announcement of Bath Climate Camp

4.03.2007

Bath Activist Net­work has begun organ­is­ing a cli­mate camp to be held between thurs­day the 19th and sun­day the 22nd of April

The focus of the camp will be the head­quaters of Land and marine, the com­pa­ny build­ing a 150 mile long, envi­ron­men­tal­ly destruc­tive pipeline through Wales.

4.03.2007

Bath Activist Net­work has begun organ­is­ing a cli­mate camp to be held between thurs­day the 19th and sun­day the 22nd of April

The focus of the camp will be the head­quaters of Land and marine, the com­pa­ny build­ing a 150 mile long, envi­ron­men­tal­ly destruc­tive pipeline through Wales.
We hope to shut land and Marine down with Blockades/protests on the fri­day and sat­ur­day.
this is a chance to show sol­i­dar­i­ty with those in Wales who have been sucess­ful­ly dis­rupt­ing the pipeline for so long, and a chance to bring the bat­tle to the doorstep of the com­pa­ny respon­si­ble.

The camp will be a self man­aged space which will include work­shops, music/soundsystem a veg­an kitchen and more and is inspired by the Camp for Cli­mate Action held last sum­mer.

We will have a web­site, posters, book­lets etc pro­duced soon

feel free to e‑mail us if you want any info, or to help us pub­li­cise the camp.

bathclimatecamp@yahoo.co.uk

documentary: Reclaim Power — voices from the camp for climate action 2006

In the sum­mer of 2006, 600 peo­ple con­vinced that there is no time to waste set up a Camp for Cli­mate Action in the shad­ow of one of the biggest C02 emit­ters in Europe: Drax coal-fired pow­er sta­tion in York­shire / UK. Cine Rebelde pro­duced a doc­u­men­tary film about the camp.

Cli­mate change is now a real­i­ty. Lead­ing sci­en­tists across the world agree that in a ’busi­ness as usu­al sce­nario’ we have no longer than 10 years to pre­vent 2–3 degrees of addi­tion­al glob­al arm­ing that will lead to irre­versible cli­mat­ic changes with dra­mat­ic con­se­quences for our plan­et.

Climate camp view from gateIn the sum­mer of 2006, 600 peo­ple con­vinced that there is no time to waste set up a Camp for Cli­mate Action in the shad­ow of one of the biggest C02 emit­ters in Europe: Drax coal-fired pow­er sta­tion in York­shire / UK. Cine Rebelde pro­duced a doc­u­men­tary film about the camp.

Cli­mate change is now a real­i­ty. Lead­ing sci­en­tists across the world agree that in a ’busi­ness as usu­al sce­nario’ we have no longer than 10 years to pre­vent 2–3 degrees of addi­tion­al glob­al arm­ing that will lead to irre­versible cli­mat­ic changes with dra­mat­ic con­se­quences for our plan­et.

How­ev­er, in a world dri­ven by prof­it and com­mit­ted to unlim­it­ed eco­nom­ic growth, human­i­ty seems very unwill­ing to change the course of the fos­sil fuel econ­o­my.

In the sum­mer of 2006, the 5th hottest year ever record­ed in recent his­to­ry, 600 peo­ple con­vinced that there is no time to waste set up a Camp for Cli­mate Action in the shad­ow of one of the biggest C02 emit­ters in Europe: Drax coal-fired pow­er sta­tion in York­shire / UK.

With over one hun­dred work­shops on a wide range of top­ics, the 10 day camp was a space of col­lec­tive learn­ing, sus­tain­able liv­ing and tak­ing direct action on the root caus­es of cli­mate change. The gath­er­ing that showed prac­ti­cal low ener­gy solu­tions in action, cul­mi­nat­ed in a day of protest and mass direct action in an attempt to shut down Drax.

DVD 62min + extras
Eng­lish with sub­ti­tles in Eng­lish, French, Ger­man and Span­ish
reports on indy­media UK: http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/actions/2006/climatecamp/

Trail­er down­load: 2:58 min
http://www.cinerebelde.org/site.php3?id_article=356〈=en

a cine rebelde pro­duc­tion in coop­er­a­tion with http://risingtide.org.uk and http://climatecamp.org.uk

indy­media reports of the Camp 2006:
http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/actions/2006/climatecamp/

Pic­tures, infor­ma­tion and film orders:
orders@cinerebelde.org
http://www.cinerebelde.org

DVDs will also soon be avail­able from ris­ing tide, cli­mate camp groups and at the meet­ing in Bris­tol.

* * * * * *
Prepa­ra­tions for the Camp for Cli­mate Action 2007 are in full swing. The upcom­ing meet­ing will be in Bris­tol on March 17th /18th.

