Anti-fracking defendants found not guilty as movement grows

10th Jan 2014 via Cor­po­rate Watch Eleven anti-frack­ing cam­paign­ers have been found not guilty after a three day tri­al at Brighton Mag­is­trate’s Court.

10th Jan 2014 via Cor­po­rate Watch Eleven anti-frack­ing cam­paign­ers have been found not guilty after a three day tri­al at Brighton Mag­is­trate’s Court.

The defen­dants had been arrest­ed on the 2nd day of the protests against Cuadrilla’s explorato­ry drilling Bal­combe last sum­mer while sit­ting on or around a log which had been dragged out­side the gates to the Cuadrilla site.

The pro­test­ers were approached by what one defen­dant described as “bat­tal­ions” of police and arrest­ed en masse. The arrests were vio­lent, with police using pres­sure point tech­niques as they dragged peo­ple away. One man, who was drink­ing a cup of tea at the time the police approached was arrest­ed for assault for spilling tea on a police offi­cer dur­ing his arrest.

The arrests were part of a con­cert­ed police strat­e­gy to stamp out resis­tance to frack­ing in Bal­combe before it had begun in earnest. Those arrest­ed were giv­en strin­gent bail con­di­tions not to go back to the area close to Cuadrilla’s oper­a­tions. How­ev­er, police bul­ly­ing tac­tics were not suc­cess­ful, despite over 120 arrests dur­ing the 2 months that the Bal­combe Com­mu­ni­ty Pro­tec­tion Camp was in place. The resis­tance, which includ­ed reg­u­lar block­ades and direct action, sig­nif­i­cant­ly delayed Cuadr­l­la’s work. The com­pa­ny’s plan­ning per­mis­sion expired in Sep­tem­ber 2013 and they left the site on Sep­tem­ber 28th hav­ing dug their well but with­out begin­ning test­ing. It is esti­mat­ed that the polic­ing costs amount­ed to £3.7 mil­lion dur­ing the course of the protests.

The Tri­al

The cam­paign­ers were ini­tial­ly arrest­ed under the pro­vi­sions of arti­cle 241 of the arcane Trade Union and Labour Rela­tions Act, a law brought in by John Major’s Con­ser­v­a­tive gov­ern­ment to pre­vent trade union­ists pick­et­ing in sol­i­dar­i­ty with oth­er work­ers or, as the judge put it (with a straight face) “to pro­tect peo­ple’s right to work”. One defen­dant said dur­ing his evi­dence, “I think they were just scrap­ing the bar­rel and could­n’t find a real rea­son to arrest us and had dug up this obscure sec­ondary pick­et­ing law”. The charges were lat­er amend­ed to obstruct­ing the high­way.

Sev­er­al defen­dants said they were shocked at the police tac­tics. One woman described a car­ni­val atmos­phere at the gates of Cuadrilla with chil­dren play­ing ten­nis and hop­scotch in the road before “mil­i­tarised” police wad­ed in to break up the protest and arrest­ed her in front of her daugh­ter.

One demon­stra­tor, who had dragged the log into the road, said he had done so to make the point to Cuadrilla that “we need to have a con­ver­sa­tion about what you’re try­ing to enforce on a com­mu­ni­ty who don’t want this sort of busi­ness going on in their back yard”.

The judge ruled that he could not be sure that the defen­dants had intend­ed to obstruct the high­way and that the fact that the road was closed while it was being resur­faced went in their favour. The court had heard that the police had not giv­en suf­fi­cient warn­ing before mak­ing arrests.

At least anoth­er 19 defen­dants are await­ing tri­al after being arrest­ed dur­ing the Bal­combe protests.

The strug­gle con­tin­ues

Char­lotte Wil­son, a spokesper­son from the Frack Off cam­paign said, on hear­ing the ver­dict: “The frack­ing block­ades at Bal­combe and now Bar­ton Moss near Man­ches­ter, are tes­ta­ment to the lev­el of anger and fear sur­round­ing these devel­op­ments. There are now 70 or more groups resist­ing frack­ing devel­op­ments nation­wide. The indus­try is los­ing. Each new well is met with months of protests and mil­lions in polici­ing costs. The scale of the gov­ern­m­ren­t’s sell-off means that rough­ly 60% of the UK is now avail­able to frack­ing com­pa­nies, huge num­bers of peo­ple are threat­ened and as a result com­mu­ni­ties from all cor­ners of the coun­try are get­ting organ­ised.”

IGas Ener­gy, who describe them­selves as a “lead­ing British oil and gas explor­er and devel­op­er”, are cur­rent­ly try­ing to set up a well to begin explorato­ry drilling in Bar­ton Moss, near Man­ches­ter, in the face of con­cert­ed resis­tance and direct action from anoth­er camp which has been set up for around 45 days. Infor­ma­tion about the cam­paign can be found at the North­ern Gas Gala web­site at  http://northerngasgala.org.uk/.

For more infor­ma­tion about anti-frack­ing move­ments in the UK see www.frack-off.org.

Bath — arson at car showroom

8th of Jan­u­ary — incen­di­ary device on delay left at Kia car show­room, Low­er Bris­tol Road, Bath. Dam­age to the build­ing facade. A brand new 4‑x-4 and three cars also con­sumed by the flames. A direct attack on exploita­tive man­u­fac­tur­ing indus­tries who prof­it from chok­ing our world, who also make sta­tus sym­bols for our class ene­mies.

