Stop the Weymouth Relief Road Update & Videos — wish list & overhanging branch tactic!

Lat­est news: a tech­ni­cal­i­ty has meant a tree top protest against a new £87m relief road scheme in Dorset has con­tin­ued despite a legal rul­ing.

The gov­ern­ment has giv­en the go-ahead for the Wey­mouth relief road and Dorset Coun­ty Coun­cil secured a land pos­ses­sion order to evict pro­tes­tors.

2 Mile Coppice in summer timeLat­est news: a tech­ni­cal­i­ty has meant a tree top protest against a new £87m relief road scheme in Dorset has con­tin­ued despite a legal rul­ing.

The gov­ern­ment has giv­en the go-ahead for the Wey­mouth relief road and Dorset Coun­ty Coun­cil secured a land pos­ses­sion order to evict pro­tes­tors.

But the demon­stra­tion, which began last Thurs­day, was con­tin­u­ing on Fri­day and has delayed work at Two Mile Cop­pice.

Pro­tes­tors have now occu­pied a tree branch over­hang­ing neigh­bour­ing land.

In the morn­ing, Dorset Coun­ty Coun­cil served a com­pul­so­ry pur­chase order on the land which meant the pro­tes­tors were legal­ly required to leave.

While the oak tree they are in is on land cov­ered by the notice, the branch they occu­py over­hangs adja­cent Wood­land Trust land.

——–

Tat list — What we need

And lat­est update (Sat­ur­day 20th Decem­ber):-

www.greenvoice.com — short­ly to be a web space for us

PLEASE CIRCULATE

update– we have an address of sorts, and dona­tions and xmas gifts would be great !”!!

Cash is ok to send as it is a secure post box, but phonecards for Orange are bet­ter than cash.
Also need AAA and AA bat­ter­ies — Dura­cell and Ener­gis­er or alka­line ONLY.
Rope — Green or blue polypro­pe­lene — 6mm or 10mm thick­ness.
Rope — Sta­t­ic climb­ing line — 10mm or larg­er.
Rope — Dynam­ic climb­ing line — any thick­ness
Rope — arborist lines — we have 2 tree sur­geons liv­ing with us and this rope is use­ful.

sec­ond hand rope is nor­mal­ly FREE from climb­ing cen­tres ‑indoor cen­tres often throw their ropes out every 6 ‑9 months — just call in and ask for it.

Tarps, plas­tic sheet­ing.

Tools — ham­mers, nails, saws, prun­ing saws, bill hooks.

2 way radios, nightvi­sion gog­gles, cat­a­pults (to get rope up), grap­pling hooks. Head torch­es — LED are best.

The Wood­land Trust still own the land that the road is being built on, but have waived their 14 days notice peri­od and told Dorset Coun­ty Coun­cil that it is ok to get on with cut­ting down the Ancient wood­land — basi­cal­ly they have thrown in the tow­el with­out even stand­ing up to argue or delay the destruc­tion on their land. The fact that the Wood­land Trust still own the land was record­ed in the Court case of the 18th decem­ber 2008 of Dorset
Coun­ty Coun­cil ’ v ’ Per­sons Unknown in Wey­mouth Coun­ty Court. Her Majesty’s Land Reg­istry in Ply­mouth also con­firmed it.

The peo­ple of Wey­mouth brought Two Mile Copse through pub­lic sub­scrip­tion. Local peo­ple dug deeply into their pock­ets and put their mon­ey into con­serv­ing the land for per­pe­tu­ri­ty, for us and all future gen­er­a­tions.

Dorset Coun­ty Coun­cil have so far not giv­en one pen­ny in com­pen­sa­tion, either to the Wood­land Trust, nor local peo­ple who raised the pub­lic mon­ey to pre­serve the wood in the first place.

—————————-

More update:-

Hi Ho!, HO!, Ho!

Liv­ing up 6 trees at wey­mouth — Two Mile Copse / Ted­dy Bear Woods. I helped fight against
this road back in 1996, and 2004 and we won it then.

BUT now they gone and done it and cut 70% of the trees.….

We have a 400 year old Oak in Ancient Wood­land that’s are pro­tect­ing and 4 Ash trees reach­ing 90 feet up into the sky. Also a tall and healthy young elm.

We have a tree house, a net, lots of walk­ways in the sky and an off route vis­i­tors site on the ground.

GET HELP + MEDIA now if u can.

regards

2 Mile Copse Protest Camp
c/o Lor­ton Barn
Lor­ton Lane
Lit­tle­Moor
Wey­mouth
DT3 5QH

Sor­ry we cur­rent­ly are in the process of arrang­ing a site mobile phone — num­ber to fol­low
short­ly

Links/more below & in pre­vi­ous sto­ry.

—–

Fol­low­ing from the Stop the Wey­mouth Relief Road bul­letin. Appar­ent­ly there is a chain­saw gang now oper­at­ing 1.5 miles fur­ther North from Lit­tle­moor, between Lit­tle­moor and Ridge­way. There are 3 pro­test­ers down there but they need more back up. I have been in con­tact with the pro­test­ers occu­py­ing the sight at Lit­tle­moor. They are in urgent need of more sup­port from locals to help on the ground and oth­ers to help build tree hous­es along the route, all help would be great­ly appre­ci­at­ed.

On site mobiles are 07792717821 / 07807952822

—–
Videos: 1 | 2

COUNCIL chiefs will go to court tomor­row in a bid to remove a grow­ing num­ber of pro­test­ers from the route of Weymouth’s planned relief road.

It comes as the stand-off inten­si­fied in Two Mile Cop­pice as eco-war­riors began mov­ing a fence and telling secu­ri­ty staff it encroached too far into the ancient wood­land.

But today Dorset Coun­ty Coun­cil is hop­ing to be grant­ed pos­ses­sion of the land by Wey­mouth Coun­ty Court.

The coun­cil is ask­ing the court to rule that the pro­test­ers must leave the prop­er­ty, and if they agree to that request, when they must leave.

The num­ber of pro­test­ers reached sev­en as a camp was set up beneath an oak tree that stands alone in the fenced off area of the woods.

Four pro­test­ers set up camp and roped off their own area below three more based up inside the tree.

One new arrival, known only as Andy, said: “We are here to stop the road as there are many rea­sons why the wood­land should not be chopped down.

“The oak tree we are in and beneath is hun­dreds of years old.

“We heard about the peo­ple here and want­ed to come to sup­port the action.

“We can help pro­vide food and what­ev­er else they need in the tree.

“If you let the coun­cil go ahead with the road it won’t be long before they want to chop more of this beau­ti­ful wood­land down for devel­op­ment.

“The road won’t actu­al­ly help pre­vent traf­fic con­ges­tion in the end any­way.”

A coun­cil spokesman con­firmed clear­ance work is con­tin­u­ing in the west­ern edge strip of Two Mile Cop­pice and said it is hoped this will be fin­ished before Christ­mas.

She said: “There is a coun­ty court hear­ing today where the coun­ty coun­cil will be ask­ing for an order for the tres­passers to hand over the land to the pos­ses­sion of the coun­cil.”

Nick Pep­per, 41, has camped in the woods since he came down from a tree which has now been chopped down.

Mr Pep­per, who pre­vi­ous­ly lived in Wey­mouth but now lives in Bris­tol, said: “As soon as we received the legal papers to evict the tree we thought we’d bet­ter have a legal­ly legit­i­mate sup­port camp.

“We are pro­tect­ed under the 1977 Crim­i­nal Law Act which stops us from being legal­ly evict­ed or ille­gal­ly assault­ed.

“We’ve actu­al­ly squat­ted in an area of land so we can pro­tect the peo­ple up the tree from intim­i­da­tion or ille­gal activ­i­ty.

“There needs to be open access so we can mon­i­tor what’s going on.”

