Climate Rush at Heathrow 12th January

On Mon­day 12th Jan­u­ary 2009 at 7pm the Cli­mate Rush will hit Heathrow. We will arrive in Edwar­dian dress (under a big coat!) with ham­pers of food to have our ‘Din­ner at Domes­tic Depar­tures’. This will be an action against the con­struc­tion of the third run­way and the unsus­tain­able use of short-haul, nation­al flights.

Climate Rush at HeathrowOn Mon­day 12th Jan­u­ary 2009 at 7pm the Cli­mate Rush will hit Heathrow. We will arrive in Edwar­dian dress (under a big coat!) with ham­pers of food to have our ‘Din­ner at Domes­tic Depar­tures’. This will be an action against the con­struc­tion of the third run­way and the unsus­tain­able use of short-haul, nation­al flights. It will take place on the day that the MPs return from their win­ter hol­i­day.

When the string quar­tet plays its first note we will reveal our dress and share our food. Ours will be the first peace­ful sit-in of the envi­ron­men­tal move­ment. Hun­dreds will join us and togeth­er we will make his­to­ry. We have wait­ed too long and been mis­led too many times. It is time for us to take con­trol and to lead social change.

After a huge­ly suc­cess­ful storm­ing of Par­lia­ment, The Cli­mate Rush is back in town!

Any day now the gov­ern­ment will announce its plans to expand Heathrow and no amount of march­ing or let­ter-writ­ing will make them stop. Sip­son Vil­lage will be demol­ished. Mil­lions of Lon­don­ers will find them­selves under new flight-paths. The UK will con­tin­ue to lag behind the rest of Europe and the world as it miss­es cli­mate tar­get after cli­mate tar­get.

It is time to take our future into our own hands. It is time to take action.

You and all of your friends, net­works and neigh­bours are cor­dial­ly invit­ed to our ‘Din­ner at Domes­tic Depar­tures’, 7pm on Mon­day 12th Jan­u­ary at Heathrow Air­port Ter­mi­nal One. Join ‘The Cli­mate Rush’, ‘Cli­mate Action Now’, ‘The Wom­en’s Envi­ron­men­tal Net­work’ and Car­o­line Lucas MEP as we cel­e­brate the UK pub­lic’s com­mit­ment to beat­ing cli­mate change.

www.climaterush.co.uk

Plane Stupid protest shuts Stansted Airport

8.12.2008
Over fifty young pro­test­ers from the cli­mate action group Plane Stu­pid have this morn­ing shut down Stanst­ed Air­port by camp­ing on the run­way and sur­round­ing them­selves with for­ti­fied secu­ri­ty fenc­ing.

Stansted runway protest8.12.2008
Over fifty young pro­test­ers from the cli­mate action group Plane Stu­pid have this morn­ing shut down Stanst­ed Air­port by camp­ing on the run­way and sur­round­ing them­selves with for­ti­fied secu­ri­ty fenc­ing.

The peace­ful protest began at 3.15am this morn­ing (Mon­day) whilst the run­way was tem­porar­i­ly closed for main­te­nance work. Plane Stu­pid aims to pre­vent the sched­uled reopen­ing of the run­way at 5am. The group intends to main­tain its block­ade for as long as pos­si­ble, pre­vent­ing the release of thou­sands of tonnes of green­house gas emis­sions into the atmos­phere.

10:20am update: The Press Asso­ci­a­tion reports that 57 peo­ple have been arrest­ed, and 56 Ryanair flights can­celled.

8:10am update: At least 39 peo­ple have been arrest­ed and the run­way
re-opened. BAA are claim­ing that 21 flights have been can­celled. Every
minute the air­port emits around 4 tonnes of CO2.

6:00am update: BAA have con­firmed that the first flights out of the air­port have been delayed. The aver­age flight out of Stanst­ed has a cli­mate impact equiv­a­lent to 41.58 tonnes of CO2.

One young woman, Lily, aged 21 said:

“We’re here because our par­ents’ gen­er­a­tion has failed us and its now down to young peo­ple to stop cli­mate change by what­ev­er peace­ful means we have left. We’re afraid of what the police might do to us, we’re afraid of going to jail but noth­ing scares us as much as the threat of run­away cli­mate change. We’ve thought through the con­se­quences of what we’re doing here but we’re deter­mined to stop as many tonnes of CO2 as we can.”

The young cam­paign­ers have raised a ban­ner read­ing ‘CLIMATE EMERGENCY’. Wear­ing high vis­i­bil­i­ty vests which have the mes­sage “Please DO some­thing” print­ed on them, they chose this day for the peace­ful tres­pass as they knew the run­way was closed for main­te­nance works and no flights were due to take off or land for two hours after they arrived.

Tilly, 21, said:

“We all grew up lis­ten­ing to Blair and Brown talk­ing about the urgent need to slash emis­sions, but noth­ing ever hap­pened. Even now politi­cians from our par­ents’ gen­er­a­tion are in Poland hold­ing talks about talks, but still nobody’s actu­al­ly doing any­thing. The sci­en­tists tell us we’ve got about sev­en years to make emis­sions peak then drop, and if we fail it will be the peo­ple on this run­way, and our chil­dren, who’ll live with the con­se­quences. That’s why I’m doing this.”

The cam­paign­ers chose to close Stanst­ed after the gov­ern­ment approved the expan­sion of capac­i­ty at the air­port by ten mil­lion pas­sen­gers a year. Avi­a­tion is Britain’s fastest grow­ing source of emis­sions, already amount­ing to at least 13% of our coun­try’s cli­mate impact. With plans for new run­ways across the UK, includ­ing at Heathrow and Stanst­ed, experts from the Tyn­dall Cen­tre for cli­mate research say Labour’s avi­a­tion pol­i­cy alone will scup­per any chance the UK has of hit­ting its cli­mate tar­gets.

Daniel, 24, said:

“We ful­ly appre­ci­ate the scale of what we’ve done here today and we know many peo­ple will strug­gle to under­stand why we’ve done it, but the Arc­tic ice cap is dis­ap­pear­ing, the seas are ris­ing and our last chance to save our future is van­ish­ing. With peo­ple tak­ing more flights in Britain than any­where else on earth, we have a unique respon­si­bil­i­ty to tack­le emis­sions from fly­ing.”

Intruder enters E.ON power station and switches off 2% of UK supplies

Police have begun an inves­ti­ga­tion after pro­test­ers broke into one of Britain’s biggest pow­er sta­tions last week [28th Novem­ber 2008] and cut almost 2 per cent of the country’s elec­tric­i­ty sup­plies.

Police have begun an inves­ti­ga­tion after pro­test­ers broke into one of Britain’s biggest pow­er sta­tions last week [28th Novem­ber 2008] and cut almost 2 per cent of the country’s elec­tric­i­ty sup­plies.

Up to 500 megawatts of gen­er­at­ing capac­i­ty was lost from the nation­al net­work for about four hours after the inci­dent at Kingsnorth coal and oil-fired pow­er sta­tion in Kent, The Times has learnt. An intrud­er scaled an elec­tric fence, entered a secure area and switched off one of four tur­bines sup­ply­ing Lon­don and the South East.

E.ON, the Ger­man pow­er group that oper­ates the plant, is under­stood to sus­pect that some of its own staff or con­tract­ed employ­ees were involved in the inci­dent last Fri­day night.

Accord­ing to fig­ures from Nation­al Grid, total UK elec­tric­i­ty demand at the time was about 33,000 megawatts – mean­ing that 500 megawatts rep­re­sent­ed more than 1.5 per cent of the total, enough to pow­er a city the size of Bris­tol.

The pro­test­ers, who have not been caught despite much of the episode being caught on CCTV, climbed an elec­tric secu­ri­ty fence that was not work­ing at the time. Hav­ing switched off Unit Two, they left through an entrance that only employ­ees would have been famil­iar with. They also man­aged to go through a com­plex pro­ce­dure at a con­trol pan­el inside one of the tur­bine halls to turn the machin­ery off.

Kent police are involved in the inves­ti­ga­tion. E.ON has ordered an inter­nal inves­ti­ga­tion, and is exam­in­ing its own secu­ri­ty pro­ce­dures.

E.ON has become a key tar­get for cli­mate change pro­test­ers because Kingsnorth has been ear­marked for con­struc­tion of Britain’s first new coal-fired pow­er sta­tion in decades. The plant, which has a total gen­er­at­ing capac­i­ty of 1,960 megawatts, mak­ing it one of Britain’s biggest pow­er sta­tions, is to be retired from ser­vice soon and E.ON wants to build a £2 bil­lion coal replace­ment, which envi­ron­men­tal­ists say would lock in the emis­sion of many mil­lions of tonnes of green­house gas­es for decades to come.

Protest mes­sages were also left strewn across the tur­bine hall dur­ing the inci­dent.

An E.ON spokesman con­firmed that an inci­dent had tak­en place in which the site was entered ille­gal­ly and equip­ment was tam­pered with. “While we are respect­ful of people’s right to peace­ful and law­ful protest, this was clear­ly nei­ther of those and could have had very seri­ous impli­ca­tions, not least because of the poten­tial for seri­ous injury or worse. Thank­ful­ly, our site team respond­ed very quick­ly and pro­fes­sion­al­ly to ensure that the sit­u­a­tion was brought under con­trol.

