La Parota Opponent Charged With Terrorism

The Land is Not for Sale! A community in resistance to La Parota dam.

The Land is Not for Sale!

The Land is Not for Sale! A community in resistance to La Parota dam.

The Land is Not for Sale! A com­mu­ni­ty in resis­tance to La Paro­ta dam.

11th Novem­ber

In line with recent state­ments indi­cat­ing a resump­tion of efforts to force through the con­struc­tion of La Paro­ta Dam, the Mex­i­can gov­ern­ment has also launched a new cam­paign of repres­sion against the dam’s oppo­nents.

First, dam oppo­nents warned of increas­ing para­mil­i­tary activ­i­ty in the region. Then came word that the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment is seek­ing to relo­cate entire vil­lages to ham­string the oppo­si­tion to the dam. Now Mar­co Anto­nio Suástegui Muñoz, spokesper­son for the Coun­cil of Eji­dos and Com­mu­ni­ties in Oppo­si­tion to La Paro­ta Dam (CECOP), said the state gov­ern­ment of Guer­rero has issued a war­rant for his arrest on false charges of ter­ror­ism, kid­nap­ping and “attacks on fed­er­al roads.” He denounced these as bla­tant acts of repres­sion relat­ed to his orga­niz­ing work against La Paro­ta.

Suástegui told a CECOP assem­bly that police set up three sep­a­rate road­blocks in an attempt to detain him, with orders to imme­di­ate­ly trans­port him to the max­i­mum secu­ri­ty prison in Tepic, Nayarit. Suástegui was forced to change vehi­cles to evade the road­blocks and reach the assem­bly.

In recent months, Suástegui said, he has been threat­ened by rank­ing state offi­cial Hum­ber­to Sal­ga­do Gómez. “Sal­ga­do Gómez told me: calm your­self, or we’ll put you in jail. Bad peo­ple are watch­ing you. Either we put you in jail, or your life ends,” he said.

Suástegui accused Guer­rero Gov­er­nor Ángel Aguirre Rivero of vio­lat­ing the 2012 Cac­ahu­ate­pec Agree­ment, which com­mit­ted him to cease crim­i­nal­iz­ing or using force against oppo­nents of La Paro­ta dam, and to seek a meet­ing with Mex­i­can Pres­i­dent Enrique Peña Nieto and inform him that La Paro­ta dam will not be approved.

Suástegui also said that in spite of the war­rant, he will remain in his home vil­lage. “If the gov­ern­ment wants to come for me, I will not leave my pueblo [village/community/people]. We will wait for them, ladies and gen­tle­men.”

 

Fierce Infrastructure Battles in Peru

 Indigenous protesters march against Minas Conga mine in defense of their water and lands8th Novem­ber Indige­nous pro­test­ers m
 Indigenous protesters march against Minas Conga mine in defense of their water and lands8th Novem­ber Indige­nous pro­test­ers march against Minas Con­ga mine in defense of their water and lands

Cajamarca: Conga occupation not moved

Campesinos from some 40 pueb­los across Celendín province, in Peru’s north­ern region of Caja­mar­ca, held a meet­ing at Huas­mín vil­lage Oct. 23 to announce a cross-coun­try march that would arrive in mid-Novem­ber at the planned site of the Con­ga gold mine, where marchers would join the encamp­ment that has been estab­lished there [for almost two years]. … (Servin­di, Oct. 25; Celendin Libre, Oct. 23)

Comuneros (com­mu­nal peas­ants) in Celendín’s Yagén pueblo, Corte­gana dis­trict, weeks ear­li­er announced their readi­ness to resist the Chadín II hydro-elec­tric project, to be built by Brazil­ian firm Ode­brecht in the head­wa­ters of the Río Marañón, a major trib­u­tary of the Amazon—with much of of the ener­gy gen­er­at­ed slat­ed for local min­ing oper­a­tions. In a state­ment, the Defense Front for the Inter­ests of Pueblo Yagén said they would reject thecanonof funds offered to local com­mu­ni­ties for devel­op­ment of the project in their area. The state­ment also reject­ed offers of new roads for local com­mu­ni­ties, say­ing they would only facil­i­tate  the despoil­ing of their lands by Odebrecht’s heavy equip­ment. … The state­ment closed with the slo­gan: “Nei­ther Con­ga nor Chadín! Respect the peo­ple!” (Celendin Libre, Sept. 30)

Read the full sto­ry.