Ris­ing Tide North Amer­i­ca is cur­rent­ly doing a Road Show. Check out:
http://risingtidenorthamerica.org

Police Critical of Mass (edinburgh)

23 Feb 2007
A crit­i­cal mass of over 40 cyclists con­verged this Fri­day on Edin­burgh city cen­tre. After meet­ing between the art gal­leries near the mound they under­took a live­ly cycle ride, last­ing near­ly two hours through the town.

23 Feb 2007
A crit­i­cal mass of over 40 cyclists con­verged this Fri­day on Edin­burgh city cen­tre. After meet­ing between the art gal­leries near the mound they under­took a live­ly cycle ride, last­ing near­ly two hours through the town.
Click on image for a larg­er ver­sion

The mass had a gen­er­al­ly uncom­pro­mis­ing atti­tude to traf­fic, cork­ing lanes at red lights to keep the mass togeth­er, ensur­ing the event was safe and fun for all involved.

Pound­ing tech­no music from the sound sys­tem set a real­ly good mood for the cycle. There was a 25Watt mega­phone-soundsys­tem with some uplift­ing tunes from Aphex twin, Square­push­er, a bit apoc­olyp­tic orches­tral. One of the par­tic­i­pants said “The music was quite amaz­ing, it brought a whole dif­fer­ent atmos­phere to the ride. By chang­ing the dai­ly real­i­ty of peo­ple, with cars blocked and silent bikes rid­ing to the music that fill­ing the whole street, there is a vision of what is pos­si­ble. I think crit­i­cal mass is a rev­o­lu­tion­ary moment.”

Four police motor­cy­cles arrived halfway through the ride, inter­cept­ing the pro­ces­sion out­side the mosque near Edin­burgh Uni­ver­si­ty. Sev­er­al indi­vid­u­als were pulled to one side and warned that their lights were not legal. Despite forty cyclists being quite con­spic­u­ous and eas­i­ly observ­able by motorists, they com­plained that sev­er­al par­tic­i­pants in the crit­i­cal mass were break­ing the law. Appar­ent­ly flash­ing red lights are not ade­quate­ly safe and vis­i­ble, despite forty peo­ple with flash­ing red lights look­ing much like an xmas par­ty. The name and address of one Edin­burgh Uni­ver­si­ty stu­dent was tak­en, but no-one was arrest­ed or for­mal­ly cau­tioned, although they were warned that they may face an on the spot fine if caught again with­out legal lights. Despite this, the four police motor­cy­clists left the mass and no police were seen again after this unnec­es­sary con­fronta­tion.

An Edin­burgh Uni­ver­si­ty anthro­pol­o­gy stu­dent who was accost­ed by the a police motor­cy­clists com­ment­ed: “the prob­lems they had with me were rea­son­able, i was cycling with­out any lights, they were just enforc­ing the law, I did­nt go home when warned and was going slow on the inside lane and par­tial­ly obstruct­ing the police motor­cy­cles”

One of the par­tic­i­pants, an unem­ployed man liv­ing in Lei­th said: “the police were being antag­o­nis­tic. So what if some of us had flash­ing red lights, and did not have the legal­ly nec­es­sary white lights on the front of our bikes, haven’t they got bet­ter things to do? I think they just hate it when a bunch of peo­ple get togeth­er in a group to do some­thing fun or rad­i­cal and they cant con­trol or dom­i­nate the sit­u­a­tion. Despite the police, it was the best crit­i­cal mass i have been on, good peo­ple and good atmos­phere.”

A com­put­er pro­gram­mer from near the mead­ows said “I thought it went just dandi­ly, it was good that we went slow­ly and blocked the whole road and there was noth­ing they [the police] could do about it because we were well with­in the law.”

“I’m going to dress up like a fuck­ing christ­mas tree for the next crit­i­cal mass, then they cant com­plain!” exclaimed one cyclist.

The vast major­i­ty of those in the mass were not intim­i­dat­ed by the police and con­tin­ued with the crit­i­cal mass demon­stra­tion, con­tin­u­ing along George St., and enjoyed cycling around the round­abouts and along the pic­turesque cob­bled streets.

Edin­burgh’s crit­i­cal mass meets at 5.30pm on the last Fri­day of every month, out­side the art gallery at the foot of the mound, It appears to be grow­ing in num­bers and enthu­si­asm as the warmer and lighter sea­sons approach.

Bradford Climate Criminals flyposted

22.1.07
On Wednes­day evening, a num­ber of con­cerned Leeds and Brad­ford res­i­dents decid­ed to draw atten­tion to the activ­i­ties of a num­ber of cli­mate crim­i­nals in Brad­ford city cen­tre. Adver­tise­ments for dam­ag­ing air flights were mod­i­fied to tell the truth; that fly­ing is the fastest grow­ing cause of cli­mate change, the “sin­gle great­est threat to human-kind” accord­ing to the government’s chief sci­en­tist.

