Another 3 people from the Lappersfort Forest arrested

Around mid­night on 21st April three peo­ple from the Lap­pers­fort for­est occu­pa­tion in Brugge, Bel­gium were arrest­ed.

They were on their way back to the for­est on foot when they were sprung on by at least 6 pigs dressed in black & a police dog who were wait­ing on ambush. At the moment all we know is they are accused of damaging/vandalising a road being con­struct­ed through the for­est.

Around mid­night on 21st April three peo­ple from the Lap­pers­fort for­est occu­pa­tion in Brugge, Bel­gium were arrest­ed.

They were on their way back to the for­est on foot when they were sprung on by at least 6 pigs dressed in black & a police dog who were wait­ing on ambush. At the moment all we know is they are accused of damaging/vandalising a road being con­struct­ed through the for­est.

The road con­struc­tion began in sept.08 and was met with large protest from the local com­mu­ni­ty, as part of the Lap­pers­fort for­est by the canal was to be destroyed to make way for its con­struc­tion. Activists man­aged to occu­py the threat­ened trees on the first night of con­struc­tion (sept. 2nd) despite a police cor­don of some 250 pig­gies, and delayed work for some hours. Since then, through­out the 7 months of the occu­pa­tion the con­struc­tion com­pa­ny, police & media have accused the occu­piers of sab­o­tage against their pumps and cranes, with­out any proof or charges.

The arrests are part of an ongo­ing sequence of repres­sion. Less than 2 weeks ago two peo­ple were final­ly released from Brugge prison after spend­ing 10 days in the cell based on false charges and fab­ri­cat­ed sto­ries from the Brugge cops. On the day of the lat­est 3 arrests, under­cov­er and uni­formed pig­gies had been seen around the for­est and talk­ing with the con­struc­tion work­ers, and the nature of the arrest shows that the cops here in Brugge are sim­ply try­ing to find any excuse, real or not, to arrest as many peo­ple as pos­si­ble.
We don’t know yet exact­ly what their charges are, or when the 3 peo­ple will be released, but they are already in cus­tody for more than 12 hours, which means they are arrest­ed juridi­cal­ly and will have to see a judge in the Brugge cour­t­house some­time tomor­row.

lap­pers­fort occu­piers — lappersfort@gmail.com

Calais No Border Camp 23–29 June

The Calais No Bor­der camp is an excit­ing joint ven­ture between French activists and migrant sup­port groups and the UK No Bor­ders Net­work.

The Calais No Bor­der camp is an excit­ing joint ven­ture between French activists and migrant sup­port groups and the UK No Bor­ders Net­work.

It aims to high­light the real­i­ties of the sit­u­a­tion in Calais and North­ern France; to build links with the migrant com­mu­ni­ties; to help build links between migrants sup­port groups; and last­ly, but not least, to chal­lenge the author­i­ties on the ground, to protest against increased repres­sion of migrants and local activists alike.

Why Calais?
For cen­turies Euro­pean impe­r­i­al pow­ers have exploit­ed the land, resources and peo­ple of the major­i­ty world to become wealthy and pow­er­ful, leav­ing war, envi­ron­men­tal destruc­tion and mas­sive inequal­i­ty in their wake. Those who attempt the jour­ney to the UK are chal­leng­ing this injus­tice by their move­ment.

At the end of this jour­ney they face anoth­er human­i­tar­i­an cri­sis — caused by the increas­ing­ly repres­sive British and EU immi­gra­tion poli­cies. This makes the Calais bor­der an impor­tant focal point for the strug­gle between those who would see an end to all migra­tion into the EU and those try­ing to break down the bar­ri­ers between peo­ples and the bor­ders that pre­vent the free­dom of move­ment for all all but the priv­i­leged few.

Build­ing a move­ment against bor­ders:
This camp is not just about Calais: we are call­ing for the free­dom of move­ment for all, an end to bor­ders and to all migra­tion con­trols. We need to build a rad­i­cal transna­tion­al move­ment to chal­lenge these repres­sive poli­cies that serve to divide us into cit­i­zens and non-cit­i­zens, into the doc­u­ment­ed and the undoc­u­ment­ed.

The Calais camp is a place to strength­en this move­ment and we need your help to make it hap­pen. We call on all groups and indi­vid­u­als that want to show transna­tion­al sol­i­dar­i­ty to join us in Calais. If you want to get involved in help­ing to organ­ise the camp, sup­port us with fundrais­ing and pub­lic­i­ty, host an event on Calais and No Bor­ders or offer prac­ti­cal
skills and sup­port please get in touch (details below).

No one is ille­gal! Free­dom of Move­ment for all!

For more infor­ma­tion and to get involved see:
http://london.noborders.org.uk/calais2009
http://noborders.org.uk
or con­tact calais@riseup.net
More info com­ing soon!

Skyr Thrown in the Heavy Industry Parties’ Election Offices

April 20 2009

Skyr throwing 1Skyr throwing 2April 20 2009
Today, green ’skyr’ (tra­di­tion­al Ice­landic dairy prod­uct) was thrown at the elec­tion offices of three polit­i­cal par­ties, which are respon­si­ble for the inva­sion of the alu­mini­um indus­try into Ice­land. Skyr throw­ing is the Ice­landic equiv­a­lent of pie throw­ing and has become a tra­di­tion in the envi­ron­men­tal strug­gle; the last sim­i­lar action took place only one and a half month ago.

At 11:00 this morn­ing, peo­ple rushed into an office of Sam­fylkingin (the Social Demo­c­ra­t­ic Alliance) in Haf­nar­fjörður, and threw the green liq­uid over the party’s pro­pa­gan­da, fur­ni­ture and the floor. At a sim­i­lar time Fram­sók­narflokkurinn (right wing) was tar­get­ed in Kópavogur. The win­dows of the elec­tion office were com­plete­ly cov­ered in green liq­uid, as well as adver­tise­ment signs out­side the build­ing.

Two hours lat­er, green ’skyr’ was thrown inside an office of Sjálf­stæð­is­flokkurinn (right wing con­ser­v­a­tives) close to the cen­ter of Reyk­javík. The whole office was cov­ered; fur­ni­ture, floors and pro­pa­gan­da.

Skyr Why these tar­gets?
The tar­gets are all under­stand­able, since these three par­ties share the respon­si­bil­i­ty for the envi­ron­men­tal and eco­nom­i­cal cri­sis Ice­land is now fac­ing.

Rio Tin­to-Alcan oper­ates an alu­mini­um smelter in Haf­nar­fjörður and has want­ed to enlarge it for sev­er­al years. In a local ref­er­en­dum the major­i­ty of Haf­nar­fjörður inhab­i­tants vot­ed against the enlarge­ment. But since then, RT-Alcan and the city coun­cil, lead by Sam­fylkingin, have tried to force the enlarge­ment through, e.g. by claim­ing that the referendum’s issue was not the enlarge­ment of the smelter, but only city plan­ning. In con­tin­u­a­tion they have sug­gest­ed that the smelter will be enlarged in the oppo­site direc­tion; on a land­fill in the sea. The ener­gy need­ed for the increased pro­duc­tion is sup­posed to come from Þjórsá and Tung­naá Rivers in the south of Ice­land, where there is fierce local oppo­si­tion to fur­ther dams.

Sjálf­stæð­is­flokkurinn was in gov­ern­ment for 17 years, until angry Ice­landers rushed onto the streets of Reyk­javík last Jan­u­ary, protest­ed and in the end top­pled the gov­ern­ment. Dur­ing these years, Sjálf­stæð­is­flokkurinn invit­ed the alu­mini­um indus­try to Ice­land, promis­ing “min­i­mal envi­ron­men­tal red tape” and cheap ener­gy. To ful­fill the party’s mas­ter plan, every major glacial riv­er in Ice­land would have to be dammed, as well as every active geot­her­mal zone.

Skyr­Fram­sók­narflokkurinn formed the oth­er half of the first cor­rupt heavy indus­try coali­tion, hold­ing the min­istries of envi­ron­ment and indus­try. Now, when in par­lia­men­tary oppo­si­tion, the par­ty speaks and behaves like it had noth­ing to do with the eco­nom­ic col­lapse last fall. One of its main aims for the upcom­ing elec­tions is (just like Sjálf­stæð­is­flokkurinn) the con­tin­u­a­tion of the alu­mini­um industry’s inva­sion.

Not for the first time
This is the sec­ond time in a short time peri­od when green skyr is thrown in Ice­land. Ear­ly in March this year, three peo­ple attacked the ener­gy com­pa­nies, while their rep­re­sen­ta­tives took part in green-wash­ing days inside the Uni­ver­si­ty of Ice­land. Read more about it here.

Clean­ing June 14th 2005, green skyr was thrown in an inter­na­tion­al alu­mini­um con­fer­ence in Reyk­javík. This was one of the first Sav­ing Ice­land actions as well as one of the first direct actions tak­en against the government’s heavy indus­try pol­i­cy. Read more here.