Cuzco: unrest over water mega-diversion

In a pop­u­lar assem­bly Nov. 6, res­i­dents of Espinar vil­lage in Peru’s Cuz­co region declared them­selves on a “war foot­ing,” pledigng to resist immi­nent con­struc­tion of the Majes Siguas II irri­ga­tion mega-project, which would divert water from indige­nous com­mu­ni­ties in the high­lands to agribusi­ness inter­ests on the coast. … Lat­er that day, Espinar’s may­or Oscar Mol­lo­huan­ca announced that some 100 police troops had attacked local vil­lagers at Urin­saya in Copo­raque dis­trict, beat­ing five. The where­abouts of one vil­lager has been unknown since the attack. … (Radio Uni­ver­sal, RPP, Nov. 6)

Read the full sto­ry.

Peru: government ultimatum to illegal miners

Peru’s gov­ern­ment has issued an “ulti­ma­tum” to small-scale arti­sanal min­ers in south­ern Puno region, say­ing that if they do not remove their dredges and oth­er equip­ment from the water­sheds of the Ramis and Such­es rivers (which both flow into Lake Tit­i­ca­ca), they will be dyna­mit­ed. …

The state­ment fol­lows weeks of protests by infor­mal min­ers in sev­er­al regions of the coun­try, demand­ing “for­mal­iza­tion” of their claims. A clash with Nation­al Police troops was report­ed Oct. 2 from a min­er road­block at Hua­machu­co, La Lib­er­tad region. The Region­al Fed­er­a­tion of Arti­sanal Min­ers and Small Pro­duc­ers of La Lib­er­atd (FREMARLIB) said two min­ers were killed in the con­fronta­tion, and sev­er­al wound­ed and detained.

Read the full sto­ry.

 

Mi’kmaq Warrior Society Members Beaten in Jail

1378041_10151948903995923_196279515_n1st Novem­ber

1378041_10151948903995923_196279515_n1st Novem­ber

Two mem­bers of the Mi’kmaq War­rior Soci­ety say they were roughed up and beat­en by RCMP offi­cers and jail guards after they were arrest­ed fol­low­ing a heav­i­ly-armed raid on a Mi’kmaq led anti-frack­ing camp in New Brunswick ear­li­er this month.

Jason Augus­tine, War­rior Soci­ety dis­trict chief, said he was kicked in the head by an RCMP offi­cer after he was cuffed and arrest­ed dur­ing the Oct. 17 raid.

Augus­tine said he was lat­er diag­nosed with a con­cus­sion at the hos­pi­tal in Monc­ton, NB.

“I was kicked in the head three times when I was tak­en down,” said Augus­tine. “I wasn’t resist­ing arrest, I had my hands behind my back, and this one RCMP start­ed bash­ing my head in.”

Augus­tine said he was nod­ding-off while he was held in one of the cells with oth­er war­riors at the Codi­ac RCMP detach­ment in Monc­ton. He claimed his head was hit against the wall as he was being tak­en to the ambu­lance.

“One of the guys called the guards up and said I need­ed an ambu­lance,” said Augus­tine. “The RCMP picked me up, they roughed me up and hit my head against the wall when they were tak­ing me to the hos­pi­tal.”

 

David Maze­rolle, anoth­er War­rior Soci­ety mem­ber, claimed in a YouTube video that Aaron Fran­cis was beat­en while hand­cuffed as he was being tak­en to a cell at the South East Region­al Cor­rec­tion Cen­tre in She­di­ac, NB.

Augus­tine and Maze­rolle, who were released from cus­tody last Fri­day, both said they were denied use of the tele­phone.

Augus­tine said all six of the war­riors kept in cus­tody fol­low­ing the raid were put into soli­tary con­fine­ment.

An offi­cial at the cor­rec­tion cen­tre referred queries on the alle­ga­tions to New Brunswick’s Pub­lic Safe­ty depart­ment. The depart­ment did not return tele­phoned and emailed requests for com­ment.

RCMP spokesper­son Con­st. Jul­lie Rogers-Marsh said she would look into the issue before pro­vid­ing a response.

A total of 40 peo­ple were arrest­ed the day of the raid which spi­ralled into chaos after mem­bers of the Elsi­pog­tog First Nation clashed with police.

