sa­tions of col­lu­sion between EON and the gov­ern­ment. For more infor­ma­tion see: www.greenpeace.org.uk

* Kingsnorth will pro­duce twice as many cli­mate-harm­ing emis­sions as a third run­way at Heathrow. Accord­ing to the World Devel­op­ment Move­ment, flights from a third run­way at Heathrow will pro­duce as much green­house gas as the whole of Kenya.

* If Kingsnorth is built it is like­ly to open the way to new build coal. Up to sev­en oth­er sim­i­lar projects are planned. Growth in coal-pow­er will under­mine invest­ment in renew­able ener­gy.

* Last year’s camp was on land which is intend­ed for the build­ing of a third run­way at Heathrow. The eight-day camp brought togeth­er 2000 peo­ple on land next to the vil­lage of Sip­son and shut down BAA’s head­quar­ters for 24 hours. The camp also organ­ised up to 20 small­er actions on oth­er avi­a­tion and cli­mate change relat­ed tar­gets. There were 70 arrests over the week.

* E.ON has tried to green­wash their plans to build a new plant at Kingsnorth by claim­ing that it might one day be upgrad­ed to use car­bon cap­ture tech­nol­o­gy. Even by the most opti­mistic stan­dards, such tech­nol­o­gy will not be ready until 2020.

* In the weeks before last year’s camp, BAA applied for an injunc­tion to stop the camp tak­ing place. The injunc­tion cov­ered two mil­lion mem­bers of envi­ron­men­tal groups from the RSPB to Green­peace. The injunc­tion was suc­cess­ful­ly defeat­ed in the courts.

* In addi­tion to the camp, days of action on cli­mate change are planned for the 1st April (Fos­sil Fools Day), 1st May (May­day), 3rd June (high­light­ing issues to do with food and cli­mate change)

* “Agro­fu­els” are liq­uid fuels pro­duced from agri­cul­tur­al crops. These are also referred to as “Bio­fu­els”.

ELF Burn Down Luxury Homes

3.03.2008
Ear­ly this morn­ing, at around 4am, three mul­ti­mil­lion-dol­lar mod­el homes in a Seat­tle sub­urb were burnt down with mes­sages left by the ELF, “Built Green? Nope black!”, mock­ing the claims that the homes were envi­ron­men­tal­ly friend­ly.

3.03.2008
Ear­ly this morn­ing, at around 4am, three mul­ti­mil­lion-dol­lar mod­el homes in a Seat­tle sub­urb were burnt down with mes­sages left by the ELF, “Built Green? Nope black!”, mock­ing the claims that the homes were envi­ron­men­tal­ly friend­ly.

The build­ings, orig­i­nal­ly esti­mat­ed at $2 mil­lion, then re-cal­cu­lat­ed to be worth $7 mil­lion dol­lars, and were com­plete­ly destroyed in the fires.

Oth­er mes­sages were spray­paint­ed on homes “Stop Urban Sprawl”; “If you build it we will burn it”; and “Burn the rich.”

A ban­ner was also left say­ing: “Built green? Nope black! McMan­sions in RCD’s r not green. ELF”

RCD=rural clus­ter devel­op­ments

»

ELF: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth_Liberation_Front

Video: http://www.cnn.com/2008/CRIME/03/03/seattle.fire/#cnnSTCVideo

Sources: http://news.google.co.uk/news?hl=en&tab=wn&ie=UTF‑8&ncl=1138828157Seattle houses ELF 2

Japanese Whaling Fleet Confronted By Sea Shepherd + Interview With Nottingham Activist On Board