8th of Jan­u­ary — incen­di­ary device on delay left at Kia car show­room, Low­er Bris­tol Road, Bath. Dam­age to the build­ing facade. A brand new 4‑x-4 and three cars also con­sumed by the flames. A direct attack on exploita­tive man­u­fac­tur­ing indus­tries who prof­it from chok­ing our world, who also make sta­tus sym­bols for our class ene­mies. This sec­tion of the Earth Lib­er­a­tion Front and Infor­mal Anar­chist Fed­er­a­tion has them in our sights.

With the cops cleared of the exe­cu­tion of Mark Dug­gan that start­ed the riots of 2011, as good a time as ever to re-ignite the streets.

Unfor­tu­nate­ly for the ene­my, the 32 year old man arrest­ed for the action has no rela­tion to our group.

Active sol­i­dar­i­ty with:
- the stir­rings of new strug­gle against road build­ing pro­grams in the UK (traces of which we saw in Combe Haven), specif­i­cal­ly with the ones who won’t take the path of lib­er­als and paci­fists next time
- Swiss anar­chist Mar­co Camenish (who is on hunger strike and refus­ing work since the 30th of Decem­ber) and also infor­mal anar­chist pris­on­ers Alfre­do Cospi­to and Nico­la Gai in Italy
- Hen­ry Zegar­run­do (who we recog­nise as a kin­dred spir­it through his let­ters) tar­get­ed by the Boli­vian pros­e­cu­tors, those on the run, and the anar­chist and indige­nous peo­ples still fight­ing the high­way devel­op­ment

Peren­ni­al Resis­tance ELF-FAI

Bris­tol — Tolu­ca — Jakar­ta — Moscow — Buenos Aires — Mel­bourne — keep the fires burn­ing

Bombing against Bristol office of Vinci, Life Sciences Centre constructors

We think that any­one seri­ous about con­fronting dom­i­na­tion as it stands today will soon­er or lat­er come to the ques­tions of sci­ence and tech­nol­o­gy. It’s clear how both have an increas­ing­ly vital role to the rul­ing order by cre­at­ing, man­ag­ing and spread­ing con­trol with­in soci­ety and over the rest of an earth we’re false­ly sep­a­rat­ed from.

We think that any­one seri­ous about con­fronting dom­i­na­tion as it stands today will soon­er or lat­er come to the ques­tions of sci­ence and tech­nol­o­gy. It’s clear how both have an increas­ing­ly vital role to the rul­ing order by cre­at­ing, man­ag­ing and spread­ing con­trol with­in soci­ety and over the rest of an earth we’re false­ly sep­a­rat­ed from. By inves­ti­gat­ing the devel­op­ment of these pow­ers in the region and who makes it pos­si­ble, we came to Vin­ci.

In the U.K, the French multi­na­tion­al ener­gy and con­struc­tion giant Vin­ci car­ry out spe­cial­ist con­struc­tion ser­vices for the police, Min­istry of Defence and pris­ons, earth­works for motor­ways, rail­ways and quar­ry­ing, pow­er sta­tions, off­shore rigs and nuclear new-builds, as well as shop­ping cen­tres and the like. World­wide this cor­po­ra­tion and its sub­sidiaries are active in many fields: dam build­ing, pri­vate secu­ri­ty, air­ports, ura­ni­um mines; these scum have no prob­lem with inflict­ing car­nage on the earth and us as part of it, rais­ing an indus­tri­al cage around us both fig­u­ra­tive­ly and lit­er­al­ly, and feed­ing off the labours of their work­force while the boss­es line their pock­ets and move on to the next con­tract.

In these respects we attack Vin­ci any­way, but one of our main motives for tar­get­ing them is because they’re respon­si­ble for build­ing the new Bio­log­i­cal Life Sci­ences Cen­tre soon to open at the Uni­ver­si­ty of Bris­tol.

We set off an explo­sive at Vin­ci’s offices at Van­tage busi­ness park, north of Bris­tol, at approx­i­mate­ly 3:45 yes­ter­day morn­ing (6th Jan­u­ary). It was placed with the aim of cut­ting off pow­er lines, scorch­ing the exte­ri­or and start­ing a fire inside. We con­sid­ered the res­i­dent com­pa­ny in the next-door part of the unit a wor­thy sec­ondary tar­get in any dam­ages (White­head, anoth­er con­struc­tion and build­ing ser­vic­ing group who do com­mis­sioned work for Vin­ci).

A £54 mil­lion facil­i­ty, the Bio­log­i­cal Life Sci­ences Cen­tre will offer cours­es for “the next gen­er­a­tion of biol­o­gists” as well as cur­rent spe­cial­ists, aim­ing to improve col­lab­o­ra­tion with the uni­ver­si­ty’s nan­otech­nol­o­gy cen­tre and just across from the Med­ical School’s genet­ic engi­neer­ing, vivi­sec­tion and ani­mal breed­ing labs. The world cap­i­tal­ist sys­tem sees advances in fields like this as key to the next round of dis­cov­ery, enclo­sure and wealth cre­ation. As the area around Bris­tol and Bath hous­es the biggest hi-tech design clus­ter in the world after Amer­i­ca’s Sil­i­con Val­ley, this “rev­o­lu­tion” is hap­pen­ing on our doorsteps, “with Bris­tol being an excit­ing and ide­al place to car­ry out research over the com­ing years.” (This is in the words of Pro­fes­sor Gary Fos­ter, whose work at the Uni­ver­si­ty of Bris­tol in genet­ic-mod­i­fi­ca­tion and oth­er biotech­nolo­gies feeds the nox­ious phar­ma­ceu­ti­cal indus­try such as Glax­o­SmithK­line. The uni­ver­si­ty breeds genet­i­cal­ly-altered mice, for exam­ple, then mor­bid­ly sub­jects these liv­ing crea­tures to exten­sive nerve dam­age and hand the results to drug com­pa­nies.)

