National anti-Fracking Gathering

Sat­ur­day 17th March,

Sat­ur­day 17th March,
Methodist Cen­tral Hall, Old­ham Street, Man­ches­ter.  Map and Direc­tions here.
Organ­ised by Cam­paign against Cli­mate Change with REAF, The Vale Says No, Frack Off and No Frack­ing in Sus­sex.

11.00 am to 6.00 pm
Come and meet peo­ple from groups all around the coun­try (and beyond) cam­paign­ing against ‘hydraulic frac­tur­ing’ or “fracking”.(find out more about frack­ing here)
The event will include:
Open­ing ple­nary includ­ing pre­sen­taion from the Tyn­dal Cen­tre, speak­er from ‘Frack Off’ and oth­er speak­ers tba (watch this space)

Region­al report ses­sion from local anti-frack­ing cam­paign groups all around the coun­try.
2 Ses­sions of work­shops on all you need to know about frack­ing, tar­get­ed advice on how to run a local cam­paign, anti-frack­ing Direct action .…and more (watch this space for more details about spe­cif­ic work­shops…)
Dis­cus­sion on what we can do to form a broad-based Nation­al anti-frack­ing Coali­tion or umbrel­la group (with the local grass-roots res­i­dents groups at its core)

Extra time for the meet­ing to take things for­ward as it sees fit.….
Lets get togeth­er to stop frack­ing in the UK NOW, before it gets a hold and becomes unstop­pable!
 Put  the 17th March in your diary now !
www.campaigncc.org/nationalantifrackingmeeting

Longest Tree Sit in Tasmanian History Stays Strong

19.2.12

TODAY marks the begin­ning of a glob­al 24 hours of action in sup­port of Miran­da Gib­son, who has now bro­ken the Tas­man­ian record for the longest time spent at the top of a tree.

19.2.12

TODAY marks the begin­ning of a glob­al 24 hours of action in sup­port of Miran­da Gib­son, who has now bro­ken the Tas­man­ian record for the longest time spent at the top of a tree.

Miran­da has been on a plat­form 60m above the ground for 52 days and will remain there to high­light the ongo­ing destruc­tion of Tasmania’s forests.

Her tree sit, known as The Observ­er Tree, has received inter­na­tion­al atten­tion over the past 52 days as she uses solar pow­er and inter­net access to bring Tasmania’s spec­tac­u­lar forests into people’s homes all around the world.

The Observ­er Tree is call­ing on the Japan­ese cus­tomers of log­ging cor­po­ra­tion Ta Ann to cease pur­chas­ing wood com­ing from Tasmania’s high con­ser­va­tion val­ue forests.

Yes­ter­day the Bellin­gen Envi­ron­ment Cen­tre ini­ti­at­ed a ral­ly in sup­port of Miran­da and also to raise aware­ness about the loss of habi­tat local­ly.

BEC spokes­woman Car­o­line Joseph said Bellin­gen Shire res­i­dents were increas­ing­ly wor­ried about their own forests.

“The inten­si­ty of log­ging has increased local­ly as Forests NSW tries to keep up with its quo­tas,” Mrs Joseph said.

“Peo­ple can see that increase and are feel­ing con­cerned about this dra­mat­ic loss of habi­tat, espe­cial­ly for koalas.”

She said anoth­er habi­tat threat was to tracts of land zoned for devel­op­ment under old leg­is­la­tion.

“This land is not cov­ered by new­er envi­ron­men­tal pro­tec­tion laws and is high­ly desir­able to devel­op­ers.”

Lebanese Activists Sit-in to Protest Environmental Destruction

19.2.12

Tripoli res­i­dents orga­nized a sit-in Wednes­day to protest against the recent felling of sev­er­al trees in the city and to demand answers on who was ulti­mate­ly respon­si­ble for the deci­sion.

19.2.12

Tripoli res­i­dents orga­nized a sit-in Wednes­day to protest against the recent felling of sev­er­al trees in the city and to demand answers on who was ulti­mate­ly respon­si­ble for the deci­sion.

Inhab­i­tants of the north­ern city’s Al-Mina sub­urb held Wednesday’s sit-in on the city’s main boule­vard. Pro­test­ers slammed the recent move, and also urged rel­e­vant author­i­ties to under­take the nec­es­sary actions to pre­vent sim­i­lar inci­dents from hap­pen­ing again in the future.