The RCMP raid, which includ­ed tac­ti­cal unit mem­bers wear­ing cam­ou­flage and wield­ing assault weapons, freed sev­er­al vehi­cles owned by a Hous­ton-based com­pa­ny doing shale gas explo­ration work in the region. The anti-frack­ing camp was block­ing SWN Resources Canada’s trucks from leav­ing a com­pound in Rex­ton, NB.

Augus­tine and Maze­rolle face sev­er­al charges includ­ing forcible con­fine­ment, mis­chief, assault­ing a peace offi­cer and escap­ing law­ful cus­tody.

Augus­tine also denied RCMP alle­ga­tions that the war­riors forcibly con­fined secu­ri­ty guards employed by Indus­tri­al Secu­ri­ties Ltd in the com­pound hold­ing SWN’s vehi­cles.

Augus­tine said the secu­ri­ty guards were escort­ed by the RCMP at the begin­ning and end of their shifts.

“They were not held unlaw­ful­ly,” he said. “They stayed there until their shift changes.”

Augus­tine also denied RCMP alle­ga­tions that the war­riors uttered death threats or bran­dished weapons at the secu­ri­ty guards.

“There were no death threats, we had nobody in con­fine­ment and we had no weapons,” he said.

The RCMP held a press con­fer­ence fol­low­ing the raid where they dis­played three rifles and ammu­ni­tion seized dur­ing the raid. The RCMP said offi­cers also found crude explo­sive devices.

Augus­tine claimed the guns and explo­sives were plant­ed after the raid.

“I do believe they were plant­ed, they knew we want­ed peace,” said Augus­tine. “They had a one track mind to hurt the war­rior soci­ety.”

Augus­tine said the war­riors were pre­pared to nego­ti­ate the release of SWN’s vehi­cles.

“They kept telling me, ‘we just want the trucks out’ and I said I was going to our War Chief to tell him to get the trucks out,” said Augus­tine.

Augus­tine said he was shot four times by RCMP offi­cers using bean-bag rounds.

He said two RCMP offi­cers pre­sent­ed the war­riors with tobac­co bun­dles the night before the raid.

Augus­tine said his main defence against the charges will be to demand a hear­ing before an inter­na­tion­al court.

“Under our treaty laws we have to go to inter­na­tion­al court,” said Augus­tine. “We can’t be under the Crown because we are not under the Indi­an Act, we are treaty peo­ple.”

Since spring 2013, RCMP in New Brunswick arrest­ed 82 peo­ple in con­nec­tion with anti-frack­ing relat­ed protests

Rising Tide Protests TD Bank in Seattle

1422435_727576977270701_442586150_n31st Octo­ber Our friends with Ris­ing Tide Seat­tle and South Soun

1422435_727576977270701_442586150_n31st Octo­ber Our friends with Ris­ing Tide Seat­tle and South Sound Ris­ing Tide arrived at a TD Bank office with a 35-foot-long mock pipeline and a funer­al pro­ces­sion to demand they stop bankrolling the Key­stone XL and tar sands extrac­tion.

TD Bank is one of the largest share­hold­ers in the Alber­ta Tar Sands, and was also protest­ed by Ris­ing Tide Philly ear­li­er this year.

After the TD Bank office, they marched to the fed­er­al build­ing to put Pres­i­dent Oba­ma on notice; they have pledged to resist along with over 80,000 peo­ple orga­nized by The Oth­er 98%,CREDO Mobile and Rain­for­est Action Net­work.

Protesters Block Miners from Coromandel Harbour

6n_coromandel_301013

6n_coromandel_301013

30th Octo­ber New Zealand – A group of Coro­man­del pro­test­ers are cur­rent­ly blockad­ing the town’s har­bour in an attempt to stop Sea Hold­ings from tak­ing sam­ples.

The area is part of Sched­ule 4, where the Gov­ern­ment gave con­sent for min­er­al prospect­ing ear­li­er this year, despite promis­ing in 2010 no min­ing would be allowed.

Green MP Cather­ine Delahunty is at the “peace­ful protest”, tweet­ing: “Min­ers have head­ed back to motel try­ing to work how to get around Coro­man­del com­mu­ni­ty but it’s not work­ing!”.