“We have launched an inves­ti­ga­tion and are work­ing close­ly with the police on their inquiries. Kingsnorth pow­er sta­tion remains oper­a­tional.”

E.ON has defend­ed its plans for a coal-fired plant at Kingsnorth by say­ing that it would be fit­ted with equip­ment designed to strip out car­bon diox­ide for safe stor­age.

So-called car­bon cap­ture and stor­age (CCS) remains an exper­i­men­tal tech­nol­o­gy that has not yet been demon­strat­ed on a com­mer­cial scale any­where in the world.

– from The Times news­pa­per.

– or the below from BBC News; pick & mix the facts you pre­fer:

Intrud­er shuts down pow­er tur­bine

A tur­bine at a pow­er sta­tion in Kent where cli­mate change cam­paign­ers have been hold­ing a series of protests was shut down by an intrud­er.

Ener­gy com­pa­ny E.On said it believed who­ev­er shut down the tur­bine must have had spe­cial­ist knowl­edge to car­ry out the “poten­tial­ly dead­ly” sab­o­tage.

The shut-down hap­pened on the night of 28 Novem­ber dur­ing two days of action by the Camp for Cli­mate Action group.

How­ev­er, no organ­i­sa­tion or indi­vid­ual has claimed it turned off the tur­bine.

“We don’t know whether it was a pro­test­er or not,” said E.On spokesman Jonathan Smith.

“But they gained access to the site, tam­pered with a pret­ty spe­cif­ic board and man­aged to turn off unit two.

“It is com­plete­ly unac­cept­able. If you ignore the fact they have bro­ken into our site, what they were doing was poten­tial­ly dan­ger­ous, poten­tial­ly dead­ly even.”

Tar­get­ed offices

He said engi­neers locat­ed the prob­lem quick­ly and turned the tur­bine back on.

Cus­tomers were not affect­ed by the shut­down because the short­fall was made up by oth­er sup­pli­ers to the Nation­al Grid.

Dur­ing the two days of action, Camp for Cli­mate Action pro­test­ers tar­get­ed E.ON offices in Lon­don and across Eng­land.

It fol­lowed a week-long Cli­mate Camp near Kingsnorth pow­er sta­tion on the Hoo penin­su­lar in August.

The cur­rent Kingsnorth pow­er sta­tion is due to close in 2015 and E.ON wants to replace it with two new coal units, which it claims will be 20% clean­er.

Mr Smith said police were inves­ti­gat­ing the shut­down.

He said Kingsnorth was prob­a­bly the most secure coal-fired pow­er sta­tion in the UK.

“Secu­ri­ty at Kingsnorth is extreme­ly high,” he said.

“We are look­ing at secu­ri­ty and work­ing with police to make sure this can’t hap­pen again.”

– from The Guardian news­pa­per:

“It was extreme­ly odd indeed, quite creepy. We have nev­er known any­thing like this at all, but it shows that if peo­ple want to do some­thing bad­ly enough they will find a way,” said Emi­ly High­more, a spokes­woman for E.On.

Yes­ter­day the full sto­ry emerged of what hap­pened. “It was about 10pm, very dark indeed,” said High­more. “It looks from the CCTV like he came in via a very remote part of the site by the sea wall and got over the dou­ble lay­er of fences.”

The intrud­er then crossed a car park and walked to an unlocked door. But instead of going to the pow­er sta­tion’s main con­trol room, where about eight peo­ple would have been work­ing, he head­ed for its main tur­bine hall, where no one would have been work­ing at that time.

With­in min­utes, says E.On, “he had tam­pered with some equip­ment” — believed to be a com­put­er at a con­trol pan­el — “and tripped unit 2, one of the sta­tion’s giant 500MW tur­bines”.

“This caused the unit to go offline,” she added. “It was run­ning at full 500MW load and the noise it would have made as it shut itself down is just incred­i­ble. CCTV shows that he then just walked out, and went back over the fence.

“It could be that no one has tak­en respon­si­bil­i­ty because they were so fright­ened by the noise it would have made. It’s prob­a­bly tak­en them a week just to get over the shock.”

“He left a ban­ner but it was a real DIY job. It was real­ly scrap­py. This was an old bed­sheet with writ­ing done out of gaffer tape. It was very crude,” said High­more

“Peo­ple at the sta­tion are gob­s­macked,” she added. “This is a dif­fer­ent league to pro­test­ers chain­ing them­selves to equip­ment. It’s some­one treat­ing a pow­er sta­tion as an adven­ture play­ground. You have to be trained to work here. Peo­ple do not just wan­der about on their own. He could have killed him­self. We do not have a prob­lem with pub­lic protest but this was reck­less. Who­ev­er it was has crossed a line they should not have gone over. Pow­er sta­tions are dan­ger­ous places.”

(full arti­cle)

McTrial Cambridge – This Monday!

An all day tri­al so get some McDon­alds Burg­ers in!

When : 8th Dec 08, 10 a.m.

Where: Cam­bridge Mag­is­trates Court
12 St. Andrews Street,
Cam­bridge

What: Back in June an activist was arrest­ed on a walk in protest at McDon­alds. The activist is charged under Sec­tion 5 of the Pub­lic Order Act.

An all day tri­al so get some McDon­alds Burg­ers in!

McDonalds World Food Day protest CambridgeWhen : 8th Dec 08, 10 a.m.

Where: Cam­bridge Mag­is­trates Court
12 St. Andrews Street,
Cam­bridge

What: Back in June an activist was arrest­ed on a walk in protest at McDon­alds. The activist is charged under Sec­tion 5 of the Pub­lic Order Act.

See http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/regions/cambridge/2008/06/401637.html

Why: You may very well ask that?

Any sup­port appre­ci­at­ed!

Tyres of luxury cars ventilated

Decem­ber 5th 2008
This night the action Air gone! start­ed to flat­ten the tyres of lux­u­ry cars as a con­tri­bu­tion to the cli­mate action day to paral­yse cli­mate killers.

German CO2 exhaust imageDecem­ber 5th 2008
This night the action Air gone! start­ed to flat­ten the tyres of lux­u­ry cars as a con­tri­bu­tion to the cli­mate action day to paral­yse cli­mate killers.

While the cli­mate alliance calls for pro­mo­tion par­o­dies against the green­wash­ing of the com­pa­nies, rad­i­cal cli­mate activists went a bit fur­ther that night.

In dif­fer­ent cities the tyres of expen­sive jeeps and sports cars were ven­ti­lat­ed. Aim of the action is not only car­bon expul­sion, but also to put on the agen­da the social and glob­al injus­tices con­nect­ed to cli­mate change, the group call­ing for the action explained. The biggest amount of emis­sions are caused by the indus­tri­al states — and, as it is made more than

clear by the exam­ple of lux­u­ry cars, it is main­ly the rich here as well — while the coun­tries in the South are most affect­ed already by the effects of cli­mate change.

Fly­ers were left at the cars explain­ing the actiond and demand­ing from the own­ers to immidi­ate­ly shut them down per­ma­nent­ly.

Sim­i­lar actions hap­pened a year ago in Berlin and aroused a lot of pub­lic atten­tion. This year the news­pa­per taz report­ed about the call to the action.

Mean­while the world cli­mate sum­mit dis­cussed about a fol­low-up of the Kyoto Pro­to­col in Poz­nan (Con­fer­ence of the par­tied COP 14), pro­duc­ing noth­ing but hot air, as a lot of cli­mate activists think. Back­ground info and state­ments from a semi-crit­i­cal NGO per­spec­tive on wir-klimaretter.de. For the fol­low­ing sum­mit in Decem­ber 2009 an inter­na­tion­al mobi­liza­tion was already start­ed by the rad­i­cal leftb from Den­mark (Ung­domshuset-Scene) as well as b y sozial move­ments from the glob­al south like Via Campesina

http://luftraus.wordpress.com

Students roll out red carpet for RBS greenwash award show

Stu­dents from Man­ches­ter Peo­ple and Plan­et groups host­ed an awards cer­e­mo­ny and award­ed the Roy­al Bank of Scot­land with the pres­ti­gious “2008 Green­wash Award”.

RBS Greenwash awardsStu­dents from Man­ches­ter Peo­ple and Plan­et groups host­ed an awards cer­e­mo­ny and award­ed the Roy­al Bank of Scot­land with the pres­ti­gious “2008 Green­wash Award”.

On Wednes­day 3rd Decem­ber stu­dents of Man­ches­ter host­ed an elab­o­rate awards cer­e­mo­ny out­side the Roy­al Bank of Scot­land offices. At 2pm, around 50 stu­dents wear­ing evening suits and ball gowns, rolled out a red car­pet and set up a podi­um. The pre­sen­ter bound­ed up onto the stage to begin the pro­ceed­ings.

