More arrests in Tasmanian forest destruction

JAN 14, 2008: A camp set up by con­ser­va­tion­ists almost three years ago was bro­ken up by police on Mon­day morn­ing at the request of Forestry Tas­ma­nia which wants to start log­ging.

JAN 14, 2008: A camp set up by con­ser­va­tion­ists almost three years ago was bro­ken up by police on Mon­day morn­ing at the request of Forestry Tas­ma­nia which wants to start log­ging.

A pro­test­er who locked him­self in a spi­der­hole tun­nel for over 30 hours has been charged with tres­pass in Hobart. The activist was one of a group attempt­ing to stop Forestry Tas­ma­nia build­ing a road into a log­ging coupe in the Upper Flo­ren­tine Val­ley.

Two oth­er men have also been charged after try­ing to enter the same tun­nel. A Queens­land woman was also arrest­ed after evad­ing police ear­li­er by climb­ing high­er up a tree as they used a cher­ry-pick­er to bring her down.

Four pro­test­ers remain in tree-sits as more peo­ple arrived to sup­port activists who have been liv­ing in the area. Still Wild Still Threat­ened say 150 peo­ple have gath­ered for a com­mu­ni­ty walk through the area in sup­port of pro­test­ers who are try­ing to stop a log­ging road.

“The com­mu­ni­ty mem­bers who are out in the Upper Flo­ren­tine Val­ley in defence of our old growth forests will be attempt­ing to get into this exclu­sion zone by any means so they can wit­ness the ongo­ing destruc­tion of our old growth forests…”

READ MORE/Comment…

MORE: Take Action || Police raid Tas­man­ian for­est block­ade || Spi­der-hole for­est pro­test­er arrest­ed || Still Wild Still Threat­ened

Florentine Arrests — Police raid Tasmanian forest blockade

JAN 12, 08 — Nine anti-log­ging pro­test­ers remain locked to a road in the Upper Flo­ren­tine Val­ley in south­ern Tas­ma­nia after refus­ing to leave their camp­site.

Styx tripodJAN 12, 08 — Nine anti-log­ging pro­test­ers remain locked to a road in the Upper Flo­ren­tine Val­ley in south­ern Tas­ma­nia after refus­ing to leave their camp­site.

Police are try­ing to break up the two-year-old protest camp so that Forestry Tas­ma­nia can begin road­works and log­ging. Forty mem­bers of the group ‘Still Wild Still Threat­ened’ were camped in the area this morn­ing when police arrived just after 8:30pm.

The immi­nent log­ging of the Upper Flo­ren­tine for­est is a nation­al dis­grace, Aus­tralian Greens Leader Bob Brown said today.
“The Upper Flo­ren­tine For­est has been deemed of World Her­itage val­ue. The immi­nent log­ging oper­a­tion there is a nation­al dis­grace. Claims by Prime Min­is­ter Rudd that native for­est log­ging is sus­tain­able are patent­ly stu­pid,” Sen­a­tor Brown said.

The con­voy report­ed­ly con­tains 12 police cars, includ­ing two small bus­es with an esti­mat­ed 30 police involved in the oper­a­tion.

Sen­a­tor Brown was fly­ing over the site in a heli­copter this morn­ing, which was recalled to base fol­low­ing con­tact from the police. A large ban­ner read­ing ‘Save our Forests’ can be seen from the sky.

Spokesman Chris­to Mills says police asked them to leave but they refused. Mr Mills says after a two hour stand-off 30 activists have now been removed, one has been arrest­ed and nine remain locked to a road, accord­ing to reports on the ABC web­site.

“For­est defend­ers are con­tin­u­ing to hold their posi­tions and will do so for as long as it takes,” he said.

Sen­a­tor Bob Brown says police had bet­ter pre­pare for a long fight. “I think it will take quite a while to remove these folk…”

——–

RED ALERT!!!! CAMP FLORENTINE HAS BEEN BUSTED

RED ALERT!!!! CAMP FLORENTINE HAS BEEN BUSTED AND THE BULLDOZERS AND CHAINSAWS ARE MOVING IN RIGHT NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Ear­ly this morn­ing, police stormed a peace­ful com­mu­ni­ty block­ade in the Upper Flo­ren­tine Val­ley. Camp Flo­ren­tine, locat­ed in log­ging coupe FO044A, has been defend­ing the glob­al­ly recog­nised old growth forests of the Upper Flo­ren­tine for over two years.

This move by police is designed to allow Forestry Tas­ma­nia to build 4km of new log­ging roads into the heart of the val­ley. These roads will rip apart an ancient and glob­al­ly sig­nif­i­cant ecosys­tem, open­ing up the val­ley to indus­tri­al scale dev­as­ta­tion at the hands of wood­chip­ping barons Gunns Lim­it­ed.

THE BULLDOZERS AND CHAINSAWS ARE MOVING INTO THE PRISTINE FORESTS OF THE UPPER FLORENTINE VALLEY RIGHT NOW AND WE NEED YOUR HELP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

PEACEFUL COMMUNITY WALK IN THIS WEDNESDAY AT 10AM.

If you are liv­ing in Tas­ma­nia, please stand up and speak out against the destruc­tion of our pre­cious old growth forests. A com­mu­ni­ty walk in will be held this Wednes­day, 14th Jan­u­ary 2009 at 10am. Meet at Timbs Track carpark, Upper Flo­ren­tine Val­ley. To get to the Upper Flo­ren­tine Val­ley, take the Brook­er High­way out of Hobart, take the New Nor­folk turnoff and fol­low the signs to Mt Field or Lake Ped­der. Con­tin­ue on through May­de­na. Camp Flo­ren­tine and Timbs Track are 20 min­utes past May­de­na on the side of the Gor­don Riv­er Road.

WRITE TO THE POLLIES AND THE NEWSPAPERS. CALL UP YOUR LOCAL MP AND TALKBACK RADIO STATION.

Politi­cians need to know about your seri­ous con­cerns with the destruc­tion of the glob­al­ly sig­nif­i­cant forests of the Upper Flo­ren­tine Val­ley. Become an active cit­i­zen and exer­cise your demo­c­ra­t­ic right to let the gov­ern­ment know that old growth log­ging and the destruc­tion of ancient ecosys­tems is unac­cept­able, and that seri­ous changes to leg­is­la­tion and pol­i­cy need to hap­pen now!

Write a let­ter (every hand writ­ten let­ter is viewed as rep­re­sent­ing the opin­ions of 100 vot­ers, so it’s cer­tain­ly worth mak­ing the extra effort) or send an email to your local fed­er­al mem­ber and any (or all!) of the fol­low­ing mem­bers of par­lia­ment. Make an appoint­ment with your local MPs … they are your employ­ees and need to lis­ten to your con­cerns.

Write let­ters to the edi­tor of your local news­pa­per and call up talk back radio. Get the word out in the media!

The Tas­man­ian Gov­ern­ment.

THE PREMIER OF TASMANIA

David Bartlett, MHA

Lev­el 11. 15 Mur­ray St. Hobart, TAS 7000

david.bartlett@education.tas.gov.au

THE LEADER OF THE LIBERAL PARTY, TASMANIAN DIVISION

Will Hodg­man, MHA

Par­lia­ment House, Hobart, TAS 7000

will.hodgman@parliament.tas.gov.au

The Aus­tralian Gov­ern­ment

THE PRIME MINISTER

The Hon. Kevin Rudd MP

PO Box 6022, House of Rep­re­sen­ta­tives

Par­lia­ment House, Can­ber­ra ACT 2600

Email via the PM.s web­site . www.pm.gov.au

THE LEADER OF THE OPPOSITION

The Hon Mal­colm Turn­bull MP

PO Box 6022, House of Rep­re­sen­ta­tives

Par­lia­ment House, Can­ber­ra ACT 2600

Malcolm.Turnbull.MP@aph.gov.au

MINISTER FOR THE ENVIRONMENT, HERITAGE & THE ARTS

The Hon. Peter Gar­rett

PO Box 6022, House of Rep­re­sen­ta­tives

Par­lia­ment House, Can­ber­ra ACT 2600

Peter.garrett.MP@aph.gov.au

tellpeter@petergarrett.com.au

MINISTER FOR CLIMATE CHANGE AND WATER

Sen­a­tor The Hon. Pen­ny Wong

PO Box 6237

Hal­i­fax Street, Ade­laide SA 5000

Senator.wong@aph.gov.au

MINISTER FOR AGRICULTURE, FISHERIES AND FORESTRY

The Hon Tony Burke MP

PO Box 6022, House of Rep­re­sen­ta­tives

Par­lia­ment House, Can­ber­ra ACT 2600

Tony.Burke.MP@aph.gov.au

SHADOW MINISTER FOR CLIMATE CHANGE, ENVIRONMENT & WATER

Mr Greg Hunt

PO Box 6022, House of Rep­re­sen­ta­tives

Par­lia­ment House, Can­ber­ra ACT 2600

Greg.Hunt.MP@aph.gov.au

Please con­tact us at stillwildstillthreatened@gmail.com for more info on what you can do to help us save the out­stand­ing forests of the Upper Flo­ren­tine Val­ley.

Donate online or at any West­pac Bank to the cam­paign to save these pre­cious forests.

Account name: Tas­ma­nias South­ern Forests
BSB #: 737001.
Account #: 704815.

——–

“For the wood­chip­pers. immense pow­er threat­ens not only our for­est, but Tas­ma­ni­a’s future. Not con­tent with our great forests, their greed now destroys not only our nat­ur­al her­itage, but dis­torts our par­lia­ment, deforms our poli­ty, cows our media and stunts our soci­ety . Have courage, speak of love, take action your­self, stand up for what you believe, and our world will sure­ly change.”

Richard Flana­gan

Speech made at a Par­lia­ment Lawns forests ral­ly on 16 March, 2006. Hobart, Tas­ma­nia.

Animal Rights Case Concern to Environmentalists & call out for 19th January — updated with CW analysis

While the case of 4 ani­mal rights cam­paign­ers found guilty on “con­spir­a­cy to black­mail” charges in rela­tion to con­tract test­ing com­pa­ny Hunt­ing­don Life Sci­ences (HLS) that tests on ani­mals may seem unre­lat­ed to the envi­ron­men­tal move­ment the case has direct rel­e­vance to all rad­i­cal envi­ron­men­tal­ists.

While the case of 4 ani­mal rights cam­paign­ers found guilty on “con­spir­a­cy to black­mail” charges in rela­tion to con­tract test­ing com­pa­ny Hunt­ing­don Life Sci­ences (HLS) that tests on ani­mals may seem unre­lat­ed to the envi­ron­men­tal move­ment the case has direct rel­e­vance to all rad­i­cal envi­ron­men­tal­ists. The activists were con­vict­ed for their part in the now famous SHAC (Stop Hunt­ing­don Ani­mal Cru­el­ty) cam­paign that’s stat­ed aim is to close down the com­pa­ny.

Fol­low­ing their con­vic­tions the media lam­bast­ed the activists for numer­ous unlaw­ful and intim­i­dat­ing actions tak­en against Hunt­ing­don and asso­ci­at­ed com­pa­nies. Many of these actions will be dis­taste­ful to some and there are many dif­fer­ing views on ani­mal research in the envi­ron­men­tal move­ment how­ev­er this case has wider impli­ca­tions for activists across the board.

After a recent nation­al media arti­cle claim­ing a lone extrem­ist might be plan­ning an attack aimed at pop­u­la­tion reduc­tion was pub­lished, which NETCU appear to have had a hand in, some feel that NETCU (Nation­al Extrem­ism Tac­ti­cal Co-ordi­na­tion Unit) could be turn­ing their spot­light on the envi­ron­men­tal move­ment. Addi­tion­al­ly the polic­ing tac­tics expe­ri­enced at Cli­mate Camp indi­cate that ani­mal rights cam­paign­ers aren’t the sole focus of NETCU. If the envi­ron­men­tal move­ment is the new tar­get of NETCU this judge­ment should be tak­en seri­ous­ly by all envi­ron­men­tal­ists.

This case seems to imply that the “organ­is­ers” of rad­i­cal cam­paigns are ful­ly respon­si­ble for every­one that tar­gets the com­pa­ny that they are cam­paign­ing against. Indeed it is the case some cam­paign­ers act­ing against HLS and asso­ci­at­ed com­pa­nies used direct action and it’s true that the defen­dants did not nec­es­sar­i­ly con­demn this type of action either. How­ev­er what is being said is there is no evi­dence that the defen­dants were involved in or even incit­ed the actions list­ed in the media and which it seems they have been held liable for in court.

So what is to be under­stood by this case is that a rad­i­cal cam­paign, such as SHAC, Earth First or Cli­mate Camp is ful­ly respon­si­ble for the actions of all its sup­port­ers. It seems that a cam­paign is expect­ed to ‘con­trol’ activists and speak out against every ille­gal action they make or be faced with respon­si­bil­i­ty for the oth­er activist’s actions.

This will be a prob­lem for net­works and groups like Earth First and Cli­mate Camp the police need only arrest the group organ­is­ing the EF! gath­er­ing, the peo­ple who pro­mote Cli­mate Camp etc. and then hold them respon­si­ble for the actions of any­one cam­paign­ing on the same issue or using the cam­paign name, any­one tak­ing action against GMOs or who attacked the pow­er sta­tion dur­ing Cli­mate Camp.

The police no longer need to find and arrest the per­son who com­mit­ted the rel­e­vant action but can sim­ply imply that the cam­paign is respon­si­ble espe­cial­ly if the cam­paign sup­ports direct action or car­ries reports on such actions on their web­site.

On Mon­day 19th Jan­u­ary there has been a call out for a Nation­al Anti-Vivi­sec­tion Day of Action/Freedom to Protest Day of Action in sup­port of the SHAC activists that are being sen­tenced on that day. Because of the direct rel­e­vance of this case to envi­ron­men­tal­ists I ask that regard­less of your indi­vid­ual view­point on the SHAC cam­paign or ani­mal test­ing you do some­thing to sup­port the free­dom to cam­paign. This could be as sim­ple as ded­i­cat­ing an already planned envi­ron­men­tal action to the cam­paign­ers or hold­ing a small protest.

FREEDOM TO PROTEST NOW!

————–

State repres­sion of Anti-Cor­po­rate Dis­sent: Ani­mal right activists con­vict­ed of ‘con­spir­a­cy to black­mail’

On Decem­ber 23rd, 4 out of 5 activists on tri­al at Win­ches­ter Crown Court were found guilty of ‘Con­spir­a­cy to Black­mail’ at Win­ches­ter Crown Court after a 3 and a half month long show tri­al. The world’s media, prompt­ed by police press offi­cers, were quick to con­demn activists by point­ing to harass­ment against the employ­ees of Hunt­ing­don Life Sci­ences (HLS) and their cus­tomers, share­hold­ers and investors. Actions against HLS, not linked to those con­vict­ed, such as hoax bombs, let­ters alleg­ing pae­dophil­ia, and threats were point­ed to as evi­dence of the defen­dants’ extrem­ism. Police spokes­men and the Nation­al Extrem­ist Coor­di­na­tion Unit (NETCU), the branch of the police set up to deal with the AR move­ment and oth­er expres­sions of the pub­lic’s dis­sent, hailed the con­vic­tions as a vic­to­ry. (For more infor­ma­tion on NETCU see here and here.

What was not exam­ined in the media was the wor­ry­ing devel­op­ment of the repres­sive use of the law which lead to the con­vic­tion of the four defen­dants.

Cor­po­rate Watch has fol­lowed the progress of the tri­al at Win­ches­ter since the begin­ning. The rea­son we were con­cerned about the tri­al is that we see it as part of a larg­er attack on the ani­mal rights move­ment moti­vat­ed by the state’s desire to pro­tect pri­vate cor­po­ra­tions against dis­sent. Since the ani­mal rights move­ment began to effec­tive­ly chal­lenge the prof­its of those involved in vivi­sec­tion and the phar­ma­ceu­ti­cal indus­try the state has repeat­ed­ly respond­ed with new repres­sive mea­sures. In May this year Sean Kirt­ley, an activist involved with Stop Sequani Ani­mal Tor­ture (SSAT), was sen­tenced to four and a half years in prison for updat­ing a web­site with news about a legal, non­vi­o­lent cam­paign to close down Sequani lab­o­ra­to­ries in Led­bury. Kirt­ley was con­vict­ed of ‘Con­spir­a­cy to inter­fere with the con­trac­tu­al rela­tions of an ani­mal research facil­i­ty under sec­tion 145 of the Seri­ous Organ­ised Crime and Police Act’ (SOCPA 145) . His only crime was to protest law­ful­ly against the lab and to update a web­site.

NETCU, how­ev­er, was not sat­is­fied with see­ing ani­mal rights activists banged up for four and a half years and chose to charge cam­paign­ers asso­ci­at­ed with Stop Hunt­ing­don Ani­mal Cru­el­ty (SHAC) with ‘con­spir­a­cy to black­mail’, an offence car­ry­ing up to 14 years in prison. In May 2007, police arrest­ed 32 peo­ple in raids dubbed ‘Oper­a­tion Achilles’. Since then, 15 peo­ple have been charged with ‘con­spir­a­cy’ and are being tried in two sep­a­rate tri­als, of which this was the first.

The charges relate to over four years of con­cert­ed cam­paign­ing against HLS, the largest con­tract test­ing lab­o­ra­to­ry in Europe. The defen­dants includ­ed peo­ple who had been involved in SHAC from the out­set. How­ev­er, two of the defen­dants, Ger­rah Sel­by and Dan Wad­ham, had been in their ear­ly teens at the begin­ning of the peri­od con­cerned and had only been involved for a short time. Wad­ham was only 17 when his part of the alleged con­spir­a­cy alleged­ly occurred.

SHAC, an inter­na­tion­al cam­paign group call­ing for the clo­sure of HLS, has been paint­ed by the police and the press as a ‘crim­i­nal organ­i­sa­tion’ dup­ing mem­bers of the pub­lic con­cerned with ani­mal abuse into donat­ing their mon­ey to fur­ther ‘a cam­paign of black­mail’. SHAC’s activ­i­ties, how­ev­er, have been over­whelm­ing­ly law­ful: the cam­paign pub­lish­es infor­ma­tion about ani­mal abuse inside HLS labs, reports cam­paign­ing activ­i­ties and issues action alerts call­ing on sup­port­ers to write polite let­ters to com­pa­nies work­ing with HLS and ask them to desist. If those com­pa­nies con­tin­ue to do busi­ness with HLS, protests would usu­al­ly fol­low. All mate­r­i­al on the SHAC web­site is checked by a bar­ris­ter and police are giv­en pri­or notice of their demon­stra­tions.

Cus­tomers, sup­pli­ers and share­hold­ers in HLS have also been the sub­ject of some direct action. Slo­gans have been daubed at com­pa­ny premis­es and employ­ees homes; cars have been painstrip­pered; hoax bombs have been sent and employ­ees have been accused of being pae­dophiles. How­ev­er, these actions are not direct­ly linked to the SHAC cam­paign and have only ten­u­ous links to the defen­dants, whose faces were spashed across many tabloid front pages after their con­vic­tions at Win­ches­ter.

Dur­ing the sum­mer, three defen­dants, com­mit­ted cam­paign­ers against HLS, plead guilty to charges of ‘con­spir­a­cy to black­mail’. Dur­ing the tri­al, evi­dence recov­ered from the cam­paign PCs and activists’ per­son­al com­put­ers was pre­sent­ed. Police had found many doc­u­ments believed to have been per­ma­nent­ly delet­ed or shred­ded by their authors. This includ­ed a spread­sheet detail­ing names and address­es of peo­ple work­ing for com­pa­nies linked to HLS, details of direct actions car­ried out against them and a doc­u­ment con­tain­ing a pri­vate chat between activists appar­ent­ly talk­ing about direct action. This evi­dence may sug­gest that some activists had decid­ed to take direct action against com­pa­nies linked to HLS, but the evi­dence link­ing the defen­dants found guilty on 23rd Decem­ber to these doc­u­ments was cir­cum­stan­tial and, in some cas­es, non-exis­tent. Even if some activists linked to SHAC did decide to take direct action, this does not make every­body asso­ci­at­ed with the cam­paign guilty by asso­ci­a­tion. The pros­e­cu­tion case was that that the entire SHAC cam­paign was aimed at clos­ing down HLS, which is true, and that SHAC cam­paign­ers attempt­ed to per­suade com­pa­nies not to work with HLS, which is also true. The pros­e­cu­tion argu­ment, how­ev­er, went on to imply that, when com­pa­nies did not agree to cease trad­ing with HLS, they were the sub­ject of direct action. Often direct action did occur but this was not under the ban­ner of SHAC. More­over, SHAC did not pub­lish any infor­ma­tion about com­pa­nies that was not already in the pub­lic domain. But because some activists, some­times under the ban­ner of the Ani­mal Lib­er­a­tion Front (ALF), did take direct action, the pros­e­cu­tion argued that the SHAC cam­paign was facil­i­tat­ing direct action and giv­ing it its tac­it appo­val. The police went one step fur­ther and said SHAC and the ALF were one and the same thing!

Much of the evi­dence in the three-month tri­al was in rela­tion to law­ful demon­stra­tions against com­pa­nies linked to HLS. This was par­tic­u­lar­ly impor­tant in the instances of defen­dants who could not be linked to the uncov­ered com­put­er evi­dence. In sev­er­al cas­es, the only evi­dence was what they had said at demon­stra­tions. Com­ments made by defen­dants dur­ing protests in earshot of the police were por­trayed as link­ing them to the ‘con­spir­a­cy’. Com­ments, such as “we know where you live”, were tak­en as proof that defen­dants were par­ty to the con­spir­a­cy. In any oth­er con­text, such spur-of-the-moment com­ments would have, at most, lead to minor charges in the Mag­is­trate’s Court. Equal­ly impor­tant was the fact that some of those con­vict­ed were linked per­son­al­ly to the defen­dants who plead­ed guilty. Heather Nichol­son and Ger­rah Sel­by had both shared hous­es with them. This was obvi­ous­ly a fac­tor in find­ing them guilty by asso­ci­a­tion.

So what does this mean for free speech and anti-cor­po­rate dis­sent in the UK? By the same log­ic, an anti-war cam­paign that pub­lish­es infor­ma­tion on the where­abouts of a mil­i­tary base or arms fac­to­ry and calls for its clo­sure could be put in the frame for the same crime if that base was then the sub­ject of an arson attack. All it would take would be for the police to imply that the peo­ple run­ning the pub­lic cam­paign are linked to those involved in direct action. Con­se­quent­ly, cam­paign­ers might feel com­pelled to pub­licly dis­tance them­selves from acts of direct action lest they find that, unbe­known to them, those respon­si­ble for the covert actions are involved in pub­lic action too and the whole move­ment is charged with ‘con­spir­a­cy’. In fact, the use of such charges is a clas­sic police tac­tic aimed at spread­ing para­noia and con­vict­ing as many activists as pos­si­ble for acts car­ried out by only a few. The aim is also to min­imise pub­lic sup­port for ille­gal actions by har­rass­ing and crim­i­nal­is­ing those who speak up in sol­i­dar­i­ty.

NETCU have already inti­mat­ed, for exam­ple in the recent Mark Townsend arti­cle on ‘eco-ter­ror­ists’, that envi­ron­men­tal or anti-gm pro­test­ers might be their next tar­get.

The con­vict­ed activists are now long peri­ods in jail, they will be sen­tenced on Jan­u­ary 19th. Heather Nichol­son, who was remand­ed after her arrest in May 2007, has already spent over 19 months in jail, longer than some con­vict­ed of seri­ous assaults or sex crimes would spend in prison. In May this year, Sean Kirt­ley, who was impris­oned for his role in anoth­er ani­mal rights cam­paign, was sen­tenced to four and a half years in prison on the same day that men who beat a man until he was blind received two years. Since ‘Oper­a­tion Achilles’, the police have been pat­ting them­selves on the back for putting the ani­mal rights move­ment into ‘dis­ar­ray’. A NETCU source told the Observ­er in Novem­ber 2008 that the ani­mal rights move­men­t’s ‘ring­lead­ers’ had ‘either been pros­e­cut­ed or were await­ing pros­e­cu­tion.’ One may sus­pect that com­ments like these are more to do with main­tain­ing NETCU’s fund­ing than real­i­ty (see this Cor­po­rate Watch com­men­tary for more details).

In fact the attack on ani­mal rights cam­paign­ers does not seem to have lim­it­ed their capac­i­ty to take action. Reg­u­lar demon­stra­tions are still tak­ing place against com­pa­nies linked to HLS, with one planned for 29th Decem­ber.The ALF, which does not seem to be in need of ‘lead­ers’, has recent­ly freed 70 turkeys from a UK farm. If any­thing, the glob­al ani­mal rights move­ment seems to be grow­ing steadi­ly.

The deci­sion to try these cam­paign­ers for ‘con­spir­a­cy to black­mail’ was evi­dent­ly a polit­i­cal one. Huge amounts of police resources have been poured into this pros­e­cu­tion, and oth­ers like it, at the behest of the Labour gov­ern­ment. This is due to the effec­tive­ness of the ani­mal rights move­ment in con­fronting and chal­leng­ing the pow­er of cor­po­ra­tions involved in ani­mal abuse. The demon­i­sa­tion of ani­mal rights cam­paign­ers in the media, facil­i­tat­ed by NETCU press releas­es, only makes it eas­i­er for the state to repress them with­out pub­lic out­cry. The con­vic­tion of the defen­dants at Win­ches­ter is yet anoth­er nail in the cof­fin of the pub­lic’s right to voice their anger and dis­sent against cor­po­rate crime.

For more info see Stop Hunt­ing­don Ani­mal Cru­el­ty — www.shac.net

NETCU Watch — http://netcu.wordpress.com/

SCHnews — www.schnews.org.uk

Radley Lakes saved

Fol­low­ing years of cam­paign­ing through legal chan­nels, and the squat­ting of a build­ing by the side of Thrupp Lake at the begin­ning of 2007, the Save Radley Lakes cam­paign is vic­to­ri­ous — hoorah! Use the search above for old sto­ries and pho­tos from the cam­paign — sto­ries about the recent vic­to­ry and future plans are below.

Thrupp Lake at sunsetFol­low­ing years of cam­paign­ing through legal chan­nels, and the squat­ting of a build­ing by the side of Thrupp Lake at the begin­ning of 2007, the Save Radley Lakes cam­paign is vic­to­ri­ous — hoorah! Use the search above for old sto­ries and pho­tos from the cam­paign — sto­ries about the recent vic­to­ry and future plans are below.

End of an Era

Yes­ter­day’s (17.12.08) announce­ment by RWE Npow­er brought to an end a 41 month cam­paign to save the last remain­ing Radley Lakes, Thrupp and Bull­field Lakes, from destruc­tion by being filled with waste pul­verised fuel ash (PFA) from the Did­cot A Pow­er Sta­tion.

It also brings to an end 23 years of fill­ing of old grav­el pits in Radley with pow­er sta­tion ash, which began in 1985, when the Pow­er Sta­tion was run by the nation­alised Cen­tral Elec­tric­i­ty Gen­er­at­ing Board and when the envi­ron­ment fig­ured less high­ly in pop­u­lar con­cerns. The choice back then was between land­fill with gen­er­al waste, com­mer­cial exploita­tion, or ash. Local peo­ple vot­ed for the ash, which is prob­a­bly what they would have got any­way.

The ash had been pumped into the grav­el pits as a slur­ry via an under­ground pipeline. Many grav­el pits were filled in this way over the inter­ven­ing years and peo­ple did not seem to mind, though eye­brows were being increas­ing­ly raised, and there were objec­tions to the fill­ing of Lakes H and I, which had become a spec­tac­u­lar haven for wild­fowl. In 2005, RWE npow­er sought per­mis­sion to fill the the two remain­ing grav­el pits. These were the old­est exca­va­tions, which had, over the half cen­tu­ry or so of their exis­tence, become restored into beau­ti­ful lakes and had been giv­en names by local peo­ple.

How the Lakes Were Saved (in a nut­shell)

The small­er Bull­field Lake was res­cued from this fate fol­low­ing protests back in 2005, but the much larg­er and more impor­tant Thrupp Lake has remained under threat ever since, as plan­ning, legal and oth­er bat­tles raged around it. As a last resort, local peo­ple even applied to have the area turned into a Town Green. This too failed, but it remains the sub­ject of a Judi­cial Review, which was due to be heard in the High Court in Feb­ru­ary 2009. In Feb­ru­ary 2007, hav­ing got all nec­es­sary plan­ning per­mis­sions and removed the pro­tes­tors who’d occu­pied the lake­side build­ing, npow­er went ahead with clear­ance work on the site, and many trees were destroyed. Work then had to stop until the Autumn, because of nest­ing birds. After car­ry­ing out some pre­lim­i­nary work in Octo­ber 2007, npow­er sud­den­ly ceased their activ­i­ties on the site.

Then, in Feb­ru­ary 2008, events took an unex­pect­ed turn: npow­er announced an inter­im reprieve for Thrupp Lake. A lit­tle lat­er, Waste Recy­cling Group (WRG) open­ly came for­ward with a pro­pos­al that would save Thrupp Lake for ever. It has tak­en until now to bring this to fruition. Plan­ning per­mis­sion was need­ed, tech­ni­cal prob­lems had to be resolved, a com­mer­cial agree­ment had to be reached; then there was the ques­tion of what to do with Thrupp Lake. Many del­i­cate nego­ti­a­tions, it seemed, were going on in the back­ground, cul­mi­nat­ing in yes­ter­day’s momen­tous announce­ment.

Tri­umph at Last!

To mark the occa­sion, the Pow­er Sta­tion oper­a­tors invit­ed press and pub­lic into the grounds of San­dles, the house on the shore Thrupp Lake. There, Mr John Rain­ford, the Pow­er Sta­tion man­ag­er, announced that, because the pow­er sta­tion had found bet­ter and more sus­tain­able ways of dis­pos­ing of its ash, there would be no need to destroy Thrupp Lake, not now, not ever. He made it clear that RWE npow­er was offer­ing The Lake to the local com­mu­ni­ty as a nature con­ser­va­tion area and that dis­cus­sions were under­way with the North­moor Trust to pro­vide for its man­age­ment. It was hoped that the house could be con­vert­ed into an edu­ca­tion­al cen­tre.

Rep­re­sen­ta­tives of the com­mu­ni­ty, Jen­ny Standen, chair­man of Radley Parish Coun­cil, and Basil Crow­ley, chair­man of Save Radley Lakes, expressed their sat­is­fac­tion and delight, thank­ing npow­er for their mag­na­nim­i­ty and look­ing for­ward to work­ing with them in restor­ing the area to cre­ate some­thing to be real­ly proud of. Both expressed grat­i­tude to all the peo­ple who had sup­port­ed the cam­paign and whose sup­port and tire­less efforts had helped bring this about.

With the late Decem­ber after­noon sun­shine cast­ing long shad­ows across the ves­tiges of San­dles’ lawn, a jubi­lant par­ty atmos­phere pre­vailed. Cham­pagne flowed, hands were shak­en, cam­eras clicked and, in a touch of sur­re­al­i­ty, a man in a frog suit played a solo trom­bone fan­fare at the lake­side to her­ald the lake’s sal­va­tion.Radley Lakes saved trombone fanfare

Where the Ash Will Go

The ash that was to have gone into Thrupp Lake will now go to Waste Recy­cling Group’s Sut­ton Courte­nay land­fill site next to the pow­er sta­tion where it will be used for engi­neer­ing, cap­ping and land­scap­ing of the land­fill oper­a­tions. Sur­plus ash will be stock­piled in a planned new stor­age facil­i­ty, which received plan­ning per­mis­sion back in July, and will main­tain WRG’s essen­tial sup­ply of ash after 2015 when the pow­er sta­tion will have closed. Because the pow­er sta­tion and the waste site are imme­di­ate­ly adja­cent, the ash can be trans­port­ed direct­ly across the fence and put into the stock­pile, which is not far from the pow­er sta­tion bound­ary. At no time will this ash be trans­port­ed on pub­lic roads, which means there will be no adverse impact on the res­i­dents of Sut­ton Courte­nay. Indeed, it will remove the need to import over half a mil­lion tonnes of sub­sti­tute mate­ri­als after 2015, which would have had an impact!

http://www.saveradleylakes.org.uk/
http://www.radleyvillage.org.uk/news/News0009.htm

Day 7 of the revolt in Greece

Fol­low­ing the police shoot­ing of a 15 year old anar­chist, riots, protests & vig­ils con­tin­ue through­out Greece, with world­wide sol­i­dar­i­ty protests tak­ing place. Lat­est report below (click Read more). For much more info and all the lat­est, see https://www.indymedia.org.uk

Greek cops run past burning barricadesFol­low­ing the police shoot­ing of a 15 year old anar­chist, riots, protests & vig­ils con­tin­ue through­out Greece, with world­wide sol­i­dar­i­ty protests tak­ing place. Lat­est report below (click Read more). For much more info and all the lat­est, see https://www.indymedia.org.uk

The Greek Intifa­da con­tin­ues and the gov­ern­ment is unable to impose its con­trol in the coun­try, spread­ing fears among the rul­ing class­es all over the Euro­pean Union.

The Greek Intifa­da con­tin­ues and the gov­ern­ment is unable to impose its con­trol in the coun­try, spread­ing fears among the rul­ing class­es all over the Euro­pean Union. In the EU Sum­mit in Brus­sels, Sarkozy but also the oth­er bour­geois lead­ers demand­ed to the Greek right wing Prime Min­is­ter Kara­man­lis “to arrest imme­di­ate­ly those respon­si­ble for the chaos”. So in today’s demon­stra­tion in Athens of tens of thou­sands of school­child­ren, stu­dents, par­ents, teach­ers and pro­fes­sors, the riot police tried to make mass arrests of 12–15 years boys and girls. The teach­ers and par­ents inter­vened to save the kids, fought with Police and lib­er­at­ed most of them apart from 3(more or less kids of 12–13 years old) who are added to the 176 already offi­cial­ly arrest­ed.

Clash­es between school­child­ren and riot police took also place in front of the par­lia­ment in Syn­tag­ma Square. The repres­sive forces of the State attacked after­wards the Law Fac­ul­ty under occu­pa­tion where our Inde­pen­dent Action Cen­ter is func­tion­ing. The cen­ter of Athens has been suf­fo­cat­ed with the chem­i­cal gazes used by the riot police. But the police had to retreat as the stu­dents defend­ed them­selves with stones and a few Molo­tov cock­tails. Then the Stu­dents Assem­bly took place and a new pro­gram of actions was decid­ed for the next days.

The Kara­man­lis gov­ern­ment was unable to have the sup­port of oth­er bour­geois par­ties and the offi­cial Left to declare the stage of the siege. The gov­ern­ment itself is split on that cru­cial issue. Nev­er­the­less, the real State of Emer­gency was declared by the school­child­ren who have put under siege tens of Police Sta­tions in Athens and all over the coun­try.

The Stal­in­ist KKE con­tin­ues to esca­late not only its attacks against Synaspis­mos /Syriza accused to be “pro­tec­tors of the hooli­gans”, but the revolt itself. Offi­cial­ly the lead­ers of KKE insist that there is no… any revolt! Today, at the same time that the school­child­ren waged their bat­tles with the riot police in front of the Athens Uni­ver­si­ty and in the Syn­tag­ma Square, the Stal­in­ist bureau­crats kept their sup­port­ers away, in Omo­nia Square and rapid­ly dis­persed them in a few blocks dis­tance from that Square. Nev­er­the­less, KKE deputies and their news­pa­per Rizospastis repeat­ed their slan­ders against the revolt­ed — to be hooli­gans, Tal­ibans, drug deal­ers, pros­ti­tu­tion rack­e­teers( 12–13 years old boys?) , police agents- adding now a new slan­der: that those fight­ing the police are agents of impe­ri­al­ist agen­cies name­ly of CIA!!!

As the polit­i­cal cri­sis inten­si­fies, the eco­nom­ic cri­sis is exac­er­bat­ed. Today’s news show that over-indebt­ed Greece finds more and more dif­fi­cult to get new loans to pay both its past debts and its deficits. To give an idea: the spread( the dif­fer­ence between the inter­est rates) of the Greek State bonds in rela­tion to those of Ger­many has esca­lat­ed to 202, while in the begin­ning of 2008 was just 20. Until March 2009 it is expect­ed that the spread will grow to 500 or more. Greece is de fac­to bank­rupt. It is the weak­est eco­nom­ic link in the chain of the Euro-zone coun­tries, and now it is proved above any doubt that it is also the weak­est polit­i­cal link. The glob­al cap­i­tal­ist cri­sis not only desta­bi­lizes all social rela­tions but pro­duce now explo­sions and a ten­den­cy towards a pre-rev­o­lu­tion­ary and/or rev­o­lu­tion­ary sit­u­a­tion.

http://www.eek.gr/default.asp?pid=6&id=639

Telmex phone booths sabotaged in Mexico City

Com­mu­niques from the 96 phone booths sab­o­taged in four sep­a­rate actions by the eco-anar­chist cell for direct attack, the Earth Lib­er­a­tion Front (ELF) and the Lud­dites Against the Domes­ti­ca­tion of Wild Nature (LCDNS);

Telmex sabotagedTelmex sabotagedCom­mu­niques from the 96 phone booths sab­o­taged in four sep­a­rate actions by the eco-anar­chist cell for direct attack, the Earth Lib­er­a­tion Front (ELF) and the Lud­dites Against the Domes­ti­ca­tion of Wild Nature (LCDNS);

“Dur­ing four days last week 37 tele­phone receivers of pub­lic tele­phones belong­ing to the ‘telmex’ phone com­pa­ny in Mex­i­co City were cut (with the help of bolt cut­ters and wire cut­ters), leav­ing the phones unus­able.
Telmex, in addi­tion to being respon­si­ble for the destruc­tion of the plan­et, also finan­cial­ly sup­ports, direct­ly and with adver­tis­ing, sadis­tic bull­fights.
The sab­o­tage con­tin­ues … it will not stop …

arm your desires … do not let the moment pass …

until the exploita­tion ends.

eco-anar­chist cell for direct attack.

mex­i­co city 31 octo­ber 2008”

—————————-

“Inspired by the action on Octo­ber 31 in Mex­i­co City, we have like­wise sab­o­taged 25 phone booths of the Telmex com­pa­ny.

Frente de Lib­eración de la Tier­ra [Earth Lib­er­a­tion Front]”

—————————-

“Sab­o­tage to 4 telmex tele­phones.

On Sat­ur­day, Novem­ber 8, with the means with­in our reach we sab­o­taged 4 pub­lic tele­phones belong­ing to the super mil­lion­aire Car­los Slim and his busi­ness telmex. Telmex not only finan­cial­ly sup­ports bull­fights, but is also one of the major destroy­ers of the plan­et.
These sab­o­tages will not stop… until the end of exploita­tion of flo­ra and fau­na.
For ani­mal lib­er­a­tion… com­mit­ment and direct action…

eco-anar­chist cell for direct attack.

mex­i­co city (d.f.) novem­ber 9, 2008”

—————————-

Novem­ber 12:

The com­pa­ny that destroys the earth and its inhab­i­tants, Telmex, received a new attack from the Lud­dites Against the Domes­ti­ca­tion of Wild Nature (LCDNS); at night we sab­o­taged 30 tele­phones, tear­ing them from their respec­tive booths.

The sab­o­tage against Telmex will not stop until civ­i­liza­tion falls.

We are the stone in your shoes!

Rev­o­lu­tion and insur­rec­tion, Mex­i­co.”

—————————-

Source — www.directaction.info

Shell to Sea / Rossport Solidarity Camp Update from Erris Co. Mayo. November 2009.

While Glen­gad and Shell issues have large­ly gone from the pub­lic eye, and indeed things have qui­etened down some what, that’s not to say that stuff hasn’t been going on, it just doesn’t always make the media.

The last few months have seen a few devel­op­ments since the Soli­taire left our shores.

While Glen­gad and Shell issues have large­ly gone from the pub­lic eye, and indeed things have qui­etened down some what, that’s not to say that stuff hasn’t been going on, it just doesn’t always make the media.

The last few months have seen a few devel­op­ments since the Soli­taire left our shores.

* Shell have com­plete­ly vacat­ed the Glen­gad com­pound in the last few week or so. Unfor­tu­nate­ly they haven’t done a won­der­ful job of clean­ing up after them­selves. Plen­ty of rub­ble was left behind on the beach from the cause­way that they extend­ed out to sea and then removed.

The “cliff” has been banked up with soft mate­ri­als which don’t look too sta­ble to me and will like­ly con­tin­ue to be washed out by the rain­wa­ter. In the old com­pound itself large heaps of mate­ri­als have been piled and net­ted over to pre­vent birds nest­ing? Strange­ly they have not attempt­ed to net the re-banked cliff area, as they had before. Some of the old net­ting can be seen on the cliff top, inter­meshed with the grass on top.

Their chan­nel buoy mark­ers have been wash­ing ashore recent­ly also, as they left these behind to. At the road entrance to the Glen­gad com­pound all the fenc­ing and gates have gone (as it has around the whole site), to be replaced with reg­u­lar cat­tle fenc­ing and gates, hav­ing pulled out at this time of year the whole place is a bit of a mud bath.

* The road, left unfin­ished by Mayo Coun­ty Coun­cil now Shell have pulled out, is already show­ing signs of dete­ri­o­ra­tion, with pot­holes form­ing in the tar­mac beside where the entrance gates to this com­pound stood. The Co.Co. have left the road as it stands from what I can see, with­out fin­ish­ing the works, just loads of signs and bol­lards left around every­where.

* Nov 10th last saw a pro­ces­sion along the Bel­lan­aboy Road up to the main refin­ery gates, attend­ed by about 50 local peo­ple car­ry­ing cross­es with the names of the Ogo­ni 9, to mark the exe­cu­tion of Ken Sara Wiwa and 8 of his col­leagues in 1995, the Niger­ian activists who were exe­cut­ed by the Niger­ian Mil­i­tary Dic­ta­tor­ship at the time, at Shel­l’s behest.

* The Gar­da pres­ence is like­wise down, but still tan­gi­ble.

* After a meet­ing some time ago with a few min­is­ters, the silence has been loud from the pow­ers that be, despite their recent announce­ment of set­ting up some forum or dia­logue with peo­ple involved in the Cor­rib Gas issue. How­ev­er no one here has actu­al­ly heard any­thing or been con­tact­ed about as of yet. Min­is­ter Eamon Ryan has admit­ted in the media that ‘mis­takes were made’ but has refused to dis­cuss the mov­ing of the refin­ery or the appro­pri­a­cy of a pipeline land­fall at Glen­gad. “There will be no re-vis­it­ing of the con­sents / per­mis­sions already giv­en to Shell”, he said. As usu­al the terms of ref­er­ence are pre-set by the ‘author­i­ties’ in order to avoid a fair and prop­er address­ing of the issues.

* The AFRI hedge school a few weeks ago was real­ly fan­tas­tic with some great peo­ple com­ing to have an input/speak includ­ing Den­nis Hal­l­i­day and oth­er peo­ple who have been deal­ing with Shell in oth­er coun­tries.

The fight goes on.

Indigenous Resistance To Silly Dam Project In Brazil

18/11/2008
Peo­ple Pow­er Fucks Up Con­struc­tion

Juruena Dam construction site trashed 1Juruena Dam construction site trashed 218/11/2008
Peo­ple Pow­er Fucks Up Con­struc­tion

One hun­dred and twen­ty mem­bers of the Enawene Nawe tribe trashed a con­struc­tion site of a hydro elec­tric dam on the Juru­e­na riv­er in west­ern Brazil on 11th of last month. Trucks, offices, hous­ing for work­ers were all destroyed and or torched in a $1 mil­lion sur­vival spree.

“They came armed with axes and pieces of wood, ban­ished the employ­ees and lat­er set fire to every­thing” said Fred­eri­co Muller, a coor­di­na­tor work­ing at the site. At least 12 trucks were destroyed, along with a num­ber of offices and hous­ing units.

Sur­vival because the tribes all over the Ama­zon basin rely on the rivers for fish­ing, one of the eas­i­est, most reli­able ways to get food. There are 77 such dams planned for the area but the destruc­tion is very wide­ly spread: one Brazil­ian super dam project – the Belo Monte – will dis­place 16,000 peo­ple.

Some back­ground to this cri­sis: Brazil’s spi­ralling ener­gy needs are the result of the den­tal­ly inim­itable pro indus­try fuck­wit Lula de Sil­va’s (or should that be the IMF etc’s) poli­cies of growth at any cost. Demand has out­stripped sup­ply in recent years and a long drought in 2001 brought mat­ters to a head. With no water even the best dams can pro­duce no pow­er so rationing was com­menced – down to one fifth of nor­mal sup­ply. The deci­sion was made at this time to increase Brazil’s hydro capac­i­ty by 75% and thus we have the cur­rent sit­u­a­tion of mass forced dis­place­ment of indige­nous peo­ples.

But the dams are not even a sure thing either eco­nom­i­cal­ly or prac­ti­cal­ly (except­ing the con­struc­tion com­pa­nies, financiers, bribees etc.). Pre­dic­tions of low water for 3 – 5 months of the year make the projects look ridicu­lous. How­ev­er if you include geno­cide as a wel­come part of your busi­ness mod­el then the fig­ures are any­thing but. As one fucked up white ele­phant dam is com­plet­ed it requires more upstream stor­age capac­i­ty to be built and hence more dis­place­ment. This is the real­i­ty of ‘eco­nom­ic devel­op­ment’ in Brazil.

Mass Tribal Uprising in West Bengal

Novem­ber 18, 2008

What we are wit­ness­ing in the trib­al belt of West Ben­gal is [an] his­tor­i­cal moment. A long oppressed peo­ple have risen up and are dar­ing to con­front their oppres­sors and ques­tion the log­ic of “devel­op­ment” that destroys their lives and liveli­hoods.”

Novem­ber 18, 2008

What we are wit­ness­ing in the trib­al belt of West Ben­gal is [an] his­tor­i­cal moment. A long oppressed peo­ple have risen up and are dar­ing to con­front their oppres­sors and ques­tion the log­ic of “devel­op­ment” that destroys their lives and liveli­hoods.”

In what start­ed out as a protest against police bru­tal­i­ty, on Novem­ber 7 more than ten thou­sand San­thal men and women con­verged in the Indi­an state of West Ben­gal to demand the end to state oppres­sion and the con­stant dis­pos­ses­sion of their lands.

It is an his­toric moment for the trib­al peo­ples in the region — and one so unprece­dent­ed that author­i­ties are not even sure what to do about it.

“Even the polit­i­cal par­ties and civ­il soci­ety are at a loss try­ing to come to terms with what is hap­pen­ing,” says Partho Sarathi Ray, in Sanhati.com. “Noth­ing like this has been wit­nessed in West Ben­gal in liv­ing mem­o­ry.”

The upris­ing report­ed­ly began fol­low­ing a land mine explo­sion on Novem­ber 2, which tar­get­ed the state’s chief min­is­ter as well as the union steel and mines min­is­ter.

The two men were return­ing from the inau­gu­ra­tion of the Jin­dal Steel Works (JSW) spe­cial eco­nom­ic zone (SEZ) in West Mid­na­pore dis­trict. Approx­i­mate­ly 5000 acres of land had been acquired for JSW, the vast major­i­ty of which was sup­posed to be dis­trib­uted amongst the land­less Adi­va­sis (indige­nous peo­ple) in the region. The gov­ern­ment hand­ed it over to the com­pa­ny instead.

The explo­sion was prompt­ly blamed on the Maoist guer­ril­las — how­ev­er, in what has become a com­mon prac­tice in West Ben­gal, the police turned all of their atten­tion to the local indige­nous pop­u­la­tion for being “com­plic­it” in the attack.

Over the next few days, the police set out on a cam­paign to assault, harass and ran­dom­ly arrest any trib­al per­son they want­ed.

But it just wasn’t enough for the police, who hadn’t the slight­est clue who was behind the explo­sion. So, on Novem­ber 6 the police “… led by the offi­cer in charge of Lal­garh police sta­tion… unleashed a reign of ter­ror in 35 vil­lages encom­pass­ing the entire trib­al belt of Lal­garh,” explains Ray. “In raids through­out the night of Novem­ber 6th, women were bru­tal­ly kicked and beat­en up with lath­is and butts of guns. Among the injured, Chi­ta­mani Mur­mu, one of whose eyes was hit by a gun butt, and Pana­mani Hans­da, who was kicked on her chest and suf­fered mul­ti­ple frac­tures, had to [be] hos­pi­tal­ized. Chitamani’s lost her eye because of the injury. Eight oth­er women were bad­ly wound­ed. These police bru­tal­i­ties soon reached a point where the adi­va­sis had no oth­er option but to rise up in revolt,” Ray con­tin­ues.

The next day, “what began as rum­blings of protest took the shape of a spon­ta­neous mass upris­ing [of] ten thou­sand San­thal men and women, armed with tra­di­tion­al weapons, [who] came out and obstruct­ed the roads lead­ing to Lal­garh, dis­con­nect­ing it from Mid­na­pur and Banku­ra. Roads were dug up and tree trunks were placed on the road to obstruct the entry of police vehi­cles, in the same way as it had been done in Nandi­gram.”

Dur­ing the night, “peo­ple also dis­con­nect­ed tele­phone and elec­tric­i­ty lines, vir­tu­al­ly con­vert­ing a vast area into a lib­er­at­ed zone. The apex social orga­ni­za­tion of the San­thals, the Bharat Jakat Majhi Mad­wa Juan Gaon­ta took up the lead­er­ship of the strug­gle, although the leader of the orga­ni­za­tion, the “Disham Majhi” Nityanan­da Hem­bram has him­self admit­ted that the orga­ni­za­tion has no con­trol over the move­ment; rather the move­ment is con­trol­ling the orga­ni­za­tion.”

As for the gov­ern­ment, which has “not dared to respond with overt vio­lence yet”, is help­less in the face of this upsurge. They’ve been try­ing to nego­ti­ate, but the effort has so far been fruit­less due to the demo­c­ra­t­ic and decen­tral­ized nature of the upris­ing. They sim­ply can’t exert any influ­ence over the indige­nous peo­ple.

They way things look right now, the gov­ern­ment may have no choice but to con­cede.

Reports on Sanhati

Mainstream Reports

Remember remember, action security in November… [update: Observer article withdrawn]

Remem­ber to think about secu­ri­ty when plan­ning actions & cam­paigns, every month — there’s been a help­ful reminder in a Sun­day news­pa­per that our aims and the aims of the state are some­what dif­fer­ent!

Though the arti­cle can be tak­en to be a police unit safe­guard­ing their ongo­ing bud­gets and employ­ment — as has hap­pened in the past with sim­i­lar scare arti­cles (from the police & the secu­ri­ty ser­vices) — it’s also a handy reminder of the secu­ri­ty issues we should think about to ensure that our cam­paign­ing remains effec­tive. Check out the back­ground dirt on the journos below…

It Came From the Black Swampy - Eco-Terror!!CCTV camera 1Remem­ber to think about secu­ri­ty when plan­ning actions & cam­paigns, every month — there’s been a help­ful reminder in a Sun­day news­pa­per that our aims and the aims of the state are some­what dif­fer­ent!

Though the arti­cle can be tak­en to be a police unit safe­guard­ing their ongo­ing bud­gets and employ­ment — as has hap­pened in the past with sim­i­lar scare arti­cles (from the police & the secu­ri­ty ser­vices) — it’s also a handy reminder of the secu­ri­ty issues we should think about to ensure that our cam­paign­ing remains effec­tive. Check out the back­ground dirt on the journos below…

See the Activist Secu­ri­ty web­site for a full down­load­able book­let.

Also, try out this selec­tion of links:

Secu­ri­ty, Pri­va­cy, & Anonymi­ty for Auton­o­my…
ELF Press Office’s secu­ri­ty page
Top 100 Net­work Secu­ri­ty Tools

The orig­i­nal news­pa­per arti­cle:

Police warn of grow­ing threat from eco-ter­ror­ists

Fear of dead­ly attack by lone mav­er­ick as offi­cers alert major firms to dan­ger of green extrem­ism

Mark Townsend and Nick Den­ning,
The Observ­er, Sun­day Novem­ber 9 2008

Police have warned of the grow­ing threat of eco-ter­ror­ism after reveal­ing they are inves­ti­gat­ing a group which has sup­port­ers who believe that reduc­ing the Earth­’s pop­u­la­tion by four-fifths will help to pro­tect the plan­et.

Offi­cers from a spe­cial­ist unit ded­i­cat­ed to tack­ling domes­tic ter­ror­ism are mon­i­tor­ing an eco-move­ment called Earth First! which has advo­cates who state that cut­ting the Earth­’s pop­u­la­tion by 80 per cent will ease pres­sure on oth­er species. Offi­cers are con­cerned a ‘lone mav­er­ick’ eco-extrem­ist may attempt a ter­ror­ist attack aimed at killing large num­bers of Britons.

The Nation­al Extrem­ism Tac­ti­cal Co-ordi­na­tion Unit, which col­lates intel­li­gence and advice to police forces, has revealed that eco-activists are research­ing a list of tar­get com­pa­nies which they believe are major pol­luters or are exac­er­bat­ing the threat of cli­mate change.

The unit is cur­rent­ly mon­i­tor­ing blogs and inter­net traf­fic con­nect­ed to a net­work of UK cli­mate camps and rad­i­cal envi­ron­men­tal move­ments under the umbrel­la of Earth First!, which has claimed respon­si­bil­i­ty for a series of crim­i­nal acts in recent months.

A senior source at the unit said it had grow­ing evi­dence of a threat from eco-activists. ‘We have found state­ments that four-fifths of the human pop­u­la­tion has to die for oth­er species in the world to sur­vive.

‘There are a num­ber of very ded­i­cat­ed indi­vid­u­als out there and they could be dan­ger­ous to oth­er peo­ple.’

Earth First! says its mis­sion is ‘about direct action to halt the destruc­tion of the Earth’ and advo­cates ‘civ­il dis­obe­di­ence and mon­key­wrench­ing’, tac­tics that include sab­o­tage and dis­rup­tive behav­iour. The move­ment has links to US envi­ron­men­tal extrem­ists which have waged a cam­paign of vio­lence in Amer­i­ca, includ­ing the fire­bomb­ing of a string of 4x4 car deal­er­ships in Cal­i­for­nia in 2003 and alleged arson attacks on oth­er prop­er­ty.

The anti-extrem­ist unit has already alert­ed a num­ber of major com­pa­nies which have been accused of being car­bon pol­luters with advice on how they can with­stand being tar­get­ed by eco-ter­ror­ists. Com­pa­nies are thought to include air­port oper­a­tor BAA, an inter­na­tion­al min­ing con­glom­er­ate BHP Bil­li­ton and firms con­nect­ed to UK coal-fired pow­er sta­tions.

‘They are doing research of pos­si­ble tar­gets, look­ing at share­hold­ers and financiers. For exam­ple, they could research an air­line and see how many of its air­craft are not envi­ron­men­tal­ly friend­ly,’ said the NETCU source.

Although green extrem­ists have yet to embark on an orches­trat­ed cam­paign of vio­lence in the UK, offi­cers warn that they may be about to launch a cam­paign of intim­i­da­tion and fear aimed at dis­rupt­ing busi­ness­es. ‘For some peo­ple, if they can jus­ti­fy it in their minds, then it’s a noble cause even if it’s a crim­i­nal action. They haven’t start­ed yet, but we believe they will come up with a strat­e­gy and tac­tics,’ said the source at the unit, who described the move­ment as well-fund­ed and organ­ised.

A spate of recent attacks, for which Earth First! sup­port­ers have claimed respon­si­bil­i­ty, has includ­ed van­dal­ism of branch­es of sev­en Ger­man banks such as Deutsche Bank and Allianz AG. The actions were appar­ent­ly because the banks hold shares in UK Coal, which plans to build new coal-fired pow­er sta­tions.

A state­ment on the Earth First! web­site explains the attacks by say­ing: ‘Exploita­tion of the envi­ron­ment and peo­ple by the state and indus­try go hand in hand. They can­not be sep­a­rat­ed and both must be attacked. Social war, not cli­mate chaos.’

Anoth­er attack hit a quar­ry in Stafford­shire which belongs to Bar­don Aggre­gates, a com­pa­ny hat also owns a con­tro­ver­sial quar­ry at Glen­san­da on the north-west coast of Scot­land. The Scot­tish quar­ry is accused of spoil­ing the High­lands envi­ron­ment. The Earth First! web­site states: ‘We slashed tyres, stripped paint jobs, glued locks and trashed con­vey­or belts. All the earth movers were hit and many of the cement and aggre­gate trucks. This action cost us very lit­tle but should cost Bar­don thou­sands.’

Among the net­work of groups under the Earth First! umbrel­la are var­i­ous cli­mate camps. Last August police found a stash of knives and weapons beside one such camp in Kent. Pro­test­ers, how­ev­er, said they had noth­ing to do with the weapons and accused police of launch­ing a ‘smear cam­paign’.

A spokesman for Der­by Earth First! said the move­ment was strict­ly non-vio­lent, if not always law-abid­ing. He said: ‘If some­one does eco­log­i­cal dam­age we would per­haps break the law and pro­tect the ecol­o­gy, but the ecol­o­gy also includes humans.

‘We’re all about com­mu­ni­ties. Cap­i­tal­ism is the prob­lem and we want to return to a more sus­tain­able time. But we are not about reduc­ing the pop­u­la­tion, that is just scare­mon­ger­ing by the police.’

The rise of eco-extrem­ism coin­cides with the fall of the ani­mal rights activist move­ment. Police said the ani­mal rights move­ment was in ‘dis­ar­ray’ and that its ring­lead­ers had either been pros­e­cut­ed or were await­ing pros­e­cu­tion, adding that its ‘crit­i­cal mass’ of hard­core extrem­ists was suf­fi­cient­ly deplet­ed to have halt­ed its effec­tive­ness. Last Thurs­day a promi­nent ani­mal rights activist accused of plant­i­ng petrol bombs at Oxford Uni­ver­si­ty was cleared of pos­sess­ing an explo­sive sub­stance with intent.

Reports on the Earth First! Jour­nal web­site, which tells users how to send encrypt­ed emails, reveals con­nec­tions to the Earth Lib­er­a­tion Front (ELF) which has been linked to a series of vio­lent attacks in the US. ELF was clas­si­fied as the top domes­tic ter­ror­ism threat in the US by the FBI in March 2001.

The ELF was found­ed in 1992 in Brighton by mem­bers of the Earth First! move­ment who want­ed to form a break­away group that would use more extreme tac­tics.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2008/nov/09/eco-terrorism-earth-first-elf

Dirt dug on arti­cle writ­ers:

From: http://ianbone.wordpress.com/2008/11/10/the-guardian-eco-terrorism-and-the-armyexclusive/

THE GUARDIAN ECO-TERRORIST JOURNO IS ARMY INTELLIGENCE OFFICER……..EXCLUSIVE!

Curios­er and Curiouser……I’m check­ing for Nick Den­ning — co-author with Mark Townsend of yesterday’s hilarous Observ­er piece on eco ‑ter­ror­ism. He doesn’t appear to have any pre­vi­ous as a jour­nal­ist. But what’s this?? A piece writ­ten by Townsend in Afghanistan in August 2007 where he’s embed­ded with the Roy­al Anglian Reg­i­ment in Sangin………and shar­ing a heli­copter ride with NICK DENNING — COMMANDER OF 1 PLATOON A COMPANY in the Roy­al Anglian reg­i­ment!!! And less than a year lat­er this Den­ning is pro­vid­ing intel­li­gence to his mate on The Guardian on eco — teror­ism!!! Some expla­na­tions from The Guardian reqired on this one methinks! Watch this space…………

Also see http://ianbone.wordpress.com/2008/11/09/guardian-journalists-police-patsies-yet-again/
And http://ianbone.wordpress.com/2008/11/11/god-bone-youre-a-cunt-the-observer-replies/

Fun­ny & infor­ma­tive.

—OR—

This ‘Nick Den­ning’ is clear­ly not the crick­eter and Ian Bone’s sug­ges­tion that he is an army offi­cer is unlike­ly. It is more like­ly to be the ND who worked at the BBC as a researcher and a bit of work on Google pulls up a num­ber of requests that he has made for infor­ma­tion.

For instance:

http://www.stewartbyfc.co.uk/fusionnews/archive.php?show=month&month=July&year=2004

The most like­ly expla­na­tion is that this is the per­son – that he is a researcher who wants to break into nation­al jour­nal­ism.

——

Schnews arti­cle & quotes from the journo

——

The Observer/Guardian blog on the sub­ject if you want to post some­thing there is http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/blog/2008/nov/10/activists-kingsnorth

——
Update:
The read­ers’ edi­tor on … anony­mous sources and claims of eco-ter­ror­ism

The Observ­er, Sun­day Novem­ber 23 2008

You might think The Observer’s con­cern for the envi­ron­ment arose only in the past 20 years as glob­al warm­ing became appar­ent, but it has actu­al­ly been read­ing the signs since 1925. Wal­dorf Astor, then the paper’s for­ward-think­ing own­er, took a keen inter­est in all things envi­ron­men­tal and urged his edi­tor, JL Garvin, to appoint a cor­re­spon­dent to cov­er ecol­o­gy and agri­cul­ture. Step for­ward Sir William Beach Thomas, who became, in effect, the first envi­ron­ment cor­re­spon­dent.

Much lat­er, The Observ­er was to inves­ti­gate and reveal the ‘green­house effect’ and to warn of its pos­si­ble con­se­quences. Thou­sands of words have been devot­ed to the sub­ject ever since, win­ning a loy­al audi­ence, par­tic­u­lar­ly among those who are active in the envi­ron­ment move­ment. So there was under­stand­able dis­may at a recent sto­ry which told of a ‘grow­ing threat from eco-ter­ror­ists’.

Police were said to be inves­ti­gat­ing the eco-move­ment Earth First! which, they claimed, had sup­port­ers who believed that reduc­ing the Earth­’s pop­u­la­tion by four-fifths would help pro­tect the plan­et. The Nation­al Extrem­ism Tac­ti­cal Co-ordi­na­tion Unit was con­cerned that a lone mav­er­ick might attempt a ter­ror­ist attack. It had also warned sev­er­al com­pa­nies they were being tar­get­ed as major pol­luters by the group and had offered them advice on how to with­stand attack.

It’s per­fect­ly legit­i­mate to report police secu­ri­ty con­cerns, but none of the state­ments were sub­stan­ti­at­ed. No web­site links were offered, no names were men­tioned, no com­pa­nies iden­ti­fied and no police source would go on the record.

The arti­cle linked Earth First! to cli­mate camps estab­lished last sum­mer, includ­ing one at Kingsnorth pow­er sta­tion, Kent, and at Heathrow.

While the paper had no inten­tion of sug­gest­ing that every activist was a poten­tial ter­ror­ist, sev­er­al cli­mate campers wrote to protest. ‘If a jour­nal­ist is told by a sin­gle anony­mous source that a move­ment of peo­ple has among it indi­vid­u­als who would take the lives of men, women and chil­dren in a ter­ror attack, what stan­dard of evi­dence does that jour­nal­ist require? In this case: no evi­dence what­so­ev­er. The claim itself was the sto­ry.’

We’ve been here before. Oth­er news­pa­pers report­ed on a pre­dict­ed ‘sum­mer of hate’ at cli­mate camps that nev­er mate­ri­alised and the Press Com­plaints Com­mis­sion found against the Evening Stan­dard at cli­mate campers were plan­ning attacks at Heathrow.

Envi­ron­men­tal­ist Kei­th Met­calf explained that Earth First! sup­port­ed direct action against prop­er­ty, but not against peo­ple. He believed that the debate around sus­tain­able pop­u­la­tion size had been twist­ed to imply that envi­ron­men­tal­ists wished to kill peo­ple.

He also repeat­ed the belief of sev­er­al oth­ers that Nec­tu was brief­ing in this man­ner in order to make pros­e­cu­tions eas­i­er and to boost its fund­ing, which is at risk owing to the decline in ani­mal rights cam­paigns. I can’t ver­i­fy that or the fears about mass mur­der because, despite repeat­ed requests, Nec­tu won’t respond. Accord­ing­ly, The Observ­er has decid­ed to with­draw the sto­ry.