Letter of solidarity with tree-occupations against road-buildings

Dur­ing the last weeks, at two dif­fer­ent loca­tions in Europe, trees have been squat­ted that would fall prey to the con­struc­tion of motor­ways. On Decem­ber 22nd, activists in Bex­hill, Eng­land occu­pied trees against the con­struc­tion of the Bex­hill-Hast­ings Link Road and have erect­ed an entire camp now.

Dur­ing the last weeks, at two dif­fer­ent loca­tions in Europe, trees have been squat­ted that would fall prey to the con­struc­tion of motor­ways. On Decem­ber 22nd, activists in Bex­hill, Eng­land occu­pied trees against the con­struc­tion of the Bex­hill-Hast­ings Link Road and have erect­ed an entire camp now. In Berlin, free-spaces-activists, togeth­er with envi­ron­men­tal-activists occu­pied trees against the A100 that is to be built through the mid­dle of Berlin. We, the squat­ters from the Ham­bach For­est stand in sol­i­dar­i­ty with these strug­gles and call for a prac­ti­cal sup­port and for the cre­ation of a net­work of these emerg­ing spaces of resis­tance with each oth­er and the cre­ation of many new spaces like these.

 

The anti-road move­ment in the UK in the 90s, which fol­lowed in response to the neolib­er­al infra­struc­ture poli­cies of Mar­garet Thatch­er („there is no alter­na­tive“), was one of the strongest social and envi­ron­men­tal move­ments of recent decades in Europe. Out of it many new forms of action devel­oped: The tree house vil­lages, with spe­cial­ized blockad­ing tech­niques at the sites where the roads should be built, the „crit­i­cal mass­es“ and „reclaim the streets“ par­ties as reclaim­ing the cities against the car craze, and a gen­er­al polit­i­cal under­stand­ing of „direct action“ as a self-empow­er­ing, dynam­ic form of pol­i­tics from below. Even the rad­i­cal envi­ron­men­tal move­ment in Britain, that spread after the turn of the mil­len­ni­um and inspired cli­mate move­ments all over Europe, had its roots in the anti-road move­ment.

Now, over 20 years lat­er, the gov­ern­ment in the UK is plan­ning a new com­pre­hen­sive road-build­ing pro­gram (while mas­sive social cuts were pushed through). 1,244 km of new roads are planned. Through the con­struc­tions, as well as improved infra­struc­ture, they hope to push the econ­o­my out of the cri­sis. At the same time new roads also bring more and more traf­fic with it and so it’s projects like these which also push the glob­al cli­mate clos­er to the „tip­ping points“. For this rea­son, on Decem­ber 22nd, activists hung plat­forms in trees to be felled for the Bex­hill-Hast­ings Link Road. Bex­hill is locat­ed between Dover and Brighton. There is even a „ful­ly oper­a­tional“ block­ade tun­nel!

Two weeks lat­er activists occu­pied trees in Berlin, Neukölln, in order to resist the con­struc­tion of the A100. We think the inter­est­ing thing about this action is that it was car­ried out by free-spaces-activists togeth­er with envi­ron­men­tal-activists. Far too rarely the resis­tance against the var­i­ous antag­o­nisms of cap­i­tal­ism – social and envi­ron­men­tal – com­bines in joint oper­a­tions. Exact­ly where it would be need­ed urgent­ly: The dom­i­nant dis­course wants us to believe that cli­mate or envi­ron­men­tal pro­tec­tion is only to achieve with renun­ci­a­tion and per­son­al con­sumer choic­es. The oppo­site is the case: By over­com­ing the cap­i­tal­ist sys­tem, much of the sense­less con­sump­tion of resources would dis­ap­pear, while a self-deter­mined life and a free devel­op­ment would become pos­si­ble. Let’s take Fordism as a tri­umph of the cars in the cities: Not a demand for auto­mo­biles was the begin­ning of mass con­sump­tion of the like, but a car favour­ing urban plan­ning, that accord­ing to the con­cepts of the Hitler­friend Ford, con­scious­ly put the dif­fer­ent areas of work, hous­ing and con­sump­tion so far apart that a life with­out a car has been more and more dif­fi­cult . So the time that the peo­ple had to use for chang­ing loca­tions wasn‘t get­ting short­er, but at once the cities were filled with this stink­ing met­al box­es which affect­ed the lives in the city fun­da­men­tal­ly – a dete­ri­o­ra­tion of life with high­er ener­gy con­sump­tion was the result. An oppo­site trend should be the goal of eman­ci­pa­to­ry envi­ron­men­tal strug­gles, the same as that of social strug­gles, that don‘t close their eyes in front of the acute cli­mate prob­lem we are fac­ing.