Bradford climate camp aviation flyposters22.1.07
On Wednes­day evening, a num­ber of con­cerned Leeds and Brad­ford res­i­dents decid­ed to draw atten­tion to the activ­i­ties of a num­ber of cli­mate crim­i­nals in Brad­ford city cen­tre. Adver­tise­ments for dam­ag­ing air flights were mod­i­fied to tell the truth; that fly­ing is the fastest grow­ing cause of cli­mate change, the “sin­gle great­est threat to human-kind” accord­ing to the government’s chief sci­en­tist.

Despite assur­ances that cli­mate change is being tak­en seri­ous­ly by any num­ber of politi­cians or busi­ness peo­ple, the fact is that new run­ways are planned, motor­ways are being expand­ed, and pipelines being built to increase our depen­dence on fos­sil fuels. In the face of this hypocrisy, it was clear that the time had come to make a direct state­ment that irre­spon­si­ble crim­i­nal­i­ty of this kind will not be tol­er­at­ed by sane and mod­er­ate peo­ple.

Sev­er­al trav­el agents, shame­less­ly plug­ging mas­sive­ly destruc­tive air flights for prof­it, had their mis­lead­ing win­dow dis­plays obscured by handy stick­ers which made plain the true cost of fly­ing. Those peo­ple tak­ing part in this vital ser­vice did so as a way of encour­ag­ing oth­ers to stand up against the cli­mate crim­i­nals and car­ry out sim­i­lar pub­lic-spir­it­ed actions in their areas. The stick­ers used are avail­able at a cost of 50p each to any­one who wants them – just email trees@riseup.net with your order. The stick­ers are just £10 for 20, post free!

There is still time to pre­vent run­away cli­mate change but we must act now.

Part of that action must be to expose the ongo­ing activites of those who wish to destroy the plan­et for prof­it. Clear­ly, we can’t leave it to busi­ness and gov­ern­ment to sort out the mess – they are the ones mak­ing it because of their bizarre obses­sion with an eco­nom­ic sys­tem based on con­tin­u­al growth and unsus­tain­able con­sump­tion.

The rich are plun­der­ing the Earth, and as always the poor will suf­fer the worst. We can all act in our lives, and join togeth­er to cre­ate a rad­i­cal, and ulti­mate­ly rea­son­able and mod­er­ate, move­ment for social change and cli­mate jus­tice.

This action was inspired by the Camp For Cli­mate Action, which seems to have been a new begin­ning for the fight-back by rea­son­able and mod­er­ate peo­ple against the cli­mate crim­i­nals and prof­it-ter­ror­ists who seek to kill us all.

Carbon Trading Company’s Offices Occupied

Today, Wednes­day 21st Feb 2007, in a non-vio­lent protest, activists occu­pied the offices of a com­pa­ny deal­ing in Car­bon Off­sets, whilst oth­er cam­paign­ers car­ried out an action out­side the Com­pa­ny’s offices in Kings Cross Lon­don. The action was car­ried out to high­light what they claim is the green­wash of this com­pa­ny, and the dan­gers of sidelin­ing the huge­ly impor­tant issue of cli­mate change. This action, sweep­ing coal under a car­pet, was car­ried out to demon­strate their asser­tion that car­bon trad­ing is to attempt to sweep the issues asso­ci­at­ed with cli­mate change under the car­pet.

Carbon Neutral Company protest 2Carbon Neutral Company protest 1Today, Wednes­day 21st Feb 2007, in a non-vio­lent protest, activists occu­pied the offices of a com­pa­ny deal­ing in Car­bon Off­sets, whilst oth­er cam­paign­ers car­ried out an action out­side the Com­pa­ny’s offices in Kings Cross Lon­don. The action was car­ried out to high­light what they claim is the green­wash of this com­pa­ny, and the dan­gers of sidelin­ing the huge­ly impor­tant issue of cli­mate change. This action, sweep­ing coal under a car­pet, was car­ried out to demon­strate their asser­tion that car­bon trad­ing is to attempt to sweep the issues asso­ci­at­ed with cli­mate change under the car­pet.

Below is a copy of Lon­don Ris­ing Tides press release relat­ing to this action.

LONDON RISING TIDE OCCUPY HEAD OFFICE OF CARBON NEUTRAL COMPANY IN LONDON

Lon­don Ris­ing Tide has occu­pied the head office of the Car­bon Neu­tral Com­pa­ny (for­mer­ly Future Forests) on the day they had been invit­ed to appear before the All Par­ty Par­lia­men­tary Com­mit­tee on Cli­mate Change, that is chaired by the Car­bon Neu­tral Com­pa­ny.