How­ev­er, the may­or of Al-Mina, Moham­mad Issa, said the trees had been felled fol­low­ing a peti­tion from oth­er res­i­dents, who had demand­ed the trees be cut down after an inci­dent two years ago in which a palm tree fell on a car and result­ed in the death of a young woman.

In com­pli­ance with the resident’s peti­tion, Issa said that 14 trees, none of which were old­er than 15 years, were cut down. The may­or also expressed his will­ing­ness to plant new trees to replace those which were cut down.

Res­i­dents described the felling of old trees as an envi­ron­men­tal mas­sacre. “Trees do not harm any­one; we need to pre­serve the green spaces in light of the grow­ing usage of con­crete,” said Zaki al-Zay­laa, an envi­ron­men­tal activist.

Zay­laa added that cut­ting down such trees was irre­spon­si­ble and ques­tioned who had the author­i­ty to decide when trees can be cut down as such. Zay­laa, a mem­ber of an envi­ron­men­tal com­mit­tee affil­i­at­ed to the munic­i­pal coun­cil, denied the com­mit­tee had any role in cut­ting down the trees.

Anti-Development Protest Gets Heated in Armenia

17 Feb­ru­ary 2012

Police used force on Fri­day against more than a dozen envi­ron­men­tal activists who were camped in a pub­lic park in down­town Yere­van to protest against the con­struc­tion of sev­er­al shops there.

17 Feb­ru­ary 2012

Police used force on Fri­day against more than a dozen envi­ron­men­tal activists who were camped in a pub­lic park in down­town Yere­van to protest against the con­struc­tion of sev­er­al shops there.

The Yere­van munic­i­pal­i­ty autho­rized the con­struc­tion after order­ing the shop own­ers to relo­cate their busi­ness­es from large kiosks that stood on a major street in the city cen­ter until last month. They were dis­man­tled along with hun­dreds of side­walk kiosks across the Armen­ian cap­i­tal.

Envi­ron­ment pro­tec­tion and oth­er civic groups con­demned the choice of a new loca­tion for the shops, say­ing that it would inflict fur­ther dam­age on Yerevan’s green areas that have shrunk sig­nif­i­cant­ly over the past decade. They also say that the munic­i­pal admin­is­tra­tion failed to fol­low all legal pro­ce­dures before issu­ing the con­struc­tion per­mit.

Dozens of most­ly young activists have staged dai­ly sit-ins in the park since Mon­day, pre­vent­ing the con­struc­tion from going ahead. Their rep­re­sen­ta­tives met with Yere­van May­or Taron Markar­i­an ear­li­er this week to demand that he scrap the con­tro­ver­sial deci­sion. Markar­i­an reject­ed the demand.

Eye­wit­ness­es said riot police pushed a group of pro­test­ers away from the con­struc­tion site to allow work­ers to resume their work on Fri­day morn­ing. The site was cor­doned off by police offi­cers as the activists con­tin­ued to demon­strate near­by.

The pro­test­ers stood in the way of a heavy truck car­ry­ing con­crete for the builders. The truck dri­ver had to turn away and leave the scene after two young men lay on the ground in front of the vehi­cle.

The chief of Yerevan’s police depart­ment, Ners­es Nazar­i­an, arrived at the scene in the after­noon to urge the pro­test­ers not to inter­fere with the shop con­struc­tion. The head of the municipality’s legal depart­ment, Zaven Arake­lian, also addressed them, show­ing copies of doc­u­ments pur­port­ed­ly prov­ing the legal­i­ty of the con­struc­tion.

“All those deci­sions were made in breach of the law,” said Sona Ayvaz­ian, an anti-cor­rup­tion cam­paign­er also tak­ing part in the protest. “There­fore, they can­not be deemed legal.”

To check out the arti­cle online click here

Mass Action, Barricades and Lock Downs Fail to Halt Development for the Mega-Rich

18.2.12

City offi­cials said on Wednes­day morn­ing they were pleased with how the oper­a­tion in the Schloss­garten park went. They said 2,500 offi­cers had encoun­tered lit­tle vio­lence.

18.2.12

City offi­cials said on Wednes­day morn­ing they were pleased with how the oper­a­tion in the Schloss­garten park went. They said 2,500 offi­cers had encoun­tered lit­tle vio­lence.

