Climate campaigners target coal power construction firm — again!

For the sec­ond time this month, pro­test­ers have focused on major build­ing con­trac­tor BAM Nut­tall due to its poten­tial role in build­ing the con­tro­ver­sial Kingsnorth coal pow­er sta­tion. Pro­test­ers have climbed the company’s flag­pole and raised a flag read­ing “no new coal”. Peo­ple have attempt­ed to enter the build­ing, ask­ing to speak to Chief Exec­u­tive Mar­tin J.

For the sec­ond time this month, pro­test­ers have focused on major build­ing con­trac­tor BAM Nut­tall due to its poten­tial role in build­ing the con­tro­ver­sial Kingsnorth coal pow­er sta­tion. Pro­test­ers have climbed the company’s flag­pole and raised a flag read­ing “no new coal”. Peo­ple have attempt­ed to enter the build­ing, ask­ing to speak to Chief Exec­u­tive Mar­tin J. Rogers in order to give him a let­ter about the dis­as­trous impli­ca­tions of build­ing more coal-fired pow­er sta­tions.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

29 June 2009, 11:30

For more infor­ma­tion, inter­views and pho­tographs [1] con­tact Thames Val­ley Cli­mate Action on 07912 614 541 or oxford@climatecamp.org.uk

CLIMATE CAMPAIGNERS TARGET COAL POWER CONSTRUCTION FIRM

Pro­test­ers focus on major build­ing con­trac­tor BAM Nut­tall due to poten­tial role in con­tro­ver­sial Kingsnorth coal pow­er sta­tion

[Pho­to and film­ing oppor­tu­ni­ty at: BAM Nut­tall Head Office, St. James House, Knoll Road, Cam­ber­ly, Sur­rey, GU15 3XW]

For the sec­ond time this month, cam­paign­ers have tar­get­ed offices of Sur­rey-based build­ing firm BAM Nut­tall. Pro­test­ers have climbed the company’s flag­pole and raised a flag read­ing “no new coal”. Sev­en peo­ple attempt­ed to enter the build­ing, ask­ing to speak to Chief Exec­u­tive Mar­tin J. Rogers in order to give him a let­ter about the dis­as­trous impli­ca­tions of build­ing more coal-fired pow­er sta­tions.

The cam­paign­ers from Thames Val­ley Cli­mate Action [2], are tar­get­ing BAM because the com­pa­ny is bid­ding for the con­tract to build a new coal pow­er sta­tion at Kingsnorth in Kent, for the ener­gy giant E.ON [3]. This would be the first new UK coal pow­er sta­tion for 30 years, and would pro­duce about 7 mil­lions tonnes of CO2 per year, equiv­a­lent to the entire emis­sions of a coun­try like Ghana [4]. Accord­ing to a new report from Kofi Annan’s Glob­al Human­i­tar­i­an Forum, cli­mate change is already killing 300,000 peo­ple per year, and will get much worse unless we urgent­ly reduce our CO2 emis­sions [5].

One of the pro­test­ers, Mike Hold­man, said: “We are here for the sec­ond time this month to demand that BAM Nut­tall pulls out of build­ing coal pow­er sta­tions. While we praise BAM’s intro­duc­tion of low ener­gy light­ing and improved heat­ing con­trols, these ini­tia­tives are a drop in the ocean com­pared with the emis­sions the firm will cause by build­ing new coal pow­er sta­tions.”

The Gov­ern­ment and E.ON are claim­ing that a new Kingsnorth pow­er sta­tion would even­tu­al­ly include “car­bon cap­ture and stor­age” (CCS) tech­nol­o­gy, to catch 25% of its emis­sions and store them under­ground [6]. How­ev­er, the cam­paign­ers inside BAM Nut­tall point out that this is unproven tech­nol­o­gy that is still being test­ed, and won’t be avail­able until at least 2020 [7]. Cli­mate sci­en­tists say we need to make sharp car­bon cuts long before that date [8]. Even if CCS is one day installed, and works as planned, the plant would still pro­duce more CO2 than a gas pow­er sta­tion [9].

The Government’s oth­er favoured jus­ti­fi­ca­tion for build­ing new coal pow­er stations—that the emis­sions would be includ­ed in the EU’s “car­bon trad­ing” scheme—has been wide­ly and heav­i­ly crit­i­cized. Crit­ics say that this scheme is a com­plex and unwork­able dis­trac­tion from the real cli­mate change solu­tions, that it isn’t reduc­ing emis­sions, and it essen­tial­ly hands con­trol of the cli­mate over to the same bankers, bro­kers and pri­vate traders respon­si­ble for the glob­al finan­cial crash [11].

Last week NASA’s top cli­mate sci­en­tist, James Hansen, was arrest­ed for tak­ing action against new coal. Hansen said, “It seems to me that young peo­ple, espe­cial­ly, should be doing what­ev­er is nec­es­sary to block con­struc­tion of dirty coal-fired pow­er plants.” Even Al Gore said in 2007, “I can’t under­stand why there aren’t rings of young peo­ple block­ing bull­doz­ers and pre­vent­ing them from con­struct­ing coal-fired pow­er sta­tions.” One of today’s pro­test­ers, Anna Samuels, said: “You have a top politi­cian and a top sci­en­tist call­ing for direct action on coal, as we are doing here today. Gore and Hansen must recog­nise that non-vio­lent direct action has been an impor­tant cat­a­lyst in near­ly every major social change move­ment in his­to­ry, from woman’s suf­frage to civ­il rights. We are here today to help cat­alyze the much-need­ed shift from coal to a low-car­bon econ­o­my.”

