Blockade at Fracking Waste Storage Facility

This morn­ing 19th Feb, pro­test­ers block­ad­ed a Frack­ing Waste Stor­age Facil­i­ty in New Mata­moras, OH. Truck traf­fic to the facil­i­ty was dis­rupt­ed for 2.5 hours. As of this post­ing, a mono­pod is still in place on the site.

This morn­ing 19th Feb, pro­test­ers block­ad­ed a Frack­ing Waste Stor­age Facil­i­ty in New Mata­moras, OH. Truck traf­fic to the facil­i­ty was dis­rupt­ed for 2.5 hours. As of this post­ing, a mono­pod is still in place on the site.

In an unprece­dent­ed show of uni­ty against the extrac­tion indus­try mem­bers of  Appalachia Resist!Tar Sands Block­ade, Rad­i­cal Action for Moun­tain Peo­ples’ Sur­vival (RAMPS), a coali­tion of indige­nous lead­ers includ­ing rep­re­sen­ta­tives from No Line 9 and the Unis’tot’en Camp, Great Plains Tar Sands Resis­tance, and Earth First! chap­ters from across the coun­try have gath­ered in South­ern Ohio to par­tic­i­pate in and sup­port this action.  This is the lat­est in an ongo­ing and esca­lat­ing cam­paign of resis­tance to the dan­ger­ous and exploita­tive resource extrac­tion indus­try that is threat­en­ing the exis­tence and sur­vival of the earth and all of it’s inhab­i­tants world-wide.

 

 

“Cancel Keystone Pipeline:” Largest Climate Protest in U.S. History

Between 35,000 and 50,000 peo­ple ral­lied in Wash­ing­ton, DC on Sun­day, Feb 17th in the largest glob­al warm­ing protest in U.S. his­to­ry. The pri­ma­ry demand: ditch the Key­stone XL tar sands pipeline.

Between 35,000 and 50,000 peo­ple ral­lied in Wash­ing­ton, DC on Sun­day, Feb 17th in the largest glob­al warm­ing protest in U.S. his­to­ry. The pri­ma­ry demand: ditch the Key­stone XL tar sands pipeline.

Read some tes­ti­mo­ni­als here from women who trav­eled to DC to protest the pipeline.

Mean­while, in spite of vague promis­es to take action to avert cat­a­stroph­ic glob­al warm­ing, Obama’s admin­is­tra­tion is gear­ing up for a big frack­ing push to accel­er­ate nat­ur­al gas min­ing.

Tasmanian Activists Challenge Mining in The Tarkine

Two female activists from envi­ron­men­tal direct action group Groundswell have tak­en peace­ful action to high­light the detri­men­tal impacts that min­ing in the Tarkine will have on healthy dev­il pop

Two female activists from envi­ron­men­tal direct action group Groundswell have tak­en peace­ful action to high­light the detri­men­tal impacts that min­ing in the Tarkine will have on healthy dev­il pop­u­la­tions liv­ing in the region.

At 10AM on Sat­ur­day, Feb. 2, Groundswell activists deployed a ban­ner read­ing “FOR DEVILS SAKE, DON’T MINE THE TARKINE” from the Alexan­dra Sus­pen­sion Bridge, in Launceston’s Cataract Gorge.  The two climbers– a local law stu­dent and a doc­tor- remained sus­pend­ed from the bridge for two hours until 12pm.

“The Tarkine region of North West Tas­ma­nia con­tains the last wild pop­u­la­tions of dis­ease free dev­ils.   Min­ing and asso­ci­at­ed activ­i­ties are of sig­nif­i­cant threat to the dev­ils of this region” said Groundswell spokesper­son Sarah Van Est.

tasmanian-devil

“Already under direct threat from the dead­ly facial tumour dis­ease, loss of habi­tat sig­nif­i­cant­ly increas­es the like­li­hood of con­tact between healthy and dis­eased ani­mals. This has the poten­tial to increase the rate of spread of DFTD.”

“A fur­ther threat is the sub­stan­tial increase of heavy traf­fic in the area, which would great­ly increase wildlife road­kill” added Miss Van Est.

A lead­ing wildlife expert, Prof. Hamish McCal­lum, head of Grif­fith University’s School of Envi­ron­ment and for­mer chief sci­en­tist of the Save the Tas­man­ian Dev­il Pro­gram, con­firmed that the mines would have a poten­tial­ly dis­as­trous impact on dev­ils.

“There is suf­fi­cient evi­dence to sug­gest that it may threat­en the sur­vival of pop­u­la­tions of Tas­man­ian dev­ils in the area,” said Pro­fes­sor McCal­lum.

Miss Van Est said that “Self-reg­u­la­tion and token fines offer no real incen­tive for wealthy min­ing com­pa­nies to take mea­sures to ensure pro­tec­tion for the endan­gered Tas­man­ian icon.”

As well as con­tain­ing sig­nif­i­cant dev­il habi­tat, much of the Tarkine has already been inde­pen­dent­ly ver­i­fied as high con­ser­va­tion val­ue wilder­ness. Groundswell is call­ing on the State and Fed­er­al Gov­ern­ments, specif­i­cal­ly fed­er­al envi­ron­ment min­is­ter Tony Burke,  to safe­guard the area and the dev­ils by ensur­ing imme­di­ate and ongo­ing pro­tec­tion in the form of Nation­al Park or World Her­itage List sta­tus for the Tarkine region.

48 arrested in historic act of civil disobedience to stop Keystone XL pipeline

JULIAN BOND, BILL MCKIBBEN, MICHAEL BRUNE, AND OTHERS ARRESTED IN FRONT OF WHITE HOUSE IN CALL FOR ACTION ON CLIMATE

JULIAN BOND, BILL MCKIBBEN, MICHAEL BRUNE, AND OTHERS ARRESTED IN FRONT OF WHITE HOUSE IN CALL FOR ACTION ON CLIMATE

WASHINGTON, D.C. — This morn­ing, 48 envi­ron­men­tal, civ­il rights, and com­mu­ni­ty lead­ers from across the coun­try joined togeth­er for a his­toric dis­play of civ­il dis­obe­di­ence at the White House where they demand­ed that Pres­i­dent Oba­ma deny the Key­stone XL tar sands pipeline and address the cli­mate cri­sis.