The tra­di­tion of throw­ing skyr as a protest orig­i­nates from a mil­i­tant athe­ist action that took place in Reyk­javík, 1970, when one indi­vid­ual, car­pen­ter Hel­gi Hósea­son, threw ’skyr’ over the Ice­landic bish­op, pres­i­dent, the entire gov­ern­ment and mem­bers of par­lia­ment. For years he had fought for the right to be de-bap­tized, but was repeat­ed­ly refused. Hence he took action.

Recent actions at Tara, Eire

planned action went ahead on mon­day 20.4.09 at the ard­sal­lagh bridge project at the boyne… pro­tes­tors entered site imme­di­at­ly stop­ping all work but this did not last for long as with­in only five min­utes the guards and nine jeeps from M3 work­ers had arrived on site. it was a total set up.

Standing on a dumper-truck at Taraplanned action went ahead on mon­day 20.4.09 at the ard­sal­lagh bridge project at the boyne… pro­tes­tors entered site imme­di­at­ly stop­ping all work but this did not last for long as with­in only five min­utes the guards and nine jeeps from M3 work­ers had arrived on site. it was a total set up. per­haps this is proof of phone mon­i­tor­ing. pro­tes­tors retreat­ed to the pub­lic road where a block­ade sit­u­a­tion quick­ly unfold­ed. this stand off last­ed well in excess of an hour as M3 work­ers had gar­dai inves­ti­gate some ‘bent steel’ all activists were ques­tioned all names were tak­en, mean­while M3 work­ers con­tin­ue to block pub­lic road infu­ri­at­ing locals. after all was said and done the guards escort­ed us back to the hill and wait­ed in the carpark at maguires eat­ing the tara spe­cial…

enjoy the video

——–

Fan­cy dress dig­ger-div­ing, 25.3.09 — video

——–

Action 3.3.09 video

——–


action 12.2.09
THE NEXT DAY OF ACTION for Tara, this wednes­day 18th feb. Meet­ing tues­day night
at Vig­il Farm, for actions ear­ly and all day wednes­day.
Come pre­pared — bring sleep­ing bag, torch, water­proof warm clothes, cam­eras,
ban­ners, cos­tumes, musi­cal instru­ments etc etc

*All wel­come, please tell lit­er­al­ly every­one. Protests can­not con­tin­ue
unless we have the num­bers to sup­port us.
*
If you can­not make it on wednes­day but would like to help out, we need help
with:
Press releas­es
Ban­ner mak­ing mate­ri­als
Cam­eras
Food
Any­thing else you thing that could be help­ful!
Tara is call­ing, the days are get­ting longer and warmer. Protest­ing is
great cra­ic, it’s nev­er to late for TARA
——–

Video of dan­ger­ous dig­ger-div­ing action, 29.1.09

Protests continue…see youtube for more past actions…

Earth First! Occupies Director’s Office at E.On HQ (Netherlands)

14.04.2009
Four activists from Groen­Front! (the Dutch Earth First!) occu­pied a direc­tor’s office at the head office of ener­gy giant E.On today in Rot­ter­dam. The activists told the peo­ple work­ing at the office that they were look­ing for the direc­tors for a ‘seri­ous chat’ about the planned con­struc­tion of a new coal fired pow­er sta­tion in Rot­ter­dam. Although legal issues should have hin­dered E.On on start­ing con­struc­tion at the site, work has has been pushed ahead regard­less. Activist Roos van Dijck: ” Build­ing a coal fired pow­er sta­tion now is crim­i­nal, solv­ing the cli­mate cri­sis starts with keep­ing coal in the ground. ”

e-ON-F-off square logo14.04.2009
Four activists from Groen­Front! (the Dutch Earth First!) occu­pied a direc­tor’s office at the head office of ener­gy giant E.On today in Rot­ter­dam. The activists told the peo­ple work­ing at the office that they were look­ing for the direc­tors for a ‘seri­ous chat’ about the planned con­struc­tion of a new coal fired pow­er sta­tion in Rot­ter­dam. Although legal issues should have hin­dered E.On on start­ing con­struc­tion at the site, work has has been pushed ahead regard­less. Activist Roos van Dijck: ” Build­ing a coal fired pow­er sta­tion now is crim­i­nal, solv­ing the cli­mate cri­sis starts with keep­ing coal in the ground. ”

The four activists occu­pied the room of Chief Finan­cial Offi­cer Markus Bokel­mann. Although he has var­i­ous books on sus­tain­able busi­ness­ing on his book shelf, he does­n’t seem to be able to put this into prac­tice yet. Police arrived after a few hours and arrest­ed the activists. None of the E.On direc­tors were will­ing to par­tic­i­pate in a con­ver­sa­tion about the planned con­struc­tion of the pow­er plant.

Shell to Sea Good Friday Walk ends with net removal after battle with Shell security.

Shell to Sea sup­port­ers on the annu­al Good Fri­day Walk, walked to Glen­gad beach this morn­ing to take action in defence of their com­mu­ni­ty and envi­ron­ment by remov­ing nets over the cliff face in the Spe­cial Area of Con­ser­va­tion, despite a bat­tle with Shell Secu­ri­ty.

Glengad bannerShell to Sea sup­port­ers on the annu­al Good Fri­day Walk, walked to Glen­gad beach this morn­ing to take action in defence of their com­mu­ni­ty and envi­ron­ment by remov­ing nets over the cliff face in the Spe­cial Area of Con­ser­va­tion, despite a bat­tle with Shell Secu­ri­ty.

Today, the tra­di­tion­al Good Fri­day walk took place in both Glen­gad and Ross­port. Over 150 peo­ple attend­ed in total. The first walk end­ed at the site of the Shell com­pound in Glen­gad. The group walked togeth­er to the Glen­gad cliff-face and removed net­ting, recent­ly erect­ed by Shell, intend­ed to stop Sand Mar­tins nest­ing in the area. This is the eighth time the net­ting has been removed in the last two weeks by local res­i­dents.
Crossing Glengad gate
Although Eamon Ryan only signed the final con­sents for work at Glen­gad yes­ter­day, there were already over 40 secu­ri­ty per­son­nel present on the site. They were wear­ing dark, mil­i­tary-style cloth­ing with no vis­i­ble iden­ti­fi­ca­tion badges. In scenes rem­i­nis­cent of last year at Glen­gad, they used exces­sive force in deal­ing with the group, which includ­ed elder­ly peo­ple and chil­dren.
Glengad standoff
For around 45 min­utes the group attempt­ed to remove the net and the secu­ri­ty attempt­ed to stop them … Even­tu­al­ly, a pair of scis­sors was pro­duced and the net was cut in two. After, every­one left togeth­er; there were no arrests.

Glengad tug-o-war
The action tak­en today is a demon­stra­tion of resis­tance to come if Shell attempt to recom­mence work in Glen­gad.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I7ZHynY0sKw

Why climate camping & other protest? Ecological debt day for your city…coming soon!

Eco­log­i­cal debt: no way back from bank­rupt

3 planetsEco­log­i­cal debt: no way back from bank­rupt

While most gov­ern­ments’ eyes are on the bank­ing cri­sis, a much big­ger issue — the envi­ron­men­tal cri­sis — is pass­ing them by, says Andrew Simms. In the Green Room this week, he argues that fail­ure to organ­ise a bailout for eco­log­i­cal debt will have dire con­se­quences for human­i­ty.

“Nature Does­n’t Do Bailouts!” said the ban­ner strung across Bish­ops­gate in the City of Lon­don.

Civil­i­sa­tion’s biggest prob­lem was out­lined in five words over the entrance to the small, par­al­lel real­i­ty of the peace­ful cli­mate camp. Their tents bloomed on the morn­ing of 1 April faster than daisies in spring, and faster than the police could stop them.

Across the city, where the world’s most pow­er­ful peo­ple met simul­ta­ne­ous­ly at the G20 sum­mit, the same prob­lem was almost com­plete­ly ignored, mer­it­ing only a sin­gle, after­thought men­tion in a long com­mu­nique.

World lead­ers dropped every­thing to tack­le the finan­cial debt cri­sis that spilled from col­laps­ing banks.

Gripped by a pan­ic so com­plete, there was no pol­i­cy dog­ma too deeply engrained to be dug out and instant­ly dis­card­ed. We went from tri­umphant, finance-dri­ven free mar­ket cap­i­tal­ism, to bank nation­al­i­sa­tion and mov­ing the dec­i­mal point on indus­try bailouts quick­er than you can say sub-prime mort­gage.

But the eco­log­i­cal debt cri­sis, which threat­ens much more than pen­sion funds and car man­u­fac­tur­ers, is left to lan­guish.

It is like hav­ing a Com­mis­sion on House­hold Ren­o­va­tion ago­nise over which expen­sive design­er wall­pa­per to use for paper­ing over plas­ter cracks whilst ignor­ing the fact that the walls them­selves are col­laps­ing on sub­sid­ing foun­da­tions.