After Oscars style nom­i­na­tions in which E.On, BP, Shell and BAA were announced as run­ners up, RBS was declared the win­ner of the 2008 Green­wash Award show.[1] A mock rep­re­sen­ta­tive from RBS’ Cor­po­rate Social Respon­si­bil­i­ty sec­tor call­ing him­self ‘Gra­ham Wascha’ then gave a very enter­tain­ing yet poignant speech about RBS’ green­wash. He was reward­ed with a gold­en stat­ue and a large cheque con­grat­u­lat­ing their mas­sive invest­ments in indus­tries that accel­er­ate cli­mate change.[2]

RBS-NatWest have fund­ed almost $16billion for coal com­pa­nies and explo­ration projects from May 2006 to April 2008[3], yet their green­wash claims that they are financ­ing a tran­si­tion to a low car­bon econ­o­my. [4][5]

This award show was part of a series of actions by stu­dents from the cam­paign­ing group Peo­ple and Plan­et against RBS and oth­er big dri­vers of cli­mate change. It fol­lows a recent action by Man­ches­ter stu­dents against RBS and E.On which saw over 50 stu­dents demon­strat­ing at a busi­ness recruit­ment fair. [6][7]

Quotes:

Abi­gail Dil­li­way, 21, pri­ma­ry edu­ca­tion stu­dent at Man­ches­ter Met­ro­pol­i­tan Uni­ver­si­ty says “I have cho­sen to take part in this action because I believe that RBS have com­mit­ted a green­wash atroc­i­ty. They have cho­sen to only cel­e­brate their invest­ment in renew­ables whilst fail­ing to com­pre­hend their invest­ment in fos­sil fuels and thus the dev­as­tat­ing envi­ron­men­tal impli­ca­tions of their actions.”

Alex Foun­tain, 20, busi­ness stud­ies stu­dent at Man­ches­ter Met­ro­pol­i­tan Uni­ver­si­ty says, “RBS claims to be com­mit­ted to a long-term tran­si­tion to a low car­bon econ­o­my yet con­tin­ues to mas­sive­ly fund fos­sil fuel infra­struc­tures. This will lock us into high emis­sions for many decades to come and jeop­ar­dise any attempts to stop run­away cli­mate change.”

ENDS

Notes to the edi­tor:

1. Green­wash – “Green­wash (a port­man­teau of green and white­wash) is a term used to describe the per­cep­tion of con­sumers that they are being mis­led by a com­pa­ny regard­ing the envi­ron­men­tal prac­tices of the com­pa­ny or the envi­ron­men­tal ben­e­fits of a prod­uct or ser­vice. It is a decep­tive use of green PR or green mar­ket­ing.”

Wikipedia — http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greenwash

2. Cli­mate change is the biggest threat to a secure future cur­rent­ly fac­ing human­i­ty. If cur­rent trends con­tin­ue, aver­age glob­al tem­per­a­tures could rise by 6.4˚C by the end of the cen­tu­ry with dev­as­tat­ing and per­ma­nent results for the plan­et. — “Sum­ma­ry for Pol­i­cy­mak­ers”, Inter­gov­ern­men­tal Pan­el on Cli­mate Change, 2007

3. RBS is respon­si­ble for $15.93 bil­lion worth of loans from May 2006 to April 2008 to com­pa­nies engaged in loans to com­pa­nies engaged in the extrac­tion and/or com­bus­tion of coal. — http://www.oyalbankofscotland.com/cioc/pdf/cashinginoncoal.pdf

4. In 2007 RBS’ embed­ded emis­sions (emis­sion due to its invest­ments) was over 43 mil­lion tonnes, more than Scot­land — PLATFORM, ‘The Oil and Gas Bank – RBS & the financ­ing of cli­mate change’, http://www.carbonweb.org/documents/Oil_&_Gas_Bank.pdf

5. RBS claim that they only lend to projects that con­form to the high­est envi­ron­men­tal and social stan­dards yet finances some of the dirt­i­est and most dan­ger­ous oil & gas projects, includ­ing the Baku-Tbil­isi-Cey­han pipeline from Azer­bai­jan to Turkey crit­i­cised by the WWF and Friends of the Earth for its human rights and pol­lu­tion impacts.

Videos: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qPLW2H88q7g
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Xm0q9_CfRw

London Critical Mass report (& recent legal ruling), & Exeter CM announcement

In the week of the law lords’ final rul­ing on the legal sta­tus of crit­i­cal mass, fri­day night saw around 200 cyclists brave the damp and cold to take part in the “com­mon­ly or cus­tom­ar­i­ly held pro­ces­sion” — for the third month in a

London Critical Mass penny farthingsIn the week of the law lords’ final rul­ing on the legal sta­tus of crit­i­cal mass, fri­day night saw around 200 cyclists brave the damp and cold to take part in the “com­mon­ly or cus­tom­ar­i­ly held pro­ces­sion” — for the third month in a row, no police direct­ly accom­pa­nied the ride. the ride itself was most­ly fun and smooth-going, but there was a col­li­sion at mar­ble arch that marred an oth­er­wise suc­ces­ful evening.

the mass went over water­loo bridge and then along the strand to white­hall and par­lia­ment square. after a few cir­cles there, the next stop was out­side new scot­land yard, where a very loud cycle sound sys­tem noti­fied their pres­ence to the police (along with chants of “one-nil, one-nil”). mov­ing on past buck­ing­ham palace and round the back streets of pic­cadil­ly, there was a brief stop at pic­cadil­ly cir­cus.

this is the third month with­out direct police accom­pa­ni­ment, and it seems each time the mass is get­ting bet­ter at con­trol­ling itself and oth­er road traf­fic for the safe­ty and ben­e­fit of all. it seemed that almost every­one was empow­ered to have a go at ‘cork­ing’ (block­ing incom­ing side roads at junc­tions to stop motor vehi­cles from min­gling with the mass). if done firm­ly and polite­ly, the road is kept clear for the whole mass to pass, and then the incon­ve­nience to oth­er motorists is min­imised and the cyclists keep mov­ing safe­ly and freely. also, the front rid­ers stopped every now and then to allow the mass to regroup. mean­while pedes­tri­ans were often catered for and let through at cross­ings etc.

there were an array of dif­fer­ent bikes too, with a cou­ple of mod­ern pen­ny far­things, a very tall ‘dou­ble deck­er’ bike (whose rid­er was heard now and then shout­ing for peo­ple to keep mov­ing — it was a long way down!!), there was a rick­shaw, and at least two sound sys­tems.

after a damp start, the rain held off, things were going smooth­ly until at mar­ble arch, a bicy­cle was hit by an irate motorist who had been briefly held up by a ‘cork’ at the top of park lane and then decid­ed to dri­ve like a lunatic. as sev­er­al cyclists went to aid, the dri­ver at first tried to dri­ve from the scene of the acci­dent, then scraped his own car door by push­ing it hard open against a near­by bicy­cle, and then assault­ed the cyclist by pok­ing him in the eye.

sev­er­al rid­ers kept the car sur­round­ed until police arrived. the first cops were from char­ing cross, and they seemed to be very much on the side of the motorist, even sug­gest­ing that they’d arrest the cyclist who was assault­ed! after a while some padding­ton offi­cers turned up, and act­ed more pro­fes­sion­al­ly, tak­ing details of the var­i­ous wit­ness­es, and even­tu­al­ly arrest­ing and hand­cuff­ing the crazy dri­ver.

a shout out to the cyclists that stuck around to help. next mass on box­ing day — meet (as cus­tom­ar­i­ly!) under water­loo bridge on the south bank at 6–6.30pm (last fri­day of every month)

Since 1994, Lon­don cyclists have been gath­er­ing every sin­gle month to cycle, par­ty and assert their right to the road — the famous Crit­i­cal Mass. 

Amidst oth­er police tac­tics aim­ing to break the d.i.y spir­it of the event, the Police attempt­ed to ban the ride in Sep­tem­ber 2005. The court case and oblig­a­tory appeals that ensued last­ed for 3 years until the 26th of Novem­ber 2008 when the Law Lords ruled in favour of Lon­don Crit­i­cal Mass. A vic­to­ry for Lon­don — but an unclear result for oth­er Crit­i­cal Mass­es around the coun­try.

The Crit­i­cal Mass bicy­cle ride has been going on in Lon­don since 1994 — a month­ly gath­er­ing of cyclist who cycle togeth­er through Lon­don with no planned route and no defined lead­ers or organ­is­ers.

In Sep­tem­ber 1995, the police effec­tive­ly tried to ban Crit­i­cal Mass by claim­ing it was an ille­gal pro­ces­sion, and that the organ­is­ers had to inform the police of the route ahead of the event. This is an exerpt from the leaflet they dis­trib­uted on that occa­sion :

“…Police can impose con­di­tions on pro­ces­sions, demon­stra­tions and oth­er assem­blies, and par­tic­i­pants ren­der them­selves liable to arrest if they fail to com­ply with those con­di­tions. These cycle protests are not law­ful because no organ­is­er has pro­vid­ed police the with the nec­es­sary noti­fi­ca­tion. Your par­tic­i­pa­tion in this event could ren­der you liable to pros­e­cu­tion. Police pol­i­cy in facil­i­tat­ing these events is cur­rent­ly under review…”

It may be dif­fi­cult for the police to accept it, but it is a well known fact that Crit­i­cal Mass has no set organ­is­ers. While some may print leaflets and oth­ers host a web­site, it’s a spon­ta­neous event ; peo­ple just show up on the last Fri­day of the month and ride togeth­er, any­one can go at the front and sug­gest ite­nar­ies. Claim­ing that Crit­i­cal Mass is organ­ised is like claim­ing that traf­fic jams are organ­ised. By their let­ter, the police refused cyclist the sta­tus of ‘traf­fic’ — one of Crit­i­cal Mass’ aim being to show that cyclists are traf­fic and should be allowed to use the road as much as cars.

