Huila Community of Colombia Continues to Defend the Earth from Mega-Development. 28th Feb

The New Year in Huila start­ed as 2012 fin­ished, with the Nation­al Author­i­ty of Envi­ron­men­tal Licens­es’ (ANLA) refusal  to hold the ener­gy com­pa­ny Enel-Ende­sa-Emge­sa account­able for fail­ing to com­ply with the envi­ron­men­tal license for the Quim­bo Hydro­elec­tric Project.

The New Year in Huila start­ed as 2012 fin­ished, with the Nation­al Author­i­ty of Envi­ron­men­tal Licens­es’ (ANLA) refusal  to hold the ener­gy com­pa­ny Enel-Ende­sa-Emge­sa account­able for fail­ing to com­ply with the envi­ron­men­tal license for the Quim­bo Hydro­elec­tric Project.

The Comptroller’s Office has con­tin­u­al­ly stud­ied the infor­ma­tion put forth by Asso­ci­a­tion of Affect­ed Peo­ples of the Quim­bo Hydro­elec­tric Project (Aso­quim­bo), and has backed the local com­mu­ni­ties’ demands that the envi­ron­men­tal license be respect­ed in regards to reset­tle­ment, com­pen­sa­tions and envi­ron­men­tal mit­i­ga­tion.  Mean­while in Huila, local media have false­ly report­ed that noth­ing is wrong in the region and have irre­spon­si­bly reduced their report­ing to noth­ing more than pub­lic rela­tions on behalf of the company’s image.

Nonethe­less, through­out Huila, the resis­tance has not only man­i­fest­ed from the com­mu­ni­ties affect­ed by the Quim­bo Dam, but also from the com­mu­ni­ties in Gigante and Garzón affect­ed by petro­le­um com­pa­ny Emer­ald Ener­gy, as well as com­mu­ni­ties in south­ern and cen­tral Huila resist­ing the Mas­ter Advan­tage Plan of the Mag­dale­na Riv­er which would hand over the country´s largest and most impor­tant riv­er in con­ces­sion to the state-owned com­pa­ny HydroChi­na. In addi­tion to the inva­sion of extrac­tive indus­tries to Huila, the regions large amount of cof­fee grow­ers have been impact­ed by the falling price in cof­fee which has pro­gres­sive­ly got­ten worse since the sign­ing of the US free trade agree­ment. As a result, Huila and all of Colombia’s cof­fee grow­ers have also start­ed pres­sur­ing the Colom­bian State that has result­ed injuries in recent days as cof­fee grow­ers have had clash­es with the riot police (ESMAD).

In the cof­fee lands, fruit orchards, and veg­etable fields main­tained by the campesinos around the Miraflo­res Peak, mem­bers of the Inter-sec­toral Asso­ci­a­tion Garzón & Gigante (ASIEG), con­tin­ue to fight to have the envi­ron­men­tal license that would per­mit Emer­ald Ener­gy, a sub­sidiary of the Chi­nese chem­i­cal com­pa­ny, Sinochem to drill for oil in the Paramo of Miraflo­res ecosys­tem. Cur­rent­ly AISEG along with the Region­al Autonomous Cor­po­ra­tion of the Upper Mag­dale­na (CAM) along with CORPOAMAZONIA from the Depart­ment of Caque­ta, are push­ing the Office of Nation­al Nat­ur­al Parks to declare the 122,000 HA of the Paramo de Miraflo­res Peak a Nation­al Nat­ur­al park to help cre­ate a stronger legal mech­a­nisms for pro­tect­ing this area and effec­tive­ly exclud­ing it from any form of oil extrac­tion.

The Mag­dale­na Riv­er, born in south Huila, flows north some 1,528 kilo­me­ters to its delta in the Caribbean Sea. Its drainage basin is near­ly a quar­ter of the country´s nation­al ter­ri­to­ry and two-thirds of the near­ly 46 mil­lion Colom­bians live in this region which pro­duces about 86% of the country´s GDP.  This year, the Mag­dale­na Riv­er will be hand­ed over in con­ces­sion to the com­pa­ny HydroChi­na whose plans for the riv­er are to turn a liv­ing ecosys­tem that sup­ports human and non­hu­man com­mu­ni­ties into the country´s most impor­tant trans­porta­tion cor­ri­dor for cheap goods.

The plan will include dredg­ing the riv­er from Hon­da, Toli­ma all the way to its delta to allow large barges to enter that far up-riv­er from the caribbean delta with­in Colom­bia. Hon­da will be con­nect­ed via high-speed rail­ways to the Pacif­ic-coast port city of Bue­naven­tu­ra as a con­nec­tion between east­ern and west­ern mar­kets.  For the upper area of the Mag­dale­na Riv­er Val­ley the con­ces­sion involves a total of 11 medi­um to large hydro­elec­tric dams to gen­er­ate elec­tric­i­ty for use else­where. Com­mu­ni­ties in south­ern Huila such as Opo­ra­pa, San Agustín, and San Jose de Isnos have all become active in the local resis­tance since the plans for the riv­er were announced last year.