We urgent­ly need a rad­i­cal and pow­er­ful cli­mate move­ment all over the world. We see some pos­i­tive signs. For exam­ple, the con­flicts of the last months in La ZAD/France against a ‚green‘ air­port to be built. In mobi­liza­tions tem­porar­i­ly 40 000 activists par­tic­i­pat­ed. We need such cristal­liza­tion places where we can expe­ri­ence what’s pos­si­ble – and then we have to spread this resis­tance and hun­dreds of oth­er crys­tal­liza­tion places must sprout from the ground, which in turn inspire oth­ers.

We appeal to sup­port these new occu­pa­tions in Bex­hill and Berlin with prac­ti­cal help, just as we call to sup­port our occu­pa­tion at the edge of the Ham­bach for­est with prac­ti­cal assis­tance. But we also call out to you, to cre­ate many new such places your­self, that it takes as focal sites of resis­tance. Places where peo­ple can come togeth­er, are able to plan things, but also to guess what kind of world would be pos­si­ble in the new way of life and orga­ni­za­tion, beyond cap­i­tal­ism and dom­i­na­tion sys­tems.
And we call out to link those places of resis­tance – because the straw fires that cur­rent­ly flare up here and there have to con­nect to a wild­fire – a wild­fire of the unen­force­abil­i­ty of all these destruc­tive projects, whether roads, pipelines or open cast mines.

act – before it’s too late!

 https://combehavendefenders.wordpress.com/
 http://www.robinwood.de/Newsdetails.13+M5d5007d0da9.0.html
 http://wirbleibenalle.org/
 http://hambacherforst.blogsport.de/

Sol­i­dar­ität­serk­lärung mit Baumbe­set­zun­gen gegen Auto­bahn-wahn

In den let­zten Wochen wur­den gle­ich an zwei ver­schiede­nen Orten in Europa Bäume beset­zt, die dem Bau von Auto­bah­nen zum Opfer fall­en sollen. Am 22. Dezem­ber beset­zten Aktivist_innen in Bex­hill, Eng­land Bäume gegen den Bau der Bex­hill-Hast­ings Link Road und haben nun schon ein ganzes Camp errichtet. In Berlin beset­zten Freiraumaktivist_innen gemein­sam mit Umweltaktivist_innen Bäume gegen die A100 die mit­ten durch Berlin gebaut wer­den soll. Wir, die Besetzer_innen vom Ham­bach­er Forst sol­i­darisieren uns mit diesen Kämpfen und rufen zu ein­er prak­tis­chen Unter­stützung auf, zu ein­er Ver­net­zung der entste­hen­den Wider­stand­sorte untere­inan­der und dazu viele neue solch­er Orte zu schaf­fen.

Die Anti-Road Bewe­gung in Großbrit­tanien in den 90er Jahren, die als Antwort auf die neolib­erale Infra­struk­tur-Poli­tik von Marg­eret Thatch­er („there is no alter­na­tive“) fol­gte, war eine der stärk­sten sozialen Umwelt­be­we­gun­gen der let­zten Jahrzehnte in Europa. Aus ihr her­aus entwick­el­ten sich viele neue Aktions­for­men: Die Baumhaus­dör­fer, mit spezial­isierten Block­ade­tech­niken an den Orten wo die Straßen gebaut wer­den soll­ten, die „crit­i­cal mass­es“ und „reclaim the streets“-Partys als Rücker­oberung der Städte gegen den Autowahn, und generell ein Poli­tikver­ständ­nis der „direct action“ als selb­ster­mächti­gende, dynamis­che Poli­tik­form von unten. Auch die radikale Klimabe­we­gung in Großbri­tanien, die sich nach der Jahrtausendwende aus­bre­it­ete und Klimabe­we­gun­gen in ganz Europa inspiri­erte, hat­te ihre Wurzeln in dieser Anti-Road-Bewe­gung.

Nun, über 20 Jahre später, plant die Regierung in Großbrit­tanien ein neues umfassendes Straßen­baupro­gramm (während gle­ichzeit­ig mas­sive Sozialkürzun­gen durchgepeitscht wur­den). 1244 Kilo­me­ter neue Straßen sind geplant. Durch die Bauaufträge, sowie die verbesserte Infra­struk­tur wird erhofft die Wirtschaft aus der Krise zu stoßen. Gle­ichzeit­ig brin­gen neue Straßen aber auch immer mehr Autoverkehr mit sich, und so sind es Pro­jek­te wie dieses, die auch das glob­ale Kli­ma immer näher an die „tip­ping points“ stoßen. Aus diesem Grunde haben Aktivist_innen am 22. Dezem­ber Plat­tfor­men in Bäume gehängt, die für die Bex­hill-Hast­ings Link Road gerodet wer­den sollen. Bex­hill befind­et sich zwis­chen Dover und Brighton. Inzwis­chen gibt es sog­ar einen „ful­ly oper­a­tional“ Block­ade­tun­nel!