Louise Smith said: “We need to think about the long-term pic­ture. The Stern Review has shown that coal is not a cost-effec­tive ener­gy source when you fac­tor in the dam­ages that it will cause through future cli­mate change. Cli­mate sci­en­tists around the world, from Oxford University’s Myles Allen to NASA’s James Hansen, are denounc­ing coal. We ask BAM Nut­tall to do the same, and stop build­ing new coal pow­er sta­tions.”

—ENDS—

Notes to Edi­tors:

[1] Pho­tographs of our protest at BAM ear­li­er this month are avail­able at http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/regions/oxford/2009/06/431779.html
[2] TVCA is part of the Camp for Cli­mate Action net­work, which set up a week-long protest camp at Kingsnorth in August 2008—see www.climatecamp.org.uk. Today’s action is part of a nation­al cam­paign, sup­port­ed by the Camp for Cli­mate Action, called the E.ON Face Off—see www.e‑onf-off.org.uk. Pre­vi­ous actions have includ­ed the occu­pa­tion of E.ON’s UK head office by pro­test­ers dressed as San­ta Claus, and actions at E.ON stalls at Uni­ver­si­ty recruit­ment events, which led to the com­pa­ny aban­don­ing its grad­u­ate recruit­ment dri­ve.
[3] BAM Nut­tall is a con­struc­tion and civ­il engi­neer­ing firm owned by the Roy­al BAM Group
[4] Car­bon Diox­ide Infor­ma­tion Analy­sis Cen­tre: http://cdiac.ornl.gov/
[5] Glob­al Human­i­tar­i­an Forum: http://ghf-geneva.org/
[6] http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8014295.stm
[7] http://www.guardian.co.uk/environmental/georgemonbiot/2009/apr/23/carbon-capture-and-storage-coal
[8] http://www.tyndall.ac.uk/publications/briefing_notes/bn17.pdf
[9] Gen­er­at­ing elec­tric­i­ty from coal pro­duces about twice as much CO2 per KWh than gen­er­a­tion from gas. There­fore a 25%reduction would leave coal about 1.5 times as pol­lut­ing as gas.
[10] See for exam­ple: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article5257602.ece, http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20227046.200-carbon-trading-wont-stop-climate-change.html and http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/cif-green/2009/may/28/carbon-trading
[11] http://carbontradewatch.org

11:30
UPDATE: Five pro­test­ers entered the build­ing and were lat­er eject­ed. They are now being searched under Sec­tion 1 of the 2003 Crim­i­nal Jus­tice Act. No arrests thus far.

Thames Val­ley Cli­mate Action
oxford@climatecamp.org.uk
http://www.climatecamp.org.uk

Aviation biofuels protest targets Virgin Atlantic

Activists from Plane Stu­pid and Action Against Agro­fu­els protest­ed at Heathrow Ter­mi­nal 3 out­side the Vir­gin check-in about the pro­posed use of bio­fu­els for avi­a­tion.

Virgin biofuel action 1Virgin biofuel action 2Activists from Plane Stu­pid and Action Against Agro­fu­els protest­ed at Heathrow Ter­mi­nal 3 out­side the Vir­gin check-in about the pro­posed use of bio­fu­els for avi­a­tion. Mon­day 22nd June was cho­sen as it was the 25th anniver­sary of Vir­gin Atlantic who plan to meet 5% of their 2015 avi­a­tion fuel quo­ta from bio­fu­els. Most of this will inevitably come from palm oil.

Mon­day was the 25th anniver­sary of Vir­gin Atlantic. They cel­e­brat­ed at Gatwick Ter­mi­nal 3 with a repeat of their 1:00pm maid­en flight from Lon­don to Newark in 1984.

The protest con­tin­ued for over 5 hours. At the final count 11 activists were arrest­ed.
Virgin biofuel action 3
News sto­ry here:
http://latestnews.virginmedia.com/news/environment/2009/06/22/anti_airport_protesters_arrested

And press release below:

9 arrest­ed as Plane Stu­pid and Action Against Agro­fu­els (AAA) crash Vir­gin Atlantic 25th birth­day par­ty

9 activists from Plane Stu­pid and AAA (Action Against Agro­fu­els) have been arrest­ed gate crash­ing Vir­gin Atlantic’s 25th birth­day par­ty at Heathrow air­port, to high­light plans to allow the avi­a­tion indus­try to con­tin­ue to expand if it uses bio­fu­els instead of con­ven­tion­al avi­a­tion fuel.

Two men, dressed as stew­ardess­es, are still on top of the entrance to the Vir­gin com­plex at Ter­mi­nal 3 where the cel­e­bra­tion is being held. Out­side more activists, also dressed as stew­ardess­es, unfurled a ban­ner read­ing, “Avi­a­tion Indus­try: no way out” and “Cli­mate Crim­i­nals Inside”. All those out­side have now either been arrest­ed or moved on by the police.