The Gov­ern­ment had orig­i­nal­ly pro­posed min­er­al explo­ration in 7000ha of con­ser­va­tion land in the Coro­man­del, Great Bar­ri­er Island and Paparoa Nation­al Park.

How­ev­er, the Gov­ern­ment did a U‑turn in 2010 and said it will not remove any land from Sched­ule 4 for min­ing pur­pos­es.

But, in March this year it issued eight con­sents to prospect and explore for coal and oth­er min­er­als in Coro­man­del and Paparoa Nation­al Park.

 

Gloucestershire Badger Cull Extended by 8 Weeks

badger_wx@body29th Octo­ber

badger_wx@body29th Octo­ber

Humane Society UK appalled & flabbergasted at “madness” of Gloucestershire badger cull 8 Week extension, risks spreading bTB

Lead­ing ani­mal wel­fare char­i­ty, Humane Soci­ety Inter­na­tion­al UK, is appalled by news that an eight week exten­sion to the Glouces­ter­shire bad­ger cull has been grant­ed by Nat­ur­al Eng­land. The char­i­ty warns that pro­long­ing the shoot­ing is the very worst thing the gov­ern­ment can do because it increas­es the risk of spread­ing bovine TB as bad­gers flee the area.

Per­tur­ba­tion dan­ger
The exten­sion of the killing peri­od in Glouces­ter­shire more than dou­bles the orig­i­nal six weeks to 14 weeks. The sem­i­nal Ran­domised Bad­ger Culling Tri­al high­light­ed the impor­tance of any cull to be done quick­ly because of the dan­ger of per­tur­ba­tion.

Fias­co
Mark Jones, Glouces­ter­shire res­i­dent and Exec­u­tive Direc­tor of HSI UK said: “I am appalled & flab­ber­gast­ed that an eight week exten­sion has been grant­ed to DEFRA’s bad­ger killing fias­co in Glouces­ter­shire. By extend­ing culls here as well as in Som­er­set, the pilots are mov­ing even more dan­ger­ous­ly away from the rec­om­men­da­tions of the Ran­domised Bad­ger Culling Tri­al which were very clear – the longer you sub­ject bad­gers to this sort of dis­rup­tion, the greater the risk of wors­en­ing the spread of bovine TB among both bad­gers and cat­tle. It is utter­ly illog­i­cal to con­tin­ue with a pol­i­cy that has already proven such a dis­as­ter, and flies square­ly in the face of sound sci­en­tif­ic advice. Sure­ly some­body in Gov­ern­ment can put a stop to Owen Paterson’s bad­ger cull mad­ness before it’s too late.”

In Glouces­ter­shire 708 out of a tar­get 1,650 bad­gers have been killed. In Som­er­set 850 bad­gers out of a tar­get 1,020 have been shot.

HSI UK has also writ­ten to Owen Pater­son to ask him to explain him­self over unsub­stan­ti­at­ed claims he made last week about bad­ger suf­fer­ing. On 10th Octo­ber he stat­ed in a par­lia­men­tary answer to a ques­tion from Angela Smith MP that ‘…some of the ani­mals we have shot have been des­per­ate­ly sick-in the final stages of dis­ease…’.

No bTB tests on bad­ger car­cass­es
Mark Jones said: “As a vet I find Mr Paterson’s claim that bad­gers shot in the pilot culls were ‘des­per­ate­ly sick’ high­ly sus­pi­cious. I know of no evi­dence to back this up, indeed all the avail­able data sug­gests that even where bovine TB is rife among cat­tle, only a tiny pro­por­tion of bad­gers will be suf­fer­ing any symp­toms of the dis­ease. The fig­ure is per­haps as low as one in a hun­dred. As Mr Pater­son has refused to have the bad­ger car­cas­es test­ed for TB, he can­not pos­si­bly have any sci­en­tif­i­cal­ly cred­i­ble data to sup­port his asser­tion and nobody will be per­mit­ted to chal­lenge his claim because DEFRA is hav­ing all the bod­ies incin­er­at­ed. As usu­al, the Sec­re­tary of State is fond of mak­ing wild asser­tions with­out pro­vid­ing a shred of evi­dence to sup­port them but in doing so his own cred­i­bil­i­ty is crum­bling day by day. It is not ani­mal groups but the Gov­ern­ment this is caus­ing bad­gers to suf­fer. It is men armed with rifles and shot­guns tak­ing pot-shots at these ani­mals who are con­demn­ing many to a painful death and no amount of cre­ative account­ing by Mr Pater­son will change that.”