Among the notable lead­ers involved in the civ­il dis­obe­di­ence were Michael Brune, exec­u­tive direc­tor of the Sier­ra Club; Bill McK­ibben, Founder of 350.org; Julian Bond, for­mer pres­i­dent of the NAACP; Dan­ny Kennedy, CEO of Sungevi­ty; Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Con­nor Kennedy, and Daryl Han­nah, Amer­i­can actress.

After block­ing a main thor­ough­fare in front of the White House, and refus­ing to move when asked by police, the activists were arrest­ed and trans­port­ed to Ana­cos­tia for pro­cess­ing by the US Park Police Depart­ment.

“The threat to our planet’s cli­mate is both grave and urgent,” said civ­il rights activist Julian Bond. “Although Pres­i­dent Oba­ma has declared his own deter­mi­na­tion to act, much that is with­in his pow­er to accom­plish remains undone, and the deci­sion to allow the con­struc­tion of a pipeline to car­ry mil­lions of bar­rels of the most-pol­lut­ing oil on Earth from Canada’s tar sands to the Gulf Coast of the U.S. is in his hands. I am proud today to stand before my fel­low cit­i­zens and declare, ‘I am will­ing to go to jail to stop this wrong.’ The envi­ron­men­tal cri­sis we face today demands noth­ing less.”

 

“We real­ly shouldn’t have to be put in hand­cuffs to stop KXL–our nation’s lead­ing cli­mate sci­en­tists have told us it’s dan­ger­ous fol­ly, and all the recent Nobel Peace lau­re­ates have urged us to set a dif­fer­ent kind of exam­ple for the world, so the choice should be obvi­ous,” said 350.org founder Bill McK­ibben. “But giv­en the amount of mon­ey on the oth­er side, we’ve had to spend our bod­ies, and we’ll prob­a­bly have to spend them again.”

“For the first time in the Sier­ra Club’s 120-year his­to­ry, we have joined the ranks of vision­ar­ies of the past and present to engage in civ­il dis­obe­di­ence, know­ing that the issue at hand is so crit­i­cal, it com­pels the strongest defen­si­ble action,” said Michael Brune, exec­u­tive direc­tor of the Sier­ra Club. “We can­not afford to allow the pro­duc­tion, trans­port, export and burn­ing of the dirt­i­est oil on Earth via the Key­stone XL pipeline. Pres­i­dent Oba­ma must deny the pipeline and take deci­sive steps to address cli­mate dis­rup­tion, the most sig­nif­i­cant issue of our time.”

If approved, the Key­stone XL pipeline would boost car­bon pol­lu­tion tomor­row by trig­ger­ing a boom of growth in the tar sands indus­try in Cana­da, and great­ly increas­ing green­house gas emis­sions.

The Envi­ron­men­tal Pro­tec­tion Agency (EPA) has esti­mat­ed that this tar sands pipeline will boost annu­al U.S. car­bon pol­lu­tion emis­sions by up to 27.6 mil­lion met­ric tons – the impact of adding near­ly 6 mil­lion cars on the road.

How­ev­er, new research by Oil Change Inter­na­tion­al (OCI) shows that the government’s esti­mates of the car­bon emis­sions asso­ci­at­ed with Key­stone XL under­es­ti­mates the full impact of tar sands because a bar­rel of tar sands pro­duces sig­nif­i­cant­ly more petro­le­um coke than con­ven­tion­al crude, which is more car­bon-inten­sive than coal. The research can be found at: http://priceofoil.org/2013/01/17/petroleum-coke-the-coal-hiding-in-the‑t….

OCI’s research shows that Key­stone XL will pro­duce enough pet­coke to fuel five U.S. coal plants. The emis­sions from this pet­coke have not yet been includ­ed in cli­mate-impact analy­sis of the pipeline or the tar sands indus­try and OCI shows that it will raise total emis­sions by at least 13 per­cent.

Fracking Saboteur Sentenced to 6 Months. 13 Feb

As far as we can tell, there’s been no clear rea­son expressed about why he did it.

As far as we can tell, there’s been no clear rea­son expressed about why he did it. But does there real­ly need to be? Any­one who risks their free­dom to attack a frack­ing site in the Mar­cel­lus Shale, and in one evening suc­ceeds at delay­ing oper­a­tions for three months, is a hero to all who drink water and hate ener­gy cor­po­ra­tions.

Tan­ner Long, 21, from the Trout Run area of Lycoming Coun­ty, PA, alleged­ly admit­ted to an ambi­tious act of van­dal­ism on August 30, 2012, and was sen­tenced in late-Jan­u­ary to six months of prison (in a “coun­ty pre-release cen­ter”) and five years pro­ba­tion.

The sto­ry was not heav­i­ly report­ed out­side the local area, but you can check out a short news clip here, which includes heart warm­ing images of over­turned bull­doz­ers at a trashed frack­ing site on pub­lic land. You can also send him a let­ter here for the time being:

Tan­ner J. Long #3625
Lycoming Coun­ty Prison
277 West Third Street
Williamsport, PA 17701

What we know of the sto­ry: In Sep­tem­ber 2012, a $10,000 reward was offered by Brubach­er Ener­gy Ser­vices for any infor­ma­tion lead­ing to the arrest and con­vic­tion of who­ev­er van­dal­ized con­struc­tion equip­ment in Loy­al­sock State For­est. 

Accord­ing to Myron Brubach­er, an own­er of the Lan­cast­er Coun­ty company.”They basi­cal­ly cut the trees to block access to the road where our equip­ment was locat­ed.”