Zwei Wochen später, macht­en es Aktivist_innen in Berlin nach, und beset­zen Bäume in Neukölln um Wider­stand gegen den Bau der A100 zu leis­ten. Inter­es­sant an dieser Aktion find­en wir, dass sie von Freiraumaktivist_innen zusam­men mit Umweltaktivist_innen durchge­führt wurde. Viel zu sel­ten verbindet sich der Wider­stand gegen die ver­schiede­nen Antag­o­nis­men des Kap­i­tal­is­mus – den sozialen und den ökol­o­gis­chen – in gemein­samen Aktio­nen. Wobei genau das drin­gend notwendig wäre: Der herrschende Diskurs will uns weis machen, dass Kli­ma- oder Umweltschutz nur mit Verzicht zu haben sei. Das Gegen­teil ist der Fall: Durch die Über­win­dung der kap­i­tal­is­tis­chen Wirtschaftsweise würde gle­ichzeit­ig sehr viel unsin­niger Ressourcenver­brauch weg­fall­en, während ein selb­st­bes­timmtes Leben und eine freie Ent­fal­tung erst möglich würde. Nehmen wir nur ein­mal den Fordis­mus als Siegeszug des Autos in den Städten: Nicht ein Bedürf­nis nach Auto­mo­bilen war der Beginn des Massenkon­sums der­gle­ichen, son­dern eine Auto-ritäre Stadt­pla­nung, die nach den Konzepten des Hitler-Fre­un­des Ford, bewusst die ver­schiede­nen Bere­iche Arbeit, Wohnen und Kon­sum soweit auseinan­der­legte, dass ein Leben ohne Auto immer schw­er­er wurde. So wurde zwar nicht die Zeit kürz­er, die Men­schen täglich für Ortswech­sel auf­brin­gen mussten, aber die Städte waren auf ein­mal voll mit diesen stink­enden Blechk­isten und beein­trächtigten das Leben in der Stadt fun­da­men­tal – eine Beein­träch­ti­gung des Lebens bei höherem Energie­ver­brauch war das Ergeb­nis. Eine ent­ge­genge­set­zte Entwick­lung muss das Ziel emanzi­pa­torisch­er Umweltkämpfe sein, genau­so wie das­jenige sozialer Kämpfe, die das akute Klimaprob­lem vor dem wir ste­hen nicht ein­fach aus­blenden.

Wir brauchen drin­gend eine radikale und schlagkräftige Klimabe­we­gung und zwar weltweit. Wir sehen dabei einige pos­i­tive Ansätze. So zum Beispiel die Auseinan­der­set­zun­gen der let­zten Monate in La ZAD gegen einen „grü­nen“ Flughafen, der gebaut wer­den soll. An den Mobil­isierun­gen beteiligten sich zeitweise 40 000 Aktive. Wir brauchen solche Kristalli­sa­tion­sorte, an denen erfahrbar wird, was alles möglich ist – und dann muss dieser Wider­stand in die Fläche getra­gen wer­den und hun­derte weit­ere Kristalli­sa­tion­sorte müssen aus dem Boden sprießen, die wiederum andere inspiri­eren u.s.w.

Wir rufen dazu auf diese neuen Beset­zun­gen in Bex­hill und Berlin mit prak­tis­ch­er Hil­fe zu unter­stützen, genau­so wie wir dazu aufrufen unsere Beset­zung am Rande des Ham­bach­er Forstes mit prak­tis­ch­er Hil­fe zu unter­stützen. Wir rufen aber auch dazu auf sel­ber viele neue solch­er Orte zu schaf­fen, die es braucht als Kristalli­sa­tion­sorte des Wider­standes. Orte an denen Men­schen zusam­menkom­men kön­nen, Dinge pla­nen kön­nen, aber auch schon in der Art und Weise des Lebens und der neuen Organ­isierung erah­nen kön­nen, was für eine Welt möglich wäre jen­seits von Kap­i­tal­is­mus und Herrschaftssys­te­men.
Und wir rufen dazu auf sich unter diesen Orten stärk­er zu ver­net­zten – denn die Stro­hfeuer die derzeit hier und dort auflodern müssen sich verbinden zu einem Flächen­brand – ein Flächen­brand der Undurch­set­zbarkeit all dieser Pro­jek­te.

act – before it’s too late!

Ham­bach­er Forst
 e‑mail: hambacheforst@eiseup.net
 Home­page: http://hambacherforst.blogsport.de/

ALF/ELF sabotage road construction at Combe Haven

report­ed anony­mous­ly:

“Combe Haven. 7th-8th Jan­u­ary 2013.

Act­ing in sol­i­dar­i­ty with the cam­paign against the Bex­hill-Hast­ings link road, activists sab­o­taged con­trac­tors attempts to force local wildlife to migrate away from the site of the pro­posed road.

report­ed anony­mous­ly:

“Combe Haven. 7th-8th Jan­u­ary 2013.