This is what they have to say:

CARBON ‘OFFSET’ = CLIMATE UPSET

Today we have occu­pied and with any luck shut down the head office of the Car­bon Neu­tral Com­pa­ny (CNC) here in King’s Cross. CNC is one of many busi­ness­es which sell ‘car­bon off­sets’ to peo­ple and com­pa­nies that want to can­cel out their con­tri­bu­tion to cli­mate chaos (also known as ‘glob­al warm­ing’). CNC claims that it will neu­tralise the car­bon diox­ide (CO2) giv­en off by, say, Sil­ver­jet (a pri­vate jet air­line), and that it will do this by pay­ing peo­ple in devel­op­ing coun­tries to cut their own emis­sions with schemes that involve renew­able ener­gy or tree plant­i­ng. So what’s the prob­lem?

Car­bon off­set­ting: an excuse for no action?

Cli­mate chaos is an issue of jus­tice: it is hurt­ing the world’s poor­est (and least-pol­lut­ing) peo­ple first and hard­est, caus­ing mas­sive dis­as­ters and threat­en­ing mil­lions of species world­wide. Many peo­ple are now ques­tion­ing whether off­set­ting allows some of us in the rich­er, devel­oped world to car­ry on with our mas­sive­ly pol­lut­ing lifestyles, instead of low­er­ing our own emis­sions. Those who are buy­ing off­sets are often doing so with the best of inten­tions, but the fact remains that it’s a smoke­screen that has to stop.

If we com­pare the plan­et to a run­ning bath, full almost to the brim with CO2, to off­set CO2 emis­sions is like say­ing “I won’t turn off my tap. I’ll pay some­one else £10 to pay some­one else £2 to turn off their own tap.” (Guess who pock­ets the change?) The real­i­ty is that we need to turn off both, if we’re to have a chance of cut­ting CO2 emis­sions by 50% before 2016 (which is the sin­gle most impor­tant task fac­ing you and me, right here, right now in 2007.)

Not only is tree plant­i­ng a dis­cred­it­ed fail­ure when it comes to soak­ing up car­bon, many oth­er off­set schemes are look­ing pret­ty shab­by when looked at in detail by inde­pen­dent third par­ties.

Yes­ter­day, Car­bon Trade Watch released a report called “The Car­bon Neu­tral Myth – Off­set Indul­gences for your Cli­mate Sins” that gave a lot of evi­dence and infor­ma­tion as to why off­set­ting is inef­fec­tive, injust and dam­ag­ing to the cli­mate change debate. ( http://www.carbontradewatch.org/pubs/carbon_neutral_myth.pdf)

Who are we?

Our group is called Lon­don Ris­ing Tide (LRT), and we are part of a wider nation­al and inter­na­tion­al move­ment that believes pas­sion­ate­ly in tak­ing direct action for ‘cli­mate jus­tice’. We reck­on it’s well past time for us to get cre­ative, to get move­ment-build­ing, to drown out the ris­ing tide of cor­po­rate ‘green­wash’ (ie. prof­it-dri­ven lies), to get food grow­ing with neigh­bours and friends, and to get seri­ous­ly dis­obe­di­ent, (but to do it with a good bit of humour).

A while ago, we were asked by the All Par­ty Par­lia­men­tary Com­mit­tee on Cli­mate Change to make a sub­mis­sion about planned Cli­mate Bill. The Com­mit­tee is admin­is­trat­ed by the Car­bon Neu­tral Com­pa­ny. After think­ing long and hard about it, this was our response:

‘We’re declin­ing the invi­ta­tion to address the meet­ing, since we believe in the cre­ation of mass move­ments striv­ing for sys­temic social and eco­log­i­cal change. Engag­ing with the com­mit­tee would be a dis­trac­tion from that, as it’s not in the inter­ests of either Par­lia­ment or pri­vate com­pa­nies to call for — or work for — such change. Also, we are deeply scep­ti­cal about the appar­ent pri­vati­sa­tion of the com­mit­tee process, espe­cial­ly when the com­pa­ny con­cerned is prof­it­ing hand­some­ly from the sale to the pub­lic of the pho­ny solu­tion that is the car­bon off­set.’

Beat the Chainsaw Pledge, Hereford

HEREFORD GREEN PARTY PRESS RELEASE:

Forty-nine locals vow to stand in front of chain­saws to pre­vent loss of Mead­ow trees.

HEREFORD GREEN PARTY PRESS RELEASE:

Forty-nine locals vow to stand in front of chain­saws to pre­vent loss of Mead­ow trees.