The van­dals, who had some­how acquired keys, used pieces of equip­ment to dam­age oth­er pieces of equip­ment. In total, the com­pa­ny report­ed $120,000 in dam­ages.

“They rolled sev­er­al pieces, one of our machines was rolled over on its side. They did a lot of dam­age,” Brubach­er said. “It took three months to repair the dam­age.”

He added that the com­pa­ny has increased secu­ri­ty since the van­dal­ism.

Lycoming Coun­ty Judge Nan­cy L. Butts  told Long to “grow up.” While we at the EF! Newswire could see  the poten­tial for fla­grant Bart Simp­son-inspired imma­tu­ri­ty when fac­ing off with some­one named Judge Butts, her hon­or was appar­ent­ly refer­ring to Long’s hero­ic van­dal­ism being imma­ture (as opposed any per­son­al insult  to Butts that one may have eas­i­ly been tempt­ed to utter, as we were.)

While three oth­ers report­ed­ly watched on the night of Aug. 30, Long start­ed heavy equip­ment belong­ing to Brubach­er Ener­gy, of Bow­mans­ville, at a well site off Route 14 north of Trout Run.

Whaling fleet in chaos as scattered Japanese poachers abandon harpoon ship dangerously low on fuel.

MELBOURNE, Aus­tralia  — An anony­mous source with­in Korea has report­ed that the Japan­ese whal­ing fleet is in total dis­ar­ray, with Sea Shep­herd Australia’s ship the SSS Sam Simo

MELBOURNE, Aus­tralia  — An anony­mous source with­in Korea has report­ed that the Japan­ese whal­ing fleet is in total dis­ar­ray, with Sea Shep­herd Australia’s ship the SSS Sam Simon tail­ing the refu­elling tanker for the Japan­ese whal­ing fleet, the Pana­man­ian-reg­is­tered and South Kore­an-owned ves­sel Sun Lau­rel.  The Sam Simon plans to fol­low the Sun Lau­rel in hopes to track them straight to the Nis­shin Maru.

The source detailed that the Sun Lau­rel was only con­tract­ed to refu­el the Japan­ese whal­ing fleet until mid-Feb­ru­ary, but because Japan’s Whal­ing Pro­gram is so close­ly con­nect­ed to their com­mer­cial fish­ing inter­ests, they are using their clout with­in the fish­ing indus­try, attempt­ing to pres­sure the Sun Lau­rel to refu­el the whalers below 60° in Aus­trali­a’s Antarc­tic Ter­ri­to­ry, with the threat of black­list­ing the Sun Lau­rel from future con­tracts if they don’t abide.

Sea Shep­herd Aus­tralia Direc­tor, Jeff Hansen states, “The Yushin Maru is in a des­per­ate sit­u­a­tion, quite pos­si­bly unable to get to safe­ty in the event of an emer­gency. The Japan­ese whal­ing fleet would­n’t be in this predica­ment if they weren’t pari­ahs for their ille­gal whal­ing; unwel­come to refu­el in any land-based port with­out scruti­ny and banned from Aus­tralian ports, they must hire a refu­elling ves­sel sim­ply to be fuelled for their ille­gal poach­ing.  These poach­ers are in con­tempt of an Aus­tralian Fed­er­al Court rul­ing and should not be in the South­ern Ocean Whale Sanc­tu­ary in the first place. The South Kore­an ves­sel, the Sun Lau­rel is sup­ply­ing fuel to the ille­gal oper­a­tions of the Japan­ese whal­ing fleet, which is akin to sup­ply­ing equip­ment to ele­phant poach­ers in Africa.”

Oper­a­tion Zero Tol­er­ance Co-Cam­paign Leader, Bob Brown stat­ed, “Once again, Japan’s whal­ing fleet is flout­ing inter­na­tion­al law. Now it is draw­ing in the Gov­ern­ment of South Korea, which so wise­ly decid­ed against whal­ing last year. South Korea should order this tanker to turn around and go home. Oth­er­wise it invites world con­dem­na­tion instead of the praise it so recent­ly enjoyed.”

The source report­ed that the Yushin Maru is sep­a­rat­ed from the fleet by hun­dreds of miles, very low on fuel and unable to pro­ceed unless refu­elled.  This indi­cates that the Yushin Maru has been total­ly aban­doned by the Nis­shin Maru and the rest of the Japan­ese whal­ing fleet in their hour of need.

Cap­tain of the SSS Steve Irwin, Sid­dharth Charkravar­ty recounts: “While in pur­suit of the Nis­shin Maru, the Steve Irwin picked up the Yushin Maru as a tail­ing ves­sel, rid­ing extreme­ly high out of the water, indi­cat­ing that they were very low on fuel.  A few days lat­er when the whalers tried to swap the Yushin Maru with a ful­ly fuelled Yushin Maru No. 3, the Steve Irwin instead chased the Yushin Maru in the oppo­site direc­tion of the whaler’s fac­to­ry ship for 150 miles.  Dur­ing this chase, the Yushin Maru was unable to reach their full speed of 20+ knots, but was bare­ly able to eke out 16–17 knots, con­firm­ing that they were low on fuel and hence run­ning at a more fuel-sav­ing speed.”  Since then, this Kore­an source reports, the Yushin Maru is con­serv­ing their mea­gre fuel stores and is unable to cov­er the ground between them and the Nis­shin Maru.

Rather than remain with their sis­ter ship, or even trans­fer fuel to them, the Yushin Maru No. 3 instead chose to aban­don the Yushin Maru in the treach­er­ous waters of the South­ern Ocean in order to chase the Sea Shep­herd ship Steve Irwin.

Sea Shep­herd Founder, Paul Wat­son says, “This action shows the neg­li­gence of the whal­ing com­man­der, not only for the sanc­ti­ty of the whales of the South­ern Ocean Whale Sanc­tu­ary, but an utter and total dis­re­gard for the life and safe­ty of the crews who work on these death ships.  Last year, on Oper­a­tion Divine Wind, when one of Sea Shep­herd’s ships, the Brigitte Bar­dot, was com­pro­mised, we stopped our entire cam­paign to escort them to port and ensure their safe­ty.  It’s not sur­pris­ing that the whalers share no such cama­raderie for one anoth­er, since their entire motive for being in these waters is ruth­less greed.”