Act­ing in sol­i­dar­i­ty with the cam­paign against the Bex­hill-Hast­ings link road, activists sab­o­taged con­trac­tors attempts to force local wildlife to migrate away from the site of the pro­posed road.

Wire mesh and wood­en doors cov­ered all but one entrance to each bad­ger sett in the area, in an attempt to encour­age the bad­gers to move into human-built setts pri­or to mat­ing sea­son. The mesh and doors sur­round­ing the bad­ger setts have since been dis­man­tled to encour­age the bad­gers to stay in their habi­tat of choice.

Newt-nets have also been set up by con­trac­tors with the same goal in mind, plas­tic sheet­ing staked along the route of the road a foot below and above ground, forc­ing newts, insects and oth­er small ani­mals out of the area. Thus these nets have also been attacked, torn out of the ground and
smashed.

Not only do these actions allow wild crea­tures to exist where they choose, but slows the build of the road, as the con­trac­tors attempt to green­wash their mind­less destruc­tion of ani­mal habi­tats and local nat­ur­al envi­ron­ments by ‘spar­ing the ani­mal’s lives’ in this man­ner and can­not pro­ceed with the road build­ing until they say they are cer­tain that the local wildlife has migrat­ed away from the site of eco­log­i­cal destruc­tion.

After wit­ness­ing the sur­vey­ors dis­may upon notic­ing the trashed nets, these acts of sab­o­tage will only con­tin­ue and increase in their sever­i­ty until those who choose con­ve­nience and prof­it over life have suf­fered at least equal­ly in their fight for the absolute con­trol and destruc­tion of the nat­ur­al world.

ALF/ELF.”

World’s Longest Treesit Campaign, Update from Bilston Glen

Yes­ter­day, peo­ple involved in the cam­paign to save Bil­ston Glen sent an update stat­ing, “We have new infor­ma­tion from the Mid­loth­i­an Coun­cil and it would seem like­ly that the road is being redi­rect­ed along a dif­fer­ent route, one that does not go through Bil­ston Glen.

Yes­ter­day, peo­ple involved in the cam­paign to save Bil­ston Glen sent an update stat­ing, “We have new infor­ma­tion from the Mid­loth­i­an Coun­cil and it would seem like­ly that the road is being redi­rect­ed along a dif­fer­ent route, one that does not go through Bil­ston Glen. We have a map of the alter­na­tive route and it makes a lot more sense than any of the plans that we had seen before. We will not know until the spring what plan has been final­ized for the road. They are also plan­ning a lot of oth­er devel­op­ment in the area so it is pos­si­ble that the glen might still be under threat even if the pro­posed devel­op­ment is not the road.

We should have a lot more infor­ma­tion in the spring. They are also con­sid­er­ing build­ing a new open cast coal mine some­where near Rosewell, so depend­ing on what is going on we may be join­ing in with that cam­paign as well. Keep in touch and we’ll let every­one know what is going on.”

The tree vil­lage is open for vis­it­ing and stay­ing. Help is always need­ed in a vari­ety of ways, from donat­ing funds and sup­plies to attend­ing Sun­day Free Cafes in the glen and par­tic­i­pat­ing in the pub­lic out­reach, edu­ca­tion and demon­stra­tions against the devel­op­ment in Mid­loth­i­an Scot­land.

Campaign History

Since June 2002 Bil­ston Glen, locat­ed near Penicuik, Scot­land about eight miles from the city of Edin­burgh,  has been occu­pied and for­ti­fied by an ever-expand­ing group of multi­na­tion­al envi­ron­men­tal activists. The Bil­ston Glen Anti-Bypass Protest Site began when a pro­pos­al to build a road through the glen was put on the table by biotech giant Bay­er. At the time, Bay­er was build­ing big dreams around com­mer­cial farm­ing of genet­i­cal­ly mod­i­fied foods (GMOs) in the UK. While Bay­er was dream­ing, we were schem­ing. A strong anti-GMO move­ment in the UK attacked the biotech indus­try from every angle – slash­ing crop fields and test sights, protest­ing uni­ver­si­ties fund­ing the research for fur­ther devel­op­ment, stag­ing large pub­lic demon­stra­tions out­side gro­cery stores demand­ing the label­ing of GMOs on con­sumer prod­ucts, and last but not least – attack­ing the infra­struc­ture of indus­tri­al devel­op­ment – the roads that would lead to com­mer­cial farm lands.

