Letter of solidarity with tree-occupations against road-buildings

Dur­ing the last weeks, at two dif­fer­ent loca­tions in Europe, trees have been squat­ted that would fall prey to the con­struc­tion of motor­ways. On Decem­ber 22nd, activists in Bex­hill, Eng­land occu­pied trees against the con­struc­tion of the Bex­hill-Hast­ings Link Road and have erect­ed an entire camp now.

Dur­ing the last weeks, at two dif­fer­ent loca­tions in Europe, trees have been squat­ted that would fall prey to the con­struc­tion of motor­ways. On Decem­ber 22nd, activists in Bex­hill, Eng­land occu­pied trees against the con­struc­tion of the Bex­hill-Hast­ings Link Road and have erect­ed an entire camp now. In Berlin, free-spaces-activists, togeth­er with envi­ron­men­tal-activists occu­pied trees against the A100 that is to be built through the mid­dle of Berlin. We, the squat­ters from the Ham­bach For­est stand in sol­i­dar­i­ty with these strug­gles and call for a prac­ti­cal sup­port and for the cre­ation of a net­work of these emerg­ing spaces of resis­tance with each oth­er and the cre­ation of many new spaces like these.

 

The anti-road move­ment in the UK in the 90s, which fol­lowed in response to the neolib­er­al infra­struc­ture poli­cies of Mar­garet Thatch­er („there is no alter­na­tive“), was one of the strongest social and envi­ron­men­tal move­ments of recent decades in Europe. Out of it many new forms of action devel­oped: The tree house vil­lages, with spe­cial­ized blockad­ing tech­niques at the sites where the roads should be built, the „crit­i­cal mass­es“ and „reclaim the streets“ par­ties as reclaim­ing the cities against the car craze, and a gen­er­al polit­i­cal under­stand­ing of „direct action“ as a self-empow­er­ing, dynam­ic form of pol­i­tics from below. Even the rad­i­cal envi­ron­men­tal move­ment in Britain, that spread after the turn of the mil­len­ni­um and inspired cli­mate move­ments all over Europe, had its roots in the anti-road move­ment.

Now, over 20 years lat­er, the gov­ern­ment in the UK is plan­ning a new com­pre­hen­sive road-build­ing pro­gram (while mas­sive social cuts were pushed through). 1,244 km of new roads are planned. Through the con­struc­tions, as well as improved infra­struc­ture, they hope to push the econ­o­my out of the cri­sis. At the same time new roads also bring more and more traf­fic with it and so it’s projects like these which also push the glob­al cli­mate clos­er to the „tip­ping points“. For this rea­son, on Decem­ber 22nd, activists hung plat­forms in trees to be felled for the Bex­hill-Hast­ings Link Road. Bex­hill is locat­ed between Dover and Brighton. There is even a „ful­ly oper­a­tional“ block­ade tun­nel!

Two weeks lat­er activists occu­pied trees in Berlin, Neukölln, in order to resist the con­struc­tion of the A100. We think the inter­est­ing thing about this action is that it was car­ried out by free-spaces-activists togeth­er with envi­ron­men­tal-activists. Far too rarely the resis­tance against the var­i­ous antag­o­nisms of cap­i­tal­ism – social and envi­ron­men­tal – com­bines in joint oper­a­tions. Exact­ly where it would be need­ed urgent­ly: The dom­i­nant dis­course wants us to believe that cli­mate or envi­ron­men­tal pro­tec­tion is only to achieve with renun­ci­a­tion and per­son­al con­sumer choic­es. The oppo­site is the case: By over­com­ing the cap­i­tal­ist sys­tem, much of the sense­less con­sump­tion of resources would dis­ap­pear, while a self-deter­mined life and a free devel­op­ment would become pos­si­ble. Let’s take Fordism as a tri­umph of the cars in the cities: Not a demand for auto­mo­biles was the begin­ning of mass con­sump­tion of the like, but a car favour­ing urban plan­ning, that accord­ing to the con­cepts of the Hitler­friend Ford, con­scious­ly put the dif­fer­ent areas of work, hous­ing and con­sump­tion so far apart that a life with­out a car has been more and more dif­fi­cult . So the time that the peo­ple had to use for chang­ing loca­tions wasn‘t get­ting short­er, but at once the cities were filled with this stink­ing met­al box­es which affect­ed the lives in the city fun­da­men­tal­ly – a dete­ri­o­ra­tion of life with high­er ener­gy con­sump­tion was the result. An oppo­site trend should be the goal of eman­ci­pa­to­ry envi­ron­men­tal strug­gles, the same as that of social strug­gles, that don‘t close their eyes in front of the acute cli­mate prob­lem we are fac­ing.

We urgent­ly need a rad­i­cal and pow­er­ful cli­mate move­ment all over the world. We see some pos­i­tive signs. For exam­ple, the con­flicts of the last months in La ZAD/France against a ‚green‘ air­port to be built. In mobi­liza­tions tem­porar­i­ly 40 000 activists par­tic­i­pat­ed. We need such cristal­liza­tion places where we can expe­ri­ence what’s pos­si­ble – and then we have to spread this resis­tance and hun­dreds of oth­er crys­tal­liza­tion places must sprout from the ground, which in turn inspire oth­ers.