Cap­tain Peter Ham­marst­edt, aboard the SSS Bob Bark­er said, “Oper­a­tion Zero Tol­er­ance has had vic­to­ries in so many forms, from inter­cept­ing the whalers’ fuelling ves­sel, and thus cut­ting their sea­son, to pulling two-thirds of the fleets’ har­poon ships entire­ly out of oper­a­tion, and keep­ing the sole remain­ing har­poon­er with the fac­to­ry ship run­ning, stunt­ing their progress, and severe­ly lim­it­ing their abil­i­ty to poach Antarc­ti­ca’s pris­tine waters.  We also inter­cept­ed the whal­ing fleet before they had a chance to fire a sin­gle har­poon.”

The Bob Bark­er con­tin­ues to chase and hunt the whalers’ butcher­ing ship, the Nis­shin Maru, unen­cum­bered by a tail, and aid­ed by a fleet of aer­i­al scout­ing drones.

http://www.seashepherd.org.au/news-and-media/2013/02/10/japanese-whaling-fleet-abandons-harpoon-vessel-nearly-empty-on-fuel-1491

Lifelong Oklahoman Youth Pastor Locked to Machinery in Protest of Keystone XL 11 Feb

Ear­li­er this morn­ing, Ste­fan Warn­er, a youth pas­tor who was born and raised in Har­rah, OK, locked him­self to machin­ery being used to build the tox­ic Key­stone XL tar sands pipeline through Creek land near Schoolton, OK.

Warn­er is tak­ing action to pro­tect the health of the North Cana­di­an Riv­er, com­mu­ni­ties and land that this pipeline would run through from being irre­versibly dam­aged by dilut­ed bitu­men (tar sands) leaks and spills. He is send­ing a clear mes­sage that the cur­rent day colo­nial­ism and dis­re­gard for the health and sov­er­eign­ty of indige­nous peo­ples in Alber­ta, Cana­da, and along the pipeline is unacceptable—from a Chris­t­ian per­spec­tive, as well as a human per­spec­tive.

Tar sands pipelines have a hor­ren­dous track record: the exist­ing Key­stone 1 pipeline leaked 12 times in its first year, and at least thir­ty times to date. In 2010, the added dan­gers of tar sands pipelines were demon­strat­ed by Enbridge’s Line 6B pipeline spill of more than a mil­lion gal­lons of dilut­ed bitu­men into the Kala­ma­zoo Riv­er in Michi­gan. The Kala­ma­zoo tar sands spill is the costli­est inland spill in U.S. his­to­ry, drain­ing the oil spill cof­fers and plac­ing the $800 mil­lion and ris­ing price tag onto the backs of local and fed­er­al tax­pay­ers. But it is not the mon­e­tary bur­den that weighs heav­i­est. It is the toll on human life and the health of local ecosys­tems that is immea­sur­able, espe­cial­ly the tox­i­c­i­ty of the dilut­ed bitu­men and undis­closed pro­pri­etary chem­i­cals has proven dev­as­tat­ing.

In addi­tion to the immense dan­gers posed by the Key­stone XL, Tran­sCana­da has been mis­rep­re­sent­ing the eco­nom­ic effects of the pipeline. The major­i­ty of con­struc­tion jobs are tem­po­rary and have been filled by Wis­con­sin-based con­trac­tor Michel’s, not Okla­homans and Tex­ans. Despite Tran­sCana­da and the State Department’s rhetoric of ener­gy inde­pen­dence, the dilut­ed bitu­men trans­port­ed by the Key­stone XL is des­tined for export to for­eign mar­kets after being refined in Gulf Coast refiner­ies, and the Nation­al Resources Defense Coun­cil asserts that the KXL will increase domes­tic gas prices.

“I grew up in a town where the North Cana­di­an Riv­er runs right through, and we can’t let the North Cana­di­an become anoth­er Kala­ma­zoo,” said Okla­homan youth pas­tor Ste­fan Warn­er. “I fig­ure folks have to take action to stop our beau­ti­ful Okla­homa from being marred by a for­eign cor­po­ra­tion, and stand up to fight big cor­po­ra­tions who think that poi­son­ing peo­ple and steal­ing land is accept­able so long as they make a prof­it.”

Warn­er is act­ing with Great Plains Tar Sands Resis­tance, a coali­tion of Okla­homans and allies fight­ing to pre­vent con­struc­tion of the Key­stone XL which will bring dan­ger­ous and tox­ic dilut­ed bitu­men from the bio­me-con­sum­ing tar sands gigapro­ject to refin­ery com­mu­ni­ties in the Gulf. This action comes in the wake of dozens of sim­i­lar actions which have active­ly fought con­struc­tion of the Key­stone XL in Okla­homa and Texas. In light of reports of shod­dy weld­ing by Tran­sCana­da whistle­blow­er Evan Vokes and the recent release of pho­tographs depict­ing holes in the weld of a pipe buried in Texas, the strug­gle to keep the Key­stone XL from being com­plet­ed is even more urgent.

Updates

At 8 a.m., direct sup­port for Ste­fan was arrest­ed with­out warn­ing and placed in police car. Six oth­er peo­ple on site are being detained.

At 9 a.m., six peo­ple detained now arrest­ed. Sev­en police vehi­cles are on scene. Work­ers have low­ered side-boom in dis­re­gard of Stefan’s safe­ty and OSHA reg­u­la­tions. Ste­fan is still locked to machin­ery but lying painful­ly face-down on the low­ered arm. Police are obscur­ing Ste­fan from view and not allow­ing any­one with­in pho­tograph­ing dis­tance.