But pro­test­ers, who were try­ing to pro­tect 176 trees that author­i­ties say need to be cut down or moved as part of the project, charged that police had been over­ly aggres­sive dur­ing the evic­tion and had even attacked peo­ple with batons.

A spokesman for the pro­test­ers, Matthias Her­rmann, called the oper­a­tion “hec­tic and esca­lat­ing.”

But a Stuttgart police spokesman said that there had been only “occa­sion­al baton use” when pro­test­ers attempt­ed to set up a bar­ri­cade. A 38-year-old man was arrest­ed after he alleged­ly set off fire­works near offi­cials, accord­ing to police.

Oth­er pro­test­ers had to be forcibly cut away after they chained them­selves to trees. Some used pal­lets to erect bar­ri­ers on access roads, police said. Two even encased their arms in con­crete and police were still fig­ur­ing out how to deal with them as of mid-morn­ing.

Stuttgart 21 is a mul­ti-bil­lion-euro project that aims to trans­form the Baden-Würt­tem­berg state cap­i­tal into a major Euro­pean trans­port hub by lay­ing 57 kilo­me­tres of new track and rebuild­ing the city’s main train sta­tion under­ground while turn­ing it around 90 degrees.

But many have baulked at the cost of the plan and what they say will be dam­age to the local envi­ron­ment. Vio­lent protests flared in 2010, but the gov­ern­ment has insist­ed that con­struc­tion must con­tin­ue. On Sun­day, pro­test­ers tried to mount heavy equip­ment to pre­vent the cut­ting down of trees but were removed by police in a pre­lude to Wednesday’s evic­tion.

At the park, pro­test­ers had set up dozens of tents and tree hous­es before the police oper­a­tion began at about 3 am. Offi­cers first asked pro­test­ers to leave on their own – which some did – before they began the evic­tion.

Stuttgart 21 project spokesman Wolf­gang Diet­rich said the police oper­a­tion had gone “very well” because pro­test­ers had, for the most part, abstained from vio­lence. Author­i­ties could begin felling trees as ear­ly as Wednes­day after­noon.

Massive Protests Block Pan-American Highway for Six Days, Leave Police Station in Ashes

18.2.12

18.2.12

As she stands among vil­lagers in the high­lands of west­ern Pana­ma, their cho­sen leader, Sil­via Car­rera, is an image of bucol­ic har­mo­ny. Then Car­rera, elect­ed chief or gen­er­al cacique of the Ngäbe-Buglé com­mu­ni­ty, ges­tures to a woman who hands her a bag of spent US riot-con­trol equip­ment – rub­ber bul­let cas­ings, shot­gun shells, sting-ball grenades, tear­gas can­is­ters.

Pana­ma nation­al police, she explains, used these against her peo­ple only days ear­li­er to break up a protest against gov­ern­ment plans for a vast cop­per mine and hydro­elec­tric schemes on their ter­ri­to­ry. Three young Ngäbe-Buglé men were killed, dozens were wound­ed and more than 100 detained.

What began with vil­lagers at Ojo de Agua in Chiriquí province using trees and rocks to block the Pan-Amer­i­can high­way ear­li­er this month – trap­ping hun­dreds of lor­ries and bus­loads of tourists com­ing over the bor­der from Cos­ta Rica for six days – has now placed Pana­ma at the fore­front of the endur­ing and often vio­lent clash between indige­nous peo­ples and glob­al demand for land, min­er­als and ener­gy. Car­rera is emerg­ing as a piv­otal fig­ure in the con­flict.

“Look how they treat us. What do we have to defend our­selves? We don’t have any­thing; we have only words,” Car­rera protests. “We are defence­less. We don’t have weapons. We were attacked and it wasn’t just by land but by air too. Every­thing they do to us, to our land, to our com­pan­ions who will not come back to life, hurts us.”

At the height of the protests, thou­sands of Ngäbe-Buglé came down from the hills to block the high­way; in El Vol­cán and San Félix they briefly rout­ed police and set fire to a police sta­tion. In Pana­ma City, stu­dents and unions joined with indige­nous pro­test­ers march­ing almost dai­ly on the res­i­dence of Pres­i­dent Ricar­do Mar­tinel­li. Some daubed walls near the pres­i­den­tial palace with the words “Mar­tinel­li assas­sin”.