One of the main thrusts of this dri­ve is syn­thet­ic biol­o­gy, a dis­turb­ing prac­tice using the lat­est tech­nol­o­gy for “rewrit­ing and rebuild­ing nat­ur­al sys­tems to pro­vide engi­neered sur­ro­gates.” In 2012 a con­fer­ence at the Uni­ver­si­ty of Bris­tol stat­ed that syn­thet­ic biol­o­gy “could become a dri­ving force of the nation­al econ­o­my,” and the gov­ern­ment have declared it a top research pri­or­i­ty. The Euro­pean Union has now award­ed £3.3 mil­lion to the Uni­ver­si­ty of Bris­tol just to cre­ate “pub­lic aware­ness” pro­mot­ing the prac­tice.

The log­ic of these kind of sci­ences has, as its pri­ma­ry goal, attempt­ed con­trol over every­thing. They reduce knowl­edge, that might be more deeply gained in wild rela­tion­ships of inter­ac­tion and inter­de­pen­dence, to a detached uni­verse of obses­sive mea­sure­ment and objec­ti­fi­ca­tion, arro­gant­ly sep­a­rat­ing parts from the whole that gives them mean­ing as if every­thing were mere­ly a machine to dis­man­tle. This sci­en­tif­ic tra­di­tion is close­ly tied up with the world­view that emerged dur­ing the ear­ly for­ma­tion of com­mer­cial cap­i­tal­ism, which sought and still seeks to adapt life­forms to the dri­ve for prof­its, jus­ti­fy the dom­i­na­tion and destruc­tion of the liv­ing world, and imple­ment a macho uber-ratio­nal­ism scorn­ful of every­thing frag­ile and organ­ic on which all species depend. Right now, plant and ani­mal genes are bro­ken down and opti­mised in labs so they suit pro­duc­tive stan­dards and to cre­ate new pri­vate prop­er­ty through patents. Where we might see the unique leaves, seeds, bod­ies and minds of our­selves and our fel­low crea­tures, this sci­ence (if not nec­es­sar­i­ly each sci­en­tist, the results are the same) just sees life­less objects to pick apart, study and sac­ri­fice on the altar of eco­nom­ic use­ful­ness to their pay­mas­ters who reap the ben­e­fits from this sick and sick­en­ing soci­ety.

For instance we can see the cur­rent push for genet­i­cal­ly-mod­i­fied (G.M) food in the U.K by the media, indus­try and gov­ern­ment, for which these research insti­tu­tions play an impor­tant part: such as advances in biotech­nol­o­gy for crops thanks to the Long Ash­ton Research Sta­tion run by the Uni­ver­si­ty of Bris­tol in the past. Sci­en­tists like Gary Fos­ter are well aware of the dan­gers from G.M genes “leak­ing into the nat­ur­al world” (again, his own words) but appar­ent­ly the mon­ey and pres­tige from their mas­tery are worth more than our insignif­i­cant lives. A decade ago the first wave of G.M tri­als was slowed here by sus­tained pres­sure and crop-trash­ing; today sab­o­tage con­tin­ues from Hol­land to the Philip­pines, and oth­ers like us also won’t be accom­plices to these devel­op­ments or their agents through inac­tion. It’s nec­es­sary to attack the new wave of so-called ‘life’ sci­ence facil­i­ties at the root (those who design them, those who con­struct them) not just crit­i­cize the more well-known prod­ucts of their research: because to these insti­tu­tions all knowl­edge becomes anoth­er oppor­tu­ni­ty for con­trol and exploita­tion, so extend­ing the scope of a sys­tem that’s in real­i­ty anni­hi­lat­ing and arti­fi­cial­is­ing life in all it’s beau­ty.

Abroad, plant and ani­mal die-offs as well as increased aller­gies and intol­er­ances are already being attrib­uted to G.M. With the bio-tech indus­try non­cha­lant­ly unleash­ing its mon­sters, espe­cial­ly across lands in the glob­al south where patent­ed G.M seeds that must be re-bought year­ly exert a stran­gle­hold, it many take gen­er­a­tions to show some of their effects on infi­nite­ly com­plex webs of life that evolved over mil­lions of years. That is, before civilised cul­tures began inten­sive­ly manip­u­lat­ing them, today even down to the nano-scale. With the like of syn­thet­ic biol­o­gy we’re mov­ing fast into a future where even life­forms “in nature” are the prod­ucts of lab­o­ra­to­ry exper­i­ments, and noth­ing remains that isn’t engi­neered some­where along the line by a human-cen­tred sys­tem of sci­en­tif­ic total­i­tar­i­an­ism.

For obvi­ous rea­sons as peo­ple turn­ing against laws and dom­i­na­tion in more than words we also stand against new polic­ing and iden­ti­fi­ca­tion con­trols enabled by more foren­sics, bio­met­rics etc. and the intro­duc­tion of their com­mon use in the infor­ma­tion-age social prison (mobile fin­ger­print­ing, facial recog­ni­tion sys­tems, D.N.A swabs etc. — they did­n’t stop us yet though…).

This isn’t Vin­ci’s only U.K ven­ture into this lucra­tive field either. They’ve also under­tak­en future expan­sions in sci­ence, tech­nol­o­gy and engi­neer­ing depart­ments at Swansea Uni­ver­si­ty. They’ve com­mis­sioned White­head for the job too, their neigh­bours at Van­tage busi­ness park, who are now also marked by our attack. This will be the result for as long as soci­ety steps in line to realise the fan­tasies of a despot­ic sci­ence, reach­ing for their dreams which are our night­mares.

