Self-Determination and Self-Defense in Cherán, Michoacán

On Decem­ber 11, 2012, the US Jus­tice Depart­ment announced that bank­ing giant HSBC was immune from pros­e­cu­tion despite over­whelm­ing evi­dence that they con­sis­tent­ly failed to imple­ment con­trols against mon­ey-laun­der­ing. Assis­tant attor­ney gen­er­al Lan­ny Breuer said: “Had the US author­i­ties decid­ed to press crim­i­nal charges, HSBC would almost cer­tain­ly have lost its bank­ing license in the US, the future of the insti­tu­tion would have been under threat and the entire bank­ing sys­tem would have been desta­bi­lized.”

The entire bank­ing sys­tem would have been desta­bi­lized?

 

The Depart­ment of Jus­tice opt­ed rather to charge HSBC a record-break­ing 1.9 bil­lion dol­lar fine, and ordered the bank’s activ­i­ties mon­i­tored for five years. The 1.9 bil­lion is equiv­a­lent to five weeks’ worth of HSBC earn­ings, in oth­er words, a drop in the buck­et. The sad­dest part of the sto­ry in the main­stream media, is the focus on mon­ey laun­dered and mon­ey fined, as opposed to lives lost and crime legit­imized in one of the most grotesque admis­sions of com­plic­i­ty with orga­nized crime in the so-called war on drugs. Basi­cal­ly what was announced to the world by the US Jus­tice Depart­ment was that the mon­ey ran too thick, and the crim­i­nals were too pow­er­ful. The glob­al eco­nom­ic impact of pros­e­cut­ing a bank where the dirty mon­ey has been going, was too dan­ger­ous to risk. “Sor­ry kids, but we guess the bad guys win.”

In Cher­an, Michoa­can, Mex­i­co the news of HSBC’s immu­ni­ty from crim­i­nal pros­e­cu­tion and US sanc­tions comes as no sur­prise. Orga­nized crime has been preva­lent in the com­mu­ni­ty since 2000. After a 2008 may­oral race that left a PRI (Insti­tu­tion­al Rev­o­lu­tion­ary Par­ty) can­di­date in office, illic­it activ­i­ty increased sub­stan­tial­ly. The com­mu­ni­ty learned that orga­nized crime is an inte­gral part of local pol­i­tics and eco­nom­ics every­where. Cher­an is a beau­ti­ful small indige­nous Purepecha moun­tain com­mu­ni­ty sur­round­ed by pre­cious forests, that knows the true cost of those prof­its laun­dered. Imme­di­ate­ly after the 2008 may­oral race the com­mu­ni­ty began expe­ri­enc­ing the dev­as­tat­ing effects of dog eat dog cap­i­tal­ism of which orga­nized crime is only anoth­er part.

The ille­gal log­ging indus­try began to rav­age the community’s most pre­cious forests, which have been tra­di­tion­al­ly respect­ed as a spir­i­tu­al con­nec­tion by the Indige­nous Purepecha peo­ple to their ter­ri­to­ry. The log­ging began to look a lot more like pil­lag­ing and when com­mu­ni­ty mem­bers began to attempt to defend their forests, they were met with a real life night­mare: the log­gers were not only aid­ed and pro­tect­ed by gov­ern­ment agen­cies and local police, the entire log­ging oper­a­tion was being coor­di­nat­ed by mem­bers of a major orga­nized crime syn­di­cate. [To this day I am told by com­mu­ni­ty mem­bers not to name the actu­al syn­di­cate in any­thing I write or say, or risk an almost cer­tain death.]

The first com­mu­ni­ty mem­bers who began to defend their for­est were sim­ply and quick­ly assas­si­nat­ed. From 2008–2011 the sit­u­a­tion only became worse. Crim­i­nals charged pro­tec­tion to run even a small busi­ness in the com­mu­ni­ty of Cher­an. The for­est was raped and ter­ror reigned as any­one felt at risk. The city would become a ghost town by sun­set. This is a real­i­ty con­front­ed by too many com­mu­ni­ties in Mex­i­co every day.

Mur­ders, dis­ap­pear­ances, kid­nap­pings, the crim­i­nal amounts of ille­gal log­ging and the reign of ter­ror came to a head on the ear­ly morn­ing of April 15th, 2011. A group of women had begun qui­et­ly orga­niz­ing in the days before an action to bring the rav­aging of their town to a halt. On April 15th, with chil­dren and youth at their sides, the women rose up and attempt­ed to detain log­gers trav­el­ing through town. The log­gers tried to run the women over and in response the com­mu­ni­ty react­ed as a whole, and began burn­ing the log­gers’ vehi­cles and began detain­ing the log­gers them­selves.

It is at this point that the com­mu­ni­ty rec­og­nized the com­plic­i­ty of the local police when it was police offi­cers who guid­ed orga­nized crime thugs to the place where the log­gers were being held, in an attempt to vio­lent­ly release them. The com­mu­ni­ty erect­ed “fogatas” or bon­fire bar­ri­cades through­out town in order to pre­vent vio­lence against com­mu­ni­ty mem­bers. With­in days the com­mu­ni­ty decid­ed that it no longer trust­ed any politi­cians from any polit­i­cal par­ty or any of the local and state police. They began to orga­nize for self-deter­mi­na­tion and self-defense and chose to return to their tra­di­tion­al Purepecha forms of self gov­er­nance.