Vir­gin has been an out­spo­ken sup­port­er of bio­fu­els as a solu­tion to the steeply ris­ing emis­sions from air­craft, but sci­en­tists are crit­i­cal of plans to scale up their pro­duc­tion to meet the new demand for replace­ment fuels.

Mary­la Hart, spokesper­son for AAA said, “Vir­gin Atlantic are claim­ing to be “Red Hot after 25 years”, but with bio­fu­els it’s going to be a red hot plan­et we’ll be liv­ing on. Today’s cel­e­bra­tion is all about hav­ing fun but the biggest joke of the par­ty is that the
avi­a­tion indus­try are sell­ing bio­fu­els as a green solu­tion to their prob­lems.”

Josh Moos of Plane Stu­pid said, “Vir­gin are invest­ing mas­sive­ly in try­ing to make bio­fu­els work, but bio­fu­els are no way out for the avi­a­tion indus­try. It’s far­ci­cal to sug­gest that bio­fu­els are the answer when last year it took 150,000 coconuts to pro­vide just 5% of the fuel for a one-way flight from Lon­don to Ams­ter­dam. In real­i­ty it will be oth­er veg­etable oil blends such as palm oil pow­er­ing air­craft, but the soar­ing demand for palm oil is already dri­ving trop­i­cal defor­esta­tion.”

Dee Rughani of AAA added, “The avi­a­tion indus­try is pre­tend­ing that bio­fu­els reduce green­house gas emis­sions when all the peer reviewed sci­ence states that the oppo­site is true. Whether it’s palm oil or 2nd gen­er­a­tion bio­fu­els, both will still com­pete for land, so any growth in this indus­try will add fur­ther to the 100 mil­lion peo­ple
already going hun­gry due to bio­fu­els whilst exac­er­bat­ing trop­i­cal for­est destruc­tion and cli­mate change.”

Coal protesters board cargo ship

22 June 2009
Cam­paign­ers from Green­peace have board­ed a ship deliv­er­ing coal to the Kingsnorth pow­er sta­tion in Kent.

The ves­sel was tar­get­ed as it sailed up the Riv­er Med­way, with reports of peo­ple swim­ming in front of the ship to stop it dock­ing.

Greenpeace about to board E.on coal ship22 June 2009
Cam­paign­ers from Green­peace have board­ed a ship deliv­er­ing coal to the Kingsnorth pow­er sta­tion in Kent.

The ves­sel was tar­get­ed as it sailed up the Riv­er Med­way, with reports of peo­ple swim­ming in front of the ship to stop it dock­ing.

The group, which is protest­ing against coal-fired pow­er sta­tions, climbed aboard from inflat­able speed­boats.

How­ev­er, Kent Police said the ves­sel still man­aged to dock at Kingsnorth with some pro­test­ers still on board.

Three men and a woman have been arrest­ed on sus­pi­cion of con­spir­a­cy to com­mit crim­i­nal dam­age, while anoth­er woman has been held on sus­pi­cion of endan­ger­ing an air­craft.

The ship was board­ed at about 2250 BST on Sun­day as it approached the pow­er sta­tion near Hoo.

Action ‘unac­cept­able’

On Mon­day morn­ing, sev­er­al cam­paign­ers remained on board, sur­round­ed by offi­cers.

A Green­peace spokesman said: “There are still five cam­paign­ers on the ship so the protest is con­tin­u­ing. They are going to try and hold their posi­tion for as long as they can to pre­vent the coal from being unloaded, but the ship is sur­round­ed with police.”

Ch Supt Matthew said police were using all avail­able resources to bring a safe con­clu­sion to the inci­dent.

He said: “There are no reports of any injuries at this time. Pub­lic safe­ty is of para­mount impor­tance to the oper­a­tion.”

A spokes­woman for E.ON, which owns Kingsnorth, said the cam­paign­ers’ action was unac­cept­able.

She said: “Obvi­ous­ly we remain respect­ful of peo­ple’s right to protest but it was a dan­ger­ous thing to do — board­ing a ship in the mid­dle of the night.

“So our point of view is that this is unac­cept­able.”

Ear­li­er, cam­paign­er Sarah Shora­ka, 31, who climbed the ship’s fore­mast, said: “There are nine of us on the ship.

“We have split into three teams of three, with one team on fore­mast, anoth­er on the fun­nel and the third hang­ing off the side.

“We are using walkie-talkies to stay in con­tact with each oth­er and have enough food and water to last sev­er­al days.

“We will stay as long as we can to stop the coal being unloaded.”

A police state­ment said: “Kent Police received reports of Green­peace pro­test­ers board­ing and attempt­ing to impede the berthing of a coal ves­sel at Kingsnorth pow­er sta­tion in Kent.

“Pro­test­ers used ribs (rigid inflat­able boats) and also entered the water in order to board and pre­vent the coal ves­sel from mak­ing port.

“They were unsuc­cess­ful in their attempts and the coal ves­sel has now docked.”