So what about the ‘ben­e­fits’ that these hi-tech insti­tu­tions want to sell us, found­ed as they are on mas­sive ener­gy con­sump­tion and resource extrac­tion, on the author­i­ty of a spe­cial­ist caste’s some­how-unre­proach­able med­dling with our envi­ron­ments, and on the domes­ti­ca­tion of wild spaces and the tor­ture of oth­er ani­mals? They promise us advances in (human) health, food and tech­nol­o­gy, fos­ter­ing the illu­sion that sci­ence can fix all the dam­age incurred by the dom­i­nant ways of liv­ing. They expect us to for­get how many of the dis­eases, dis­or­ders and can­cers are direct­ly caused by the same indus­tri­al out­put, glob­alised mass soci­ety, psy­cho­log­i­cal­ly and phys­i­cal­ly unhealthy habi­tats and tox­ic work­places of a cul­ture which goes toward these labs and more in the first place. They expect us to for­get that agri-mono­cul­ture pro­duc­tion led to an anti-nutri­tious diet of manip­u­lat­ed short-term energising/comfort food at an esca­lat­ing cost to the land, while diverse wild plant and ani­mals species we used to coex­ist with get wiped out by the sys­tem’s end­less expan­sion and pol­lu­tion. (Vin­ci’s works being a prime exam­ple.) They expect us to for­get how it’s pre­cise­ly the advances in com­plex tech­no­log­i­cal sys­tems that gen­er­ate our depen­dance on their design­ers and man­u­fac­tur­ers, alien­ation from our­selves as well as the earth as a whole and each oth­er at the per­son­al lev­el, and increased effi­cien­cy in achiev­ing the goals of soci­ety’s rulers: prof­it and pow­er, through mis­ery and exploita­tion, push­ing the plan­e­tary ecol­o­gy toward col­lapse.

In short the sick­ness is civil­i­sa­tion itself, includ­ing its false solu­tions to its chron­ic prob­lems steadi­ly impov­er­ish­ing sur­vival for human and non-human pop­u­la­tions alike, an unac­cept­able trans­gres­sion on our intent to live freely.

Choos­ing direct action over despair we declare our part in a low-inten­si­ty urban war in its ear­ly stages across Bris­tol against the many faces of the sys­tem, with stones, paint or fire and with the plans, debates and dai­ly refusals; some­times almost imper­ceiv­able, some­times dev­as­tat­ing. In Britain’s ugly cities and inten­sive­ly-man­aged coun­try­side a deter­mined minor­i­ty of rebels and wilder­ness-lovers spo­rad­i­cal­ly take the offen­sive: some strik­ing anony­mous­ly, some form­ing one-off action groups, and some hav­ing test­ed the open pro­pos­al of the Infor­mal Anar­chist Fed­er­a­tion; not only in the south-west but Not­ting­ham, Cam­bridge, Lon­don and now Glas­gow.

Every­thing is at stake to us and we our­selves have no time to waste. Toward recov­er­ing our own voli­tion and find­ing affini­ties for rebel­lion, our meth­ods shall include intractable con­flict with­out pause or nego­ti­a­tion: and much more besides, break­ing with this mis­er­able civ­il order with a wide vari­ety of exper­i­ments and the full scope of our imag­i­na­tions. Destruc­tion is just anoth­er indis­pens­able side of cre­ation (and vice ver­sa) not an oppo­site, we’re now sure of that. Our insur­gency would be jus­ti­fied as an end in itself in the face of this life we’re raised into, but it’s beyond only being reac­tive. It acts to solid­i­fy that we’re already tak­ing back in our face-to-face encoun­ters and in our minds. It allows poten­tial space for new and stronger rela­tion­ships cho­sen by aware indi­vid­u­als mind­ful of all life­forms, through active­ly weak­en­ing the cur­rent modes. Until some point of break­down where what­ev­er comes next is out of any soci­ety-wide con­trol and rea­son­ing, and so beyond soci­ety. Lib­er­a­tion can mean noth­ing less; tend­ing toward the wild.

The inter­na­tion­al and inter­nal bat­tle­ground between anar­chy and dom­i­na­tion holds both loss­es and gains, of which some are known and some unknown to us. With this is mind we start the new year by cel­e­brat­ing the release of Braulio Duran (an unre­pen­tant eco-anar­chist who was held by the Mex­i­can State) last Octo­ber, albeit into the wider prison-soci­ety. When we dis­cov­er sol­i­dar­i­ty with a locked-up com­rade through their atti­tude and words, it does­n’t dimin­ish when they get ‘out’; it just cre­ates more grounds to keep fight­ing toward our mutu­al goals. Still ‘inside’, we remem­ber the total-lib­er­a­tionist Adri­an Gon­za­les and anar­chist ban­dits of the Kozani case as well as Babis Tsil­ian­i­dis; and Mar­co Camenisch, denied parole once again. Respect to the Mi’k­maq War­riors engag­ing the Cana­di­an State/petro-indus­try aggres­sors in incen­di­ary clash­es, a renewed phase of indige­nous mil­i­tan­cy, and to the ones con­sis­tent­ly defend­ing both Khim­ki for­est and the land of Notre-Dames-Des-Lan­des from Vin­ci’s devel­op­ments. A raised fist above the prison walls for Nico­la Gai and Alfre­do Cospi­to aka F.A.I/F.R.I Olga Nucle­us, until cell­blocks are rub­ble and jail­ers are ash.