3.03.2008 — Aboard the M/Y Steve Irwin South­ern Oceans —The crew on the Sea Shep­herd ship Steve Irwin engaged in a con­fronta­tion with the Japan­ese fac­to­ry ship Nis­shin Maru this morn­ing between 0800 and 1000 Hours. The Nis­shin Maru can­not out­run the Steve Irwin. After a 12 hour chase the Sea Shep­herd ship closed the gap and passed along­side the Nis­shin Maru. The crew deployed over two dozen bot­tles of rot­ten but­ter send­ing a stench through­out the whale killing ship that will remain for days. The crew also threw pack­ets of a slip­pery chem­i­cal onto the deck of the Nis­shin Maru. This will make it very dif­fi­cult to cut up whales. The sub­stance becomes even more slip­pery with water so it will be dif­fi­cult to wash it off the decks.

rotten butter throwing Sea Shepherd style3.03.2008 — Aboard the M/Y Steve Irwin South­ern Oceans —The crew on the Sea Shep­herd ship Steve Irwin engaged in a con­fronta­tion with the Japan­ese fac­to­ry ship Nis­shin Maru this morn­ing between 0800 and 1000 Hours. The Nis­shin Maru can­not out­run the Steve Irwin. After a 12 hour chase the Sea Shep­herd ship closed the gap and passed along­side the Nis­shin Maru. The crew deployed over two dozen bot­tles of rot­ten but­ter send­ing a stench through­out the whale killing ship that will remain for days. The crew also threw pack­ets of a slip­pery chem­i­cal onto the deck of the Nis­shin Maru. This will make it very dif­fi­cult to cut up whales. The sub­stance becomes even more slip­pery with water so it will be dif­fi­cult to wash it off the decks.

“I guess we can call this non-vio­lent chem­i­cal war­fare,” said Cap­tain Paul Wat­son. “We only use organ­ic, non-tox­ic mate­ri­als designed to harass and obstruct ille­gal whal­ing oper­a­tions.” Four armed Japan­ese Coast Guard offi­cers clear­ly iden­ti­fied in their uni­forms video­taped the con­fronta­tion.

The Cap­tain of the Nis­shin Maru played a tape over and over again with a wom­an’s voice say­ing “Warn­ing, warn­ing, this is the Nis­shin Maru cap­tain. Stop your destruc­tive actions imme­di­ate­ly. If you dare to board this ves­sel you will be tak­en into cus­tody and restrained as ille­gal intrud­ers under Japan­ese law.”

Cap­tain Paul Wat­son radioed the Nis­shin Maru to inform them that they had no author­i­ty in the Aus­tralian Antarc­tic Ter­ri­to­ry. Cap­tain Wat­son ordered the Japan­ese cap­tain to cease all whal­ing oper­a­tions and to com­ply with the Aus­tralian Fed­er­al Court rul­ing that pro­hibits the Japan­ese whal­ing fleet from killing whales in the Aus­tralian Antarc­tic Ter­ri­to­r­i­al waters.

The con­fronta­tion took place at 63 Degrees 17 Min­utes South and 126 Degrees and 20 min­utes east. This is 175 miles off the Ban­zare Coast inside the Aus­tralian Eco­nom­ic Exclu­sion Zone. The Steve Irwin has fall­en half a mile off to the star­board side of the Nis­shin Maru. “It stinks too bad to remain any clos­er,” said Todd Emko 32, of New York City.

Not a sin­gle whale has been killed since the Sea Shep­herd ship Steve Irwin returned to harass the Japan­ese whal­ing fleet in the Aus­tralian Whale Sanc­tu­ary. “They will not be get­ting their quo­ta this year and that is a cer­tain­ty,” said Jeff Han­son 35, from Fre­man­tle, West­ern Aus­tralia. “In fact I don’t think they will be get­ting half their quo­ta.” In total the Sea Shep­herd Con­ser­va­tion Soci­ety has shut down ille­gal Japan­ese whal­ing oper­a­tions for over four and a half weeks.