So far the activism expos­ing GMOs for the evils they are has worked in many parts of the world. To this day, com­mer­cial farm­ing of GMOs is ille­gal in the UK, and by Euro­pean law, food prod­ucts con­tain­ing more than .9% of a GM or GE ingre­di­ent must be labeled as con­tain­ing GMOs. How­ev­er, these vic­to­ries did not get the pro­pos­al for the road off the Mid­loth­i­an coun­cil agen­da. After Bay­er was no longer fund­ing the road, a large “indus­tri­al estate” near to the glen where Ikea and oth­er large “box” stores and pack­ag­ing facil­i­ties reside took up the bid to fund the road. The new investors meet uproars from the com­mu­ni­ty, who for many rea­sons feel that the road is need­less and are opposed to indus­tri­al devel­op­ment through the ancient wood­land. Bil­ston Glen is not only a des­ig­nat­ed “Sight of Sci­en­tif­ic Spe­cial Inter­est” (SSSI) – a con­ser­va­tion des­ig­na­tion denot­ing a pro­tect­ed area in the UK – it is also apart of the Green Belt. The Green Belt was des­ig­nat­ed as a coori­dor for wildlife in the Mid­loth­i­an area of Scot­land, it’s pur­pose is to pre­vent devel­op­ment along the belt line. With bla­tent dis­re­gard to these already pro­tect­ed areas, the local coun­cil itself became the face of the road expan­sion.

Luck­i­ly, Earth war­riors, for­est squat­ters, world trav­el­ers, Earth First!ers and the like have done an amaz­ing job at pre­vent­ing road expan­sion through Bil­ston Glen for over 10 years! The tree-sit is the one of the longest stand­ing peace and sol­i­dar­i­ty projects in the world, along side The Fasland Peace Camp, which is also locat­ed in Scot­land. Intent on block­ing any attempts to build a road through Bil­ston Glen, res­i­dents are also doing a alter­na­tive lifestyle project. Liv­ing and work­ing togeth­er, organ­is­ing our­selves and co-oper­a­tive­ly help­ing each oth­er.

Battle of Hastings

As pre­dict­ed, Mon­day 7 Jan­u­ary saw the chain­saws back in force on the Bex­hill-Hast­ings Link Rd being built smack through the mid­dle of tran­quil Combe Haven.

As pre­dict­ed, Mon­day 7 Jan­u­ary saw the chain­saws back in force on the Bex­hill-Hast­ings Link Rd being built smack through the mid­dle of tran­quil Combe Haven. Despite the fact that the fund­ing for the road isn’t yet in place East Sus­sex Coun­ty Coun­cil seem deter­mined to fell all the trees along the route. With most activ­i­ty focussed on the area near the rail­way, just oppo­site Upper Wilt­ing Farm (TN38 8EG). Activists rapid­ly occu­pied trees in the area, and then one of the exca­va­tors, also stag­ing a sit-down protest in front of the lat­ter.

“We were up and ready for them at six this morn­ing, before it got light. They were try­ing to cut trees to the north of the sec­ond camp. There are three big oaks there that they clear­ly want­ed to fell but we pushed through the lines of secu­ri­ty and got peo­ple into the trees”

Two peo­ple were arrest­ed and sub­se­quent­ly released: one charged, one cau­tioned (both for “aggra­vat­ed tres­pass”).

“We obvi­ous­ly stopped a lot of what they were plan­ning to do. They were most­ly just brush-cut­ting all day. We were with them until it got dark. I’m not entire­ly sure what they brought a dig­ger along for but they did­n’t real­ly get to use it”

Fur­ther action – by both road con­trac­tors & oppo­nents of the road – is expect­ed to begin ear­ly Tues­day (8 Jan­u­ary) & more peo­ple are need­ed for both arrestable and non-arrestable roles! And don’t for­get the ongo­ing Camp, not far away, near Adam’s Farm.

Mass Action Targets TransCanada Offices

Jan­u­ary 7th, 2013

What: Tar Sands Block­ade pro­test­ers take over Tran­sCana­da Key­stone XL offices in Hous­ton, demand­ing account­abil­i­ty for abus­es by Tran­sCana­da

Jan­u­ary 7th, 2013

What: Tar Sands Block­ade pro­test­ers take over Tran­sCana­da Key­stone XL offices in Hous­ton, demand­ing account­abil­i­ty for abus­es by Tran­sCana­da

Where: 2700 Post Oak Blvd, Suite 400, Hous­ton TX 77056 (next to the Hous­ton Gal­le­ria)

When: Under­way now!

Who: 100+ pro­test­ers gath­ered to con­front pipeline com­pa­ny over land abus­es, tox­ic lega­cy and cli­mate change con­nect­ed to TransCanada’s Key­stone XL pipeline.

The Tar Sands Block­ade is a group of envi­ron­men­tal­ists and landown­ers work­ing to stop the Key­stone XL tar sands pipeline through direct action.

Why: This action kicks off a new phase of the Tar Sands Block­ade tar­get­ing the cor­po­rate and finan­cial infra­struc­ture behind the Key­stone XL pipeline. TransCanada’s pipeline uses seized land to trans­port tox­ic tar sands oil through Texas and Okla­homa com­mu­ni­ties, in order to export it from Hous­ton ports. These dan­ger­ous busi­ness prac­tices and the back­lash from com­mu­ni­ties across the coun­try make this pipeline a tox­ic invest­ment for our state and TransCanada’s cor­po­rate lenders.