The Octo­ber 2005 mass saw one of the biggest turnout ever in Lon­don — show­ing how many peo­ple care about Crit­i­cal Mass, and that peo­ple would not let the police stop it. Soon after, Des Key and Friends of the Earth start­ed a court case against the police.

The court case took sev­er­al years and went up to the House of Lords before fin­ish­ing, on the 26th of Novem­ber 2008, rul­ing in favour of crit­i­cal mass. The rul­ing stat­ed that Crit­i­cal Mass was cus­tom­ary, and there­fore did not need to apply for per­mis­sion, or to inform the police.

The rul­ing how­ev­er sug­gests that Crit­i­cal Mass is a pro­ces­sion — refus­ing the idea that cyclist are traf­fic. As such it is not clear how the rul­ing may be used in the future for peo­ple set­ting up new Crit­i­cal Mass­es around the UK who will not be able to claim these are cus­tom­ary events.

Police has been a reg­u­lar fea­ture at Crit­i­cal Mass for the past 3 or 4 years — occa­sion­aly pro­tect­ing cyclists from angry dri­vers, but always try­ing to man­age the ride, shout­ing at peo­ple who tried to do it them­selves and gen­er­al­ly being intim­i­dat­ing towards peo­ple who showed any form of ini­tia­tive. The police were try­ing to trans­form Crit­i­cal Mass into some­thing they could under­stand : an event where par­tic­i­pants are sheep­ish and sim­ply do as the organ­is­ers tell them to do.

It is unclear whether it is relat­ed to this judg­ment, the leav­ing of Ian Blair or oth­er inter­nal police mat­ters, but the police has not been at Crit­i­cal Mass for the past two months. Now that the judge­ment has ruled  in favor of Crit­i­cal Mass, they have even less of a rea­son for show­ing up — and we are going to have to re-learn how to man­age this event our­selves prop­er­ly.

Exeter Crit­i­cal Mass — meet 12.00 on Cathe­dral Green on Sat­ur­day Decem­ber 6th. To get in the mood come along to a screen­ing of “We are traf­fic” at Exeter Phoenix on Thurs­day Decem­ber 4th at 19.00

Thurs­day Decem­ber 4th@ 7.00 — We are Traf­fic Screen­ing -
Exeter Phoenix , Brad­ninch Place, Gandy St, Exeter,

We Are Traf­fic! chron­i­cles the his­to­ry and devel­op­ment of the “Crit­i­cal Mass” bicy­cle move­ment– one of the most spir­it­ed and dynam­ic social/political move­ments of the apa­thet­ic 90’s. In over 200 cities in 14 dif­fer­ent coun­tries, Crit­i­cal Mass has now become a month­ly rit­u­al.

With traf­fic con­ges­tion, pol­lu­tion, and road rage on the rise, grow­ing num­bers around the world are advo­cat­ing for trans­porta­tion alter­na­tives, and Crit­i­cal Mass is at the cut­ting edge of this mind­set.

Show­ing in the Black Box Film, every­one wel­come to stay after to talk about future events/critical mass­es etc and maybe for a drink at North­bridge Inn

Snacks pro­vid­ed — feel free to bring more snacks though!

——————————————————————————

Exeter Crit­i­cal Mass — Sat­ur­day 6th Decem­ber @ 12.00 Cathe­dral Green, Exeter -

Xmas Theme option­al — dec­o­rate your bikes!

WHAT’S IS ALL ABOUT?
Crit­i­cal Mass is often described as an ‘unor­gan­ised coin­ci­dence’. It hap­pens when a lot of cyclists hap­pen to be in the same place at the same time and decide to cycle the same way togeth­er for a while

WHAT’S THE PURPOSE?
“Every­day, all over the world, peo­ple are resist­ing the prob­lem cul­ture of the car by get­ting on their bikes and rid­ing, instead of dri­ving.

Crit­i­cal Mass is a cel­e­bra­tion of the alter­na­tives to cars, pol­lu­tion, acci­dents and the loss of pub­lic spaces and free­doms.

Not an organ­i­sa­tion or group, but an idea or tac­tic, Crit­i­cal Mass allows peo­ple to reclaim cities with their bikes, just by get­ting togeth­er and out-num­ber­ing the cars on the road”

WHAT HAPPENS ON A CRITICAL MASS?
Each one is dif­fer­ent and they fol­low no set route, with the direc­tion being spon­ta­neous­ly cho­sen as peo­ple cycle along. Any­one is free to join or leave the ride as it ped­als along.

The ride lasts no more than a cou­ple of hours (depend­ing on the weath­er!) and usu­al­ly ends in a con­ve­nient­ly placed pub for more drinks.

Most all, they are peace­ful, safe and fun!

DO I NEED A BIKE?
Nope! Crit­i­cal Mass is not just for bikes — skate­boards, roller blades, wheel­chairs, pogo sticks — in fact any form of non-motorised, non-pol­lut­ing are all very wel­come!

Protests mark the start of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change in Posnan (Poland)

Den­mark: Kli­maX rocks the COP15 sum­mit site

Activists from the copen­hagen based cli­mate activist group Kli­maX climbed onto the front of the con­fer­ence site Bel­la Cen­tret and threw out ban­ners. The site is sym­bol­ic in the way that its the actu­al site of the COP15 sum­mit excact­ly one year from now.

Den­mark: Kli­maX rocks the COP15 sum­mit site
KlimaX Posnan protest
Activists from the copen­hagen based cli­mate activist group Kli­maX climbed onto the front of the con­fer­ence site Bel­la Cen­tret and threw out ban­ners. The site is sym­bol­ic in the way that its the actu­al site of the COP15 sum­mit excact­ly one year from now.

“We need a humane solu­tion to the cli­mate cri­sis.” Says Sini Øster­gaard from Kli­maX “We can­not stand by and watch while the rich coun­tries buy CO2 quo­tas from the poor coun­tries. We have take action now.”

The activists brought ban­ners, music, cook­ies and tea while the secu­ri­ty peo­ple and diplo­mats attend­ing a con­fer­ence watched the fun.

“The clock is tick­ing and time has run out. We have to face the con­se­quences of our over-con­sump­tion in the west now.” says Thor from Kli­maX.

The police arrived but did­n’t both­er any­one. The activists promis­es that they’ll con­tin­ue their actions in the run-up to and under the cli­mate sum­mit. Already oth­er actions are brew­ing for the ime­di­ate future.

The inter­na­tion­al mobi­liza­tion for action at the cli­mate sum­mit:
http://climateaction09.org/

Kli­maX — Copen­hagen:
http://klimax2009.org

Video from a coor­po­rate news­pa­per (ignore lame com­er­cials):
http://ekstrabladet.tv/nyheder/indland/article1091836.ece

Kli­maX — Copen­hagen
international@klimax2009.org
http://www.climateaction09.org

========
RTNA Posnan protest
USA: Mon­day Dec. 1

Cli­mate Activists Invade DC Offices of Envi­ron­men­tal Defense, Daugh­ter
of ED Founder Accus­es Group of Push­ing False Solu­tions to Cli­mate Change

Off-site Media Con­tact: Matt Wal­lace, Ris­ing Tide North Amer­i­ca,
828–280-3462
On-site Con­tact: Dr. Rachel Smolk­er, Glob­al Jus­tice Ecol­o­gy Project
802–735-7794

***high res­o­lu­tion pho­tos avail­able soon at:
www.risingtidenorthamerica.org***

Wash­ing­ton, DC-As the UN Frame­work Con­ven­tion on Cli­mate Change opened today in Poz­nan, Poland, grass­roots cli­mate activists took over the Wash­ing­ton DC office of Envi­ron­men­tal Defense. The activists stat­ed that they had tar­get­ed ED, one of the largest envi­ron­men­tal orga­ni­za­tions in the world, because of the orga­ni­za­tion’s key role in pro­mot­ing the dis­cred­it­ed approach of car­bon trad­ing as a solu­tion to cli­mate change.

Dr. Rachel Smolk­er of Glob­al Jus­tice Ecol­o­gy Project and Glob­al For­est Coali­tion read a state­ment, which said in part, “My father was one of the founders of this orga­ni­za­tion, which sad­ly I am now ashamed of. The Kyoto Pro­to­col, the Euro­pean Emis­sions Trad­ing Scheme and vir­tu­al­ly every oth­er ini­tia­tive for reduc­ing emis­sions have adopt­ed their mar­ket approach­es. So far they have utter­ly failed, serv­ing only to pro­vide huge prof­its to the world’s most pol­lut­ing indus­tries. Instead of pro­tect­ing the envi­ron­ment, ED now seems pri­mar­i­ly con­cerned with pro­tect­ing cor­po­rate bot­tom lines. I can hear my father rolling over in his grave.”

The activists rearranged fur­ni­ture in the office, illus­trat­ing how mar­ket­ing car­bon is “like rear­rang­ing the deck chairs on the Titan­ic.” Oth­ers held signs read­ing “Keep the cap, ditch the trade” and “Car­bon trad­ing is an envi­ron­men­tal offense.”

Leo Cer­da, an indige­nous activist with Ris­ing Tide Ecuador said, “ED wants to turn the atmos­phere and forests into pri­vate prop­er­ty, and then give it away to the most pol­lut­ing indus­tries in the form of pol­lu­tion allowances that can be bought and sold. Not only is this an inef­fec­tive way to con­trol emis­sions, it is also a dis­as­ter for the poor and indige­nous peo­ples who are not par­ty to these mar­kets and are most impact­ed by cli­mate change.”