We appeal to sup­port these new occu­pa­tions in Bex­hill and Berlin with prac­ti­cal help, just as we call to sup­port our occu­pa­tion at the edge of the Ham­bach for­est with prac­ti­cal assis­tance. But we also call out to you, to cre­ate many new such places your­self, that it takes as focal sites of resis­tance. Places where peo­ple can come togeth­er, are able to plan things, but also to guess what kind of world would be pos­si­ble in the new way of life and orga­ni­za­tion, beyond cap­i­tal­ism and dom­i­na­tion sys­tems.
And we call out to link those places of resis­tance – because the straw fires that cur­rent­ly flare up here and there have to con­nect to a wild­fire – a wild­fire of the unen­force­abil­i­ty of all these destruc­tive projects, whether roads, pipelines or open cast mines.

act – before it’s too late!

 https://combehavendefenders.wordpress.com/
 http://www.robinwood.de/Newsdetails.13+M5d5007d0da9.0.html
 http://wirbleibenalle.org/
 http://hambacherforst.blogsport.de/

Sol­i­dar­ität­serk­lärung mit Baumbe­set­zun­gen gegen Auto­bahn-wahn

In den let­zten Wochen wur­den gle­ich an zwei ver­schiede­nen Orten in Europa Bäume beset­zt, die dem Bau von Auto­bah­nen zum Opfer fall­en sollen. Am 22. Dezem­ber beset­zten Aktivist_innen in Bex­hill, Eng­land Bäume gegen den Bau der Bex­hill-Hast­ings Link Road und haben nun schon ein ganzes Camp errichtet. In Berlin beset­zten Freiraumaktivist_innen gemein­sam mit Umweltaktivist_innen Bäume gegen die A100 die mit­ten durch Berlin gebaut wer­den soll. Wir, die Besetzer_innen vom Ham­bach­er Forst sol­i­darisieren uns mit diesen Kämpfen und rufen zu ein­er prak­tis­chen Unter­stützung auf, zu ein­er Ver­net­zung der entste­hen­den Wider­stand­sorte untere­inan­der und dazu viele neue solch­er Orte zu schaf­fen.

Die Anti-Road Bewe­gung in Großbrit­tanien in den 90er Jahren, die als Antwort auf die neolib­erale Infra­struk­tur-Poli­tik von Marg­eret Thatch­er („there is no alter­na­tive“) fol­gte, war eine der stärk­sten sozialen Umwelt­be­we­gun­gen der let­zten Jahrzehnte in Europa. Aus ihr her­aus entwick­el­ten sich viele neue Aktions­for­men: Die Baumhaus­dör­fer, mit spezial­isierten Block­ade­tech­niken an den Orten wo die Straßen gebaut wer­den soll­ten, die „crit­i­cal mass­es“ und „reclaim the streets“-Partys als Rücker­oberung der Städte gegen den Autowahn, und generell ein Poli­tikver­ständ­nis der „direct action“ als selb­ster­mächti­gende, dynamis­che Poli­tik­form von unten. Auch die radikale Klimabe­we­gung in Großbri­tanien, die sich nach der Jahrtausendwende aus­bre­it­ete und Klimabe­we­gun­gen in ganz Europa inspiri­erte, hat­te ihre Wurzeln in dieser Anti-Road-Bewe­gung.

Nun, über 20 Jahre später, plant die Regierung in Großbrit­tanien ein neues umfassendes Straßen­baupro­gramm (während gle­ichzeit­ig mas­sive Sozialkürzun­gen durchgepeitscht wur­den). 1244 Kilo­me­ter neue Straßen sind geplant. Durch die Bauaufträge, sowie die verbesserte Infra­struk­tur wird erhofft die Wirtschaft aus der Krise zu stoßen. Gle­ichzeit­ig brin­gen neue Straßen aber auch immer mehr Autoverkehr mit sich, und so sind es Pro­jek­te wie dieses, die auch das glob­ale Kli­ma immer näher an die „tip­ping points“ stoßen. Aus diesem Grunde haben Aktivist_innen am 22. Dezem­ber Plat­tfor­men in Bäume gehängt, die für die Bex­hill-Hast­ings Link Road gerodet wer­den sollen. Bex­hill befind­et sich zwis­chen Dover und Brighton. Inzwis­chen gibt es sog­ar einen „ful­ly oper­a­tional“ Block­ade­tun­nel!