On a sad­der note, 2012 end­ed with the anar­chist Sebas­t­ian Over­sluij being fatal­ly shot in San­ti­a­go while try­ing to col­lec­tive­ly seize back some of what the banks extract every day from the exploit­ed. Nei­ther a vic­tim or a mar­tyr, we sim­ply see some­one who did­n’t bow their head and accept the sys­tem’s rules, and we are glad to have such peo­ple as com­rades. Even with­in this non­sen­si­cal, resigned and cyn­i­cal mod­ern cul­ture, every action demands a reac­tion. When they kill one of the resisters, our ene­mies must pay in any way. This is how our strug­gle leaves behind emp­ty ges­tures and keeps the dead from falling into obliv­ion. Black­ened offices won’t replace split blood, but they sig­nal that same social war isn’t fin­ished, and our grief births rage.

Infor­mal Anar­chist Fed­er­a­tion (F.A.I) Insur­gents: Bris­tol North

URGENT: Q’eqchi Leaders Attacked with Machetes on Eve of Megadam Construction

August, 2013 funeral for two Q'eqchi children killed in an assassination attempt against an opponent of Hidro Santa Rita's planned dam on Guatemala's Dolores River10th Dec From

August, 2013 funeral for two Q'eqchi children killed in an assassination attempt against an opponent of Hidro Santa Rita's planned dam on Guatemala's Dolores River10th Dec From Guatemala Sol­i­dar­i­ty Project:

Four lead­ers of the Q’eqchi com­mu­ni­ty Monte Oli­vo were attacked and severe­ly injured with machetes by employ­ees of the San­ta Rita hydro­elec­tric com­pa­ny who also car­ried firearms. Police were called but refused to arrest the attack­ers. On Wednes­day the com­pa­ny plans to begin con­struc­tion of a hydro­elec­tric dam that would flood com­mu­ni­ties and destroy the local ecosys­tem. The dam is being con­struct­ed in vio­la­tion of nation­al and inter­na­tion­al law which require con­sul­ta­tion of the com­mu­ni­ties, which strong­ly oppose the project. In August the com­mu­ni­ty was also attacked and two chil­dren were killed in ret­ri­bu­tion to human rights com­plaints filed by the com­mu­ni­ty.

We are extreme­ly con­cerned that fur­ther vio­lence will occur this week in sup­port of the ille­gal dam. The GSP con­demns the attack and calls for the imme­di­ate arrest of those respon­si­ble, includ­ing the intel­lec­tu­al authors of the attack. The GSP calls for the sus­pen­sion of con­struc­tion and imme­di­ate can­cel­la­tion of the ship­ment of machin­ery to the region.

Take Action

1 Call Edgar Vil­lanue­va at the Gutemalan Embassy in the Unit­ed States at (202) 745‑4953 or (202) 745‑3873 and demand the imme­di­ate arrest of those respon­si­ble, includ­ing the intel­lec­tu­al authors of the attack. Also ask for sus­pen­sion of con­struc­tion and imme­di­ate can­cel­la­tion of the ship­ment of machin­ery to the region.

2 Sign our new peti­tion call­ing for jus­tice for Saquimo Setana, a Q’eqchi com­mu­ni­ty locat­ed near­by Monte Oli­vo which has also par­tic­i­pat­ed in mobi­liz­ing against the dam.

3. Sup­port our part­ners through a con­tri­bu­tion to the Guatemala Sol­i­dar­i­ty Project. We are a vol­un­teer run orga­ni­za­tion and all funds go to our part­ners in Guatemala. The best way to donate is to send a check to our fis­cal spon­sor, “UPAVIM Com­mu­ni­ty Devel­op­ment Foun­da­tion” to UPAVIM, PO Box 63, Marsh­field, VT 05658. Please write “GSP” in the notes/memo sec­tion of the check. Or donate online by vis­it­ing http://www.upavim.or/donate Click on the yel­low donate but­ton, then YOU MUST WRITE ‘Guatemala Sol­i­dar­i­ty Project’ for the pur­pose. We thank our fis­cal spon­sor UPAVIM for help­ing us ensure that your con­tri­bu­tions are tax deductible and that all funds (oth­er than bank trans­ac­tion) go to our part­ners in Guatemala.

Italy: Police Arrest Four on Terrorism Charges Against High Speed Rail

tav_corteo030a711_sitonotaveeu--400x300 9th Decem­ber  Police on Mon­day arrest­ed four alleged anar­chists in the north­west­ern Pied­mont and the north­ern Lom­bardy regions on ter­roris

tav_corteo030a711_sitonotaveeu--400x300 9th Decem­ber  Police on Mon­day arrest­ed four alleged anar­chists in the north­west­ern Pied­mont and the north­ern Lom­bardy regions on ter­ror­ism charges.

The four sus­pects were alleged­ly plan­ning to car­ry out attacks using explo­sives against a high-speed train line cur­rent­ly being built between Italy and France, accord­ing to inves­ti­ga­tors.

Pros­e­cu­tors in Piedmont’s region­al cap­i­tal, Turin ordered the arrests after an attempt­ed attack on 13–14 May at a buid­ing site in Chiomonte in Piedmont’s Valle De Susa using molo­tov cock­tails.

Work began this year on the main 58-kilo­me­tre tun­nel, of which 12 km are in Italy, for the 15 bil­lion euro train-link due to go into ser­vice around 2023.

The line will cut three hours off the cur­rent sev­en-hour train jour­ney between Paris and Milan.

But it has sparked fierce oppo­si­tion includ­ing from res­i­dents, envi­ron­men­tal groups and local may­ors. Pro­test­ers claim drilling to build the train link will dam­age the local ecosys­tem and could release poten­tial­ly harm­ful sub­stances into the envi­ron­ment.