ED has been key in estab­lish­ing the U.S. Cli­mate Action Part­ner­ship, a busi­ness con­sor­tium advo­cat­ing for a cap and trade sys­tem with extreme­ly weak emis­sions reduc­tions. US CAP allows pol­luters like Duke Ener­gy, Shell, BP, DuPont, and Dow Chem­i­cal to claim they are green while con­tin­u­ing with busi­ness as usu­al. In recog­ni­tion, activists award­ed ED the “Cor­po­rate Green­wash Award,” a three foot tall green paint­brush. “We think this award is appro­pri­ate since Envi­ron­men­tal Defense spends more time paint­ing pol­luters green than actu­al­ly defend­ing the envi­ron­ment,” said Matt Wal­lace of Ris­ing Tide North Amer­i­ca.

Oppo­si­tion to car­bon trad­ing is grow­ing as it becomes appar­ent that mar­ket based schemes do lit­tle to fight cli­mate change while help­ing cor­po­ra­tions rake in prof­its. Ear­li­er this year, over 50 groups came togeth­er in the US to denounce car­bon trad­ing in a Dec­la­ra­tion Against the Use of Car­bon Trad­ing Schemes to Address Cli­mate Change. Glob­al­ly, hun­dreds of envi­ron­men­tal, social jus­tice, and indige­nous groups have come togeth­er to oppose such mar­ket based ini­tia­tives as inher­ent­ly unsus­tain­able and inef­fec­tive in cre­at­ing a just tran­si­tion away from fos­sil fuels.

========

Aus­tralia: Coal-fired pow­er sta­tion block­ade on the eve of inter­na­tion­al cli­mate nego­ti­a­tions

Novem­ber 27, 2008: This morn­ing, four peo­ple entered the Mun­morah Coal-Fired Pow­er Sta­tion on the NSW Cen­tral Coast, attach­ing them­selves to con­vey­or belts car­ry­ing coal.

Spokesper­son Ann-Marie Rohlfs says “In two days, the Rudd Gov­ern­ment will go to the Unit­ed Nations cli­mate change meet­ing in Poland. Instead of show­ing lead­er­ship, they are set to announce weak and inef­fec­tive domes­tic emis­sions reduc­tion tar­gets…”
“With the upcom­ing release of the Cli­mate White Paper, the Rudd Gov­ern­ment will hand tens of bil­lions of dol­lars in com­pen­sa­tion and free per­mits to pol­lut­ing indus­tries. Pub­lic mon­ey would be bet­ter spent invest­ing in a green renew­able future for Aus­tralia.”

Spokesper­son Nicky Ison says, “This week we wit­nessed the clo­sure of the BP solar plant in Home­bush Bay. Aus­tralia is miss­ing out on tens of thou­sands of new jobs by con­tin­u­ing to prop up the coal indus­try and pre­vent­ing the tran­si­tion to a renew­able ener­gy econ­o­my.”

In Sep­tem­ber, Nobel Prize Win­ner Al Gore said “I believe we have reached the stage where it is time for civ­il dis­obe­di­ence to pre­vent the con­struc­tion of new coal plants.”

We are tak­ing him at his word.

Today’s block­ade at the Mun­morah Pow­er Sta­tion is part of a huge com­mu­ni­ty effort to kick Australia’s coal habit.

“We are fac­ing a cli­mate emer­gency, but our emis­sions are still ris­ing. We call on the Rudd Gov­ern­ment to ensure 2010 is the year Australia’s green­house emis­sions peak and begin to rapid­ly decline.

“If half of the homes in NSW had solar hot water sys­tems, there would be no need for Mun­morah Pow­er Sta­tion. We would save 1.5 mil­lion tonnes of CO2 annu­al­ly. As the old­est pow­er sta­tion in NSW, Mun­morah Pow­er sta­tion must be the first to go in the new green econ­o­my.”

For fur­ther com­ment:
Hol­ly Creenaune- 0417 682 541
Ann-Marie Rohlfs – 0406 021 920
Nicky Ison – 0423 717 567
For high res­o­lu­tions pho­tos and video footage, con­tact Nicky Ison on 0423 717 567

protests against the roll-out of the ID card scheme & database

Against the impo­si­tion of ID cards on Non-EU stu­dents and mar­riage visa hold­ers.

Fingerprinted barbed wire fence graphicAgainst the impo­si­tion of ID cards on Non-EU stu­dents and mar­riage visa hold­ers.

This is not the first time for­eign nation­als or migrants have been used as guinea pigs to test a law or tech­nol­o­gy. Exam­ples include the Asy­lum Reg­is­tra­tion Cards (ARC), which is a sim­i­lar card that asy­lum seek­ers have been required to car­ry since 2002. Once migrants have been used as a ‘road test’ for the wide­ly opposed ID scheme, the gov­ern­ment will start on the rest of us. From 2010 on, the gov­ern­ment pre­dicts that one mil­lion cards will be hand­ed out every year.

For more back­ground infor­ma­tion on how this ‘drip drip’ approach to impos­ing bio­met­ric ID cards relates to migra­tion man­age­ment and the Home Office’s points sys­tem read:

http://www.corporatewatch.org.uk/?lid=3147
http://nobordersmanchester.blogspot.com/2008/11/defy-id-cards-no-one-is-illegal.html

==========
No No No ID cardsNewcastle ID cards protest
27th Novem­ber 2008
This evening approx­i­mate­ly 13 activists from No Bor­ders North East hand­ed out 200 anti-ID card leaflets to shop­pers in Cen­tral New­cas­tle. Ban­ners and plac­ards were also held, and a very pos­i­tive response was giv­en from the pub­lic.

Tues­day saw the intro­duc­tion of Iden­ti­ty Cards for non-EU cit­i­zens. No Bor­ders views this as yet anoth­er attempt to vic­tim­ize an often voice­less group, and so has orches­trat­ed a series of protests this week through­out the coun­try.

http://www.noborders.org.uk

.….

This morn­ing, dur­ing the peak rush hour time of 7.30 — 9.00 am, 4 activists from No Bor­ders North East per­formed an anti‑i.d card ban­ner drop from a bridge over one of the city’s busiest inner motor­ways. The largest ban­ner read “No To ID Cards, Free­dom For All!” and was accom­pa­nied by a small­er No Bor­ders ban­ner.

The reac­tion from the dri­vers below was over­whelm­ing­ly pos­i­tive, with many honk­ing horns, wav­ing and giv­ing thumbs up.

Today sees the start of the ID card scheme, with non-EU cit­i­zens apply­ing for, or renew­ing visas for study or mar­riage, being made to car­ry a card and have their details put on the Gov­ern­men­t’s data­base. Immi­gra­tion law already gives the Home Office pow­ers it would like to exert over every­body. Under a cloud of anti-immi­gra­tion hys­te­ria the gov­ern­ment is increas­ing it’s social con­trol and attempt­ing to ush­er in unprece­dent­ed pow­ers of sur­veil­lance over the whole pop­u­la­tion.

The police came along while we were doing it, but did­nt seem to have any prob­lem with it. Inter­est­ing­ly how­ev­er, they said that an anar­chist sym­bol can be deemed offen­sive and thus remov­able under a pub­lic order act (?!). We told them that our No Bor­ders ban­ner with a large anar­chist sym­bol was­n’t in fact anar­chist relat­ed, and they believed us for some rea­son.… 😉

York­shire Activists block­ade Sheffield Bor­der Agency Cen­tre

1.12.2008
At 8am this morn­ing a group of York­shire activists block­ad­ed the Sheffield Bor­der Agency Inter­ro­ga­tion Cen­tre at Vul­can House using bicy­cle locks and super­glue to attach them­selves to both entrances. The group are there in response to the intro­duc­tion of com­pul­so­ry ID cards for non-EU peo­ple on stu­dent or mar­riage visas. They are dis­play­ing two ban­ners, one reads “My iden­ti­ty is not your prop­er­ty” and the oth­er “Noth­ing to hide? Every­thing to fear! Defy ID!”

Some appli­cants have been turned away by the Bor­der Agency staff but many were sup­port­ive of the actions the group has tak­en. Speak­ing to a block­ad­er, one appli­cant said that by intro­duc­ing com­pul­so­ry ID cards, the gov­ern­ment have shown that “they just want to con­trol peo­ple”. Bor­der Agency staff have called the police to remove the pro­test­ers but at the time of send­ing (10:30am) the pro­test­ers are still in place.

An activist from Brad­ford (who is cur­rent­ly super­glued to two oth­ers in front of the main entrance) said “The gov­ern­ment are try­ing to intro­duce ID cards through the back door, tar­get­ing some of the most vul­ner­a­ble peo­ple in the coun­try.” A Sheffield activist added “If we want to save the peo­ple of Great Britain from ID cards, we must act now!”

Gov­ern­ment leg­is­la­tion has meant that, since 25^th Novem­ber, for­eign spous­es and non-EU stu­dents who apply for, or renew, visas will be forced to attend an inter­ro­ga­tion and be issued with an ID card that will hold their name, pho­to­graph, nation­al­i­ty and immi­gra­tion sta­tus, along with a bio­met­ric chip that will hold their fin­ger­prints and dig­i­tal image. The details will be held indef­i­nite­ly on the UK Iden­ti­ty Ser­vice data­base. Delays meant that the Sheffield Bor­der Agency Cen­tre only began inter­ro­ga­tions from today (1^st Decem­ber).