Car­rera pulls from her satchel a hasti­ly drawn-up agree­ment bro­kered by the Catholic church that oblig­es the Pana­man­ian nation­al assem­bly to dis­cuss the issue. It did not guar­an­tee that the projects would be halt­ed. Nei­ther she nor the Ngäbe-Buglé peo­ple expressed opti­mism that the gov­ern­ment would keep its word on the min­ing issue.

“The vil­lage doesn’t believe it,” she says, “and it wouldn’t be the first time that the gov­ern­ment threw around lies. They do not lis­ten to the vil­lage. There was a sim­i­lar mas­sacre in 2010 and 2011, when there were deaths and injuries. Some were blind­ed, some of our com­pan­ions lost limbs.” A cry goes up: “No to the min­ers! No to the hydro­elec­tric!”

The Ngäbe-Buglé comar­ca, or ter­ri­to­ry, sits atop the huge Cer­ro Col­orado cop­per deposit, the rich­est min­er­al deposit in Pana­ma, pos­si­bly in all of cen­tral Amer­i­ca. Pro-busi­ness Mar­tinel­li, a self-made super­mar­ket tycoon, signed a deal with Canada’s Inmet Min­ing with a 20% Kore­an invest­ment to extract as much as 270,000 tons of cop­per a year, along with gold and sil­ver, over the 30-year lifes­pan of the pro­posed mine. Panama’s tribes form 10% of the pop­u­la­tion but, through a sys­tem of autonomous comar­cas, they con­trol 30% of the land, giv­ing them greater lever­age.

Mar­tinel­li could hard­ly have found a proud­er adver­sary than Car­rera who, at 42 and elect­ed only in Sep­tem­ber, is the first woman to lead Panama’s largest indige­nous tribe. “The land is our moth­er. It is because of her that we live,” she says sim­ply. “The peo­ple will defend our moth­er.” Car­rera holds Mar­tinel­li in scant regard. She accus­es him of “mock­ing” indige­nous peo­ple and con­sid­ers his admin­is­tra­tion a gov­ern­ment of busi­ness­men who “use us to enter­tain them­selves, say­ing one thing today and anoth­er tomor­row”.

Two days before the police cleared the road­blocks, the pres­i­dent invit­ed her to the Pala­cio de las Garzas in Panamá City for a “good meal and a drink”. The Ngäbe-Buglé chief, who received edu­ca­tion to sec­ondary lev­el, was unim­pressed. The offer, she said, revealed “a lack of respect”.

In past min­ing dis­putes, the gov­ern­ment blamed “for­eign actors” and jour­nal­ists for stir­ring up trou­ble. Last week it accused the Ngäbe-Buglé of “kid­nap­ping” and “hostage-tak­ing” when refer­ring to the trav­ellers delayed on the high­way. By the time the smoke cleared, Panama’s for­eign min­is­ter, Rober­to Hen­ríquez, con­ced­ed that his gov­ern­ment was “only pro­duc­ing deep­er wounds”.

Car­rera ges­tures to women in the group she says have been injured. Over the pre­vi­ous 24 hours she had trav­elled between towns to ensure that all the pro­test­ers had been released, but some reports sug­gest that dozens are still miss­ing. One woman holds up a ban­daged hand, a wound that she says came from an army bul­let.

With the dead – includ­ing Jerón­i­mo Rodríguez Tugri, who had his jaw blown off, and Mauri­cio Mén­dez, a learn­ing-dis­abled 16-year-old – still lying in the mor­tu­ary, Carrera’s anger is plain. “This is the strug­gle of the indige­nous peo­ple. We are try­ing to make con­tact, ask­ing our inter­na­tion­al broth­ers to join us in sol­i­dar­i­ty. We call for jus­tice from the UN. The gov­ern­ment doesn’t want oth­er coun­tries to know about this. That’s why they cut off our cell­phone ser­vice. We couldn’t find each oth­er. Nobody knew any­thing. They were try­ing to con­vince us to give up.”

Fear­ful of the envi­ron­men­tal and polit­i­cal fall­out, gov­ern­ments through­out cen­tral Amer­i­ca are tight­en­ing min­ing con­trols. But Mar­tinel­li, who came to pow­er with the cam­paign slo­gan “walk­ing in the shoes of the peo­ple”, seems deter­mined to find a way around leg­is­la­tion that pro­tects indige­nous min­er­al, water and envi­ron­men­tal resources from exploita­tion.