=======

Inter­view With Not­ting­ham Activist In South­ern Ocean On Board Sea Shep­herd Ship

Dan is an activist from Not­ting­ham who has joined the crew on board the Sea Shep­herd ves­sel Steve Irwin in a bid to stop the ille­gal whal­ing activ­i­ties of the Japan­ese near Antar­ti­ca. The mis­sion, named Miga­loo, start­ed last Decem­ber and after refu­elling in Mel­bourne last month, the Sea Shep­herd crew is back in the oceans, have man­aged to track down the whal­ing fleet and have been in hot per­suit of its main ves­sel, the Yushin Maru No. 2 for the last week. Accor­ing to one of the crew onboard the ship “the weath­er is get­ting cold­er and we are get­ting many hours of dark­ness now. The Antarc­tic win­ter is creep­ing up on us. The seas are get­ting rougher and we are get­ting bliz­zards.” We joined Dan via sat­telite phone to ask him about his adven­tures..

Inter­view 28/02/08

Dan: Hel­lo?

Q: Hel­lo?

Dan: Eh up, how is it going?

Q: Yeah, I’m fine, how are you?

Dan: Good mate.

Q: And you thought you’d get away with not doing an inter­view with us? 🙂 (Dan left ear­li­er than antic­i­pat­ed)

Dan: I knew you’d catch up with me even­tu­al­ly..

Q: So how is it going?

Dan: Yeah, I’m alright. We’re in the mid­dle of the south­ern ocean right now. In a big storm at the moment with things fly­ing around every­where..

Q: I read some stuff about the seas being real­ly rough, var­ied at times it would be like sun­ny and then bliz­zards and things..

Dan: Yeah, I mean we’ve got about 4 meter waves and I’m not sure what the wind­speed is..

Q: But you’re all cop­ing with it?

Dan: Yeah, we did­n’t expect it to be this bad, from the weath­er reports we were get­ting. But its here now..

Q: Could you explain a lit­tle bit about what it is that you guys are doing there at the moment?

Dan: Right now we are chas­ing the Japan­ese whal­ing fleet around the coast of Antar­ti­ca. We’d like to catch up with them and stop them. By con­stant­ly chas­ing them we’re hop­ing to reduce their abil­i­ty to whale. […] They’re cer­tain­ly not whal­ing in this weath­er. The last cou­ple of days they haven’t killed any whales at all.

Q: You’ve been on the chase for a num­ber of days. Is there an end in sight? How long is this gonna go on for?

Dan: I mean depend­ing on the weath­er and stuff we will car­ry on until our fuel runs out. Thats still a good few weeks yet, which should bring us to the end of the whal­ing sea­son actu­al­ly. We should be leav­ing the same time as the [whal­ing] fleet.

Q: Whats your job on the ship?

Dan: Every­one has their set role on the ship. I’m in charge of the deck depart­ment. I am also in charge of all the ships clean­ing duties, mak­ing sure the toi­lets are clean. Also look­ing after all the equip­ment on deck, like the crane and the anchors. I’m also in charge of the inflat­able boats which we use on our actions. Mak­ing sure they are in good work­ing order and get­ting peo­ple trained up to use them. So thats my job. We’ve got nav­i­ga­tors, we’ve got peo­ple in the gal­ly cook­ing, we got peo­ple in the engine room mak­ing sure we have the pow­er and [there is] also a com­mu­ni­ca­tions offi­cer, who keeps us in touch with email etc, lots of dif­fer­ent jobs.

Q: Why did you decide to join the Sea Shep­herd more than any oth­er organ­i­sa­tion, for exam­ple Green­peace?

Dan: I’m inter­est­ed in the Sea Shep­herd because of its direct action angle. We don’t do any protest­ing. We actu­al­ly phys­i­cal­ly try­ing to stop [the whal­ing fleet]. Not real­ly inter­est­ed in just protest­ing, done that before.. I’m con­cerned with sav­ing [ani­mals] from the seas and end­ing whal­ing for­ev­er. Its the Sea Shep­herd direct angle I’m attract­ed to..

Q: Because at the moment there are a lot of laws pro­tect­ing whales.. A lot of laws have been passed, inter­na­tion­al treaties and all sorts which basi­cal­ly pro­hib­it the whal­ing, but no one to enforce them and that that is the task that the Sea Shep­herd has tak­en on.