Beyond our means

Each year, human­i­ty’s eco­log­i­cal over­draft gets larg­er, and the day that the world as a whole goes into eco­log­i­cal debt — con­sum­ing more resources and pro­duc­ing more waste than the bios­phere can pro­vide and absorb — moves ever ear­li­er in the year.

The same pic­ture emerges for indi­vid­ual coun­tries like the UK — which now starts liv­ing beyond its own envi­ron­men­tal means in mid-April.

Because the glob­al econ­o­my is still over­whelm­ing­ly fos­sil-fuel depen­dent, the accu­mu­la­tion of green­house gas­es and the prog­no­sis for glob­al warm­ing remain our best indi­ca­tors of “over­shoot”.

World famous French free-climber Alain Robert, known as Spi­der­man, climbed the Lloyds of Lon­don build­ing for the OneHundredMonths.org cam­paign as the G20 met, to demon­strate how time is slip­ping away.

Using thresh­olds for risk iden­ti­fied by the Inter­gov­ern­men­tal Pan­el on Cli­mate Change (IPCC), on cur­rent trends, in only 92 months — less than eight years — we will move into a new, more per­ilous phase of warm­ing.

It will then no longer be “like­ly” that we can pre­vent some aspects of run­away cli­mate change. We will begin to lose the cli­mat­ic con­di­tions which, as Nasa sci­en­tist James Hansen points out, were those under which civil­i­sa­tion devel­oped.

Small div­i­dend

As “nature does­n’t do bailouts”, how have our politi­cians fared who ripped open the nation’s wal­let to save the banks?

Not good.

Accord­ing to the Inter­na­tion­al Mon­e­tary Fund (IMF), the UK spent a stag­ger­ing 20% of its GDP in sup­port of the finan­cial sec­tor.

Yet the amount of mon­ey that was new and addi­tion­al, announced in the “green stim­u­lus” pack­age of the Trea­sury’s Pre-Bud­get Report, added-up to a van­ish­ing­ly small 0.0083% of GDP.

Glob­al­ly, the green shade of eco­nom­ic stim­u­lus mea­sures has var­ied enor­mous­ly. For exam­ple, the shares of spend­ing con­sid­ered in research by the bank HSBC to be envi­ron­men­tal were:

* the US — 12%
* Ger­many — 13%
* South Korea — 80%

The inter­na­tion­al aver­age was around 15%. HSBC found the UK planned to invest less than 7% of its stim­u­lus pack­age (dif­fer­ent from the bank bailout) in green mea­sures.

Com­par­ing the IMF and HSBC fig­ures actu­al­ly reveals an inverse rela­tion­ship — pro­por­tion­ate­ly, those who spent more on sup­port for finance had weak­er green spend­ing.

So here we are, faced with the loss of an envi­ron­ment con­ducive to human civil­i­sa­tion, and we find gov­ern­ments pros­trate before bare­ly repen­tant banks, with their backs to a far worse eco­log­i­cal cri­sis.

Extreme mar­kets

On top of low and incon­sis­tent fund­ing for renew­able ener­gy, the shift to a low car­bon econ­o­my is being fur­ther frus­trat­ed by anoth­er mar­ket fail­ure in the trade for car­bon seen, for exam­ple, in the EU’s Emis­sions Trad­ing Scheme.

Bad mar­ket design, fee­ble car­bon reduc­tion tar­gets and the reces­sion have all con­spired to dri­ve down the cost of car­bon emis­sion per­mits, wreck­ing eco­nom­ic incen­tives to grow renew­able ener­gy.

Worse still, the dif­fi­cul­ty of account­ing to ensure that per­mits rep­re­sent real emis­sions has led both ener­gy com­pa­nies and envi­ron­men­tal­ists to warn of an emerg­ing “sub-prime car­bon mar­ket”.

Rely­ing on mar­ket mech­a­nisms is attrac­tive to gov­ern­ments because it means they have less to do them­selves. But they will fail if car­bon mar­kets are just hot air.

There seems to be a hard-wired link between mem­o­ry fail­ure and mar­ket fail­ure.

As the his­to­ri­an E J Hob­s­bawm observed in The Age of Extremes: “Those of us who lived through the years of the Great Slump still find it almost impos­si­ble to under­stand how the ortho­dox­ies of the pure free mar­ket, then so obvi­ous­ly dis­cred­it­ed, once again came to pre­side over a glob­al peri­od of depres­sion in the late 1980s and 1990s”.

Per­haps the great­est fail­ure is one of imag­i­na­tion.

Some peo­ple alive today lived through those past reces­sions and depres­sions. They know they can be nasty and need avert­ing.

But the last time the Earth­’s cli­mate real­ly flipped was at the end of the last Ice Age, more than 10,000 years ago. No one can remem­ber what that felt like.

Lessons of his­to­ry

Look­ing for­ward, the IPC­C’s worst case sce­nario warns of a max­i­mum 6C rise over the next cen­tu­ry.

Look­ing back, how­ev­er, indi­cates that an unsta­ble cli­mate sys­tem holds worse hor­rors.

Work by the sci­en­tist Richard Alley on abrupt cli­mate change indi­cates the plan­et has pre­vi­ous­ly expe­ri­enced a 10C tem­per­a­ture shift in only a decade, and pos­si­bly “as quick­ly as in a sin­gle year”.

And, around the turn of the last Ice Age, there were “local warm­ings as large as 16C”.

Imag­ine that every day of your life you have tak­en a walk in the woods and the worse thing to hap­pen was an acorn or twig falling on your head.

Then, one day, you stroll out, look up and there is a threat approach­ing so large, unex­pect­ed and out­side your expe­ri­ence that can’t quite believe it, like a mas­sive goth­ic cathe­dral falling from the sky.

In tack­ling cli­mate change we need urgent­ly to recal­i­brate our respons­es, just as gov­ern­ments had to when they res­cued the reck­less finance sec­tor.

Then offi­cials had to ask them­selves “is what we are doing right, and is it enough?”

They must ask them­selves the same ques­tions on the eco­log­i­cal debt cri­sis and cli­mate change.

The dif­fer­ence is, that if they fail this time, not even a long-term busi­ness cycle will come to our res­cue. If the cli­mate shifts to a hot­ter state not con­vivial to human soci­ety, it could be tens of thou­sands of years, or nev­er, before it shifts back.

Remem­ber; nature does­n’t do bailouts.

Andrew Simms is pol­i­cy direc­tor of the New Eco­nom­ics Foun­da­tion (nef), and author of Eco­log­i­cal Debt: Glob­al Warm­ing and the Wealth of Nations

——

One Plan­et Liv­ing http://www.oneplanetliving.org

Your city’s Eco­log­i­cal Debt Day:

Using the lat­est data avail­able WWF has cal­cu­lat­ed when res­i­dents of British cities will have con­sumed their fair share of nat­ur­al resources for 2008 – or when their eco­log­i­cal debt day is.

City Eco­log­i­cal debt day

Win­ches­ter 10 April
St Albans 13 April
Chich­ester 14 April
Brighton & Hove 14 April
Can­ter­bury 17 April
Oxford 17 April
Southamp­ton 21 April
Durham 22 April
Cam­bridge 23 April
Portsmouth 23 April
Edin­burgh 23 April
Chester 24 April
Aberdeen 24 April
Ely (East Cambs) 26 April
Here­ford (Coun­ty of Here­ford­shire) 28 April
Stir­ling 28 April
Lon­don 29 April
Lich­field 29 April
Lan­cast­er 30 April
New­cas­tle upon Tyne 30 April
Wells (Bath and NE Som­er­set) 1 May
Bath (Bath and North East Som­er­set) 1 May
Ripon (Har­ro­gate) 2 May
Man­ches­ter 2 May
Inver­ness (High­land) 2 May
Pre­ston 2 May
Nor­wich 2 May
Peter­bor­ough 2 May
Dundee City 3 May
Leeds 3 May
York 3 May
Sheffield 3 May
Der­by 4 May
Carlisle 4 May
Leices­ter 4 May
Worces­ter 4 May
Ban­gor (Gwynedd) 4 May
St Davids (Pembrokeshire)4 May
Not­ting­ham 4 May
Liv­er­pool 4 May
Bris­tol 5 May
Birm­ing­ham 5 May
Lin­coln 5 May
Brad­ford 5 May
Glas­gow 6 May
Cardiff 6 May
Exeter 6 May
Coven­try 7 May
Swansea 8 May
Sal­ford 8 May
Wolver­hamp­ton 8 May
Truro (Car­rick) 8 May
Sun­der­land 8 May
Wake­field 9 May
Glouces­ter 9 May
Stoke on Trent 10 May
Kingston upon Hull 10 May
Sal­is­bury 10 May
Ply­mouth 11 May
New­port 11 May

Lappersfort forest occupation — ongoing Repression in Brugge – 2 people in prison

In the ear­ly hours of Wednes­day 30th of march, two occu­pants of the Lap­pers­fort for­est protest site were arrest­ed cycling back to the camp. Based on the fact that they had a screw­driv­er on them and a bike trail­er full of food, they are accused of break­ing a fence in order to take food from a skip that they nev­er actu­al­ly vis­it­ed.