The Mar­tinel­li gov­ern­ment faces accu­sa­tions of sys­tem­at­ic crony­ism in the allo­ca­tion of more than $12bn in new con­struc­tion projects, fund­ed in part by increased rev­enue antic­i­pat­ed from a $5.25bn Pana­ma canal expan­sion pro­gramme. Among the dis­put­ed projects is a $775m high­way that will encir­cle Pana­ma City’s old quar­ter of Cas­co Viejo, cut­ting it off from the sea and iso­lat­ing a new Frank Gehry-designed muse­um cel­e­brat­ing Panama’s influ­ence as a three-mil­lion-year-old land bridge between the Amer­i­c­as. Crit­ics say the road is point­less and Unesco is threat­en­ing to with­draw its world her­itage site des­ig­na­tion if it pro­ceeds.

Despite the region’s his­to­ry of con­flict and shady bank­ing prac­tices, Pana­ma is aggres­sive­ly posi­tion­ing itself both as an eco­nom­ic haven (GDP growth is run­ning at close to 7.5%) and a tourist and eco-tourist des­ti­na­tion. New sky­scrap­ers thrust up into the humid­i­ty like a mini-Dubai; chic restau­rants and hotels are open­ing up .

Offi­cials express con­cern that the Ngäbe-Buglé and oth­er indige­nous dis­putes may undo Panama’s care­ful­ly orches­trat­ed PR push, spot­light­ing the dis­par­i­ty of wealth in a coun­try where 40% of the pop­u­la­tion live in pover­ty. “The gov­ern­ment says Good, Pana­ma is grow­ing its econ­o­my. Yet the econ­o­my is for a few bel­la­co [macho men],” Car­rera says. “But progress should be for the major­i­ty and for this we will go into the street, and from fron­tier to fron­tier, to protest.”

The tourism Pana­ma seeks is threat­en­ing their way of life, she says. Along the coast, pri­vate devel­op­ments are begin­ning to restrict access to the sea. “We work and we own prop­er­ty, but the tourists take the land and the best prop­er­ty. Then we can’t go there.”

At the bot­tom of the hill the gen­er­al cacique waits for a bus to take her and sev­er­al dozen women to Pana­ma City, 200km to the west, for anoth­er anti-gov­ern­ment ral­ly, where they will be joined by the Kuna and rep­re­sen­ta­tives of the Emberá and Wounaan peo­ples, who are oppos­ing encroach­ment of farm­ers on their land in the east­ern provinces. Car­rera vows that the Ngäbe-Buglé cam­paign will con­tin­ue. “We are not vio­lent. We just want to reclaim our rights and jus­tice. Above all, we want to live in peace and tran­quil­i­ty.”

Hinkley Point Barnstormers — Occupiers aim to stop EDF land trash — video and flyer

“This film gives an account of the first few days of the occu­pa­tion of Lang­bor­ough Farm on the site of one of the pro­posed ‘new wave’ of Nuclear Reac­tors, at Hink­ley point in Som­er­set. The activists took occu­pan­cy in the ear­ly hours of Sun­day the 12th of Feb­ru­ary and are set­tling in to their new home and com­mu­ni­ty.”

“This film gives an account of the first few days of the occu­pa­tion of Lang­bor­ough Farm on the site of one of the pro­posed ‘new wave’ of Nuclear Reac­tors, at Hink­ley point in Som­er­set. The activists took occu­pan­cy in the ear­ly hours of Sun­day the 12th of Feb­ru­ary and are set­tling in to their new home and com­mu­ni­ty.”

Check out this great vid of the open­ing days of the occu­pa­tion

 

Thurs­day, 16 Feb­ru­ary 2012, South West Against Nuclear:

Activists who have occu­pied a farm to oppose ground clear­ance for a new nuclear site in West Som­er­set today entered the fifth day of their stand-off with the French ener­gy com­pa­ny EDF.

The pro­test­ers entered Lang­bor­ough Farm at Hink­ley Point on Sat­ur­day night and estab­lished a camp around derelict build­ings which are believed to house hiber­nat­ing bats. They want the “Pre­lim­i­nary Works”, which will clear and lev­el sev­er­al hun­dred acres of Som­er­set coastal land to be halt­ed for 12 months until EDF know if they actu­al­ly have per­mis­sion to build their pro­posed reac­tors.