At 9:15 a.m., anoth­er indi­vid­ual arrest­ed. This per­son was not ini­tial­ly detained but was pre­vent­ed from access­ing her vehi­cle since 8 a.m. Ste­fan
is still hold­ing strong. It also appears that this action is also blockad­ing an active frack site.

Indigenous resistance forces Malaysia to scale back twelve dam megaproject

A Malaysian state min­is­ter Fri­day said the gov­ern­ment would not push ahead with build­ing a dozen new dams on Bor­neo island, acknowl­edg­ing they have caused out­rage from local tribes and envi­ron­men­tal­ists.

A Malaysian state min­is­ter Fri­day said the gov­ern­ment would not push ahead with build­ing a dozen new dams on Bor­neo island, acknowl­edg­ing they have caused out­rage from local tribes and envi­ron­men­tal­ists.

The pro­pos­als sparked fears that the dams would destroy pris­tine rain­forests, endan­ger wildlife, and dis­place natives in Sarawak, a Malaysian state crossed by pow­er­ful rivers with rich jun­gle habi­tats.

“It is not a firm plan to build 12 dams. I don’t think we will need that. We will only need four,” James Mas­ing, Sarawak’s state min­is­ter of land devel­op­ment, told AFP in an inter­view.

Mas­ing said the gov­ern­ment was back­ing off in response to wide­spread crit­i­cism. Protests over the years have seen activists and locals stag­ing block­ades of roads into dam areas.

“I’m pleased that this type of thing (protests) takes place. Not all that we do is cor­rect, and this shows we need to refine our plans and think again,” he said.

The now-com­plete Bakun mega-dam, which is not part of the new dam pro­pos­al, has already been dogged for years by claims of cor­rup­tion in con­struc­tion con­tracts, the flood­ing of a huge swathe of rain­for­est and the dis­place­ment of thou­sands of tribes­peo­ple.

Despite that, the gov­ern­ment moot­ed con­struct­ing more dams as part of an indus­tri­al devel­op­ment dri­ve to boost the resource-rich state’s back­ward econ­o­my.

Anoth­er dam at Murum, also deep in the inte­ri­or, is near­ing com­ple­tion and two oth­ers are in the plan­ning stages as part of the new pro­pos­al.

Togeth­er the four dams — at Bakun, Murum, Baleh and Baram — are already expect­ed to put out near­ly 6,000 megawatts of pow­er, six times what Sarawak cur­rent­ly uses, Mas­ing said.

“The protests are becom­ing more vocal on the ground so (the dam rethink) is a very good devel­op­ment for me,” said Peter Kallang, mem­ber of a Sarawak tribe and chair­man of SAVE Rivers, an NGO that has cam­paigned against the dams.

How­ev­er, he said plans for the Baram and Baleh dams should be scrapped as well, not­ing that the Baram dam would dis­place about 20,000 peo­ple, com­pared to about 10,000 at Bakun, and destroy irre­place­able for­est.

He said SAVE Rivers last month organ­ised a float­ing protest along the Baram riv­er that cruised down riv­er for three days and was met with sup­port along the way by local tribes­peo­ple.

Kallang and oth­er activists have also trav­elled abroad to lob­by against the dams, includ­ing meet­ing offi­cials of Hydro Tas­ma­nia, an Aus­tralian cor­po­ra­tion that advis­es the Sarawak gov­ern­ment on the dams.

The Tas­ma­nia gov­ern­ment cor­po­ra­tion pledged in Decem­ber after meet­ing the activists that it would pull its per­son­nel out of Sarawak by the end of 2013, Kallang said.

Sarawak’s tribes — eth­ni­cal­ly dis­tinct from Malaysia’s major­i­ty Malays — fear that they will lose their ances­tral lands and hunt­ing and bur­ial grounds, as the gov­ern­ment encour­ages them to make way for projects and move into new set­tle­ments.

Those are equipped with med­ical clin­ics, elec­tric­i­ty, and Inter­net access. But vil­lage elders and activists say alco­holism, drug use, and crime are on the increase and anger is ris­ing over con­tin­u­ing encroach­ment on native lands.

In one of the block­ades in 2011, Penan tribes­peo­ple blocked roads into their lands for a week to protest log­ging and alleged riv­er pol­lu­tion by Malaysian firm Inter­hill until the block­ade was dis­man­tled by author­i­ties.

Misdirection & Target Selection, Part 1

We’re up against a lot. With hun­dreds of species going extinct every day, with the oceans being vac­u­umed of life, with the last ves­tiges of wild forests being felled or burned and the heart of the plan­et being torn up to poi­son the air, civ­i­liza­tion is dri­ving Earth towards biot­ic col­lapse.

We’re up against a lot. With hun­dreds of species going extinct every day, with the oceans being vac­u­umed of life, with the last ves­tiges of wild forests being felled or burned and the heart of the plan­et being torn up to poi­son the air, civ­i­liza­tion is dri­ving Earth towards biot­ic col­lapse. We can’t afford to waste time or ener­gy with so much at stake; dis­man­tling the soci­ety that is dis­man­tling the plan­et is no easy task.

For more than 30 years now, the envi­ron­men­tal move­ment has been work­ing toward that end, yet in few (if any) cir­cum­stances have we been able to seri­ous­ly dis­lodge the foun­da­tions of indus­tri­al­ism. Despite our best efforts, the species count con­tin­ues to decline as the car­bon con­tin­ues to rise. Those we’re up against are well pro­tect­ed and have immense resources at hand to pro­tect them­selves from dis­rup­tion.

Sys­tems of power—such as patri­archy, white suprema­cy, cap­i­tal­ism, civilization—safeguard them­selves through brute force. They react with over­whelm­ing vio­lence against those who oppose them. How­ev­er, this isn’t the only tool avail­able to those in pow­er, and rarely is it the first to which they reach when they feel threat­ened. One of the more sin­is­ter and effec­tive tech­niques is sys­temic mis­di­rec­tion.