The Impacts are being felt

With sad­ness, mem­bers and allies of the Aso­quim­bo paid farewell to Sain Pedra­zo, a farmer and day labor­er from Ver­acruz, Gigante. Don Sain, known by all who knew him as a sweet, lov­ing and noble man, was an elder and stead­fast war­rior of Aso­quim­bo. He joins at least sev­en oth­er old­er adults from the affect­ed pop­u­la­tion that have passed due to the phys­i­o­log­i­cal trau­ma that the place where they were born, grew up, raised their fam­i­lies and have lived in always, might pos­si­bly be erased. In his own words he said that he would pass before the Dam could be com­plet­ed. “If every­one thinks like me, I am leav­ing before it is my time. I´d rather that no one men­tion that Quim­bo to me, because God does not want it. Though based on what I feel, I am leav­ing here ear­ly. I will not wait for this dis­as­ter to hap­pen. Me with my 72 years of birth and life here, I do feel it and it hurts me hard.”  Don Sain is great­ly missed though his lega­cy of his fight and strug­gle for the love of our ter­ri­to­ry till the very end accom­pa­ny those that con­tin­ue to strug­gle for the lib­er­a­tion of Moth­er Earth in Huila.

On Jan­u­ary 16, Moi­ses Sanchez, a share­crop­per on the Cha­gres Farm in Gigante, along with his fam­i­ly and cat­tle, was forcibly removed from his home by the ESMAD by order of the Gigante’s may­or Ivan Luna.  Bru­tal­ized dur­ing the process, this is anoth­er exam­ple of how laws are applied when they favor Emge­sa-Ende­sa-Enel, though when it comes to the sanc­tions placed against the com­pa­ny and mak­ing sure they are adhered to, the nec­es­sary State insti­tu­tions are nowhere to be found. To date there is still an open inves­ti­ga­tion by the Comptroller´s Office of the ANLA for the vio­la­tions of social and envi­ron­men­tal rights caused by the Quim­bo Hydro­elec­tric Project and dam­ages total­ing an amount over $175 bil­lion (USD) that the com­pa­ny has yet to respond to and the Min­istry of Envi­ron­ment has also been silent on.

In mid-Feb­ru­ary a mas­sive die-off of Tilapia and Bass occurred in the float­ing aqua­cul­ture cages in the Beta­nia Reser­voir that belong to local elites. Over 300 tons of fish des­tined to export to for­eign coun­tries died due to anaer­o­bic con­di­tions in the reser­voir found down riv­er from the Quim­bo con­struc­tion site. A local aqua­cul­ture busi­ness own­er who asked to remain anony­mous accused the Nation­al Fish­ing and Aqua­cul­ture Author­i­ty (Aunap) of doing noth­ing. “The uncon­trolled growth of aqua­cul­ture in Beta­nia threat­ens the eco­log­i­cal bal­ance as well as indus­tri­al aqua­cul­ture,” said the busi­ness own­er.
In 2005, accord­ing to the Plan of Fish and Aqua­cul­ture Order, there were 1,686 cages, eight years lat­er there are 7,000 cages. This over­pro­duc­tion along with pol­lu­tion and high­er sed­i­ment con­tent in the water low­ered the water qual­i­ty and caused the water to lose Oxy­gen pro­vok­ing the mas­sive die off.

Region­al Polit­i­cal Cor­rup­tion and a Chal­lenge

On Jan­u­ary 9th, 2013 Cielo Gon­za­lez was final­ly removed from her posi­tion as gov­er­nor of Huila and her for­mer Sec­re­tary Julio César Tri­ana, was appoint­ed by Pres­i­dent San­tos as the new inter­im gov­er­nor in ear­ly Feb­ru­ary. Pri­or to Tri­ana, Luis Guiller­mo Vélez Cabr­era was serv­ing as inter­im gov­er­nor when he vis­it­ed the con­struc­tion site of the Quim­bo telling local media the “Quim­bo must hap­pen, but the right way.”  He also not­ed that while there had been progress, the company´s delay in the cre­ation of the irri­ga­tion dis­trict Paicol-Tesalia was espe­cial­ly wor­ry­ing. Since Tri­ana has come into office as inter­im-gov­er­nor, he has only men­tioned that Vélez Cabr­era would be the “point per­son” to con­tin­ue work­ing on the project.

On April 14 there will atyp­i­cal elec­tions held in Huila to pick the new gov­er­nor. Aso­quim­bo is call­ing on the peo­ple of Huila to vote in blank and for the Defense of the Ter­ri­to­ry.  Cur­rent­ly all the can­di­dates from the dif­fer­ent par­ties sup­port and helped cre­ate the Depart­men­tal Plan of Devel­op­ment 2012–2015 “Mak­ing Change,” which seeks to use extrac­tive indus­tries as part of Pres­i­dent San­tos “Min­ing-Ener­gy Loco­mo­tive” as a major force in region­al and nation­al devel­op­ment. On the bal­lot, list­ed as a viable option is the “Pro­gram of Uni­ty for Ter­ri­to­r­i­al Defense” that is reg­is­tered with the Nation­al Civic Reg­istry. The out­lined plat­forms the make up the “Pro­gram of Uni­ty for Ter­ri­to­r­i­al Defense” were cre­at­ed through open assem­blies in the com­mu­ni­ties of Agra­do, Garzón, Gigante, Hobo, La Pla­ta, San josé de Isnos, Tar­qui and San Agustín, Huila from Feb­ru­ary 9–17th that focus on pro­tect­ing the local com­mu­ni­ties, economies and the envi­ron­ment.