A capac­i­ty crowd of near­ly 300 peo­ple filled two floors of Here­ford’s Water­shed build­ing last night, to hear a coali­tion of groups talk about the Envi­ron­ment Agen­cy’s poor­ly-designed flood defence scheme for the City. Atten­dees expressed sup­port for the pro­vi­sion of effec­tive flood defences — but also con­cern over the Coun­cil’s lack of vision and lead­er­ship in pass­ing the cur­rent scheme by which estab­lished trees on Bish­op’s Mead­ow will be need­less­ly cut down. Green Par­ty prospec­tive Coun­cil can­di­date Mar­tin Wyness asked peo­ple if they would be will­ing to stand under the affect­ed trees, there­by mak­ing it impos­si­ble for work­ers to fell them. Forty-nine peo­ple expressed a com­mit­ment to stand in the way of the chain­saws in order to pro­tect Here­ford’s won­der­ful cul­tur­al and nat­ur­al her­itage.

Mem­bers of the pub­lic attend­ing the meet­ing expressed sur­prise that local ward Coun­cil­lors were not present to take ques­tions as to why they had not robust­ly chal­lenged the scheme dur­ing the plan­ning process. Dis­ap­point­ment was voiced as to why that process was not pub­li­cised suf­fi­cient­ly for res­i­dents to engage with it effec­tive­ly.

The Green Par­ty hopes that Coun­cil­lors who felt they could not chal­lenge the Envi­ron­ment Agency and DEFRA before, because of fears of los­ing fund­ing, will now find the courage to stand with the coali­tion as it demands that the scheme is rethought.

Green Par­ty prospec­tive Coun­cil can­di­date Mar­tin Wyness asked the Envi­ron­ment Agency rep­re­sen­ta­tive present at the meet­ing: “Can you give an assur­ance that the trees affect­ed will not be cut down in a rush in order to beat restric­tions caused by the immi­nent bird nest­ing sea­son?” The Envi­ron­ment Agency’s reply was that a sur­vey would be car­ried out.

Because it is still too ear­ly for nest­ing, this effec­tive­ly means that the chain­saws can come at any moment, even before the Envi­ron­ment Agency or Coun­cil looks at any alter­na­tive pro­pos­als.

The Green Par­ty is dis­ap­point­ed that Here­ford Lib­er­al Demo­c­rat MP Paul Keetch has until now, not seen fit to ques­tion the scheme prop­er­ly until he saw the scale of pub­lic con­cern. Here­ford needs a dynam­ic and pas­sion­ate Mem­ber of Par­lia­ment who will argue the case for keep­ing the mon­ey on the table while we amend the detail of these plans that would do so much dam­age to Here­ford’s his­toric envi­ron­ment. A some­what reluc­tant Mr. Keetch said on radio yes­ter­day “I am assured by the Envi­ron­ment Agency that if there is fine tun­ing that can be done, it will be done”. Let us hope he holds the agency to that promise.

ENDS

NOTES FOR EDITORS

It is quite pos­si­ble that Elgar walked beneath the trees that will be destroyed by this scheme. There is also a memo­r­i­al on the site that says that Elgar penned The Enig­ma Vari­a­tions after see­ing the Cathe­dral organist’s dog fall into the riv­er at this spot.

The coali­tion is ful­ly in favour of a flood defence scheme for the city, but not this one.

RRA Archi­tects showed their alter­na­tive and sym­pa­thet­ic pro­pos­al to the pub­lic meet­ing.

The coali­tion in favour of bet­ter flood defences includes: -

Cycle Here­ford
The Dis­abled Users Access Group
Friends of Cas­tle Green
Friends of the Earth
Fod­der
The Green Par­ty
The Here­ford Civic Soci­ety
RRA Archi­tects
St James and Bar­ton­sham Com­mu­ni­ty Asso­ci­a­tion
Water­shed

For fur­ther infor­ma­tion please con­tact:
Mar­tin Wyness
Media — Here­ford & South Here­ford­shire Green Par­ty
07809 150344
mediasouth@herefordshiregreens.org.uk
www.herefordshiregreens.org.uk

On the Ground Ireland: Day four, the Monday picket, video and report

Fears on ear­ly Mon­day morn­ing. Rats. Big ones. Per­haps Bertie Ahern and his cor­po­rate bud­dies had stormed the camp, attempt­ed to make a prof­it nest under the com­mu­nal ben­der and, as usu­al, couldn’t agree on any­thing and began squab­bling, squawk­ing and squeak­ing, claw­ing out each oth­ers eye­balls.

Fears on ear­ly Mon­day morn­ing. Rats. Big ones. Per­haps Bertie Ahern and his cor­po­rate bud­dies had stormed the camp, attempt­ed to make a prof­it nest under the com­mu­nal ben­der and, as usu­al, couldn’t agree on any­thing and began squab­bling, squawk­ing and squeak­ing, claw­ing out each oth­ers eye­balls.

Video 190207_Corrib_picket — video/x‑ms-wmv 5.6M

The ear­ly morn­ing pick­et saw peo­ple gath­er­ing again out­side the main gates of the con­struc­tion site again, this time at 7.30am.

