Intruder enters E.ON power station and switches off 2% of UK supplies

Police have begun an inves­ti­ga­tion after pro­test­ers broke into one of Britain’s biggest pow­er sta­tions last week [28th Novem­ber 2008] and cut almost 2 per cent of the country’s elec­tric­i­ty sup­plies.

Police have begun an inves­ti­ga­tion after pro­test­ers broke into one of Britain’s biggest pow­er sta­tions last week [28th Novem­ber 2008] and cut almost 2 per cent of the country’s elec­tric­i­ty sup­plies.

Up to 500 megawatts of gen­er­at­ing capac­i­ty was lost from the nation­al net­work for about four hours after the inci­dent at Kingsnorth coal and oil-fired pow­er sta­tion in Kent, The Times has learnt. An intrud­er scaled an elec­tric fence, entered a secure area and switched off one of four tur­bines sup­ply­ing Lon­don and the South East.

E.ON, the Ger­man pow­er group that oper­ates the plant, is under­stood to sus­pect that some of its own staff or con­tract­ed employ­ees were involved in the inci­dent last Fri­day night.

Accord­ing to fig­ures from Nation­al Grid, total UK elec­tric­i­ty demand at the time was about 33,000 megawatts – mean­ing that 500 megawatts rep­re­sent­ed more than 1.5 per cent of the total, enough to pow­er a city the size of Bris­tol.

The pro­test­ers, who have not been caught despite much of the episode being caught on CCTV, climbed an elec­tric secu­ri­ty fence that was not work­ing at the time. Hav­ing switched off Unit Two, they left through an entrance that only employ­ees would have been famil­iar with. They also man­aged to go through a com­plex pro­ce­dure at a con­trol pan­el inside one of the tur­bine halls to turn the machin­ery off.

Kent police are involved in the inves­ti­ga­tion. E.ON has ordered an inter­nal inves­ti­ga­tion, and is exam­in­ing its own secu­ri­ty pro­ce­dures.

E.ON has become a key tar­get for cli­mate change pro­test­ers because Kingsnorth has been ear­marked for con­struc­tion of Britain’s first new coal-fired pow­er sta­tion in decades. The plant, which has a total gen­er­at­ing capac­i­ty of 1,960 megawatts, mak­ing it one of Britain’s biggest pow­er sta­tions, is to be retired from ser­vice soon and E.ON wants to build a £2 bil­lion coal replace­ment, which envi­ron­men­tal­ists say would lock in the emis­sion of many mil­lions of tonnes of green­house gas­es for decades to come.

Protest mes­sages were also left strewn across the tur­bine hall dur­ing the inci­dent.

An E.ON spokesman con­firmed that an inci­dent had tak­en place in which the site was entered ille­gal­ly and equip­ment was tam­pered with. “While we are respect­ful of people’s right to peace­ful and law­ful protest, this was clear­ly nei­ther of those and could have had very seri­ous impli­ca­tions, not least because of the poten­tial for seri­ous injury or worse. Thank­ful­ly, our site team respond­ed very quick­ly and pro­fes­sion­al­ly to ensure that the sit­u­a­tion was brought under con­trol.

“We have launched an inves­ti­ga­tion and are work­ing close­ly with the police on their inquiries. Kingsnorth pow­er sta­tion remains oper­a­tional.”

E.ON has defend­ed its plans for a coal-fired plant at Kingsnorth by say­ing that it would be fit­ted with equip­ment designed to strip out car­bon diox­ide for safe stor­age.

So-called car­bon cap­ture and stor­age (CCS) remains an exper­i­men­tal tech­nol­o­gy that has not yet been demon­strat­ed on a com­mer­cial scale any­where in the world.

– from The Times news­pa­per.

– or the below from BBC News; pick & mix the facts you pre­fer:

Intrud­er shuts down pow­er tur­bine

A tur­bine at a pow­er sta­tion in Kent where cli­mate change cam­paign­ers have been hold­ing a series of protests was shut down by an intrud­er.