The Con­stant Hypocrisy of the Nation­al Author­i­ty of Envi­ron­men­tal Licens­es

The lack of con­sis­ten­cy of the Direc­tor of the ANLA, Luz Hele­na Sarmien­to, has only made evi­dent that her role is that of a pup­pet for transna­tion­al com­pa­nies more than a true author­i­ty who absurd­ly has been del­e­gat­ed the respon­si­bil­i­ty of pro­tect­ing the needs of the human and non­hu­man com­mu­ni­ties in Colom­bia.  In late Decem­ber yet anoth­er res­o­lu­tion was passed mod­i­fy­ing the Quimbo´s Envi­ron­men­tal License through Res­o­lu­tion 1142 attempt­ing to help Enel-Ende­sa-Emge­sa remain unac­count­able to the demands placed on it by the comptroller´s Office. As a result, Comp­trol­ler San­dra Morel­li has declared that the ANLA was deep­en­ing the country’s envi­ron­men­tal cri­sis that it had already brought on by its faulty poli­cies. This cri­tique helped elim­i­nate an eco-tourism hotel known as “Los Ciru­e­los” that was planned for the Tay­rona Nation­al Park on the Caribbean Coast by the ANLA through Res­o­lu­tion 0024.

The cri­tiques of Sarmiento´s hypocrisy is that the envi­ron­men­tal impact of the Quim­bo is much greater than that of Los Ciru­e­los tak­ing into account the over 800 Ha of dry-trop­i­cal for­est will be destroyed (the same ecosys­tem that Los Ciru­e­los would affect) and large por­tions of the Ama­zon­ian Pro­tec­tion For­est Reserve.  Since ear­ly Feb­ru­ary the ANLA has denied licens­es for numer­ous com­pa­nies includ­ing Drum­mond, CCX, Prode­co and Gold­man Sachs, who all had plans for coal min­ing in the Depart­ment of Cesar. ANLA denied these solic­i­ta­tions cit­ing these com­pa­nies did not fol­low reg­u­la­tions. This inco­her­ence that direct­ly impacts com­mu­ni­ties is what is push­ing so many to take more direct actions after more than four years of inter­na­tion­al­ly rec­og­nized evi­dence of count­less vio­la­tions of the Quimbo´s envi­ron­men­tal licens­es even after the licens­ing has been changed no less than four times always in ben­e­fit of the com­pa­ny.

Huila, won’t take it no more

On Feb­ru­ary 25, a nation­al strike was orga­nized by cof­fee grow­ers in Antio­quia, Huila, Quindío, Ris­ar­al­da and oth­er cof­fee grow­ing regions. Tens of thou­sands of campesinos through­out Huila blocked roads to pres­sure the gov­ern­ment to take action in help­ing cof­fee grow­ers as a result of the falling prices. In Garzón, clash­es led to over 25 peo­ple being injured and cur­fews being called; mean­while in Nei­va and the roads con­nect­ing Huila with Caque­ta and Putu­mayo, all trans­porta­tion is par­a­lyzed in the region as a result of the strikes. Aso­quim­bo and AISEG are in sol­i­dar­i­ty with the cof­fee grow­ers strike and par­tic­i­pate, as well as pre­pare for more upcom­ing mobi­liza­tions. Mer­cedes Nin­co, a res­i­dent of La Jagua, explained “we are sup­port­ing the cof­fee grow­ers and strik­ing as well. The State´s poli­cies that hurt them are also hurt­ing us.”

What con­tin­ues to be appar­ent is that the Quim­bo and oth­er extrac­tion projects in Huila are only the tip of the ice­berg.  Region­al­ly and glob­al­ly, the meth­ods that gov­ern­ments are using to dis­guise cor­po­rate land grabs, resource extrac­tion, envi­ron­men­tal destruc­tion and forced dis­place­ment as a minor part of “progress” and “devel­op­ment” has nev­er been akin to the world­views of most com­mu­ni­ties affect­ed by these projects. In fact, the strug­gle of move­ments like Idle No More in Cana­da against the Tar Sands and oth­er extrac­tion projects on indige­nous lands, the efforts in the US against the Key­stone Pipeline, or the incal­cu­la­ble amount of com­mu­ni­ties stand­ing up against mines, dams, pipelines, agro-indus­try through­out the world are the same fight.

Since the upris­ings led by the Gai­tana in the 1530s against Pedro de Añas­co and the invad­ing Span­ish forces, the peo­ple of Huila have nev­er been Idle.  While the Cof­fee Grow­ers Strike is build­ing strength and shows no sign of sub­sid­ing any­time soon, through­out Huila com­mu­ni­ties are gath­er­ing forces and prepar­ing for the region­al strike to be ini­ti­at­ed on March 14, the Inter­na­tion­al Day against Dams and For Rivers, Water and Life. The Com­mu­ni­ties affect­ed by the Quim­bo Dam and oth­er extrac­tive indus­tries in Huila call for inter­na­tion­al direct actions in sol­i­dar­i­ty with the peo­ple of Huila with a sim­ple mes­sage, “extrac­tive indus­tries out of the ter­ri­to­ry, repeal the free trade agree­ments and land reform now”. Just like last year when there were numer­ous inter­na­tion­al sol­i­dar­i­ty actions, the peo­ples of Huila are ask­ing for all oth­ers in strug­gle for the Lib­er­a­tion of Moth­er Earth to “flood” Colom­bian Embassies, Con­sulates and the facil­i­ties of the com­pa­nies Enel, Ende­sa, Emge­sa, Emer­ald Ener­gy and HydroChi­na.

Red Lake Pipeline Blockade. 28th feb

Enbridge Ener­gy LP has been tres­pass­ing on Red Lake Nations Ced­ed lands in Min­neso­ta by oper­at­ing mul­ti­ple pipelines with­out an ease­ment. Nizhawen­daamin Indaakim­i­naan, a group of grass­roots Red Lake trib­al mem­bers and allies, demand that the flow of oil through these pipelines be stopped.