Dozens have been arrest­ed and hun­dreds of demon­stra­tors and police injured in vio­lent protests over the high-speed link and scores of envi­ron­men­tal activists sent to tri­al. Far-left ‘black block’ extrem­ists from Italy and oth­er coun­tries have infil­trat­ed the protest move­ment, acc­cord­ing to police.

In 2010, a bul­let was mailed to Turin may­or Ser­gio Chi­ampar­i­no for his sup­port for the project, which Rome has vowed to com­plete.

Con­struc­tion of the high-speed link in Italy was brought to a stand­still by protests before and after the Turin Win­ter Olympics in 2006.

Bullying tactics drive Penan to abandon dam blockade

The abandoned Long Singu longhouse last week after the government rushed through the Penan's move to the unfinished relocation site. 9th Dec Mem­bers of the

The abandoned Long Singu longhouse last week after the government rushed through the Penan's move to the unfinished relocation site. 9th Dec Mem­bers of the Penan tribe from the Malaysian state of Sarawak have bowed to over­whelm­ing pres­sure and aban­doned their 77-day protest against the Murum dam.

Faced with ris­ing waters approach­ing their vil­lages, lack of food at the protest site and the announce­ment that the bridges that led to their vil­lages were going to be dis­man­tled, the Penan felt they had no choice but to halt their block­ade and accept the move to a new gov­ern­ment reset­tle­ment site.

When asked why they had agreed to move one Penan man said, ‘ The water is already very close to our vil­lage. It’s very high’. A local activist told Sur­vival, ‘They went with a very heavy heart, they are not hap­py’.

As part of the agree­ment the Penan were promised a fur­ther RM8000 (approx­i­mate­ly US$2,500) com­pen­sa­tion, tak­ing the total com­pen­sa­tion per fam­i­ly to just over US$7,000. How­ev­er, their oth­er demands includ­ing, cru­cial­ly, the need for more land for plant­i­ng and for­est for hunt­ing and gath­er­ing, have been ignored.

The Penan rely on hunting and gathering in their forests to survive.

The for­est is cru­cial for the Penan. Even the government’s own stud­ies showed that the Murum Penan rely on the for­est for 75% of their sus­te­nance. With­out more for­est it’s hard to see how the Penan will sur­vive in the relo­ca­tion site.

Despite being pres­sured to move, the build­ing of the new site is not yet fin­ished. Two of the long­hous­es are still being worked on. Water sup­plies have not been con­nect­ed; the promised school and clin­ic have not been built and the road con­nect­ing the vil­lages is not com­plet­ed.

The impound­ment (flood­ing) of the dam before all the affect­ed fam­i­lies had agreed to move has caused world­wide out­rage. Despite promis­es from the Sarawak gov­ern­ment that the relo­ca­tion process would meet inter­na­tion­al stan­dards the Penan were not prop­er­ly con­sult­ed and the relo­ca­tion process was shroud­ed in secre­cy.

Sur­vival was told, ‘Peo­ple believed that it would be dif­fer­ent this time, but it has shown to be lies. The gov­ern­ment nev­er took their demands into con­sid­er­a­tion’.

The lawyer act­ing for the Penan has promised that despite this move the Penan will still protest and will con­tin­ue to push for jus­tice in the courts.

Actions on behalf of piers against High Speed Train start

  As it was planned before­hand, yes­ter­day novem­ber the 12th there were actions in sol­i­dar­i­ty with the piers against the Basque project of High Speed Train and obvi­ous­ly, against the pro­je­cyt itself.

  As it was planned before­hand, yes­ter­day novem­ber the 12th there were actions in sol­i­dar­i­ty with the piers against the Basque project of High Speed Train and obvi­ous­ly, against the pro­je­cyt itself. This Sat­ur­day a demon­stra­tion has been organ­ised to den­nounce the lack of pro­por­tion between the pennal­ties against the piers and oth­er well known crim­i­nals (what to say about those ones who are destroy­ing Amalur­ra (Moth­er Earth) and wast­ing loads of pub­lic mon­ey on use­less infra­struc­tures!!!). As you may known, the piers are fac­ing between four and nine years for pieing the cur­rent Navar­ran region­al pres­i­dent Yolan­da Barci­na in a meet­ing for a High Speed net­work between insti­tu­tions of both S’pain and France, and as she was pres­i­dent of this insti­tu­tion.
 
  http://mugitu.blogspot.com.es/
 
  yes­ter­day novem­ber the 12th there were actions all over the basque Coun­try:  in Arru­azu , Cadre­i­ta , Bil­bo , Basauri , Donos­tia, Irun, Orere­ta, Gasteiz, Basauri,  and S’pain: Cáceres, Asturies
  and on the pre­vi­ous days there were actions in Sakana, Barañain and there are more events planned before Sat­ur­day in Lezo, Pasa­ia  and even at Bus­soleno (Italy). The tri­al against the 4 piers  is next Mon­day in Madrid at the High Hear­ing Court. There are sol­i­dar­i­ty and den­nounce activ­i­ties orga­nized there too.

The High Hear­ing Court deals with ter­ror­ism acts, but this is what the author­i­ties are treat­ing the pieing like, like a ter­ror­ist action, and because of that, the 4 and 9 years penal­ties. It’s clear that the aim of this repres­sion is to put peo­ple away from movil­is­ing against big infra­struc­tures and destruc­tion, but as we can see on these days pre­vi­ous to the tri­al and we will see on Sat­ur­day at the demon­stra­tion (there are already bus­es organ­ised from each city and town), what they real­ly pro­voke is more reac­tion.
 