Zwei Wochen später, macht­en es Aktivist_innen in Berlin nach, und beset­zen Bäume in Neukölln um Wider­stand gegen den Bau der A100 zu leis­ten. Inter­es­sant an dieser Aktion find­en wir, dass sie von Freiraumaktivist_innen zusam­men mit Umweltaktivist_innen durchge­führt wurde. Viel zu sel­ten verbindet sich der Wider­stand gegen die ver­schiede­nen Antag­o­nis­men des Kap­i­tal­is­mus – den sozialen und den ökol­o­gis­chen – in gemein­samen Aktio­nen. Wobei genau das drin­gend notwendig wäre: Der herrschende Diskurs will uns weis machen, dass Kli­ma- oder Umweltschutz nur mit Verzicht zu haben sei. Das Gegen­teil ist der Fall: Durch die Über­win­dung der kap­i­tal­is­tis­chen Wirtschaftsweise würde gle­ichzeit­ig sehr viel unsin­niger Ressourcenver­brauch weg­fall­en, während ein selb­st­bes­timmtes Leben und eine freie Ent­fal­tung erst möglich würde. Nehmen wir nur ein­mal den Fordis­mus als Siegeszug des Autos in den Städten: Nicht ein Bedürf­nis nach Auto­mo­bilen war der Beginn des Massenkon­sums der­gle­ichen, son­dern eine Auto-ritäre Stadt­pla­nung, die nach den Konzepten des Hitler-Fre­un­des Ford, bewusst die ver­schiede­nen Bere­iche Arbeit, Wohnen und Kon­sum soweit auseinan­der­legte, dass ein Leben ohne Auto immer schw­er­er wurde. So wurde zwar nicht die Zeit kürz­er, die Men­schen täglich für Ortswech­sel auf­brin­gen mussten, aber die Städte waren auf ein­mal voll mit diesen stink­enden Blechk­isten und beein­trächtigten das Leben in der Stadt fun­da­men­tal – eine Beein­träch­ti­gung des Lebens bei höherem Energie­ver­brauch war das Ergeb­nis. Eine ent­ge­genge­set­zte Entwick­lung muss das Ziel emanzi­pa­torisch­er Umweltkämpfe sein, genau­so wie das­jenige sozialer Kämpfe, die das akute Klimaprob­lem vor dem wir ste­hen nicht ein­fach aus­blenden.

Wir brauchen drin­gend eine radikale und schlagkräftige Klimabe­we­gung und zwar weltweit. Wir sehen dabei einige pos­i­tive Ansätze. So zum Beispiel die Auseinan­der­set­zun­gen der let­zten Monate in La ZAD gegen einen „grü­nen“ Flughafen, der gebaut wer­den soll. An den Mobil­isierun­gen beteiligten sich zeitweise 40 000 Aktive. Wir brauchen solche Kristalli­sa­tion­sorte, an denen erfahrbar wird, was alles möglich ist – und dann muss dieser Wider­stand in die Fläche getra­gen wer­den und hun­derte weit­ere Kristalli­sa­tion­sorte müssen aus dem Boden sprießen, die wiederum andere inspiri­eren u.s.w.

Wir rufen dazu auf diese neuen Beset­zun­gen in Bex­hill und Berlin mit prak­tis­ch­er Hil­fe zu unter­stützen, genau­so wie wir dazu aufrufen unsere Beset­zung am Rande des Ham­bach­er Forstes mit prak­tis­ch­er Hil­fe zu unter­stützen. Wir rufen aber auch dazu auf sel­ber viele neue solch­er Orte zu schaf­fen, die es braucht als Kristalli­sa­tion­sorte des Wider­standes. Orte an denen Men­schen zusam­menkom­men kön­nen, Dinge pla­nen kön­nen, aber auch schon in der Art und Weise des Lebens und der neuen Organ­isierung erah­nen kön­nen, was für eine Welt möglich wäre jen­seits von Kap­i­tal­is­mus und Herrschaftssys­te­men.
Und wir rufen dazu auf sich unter diesen Orten stärk­er zu ver­net­zten – denn die Stro­hfeuer die derzeit hier und dort auflodern müssen sich verbinden zu einem Flächen­brand – ein Flächen­brand der Undurch­set­zbarkeit all dieser Pro­jek­te.

act – before it’s too late!

Ham­bach­er Forst
 e‑mail: hambacheforst@eiseup.net
 Home­page: http://hambacherforst.blogsport.de/

Battle of Hastings

As pre­dict­ed, Mon­day 7 Jan­u­ary saw the chain­saws back in force on the Bex­hill-Hast­ings Link Rd being built smack through the mid­dle of tran­quil Combe Haven.

As pre­dict­ed, Mon­day 7 Jan­u­ary saw the chain­saws back in force on the Bex­hill-Hast­ings Link Rd being built smack through the mid­dle of tran­quil Combe Haven. Despite the fact that the fund­ing for the road isn’t yet in place East Sus­sex Coun­ty Coun­cil seem deter­mined to fell all the trees along the route. With most activ­i­ty focussed on the area near the rail­way, just oppo­site Upper Wilt­ing Farm (TN38 8EG). Activists rapid­ly occu­pied trees in the area, and then one of the exca­va­tors, also stag­ing a sit-down protest in front of the lat­ter.