Enbridge Ener­gy LP has been tres­pass­ing on Red Lake Nations Ced­ed lands in Min­neso­ta by oper­at­ing mul­ti­ple pipelines with­out an ease­ment. Nizhawen­daamin Indaakim­i­naan, a group of grass­roots Red Lake trib­al mem­bers and allies, demand that the flow of oil through these pipelines be stopped. Enbridge Ener­gy LP pur­chased these oil pipelines from Lake­head Pipeline, who orig­i­nal­ly built these pipelines in 1949 on Red Lake land with­out obtain­ing the per­mis­sion of the Red Lake sov­er­eign nation. Accord­ing to Mar­ty Cobe­nais, pipeline orga­niz­er for Indige­nous Envi­ron­men­tal Net­work and a trib­al mem­ber of Red Lake, “Enbridge Ener­gy LP still does not have per­mis­sion to have these pipelines” on an eight acre piece of Red Lake land just south­east of Leonard, Min­neso­ta.

Today Nizhawen­daamin Indaakim­i­naan have occu­pied the land direct­ly over these pipelines on Red Lake land. They demand that these pipelines be shut down imme­di­ate­ly. “The goal is to stand in sol­i­dar­i­ty not only with our first Nation broth­ers and sis­ters in Cana­da but also to pro­tect our Moth­er Earth and all of our chil­dren and future gen­er­a­tions on this earth,” says Tito Ybar­ra, a mem­ber of Nizhawen­daamin Indaakim­i­naan and an enrolled mem­ber of the Red Lake band of Ojib­we.

It is expect­ed if the occu­pa­tion pro­ceeds for three days, the flow of oil — which may include con­tro­ver­sial tar sands bitu­men extract­ed from Alber­ta, Cana­da — will have to be shut down. The 72-hour count­down has start­ed around rough­ly 3PM Thurs­day.

Sup­port­ers have been invit­ed onto the site by trib­al mem­bers to sup­port the block­ade, and cur­rent­ly vol­un­teer media from the new Unedit­ed­Me­dia col­lec­tive, TC Indy­media & [infor­mal­ly] Occu­pyMN are on site. Inter­net access appears sta­ble enough for @unedit­ed­cam­era to peri­od­i­cal­ly livestream as the camp takes shape for the long haul, also aid­ed by mild weath­er. Also @samRichards10 and Robert Des­Jar­lait (@r_desjarlait) are pro­vid­ing updates. Des­jar­lait tweet­ed “This isn’t a block­ade, as some have report­ed. There is noth­ing to block. It is a non-con­fronta­tion­al protest.” How­ev­er, it does have poten­tial con­se­quences akin to that cre­at­ed by a block­ade.

Addi­tion­al­ly it appears that Enbridge recent­ly scrubbed some con­tent per­tain­ing to con­tro­ver­sial “Line 67” from their web­site. With the dan­ger­ous Tran­scana­da Key­stone XL pipeline intend for tar sands bitu­men mired in polit­i­cal con­tro­ver­sy, the prospects for  extend­ing the capac­i­ty of Line 67, are rel­e­vant to the sit­u­a­tion. (There are sev­er­al pub­lic hear­ings in the region sched­uled on Line 67 in com­ing weeks.)

// UPDATE 3/1/13 11:30AM : Mar­ty Cobe­nais of the Indige­nous Envi­ron­men­tal Net­work issues state­ment on behalf of block­ade pro­test­ers http://www.ustream.tv/uneditedcamera

Stop the Tennessee Pipeline. 26th Feb

Gif­ford Pin­chot, the Penn­syl­va­nia tree-sit­ter that is blockad­ing the route of the Ten­nessee Pipeline from log­ging, stays strong and gives us this update from the trees:

Gif­ford Pin­chot, the Penn­syl­va­nia tree-sit­ter that is blockad­ing the route of the Ten­nessee Pipeline from log­ging, stays strong and gives us this update from the trees:

“Right now there is a march going on across the Delaware Riv­er to stop the pipeline. I wish I could join but I’m afraid that those trees around me wouldn’t still be stand­ing when I returned. It’s wet and rainy and there are no chain saws that I can hear, but I know they are run­ning some­where and so the fight must con­tin­ue. Ten­nessee Gas may not care about these hills and this  com­mu­ni­ty, the state and nation­al gov­ern­ment may not care, but we care and peo­ple who are being poi­soned by the gas indus­try, forced to sell their homes and relo­cate or live next to the destruc­tion wrought in the name of prof­its only the exec­u­tives will see…”

Pin­chot is still in the tree stand as tree crews cut toward him.  No tree crews have showed up on the Pike Coun­ty side of the clear­ing project yet this morn­ing, and activists are pre­pared to call OSHA (Occu­pa­tion­al Safe­ty and Health Admin­is­tra­tion) if log­gers attempt to com­plete the steep slope above Cum­mins Hill Road.  …

These actions are part of a cam­paign oppos­ing the Ten­nessee Pipeline in the Delaware Riv­er Basin. The direct action cam­paign is tak­ing place after near­ly two years of local polit­i­cal lead­ers and grass­roots oppo­si­tion in the courts, pub­lic com­ment, and protest. …

Riot Police Attack Communities Protesting Oil Exploitation in Colombia

After two weeks of peace­ful protest­ing against oil exploita­tion in Arau­ca, on Feb­ru­ary 12 that department’s social orga­ni­za­tions began a strike announced a few days ear­li­er as a response to the repeat­ed bro­ken promis­es by the nation­al gov­ern­ment and transna­tion­al com­pa­nies.