Kingsnorth has been at the cen­tre of a cli­mate change row after E.ON announced plans to build a big­ger coal-fired pow­er sta­tion to replace the exist­ing facil­i­ty.

If built it would be the first new coal pow­ered plant in the UK for a quar­ter of a cen­tu­ry.

An esti­mat­ed 1,500 demon­stra­tors attend­ed a cli­mate camp to protest against the plans last August.

Protester erects fake phone mast

18 June 2009
A man has put up a fake phone mast in a bid to stop a real one being built next to his garage in Hamp­shire.

Sean Den­man reject­ed £4,500 from Voda­fone to erect a mast at his ser­vice sta­tion in Ever­ton Road, Hor­dle.

Fake phone mast protest18 June 2009
A man has put up a fake phone mast in a bid to stop a real one being built next to his garage in Hamp­shire.

Sean Den­man reject­ed £4,500 from Voda­fone to erect a mast at his ser­vice sta­tion in Ever­ton Road, Hor­dle.

The phone giant turned its atten­tion to a pave­ment adja­cent to the garage but was ini­tial­ly refused per­mis­sion.

How­ev­er, the plan was agreed on appeal but Mr Den­man has blocked con­struc­tion by weld­ing a pole and a box to a car which over­hangs the pave­ment.

Voda­fone said it was still look­ing to start work at the site, by the end of March 2010, and would take advice on any obstruc­tion at the site before work was due to start.

The firm said it would need a plan­ning agree­ment if it want­ed to move its mast to avoid Mr Den­man’s con­struc­tion.

In a state­ment, Voda­fone said: “The pro­posed radio base sta­tion… is required to improve the 3G cov­er­age to our cus­tomers in the area.

This loca­tion was cho­sen after con­sid­er­a­tion of 15 alter­na­tives as it pro­vides a back­drop of street fur­ni­ture, against which the pro­posed tim­ber tele­graph pole will not be visu­al­ly intru­sive.

“We are cur­rent­ly final­is­ing our build plans and it is our inten­tion to devel­op this site this finan­cial year.”

Mr Den­man said: “I had to get land sur­vey­ors to mark down where this con­struc­tion would go.

“Not hav­ing com­plete right of way, I decid­ed I can’t put any­thing on the pave­ment so took a car, weld­ed on a box and pole which over­hangs by the cor­rect amount cov­er­ing where the mast and box would go.

“They [Voda­fone] feel they can put their con­struc­tion any­where and make up any excuse.

“I am not against it, but not in this sort of place.”

‘Anten­nae need­ed’

New For­est Dis­trict Coun­cil and the parish coun­cil had pre­vi­ous­ly refused the plan­ning appli­ca­tion.

Chris Elliott, head of plan­ning at the coun­cil, said: “The coun­cil is con­cerned that so many phone mast appeals like this are being allowed by plan­ning inspec­tors because of the gov­ern­men­t’s com­mit­ment to 3G tech­nol­o­gy.”

The plan­ning inspec­tor had agreed the pro­pos­al, with a report stat­ing: “The appel­lant [Voda­fone] has demon­strat­ed the need for the anten­nae to pro­vide 3G cov­er­age in the Hor­dle area.”

The inspec­tor added that “giv­en gov­ern­ment tele­coms plan­ning pol­i­cy… the need for this facil­i­ty is suf­fi­cient to out­weigh the lim­it­ed harm to the char­ac­ter and appear­ance of the area.”

Trident Ploughshares Blockade at Aldermaston on 15th June 2009

It was a glo­ri­ous morn­ing as 5 sep­a­rate groups made their way towards Alder­mas­ton. At 6.30a.m.

Aldermaston blockade 1It was a glo­ri­ous morn­ing as 5 sep­a­rate groups made their way towards Alder­mas­ton. At 6.30a.m. the Muriel Lesters arrived at North Gate to find it had not been opened yet for the park and ride coach­es so they fur­ther locked it with their own chains and some super-glue and arranged them­selves as com­fort­ably as pos­si­ble in their lock-ons and hung their peace ban­ners.

There were 5 of them locked on, includ­ing one in a wheel chair plus a lone sup­port­er. A police­man soon arrived and asked them, in amaze­ment, why they had cho­sen that par­tic­u­lar gate (it being rather out of the way and not a usu­al tar­get for demon­stra­tors). They inge­nious­ly replied that they had nev­er blocked that gate before! They were then told that they were doing noth­ing ille­gal and could stay there all day if they wished! Well we know we are doing noth­ing ille­gal and that the real crim­i­nals are those build­ing ille­gal weapons of mass destruc­tion inside the fences. And the Muriel Lesters also knew, unlike the police, that they were an essen­tial part of an over­all block­ade and that oth­er gates were being block­ad­ed. They remained where they were.

Aldermaston blockade 2At 7a.m. women from the Alder­mas­ton Women’s Peace Camp pushed their heavy lock-ons into place at Home Office Gate, and three women locked on, slow­ing traf­fic down whilst the East Anglian group drove two cars into Tadley Gate com­plete­ly block­ing it. The two cars had been care­ful­ly pro­vid­ed with lock-on tubes fixed to the back-seat floors so that when the cars were posi­tioned the sup­port­ers in the front could get out fast and the two in the back seat just opened their doors and then sat in the road and put their arms in the tube. Thus 2 peo­ple locked-on to each car and the rest of the sup­port­ing group spray paint­ed CND signs on the cars and hung ban­ners say­ing ’Nuclear Weapons are State Ter­ror­ism’.