Forest and climate activists shut down Gunns’ Triabunna mill woodchip mill, Tasmania

2008-12-16
Sev­en activists were charged with tres­pass today after shut­ting down Gunns’ Tri­abun­na mill for over sev­en hours this morn­ing. Fif­teen peo­ple occu­pied the wood­chip mill at 4:45am, with sev­en activists attach­ing them­selves to a con­vey­or belt and oth­er machin­ery.

FIFTEEN FOREST AND CLIMATE ACTIVISTS SHUT DOWN TRIABUNNA WOODCHIP MILL, TASMANIA2008-12-16
Sev­en activists were charged with tres­pass today after shut­ting down Gunns’ Tri­abun­na mill for over sev­en hours this morn­ing. Fif­teen peo­ple occu­pied the wood­chip mill at 4:45am, with sev­en activists attach­ing them­selves to a con­vey­or belt and oth­er machin­ery.

“The Car­bon Pol­lu­tion Reduc­tion Scheme White Paper makes it plain that the Fed­er­al ALP is not com­mit­ted to ‘seri­ous and cred­i­ble’ emis­sions reduc­tions. There is a fail­ure by pol­i­cy mak­ers to grasp that we are fac­ing a cli­mate emer­gency – the poli­cies pro­posed by the White Paper will result in the dis­ap­pear­ance of Tas­ma­ni­a’s unique alpine ecosys­tems, the col­lapse of the Bar­ri­er Reef, and the sali­na­tion of Kakadu,” Huon Val­ley Envi­ron­ment Cen­tre spokesper­son said.

“Tar­gets of a 5% reduc­tion by 2020 are piti­ful and inter­na­tion­al­ly humil­i­at­ing. The Aus­tralian Gov­ern­men­t’s increased assis­tance to large emit­ters pro­vides a clear demon­stra­tion that their pri­or­i­ties lie with heav­i­ly pol­lut­ing big busi­ness, and not with Aus­trali­a’s peo­ple and nat­ur­al envi­ron­ment,” War­rick Jor­dan said.

“In Tas­ma­nia, the log­ging, burn­ing and wood­chip­ping of old growth for­est releas­es mas­sive quan­ti­ties of car­bon. Gunns Lim­it­ed is the dri­ver of this gross­ly irre­spon­si­ble and moral­ly rep­re­hen­si­ble sit­u­a­tion,” Still Wild Still Threat­ened spokesper­son said.

“Gunns hides this immense cli­mate crime behind offi­cial car­bon account­ing fig­ures which exclude the log­ging of native for­est. Tas­ma­ni­a’s old growth forests are glob­al­ly sig­nif­i­cant as unique ecosys­tems and car­bon stores, and their pro­tec­tion can play a sig­nif­i­cant role in Aus­tralia tak­ing real cli­mate action,” SWST

“The Tas­man­ian Gov­ern­ment has pub­licly expressed a will to address cli­mate change. If the Bartlett gov­ern­ment is seri­ous about address­ing cli­mate change then it will leg­is­late an end to old growth log­ging” con­clud­ed SWST.

Scottish coal rail terminal shut down by local residents and Climate campaigners

15/12/2008: this morn­ing thir­ty cam­paign­ers from Coal Action Scot­land togeth­er with local res­i­dents peace­ful­ly block­ad­ed the entrance to the Scot­tish Coal-oper­at­ed Raven­struther coal rail ter­mi­nal in South Lanark­shire. Hav­ing stopped its reopen­ing after the week­end, this action is cur­rent­ly pre­vent­ing the deliv­ery of thou­sands of tonnes of coal to pow­er sta­tions across Scot­land. Pro­tes­tors intend to stay in place as long as pos­si­ble.

Lanarkshire coal action tripod15/12/2008: this morn­ing thir­ty cam­paign­ers from Coal Action Scot­land togeth­er with local res­i­dents peace­ful­ly block­ad­ed the entrance to the Scot­tish Coal-oper­at­ed Raven­struther coal rail ter­mi­nal in South Lanark­shire. Hav­ing stopped its reopen­ing after the week­end, this action is cur­rent­ly pre­vent­ing the deliv­ery of thou­sands of tonnes of coal to pow­er sta­tions across Scot­land. Pro­tes­tors intend to stay in place as long as pos­si­ble.

With Scotland’s CO2 emis­sions increas­ing sig­nif­i­cant­ly, con­tin­u­ing the con­sump­tion of coal will make it impos­si­ble for Scot­land to meet its 80% tar­get reduc­tion in CO2 emis­sions by 2050. Angus Mcloud said “The fact is that the gov­ern­ment will not meet its own tar­gets. This con­firms what cli­mate pro­tes­tors have believed all along – that the Scot­tish gov­ern­ment is pay­ing lip ser­vice to the dan­gers of cli­mate change.”

The action is aim­ing to dis­rupt the oper­a­tions of Scot­tish Coal and Scot­tish Pow­er in the region. The pro­tes­tors are act­ing to oppose the five open cast coal mines that deliv­er coal to the rail ter­mi­nal and in resis­tance to the thir­teen new open cast coal mines due to open in Scot­land.

Pro­tes­tors erect­ed and scaled a 15ft scaf­fold­ing tri­pod, block­ing trucks from enter­ing the ter­mi­nal. Oth­ers are locked by their necks to a con­vey­or belt and a bull­doz­er, pre­vent­ing coal stock­piles from being loaded onto trains.

Tilly Gif­ford who is at the site said: “In the face of dan­ger­ous run­away cli­mate change, increas­ing our depen­dence on coal – the most pol­lut­ing of the fos­sil fuels – is sim­ply unac­cept­able. We urgent­ly need to make the tran­si­tion to renew­able ener­gy and close exist­ing mines. We shouldn’t even be think­ing about new ones.”

The demon­stra­tion today is in sup­port of com­mu­ni­ties oppos­ing new open cast mines. Rebec­ca Macken­zie, a local res­i­dent said: “We’re here today to send a clear mes­sage that we don’t want parts of Scot­land such as South Lanark­shire to become the most heav­i­ly mined areas in Europe, as they will be if per­mis­sion is grant­ed for all the new open cast coal mines cur­rent­ly being pro­posed. If sites such as Main­shill near Dou­glas can’t be stopped through legal avenues, then action will have to be tak­en to make sure these last remain­ing areas of un-mined coun­try­side aren’t destroyed”.

Beth Whe­lan, the cam­paign­er perched on the scaf­fold­ing tri­pod, said: “Local author­i­ties, the Scot­tish gov­ern­ment and com­pa­nies such as Scot­tish Coal and Scot­tish Pow­er are ignor­ing the sci­en­tif­ic evi­dence on cli­mate change. We have to take respon­si­bil­i­ty for our cli­mate and our future, and stop the coal indus­try and its expan­sion. This is what we doing today: act­ing respon­si­bly”.

It is esti­mat­ed that 6,380 tonnes of coal were stopped from being trans­port­ed from the coal mines to pow­er sta­tions, equiv­a­lent to 11,675,400 kg CO2 (11,675.4 tonnes) released into the atmos­phere.

Coal Action Scot­land apol­o­gizes to any work­ers affect­ed by today’s demon­stra­tion, but in rec­og­niz­ing the des­per­ate need to stop burn­ing coal sees no oth­er choice but to tar­get the com­pa­nies respon­si­ble for min­ing it.

The action last­ed over 8 hours and result­ed in 6 arrests and not a sin­gle chunk of coal was trans­port­ed from the ter­mi­nal.

http://coalactionedinburgh.wordpress.com/

Kelsterbach protest against airport extension, camp news & upcoming events, frankfurt / germany

On Sun­day, 14.12. about 150 peo­ple demon­strat­ed in the for­est of Kel­ster­bach (near Frank­furt / Main) against the con­struc­tion of the new run­way north of the cur­rent air­port site.

No Night Flights (German)On Sun­day, 14.12. about 150 peo­ple demon­strat­ed in the for­est of Kel­ster­bach (near Frank­furt / Main) against the con­struc­tion of the new run­way north of the cur­rent air­port site.