“We were up and ready for them at six this morn­ing, before it got light. They were try­ing to cut trees to the north of the sec­ond camp. There are three big oaks there that they clear­ly want­ed to fell but we pushed through the lines of secu­ri­ty and got peo­ple into the trees”

Two peo­ple were arrest­ed and sub­se­quent­ly released: one charged, one cau­tioned (both for “aggra­vat­ed tres­pass”).

“We obvi­ous­ly stopped a lot of what they were plan­ning to do. They were most­ly just brush-cut­ting all day. We were with them until it got dark. I’m not entire­ly sure what they brought a dig­ger along for but they did­n’t real­ly get to use it”

Fur­ther action – by both road con­trac­tors & oppo­nents of the road – is expect­ed to begin ear­ly Tues­day (8 Jan­u­ary) & more peo­ple are need­ed for both arrestable and non-arrestable roles! And don’t for­get the ongo­ing Camp, not far away, near Adam’s Farm.

Mass Action Targets TransCanada Offices

Jan­u­ary 7th, 2013

What: Tar Sands Block­ade pro­test­ers take over Tran­sCana­da Key­stone XL offices in Hous­ton, demand­ing account­abil­i­ty for abus­es by Tran­sCana­da

Jan­u­ary 7th, 2013

What: Tar Sands Block­ade pro­test­ers take over Tran­sCana­da Key­stone XL offices in Hous­ton, demand­ing account­abil­i­ty for abus­es by Tran­sCana­da

Where: 2700 Post Oak Blvd, Suite 400, Hous­ton TX 77056 (next to the Hous­ton Gal­le­ria)

When: Under­way now!

Who: 100+ pro­test­ers gath­ered to con­front pipeline com­pa­ny over land abus­es, tox­ic lega­cy and cli­mate change con­nect­ed to TransCanada’s Key­stone XL pipeline.

The Tar Sands Block­ade is a group of envi­ron­men­tal­ists and landown­ers work­ing to stop the Key­stone XL tar sands pipeline through direct action.

Why: This action kicks off a new phase of the Tar Sands Block­ade tar­get­ing the cor­po­rate and finan­cial infra­struc­ture behind the Key­stone XL pipeline. TransCanada’s pipeline uses seized land to trans­port tox­ic tar sands oil through Texas and Okla­homa com­mu­ni­ties, in order to export it from Hous­ton ports. These dan­ger­ous busi­ness prac­tices and the back­lash from com­mu­ni­ties across the coun­try make this pipeline a tox­ic invest­ment for our state and TransCanada’s cor­po­rate lenders.

Australian miner Whitehaven Coal hit by hoax

7th Jan 2013.

7th Jan 2013. Shares in Aus­tralian min­er White­haven Coal fell almost 9% after a fake press release claimed one of the fir­m’s lenders had with­drawn fund­ing.

The release, from an anti-coal action group claim­ing that ANZ bank had with­drawn A$1.2bn ($1.3bn; £784m), prompt­ed the min­er to sus­pend trad­ing in its shares.

Once the hoax was uncov­ered, White­haven shares recov­ered the loss­es.

Oth­er Aus­tralian firms have fall­en vic­tim to hoax­es in recent months.

The state­ment said that ANZ had with­drawn fund­ing for White­haven’s pro­posed Maules Creek mine due to “rep­u­ta­tion­al risks and analy­sis of the returns on this mine in the cur­rent cli­mate of high volatil­i­ty in the coal export mar­ket”.

Investors then sold shares in the com­pa­ny, fear­ing that the mine may be pulled.

Once the hoax came to light, ANZ issued its own release say­ing it had made no state­ment on White­haven and remained “ful­ly sup­port­ive” of the com­pa­ny.

Jonathan Moy­lan from Front­line Action for Coal, which issued the hoax state­ment, said envi­ron­men­tal con­cerns had prompt­ed the press release.

For more info on Front­line Action for Coal and their con­tin­u­ing protest camp and actions, see here

Come to Camp, Defend the Trees, Celebrate 12th Night (6/7 Jan)!

[Please note: There is a replace­ment bus ser­vice for the train between Bat­tle and Hast­ings all week­end (6 & 7 Jan­u­ary), so check the times before you leave.]

[Please note: There is a replace­ment bus ser­vice for the train between Bat­tle and Hast­ings all week­end (6 & 7 Jan­u­ary), so check the times before you leave.]

The chain­saws have been silent over Christ­mas but they’ll soon be back. And when they come, they’ll come ear­ly. So: come and defend the trees, and cel­e­brate 12th night (the evening of Sun­day 6 Jan­u­ary), all in one place!

Bring a dish to share, a song to sing, and be ready to defend the trees ear­ly the next morn­ing (Mon­day 7 Jan­u­ary – which also hap­pens to be our best guest of when the con­trac­tors will be return­ing in force). (See here for direc­tions to – and groundrules for – the Camp). Prac­ti­cal work­shops – focussing on putting up struc­tures to help with the peace­ful defence of the trees – will also be tak­ing place on Sat­ur­day 5 Jan­u­ary.