Oppres­sive and destruc­tive sys­tems pro­tect them­selves first and fore­most through dis­guise and decep­tion. They hide their weak­ness­es and vul­ner­a­bil­i­ties, coax­ing us into attack­ing dum­my tar­gets or sym­bols of their pow­er, rather than the mate­r­i­al struc­tures that sup­port their pow­er. The results are ones we’re all famil­iar with (or should be): we focus our atten­tion on spe­cif­ic symp­toms of the prob­lem rather than the under­ly­ing caus­es, and our efforts for polit­i­cal change are dif­fuse and unco­or­di­nat­ed, chal­leng­ing only par­tic­u­lar man­i­fes­ta­tions of larg­er oppres­sive pow­er sys­tems, rather than the sys­tems them­selves. We wan­der into a strate­gic dead-end, and ener­gy is redi­rect­ed into the sys­tem itself.

We are guid­ed into a strate­gic dead-end, and our ener­gy is redi­rect­ed to bol­ster the sys­tem itself.

Break­ing free of this mis­di­rec­tion-dynam­ic requires a thor­ough lift­ing-back of the veil that’s been draped over our eyes. It means focus­ing our efforts where they will be most effec­tive, tar­get­ing crit­i­cal nodes and bot­tle­necks with­in indus­tri­al sys­tems to bring civ­i­liza­tion down upon itself.

We need crit­i­cal and strate­gic process­es of tar­get selec­tion. One pow­er­ful tool towards this end is the CARVER Matrix. CARVER is an ana­lyt­ic for­mu­la used by mil­i­taries and secu­ri­ty cor­po­ra­tions for the selec­tion of tar­gets (and the iden­ti­fi­ca­tion of weak points). “CARVER” is an acronym for six dif­fer­ent cri­te­ria: crit­i­cal­i­ty, acces­si­bil­i­ty, recu­per­abil­i­ty, vul­ner­a­bil­i­ty, effect, and rec­og­niz­abil­i­ty.

Crit­i­cal­i­ty is an assess­ment of tar­get val­ue and is the pri­ma­ry con­sid­er­a­tion in CARVER and tar­get selec­tion. A tar­get is crit­i­cal if destruc­tion, dam­age or dis­rup­tion has sig­nif­i­cant impact on the oper­a­tion of an enti­ty; or more blunt­ly, ‘how impor­tant is this tar­get to ene­my oper­a­tions?”  Dif­fer­ent tar­gets can be crit­i­cal to dif­fer­ent sys­tems in dif­fer­ent ways: phys­i­cal­ly (as in inter­state trans­mis­sion lines), eco­nom­i­cal­ly (such as a stock exchange), polit­i­cal­ly, social­ly, etc.

It’s impor­tant to remem­ber that noth­ing exists in a vac­u­um; soci­ety is made up of inter-relat­ed enti­ties and insti­tu­tions, and our tar­gets will be as well. Thus the crit­i­cal­i­ty of a poten­tial tar­get should be con­sid­ered in the con­text of the way that tar­get relates to larg­er sys­tems. For exam­ple, there are thou­sands of elec­tri­cal trans­mis­sion sub­sta­tions all over the world, and hence they may ini­tial­ly seem non-crit­i­cal. How­ev­er, some sub­sta­tions car­ry a much greater load than oth­ers and are sys­temic bot­tle­necks, whose dis­abling would have rip­ple effects across entire regions. Crit­i­cal­i­ty depends on sev­er­al fac­tors, includ­ing:

  • Time: How rapid­ly will the impact of the attack affect oper­a­tions?
  • Qual­i­ty: What per­cent­age of out­put, pro­duc­tion, or ser­vice will be cur­tailed by the attack?
  • Rel­a­tiv­i­ty: What will be affect­ed in the sys­tems of which the tar­get is a com­po­nent?

Acces­si­bil­i­ty refers to how fea­si­ble it is to reach the tar­get with suf­fi­cient peo­ple and resources to accom­plish the goal. What sorts of bar­ri­ers or deter­rents are in place, and how eas­i­ly they can be over­come? Acces­si­bil­i­ty includes not only reach­ing a tar­get, but the abil­i­ty to get away as well.

Recu­per­abil­i­ty is a mea­sure of how quick­ly the dam­age done to a tar­get will be repaired, replaced or bypassed. Just about any­thing can be replaced or rebuilt, but some par­tic­u­lar things are much more dif­fi­cult, such as elec­tri­cal trans­form­ers, few of which are man­u­fac­tured in the U.S. and which take months to pro­duce.

The fourth selec­tion fac­tor is vul­ner­a­bil­i­ty. Tar­gets are vul­ner­a­ble if one has the means to suc­cess­ful­ly dam­age, dis­able, or destroy them. In deter­min­ing vul­ner­a­bil­i­ty, it’s impor­tant to com­pare the scale of what is nec­es­sary to dis­able the tar­get to the capa­bil­i­ty of the “attack­ing ele­ment” to do so. For exam­ple, while an unguard­ed dam might seem a vul­ner­a­ble tar­get, if resisters had no means of brin­ing it down, it wouldn’t be con­sid­ered vul­ner­a­ble. Specif­i­cal­ly, vul­ner­a­bil­i­ty depends on the nature & con­struc­tion of the tar­get, the amount & qual­i­ty of dam­age required to dis­able it, and the avail­able assets (per­son­nel, funds, equip­ment, weapons, moti­va­tion, exper­tise, etc.).

Next is effect.  Effect con­sid­ers the sec­ondary and ter­tiary impli­ca­tions of attack­ing a tar­get, includ­ing polit­i­cal, eco­nom­ic, social, and psy­cho­log­i­cal effects. Put anoth­er way, this could be rephrased as “con­sid­er all the con­se­quences of your actions.” How will those in pow­er respond? How will the gen­er­al pop­u­lace respond? How will this affect future efforts?