The Gar­da were out in ear­ly, two vans, sev­er­al patrol cars and an unmarked blue car full of grin­ning senior offi­cers, who drove up and down the road all morn­ing.

30 to 40 pro­tes­tors pick­et­ed the trucks, cars and bus­es bring­ing in the work­ers. But the Shell con­tract­ed work­force was now minus five, accord­ing to local peo­ple. Five more work­ers quit after the Fri­day morn­ing protest.

The pick­et last­ed sev­er­al hours, includ­ing a tea-break at the Shell-to-Sea infor­ma­tion hut. Then the “musi­cians” decid­ed to give the work­ers a lit­tle scare, and send the mes­sage the protest to this pipeline and gas ter­mi­nal was not going away. They ran to the front gate and fence and used sticks to ham­mer out as much noise as they could muster until the only remain­ing police van drove up out front. The musi­cal pro­tes­tors retreat­ed back to the infor­ma­tion cen­tre and then took up perch oppo­site the main entrance again and ham­mered out beats on drums and bar­rels.

For now, there seems no real retal­i­a­tion from the Gar­da. There was a lit­tle point­less shov­ing of sev­er­al of the known local mem­bers, but it amount­ed to noth­ing.

The destruction of primeval Rospuda Valley is approaching! React!

The last moment to step in and stop the destruc­tion of primeval swamps and for­est in Cen­tral Europe: the Rospu­da Val­ley Bypass. A let­ter by Adam

Dear Ladies and Sirs,

I do not know if You are aware that Poland is build­ing a road through a part of Europe’s last primeval for­est- the Rospu­da Val­ley Bypass.

Rospuda valleyThe last moment to step in and stop the destruc­tion of primeval swamps and for­est in Cen­tral Europe: the Rospu­da Val­ley Bypass. A let­ter by Adam

Dear Ladies and Sirs,

I do not know if You are aware that Poland is build­ing a road through a part of Europe’s last primeval for­est- the Rospu­da Val­ley Bypass.

The primeval swamps in pic­tures:
http://images.google.co.uk/images?hl=en&q=rospuda%20valley&ie=UTF‑8&oe=UTF‑8&sa=N&tab=wi

The invest­ment is con­tra­dic­to­ry to EU reg­u­la­tions on prepa­ra­tion of trans­port invest­ments, how­ev­er, the Com­mi­sion has not informed yet about the results of the inquiry, nor threat­ened the Pol­ish gov­ern­ment with penal­ties high enough to deter it from run­ning the most con­tro­ver­sial trans­port invest­ment in Europe with­out hav­ing the deci­sion process inspect­ed by the EU.

Con­cern­ing thae whole deci­sion process that took place, nev­er in my life have I seen less demo­c­ra­t­ic pro­ce­dure. There was not a cor­rect trans­port invest­ment appraisal pro­ce­dure, nor any demo­c­ra­t­ic dis­pute or pub­lic inquiry. It was all done as in a total­i­tar­i­an state.

There were two vari­ants that were sav­ing the val­ley: one- the Chodor­ki vari­ant, and sec­ond one- the Augustów East­ern Bypass vari­ant. Both were left out of trans­port appraisal pro­ce­dure due to no clear rea­son except for wish to manip­u­late with the results to sup­port one par­tic­u­lar vari­ant that was destroy­ing the nature but was sav­ing the paper­work need­ed to buy out the plots of land from local peasants.There is no oth­er argu­ment in choice of this par­tic­u­lar cor­ri­dor than the sav­ings in paper­work!

Here­with I accuse Pol­ish gov­ern­ment of will­full manip­u­la­tion with the data in order to pro­tect incom­pe­tence of the peo­ple who pre­pared this invest­ment. In my opin­ion the for­mal doc­u­ments were pre­pared after the deci­sion has been tak­en, and their goal was not to find the best bypass vari­ant, but to jus­ti­fy exact­ly this option by strate­gic manip­u­lat­ing with the choice of vari­ants analysed.

The vari­ants includ­ed by gov­ern­ment:
http://www.transpolska.most.org.pl/rozpuda/warianty2.jpg

The vari­ants exclud­ed from for­mal appraisal:
http://www.transpolska.most.org.pl/rozpuda/warianty2.jpg
http://www.transpolska.most.org.pl/rozpuda/warianty4.jpg

I would like to inform You that now it is expect­ed that with­in no more than a week the trees will be chopped off. I think that You should act prompt­ly enough, if You want to save the val­ley.