To famil­iar­ize with the sur­round­ing of the for­est, which fra­port (the com­pa­ny which runs the air­port) wants to destroy and in view of the area which prob­a­bly will be cleared first, the demon­stra­tion moved trough the for­est towards the air­port grounds, along the cur­rent path to where the road Okriftel­er crossed the motor­way 3 and the fast-train tracks. Through­out the Kel­ster­bach­er for­est are the prepara­to­ry mea­sures (removal of muni­tions, sub-wood and ani­mals) large­ly com­plet­ed. Among the prepara­to­ry mea­sures include mark­ing work on the trees. These were from the demon­stra­tors numer­ous and var­ied with paint and spray cans sup­ple­ment­ed, so that the ori­en­ta­tion for forestry work­ers in the for­est in the future will be more dif­fi­cult.

At the bridge on the ICE route had already post­ed the cops and blocked the tran­si­tion towards sound­proof­ing wall of the air­port. Under the obser­va­tion of a police heli­copter there was a short ral­ly, while on the road Okriftel­er many new slo­gans against the expan­sion were paint­ed.

The for­est walk was a good step from the activist lethar­gy of the past few months!

Upcom­ing events:

4th Jan­u­ary 2009: The first colour­ful walk in the forests in the new year will again explore the area and make the extent of for­est destruc­tion clear. Meet­ing: 14 clock For­est Camp

From the 12th Jan­u­ary 2009: pos­si­ble grub­bing begin­ning, Day X
Day X is the day on which the site is fenced and / or with the clear­ing work is begun. Get on the alarm lists (soon under www.waldbesetzung.blogsport.de or in the for­est camp)!

14th Jan­u­ary 2009: demon­stra­tion togeth­er with pupils, stu­dents and oth­ers against the Hes­s­ian con­di­tions in Frank­furt. Check: www.14januar.de

Even between the years, there will be activ­i­ties around the camp and against the expan­sion type. Keep you updat­ed on www.waldbesetzung.blogsport.de or www.flughafen-bi.de

Pre­vi­ous sto­ries about the camp: 1 | 2

Stop the new Leeds Opencast

Join us on Sat­ur­day 10th Jan­u­ary 2009 to march around the pro­posed open cast coal mine site at New­ton Lane, near Fair­burn Ings nature reserve and Castle­ford.

YANC SAYS:

NO CO2AL HOLE

It’s time to say NO!

We don’t want a dirty open­cast coal site adding to cli­mate change

Join us on Sat­ur­day 10th Jan­u­ary 2009 to march around the pro­posed open cast coal mine site at New­ton Lane, near Fair­burn Ings nature reserve and Castle­ford.

YANC SAYS:

NO CO2AL HOLE

It’s time to say NO!

We don’t want a dirty open­cast coal site adding to cli­mate change

Join us on Sat­ur­day 10th Jan­u­ary 2009 to march around the pro­posed open cast coal mine site at New­ton Lane, near Fair­burn Ings nature reserve and Castle­ford. Meet at the White Horse in Led­ston at 12 noon for a 12:30 start. We will take a route on pub­lic rights of way around and through the pro­posed open cast site. The walk should take no more than an hour.

This protest event will be a joint ven­ture between YANC (York­shire Against New Coal) and RAGE (Res­i­dents Against Green­belt Expan­sion).

For a map of the area includ­ing loca­tion of Led­ston, see the RAGE web­site at: www.savefairburnings.org.uk

White Horse pub post­code is WF10 2AB. Add this post­code to mul­timap for direc­tions.

Mul­timap link: http://www.multimap.com/maps/?qs=WF10+2AB&countryCode=GB

We will have some ban­ners and plac­ards but please feel free to make and bring your own.

Media will be invit­ed.

If we are to tack­le cli­mate change, coal must be left in the ground. We need clean, green renew­able tech­nol­o­gy, ener­gy effi­cien­cy and decen­tralised ener­gy.

Your New Years Res­o­lu­tion? To stop cli­mate change!

For fur­ther infor­ma­tion see the YANC web­site: www.yanc.org.uk or find us on Face­book.

York­shire Against New Coal
events@yanc.org.uk

Titnore Woods battle goes on! Upcoming events & update

DETERMINED eco-pro­test­ers in Wor­thing are fac­ing up to the hard­est chal­lenge yet in their two and a half year occu­pa­tion of threat­ened wood­land.

Trees drawingDETERMINED eco-pro­test­ers in Wor­thing are fac­ing up to the hard­est chal­lenge yet in their two and a half year occu­pa­tion of threat­ened wood­land.

The freez­ing tem­per­a­tures and stormy con­di­tions mean life is cur­rent­ly no pic­nic for the hardy pro­test­ers camped out in Tit­nore Woods, West Dur­ring­ton, in a last-ditch bid to try and stop a new hous­ing estate and Tesco mega­s­tore from being built over green fields and ancient wood­land.

And grate­ful local sup­port­ers are organ­is­ing a pre-Christ­mas stall in the town cen­tre to bring fes­tive cheer to the tree-house dwellers, who moved onto the site back in May 2006.

They will be col­lect­ing pro­vi­sions for the pro­test­ers under the title “A Ham­per for a Camper” at Hold­er’s Cor­ner, Mon­tague Street, Wor­thing, on Sat­ur­day Decem­ber 20, from 11am.

It wasn’t an easy option when the team of eco-heroes sneaked onto the threat­ened ancient wood­land off Tit­nore Lane at the crack of dawn on a May bank hol­i­day and start­ed build­ing their tree homes before any­one knew what was hap­pen­ing.

Most peo­ple assumed they’d be kicked off again straight away, but the days turned to weeks turned to months turned to years and they’re still there!

The final plan­ning appli­ca­tion isn’t even through yet — they had to rethink part of it — and you can still object, writ­ing to the Wor­thing Bor­ough Coun­cil plan­ning depart­ment at Port­land House, Rich­mond Road, Wor­thing and quot­ing WB/04/00040/OUT.

But, sad­ly, Wor­thing cam­paign­ers against the devel­op­ment have already dis­cov­ered through years of cam­paign­ing, let­ter-writ­ing, peti­tion-rais­ing and large, peace­ful, demon­stra­tions that mon­ey and pow­er don’t lis­ten to the lit­tle peo­ple who know the dif­fer­ence between right and wrong.

We live in a world where even if police com­mit mur­der or theft they can get com­plete­ly off the hook.

We live in a world where politi­cians can lie through their teeth, start wars that kill hun­dreds of thou­sands of peo­ple, and get away with it. We live in a world that is being choked to death by the blind greed of cap­i­tal­ism and yet we are told there is no oth­er option.

The Tit­nore campers are part of that big­ger pic­ture — they have the guts to phys­i­cal­ly put them­selves on the line and say ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!

Please sup­port them in any way you can — food, sup­plies, a friend­ly vis­it.

There are tough times ahead and we all need to be there for each oth­er.

* 1990s road pro­test­er Jim Hin­dle will be giv­ing a talk at 8pm on Thurs­day Jan­u­ary 29 upstairs at The Rest in Bath Place, Wor­thing. All wel­come.

Santas Against Excessive Consumption, London UK, Xmas 08

Five brave coun­ter­cul­ture war­riors don San­ta Suits, sing anti-con­sumerist and anti-cap­i­tal­ist Xmas car­ols, and leaflet for more mind­ful atten­tion to love, gifts, and cat­a­stroph­ic cli­mate change – in Oxford Street, in the heart of the shop­ping dis­trict of Old Lon­don Town, on the busiest shop­ping day of the year: Sat 13 De

London consumption climate santas 2008Five brave coun­ter­cul­ture war­riors don San­ta Suits, sing anti-con­sumerist and anti-cap­i­tal­ist Xmas car­ols, and leaflet for more mind­ful atten­tion to love, gifts, and cat­a­stroph­ic cli­mate change – in Oxford Street, in the heart of the shop­ping dis­trict of Old Lon­don Town, on the busiest shop­ping day of the year: Sat 13 Dec 08.