Whether or not you plan to stay overnight you’ll prob­a­bly want to bring a torch, wellies and some eat­ing uten­sils. If you are going to stay over then you’ll also need to bring water, snacks, bed­ding and – ide­al­ly – a tent. If you haven’t got a tent, let us know, as there may be some spare tent space. The camp is near Adam’s Farm, Crowhurst: see here.

Final­ly, whether or not you’re able to make any of this weekend’s events, please try and come to the Camp as ear­ly as pos­si­ble on the morn­ing of Mon­day 7th Jan­u­ary (when we antic­i­pate the chain­saws will be back in force). We may be able to offer lifts at 5.45am from Crowhurst. If you require or can offer a lift please let us know – 07926 423 033

First Nations may engage in economic blockades if Canada refuses treaty talks

First Nations lead­ers have dis­cussed plans to launch coun­try-wide eco­nom­ic dis­rup­tions by the mid­dle of Jan­u­ary if Prime Min­is­ter Stephen Harp­er doesn’t agree to hunger-strik­ing Attawapiskat Chief There­sa Spence’s demand for a treaty meet­ing

First Nations lead­ers have dis­cussed plans to launch coun­try-wide eco­nom­ic dis­rup­tions by the mid­dle of Jan­u­ary if Prime Min­is­ter Stephen Harp­er doesn’t agree to hunger-strik­ing Attawapiskat Chief There­sa Spence’s demand for a treaty meet­ing

Dur­ing three days of meet­ings and tele­con­fer­ences, chiefs from across the coun­try dis­cussed a plan set­ting Jan. 16 as the day to launch a cam­paign of indef­i­nite eco­nom­ic dis­rup­tions, includ­ing rail­way and high­way block­ades, accord­ing to two chiefs who were involved in the talks who request­ed anonymi­ty.

“The peo­ple are rest­less, they are say­ing enough is enough,” said one chief, who was involved in the dis­cus­sions. “Eco­nom­ic impacts are immi­nent if there is no response.”

Chiefs were still final­iz­ing details of their plans Mon­day evening and it remained unclear to what extent their dis­cussed options would trans­late into the offi­cial posi­tion.

Assem­bly of First Nations Nation­al Chief Shawn Atleo is expect­ed to write Harp­er a let­ter out­lin­ing the chiefs’ posi­tion.

Spence launched her hunger strike on Dec. 11 to force a meet­ing between Prime Min­is­ter Stephen Harp­er, Gov­er­nor Gen­er­al David John­ston and First Nations lead­ers to dis­cuss the state of the treaties. Spence said in a state­ment issued Mon­day that the aim of the meet­ing was to “re-estab­lish” the treaty rela­tion­ship and final­ly put First Nations peo­ple in their “right­ful place back here in our home­lands that we all call Cana­da.”

The plan of action comes as the Idle No More move­ment con­tin­ues to sweep across the coun­try through round dances, ral­lies along with high­way and rail block­ades.

The Tyen­d­i­na­ga Mohawks briefly block­ad­ed a main CN rail line between Toron­to and Mon­tre­al Sun­day, strand­ing about 2,000 Via Rail pas­sen­gers. The Mi’kmaq from the Lis­tuguj First Nation, Que., con­tin­ue to hold a rail block­ade on a CN line along with mem­bers of the Aamji­w­naang First Nation who have shut a CN line in Sar­nia, Ont. In British Colum­bia, the Seton Lake Indi­an Band end­ed a rail block­ade on Sun­day.

How the chiefs’ action plan will mesh with the Idle No More move­ment remains to be seen. Idle No More orga­niz­ers issued a state­ment Mon­day that dis­tanced the move­ment from the chiefs.

“The chiefs have called for action and any­one who choos­es can join with them, how­ev­er, this is not part of the Idle No More move­ment as the vision of this grass­roots move­ment does not coin­cide with the visions of the lead­er­ship,” said the state­ment, post­ed on the Idle No More Face­book page. “While we appre­ci­ate the indi­vid­ual sup­port we have received from chiefs and coun­cil­lors, we have been giv­en a clear man­date by the grass­roots to work out­side the sys­tems of gov­ern­ment and that is what we will con­tin­ue to do.”

One of the chiefs involved in action plan dis­cus­sion said the lead­er­ship want­ed to be sen­si­tive to the grass­roots-dri­ven move­ment and make clear that their plans are being devel­oped in sup­port and as a response to Idle No More.

“Chiefs are stand­ing firm in sup­port of Idle No More and grass­roots cit­i­zens,” said the chief. “We now need to uni­fy.”