In the ear­ly hours of Wednes­day 30th of march, two occu­pants of the Lap­pers­fort for­est protest site were arrest­ed cycling back to the camp. Based on the fact that they had a screw­driv­er on them and a bike trail­er full of food, they are accused of break­ing a fence in order to take food from a skip that they nev­er actu­al­ly vis­it­ed.

They are cur­rent­ly in prison await­ing a hear­ing on Fri­day morn­ing 9:00. There will be a noise demo tomor­row before the court house; those who wish to come, meet us at the train sta­tion at 8:00 or come to the for­est tonight. In case they don’t get released, there will be anoth­er demo in Brugge on Sat­ur­day, meet­ing at 13:00 at the front of the train sta­tion. BRING YOURSELF AND YOUR FRIENDS, BRING YOUR NOISE AND WHATEVER YOU WISH!

These arrests are the lat­est devel­op­ment in the ongo­ing cam­paign of repres­sion against the occu­pants of the protest site. In Feb­ru­ary one per­son was arrest­ed for skip­ping food and was held for 15 days in a high-secu­ri­ty prison after refus­ing to iden­ti­fy him­self in court. After the judge in Gent ordered his release, the Lap­pers­fort lawyer is expect­ing the judge in Brugge to flex his lit­tle mus­cles and try to make an exam­ple of the two peo­ple in prison.

Oth­er ‘offences’ occu­pants have been arrest­ed for in the last five months include: Tak­ing scrap wood from a bin, car­ry­ing wood chips in wheel­bar­rows in the street, hand­ing out fly­ers at a mar­ket in the city cen­tre and putting up posters on a legal pos­ter­ing spot.

The Lap­pers­fort occu­pants see this as an ongo­ing cam­paign of repres­sion to try to force them out of the woods and dis­cov­er as many of their iden­ti­ties as pos­si­ble. It is also seen as a crim­i­nal­iza­tion of envi­ron­men­tal activism, skip­ping and gen­er­al­ly increas­ing the pow­er of the police state. THIS IS NO LONGER A FIGHT ONLY FOR THE FOREST, BUT ALSO FOR PERSONAL FREEDOM, SELFDETERMINATION AND THE RIGHT TO RECYCLE.

Lap­pers­fort for­est has been occu­pied since Sep­tem­ber 2008 to pre­vent it from being cut down to build ware­hous­es, office build­ings and a car park. The own­er of the land, FABRICOM GTI, enti­ty of ener­gy-giant GDF SUEZ, has until now offered lit­tle con­tact to the occu­piers except to say that they insist on going ahead with their destruc­tive project.

The site is under con­stant evic­tion threat. Peo­ple who want to come and live with us to defend the for­est are wel­come, and vis­i­tors too!

Direc­tions from Brugge Train Sta­tion: Exit at the back – where all the con­struc­tion is going on – turn left and fol­low the road for a while until the round­about, turn left under the rail­way bridge. You’ll see the for­est soon on your right!

0032 (0) 471 658 544
(For infor­ma­tion in dutch — not yet trans­lat­ed nor updat­ed — www.lappersfort.tk)
lappersfort@gmail.com

————-

update — 3/4/2009
A tri­al was held today in the Brugge cour­t­house for the two Lap­pers­fort occu­piers, Sophie and Pitree, who were arrest­ed on tues­day night while rid­ing their bicy­cles back to the for­est. Occu­piers and oth­er folk went along to the cour­t­house to make some noise and show sol­i­dar­i­ty with their friends.

The judge decid­ed they must be detained longer to give the police/repressive scum more time for “fur­ther inves­ti­ga­tion”. They are main­tain­ing their accu­sa­tion that the two girls had been skip­ping at the Del­haize in Asse­broek, which is obvi­ous­ly made up and is sim­ply being used as an excuse to hold them longer in prison. The only evi­dence they claim to have is some foot­print on the wall by the skip in ques­tion.
As this is being writ­ten an appeal process is going on, to request a sec­ond opin­ion from anoth­er judge. We cant say yet what the results are, but if the appeal is unsuc­ces­fulk the two will have to wait ANOTHER MONTH WITHOUT TRIAL to receive their next judge­ment.…

The devel­op­ments of police repres­sion against the Lap­pers­fort occu­piers in Brugge could not only threat­en the action camp and the for­est, but may also set prece­dents for fur­ther arrests and charges involv­ing skipping/dumpster diving…WE SEE THIS AS A CLEAR AND ROTTEN ATTEMPT TO CRIMINALISE A WAY OF LIFE, TURN PUBLIC OPINION AGAINST US,TO WEAKEN SUPPORT AND DEMORALISE THE SPIRIT OF THE ACTION CAMP ITSELF.…

SO… AS SOPHIE AND PITREE SIT IN PRISON, WE WILL GATHER TOMORROW (SATURDAY) AT 13:00 AT BRUGGE TRAIN STATION AND NOISILY WALK TO THE BRUGGE PRISON, TO SHOW OUR SOLIDARITY WITH OUR FRIENDS, WITH DUMPSTERDIVERS EVERYWHERE, AND AGAINST THE ONGOING REPRESSION BY THE POLICE STATE.….THE FIGHT FOR THE LAPPERSFORT FOREST WILL NOT BE STOPPED BY STUPID ARRESTS AND POINTLESS REPRESSION BY POLICE ANYWHERE…….
after the demo all are invit­ed back to the Lap­pers­fort for­est for some yum­my hot soup, camp­fire and all the rest of it, and are wel­come to stay as long as they wish…

RE-CYCLE, CREATE, FUCK THE STATE!!!
RED HET BOS!!

Shell to Sea Update from Erris – Shell Nets and Boats at Glengad

Shell has returned to Glen­gad beach to install nets over the cliff face. This cliff is a sand mar­tin nest­ing area, and the sand mar­tin nest­ing sea­son is begin­ning this month.

Glengad cliff nettedDead sandmartin in Shell's netShell has returned to Glen­gad beach to install nets over the cliff face. This cliff is a sand mar­tin nest­ing area, and the sand mar­tin nest­ing sea­son is begin­ning this month. Birds have been spot­ted in the area, and although there are some sec­tions of cliff not cov­ered by the nets, the nest­ing area is severe­ly restrict­ed. The sur­face of the cliff face is marked­ly dif­fer­ent from years past, after being destroyed last fall dur­ing Shel­l’s failed attempt to bring their raw gas pipeline onshore. For a report on the destruc­tion done to the beach last fall, you can read the Sol­i­dar­i­ty Cam­p’s Novem­ber update here on Earth First! Action Reports.

Two boats were present in Broad­haven Bay today from at least 10am until 4pm. The larg­er boat moved all around the bay, while the small­er boat most­ly stayed close to the green buoy. It is pos­si­ble that they are car­ry­ing out sur­vey works to pre­pare for the off­shore pipe lay­ing. Accord­ing to Shel­l’s Envi­ron­men­tal Man­age­ment Plan, Shell may be plan­ning to begin off­shore pipe lay­ing in May of this year, using an alter­na­tive “wet start” option. From the Envi­ron­men­tal Man­age­ment Plan:

“Alter­na­tive “wet start” option
If the dredg­ing of the trench for the nearshore sec­tion of the pipeline has not been com­plet­ed and the pipelay ves­sel is avail­able to start work an alter­na­tive sequence of instal­la­tion maybe under­tak­en.
The pipelay ves­sel will install a marine anchor on the pipeline route in approx­i­mate­ly 20 to 25m of water. A wire between this anchor and the lead­ing end of the pipeline will main­tain ten­sion in the pipeline and the ves­sel will start to lay pipe towards the Cor­rib Field as out­lined pre­vi­ous­ly.
Depend­ing upon the progress of the dredg­ing oper­a­tion, the pipelay ves­sel may con­tin­ue and lay all of the line to Cor­rib. Alter­na­tive­ly, it may sus­pend its oper­a­tions part way and return to Broad­haven Bay to com­plete the pull-in of the land­fall sec­tion and then pick up the pre­vi­ous­ly laid sec­tion before con­tin­u­ing to the field.
If a “wet start” is under­tak­en, it will be nec­es­sary to join the two sec­tions of pipeline togeth­er with­in Broad­haven Bay by lift­ing the pipe ends above water and weld­ing them togeth­er, or com­plet­ing the weld on the seabed using divers.”

As expect­ed, Shell seems to be gear­ing up for anoth­er attempt at forc­ing their project ahead with­out com­mu­ni­ty con­sent again in 2009. The strug­gle against Shell con­tin­ues, fol­low­ing a spir­it­ed week­end in Dublin out­side Moun­tjoy Prison in sol­i­dar­i­ty with Mau­ra Har­ring­ton. Mau­ra has been impris­oned for 20 days and has anoth­er 8 days yet to serve in her sen­tence. Anoth­er Peo­ple’s Forum will take place this week­end, with talks on the upcom­ing US case against Shel­l’s actions Nige­ria, Cli­mate Change, and Cor­rib Gas Per­mis­sions.