Aldermaston blockade 3Mean­while, two intre­pid cyclists man­aged to pad­lock shut both sets of gates at the Main Gate and then rush off with­out get­ting arrest­ed in order to sup­port the oth­er groups. They were soon joined by 2 oth­er cyclists and through­out the morn­ing not only gave good sup­port but also got lots of ideas about how to do some bicy­cle block­ades anoth­er time. They put up their ban­ner that said ’Bikes Block Bombs — No Tri­dent’ at the Tadley Gate.

Aldermaston blockade 4At 7.30a.m. two com­bined TP affin­i­ty groups call­ing them­selves the ’Birth­day Group’ (it was Alison’s 60th birth­day) manoeu­vred a car­a­van into the Boil­er­house Gate stop­ping the line of traf­fic that had been direct­ed around to that gate. There were 4 locked to each cor­ner of the car­a­van sit­ting on the ground with their arms in con­crete lock-ons that were fixed inside each cor­ner of the car­a­van. One oth­er block­ad­er locked him­self to the side of the car­a­van. Then the ban­ner went up say­ing ’No Tri­dent Replace­ment’ and the birth­day cake came around.

Streams of traf­fic were try­ing to get into the var­i­ous gates and hav­ing to move slow­ly around the base try­ing to find a way to get in. The base had been suc­cess­ful­ly blocked at 5 gates and although the locks were bro­ken with­in min­utes at the main gates and traf­fic trick­led in past the con­crete blocks at Home Office Gate nev­er­the­less 3 gates were blocked for between 2 to 3 hours. The hard­est to move were the two cars as it was dif­fi­cult for the cut­ting teams to remove the tubes with­in the restrict­ed space inside the cars. Once every­one was removed the cars and the car­a­van then had to be towed away.

Eleven peo­ple were arrest­ed and tak­en along to Lod­don Val­ley Police Sta­tion. The 5 at North Gate had been released last of all, cut out and then plonked on the grass and instead of being arrest­ed they were left free to join the sup­port­ers from the oth­er blockad­ing groups. We all sat down and shared food and drink and our expe­ri­ences of the day. We had had a kind ded­i­cat­ed press per­son who got out the press releas­es for us as he cycled round col­lect­ing people’s pic­tures and anoth­er sup­port per­son who had dri­ven me around to take pic­tures and to get an over­all pic­ture of what was going on. We were able to do a cou­ple of inter­views includ­ing one for the local radio. You can find local press accounts here at http://www.newburytoday.co.uk/News/Article.aspx?articleID=10297 and at http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/berkshire/8101261.stm

You can also find pic­tures of the block­ades at http://aldermaston.net/media

In all eleven peo­ple were arrest­ed and tak­en along to Lod­don Val­ley Police Sta­tion. They were not kept inside too long and we were all re-unit­ed at around 4p.m. After more chat­ting and de-briefs we all set off home — tired but hap­py.

The 11 arrest­ed were all charged with wil­ful obstruc­tion of the high­way either with or with­out a motor vehi­cle and were giv­en rather stiff bail con­di­tions to stay well away from Alder­mas­ton and Burgh­field that some of them may chal­lenge in court. They have to appear at New­bury Mag­is­trates Court on the fol­low­ing dates:- 7 on the 25th June, 2 on the 26th June, 1 on the 30th June and 1 on 2nd July. If any­one lives near the court then some court sup­port would be wel­come for the actu­al court cas­es. You can con­tact me if you want to do this and I will let you know the dates.

Any groups read­ing this who want to be involved in the next hid­den block­ade do con­tact me.….…we need to keep the pres­sure on Alder­mas­ton and try to per­suade our Gov­ern­ment to ful­fil its promise to the world com­mu­ni­ty to dis­arm its nuclear weapons not make new ones.

Local Writer Stops Council Hedge Cutting

This small, local action was car­ried out on the spur of the moment, but worked and prob­a­bly saved the lives of hun­dreds of nest­ing birds and oth­er inhab­i­tants of the hedgerow ecol­o­gy. Just goes to show that any­one can do it if they care enough — you don’t always need chains and tubes.

———-

This small, local action was car­ried out on the spur of the moment, but worked and prob­a­bly saved the lives of hun­dreds of nest­ing birds and oth­er inhab­i­tants of the hedgerow ecol­o­gy. Just goes to show that any­one can do it if they care enough — you don’t always need chains and tubes.

———-

NATURE-LOVING Kei­th Far­nish stood in front of trac­tors to stop them get­ting to birds nest­ing in hedges.

And Keith’s defi­ance has man­aged to halt a coun­cil hedge-cut­ting project in his local park.

Kei­th, 38, sprung into action when he spot­ted coun­cil con­trac­tors lop­ping two foot off the top of hedgerows, as he walked home through Sweyne Park, Rayleigh.