After two weeks of peace­ful protest­ing against oil exploita­tion in Arau­ca, on Feb­ru­ary 12 that department’s social orga­ni­za­tions began a strike announced a few days ear­li­er as a response to the repeat­ed bro­ken promis­es by the nation­al gov­ern­ment and transna­tion­al com­pa­nies.

The last attempt at dia­logue took place on Mon­day, Feb­ru­ary 11, between the Commission’s spokes­peo­ple (com­posed of a del­e­ga­tion of indige­nous peo­ple, peas­ants, youth, women, work­ers and com­mu­ni­ty mem­bers) and rep­re­sen­ta­tives of the Min­is­ter of the Inte­ri­or, as well as oil com­pa­nies that oper­ate in the region, with the goal of estab­lish­ing the con­di­tions that would allow the ful­fill­ment of those promis­es that they’ve been mak­ing since May 2012.

The repeat­ed lack of fol­low-through by the gov­ern­ment and busi­ness­es, and the delay in the nego­ti­a­tion process caused the frac­ture in the space for dia­logue, fol­lowed by the use of state force: approx­i­mate­ly 1,200 mem­bers of the Mobile Anti-Dis­tur­bance Squadron (the ESMAD in Span­ish) arrived to vio­lent­ly evict the com­mu­ni­ties at the protest sites.

The first act occurred on the walk­way San Isidro, over the de Tame road toward the Arau­ca cap­i­tal, at the gate to the petro­le­um com­plex Cari­care, which is used by the transna­tion­al com­pa­ny OXY, where ESMAD, the Police, and the Army assault­ed the mobi­lized com­mu­ni­ties by set­ting fires to the sur­round­ing pas­tures, dis­charg­ing their weapons, destroy­ing com­mon build­ings (a school), tak­ing away the food sup­plies to the pro­tes­tors,  and beat­ing and retain­ing four peo­ple.

As a result of the vio­lence, a preg­nant indige­nous woman who was pass­ing through lost her baby because of the effects of the tear gas, and had to receive emer­gency atten­tion at a med­ical cen­ter.

The police had kept local and nation­al reporters from con­tact­ing CM&, RCN, and oth­er local media that moved to Cari­care; the nation­al army set up a check­point in the sec­tor of Lipa that pro­hib­it­ed the pas­sage of reporters “for secu­ri­ty rea­sons.”  It should be not­ed that in the Quim­bo (Huila) events the police also restrict­ed the pres­ence of the media and act­ed out a series of vio­la­tions of basic human rights and Inter­na­tion­al Human­i­tar­i­an Rights (DIH).

In the face of the this sit­u­a­tion, the Human Rights Foun­da­tion Joel Sier­ra post­ed an Urgent Action which stat­ed its con­cern for the deten­tion of peo­ple, aggres­sion and bru­tal vio­lence exer­cised against the peas­ants and indige­nous peo­ples, the infrac­tions of the Inter­na­tion­al Human­i­tar­i­an Rights com­mit­ted by the police to vio­late and destroy civ­il instal­la­tions, and the removal of sup­plies for feed­ing those protest­ing. The Foun­da­tion also insist­ed that the Colom­bian State respect human rights and the Inter­na­tion­al Human­i­tar­i­an Rights norms.

In sim­i­lar form, Urgent Action denounced a series of vio­la­tions to the pro­tes­tors’ rights by the police, whose mem­bers have ded­i­cat­ed them­selves to con­stant­ly pho­to­graph those that par­tic­i­pate in the protests, have retained, inter­ro­gat­ed, and report­ed some of them, and have appeared in civil­ian cloth­ing and armed in the mid­dle of the night at the edges of the protest sites, among oth­er cas­es.

In the rest of the protest sites, like the gate to the petro­le­um com­plex of Caño Limón in the munic­i­pal­i­ty of Arau­ca, the town of Cari­care in Arauqui­ta, the bicen­ten­ni­al pipeline in Tamacay and el Tigre (Tame) and in Vil­la­m­a­ga (Sar­ave­na) and the fire sub­sta­tion of Banadías (Sar­ave­na), the author­i­ties have sent con­tin­gents from the army, the nation­al police, and the ESMAD, because they fear the same will hap­pen in those places that hap­pened in Cari­care.

It’s impor­tant to note that at this time peo­ple and vehi­cles can­not trav­el by land to get out­side of the depart­ment of Arau­ca by the only two major roads (Casanare and Norte de San­tander), and all com­merce and activ­i­ty is com­plete­ly par­a­lyzed in that region of the coun­try.

EDF suing climate activists for £5 million — protesters face losing homes Wed 20th

EDF suing cli­mate activists for £5million

Evi­dence of police/corporate col­lu­sion as police serve legal papers on activists on behalf of EDF, and hand over per­son­al data

EDF suing cli­mate activists for £5million

Evi­dence of police/corporate col­lu­sion as police serve legal papers on activists on behalf of EDF, and hand over per­son­al data

Key CCTV footage at police sta­tion may have been delet­ed

Counter-Ter­ror­ism Com­mand vis­it­ed activist at home

Home Sec­re­tary There­sa May ques­tioned in Par­lia­ment

For more infor­ma­tion, pho­tos, film footage and inter­views email
press@nodashforgas.org.uk or phone 07447027112. A new short film of two of
the activists speak­ing about the civ­il claim can be seen here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9kTZgMIn4Go

Fol­low­ing the week-long shut-down and occu­pa­tion of EDF’s West Bur­ton gas-fired pow­er sta­tion last Octo­ber by cam­paign group ‘No Dash for Gas’, EDF has launched a civ­il claim for dam­ages against the group and asso­ci­at­ed activists for costs the com­pa­ny claims to have incurred – a fig­ure it puts at £5 mil­lion [1].