Update — 11 activists were arrest­ed (sig­nif­i­cant­ly more than were thought to be locked on) after hold­ing the block­ade for more than three hours. All released with with ver­bal cau­tions.


Lunar House ID poster
Iden­ti­ty Cards Protest, Lunar House, Croy­don

26.11.2008
On the cor­ner of George Street in Croy­don, Lon­don, a Novem­ber sun was warm­ing the shop­pers and office work­ers on their lunch breaks, but a few hun­dred metres north on Welles­ley Road a bit­ing Siber­ian wind seared the demon­stra­tors out­side Lunar House. It seemed appro­pri­ate that such a freez­ing blast should sur­round the UK head­quar­ters of the Bor­der and Immi­gra­tion Agency and indeed be gen­er­at­ed by its twen­ty sto­ries of the grim ear­ly 1970s office com­plex. After all its rai­son d’être is to give would-be immi­grants and asy­lum seeks an extreme­ly cold recep­tion.

Its bleak anonymi­ty is also a warn­ing of things to come for all of us in a Brave New Britain of state sur­veil­lance and con­trol whose infra­struc­ture is increas­ing­ly with us through secu­ri­ty cam­eras, the inter­cep­tion mobile phone sig­nals and elec­tron­ic com­mu­ni­ca­tions and the planned intro­duc­tion of uni­ver­sal ID cards.

The pick­et, called by Lon­don NoBor­ders http://london.noborders.org.uk and NO2ID http://www.no2id.net/, marked the start of Bio­met­ric ID cards, which are being issued from today, 25 Novem­ber 2008, to all non-EU stu­dents and spous­es apply­ing for, or renew­ing visas for study or mar­riage. The cards will have a pho­to­graph with name, date of birth, nation­al­i­ty, immi­gra­tion sta­tus and bio­met­ric details, includ­ing fin­ger­prints and dig­i­tal facial image will be stored on a chip on the card as well as being held indef­i­nite­ly on the UK Iden­ti­ty Ser­vice data­base.

Soon all for­eign nation­als in the UK will be required to have these cards, which will be rolled out to oth­er groups includ­ing stu­dents who want a stu­dent loan by 2010. And from 2011 you will need to get one – and have your details on that data­base — if you want to renew or get a pass­port.

What wor­ries many of us is not just the use to which our own gov­ern­ment and secu­ri­ty ser­vices might make of such data – link­ing to face recog­ni­tion soft­ware work­ing on images from secu­ri­ty cam­eras and mobile phone data would enable our every move to be tracked – but the cer­tain­ty that it will get into oth­er hands – such as those of our US friends in the CIA, as well as crim­i­nal and com­mer­cial organ­i­sa­tions who will have their own ideas about how such all-per­va­sive data might be used.

Among those at today’s demon­stra­tion was David Mery http://gizmonaut.net/bits/suspect.html a man who has achieved a small per­son­al vic­to­ry against the jug­ger­naut data­base state.

Mery was stopped by police enter­ing South­wark tube sta­tion on 28 July for being “calm on arrival, almost too calm” and hav­ing a lar­gish ruck­sack and a strong French accent. It was three weeks after the Lon­don bomb­ing – and — per­haps luck­i­ly for him, six days after the shoot­ing of Jean Charles de Menezes. This time at least the police didn’t shoot first and ask ques­tions lat­er, but his treat­ment in the months and years fol­low­ing the event can most favourably be described as Kafkaesque. He final­ly (or at least prob­a­bly) suc­ceed­ed in hav­ing both his fin­ger­prints and DNA record removed from the police data­bas­es, but it took over two years of fight­ing. His blog http://gizmonaut.net/ and arti­cles are essen­tial read­ing for any­one who won­ders why civ­il lib­er­ties are impor­tant.

Leeds NO2ID have burnt a mock ID card in protest at the intro­duc­tion of the ID card scheme for for­eign nation­als

Video — video/quicktime 13M

Around 20 activists braved the freez­ing tem­per­a­tures and rain to gath­er in Leeds last night on the eve of the intro­duc­tion of ID cards for for­eign nation­als.

The protest was made my burn­ing a mock ID card in pub­lic.

The Protest passed off peace­ful­ly with­out the pres­ence of West York­shire Police.

Liv­er­pool anti-ID pick­et: No One Is Ille­gal

20 stu­dents and No Bor­der­s/an­ti-ID cam­paign­ers from Man­ches­ter made their way to Liv­er­pool on 25th Novem­ber, the day that the gov­ern­ment intro­duced ID cards for non-EU nation­als liv­ing in the UK. There they joined a group of 30 Mersey­side activists out­side Reliance House to protest at the intro­duc­tion of com­pul­so­ry ID cards for inter­na­tion­al stu­dents and non-EU spous­es on that day.

Reliance House is where inter­view­ing, pho­tograph­ing and fin­ger­print­ing will take place from 4th Decem­ber before being issued with a bio­met­ric ID card. It is also Liverpool’s report­ing cen­tre where those seek­ing asy­lum have to ‘sign in’ on a reg­u­lar basis while their claims are being processed. If their claims fail they can be held, with­out pri­or notice, in the immi­gra­tion deten­tion facil­i­ty in the same build­ing for up to 7 days.

It is thus imper­a­tive to make the con­nec­tion between ID cards and the assault on the rights of non-EU nation­als want­i­ng to live, work and study in the UK. Peo­ple from Man­ches­ter No Bor­ders had brought along plac­ards and ban­ners pro­claim­ing that “no one is ille­gal”. Where the state rein­forces the divi­sion between legal and ‘ille­gal’ peo­ple our sol­i­dar­i­ty must extend to those most affect­ed by the scheme.

Some men­tion in the news:
http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/liverpool-news/local-news/2008/11/25/protests-in-city-over-id-cards-100252–22330184/
http://www.theherald.co.uk/politics/news/display.var.2470740.0.Protests_as_first_ID_card_scheme_launched_in_Britain.php
http://www.liverpooldailypost.co.uk/liverpool-news/regional-news/2008/11/26/protesters-say-no-to-introduction-of-id-cards-for-foreign-students-64375–22341365/

(Dur­ing the pick­et of Reliance House, some first con­tact was made with indi­vid­ual No Bor­der activists from Liv­er­pool, Mersey­side and North Wales. If you are from this region and want to get active in a No Bor­ders group, please email us, so we can get you in touch)

manchesternoborders@riseup.net
http://www.manchesternoborders.org.uk


Cardiff No ID protest
Over 60 peo­ple attend­ed our protest against the intro­duc­tion of Bio­met­ric ID Cards for non-EU stu­dents and spous­es on Tues­day. The demon­stra­tion was held for a cou­ple of hours at mid­day out­side the Cardiff office of the UK Bor­der Agency at 31–33 New­port Road. Peo­ple the gov­ern­ment is forc­ing to car­ry ID cards will have to attend this cen­tre for inter­ro­ga­tion, pho­tograph­ing and fin­ger­print­ing.

We dis­played ban­ners, held plac­ards, waved giant mock ID cards and dis­trib­uted 600 copies of this leaflet — the reac­tion from passers by was com­plete­ly sup­port­ive. Many peo­ple used their lunch­break to join the protest for a short while before return­ing to work or study. This protest was part of a nation­wide day of action out­side UKBA cen­tres by No Bor­ders Net­work who, along with Defy ID, NO2ID and oth­er groups, held protests in Croy­don, Liv­er­pool, Glas­gow, Soli­hull, and New­cas­tle. Though many of these protests around the coun­try got into local news­pa­pers, Welsh media cov­er­age has been min­i­mal.

This protest appears to be just the start of resis­tance to ID Cards, the British Air­line Pilots’ Asso­ci­a­tion (BALPA) has threat­ened indus­tri­al action if the gov­ern­ment goes ahead with it’s plan to impose ID cards on air­port work­ers next year. Tens of thou­sands of peo­ple have signed up to NO2ID’s pledge not to reg­is­ter for a card, even if that means going to prison. No Bor­ders South Wales will be protest­ing out­side the Bor­der agency again, on Wednes­day 10th Decem­ber when the Cardiff office will start to reg­is­ter peo­ple, join us if you can.

“These new ID cards are not only a repres­sive mea­sure against non-EU stu­dents and spous­es, they are the first shot in an attack against everyone’s lib­er­ty. In tar­get­ing a large­ly voice­less migrant group, who have the least chance to com­plain and the most to lose, the gov­ern­ment is fol­low­ing a famil­iar path of repres­sive regimes through­out his­to­ry. Immi­gra­tion law already gives the Home Office pow­ers it would like to exert over every­body. By resist­ing the repres­sion of migrants, we defend the free­dom of every­one!“

For links to leaflet, video and oth­er stuff, see http://noborderswales.wordpress.com/2008/11/26/cardiff-protest-against-id-cards/

Soli­hull protest against the impo­si­tion of bio­met­ric ID cards on migrants

26.11.2008
Yes­ter­day Nobor­ders Birm­ing­ham protest­ed against the impo­si­tion of bio­met­ric ID cards at the UK Bor­der Agency Office in Soli­hull. They were met by a puz­zling dis­pro­por­tion­ate police response at Domin­ion Court, 41 Sta­tion Road, Soli­hull — around 12 police offi­cers, includ­ing 3 police vans and an evi­dence gath­er­er. This may have some­thing to do with the polic­ing of a pre­vi­ous protest around the cor­ner at Sand­ford House, the home office report­ing cen­tre, where hun­dreds of Con­golese demon­stra­tors fac­ing mass depor­ta­tion occu­pied the main road http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/regions/birmingham/2007/04/368076.html

A ban­ner pro­claim­ing ‘Free­dom of Move­ment for All’ was held by the entrance of the UK Bor­ders Agency Office. The police offered to ‘facil­i­tate’ our protest by a seem­ing­ly polite offer to arrange for a met­al bar­ri­er to hang our ban­ner from. How­ev­er, we realised that the six foot high hedge in front of the build­ing would make our protest invis­i­ble to almost every­one, so instead we hung our ban­ner by the main road and dis­trib­uted around 600 leaflets to some very inter­est­ed mem­bers of the pub­lic.