Adam, Trans­pol­s­ka

Ear­li­er doc­u­ments on the issue:
1. UK Indy­media — EMERGENCY ACTION: WE NEED 100 HARDCORE DIRECT …

“The bull­doz­ers will start destroy­ing the Rospu­da Val­ley wet­lands – unless they meet … The Rospu­da Val­ley is a nat­ur­al trea­sure, pro­tect­ed by Nature 2000. …”

http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2007/02/362519.html

2. UK Indy­media — Pol­ish ultra­catholic gov­ern­ment is build­ing a road …

“In the first step of the Via Balti­ca cor­ri­dor the by-pass of Augustów through the Rospu­da Val­ley will be built. Cur­rent­ly it is the the most con­tro­ver­sial …”

http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2006/11/355034.html?c=on

Trans­pol­s­ka
http://www.transpolska.most.org.pl/

M1 widening actions pigged

Police News Man­age­ment, Incom­pe­tence and Poor Atti­tude To Peace­ful Protest Exposed After They Pre­vent Peace­ful Cli­mate Camp Action With Mas­sive Over Reac­tion

Today, Mon­day 19th of Feb­ru­ary, peace­ful pro­test­ers from the Camp For Cli­mate Action had planned a series of events to high­light the envi­ron­men­tal cost of widen­ing the M1. Unfor­tu­nate­ly, a mas­sive police pres­ence, total­ly out of pro­por­tion to the pro­posed protest, appears to have con­tributed to mas­sive tail-backs on the motor­way near Sheffield. The pro­test­ers decid­ed not to go ahead with their event after being offered a ridicu­lous­ly lim­it­ed space in which to make their point and no pro­test­er actions took place at any time. At no point did any of them approach close to the motor­way, and they could not have there­fore caused the tail­backs as the Police sug­gest­ed to local radio. In fact, there had been an acci­dent on that stretch, which com­bined with the road­works and the police pres­ence, was prob­a­bly the cause of the delays.

Police News Man­age­ment, Incom­pe­tence and Poor Atti­tude To Peace­ful Protest Exposed After They Pre­vent Peace­ful Cli­mate Camp Action With Mas­sive Over Reac­tion

Today, Mon­day 19th of Feb­ru­ary, peace­ful pro­test­ers from the Camp For Cli­mate Action had planned a series of events to high­light the envi­ron­men­tal cost of widen­ing the M1. Unfor­tu­nate­ly, a mas­sive police pres­ence, total­ly out of pro­por­tion to the pro­posed protest, appears to have con­tributed to mas­sive tail-backs on the motor­way near Sheffield. The pro­test­ers decid­ed not to go ahead with their event after being offered a ridicu­lous­ly lim­it­ed space in which to make their point and no pro­test­er actions took place at any time. At no point did any of them approach close to the motor­way, and they could not have there­fore caused the tail­backs as the Police sug­gest­ed to local radio. In fact, there had been an acci­dent on that stretch, which com­bined with the road­works and the police pres­ence, was prob­a­bly the cause of the delays.

In a sec­ond embar­rass­ing mis­take, the Police seem to have believed that the action had been planned by the No M1 Widen­ing Cam­paign. In fact, the Camp For Cli­mate Action was sole­ly respon­si­ble. The police prob­a­bly don’t realise the link between traf­fic growth and wors­en­ing cli­mate change which threat­ens us all.

Sam Nex­ter said “Tony Blair has claimed that the gov­ern­ment is tak­ing cli­mate change seri­ous­ly but bil­lions of pounds of tax­pay­er’s mon­ey is now being wast­ed on a scheme that will do noth­ing to ease con­ges­tion but will increase emis­sions. There are much more effec­tive and eco­nom­ic ways to tack­le con­ges­tion such as improv­ing pub­lic trans­port and trans­fer­ring freight onto the rail­ways.”

“Its mad that, on top of pay­ing for dan­ger­ous motor­way build­ing, mon­ey is also wast­ed pay­ing large num­bers of police to sit around in vans.” he added.

The work to widen this stretch of M1 start­ed a month ago, and work on the sec­tion between junc­tion 6a-10 is already well under way. In total 115 miles of the M1 is due to be widened from the M25 to Mil­ton Keynes and from Leices­ter to Leeds, cost­ing a total of over £3.74 bil­lion. Many peo­ple believe the widen­ing will allow traf­fic to grow, caus­ing more CO2 emis­sions. Road trans­port already accounts for 21% of emis­sions in the UK and ris­es every year.

info@climatecamp.org.uk
http://www.climatecamp.org.uk

Radley Lake: The destruction begins — updates

15.02.2007

The Oxford Mail report­ed last night that a pro­test­er has been arrest­ed at the Radley Lakes site after work­ers start­ed prepar­ing the area for the con­tro­ver­sial dump­ing of pow­er sta­tion ash.

15.02.2007

The Oxford Mail report­ed last night that a pro­test­er has been arrest­ed at the Radley Lakes site after work­ers start­ed prepar­ing the area for the con­tro­ver­sial dump­ing of pow­er sta­tion ash.