Turn­ing mate­r­i­al wealth into pos­ses­sions makes you hap­py; shop­ping till you drop and retail ther­a­py are good for every­body; prov­ing you love some­body means giv­ing them an expen­sive present. The bullplop pro­mot­ed by Capital’s adver­tis­ing and mar­ket­ing psy­che-manip­u­la­tors has nev­er need­ed chal­leng­ing more than it does today, in the worst of the mad­ness of Xmas shop­ping mass-psy­chosis dur­ing a cash-strapped cred­it crunch reces­sion.

Our yule­tide ‘tra­di­tion’ at Lon­don Ris­ing Tide [1] involves a ‘San­tas Against Exces­sive Con­sump­tion’ [2] choral street action – mass dress­ing as San­ta Claus, social singing of anti-con­sumerist Xmas car­ols, and let­ting folks know by leaflet that there is an alter­na­tive to the dom­i­nant the-one-who-dies-with-the-most-toys-wins idio­cy of hyper­con­sumerism. Since the rain was heavy and steady, we sought shel­ter and per­for­mance space in the West One indoor shop­ping mall on Oxford Street, by Bond Street tube sta­tion. But anti-cap­i­tal­ist cho­ris­ters only damp­ened what lit­tle Xmas spir­it the secu­ri­ty boss had left – and he threat­ened to call the cops if we didn’t leave forth­with.

Thank­ful­ly, his remit seemed to run out at the doors to Oxford Street, which still left us with a suit­ably sized cov­ered area in which we could sing to our hearts con­tent, and com­pete with the McDon­alds McFly­er to see who could give away the most leaflets per unit time. The applause of shop­pers hap­py to be spared, if only tem­porar­i­ly, from the soul-rot­ting rounds of shop­ping for tat was much appre­ci­at­ed.

The lyrics of the songs you can hear us singing in the video (so you can sing along, or even stage your own San­tas Against Con­spic­u­ous Con­sump­tion street action) are as fol­lows.

___________________________________________________________________
1 (& 3). Jin­gle All The Way – to the tune of Jin­gle Bells

Cho­rus:
Prof­its here, prof­its there,
prof­its every­where
Christ­mas time is fun­ny
we smell mon­ey in the air
Adver­tise, glam­or­ize,
fool you with a flair.
Let’s make sure that Christ­mas
is a busi­nesslike affair.

You’re eat­ing up our lies and dash­ing to the stores
Then all our prices rise and how the mon­ey pours
If we don’t keep you drugged and watch­ing your TV
You might see the hypocrisy
then where would busi­ness be?

Cho­rus

We’ll tell you how to think and tell you what to try
What to eat and drink and how to live and die
And if our plan suc­ceeds, when Christ­mas-time is nigh
Instead of seek­ing love and peace you’ll hunt for gifts to buy

Cho­rus

___________________________________________________________________
2. Con­sumer Won­der­land – to the tune of Win­ter Won­der­land, lyrics by Eri­ca Avery

The TV’s on / are you watch­ing?
Anoth­er prod­uct / that they’re hawk­ing
one more thing you need
to make life com­plete
Wel­come to Con­sumer Won­der­land

In the stores / you will hear it
“Pricey gifts / show hol­i­day spir­it”
That’s what they call it
to get to your wal­let
Wel­come to Con­sumer Won­der­land

At the mall we can go out shop­ping
and buy lots of stuff we can’t afford
we’ll have lots of fun with our new toys
until we real­ize that we’re still bored

When you shop / ain’t it thrilling
until / you get the billing
the mon­ey you still owe the stuff broke long ago
Wel­come to Con­sumer Won­der­land

___________________________________________________________________
4. Oh Come All Ye Shop­pers – to the tune of Oh Come All Ye Faith­ful

Oh come all ye shop­pers
Bur­dened and despon­dent
Come all ye fol­low­ers of ma-a-mon
Come and buy things
Spark­ly and redun­dant

Oh come let us ignore it
Oh come let us deplore it
Oh come let us abhore it
Mon­ey and greed.

Ring tills with prof­it
Ring in exploita­tion
Ring all ye reg­is­ters of cap­i­tal­ism
Glo­ry to prof­it
At it’s high­est

Oh come let us ignore it
Oh come let us deplore it
Oh come let us abhore it
Mon­ey and greed.

___________________________________________________________________

For cap­i­tal­ists, giv­ing means buy­ing tat from them first. For anti-cap­i­tal­ists, a gift econ­o­my can under­mine the mar­ket eco­nom­ics that poi­son our envi­ron­ment, our cul­ture and our minds – for exam­ple, see ‘Cre­at­ing Our Future World One Gift At A Time’ – http://tinyurl.com/gift-economy

Foot­notes

[1] Lon­don Ris­ing Tide – http://www.londonrisingtide.org.uk

[2] The Ris­ing Tide “tra­di­tion” of ‘San­tas Against Exces­sive Con­sump­tion’:
▪ ‘San­tas Against Exces­sive Con­sump­tion hit Lon­don, 16.12.06’ – http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2006/12/358481.html
▪ ‘San­tas Against Exces­sive Con­sump­tion invade Oxford Street’ – http://www.londonrisingtide.org.uk/node/33
▪ ‘Sub­ver­sive Singing San­tas Spread Sea­son­al San­i­ty in Lon­don and Nor­wich’ – http://risingtide.org.uk/node/247

[2] Car­ol resources:
▪ Christ­mas Car­ols – http://www.buynothingchristmas.org/resources/carols.html
▪ Our Entire 11-song Song­sheet – http://www.earthfirst.org.uk/actionreports/node/17929

Christmas consumption causes climate chaos leaflet - frontChristmas consumption causes climate chaos leaflet - back

Day 7 of the revolt in Greece

Fol­low­ing the police shoot­ing of a 15 year old anar­chist, riots, protests & vig­ils con­tin­ue through­out Greece, with world­wide sol­i­dar­i­ty protests tak­ing place. Lat­est report below (click Read more). For much more info and all the lat­est, see https://www.indymedia.org.uk

Greek cops run past burning barricadesFol­low­ing the police shoot­ing of a 15 year old anar­chist, riots, protests & vig­ils con­tin­ue through­out Greece, with world­wide sol­i­dar­i­ty protests tak­ing place. Lat­est report below (click Read more). For much more info and all the lat­est, see https://www.indymedia.org.uk

The Greek Intifa­da con­tin­ues and the gov­ern­ment is unable to impose its con­trol in the coun­try, spread­ing fears among the rul­ing class­es all over the Euro­pean Union.

The Greek Intifa­da con­tin­ues and the gov­ern­ment is unable to impose its con­trol in the coun­try, spread­ing fears among the rul­ing class­es all over the Euro­pean Union. In the EU Sum­mit in Brus­sels, Sarkozy but also the oth­er bour­geois lead­ers demand­ed to the Greek right wing Prime Min­is­ter Kara­man­lis “to arrest imme­di­ate­ly those respon­si­ble for the chaos”. So in today’s demon­stra­tion in Athens of tens of thou­sands of school­child­ren, stu­dents, par­ents, teach­ers and pro­fes­sors, the riot police tried to make mass arrests of 12–15 years boys and girls. The teach­ers and par­ents inter­vened to save the kids, fought with Police and lib­er­at­ed most of them apart from 3(more or less kids of 12–13 years old) who are added to the 176 already offi­cial­ly arrest­ed.

Clash­es between school­child­ren and riot police took also place in front of the par­lia­ment in Syn­tag­ma Square. The repres­sive forces of the State attacked after­wards the Law Fac­ul­ty under occu­pa­tion where our Inde­pen­dent Action Cen­ter is func­tion­ing. The cen­ter of Athens has been suf­fo­cat­ed with the chem­i­cal gazes used by the riot police. But the police had to retreat as the stu­dents defend­ed them­selves with stones and a few Molo­tov cock­tails. Then the Stu­dents Assem­bly took place and a new pro­gram of actions was decid­ed for the next days.