The Forum will take place in the Inver Com­mu­ni­ty Cen­ter on Sat­ur­day, April 4th from 10.30am – 3.30pm. As always, the Sol­i­dar­i­ty Camp is open to any­one who wants to vis­it Erris to sup­port the cam­paign. Con­tact the Ross­port Sol­i­dar­i­ty Camp: 085 1141170 ross­port­sol­i­dar­i­ty­camp at gmail dot com

—-

April 2nd, 2009

The net­ting over the cliff face at Glen­gad was tak­en down yes­ter­day by two mem­bers of Pobal Chill Chomain, in the pres­ence of a NPWS man­ag­er.

Attempts are being made by Bel­cross con­trac­tors this morn­ing (Thurs­day, 11am) to put the nets back up. They are cur­rent­ly being pre­vent­ed from fin­ish­ing this work.

Sand mar­tins and Brent geese are present on the beach.

Two boats, pos­si­bly sur­vey boats, are in Broad­haven Bay.

Beau­ti­ful day on the beach!

Climate Camp in the City, Critical Mass & the G20 Meltdown Bank of England plus other protests from this week — updated

The urban Cli­mate Camp at Bish­ops­gate by the Euro­pean Cli­mate Exchange has been report­ed to have over 2000 peo­ple and 150 tents, and has been described as a huge­ly impres­sive infra­struc­ture.

Welcome to the Climate Camp in the CityThe urban Cli­mate Camp at Bish­ops­gate by the Euro­pean Cli­mate Exchange has been report­ed to have over 2000 peo­ple and 150 tents, and has been described as a huge­ly impres­sive infra­struc­ture. There has been numer­ous the­atri­cal per­for­mances, and sound-sys­tems along­side com­post toi­lets, a med­ical tent, a chil­dren’s area, a cou­ple of work­ing kitchens, speak­ers, ban­ners across the street and numer­ous work­shops. Many peo­ple have been pic­nick­ing there and the camp has been attract­ing passers by and city work­ers. There have been police lines on either side of the camp but peo­ple are allowed in and out. There has been danc­ing near the police lines and the atmos­phere has gen­er­al­ly been described as very good, with office work­ers waiv­ing out of win­dows at the campers.

'Nature doesn't do Bailouts'CC London money-eyes
“Street emp­ty. They beat us out and squashed our tents. But oh what a world we cre­at­ed! Shame on the pow­ers that be.”
— Cli­mate Camp Lon­don

Cli­mate Camp in the City has come to a end as police aggres­sive­ly cleared pro­test­ers from Bish­ops­gate. Sev­er­al hours ear­li­er campers agreed to move to the North to shore up their defences, but after heav­i­ly provoca­tive polic­ing, peo­ple began to try and leave.

Bloodied & put in vanMany campers head home with light injuries after a long evening of intim­i­da­tion and vio­lence from the police. At sev­er­al points they moved in to snatch indi­vid­u­als from the crowd and sent lines of offi­cers into sit­ting campers, unpro­voked. One pro­test­er said “the police act­ed aggres­sive­ly, goad­ing pro­test­ers, but we remained peace­ful and the aim remains strong.” By 2am their aggres­sive tac­tics suc­ceed­ed with most of the campers doing their best to escape the cor­don. Soon after the camp was bro­ken.

Climate Camp in the City tentsCampers claim a vic­to­ry hav­ing held their ground peace­ful­ly for so long, serv­ing food, drink, a vari­ety of work­shops to the campers, and above all, cre­at­ing a pos­i­tive space for change. We also pay homage to the inven­tor of the pop-up tent, for mak­ing today pos­si­ble.

Updates:

01:20 Reports that Cli­mate Camp has been evict­ed by police — peo­ple pushed back and beat­en, won­der­ing how to retrieve their belong­ings.

01:10 — Police pulling peo­ple out of Cli­mate Camp from south­ern perime­ter.

00:30 — Cli­mate Camp par­tic­i­pants have been mak­ing speech­es to the police about why they have been tak­ing action today.

00:20 — Reports from Cli­mate Camp of police using bolt-cut­ters to dis­man­tle the bike bar­ri­cade whilst there is now noth­ing to stop them com­ing in from the North.

23:55 — Police are now mov­ing from south to north push­ing peo­ple out of the space occu­pied by the cli­mate camp, and it’s clear­ing out fast. About 500 peo­ple are left at this point.

23:28 — Push past Liv­er­pool Street as a group are chased at speed pur­sued by police dogs and vans. At least one arrest.

23:18 — Let­ting peo­ple out from South side oppo­site Liv­er­pool St. Lots of police charg­ing, Bot­tles being thrown from out­side camp towards charg­ing cops

22:48 — About 2000 peo­ple in Cli­mate Camp Ket­tle, police want to impose a sec­tion 14 and ID every­one. They’re look­ing to force peo­ple out through the North two at a time. There are police mass­ing at the South End, Due to the amount of campers that does cur­rent­ly not seem fea­si­ble.

22:15 — riot police have moved into the cli­mate camp crowd at bish­ops­gate and are vio­lent­ly drag­ging peace­ful sit­ting pro­test­ers to dis­perse the area

ear­li­er this evening riot police forced their way into the peace­ful cli­mate camp. pro­test­ers held their hands up and shout­ed ‘this is not a riot’ over and over, while ful­ly-kit­ted riot police used shields and batons to push and vio­lent­ly surge for­ward into the camp along the east­ern pave­ment of bish­ops­gate. it seems like­ly this clear­ance oper­a­tion had been planned all day — a line of police vans parked along the east­side had cre­at­ed a ‘walk­way’ along that pave­ment which was effec­tive­ly sep­a­rat­ed from the camp itself. all the riot police had to do was push their way onto that side, and it is clear that was their strat­e­gy. once done, there was a fur­ther stand-off for a while before the next stage to start mov­ing pro­test­ers out one-by-one.

21:35 — we are cur­rent receiv­ing reports from the Cli­mate Camp in the city, that all peo­ple are going to be searched to be allowed out, as well as peo­ple are told to delete pho­tos of offi­cers from their cam­eras, under the threat of seizure. Inter­est­ing­ly the joint com­mit­tee on human rights of the UK par­lia­ment has just made a cou­ple of rec­om­men­da­tion about polic­ing direct­ly con­demn­ing the use of these anti-ter­ror pow­er to police protest. Here are the direct quotes and links.

Democracy is an illusionRec­om­men­da­tions of the UK Par­lia­ment Joint Com­mit­tee on Human Rights con­cern­ing the use of anti-ter­ror pow­ers for stop-and-search:

“93. Whilst we accept that there may be cir­cum­stances where the police rea­son­ably believe, on the basis of intel­li­gence, that a demon­stra­tion could be used to mask a ter­ror­ist attack or be a tar­get of ter­ror­ism, we have heard of no exam­ples of this issue aris­ing in prac­tice. We are con­cerned by the reports we have received of police using counter-ter­ror­ism pow­ers on peace­ful pro­test­ers. It is not clear to us whether this stems from a delib­er­ate deci­sion by the police to use a legal tool which they now have or if indi­vid­ual offi­cers are exer­cis­ing their dis­cre­tion inap­pro­pri­ate­ly. What­ev­er the rea­son, this is a mat­ter of con­cern. We wel­come the Min­is­ter’s com­ments that counter-ter­ror­ism leg­is­la­tion should not be used to deal with pub­lic order or protests. We also wel­come the rec­om­men­da­tion in the new guid­ance to human rights being includ­ed in com­mu­ni­ty impact assess­ments. We rec­om­mend that the new guid­ance on the use of the sec­tion 44 stop and search pow­er be amend­ed to make clear that counter-ter­ror­ism pow­ers should not be used against peace­ful pro­test­ers. In addi­tion, the guid­ance should make spe­cif­ic ref­er­ence to the duty of police to act com­pat­i­bly with human rights, includ­ing, for exam­ple, by spec­i­fy­ing the human rights engaged by protest.”
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/jt200809/jtselect/jtrights/47/4707.htm

Con­cern­ing the impact of the recent leg­is­la­tion about tak­ing pho­tographs of offi­cers in pub­lic the joint com­mit­tee said:

“94. Con­cerns have recent­ly been expressed in the media that a new pro­vi­sion in the Counter Ter­ror­ism Act 2008 makes it a crim­i­nal offence to take and pub­lish a pho­to­graph of a police offi­cer. Sec­tion 76 of the 2008 Act makes it an offence to elic­it or attempt to elic­it infor­ma­tion about an indi­vid­ual who is or has been a con­sta­ble “which is of a kind like­ly to be use­ful to a per­son com­mit­ting or prepar­ing an act of terrorism.”[174] As the Explana­to­ry Notes to the Counter Ter­ror­ism Bill cor­rect­ly stat­ed, the new offence will only be com­mit­ted where the infor­ma­tion in ques­tion is “such as to raise a rea­son­able sus­pi­cion that it was intend­ed to be used to assist in the prepa­ra­tion or com­mis­sion of an act of ter­ror­ism, and must be of a kind that was like­ly to pro­vide prac­ti­cal assis­tant to a per­son com­mit­ting or prepar­ing an act of terrorism.”[175] That is the effect of a deci­sion of the Court of Appeal in a case in 2008[176] inter­pret­ing the same statu­to­ry lan­guage in the sep­a­rate ter­ror­ism offence of pos­sess­ing a doc­u­ment or record con­tain­ing infor­ma­tion of a kind like­ly to be use­ful to a per­son com­mit­ting or prepar­ing an act of terrorism.[177]”

“95. We there­fore do not share the con­cerns expressed in the media that the new offence crim­i­nalis­es tak­ing pho­tographs of the police. How­ev­er, we do regard as sig­nif­i­cant the fact that this is being wide­ly report­ed as a mat­ter of con­cern to jour­nal­ists. Legal uncer­tain­ty about the reach of crim­i­nal offences can have a chill­ing effect on the activ­i­ties of jour­nal­ists and pro­test­ers. We there­fore rec­om­mend that, to elim­i­nate any scope for doubt about the scope of the new offence in section76 of the Counter Ter­ror­ism Act 2008, guid­ance be issued to the police about the scope of the offence in light of the deci­sion of the Court of Appeal, and specif­i­cal­ly address­ing con­cerns about its improp­er use to pre­vent pho­tograph­ing or film­ing police. ”
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/jt200809/jtselect/jtrights/47/4707.htm

20:45 — cur­rent­ly ket­tled in but they are hav­ing a ceilidh/ barn dance so not bro­ken yet! Fuck the po-lice.

18:35 — Riot police baton charge cli­mate camp
Police clearing climate camp in city
Numer­ous reports come in stat­ing the riot police are in the process of attack­ing the peace­ful cli­mate camp. Even in the face of severe and unpro­voked police bru­tal­i­ty the pro­test­ers are main­tain­ing their peace­ful protest.

Despite events through­out the day at the urban cli­mate camp being entire­ly peace­ful, riot police are mobil­is­ing at the camp with 14 riot vans pulling up in addi­tion to the six already present there. While cli­mate campers appealed to the police high­light­ing the peace­ful nature of the protest and the pres­ence of many fam­i­lies with chil­dren, the police stormed into into the camp through a gap in the bicy­cle perime­ter of the camp indis­crim­i­nate­ly attack­ing campers with batons, push­ing fam­i­lies and chil­dren out of tents and destroy­ing sec­tions of the camp. Camomile, Bish­ops­gate and Wom­wood st are closed off hem­ming in the campers. Five police motor bikes pulled up with what looked like sur­veil­lance gear. Anoth­er report comes in from cli­mate camp stat­ing that the police have formed lines at the Liv­er­pool st end of the camp. a third report comes in from an Indy­media vol­un­teer report­ing that he has ‘nev­er seen any­thing like this’ three lines of hel­met­ed riot police are indis­crim­i­nate­ly beat­ing pro­test­ers with batons. Pro­test­ers are not fight­ing back and are main­tain­ing the non-vio­lent nature of their action in spite of this there are report­ed to be at least four arrests. The crowd chants shame on you as the police con­tin­ue to attack campers.

Full 1st April time­line

Video show­ing police tac­tics clear­ing space.

Camp set­ting-up video.

Panora­ma — click through to orig­i­nal for big­ger image: Climate Camp in the City panorama

Anoth­er per­son­al report: I arrived at about 5pm, at the north end of it. Police were already form­ing a line along­side the bar­ri­er that had been erect­ed made up of rail­ings and bikes attached to them, but they were not blockad­ing and every one was free to vis­it, come in and out.

There was a fes­tive atmos­phere, colour­ful tents, ban­ners, street dec­o­ra­tion…

A man with the slo­gan “God is too big for reli­gion” on his t‑shirt then start­ed to try and make every sin­gle riot police­man and woman on the line to smile. “This is an order”, he shout­ed, “and if they don’t com­ply, things will only get worse”. He man­aged to get or steal a smile of every sin­gle police offi­cer includ­ing a police woman who tried just too hard to keep a stony face.

He then pro­ceed­ed to try and hug every one “of these very won­der­ful peo­ple” as a sign of his love. To try to get to their hearts, he asked them if they had chil­dren: “please raise your hands if you do not have chil­dren, or keep your hands down if you do have chil­dren”. None of the police moved their arms but he did not suc­ceed to hug every one of the offi­cers. One of them claimed that he was embar­rass­ing them.

I then pro­ceed­ed to pho­to­graph the rest of the camp. A few police vans had some­how made their way into the mid­dle of the cli­mate camp.

At about 6.15pm the south end of the camp start­ed to get “nasty”. Police charged into the peace­ful peo­ple, bring­ing tents vio­lent­ly down to the ground, but peo­ple man­aged to peace­ful­ly stop the police vio­lence, and a par­ty was estab­lished in front of the police lines.

A few police also moved to the mid­dle of the camp, next to the vans, and it looked like they were try­ing to divide the crowd. But peo­ple kept the area occu­pied and this did­n’t hap­pen.

As it got dark­er, more and more riot police and vans gath­ered at the south end of the camp, and I heard that a demon­stra­tion had formed at the north end of the camp, but that the police were afraid of the grow­ing num­bers and were pre­vent­ing peo­ple from get­ting in or out of the camp. We had been cor­doned off with­out warn­ing.

Three meet­ings were held in the camp. One at the south end, anoth­er at the north end, and anoth­er one in the mid­dle, right in front of police. We were informed that the police had decid­ed to keep us penned for two hours, and that after that, they would allow us out in groups of 20, after tak­ing every one’s pho­to­graph and details.

Some peo­ple con­sid­ered sleep­ing the night in the camp, but it was clear from the begin­ning of the night that police were going to dis­rupt peo­ple’s sleep all through the night, just like it had hap­pened dur­ing the cli­mate camp in the sum­mer, last year, with a heli­copter fly­ing over our heads fir­ing an intense light over the street and with the vans’ strongest lights also focus­ing on the campers.

At about 10.00 I tried my luck to get out of the pen by ask­ing per­mis­sion to leave to one of the police offi­cer. He said, “I can not tell you if you can go out. Ask one of your senior mem­bers (eh?) Your legal observers should know more”. A legal observ­er told me that the police had decid­ed to only allow peo­ple out in groups of two after push­ing the crowd in a way that I did­n’t man­age to under­stand.

It was get­ting cold­er and most peo­ple present in the camp by then had not brought a camp­ing tent or sleep­ing bag. Luck­i­ly peo­ple had brought plen­ty of food, which was wide­ly shared. Music was heard around the camp most of the time, and at about 10.30 mem­bers of Radio Rev­olu­cion gave a taste of their music towards the mid­dle of the street. Police offi­cers looked at the scene in aston­ish­ment and a secu­ri­ty guard inside the build­ing began to video them using his phone, as if he had nev­er in his life seen spon­ta­neous acts of arts hap­pen­ing. After a few songs, ran­dom peo­ple in the crowd took on the micro­phone and the instru­ments and shared their art with a small crowd danc­ing around them.

At about 22.45 we again heard des­per­ate cries from the south end of the street and there we went, to learn that the police had charged again on the peace­ful crowd, using batons and pep­per spray, and to see that the peo­ple had decid­ed to sit down and hold the site as much as pos­si­ble.

I joined some peo­ple that had shared their food with me before and start­ed to help them putting their tent down. It was pret­ty clear that the police were going to charge again so we thought bet­ter to have the tent and oth­er things on our backs than destroyed. As we were in the process of undo­ing the tent, the whole of the police line that was at the north end of the camp moved in and we fran­ti­cal­ly con­tin­ued to undo the tent as the police approached, with peo­ple run­ning ahead of them, cry­ing for help. We decid­ed to stay and con­tin­ue to gath­er and pack every­thing until the police stopped us with their batons.

Strange­ly, they just passed by. It seemed all they want­ed to do was reach the north end of the street and join the cops there.

By then it seemed that there were few­er peo­ple than before and we were informed that, although the police had intend­ed to search every one before leav­ing, they were only doing so ran­dom­ly. We gath­ered tent, sleep­ing bags and food, and head­ed for the con­ver­gence cen­tre unmo­lest­ed.

At 11.30 the street was still cor­doned off and peo­ple were not allowed in, but from the out­side, it looked like the peo­ple who were remained inside the cor­don actu­al­ly want­ed to be there; exit seemed to be allowed.


G20 EF! graffiti
Although for the first half hour or so the police seemed con­tent to watch the protest, scuf­fles start­ed to devel­op around the edges. Most seemed to be caused by groups of police grab­bing masked demon­stra­tors and attempt­ing to unmask them.