It stopped work­ers in their tracks, and Rochford Dis­trict Coun­cil has now decid­ed to call off the whole project until the end of the nest­ing sea­son.

Writer and dad-of-two Kei­th, who lives in near­by Eastcheap, is delight­ed.

He said: “That’s bril­liant news.Obviously, the coun­cil needs to review its pol­i­cy so it won’t hap­pen again.

“It’s so impor­tant the coun­cil takes into accounts pat­terns of nature.

“It was about three miles of hedgerow they would have mas­sa­cred and it would have destroyed nest­ing birds. Sweyne Park is the only green lung that Rayleigh has.”

Kei­th said the hedges are used by spar­rows, black­birds and robins, and about 20 metres had been cut down by the time he arrived after drop­ping off his chil­dren at school.

He said: “It’s just pure chance I hap­pened to be there and saw them. I said to the con­trac­tors that I will just stand in front of your machin­ery until you go.

“These guys seemed OK though I got their goat a bit. The man­ag­er told me they will just have to pack up and go some­where else.

“It’s the first time I’ve ever stood in front of machin­ery. It’s just some­thing I had to do.

“I felt empow­ered because it was the right thing to do. I didn’t feel threat­ened at all.”

(from http://www.echo-news.co.uk/news/local_news/rayleigh/4431250.Keith_makes_a_stand_to_protect_bird_nests/)Hedge Protester

New Social Centre/Ecovillage To Be Occupied In Suffolk/Essex Area

Want to get involved?

This week­end we will be occu­py­ing a prop­er­ty in the Suffolk/Essex area in order to start an ecov­il­lage. It’s got many acres of land attached, and var­i­ous groups will hope­ful­ly be com­ing to give work­shops on cli­mate change, shar­ing var­i­ous skills and activism.

Want to get involved?

This week­end we will be occu­py­ing a prop­er­ty in the Suffolk/Essex area in order to start an ecov­il­lage. It’s got many acres of land attached, and var­i­ous groups will hope­ful­ly be com­ing to give work­shops on cli­mate change, shar­ing var­i­ous skills and activism.

If you want to get involved in the occu­pa­tion, would like to come and live there, get in any of the activ­i­ties, or have some­thing you would like to teach, please email cocklehorsecrab@googlemail.com

Kingsnorth construction firm invaded by climate activists!

One of the com­pa­nies bid­ding for the con­tract to con­struct a new coal fired pow­er sta­tion at Kingsnorth has been tar­get­ed by cli­mate cam­paign­ers. Three peo­ple have locked on inside and two are up on a ledge out­side hav­ing dropped a ban­ner.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

5th June 2009. 10.30am

Nutall protestOne of the com­pa­nies bid­ding for the con­tract to con­struct a new coal fired pow­er sta­tion at Kingsnorth has been tar­get­ed by cli­mate cam­paign­ers. Three peo­ple have locked on inside and two are up on a ledge out­side hav­ing dropped a ban­ner.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

5th June 2009. 10.30am

For more infor­ma­tion, inter­views and pho­tographs con­tact 07932 096677 or press@climatecamp.org.uk

CLIMATE CAMPAIGNERS INVADE KINGSNORTH CONSTRUCTION FIRM

Major build­ing con­trac­tor BAM Nut­tall tar­get­ed due to poten­tial role in con­tro­ver­sial coal pow­er sta­tion

[Pho­to and film­ing oppor­tu­ni­ty at: BAM Nut­tall Head Office, St James House, Knoll Road, Cam­ber­ley, Sur­rey, GU15 3XW]

This morn­ing, thir­teen peo­ple invad­ed the offices of Sur­rey-based build­ing firm BAM Nut­tall. They have locked them­selves to fur­ni­ture, glued them­selves to desks, and are ask­ing to speak to Chief Exec­u­tive Mar­tin J. Rogers about the dis­as­trous impli­ca­tions of build­ing more coal-fired pow­er sta­tions. Sev­er­al pro­test­ers have also occu­pied an exte­ri­or ledge above the building’s entrance, with a ban­ner read­ing: “No New Coal: Build a Green­er Future”, and staff and passers-by are being giv­en leaflets and infor­ma­tion about the protest.

The cam­paign­ers, from Thames Val­ley Cli­mate Action [1], are tar­get­ing BAM because the com­pa­ny is bid­ding for the con­tract to build a new coal pow­er sta­tion at Kingsnorth in Kent, for the giant ener­gy com­pa­ny E.ON [2]. This would be the first new UK coal pow­er sta­tion for 30 years, and would pro­duce around 7 mil­lion tonnes of CO2 per year, equiv­a­lent to the entire emis­sions of a coun­try like Ghana [3]. Accord­ing to a new report from Kofi Annan’s Glob­al Human­i­tar­i­an Forum, cli­mate change is already killing 300,000 peo­ple per year, and will get much worse unless we urgent­ly reduce our CO2 emis­sions [4].