The Kara­man­lis gov­ern­ment was unable to have the sup­port of oth­er bour­geois par­ties and the offi­cial Left to declare the stage of the siege. The gov­ern­ment itself is split on that cru­cial issue. Nev­er­the­less, the real State of Emer­gency was declared by the school­child­ren who have put under siege tens of Police Sta­tions in Athens and all over the coun­try.

The Stal­in­ist KKE con­tin­ues to esca­late not only its attacks against Synaspis­mos /Syriza accused to be “pro­tec­tors of the hooli­gans”, but the revolt itself. Offi­cial­ly the lead­ers of KKE insist that there is no… any revolt! Today, at the same time that the school­child­ren waged their bat­tles with the riot police in front of the Athens Uni­ver­si­ty and in the Syn­tag­ma Square, the Stal­in­ist bureau­crats kept their sup­port­ers away, in Omo­nia Square and rapid­ly dis­persed them in a few blocks dis­tance from that Square. Nev­er­the­less, KKE deputies and their news­pa­per Rizospastis repeat­ed their slan­ders against the revolt­ed — to be hooli­gans, Tal­ibans, drug deal­ers, pros­ti­tu­tion rack­e­teers( 12–13 years old boys?) , police agents- adding now a new slan­der: that those fight­ing the police are agents of impe­ri­al­ist agen­cies name­ly of CIA!!!

As the polit­i­cal cri­sis inten­si­fies, the eco­nom­ic cri­sis is exac­er­bat­ed. Today’s news show that over-indebt­ed Greece finds more and more dif­fi­cult to get new loans to pay both its past debts and its deficits. To give an idea: the spread( the dif­fer­ence between the inter­est rates) of the Greek State bonds in rela­tion to those of Ger­many has esca­lat­ed to 202, while in the begin­ning of 2008 was just 20. Until March 2009 it is expect­ed that the spread will grow to 500 or more. Greece is de fac­to bank­rupt. It is the weak­est eco­nom­ic link in the chain of the Euro-zone coun­tries, and now it is proved above any doubt that it is also the weak­est polit­i­cal link. The glob­al cap­i­tal­ist cri­sis not only desta­bi­lizes all social rela­tions but pro­duce now explo­sions and a ten­den­cy towards a pre-rev­o­lu­tion­ary and/or rev­o­lu­tion­ary sit­u­a­tion.

http://www.eek.gr/default.asp?pid=6&id=639

Tree Sit Ends But Resistance Continues in Santa Cruz, U$A

Decem­ber 13th, 2008
San­ta Cruz, CA — Over four hun­dred days ago, a hand­ful of activists climbed up into the trees on Sci­ence Hill as a sym­bol of resis­tance to the uni­ver­si­ty’s plan to destroy 120 acres of cam­pus for­est. For the past 13 months, the tree sit has drawn atten­tion to UCSC’s reck­less plan to devel­op upper cam­pus with­out regard for the wel­fare of one of San­ta Cruz’s last wild ecosys­tems.

Squirrel up a redwood treeDecem­ber 13th, 2008
San­ta Cruz, CA — Over four hun­dred days ago, a hand­ful of activists climbed up into the trees on Sci­ence Hill as a sym­bol of resis­tance to the uni­ver­si­ty’s plan to destroy 120 acres of cam­pus for­est. For the past 13 months, the tree sit has drawn atten­tion to UCSC’s reck­less plan to devel­op upper cam­pus with­out regard for the wel­fare of one of San­ta Cruz’s last wild ecosys­tems.

At approx­i­mate­ly 8 AM this morn­ing, the tree sit drew to a close as police seized con­trol of Sci­ence Hill, arrest­ing one Tree Sit­ter. Lat­er, a tree cut­ting ser­vice hired by the uni­ver­si­ty cut down a grove of 100 year old red­wood trees to make way for con­struc­tion of a new Bio­science build­ing.

The three clus­ters of red­woods which have now been clearcut were inhab­it­ed since Novem­ber 7, 2007, when over 500 stu­dents, alum­ni, and com­mu­ni­ty mem­bers ral­lied in oppo­si­tion to the Uni­ver­si­ty’s “Long Range Devel­op­ment Plan”. The Tree Sit and the Uni­ver­si­ty entered medi­a­tion to find a solu­tion to this con­flict, but the Uni­ver­si­ty was unwill­ing to mod­i­fy any of their plans, despite the dev­as­tat­ing effect that upper cam­pus devel­op­ment will have on the San­ta Cruz ecosys­tem. Pre­cious water­shed regions, unique man­zani­ta groves and hun­dred-year old red­wood forests will be destroyed by the Uni­ver­si­ty’s devel­op­ment of the wild lands just north of cam­pus. The homes of such rare native ani­mals as the bur­row­ing owl and the endan­gered red-legged frog will be irrepara­bly dam­aged.

The Tree Sit tac­tic was employed due to the Uni­ver­si­ty’s fail­ure to mean­ing­ful­ly address the con­cerns of San­ta Cruz city and coun­ty offi­cials, com­mu­ni­ty mem­bers, envi­ron­men­tal­ists and UCSC fac­ul­ty and stu­dents. Instead of act­ing upon the con­cerns of the thou­sands of peo­ple who have voiced oppo­si­tion to increased Uni­ver­si­ty con­struc­tion, UCSC has spent tens of thou­sands of tax­pay­er dol­lars to hire riot police to intim­i­date com­mu­ni­ty mem­bers who oppose their plans.

The end of the Tree Sit is not the end of resis­tance to the Long Range Devel­op­ment Plan. The deter­mi­na­tion and integri­ty that sus­tained the 13 month occu­pa­tion will con­tin­ue to incite action against the Long Range Devel­op­ment Plan. The diverse com­mu­ni­ties that unit­ed to oppose the destruc­tion of upper cam­pus are renewed in their com­mit­ment to resis­tance.

.….….

One Year Anniver­sary Cel­e­bra­tion at the UCSC Tree-Sit

.….….

Police Offi­cers Pep­per Spray Peo­ple on Sci­ence Hill
.….….

Strug­gle on Sci­ence Hill.
UCSC protest & treesit - cops fight back with teargas
Nov 7 Noon­time — a group of stu­dents protest­ing the UCSC’s Long Range Devel­op­ment Plan (LRPD) strug­gled with police while bring­ing food and water to a group of about five old-style activists who, using moun­tain climb­ing gear, had placed them­selves and sev­er­al wood­en plat­forms inside the upper reach­es of sev­er­al red­wood trees.

The march, and chaos.

The police had arrived on the scene ear­ly that day and had cor­doned off the area on sci­ence hill just out­side the Sci­ence and Engi­neer­ing Library with tape, plas­tic fenc­ing, and portable met­al bar­ri­ers.

How­ev­er, the protest turned ugly when the march cir­cled the enclo­sure. One pro­tes­tor speak­ing with a police offi­cer took a step too close, was told to step back, and was pushed for­ward by the crowd.

One of the pro­tes­tors, Jane Oliv­era, retold what hap­pened next. She had been walk­ing around the enclo­sure at the front of the march when she saw her friend Robin Speak­ing with some­one who wasn’t part of the protest.

“I came around just to hang out with him and then he moved in a lit­tle bit and the cop said ‘ no, no you can‘t do that,’ and then there was a crown of peo­ple that fol­lowed him as he moved in a lit­tle bit, and then he moved in a lot more, and then before I knew it there was a cop on him. They had jumped on him, and tack­led him to the floor, and I don‘t like it when my friends get arrest­ed, and so I jumped in because he was using force. He was hold­ing his hands and he was hit­ting him so I ran in and said ‘no, you can‘t do that‘ and before I knew it one cop threw me to the floor. I flew,” she said. “I had just moved in a lit­tle bit. After I had moved in they just got on top of me and start­ed hit­ting me.”

Oliv­era sus­tained mul­ti­ple bruis­es and a scratch on her left arm, was arrest­ed, tick­et­ed, and then released on the scene along with the rest of the pro­tes­tors. No one was hos­pi­tal­ized.