——–

Crit­i­cal Mass

At 9.30 we were still wait­ing for more peo­ple to join in Bank Junc­tion. We start­ed off at about 10am, with a big sound sys­tem and lots of peo­ple in cos­tumes.

Our first stop was the Roy­al Bank of Scot­land, RBS, next to Bish­ops­gate. There we were informed that RBS heav­i­ly invest in fos­sil fuels. RBS has recent­ly giv­en a mas­sive loan to EON, the com­pa­ny behind the coal pow­er sta­tion in King­worth, where the last cli­mate camp took place.

Back on Bish­ops­gate, we went then to the Deutche Bank, where again the sound sys­tem per­son informed us that this bank has been active­ly involved in “car­bon trad­ing”, which means plant­i­ng trees to “off­set” the exces­sive car­bon emis­sions that com­pa­nies in the rich part of the world should not be pro­duc­ing if they were com­ply­ing with their com­pa­nies’ signed treaties. This tree-plant­i­ng has been done in lands of indige­nous peo­ples in the poor part of the world that have been how the land that they need for their own food is used for this busi­ness with­out their being able to do any­thing about it. We were told that car­bon trad­ing is now big busi­ness, and that it basi­cal­ly con­sists of sell­ing the air we breath.

From where we were, across the road, was the Car­bon Exchange, which, we’re informed, gives us in the Rich West the abil­i­ty to use more car­bon than we have agreed to use in order to try and stop cli­mate chaos. Big com­pa­nies in devel­op­ing coun­tries are said to be mak­ing mon­ey by sell­ing their car­bon cred­its to big com­pa­nies in rich coun­tries so that they can use more car­bon.

We’re told about a com­pa­ny in South Korea that dis­cov­ered a prod­uct in the 70s that is use­ful to “decar­bon­ate” the air, but for some mys­te­ri­ous rea­son it has not made this dis­cov­ery pub­lic, nor used the prod­uct, until now, so it has been allow­ing the South Kore­an pop­u­la­tion to be unnec­es­sar­i­ly pol­lut­ed for about 40 years. Now that it is sell­ing this prod­uct, this com­pa­ny still makes (10 times?) more mon­ey sell­ing car­bon trade cred­its than pro­duc­ing and sell­ing this de-con­t­a­m­i­nat­ing prod­uct.

Space Hijackers APC outside & guarding RBSAt this point the Space Hijack­ers took on the micro­phone to ask us for sup­port because their tank had been “stopped”, sur­round­ed by police. We went there to show our sup­port but the cops did­n’t seem very pre­pared to allow the tank move peace­ful­ly.

At about 10.30 we moved south towards Lon­don Bridge. Last stop before cross­ing the bridge was a spot next to premis­es of Cater­pil­lar, the com­pa­ny pro­vid­ing home-destroy­ing bull­doz­ers to the Israeli gov­ern­ment, and right next to an “Abbey” branch, now prop­er­ty of Grupo San­tander, cur­rent­ly in the process of buy­ing most of the His­pan­ic world and part of the rest, and object of protests and con­tempt in Spain and Latin Amer­i­ca.

From there crossed Lon­don Bridge and then Tow­er Bridge back to the north bank of the riv­er. Next to the tow­er, we were served with free veg­an food reclaimed from the sys­tem’s dai­ly waste. There we were joined by the Dancers and then moved on to join the Cli­mate Camp.

In the mean­time police had moved on to close all streets that lead to Bank junc­tion to the traf­fic, and at noon they were prepar­ing to com­plete­ly cor­don off the area, allow­ing peo­ple in but not out, except city work­ers.

Police separate crowdAt 12.15 peo­ple were in Bank Junc­tion already penned in and allowed in but not out. In Princess Street there were to lines of cops, sep­a­rat­ed by about 100 metres. The “out­side” line, away from the crowd penned in, was rein­forced with three vans crossed.

At 12.30, Queen Vic­to­ria Street, on the west side of Bank Junc­tion, it did­n’t look like the police had formed a line, but quick­ly formed at the shout of one of their offices, then moved away from the pen, still form­ing a line, and push­ing peo­ple away from the junc­tion, so the police line came to block the access of peo­ple com­ing both from Poul­try Street and Queen Vic­to­ria Street. The police were wear­ing bul­let proof vests.

In Man­sion House Place, a small alley way approach­ing the Junc­tion from St. Stephen’s Row in the South, police were also form­ing two lines sep­a­rat­ed by a few metres, cor­don­ing off the junc­tion and only allow­ing fam­i­lies and city work­ers out.

A sin­gle line of vans com­bined with cops blocked the point where King William Street and Lom­bard Street meet.

A few min­utes lat­er horse mount­ed police were form­ing the lines instead of police­men on foot.

——–

Pho­tos from the G20 Melt­down, and oth­er protests from todayG20 Stop Fooling placard
Police armoured vehicle at G20 | Oth­er pic­tures of police APCs: 2 | 3

FIT spotting from on high
Injured woman at G20
'The Beginning is Nigh' placard
Riot cops at G20
Video of police forced into retreat at G20 Melt­down.

How not to use crowd con­trol bar­ri­ers when deal­ing with the police video — also watch police advances & retreats! Tips for how — see the Guide to Pub­lic Order Sit­u­a­tions.

Violent cops at G20
Link to many oth­er video clips.

——–

Activist tank at Roy­al Bank of Scot­land

The activist group Space Hijack­ers joined with police to take care of any “bad” demon­stra­tors who might have shown up to anti-G20 protests in the City of Lon­don today. At 10:30 this morn­ing they showed up with a CCTV-equipped armoured vehi­cle in front of the Roy­al Bank of Scot­land and pre­pared to defend the build­ing.

Police spoil­sports refused their help, con­duct­ed thor­ough search of the vehi­cle, and moved them along. They were lat­er arrest­ed out­side News Inter­na­tion­al.

——–

Window-kicking at the G20Despite the media’s apoc­a­lyp­tic pre­dic­tions, the four horse­men (See SchNEWS 667) did at least make it to the Bank of Eng­land. Whether this was a good idea or not is open to ques­tion. It cer­tain­ly brought a mea­sure of may­hem to the finan­cial heart of Lon­don, which seemed large­ly closed down for the dura­tion. Our num­bers were impres­sive – giv­en the short notice and the media hype of extreme vio­lence. But tac­tics adopt­ed gave the Met free rein to place a huge cor­don around the entire demo – the so-called ket­tle.

As soon as the final Black Horse (iron­i­cal­ly the one sym­bol­is­ing land enclo­sure) arrived, police lines rapid­ly snapped into place across the streets sur­round­ing the plaza that the bank sits on. Unfor­tu­nate­ly — although many did suc­cess­ful­ly make a break for it — the major­i­ty of the crowd, with lit­tle idea of what to do (unless they’d read last week’s SchNEWS pub­lic order guide obvi­ous­ly) stood around as this manoeu­vre was exe­cut­ed. Whilst we know that the protests were organ­ised on very short notice, there seemed to be lit­tle aim oth­er than sim­ply get­ting into the area – there were no bust-cards, and no attempts at crowd co-ordi­na­tion.

At first most seemed hap­py to be inside the huge ket­tle – a few sound-sys­tems were blast­ing out and there was even a bizarre out­burst of con­tem­po­rary dance in front of the The Roy­al Exchange. As the hours wore on and the few city types caught in the cir­cle had shown ID and got them­selves extract­ed, it became obvi­ous that if the police had their way no-one was get­ting out ‘til long after dark. No water, no food, not even a toi­let. The rea­son giv­en? — ‘to pre­vent a breach of the peace’.

By around half-one the ket­tle had been tru­ly brought the boil and fight­ing had bro­ken out along Thread­nee­dle St. A line of police were pushed back by a crowd shout­ing, “Let us out”. A few bot­tles were lobbed but even with­out these the cops were forced to give way to the sheer phys­i­cal pres­sure. Alert­ed by the noise, sup­port streamed over from the oth­er exits to rein­force Thread­nee­dle and push the cops back to the junc­tion with Bartholomew Lane. This left the win­dows of Roy­al Bank of Scot­land exposed. They were duly smashed, although riot­ers were out­num­bered by pho­tog­ra­phers by around fif­teen to one. How­ev­er police lines here were too strong to breach.

At around 2.30, the crowd fac­ing a thin­ner police line across Vic­to­ria St sud­den­ly surged for­ward and by sheer weight of num­bers pushed their way through. One of the shovers told SchNEWS, “It was amaz­ing – we were resigned to being in the ket­tle until mid­night but the lines broke right in front of me and con­fused police were shout­ing ask­ing each oth­er, ‘What’s the plan?’”. Despite the rapid deploy­ment of riot cops, pos­si­bly up to a thou­sand peo­ple escaped at this point. Soon the win­dows of HSBC on Cheap­side had gone in.

SchNEWS has heard reports that oth­ers man­aged to sneak or blag their way out over the next few hours but dur­ing the after­noon the noose was grad­u­al­ly tight­ened with baton charges. Eye­wit­ness­es report­ed a sense of pan­ic devel­op­ing inside the pen. Peo­ple were not allowed out until after 8pm and only then after being pho­tographed.