Australian miner Whitehaven Coal hit by hoax

7th Jan 2013.

7th Jan 2013. Shares in Aus­tralian min­er White­haven Coal fell almost 9% after a fake press release claimed one of the fir­m’s lenders had with­drawn fund­ing.

The release, from an anti-coal action group claim­ing that ANZ bank had with­drawn A$1.2bn ($1.3bn; £784m), prompt­ed the min­er to sus­pend trad­ing in its shares.

Once the hoax was uncov­ered, White­haven shares recov­ered the loss­es.

Oth­er Aus­tralian firms have fall­en vic­tim to hoax­es in recent months.

The state­ment said that ANZ had with­drawn fund­ing for White­haven’s pro­posed Maules Creek mine due to “rep­u­ta­tion­al risks and analy­sis of the returns on this mine in the cur­rent cli­mate of high volatil­i­ty in the coal export mar­ket”.

Investors then sold shares in the com­pa­ny, fear­ing that the mine may be pulled.

Once the hoax came to light, ANZ issued its own release say­ing it had made no state­ment on White­haven and remained “ful­ly sup­port­ive” of the com­pa­ny.

Jonathan Moy­lan from Front­line Action for Coal, which issued the hoax state­ment, said envi­ron­men­tal con­cerns had prompt­ed the press release.

For more info on Front­line Action for Coal and their con­tin­u­ing protest camp and actions, see here

Come to Camp, Defend the Trees, Celebrate 12th Night (6/7 Jan)!

[Please note: There is a replace­ment bus ser­vice for the train between Bat­tle and Hast­ings all week­end (6 & 7 Jan­u­ary), so check the times before you leave.]

[Please note: There is a replace­ment bus ser­vice for the train between Bat­tle and Hast­ings all week­end (6 & 7 Jan­u­ary), so check the times before you leave.]

The chain­saws have been silent over Christ­mas but they’ll soon be back. And when they come, they’ll come ear­ly. So: come and defend the trees, and cel­e­brate 12th night (the evening of Sun­day 6 Jan­u­ary), all in one place!

Bring a dish to share, a song to sing, and be ready to defend the trees ear­ly the next morn­ing (Mon­day 7 Jan­u­ary – which also hap­pens to be our best guest of when the con­trac­tors will be return­ing in force). (See here for direc­tions to – and groundrules for – the Camp). Prac­ti­cal work­shops – focussing on putting up struc­tures to help with the peace­ful defence of the trees – will also be tak­ing place on Sat­ur­day 5 Jan­u­ary.

Whether or not you plan to stay overnight you’ll prob­a­bly want to bring a torch, wellies and some eat­ing uten­sils. If you are going to stay over then you’ll also need to bring water, snacks, bed­ding and – ide­al­ly – a tent. If you haven’t got a tent, let us know, as there may be some spare tent space. The camp is near Adam’s Farm, Crowhurst: see here.

Final­ly, whether or not you’re able to make any of this weekend’s events, please try and come to the Camp as ear­ly as pos­si­ble on the morn­ing of Mon­day 7th Jan­u­ary (when we antic­i­pate the chain­saws will be back in force). We may be able to offer lifts at 5.45am from Crowhurst. If you require or can offer a lift please let us know – 07926 423 033

First Nations may engage in economic blockades if Canada refuses treaty talks

First Nations lead­ers have dis­cussed plans to launch coun­try-wide eco­nom­ic dis­rup­tions by the mid­dle of Jan­u­ary if Prime Min­is­ter Stephen Harp­er doesn’t agree to hunger-strik­ing Attawapiskat Chief There­sa Spence’s demand for a treaty meet­ing

First Nations lead­ers have dis­cussed plans to launch coun­try-wide eco­nom­ic dis­rup­tions by the mid­dle of Jan­u­ary if Prime Min­is­ter Stephen Harp­er doesn’t agree to hunger-strik­ing Attawapiskat Chief There­sa Spence’s demand for a treaty meet­ing

Dur­ing three days of meet­ings and tele­con­fer­ences, chiefs from across the coun­try dis­cussed a plan set­ting Jan. 16 as the day to launch a cam­paign of indef­i­nite eco­nom­ic dis­rup­tions, includ­ing rail­way and high­way block­ades, accord­ing to two chiefs who were involved in the talks who request­ed anonymi­ty.

“The peo­ple are rest­less, they are say­ing enough is enough,” said one chief, who was involved in the dis­cus­sions. “Eco­nom­ic impacts are immi­nent if there is no response.”

Chiefs were still final­iz­ing details of their plans Mon­day evening and it remained unclear to what extent their dis­cussed options would trans­late into the offi­cial posi­tion.