Should the claim suc­ceed, sev­er­al of the cam­paign­ers face los­ing their homes, and all could face  bank­rupt­cy or be forced to pay a per­cent­age of their salaries to EDF for decades to come. The amount of the claim rep­re­sents just 0.3% of EDF’s annu­al UK prof­its, which rose by 7.5% this year to £1.7 bil­lion [2].

This is the first time an ener­gy com­pa­ny has attempt­ed such a claim, and cam­paign­ers say it rep­re­sents the open­ing of a new front against peace­ful direct action pro­test­ers. If suc­cess­ful, it could have a chill­ing effect on oth­er groups – such as UK Uncut and Green­peace – who use civ­il dis­obe­di­ence to chal­lenge social and envi­ron­men­tal prob­lems.

Anea­ka Kel­ly, one of the No Dash for Gas defen­dants said: ‘This un-civ­il action by EDF is not about mon­ey – they know we don’t have this kind of cash. EDF just want to make sure that any­one who tries to stand up and chal­lenge their prof­i­teer­ing price hikes, shady gov­ern­ment lob­by­ing and cli­mate-trash­ing pow­er plants is quick­ly silenced by the threat of legal action.”

Six­teen cam­paign­ers occu­pied two chim­neys at West Bur­ton for a week in Octo­ber 2012, stop­ping near­ly 20,000 tonnes of CO2 emis­sions [3]. The activists – 21 in total — were con­vict­ed of aggra­vat­ed tres­pass at
Mans­field Mag­is­trates Court today. Sev­en­teen are due to be sen­tenced on March 20th, and the remain­ing four on April 2nd.

There is evi­dence that Not­ting­hamshire Police col­lud­ed with EDF against ‘No Dash for Gas’ by for­mal­ly serv­ing civ­il papers on the activists after their arrest, and by shar­ing their per­son­al data with the pow­er com­pa­ny. In one case offi­cers served the papers on the activists’ lawyer, in anoth­er they chased an activist down the street out­side the sta­tion and served the papers on him direct­ly, com­ment­ing, “I’m doing this as a
cour­tesy to EDF” [4]. Last week, the Home Sec­re­tary was ques­tioned in Par­lia­ment about whether this kind of prac­tice is rou­tine [5].

The cam­paign­ers believe that Not­ting­hamshire Police’s sup­port for the civ­il claim is part of a larg­er strat­e­gy to crack down on envi­ron­men­tal protest, as evi­denced by the use of extreme­ly oner­ous bail con­di­tions on
the activists after their arrest. They were not allowed to asso­ciate with each oth­er and most were sub­ject to home cur­fews from 9pm to 7am. Those con­di­tions were only lift­ed once the com­pa­ny had ordered its own civ­il legal strat­e­gy against the activists. FOI doc­u­ments obtained by No Dash for Gas show that a Spe­cial Advi­sor in the Depart­ment for Ener­gy was liais­ing with the police about those bail con­di­tions before most of the activists were even arrest­ed. [6]

In anoth­er inci­dent, Counter Ter­ror­ism Com­mand offi­cers vis­it­ed an activist at her home to ‘remind’ her of her bail con­di­tions and cau­tion her against going with­in 50 metres of E.ON’s Grain Island Pow­er Sta­tion.

Deeply con­cerned by police involve­ment in the unprece­dent­ed civ­il claim, the activists’ lawyer Mike Schwarz of Bind­mans wrote to the police ask­ing to view CCTV footage from inside the sta­tion, only to be told it had
prob­a­bly been delet­ed as footage was only kept for three months – despite the fact that this three-month dead­line had not yet passed.

Anea­ka Kel­ly from No Dash For Gas said: “The police are meant to be work­ing in the pub­lic inter­est, not act­ing as EDF’s pri­vate police force. If I want­ed to sue EDF over their pol­lu­tion or their price hikes, would
you expect the police to deliv­er the legal papers to EDF on my behalf, or hand over the names and address­es of their top exec­u­tives? Some­how, I don’t think so.”

The protest itself aimed to chal­lenge the Gov­ern­men­t’s plan to build up to 40 new gas-fired pow­er sta­tions, which would see gas account­ing for over 50% of the UK’s pow­er gen­er­a­tion over the next three decades. The Gov­ern­men­t’s own Com­mit­tee on Cli­mate Change have said that a new “dash for gas” would make it impos­si­ble for the Gov­ern­ment to meet its legal­ly-bind­ing car­bon reduc­tion tar­gets, and thus would push us ever clos­er to the brink of unstop­pable cli­mate change [7].

The Com­mit­tee also point out that a greater reliance on gas would increase house­hold bills by up to six times more than a shift to renew­able ener­gy [8]. These com­ments were echoed this week by the Chief Exec­u­tive of Ofgem Alis­tair Buchanan, who warned that an increased reliance on gas will lead
to high­er prices in the near future [9]. Cam­paign­ers blame the lob­by­ing pow­er of big ener­gy com­pa­nies like EDF for the Gov­ern­men­t’s cur­rent pro-gas posi­tion [10].