Along with the arrests an inde­ter­mi­nate num­ber of stu­dents received blows from batons around the arms and head and were hit with pep­per spray. Stu­dents pulled down fences and climbed across, the police stepped back while spray­ing, club­bing, and push­ing.

Almost an equal num­ber of stu­dents ran towards the fences and away from them. One girl stood root­ed to the ground while the met­al grate was being lift­ed by police and pulled away by stu­dents.

Lat­er rein­force­ments arrived in about six to eight squad cars with what appeared to be tear gas and armor. When the offi­cers who were armed were asked about their weapons they did not respond. These offi­cers formed a line across the mid­dle of the grove where they remained for sev­er­al hours.

Stu­dents then read the entire­ty of ‘The Lorax’ using a mega­phone, shout­ed at the police, and helped bring sup­plies to the trees where the sit­ters hoist­ed up water, food, and blan­kets.

Oliv­era and oth­er pro­test­ers were released by police offi­cers only a lit­tle after the read­ing of the Lorax. She was scratched and shak­en.

“A lot of my friends are orga­niz­ers and I just don‘t think that devel­op­ment is real­ly a good idea because we can‘t sup­port the num­ber of stu­dents we have now and the devel­op­ment is going to stress the water table, the town — there are a lot of rea­sons out­side the trees that makes this not a good idea,” Oliv­era said. “I don‘t want to go to school inside a cement block.”

The devel­op­ment plan.

The LRDP was approved unan­i­mous­ly by the UC regents in on Sep­tem­ber 28 ‘06 who had orig­i­nal­ly draft­ed the plan three years ear­li­er in 2003. The plan makes way for the devel­op­ment of 120 acres of upper cam­pus, the pos­si­ble destruc­tion or relo­ca­tion of the UC trail­er park, the addi­tion of 4,500 new stu­dents, and the con­struc­tion of a bio­med­ical sci­ences facil­i­ty on what is now a grove of sec­ond growth red­wood trees.

The dis­trict super­vi­sor Mar­di Wormhoudt, and the mem­bers of the Coali­tion for Lim­it­ing Cam­pus Expan­sion (CLUE) have been fight­ing the LRDP. To do this Wormhoudt draft­ed mea­sures I and J, which made the Uni­ver­si­ty respon­si­ble for com­ply­ing with the Local Agency For­ma­tion Commission’s (LAF­co) guide­lines before the City extends water and sew­er ser­vice to the uni­ver­si­ty, which would, in effect inhib­it Uni­ver­si­ty growth by pre­vent­ing the toi­lets from flush­ing in what­ev­er build­ings the Uni­ver­si­ty makes if the guide­lines aren’t met. Cur­rent­ly CLUE is engaged in a legal bat­tle over the pro­posed con­struc­tion as well.

Jen­nifer Charles is a UCSC alum­na, and the media con­tact for the protest. She said that cam­pus expan­sion would decrease the qual­i­ty of the edu­ca­tion that stu­dents receive.

“This comes at a time when UCSC is increas­ing enroll­ment but real­ly decreas­ing the qual­i­ty of edu­ca­tion. They’re putting a lot of mon­ey towards expan­sion,” she said. “but not a lot of mon­ey for the pro­grams that stu­dents need.”

Charles said that the nonex­is­tent eth­nic stud­ies pro­gram and the now nonex­is­tent jour­nal­ism minor were two good exam­ples.

“Those are pro­grams that stu­dents real­ly want to see. Instead the Uni­ver­si­ty is expand­ing things like the facil­i­ty planned to be on this site. It‘s an 80 mil­lion dol­lar facil­i­ty for research that includes live ani­mal test­ing. It includes no class­room space. The entire build­ing will be used by grad­u­ate stu­dents and researchers which will prob­a­bly be fund­ed by out­side cor­po­ra­tions. And as we‘ve seen at oth­er uni­ver­si­ties when pri­vate cor­po­ra­tions are fund­ing research at pub­lic insi­ti­tu­tions they want con­trol over research.”

Charles said that the LRDP would change the uni­ver­si­ty from a small lib­er­al arts col­lege into a mas­sive sci­ence col­lege which would anni­hi­late the feel of UCSC.

“We don‘t want to be UCLI or UCLA or even UC Berke­ly,” said Charles. “We want to be UC San­ta Cruz. We cer­tain­ly don‘t want to be the UC of the Sil­i­con Val­ley.”

Tree peo­ple.

After the vio­lence, after the chant­i­ng, and after the read­ing of the Lorax the police left. Sup­plies were hoist­ed up into the trees. The sit­ters have climbed the trees and are now liv­ing in the branch­es around sci­ence hill.

One of the tree sit­ters wear­ing a sweat­shirt with a hood and a cam­ou­flaged mask came down and refused to give his name or reveal his face. He referred to him­self only as Malachi.

Malachi said that the sit­ters’ voic­es had not been heard. He said that he and the oth­er tree sit­ters were going to remain sus­pend­ed above the ground for as long as it took to change the LRDP “to accom­mo­date all of upper cam­pus and not just cor­po­rate inter­ests.”

“We just need sup­port,” said Malachi. “If peo­ple want to come up and sit for a few days then they can do that. If they want to come and bring food — day or night — just tell them you‘ve got some food and they‘ll low­er a line.”

Accord­ing to the orga­niz­ers the tree sit­ters need blan­kets, buck­ets (the ten gal­lon kind with lids,) portable stoves, and food.

.….….

Orig­i­nal occu­pa­tion of the site:

Stand­off with Police as Activists occu­py red­woods to oppose UCSC Expan­sion

Ear­ly Wednes­day morn­ing, activists opposed to UCSC’s Long Range Devel­op­ment Plan (LRDP) launched a tree-sit in red­woods near Sci­ence Hill. UCSC plans to devel­op the occu­pied site into a new Bio­med­ical Sci­ences Facil­i­ty.

Con­tact: Jen­nifer Charles
(831) 430‑6791
LRDPaction.media [at] gmail.com

Press Release

Stand­off with Police as Activists occu­py red­woods to oppose UCSC Expan­sion

UCSC Stu­dents launch tree-sit at site of con­tro­ver­sial Bio­med­ical Sci­ences build­ing.

Nov. 7, 2007 San­ta Cruz, CA Ear­ly Wednes­day morn­ing, activists opposed to UCSC’s Long Range Devel­op­ment Plan (LRDP) launched a tree-sit in red­woods near Sci­ence Hill. UCSC plans to devel­op the occu­pied site into a new Bio­med­ical Sci­ences Facil­i­ty.

One per­son was arrest­ed by UC police ear­ly in the morn­ing. Police sur­round­ed the site, where at least 4 activists were 50 feet up red­wood trees. A sched­uled ral­ly and march that began at 11am drew hun­dreds of sup­port­ers to the site. A tense stand­off with police com­menced, as sup­port­ers attempt­ed to get close enough to the trees to send up sup­plies. Police pep­per sprayed the crowd and at least four peo­ple were arrest­ed.

The Bio­med­ical Sci­ences facil­i­ty would be the first project under the Uni­ver­si­ty’s plan to devel­op 120 acres of for­est in order to accom­mo­date 4,500 new stu­dents. The Bio­med­ical Sci­ences build­ing will have no allot­ted class­room space, despite stu­dent com­plaints about over­crowd­ed class sizes. But it will have room for live ani­mal exper­i­men­ta­tion, which includes such prac­tices as food/air depri­va­tion, infec­tion, and non-anes­thetized surgery, accord­ing to cam­pus guide­lines (http://carc.ucsc.edu).