Unist’ot’en Camp Site of Late Night Bombing

Banners at the Unist’ot’en camp, 2012.

29th Octo­ber

Banners at the Unist’ot’en camp, 2012.

29th Octo­ber

An attempt to destroy the main Unist’ot’en sign with a home-made explo­sive accel­er­ant occurred last night at approx­i­mate­ly 10:20 p.m.

The Unist’ot’en camp locat­ed around 70 kilo­me­tres south of Hous­ton has been in place since 2010 in response to pro­posed pipelines such as Enbridge’s North­ern Gate­way and Pacif­ic Trails’ liq­uid nat­ur­al gas line.

Last night indi­vid­u­als liv­ing at the camp heard what sound­ed like a gun­shot and they imme­di­ate­ly took steps to make sure they were pro­tect­ing them­selves.

“We were in the main cab­in and a soon as we heard the bang we shut off our lights, grabbed firearms, went out­side and fired a warn­ing shot,” Togh­estiy (Warn­er Naziel) said.

Togh­estiy inves­ti­gat­ed the scene on the north side of the bridge where he could see fire burn­ing. He found a few can­is­ters of ‘accel­er­ant’ bound togeth­er with bright green sur­vey­or tape and a long trail of ‘accel­er­ant’ lead­ing north along the road away from the bridge, which was used to reach the can­is­ters, he said.

 

“When I was approach­ing the site I could see head­lights head­ing away from the bridge,” Togh­estiy said.

The Unist’ot’en have renewed the tra­di­tion­al pro­to­col of free, pri­or and informed con­sent in regards to access­ing Unist’ot’en ter­ri­to­ry for any rea­son.

To accom­plish the pro­to­col a soft block­ade has been employed on a bridge cross­ing the Morice Riv­er, where every per­son wish­ing to enter Unist’ot’en land has to answer ques­tions. One such ques­tion is: How will your vis­it ben­e­fit the Unist’ot’en? Fail­ure to give sat­is­fac­to­ry answers gives the Unist’ot’en grounds to pre­vent access for what­ev­er pur­pose sought.

One group of young men from the Hous­ton area have report­ed­ly tak­en issue with the Unist’ot’en pro­to­col, Fre­da Huson, Unist’ot’en mem­ber and res­i­dent of the camp, said.

“A group com­plained to the RCMP about our pro­to­col,” Huson said, but she’s not sure if it’s the same group respon­si­ble for last night’s event.

RCMP have yet to inves­ti­gate the scene.

A hunter from the Tum­bler Ridge area, who answered the pro­to­col ques­tions prop­er­ly, shared that he heard a group of young men were angri­ly talk­ing about the Unist’ot’en and the group claimed they were going to ‘do some­thing about it’, Huson said.

“It may have been the peo­ple who honked at the bridge but didn’t wait for us to come ask the pro­to­col ques­tions,” Huson said. “I believe it’s the same group that destroyed our sign at the 44 kilo­me­tre mark.”

The Unist’ot’en are ask­ing any­one with infor­ma­tion about who is respon­si­ble for last nights events to please con­tact the Hous­ton RCMP at 250–845-2204.

Mi’kmaq Anti-Fracking Update: Two Warriors Released on Bail, Four Others Remain in Jail

One of some 40 peo­ple arrest­ed b

One of some 40 peo­ple arrest­ed by RCMP on Oct 17, 2013. CBC News,Oct 25, 2013

Bail hearings for 3 others continue; 1 denied bail Thursday

Two of six pro­test­ers who were held in cus­tody fol­low­ing the shale-gas protest con­fronta­tion near Rex­ton, N.B., last week have been released on bail.

Jason Augus­tine and David Maze­rolle were released on a num­ber of con­di­tions and will be back in court next month to enter a plea. The pair face var­i­ous charges, includ­ing mis­chief, unlaw­ful con­fine­ment, escap­ing law­ful cus­tody, obstruct­ing a peace offi­cer and assault­ing a peace offi­cer.

Thurs­day anoth­er pro­test­er, Coady Stevens, was denied bail. He remains in cus­tody and is to enter a plea on Novem­ber 1.