 
 Actions on te 12th Novem­ber
    
Acticvists took over the High Speed train work site in Cadre­i­ta demand­ing imme­di­ate and defin­i­tive ces­sa­tion of work. con­duct­ing a sit for 35 min­utes has pre­vent­ed the con­tin­u­a­tion of the work by climb­ing the machines and unfold­ing ban­ners.

ARRUAZU (Navar­ra): one of the accused is coun­cil­lor of this lit­tle rur­al vil­lage where peo­ple gath­ered to reclaim to be left alone.

Donos­t­ian: peo­ple demon­start­ed out­side the local Court wear­ing cook hats (many actions and per­for­mance are takin place with cooks and cakes as main ingri­di­ent). Activists have reached the bal­cony of the  local Court where they haged a ban­ner in sol­i­dar­i­ty. Two peo­ple were arrest­ed and face a fine

BASAURI: 30 peo­ple gath­ered despite the rain in sol­i­dar­i­ty with the anti-TAV piers .

LEZO — Orere­ta : 25 peo­ple gath­ered and marched.

BILBO : peo­ple demon­strat­ed out­side the Basque region­al Gov­ern­ment

On 9th Novem­ber two activists chained  them­selves from their neck  at the flags of the Navar­ran prov­in­tial gov­ern­ment bal­cony with ban­ners against the High Speed Train and in sol­i­dar­i­ty with the four piers. In the mean­time peo­ple gath­ered out­side scream­ing agan­ist teh High Speed Train and against destruc­tion of Nna­ture. The police tried to cut the D‑locks with shears, find­ing it imposi­ble and end­ing up tak­ing the flags away (and smash­ing a win­dow! … and the flags, obvi­ous­ly) They were arrest­ed spend­ing the night in police sta­tion (they were not pro­vid­ed any matress and they kept the light on for all night). On Sun­day morn­ing were tak­en befor the judge acussed of “Resis­tance and severe des­o­bid­i­ance against the  author­i­ty” (as it should be!!!) resisten­cia y des­obe­di­en­cia grave a agentes de la autori­dad.

Pho­tos: http://ekinklik.org/index.php/es/ultimas-coberturas/411-encadenamiento-contra-el-tav-y-en-solidaridad-con-los-tartalaris

On 7th Novem­ber: 8 activists enroled for the Con­fer­ence Work Com­mu­ni­ty of the Pyre­nees (a pre­vi­ous Con­fer­ence as this was where YBarci­na was pied at before). They were pre­vent­ed from attend­ing it. Instead around 60 peo­ple gath­ered out­side the Con­fer­ence in sol­i­dar­i­ty with the piers and against the High Speed Train. At the end of the event there was a pie war between the demon­stra­tors.
 

Mining Resistance Stories

Anti-fracking protesters on the Seaway International Bridge at Akwesasne, Mohawk territory, Nov 9, 2013.

Anti

Anti-fracking protesters on the Seaway International Bridge at Akwesasne, Mohawk territory, Nov 9, 2013.

Anti-frack­ing pro­test­ers on the Sea­way Inter­na­tion­al Bridge at Akwe­sasne, Mohawk ter­ri­to­ry, Nov 9, 2013.

Akwesasne Anti-fracking Protest Briefly Closes Seaway International Bridge

OTTAWA — The Sea­way Inter­na­tion­al Bridge between Corn­wall and the U.S. was closed for about an hour Sat­ur­day as First Nations pro­test­ers staged an “infor­ma­tion march” in oppo­si­tion to hydraulic frack­ing gas extrac­tion process­es.

First Nations Granted Delay On Shell’s Tar Sands Project

Ear­li­er this week  the Cana­di­an Envi­ron­men­tal Assess­ment Agency (CEAA) announced that a fed­er­al deci­sion on Shell Oil’s Jack­pine Mine Expan­sion, a 100,000 bar­rel per day open pit tar sands mine expan­sion, would be delayed an addi­tion­al 35 days.  At the heart of this deci­sion is the Athabas­ca Chipewyan First Nation who has been speak­ing out against the project since day one cit­ing a vari­ety of con­cerns relat­ing to treaty and abo­rig­i­nal rights as well as  direct and cumu­la­tive envi­ron­men­tal impacts.

Colombia: Mine Opponents Assassinated

Cesar Gar­cía, a campesino leader who opposed the min­ing oper­a­tions of Angl­o­Gold Ashan­ti at La Colosa in the cen­tral Colom­bian depart­ment of Toli­ma, was assas­si­nat­ed Nov. 2 by an unknown gun­man as he worked his small farm at the vere­da (ham­let) of Cajón la Leona. Sup­port­ers said he had been tar­get­ed for his work with the Envi­ron­men­tal Campesino Com­mit­tee of Caja­mar­ca, the local munic­i­pal­i­ty. In a state­ment, the Net­work of Toli­ma Envi­ron­men­tal and Campesino Com­mit­tees said the Caja­mar­ca group had been “stig­ma­tized as ene­mies of progress in the region,” and false­ly linked to the gueril­la move­ment.

 

La Parota Opponent Charged With Terrorism

The Land is Not for Sale! A community in resistance to La Parota dam.

The Land is Not for Sale!

The Land is Not for Sale! A community in resistance to La Parota dam.

The Land is Not for Sale! A com­mu­ni­ty in resis­tance to La Paro­ta dam.

11th Novem­ber

In line with recent state­ments indi­cat­ing a resump­tion of efforts to force through the con­struc­tion of La Paro­ta Dam, the Mex­i­can gov­ern­ment has also launched a new cam­paign of repres­sion against the dam’s oppo­nents.

