Picnic protest over airport plan

25 April 2009
Six­ty cli­mate cam­paign­ers have held a pic­nic in the check-in hall at Leeds Brad­ford Air­port in a protest over its planned expan­sion.
The air­port wants to build a £28m two-storey exten­sion to the ter­mi­nal build­ing which would house an improved check-in area and depar­ture lounge.

Cam­paign­ers say the plan will cause an increase in green­house gas emis­sions.

25 April 2009
Six­ty cli­mate cam­paign­ers have held a pic­nic in the check-in hall at Leeds Brad­ford Air­port in a protest over its planned expan­sion.
The air­port wants to build a £28m two-storey exten­sion to the ter­mi­nal build­ing which would house an improved check-in area and depar­ture lounge.

Cam­paign­ers say the plan will cause an increase in green­house gas emis­sions.

The air­port has said it planned to “improve and refine” its method of mon­i­tor­ing air qual­i­ty.

Pro­test­ers ate cucum­ber sand­wich­es and gin­ger­bread aero­planes.

One of the cam­paign­ers, Leeds Uni­ver­si­ty stu­dent Guy Mitchell, said the pic­nic was a “very civ­il way to protest”.

‘Impor­tant asset’

He said it was a “great chance” for peo­ple with con­cerns about cli­mate change and air­port expan­sion to express them in “a fun, fam­i­ly-friend­ly way”.

“Avi­a­tion is the sin­gle fastest grow­ing source of green­house gas emis­sion in the UK,” he said.

“If Leeds Brad­ford Air­port expands it will destroy any chance of Leeds reduc­ing its impact on the cli­mate.”

The expan­sion is part of a wider £70m, five-year invest­ment pack­age for the air­port.

The air­port said it was noti­fied of envi­ron­men­tal con­cerns dur­ing a pub­lic con­sul­ta­tion on the plans.

It said: “The air­port intends to improve air qual­i­ty where pos­si­ble. We expect to improve and refine our method of mon­i­tor­ing air qual­i­ty in line with EU require­ments and indus­try stan­dards.

“Clear­ly there are con­cerns about the envi­ron­ment and the loca­tion of the air­port with­in the green belt.

“There are also a few respon­dents who con­sid­er the air­port should be either restrict­ed in its growth or not devel­op at all.

“How­ev­er, the vast major­i­ty of respon­dents con­sid­er that the air­port is an increas­ing­ly impor­tant asset for the city region and that the air­port should be devel­oped in line with the draft mas­ter­plan.”