“Cur­rent­ly EDF have no per­mis­sion to build here, but aston­ish­ing­ly they DO have per­mis­sion to destroy this pre­cious part of our com­mon nat­ur­al her­itage” said farm occu­pant Theo Simon. “If this land and these habi­tats are lost and then they don’t get plan­ning per­mis­sion, EDF will have com­mit­ted an act of unprece­dent­ed eco­log­i­cal van­dal­ism. If on the oth­er hand, as many locals now sus­pect, the plan­ning per­mis­sion is already a “done deal” then that means the cur­rent IPC pub­lic con­sul­ta­tion is an expen­sive sham.”

Mr Simon (53) said that their camp has now been strength­ened with food and water and oth­er sup­plies brought in by local well-wish­ers. Yes­ter­day campers were vis­it­ed by West Som­er­set Dis­trict Coun­cil­lor Jon Free­man, who told them how he thought the plan­ning process had been cor­rupt­ed by pres­sure from cen­tral gov­ern­ment and the edf. today they were advised by a retired Hink­ley B engi­neer who explained his tech­ni­cal reser­va­tions about flaws in the EDF’s reac­tor and waste stor­age plans.

Anoth­er occu­pi­er, Nik­ki Clark, said, “Already our sup­port is grow­ing here, peo­ple who had begun to give up hope, have been empow­ered by our occu­pa­tion, and they are free to walk up the foot­paths to vis­it us. There is a lot of resent­ment in this are at the way this project has been steam-rollered through, but we’re here to draw a line on the ground. The wan­ton destruc­tion of this beau­ti­ful land must be halt­ed until there has been a gen­uine demo­c­ra­t­ic process the begin­ning of which must be Par­lia­ment deem­ing the Nation­al State­ments as fraud­u­lent in the light if the cor­rup­tion of gov­er­nance report.”

The new res­i­dents are all look­ing for­ward to the stop new nuclear sur­round & block­ade of Hink­ley Point on March 10th & 11th to mark the first anniver­sary of the begin­ning of the Fukushi­ma cat­a­stro­phe. Around 400 peo­ple descend­ed on the sta­tion last Octo­ber to dis­rupt EDFs oper­a­tions & voice their dis­sent at the so-called Nuclear Renais­sance.

ENDS

Site Con­tact: 07933920425

OR: 07530947554

Notes:

Details of the Stop New Nuclear sur­round & block­ade avail­able here:  http://stopnewnuclear.org.uk

South West Against Nuclear:
http://southwestagainstnuclear.wordpress.com

Stop Nuclear Pow­er Net­work:
http://stopnuclearpoweruk.net

Boy­cott EDF Ener­gy:
 http://boycottedf.org.uk

Twit­ter: @StopNukePower @NoNewNuclear @StopNewNuclear @BoycottEDF #Occu­py­Hink­ley

‘Join the Hink­ley Barn­stomers’ fly­er avail­able for down­load here:  https://we.riseup.net/assets/83705/barnstormer.pdf

 

Venezuelans Blockade Streets, Burn Tires After Oil Spill

15.2.12

15.2.12

Hun­dreds of pro­test­ers blocked streets and burned tires in east­ern Venezuela on Wednes­day to demand clean water after a recent oil spill pol­lut­ed rivers and streams that sup­ply local stor­age tanks.

“We have not had water for a week,” said Maria Rodriguez, an angry 26-year-old house­wife who joined the protest in the city of Maturin. “We don’t have water to cook and bathe, and we don’t have the mon­ey need­ed to buy bot­tled water every­day.”

Crude oil began spilling from a rup­tured pipeline on Feb. 4 near Maturin.

Mon­a­gas state Gov. Jose Gre­go­rio Briceno declared a “state of emer­gency” fol­low­ing the spill, halt­ing water dis­tri­b­u­tion and clos­ing schools in the state’s cap­i­tal of Maturin, which is locat­ed approx­i­mate­ly 255 miles (410 kilo­me­ters) north­east of Cara­cas

Rep­re­sen­ta­tives of Venezuela’s state oil com­pa­ny, Petroleos de Venezuela S.A., or PDVSA, have not revealed how much oil leaked into the riv­er.