The six men — Stevens, Augus­tine, Maze­rolle, Aaron Fran­cis, Ger­main Junior Breau, and James Sylvester Pic­tou — face 37 charges in all.

Bail hear­ings are con­tin­u­ing for the oth­er three jailed pro­test­ers. They’ve been in cus­tody since their arrest eight days ago.

The six were among 40 peo­ple arrest­ed when RCMP broke up a weeks-long protest against shale gas explo­ration on Route 134 in Rex­ton. The pro­test­ers were pre­vent­ing SWN from access­ing seis­mic-test­ing vehi­cles and equip­ment in its com­pound in the area. The explo­ration com­pa­ny had obtained a court injunc­tion order­ing that it be allowed access to its vehi­cles and be allowed to car­ry out explo­ration work with­out harass­ment.

‘No means no’

After being released, Augus­tine hugged his wife and moth­er out­side the Monc­ton Law Courts.

“It’s good to be out,” he said. “It’s not good to see my bros that are still in there be incar­cer­at­ed for some­thing that we believe is right to save.”

Augus­tine said he and his fel­low war­riors were arrest­ed try­ing to save the province from the dan­gers of shale gas devel­op­ment.

“We are there for our Moth­er Earth. We’re not there to uphold pol­i­tics. Pol­i­tics this, pol­i­tics that. No way. Just say no, and no means no.”

Abo­rig­i­nal lead­ers have not said they are absolute­ly against shale gas devel­op­ment, how­ev­er.

“They’re not say­ing no to all resource devel­op­ment,” Assem­bly of First Nations Nation­al Chief Shawn Atleo said dur­ing a vis­it to Elsi­pog­tog First Nation on Thurs­day. “Just say­ing not yes at all costs.”

Mean­while, Elis­pog­tog Chief Aaron Sock said the issue of resource devel­op­ment should be dealt with after going to court to deal with abo­rig­i­nal land claims.

Augus­tine said his opin­ion hasn’t changed.

“Shawn Atleo and Aaron Sock have to under­stand — this is a Mi’kmaq ter­ri­to­ry land. You can’t destroy our Mi’kmaq ter­ri­to­ry land, no mat­ter how much peo­ple are try­ing.”

More Photos from Open Rescue of Hundreds of Beagles from Experimental Lab in Brazil

brazil-beagle-lab-rescue-428th Octo­ber As report­ed a lit­tle over a week ago that 20

brazil-beagle-lab-rescue-428th Octo­ber As report­ed a lit­tle over a week ago that 200 bea­gles were lib­er­at­ed from a lab in Brazil. This action was unique in that the ani­mals were freed by dozens of activists who stormed the build­ing after a protest, and did not cov­er their faces to hide their iden­ti­ties.

Today, more pho­tos of the action were released by Will Pot­ter from Green is the New Red. The lab is call­ing this open res­cue an act of ter­ror­ism. Pot­ter asks, “Does this look like ter­ror­ism to you?”

 

brazil-beagle-lab-rescue-2

 

brazil-beagle-lab-rescue-3

brazil-beagle-lab-rescue-1

See the rest of the pho­tos and read Will Potter’s arti­cle here.

protests and ecotage at road building site in Iceland

28.10.13

28.10.13

[from a main­tream news­pa­per:] Equip­ment at the Gál­gahraun lava field — where con­struc­tion of a con­tro­ver­sial new road is planned — was sab­o­taged by van­dal­ism last night.

As report­ed last week, pro­test­ers were arrest­ed at the lava fields for refus­ing to move out of the way of road con­struc­tion equip­ment. The pro­posed road, Álf­tanesve­g­ur, is planned to pass through a pro­tect­ed lava field, which has prompt­ed pub­lic resis­tance in the form of direct action.

Vísir now reports that con­struc­tion work­ers arrived at the site this morn­ing to find that some­one (or some peo­ple) had poured grav­el into the fuel tanks of the machines, ren­der­ing them use­less.

Lava Friends — the organ­i­sa­tion that has protest­ed road con­struc­tion at Gál­gahraun most promi­nent­ly — denied any involve­ment with the sab­o­tage, say­ing, “Lava Friends do not use vio­lence nor ruin the pri­vate prop­er­ty of oth­ers. Lava Friends speak on behalf of nature, and know that nature will win in the end.”