Fol­low­ing a con­cerned report from a ded­i­cat­ed com­mu­ni­ty police offi­cer ear­li­er in the day, two equal­ly com­mit­ted coun­cil work­ers from the envi­ron­men­tal and health depart­ment at Soli­hull Coun­cil turned up in their lunch hour to ensure that the lit­er­a­ture being dis­trib­uted was of a polit­i­cal, rather than com­mer­cial, nature and thus would not run afoul of local bye-laws on littering/flyering (no one seemed quite sure). This fol­lows sev­er­al oth­er inci­dents known to us in cen­tral Birm­ing­ham where coun­cil offi­cials have attempt­ed to apply sim­i­lar bye-laws (with accom­pa­ny­ing threats of fines and court appear­ances) to dis­suade peo­ple from hand­ing out polit­i­cal lit­er­a­ture. It has been not­ed before that the par­lia­men­tary leg­is­la­tion which serves as the basis of these bye-laws specif­i­cal­ly exempt­ed mate­ri­als of a polit­i­cal nature. The coun­cil work­ers also showed some inter­est in the ban­ner, rais­ing con­cern over the man­ner of its attach­ment to some local shrubs and some­thing else about pri­vate prop­er­ty, but in the end they seemed to decide that nei­ther the pub­lic nor the shrubs were at any risk (poten­tial, real, or oth­er­wise) and returned to what remained of their lunch hour.

Two stu­dents from Pak­istan informed us that they had to book an appoint­ment to begin the bio­met­ric ID card process and they could­n’t return home until this had been com­plet­ed. They claimed today they were told by staff that they would be required to give blood sam­ples and have iris scans for their bio­met­ric cards so if they com­mit­ted any ‘crimes’ in the UK they could be iden­ti­fied imme­di­ate­ly. It appears that the pri­vate com­pa­ny con­tract­ed to the tune of £5.6 bil­lion, and entrust­ed with sen­si­tive bio­met­ric data, are already doing their best to impress upon appli­cants that ID cards will be effec­tive at ‘fight­ing crime’. Lib­er­ty, the civ­il lib­er­ties and human rights organ­i­sa­tion, have already expressed con­cern about the Government’s abil­i­ty to safe­guard individual’s inti­mate details on the Nation­al Iden­ti­ty Reg­is­ter after Gov­ern­ment depart­ments last year lost 30 mil­lion pieces of per­son­al data, includ­ing those of 25 mil­lion child ben­e­fit claimants. ‘We have ID cards in our coun­try but they aren’t bio­met­ric’ said one of the stu­dents. ‘It feels very dis­crim­i­na­to­ry that we are being tar­get­ed first. Why aren’t they pro­cess­ing UK nation­als first?’ The inter­na­tion­al stu­dents also point­ed out that this was cost­ing them a great deal of mon­ey. Not only did they have to pay exor­bi­tant fees for their cours­es but on top of that they have to pay £300 for their visas and now they have to pay for their bio­met­ric ID cards and they are only per­mit­ted to work 20 hours a week. They also added that these mea­sures would serve to put over­seas stu­dents off study­ing here cit­ing Aus­tralia as a more wel­com­ing alter­na­tive.

The use of for­eign nation­als as guinea pigs for the more wide­spread intro­duc­tion of ID cards is a strat­e­gy to run a test­bed for the tech­nol­o­gy on peo­ple with­out a voice. It has become appar­ent that the gov­ern­ment is like­ly to pick off cer­tain sec­tions of the com­mu­ni­ty in Britain one at a time. This divide and rule strat­e­gy has been used through­out his­to­ry, most notably by the Nazi regime in Ger­many.

When the British gov­ern­ment came for the migrants,
I remained silent;
I was not a migrant.

When they came for the air­line work­ers,
I remained silent;
I was not an air­line work­er.

When they came for the con­victs,
I did not speak out;
I was not a con­vict.

When they came for the health work­ers,
I did not speak out;
I was not a health work­er.

When they came for the stu­dents,
I did not speak out;
I was not a stu­dent.

When they came for me,
there was no one left to speak out.

nobor­ders-brum @ riseup.net

ID demo
http://glasgowanarchists.wordpress.com/

Also in the news:

ID ‘read­ing’ machines on Cana­da and Mex­i­co bor­ders
‘Smart’ CCTV in Portsmouth

Buy Nothing Day reports — London x2, Norwich, Wrexham, Liverpool & Manchester

“Take your clothes off!

Swap Shop 1Swap Shop 2“Take your clothes off! Swap them with your friends for FREE!” was the mes­sage from the Space Hijack­ers http://www.spacehijackers.co.uk/html/welcome.html, who decid­ed to set up their clothes swap — “the restyling fash­ion mash-up event of the year” — on the low­er ground floor of TOPSHOP at Oxford Cir­cus (Lon­don). The idea was to demon­strate that “we don’t need to spend mon­ey we don’t have on things we don’t need.”

The action, designed as it was to sub­vert one of the icon­ic tem­ples of con­sumerism seemed to baf­fle police and did­n’t amuse the secu­ri­ty staff, who stopped me tak­ing pic­tures there. One oth­er pho­tog­ra­ph­er was man­han­dled out of the store, but I was treat­ed very polite­ly, with sev­er­al secu­ri­ty men stand­ing between me and the action and telling me that pho­to­graph was not allowed. On of the store man­agers even offered to per­son­al­ly help me find any clothes I might wish to buy else­where in the store, a pos­si­bil­i­ty I found most unlike­ly.

I left the store (with a rather large escort until I left the premis­es) and walked around to the side exit where I expect­ed the clothes swap­pers to be eject­ed, arriv­ing just before they emerged, and was able to pho­to­graph them con­tin­u­ing to swap clothes on the pave­ment in Regent Street. Here one police­man did attempt to pre­vent me from tak­ing pic­tures, claim­ing I was caus­ing an obstruc­tion (which clear­ly I was­n’t) and as usu­al I moved back a cou­ple of feet before return­ing to take pic­tures when he moved away.

Things did threat­en to get out of hand when a rather elder­ly police offi­cer (at my age all police­men are sup­posed to look young), helped by a ‘Red Cap’ (rather sin­is­ter pri­vate secu­ri­ty war­dens employed by the ‘New West End Com­pa­ny’ to ensure shop­pers don’t step out of line) start­ed to push peo­ple around, but most­ly oth­er offi­cers took a more sen­si­ble approach, some even talk­ing and jok­ing with the swap­pers as they con­tin­ued to exchange items of cloth­ing on the pave­ment.

Some shop­pers pass­ing by stopped to watch, and a few took a leaflet, but there was no evi­dence of any Dam­a­scene con­ver­sions, most hur­ry­ing on clutch­ing their loaded shop­ping bags, des­per­ate to spend more mon­ey.

One of those tak­ing part was held by the police for a while as they had decid­ed he was the ring­leader. He got a big cheer when he was released, wav­ing his pink ‘Get out of TOPSHOP Jail Free’ Chance Card and the Anti-social Behav­iour Act Notice for the Dis­per­sal of Groups (see http://www.opsi.gov.uk/ACTS/acts2003/ukpga_20030038_en_5 ) which the Met had issued. This required him to leave the Oxford St/Regent St area for the next 24 hours. For­tu­nate­ly the map pro­vid­ed did­n’t include the Red Lion, where he announced his inten­tion of going — and at this point I also left as I was already late for a meet­ing with friends in Streatham. Some of the oth­ers looked as if they were going to con­tin­ue their fun along Oxford Street.

========

All in all, I think it was a good action.

around 30–40 peo­ple turned up and swapped clothes, hun­dreds of leaflets were hand­ed out on oxford street before the action, and when it did hap­pen, Top­Shop had a shop full of Police, PCSO’s and secu­ri­ty, they closed the entrance to the shop and removed the ‘red phone box’ meet­ing point dis­play.

Lots of lit­er­a­ture was hand­ed out, and plen­ty of pret­ty activist flesh, (oh my).

two arrests hap­pened, one for refus­ing to give a name and address (sec­tion 50 of the Police Reform Act) appar­ent­ly it was anti-social behav­iour. On the con­trary I thought it was incred­i­bly social behav­iour show by the hijack­ers. Both arrests were released with­out charge fair­ly swift­ly. Although one was dri­ven to Trafal­gar square and dropped off there for no appar­ent rea­son?

Lat­er on the actions con­tin­ued with a street par­ty in King­ly Court shop­ping cen­tre, and then a road blo­cade at Sev­en Dials with plen­ty of danc­ing.

thanks to all of the non-shop swap­pers and to the love­ly peo­ple who swapped their clothes with mine for the great new out­fit I have.