This build­ing, which will house biotech­nol­o­gy and nan­otech­nol­o­gy research, is exem­plary of how the new LRDP marks a clear shift from UCSC’s com­mit­ment to under­grad­u­ate, lib­er­al arts edu­ca­tion to the more lucra­tive pro­grams fund­ed by large cor­po­ra­tions. Fol­low­ing the trend of pri­va­tiz­ing pub­lic uni­ver­si­ties, stu­dents are pay­ing more for edu­ca­tion and receiv­ing less. Stu­dents are call­ing for more fund­ing for human­i­ties and arts, includ­ing the cre­ation of an Eth­nic Stud­ies depart­ment. Mean­while, the UC is cut­ting fac­ul­ty, increas­ing enroll­ment and ignor­ing the con­cerns of stu­dents.

Crit­ics say the planned addi­tion of 4,500 full-time stu­dents is irre­spon­si­ble giv­en the exist­ing short­age of resources. They cite over­crowd­ed class­rooms, over­worked teach­ing assis­tants and dis­sat­is­fied fac­ul­ty as signs that the UCSC has already exceed­ed its capac­i­ty. In addi­tion, the Envi­ron­men­tal Impact Report (EIR) accom­pa­ny­ing the LRDP does not bind the UC to mit­i­gate the impacts of growth. The LRDP calls for the devel­op­ment of 120 acres of for­est. Envi­ron­men­tal­ists say that the cur­rent devel­op­ment plans will sig­nif­i­cant­ly dam­age unique ecosys­tems, includ­ing Moore Creek, the Jor­dan Gulch wildlife cor­ri­dor and the Cam­pus Nat­ur­al Reserve seep zone. Again, UCSC refus­es any bind­ing lan­guage requir­ing them mit­i­gate the effects of devel­op­ment on impact­ed habi­tats.

Stu­dents, fac­ul­ty, city coun­cil, com­mu­ni­ty mem­bers, and envi­ron­men­tal­ists all expressed con­cerns about the impact of expan­sion dur­ing the plan­ning process and were dis­re­gard­ed by the Uni­ver­si­ty. The group of indi­vid­u­als who are occu­py­ing the trees believe that action is need­ed to oppose UCSC’s destruc­tive plans before con­struc­tion begins on any of the LRDP build­ings.

http://lrdpresistance.org

Direct Action in Iceland

Since ear­ly this win­ter, Ice­land has been fac­ing eco­nom­ic cri­sis. The three major busi­ness banks have been nation­al­ized, putting their dept on the people’s shoul­ders. Peo­ple have been los­ing their live­long sav­ings, loans have increased and are get­ting sky high (and for sure they already were high enough).

Since ear­ly this win­ter, Ice­land has been fac­ing eco­nom­ic cri­sis. The three major busi­ness banks have been nation­al­ized, putting their dept on the people’s shoul­ders. Peo­ple have been los­ing their live­long sav­ings, loans have increased and are get­ting sky high (and for sure they already were high enough). 200 peo­ple lost their job, every sin­gle day of Novem­ber and more and more peo­ple are fac­ing the threat of los­ing their hous­es.

Activists vs. the police

Peo­ple are get­ting angry, some of them want­i­ng back the “good old” pros­per­i­ty, while oth­ers and hope­ful­ly the major­i­ty, are real­iz­ing the real cost of cap­i­tal­ism. More and more peo­ple are stand­ing up against cor­rup­tion and demand­ing new form of soci­ety — soci­ety of jus­tice. But every day the cur­rent gov­ern­ment proves that it’s main aim is to save their own and their friend’s ass. A loan from the Inter­na­tion­al Mon­e­tary Fund (IMF) has been grant­ed, most like­ly lead­ing to the com­mon after­maths of an IMF loan: the pri­va­ti­za­tion of social sys­tems as the health care and the edu­ca­tion sys­tem, and more destruc­tion of the Ice­landic wilder­ness.

Week­ly demon­stra­tions

For more than 2 months peo­ple have gath­ered week­ly in a park in front of the par­lia­ment. The first protests demand­ed that the gov­ern­ment would “break it’s silence” about the cur­rent sit­u­a­tion. Peo­ple were tired of not even being told about what was hap­pen­ing and what the gov­ern­ment was doing about it.

One of the week­ly domon­stra­tions

But soon peo­ple real­ized that it was not enough to ask the gov­ern­ment to speak, so the protests took up anoth­er and more rad­i­cal demand: the resign of the gov­ern­ment and new elec­tions as soon as pos­si­ble. The gov­ern­ment has com­plete­ly ignored this demand and peo­ple are get­ting more and more angry.

Anar­chists and oth­er rad­i­cal left­ists have come to most of the protests, but not to protest against the eco­nom­ic sit­u­a­tion, not to ask the gov­ern­ment for solu­tions, not to ask for new elec­tions, not to ask any mem­ber of the gov­ern­ment or par­lia­ment or any oth­er offi­cial insti­tu­tion to do any­thing to “solve” the cri­sis we are fac­ing. But to spread anar­chis­tic and anti-cap­i­tal­is­tic infor­ma­tion among peo­ple, analyse the prob­lems of author­i­ty and cap­i­tal­ism and to encour­age Ice­landic peo­ple to take direct action against the forces of cor­rup­tion.

Burn­ing flag and mon­ey

Burn­ing of bank flags and “hang­ing” of a cap­i­tal­ist

Dur­ing a protest in front of the prime minister’s office in late Octo­ber, the flags of two Ice­landic banks were burned. A group of anar­chists, prob­a­bly the biggest in Ice­landic his­to­ry at that time, shout­ed anar­chis­tic slo­gans, point­ing out cap­i­tal­ism as the real prob­lem. Until then, cap­i­tal­ism seemed to be a ban-word among the pro­test­ers. The flag burn­ing caught the inter­est of for­eign media, e.g. CNN which showed the burn­ing in their news show lat­er the same evening. An event like this had not hap­pened in Ice­land for a long time.

Burn­ing the flag of Lands­ban­ki bank

A week lat­er, a big demon­stra­tion parade went through the cen­ter of Reyk­javík, demand­ing the resign of the gov­ern­ment. Anar­chists, which grew big­ger and stronger every week, joined the march with ban­ners, black flags, leaflets about direct actions, and anar­chis­tic slo­gans. While oth­er pro­test­ers chant­ed “Away with the gov­ern­ment”, anar­chists shout­ed “Nev­er again gov­ern­ment!”

When the parade came down the the park were week­ly speech­es took place, a group of peo­ple climbed a big fence and hung a doll of a cap­i­tal­ist. Again for­eign media cap­tured the per­for­mance on tape and screened it around the world.

Cou­ple of meters away from the park were the protests take place, a Food Not Bombs groups has been giv­ing away food every Sat­ur­day for the last 8 or 9 months. Food Not Bombs has for sure had it’s effect of the walk­ing-by Ice­landers, who are get­ting more curi­ous and inter­est­ed in alter­na­tive solu­tions to the prob­lems of cap­i­tal­ism.

Dur­ing a protest, Sat­ur­day Novem­ber 8th, an anar­chist climbed on top of the par­lia­ment were he hung the flag of Bónus, Iceland’s cheap­est super­mar­ket. The mes­sage was clear since the flag is yel­low with a pink pig on it: “The gov­ern­ment is a cheap and dirty pig!” Unlike to the usu­al Ice­landic pro­test­ers, peo­ple cel­e­brat­ed this act and sang along “The gov­ern­ment is a cheap and dirty pig!”

Soon hun­dred pro­test­ers sur­rouned­ed the par­li­ment to help the anar­chist to get away from the police, which had already arrest­ed a mate of him. After a bit of a strug­gle with the police, peo­ple man­aged to help the flag-man (like he lat­er became known as) to get down of the roof and de-arrest­ed him more than once. One could feel some change in the air.

Ille­gal arrest

Less than a week lat­er, on a Fri­day night, the police arrest­ed the flag-man. He was in the mid­dle of a research trip to the par­lia­ment, orga­nized by his uni­ver­si­ty, when some par­lia­ment staff rec­og­nized him and called the pigs.