“The Ant” as the man is know, had set up camp out­side the Thrupp Lake. He went into the area owned by RWE npow­er after work­men began clear­ing trees today and was arrest­ed on sus­pi­cion of aggra­vat­ed tres­pass.

http://www.saveradleylakes.org.uk

««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««
Radley Lat­est

17.02.2007
Work has begun in earnest now, with most of the trees on the islands cut down.
NPow­er’s law­ers have also issued an injunc­tion, served on 6 named indi­vid­u­als, plus any­one else they can man­age to serve one on down there, pret­ty much cur­tail­ing most of your civ­il lib­er­ties in that area.
This includes tak­ing phot­graphs of “pro­tect­ed indi­vid­u­als” (guys with chain­saws and secu­ri­ty guards), set­ting up any camp with­in a half mile radius of the lake, car­ry­ing equip­ment that could be used to set up tripods, or spike trees, protest­ing with­in 5 yards of a “pro­tect­ed indi­vid­ual”…
Appar­ent­ly, the secu­ri­ty guards were feel­ing har­rased.
So- care­ful not to breath too heav­i­ly either- you might end up get­ting nicked for that too.
So far 3 peo­ple have been arrest­ed in the lat­est wave of the protest- 1 in breach of the injunc­tion (for dar­ing to take pho­tos on a pub­lic high­way!).
Camps will be demol­ished after 6 hours, and Camp Kylie, pre­vi­ous­ly home to “The Ant” was demol­ished in the wee small hours of the morn­ing (no arrests, as there were no longer any occu­pants, as they’d all been nicked!)

Sug­gest­ed action- go down there, bear wit­ness, and I leave it up to you as to whether or not you take any notice of this injunc­tion.
I did­n’t!

««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««
back­ground & update

RWE NPow­er have gone to great expense to try and gag the local press, TV and
even Radio, to pre­vent the news get­ting out there that they are trash­ing
Thrupp Lake and cut­ting down hun­dreds of trees, caus­ing dis­tress to the
nest­ing birds and caus­ing pain to the local res­i­dents who have made an
appli­ca­tion to have the place classed as a Town Green.

It all start­ed when NPow­er evict­ed a group of peo­ple who decid­ed to occu­py
the house called San­dles which had remained unoc­cu­pied for 18 months. They
went in on the 6th Feb with a team of thug­gish indi­vid­u­als with faces hid by
bal­a­clavas and sledge­ham­mered their way through a plate glass win­dow to gain
access to the house. Two girls sleep­ing next to the win­dow were trau­ma­tised
and lucky not to have been injured by the fly­ing shards of glass.

After they had evict­ed the occu­pants, the secu­ri­ty guards, still with their
bal­a­clavas decid­ed to film any­one and every­one who came near the lakes.
Film­ing vehi­cle reg­is­tra­tion num­bers and eaves­drop­ping on con­ver­sa­tions,
they were car­ry­ing out their patrols with gus­to, dis­turb­ing the wildlife all
through the night dur­ing their reg­u­lar pass­es and being intim­i­dat­ing to
peo­ple who were vis­it­ing the area.

A young man called Ant decid­ed on evic­tion to do a vig­il out­side the house.
First of all for two days he sat on a chair. Then some­one gave him a tent
and brought him some pro­vi­sions. It seemed an act of kind­ness for some­one
who felt that a protest had to be made. How­ev­er, the con­tin­ued stream of
peo­ple who sup­port­ed Ant seemed to aggra­vate the NPOWER GOONS and soon
NPow­er obtained some sort of Court Order to stop any­one camp­ing near their
prop­er­ty, car­ry­ing a rope or spike with­in a mile of the site, pho­tograph­ing
their work­men and secu­ri­ty guards, and demand­ing that the peo­ple against who
the injunc­tion was served should send a copy of the injunc­tion which they
had received to every­one who sup­port­ed the Cam­paign to Save the Lakes.

One of the peo­ple named on the injunc­tion is a retired sci­en­tist who is
extreme­ly law abid­ing and is at a loss to under­stand why his name should
appear on this paper­work. He did have an alter­ca­tion with a Secu­ri­ty Guard
who refused to let him pass down Thrupp Lane BOAT (Byway open to all
Traf­fic) say­ing it was a ByWay and he could­n’t dri­ve his vehi­cle down it.

Any­one who vis­its the lakes is like­ly to be fol­lowed round by a pair of
burly secu­ri­ty guards who are look­ing for the oppor­tu­ni­ty to have a
con­fronta­tion. Some­one vis­it­ed this morn­ing and report­ed his path barred by
three secu­ri­ty men from NPow­er, threat­en­ing that if he tried to go past
them, he was in breach of the “injunc­tion” and they would have him arrest­ed
because no one is allowed with­in 5 feet of a Secu­ri­ty Guard or NPow­er’s
prop­er­ty.