First, dam oppo­nents warned of increas­ing para­mil­i­tary activ­i­ty in the region. Then came word that the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment is seek­ing to relo­cate entire vil­lages to ham­string the oppo­si­tion to the dam. Now Mar­co Anto­nio Suástegui Muñoz, spokesper­son for the Coun­cil of Eji­dos and Com­mu­ni­ties in Oppo­si­tion to La Paro­ta Dam (CECOP), said the state gov­ern­ment of Guer­rero has issued a war­rant for his arrest on false charges of ter­ror­ism, kid­nap­ping and “attacks on fed­er­al roads.” He denounced these as bla­tant acts of repres­sion relat­ed to his orga­niz­ing work against La Paro­ta.

Suástegui told a CECOP assem­bly that police set up three sep­a­rate road­blocks in an attempt to detain him, with orders to imme­di­ate­ly trans­port him to the max­i­mum secu­ri­ty prison in Tepic, Nayarit. Suástegui was forced to change vehi­cles to evade the road­blocks and reach the assem­bly.

In recent months, Suástegui said, he has been threat­ened by rank­ing state offi­cial Hum­ber­to Sal­ga­do Gómez. “Sal­ga­do Gómez told me: calm your­self, or we’ll put you in jail. Bad peo­ple are watch­ing you. Either we put you in jail, or your life ends,” he said.

Suástegui accused Guer­rero Gov­er­nor Ángel Aguirre Rivero of vio­lat­ing the 2012 Cac­ahu­ate­pec Agree­ment, which com­mit­ted him to cease crim­i­nal­iz­ing or using force against oppo­nents of La Paro­ta dam, and to seek a meet­ing with Mex­i­can Pres­i­dent Enrique Peña Nieto and inform him that La Paro­ta dam will not be approved.

Suástegui also said that in spite of the war­rant, he will remain in his home vil­lage. “If the gov­ern­ment wants to come for me, I will not leave my pueblo [village/community/people]. We will wait for them, ladies and gen­tle­men.”

 

Fierce Infrastructure Battles in Peru

 Indigenous protesters march against Minas Conga mine in defense of their water and lands8th Novem­ber Indige­nous pro­test­ers m
 Indigenous protesters march against Minas Conga mine in defense of their water and lands8th Novem­ber Indige­nous pro­test­ers march against Minas Con­ga mine in defense of their water and lands

Cajamarca: Conga occupation not moved

Campesinos from some 40 pueb­los across Celendín province, in Peru’s north­ern region of Caja­mar­ca, held a meet­ing at Huas­mín vil­lage Oct. 23 to announce a cross-coun­try march that would arrive in mid-Novem­ber at the planned site of the Con­ga gold mine, where marchers would join the encamp­ment that has been estab­lished there [for almost two years]. … (Servin­di, Oct. 25; Celendin Libre, Oct. 23)

Comuneros (com­mu­nal peas­ants) in Celendín’s Yagén pueblo, Corte­gana dis­trict, weeks ear­li­er announced their readi­ness to resist the Chadín II hydro-elec­tric project, to be built by Brazil­ian firm Ode­brecht in the head­wa­ters of the Río Marañón, a major trib­u­tary of the Amazon—with much of of the ener­gy gen­er­at­ed slat­ed for local min­ing oper­a­tions. In a state­ment, the Defense Front for the Inter­ests of Pueblo Yagén said they would reject thecanonof funds offered to local com­mu­ni­ties for devel­op­ment of the project in their area. The state­ment also reject­ed offers of new roads for local com­mu­ni­ties, say­ing they would only facil­i­tate  the despoil­ing of their lands by Odebrecht’s heavy equip­ment. … The state­ment closed with the slo­gan: “Nei­ther Con­ga nor Chadín! Respect the peo­ple!” (Celendin Libre, Sept. 30)

Read the full sto­ry.

Cuzco: unrest over water mega-diversion

In a pop­u­lar assem­bly Nov. 6, res­i­dents of Espinar vil­lage in Peru’s Cuz­co region declared them­selves on a “war foot­ing,” pledigng to resist immi­nent con­struc­tion of the Majes Siguas II irri­ga­tion mega-project, which would divert water from indige­nous com­mu­ni­ties in the high­lands to agribusi­ness inter­ests on the coast. … Lat­er that day, Espinar’s may­or Oscar Mol­lo­huan­ca announced that some 100 police troops had attacked local vil­lagers at Urin­saya in Copo­raque dis­trict, beat­ing five. The where­abouts of one vil­lager has been unknown since the attack. … (Radio Uni­ver­sal, RPP, Nov. 6)

Read the full sto­ry.

Peru: government ultimatum to illegal miners

Peru’s gov­ern­ment has issued an “ulti­ma­tum” to small-scale arti­sanal min­ers in south­ern Puno region, say­ing that if they do not remove their dredges and oth­er equip­ment from the water­sheds of the Ramis and Such­es rivers (which both flow into Lake Tit­i­ca­ca), they will be dyna­mit­ed. …

The state­ment fol­lows weeks of protests by infor­mal min­ers in sev­er­al regions of the coun­try, demand­ing “for­mal­iza­tion” of their claims. A clash with Nation­al Police troops was report­ed Oct. 2 from a min­er road­block at Hua­machu­co, La Lib­er­tad region. The Region­al Fed­er­a­tion of Arti­sanal Min­ers and Small Pro­duc­ers of La Lib­er­atd (FREMARLIB) said two min­ers were killed in the con­fronta­tion, and sev­er­al wound­ed and detained.

Read the full sto­ry.