New Keystone XL Aerial Tree Blockade Halts Construction in Diboll, TX, 3rd Jan

Unprecedented “dump platforms” protected by intricate 100 ft perimeter web of safety lines to protect sitters; action declared in solidarity with “Idle No More” in Canada

From a TSB state­ment released at 9:00AM this morn­ing — Late last night, block­aders set up two &ldqu

Unprecedented “dump platforms” protected by intricate 100 ft perimeter web of safety lines to protect sitters; action declared in solidarity with “Idle No More” in Canada

From a TSB state­ment released at 9:00AM this morn­ing — Late last night, block­aders set up two “dump plat­forms” in trees out­side of Diboll, Texas which would oth­er­wise be cleared to make way for TransCanada’s Key­stone XL tox­ic tar sands pipeline. These spe­cial “dump plat­forms” are shield­ed by an unprece­dent­ed 80–100 ft perime­ter of life-lines arranged, which if dis­turbed would cer­tain­ly dump the two block­aders nest­ed in them rough­ly 50–60 ft in the air. The Block­aders are sit­ting in sol­i­dar­i­ty with the now glob­al “Idle No More” cam­paign for First Nation’s human rights and trib­al sov­er­eign­ty that very recent­ly start­ed in Cana­da.

This new tree block­ade comes just a cou­ple weeks after the end of Tar Sands Blockade’s 85-day tree-sit near Winns­boro, TX. Tran­sCana­da rerout­ed the tar sands pipeline to go around the Winns­boro tree-sit, despite hav­ing told count­less landown­ers, includ­ing Dou­glass res­i­dent Mike Bish­op, that the route was set in stone and could not be altered to avoid bull­doz­ing their crop­land, or to go around schools, neigh­bor­hoods, or eco­log­i­cal­ly sen­si­tive areas.

This new site is sur­round­ed by bar­ri­ers like High­way 59, rail­road tracks, and Ryan Lake. With these near­by, block­aders have found a loca­tion around which the pipe can­not eas­i­ly be rerout­ed.

The via­bil­i­ty of this block­ade depends entire­ly on the safe con­duct of Tran­sCana­da and local police forces. They could eas­i­ly end it by cut­ting ropes and seri­ous­ly injur­ing or killing the tree sit­ters. Block­aders Audrey and Mike know the risks. They are pre­pared to stay on their plat­forms, just big enough to lie down on, indef­i­nite­ly, to defend their col­lec­tive home from the expan­sion of tar sands exploita­tion that Key­stone XL would ush­er in.

“Pro­tect­ing the liv­ing sys­tems which we’re a part of is a moral neces­si­ty,” shared Audrey, who is sit­ting in a sin­gu­lar tree left in a new­ly-cleared field. “Extrac­tion of the tar sands is the most destruc­tive project on the con­ti­nent. It threat­ens the integri­ty of the entire bios­phere, not to men­tion the First Nations depen­dent upon access to clean water, land, and air for the health and food for their trib­al com­mu­ni­ties.”

Mike, the oth­er sit­ter sus­pend­ed in a 50 ft sky­pod between two trees, agreed, “That their plight has been so long ignored by indus­try and pol­i­cy-mak­ers is a clear vio­la­tion of their human rights and a crime of con­science. That’s why we are enthu­si­as­ti­cal­ly sup­port­ing the Idle No More move­ment!”

Tar Sands Block­ade is a coali­tion of Texas and Okla­homa landown­ers and cli­mate jus­tice orga­niz­ers using peace­ful and sus­tained civ­il dis­obe­di­ence to stop the con­struc­tion of TransCanada’s Key­stone XL tar sands pipeline.

“Insti­tu­tion­al meth­ods of address­ing cli­mate change have failed us,” explained Ron Seifert, a Tar Sands Block­ade spokesper­on. “Ris­ing up to defend our homes against cor­po­rate exploita­tion is our best and only hope to pre­serve life on this plan­et. We must nor­mal­ize and embrace direct, orga­nized resis­tance to the death machine of indus­tri­al extrac­tion and stand with those like Idle No More who take extra­or­di­nary risk to defend their fam­i­lies and liveli­hoods.”

Pho­tos of the action are avail­able on Tar Sands Blockade’s Flickr account here: http://flickr.com/photos/tarsandsblockade/

[Block­ade is locat­ed two miles south of Diboll, TX on north­bound High­way 59, a mas­sive ban­ner deployed there is high­ly vis­i­ble to high­way traf­fic.]
See TarSandsBlockade.org for more info.

Idle No More — First Nation blockade of Sarnia CN Rail track

Dec 25th, 2012

A south­west­ern Ontario First Nation is plan­ning a ral­ly in Sar­nia today — the fourth day of its block­ade of a CN Rail line in the city.

Dec 25th, 2012

A south­west­ern Ontario First Nation is plan­ning a ral­ly in Sar­nia today — the fourth day of its block­ade of a CN Rail line in the city.

The Aamji­w­naang (AWN’-ja-nong) First Nation says both the demon­stra­tion at Sar­nia city hall this morn­ing and the ongo­ing block­ade are part of the nation­al Idle No More protests.

The may­or of Sar­nia, Ont., says city police do not plan to shut down a CN Rail block­ade by First Nations activists as long as no one is hurt in the protest.