Last is rec­og­niz­abil­i­ty; will the attack be rec­og­nized as such, or might it be attrib­uted to oth­er fac­tors (e.g. “It wasn’t arson­ists that burned down the facil­i­ty, it was an elec­tri­cal fire”). Depend­ing on the par­tic­u­lar cir­cum­stances, this can cut either way; tak­ing cred­it for an attack can bol­ster sup­port and bring more atten­tion to an issue, but it may also make action­ists more vul­ner­a­ble to repres­sion. Rec­og­niz­abil­i­ty also applies at a more indi­vid­ual lev­el: were fin­ger­prints or oth­er evi­dence left at the site of the tar­get through which the iden­ti­ty of the attack­ers can be deter­mined?

Often, numer­i­cal val­ues between 1 and 10 are giv­en to each of the tar­get selec­tion cri­te­ria in the CARVER Matrix, and then totaled for each poten­tial tar­get. More gen­er­al­ly, CARVER presents a crit­i­cal frame­work for strate­gic plan­ning and deci­sion-mak­ing, help­ing us to avoid mis­di­rect­ed action.

It needs to be said that this sort of crit­i­cal and cal­cu­lat­ed approach to resis­tance efforts applies to non­vi­o­lent & above­ground groups and oper­a­tions as well as those that are mil­i­tant or under­ground. Non­vi­o­lent resis­tance is too often dis­tort­ed to fit roman­ti­cized ideas of a moral high ground, and is rel­e­gat­ed to pure sym­bol­ism. But strug­gle (whether vio­lent or non­vi­o­lent) isn’t about sym­bol­ic resis­tance; it’s about fac­ing down the real­i­ty of pow­er, iden­ti­fy­ing its lynch­pins, and using force to dis­able or break them. The par­tic­u­lar tac­tics we use deter­mine the form the force will be applied in, but unless we iden­ti­fy and tar­get the crit­i­cal lynch­pins, the dai­ly destruc­tion wrought upon the earth will con­tin­ue unabat­ed as we strike at the dis­trac­tions dan­gled before us.

For too long our move­ments have fall­en prey to poor tar­get selec­tion or mis­di­rec­tion. When we’re not too busy fight­ing defen­sive bat­tles, we focus our ener­gies on those enti­ties which are either entire­ly non-crit­i­cal to the func­tion of indus­tri­al­ism or are invul­ner­a­ble giv­en our capac­i­ty for action. And the world burns while we spin our wheels.

In part 2, we will take a clos­er look at sev­er­al exam­ples of dif­fer­ent actions, apply­ing this ana­lyt­i­cal exam­i­na­tion to bet­ter under­stand the impor­tance and rel­e­vance of tar­get selec­tion in rad­i­cal move­ments.

The forces we’re up against are ruth­less and cal­cu­lat­ed; they’ll do what­ev­er they can to keep us inef­fec­tive, and when that fails, they bring down all the repres­sive force of which they’re capa­ble. If we’re to be suc­cess­ful in stop­ping indus­tri­al civ­i­liza­tion, we’ll have to iden­ti­fy and under­mine its crit­i­cal sup­port sys­tems. We don’t have much time, which is why we can’t afford to waste it on actions, tar­gets or strate­gies that don’t move us tan­gi­bly clos­er to our goals.

Sea Shepherd Activists Make January a “No Kill” Month

The month of Jan­u­ary, usu­al­ly the prime whale catch­ing month for the Japan­ese whal­ing fleet in the South­ern Ocean, has come and gone with­out the death of a sin­gle whale, says Sea Shep­herd Con­ser­va­tion Soci­ety Aus­tralia Direc­tor Jeff Hansen.

The month of Jan­u­ary, usu­al­ly the prime whale catch­ing month for the Japan­ese whal­ing fleet in the South­ern Ocean, has come and gone with­out the death of a sin­gle whale, says Sea Shep­herd Con­ser­va­tion Soci­ety Aus­tralia Direc­tor Jeff Hansen.

It is the inter­na­tion­al organization’s ninth Antarc­tic Whale Defense Cam­paign, Oper­a­tion Zero Tol­er­ance. This season’s cam­paign is under the direc­tion of Sea Shep­herd Aus­tralia, now that found­ing pres­i­dent Paul Wat­son has hand­ed author­i­ty to Hansen and for­mer Aus­tralian Greens leader and sen­a­tor Bob Brown.

Author­i­ty was trans­ferred in Decem­ber in com­pli­ance with a U.S. court restrain­ing order and after Watson’s escape last sum­mer from Ger­many, where he was detained on bail for pos­si­ble extra­di­tion to Cos­ta Rica.

The Sea Shep­herd fleet of four ships, one heli­copter, drones, and more than 120 vol­un­teer crew from around the world has to date suc­ceed­ed in keep­ing the four-ves­sel Japan­ese fleet of “research” whalers sep­a­rat­ed on the run, mak­ing it impos­si­ble for them to catch whales, Hansen says.

As an observ­er, Wat­son remains aboard the Sea Shep­herd ves­sel SSS Steve Irwin, named in hon­or of the late Aus­tralian nat­u­ral­ist and broad­cast­er.

Wat­son says he will “doc­u­ment the cam­paign” against Japan­ese whal­ing in Antarc­tic waters. The Steve Irwin is cap­tained this sea­son by for­mer first offi­cer Sid­dharth Chakravar­ty of India.

Now two inter­linked bat­tles are under­way – in the courts and at sea, where ships from both sides are maneu­ver­ing to block each oth­er.

On Jan­u­ary 31, the Japan­ese whal­ing secu­ri­ty ship Shonan Maru No. 2 entered the Aus­tralian Eco­nom­ic Exclu­sion Zone around Mac­quar­ie Island, chas­ing the Sea Shep­herd ship, the SSS Bob Bark­er.

The Bob Bark­er head­ed for World Her­itage list­ed Mac­quar­ie Island to lose the Shonan Maru No. 2 and escaped the Japan­ese ves­sel on Fri­day.