City may­or Jose Vicente Maicavares said approx­i­mate­ly 2,000 peo­ple, includ­ing PDVSA employ­ees, try­ing to con­tain the spill that has fouled the Guara­piche Riv­er.

Maicavares called for calm, say­ing offi­cials were doing every­thing pos­si­ble to resolve the prob­lem.

“We under­stand the irri­ta­tion,” Maicavares told a news con­fer­ence on Wednes­day. “We can only be patient.”

None of the pro­test­ers have been arrest­ed, he said.

Ramiro Ramirez, envi­ron­men­tal direc­tor of state oil com­pa­ny, told the state-run Venezue­lan News Agency last week that work­ers have been using absorbent bar­ri­ers to block the crude in the riv­er.

They have also shut off water intakes along the riv­er, where a drink­ing water purifi­ca­tion plant is locat­ed, Ramirez said.

State oil com­pa­ny offi­cials said a pipe that trans­ports crude to a pro­cess­ing plant rup­tured.

Ramirez said offi­cials were inves­ti­gat­ing what caused the acci­dent.

 

Hinkley Occupied Again — directions to camp

13th Feb­ru­ary 2012

13th Feb­ru­ary 2012

Pro­test­ers have for the sec­ond time in a week occu­pied the devel­op­ment site at Hink­ley Point nuclear pow­er sta­tion in Som­er­set.

In the ear­ly hours of this morn­ing anti-nuclear activists took pos­ses­sion of an aban­doned farm on the site which is pro­tect­ed under Inter­na­tion­al Envi­ron­men­tal law. The site con­tains a Site of Spe­cial Sci­en­tif­ic inter­est (SSSI) and a pro­tect­ed wet­land (R.A.M.S.A.R site) but it is due to be cleared by pow­er com­pa­ny EDF in the com­ing months. Pro­test­ers are angry that per­mis­sion has been giv­en for this work to begin before the com­pa­ny have won per­mis­sion to build their con­tro­ver­sial new nuclear plant.

Som­er­set born Theo Simon said “We want to reclaim this land and make sure that the wildlife that inhab­its it and for­ages here is pro­tect­ed. Giv­ing per­mis­sion to clear the land before Plan­ning Per­mis­sion has even been grant­ed clear­ly gives the mes­sage to EDF that per­mis­sion is a done deal. I, and many oth­ers like me, want prop­er pub­lic con­sul­ta­tion and debate before we com­mit to a tech­nol­o­gy whose tox­ic lega­cy will remain for gen­er­a­tions.”

Local media report­ed this week that EDF will begin site clear­ance in the com­ing weeks, although EDF claimed the oppo­site when pro­test­ers occu­pied the trees on Tues­day.
The first phase of the prepa­ra­tion works will include removal of hedgerows and all trees, before strip­ping all top­soil and lev­el­ling the land­scape, all this despite the fact that plan­ning per­mis­sion has not been grant­ed for a new nuclear pow­er sta­tion at the site.

Nik­ki Clark of SWAN said “Bat ecol­o­gists have explained to us that 86% of Bat crime is caused by the destruc­tion of roosts car­ried out by devel­op­ers. We have been told that the so-called ‘mit­i­ga­tion’, which involves build­ing alter­na­tive roosts, that has been pro­posed by EDF has nev­er been sci­en­tif­i­cal­ly test­ed to prove that it actu­al­ly works.”

Ques­tions have been raised about the Gov­ern­men­t’s process of devel­op­ing ener­gy pol­i­cy.
In the cor­rup­tion of gov­er­nance report last week it was revealed that the ‘Nuclear Renais­sance’ was insti­gat­ed against the advice of sci­en­tists, and is indica­tive of wider cor­rup­tion with­in the Depart­ment of Ener­gy and Cli­mate Change.

The new min­is­ter brought into replace Chris Huhne, who stood down last week to face crim­i­nal charges, is Lib Dem — Ed Dav­ey. Despite hav­ing pro­duced the par­ty’s anti-nuclear pol­i­cy in 2006, he has now made a com­plete U‑turn and is sup­port­ing the coali­tion in pro­mot­ing new nuclear build in the UK.

Shana Deal, one of the occu­piers in Lang­bor­ough Farm, said today: “If EDF’s activ­i­ties con­tin­ue, this nature reserve will be lost for­ev­er. Not even EDF are will­ing to guar­an­tee that a new nuclear pow­er sta­tion will be eco­nom­i­cal­ly viable, and I for one do not want to see this beau­ti­ful land turned into a Tox­ic Waste dump.”