Mike Bradley says CN obtained a court injunc­tion that leaves it to police in the south­west­ern Ontario city to decide whether to end the three-day-old block­ade.

Block­ade spokesman Ron Plain says the protests are being led by young Aamji­w­naang First Nation mem­bers, who met Sun­day with rep­re­sen­ta­tives from CN, as well as Bradley and Sarnia’s police chief.

Dozens of demon­stra­tors set up tables, tents and vehi­cles on and around the track Fri­day as part of the nation­al Idle No More protests.

Orga­niz­er Vanes­sa Gray says the ral­ly aims to bring the com­mu­ni­ty togeth­er “to stand up for what your rights are and what you believe in.”

Mean­while, there’s no indi­ca­tion when the block­ade will come to an end.

They say the block­ade of the com­mer­cial-rail cor­ri­dor will con­tin­ue until Prime Min­is­ter Stephen Harp­er meets with Atti­wapiskat Chief There­sa Spence, who is on a hunger strike to bring atten­tion to abo­rig­i­nal issues.

CN Rail spokesman Jim Fee­ny says the rail com­pa­ny is urg­ing gov­ern­ments and police to step up nego­ti­a­tions to come up with a peace­ful set­tle­ment.

He says the stop­page is start­ing to affect CN cus­tomers, for exam­ple it’s pre­vent­ing propane ship­ments from get­ting to Cana­di­an con­sumers.

Defend the trees at Adam’s farm! (Sat 22 Dec & beyond)

The trees at Adam’s Farm were suc­cess­ful­ly defend­ed all day Fri­day (21 Dec), and the plan is now to hold and secure them over the week­end and beyond. Please con­sid­er doing a stint at the camp over the next few days. It is locat­ed on the dis­used rail­way: please respect the pri­va­cy of the res­i­dents of the farm­house and access down the dis­used rail­way track, not the Adams Farm track. Please don’t bring vehi­cles in. More folk are need­ed to camp out dur­ing the day & overnight, and to sup­port with wood, tools, car­pen­try, climb­ing skills, dri­ving, and food. All wel­come!

For more info call 07926 423 033. Map below: the camp is at the end of the old rail­way, in and around the trees at risk. Google map here.


View BHLR road protest map in a larg­er map

Combe Haven Week 1: Summary, reports and pictures December 22, 2012

Clear­ly try­ing to get the jump on the Link Road’s oppo­nents, con­trac­tors start­ed work on the Bex­hill-Hast­ings Link Road (BHLR) prop­er on Fri­day 14 Decem­ber with a move to cut down the trees near Adam’s farm in Crowhurst (“clear­ance” work like this was not sched­uled to begin until next year). The resis­tance over the next week was some­times sham­bol­ic, always peace­ful, and occa­sion­al­ly hero­ic. Six tree defend­ers were arrest­ed (2 on Sat­ur­day, 4 on Mon­day), and Day 8 closed with activists camp­ing overnight in the trees near Adam’s farm.

Activists are now call­ing on peo­ple to help them hold the site near Adam’s farm.

What fol­lows is a brief sum­ma­ry of the sto­ry so far.

Fri­day 14 Decem­ber 2012

Anti-road pro­tes­tors from Hast­ings, St Leonards and Bex­hill were joined by oth­ers from East­bourne, Brighton and Lon­don at dawn in the Combe Val­ley today to stop attempts to begin tree-felling for the Bex­hill-Hast­ings Link Road. On a day of heavy rain and high winds, around 30 pro­tes­tors suc­cess­ful­ly pre­vent­ed any sig­nif­i­cant work tak­ing place despite the pres­ence in the val­ley of over 100 secu­ri­ty guards, chain­saw oper­a­tives and oth­er con­trac­tors.

The cam­paign­ers ini­tial­ly occu­pied trees at Adams Farm and suc­cess­ful­ly block­ad­ed the access track for over 2 hours. The main con­trac­tors’ con­voy from Sid­ley arrived en masse at Upper Wilt­ing Farm mid-morn­ing, and they pro­ceed­ed on foot to attempt tree-cut­ting near Lit­tle Bog Wood. Pro­tes­tors prompt­ly moved into the wood­land to min­gle with the work­ers, mak­ing it impos­si­ble for any felling to occur.

The con­trac­tors then relo­cat­ed by vehi­cle to Adams Farm and were again meet by pro­tes­tors, some still occu­py­ing trees and oth­ers on the ground. There were lengthy peri­ods of inac­tiv­i­ty with the work crews and secu­ri­ty seem­ing unclear what tac­tics to adopt. On only a few occa­sions were chain­saws or strim­mers start­ed but pro­tes­tors imme­di­ate­ly placed them­selves in posi­tions to stop them being used. The con­trac­tors and secu­ri­ty guards retreat­ed to their vans for lunch and at around 12.30 made a deci­sion to aban­don work for the day. Pro­tes­tors remained on alert in the val­ley for a fur­ther 2 hours to ensure no fur­ther attempts were made.