Dan: In this sit­u­a­tion the Sea Shep­herd is actu­al­ly play­ing the role of the Aus­tralian navy or coast­guard. We’re in Aus­tralian waters and Aus­tralian ter­ri­to­ry. The Aus­tralian [Fed­er­al] Court ruled [recent­ly] that the Japan­ese whal­ing [oper­a­tions] inside their ter­ri­to­ry is ille­gal and that it should be restrained. There just isn’t the polit­i­cal will to do that. Japan and Aus­tralia are impor­tant trad­ing part­ners. There are numer­ous laws which are pro­tect­ing the whales down here, I’m not an expert on all of them, but there is the Con­ven­tion Inter­na­tion­al Trade In Endan­gered Species, the UN World Char­ter for Nature, which is actu­al­ly empow­eres [ordi­nary] peo­ple to enforce these laws, the Inter­na­tion­al Whal­ings Com­mis­sion Mora­to­ri­um on Com­mer­cial Whal­ing, and the Antarc­tic Treaty pro­tects whales. So they are real­ly bla­tent­ly break­ing a whole bunch of laws. So it is a case of law enforce­ment, more so that protest­ing.

Q: Yeah, because I guess there could be a whole load of laws, but if there is no one to enforce them..

Dan: Yeah, its only worth as much as the piece of paper its writ­ten on.. These treaties should either not be agreed on or be enforced.

Q: You’re obvi­ous­ly doing a great job down there, is there any­thing peo­ple can do on land to sup­port the stuff you’re doing down there?

Dan: When you go to the Sea Shep­herd web­site there are numer­ous peo­ple you can con­tact to [con­front] them about their inac­tion. There is Sea Shep­herd UK who are con­stant­ly rais­ing funds. This ship con­sumes huge amounts of diesel and then the main­te­nance and repair. Peo­ple can be sure that any mon­ey they donate will be used direct­ly to [con­front] the whalers.

Q: Is there any­thing you’d like to say to the peo­ple in Not­ting­ham, some who you know and will be read­ing this?

Dan: Hel­lo to every­one I know. Take care of your­selves back there. I’m a bit cold and wet, but yeah, safe so far and I’ll see you all in a few weeks.

Q: Well we wish you all the best, you’re doing a great job down there and there are tonnes of peo­ple who real­ly sup­port the stuff you’re doing and we all know its very impor­tant so keep up the good work!

Dan: Yeah, cheers mate, take care.

Operation Migaloo (Sea Shepherd)

Sea Shep­herd Aussie Crew Pre­pared to Be Tak­en as Pris­on­ers to Japan

Hunt Chaos in Derbyshire

Chaos in Monyash — 01/03/2008

On Sat­ur­day the 1st March the High Peak Hunt meet at 11.30am at the Bulls Head Inn at Monyash, Der­byshire.

Dur­ing the course of the next three hours the hunts­man lost con­trol of his pack on numer­ous occa­sions. This result­ed in them caus­ing chaos on the roads and in the fields around the area.

Chaos in Monyash — 01/03/2008

On Sat­ur­day the 1st March the High Peak Hunt meet at 11.30am at the Bulls Head Inn at Monyash, Der­byshire.

Dur­ing the course of the next three hours the hunts­man lost con­trol of his pack on numer­ous occa­sions. This result­ed in them caus­ing chaos on the roads and in the fields around the area.

The footage below shows one event where the pack can be seen run­ning back and forth across a main road. Also dur­ing this clip you can see the pack look­ing for the scent of a hare they had been chas­ing, all this with­out the hunts­man in the area.

Sabs where the only ones present where they pro­ceed­ed to slow down the cars dri­ving along the road, thus pre­vent­ing any loss of life. They also made sure the hunt did not chase any hares they were after.

30 min­utes lat­er the same occurred again, with the same result. This time one of the hounds went astray.

When the hunt final­ly called it a day they were still miss­ing a hound, which even­tu­al­ly came run­ning down the road to the meet 20 min­utes after the hunts­man had put away the rest of his pack.

To watch the three and a half minute video clip just fol­low the link off our front page www.nwhsa.org.uk

How can all this hap­pen if they were ‘fol­low­ing a scent’?

info@nwhsa.org.uk

A Climate Camp visits the Government Office in Leeds

29.2.2008
Res­i­dents from flood strick­en areas of York­shire and Hum­ber­side today block­ad­ed the Gov­ern­ment Office in Leeds to protest at its con­tin­ued pro­mo­tion of air­port expan­sion. Inspired by last year’s camp for cli­mate action at Heathrow, the pro­tes­tors from Hull, South York­shire and the Calder Val­ley used pop-up tents to set up camp out­side the main entrance.

Yorkshire RSS protest29.2.2008
Res­i­dents from flood strick­en areas of York­shire and Hum­ber­side today block­ad­ed the Gov­ern­ment Office in Leeds to protest at its con­tin­ued pro­mo­tion of air­port expan­sion. Inspired by last year’s camp for cli­mate action at Heathrow, the pro­tes­tors from Hull, South York­shire and the Calder Val­ley used pop-up tents to set up camp out­side the main entrance.

This morn­ing, con­cerned and mod­er­ate local peo­ple have block­ad­ed the entrance to their Gov­ern­ment Office. Their mes­sage; that with its con­tin­ued sup­port for expan­sion of air trav­el in the region, the Gov­ern­ment is fly­ing in the face of sci­ence.

Res­i­dents from flood strick­en areas of York­shire and Hum­ber­side today block­ad­ed the Gov­ern­ment Office at 8 City Walk, Leeds to protest at its con­tin­ued pro­mo­tion of air­port expan­sion.

The tim­ing of the protest coin­cid­ed with the final stages in the adop­tion of the Region­al Spa­tial Strat­e­gy (RSS) – the area’s fif­teen year devel­op­ment plan which is cur­rent­ly on the desk of gov­ern­ment min­is­ter Baroness Andrews, await­ing final approval. The plan allows for a three­fold expan­sion of pas­sen­ger flights from York­shire and Hum­ber­side. Bizarrely, voic­es which you might have expect­ed to argue against this mad­ness seem all to eager — Friends of The Earth made a sub­mis­sion to the RSS sug­gest­ing that an expan­sion of air trav­el was accept­able. (Maybe they should rename them­selves Foes of the Earth?)

Gov­ern­ment trans­port poli­cies were sin­gled out for crit­i­cisim by the plan’s Sus­tain­abil­i­ty Appraisal, which com­ment­ed that any pos­i­tive impacts of pro­posed changes to the RSS might not be able to counter wider neg­a­tive trends.

The pro­tes­tors made a for­mal pre­sen­ta­tion of a sci­en­tif­ic brief­ing for con­sid­er­a­tion by Baroness Andrews and issued the fol­low­ing state­ment::-

“We are con­tin­u­al­ly bom­bard­ed with mes­sages ask­ing us to “do our bit”, but this should go for gov­ern­ment too. It is shame­ful that their pol­i­cy to expand avi­a­tion and unsus­tain­able eco­nom­ic devel­op­ment is total­ly at odds with their stat­ed pol­i­cy to reduce CO2 emis­sions.

They are fly­ing in the face of sci­ence, and under­min­ing any hope of pre­vent­ing cli­mate change accel­er­at­ing beyond con­trol. York­shire and Hum­ber­side will be par­tic­u­lar­ly hard hit, because of our vul­ner­a­bil­i­ty to coastal ero­sion and flood­ing. This will spell mis­ery for hard work­ing fam­i­lies through­out the region”.

It’s clear that Baroness Andrews needs to insti­gate a major revi­sion of the region­al trans­port plan ele­ment of the RSS to remove the empha­sis on air­port growth, and to ensure a sig­nif­i­cant decrease in car­bon emis­sions from our area. A fif­teen year plan that ignores its own sus­tain­abil­i­ty appraisal is a bad fif­teen year plan, but maybe sci­ence and com­mon sense aren’t enough on their own when Gov­ern­ment pol­i­cy is made in the board­rooms of multi­na­tion­als like BAA?

Limagrain Moves GM Tests To The US due to French ban & decontaminations

FRANCE: Feb­ru­ary 29, 2008
PARIS — Europe’s largest seed coop­er­a­tive Lima­grain said on Thurs­day it had moved its research tests into genet­i­cal­ly mod­i­fied (GM) crops to the Unit­ed States, put off by France’s hos­til­i­ty to GMs and the destruc­tion of test fields.

FRANCE: Feb­ru­ary 29, 2008
PARIS — Europe’s largest seed coop­er­a­tive Lima­grain said on Thurs­day it had moved its research tests into genet­i­cal­ly mod­i­fied (GM) crops to the Unit­ed States, put off by France’s hos­til­i­ty to GMs and the destruc­tion of test fields.

Chair­man Pierre Pagesse said Bio­gem­ma, Lima­grain’s grain and oilseed research unit, would car­ry around 1,000 tests on GM crops this year in Illi­nois, in the US corn belt.

Lima­grain has a 70 per­cent stake in the world’s fourth-largest seed mak­er Vil­morin.

“We have decid­ed to trans­fer our tests to the Unit­ed States this year,” Pagesse told Reuters in an inter­view at the Paris farm show.

“It is with a heavy heart,” he added. “For the first time we will move out­side France and even out­side the Euro­pean Union to car­ry out our tests and this due to the cur­rent sit­u­a­tion in our coun­try,” Pagesse said.

While GM crops are com­mon in the Unit­ed States, France and oth­er Euro­pean coun­tries are dubi­ous about using the new genet­ic tech­nol­o­gy in agri­cul­ture.

France decid­ed in Decem­ber to sus­pend the cul­ti­va­tion of the sole GM crop grown in the Euro­pean Union, a maize devel­oped by US biotech giant Mon­san­to, and noti­fied the Euro­pean Com­mis­sion ear­li­er this month that it was extend­ing the ban.

Pagesse said the expa­tri­a­tion of the GM tests to the Unit­ed States, was also prompt­ed by the repet­i­tive attacks car­ried out by anti-GM activists on Bio­gem­ma’s test fields.

CONTRADICTION

The deci­sion, although not irre­versible, will inevitably affect the work­ing of Lima­grain, which owns 55 per­cent of Bio­gem­ma and total­ly relies on the com­pa­ny for its GM research, he said.

“I know that to move the intel­lec­tu­al part of the group is to move the group’s epi­cen­tre in time,” he said, stress­ing that the com­pa­ny had prob­a­bly wait­ed too long to make the move.

Lima­grain would keep doing non-GM tests in France but all biotech research, car­ried out through Bio­gem­ma, would be done in the Unit­ed States, which in the end could penalise Europe as seeds may not be adapt­ed to Euro­pean soil and pests, he said.

“The com­pa­ny keeps its knowl­edge but it’s the French peas­ants who are going to lose out,” he said.

Pagesse argued there was a con­tra­dic­tion between the French ban on the grow­ing of GM maize and mas­sive­ly import­ing genet­i­cal­ly mod­i­fied ani­mal feed.

“Either it is bad and we should hur­ry ban­ning imports or we con­sid­er that it’s good for con­sumers, includ­ing through ani­mal feed, then we should let French farm­ers use the tech­nolo­gies that we think are bet­ter adapt­ed,” he said.

A gov­ern­ment-appoint­ed com­mit­tee of sci­en­tists, farm­ers, politi­cians and non-gov­ern­men­tal organ­i­sa­tions said in Jan­u­ary “seri­ous doubts” remained over whether the MON 810 was safe.

The main wor­ry men­tioned in the report, which trig­gered the gov­ern­men­t’s deci­sion on the ban, con­cerned dis­sem­i­na­tion to oth­er crops and bio­di­ver­si­ty, not human health.