One of the pro­test­ers, Xavier Perez, said: “BAM Nut­tall point to the intro­duc­tion of low ener­gy light­ing and improved heat­ing at their head office as exam­ples of how they are reach­ing their sus­tain­abil­i­ty goals. This con­ve­nient­ly over­looks the fact that they are hop­ing to con­struct a pow­er sta­tion reliant on the filth­i­est fos­sil fuel in exis­tence. This would be laugh­able if it were not for the fact that mil­lions of lives, liveli­hoods and species could be lost.” [5]

The Gov­ern­ment and E.ON are claim­ing that a new Kingsnorth pow­er sta­tion would even­tu­al­ly include “car­bon cap­ture and stor­age” (CCS) tech­nol­o­gy, to catch 25% of its emis­sions and store them under­ground [6]. How­ev­er, the cam­paign­ers inside BAM Nut­tall point out that this is unproven tech­nol­o­gy that is still being test­ed, and won’t be avail­able until at least 2020 [7]. Cli­mate sci­en­tists say we need to make sharp car­bon cuts long before that date [8]. Even if CCS is one day installed, and works as planned, the plant would still pro­duce more CO2 than a gas pow­er sta­tion [9].

The Government’s oth­er favoured jus­ti­fi­ca­tion for build­ing new coal pow­er sta­tions – that the emis­sions would be includ­ed in the EU’s “car­bon trad­ing” scheme – has been wide­ly and heav­i­ly crit­i­cised [10]. Crit­ics say that this scheme is a com­plex and unwork­able dis­trac­tion from real cli­mate change solu­tions, that isn’t reduc­ing net emis­sions, and essen­tial­ly hands con­trol of the cli­mate over to the same bankers, bro­kers and pri­vate traders respon­si­ble for the glob­al finan­cial crash [11].

Anoth­er of today’s pro­test­ers, Sasha Good­win, said: “After last summer’s Cli­mate Camp at Kingsnorth, thou­sands of peo­ple pledged to take direct action to stop this pow­er sta­tion, and there is a huge wave of pub­lic sup­port for the cam­paign. Today’s action shows how peo­ple are ready to act on their words. Any com­pa­nies think­ing about get­ting involved in the Kingsnorth project should remem­ber the road protests of the 1990s, which cost con­trac­tors mil­lions of pounds and pre­vent­ed many pro­posed road projects from going ahead.

“BAM Nut­tall say they need this work because of the reces­sion, but this com­plete­ly miss­es the point. If we keep burn­ing coal, then we’ll lose a lot more than just our jobs – people’s homes, health, food sup­ply, and the sta­bil­i­ty of our soci­ety are all at risk from cli­mate change. Instead, we need to build a sus­tain­able soci­ety, pow­ered by renew­able ener­gy from the wind, sun and tides, which will lead to bet­ter ways to live and work. We need to make sure that this tran­si­tion is a fair one, active­ly involv­ing work­ers from the ener­gy indus­try. We’re hop­ing to have some inter­est­ing con­ver­sa­tions with BAM staff today about all of these issues!”

ENDS

Notes to Edi­tors

[1] TVCA is part of the Camp for Cli­mate Action net­work, which set up a week-long protest camp at Kingsnorth in August 2008 – see www.climatecamp.org.uk. Today’s action is part of a nation­al cam­paign, sup­port­ed by the Camp for Cli­mate Action, called the E.ON Face Off — see www.e‑onf-off.org.uk. Pre­vi­ous actions have includ­ed the occu­pa­tion of E.ON’s UK head office by pro­test­ers dressed as San­ta Claus, and actions at E.ON stalls at Uni­ver­si­ty recruit­ment events which led to the com­pa­ny aban­don­ing their grad­u­ate recruit­ment dri­ve.
[2] BAM Nut­tall is a con­struc­tion and civ­il engi­neer­ing firm owned by the Roy­al BAM Group
[3] Car­bon Diox­ide Infor­ma­tion Analy­sis Cen­ter: http://cdiac.ornl.gov/
[4] http://www.ghf-geneva.org/
[5] Roy­al BAM Group Sus­tain­abil­i­ty Report
[6] http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8014295.stm
[7] http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/georgemonbiot/2009/apr/23/carbon-capture-and-storage-coal
[8] http://www.tyndall.ac.uk/publications/briefing_notes/bn17.pdf
[9] Gen­er­at­ing elec­tric­i­ty from coal pro­duces about twice as much CO2 per KWh than gen­er­a­tion from gas. There­fore, a 25% reduc­tion would still leave coal about one and a half times as pol­lut­ing as gas.
[10] See for exam­ple http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article5257602.ece, http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20227046.200-carbon-trading-wont-stop-climate-change.html and http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/cif-green/2009/may/28/carbon-trading
[11] http://www.carbontradewatch.org/

Thames Val­ley Cli­mate Action

Lat­est — 10:30

Four cop vans, an ambu­lance (to deal with the per­son super­glued to the front door) and a police heli­copter now on the scene. Pass­ing Con­ser­v­a­tive coun­cil­lors milling about express­ing their out­rage that the boys in blue are doing this rather than catch­ing bur­glars.

1 arrest so far — 11:50

One per­son inside arrest­ed for aggra­vat­ed tres­pass — not giv­en the option to leave of his own accord… Those locked on/glued/perched on ledge still going strong.

Sev­er­al arrests, includ­ing one pass­er-by who wan­dered over to talk to the peo­ple up on the ledge and prompt­ly got nicked.