Ener­gy com­pa­ny E.On said it believed who­ev­er shut down the tur­bine must have had spe­cial­ist knowl­edge to car­ry out the “poten­tial­ly dead­ly” sab­o­tage.

The shut-down hap­pened on the night of 28 Novem­ber dur­ing two days of action by the Camp for Cli­mate Action group.

How­ev­er, no organ­i­sa­tion or indi­vid­ual has claimed it turned off the tur­bine.

“We don’t know whether it was a pro­test­er or not,” said E.On spokesman Jonathan Smith.

“But they gained access to the site, tam­pered with a pret­ty spe­cif­ic board and man­aged to turn off unit two.

“It is com­plete­ly unac­cept­able. If you ignore the fact they have bro­ken into our site, what they were doing was poten­tial­ly dan­ger­ous, poten­tial­ly dead­ly even.”

Tar­get­ed offices

He said engi­neers locat­ed the prob­lem quick­ly and turned the tur­bine back on.

Cus­tomers were not affect­ed by the shut­down because the short­fall was made up by oth­er sup­pli­ers to the Nation­al Grid.

Dur­ing the two days of action, Camp for Cli­mate Action pro­test­ers tar­get­ed E.ON offices in Lon­don and across Eng­land.

It fol­lowed a week-long Cli­mate Camp near Kingsnorth pow­er sta­tion on the Hoo penin­su­lar in August.

The cur­rent Kingsnorth pow­er sta­tion is due to close in 2015 and E.ON wants to replace it with two new coal units, which it claims will be 20% clean­er.

Mr Smith said police were inves­ti­gat­ing the shut­down.

He said Kingsnorth was prob­a­bly the most secure coal-fired pow­er sta­tion in the UK.

“Secu­ri­ty at Kingsnorth is extreme­ly high,” he said.

“We are look­ing at secu­ri­ty and work­ing with police to make sure this can’t hap­pen again.”

– from The Guardian news­pa­per:

“It was extreme­ly odd indeed, quite creepy. We have nev­er known any­thing like this at all, but it shows that if peo­ple want to do some­thing bad­ly enough they will find a way,” said Emi­ly High­more, a spokes­woman for E.On.

Yes­ter­day the full sto­ry emerged of what hap­pened. “It was about 10pm, very dark indeed,” said High­more. “It looks from the CCTV like he came in via a very remote part of the site by the sea wall and got over the dou­ble lay­er of fences.”

The intrud­er then crossed a car park and walked to an unlocked door. But instead of going to the pow­er sta­tion’s main con­trol room, where about eight peo­ple would have been work­ing, he head­ed for its main tur­bine hall, where no one would have been work­ing at that time.

With­in min­utes, says E.On, “he had tam­pered with some equip­ment” — believed to be a com­put­er at a con­trol pan­el — “and tripped unit 2, one of the sta­tion’s giant 500MW tur­bines”.

“This caused the unit to go offline,” she added. “It was run­ning at full 500MW load and the noise it would have made as it shut itself down is just incred­i­ble. CCTV shows that he then just walked out, and went back over the fence.

“It could be that no one has tak­en respon­si­bil­i­ty because they were so fright­ened by the noise it would have made. It’s prob­a­bly tak­en them a week just to get over the shock.”

“He left a ban­ner but it was a real DIY job. It was real­ly scrap­py. This was an old bed­sheet with writ­ing done out of gaffer tape. It was very crude,” said High­more

“Peo­ple at the sta­tion are gob­s­macked,” she added. “This is a dif­fer­ent league to pro­test­ers chain­ing them­selves to equip­ment. It’s some­one treat­ing a pow­er sta­tion as an adven­ture play­ground. You have to be trained to work here. Peo­ple do not just wan­der about on their own. He could have killed him­self. We do not have a prob­lem with pub­lic protest but this was reck­less. Who­ev­er it was has crossed a line they should not have gone over. Pow­er sta­tions are dan­ger­ous places.”

(full arti­cle)