The case is rem­i­nis­cent of the record-break­ing “McLi­bel” case, when the fast food chain McDon­alds sued two activists from North Lon­don from 1990–1997. Ewa Jasiewicz, anoth­er No Dash for Gas defen­dant said: ‘This is start­ing to look just like McLi­bel. It’s a David and Goliath bat­tle between pro­test­ers with noth­ing but their bod­ies to put in the way, and out-of-con­trol Big Ener­gy which has a busi­ness plan that will dri­ve up
bills, push mil­lions into fuel pover­ty and crash our cli­mate tar­gets. We will be resist­ing EDF’s claim every step of the way’.

ENDS

Notes for edi­tors

[1] Copies of the legal papers from EDF are avail­able — please email us on
press@nodashforgas.org.uk or phone 07447027112 to see them. The £5 mil­lion
fig­ure was pre­sent­ed in court today, in evi­dence from Graeme Belling­ham,
Project Direc­tor at West Bur­ton’s, who stat­ed that: ‘Delays to the final
com­ple­tion of the project has caused total loss­es to EDF in excess of £5
mil­lion’. See also
http://www.channel4.com/news/edf-sues-activists-for-5m-an-attack-on-peaceful-protest

[2]
http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2013/feb/14/edf-profits-rise-following-price-hike

[3] See
http://www.nodashforgas.org.uk/blog/press-release-campaigners-prevent-carbon-emissions-in-longest-ever-power-station-occupation.
The cam­paign­ers cal­cu­lat­ed that they were stop­ping 2,371 tonnes per day, and the action last­ed for sev­en days, so that’s 2371 x 7 = 19117 tonnes of CO2 saved.

[4] See
http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2013/feb/20/activists-police-edf-law-suit

[5] On Fri­day 8th Feb­ru­ary, Car­o­line Lucas (MP for Brighton Pavil­ion) put for­ward the fol­low­ing ques­tion in Par­lia­ment:

“To ask the Sec­re­tary of State for the Home Depart­ment, what her pol­i­cy is on (a) the pro­vi­sion of
infor­ma­tion by the police to pri­vate com­pa­nies that are plan­ning or tak­ing civ­il legal action against pro­test­ers, where those pro­test­ers may be sub­ject to crim­i­nal pro­ceed­ings, (b) the tim­ing of the pro­vi­sion of such infor­ma­tion and © pro­vi­sion of oth­er prac­ti­cal assis­tance by the police to com­pa­nies tak­ing civ­il pro­ceed­ings, includ­ing ser­vice or qua­si-ser­vice of court papers; whether her Depart­ment has estab­lished any for­mal pro­ce­dures or organ­i­sa­tions to (i) facil­i­tate the flow of any such infor­ma­tion and (ii) estab­lish com­pli­ance with or breach of any such pro­ce­dures and poli­cies; and if she will make a state­ment.”

http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201213/cmordbk2/130212o01.htm#13_

The Home Sec­re­tary has not yet respond­ed.

[6] FOI doc­u­ments avail­able on request — please email us on
press@nodashforgas.org.uk or phone 07447027112 to see them.

[7]
http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/climate-change/tories-dash-for-gas-risks-climate-target-8120153.html

[8]
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2012/dec/13/gas-energy-bills-renewables

[9]
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/energy/9878281/Ofgem-boss-warns-of-higher-energy-prices-in-supply-roller-coaster.html

[10] See for exam­ple
http://www.foe.co.uk/resource/reports/dirty_half_dozen.pdf

Statement from No Dash for Gas on today’s court appearance 20th Feb

Today, 21 No Dash for Gas activists appeared in court, to face charges of aggra­vat­ed tres­pass fol­low­ing the week-long occu­pa­tion of EDF’s West Bur­ton pow­er sta­tion last October/November. All 21 chose to plead guilty, because they felt their time will be bet­ter spent cam­paign­ing against the gov­ern­men­t’s insane dash for gas, rather than being tied up in a pro­tract­ed court case.

Today, 21 No Dash for Gas activists appeared in court, to face charges of aggra­vat­ed tres­pass fol­low­ing the week-long occu­pa­tion of EDF’s West Bur­ton pow­er sta­tion last October/November. All 21 chose to plead guilty, because they felt their time will be bet­ter spent cam­paign­ing against the gov­ern­men­t’s insane dash for gas, rather than being tied up in a pro­tract­ed court case. They are due to be sen­tenced on 20th March and 2 April.

The activists have issued the fol­low­ing state­ment:

“We under­took our care­ful­ly con­sid­ered protest action last Octo­ber out of a sin­cere belief that com­pa­nies such as EDF, in col­lu­sion with gov­ern­ment, are unac­count­able, unrep­re­sen­ta­tive and wrong in pur­su­ing gas as a dom­i­nant fuel in our coun­try’s ener­gy sys­tem.

We have no influ­ence over where and how our ener­gy is sourced, priced and deliv­ered in this coun­try. We believe that these deci­sions should be made demo­c­ra­t­i­cal­ly and in the pub­lic inter­est.

Six large multi­na­tion­al cor­po­ra­tions have a monop­oly over our domes­tic ener­gy sup­ply and some of their per­son­nel write pol­i­cy at the Depart­ment for Ener­gy and Cli­mate Change. These com­pa­nies set the ener­gy agen­da in this coun­try, to the detri­ment of the pub­lic inter­est and legal­ly bind­ing car­bon reduc­tion tar­gets. We do not have the pow­er, access or cap­i­tal that these com­pa­nies have. Civ­il dis­obe­di­ence is one of the only means we have to inter­vene in this agen­da.