A gen­er­al coun­cil of com­mu­ni­ty elders was elect­ed and com­mis­sions were formed in order to car­ry out the community’s logis­ti­cal, social, eco­nom­ic, and polit­i­cal needs. Com­mu­ni­ty mem­bers sim­ply say that they referred to their his­to­ry and referred to their elders in order to return to the way the com­mu­ni­ty was orga­nized before polit­i­cal par­ties, police, and orga­nized crime exist­ed. The gen­er­al coun­cil is legal­ly rec­og­nized as the gov­ern­ing body of Cher­an, Michoa­can today.

The com­mu­ni­ty has main­tained that they only have three demands: safe­ty, jus­tice, and the refor­esta­tion of their ter­ri­to­ry. They have active­ly been refor­est­ing the entire region and take that aspect of their strug­gle very seri­ous­ly, and remind us that for them pro­tect­ing the for­est is both a tra­di­tion­al and a spir­i­tu­al oblig­a­tion. Cher­an does not believe that any­body will ever be able to bring them jus­tice for their dead, dis­ap­peared, and dis­placed as a result of the con­flict, nor do they expect any­one in pow­er to under­stand the jus­tice they seek for the for­est. Today Cher­an knows that jus­tice is some­thing that they will have to take care of obtain­ing on their own from now on. When it comes to safe­ty, the world is able to see what it looks like for a com­mu­ni­ty to take respon­si­bil­i­ty for its own safe­ty through tra­di­tion­al indige­nous forms of self gov­er­nance and self-defense.

Short­ly after the 2011 upris­ing began, com­mu­ni­ty mem­bers state that the local politi­cians and the police sim­ply exiled them­selves in fear from the com­mu­ni­ty, war­rant­i­ng no need to run them out of town. Com­mu­ni­ty mem­bers took the local gov­ern­ment offices, took police trucks, took the polices’ weapons, and put them all to use. His­tor­i­cal­ly, Cher­an had tra­di­tion­al­ly been “policed” or defend­ed by mem­bers from the com­mu­ni­ty. In a vol­un­tary rota­tion mem­bers from each of the four “bar­rios” or neigh­bor­hoods would patrol the com­mu­ni­ty for self-defense in what is known as the “com­mu­ni­ty ron­da.” After the upris­ing the gen­er­al coun­cil made a call out for vol­un­teers to par­tic­i­pate in the com­mu­ni­ty “ron­da”, or com­mu­ni­ty guard. Com­mu­ni­ty mem­bers main­tain that police are imposed by the gov­ern­ment, but the “ron­da” is a tra­di­tion­al way in which com­mu­ni­ty mem­bers pro­tect them­selves and their com­mu­ni­ty. Today the “ron­da” is sep­a­rat­ed into two parts. The “ron­da comu­ni­taria” which is respon­si­ble for patrolling and pro­tect­ing the com­mu­ni­ty from with­in its bor­ders and the “guard­a­bosques” or for­est defend­ers, which patrol the out­skirts of town and deep into the forests in order to pro­tect com­mu­ni­ty mem­bers liv­ing in those more rur­al areas and in order to pro­tect the for­est itself.

Cher­an is not the first com­mu­ni­ty in Mex­i­co to return to their tra­di­tion­al means of com­mu­ni­ty self-defense, nor is it the first place in the state of Michoa­can, nor in the indige­nous Purepecha region. Oth­er com­mu­ni­ties have engaged in sim­i­lar prac­tices of self gov­er­nance and self-defense, and lit­tle by lit­tle more and more com­mu­ni­ties are see­ing tra­di­tion­al self gov­er­nance and self-defense as a viable alter­na­tive to cor­rupt pol­i­tics and sub­mis­sion to orga­nized crime. Recent­ly coun­cil mem­bers from Nurio, Michoa­can, a larg­er com­mu­ni­ty and long time prac­ti­tion­er of self gov­er­nance and self-defense, sug­gest­ed that the entire Purepecha region should begin to orga­nize a region­al “ron­da” that could poten­tial­ly coor­di­nate self-defense patrols on a region­al lev­el for the indige­nous Purepecha peo­ple liv­ing through­out the state of Michoa­can.

It is hard not to throw your hands up in the air in res­ig­na­tion when you hear about crim­i­nals such as HSBC being grant­ed immu­ni­ty from pros­e­cu­tion and sanc­tions, but it is even hard­er not to throw a fist in the air when you see indige­nous Purepe­chas suc­cess­ful­ly over­com­ing orga­nized crime, cor­rupt politi­cians, and big busi­ness by estab­lish­ing mod­els for self-deter­mi­na­tion and self-defense, on a com­mu­ni­ty lev­el.

Simòn Sedil­lo