Assem­bly of First Nations Nation­al Chief Shawn Atleo is expect­ed to write Harp­er a let­ter out­lin­ing the chiefs’ posi­tion.

Spence launched her hunger strike on Dec. 11 to force a meet­ing between Prime Min­is­ter Stephen Harp­er, Gov­er­nor Gen­er­al David John­ston and First Nations lead­ers to dis­cuss the state of the treaties. Spence said in a state­ment issued Mon­day that the aim of the meet­ing was to “re-estab­lish” the treaty rela­tion­ship and final­ly put First Nations peo­ple in their “right­ful place back here in our home­lands that we all call Cana­da.”

The plan of action comes as the Idle No More move­ment con­tin­ues to sweep across the coun­try through round dances, ral­lies along with high­way and rail block­ades.

The Tyen­d­i­na­ga Mohawks briefly block­ad­ed a main CN rail line between Toron­to and Mon­tre­al Sun­day, strand­ing about 2,000 Via Rail pas­sen­gers. The Mi’kmaq from the Lis­tuguj First Nation, Que., con­tin­ue to hold a rail block­ade on a CN line along with mem­bers of the Aamji­w­naang First Nation who have shut a CN line in Sar­nia, Ont. In British Colum­bia, the Seton Lake Indi­an Band end­ed a rail block­ade on Sun­day.

How the chiefs’ action plan will mesh with the Idle No More move­ment remains to be seen. Idle No More orga­niz­ers issued a state­ment Mon­day that dis­tanced the move­ment from the chiefs.

“The chiefs have called for action and any­one who choos­es can join with them, how­ev­er, this is not part of the Idle No More move­ment as the vision of this grass­roots move­ment does not coin­cide with the visions of the lead­er­ship,” said the state­ment, post­ed on the Idle No More Face­book page. “While we appre­ci­ate the indi­vid­ual sup­port we have received from chiefs and coun­cil­lors, we have been giv­en a clear man­date by the grass­roots to work out­side the sys­tems of gov­ern­ment and that is what we will con­tin­ue to do.”

One of the chiefs involved in action plan dis­cus­sion said the lead­er­ship want­ed to be sen­si­tive to the grass­roots-dri­ven move­ment and make clear that their plans are being devel­oped in sup­port and as a response to Idle No More.

“Chiefs are stand­ing firm in sup­port of Idle No More and grass­roots cit­i­zens,” said the chief. “We now need to uni­fy.”

Camp: wish list, tunnel(s), and groundrules January 4, 2013

The Camp in Crowhurst has been in place con­tin­u­ous­ly since 21 Decem­ber, and now con­sists of sev­er­al tree hous­es and at least one “ful­ly oper­a­tional tun­nel”!

Cur­rent wish list (as at 8am on Fri 4 Jan): per­son­al head torch (dona­tion offered); cook­ing pot; blan­kets (esp. ones made of wool or cot­ton). More info: 07926 423 033.

GROUNDRULES FOR THE CAMP

Please note that the Camp has agreed the fol­low­ing groundrules which it is ask­ing par­tic­i­pants to abide by:

1. Peace­ful resis­tance
This Camp is about peace­ful resis­tance to the con­struc­tion of the Bex­hill-Hast­ings Link Road (BHLR). By “peace­ful resis­tance” we mean actions that: (1) do not harm or dehu­man­ise any human being; and (2) Do not threat­en to harm or dehu­man­ise any human being. Campers need not sub­scribe to non­vi­o­lence as a life-phi­los­o­phy, but we do ask that they restrict their activ­i­ties to peace­ful resis­tance while they are asso­ci­at­ed with the Camp. Because of the poten­tial risk it pos­es to chain­saw oper­a­tors, we do not con­sid­er tree spik­ing to be a form of “peace­ful resis­tance”, and ask that Campers not engage in this prac­tice.

2. Alco­hol & drugs pol­i­cy
We want to make this Camp as safe a space as pos­si­ble. We have there­fore agreed a pol­i­cy that there be no alco­hol and no ille­gal drugs on site. If you want a drink then go to the pub in Crowhurst and mix with the locals!

3. Anti-oppres­sion
We want the Camp to be a wel­com­ing, engag­ing and sup­port­ive space. Dis­crim­i­na­tion and oppres­sive behav­iour (eg. racism, sex­ism, homo­pho­bia, prej­u­dice based on dis­abil­i­ty, class etc…) are unac­cept­able and will be chal­lenged. We also ask that campers respect each other’s phys­i­cal and emo­tion­al bound­aries and try to fos­ter a spir­it of mutu­al respect.

4. Gen­er­al safe­ty
Tree protests are inher­ent­ly unsafe, and all par­tic­i­pants are respon­si­ble for their own safe­ty. If you’re going to be climb­ing high into trees then best prac­tice is to have your own har­ness and climb­ing rope, and to rig it up your­self. Do not assume that peo­ple know what they’re doing just because they project an air of con­fi­dence!