The major­i­ty of peo­ple in this coun­try want clean, renew­able, cheap­er ener­gy. We act­ed out of neces­si­ty and, we sin­cere­ly believe, in the pub­lic inter­est — to pre­vent an esca­la­tion in the cri­sis of cli­mate change that threat­ens the safe­ty and secu­ri­ty of mil­lions of peo­ple and ecosys­tems in the UK and around the world.”

Blockade at Fracking Waste Storage Facility

This morn­ing 19th Feb, pro­test­ers block­ad­ed a Frack­ing Waste Stor­age Facil­i­ty in New Mata­moras, OH. Truck traf­fic to the facil­i­ty was dis­rupt­ed for 2.5 hours. As of this post­ing, a mono­pod is still in place on the site.

This morn­ing 19th Feb, pro­test­ers block­ad­ed a Frack­ing Waste Stor­age Facil­i­ty in New Mata­moras, OH. Truck traf­fic to the facil­i­ty was dis­rupt­ed for 2.5 hours. As of this post­ing, a mono­pod is still in place on the site.

In an unprece­dent­ed show of uni­ty against the extrac­tion indus­try mem­bers of  Appalachia Resist!Tar Sands Block­ade, Rad­i­cal Action for Moun­tain Peo­ples’ Sur­vival (RAMPS), a coali­tion of indige­nous lead­ers includ­ing rep­re­sen­ta­tives from No Line 9 and the Unis’tot’en Camp, Great Plains Tar Sands Resis­tance, and Earth First! chap­ters from across the coun­try have gath­ered in South­ern Ohio to par­tic­i­pate in and sup­port this action.  This is the lat­est in an ongo­ing and esca­lat­ing cam­paign of resis­tance to the dan­ger­ous and exploita­tive resource extrac­tion indus­try that is threat­en­ing the exis­tence and sur­vival of the earth and all of it’s inhab­i­tants world-wide.

 

 

“Cancel Keystone Pipeline:” Largest Climate Protest in U.S. History

Between 35,000 and 50,000 peo­ple ral­lied in Wash­ing­ton, DC on Sun­day, Feb 17th in the largest glob­al warm­ing protest in U.S. his­to­ry. The pri­ma­ry demand: ditch the Key­stone XL tar sands pipeline.

Between 35,000 and 50,000 peo­ple ral­lied in Wash­ing­ton, DC on Sun­day, Feb 17th in the largest glob­al warm­ing protest in U.S. his­to­ry. The pri­ma­ry demand: ditch the Key­stone XL tar sands pipeline.

Read some tes­ti­mo­ni­als here from women who trav­eled to DC to protest the pipeline.

Mean­while, in spite of vague promis­es to take action to avert cat­a­stroph­ic glob­al warm­ing, Obama’s admin­is­tra­tion is gear­ing up for a big frack­ing push to accel­er­ate nat­ur­al gas min­ing.

Just another manic monday.

Glen­gad com­pound invad­ed and work stopped for over 3 hours. Traf­fic con­trol out of con­trol.

Glen­gad com­pound invad­ed and work stopped for over 3 hours. Traf­fic con­trol out of con­trol.

On a sun­ny dawn after a suc­cess­ful nation­al cam­paign meet­ing at the week­end, cam­paign­ers decid­ed to take to the bog and stop work on the Glen­gad com­pound where Shell are cur­rent­ly exca­vat­ing the recep­tion pit for the tun­nel bor­ing machine.

All the pro­test­ers man­aged to breach the rag­tag fences and two decid­ed to rest them­selves upon a Shell dig­ger.
Work was stopped for over 3 hours on the com­pound.

Protest con­tin­ued with a road block­ade but when dig­gers recom­menced there work, pro­test­ers ran back to the com­pound and tried once more to breach the fences and stop work.

After a short scuf­fle with Shell secu­ri­ty IRMS pro­test­ers moved back to block­ade trucks for the rest of the day.
 

Relat­ed Link: http://www.shelltosea.com
 

Protesters continue to frustrate Shell’s work 17th Feb

This last week has been anoth­er week of resis­tance to Shell con­tro­ver­sial pipeline, with numer­ous truck block­ades and dis­rup­tion to work­ers

This last week has been anoth­er week of resis­tance to Shell con­tro­ver­sial pipeline, with numer­ous truck block­ades and dis­rup­tion to work­ers

In sol­i­dar­i­ty with our friend Izzy Ní Ghraidm, we have con­tin­ued to keep up the pres­sure on Shell by block­ing trucks and work­ers through­out the day.
Shell work­ers arrive at 6.30am and there are up to 105 truck move­ments per day so there’s plen­ty of chance to show your oppo­si­tion and sup­port the local com­mu­ni­ty.

Shell was forced to admit that they had been expe­ri­enc­ing prob­lems with the Tun­nel Bor­ing Machine after it was announced on the radio that work on the tun­nel had resumed.
How­ev­er just days after this was announced there are rumours fly­ing of fur­ther prob­lems.

As the pho­to of Glen­gad shows, the Shell com­pound has expand­ed and is now just next to the old camp field. It is a real eye­sore on this beau­ti­ful land­scape but it is not too late to stop it.
Come up and sup­port this com­mu­ni­ty under siege from Shell.
 

Relat­ed Link: http://www.shelltosea.com