Cap­tain of the Bob Bark­er Peter Ham­marst­edt said, “The Shonan Maru No. 2 is an inte­gral part of the Japan­ese whal­ing pro­gram. On board are armed storm troop­ers from the Japan Coast Guard whose sole mis­sion is to vio­lent­ly pre­vent my crew of whale defend­ers, many of whom are Aus­tralian cit­i­zens, from uphold­ing Aus­tralian domes­tic law and inter­na­tion­al law pro­tect­ing whales.”

The Aus­tralian gov­ern­ment offi­cial­ly noti­fied the Japan­ese gov­ern­ment to order the Shonan Maru No. 2 to remain out­side of Aus­tralian ter­ri­to­r­i­al waters, includ­ing the waters around Mac­quar­ie Island.

Since 2008, the Japan­ese whal­ing fleet has been in con­tempt of an Aus­tralian Fed­er­al Court order that pro­hibits them from killing whales in Aus­tralian ter­ri­to­r­i­al waters. Despite the rul­ing, Japan’s Insti­tute for Cetacean Research announced that it intends to kill near­ly 1,000 minke and 50 endan­gered fin whales dur­ing its 2012/2013 whale-hunt­ing sea­son in the South­ern Ocean.

Only the Yushin Maru No. 2 remains with the fac­to­ry ship Nis­shin Maru and both ves­sels are far north of the whal­ing area and run­ning from con­ser­va­tion­ist ves­sels.

Co-Cam­paign Leader Bob Brown said, “The first 24 hours of con­tact with the whale poach­ers have been a vic­to­ry for Sea Shep­herd and a com­plete loss for the Japan­ese whal­ing fleet. I am delight­ed to report that not a sin­gle whale has been harmed so far.”

The speedy Sea Shep­herd ship Brigitte Bar­dot has chased the Japan­ese whaler Yushin Maru No. 3 some 300 miles to the south.

Today, a lawyer for the whalers is threat­en­ing the Sea Shep­herd with con­tempt of court action, claim­ing the Brigitte Bar­dot breached the order grant­ed by a U.S. appeals court that restrains Sea Shep­herd ves­sels from approach­ing with­in 500 yards of Japan­ese whalers.

The Decem­ber 17, 2012 injunc­tion issued in Seat­tle, Wash­ing­ton by U.S. Ninth Cir­cuit Court of Appeals states, “Defen­dants Sea Shep­herd Con­ser­va­tion Soci­ety and Paul Wat­son, and any par­ty act­ing in con­cert with them, are enjoined from phys­i­cal­ly attack­ing any ves­sel engaged by Plain­tiffs the Insti­tute of Cetacean Research, Kyo­do Sen­paku Kaisha, Ltd., Tomoyu­ki Ogawa or Toshiyu­ki Miu­ra in the South­ern Ocean or any per­son on any such ves­sel, or from nav­i­gat­ing in a man­ner that is like­ly to endan­ger the safe nav­i­ga­tion of any such ves­sel.”

Kyo­do Sen­paku Kaisha oper­ates the whal­ing fleet for the Insti­tute of Cetacean Research, a gov­ern­ment agency, while Ogawa and Miu­ra are believed to be senior offi­cers.

The injunc­tion responds to an appeal by the Insti­tute for Cetacean Research against the deci­sion of a U.S. Dis­trict Court judge, who refused to grant an injunc­tion.

The injunc­tion will remain in place until the court decides on the mer­its of the Japan­ese case oppos­ing Sea Shep­herd in Wash­ing­ton State, where the U.S. chap­ter of the group is based.

The whalers’ lawyer claims that, in vio­la­tion of the injunc­tion, the SSS Brigitte Bar­dot came with­in 20.25 yards of the Yushin Maru No. 3 on Jan­u­ary 29.

Today “The Age” reports that the group’s Mel­bourne lawyer takes the posi­tion that Sea Shep­herd Aus­tralia is respon­si­ble for the group’s Antarc­tic cam­paign and the Aus­tralian chap­ter is not sub­ject to the restrain­ing order of the U.S. court.

The U.S. Sea Shep­herd Con­ser­va­tion Soci­ety has no shares in, nor con­trol over, the Aus­tralian chap­ter, which is now run by Aus­tralians – Hansen and Bob Brown, the for­mer sen­a­tor and leader of the Aus­tralian Greens.

Wat­son was arrest­ed in Ger­many last May on a 10-year-old Cos­ta Rican war­rant, issued after a Sea Shep­herd ves­sel he com­mand­ed inter­cept­ed a Cos­ta Rican shark-finning ves­sel and was escort­ing it to a Cos­ta Rican port. The Guatemalan gov­ern­ment sent a gun­boat to force release of the shark fish­ing ves­sel, while Cos­ta Rica charged Wat­son with attempt­ed mur­der. Cos­ta Rica has since banned shark finning.

Wat­son jumped bail and left Ger­many on July 22, 2012, say­ing that the Cos­ta Rican war­rant was a maneu­ver intend­ed to deliv­er him to Japan.

At the request of Cos­ta Rica, Inter­pol has issued a Red Notice ask­ing for infor­ma­tion about the where­abouts of the 62-year-old who holds dual cit­i­zen­ship in the Unit­ed States and Cana­da.

Brown has been a con­ser­va­tion­ist for decades, both before and dur­ing the time he rep­re­sent­ed the state of Tas­ma­nia in Par­lia­ment.

“I am hon­ored to serve the great whales of the South­ern Ocean and Sea Shep­herd in this way,” Brown said. “My admi­ra­tion for Paul Wat­son is inverse­ly pro­por­tion­al to the Japan­ese government’s anger at Sea Shepherd’s suc­cess at pre­vent­ing the slaugh­ter of almost 4,000 whales in recent years.”

The Dis­cov­ery Channel’s Ani­mal Planet’s Emmy-nom­i­nat­ed show “Whale Wars” has doc­u­ment­ed the Sea Shepherd’s whale defense cam­paigns for the past five years and is also onboard this sea­son.