========

Buy noth­ing day — brix­ton report

“Buy noth­ing day” is an inter­na­tion­al anti-con­sumerist day. Put sim­ply : peo­ple are encour­aged to stop shop­ing for one day. In Brix­ton, activist set up a stall to give away free food and oth­er free items.

Activists met at 11am at Library House to pick up veg­eta­bles and part of the con­tent of the Library House­’s freeshop. The items were brought to Brix­ton, and were giv­en out for free in front of the super­mar­ket next to the tube sta­tion.

——
Norwich rat race
To mark Buy Noth­ing Day, activists from Nor­wich Ris­ing Tide held a Rat Race in the Nor­wich city cen­tre.

The busiest high street in Nor­wich was today full of rats. The rats were equipped with plac­ards read­ing Work Hard­er, Earn More Mon­ey, Buy More Things, Keep Going, and leaflets telling peo­ple to join the con­sump­tion Rat Race. The reverse of the leaflet, revealed the spoof and informed peo­ple that today was buy noth­ing day and per­haps they should con­sid­er the envi­ron­men­tal and social con­se­quences of exces­sive con­sump­tion.

600 leaflets were hand­ed out in total (see below), and many passers-by expressed their sup­port, although one by pass­er was heard to call “Get a job” to which one of the rat (a teacher) shout­ed back, “It’s a Sat­ur­day you toss­er!” – the crowd of shop­pers that had gath­ered around the rats all laughed.BND Norwich flier front
BND Norwich flier back

——–
Wrexham BND freeconomy leaflet
“Free Socks!” “Why? Who’s hold­ing him?”
29.11.2008
In Wrex­ham town cen­tre this morn­ing, the local Freecon­o­my group held a Sock (FREE) Shop — that’s socks for free, not a shop free of socks or even free­ing Sock. Hun­dreds of pairs of warm socks were dis­trib­uted in sub­ze­ro tem­per­a­tures to peo­ple with cold feet — and hands — along with leaflets explain­ing what Freecon­o­my Wrex­ham does and invit­ing peo­ple to get involved in the hap­py world of giv­ing and shar­ing.

There was a great deal of puz­zle­ment about a stall offer­ing free socks in the town cen­tre on a busy Sat­ur­day morn­ing.

One pass­ing shop­per came over to find out more about our cam­paign to free the mys­te­ri­ous ‘Socks’ from his cap­tor. More com­mon­ly, peo­ple just could­n’t seem to believe that the socks were for free:

Free? What’s the catch? You don’t get any­thing for free… do you?

But of course you do. Or, at least, some­one does.…

Loads of stuff hap­pens for free all the time. Cap­i­tal­ism has only sur­vived this long because of the free labour which is pro­vid­ed by any­one whose work helps some­one else to get rich­er. Marx had some­thing to say about this. Land and resources stolen from the peo­ple — our own Eagles Mead­ow includ­ed — are used by busi­ness­es to gen­er­ate prof­it, and trashed in the process. We nur­ture our chil­dren for free because we love them, but all that free care and atten­tion is what brings the next gen­er­a­tion of work­ers into being — a free gift to cap­i­tal­ism. Much of the free stuff we do as par­ents, car­ers, part­ners, friends, ‘good neigh­bours’ and so on is large­ly invis­i­ble to the econ­o­my, although with­out it the econ­o­my as it is could­n’t func­tion at all.

Freecon­o­my Wrex­ham is just doing a bit to raise the pro­file of free giv­ing and encour­age peo­ple to spread their free gifts around rather than trash­ing them, which is what hap­pens when good stuff ends up at the tip, for exam­ple. We hand­ed out socks and leaflets for about 3 hours, by which time even mul­ti­ple lay­ers of our free socks could­n’t keep our feet and hands from freez­ing, so we called it a day.

LEAFLET TEXT

FREECONOMY WREXHAM… Bring and Take… Free for All…

What’s it all about?

Freecon­o­my Wrex­ham is:
for every­one; envi­ron­men­tal­ly friend­ly; shar­ing; giv­ing; fun!; re-using stuff; com­plete­ly free; sus­tain­able.

Turn over to find out more…

Freecon­o­my Wrex­ham is about gift and shar­ing, show­ing that it is pos­si­ble to make things work with­out pay­ment or finan­cial prof­it. In a world where every­thing seems to have a price — often more than we can afford — it can be dif­fi­cult to imag­ine a com­plete­ly free event. But all the goods on our stalls and at our events are there for the tak­ing. Every­one is invit­ed to come and help them­selves.

Bring and Take is made pos­si­ble by every­one who gives their time and ener­gy to help out, who donates goods to be giv­en away, who loans a venue for free or lets us use a van or bakes a cake, and — most impor­tant­ly — every­one who takes away all the things that are donat­ed!

Re-use for the plan­et. Before you throw any­thing away, think about whether some­one else could use it. Nat­ur­al resources, time and skills were need­ed to make that item. If it’s binned, all those things are lost. By shar­ing and re-using, we can keep wealth in our com­mu­ni­ties, help each oth­er, cre­ate good­will and hap­pi­ness, and do a lit­tle bit to save the plan­et.

freeconomywrexham[at]yahoo.co.uk

——–
What, No Prices?
Liverpool Buy Nothing Day 08
More than 150 peo­ple came to Next To Nowhere’s Free Shop on Sat­ur­day in Liv­er­pool. This was a one-off event to mark Buy Noth­ing Day. The organ­is­ers encour­aged peo­ple to come in by offer­ing free tea and toast and free mistle­toe on the street out­side.

Real­ly, it’s free

Buy Noth­ing Day orig­i­nat­ed in the USA in 1992. It was intend­ed to make a state­ment about over-con­sump­tion and the amount of waste this gen­er­ates, and encour­age peo­ple to re-think their lifestyles. It gen­er­at­ed some con­tro­ver­sy, and still does, if the com­ments to the pre­vi­ous post­ing about Buy Noth­ing Day are any­thing to go by! Some peo­ple think con­sump­tion by itself is not the issue, oth­ers think the event is patro­n­is­ing to peo­ple who can’t afford to buy much any­way.
But none of the peo­ple who wan­dered into the free shop last Sat­ur­day seemed to feel patro­n­ised. Some, who had come to town to do Christ­mas shop­ping, looked in out of curi­ousi­ty, and found they pre­ferred doing some “non-shop­ping”, and get­ting some refresh­ments at the free cafe. Peo­ple with lit­tle mon­ey were hap­py to take away free items they need­ed, and for the peo­ple who had donat­ed things, it was sat­is­fy­ing to see goods they don’t need any more being tak­en for re-use. Not every­body who came had heard of Buy Noth­ing Day, and had to be reas­sured that every­thing real­ly was free!
What­ev­er the gen­er­al crit­i­cisms, this par­tic­u­lar free shop worked as a co-oper­a­tive event, it intro­duced peo­ple to the social cen­tre who had nev­er been there before, and it gave peo­ple a taste of how lib­er­at­ing it is to do with­out cur­ren­cy for once.

——–

Buy Noth­ing Day Man­ches­ter: Pri­mark Feels the Wrath of Santa’s Lit­tle Work­ers!

On Sat­ur­day 29th Novem­ber sev­en stu­dents braved Manchester’s heav­ing Mar­ket Street in sup­port of Buy Noth­ing Day 2008. In fes­tive dress and armed with some thought-pro­vok­ing cloth­ing labels of their own, the aim was to raise aware­ness about unnec­es­sary con­sumerism over Christ­mas, and to reveal the true cost of high street fash­ion to Sat­ur­day shop­pers.

The action began incog­ni­to, as the pro­tes­tors secret­ly deliv­ered mes­sages ques­tion­ing con­sumer greed and the uneth­i­cal sourc­ing of cheap fash­ion into the pock­ets, zips, and cuffs of cloth­ing in Pri­mark. Mes­sages such as “I won­der if the per­son who made this gar­ment is hap­py?”, and “Do you real­ly need anoth­er one of these?” were soon dot­ted around the bustling store and secu­ri­ty quick­ly react­ed, call­ing all clean­ers to the ground floor to remove the labels. The pro­test­ers escaped unscathed, mer­ry in the knowl­edge that the chances of hunt­ing out all the labels would be pret­ty slim.

After a quick change of clothes the pro­tes­tors took to the street, antlers and all. With a splen­did ban­ner and leaflets a‑plenty they approached the swarms of passers-by and announced that they need not spend mon­ey this Christ­mas to be hap­py. Some engag­ing debates ensued con­cern­ing con­sumerism and sweat­shops. It was felt by some that only the finan­cial­ly priv­i­leged could afford to have a con­science, and that out­lets such as Pri­mark offered those with a low­er income the chance to look (and there­fore feel) good. Oth­ers had been so far unaware of shops like Primark’s asso­ci­a­tion with fac­to­ries in India, and were gen­uine­ly shocked at some of the sto­ries the pro­tes­tors relayed about under­paid and mis­treat­ed work­ers. Whilst not every­body agreed, the val­ue of live­ly pub­lic debate can­not be under­es­ti­mat­ed. Talk­ing about some­thing is the first step to chang­ing it and per­haps now a few peo­ple will think twice before buy­ing some­thing just because it is cheap. It’s real cost is inhu­mane­ly high.