One man, Ian Tom­lin­son is known to have died inside the cor­don. SchNEWS has heard con­flict­ing reports as to whether he was struck by police. Per­haps a coro­ners inquiry into his death will expose police tac­tics to pub­lic glare (unless they invoke their handy new pow­ers to keep it all secret of course).

This report and oth­ers at http://www.schnews.org.uk/archive/news671.htm

——–
——–

2nd April

Time­line
——–

Bank of Eng­land vig­il under­way for the man who died at yes­ter­day’s G20 Melt­down protest.
G20 vigil
Around 200 pro­test­ers have gath­ered in the City, on the steps of the Old Exchange by the Bank of Eng­land. Their pres­ence rep­re­sents a spon­ta­neous protest in sol­i­dar­i­ty for the man who died while ket­tled at G20 Melt­down yes­ter­day.

No details of the man’s death have been released. All that’s known is he was around 30-years-old and died while ket­tled with thou­sands of oth­ers out­side the Bank of Eng­land.

Demon­stra­tors are demand­ing answers and an inde­pen­dent inquiry into the man’s death. A wall of con­do­lences for the man who died as sprung up. A minute silence was held also.

Police are oper­at­ing an on off ket­tle pol­i­cy. This appears to be a method of encour­ag­ing peo­ple to leave while they can.

The mood over all is calm. There have been waves of chant­i­ng: SHAME SHAME SHAME ON YOU and WHO’S STREETS? OUR STREETS! to the 200-odd police draft­ed in to “keep the peace.”

While some pro­test­ers have left, many oth­ers con­tin­ue to arrive. Some line the pave­ments out­side the Bank of Eng­land. Police are now attempt­ing to move these peo­ple on.

Inter­view with two eye­wit­ness­es of the events pre­ced­ing the death of Ian Tom­lin­son, the man who died dur­ing anti G20 protests in the City of Lon­don on the 1st of April.

Wit­ness­es State­ment: Death at G20

PRESS RELEASE
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Var­i­ous par­tic­i­pants in the City of Lon­don demon­stra­tions on April 1st have come for­ward as wit­ness­es to the col­lapse of a man lat­er iden­ti­fied by author­i­ties as Ian Tom­lin­son. Four dif­fer­ent uni­ver­si­ty stu­dents wit­nessed the col­lapse of Mr. Tom­lin­son. “He stum­bled towards us from the direc­tion of police and pro­test­ers and col­lapsed,” said Peter Apps. “I saw a demon­stra­tor who was a first aider attend to the per­son who had col­lapsed. The man was late 40s, had tat­toos on his hands, and was wear­ing a Mill­wall shirt.”

While the first aider was help­ing the man, anoth­er demon­stra­tor with a mega­phone was call­ing the police over so that they could help.

Natal­ie Lang­ford, a stu­dent at Queen Mary, said “there was a police charge. A lot of peo­ple ran in our direc­tion. The woman giv­ing first aid stood in the path of the crowd.” The run­ning peo­ple, see­ing a guy on the ground, went around them.

Anoth­er demon­stra­tor had already called 999 and was get­ting med­ical advice from the ambu­lance dis­patch­er. “Four police with two police medics came. They told her [the first aider] to ‘move along’.”, said Peter Apps. “Then they pushed her forcibly away from him. They refused to lis­ten to her [the first aider] when she tried to explain his con­di­tion.”

The first aider, who did not wish to be named, said “The police sur­round­ed the col­lapsed man. I was stand­ing with the per­son who’d called 999. The ambu­lance dis­patch­er want­ed to talk to the police, the phone was being held out to them, but the police refused.”

Anoth­er wit­ness, Elias Stoakes, added “we did­n’t see them [the police] per­form CPR.”

Oth­er peo­ple who had tried to stay with the col­lapsed man were also pushed away.

All of the wit­ness­es deny the alle­ga­tion that many mis­siles were thrown.

Accord­ing to Peter Apps, “one bot­tle was thrown, but it did­n’t come close to the police. Noth­ing was thrown after­wards as oth­er demon­stra­tors told the per­son to stop. The per­son who threw the bot­tle prob­a­bly did­n’t real­ize that some­one was behind the ring of police.” All the wit­ness­es said that the demon­stra­tors were con­cerned for the well-being of the col­lapsed man once they real­ized that there was an injured per­son.

Natal­ie Lang­ford said “when the ambu­lance arrived the pro­test­ers got straight out of the way.”

These wit­ness­es are hap­py to give media state­ments.

They can be con­tact­ed through this press liai­son email: g20witnesses@gmail.com

——–

Police Raid at Earl Street G20 Con­ver­gence Cen­tre

As peo­ple were organ­is­ing to leave the con­ver­gence space at mid-day today police raid­ed. 30–40 peo­ple attempt­ed to pro­tect the space by blockad­ing the main doors. We then con­gre­gat­ed on the top floor and sat in a cir­cle with our arms in the air to show the police that we were not vio­lent. How­ev­er, the police met us with a taser gun, full riot gear and pro­ceed­ed to make us lie face down with our hands on the floor.

We believe two peo­ple were arrest­ed, although we are unsure what they have been charged with. One has been tak­en to hos­pi­tal fol­low­ing an injury. The rest were searched, hand­cuffed and had names, DOB, address­es and pho­tos tak­en.

If any­one has more infor­ma­tion please con­tact legal sup­port urgent­ly: legal@climatecamp.org.uk

Searches/details ille­gal­ly demand­ed before raid begins here.

Police massed outside convergence centreCon­ver­gence cen­tre evic­tion full time­line here.
Convgence centre raid search

——

Police attack Ram­part Social Cen­tre

At around 12:30 this after­noon, 30–50 police arrived at the Ram­part, an activist social cen­tre in Whitechapel, East Lon­don. A for­mer­ly derelict build­ing which had been emp­ty for years, Ram­part was occu­pied by activists and turned into a social and cul­tur­al venue more than four years ago.

When the police arrived, some­one went out­side to speak to them, ask­ing them if they were going to search the place and telling them that if they had a war­rant they could just knock on the door. The police told him not to wor­ry.

A few min­utes lat­er riot police in black uni­forms, wear­ing bal­a­clavas came through a down­stairs win­dow, the door to the roof and a door to an adjoin­ing build­ing. The police broke down the doors and stormed in with drawn tasers, scream­ing at every­one to get down on the ground, jump­ing on them and hand­cuff­ing them. They had a TV crew with them when break­ing in through the door. They were insult­ing peo­ple and say­ing things like “one of you croaked last night”, try­ing to pro­voke a bad reac­tion from peo­ple.

They then demand­ed iden­ti­fi­ca­tion from every­one and checked IDs against what appeared to be a list of spe­cif­ic peo­ple. There were 2 or 3 arrests. The remain­ing peo­ple were then let go.

Right now it’s calm, how­ev­er peo­ple are a bit shak­en after the expe­ri­ence. The cops have left the neigh­bour­hood.

——

Spi­der­man on bail after G20 Lloyds Cli­mate Demo

Alain Robert, oth­er­wise known as ‘Spi­der­man’ for his dar­ing free climbs of urban build­ings was arrest­ed ear­li­er today for climb­ing the Lloyds build­ing in Lon­don in a G20 cli­mate change protest.

Unfurl­ing a ban­ner that adver­tised the cam­paign onehundredmonths.org (which says we have lit­tle under 92 months left to pre­vent cat­a­stroph­ic cli­mate change), he climbed down from the 9th floor and was arrest­ed by police for aggra­vat­ed tres­pass.

——–
——–

Oth­er inter­est­ing arti­cles from oth­er days:

——

There have been 122 arrests relat­ed to the G20, includ­ing 86 on Wednes­day and 32 on Thurs­day, police said.

——

Police ask train staff to spy on G20 pro­test­ers

——

One-man G20 protest on 28th March 2009

——

Spoof Finan­cial Times hits Lon­don streets

10000 copies of a spoof Finan­cial Times were dis­trib­uted in Lon­don today.

“Set in 2020, the 12-page paper revealed how action in 2009 reined in cli­mate change, sav­ing bil­lions from extinc­tion. Car­bon rationing didn’t kill us, it explained, despite the incon­ve­nience to multi­na­tion­al com­pa­nies. But we couldn’t have end­less growth with finite resources. Edi­tors even apol­o­gised for sug­gest­ing oth­er­wise.”

The paper is a full-colour repli­ca of the icon­ic pink broad­sheet includ­ing nation­al and inter­na­tion­al pages and edi­to­ri­als and com­ment, pok­ing fun at FT colum­nists. It was fund­ed by dona­tions on the Inter­net, and giv­en away for free by vol­un­teers. Tens of thou­sands of copies were print­ed – almost as many as the FT sells here dai­ly.

http://ft2020.com

Down­load as a PDF file

——

Inter­na­tion­al Sol­i­dar­i­tyAotearoa/New Zealand | Fin­land