We are also ask­ing par­tic­i­pants to please respect the pri­va­cy of the res­i­dents of the farm­house, not bring vehi­cles on-site (tat can be fer­ried from a near-by drop-off point) and to only use the access down the dis­used rail­way track, not the Adams Farm track.

New Keystone XL Aerial Tree Blockade Halts Construction in Diboll, TX, 3rd Jan

Unprecedented “dump platforms” protected by intricate 100 ft perimeter web of safety lines to protect sitters; action declared in solidarity with “Idle No More” in Canada

From a TSB state­ment released at 9:00AM this morn­ing — Late last night, block­aders set up two &ldqu

Unprecedented “dump platforms” protected by intricate 100 ft perimeter web of safety lines to protect sitters; action declared in solidarity with “Idle No More” in Canada

From a TSB state­ment released at 9:00AM this morn­ing — Late last night, block­aders set up two “dump plat­forms” in trees out­side of Diboll, Texas which would oth­er­wise be cleared to make way for TransCanada’s Key­stone XL tox­ic tar sands pipeline. These spe­cial “dump plat­forms” are shield­ed by an unprece­dent­ed 80–100 ft perime­ter of life-lines arranged, which if dis­turbed would cer­tain­ly dump the two block­aders nest­ed in them rough­ly 50–60 ft in the air. The Block­aders are sit­ting in sol­i­dar­i­ty with the now glob­al “Idle No More” cam­paign for First Nation’s human rights and trib­al sov­er­eign­ty that very recent­ly start­ed in Cana­da.

This new tree block­ade comes just a cou­ple weeks after the end of Tar Sands Blockade’s 85-day tree-sit near Winns­boro, TX. Tran­sCana­da rerout­ed the tar sands pipeline to go around the Winns­boro tree-sit, despite hav­ing told count­less landown­ers, includ­ing Dou­glass res­i­dent Mike Bish­op, that the route was set in stone and could not be altered to avoid bull­doz­ing their crop­land, or to go around schools, neigh­bor­hoods, or eco­log­i­cal­ly sen­si­tive areas.

This new site is sur­round­ed by bar­ri­ers like High­way 59, rail­road tracks, and Ryan Lake. With these near­by, block­aders have found a loca­tion around which the pipe can­not eas­i­ly be rerout­ed.

The via­bil­i­ty of this block­ade depends entire­ly on the safe con­duct of Tran­sCana­da and local police forces. They could eas­i­ly end it by cut­ting ropes and seri­ous­ly injur­ing or killing the tree sit­ters. Block­aders Audrey and Mike know the risks. They are pre­pared to stay on their plat­forms, just big enough to lie down on, indef­i­nite­ly, to defend their col­lec­tive home from the expan­sion of tar sands exploita­tion that Key­stone XL would ush­er in.

“Pro­tect­ing the liv­ing sys­tems which we’re a part of is a moral neces­si­ty,” shared Audrey, who is sit­ting in a sin­gu­lar tree left in a new­ly-cleared field. “Extrac­tion of the tar sands is the most destruc­tive project on the con­ti­nent. It threat­ens the integri­ty of the entire bios­phere, not to men­tion the First Nations depen­dent upon access to clean water, land, and air for the health and food for their trib­al com­mu­ni­ties.”

Mike, the oth­er sit­ter sus­pend­ed in a 50 ft sky­pod between two trees, agreed, “That their plight has been so long ignored by indus­try and pol­i­cy-mak­ers is a clear vio­la­tion of their human rights and a crime of con­science. That’s why we are enthu­si­as­ti­cal­ly sup­port­ing the Idle No More move­ment!”

Tar Sands Block­ade is a coali­tion of Texas and Okla­homa landown­ers and cli­mate jus­tice orga­niz­ers using peace­ful and sus­tained civ­il dis­obe­di­ence to stop the con­struc­tion of TransCanada’s Key­stone XL tar sands pipeline.

“Insti­tu­tion­al meth­ods of address­ing cli­mate change have failed us,” explained Ron Seifert, a Tar Sands Block­ade spokesper­on. “Ris­ing up to defend our homes against cor­po­rate exploita­tion is our best and only hope to pre­serve life on this plan­et. We must nor­mal­ize and embrace direct, orga­nized resis­tance to the death machine of indus­tri­al extrac­tion and stand with those like Idle No More who take extra­or­di­nary risk to defend their fam­i­lies and liveli­hoods.”

Pho­tos of the action are avail­able on Tar Sands Blockade’s Flickr account here: http://flickr.com/photos/tarsandsblockade/

[Block­ade is locat­ed two miles south of Diboll, TX on north­bound High­way 59, a mas­sive ban­ner deployed there is high­ly vis­i­ble to high­way traf­fic.]
See TarSandsBlockade.org for more info.