The farm premis­es is acces­si­ble by pub­lic foot­paths and vis­i­tors are being wel­comed by the pro­test­ers.

For back­ground and fur­ther infor­ma­tion phone: 07530 947554

http://stopnuclearpoweruk.net/content/nuclear-reactor-site-occupied

Directions/practical info:

In the ear­ly hours of Sun­day morn­ing a group of us moved into and occu­pied the premis­es of Lang­bor­ough Farm near Hink­ley Point nuclear pow­er sta­tion. The old farm­house premis­es, on a site that EDF has ear­marked for it’s pro­posed new nuclear reac­tor, is now a legal squat. To help them set­tle into their new home with­out any has­sle the occu­piers would wel­come friend­ly vis­i­tors today and in the days ahead.

To find your way by Pub­lic Foot­path to Lang­bor­ough Farm, see map below, or go to half-way through the youtube film “West Coun­try Walks” at
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xWp_ut-Uya4

Friends of mine went to vis­it the new­ly squat­ted site next to Hink­ley Point pow­er sta­tion in Som­er­set this week­end. Lang­bor­ough Farm (ST 201 456) is in the mid­dle of the area on which EDF ener­gy pro­pose to build a new nuclear pow­er sta­tion. They said that although work to clear the site is like­ly to begin in the com­ing weeks, it is crossed by pub­lic foot­paths and bridal ways that are still open. They said that although they saw lots of G4S secu­ri­ty, get­ting access to the site was easy. The secu­ri­ty were very inter­est­ed in them and took lots of pho­tos but did­n’t stop them so long as they stuck to the foot­paths.

They parked in the lay-by on the main approach road to the pow­er sta­tion (Point 1 on the map) and then walked along the pub­lic foot­path which starts at a stile imme­di­ate­ly to the left of the main gates to the pow­er sta­tion (Point 2). The foot­path fol­lows the south­ern perime­ter fence of Hink­ley B pow­er sta­tion and then fol­lows a hedge line west to Lang­bor­ough Farm. They said it took about 15 — 20 min­utes to get there. Access is very mud­dy and there are a cou­ple of gates and stiles.

Remem­ber that access to the farm is by Pub­lic Right Of Way, and if any­one tries to obstruct you they will be com­mit­ting an offence under sec­tion 137 of the High­ways Act 1980, pun­ish­able by a fine of up to £1000.There are many paths across the site, but your best bet may be Wick Drove Lane, where there is a lay-by for park­ing. Walk down to the Pow­er Sta­tion entrance then turn left up the pub­lic foot­path.

One of the occu­piers said “We real­ly want you to come and vis­it and  spread the word. We are fight­ing against a cor­rupt plan­ning deci­sion, made at the high­est lev­els, which favours the nuclear cor­po­ra­tions over the demo­c­ra­t­ic process, and we will feel much safer here if we have vis­i­ble sup­port.”

(It’s cold out there so please take warm food, water, any spare tents, blan­kets or bed­ding you may have and any­thing use­ful you can think of when you go!)

If you’ve got time come and stay!

Road construction disrupted in Philippines

Leftist rebels attack road project, torch equipment in Cotabato

DAVAO CITY, Philip­pines (Xin­hua) – Sus­pect­ed left­ist rebels struck anew in south­ern Philip­pines ear­ly today, burn­ing road con­struc­tion equip­ment and sev­er­al vehi­cles owned by a local trad­er, the mil­i­tary said.

Leftist rebels attack road project, torch equipment in Cotabato

DAVAO CITY, Philip­pines (Xin­hua) – Sus­pect­ed left­ist rebels struck anew in south­ern Philip­pines ear­ly today, burn­ing road con­struc­tion equip­ment and sev­er­al vehi­cles owned by a local trad­er, the mil­i­tary said.

Six New People’s Army gun­men swooped down at a quar­ry site and torched three dump trucks, a mechan­i­cal exca­va­tor (back­hoe) and a pay loader in San Roque vil­lage, Kida­pawan City, North Cota­ba­to province past 10:30 a.m. local time, accord­ing to Colonel Leopol­do Galon, spokesper­son of the East­ern Min­danao Com­mand.

http://signalfire.org/?p=17366