Eco-VIllage Occupation London 6th June Update + Other News.

Hel­lo friends,

In this report:

News of the upcom­ing Eco-Vil­lage occu­pa­tion tak­ing place on a dis­used piece of land near Ham­mer­smith start­ing on Sat­ur­day, 6th June (see attached e‑flyer for details).

Eco flyerHel­lo friends,

In this report:

News of the upcom­ing Eco-Vil­lage occu­pa­tion tak­ing place on a dis­used piece of land near Ham­mer­smith start­ing on Sat­ur­day, 6th June (see attached e‑flyer for details).

The lat­est from the Tyt­ing com­mu­ni­ty farm occu­pa­tion — infor­ma­tion on how you can get involved and sup­port the action.

And some inter­est­ing facts about the land in Britain.

ECO-VILLAGE OCCUPATION

The Eco vil­lage occu­pa­tion begins on the 6th June. Meet at Water­loo Sta­tion at 10AM under the clock. Please try to be on time.

********Please Note**********

If you are com­ing for the open­ing stage of the eco-vil­lage occu­pa­tion, you will need to bring a tent, water and food sup­plies. If you have access to kitchen equip­ment and oth­er use­ful tat that you would be OK to loan, please bring it along too.

***************************

The Eco-Vil­lage Occu­pa­tion is about to begin. Infi­nite pos­si­bil­i­ties lie ahead; what will hap­pen depends on what we make it. By cre­at­ing a sus­tain­able com­mu­ni­ty in the heart of the urban jun­gle, we have an oppor­tu­ni­ty to raise the con­scious­ness of urban dwellers all around and shine a light on a way of liv­ing that goes far to solv­ing the prob­lem of the destruc­tion of peo­ple and plan­et.

Dur­ing the last pub­lic plan­ning meet­ing, we had con­sen­sus on the fol­low­ing issues:

- A no vehi­cle on site pol­i­cy. In order to max­i­mize liv­ing space and encour­age peo­ple to come to the vil­lage via sus­tain­able means.

- Acoustic music only. So that we don’t make ene­mies of the neigh­bours.

- All major deci­sions in the eco-vil­lage to be decid­ed via the con­sen­su­al deci­sion mak­ing of all the peo­ple in the eco-vil­lage.

Please come along and join us. Ide­al­ly, we are look­ing for com­mit­ted peo­ple who share in the vision of the eco-vil­lage com­mu­ni­ty and who are able to com­mit for an indef­i­nite peri­od, how­ev­er if you sim­ply want to stay for a night or two or even vis­it for a day, please feel free to come along.

This eco-vil­lage occu­pa­tion is inspired by The Land is Ours which cam­paigns peace­ful­ly for access to the land, its resources, and the deci­sion-mak­ing process­es affect­ing them, for every­one, irre­spec­tive of race, gen­der or age. for more infor­ma­tion, please vis­it:

www.tlio.org.uk

con­tact Car­olyn on: 01727 812369 or Gareth on: 07515 166011 or

diggers360@yahoo.co.uk

Tyt­ing Com­mu­ni­ty Farm Occu­pa­tion.

Six weeks ago a group of peo­ple (some fresh from the Raven’s Ait occu­pa­tion in Kingston) assert­ing their com­mon law right to live and grow food, com­menced the occu­pa­tion of Tyt­ing Com­mu­ni­ty Farm in Half Pen­ny Lane Guild­ford. (a pub­licly owned site which has been vacant for sev­er­al years).

Guild­ford coun­cil (the own­er of the prop­er­ty) has been try­ing with­out suc­cess and with much local oppo­si­tion to sell the com­mu­ni­ty farm off by divid­ing it into small­er lots.

The coun­cil were grant­ed an ‘inter­im pos­ses­sion order’ last Wednes­day (27th May) and threat­ened to send in the police to remove any­one still on the site. On Fri­day morn­ing, var­i­ous con­trac­tors arrived and board­ed up the farm­house (but no police).

Far from dent­ing their morale, the threat of force­ful evic­tion has sim­ply made those enjoy­ing life at the farm more deter­mined to stay their ground.

To see a video of what’s been hap­pen­ing at the farm please click here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PKe_uCHpokU

This occu­pa­tion is open to any­one who would like to be part of the com­mu­ni­ty, grow veg­eta­bles and live in a sus­tain­able way, whilst help­ing to retain com­mon rights to a valu­able and beau­ti­ful piece of com­mon land. If you want to get involved, sim­ply grab a tent and some food (plus some seeds if you have them) and come along. Here is a map of the loca­tion of the farm.

Facts about the land in Britain

did you know that.…

In Britain 70% of land is still owned by less than 1% of the pop­u­la­tion
Less than 8% of the coun­try is under con­crete
50% of the land in Eng­land and Wales remains unreg­is­tered
the Church of Eng­land has ‘mis­laid’ 1.5 mil­lion acres it owned 100 years ago
the Roy­al Fam­i­ly now own or con­trol the equiv­a­lent of an aver­age-sized coun­ty in Eng­land.

* infor­ma­tion cour­tesy of www.who-owns-britain.com