The man had been arrest­ed two years before, for an action with the envi­ron­men­tal direct action cam­paign Sav­ing Ice­land, protest­ing against the build­ing of a big dam, Kárah­n­júkavirkjun, in the east­ern higlands. For this action he had got sen­tenced and fined, but refused to pay the fine and instead insist­ed on sit­ting in jail for 18 days. But after only four days of his jail-sen­tence he was “thrown out” because of lack of space in the prison.

Now, the police stat­ed that the man would have to sit the oth­er 14 days of the sen­tence. The fact is though that the it is not allowed to split the sen­tence like this, and the man was sup­posed to get an announce­ment about fin­ish­ing his sen­tence with at leas 3 weeks notice. This had not been done in his case.

Peo­ple claimed this was espe­cial­ly done by the police, fun­de­men­taly to “take out” an activist who was like­ly to take more actions dur­ing the upcom­ing week­ly demon­stra­tion. So the next day, dur­ing the protest which 10.000 peo­ple had joined, anoth­er protest was announced, this time in front of the police sta­tion, a lit­tle bit lat­er that day.

Riots by the police sta­tion

500 peo­ple came to the police sta­tion and demand­ed that the man would be set free. After a while, no sign of the police was seen and noth­ing looked like the man would be set free. The protest got heat­ed and soon peo­ple had start­ed to break win­dows of the sta­tion and in the end the door of the sta­tion was bro­ken. A group of peo­ple went in were the police wel­comed them with a splash of pep­per spray, with­out even announc­ing it.

The protest got even hot­ter, red paint and eggs were thrown at the sta­tion and on the riot squad which now had formed a chain in front of the sta­tion. A lot of peo­ple were pep­per­sprayed, includ­ing the flag-man’s moth­er and young kids down to 16 years old. In the end, the flag-man was payed out of the prison by an unknown per­son. The flag-man came out were he was cel­e­brat­ed like a hero. He thanked peo­ple for the sup­port but encour­aged peo­ple to use their ener­gy for some­thing else: a rev­o­lu­tion!

The Inva­sion of the Cen­tral Bank

A week after the riots by the police sta­tion, the weeke­ly protest was a lit­tle more chilled. Instead peo­ple hoped for some­thing big tak­ing place the upcom­ing Mon­day, Decem­ber 1st, the day of Iceland’s sov­er­eign­ty.

1st of Decem­ber used to be a free day in Ice­land but cou­ple of years ago the pro­le­tari­at move­ment dis­claimed it´s right. This 1st of May peo­ple were encour­aged not to pay their bills, not show up in work and come to a big out­door meet­ing on a big hill close to the gov­ern­ment offices and the Cen­tral Bank. Few speech­es took place, most of the includ­ing some nation­al­is­tic pif­fle which the rad­i­cals answered with a slo­gan: “No nation­al­ism — Inter­na­tion­al sol­i­dar­i­ty!”

After the meet­ing was for­mal­ly over the word on the street was that more rad­i­cal action was going to take place. Sud­den­ly a big group of peo­ple marched to the Cen­tral Bank and entered the first entrance.

The entrance was com­plete­ly full of peo­ple shout­ing and demand­ing that Davíð Odd­s­son, the chair­man of the Cen­tral Bank board and a for­mer prime min­is­ter, would resign. Few police­men had closed the sec­ond entrance but peo­ple shout­ed at them, asked in “what team” they were in, telling them to join the pub­lic, leave the entrance and let the peo­ple in. Sud­den­ly the police left the entrance, the peo­ple cheered and opened the door to the sec­ond entrance.

Pep­per spray again?

The sec­ond entrance became com­plete­ly full as well as the first one, but behind big glass doors the riot squad had formed a chain of c.a. 30 pigs, armed with shields, clubs and pep­per spray. Again, instead of speak­ing to the peo­ple, the pigs start­ed shak­ing their spray cans, forc­ing to use it against the peo­ple it they would not leave.

The riot squad, ready to strike inside the Cen­tral Bank

Peo­ple start­ed bang­ing on the door, shout­ing slo­gans against the Cen­tral Bank and the police. After a while, when a police offi­cer had sev­er­al times threat­ened to use the pep­per spray, peo­ple decid­ed to sit down peace­ful­ly and not stand up until Davíð Odd­s­son would resign. The action stood over sev­er­al hours and had it’s peaks when peo­ple stood up, lift­ed up their hands to show they were unarmed and chal­lenged the police to leave, open the doors and let the peo­ple bring Odd­s­son out.

When it became clear that Odd­s­son had already left the build­ing the pro­test­ers gave the police an offer: the riot squad would leave and than the pro­test­ers would leave the build­ing. About 30 sec­onds lat­er, the pigs walked back and the peo­ple cheered some kind of a vic­to­ry of the peo­ple.

Into the par­lia­ment

A week lat­er, last Mon­day Decem­ber 8th, thir­ty peo­ple went in to the Ice­landic par­lia­ment, head­ing to the inside bal­cony were the pub­lic is legal­ly allowed to sit, watch and lis­ten to what takes place there. The group announced that the par­lia­ment no longer served it’s pur­pose and the gov­ern­ment should there­for resign right now, the oth­er MP’s should use their time for some­thing more con­struc­tive.

Pro­test­er thrown out by police after telling the MP’s and min­is­ters to leave the par­lia­ment

Only two per­sons got to the bal­cony and shout­ed at the MP’s and min­is­ters to leave the build­ing. Quick­ly they were bru­tal­ly removed by a police offi­cer, while the rest of the group was stuck in a stair­case inside the build­ing. The par­lia­men­tary ses­sion was delayed and all the MP’s left the room.

Mean­while the pro­test­ers were bru­tal­ly han­dled by secu­ri­ty guards and police, which end­ed up arrest­ing 7 peo­ple, most of them for house­break­ing. But like said before, the pub­lic is allowed to enter the par­lia­ment bal­cony.

Police car­ries a man out after hand­cuff­ing him and rope his legs — “Fas­cist, fas­cists!” the man shout­ed while being car­ried out

The next morn­ing, 30 peo­ple had gath­ered in front of the prime minister’s office were a gov­ern­ment meet­ing was sup­posed to take place. The peo­ple had formed a human chain blockad­ing the two entrances of the house. When min­is­ters start­ed to show up, the police had already arrived and start­ed to try to remove the chain. The peo­ple resist­ed heav­i­ly and read out a state­ment sent out by the group.

The state­ment said that the aim of the action was to “pre­vent the min­is­ters from enter­ing the house and there­fore stop fur­ther mis­use of pow­er. Mon­ey has con­trolled peo­ple on the cost of their rights and the author­i­ties and their cliques have manip­u­lat­ed finance for their own ben­e­fits. That manip­u­la­tion has not entailed in a just soci­ety, just world. Time of action has dawn, because a just soci­ety is not only pos­si­ble, but it is our duty to fight for it.”

With the help of the police, all the min­is­ters got in, but heard the state­ment and were under big pres­sure from the media. They were not pre­pared for ques­tions and came out bad­ly when asked. The gov­ern­ment meet­ing was delayed because of the actions.

Two were arrest­ed, one for enter­ing a police line and the oth­er one for sit­ting in front of the police car which was about to dri­ve the oth­er arrest­ed one to the police sta­tion. More peo­ple sat on the street and it took the police quite a long time to get out of the street. Only when a police offi­cer gave the dri­ver an order to “just dri­ve hard”, the dri­ver did so and near­ly drove over two per­sons.

One of the biggest news­pa­pers in Ice­land, DV, report­ed the bru­tal behavoiur of the police. The paper’s jour­nal­ist and pho­tog­ra­ph­er were both attacked by the police, as well as notic­ing when a police punced a pro­test­er in the face, while he lay on the street. Most oth­er media did not dare to report the bru­tal behav­iour.

A left wing web­site, Smu­gan, told about a police offi­cer who was asked by the pro­test­ers if he would have pro­tect­ed Hitler. His answer was sim­ple: “Yes, if it would have been my duty.”

More actions have been announced and it will be inter­est­ing to see what comes next.

http://aftaka.org/