Sat­ur­day 15 Decem­ber 2012

Activists were able to stop some of the trees in Bex­hill from being chopped down, though con­trac­tors were able to chain­saw quite a large a num­ber there. There were two arrests – one for “aggra­vat­ed tres­pass” (now charged and released), the sec­ond for not giv­ing their name and address to a police offi­cer (which they have no legal right to demand under most cir­cum­stances).  No trees were felled at Adam’s farm how­ev­er, which was also being defend­ed.

Sun­day 16 Decem­ber

Trees con­tin­ued to be felled in Bex­hill at the back of the Leisure Cen­tre (TN39 4HS), despite attempts to defend the trees. Chain­saws and secu­ri­ty guards moved-in on trees nr Adam’s Farm with climbers, and one per­son locked-on to a con­trac­tors vehi­cle, sig­nif­i­cant­ly imped­ing their activ­i­ties.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mon­day 17 Decem­ber

Tree-felling con­tin­ued in Bex­hill, with four activists occu­py­ing the trees in the morn­ing / after­noon. All four were even­tu­al­ly removed from the trees and arrest­ed. They were all released, the last one at 2am the next day! Fel­low activists were out­side Hast­ings police sta­tion to greet them, and the CHD are now arrang­ing court sup­port for them where appro­pri­ate.

 

 

 

 

 

Tues­day 18 Decem­ber 2012

Tree-defend­ers were in action in Bex­hill again where chain­saw-wield­ing con­trac­tors con­tin­ued to fell trees. They attempt­ed to enter the area but were eject­ed by secu­ri­ty guards. Oth­er sites have been mon­i­tored and do not appear to have been attacked yet.

Wednes­day 19 Decem­ber 2012

Work began in Sid­ley again on Wednes­day (19.12.12) as secu­ri­ty guards and their ubiq­ui­tous Har­ris fenc­ing crept north­wards up the dis­used rail­way, giv­ing the chain­saw crews space to do their dirty work unob­struct­ed by the small num­bers of pro­tes­tors present. One ear­ly bird pro­tes­tor dropped by on the way to work and put anti-road posters up all along the hoard­ings by the A269 bridge.

Tree defend­ers main­tained a pres­ence across the val­ley, mon­i­tor­ing for signs of activ­i­ty in the vicin­i­ty of Upper Wilt­ing Farm, Adams Farm (where a small num­ber of Envi­ron­ment Agency peo­ple were again at work on what’s believed to water­course main­te­nance not relat­ed to road build­ing), Acton’s Farm and Glover’s Farm. The val­ley remained just about pass­able on foot, with about 30 cm of stand­ing water along the foot­path in the val­ley bot­tom near Adam’s Farm.

Sad­ly, recon­nais­sance revealed exten­sive tree-felling in the copse between Acton’s Farm and Glover’s Farm at map ref TQ748099, about 100m to the left of the foot­path as you walk towards Acton’s Farm from Sid­ley. This work looked like it was done a few days ear­li­er. The con­trac­tors cut down around 30 larg­er trees with­in the copse but left a screen of sur­round­ing small­er trees to shield their work from view. A few larg­er trees still remained in the copse on the North side.

Thurs­day 20 Decem­ber 2012

Tree defend­ers were out again in Sid­ley on Thurs­day and man­aged to halt the felling of a num­ber of trees along the dis­used rail­way near Glovers bridge. In the ear­ly hours two pro­tes­tors with climb­ing gear scaled 20ft into an over­hang­ing ash tree and hasti­ly erect­ed a tar­pau­lin to pro­vide shel­ter from the rain. Local sup­port­ers were also present on the bridge and even­tu­al­ly man­aged to get choco­lates and hot water to the tree-sit­ters.

The occu­pied tree and a num­ber of oth­ers sur­round­ing it were spared the teeth of the chain­saws, although many sig­nif­i­cant trees fur­ther along the route were felled as the chain­saw gangs and their secu­ri­ty detail moved North into the Combe Haven val­ley. The pro­tes­tors out­last­ed the work crews and even man­aged to rus­tle up a hot meal at lunch – some­thing the secu­ri­ty guard stand­ing on guard near­by for 3 hours in the pour­ing rain could only envy.

Fri­day 21 Decem­ber

The day began with the re-occu­pa­tion of the trees in Sid­ley that were suc­cess­ful­ly defend­ed the pre­vi­ous day. Secu­ri­ty and police then made a major move on the trees near Adam’s farm in Crowhurst, felling some near the barns there, and report­ed­ly pre­vent­ing access along the foot­paths.

How­ev­er, tree defend­ers were still able to occu­py key trees along the line of the old dis­used rail­way cut­ting there, build­ing tree hous­es. Police tell one of those occu­py­ing the trees that they will bring him mince pies if he’s still there in the morn­ing. The day end­ed with secu­ri­ty guards leav­ing, amid rumors that they may have knocked off now until the New Year, and activists camp­ing out overnight in and around the trees.

Resis­tance to the road also made the front pages of the three local papers: