Victories in Virginia, US of A

In the past several months, three efforts that Earth First! (EF!) has contributed action and energy to in Virginia have gained significant victories. In each of these cases, our involvement has been relatively small compared to the efforts of other groups, and all credit is due to them for doing the un-sexy, demanding work of dragging these industries through the courts and regulatory processes where these victories were ultimately won. While we envision and work to create a world where destructive projects are stopped by sheer force of grassroots direct action, we do indeed believe in using every tool in the toolbox.

Dominion BlockadeIn the past several months, three efforts that Earth First! (EF!) has contributed action and energy to in Virginia have gained significant victories. In each of these cases, our involvement has been relatively small compared to the efforts of other groups, and all credit is due to them for doing the un-sexy, demanding work of dragging these industries through the courts and regulatory processes where these victories were ultimately won. While we envision and work to create a world where destructive projects are stopped by sheer force of grassroots direct action, we do indeed believe in using every tool in the toolbox.

Here’s a brief synopsis of some of those tools being put to work over the past two years:

The first action taken by the current incarnation of Blue Ridge Earth First! (BREF!) was a demonstration at the home of a developer driving efforts to build a Wal-Mart in Blacksburg, Virginia. There was never a long-term direct action strategy hashed out to defeat this project. While an emerging community group developed support and momentum towards legislating and later litigating their opposition into law, our action served chiefly as a reminder that civil discourse with those who would desecrate our communities for a buck is no virtue. The demonstration was also the coming-out party for a new EF! chapter ready to give some teeth to the environmental movement in the hills of Virginia.

As BREF! shifted our focus to other projects, efforts to stop the Wal-Mart through any well-mannered, government-sanctioned and truly boring means necessary, persisted and ultimately reigned triumphant by way of appealing a local zoning ordinance all the way to the Supreme Court of Virginia. While the parade of Earth First!ers making merry in developer Jeannie Stosser’s front yard played a small part in the whole turn of events, it is nonetheless a gratifying victory for our more well-behaved allies and a pleasant reminder that, when pressure builds, it eventually breaks.
On the mountaintop removal (MTR) front, a bittersweet victory was won on May 7, when the Army Corps of Engineers, responding to a prompt by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), rescinded a permit for A&G coal’s Ison Rock mine. Over the past several years, the Southern Appalachian Mountain Stewards, a local community group has clogged regulatory processes and spoken out loudly against this mine. In 2004, A&G’s failure to conform to the laws for exactly how a mountain is supposed to be destroyed resulted in a boulder rolling off of a MTR mine and killing a three-year old boy asleep in his bed, prompting Katuah Earth First! to chain, lock and glue the gates to that mine closed. In 2007, this same corporation was the target of sabotage at one of it’s Wise County mountain-top removal sites by a group calling itself the “Committee to Defend the Land and People.”

The Ison Rock mine would have totaled 1,300 acres in scope and would have buried three miles of streams. This is the first time that a MTR permit has ever been rescinded due to intervention by a federal regulatory body—evidence that the mounting and increasingly militant opposition to MTR of the past several years is having an effect on policy decisions. The EPA and Army Corps reasoned that the sprawling mine would violate the Clean Water Act if it dumped mining waste into streams, a practice that always accompanies MTR operations known as “valley fills.” The bitterness of this win comes with the fact that, shortly after Obama’s EPA rescinded this and five other permits, the coal industry applied pressure for the administration to give word on 42 other pending MTR permits, which resulted in the EPA declaring that they’re all fine to proceed. Why are six MTR/valley fill mines in violation of the clean water act and 42 aren’t? Politics. They’re throwing us a bone here. We’ll take that bone, and then we’ll beat them senseless with it. All MTR buries streams! Until all MTR permits are revoked, we won’t stop!

In another case of the Clean Water Act finally being enforced, Dominion Power’s plans to add a third reactor to its Lake Anna nuclear plant were thwarted by a lawsuit brought forth by the Blue Ridge Environmental Defense League (BREDL) in February. Lawyers for BREDL, an organization supporting environmental justice struggles throughout the southeast, proved in court that operations at the plant are raising temperatures in Lake Anna to over 100 degrees in the summertime. This is the same power plant where EF!, Rising Tide and others staged a sit-in during last summer’s Southeast Convergence for Climate Action.

In the nearly two years that our small EF! collective has existed, we’ve made a deliberate effort to execute direct actions with a timing and sensibility that work concurrently with the campaigns of our friends, neighbors and allies who have the stomach to tangle up the state within the parameters of its own procedures. We do not have the time, taste, expertise or resources to spearhead these efforts ourselves but we see how they can be utilized effectively. The problem with any victory won by virtue of state approval is that the state retains the power to reverse that judgment. By bypassing the “designated channels” to express our dissent and employing actions that directly disrupt the operations we oppose, we demonstrate a readiness among the general public to reject the rules of our oppressors and defend ourselves as is our natural right. This presence reinforces the truth that favorable government actions are forced by the will of the people rather than being handed down by the benevolence of the ruling class. If we treat these wins as the end of a story and allow the hard-earned and slowly-built grassroots power that produced these victories to whither, then this is as close to justice as we will ever get. If, instead, we understand them as markers in the movement towards achieving all power to all people, then onward. It is the propagation of this sentiment as well as the specific points of impact resulting from our actions that we contribute to the environmental movement in the mountains of Appalachia.

Victory Over Mexico’s La Parota Dam

Interview: June 30, 2009
From June 2009 World Rivers Review

Interview: June 30, 2009
From June 2009 World Rivers Review

Since 2004, thousands of Mexican farmers have been fighting the construction of La Parota Dam in the state of Guerrero. They have staged blockades, protests and legal actions and have faced violent police repression in return. In May, the Mexican press reported that the government would postpone La Parota Dam until after 2018. World Rivers Review interviewed Rodolfo Chavez Galindo, a leader of the vibrant movement to stop the dams, about the battle over La Parota.

WRR: How is the local movement organized?
RCG: The Council of Communal Lands and Communities Opposed to La Parota Dam (CECOP) was created by farmers and indigenous peoples to defend their lives, land, water and natural resources. It is composed of more than 5,000 men and women from 39 villages. Its principal strength is that decisions are made in a communal way, in assemblies that have been held every Sunday without fail during the six years we have been fighting the project.

The movement began on July 28, 2003, when the peasants of three villages blocked engineers with the Federal Electricity Commission (CFE) from entering community lands. The CFE had illegally entered the community’s land without people’s permission. The land compensation process had not started, nor the environmental licensing process. The CFE cleared thousands of trees – which is a federal crime – opened roads, and brought in heavy machinery to begin construction. People got angry when they cut trees, fences and crops.

WRR: What was the reaction of the government?
RCG: The CFE removed the machinery from the peasants’ lands. The community set up guard posts to ensure the CFE would not return. The CFE has not been able to re-enter these lands since 2003. The resistance was strengthened by lawsuits, which have suspended the project until now.

The CFE tried other tactics, paying off government officials to try and expropriate the land. They convened fraudulent assemblies. When the farmers who were the owners of the lands tried to enter these assemblies, the CFE impeded their entry with 1,500 police that repelled the farmers with tear gas. Instead, the CFE filled the meetings with people they brought from the cities who were not farmers, a move that was totally illegal.

WRR: Besides road blocks, what other tactics have you used to fight the project?
RCG: Faced with these serious violations, the movement turned to the law. They asked the courts to nullify the assemblies and after three years won a court order. In 2008, the CFE admitted that it could not begin work on the dam because it had not obtained the required permissions, and it had been defeated in the courts.

Lawsuits were also brought on environmental grounds based upon CFE’s illegal deforestation and on criminal grounds based upon forged signatures used by CFE to legitimize the fraudulent assemblies. Using the law has been one of the movement’s strongest weapons, but the most important has been the strength and determination of the movement itself.

WRR: Has CECOP presented its case at an international level?
RCG: We presented the case of La Parota to the United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (DESA) through a petition signed by 102 Mexican organizations. The DESA Committee issued a recommendation that the Mexican government respect the decisions won by the farmers in the courts, that they respect their legitimate property rights and that any decision be based on a process of free, prior and informed consent by the farmers.

Other UN officials visited the area and recognized the farmers’ rights to defend their land. They also confirmed violations of the rights of indigenous peoples and the right to information and consultation.

WRR: How did farmers react when the Mexican press reported that the government is postponing La Parota until 2018? Is this true?
RCG: We have received no official information about this from the CFE. And, our demand is that the project be cancelled once and for all, not postponed!

After delivering a petition to President Calderón demanding a meeting with the CFE, we met with them on May 21, 2009. Our position is that La Parota Dam in Guerrero state, the Paso de la Reyna Dam in Oaxaca, and the Arcediano and El Zapotillo dams in Jalisco must be cancelled, and that those displaced by El Cajón Dam in Nayarit must receive just compensation.

To win, we will need unity among diverse movements, beginning with dam-affected communities. We must integrate our struggle with others suffering from environmental degradation in Mexico and in other countries. And, we must strengthen the struggle for an alternative energy policy.

More information:

International Rivers’ La Parota Campaign

Solidarity for Happy Valley in Tauranga

7 May 2009
Banner Hung to Highlight Climate Crimes

Solid Energy and Genesis continue to profit from coal mining in New Zealand despite their “million dollar” greenwash marketing campaigns.

Happy Valley is a pristene native wetland near Westport, on the west coast of the South Island. Solid Energy plan to extend their already massive open-cast coal mine at Stockton into Happy Valley.

7 May 2009
Banner Hung to Highlight Climate Crimes

Solid Energy and Genesis continue to profit from coal mining in New Zealand despite their “million dollar” greenwash marketing campaigns.

Happy Valley is a pristene native wetland near Westport, on the west coast of the South Island. Solid Energy plan to extend their already massive open-cast coal mine at Stockton into Happy Valley.

Two years ago a group of people concerned about climate change and the native ecosystems set up an occupation camp to protect Happy Valley. On the 21st April this year the camp was forcibly removed by Solid Energy.

Tauranga port is a key location for the trafficking of coal in and out of New Zealand by Solid Energy and Genesis. This banner was hung on a mega billboard (bearing a poignant message!) along a major road and railway used for transporting coal, in order to highlight the continued climate crimes committed by Solid Energy and Genesis in this time of global and ecological emergency.

http://www.savehappyvalley.org.nz/

Palo Gordo does not want trash from San Marcos, Guatemala

Neighbours of Pajopom Village from Esquipulas Palo Gordo don´t want trash from San Marcos anymore. From June 15th 2009 they have prevent the discharge of garbage in an illegal garbage dump in their community by having a pacific protest in front of the community saloon. Adults, young people and even children had been rotating since early in the morning until the sunset, in order to fight for their lives and a safe environment.

illegal dumpNeighbours of Pajopom Village from Esquipulas Palo Gordo don´t want trash from San Marcos anymore. From June 15th 2009 they have prevent the discharge of garbage in an illegal garbage dump in their community by having a pacific protest in front of the community saloon. Adults, young people and even children had been rotating since early in the morning until the sunset, in order to fight for their lives and a safe environment.

In the afternoon on Friday, June 5, a group of neighbours representing Pojopom Village from Esquipulas Palo Gordo filed a complaint against the municipal governments of San Marcos and Esquipulas Palo Gordo, because of the illegal dump in their community, in the assistance office of the Public Ministry in the municipal head, San Marcos.
The neighbours decided to use said means alter having exhausted three years of dialoguing with the mayor of San Marcos, Mr. Carlos Enrique Barrios Sacher and the mayor of Esquipulas Palo Gordo, Mr. Francisco Rogelio Sandoval. The talks, since December 2008, were mediated by the San Marcos’ Human Rights Ombudsman office. Thanks to the mediation process an agreement had been reached, but which was not acted upon by the mayors, even though they were given an extension.

The community spokesman declared, “We are not in agreement that the trash of another municipality continues contaminating our land. We will defend the earth that belongs to everyone. We do not want to be accomplices in the irresponsibility of our ignorant, lying and negligent officials, who are paid with our tax money.”
Gracias al pronto actuar de los funcionarios del Ministerio Publico se elevo la denuncia a la Fiscalía de Delitos contra el Ambiente en la ciudad de Guatemala.

The officials of the Public Ministry brought the complaint to the District Attorney of Crimes against the Environment in Guatemala City. An ocular inspection was requested to the Ministry of Environment and Natural resources, on Monday June 15th.
On Tuesday June 23 members of the National Civil Police, specifically the Division for Environment Protection got to the place to investigate about damaged houses, contaminated rivers and bad odours in the place, caused by the illegal dump.

Meanwhile, the neighbors from Palo Gordo had been preventing more trash discharges in the mentioned area.

Maya Villagers Burn Mine Equipment

A group of Mayan Mam villagers torched the equipment of a company attempting to set up a mine on their land without permission on June 12.

A group of Mayan Mam villagers torched the equipment of a company attempting to set up a mine on their land without permission on June 12. Exploradora de Guatemala, a subsidiary of the Canadian company Goldcorp, had been pressuring 20 families in the San Miguel Ixztahuacan municipality to sell their land, but the villagers had consistently refused. When the company began moving mining equipment onto their land anyway, the villagers demanded its removal.

The company promised to remove all equipment by June 10, then failed to do so. It promised again to remove the equipment by June 12, even as it requested police and army assistance — receiving 8 police units (2 of them anti-riot) and 4 vehicles full of soldiers.

On June 12, seeing that the company was not going to remove the equipment, villagers set fire to an exploration drill rig and pickup truck, while police and soldiers stood by and watched.

Unfortunately, due to company pressure, the police filed charges against 7 villagers for the action on June 19.

14 Arrests Initiate Week of Action Against Mountaintop Removal

Fourteen people were arrested on June 18 in a protest meant to launch a week of action against mountaintop removal coal mining in West Virginia.

Fourteen people were arrested on June 18 in a protest meant to launch a week of action against mountaintop removal coal mining in West Virginia. Four people climbed a 150-foot dragline at a mine site near Twilight, WV, and unfurled a banner reading, “Stop Mountaintop Removal Mining”. Another 9 entered the mine site to unfurl another banner. Climbers remained atop the dragline for more than three hours before being arrested.

This action is the first time ever that a dragline, one of the largest machines on earth, has ever been shut down in a protest, and is an important escalation in the fight against mountaintop removal.

The week of action will culminate with a civil disobedience action featuring leading climate scientist Dr. James Hansen, actress Daryl Hannah, Rainforest Action Network Executive Direction Michael Brune and former Representative Ken Hechler.

The week of action was initiated only days after President Obama announced his plans to reform, rather than abolish, mountaintop removal coal mining. The Obama administration approved environmental permits for 42 of the 48 proposed new mountaintop removal mines it has considered so far.

For more information, to get involved or to make donations for bail, visit www.mountainaction.org.

Peru Mine Blockade Enters 10th Day

Attracting less attention in light of the full-fledged uprising that has consumed Peru’s Amazon region for 70 days, a mine blockade is ongoing in the country’s highlands.

Attracting less attention in light of the full-fledged uprising that has consumed Peru’s Amazon region for 70 days, a mine blockade is ongoing in the country’s highlands. On June 10th, miners launched roadblocks at the Buenaventura mining company’s Orcopampa gold mine in Peru, in protest of poor labor conditions and the mine’s impact on local communities. The blockades are still halting work at the mine, and the workers have tentatively called for a strike for June 24th.

Climate activists blockade Peruvian Embassy & companies list

19 June 2009
Climate change activists have blocked the entrance to the Peruvian Embassy today in protest the country’s killing of indigenous people in the Amazon rainforest.

Peruvian Embassy protest19 June 2009
Climate change activists have blocked the entrance to the Peruvian Embassy today in protest the country’s killing of indigenous people in the Amazon rainforest.

Up to 100 people have been killed in recent clashes over attempts to extract oil, gas, minerals and timber from the forest where indigenous people have lived for centuries. On June 5, the government’s security forces attacked a peaceful blockade, leading to bloodshed on both sides with 30-100 estimated deaths, over 100 injuries and numerous disappearances.

Since the clashes, the Peruvian government has suspended some exploitation in the area, but it is unclear whether some companies will be allowed to continue.

Protesters from London Camp for Climate Action are demanding to deliver a letter of protest to Peruvian Ambassador Ricardo Luna. The calls for oil and gas companies in the Amazon to suspend their operations until the government agrees to peaceful negotiations with local representatives; for an independent and impartial inquiry into the violence; and for the lifting of all charges against Alberto Pizango (the President of Peru’s Amazon Indian organisation, AIDESEP)

Protester Sam Gardener said: “This protest is to show solidarity with the thousands of indigenous people that are risking, and sometimes losing, their lives to protect their homes in the Amazon.

“By destroying the Amazon rainforest to extract fossil fuels, we are accelerating catastrophic climate change. The Amazon removes vast amounts of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. By cutting it down to remove yet more fossil fuels we are speeding towards a worldwide catastrophe.”

15.6.09: Lively and well attended demo at the Embassy by Colectivo Peruano, together with the Coordinadora Latinoamericana, and was supported by Latin American Youth Against Violence

Some of the companies with new contracts in the Amazon and elsewhere in Peru (signed April 2009, some individually and some as part of a consortium with Perupetro) that I can find (but unable to secure direct links/locations in the UK) are:

Pluspetrol – http://www.pluspetrol.net/
Reliance – http://www.reliancepetroleum.com/
CNPC – http://www.cnpc.com.cn/eng/
Petroperu – http://www.cnpc.com.cn/eng/
Faulkner Suits Exploration (US)
Olympic (US or Canadian)
Petrolifera – http://www.petrolifera.ca/
Pan Andean Resources (Dublin based) – http://www.panandeanresources.com/contact/
Kei (Australia)
PetroVietnam (Vietnam)
Golden Oil – http://www.goldenoilcorp.com/new/english/company/company01_4.php

However, some of these companies DO have UK based offices and trading:

EMERALD ENERGY PLC
http://www.emeraldenergy.com/contact.htm
With a registered office in London.

CONOCO PHILLIPS
http://www.conocophillips.co.uk/ContactUs/index.htm
An American company that is reported to have a new “mega concession” of 10.5 million hectares in the Amazon for oil exploration.
Offices and activities in London, Aberdeen, Teesside, Humber, Theddlethorpe, Warwick

There’s a report on their activities in Peru here: http://www.amazonwatch.org/conoco2009.pdf

The situation in Peru currently is dire…. the indigenous communities have been mobilizing and resisting since April and at this time when their leaders are threatened with arrest and there are widespread murders and disappearances occurring it is key that those of us benefitting from these explorations (in the Global North) do what we can to show solidarity and to put the pressure directly on the companies that are treating Peru as a smorgasboard of ways out of the current economic crisis…

Peru indigenous blockades win repeal of land laws

18th June 2009: Peruvian Congress Votes 82 – 12 to Repeal Two Controversial Laws

Government Urged to Drop Criminal Charges Against Indigenous Leaders and Allow Independent Investigation into Violent Incidents in Bagua

18th June 2009: Peruvian Congress Votes 82 – 12 to Repeal Two Controversial Laws

Government Urged to Drop Criminal Charges Against Indigenous Leaders and Allow Independent Investigation into Violent Incidents in Bagua

Lima, Peru – The Peruvian Congress voted today 82 – 12 to repeal two of nine contested laws in an attempt to end widespread indigenous protests that have been paralyzing transportation and commerce in the Peruvian Amazon for 70 days. In a complete shift of discourse, President Garcia admitted that “there were a series errors and exaggerations” in the government’s handling of this conflict and asked Congress to repeal decrees 1090 and 1064, which were passed in 2008 as part of a package of new laws to facilitate the implementation of the Free Trade Agreement with the United States.

Having witnessed the vote in the Peruvian Congress, Daysi Zapata, acting President of AIDESEP, Peru’s national Amazonian indigenous organization welcomed the President’s comments and declared: “Today is a historic day. We are grateful that the will of the indigenous peoples has been heard and we only hope that in the future governments listen and attend to indigenous peoples, and not legislate behind their backs.”

Zapata said that AIDESEP it is calling on our base organizations and communities to end their blockades and protests while also calling on the government to enter into a good faith and transparent dialogue.

Primer Minister Simon, who has been a lead negotiator to the indigenous communities, said Tuesday that he would resign after bringing the current conflict closer to resolution. The Peruvian Government has been heavily criticized for the June 5 attack to quell nonviolent protests by Amazonian indigenous communities, which resulted in dozens of deaths of both protesters and police and left 150 of indigenous demonstrators injured.

In addition to decrees 1090 and 1064, AIDESEP points to at least seven other laws that continue to pose a threat to their constitutionally guaranteed rights. In addition to the repeal of all these controversial laws, indigenous people are demanding that the Peruvian Government lift the State of Emergency, in effect since May 9 in several regions throughout the Amazon. AIDESEP is also calling for the Government to drop criminal charges against Alberto Pizango and five other indigenous leaders. Pizango was given safe passage to leave the country and is now exiled in Nicaragua.

In the United States, fifteen human rights and environmental organizations recently sent a letter to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and other top Administration officials urging the United States to take immediate steps towards addressing the political crisis in Peru. Representatives from this coalition met with the U.S. Trade Representative’s office on Wednesday to again urge the U.S. Government to publicly clarify if Peru would be penalized for revoking the package of “free trade laws.”

The dramatic shift in the Garcia Administration’s discourse is likely due to the unprecedented international and domestic condemnation of the attacks on peaceful demonstrations on June 5 in Bagua. Tens of thousands protested in cities throughout Peru on June 11 in support of Peru’s indigenous peoples. Peruvian consulates and embassies worldwide have been the site of repeated vigils and protests. Tens of thousands have sent letters to Peruvian and US government officials. Celebrities including Q’orianka Kilcher and Benjamin Bratt, both part Peruvian as well as Nobel Prize Laureate Rigoberta Menchu, have publicly condemned the violence in Peru while calling for a peaceful solution.

Leading international human rights bodies including the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, the United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues, and the International Labor Organization have pressed the Garcia Administration to end repression and uphold the rights of indigenous peoples. Yesterday, James Anaya, the UN Special Rapporteur of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms of Indigenous People arrived in Peru for a 3-day visit to gather information about the violent incident in Bagua.

Amazon Watch’s Executive Director, Atossa Soltani, reacted to the news with the following statement: “The Peruvian Congress’s repeal of the two decrees is a welcome first step in bringing indigenous rights in Peru back to where they were before the decrees were promulgated in 2008. The conflict has become a watershed moment for Peru’s policies in the Amazon and has invigorated national debate about deep-rooted violations of indigenous peoples rights. Today’s good news notwithstanding, indigenous peoples are likely to continue to be at risk by Garcia’s policies to open up the Amazon to extractive industries.”

Since 2006, the government has authorized oil and gas concessions covering over 70 percent of the Peruvian Amazon, much of it on indigenous lands (see Perupetro map at http://mirror.perupetro.com.pe/exploracion01-e.asp).
For more information, see http://www.amazonwatch.org/peru-protests.php

Earlier article on blockade crushing & massacre here

ELF sabotage digger & arson solidarity with Peru

ELF SABOTAGE DIGGER (Italy)

anonymous report:

“ROME ITALY We cut wires and the oil tube of a digger used to deforest. unfortunately there were men at work so we could not destroy the cab Earth liberation front”

>>

ARSON ATTACK AGAINST POLICE VEHICLE IN SOLIDARITY WITH INDIGENOUS RESISTANCE IN PERU (Mexico)

anonymous communique (translation):

ELF SABOTAGE DIGGER (Italy)

anonymous report:

“ROME ITALY We cut wires and the oil tube of a digger used to deforest. unfortunately there were men at work so we could not destroy the cab Earth liberation front”

>>

ARSON ATTACK AGAINST POLICE VEHICLE IN SOLIDARITY WITH INDIGENOUS RESISTANCE IN PERU (Mexico)

anonymous communique (translation):

“On the night of June 8, we, the Frente de Liberación de la Tierra, along with some anarcho-Insurrectional individuals who are committed to constant conflict with the state and its institutions, decided to carry out an action together in the city of Ecatepec in Mexico State. This time our main objective was the machines that belong to authorities in that city that are used to rip up trees from their roots and to cover the earth with concrete; the machines were hidden under the bridge over Avenida Morelos and López Portillo.

When we arrived there we realized that the earth-destroying owners’ slaves were inside the machines, and that they surely wouldn’t be leaving until the following day, to work and to be exploited to earn a few coins for their subsistence. Why is it that people are watching the machines? Is it that the owners fear leaving them alone and the next morning finding them unusable, that their urbanist project be delayed and thousands of pesos lost in damages, like they have seen happen in other municipalities in Mexico State?

This objective was abandoned and we decided to carry out another; in front of the excavators, bulldozers and other machines was a large command headquarters of state police torturers, the ASE (Agency of State Security), violators of the prisoners in Atenco, accomplices in the killing of animals in Jaltenco, protectors of the interests of the multinationals, killers of the earth, living with the impunity that Mexican justice gives them, laughing with their machine guns on their backs and confidant that they can destroy any protest with their repression. They were there; maybe they didn’t know that all violence creates counter violence and for all who are struck down, sooner or later there will be a response.

Dedicated like wild wolves who have left their dens under the full moon, we placed an incendiary device in one of the trucks, a small flame ignited the engine and burnt the truck.

Our sabotage was fast and effective, the destruction of social peace was imminent. What police would be expecting an arson attack in front of their very noses? How do those commanders feel who boast of the fast effectiveness of their subordinates now that a group of eco-anarchists have attacked their facilities? Do they feel horrible because the raid they carried out after the fire was useless; they could not catch those responsible who now write these lines of revenge against the anthropocentric state and its institutions?

The war against this system is deadly serious, if they order their police to suppress, incendiary self-defense will rise up.

We dedicate this action to the fierce defense that is carried out in the Amazon in Peru; the peasants killed by the anthropocentrist state have been avenged by their natural instinct to defend the wilderness, killing, kidnapping and also injuring the police.

Let’s defend the planet where we live!

Show your teeth!

Now no more passivity!

ELF/FLT”